From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 00:02:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E4216A4CE for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:02:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AE543F93 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:02:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAO823pj089148; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:02:03 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:02:03 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20031124.170203.884087010.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: openoffice@freebsd.org From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: <3FB9C571.7070305@mailru.com> References: <3FB9C571.7070305@mailru.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: jaroshenko@mailru.com Subject: Re: oo-1.1 of 5.1-RELEASE. Some build troubles. X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 08:02:02 -0000 Hi, Serge, > When building oo-1.1 on 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Mon Nov 17 > 11:11:32 MSK 2003 I get error: In Subject `5.1-RELEASE' might be wrong, 5.1-CURRENT :) and what is the result of gcc -v ? > ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/ports/russian/openoffice-1.1/work/oo_1.1_src/udkapi/com/sun/star/lang > dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_all' > ---* TG_SLO.MK *--- > *** Error code 255 I suspect a bug in gcc-3.3. Same error has been reported by other person in Japanese, so now I'm analyzing. If it is possible, USE_GCC=3.3, to use gcc from ports and or force to use 3.2 might be fine. at least he told that it seems to be fine. Regards, maho From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 01:08:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20BE16A4CE for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:08:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.stelt.ru (ns1.stelt.ru [217.18.48.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C930B43FBD for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:08:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jaroshenko@mailru.com) Received: from gate-mx.stelt.ru ([217.18.48.5]) by ns1.stelt.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAO980WX005856; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:08:00 +0300 Received: by gate-mx.stelt.ru (Postfix, from userid 502) id 162357D411; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:08:00 +0300 (MSK) Received: from mailru.com (unknown [192.168.1.41]) by gate-mx.stelt.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEF37D40A; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:07:59 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <3FC1CB1B.2020100@mailru.com> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:10:51 +0300 From: Serge Yaroshenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nakata Maho , openoffice@freebsd.org References: <3FB9C571.7070305@mailru.com> <20031124.170203.884087010.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <20031124.170203.884087010.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: oo-1.1 of 5.1-RELEASE. Some build troubles. X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:08:05 -0000 Nakata Maho wrote: >Hi, Serge, > > > >>When building oo-1.1 on 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Mon Nov 17 >>11:11:32 MSK 2003 I get error: >> >> > >In Subject `5.1-RELEASE' might be wrong, 5.1-CURRENT :) >and what is the result of gcc -v ? > > I build oo-1.1 on FreeBSD-5.1-CURRENT, not 5.1-RELEASE. I upgrade my box to 5.2-BETA (at this time only kernel). # gcc -v Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.3.3 [FreeBSD] 20031106 # uname -a FreeBSD freebsd.stelt.ru 5.2-BETA FreeBSD 5.2-BETA #0: Mon Nov 24 09:55:51 MSK 2003 root@freebsd.stelt.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBSD i386 But I use command "make package-recursive WITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED=1 WITH_GIF_LZW_COMPRESSION=1 USE_GCC=3.2" > > >>ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making >>/usr/ports/russian/openoffice-1.1/work/oo_1.1_src/udkapi/com/sun/star/lang >>dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_all' >>---* TG_SLO.MK *--- >>*** Error code 255 >> >> > >I suspect a bug in gcc-3.3. >Same error has been reported by other person in Japanese, >so now I'm analyzing. > >If it is possible, USE_GCC=3.3, to use gcc from ports and >or force to use 3.2 might be fine. at least he told that >it seems to be fine. > >Regards, > maho > > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-openoffice-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 01:12:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D15816A4CE for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:12:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CF143FE3 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:12:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAO9COpj014076; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:12:25 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 18:12:24 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20031124.181224.1025286987.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: jaroshenko@mailru.com From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: <3FC1CB1B.2020100@mailru.com> References: <3FB9C571.7070305@mailru.com> <20031124.170203.884087010.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> <3FC1CB1B.2020100@mailru.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: oo-1.1 of 5.1-RELEASE. Some build troubles. X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:12:21 -0000 Hi, Serge > # gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler > Thread model: posix > gcc version 3.3.3 [FreeBSD] 20031106 > # uname -a > FreeBSD freebsd.stelt.ru 5.2-BETA FreeBSD 5.2-BETA #0: Mon Nov 24 > 09:55:51 MSK 2003 > root@freebsd.stelt.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBSD i386 Okay, I'll report my status tomorrow (now I'm compiling), my environment is as follows: % uname -a FreeBSD debussy.private.org 5.2-BETA FreeBSD 5.2-BETA #0: Mon Nov 24 11:36:31 JST 2003 root@debussy.private.org:/work/cvsup/current/src/sys/i386/compile/MAHO_DEBUSSY-5-CURRENT i386 % gcc -v Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.3.3 [FreeBSD] 20031106 exactly same as you. > But I use command "make package-recursive WITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED=1 > WITH_GIF_LZW_COMPRESSION=1 USE_GCC=3.2" I'll try later with this command. Regards, maho From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 04:00:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7EA16A4CE for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 04:00:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout1.freenet.de (mout1.freenet.de [194.97.50.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0051D43FDF for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 04:00:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from achim.hensel@ruhr-uni-bochum.de) Received: from [194.97.50.136] (helo=mx3.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AOFNr-0002mo-F4 for freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 13:00:03 +0100 Received: from pd9ff36e1.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.255.54.225] helo=server.private.priv) by mx3.freenet.de with asmtp (ID aspam@freenet.de) (Exim 4.24 #2) id 1AOFNq-0006IG-Ub for freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 13:00:03 +0100 Received: from physik.private.priv (physik.private.priv [192.168.1.10]) by server.private.priv (8.12.8/8.12.9) with SMTP id hAOC1hUQ013381 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 13:01:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 13:01:20 +0100 From: Achim Hensel To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20031124130120.51850dae.achim.hensel@ruhr-uni-bochum.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: make'ing OOo 1.1 and 2.0-devel stops in -STABLE with a regcomp coredump X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:00:08 -0000 Hello, folks I heard, someone has found that behaviour before. Does anybody have some idea for solving? <--- snip ---> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel # make <--- .several MB typescript later: ---> ------------------------------ Making: ../../unxfbsd.pro/bin/regcomp unx cat ../../unxfbsd.pro/misc/regcomp.cmd g++33 -Wl,--noinhibit-exec -L../../unxfbsd.pro/lib -L../lib -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel/work/oo_1.1_src/solenv/unxfbs d/lib -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel/work/oo_1.1_src/solver/645/un xfbsd.pro/lib -L/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel/work/oo_1.1_sr c/solenv/unxfbsd/lib -L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/lib -L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386 -L/usr/local/jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/client -L/usr/local/jd k1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/native_threads -L/usr/X11R6/lib -o ../../unxfbsd.pro/bin/regcomp ../../unxfbsd.pro/obj/registercomponent.o \-Wl,--whole-archive -lsalcpprt -Wl,--no-whole-archive -lsal -lcppu -lcppuhelpergcc3 -lcppu -pthread -lm -Wl,-Bdynamic -lstlport_gcc -pthrea d-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 54335 Nov 24 00:31 ../../unxfbsd.pro/bin/regcomp ------------------------------ Making: ../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/ipythonloader.uno.lib no ImportLibs on Mac and *ix ------------- cp pythonloader.py ../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/pythonloader.py rm -f ../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/pyuno_services.rdb ../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/pyuno_services.tmp ../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/pyuno_services.rdb cd ../../unxfbsd.pro/lib && regcomp -register -r pyuno_services.tmp -c typeconverter.uno -c invocation.uno -c corereflection.uno -c introsp ection.uno -c invocadapt.uno -c proxyfac.uno -c pythonloader.uno register component 'typeconverter.uno' in registry 'pyuno_services.tmp' succesful! register component 'invocation.uno' in registry 'pyuno_services.tmp' succesful! Abort (core dumped) dmake: Error code 134, while making '../../unxfbsd.pro/lib/pyuno_services.rdb'---* TG_SLO.MK *--- ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel/work/oo_1.1_src/pyuno/source/lo ader dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_all' ---* TG_SLO.MK *--- *** Error code 255 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel. /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-2.0-devel # <--- snip ---> typsescript and dump are availible. Further information: "uname -rs" : FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE "dmesg | grep CPU" : CPU: AMD-K6(tm) 3D processor (350.80-MHz 586-class CPU) Thanks for providing your help and time. CU, Achim From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 04:14:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C338116A4CE for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 04:14:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E884E43FE5 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 04:14:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 29261 invoked by uid 505); 24 Nov 2003 12:16:20 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.14 (spamassassin: 2.43. Clear:SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.270869 secs); 24 Nov 2003 12:16:20 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 24 Nov 2003 12:16:20 -0000 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 13:17:35 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031124130853.N743@pukruppa.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: /usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.1.0 not installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:14:57 -0000 Hi! I tried the openoffice-1.1rc5 port yesterday. # make built everything without errors, but # make install failed and complained about a missing file in /usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.1.0 Indeed no directory with this name was created. I am running FreeBSD pukruppa.net 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Thu Nov 20 05:28:12 CET 2003 Regards, Uli. +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 04:36:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A1816A4CE for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 04:36:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1704443FDF for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 04:36:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAOCaipj064799; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:36:44 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:36:44 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20031124.213644.783449525.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: root@pukruppa.de From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: <20031124130853.N743@pukruppa.net> References: <20031124130853.N743@pukruppa.net> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.1.0 not installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 12:36:40 -0000 Hi, Peter > I tried the openoffice-1.1rc5 port yesterday. It has already been updated to 1.1.0. if not, please cvsup your ports tree. use ports with 4.9-RELEASE might be more stable. --maho From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 11:04:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4CF16A4D5 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:04:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE019440BD for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:02:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAOJ2jFY057673 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:02:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id hAOJ2ilt057667 for openoffice@freebsd.org; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:02:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 11:02:44 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200311241902.hAOJ2ilt057667@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 19:04:19 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/08/01] ports/55147 openoffice Openoffice build failure 1 problem total. Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2002/09/07] ports/42516 openoffice OpenOffice.org generate wrong WM_LOCALE_N a [2002/09/14] ports/42777 openoffice OpenOffice install fails a [2003/05/11] ports/52068 openoffice portupgrade of editors/openoffice .org-1. a [2003/05/11] ports/52087 openoffice error while building japanese/openoffice o [2003/07/16] ports/54546 openoffice OpenOffice-1.0.3_2 build fails: autoconf. f [2003/08/01] ports/55164 openoffice openoffice fails to compile f [2003/08/13] ports/55563 openoffice openoffice doesnot build on both stable a 7 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/04/15] ports/50996 openoffice editors/ooodict-hu_HU port can moved to h 1 problem total. From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 23:40:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D455E16A4CE for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:40:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.stelt.ru (ns1.stelt.ru [217.18.48.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1022F43FF2 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 23:40:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jaroshenko@mailru.com) Received: from gate-mx.stelt.ru ([217.18.48.5]) by ns1.stelt.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAP7eAWX032570; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:40:10 +0300 Received: by gate-mx.stelt.ru (Postfix, from userid 502) id 148A97D410; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:40:10 +0300 (MSK) Received: from mailru.com (unknown [192.168.1.41]) by gate-mx.stelt.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D147D40A; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:40:09 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <3FC30806.8000502@mailru.com> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 10:43:02 +0300 From: Serge Yaroshenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nakata Maho , openoffice@freebsd.org References: <3FB9C571.7070305@mailru.com> <20031124.170203.884087010.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> <3FC1CB1B.2020100@mailru.com> <20031124.181224.1025286987.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <20031124.181224.1025286987.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: oo-1.1 of 5.1-RELEASE. Some build troubles. X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 07:40:17 -0000 Hi Nakata Maho! What version jdk you use? I use : # java -version java version "1.4.2-p5" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2-p5-root_12_nov_2003_20_30) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2-p5-root_12_nov_2003_20_30, mixed mode) Nakata Maho wrote: >Hi, Serge > > > >Okay, I'll report my status tomorrow (now I'm compiling), > >my environment is as follows: >% uname -a >FreeBSD debussy.private.org 5.2-BETA FreeBSD 5.2-BETA #0: Mon Nov 24 11:36:31 JST 2003 root@debussy.private.org:/work/cvsup/current/src/sys/i386/compile/MAHO_DEBUSSY-5-CURRENT i386 >% gcc -v >Using built-in specs. >Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler >Thread model: posix >gcc version 3.3.3 [FreeBSD] 20031106 > >exactly same as you. > > > >>But I use command "make package-recursive WITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED=1 >>WITH_GIF_LZW_COMPRESSION=1 USE_GCC=3.2" >> >> >I'll try later with this command. > >Regards, > maho > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-openoffice-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 25 04:33:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CB616A4CF; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 04:33:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBFC43F85; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 04:33:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAPCXnpj007394; Tue, 25 Nov 2003 21:33:50 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 21:33:49 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20031125.213349.596611807.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: jaroshenko@mailru.com From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: <3FC30806.8000502@mailru.com> References: <3FC1CB1B.2020100@mailru.com> <20031124.181224.1025286987.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> <3FC30806.8000502@mailru.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: dev@porting.openoffice.org cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Towards OpenOffice.org ports for FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 12:33:46 -0000 Hi, Serge and all, sorry for cross posting. > # java -version > java version "1.4.2-p5" > Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build > 1.4.2-p5-root_12_nov_2003_20_30) > Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2-p5-root_12_nov_2003_20_30, mixed > mode) absolutely same. thanks for your info. at 2003/11/23 21:47 JST(UTC+9), I cvsup'ed source tree, userland and ports, and have done clean installation, i.e., make world, kernel and then build *every* ports needed for OOo. Namely, I rebuild everything for FreeBSD 5.2-BETA, and also I could sucessfully build /usr/ports/japanese/openoffice-1.1. I have done some confirmations (installation and some operations) There were no problems. -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> make world completed on Mon Nov 24 11:26:11 JST 2003 (started Mon Nov 24 10:20:27 JST 2003) -------------------------------------------------------------- uname -a FreeBSD debussy.private.org 5.2-BETA FreeBSD 5.2-BETA #0: Mon Nov 24 11:36:31 JST 2003 root@debussy.private.org:/work/cvsup/current/src/sys/i386/compile/MAHO_DEBUSSY-5-CURRENT i386 java version "1.4.2-p5" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2-p5-maho_24_nov_2003_16_42) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2-p5-maho_24_nov_2003_16_42, mixed mode) gcc -v Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.3.3 [FreeBSD] 20031106 if you have some problems, first, please do try clean installation. e.g. using newest daily snapshot http://www.jp.freebsd.org/snapshots/ so I can say OOo 1.1 ports are almost ready for 5.2-RELEASE. Regards, maho From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 26 01:42:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F89E16A4CE; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 01:42:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.contactel.cz (mail.contactel.cz [212.65.193.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC0B43FCB; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 01:42:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zburget@c-box.cz) Received: from mail.miastudio.cz (74.75.108.194.contactel.net [194.108.75.74]) by mail.contactel.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 71BA649F4D; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:42:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from 192.168.1.250 ([192.168.1.250]) by mail.miastudio.cz (WinRoute Pro 4.1.30) with SMTP; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:42:12 +0100 Message-ID: <005801c3b402$1c9fe100$fa01a8c0@video> From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Zbyn=ECk_Burget?= To: Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 10:46:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0055_01C3B40A.7E5AD320" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4922.1500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4925.2800 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: openoffice-1.1.0_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 09:42:16 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C3B40A.7E5AD320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I find some small imperfections in Makefile for openoffice 1.1 I've defined WRKDIRPREFIX= /usr/obj in my make.conf and attempt of build reports errs I try find and correct this errs and I was create attached .diff Now all works... ...sorry for my english :-( Zbynek Burget ------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C3B40A.7E5AD320 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="Makefile.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Makefile.diff" --- Makefile.orig Thu Nov 20 06:13:27 2003=0A= +++ Makefile Sat Nov 22 12:53:01 2003=0A= @@ -324,7 +324,7 @@=0A= done=0A= @${CP} ${WRKDIR}/gpc231/gpc.c ${WRKSRC}/../external/gpc/=0A= @${CP} ${WRKDIR}/gpc231/gpc.h ${WRKSRC}/../external/gpc/=0A= - @${MAKE} extract-mozilla=0A= + @cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} extract-mozilla=0A= @-${RM} -f ${WRKSRC}/../moz/zipped/*.zip=0A= @${CHMOD} +x ${WRKSRC}/../solenv/bin/zipdep.pl=0A= .if defined(L10NHELP)=0A= @@ -335,9 +335,9 @@=0A= .endif=0A= =0A= post-patch:=0A= - @${MAKE} patch-mozilla=0A= - @${MAKE} fix-kdewrappers=0A= - @${MAKE} fix-gnomewrappers=0A= + @cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} patch-mozilla=0A= + @cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} fix-kdewrappers=0A= + @cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} fix-gnomewrappers=0A= .if defined(WITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED)=0A= @if [ "`echo ${PATCHDIR}/optpatch-*`" !=3D "${PATCHDIR}/optpatch-*" ]; = then \=0A= ${ECHO_MSG} "=3D=3D=3D> Applying additional TTF bytecode patches for = ${PKGNAME}" ; \=0A= @@ -452,17 +452,17 @@=0A= | ${ZIP} ${WRKDIR}/FREEBSDGCCIruntime.zip -@=0A= =0A= mozilla:=0A= - @${MAKE} extract-mozilla=0A= - @${MAKE} patch-mozilla=0A= - @${MAKE} build-mozilla=0A= - @${MAKE} register-mozilla=0A= - @${MAKE} install-mozilla=0A= + @cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} extract-mozilla=0A= + @cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} patch-mozilla=0A= + @cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} build-mozilla=0A= + @cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} register-mozilla=0A= + @cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} install-mozilla=0A= =0A= do-build:=0A= .if ! exists(${WRKSRC}/../moz/zipped/FREEBSDGCCIruntime.zip)=0A= .if ! exists(${WRKSRC}/../moz/zipped/FREEBSDGCCIlib.zip)=0A= .if ! exists(${WRKSRC}/../moz/zipped/FREEBSDGCCIinc.zip)=0A= - @${MAKE} mozilla=0A= + @cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} mozilla=0A= .endif=0A= .endif=0A= .endif=0A= @@ -569,8 +569,8 @@=0A= .endif=0A= =0A= update:=0A= - @${MAKE} fetch=0A= - @${MAKE} extract=0A= + @cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} fetch=0A= + @cd ${.CURDIR} && ${MAKE} extract=0A= @cd ${WRKSRC}/.. && for dir in *; do \=0A= if [ -d $$dir ]; then \=0A= cd $$dir; cvs update -d; cd ..; \=0A= ------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C3B40A.7E5AD320-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 26 05:38:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6CB16A4CE for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 05:38:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-in.m-online.net (svr8.m-online.net [62.245.150.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B88D43FDD for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 05:38:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from h@schmalzbauer.de) Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr14.m-online.net [192.168.3.144]) by svr8.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7451C04 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:38:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de (ppp-62-245-160-14.mnet-online.de [62.245.160.14]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820531B2F0 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:38:04 +0100 (CET) From: Harald Schmalzbauer To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:37:57 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 X-Birthday: 06 Oktober 1972 X-Name: Harald Schmalzbauer X-Phone1: +49 (0) 163 555 3237 X-Phone2: +49 (0) 89 18947781 X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-Country: Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_7yKx/VBNDrHKZQW"; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200311261438.03768@harrymail> Subject: Performance difference native/linux OOo1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:38:14 -0000 --Boundary-02=_7yKx/VBNDrHKZQW Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline Hello dear OpenOffice port maintainers, I am wondering why there is such a big performance difference between the=20 linux and the native OpenOffice version on FreeBSD 5.2-beta (i386). =46or example starting the native OO takes about 30 seconds, where the Linu= x=20 version takes about 5 seconds. If some of you speak german please also have a look at: http://www.bsdforen.de/forums/showthread.php?s=3D&threadid=3D2177 Thank you very much, =2DHarry --Boundary-02=_7yKx/VBNDrHKZQW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/xKy7Bylq0S4AzzwRAtn1AJ9RBqreXTOm9btdDkAxu/sjp4Gl+ACfc8lf i7sXRTd79CUKkSiO7x7bl1k= =A6Zt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_7yKx/VBNDrHKZQW-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 26 06:03:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A4516A4CF for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 06:03:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.imp.ch (mail.imp.ch [157.161.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A20043FA3 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 06:03:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from cvs.imp.ch (cvs.imp.ch [157.161.4.9]) by mail.imp.ch (8.12.9p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id hAQE3EEp060801; Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:03:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Martin.Blapp@imp.ch) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:03:14 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Blapp To: Harald Schmalzbauer In-Reply-To: <200311261438.03768@harrymail> Message-ID: <20031126150207.H82229@cvs.imp.ch> References: <200311261438.03768@harrymail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance difference native/linux OOo1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:03:23 -0000 Hi, > I am wondering why there is such a big performance difference between the > linux and the native OpenOffice version on FreeBSD 5.2-beta (i386). > For example starting the native OO takes about 30 seconds, where the Linux > version takes about 5 seconds. Hmm, could be a rtld issue. Can you trace the binary calls and see where it spends so much time ? > If some of you speak german please also have a look at: > http://www.bsdforen.de/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2177 Just did that. I'm swiss :) Martin From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 05:34:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8453816A4CE; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 05:34:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8861243FF2; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 05:34:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hARDYYIc002749; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:34:34 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:34:34 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20031127.223434.846935079.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: dev@porting.openoffice.org, Pavel@Janik.cz From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: References: <3FC30806.8000502@mailru.com> <20031125.213349.596611807.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: jaroshenko@mailru.com cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [porting-dev] Towards OpenOffice.org ports for FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:34:25 -0000 Hi, Pavel > > so I can say OOo 1.1 ports are almost ready for 5.2-RELEASE. > > how did you solved http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=22253 > > Do you still mkdir soffice.cfg in the ports? Yes we do. this is serious problem, which prohibits to do QA. I recieved some mails about `I want to use OOo just *now*, there are no packages for our langs, so I had tried by myself from ports, but in vain, how can I fix it?' well, there are serious demands for them. 5.2-RELEASE is approaching, ports, src are now frozen, so just what I want to say is: `it works for me, and I'm 99% sure that this port will work for 5.2-RELEASE, so if you want working package for 5-series, please do cvsup ports tree, and upgrade userland kernel or wait for 5.2-RELEASE, it is for you'. --maho From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 07:18:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489C916A4CE for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 07:18:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 812C643FE1 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2003 07:18:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 3142 invoked by uid 505); 27 Nov 2003 15:20:24 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.14 (spamassassin: 2.43. Clear:SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.241089 secs); 27 Nov 2003 15:20:24 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 27 Nov 2003 15:20:23 -0000 Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 16:21:17 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: <20031124.213644.783449525.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> Message-ID: <20031127160750.V5431@pukruppa.net> References: <20031124130853.N743@pukruppa.net> <20031124.213644.783449525.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.1.0 not installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 15:18:38 -0000 On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Nakata Maho wrote: > Hi, Peter > > > I tried the openoffice-1.1rc5 port yesterday. > > It has already been updated to 1.1.0. > if not, please cvsup your ports tree. (Some days of building later ...) Sorry, this didn't solve my original problem. But I found a workaround for 5.2-BETA: 1) I copied /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/oo_1.1.src/instsetoo/unxfbsd.pro/49/normal into /usr/local 2) I # cd /usr/local/normal # ./setup 3) Step 2) fails because of a missing file called /usr/local/OpenOfice.org1.1.0/program/freebsd-local.sh 4) I touch'ed this file in it's place and repeated step 2) and everything works. This means: The difficult part - the build - is absolutely ok. There is just some stupid installation error. Uli. > > use ports with 4.9-RELEASE might > be more stable. > --maho > > > +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 28 04:03:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0155316A4CE; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 04:03:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B080543FEC; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 04:03:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hASC3exi001639; Fri, 28 Nov 2003 21:03:40 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 21:03:40 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20031128.210340.607957348.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: Pavel@Janik.cz From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: References: <20031127.223434.846935079.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: jaroshenko@mailru.com cc: dev@porting.openoffice.org cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [porting-dev] Towards OpenOffice.org ports for FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 12:03:30 -0000 Hi, Pavel, > From: Nakata Maho > Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:34:34 +0900 (JST) > > > `it works for me, and I'm 99% sure that this port will work for > > No one can tell that surely. Do you know exactly where the fundamental So, I told 99%. > problem with linking is? It can be hidden anywhere and you will risk users' > satisfaction. For FreeBSD, it is still hard to say OOo has productivity quality. I read your IZ, different specification of dlopen, might affect everywhere in OOo. For FreeBSD, we need more developers. absolutely. and also I want to draw FreeBSD hackers attentions. there are huge number of Linux hackers, but still the numbers of *BSD related person are extemely few... --maho