From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 28 04:46:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B0916A4CF for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 04:46:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.111.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811BD43D2D for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 04:46:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from [128.131.111.60] (acrux [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07296137D0; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:46:22 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:46:24 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Mathew Kanner In-Reply-To: <20031228002408.GI20827@cnd.mcgill.ca> Message-ID: References: <20031227144106.35943fff.tlp@LiquidX.org> <20031228002408.GI20827@cnd.mcgill.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: multimedia@freebsd.org cc: Travis Poppe Subject: Re: The latest WINE and /dev/mixer* X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 12:46:25 -0000 On Sat, 27 Dec 2003, Mathew Kanner wrote: >> That way we cannot even use autoconf to detect support for the >> SOUND_MIXER_INFO ioctl; why do we pretent to support something >> which we actually don't? > I can see good arguments both ways. My instinct says to have > all the IOCTLs that are defined in other OSes oss support and let the > app decide what to do. I could be persuaded otherwise. Hmm, I can see this point as well. OTOH, properly written applications check return values/error codes after invoking ioctl-s, and then will bail out when encountering such a dummy (as was the case with Wine). > I really like it. Adding support for SOUND_MIXER_INFO isn't > hard work, it's grunt work to that touches most drivers. It might > turn up soon :) Even better. :-) > I think that [patch] would be great. Hopefully, they can take > the ifdef FreeBSD out. I submitted the patch with the #ifdef (to increase the change of acceptance ), but offered an alternate patch without the #ifdef. Gerald -- Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) gerald@pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/