From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 00:02:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E4216A4CE for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:02:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AE543F93 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 00:02:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAO823pj089148; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:02:03 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:02:03 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20031124.170203.884087010.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: openoffice@freebsd.org From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: <3FB9C571.7070305@mailru.com> References: <3FB9C571.7070305@mailru.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: jaroshenko@mailru.com Subject: Re: oo-1.1 of 5.1-RELEASE. Some build troubles. X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 08:02:02 -0000 Hi, Serge, > When building oo-1.1 on 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Mon Nov 17 > 11:11:32 MSK 2003 I get error: In Subject `5.1-RELEASE' might be wrong, 5.1-CURRENT :) and what is the result of gcc -v ? > ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making > /usr/ports/russian/openoffice-1.1/work/oo_1.1_src/udkapi/com/sun/star/lang > dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_all' > ---* TG_SLO.MK *--- > *** Error code 255 I suspect a bug in gcc-3.3. Same error has been reported by other person in Japanese, so now I'm analyzing. If it is possible, USE_GCC=3.3, to use gcc from ports and or force to use 3.2 might be fine. at least he told that it seems to be fine. Regards, maho