From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 03:26:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4033216A4B3 for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 03:26:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de (mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de [193.174.154.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324F343FDD for ; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 03:26:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from beagle (beagle [193.175.132.100])h96AMKh20783; Mon, 6 Oct 2003 12:22:20 +0200 (MEST) Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2003 12:22:20 +0200 (CEST) From: Harti Brandt To: Bruce M Simpson In-Reply-To: <20031004015510.GC658@saboteur.dek.spc.org> Message-ID: <20031006121405.D41960@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030615064011.02e39eb8@194.184.65.4> <20031001182507.GA24453@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20031004015510.GC658@saboteur.dek.spc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Barney Wolff cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ADSL PPoA or RFC1483, any solutions ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 10:26:13 -0000 On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Bruce M Simpson wrote: BMS>On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 09:53:08AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: BMS>> Does PPPoA really need signalling? I tried to find any pointers to PPPoA BMS>> specification, but this seems to be not easy to find. BMS> BMS>I was probably half asleep when I wrote that answer :) it's been a stressful BMS>week. BMS>I should correct myself - more often than not ISPs just use PVCs. The userland BMS>PPP could probably be run on top of a device node exporting the PVC. What kind of device node would that need to be? A tty node? Something like ng_tty only the other way 'round? BMS>I prefer the idea of in-kernel ppp, though, for 1Mbps+ xDSL use. I suppose something like pppoed would do it by just stacking the pppoed node on top of an ng_atm node instead of ng_ether's orphan. How is PPPoE different from PPPoA? harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org