From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 04:00:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE8E37B401 for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 04:00:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx02.egartech.com (aloha.egartech.com [62.118.81.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78F9143F3F for ; Mon, 5 May 2003 04:00:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from temik@egartech.com) Received: (qmail 41721 invoked by uid 85); 5 May 2003 11:00:35 -0000 Received: from temik@egartech.com by mx02.egartech.com with qmail-scanner-1.03 (. Clean. Processed in 1.314162 secs); 05 May 2003 11:00:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO turtle.egar.egartech.com) (192.168.8.4) by 0 with SMTP; 5 May 2003 11:00:33 -0000 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 15:00:35 +0400 Message-ID: <5235EF9BAE6B7F4CB3735789EEF73B29B06A68@turtle.egar.egartech.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: freebsd-performance Digest, Vol 3, Issue Thread-Index: AcMQRuF2q6+FgRV7Q1G+6stn2iYhkwCroGug From: "Artem Tepponen" To: "Terry Lambert" cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: RE: freebsd-performance Digest, Vol 3, Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 11:00:45 -0000 > Old People. >=20 > It's the same reason that people think 8% of a 120GB hard drive > is "a lot of space" and refuse to set their free reserve on their > FS's high enough to avoid fragmentation. Should they be asking 'Why FS design is so flawed that it has this requirement' instead? Is there any working FS for FreeBSD that does not have this requirement? Artem