From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 2 05:58:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C79C16A4CE for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 05:58:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp2.btinet.net (mail.gnda.com [216.235.160.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B21043F85 for ; Sun, 2 Nov 2003 05:58:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pmes@btinet.net) Received: from exim by smtp2.btinet.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AGIke-0005Aq-SO for openoffice@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2003 07:58:45 -0600 Received: from ar11-bsmrnd.l1.btigate.com ([209.62.224.243] helo=btinet.net) by smtp2.btinet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AGIkd-0005Ai-UW for openoffice@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 02 Nov 2003 07:58:44 -0600 Message-ID: <3FA50D6F.2060700@btinet.net> Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 07:58:07 -0600 From: Peter Schultz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031020 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on smtp2.btinet.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Subject: openoffice-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2003 13:58:47 -0000 Hi, Is there a known problem with compiling this version on -CURRENT? Idlc froze on compiling the file XEventBroadcaster.idl: 93985 me 139 0 6736K 3668K *proce 0 656:15 103.12% 103.12% idlc Is it safe to hit ctrl-c and start over at this point? Of course, maybe -CURRENT is still just a bit too unstable to compile openoffice. By the way, is this version of openoffice reasonably stable? Thanks, Pete...