From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 27 22:12:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B6337B401; Tue, 27 May 2003 22:12:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148DC43F85; Tue, 27 May 2003 22:12:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4S5BmM7090715; Tue, 27 May 2003 22:11:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200305280511.h4S5BmM7090715@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 22:11:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis To: imp@bsdimp.com In-Reply-To: <20030527.211312.108985092.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org cc: brucem@cruzio.com cc: julian@elischer.org cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: gcc problem/openoffice failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 05:12:50 -0000 On 27 May, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <200305280035.h4S0Z8000399@cruzio.com> > "Bruce R. Montague" writes: > : > : Julian Elischer wrote: > : > : > ... I have not been able to compile the openoffice port ... > : > : > ... Has anyone else seen this? > : > : > : I tried to build openoffice on a "clean" -current system, > : built from a recent cvsup, and it failed to compile... This > : was perhaps a week and a half ago, kept meaning to get back > : and look at it, but time seems to have got the best of me. > > I wouldn't attempt something this complex without portupgrade... That reminds me ... the openoffice port ignores non-zero exit status in too many places. More than once I've had the install phase (and maybe even the build phase fail which then proceeded to the install phase which then failed), but the the exit status was ignored, make exited with a zero status, and portupgrade thought that the installation succeeded and then nuked the working backup copy of openoffice and did a make clean. A build from scratch takes more than 24 hours on my -stable box ... From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 17:20:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609C137B401 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 17:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88F243F75 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 17:20:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4T0K9Up044262 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 17:20:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4T0K9Ka044261; Wed, 28 May 2003 17:20:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 17:20:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200305290020.h4T0K9Ka044261@freefall.freebsd.org> To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org From: Andrew Reilly Subject: Re: ports/52068: portupgrade of openoffice.org-1.0.3 stalls running installer X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andrew Reilly List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 00:20:10 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/52068; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrew Reilly To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, areilly@bigpond.net.au Cc: Subject: Re: ports/52068: portupgrade of openoffice.org-1.0.3 stalls running installer Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 10:15:06 +1000 Hi, I've just tried installing openoffice again, and it stalled again (several times), and it has finally failed in the same way that I described before. I made certain that all traces of openoffice had been removed from my system before starting the build process. The screen image that I attached to my previous report was what happened when I tried to start openoffice after the installation process finished. However, the installation process did not get to "finished" without intervention from me: In several places during the build, saxparser stalled, and I killed that process and restarted the make (without first cleaning everything up) and it continued. saxparser had been busy building what looked like i18n modules for languages/locales that I don't care about, so I was not concerned if they were corrupted. At the end, when the make install process (i.e., top-level BSD port make) said: ===> Installing for openoffice-1.0.3_2 Initializing installation program.......... *** Error code 255 (ignored) ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Add wrapper scripts ===> Registering installation for openoffice-1.0.3_2 ===> SECURITY REPORT: That Error code 255 (ignored) was me killing the soffice.bin executable, because it had been consuming 90+% of the CPU for the whole night, and that seemed unreasonable. These problems (and the others that I'm experiencing with sawfish) seem to me to be consistent with deadlock conditions in multi-threaded applications that are making unwarrented assumptions about the thread implementation, or perhaps bugs in the thread implementation. I'm thinking of upgrading to 5.x, just to get kernel-based threads, to be more like Linux and Solaris, where these applications are presumably more tested. Is that a reasonable approach? -- Andrew From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 30 04:59:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F44E37B401; Fri, 30 May 2003 04:59:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A199C43F3F; Fri, 30 May 2003 04:59:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from arved@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (arved@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4UBxdUp034732; Fri, 30 May 2003 04:59:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from arved@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from arved@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4UBxdpO034728; Fri, 30 May 2003 04:59:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 04:59:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Tilman Linneweh Message-Id: <200305301159.h4UBxdpO034728@freefall.freebsd.org> To: arved@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52740: 'preferred' misspelled twice in ports/editors/openoffice/Makefile X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 11:59:40 -0000 Synopsis: 'preferred' misspelled twice in ports/editors/openoffice/Makefile Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->openoffice Responsible-Changed-By: arved Responsible-Changed-When: Fri May 30 04:59:17 PDT 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to Maintainers http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=52740 From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 30 05:00:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA8237B401; Fri, 30 May 2003 05:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F5F43FB1; Fri, 30 May 2003 05:00:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from arved@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (arved@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4UC05Up034791; Fri, 30 May 2003 05:00:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from arved@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from arved@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4UC05lS034787; Fri, 30 May 2003 05:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 05:00:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Tilman Linneweh Message-Id: <200305301200.h4UC05lS034787@freefall.freebsd.org> To: arved@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52741: 'preferred' is mispelled twice in ports/editors/openoffice-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 12:00:06 -0000 Synopsis: 'preferred' is mispelled twice in ports/editors/openoffice-devel Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->openoffice Responsible-Changed-By: arved Responsible-Changed-When: Fri May 30 04:59:43 PDT 2003 Responsible-Changed-Why: over to maintainers http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=52741 From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 30 09:57:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243DF37B401 for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 09:57:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout05.sul.t-online.com (mailout05.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51C243F75 for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 09:57:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Juergen.Dankoweit@t-online.de) Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.de by mailout05.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 19LnBu-0003Eg-07; Fri, 30 May 2003 18:57:18 +0200 Received: from server.juergendankoweit.net (320054407018-0001@[217.235.255.38]) by fwd01.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 19LnBl-08QBsGC; Fri, 30 May 2003 18:57:09 +0200 Received: from localhost.juergendankoweit.net (localhost.juergendankoweit.net [127.0.0.1]) by server.juergendankoweit.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DE85778 for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 18:57:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.juergendankoweit.net (localhost.juergendankoweit.net [127.0.0.1])02555-2780E476; Fri, 30 May 2003 18:57:07 +0200 Received: from server.juergendankoweit.net (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by server.juergendankoweit.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA135774 for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 18:57:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 18:57:07 +0200 From: Juergen.Dankoweit@t-online.de (Juergen Dankoweit) To: OpenOffice Bugreport Message-ID: <20030530165707.GA1439@server.juergendankoweit.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Balsa 1.4.1 Lines: 35 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.1.10; AVE: 6.19.0.3; VDF: 6.19.0.23; host: localhost) X-Sender: 320054407018-0001@t-dialin.net Subject: Problems with Popwindows in Beta1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Juergen.Dankoweit@T-Online.de List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 16:57:23 -0000 Hello to the OpenOffice-FreeBSD-Team. First of all let me say that you all have done a great job for a great product!!!!!! But there are some points which made me disappointed: (1) Popwindows which are opened from the toolbar (like: Draw Functions, Font Color, etc) cannot be closed - the [x] button in the titlebar is missing. The better idea is, look at StarOffice 5.2 or OpenOffice 1.0x: the popups are part of toolbar. (2) The fontengine does not work correct: the fonts Helvetica and Times are not scaled correct. If these fonts are resized from 12pt to e.g. 96pt they are displayed in 12pt size but the surrounding-box ist resized to 96pt. (3) Statusbar-objects: After inserting the date-object in the statusbar, OO1.1Beta writes out a core-dump. (4) Startup-time: much too looooooong! I hope these points could be solved. For me the first point is the most important. Again: Many thanks for porting OO to FreeBSD - you did a great job! Please go on on this path!!! Best reagrds Jürgen Dankoweit PS: I'm running OO1.1Beta1 on FreeBSD 4.7 stable with SMP-Kernel on a DualPentiumPro (2x200MHz, 1MB Cache), 1GB RAM, Matrox G450 PCI (32MB), GUI: Gnome 1.4.2 ============================================================= Homepage: www.juergendankoweit.no-ip.org (von 19:00-22:00Uhr)