From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 10:08:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6435B37B407; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:08:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C02E43FBF; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:07:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h36H7gD0030762; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:07:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h36H7f26030761; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:07:41 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Sean_Welch@alum.wofford.org Message-ID: <20030406170741.GA30707@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <2935201.1049563926248.JavaMail.nobody@waldorf.psp.pas.earthlink.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2935201.1049563926248.JavaMail.nobody@waldorf.psp.pas.earthlink.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Peter Grehan cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newer code? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 17:08:00 -0000 On Sat, Apr 05, 2003 at 09:30:49AM -0600, Sean Welch wrote: > I haven't played with this for a couple of weeks and I was > wondering if there had been any progress on the toolchain > effort? I saw mention of what looked like a slightly newer > version of the gcc-diffs I was using posted here; is there > a newer version? Anything else that could use some focussed > testing? The last version of the GCC patch I posted is what you should be using.