From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 10 00:36:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD9337B401 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 00:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from addr-mx02.addr.com (addr-mx02.addr.com [209.249.147.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25BF43F85 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 00:36:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rbathri@addr.com) Received: from proxy1.addr.com (proxy1.addr.com [209.249.147.28]) by addr-mx02.addr.com (8.12.8/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h7A7af0G031607 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 00:36:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ts50 ([203.124.152.29]) by proxy1.addr.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with SMTP id h7A7acuW014196 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 00:36:40 -0700 (PDT) From: "Bathrinath" To: Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 13:11:19 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 In-Reply-To: <20030807190035.C47CE37B401@hub.freebsd.org> Importance: Normal X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) Subject: FreeBSD 5.1 Server Crashed twice in 10 minutes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 07:36:42 -0000 Dear Pedram, Please check whether your swap memory is configured properly. I have faced same problem without any proper information the server crashed. Regards Bathrinath From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 10 00:59:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109A237B404 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 00:59:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [64.8.50.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5229943F93 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 00:59:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pedramn@adelphia.net) Received: from nfn2.adelphia.net ([68.66.227.179]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.32 201-253-122-126-132-20030307) with ESMTP id <20030810075955.OKNO26429.mta9.adelphia.net@nfn2.adelphia.net>; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 03:59:55 -0400 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030810005745.00b5a128@pop.dc3.adelphia.net> X-Sender: pedramn@pop.dc3.adelphia.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 00:59:53 -0700 To: "Bathrinath" , From: Pedram N In-Reply-To: References: <20030807190035.C47CE37B401@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.1 Server Crashed twice in 10 minutes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 07:59:57 -0000 Thank you you guys are very helpful.. I've activated debugging and am watching now.. I will send backtrace and pr if I go down again... Thanks for being a part the greatest community, the timely responses are my biggest motivator to moving any server client I know to UNIX. This is an offtopic question but is there any load balancing that saves session state, like windows load balancing does? At 01:11 PM 8/10/2003 +0530, Bathrinath wrote: >Dear Pedram, > >Please check whether your swap memory is configured properly. I have faced >same problem without any proper information the server crashed. > >Regards > >Bathrinath > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 10 02:09:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9AB37B401 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 02:09:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from garple.migus.org (pcp243676pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net [68.55.84.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C77743F75 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 02:09:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adam@migus.org) Received: from garple.migus.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by garple.migus.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7A99EAL000136 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 05:09:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from adam@migus.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by garple.migus.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7A99EQS000135; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 05:09:14 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: garple.migus.org: www set sender to adam@migus.org using -f Received: from 192.168.4.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user adam) by mail.migus.org with HTTP; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 05:09:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <49206.192.168.4.2.1060506554.squirrel@mail.migus.org> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 05:09:14 -0400 (EDT) From: "Adam Migus" To: performance@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME,USER_AGENT,X_AUTH_WARNING version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) Subject: boot_tester - performance analysis framework X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 09:09:17 -0000 Folks, Some time ago I started developing a generic performance analysis framework for FreeBSD called "boot_tester." It got shelved for various reasons but given the recent increased interest in performance analysis I've found a little free time, tweaked the code and web site and now I'm offering it for testing. It's BSD license. The web site is: http://people.migus.org/~amigus/boot_tester/ If you have any questions or comments please email me. -- Adam - Migus Dot Org (http://www.migus.org) From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 10 00:36:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3AA37B405 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 00:36:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from garple.migus.org (pcp243676pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net [68.55.84.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3BE43F85 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 00:36:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from amigus@FreeBSD.org) Received: from garple.migus.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by garple.migus.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7A7a3AL099609 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 03:36:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from amigus@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by garple.migus.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7A7a3qt099608; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 03:36:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: garple.migus.org: www set sender to amigus@FreeBSD.org using -f Received: from 192.168.4.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user adam) by mail.migus.org with HTTP; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 03:36:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <49588.192.168.4.2.1060500963.squirrel@mail.migus.org> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 03:36:03 -0400 (EDT) From: "Adam Migus" To: performance@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3,PRIORITY_NO_NAME,USER_AGENT, X_AUTH_WARNING version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:04:54 -0700 Subject: boot_tester - performance analysis framework X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 07:36:07 -0000 Folks, Some time ago I started developing a generic performance analysis framework for FreeBSD called "boot_tester." It got shelved for various reasons but given the recent increased interest in performance analysis I've found a little free time, tweaked the code and web site and now I'm offering it for testing. It's BSD license. The web site is: http://people.migus.org/~amigus/boot_tester/ If you have any questions or comments please email me. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 10 12:21:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CEF537B401 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:21:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from garple.migus.org (pcp243676pcs.howard01.md.comcast.net [68.55.84.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE4543FBF for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:21:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adam@migus.org) Received: from garple.migus.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by garple.migus.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h7AJLHAL003335 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 15:21:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from adam@migus.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by garple.migus.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h7AJLHIX003334; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 15:21:17 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: garple.migus.org: www set sender to adam@migus.org using -f Received: from 192.168.4.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user adam) by mail.migus.org with HTTP; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 15:21:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <50022.192.168.4.2.1060543277.squirrel@mail.migus.org> In-Reply-To: <49588.192.168.4.2.1060500963.squirrel@mail.migus.org> References: <49588.192.168.4.2.1060500963.squirrel@mail.migus.org> Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 15:21:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "Adam Migus" To: performance@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,PRIORITY_NO_NAME,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT,X_AUTH_WARNING version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:22:08 -0700 Subject: Re: boot_tester - performance analysis framework X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 19:21:20 -0000 Adam Migus said: > Folks, > Some time ago I started developing a generic performance analysis > framework for FreeBSD called "boot_tester." It got shelved for > various reasons but given the recent increased interest in > performance analysis I've found a little free time, tweaked the code > and web site and now I'm offering it for testing. It's BSD license. > The web site is: > > http://people.migus.org/~amigus/boot_tester/ > > If you have any questions or comments please email me. > > -- > Adam > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Apologies for the duplicate post. This one seemed to disappear on me hours before... *shrug* -- Adam - Migus Dot Org (http://www.migus.org) From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 13 11:26:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C591537B405 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sn1oexchr01.nextvenue.com (sn1oexchr01.nextvenue.com [64.200.43.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA3F343FA3 for ; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 11:26:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nevans@talkpoint.com) Received: FROM sn1exchmbx.nextvenue.com BY sn1oexchr01.nextvenue.com ; Wed Aug 13 14:26:21 2003 -0400 Received: from paladin (64.200.43.113 [64.200.43.113]) by sn1exchmbx.nextvenue.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id PPB4FX6R; Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:25:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:26:15 -0400 From: Nick Evans To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030813142615.084b383d.nevans@talkpoint.com> In-Reply-To: <16132.36223.175148.275860@canoe.velocet.net> References: <20030628190036.0E06B37B405@hub.freebsd.org> <000f01c33dad$1595a0f0$e602a8c0@flatline> <16126.9805.829406.368426@canoe.velocet.net> <000901c33dd1$12268780$0200000a@fireball> <16126.19861.842507.318997@canoe.velocet.net> <001f01c33e0f$1f4716d0$0200000a@fireball> <16127.2826.306427.946086@canoe.velocet.net> <3EFFC3D5.7070605@mullet.se> <3F003092.30405@centtech.com> <16128.42007.75314.462685@canoe.velocet.net> <3F043F3A.1030907@centtech.com> <16132.36223.175148.275860@canoe.velocet.net> Organization: Talkpoint Communications X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Tuning Gigabit X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:26:59 -0000 I'm currently forwarding 700 megabits (1500 byte packets, netperf generated) , ~95K pps, with 254 ipfilter rules. The system is running at ~30% idle. I'm also running freevrrpd so the two units I have are fault tolerant with a 3 second failover time. Still tuning, more to come later. Nick On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 16:09:35 -0400 David Gilbert wrote: > >>>>> "Eric" == Eric Anderson writes: > > Eric> What would be a good initial start hardware-wise? > > To start testing this type of setup (gigabit routing), you'd need a > vlan'able switch with many gigabit ports, and then for each test you > need: > > 1 or more packet generators (one interface each) > > 1 router (two interfaces) > > 1 or more victims (one interface each) > > For bidirectional packet passing tests, it's best to have two (or > more) generators and 2 or more victims. The victims generally have > the least load and are good places to measure actual traffic passed. > > It's a good idea to have serial (or other) console on each of these > machines as livelock is not uncommon. There are also useful > statistics you can collect from the console that you can't always get > from the network login ... because the near-livelock conditions may > not give you enough updates. > > It is also sometimes a good idea to have a 100meg card in the boxes > for OOB management. > > Multiply this times the number of tests you want to do. We find that > you get about one test every two hours total work (much tearing down > and building up of machines inbetween included in that estimate). > > Dave. > > -- > ============================================================================ > |David Gilbert, Velocet Communications. | Two things can only be | > |Mail: dgilbert@velocet.net | equal if and only if they | > |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | > =========================================================GLO================ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"