From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 00:58:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4819E16A4CE for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:58:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from debussy.private.org (25.60.138.210.bn.2iij.net [210.138.60.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703A143FDF for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 00:58:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by debussy.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAU8xFYC026646; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:59:16 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:59:15 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20031130.175915.783372313.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> To: h@schmalzbauer.de From: Nakata Maho In-Reply-To: <200311261438.03768@harrymail> References: <200311261438.03768@harrymail> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Performance difference native/linux OOo1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 08:58:55 -0000 Hi, Harald > Hello dear OpenOffice port maintainers, > > I am wondering why there is such a big performance difference between the > linux and the native OpenOffice version on FreeBSD 5.2-beta (i386). > For example starting the native OO takes about 30 seconds, where the Linux > version takes about 5 seconds. > > If some of you speak german please also have a look at: > http://www.bsdforen.de/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=2177 Hmm I don't understand German...sad. Anyway it takes about 10 seconds for me to start OOo Pentium 4B, 2.4G... --maho