From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 00:10:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488F616A4B3; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:10:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [64.251.88.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1AF243FA3; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:10:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BC2AE5A4; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:10:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22852-09; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 72284AE58A; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:10:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030928071001.72284AE58A@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:10:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2003-09-07 - 2003-09-27 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 07:10:10 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.FreeBSDDiary.org/ - practical examples FreshPorts - http://www.FreshPorts.org/ - the place for ports FreshSource - http://www.FreshSource.org/ - the place for source From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 01:32:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0E516A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 01:32:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from partridge.numericable.net (partridge.numericable.net [80.236.0.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0CB4400E for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 01:32:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vitalis@numericable.fr) Received: (qmail 14373 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2003 08:31:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [81.220.77.69]) ([81.220.77.69]) (envelope-sender ) by 0 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Sep 2003 08:31:58 -0000 From: Vitalis To: Dan Strick In-Reply-To: <200309280217.h8S2HVgw000393@ice.nodomain> References: <200309280217.h8S2HVgw000393@ice.nodomain> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064737917.589.1.camel@sankukai.ice-age.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:31:57 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: dan@ice.nodomain cc: questions Subject: Re: MBR problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:32:01 -0000 On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 04:17, Dan Strick wrote: > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, vitalis@numericable.fr wrote: > > There are 2 partitions on my hard drive, one for FreeBSD and the other > > one for XP. I had to reinstall Windows and of course it blew the MBR up. > > I've reinstalled FreeBSD's boot manager with: > > boot0cfg -B ad0 > > > > Now when I boot, the manager lists the 2 OS, but when I choose to boot > > FreeBSD, nothing happens. > > > > Any idea? > > > > #FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT > > > > bash-2.05b# fdisk ad0 > > ******* Working on device /dev/ad0 ******* > > parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: > > cylinders=232581 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl) > > > > Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 > > parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: > > cylinders=232581 heads=16 sectors/track=63 (1008 blks/cyl) > > > > Media sector size is 512 > > Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 > > Information from DOS bootblock is: > > The data for partition 1 is: > > sysid 7 (0x07),(OS/2 HPFS, NTFS, QNX-2 (16 bit) or Advanced UNIX) > > start 63, size 117210177 (57231 Meg), flag 0 > > beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; > > end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 > > The data for partition 2 is: > > sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) > > start 117210240, size 117226305 (57239 Meg), flag 80 (active) > > beg: cyl 1023/ head 0/ sector 1; > > end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 > > I don't see any smoking guns. I know the basic concept, booting via > an MBR installed with boot0cfg on a FreeBSD 5.1 system with XP in the > first slice works, works. I did it just a couple of days ago. > > I do see a potential problem. The boot0 MBR will by default use the > legacy CHS int-13 BIOS services, even if the "extended" services are > available. (At least this is how I read the source code. This is > contrary to at least some of the boot0/boot0cfg documentation.) > > Your XP slice is just a teensy bit larger than 1024*255*63 sectors long, > pushing the bootstrap program in your FreeBSD slice just beyond the point > at which it could be successfully loaded with a legacy int-13 disk read. > > If possible, do "boot0cfg -v ad0" and see if the "packet" option is set. > If not, see if setting it with "boot0cfg -v -o packet ad0" fixes your > problem. I expect that you are using a modern motherboard whose BIOS > implements the modern "EDDS" int-13 disk functions, perhaps the Asus > P4P800 you just mentioned in a previous posting to freebsd-questions. > > Caveat: I have not yet tried the boot0cfg packet option and don't > know for sure that it works. I also wonder how the boot0 program worked > for you before you installed XP. I gather that it did and that suggests > your problem is something else. Still, it is worth a try. > > Dan Strick > strick@covad.net > Hi Dan! You were right, it works now with the 'packet' option. Thanks a lot! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 01:52:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4790E16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 01:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 120F743FE1 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 01:52:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h8S8qKfs076302 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:52:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id h8S8qKBC076301; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:52:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:52:19 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: "Jukka A. Ukkonen" Message-ID: <20030928085219.GA7813@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , "Jukka A. Ukkonen" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3326.62.78.135.6.1064731627.squirrel@office.mawit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3326.62.78.135.6.1064731627.squirrel@office.mawit.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: Support for default passive ftp mode in fetch] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:52:38 -0000 --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:47:07AM +0300, Jukka A. Ukkonen wrote: > To be really efficient I tried to send the following message to "core-tea= m" > which obviously failed. So, here is the same minor change proposal sent > to freebsd-questions. I hope some of the people who can take appropriate > action are on this list. That's not efficiency, that's bothering 3 extremely busy people with something that is very unlikely to be anything close to their particular interests within the FreeBSD sources. Please don't do that. The approved method of putting forward such enhancements is to file a problem report using send-pr(1), and maybe a follow up e-mail to one of the FreeBSD mailing lists. If you have problems getting your system to send e-mail via send-pr(1), then feel free to ask here or search the archives of this mailing list (http://freebsd.rambler.ru/ is probably the best place). In any case, fetch(1) already obeys the FTP_PASSIVE_MODE environment variable. See in the fetch(1) man page where it says: All environment variables mentioned in the documentation for the fetch= (3) library are supported. Then look at fetch(3) [ie. type 'man 3 fetch' as just saying 'man fetch' will get you the fetch(1) man page again] and you'll see: ENVIRONMENT FETCH_BIND_ADDRESS Specifies a hostname or IP address to which sockets used for outgoing connections will be bound. FTP_LOGIN Default FTP login if none was provided in the URL. FTP_PASSIVE_MODE If set to anything but `no', forces the FTP code to use passive mode. FreeBSD is like that: whenever you think of a really neat little enhancement, it always pays to double check, as chances are it already works that way... Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/dqFDdtESqEQa7a0RAkBlAJwJWfFFrS23yWXTTPgqmhk3mWir1QCff6jQ yqZdfDaMyPcanz3azEntDnE= =IMoM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 02:01:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CC616A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 02:01:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAE54400F for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 02:01:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h8S91dfs076417 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:01:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id h8S91dCd076416; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:01:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:01:39 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: "Jukka A. Ukkonen" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030928090139.GB7813@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , "Jukka A. Ukkonen" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3326.62.78.135.6.1064731627.squirrel@office.mawit.com> <20030928085219.GA7813@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030928085219.GA7813@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: [Fwd: Support for default passive ftp mode in fetch] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:01:48 -0000 --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:52:19AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > That's not efficiency, that's bothering 3 extremely busy people with > something that is very unlikely to be anything close to their > particular interests within the FreeBSD sources. Please don't do that. Uh -- make that 9 people. (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/contributors/staff-core.html). But my point still stands. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/dqNzdtESqEQa7a0RAuv2AKCAp5jnxCp37Ht1gB2gxKcSMfUZjACeJ46l 6XxNwh6xFnBanfgP60pLM2g= =1s7E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 03:15:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF46216A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 03:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mwinf0304.wanadoo.fr (smtp6.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D11E4400B for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 03:15:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aaaa@aaa.com) Received: from ARGH (ASte-Genev-Bois-113-1-5-18.w81-51.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.51.184.18]) by mwinf0304.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 2778DA8040EF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:15:15 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <000001c385a9$6848baf0$6401a8c0@ARGH> From: "aaaaa" To: Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 18:46:37 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: VNC & ssh tunneling problem: getsockopt TCP_NODELAY error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:15:17 -0000 Dear, I met the same problem and manage to solve it (thanks for your help) by = replacing Connection/SSH/Tunnels/Destination/localhost:59XX by = Connection/SSH/Tunnels/Destination/127.0.0.1:59XX. regards, Gilles From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 03:36:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF1816A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 03:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bebop.inter-sonic.com (bebop.inter-sonic.com [212.247.185.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D95C14400F for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 03:36:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from localhost (localhost.inter-sonic.com [127.0.0.1]) by bebop.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9896142A92 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:36:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bebop.inter-sonic.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bebop.inter-sonic.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08531-02 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:36:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from intersonic.se (as9-2-1.bi.s.bonet.se [217.215.7.177]) by bebop.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8797D142A90 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:36:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3F76B9B3.6030805@intersonic.se> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:36:35 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030831 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com Subject: how to get system information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:36:47 -0000 Hi all, I am wondering how to find out system hardware information from a running system, I know for instance pciconf(8) but what are the corresponding ones for memory, cpu etc? Many thanks, Per olof From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 03:46:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3C416A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 03:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lakemtao07.cox.net (lakemtao07.cox.net [68.1.17.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A8143FB1 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 03:46:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from dredster ([68.12.67.176]) by lakemtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20030928104626.GQEV15705.lakemtao07.cox.net@dredster>; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 06:46:26 -0400 Message-ID: <00f701c385ad$c9a18cb0$0201a8c0@dredster> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: "Per olof Ljungmark" , References: <3F76B9B3.6030805@intersonic.se> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 05:46:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: how to get system information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:46:28 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Per olof Ljungmark" To: Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 5:36 AM Subject: how to get system information > Hi all, > > I am wondering how to find out system hardware information from a > running system, I know for instance pciconf(8) but what are the > corresponding ones for memory, cpu etc? > > Many thanks, > > Per olof > more /var/run/dmesg.boot to get the info at boot time. vmstat 5 5 will give you 5 items 5 sconds apart to show you procs, memory, page, disks, faults and cpu info. -- Micheal Patterson Network Administration Cancer Care Network From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 04:21:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D42416A4BF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 04:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bebop.inter-sonic.com (bebop.inter-sonic.com [212.247.185.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7638143F85 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 04:21:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from localhost (localhost.inter-sonic.com [127.0.0.1]) by bebop.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F88142A92; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:21:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bebop.inter-sonic.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bebop.inter-sonic.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08531-07; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:21:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from intersonic.se (as9-2-1.bi.s.bonet.se [217.215.7.177]) by bebop.inter-sonic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4C0142A90; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:21:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3F76C421.1000104@intersonic.se> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:21:05 +0200 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030831 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Micheal Patterson References: <3F76B9B3.6030805@intersonic.se> <00f701c385ad$c9a18cb0$0201a8c0@dredster> In-Reply-To: <00f701c385ad$c9a18cb0$0201a8c0@dredster> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at inter-sonic.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to get system information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:21:14 -0000 >> >>I am wondering how to find out system hardware information from a >>running system, I know for instance pciconf(8) but what are the >>corresponding ones for memory, cpu etc? >> > > > more /var/run/dmesg.boot to get the info at boot time. > vmstat 5 5 will give you 5 items 5 sconds apart to show you procs, memory, > page, disks, faults and cpu info. > Thanks, that was a good start. Now, if I wanted to see more detailed info on the processor than the dmesg.boot output: Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 Like cache size etc.? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 04:40:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1381C16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 04:40:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.covadmail.net (mx04.covadmail.net [63.65.120.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCAAA4400B for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 04:40:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from network101@covad.net) Received: (covad.net 15055 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2003 11:40:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO install) (network101@69.3.136.141) by sun-qmail09 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2003 11:40:41 -0000 Message-ID: <020f01c385b5$668dce10$0300a8c0@install> From: "nw1" To: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 07:41:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: FreeBSD 4.8-P10 --Mouse doesn't move in the console or XFree86-- X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:40:48 -0000 Neither mouse will work in the console or in XFree86. Gigabyte GA-6BXDS = main board BIOS= AWARD (2A69KG01) ver. 4.51PG In the PCI/ISA section of the BIOS, a USB setting of: "Assign IRQ For USB: Enabled" (is set) There is also a "USB Keyboard Support" setting within the BIOS's "INTERGRATED PEROPHERALS" section; I have tried this setting to both "Enabled and Disabled". There aren't any other USB settings in this BIOS. We are using these devices that are known working devices. Mouse-1 is: Logitech | model: M-BD58 | optical corded wheel Mouse-2 is: Logitech | model: M-RM67A | Optical cordless wheel Our Kernel: # USB support device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device usb # USB Bus (required) device ums # Mouse pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support Our /etc/rc.conf: # grep -i mouse /etc/rc.conf moused_enable="YES" moused_port="/dev/ums0" # grep -i usb /etc/rc.conf usbd_enable="YES" Our /dev: ls -l /dev | grep -i ums crw-rw---- 1 root operator 111, 0 Sep 27 13:16 ums0 dmesg reports: # dmesg | grep -i usb uhci0: port 0xa000-0xa01f irq 10 at device 7.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 ums0: Logitech USB Mouse, rev 1.10/6.10, addr 2, iclass 3/1 Upon booting into the OS, using the above BIOS, and other settings --with either of the above devices; the mouse is seen on screen, but it refuse to respond while moving the hand-held device. Should we unplug one mouse (from either usb port) to test the other mouse, we receive the following on-screen message(s), respectively of the motherboards USB port we were using: uhub0: device problem, disabling port 2 uhub0: device problem, disabling port 1 When we plug the devices back in to either of the motherboards mouse ports, there's no indication at all, from the OS, that a USB device was attached. Reminder: these devices are in perfect working order. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 05:16:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E33116A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 05:16:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay7-f109.bay7.hotmail.com [64.4.11.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7215644035 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 05:16:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tracboricha@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 05:16:58 -0700 Received: from 203.199.68.201 by by7fd.bay7.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:16:58 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.199.68.201] X-Originating-Email: [tracboricha@hotmail.com] From: "Prashant Boricha" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:16:58 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2003 12:16:58.0356 (UTC) FILETIME=[69E56B40:01C385BA] Subject: R: Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:16:59 -0000 Hello, I would like to know more about FreeBSD, I m very much interested in it. But from what I infer it does'nt seem to be used at home. I would like to use it at home for connecting to the net, watching movies, playing songs, doing work in Office software. Please tell me if I can do so using BSD. Looking forward to your reply. Prashant Disclaimer: 1. The contents of this email and its attachments are confidential and privileged. Any unauthorised use, or passing on, of the information to others who are not authorised is expressly prohibited. If you receive this email in error, please advise us and then delete the email with any attachments. 2. Before opening or using attachments, check them for viruses and defects. The contents of this email and its attachments may become scrambled, truncated or altered in transmission. Please advise us of any anomalies. _________________________________________________________________ Share your photos without swamping your Inbox. Get Hotmail Extra Storage today! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 05:25:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD0B16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 05:25:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA10044039 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 05:25:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas.kohn@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 30431 invoked by uid 65534); 28 Sep 2003 12:25:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [172.16.32.190]) (212.204.32.190) by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 28 Sep 2003 14:25:09 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2431876 From: Andreas Kohn To: Prashant Boricha In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064751922.881.3.camel@klamath> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:25:22 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Free BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:25:13 -0000 On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 14:16, Prashant Boricha wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to know more about FreeBSD, I m very much interested in it. But > from what I infer it does'nt seem to be used at home. I would like to use it > at home for connecting to the net, watching movies, playing songs, doing > work in Office software. > > Please tell me if I can do so using BSD. Hi, you can do everything you named with FreeBSD. Internet: Many browsers like FireBird, Mozilla, Konqueror Watching movies: mplayer, xine Playing songs: XMMS Office: AbiWord, OpenOffice, KOffice, ... These and more programs are available through the FreeBSD ports collection, which is installed during the setup. More information can be found in the handbook http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html for example sections 15 and 16. Regards, -- Andreas Kohn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 05:41:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3230E16A4BF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 05:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp07.wxs.nl (smtp07.wxs.nl [195.121.6.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5EF4400E for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 05:41:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from akruijff@www.kruijff.org) Received: from kruij557.speed.planet.nl (ipd50a97ba.speed.planet.nl [213.10.151.186]) by smtp07.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HLX008Y3CLIOU@smtp07.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:41:43 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Intranet.lan (akruijff@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h8SCfgQL013772;akruijff@Intranet.lan) Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by Intranet.lan (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h8SCff6p013771; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:41:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:41:41 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff In-reply-to: <444qzgocn5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20030928124141.GJ94873@dds.nl> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i References: <002901c378a4$e9d584c0$17850480@D4T7J231> <444qzgocn5.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> cc: Lei Luo Subject: Re: Newbie need help on configuring mouse and X windows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:41:45 -0000 On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:51:10PM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "Lei Luo" writes: > > > I am new to FreeBSD and just trying to learning something. I installed > > FreeBSD without X system on my computer and it works fine. But when I > > tried to configure mouse and X windows, I had big problem. I think that it would be more robused to install the mouse for you console first with /stand/sysinstall. If this worked you could move to getting your mouse work under X. > > As instructed in the handbook, I configured the type and port of the > > mouse (PS2, so I used the default). But after I enabled it, I would be > > in one of two situations. What have done (exactly; aka commands given out) so far? > What were you using for this configuration? xf86cfg? > > > If I skipped this step and tried to configure X windows directly, of > > course, the system warned me that I hadn't configured the mouse and > > asked me to go back to configure it. > > > > My computer is a Gateway 2000 desktop with 200 Intel Pentium II > > processor. Very old so I used to run Linux on it. > > Maybe the same X configuration will work. > > > P.S., I didn't see the kernel configuration menu. Is it removed from > > FreeBSD 5.x? Consider using 4.x as a newbie. You have enove to lean as it is. -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 06:05:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CF316A4BF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 06:05:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail1.panix.com (mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2765643FDF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 06:05:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stanb@panix.com) Received: from panix.com (brillig.panix.com [166.84.1.76]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487A948A28; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:05:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from teddy.fas.com (pcp01010374pcs.mplsnt01.sc.comcast.net [68.58.176.69]) by panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE472AA47; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:05:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from stan by teddy.fas.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1A3bEr-0006WT-00; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:05:25 -0400 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:05:25 -0400 From: stan To: Frank Knobbe Message-ID: <20030928130525.GA25002@teddy.fas.com> Mail-Followup-To: Frank Knobbe , Free BSD Questions list References: <20030927191740.GA6978@teddy.fas.com> <1064720924.441.25.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1064720924.441.25.camel@localhost> X-Editor: gVim X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.21 X-Uptime: 09:00:00 up 45 days, 1:57, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Stan Brown cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: cvsup + portupgrade Now no Gnome login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:05:28 -0000 On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 10:48:44PM -0500, Frank Knobbe wrote: > On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 14:17, stan wrote: > > I cvsup'd today (main and ports), then did a portupgrade -aRR, and now I > > can't get loged intot a session using gdm. > > > > I've rebooted the machine, and blown awa ~/.g[cn]* in my user home > > directory. Still no luck. I tried the "Gnome failsafe" session, still no > > luck. Looks like it doesn't even _try_ to start Gnome, and I get a console > > message about > > > > gdm_slave_session_start: Execution of PostLogin script returned > 0. Aborting. > > > Heh... same thing happened to me. Here is what you need to do: > > cd into /usr/X11R6/etc/gdm. There you find your gdm.conf. After the > cvsup, you have (or have a newer version of) factory-gdm.conf. A > comparison showed wha'ts missing. Go ahead and edit gdm.conf. Search for > "PostSessionScriptDir". You should see a path assigned to it. You should > also see a definition of "PreSessionScriptDir". What you don't see is > "PostLoginScriptDir". Go ahead and add to that section following line: > > PostLoginScriptDir=/usr/X11R6/etc/gdm/PostLogin/ > > Then restart gdm ("/usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d/gdm.sh stop" and > "/usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d/gdm.sh start") and you should be good to go. > > Hope this helps, Indeed it did! Thanks for the help on this. BTW, out of curoisity, Did I need to delete the ~/.g[nc]* filles/directories? If I had not would they have been auto upgraded? Looking foward to playing with Gnome 2.4, hope it's a step back twoard 1.4 from 2.2, which I loathe. -- "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 02:59:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC6816A4B3; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 02:59:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail012.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail012.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4272C4402F; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 02:59:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anthony@carmoda.com) Received: from carmoda3 (c211-28-220-147.kelvn1.qld.optusnet.com.au [211.28.220.147])h8S9wf817925; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:58:55 +1000 From: "Anthony Carmody" To: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:02:52 +1000 Message-ID: <003301c385a7$af055220$6600a8c0@carmoda3> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 06:23:05 -0700 Subject: Ethernet Drivers with 5.1 not happening X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: anthony@carmoda.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:59:03 -0000 Hiya, I posted a question about this last week. I have done a little homework and I am resubmitting my question with more information and i hope someone can help this time around. I am building a FreeBSD 5.1 box for a client using a fairly new ASUS Mainboard, that SHOULD according to the HARDWARE.TXT file on my installer CDROM, work with all the hardware chip-sets concerned. precisely, an "Intel 82562EZ LAN PHY". These are the relevant lines i get from "pciconf -lv" : none3@pci1:8:0: class=0x2020000 card=0x80f81043 chip=0x10508086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' class = network subclass = ethernet AND this is what i get from "dmesg | more" : pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) is there a way i might just install some drivers without reinstalling the whole system? I think someone has made some recently, although i am not familiar with the procedure of obtaining and installing them. I have experience installing from ISO images and adding the odd port but not much beyond that. Here is the link to the mailing.freebsd.cvs-current thread im not sure about: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&th=c2cc18e7fd2e3621&rnum= 1 any info is greatly appreciated always. Regards, Carmoda iamcarmoda[remove-spam]@hotmail.com ==================================== Regards, Anthony John Carmody Anthony Carmody Consulting Pty Ltd Business Computing Solutions M: 0 414 417 457 I: +61 414 417 457 F: 07 38708040 anthony@carmoda.com http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html ============================================ 01100011011000010111001001101101011011110110010001100001 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 06:01:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF03316A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 06:01:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web9505.mail.yahoo.com (web9505.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.129.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C9B643FE0 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 06:01:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsdmaillist@yahoo.com.hk) Message-ID: <20030928130138.92688.qmail@web9505.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.85.131.68] by web9505.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:01:38 CST Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:01:38 +0800 (CST) From: =?big5?q?maillist=20bsd?= To: Yonatan Bokovza , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 06:23:05 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: bsdmaillist@yahoo.com.hk Subject: RE: My jail can not ssh.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:01:41 -0000 Hi all, What will be the possible problem.. As i make the jail environment with jail script. jail.sh file D=/home/jail/192.168.1.1 cd /usr/src mkdir -p $D make world DESTDIR=$D cd etc make distribution DESTDIR=$D -DNO_MAKEDEV_RUN cd $D/dev sh MAKEDEV jail cd $D ln -sf dev/null kernel #mkdir -p /home/192.168.1.1/stand #cp /stand/sysinstall /home/192.168.1.1/stand # jail /home/jail/192.168.1.1 web 192.168.1.1 /bin/sh #touch /etc/fstab #vi rc.conf sendmail_enable="NONE" sshd_enable="YES" inetd_enable="YES" inetd_flags="-wW -a 192.168.1.1" syslogd_enable="YES" syslogd_flags="-ss" portmap_enable="NO" #vi /etc/resolv.conf nameserver 1.2.3.4 #passwd root #pw useradd kinux -g wheel -d /home/kinux -s /bin/csh -m #/stand/sysinstall -->config -->timezone and configure it is HKT. # # jail /home/jail/192.168.1.1 web 192.168.1.1 /bin/sh /etc/rc Skipping disk checks ... adjkerntz[38464]: sysctl(put_wallclock): Operation not permitted Doing initial network setup:. ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCDIFADDR): permission denied lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 Additional routing options: TCP keepalive=YESsysctl: net.inet.tcp.always_keepalive: Operation not permitted . Routing daemons:. Additional daemons: syslogd. Doing additional network setup:. Starting final network daemons: creating ssh1 RSA host key Generating public/private rsa1 key pair. Your identification has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key. Your public key has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key.pub. The key fingerprint is: a4:91:9a:b7:92:fe:8b:34:fa:6d:d7:42:a6:d5:77:57 root@web creating ssh2 RSA host key Generating public/private rsa key pair. Your identification has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key. Your public key has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key.pub. The key fingerprint is: e2:26:5b:c8:f8:ee:c0:06:12:30:5e:fb:d0:f6:c2:05 root@web creating ssh2 DSA host key Generating public/private dsa key pair. Your identification has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key. Your public key has been saved in /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key.pub. The key fingerprint is: ee:b8:65:eb:e0:6f:0f:6d:dd:e9:3c:52:e0:d4:5d:d6 root@web . ELF ldconfig path: /usr/lib /usr/lib/compat a.out ldconfig path: /usr/lib/aout /usr/lib/compat/aout Starting standard daemons: inetd cron sshd. Initial rc.i386 initialization:. Additional ABI support:. Local package initialization:. Additional TCP options:. Sun Sep 28 21:00:24 HKT 2003 # ssh -l kinux 192.168.1.1 The authenticity of host '192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1)' can't be established. DSA key fingerprint is ee:b8:65:eb:e0:6f:0f:6d:dd:e9:3c:52:e0:d4:5d:d6. Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes Warning: Permanently added '192.168.1.1' (DSA) to the list of known hosts. Connection closed by 192.168.1.1 %ps -aux | grep J kinux 38557 0.0 0.4 1064 540 p1 S+ 9:14PM 0:00.00 grep J root 38498 0.0 0.5 948 632 ?? IsJ 9:00PM 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/syslog root 38508 0.0 0.5 1044 672 ?? IsJ 9:00PM 0:00.00 /usr/sbin/inetd root 38510 0.0 0.6 1024 776 ?? IsJ 9:00PM 0:00.01 /usr/sbin/cron root 38512 0.0 1.6 2592 2016 ?? IsJ 9:00PM 0:00.37 /usr/sbin/sshd Thanks Yonatan Bokovza wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: Pat Lashley [mailto:patl+freebsd@volant.org] > Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:18 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; maillist bsd > Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: My jail can not ssh.. > > > --On Tuesday, September 16, 2003 09:07:15 +0100 Matthew Seaman > wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 04:16:31AM +0800, maillist bsd wrote: > > > >> I am just testing jail on my FreeBSD4.8-stable box, i > found i can not > >> ssh to the jail environment, but i can telnet to jail > environment, the > >> sshd is running both inside and outside jail. What's the problem. > > > > I suspect that your problem is that the sshd(8) in your > host and jail > > environments are both binding to IN_ADDR_ANY. That means > both daemons > > are fighting over the loopback interface (at least). > > Another subtle thing that can cause problem is if the jailed SSH > can't do DNS resolution. Telnet in and run your favorite DNS > query app (host, dnsip, dig, nslookup, etc.). If it fails, check > resolv.conf in the jail; and check the access controls on your > name server And yet another problem is that ssh needs /dev/[u]random. Try mounting devfs in the jail's /dev and see if it works for you. The error message is something along the line of "PRNG not initialized". ¡u¦V¥ª¨« ¦V¥k¨«¡v½ì©Ç VoiceMail Åwªïµü.... http://voicemail.yahoo.com.hk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 06:57:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2199A16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 06:57:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail2.bluewin.ch (mail2.bluewin.ch [195.186.4.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EAA44029 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 06:57:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (62.203.160.216) by mail2.bluewin.ch (Bluewin AG 7.0.020) id 3F5704FC002ACBBA; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:57:30 +0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) id h8SE4D3b032016; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:04:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.12.8p1/8.12.8av) with ESMTP id h8SE3xuj032004; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:04:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: (from martin@localhost) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h8SE3wkc032003; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:03:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:03:58 +0200 From: Martin Schweizer To: synrat Message-ID: <20030928140358.GA31685@saturn.pcs.ms> Mail-Followup-To: synrat , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20030917092327.W7062@mail.wirewalk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030917092327.W7062@mail.wirewalk.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: PC-Service M. Schweizer, CH-8608 Bubikon, Switzerland X-PGP-Key: http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc X-Fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sophos on freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Schweizer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:57:33 -0000 --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I run Sophos also as a cron job. It also updates the ide's and the software= =20 over scripts. Am Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 09:26:03AM -0400 synrat schrieb: > Has anyone setup virus scanning for e-mail and/or files shared via Samba ? > I'm wondering if I need to buy sophos antivirus only, or both antivirus > and "mail monitor" from sophos. Suggestions, feedback and links are > appreciated. --=20 Regards Martin Schweizer PC-Service M. Schweizer; Gewerbehaus Schwarz; CH-8608 Bubikon Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22; http://www.pc-service.ch; public key : http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc;=20 fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239; --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/dupOwa4WkdMP0jkRAu0sAKCpCrD+OnSvP+nn8IpotCumhddAQQCgmgKH fQFdobQ0SXaCOMWJe2fcv9E= =h/Nt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 07:26:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7542116A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 07:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx0.rambler.ru (mx0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636B743FF7 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 07:26:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from twistfire@rambler.ru) Received: from mailc.rambler.ru (mailc.rambler.ru [81.19.66.27]) by mx0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A8242F92D for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:26:01 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from twistfire@rambler.ru) Received: from fire (vv.abc.mk.ua [62.64.91.193]) (authenticated bits=0) by mailc.rambler.ru (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h8SEP7VI095707 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:25:13 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <000101c385cc$b2983d10$0400a8c0@fire> From: "Alex Zivenko" To: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:25:22 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Auth-User: twistfire, whoson: (null) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Sendmail redirect problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:26:04 -0000 Hi people. I have some problem here. I need a mail account on the another server, = which runs on freebsd. I have a mail account, for example = twistfire@rambler.ru. I need a mail account like fire@someserver.ru. But the acces is restricted to prevent security = vulnerabilities. The mail server is closed for ip addresses not from = their subnets. So I decided not to login there, but when the mail will = come to fire@someserver.ru t will automatically redirects to = twistfire@rambler.ru. How can I do that? What I need to do in Sendmail? ----------------------------------------------------------------- Best regards, Alex Zivenko ICQ# 298887381 e-mail: twistfire@rambler.ru http://www.netgen.com.ua From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 07:40:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA2916A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 07:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grillolja.cs.umu.se (grillolja.cs.umu.se [130.239.40.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE214402F for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 07:40:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tdv94ped@cs.umu.se) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by amavisd-new (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9717935F9; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:40:36 +0200 (MEST) Received: from kvist.cs.umu.se (kvist.cs.umu.se [130.239.40.192]) by grillolja.cs.umu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16CF3512; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:40:25 +0200 (MEST) Received: by kvist.cs.umu.se (Postfix, from userid 4411) id 1C0823826D; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:40:25 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kvist.cs.umu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FD73826C; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:40:24 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:40:24 +0200 (MEST) From: Paul Everlund To: Jud In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG cc: fred Subject: Re: can FreeBSD run dos X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:40:42 -0000 On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Jud wrote: > On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 09:51:50 -0500, fred wrote: > > > I am new to different OS's . > > Can this Os run Wordperfect 5.1 for dos??? > > It might be possible with Wine, but you would need a FAT partition, so > that would definitely be the long way round - you might as well install > Win9x in the FAT partition and run WordPerfect on DOS directly. FreeBSD > has several good free word processing programs of its own that you may > want to look at - see . > > Jud There's also doscmd(1), but I doubt that it will be able to run WordPerfect. I recommend Jud's suggestion, to look at the FreeBSD ports. Best regards, Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 08:05:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF40E16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:05:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au [210.50.30.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED7543FE3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:05:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ekrem@ozemail.com.au) Received: from [210.50.73.192] (210.50.73.192) by smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.0.018) (authenticated as ekrem@iprimus.com.au) id 3F674905004D42A4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:05:35 +1000 From: Ekrem To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064761546.65061.4.camel@beynam.ecko.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:05:47 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Sendmail: Do I need it running? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:05:38 -0000 Hi people, I'm using FreeBSD on my standalone desktop PC. I use dialup for the internet and use Evolution as the email client, but the following 2 processes always running; sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) Do they need to be running for things like daily/weekly cron jobs that send emails to root, or for any other purpose? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 08:22:33 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFF616A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.covadmail.net (mx04.covadmail.net [63.65.120.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F00A843FB1 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:22:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from network101@covad.net) Received: (covad.net 9627 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2003 15:22:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO install) (network101@69.3.136.141) by sun-qmail01 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2003 15:22:27 -0000 Message-ID: <028b01c385d4$61ab40c0$0300a8c0@install> From: "nw1" To: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:22:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Update to earlier post (corrections) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:22:34 -0000 There were errors in an earlier post with a subject: FreeBSD 4.8-P10 --Mouse doesn't move in the console or XFree86-- The udated particulars are posted at: 69.3.136.141/freebsd/usb_mouse.txt Cheese From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 08:33:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B34016A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937A043F93 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:33:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h8SFXIw31557; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:33:18 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: "nw1" , Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:33:17 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <028b01c385d4$61ab40c0$0300a8c0@install> In-Reply-To: <028b01c385d4$61ab40c0$0300a8c0@install> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309280833.17782.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: Update to earlier post (corrections) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:33:39 -0000 On Sunday 28 September 2003 08:22 am, nw1 wrote: > There were errors in an earlier post with a subject: FreeBSD 4.8-P10 > --Mouse doesn't move in the console or XFree86-- > > The udated particulars are posted at: > 69.3.136.141/freebsd/usb_mouse.txt BTW, if you had added http://69.. we could click and browse your text file. > I was always under the impression that you enabled moused or usbd but not both. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 08:42:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A162F16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:42:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [217.120.160.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB43B43F93 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:42:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (uid 1000) by nagual.st with local; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:42:16 +0200 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:42:16 +0200 To: freebsd-questions Message-ID: <20030928154216.GA52079@pooh.nagual.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i From: Dick Hoogendijk Subject: gtk-font-name (default) for gtk-2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:42:18 -0000 Does anybody know where the default "gtk-font-name" for FreeBSD-4.8 is defined? Programs like gaim use it and I like to experiment w/ some other fonts. I cannot find the default file however. Anybody? -- dick -- http://www.nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 4.8 ++ Debian GNU/Linux (Woody) + Nai tiruvantel ar vayuvantel i Valar tielyanna nu vilja From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 08:51:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9116F16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.covadmail.net (mx04.covadmail.net [63.65.120.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DD2444030 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:51:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from network101@covad.net) Received: (covad.net 31662 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2003 15:51:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO install) (network101@69.3.136.141) by sun-qmail18 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2003 15:51:41 -0000 Message-ID: <02a701c385d8$76d3d490$0300a8c0@install> From: "nw1" To: "Kent Stewart" References: <028b01c385d4$61ab40c0$0300a8c0@install> <200309280833.17782.kstewart@owt.com> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:52:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update to earlier post (corrections) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:51:47 -0000 It will work with both moused and usbd specified in /etc/rc.conf. There is one thing i forgot to mention on that page: This install was created using another motherboard. The hdd's were transfered to this gigabyte motherboard. We have also tried doing a fresh install with the gigabyte board and enabling the same entries as posted on http://69.3.136.141/freebsd/usb_mouse.txt. In doing so the mouse works, which proves both usbd and moused can be enabled. My issue is it doesn't work at all now and I really can't do a fresh install. Recently i tried rm /dev/ums0 and recreating it, that still hasn't worked. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kent Stewart" To: "nw1" ; Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 11:33 AM Subject: Re: Update to earlier post (corrections) > On Sunday 28 September 2003 08:22 am, nw1 wrote: > > There were errors in an earlier post with a subject: FreeBSD 4.8-P10 > > --Mouse doesn't move in the console or XFree86-- > > > > The udated particulars are posted at: > > 69.3.136.141/freebsd/usb_mouse.txt > > BTW, if you had added http://69.. we could click and browse your text > file. > > > > > I was always under the impression that you enabled moused or usbd but > not both. > > Kent > > -- > Kent Stewart > Richland, WA > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 08:58:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B0416A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thor.65535.net (thor.65535.net [216.17.104.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32D444030 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:58:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rghf@fsck.me.uk) Received: from jvds.demon.co.uk ([212.228.151.253] helo=bitch.localdomain) by thor.65535.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A3duV-0002aA-AE; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 08:56:35 -0700 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:00:13 +0100 (BST) From: Rus Foster X-X-Sender: rghf@bitch.localdomain To: Ekrem In-Reply-To: <1064761546.65061.4.camel@beynam.ecko.net.au> Message-ID: References: <1064761546.65061.4.camel@beynam.ecko.net.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Sendmail: Do I need it running? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:58:21 -0000 On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Ekrem wrote: > Hi people, > > I'm using FreeBSD on my standalone desktop PC. I use dialup for the > internet and use Evolution as the email client, but the following 2 > processes always running; > > sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) > sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) > > Do they need to be running for things like daily/weekly cron jobs that > send emails to root, or for any other purpose? No if you aren't using SMTP to receive email from outside your can disable these by putting sendmail_enable="no" in /etc/rc.conf then just kill of the processes Rus -- w: http://www.jvds.com | Free Debian UNIX Shell Accounts e: rghf@jvds.com | http://www.jvds.com/freeshells t: +44 7919 373537 | t: 1-888-327-6330 | email: sales@jvds.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 09:02:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B462B16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:02:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.30.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C5343FF3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:02:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mbsd@pacbell.net) Received: from atlas (adsl-64-166-23-243.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.166.23.243])h8SG25w5001004; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:02:06 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:02:05 -0700 (PDT) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mikko_Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= X-X-Sender: mikko@atlas.home To: Per olof Ljungmark In-Reply-To: <3F76C421.1000104@intersonic.se> Message-ID: <20030928084915.Q44010@atlas.home> References: <3F76B9B3.6030805@intersonic.se> <00f701c385ad$c9a18cb0$0201a8c0@dredster> <3F76C421.1000104@intersonic.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to get system information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:02:08 -0000 On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > >> > >>I am wondering how to find out system hardware information from a > >>running system, I know for instance pciconf(8) but what are the > >>corresponding ones for memory, cpu etc? > >> > > > > > > more /var/run/dmesg.boot to get the info at boot time. > > vmstat 5 5 will give you 5 items 5 sconds apart to show you procs, memory, > > page, disks, faults and cpu info. > > > > Thanks, that was a good start. Now, if I wanted to see more detailed > info on the processor than the dmesg.boot output: > > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 > > Like cache size etc.? You should be able to get some cpu info with ports/sysutils/x86info. Dunno about memory (its physical configuration, that is). USB devices can be listed with "usbdevs", pci ones with "pciconf", ATA devices with "atacontrol", SCSI ones with "camcontrol", XFree prints lots of info on your graphics card into /var/run/XFree86.0.log. Also, some of the values detected at boot end up as sysctls (usually under "hw"). I know of no simple way to get complete hardware information on a silver platter, though. Nor do I really care :-) $.02, /Mikko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 09:31:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856E216A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:31:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854FF44001 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:31:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nkinkade@[206.26.199.146]) Received: from mail.messagingengine.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B892337B0; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:28:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 10.202.2.150 ([10.202.2.150] helo=mail.messagingengine.com) by messagingengine.com with SMTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:28:33 -0400 X-Epoch: 1064766513 X-Sasl-enc: X9/zIacxZ0gTxvdkQbFJMw Received: from [206.26.199.146] (unknown [206.26.199.146]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E4222AF0A; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:28:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nkinkade by [206.26.199.146] with local (Exim 4.12) id 1A3YGV-0000sg-00; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:54:55 +0000 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:54:55 +0000 From: Nathan Kinkade To: Bryan Cassidy Message-ID: <20030928095455.GD696@npkfbsd> Mail-Followup-To: Bryan Cassidy , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20030928014311.2f915578.b_cassidy@bellsouth.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030928014311.2f915578.b_cassidy@bellsouth.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: Nathan Kinkade cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gaim X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nathan Kinkade List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:31:03 -0000 --jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 01:43:11AM -0500, Bryan Cassidy wrote: > Has anyone had problems connecting to Yahoo on Gaim for the last couple d= ays? >=20 > Gaim v0.68 As soon as my Gaim client quit connecting to the Yahoo! Messenger service I read up on the issue, promptly dumped the Yahoo! account and went straight to jabber.org. Problem is, it's not much use if none of the people I know are using jabber. Time will tell if I'm able to convice friends, co-workers and family to quit using the proprietary services and move to jabber. Nathan --=20 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys D8527E49 --jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/dq/vO0ZIEthSfkkRAq1LAKCux7eFSrqCReM0raa9IHMn1FII1ACgtySz 36YmTZGXB6t9cTqFYNgVs0c= =9v7O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jL2BoiuKMElzg3CS-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 09:49:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88E016A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:49:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lilzmailfe02.liwest.at (lilzmailfe02.liwest.at [212.33.55.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CE34400F for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:49:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm58-27.liwest.at ([212.33.58.27]) by lilzmailfe02.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1A3ejV-0004mW-0c for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:49:17 +0200 From: Daniela To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:45:39 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309281845.39349.dgw@liwest.at> Subject: Problems with audio recording X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:49:19 -0000 Probably a stupid question: I need to record sound and it just won't work. I set the recording level to 75:75 and the recording source to "Line" (I'm not sure this is correct), and I tried sox, cat /dev/dsp > file, aurecord and numerous graphical recording utilities. I don't get any error messages, I just get silence. I have already searched the mailing list archives and documentation, but nothing helped. Best regards, Daniela From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 09:55:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DB716A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE3A43FDF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:55:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h8SGtSw02610; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:55:29 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: "nw1" Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:55:28 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <028b01c385d4$61ab40c0$0300a8c0@install> <200309280833.17782.kstewart@owt.com> <02a701c385d8$76d3d490$0300a8c0@install> In-Reply-To: <02a701c385d8$76d3d490$0300a8c0@install> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309280955.28483.kstewart@owt.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update to earlier post (corrections) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:55:37 -0000 On Sunday 28 September 2003 08:52 am, nw1 wrote: > It will work with both moused and usbd specified in /etc/rc.conf. > > There is one thing i forgot to mention on that page: This install > was created using another motherboard. The hdd's were transfered to > this gigabyte motherboard. We have also tried doing a fresh install > with the gigabyte board and enabling the same entries as posted on > http://69.3.136.141/freebsd/usb_mouse.txt. In doing so the mouse > works, which proves both usbd and moused can be enabled. > > My issue is it doesn't work at all now and I really can't do a fresh > install. Recently i tried rm /dev/ums0 and recreating it, that still > hasn't worked. What do you have setup in XF86Config for the protocol and mouse. Kent > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kent Stewart" > To: "nw1" ; > Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 11:33 AM > Subject: Re: Update to earlier post (corrections) > > > On Sunday 28 September 2003 08:22 am, nw1 wrote: > > > There were errors in an earlier post with a subject: FreeBSD > > > 4.8-P10 --Mouse doesn't move in the console or XFree86-- > > > > > > The udated particulars are posted at: > > > 69.3.136.141/freebsd/usb_mouse.txt > > > > BTW, if you had added http://69.. we could click and browse your > > text file. > > > > > > > > I was always under the impression that you enabled moused or usbd > > but not both. > > > > Kent > > > > -- > > Kent Stewart > > Richland, WA > > > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 10:04:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0390216A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:04:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E993B44005 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:04:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nkinkade@[206.26.199.146]) Received: from mail.messagingengine.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DF523337F; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:01:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 10.202.2.150 ([10.202.2.150] helo=mail.messagingengine.com) by messagingengine.com with SMTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:01:36 -0400 X-Mail-from: nkinkade@[206.26.199.146] X-Epoch: 1064768496 X-Sasl-enc: 4hdGQH09jdu0ZWCI6QttqQ Received: from [206.26.199.146] (unknown [206.26.199.146]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49EA232D17; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:01:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nkinkade by [206.26.199.146] with local (Exim 4.12) id 1A3YmU-0000v7-00; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:27:58 +0000 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:27:58 +0000 From: Nathan Kinkade To: Nick Holley Message-ID: <20030928102758.GF696@npkfbsd> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Holley , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20030926123719.GC66628@npkfbsd> <3F7518C4.7070404@imap.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VuQYccsttdhdIfIP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F7518C4.7070404@imap.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: Nathan Kinkade cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: audio problem - /dev/dsp: op. not supported by device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nathan Kinkade List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:04:21 -0000 --VuQYccsttdhdIfIP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 12:57:40AM -0400, Nick Holley wrote: > Nathan Kinkade wrote: >=20 > >I recently upgraded my system from 4.8-STABLE to 5.1-RELEASE. I haven't > >had any problems except with XMMS. Randomly XMMS will fail after it > >finishes playing a song and before it has started the next - the error > >dialog says "Couldn't open audio" in the title bar. The message that > >shows up on the console is: > > > >** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): > >Operation not supported by device > > > >If I repeatedly hit the play button it will eventually play the next > >song. Sometimes it will play 4 or 5 songs consecutively without a > >problem, and other times the problem arises after each song. I have > >tried deinstalling XMMS and then recompiling, but still nothing. I have > >also tried `fstat | grep dsp', but nothing appears to be using the > >/dev/dsp. Does anyone have any ideas what might be wrong? > > > >Thanks, > >Nathan > >=20 > > > As bad as I feel for you, I am so glad someone else is having this=20 > problems with 5.1. Every time I see a sound error (quite often), I want= =20 > to stomp the shit out of my computer. >=20 > Ok, frustration aside, I am getting the exact same error as you with=20 > xmms at the same times (after the completion of a song). I don't know=20 > what hardware you are running, but I have an Asus A7N8X with onboard=20 > sound using the pcm sound driver. The sound problems also crop up with=20 > mplayer, sometimes at the beginning of a movie, but also when I pause=20 > and unpause. Snes9x has issues as well with the sound stopping and being= =20 > unable to restart as such: >=20 > GSnes9x-WARNING **: A error has ocurred when tried to resume Esound. >=20 > Note that the gui is just redisplaying the error the snes9x core gives. >=20 > I'm sure this is a bug in 5.1, but I haven't collected enough=20 > information to approach a developer even if I knew who to approach.=20 > Actually, I don't really have a method for collecting information=20 > either; I was just hoping to send someone all the error messages I=20 > receive and then do what they need to solve the problem. >=20 > This is a serious issue for me so if you need, I will be more than=20 > willing to help out in any way I can. >=20 > Nick Ok, it may be to soon to mark my problem as resolved, but after deinstalling and recompiling XMMS and all of it's dependencies the problem appears to be fixed. Well, I have now played about 10 or 12 songs in a row without problem, which would have never been the case before. While I was at it I went ahead and totally rebuilt X also. One strange occurence was when I first launched XMMS after the rebuild immediately the "Couldn't open audio" dialog popped up, but since that one incident it hasn't happed again. Keeping my fingers crossed ... Nathan --=20 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys D8527E49 --VuQYccsttdhdIfIP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/dreuO0ZIEthSfkkRAogIAJ9iX+QmXPZKQielDJ5ocpJg4GooBgCggQU5 K8ktuhTfE5SenngArTkSUgg= =SnFp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VuQYccsttdhdIfIP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 10:20:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B198216A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:20:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp03.wxs.nl (smtp03.wxs.nl [195.121.6.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD31D44001 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:20:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from akruijff@www.kruijff.org) Received: from kruij557.speed.planet.nl (ipd50a97ba.speed.planet.nl [213.10.151.186]) by smtp03.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HLX008KDPG0VV@smtp03.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:19:12 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Intranet.lan (akruijff@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h8SHKHQL016561;akruijff@Intranet.lan) Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by Intranet.lan (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h8SHKHd2016559; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:20:17 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:20:16 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff In-reply-to: <200309272104.47949.tbstep@tampabay.rr.com> To: Todd Stephens Message-id: <20030928172016.GA16451@dds.nl> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i References: <200309271659.50019.tbstep@tampabay.rr.com> <20030927234350.GB94873@dds.nl> <200309272104.47949.tbstep@tampabay.rr.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port installation methods X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:20:21 -0000 On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:04:47PM -0400, Todd Stephens wrote: > On Saturday 27 September 2003 07:43 pm, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > > > > If you've just installed a fresh FreeBSD system then there isn't > > much difference. I offten use the make method in this case. But I > > switch to portinstall and portupgrade if I a) have updated /usr/ports > > and b) have installed any port or package. The reason for this is > > that portinstall and portupgrade have a better port management > > system. This package/port detects for you changes. With out the > > portupgrade package you will find that multiple version of the same > > packages will be registered and only one is installed. (There is only > > one installed because each override the other fysicaly in /usr/local > > and /usr/X11R6 but not in the regerstry.) > > I see. I have already run into that (having 2 versions of a package > registered but only one installed). I have recently started using > portinstall for installing ports. I have been using portupgrade for a > while now. It seems to me that portinstall (as you indicated) is > better at finding and fixing dependency issues as well. > There port also include special tools to rebuild your regerstry. I have this running by default after updating my cvs sources. The tool is called portsdb (options -uU). I run portsclean (options -DLP) to remove distfiles, libiaries and packages that are no longer needed. -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 10:38:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1404016A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:38:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp01.wxs.nl (smtp01.wxs.nl [195.121.6.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9126544013 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:38:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from akruijff@www.kruijff.org) Received: from kruij557.speed.planet.nl (ipd50a97ba.speed.planet.nl [213.10.151.186]) by smtp01.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HLX0046QQBBS3@smtp01.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:37:59 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Intranet.lan (akruijff@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h8SHbxQL016773 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:37:59 +0200 (CEST envelope-from akruijff@Intranet.lan) Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by Intranet.lan (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h8SHbxW7016772 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:37:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:37:59 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20030928173759.GA16713@dds.nl> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Q: Compiles for wrong processor and it still worked X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:38:02 -0000 I have compiles my world sources for the PIII processors. I have recently discoverd that i have a number of PII processors. The compiled code for PIII still works on them. I'm ammazed. :o Can anybody explain why? I include this in to /etc/make.conf CPUTYPE=p3 -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 10:41:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C7816A4C1 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp01.web.de [217.72.192.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74354400E for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:41:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from christian.serb@web.de) Received: from [217.228.10.96] (helo=carnivor) by smtp.web.de with esmtp (WEB.DE 4.99 #448) id 1A3fXd-0003gW-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:41:05 +0200 From: "christian serb" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:40:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <3F77393D.7777.1B3E57A@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20030927235137.GD94873@dds.nl> References: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.12a) Sender: christian.serb@web.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: can FreeBSD run dos X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:41:07 -0000 i've coincidentally found that: Xdos is available at 1. sunsite.unc.edu /pub/Linux/Incoming (will probably be moved to /pub/Linux/ALPHA/dosemu ) source: http://groups.google.de/groups?q=xdos&hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF- 8&newwindow=1&selm=2ji219%24qkv%40klaava.Helsinki.FI&rnum=1 > On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:51:50AM -0500, fred wrote: > > I am new to different OS's . > > Can this Os run Wordperfect 5.1 for dos??? > > You can use vmware2 (version 3 works only for FreeBSD 5.x) to run a > vertual machine. This way you could run your old programs. > > -- > Alex > > Articles based on solutions that I use: > http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 10:44:11 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4966816A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:44:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp07.wxs.nl (smtp07.wxs.nl [195.121.6.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AD244034 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:44:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from akruijff@www.kruijff.org) Received: from kruij557.speed.planet.nl (ipd50a97ba.speed.planet.nl [213.10.151.186]) by smtp07.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HLX009SOQLKIL@smtp07.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:44:08 +0200 (MEST) Received: from Intranet.lan (akruijff@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h8SHi7QL016834;akruijff@Intranet.lan) Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by Intranet.lan (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h8SHi76T016833; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:44:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:44:06 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff In-reply-to: <020f01c385b5$668dce10$0300a8c0@install> To: nw1 Message-id: <20030928174406.GB16713@dds.nl> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i References: <020f01c385b5$668dce10$0300a8c0@install> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.8-P10 --Mouse doesn't move in the console or XFree86-- X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-reply@akruijff.dds.nl, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:44:11 -0000 On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 07:41:04AM -0400, nw1 wrote: > Neither mouse will work in the console or in XFree86. > > Gigabyte GA-6BXDS = main board > BIOS= AWARD (2A69KG01) ver. 4.51PG > > In the PCI/ISA section of the BIOS, a USB setting of: "Assign IRQ For USB: Enabled" (is > set) > There is also a "USB Keyboard Support" setting within the BIOS's "INTERGRATED > PEROPHERALS" section; I have tried this setting to both "Enabled and Disabled". > > There aren't any other USB settings in this BIOS. > > We are using these devices that are known working devices. > Mouse-1 is: Logitech | model: M-BD58 | optical corded wheel > Mouse-2 is: Logitech | model: M-RM67A | Optical cordless wheel > > Our Kernel: > # USB support > device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface > device usb # USB Bus (required) > device ums # Mouse > pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support > > Our /etc/rc.conf: > # grep -i mouse /etc/rc.conf > moused_enable="YES" > moused_port="/dev/ums0" > # grep -i usb /etc/rc.conf > usbd_enable="YES" > > Our /dev: > ls -l /dev | grep -i ums > crw-rw---- 1 root operator 111, 0 Sep 27 13:16 ums0 > > dmesg reports: > # dmesg | grep -i usb > uhci0: port 0xa000-0xa01f irq 10 at device 7.2 > on pci0 > usb0: on uhci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > ums0: Logitech USB Mouse, rev 1.10/6.10, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > > Upon booting into the OS, using the above BIOS, and other settings --with either of the > above devices; the mouse is seen on screen, but it refuse to respond while moving the > hand-held device. Should we unplug one mouse (from either usb port) to test the other > mouse, we receive the following on-screen message(s), respectively of the motherboards USB > port we were using: > > uhub0: device problem, disabling port 2 > uhub0: device problem, disabling port 1 > > When we plug the devices back in to either of the motherboards mouse ports, there's no > indication at all, from the OS, that a USB device was attached. > > Reminder: these devices are in perfect working order. It seems to be in order. As i see it thare are two posibilties. 1) Your mouse isn't supported or 2) There is a (new) bug in the system. Did it work on previous version of FreeBSD? -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 10:50:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B5716A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.covadmail.net (mx04.covadmail.net [63.65.120.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39D854404B for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:50:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from network101@covad.net) Received: (covad.net 5513 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2003 17:50:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO install) (network101@69.3.136.141) by sun-qmail13 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2003 17:50:37 -0000 Message-ID: <02e101c385e9$141328e0$0300a8c0@install> From: "nw1" To: , References: <020f01c385b5$668dce10$0300a8c0@install> <20030928174406.GB16713@dds.nl> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:51:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.8-P10 --Mouse doesn't move in the console or XFree86-- X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:50:44 -0000 Alex: please see the update/corrections to this post at http://69.3.136.141/freebsd/usb_mouse.txt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex de Kruijff" To: "nw1" Cc: Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 1:44 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.8-P10 --Mouse doesn't move in the console or XFree86-- > On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 07:41:04AM -0400, nw1 wrote: > > Neither mouse will work in the console or in XFree86. > > > > Gigabyte GA-6BXDS = main board > > BIOS= AWARD (2A69KG01) ver. 4.51PG > > > > In the PCI/ISA section of the BIOS, a USB setting of: "Assign IRQ For USB: Enabled" (is > > set) > > There is also a "USB Keyboard Support" setting within the BIOS's "INTERGRATED > > PEROPHERALS" section; I have tried this setting to both "Enabled and Disabled". > > > > There aren't any other USB settings in this BIOS. > > > > We are using these devices that are known working devices. > > Mouse-1 is: Logitech | model: M-BD58 | optical corded wheel > > Mouse-2 is: Logitech | model: M-RM67A | Optical cordless wheel > > > > Our Kernel: > > # USB support > > device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface > > device usb # USB Bus (required) > > device ums # Mouse > > pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support > > > > Our /etc/rc.conf: > > # grep -i mouse /etc/rc.conf > > moused_enable="YES" > > moused_port="/dev/ums0" > > # grep -i usb /etc/rc.conf > > usbd_enable="YES" > > > > Our /dev: > > ls -l /dev | grep -i ums > > crw-rw---- 1 root operator 111, 0 Sep 27 13:16 ums0 > > > > dmesg reports: > > # dmesg | grep -i usb > > uhci0: port 0xa000-0xa01f irq 10 at device 7.2 > > on pci0 > > usb0: on uhci0 > > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > > ums0: Logitech USB Mouse, rev 1.10/6.10, addr 2, iclass 3/1 > > > > Upon booting into the OS, using the above BIOS, and other settings --with either of the > > above devices; the mouse is seen on screen, but it refuse to respond while moving the > > hand-held device. Should we unplug one mouse (from either usb port) to test the other > > mouse, we receive the following on-screen message(s), respectively of the motherboards USB > > port we were using: > > > > uhub0: device problem, disabling port 2 > > uhub0: device problem, disabling port 1 > > > > When we plug the devices back in to either of the motherboards mouse ports, there's no > > indication at all, from the OS, that a USB device was attached. > > > > Reminder: these devices are in perfect working order. > > It seems to be in order. As i see it thare are two posibilties. 1) Your > mouse isn't supported or 2) There is a (new) bug in the system. > > Did it work on previous version of FreeBSD? > > -- > Alex > > Articles based on solutions that I use: > http://www.kruijff.org/alex/index.php?dir=docs/FreeBSD/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 10:52:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC19E16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:52:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h76n3fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [213.67.148.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C41644048 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:52:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: (qmail 95458 invoked by uid 1001); 28 Sep 2003 17:52:00 -0000 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:51:59 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Alex de Kruijff Message-ID: <20030928175159.GA95425@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Alex de Kruijff , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20030928173759.GA16713@dds.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030928173759.GA16713@dds.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Q: Compiles for wrong processor and it still worked X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:52:05 -0000 On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 07:37:59PM +0200, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > I have compiles my world sources for the PIII processors. I have > recently discoverd that i have a number of PII processors. The compiled > code for PIII still works on them. I'm ammazed. :o Can anybody explain why? The reason why it worked is obviously that the compiler didn't generate any PIII-only instructions in the code. The only real difference between PII and PIII is that the PIII has support for SSE, which most compilers don't use anyway, so it is not very amazing that code compiled for a PIII worked on a PII. If you are running -stable it is even less amazing since the compiler included in 4.x is too old to know how to optimize for the PIII, so it will generate identical code for all the processors based on the P6 micro-architecture (i.e the Pentium Pro, Pentium II and Pentium III) as well as for the newer Pentium 4. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 10:52:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2E716A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gaff.hhhr.ision.net (gaff.hhhr.ision.net [195.180.9.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77194400B for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:52:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ohoyer@gaff.hhhr.ision.net) Received: from gaff.hhhr.ision.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gaff.hhhr.ision.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8SHqvJM034015 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:52:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohoyer@gaff.hhhr.ision.net) Received: from localhost (ohoyer@localhost)h8SHqvdb034012; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:52:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:52:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Olaf Hoyer To: Darryl Hoar In-Reply-To: <001c01c38521$47318af0$0701a8c0@darryl> Message-ID: <20030928195126.V33756@gaff.hhhr.ision.net> References: <001c01c38521$47318af0$0701a8c0@darryl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Burn an ISO image X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:52:55 -0000 On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Darryl Hoar wrote: > Well, > after the bug of the day drill, I'm replacing windows with Freebsd. > I want to install the most recent stable version of 4.8. > > I downloaded the mini.iso (as per the instructions), but I am > still on windows (with the Roxio burner software - yeah crap). > How do I burn the iso image to CD such that I can boot up > the install ? Hi! Roxio (i Think thats the adaptec supplied software) has IIRC the option to burn "raw" CD images. There shall be an option to specify that you want to burn a raw data image, usually a .raw or whatever data type, simply fit in your .iso and fire the program up. HTH Olaf -- Olaf Hoyer ohoyer@gaff.hhhr.ision.net Fuerchterliche Erlebniss geben zu raten, ob der, welcher sie erlebt, nicht etwas Fuerchterliches ist. (Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Boese) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 10:54:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC1D16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:54:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5C644025 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 10:54:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h8SHs6M3076555; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:54:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:54:06 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Alex de Kruijff Message-ID: <20030928175405.GF25442@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20030928173759.GA16713@dds.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030928173759.GA16713@dds.nl> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Q: Compiles for wrong processor and it still worked X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:54:20 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 28), Alex de Kruijff said: > I have compiles my world sources for the PIII processors. I have > recently discoverd that i have a number of PII processors. The compiled > code for PIII still works on them. I'm ammazed. :o Can anybody explain why? > > I include this in to /etc/make.conf 686, pII, p3, and p4 are all basically the same instruction set. the later versions add more MMX and SEE operations, and I don't believe gcc generates code that uses them. The different arch flags probably just change the instruction timing tables. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 11:22:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFC516A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2063643FE1 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:22:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nkinkade@[206.26.199.146]) Received: from mail.messagingengine.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E38234B6F for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:22:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 10.202.2.150 ([10.202.2.150] helo=mail.messagingengine.com) by messagingengine.com with SMTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:22:16 -0400 X-Epoch: 1064773336 X-Sasl-enc: XlLxh8W/DU//VJSTjVt8UQ Received: from [206.26.199.146] (unknown [206.26.199.146]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EC9D234B7D for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:22:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nkinkade by [206.26.199.146] with local (Exim 4.12) id 1A3a2Y-0001IS-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:48:38 +0000 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:48:38 +0000 From: Nathan Kinkade To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030928114838.GG696@npkfbsd> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20030926123719.GC66628@npkfbsd> <3F7518C4.7070404@imap.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V32M1hWVjliPHW+c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F7518C4.7070404@imap.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: Nathan Kinkade Subject: Re: audio problem - /dev/dsp: op. not supported by device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nathan Kinkade List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:22:20 -0000 --V32M1hWVjliPHW+c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Ok, it may be to soon to mark my problem as resolved, but after > deinstalling and recompiling XMMS and all of it's dependencies the > problem appears to be fixed. Well, I have now played about 10 or 12 > songs in a row without problem, which would have never been the case > before. While I was at it I went ahead and totally rebuilt X also. One > strange occurence was when I first launched XMMS after the rebuild > immediately the "Couldn't open audio" dialog popped up, but since that > one incident it hasn't happed again. Keeping my fingers crossed ... >=20 > Nathan Ok, I spoke too soon. The problem still exists. Thanks, Nathan --=20 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys D8527E49 --V32M1hWVjliPHW+c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/dsqWO0ZIEthSfkkRAvyFAKDPVy4Wa7L8dWmjWSi8J0xRPTgNWACdEuu/ 9bdpwgqr2rFIYwV6TIDjqhA= =hIbU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V32M1hWVjliPHW+c-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 11:32:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAAD16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web40402.mail.yahoo.com (web40402.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64A1F44013 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:32:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from catlord17@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030928183244.39466.qmail@web40402.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.75.82.188] by web40402.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:32:44 PDT Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:32:44 -0700 (PDT) From: RexFelis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Problems Bootstrapping FreeBSD Java while Making OpenOffice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:32:45 -0000 Hello all, I am attempting to build OpenOffice from ports. (Running FreeBSD 5.1-p5) So far I've been able to figure out how to fix everything else that stopped the build, but this just leaves me lost. I don't have a clue what this refers to. The script capture of the error message is: --------------------------------------- Script started on Sun Sep 28 14:17:54 2003 primus# make WITH_BSD_JDK=TRUE install clean ===> openoffice-1.0.3_2 depends on executable: gcc32 - found ===> openoffice-1.0.3_2 depends on file: /usr/local/jdk1.3.1/bin/java - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/jdk1.3.1/bin/java in /usr/ports/java/jdk13 ===> Building for jdk-1.3.1p8_2 # Start of jdk build i386 Build started: 1.3.1-p8-shannon-030928-14:18 ERROR: Your BOOTDIR environment variable does not point to a valid Java 2 SDK for bootstrapping this build. A Java 2 SDK 1.3.1 build must be bootstrapped against any 1.3 build. Please update your ALT_BOOTDIR setting, or just unset it, and start your build again. Exiting because of the above error(s). gmake: *** [sanity] Error 1 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk13. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice. primus# exit exit Script done on Sun Sep 28 14:18:08 2003 --------------------------------------- I read in the archives that someone suggested using 'make WITH_LINUX_BOOTSTRAP=yes install clean', but would that work if I am already using 'make WITH_BSD_JDK=TRUE install clean'? Should I use make WITH_BSD_JDK=TRUE WITH_LINUX_BOOTSTRAP=yes install clean' or am I missing something entirely? Please help. Thanks in advance. Very confused, Shannon __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 12:15:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C93516A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from corpweb.trip.net (corpweb.trip.net [216.139.64.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5637744025 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:15:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhull@digitaloverload.net) Received: from localhost.localdomain (1Cust51.tnt2.anchorage.ak.da.uu.net [65.239.41.51]) by corpweb.trip.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h8SJFfAK090231 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:15:42 -0500 (CDT) From: Damien Hull To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.5 Date: 28 Sep 2003 11:15:41 -0800 Message-Id: <1064776543.21655.19.camel@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 Subject: Installing Apache from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:15:45 -0000 I need Apache installed with php. I see mod_php or something in the ports. I plan on jumping in and running make install. That should give me Apache with php ready to go. What should I do if I need to add another something else to Apache? Can I just go back to the ports and select something? NOTE I'm running 4.9 which I got while upgrading to the stable 4.x branch. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 12:17:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BCC16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:17:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thor.65535.net (thor.65535.net [216.17.104.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2DB4402B for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:17:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rghf@fsck.me.uk) Received: from jvds.demon.co.uk ([212.228.151.253] helo=bitch.localdomain) by thor.65535.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A3h1Y-0005Cf-5m; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:16:04 -0700 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:19:42 +0100 (BST) From: Rus Foster X-X-Sender: rghf@bitch.localdomain To: Damien Hull In-Reply-To: <1064776543.21655.19.camel@debian> Message-ID: References: <1064776543.21655.19.camel@debian> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Apache from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:17:50 -0000 On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Damien Hull wrote: > I need Apache installed with php. I see mod_php or something in the > ports. I plan on jumping in and running make install. That should give > me Apache with php ready to go. > > What should I do if I need to add another something else to Apache? > > Can I just go back to the ports and select something? > > NOTE > I'm running 4.9 which I got while upgrading to the stable 4.x branch. > If you install mod_php4 it will install Apache as a dependancy so you will get everything installed Rgds Rus -- w: http://www.jvds.com | Virtual Dedicated Servers from $15/mo e: rghf@jvds.com | Dontations made to Debian, FreeBSD t: +44 7919 373537 | and Slackware t: 1-888-327-6330 | email: sales@jvds.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 12:26:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F5816A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp08.wxs.nl (smtp08.wxs.nl [195.121.6.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C2C43FAF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:26:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pblok@inter.NL.net) Received: from bsdpc (ip503cf841.speed.planet.nl [80.60.248.65]) by smtp08.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HLX000T9VAN88@smtp08.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:25:36 +0200 (MEST) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:26:53 +0200 From: "Peter J. Blok" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, pblok@inter.NL.net Message-id: <200309282126.53992.pblok@inter.NL.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 Subject: multiple ISP, one default gw X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:26:56 -0000 Hi, I have two ISP, one gives my a dynamic IP and has the default route thru DHCP. The other has a fixed IP and obviously no default route. I would like to place a webserver behind the fixed IP address, but it is not able to answer because there is no route defined to the webclient. The default route is somewhere else and the request on port 80 can come from anywhere. On Solaris this works because it learns the route and creates a host route back. Can you do this on FreeBSD as well? Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 12:27:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D31D16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.franklee.net (203.141.149.2.user.ad.il24.net [203.141.149.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC2943F85 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:27:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@franklee.net) Received: from www.franklee.net (localhost.franklee.net [127.0.0.1]) by www.franklee.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h8T4Rgqi000951 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 04:27:42 GMT (envelope-from frank@franklee.net) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Frank Lee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 04:27:41 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200309290427.41673.frank@franklee.net> Subject: How to mount USB drive in FreeBSD 5.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank@franklee.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:27:09 -0000 Hi all. My first FreeBSD post. :-) I have a USB drive (Win95 formatted) that I'm trying to dd data off of. - FreeBSD 5.0-Release - USB 2.0/1.1 drive. - laptop is 1.1 How do I mount this USB drive? I done it on 4.7 with MAKEDEV and all, but= =20 can't find any info on getting it to mount in 5.0 (no MAKEDEV and all). Thank you, Frank Lee P.S. Normally, I've been able to find answers for all my FreeBSD question= s=20 documented or in mailling lists somewhere, but can't find info on this fo= r=20 some reason. If you could provide the syntax and/or link, it would be muc= h=20 appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 12:37:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD83916A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:37:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remt19.cluster1.charter.net (remt19.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.8.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1060344011 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:37:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chowse@charter.net) Received: from [66.168.145.25] (HELO moe) by remt19.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 6378373 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:37:43 -0400 From: "Charles Howse" To: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:37:37 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c385f7$f948a5d0$04fea8c0@moe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01C385CE.10742470" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Comparing buildworld times on twin machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:37:48 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C385CE.10742470 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have 2 machines on my home network with (almost) identical hardware. They both have Celeron 300, same motherboards, same BIOS, same options set in BIOS, etc. Same make.conf, same kernel config. =20 I kill SETI@home before starting on each machine. The only difference is that curly has 128 MB ram where larry has only 64. They *do not*, however have identical hard drives, even though each machine has 2 drives, with /usr/obj on the second drive of each machine. When I buildworld, I use the following command, and write the output to '$blog'. [portion of script omitted, entire script is attached as update1.sh] \time -aho $$blog make buildworld [snip] Larry can buildworld in 1 hr 57 mins. It takes curly 3 hrs 16 mins, even though curly has twice the ram. If I watch the compile, with one eye on the disk activity light, it seems to me that the process is largely CPU intensive, therefore I would expect that the buildworld times should be roughly equal. 1) How can I determine what might be causing curly to take so long compared to larry? 2) Since curly runs httpd, and vsftpd, is it acceptable to run the entire build/install process in single-user mode in order to prevent other processes from eating CPU cycles? Thanks, Charles Got a computer with idle CPU time? Join SETI@home and help make history! http://setiathome.ssl.berkeley.edu/ ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C385CE.10742470 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="update1.sh" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="update1.sh" #!/usr/local/bin/bash=0A= #=0A= # Update the system, run in multi-user mode.=0A= #=0A= # Checks the exit status of all important commands,=0A= # Exits on exit status of anything other than 0, =0A= # Prints the name of the command that failed.=0A= # Logs the last 10 lines of screen output for important commands.=0A= =0A= blog=3D/var/log/build/build-`date "+%m-%d-%Y"`.log=0A= =0A= bailout() {=0A= if [ "$?" -ne 0 ] ; then=0A= echo "Update1 has bailed out!!"=0A= echo "The command that failed was..."=0A= echo $cmd=0A= exit 1=0A= fi=0A= }=0A= =0A= echo -n "Have you read /usr/src/UPDATING? [y/n]: "=0A= read a=0A= if [ "$a" =3D n ] ; then=0A= less /usr/src/UPDATING=0A= exit 2=0A= fi=0A= =0A= echo -n "Have you merged /etc/group and /usr/src/etc/group? [y/n]: "=0A= read b=0A= if [ "$b" =3D n ] ; then=0A= diff -c /etc/group /usr/src/etc/group | less=0A= exit 3=0A= fi=0A= =0A= echo -n "Have you merged /etc/master.passwd and = /usr/src/etc/master.passwd? [y/n]: "=0A= read c=0A= if [ "$c" =3D n ] ; then=0A= diff -c /etc/master.passwd /usr/src/etc/master.passwd=0A= exit 4=0A= fi=0A= =0A= cmd=3D"cp /disk2/larry/etc/make.conf /etc"=0A= cp /disk2/larry/etc/make.conf /etc=0A= bailout=0A= =0A= cmd=3D"cp /disk2/larry/usr/src/sys/i386/conf/CUSTOM = /usr/src/sys/i386/conf"=0A= cp /disk2/larry/usr/src/sys/i386/conf/CUSTOM /usr/src/sys/i386/conf=0A= bailout=0A= =0A= cmd=3D"Clean out /usr/obj"=0A= echo -n "Clean out /usr/obj? [y/n]: "=0A= read d=0A= if [ "$d" =3D y ] ; then=0A= cd /usr/obj=0A= chflags -R noschg *=0A= rm -rf *=0A= fi=0A= bailout=0A= =0A= echo -n "Continue with build? [y/n]: "=0A= read e=0A= if [ "$e" =3D n ] ; then=0A= exit 5=0A= fi=0A= =0A= # Kill SETI@home=0A= kill `ps -aux | grep setia | grep -v grep | awk '{print $2}'`=0A= =0A= if [ ! -d /var/log/build ] ; then=0A= mkdir /var/log/build=0A= fi=0A= =0A= cmd=3D"make buildworld"=0A= cd /usr/src=0A= echo -n "Time for buildworld:" >> $blog=0A= \time -aho $blog make buildworld=0A= bailout=0A= =0A= cmd=3D"make kernel"=0A= echo -n "Time for make kernel:" >> $blog=0A= \time -aho $blog make kernel=0A= bailout=0A= =0A= echo "Reboot to single user mode and run /disk2/larry/bin/update2" ------=_NextPart_000_0001_01C385CE.10742470-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 12:39:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC4B16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:39:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.praemunio.com (mail.praemunio.com [66.179.47.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75C9744014 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:39:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@knobbe.us) Received: from pcp563961pcs.rthfrd01.tn.comcast.net (HELO mail.knobbe.us) (68.53.41.27) by mail.praemunio.com with SMTP; 28 Sep 2003 14:39:02 -0500 Received: from localhost (HELO frankslaptop) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Sep 2003 14:39:00 -0500 Received: from localhost (HELO ??) by localhost with SMTP; 28 Sep 2003 14:38:51 -0500 From: Frank Knobbe To: stan In-Reply-To: <20030928130525.GA25002@teddy.fas.com> References: <20030927191740.GA6978@teddy.fas.com> <20030928130525.GA25002@teddy.fas.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-HdSYpGFn+XAEP/UcW9ER" Message-Id: <1064777930.524.23.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:38:51 -0500 cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: cvsup + portupgrade Now no Gnome login X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:39:05 -0000 --=-HdSYpGFn+XAEP/UcW9ER Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 08:05, stan wrote: > BTW, out of curoisity, Did I need to delete the ~/.g[nc]* > filles/directories? If I had not would they have been auto upgraded? Your Gnome config files? No. Not unless you want to start with default settings :) > Looking foward to playing with Gnome 2.4, hope it's a step back twoard 1.= 4 > from 2.2, which I loathe. I'm not too thrilled with this upgrade. While it's nice to lock icons on panels (I also appreciate various bug fixes), I'm a bit miffled since it broke my pager. When I click in a workspace window in the pager, it switches to that workspace, but moves all windows around kinda funky. :( Oh well, still, I don't mind taking 3 steps forward and 1 back :) Regards, Frank --=-HdSYpGFn+XAEP/UcW9ER Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/dzjKpo+MRgtrF98RAjM3AKCSS6NVPuR7CjlQnHQFo6j7DYIh1wCfU95O djdS5Hy6FMxjFdbfx77Mm94= =+tmz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-HdSYpGFn+XAEP/UcW9ER-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 12:46:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4B816A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B9D14400E for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:46:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas.kohn@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 11079 invoked by uid 65534); 28 Sep 2003 19:46:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [172.16.32.190]) (212.204.32.190) by mail.gmx.net (mp026) with SMTP; 28 Sep 2003 21:46:28 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2431876 From: Andreas Kohn To: frank@franklee.net In-Reply-To: <200309290427.41673.frank@franklee.net> References: <200309290427.41673.frank@franklee.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064778399.939.10.camel@klamath> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:46:39 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to mount USB drive in FreeBSD 5.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:46:32 -0000 On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 06:27, Frank Lee wrote: > Hi all. My first FreeBSD post. :-) > > I have a USB drive (Win95 formatted) that I'm trying to dd data off of. > > - FreeBSD 5.0-Release > - USB 2.0/1.1 drive. > - laptop is 1.1 > > How do I mount this USB drive? I done it on 4.7 with MAKEDEV and all, but > can't find any info on getting it to mount in 5.0 (no MAKEDEV and all). > > Thank you, > Frank Lee > Hello, add umass (and scbus + da) to your kernel configuration (if not there already), and it should be autodetected. Mounting should work like in 4.7. In FreeBSD 5, devfs makes MAKEDEV unneccessary. If that still doesn't work, please post relevant messages to the list. HTH, -- Andreas Kohn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 13:02:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F8E16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:02:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA6143FDF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:02:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A3hkk-0004BF-00 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:02:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A3hkj-0004B7-00 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:02:45 +0200 Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A3hkj-000551-00 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:02:45 +0200 From: Kai Grossjohann Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:03:35 +0200 Lines: 281 Message-ID: <867k3s4r54.fsf@slowfox.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-=-=" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cPzTanK4RsZuw6A6Ux8DJlbeE5A= Sender: news Subject: Slow network connection in -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:02:52 -0000 --=-=-= I've noticed a certain slowness in doing network connections with -current. Can't explain this. While /usr/src/UPDATING does speak of slowness that I need to expect, this smells of another problem. I type "host mail.gmx.net" and it immediately comes back with an answer. I type "telnet mail.gmx.net pop3" and it takes many seconds before a connection is established. Once the connection is established, I see the greeting from the remote server quickly enough. I can't explain why it takes such a long time to establish the connection. I tried to investigate using "truss -f telnet mail.gmx.net pop3", but that produces an error message: kai@slowfox$ truss -f -d -o truss.out telnet mail.gmx.net pop3 truss: get_struct 0x0: Bad address kai@slowfox$ As you can see, I get a new prompt. However, after some seconds (sufficient for me to write this paragraph), I get more output which shows the greeting from the remote server. Hm. Indeed, a telnet process is running, says ps. Hmmm... Ah! Here is the additional output: kai@slowfox$ truss -f -d -o truss.out telnet mail.gmx.net pop3 truss: get_struct 0x0: Bad address kai@slowfox$ psg telnet kai 977 0.0 0.4 3500 2208 p0 S 10:00PM 0:00.04 telnet mail.gmx.net pop3 kai@slowfox$ Trying 213.165.64.20... Connected to mail.gmx.net. Escape character is '^]'. psg telnet+OK GMX POP3 StreamProxy ready <25890.1064779259@mp002> Looks weird, doesn't it? The "psg telnet" in the last line comes from me hitting Ctrl-P in bash at just the time the output arrived. In case you're interested in truss.out, I'm appending it to this message. Any ideas what might be wrong? tia, Kai --=-=-= Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=truss.out 977: 0.002124013 mmap(0x0,3480,0x3,0x1000,-1,0x0) = 671633408 (0x28085000) 977: 0.003305728 munmap(0x28085000,0xd98) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.004165334 __sysctl(0xbfbff5ac,0x2,0x28082e2c,0xbfbff5a8,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.005117410 mmap(0x0,32768,0x3,0x1002,-1,0x0) = 671633408 (0x28085000) 977: 0.005854934 issetugid() = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.007448433 open("/etc/libmap.conf",0x0,0666) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' 977: 0.008945830 open("/var/run/ld-elf.so.hints",0x0,00) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.009809347 read(0x4,0xbfbff644,0x80) = 128 (0x80) 977: 0.010828471 lseek(4,0x80,0) = 128 (0x80) 977: 0.011622986 read(0x4,0x28089000,0x56) = 86 (0x56) 977: 0.012491253 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.013809576 access("/lib/libncurses.so.5",0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.015083761 open("/lib/libncurses.so.5",0x0,027757773234) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.015894479 fstat(4,0xbfbff684) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.016713577 read(0x4,0x28081d80,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) 977: 0.018038326 mmap(0x0,262144,0x5,0x20002,4,0x0) = 671666176 (0x2808d000) 977: 0.018868041 mprotect(0x280c3000,0x1000,0x7) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.019754187 mprotect(0x280c3000,0x1000,0x5) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.020808790 mmap(0x280c4000,32768,0x3,0x12,4,0x37000) = 671891456 (0x280c4000) 977: 0.021858924 mmap(0x280cc000,4096,0x3,0x1012,-1,0x0) = 671924224 (0x280cc000) 977: 0.022688917 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.023943825 access("/lib/libipsec.so.1",0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.025212702 open("/lib/libipsec.so.1",0x0,027757773234) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.026015038 fstat(4,0xbfbff684) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.026833578 read(0x4,0x28081d80,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) 977: 0.027847115 mmap(0x0,28672,0x5,0x20002,4,0x0) = 671928320 (0x280cd000) 977: 0.028638277 mprotect(0x280d2000,0x1000,0x7) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.029568004 mprotect(0x280d2000,0x1000,0x5) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.030571204 mmap(0x280d3000,4096,0x3,0x12,4,0x5000) = 671952896 (0x280d3000) 977: 0.031491153 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.032812550 access("/lib/libmp.so.4",0) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' 977: 0.034070811 access("/usr/lib/libmp.so.4",0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.035338011 open("/usr/lib/libmp.so.4",0x0,027757773234) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.036142303 fstat(4,0xbfbff684) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.036962240 read(0x4,0x28081d80,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) 977: 0.037973821 mmap(0x0,16384,0x5,0x20002,4,0x0) = 671956992 (0x280d4000) 977: 0.038798227 mprotect(0x280d6000,0x1000,0x7) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.039680183 mprotect(0x280d6000,0x1000,0x5) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.040688412 mmap(0x280d7000,4096,0x3,0x12,4,0x2000) = 671969280 (0x280d7000) 977: 0.041609758 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.042859079 access("/lib/libcrypto.so.3",0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.044106444 open("/lib/libcrypto.so.3",0x0,027757773234) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.044904590 fstat(4,0xbfbff684) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.045713911 read(0x4,0x28081d80,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) 977: 0.046692247 mmap(0x0,1110016,0x5,0x20002,4,0x0) = 671973376 (0x280d8000) 977: 0.047481174 mprotect(0x281d0000,0x1000,0x7) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.048350559 mprotect(0x281d0000,0x1000,0x5) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.049602114 mmap(0x281d1000,81920,0x3,0x12,4,0xf8000) = 672993280 (0x281d1000) 977: 0.050668172 mmap(0x281e5000,8192,0x3,0x1012,-1,0x0) = 673075200 (0x281e5000) 977: 0.051495931 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.052829620 access("/lib/libcrypt.so.2",0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.054076426 open("/lib/libcrypt.so.2",0x0,027757773234) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.054877645 fstat(4,0xbfbff684) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.055693671 read(0x4,0x28081d80,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) 977: 0.056741010 mmap(0x0,102400,0x5,0x20002,4,0x0) = 673083392 (0x281e7000) 977: 0.057535804 mprotect(0x281ed000,0x1000,0x7) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.058413290 mprotect(0x281ed000,0x1000,0x5) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.059486052 mmap(0x281ee000,4096,0x3,0x12,4,0x7000) = 673112064 (0x281ee000) 977: 0.060539817 mmap(0x281ef000,69632,0x3,0x1012,-1,0x0) = 673116160 (0x281ef000) 977: 0.061364783 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.062613545 access("/lib/libpam.so.2",0) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' 977: 0.063873761 access("/usr/lib/libpam.so.2",0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.065182586 open("/usr/lib/libpam.so.2",0x0,027757773234) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.065989113 fstat(4,0xbfbff684) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.066808212 read(0x4,0x28081d80,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) 977: 0.067834040 mmap(0x0,28672,0x5,0x20002,4,0x0) = 673185792 (0x28200000) 977: 0.068629952 mprotect(0x28205000,0x1000,0x7) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.069540123 mprotect(0x28205000,0x1000,0x5) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.070532708 mmap(0x28206000,4096,0x3,0x12,4,0x6000) = 673210368 (0x28206000) 977: 0.071450143 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.072716784 access("/lib/libkrb5.so.6",0) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' 977: 0.073968060 access("/usr/lib/libkrb5.so.6",0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.075229673 open("/usr/lib/libkrb5.so.6",0x0,027757773234) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.076036200 fstat(4,0xbfbff684) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.076854740 read(0x4,0x28081d80,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) 977: 0.078136188 mmap(0x0,245760,0x5,0x20002,4,0x0) = 673214464 (0x28207000) 977: 0.078980429 mprotect(0x2823f000,0x1000,0x7) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.079878309 mprotect(0x2823f000,0x1000,0x5) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.080884861 mmap(0x28240000,8192,0x3,0x12,4,0x39000) = 673447936 (0x28240000) 977: 0.081959300 mmap(0x28242000,4096,0x3,0x1012,-1,0x0) = 673456128 (0x28242000) 977: 0.082792087 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.084043643 access("/lib/libasn1.so.6",0) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' 977: 0.085300227 access("/usr/lib/libasn1.so.6",0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.086564354 open("/usr/lib/libasn1.so.6",0x0,027757773234) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.087363618 fstat(4,0xbfbff684) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.088203110 read(0x4,0x28081d80,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) 977: 0.089442373 mmap(0x0,155648,0x5,0x20002,4,0x0) = 673460224 (0x28243000) 977: 0.090241358 mprotect(0x28267000,0x1000,0x7) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.091114653 mprotect(0x28267000,0x1000,0x5) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.092104444 mmap(0x28268000,4096,0x3,0x12,4,0x24000) = 673611776 (0x28268000) 977: 0.093022996 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.094268685 access("/lib/libcom_err.so.2",0) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' 977: 0.095544825 access("/usr/lib/libcom_err.so.2",0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.096805600 open("/usr/lib/libcom_err.so.2",0x0,027757773234) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.097662133 fstat(4,0xbfbff684) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.098803340 read(0x4,0x28081d80,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) 977: 0.099820787 mmap(0x0,8192,0x5,0x20002,4,0x0) = 673615872 (0x28269000) 977: 0.100608038 mprotect(0x28269000,0x1000,0x7) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.101481054 mprotect(0x28269000,0x1000,0x5) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.102480343 mmap(0x2826a000,4096,0x3,0x12,4,0x1000) = 673619968 (0x2826a000) 977: 0.103419010 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.104667493 access("/lib/libroken.so.6",0) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' 977: 0.105929106 access("/usr/lib/libroken.so.6",0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.107194350 open("/usr/lib/libroken.so.6",0x0,027757773234) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.107998922 fstat(4,0xbfbff684) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.108902947 read(0x4,0x28081d80,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) 977: 0.109988560 mmap(0x0,57344,0x5,0x20002,4,0x0) = 673624064 (0x2826b000) 977: 0.110785589 mprotect(0x28277000,0x1000,0x7) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.111681513 mprotect(0x28277000,0x1000,0x5) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.112686948 mmap(0x28278000,4096,0x3,0x12,4,0xd000) = 673677312 (0x28278000) 977: 0.113616116 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.114876612 access("/lib/libc.so.5",0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.116157780 open("/lib/libc.so.5",0x0,027757773234) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.116964307 fstat(4,0xbfbff684) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.117779495 read(0x4,0x28081d80,0x1000) = 4096 (0x1000) 977: 0.118971266 mmap(0x0,892928,0x5,0x20002,4,0x0) = 673681408 (0x28279000) 977: 0.119799304 mprotect(0x2833b000,0x1000,0x7) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.120676790 mprotect(0x2833b000,0x1000,0x5) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.121696752 mmap(0x2833c000,20480,0x3,0x12,4,0xc2000) = 674480128 (0x2833c000) 977: 0.122753590 mmap(0x28341000,73728,0x3,0x1012,-1,0x0) = 674500608 (0x28341000) 977: 0.123587495 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.124639584 mmap(0x0,1384,0x3,0x1000,-1,0x0) = 674574336 (0x28353000) 977: 0.125441641 munmap(0x28353000,0x568) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.126395115 mmap(0x0,4616,0x3,0x1000,-1,0x0) = 674574336 (0x28353000) 977: 0.128270213 munmap(0x28353000,0x1208) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.129309452 mmap(0x0,776,0x3,0x1000,-1,0x0) = 674574336 (0x28353000) 977: 0.130264042 munmap(0x28353000,0x308) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.131217236 mmap(0x0,688,0x3,0x1000,-1,0x0) = 674574336 (0x28353000) 977: 0.132165122 munmap(0x28353000,0x2b0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.133118036 mmap(0x0,22008,0x3,0x1000,-1,0x0) = 674574336 (0x28353000) 977: 0.136117859 munmap(0x28353000,0x55f8) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.137096754 mmap(0x0,600,0x3,0x1000,-1,0x0) = 674574336 (0x28353000) 977: 0.138027040 munmap(0x28353000,0x258) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.139009288 mmap(0x0,1048,0x3,0x1000,-1,0x0) = 674574336 (0x28353000) 977: 0.139953821 munmap(0x28353000,0x418) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.140905059 mmap(0x0,6192,0x3,0x1000,-1,0x0) = 674574336 (0x28353000) 977: 0.142088729 munmap(0x28353000,0x1830) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.143074609 mmap(0x0,2840,0x3,0x1000,-1,0x0) = 674574336 (0x28353000) 977: 0.143990368 munmap(0x28353000,0xb18) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.144941327 mmap(0x0,408,0x3,0x1000,-1,0x0) = 674574336 (0x28353000) 977: 0.145859041 munmap(0x28353000,0x198) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.146814470 mmap(0x0,2048,0x3,0x1000,-1,0x0) = 674574336 (0x28353000) 977: 0.147764590 munmap(0x28353000,0x800) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.148593187 mprotect(0x28279000,0xc3000,0x7) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.149572362 mmap(0x0,21264,0x3,0x1000,-1,0x0) = 674574336 (0x28353000) 977: 0.152214597 munmap(0x28353000,0x5310) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.153014699 mprotect(0x28279000,0xc3000,0x5) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.154138585 sigaction(SIGILL,0xbfbff6c4,0xbfbff6a4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.154912426 sigprocmask(0x1,0x0,0x28081cdc) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.155706941 sigaction(SIGILL,0xbfbff6a4,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.156842281 sigprocmask(0x1,0x28081c80,0xbfbff6d4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.157622827 sigprocmask(0x3,0x28081c90,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.159588719 readlink("/etc/malloc.conf",0xbfbff4d0,63) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' 977: 0.160280706 issetugid() = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.160878548 getuid() = 1001 (0x3e9) 977: 0.161478624 getgid() = 1001 (0x3e9) 977: 0.162454167 mmap(0x0,4096,0x3,0x1002,-1,0x0) = 674574336 (0x28353000) 977: 0.163327742 break(0x806a000) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.164230370 break(0x806b000) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.165148085 break(0x806c000) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.166027805 break(0x806d000) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.166898866 break(0x806e000) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.167899552 __sysctl(0xbfbff578,0x2,0xbfbff5c0,0xbfbff594,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.169088530 ioctl(0,TIOCGETA,0x80662e0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.170163247 sigprocmask(0x1,0x0,0x8067ebc) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.171626562 open("/etc/services",0x0,0666) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.172511311 fstat(4,0xbfbff3f0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.173299679 break(0x8072000) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.174348695 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 16384 (0x4000) 977: 0.175605000 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.176947350 open("/etc/services",0x0,0666) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.177767007 fstat(4,0xbfbff3b0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.178628848 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 16384 (0x4000) 977: 0.179924823 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.181281979 open("/etc/services",0x0,0666) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.182135998 fstat(4,0xbfbff340) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.183009573 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 16384 (0x4000) 977: 0.184066132 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.185409040 open("/etc/services",0x0,0666) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.186225903 fstat(4,0xbfbff3b0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.187088303 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 16384 (0x4000) 977: 0.188141510 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.189520735 open("/etc/services",0x0,0666) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.190338158 fstat(4,0xbfbff340) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.191199161 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 16384 (0x4000) 977: 0.192244825 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.193582984 open("/etc/services",0x0,0666) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.194398171 fstat(4,0xbfbff3f0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.195261968 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 16384 (0x4000) 977: 0.196317130 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.197635454 open("/etc/services",0x0,0666) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.198474387 fstat(4,0xbfbff3b0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.199384559 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 16384 (0x4000) 977: 0.200433575 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.201747988 open("/etc/services",0x0,0666) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.202567086 fstat(4,0xbfbff340) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.203432280 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 16384 (0x4000) 977: 0.204480179 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.205817499 open("/etc/services",0x0,0666) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.206629055 fstat(4,0xbfbff3b0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.207493690 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 16384 (0x4000) 977: 0.208546338 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.209904890 open("/etc/services",0x0,0666) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.210723709 fstat(4,0xbfbff340) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.211589462 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 16384 (0x4000) 977: 0.212658313 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.213974681 stat("/etc/nsswitch.conf",0xbfbff470) ERR#2 'No such file or directory' 977: 0.215382402 open("/etc/hosts",0x0,0666) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.216247875 fstat(4,0xbfbfd340) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.217097145 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 1085 (0x43d) 977: 0.217907863 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.218817476 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.219658085 break(0x8082000) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.221022504 break(0x8092000) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.222497552 gettimeofday(0xbfbfef18,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.223130594 getpid() = 977 (0x3d1) 977: 0.223739051 issetugid() = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.225008486 open("/etc/resolv.conf",0x0,0666) = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.225823953 fstat(4,0xbfbfee30) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.226666518 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 23 (0x17) 977: 0.227555737 read(0x4,0x806e000,0x4000) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.228458086 close(4) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.229435305 __sysctl(0xbfbfef18,0x2,0xbfbfefd0,0xbfbfef34,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.230103547 issetugid() = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.230886887 break(0x80a2000) = 0 (0x0) 977: 0.232266112 kqueue() = 4 (0x4) 977: 0.233182988 socket(0x2,0x2,0x0) = 5 (0x5) 977: 0.234911700 connect(0x5,{ AF_INET 192.168.0.1:53 },16) = 0 (0x0) --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 13:09:30 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE2216A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:09:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB3344033 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:09:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h8SK9Hw12377; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:09:17 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: "Charles Howse" , Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:09:16 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <000001c385f7$f948a5d0$04fea8c0@moe> In-Reply-To: <000001c385f7$f948a5d0$04fea8c0@moe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309281309.16986.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: Comparing buildworld times on twin machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:09:30 -0000 On Sunday 28 September 2003 12:37 pm, Charles Howse wrote: > Hi, > I have 2 machines on my home network with (almost) identical > hardware. They both have Celeron 300, same motherboards, same BIOS, > same options set in BIOS, etc. > Same make.conf, same kernel config. > I kill SETI@home before starting on each machine. > The only difference is that curly has 128 MB ram where larry has only > 64. > > They *do not*, however have identical hard drives, even though each > machine has 2 drives, with /usr/obj on the second drive of each > machine. > > When I buildworld, I use the following command, and write the output > to '$blog'. > > [portion of script omitted, entire script is attached as update1.sh] > > \time -aho $$blog make buildworld > > [snip] > > Larry can buildworld in 1 hr 57 mins. > It takes curly 3 hrs 16 mins, even though curly has twice the ram. > > If I watch the compile, with one eye on the disk activity light, it > seems to me that the process is largely CPU intensive, therefore I > would expect that the buildworld times should be roughly equal. > > 1) How can I determine what might be causing curly to take so long > compared to larry? > > 2) Since curly runs httpd, and vsftpd, is it acceptable to run the > entire build/install process in single-user mode in order to prevent > other processes from eating CPU cycles? > > On my systems, which all run setiathome, I only see a few percent variation in buildworld time with seti running. I start setiathome with a -nice 19 so that it doesn't interfere. You might be able to see some of the processes running using top. You could always stop apache. My setup has /usr/src and /usr/obj on a 2nd and 3rd hd and I log everything to the 1st HD.. All of the HDs are on their own controller and they are ata-133's on the main system. A system with ata-66s is not 50% slower. I kind of wonder if you have cache turned on in the cpu. That much difference is pretty hard to come up with unless your 2 daemons are interfering. You might see that running top. Watch the swap to see if anything is happening. FWIW, I had one system with everything identical but the mobos and one ran 15% slower than the other. I never did figure out what was causing the difference. It is my only 400MHz machine and only use it for some special programs. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 13:25:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D4616A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:25:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.franklee.net (203.141.149.2.user.ad.il24.net [203.141.149.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF52544035 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:25:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@franklee.net) Received: from www.franklee.net (localhost.franklee.net [127.0.0.1]) by www.franklee.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h8T5QUYn000655 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:26:31 GMT (envelope-from frank@franklee.net) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Frank Lee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:26:30 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <200309290427.41673.frank@franklee.net> <1064778399.939.10.camel@klamath> In-Reply-To: <1064778399.939.10.camel@klamath> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200309290523.31804.frank@franklee.net> Subject: Re: How to mount USB drive in FreeBSD 5.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank@franklee.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:25:59 -0000 On Sunday 28 September 2003 19:46, Andreas Kohn wrote: > On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 06:27, Frank Lee wrote: > > Hi all. My first FreeBSD post. :-) > > > > I have a USB drive (Win95 formatted) that I'm trying to dd data off o= f. > > > > - FreeBSD 5.0-Release > > - USB 2.0/1.1 drive. > > - laptop is 1.1 > > > > How do I mount this USB drive? I done it on 4.7 with MAKEDEV and all,= but > > can't find any info on getting it to mount in 5.0 (no MAKEDEV and all= ). > > > > Thank you, > > Frank Lee > > Hello, > > add umass (and scbus + da) to your kernel configuration (if not there > already), and it should be autodetected. Mounting should work like in > 4.7. > > In FreeBSD 5, devfs makes MAKEDEV unneccessary. > > If that still doesn't work, please post relevant messages to the list. Thank you for your quick reply! - The kernel is generic. So umass, scbus, and da are already in there. - "usbd" is running. # ps auxw | grep usbd root 330 0.0 0.2 1144 680 ?? Ss 3:40AM 0:00.01/usr/sbin/u= sbd - I noticed that the "USB modules" section in /boot/loader.conf was set t= o=20 "NO". So I copied that over to /boot and set them to "YES": usb_load=3D"YES" # USB subsystem udbp_load=3D"YES" # USB double bulk pipe host 2 host ca= bles ugen_load=3D"YES" # USB generic device, if all else fai= ls ... umass_load=3D"YES" # Mass Storage Devices - rebooted and got (from dmesg): Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0689000. Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/udbp.ko" at 0xc06890a8. Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/ugen.ko" at 0xc0689154. Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/umass.ko" at 0xc0689200. Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/uscanner.ko" at 0xc06892ac. Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc068935c. link_elf: symbol ng_newtype undefined KLD file udbp.ko - could not finalize loading module_register: module uhub/ugen already exists! Module uhub/ugen failed to register: 17 module_register: module uhub/umass already exists! Module uhub/umass failed to register: 17 module_register: module uhub/uscanner already exists! Module uhub/uscanner failed to register: 17 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz =20 So i guess I didn't need to set them to "YES"... :-\ And later in dmesg: uhci0: port 0xfce0-0xfcff irq 1= 0 at=20 de vice 7.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered It may have detected that there's a drive... # usbdevs -v Controller /dev/usb0: addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x0000),=20 Intel(0x0000), rev 1.00 port 1 powered port 2 powered # usbdevs -d addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel uhub0 # but if FreeBSD autodetected it, I, myself, am not detecting it. :( I gues= s I=20 forgot I how did it in 4.7 :( But how do I mount it? I've tried: # mkdir /mnt/usb # mount -t msdos /dev/usb /mnt/usb msdosfs: /dev/usb: Block device required # mount -t msdos /dev/usb0 /mnt/usb msdosfs: /dev/usb0: Block device required # mount -t msdos /dev/ad0s1a /mnt/usb msdosfs: /dev/ad0s1a: Device busy # mount -t msdos /dev/ad0s1b /mnt/usb msdosfs: /dev/ad0s1b: Device busy # mount -t msdos /dev/ad0s1c /mnt/usb msdosfs: /dev/ad0s1c: Invalid argument # mount_msdosfs /dev/ad0s1b /mnt/usb mount_msdosfs: /dev/ad0s1b: Device busy # # cat /etc/fstab # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump P= ass# /dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/ad0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/acd0 /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 # Thanks for your help. The winning command itself would be nice :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 13:28:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C0B16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:28:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remt30.cluster1.charter.net (remt30.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.8.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51E144001 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:28:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chowse@charter.net) Received: from [66.168.145.25] (HELO moe) by remt30.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 6314555; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:28:46 -0400 From: "Charles Howse" To: "'Kent Stewart'" , Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:28:37 -0500 Message-ID: <000f01c385ff$19a53d00$04fea8c0@moe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <200309281309.16986.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: RE: Comparing buildworld times on twin machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:28:52 -0000 > On Sunday 28 September 2003 12:37 pm, Charles Howse wrote: > > Hi, > > I have 2 machines on my home network with (almost) identical > > hardware. They both have Celeron 300, same motherboards, same BIOS, > > same options set in BIOS, etc. > > Same make.conf, same kernel config. > > I kill SETI@home before starting on each machine. > > The only difference is that curly has 128 MB ram where=20 > larry has only > > 64. > > > > They *do not*, however have identical hard drives, even though each > > machine has 2 drives, with /usr/obj on the second drive of each > > machine. > > > > When I buildworld, I use the following command, and write the output > > to '$blog'. > > > > [portion of script omitted, entire script is attached as update1.sh] > > > > \time -aho $$blog make buildworld > > > > [snip] > > > > Larry can buildworld in 1 hr 57 mins. > > It takes curly 3 hrs 16 mins, even though curly has twice the ram. > > > > If I watch the compile, with one eye on the disk activity light, it > > seems to me that the process is largely CPU intensive, therefore I > > would expect that the buildworld times should be roughly equal. > > > > 1) How can I determine what might be causing curly to take so long > > compared to larry? > > > > 2) Since curly runs httpd, and vsftpd, is it acceptable to run the > > entire build/install process in single-user mode in order to prevent > > other processes from eating CPU cycles? > > > > >=20 > On my systems, which all run setiathome, I only see a few percent=20 > variation in buildworld time with seti running. I start=20 > setiathome with=20 > a -nice 19 so that it doesn't interfere. Me, too. > You might be able to see some of the processes running using top. You=20 > could always stop apache. True, I could do that, but what is your opinion on running the entire build/install process from single-user mode? (my original question) > I kind of wonder if you have cache turned on in the cpu. That much=20 > difference is pretty hard to come up with unless your 2 daemons are=20 > interfering. You might see that running top. Watch the swap to see if=20 > anything is happening. Oh, geeeez, technical stuff! ;-) I'm a real dumbass in the BIOS. I just select "Load High Performance Settings" on each machine, and then change the boot order to my liking. I did notice that 'internal cache' is set to 'write-back'. Am I on the right track? =20 *Exactly* how do I watch the swap...in top? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 13:47:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A46EE16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:47:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78A04400D for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:47:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h8SKlZfs013086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:47:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id h8SKlYoQ013085; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:47:34 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:47:34 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Alex Zivenko Message-ID: <20030928204734.GA12443@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Alex Zivenko , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000101c385cc$b2983d10$0400a8c0@fire> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000101c385cc$b2983d10$0400a8c0@fire> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail redirect problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:47:45 -0000 --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 28, 2003 at 09:25:22AM +0300, Alex Zivenko wrote: > I have some problem here. I need a mail account on the another server, wh= ich runs on freebsd. I have a mail account, for example twistfire@rambler.r= u. I need a mail account like > fire@someserver.ru. But the acces is restricted to prevent security vuln= erabilities. The mail server is closed for ip addresses not from their subn= ets. So I decided not to login there, but when the mail will come to fire@s= omeserver.ru t will automatically redirects to twistfire@rambler.ru. > How can I do that? What I need to do in Sendmail? Sounds like you need to read the aliases(5) man page. If you haven't got access to /etc/mail/aliases on the machine in question, then you can probably just set up a .forward file in your home dir on that machine (See forward(5)). That just overrides the local delivery agent, instead forwarding the e-mail to the address in the .forward file. Don't set up two machines to forward to each other or they will spend a lot of time playing ping-pong with your e-mail, which will eventually be bounced back to sender as undeliverable. Cheers, Matthew PS You can set up that sort of either-way forwarding using procmail(1), but it relies on using formail(1) to insert special headers so that you can avoid forarding loops. See the procmailex(1) man page for an example. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/d0jmdtESqEQa7a0RAkR6AJ4sY9J0KeIghgC2jD/oZxL+YjX6sQCcCT1J L7WLDnfr07BtfT6CLbH+1bY= =c7yI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wRRV7LY7NUeQGEoC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 13:54:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1D216A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:54:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A014403B for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:54:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h8SKsjw14814; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:54:45 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: "Charles Howse" , Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:54:45 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <000f01c385ff$19a53d00$04fea8c0@moe> In-Reply-To: <000f01c385ff$19a53d00$04fea8c0@moe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309281354.45244.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: Comparing buildworld times on twin machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:54:49 -0000 On Sunday 28 September 2003 01:28 pm, Charles Howse wrote: > > On Sunday 28 September 2003 12:37 pm, Charles Howse wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I have 2 machines on my home network with (almost) identical > > > hardware. They both have Celeron 300, same motherboards, same > > > BIOS, same options set in BIOS, etc. > > > Same make.conf, same kernel config. > > > I kill SETI@home before starting on each machine. > > > The only difference is that curly has 128 MB ram where > > > > larry has only > > > > > 64. > > > > > > They *do not*, however have identical hard drives, even though > > > each machine has 2 drives, with /usr/obj on the second drive of > > > each machine. > > > > > > When I buildworld, I use the following command, and write the > > > output to '$blog'. > > > > > > [portion of script omitted, entire script is attached as > > > update1.sh] > > > > > > \time -aho $$blog make buildworld > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > Larry can buildworld in 1 hr 57 mins. > > > It takes curly 3 hrs 16 mins, even though curly has twice the > > > ram. > > > > > > If I watch the compile, with one eye on the disk activity light, > > > it seems to me that the process is largely CPU intensive, > > > therefore I would expect that the buildworld times should be > > > roughly equal. > > > > > > 1) How can I determine what might be causing curly to take so > > > long compared to larry? > > > > > > 2) Since curly runs httpd, and vsftpd, is it acceptable to run > > > the entire build/install process in single-user mode in order to > > > prevent other processes from eating CPU cycles? > > > > On my systems, which all run setiathome, I only see a few percent > > variation in buildworld time with seti running. I start > > setiathome with > > a -nice 19 so that it doesn't interfere. > > Me, too. > > > You might be able to see some of the processes running using top. > > You could always stop apache. > > True, I could do that, but what is your opinion on running the entire > build/install process from single-user mode? (my original question) That would work but I run my buildworlds from a consol in KDE and I don't see that much difference and running it with KDE stopped. Running it single user mode may be faster than shutting apache down. But then you won't know what caused it to begin with. I have scripts in /root/bin to start and stop it and start it. They are # cat startapache #! /bin/sh /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start # cat stopapache #! /bin/sh /usr/local/sbin/apachectl stop > > > I kind of wonder if you have cache turned on in the cpu. That much > > difference is pretty hard to come up with unless your 2 daemons are > > interfering. You might see that running top. Watch the swap to see > > if anything is happening. > > Oh, geeeez, technical stuff! ;-) I'm a real dumbass in the BIOS. I > just select "Load High Performance Settings" on each machine, and > then change the boot order to my liking. > I did notice that 'internal cache' is set to 'write-back'. > Am I on the right track? I think that performance would turn things on. You may have a bad cache but that isn't what I would look at first. Not all Celerons have the same kind of cache. I gave a Celeron 433a, which had the on board cache, to some friends that needed a computer. I had swapped it out and all the needed to do was buy a montior. Using PC-100 memory is about 15% faster than PC-66 memory. This was the difference in accumulated wu processing time for seti on 2xx wus with the different speed memory. Jumping up to PC-133 didn't change anything. That is like getting a cpu upgrade for just a few $s. A 128MB pc-100 sdimm runs around $35 at Best Buy and you know you can do better than that off of the Internet. > *Exactly* how do I watch the swap...in top? > Watch top and see if something is forcing processes to swap by watching the swap line of information. You can also see if apache is accruing time while you do the build. It shows you the processes as they accrue time and which one is getting a lot of time is what you are looking for. You can't do this in single user mode because you only have the console. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 13:56:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B73316A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADD6643FE0 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:56:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas.kohn@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 26795 invoked by uid 65534); 28 Sep 2003 20:56:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [172.16.32.190]) (212.204.32.190) by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 28 Sep 2003 22:56:50 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2431876 From: Andreas Kohn To: frank@franklee.net In-Reply-To: <200309290523.31804.frank@franklee.net> References: <200309290427.41673.frank@franklee.net> <200309290523.31804.frank@franklee.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064782624.939.19.camel@klamath> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:57:04 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to mount USB drive in FreeBSD 5.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:56:55 -0000 On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 07:26, Frank Lee wrote: > On Sunday 28 September 2003 19:46, Andreas Kohn wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 06:27, Frank Lee wrote: > > > Hi all. My first FreeBSD post. :-) > > > > > > I have a USB drive (Win95 formatted) that I'm trying to dd data off of. > > > > > > - FreeBSD 5.0-Release > > > - USB 2.0/1.1 drive. > > > - laptop is 1.1 > > > > > > How do I mount this USB drive? I done it on 4.7 with MAKEDEV and all, but > > > can't find any info on getting it to mount in 5.0 (no MAKEDEV and all). > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Frank Lee > > > > Hello, > > > > add umass (and scbus + da) to your kernel configuration (if not there > > already), and it should be autodetected. Mounting should work like in > > 4.7. > > > > In FreeBSD 5, devfs makes MAKEDEV unneccessary. > > > > If that still doesn't work, please post relevant messages to the list. > > Thank you for your quick reply! > > - The kernel is generic. So umass, scbus, and da are already in there. > - "usbd" is running. > # ps auxw | grep usbd > root 330 0.0 0.2 1144 680 ?? Ss 3:40AM 0:00.01/usr/sbin/usbd > - I noticed that the "USB modules" section in /boot/loader.conf was set to > "NO". So I copied that over to /boot and set them to "YES": > usb_load="YES" # USB subsystem > udbp_load="YES" # USB double bulk pipe host 2 host cables > ugen_load="YES" # USB generic device, if all else fails ... > umass_load="YES" # Mass Storage Devices > - rebooted and got (from dmesg): > > Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0689000. > Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/udbp.ko" at 0xc06890a8. > Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/ugen.ko" at 0xc0689154. > Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/umass.ko" at 0xc0689200. > Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/uscanner.ko" at 0xc06892ac. > Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc068935c. > link_elf: symbol ng_newtype undefined > KLD file udbp.ko - could not finalize loading > module_register: module uhub/ugen already exists! > Module uhub/ugen failed to register: 17 > module_register: module uhub/umass already exists! > Module uhub/umass failed to register: 17 > module_register: module uhub/uscanner already exists! > Module uhub/uscanner failed to register: 17 > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz > > > So i guess I didn't need to set them to "YES"... :-\ Setting those to "YES" instructs the loader to load the respectively named modules. So this would only be necessary if you hadn't compiled them into your kernel. (Which is the reason for those "already exists" messages) > And later in dmesg: > > uhci0: port 0xfce0-0xfcff irq 10 at > de > vice 7.2 on pci0 > usb0: on uhci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered > > > It may have detected that there's a drive... > # usbdevs -v > Controller /dev/usb0: > addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x0000), > Intel(0x0000), rev 1.00 > port 1 powered > port 2 powered > # usbdevs -d > addr 1: UHCI root hub, Intel > uhub0 > # > but if FreeBSD autodetected it, I, myself, am not detecting it. :( I guess I > forgot I how did it in 4.7 :( It doesn't even look like your usb drive is plugged in? Even if umass hadn't accepted it, ugen should have had attached (outputting some messages) > > But how do I mount it? I've tried: > > # mkdir /mnt/usb > # mount -t msdos /dev/usb /mnt/usb > msdosfs: /dev/usb: Block device required > # mount -t msdos /dev/usb0 /mnt/usb > msdosfs: /dev/usb0: Block device required > # mount -t msdos /dev/ad0s1a /mnt/usb > msdosfs: /dev/ad0s1a: Device busy > # mount -t msdos /dev/ad0s1b /mnt/usb > msdosfs: /dev/ad0s1b: Device busy > # mount -t msdos /dev/ad0s1c /mnt/usb > msdosfs: /dev/ad0s1c: Invalid argument > # mount_msdosfs /dev/ad0s1b /mnt/usb > mount_msdosfs: /dev/ad0s1b: Device busy > # > [assuming that umass hat attached to the usb drive] There should be a new device node daX[sY] in /dev, which you should mount. mount -t msdos /dev/da0* /mnt/usb * Can't remember whether one needed to specify a slice > Thanks for your help. The winning command itself would be nice :) First thing before issueing a winning command is to have it detected =) > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Andreas Kohn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 14:12:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A88116A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:12:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.franklee.net (203.141.149.2.user.ad.il24.net [203.141.149.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5193844037 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:12:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@franklee.net) Received: from www.franklee.net (localhost.franklee.net [127.0.0.1]) by www.franklee.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h8T6DOwT000683; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:13:24 GMT (envelope-from frank@franklee.net) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Frank Lee To: Andreas Kohn Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:13:23 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <200309290427.41673.frank@franklee.net> <200309290523.31804.frank@franklee.net> <1064782624.939.19.camel@klamath> In-Reply-To: <1064782624.939.19.camel@klamath> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200309290613.23626.frank@franklee.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to mount USB drive in FreeBSD 5.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank@franklee.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:12:50 -0000 On Sunday 28 September 2003 20:57, Andreas Kohn wrote: > It doesn't even look like your usb drive is plugged in? Even if umass > hadn't accepted it, ugen should have had attached (outputting some > messages) ughh..... well, it helps to plug it *all the way* in. :-( It's new and I=20 didn't want break it... The message I get is: umass0: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, addr = 2 umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) The system just halts there... If I turn it (usb drive) off or unplug it, a bunch of other messages scro= ll up=20 and it tells me that it's going to reboot... > [assuming that umass hat attached to the usb drive] > There should be a new device node daX[sY] in /dev, which you should > mount. > mount -t msdos /dev/da0* /mnt/usb > > * Can't remember whether one needed to specify a slice Since it stops at the "umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED)" messa= ge,=20 there's no /dev/da0* : # ls -l /dev/d* crw------- 1 root wheel 173, 0 Sep 29 05:41 /dev/devctl # Is there a way to have FreeBSD dumb it (usb drive) down to 1.1? The box s= ays=20 it (usb drive) supports 1.1 and 2.0). My laptop is only 1.1. Thank you for the help! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 14:14:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC0316A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:14:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remt29.cluster1.charter.net (remt29.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.8.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD92943FE0 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:14:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chowse@charter.net) Received: from [66.168.145.25] (HELO moe) by remt29.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 6412159; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:14:26 -0400 From: "Charles Howse" To: "'Kent Stewart'" , Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:14:18 -0500 Message-ID: <001c01c38605$7ae71970$04fea8c0@moe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <200309281354.45244.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: RE: Comparing buildworld times on twin machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:14:29 -0000 > On Sunday 28 September 2003 01:28 pm, Charles Howse wrote: > > > On Sunday 28 September 2003 12:37 pm, Charles Howse wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I have 2 machines on my home network with (almost) identical > > > > hardware. They both have Celeron 300, same motherboards, same > > > > BIOS, same options set in BIOS, etc. > > > > Same make.conf, same kernel config. > > > > I kill SETI@home before starting on each machine. > > > > The only difference is that curly has 128 MB ram where > > > > > > larry has only > > > > > > > 64. > > > > > > > > They *do not*, however have identical hard drives, even though > > > > each machine has 2 drives, with /usr/obj on the second drive of > > > > each machine. > > > > > > > > When I buildworld, I use the following command, and write the > > > > output to '$blog'. > > > > > > > > [portion of script omitted, entire script is attached as > > > > update1.sh] > > > > > > > > \time -aho $$blog make buildworld > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > Larry can buildworld in 1 hr 57 mins. > > > > It takes curly 3 hrs 16 mins, even though curly has twice the > > > > ram. > > > > > > > > If I watch the compile, with one eye on the disk activity light, > > > > it seems to me that the process is largely CPU intensive, > > > > therefore I would expect that the buildworld times should be > > > > roughly equal. > > > > > > > > 1) How can I determine what might be causing curly to take so > > > > long compared to larry? > > > > > > > > 2) Since curly runs httpd, and vsftpd, is it acceptable to run > > > > the entire build/install process in single-user mode in order to > > > > prevent other processes from eating CPU cycles? > > > > > > On my systems, which all run setiathome, I only see a few percent > > > variation in buildworld time with seti running. I start > > > setiathome with > > > a -nice 19 so that it doesn't interfere. > > > > Me, too. > > > > > You might be able to see some of the processes running using top. > > > You could always stop apache. > > > > True, I could do that, but what is your opinion on running=20 > the entire > > build/install process from single-user mode? (my original question) >=20 > That would work but I run my buildworlds from a consol in KDE and I=20 > don't see that much difference and running it with KDE=20 > stopped. Running=20 > it single user mode may be faster than shutting apache down. But then=20 > you won't know what caused it to begin with.=20 >=20 > I have scripts in /root/bin to start and stop it and start=20 > it. They are >=20 > # cat startapache > #! /bin/sh > /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start >=20 > # cat stopapache > #! /bin/sh > /usr/local/sbin/apachectl stop >=20 > > > > > I kind of wonder if you have cache turned on in the cpu. That much > > > difference is pretty hard to come up with unless your 2=20 > daemons are > > > interfering. You might see that running top. Watch the swap to see > > > if anything is happening. > > > > Oh, geeeez, technical stuff! ;-) I'm a real dumbass in=20 > the BIOS. I > > just select "Load High Performance Settings" on each machine, and > > then change the boot order to my liking. > > I did notice that 'internal cache' is set to 'write-back'. > > Am I on the right track? >=20 > I think that performance would turn things on. You may have a=20 > bad cache=20 > but that isn't what I would look at first. Not all Celerons have the=20 > same kind of cache. I gave a Celeron 433a, which had the on board=20 > cache, to some friends that needed a computer. I had swapped=20 > it out and=20 > all the needed to do was buy a montior. >=20 > Using PC-100 memory is about 15% faster than PC-66 memory.=20 > This was the=20 > difference in accumulated wu processing time for seti on 2xx wus with=20 > the different speed memory. Jumping up to PC-133 didn't change=20 > anything. That is like getting a cpu upgrade for just a few=20 > $s. A 128MB=20 > pc-100 sdimm runs around $35 at Best Buy and you know you can=20 > do better=20 > than that off of the Internet. >=20 > > *Exactly* how do I watch the swap...in top? > > >=20 > Watch top and see if something is forcing processes to swap=20 > by watching=20 > the swap line of information.=20 >=20 > You can also see if apache is accruing time while you do the=20 > build. It=20 > shows you the processes as they accrue time and which one is=20 > getting a=20 > lot of time is what you are looking for. You can't do this in single=20 > user mode because you only have the console. Very good, thanks for your input! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 14:21:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6260316A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.thenetnow.com (enterprise.thenetnow.com [65.39.193.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2994401A for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:21:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from grant@thenetnow.com) Received: from grant (dsla41.ody.ca [216.240.4.41]) by enterprise.thenetnow.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h8SLK2L13354 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:20:02 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from grant@thenetnow.com) Message-ID: <008501c38606$6a725770$6501a8c0@grant> From: "Grant Peel" To: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:20:58 -0400 Organization: The Net Now MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Bad Super Block Count X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Grant Peel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:21:05 -0000 Hello all, One of my Dell servers has rebooted itself twice in the past week. No panics or anything showing in any log. No overheating noted in mbmon. I don't know if the diskstuff below is related. Dell called me and told me I had to do a PERC III ROM flash, so I went to the POP and did that. At that time I ran an fsck. I am seeing what look to be (I hope) none critical disk errors. I cant find anything specific in the FreeBSD archives and was hoping some here might have some knowledge. Here is the complete list from fsck, also I will post disklabel -r output at the bottom. As a side note, I could not get fsck to be interactive. Not even at the console, but I was never in single user mode either...should it matter? Dell 1400SC, 933Mhz, 512 MB, RAID5 PERC 3/DC. BTW, I ran a consistency check before booting back into FReeBSD and according to the PERC software the stripes etc are perfect. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------- enterprise# fsck ** /dev/amrd0s1a (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on / ** Root file system ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 3461 files, 111997 used, 384114 free (450 frags, 47958 blocks, 0.1% fragmentation) ** /dev/amrd0s1d (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /backup ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 14 files, 2345699 used, 1599707 free (3 frags, 199963 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) ** /dev/amrd0s1h (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /home ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 1022 files, 5694732 used, 2298363 free (939 frags, 287178 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) ** /dev/amrd0s1g (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /mail ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=11 (12 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=46 (11808 should be 208) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=113 (304 should be 208) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=162 (12 should be 0) CORRECT? no INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=284 (2 should be 0) CORRECT? no ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts UNREF FILE I=284 OWNER=epearson MODE=100600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Sep 28 16:59 2003 CLEAR? no ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK SALVAGE? no SUMMARY INFORMATION BAD SALVAGE? no BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS SALVAGE? no 512 files, 272012 used, 734121 free (161 frags, 91745 blocks, 0.0% fragmentation) ** /dev/amrd0s1e (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /usr ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups 224635 files, 2166168 used, 2795557 free (128629 frags, 333366 blocks, 2.6% fragmentation) ** /dev/amrd0s1f (NO WRITE) ** Last Mounted on /var ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames UNALLOCATED I=166980 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=4812 MTIME=Sep 28 17:00 2003 FILE=/spool/mqueue/dfh8SL0VL12004 REMOVE? no UNALLOCATED I=166986 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=953 MTIME=Sep 28 17:00 2003 FILE=/spool/mqueue/qfh8SL0VL12004 REMOVE? no ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts UNREF FILE I=1992070 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=227 MTIME=Sep 26 10:34 2003 CLEAR? no ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups SUMMARY INFORMATION BAD SALVAGE? no BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS SALVAGE? no FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK SALVAGE? no 150923 files, 1780430 used, 13106796 free (45716 frags, 1632635 blocks, 0.3% fragmentation) <> DISKLABEL Should I have to specify a slice etc or should it se just amrd0 ? enterprise# disklabel -r amrd0 disklabel: bad pack magic number (label is damaged, or pack is unlabeled) enterprise# disklabel -r amrd0s1 # /dev/amrd0s1c: type: ESDI disk: amrd0s1 label: flags: bytes/sector: 512 sectors/track: 63 tracks/cylinder: 255 sectors/cylinder: 16065 cylinders: 4404 sectors/unit: 70766262 rpm: 3600 interleave: 1 trackskew: 0 cylinderskew: 0 headswitch: 0 # milliseconds track-to-track seek: 0 # milliseconds drivedata: 0 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 1024000 0 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 63*) b: 2048000 1024000 swap # (Cyl. 63*- 191*) c: 70766262 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 4404*) d: 8142848 46129152 4.2BSD 1024 8192 16 # (Cyl. 2871*- 3378*) e: 10240000 3072000 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 191*- 828*) f: 30720000 13312000 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 828*- 2740*) g: 2097152 44032000 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 2740*- 2871*) h: 16494262 54272000 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 3378*- 4404*) Whats with all the 0's? -Grant Grant W. Peel Server Admin grant@thenetnow.com http://thenetnow.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 14:37:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F382316A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6244404D for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:37:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id h8SLatw17039; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:36:56 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: frank@franklee.net, Andreas Kohn Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:36:55 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200309290427.41673.frank@franklee.net> <1064782624.939.19.camel@klamath> <200309290613.23626.frank@franklee.net> In-Reply-To: <200309290613.23626.frank@franklee.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309281436.55254.kstewart@owt.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to mount USB drive in FreeBSD 5.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:37:17 -0000 On Sunday 28 September 2003 11:13 pm, Frank Lee wrote: > On Sunday 28 September 2003 20:57, Andreas Kohn wrote: > > It doesn't even look like your usb drive is plugged in? Even if > > umass hadn't accepted it, ugen should have had attached (outputting > > some messages) > > ughh..... well, it helps to plug it *all the way* in. :-( It's new > and I didn't want break it... > > The message I get is: > umass0: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, > addr 2 umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) > > The system just halts there... I find that FreeBSD gets really confused if you have a msdos formatted zip in the zip drive when you boot. Kent > > If I turn it (usb drive) off or unplug it, a bunch of other messages > scroll up and it tells me that it's going to reboot... > > > [assuming that umass hat attached to the usb drive] > > There should be a new device node daX[sY] in /dev, which you should > > mount. > > mount -t msdos /dev/da0* /mnt/usb > > > > * Can't remember whether one needed to specify a slice > > Since it stops at the "umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED)" > message, there's no /dev/da0* : > > # ls -l /dev/d* > crw------- 1 root wheel 173, 0 Sep 29 05:41 /dev/devctl > # > > Is there a way to have FreeBSD dumb it (usb drive) down to 1.1? The > box says it (usb drive) supports 1.1 and 2.0). My laptop is only 1.1. -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 14:56:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6775A16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECF543FAF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:56:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsduser@comcast.net) Received: from patience (12-225-143-41.client.attbi.com[12.225.143.41]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <200309282156060160000sg5e>; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:56:06 +0000 Message-ID: <003201c3860b$439c60f0$5864a8c0@patience> From: "cuddlesomebunny" To: "Jud" , "Kent Stewart" References: <00df01c38185$2255aee0$5864a8c0@patience> <200309222126.41170.kstewart@owt.com> <3F737666.6040603@comcast.net> <200309260732.43942.kstewart@owt.com> <20030926150050.0671276EA1@smtp.us2.messagingengine.com> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:55:41 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Ports woes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:56:09 -0000 > > I'm obviously getting into this very late, but I'll hazard a couple of > suggestions. Apologies if they've already been discussed/discarded. > > 1. If you haven't already, run portsdb -uU and pkgdb -F. > > 2. If it isn't among the "portupgrade stuff" you've already tried, the > -fRN options in combination may work. > > Jud Thanks to all who offered assistance and guidance. I'll give these offerings a try and if all else fails, uninstal and try again. :) TTFN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 15:27:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E1816A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:27:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.consult4pc.com (adsl-67-112-62-146.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.112.62.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AC144030 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:27:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from frank@franklee.net) Received: (qmail 81746 invoked by uid 85); 28 Sep 2003 22:44:29 -0000 Received: from frank@franklee.net by jim.consult4pc.com by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.60. spamassassin: 2.55. Clear:. Processed in 1.195321 secs); 28 Sep 2003 22:44:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO www.franklee.net) (127.0.0.1) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2003 22:44:27 -0000 Received: from 203.141.149.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user frank@franklee.net) by www.franklee.net with HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:44:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1090.203.141.149.2.1064789067.squirrel@www.franklee.net> In-Reply-To: <200309281436.55254.kstewart@owt.com> References: <200309290427.41673.frank@franklee.net><1064782624.939.19.camel@klamath> <200309290613.23626.frank@franklee.net> <200309281436.55254.kstewart@owt.com> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:44:27 -0700 (PDT) From: frank@franklee.net To: "Kent Stewart" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: frank@franklee.net Subject: Re: How to mount USB drive in FreeBSD 5.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:27:50 -0000 On Sunday 28 September 2003 2:36 pm, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Sunday 28 September 2003 11:13 pm, Frank Lee wrote: >> On Sunday 28 September 2003 20:57, Andreas Kohn wrote: >> > It doesn't even look like your usb drive is plugged in? Even if >> > umass hadn't accepted it, ugen should have had attached (outputting >> > some messages) >> >> ughh..... well, it helps to plug it *all the way* in. :-( It's new >> and I didn't want break it... >> >> The message I get is: >> umass0: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, >> addr 2 umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) >> >> The system just halts there... Let me clarify this statement. There's a On/Off switch on the drive. It's when I turn it (usb drive) off, the messages scroll (which I'd post if I could get them) and systems reboots. Happened twice. The third time, it says it got disconnected and the system continues to run fine. > I find that FreeBSD gets really confused if you have a msdos formatted > zip in the zip drive when you boot. It is a msdos formatted usb drive (2.5" laptop type drive in a IDE-to-USB2.0 case). Not a zip drive, but thank you for sharing that piece of info. Frank Lee From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 15:29:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DABC16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:29:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9837343FB1 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:29:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paulbeard@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (12-231-115-57.client.attbi.com[12.231.115.57]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <2003092822293401400far1qe>; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:29:34 +0000 Message-ID: <3F7760C8.90201@mac.com> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:29:28 -0700 From: paul beard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030731 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3F76B9B3.6030805@intersonic.se> <00f701c385ad$c9a18cb0$0201a8c0@dredster> <3F76C421.1000104@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <3F76C421.1000104@intersonic.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: how to get system information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:29:35 -0000 Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >>> >>> I am wondering how to find out system hardware information from a >>> running system, I know for instance pciconf(8) but what are the >>> corresponding ones for memory, cpu etc? >>> >> >> >> more /var/run/dmesg.boot to get the info at boot time. >> vmstat 5 5 will give you 5 items 5 sconds apart to show you procs, >> memory, >> page, disks, faults and cpu info. >> > > Thanks, that was a good start. Now, if I wanted to see more detailed > info on the processor than the dmesg.boot output: > > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 > > Like cache size etc.? You could try seeing what values are available through SNMP, if you're interested in dynamic values like memory usage, CPU usage, disk usage, etc. Manufacturing details on the CPU won't change between reboots, but there should be other ways to find that out. dmesg.boot gives me all this data, some of which might be useful for what you're after. CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (233.29-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x634 Stepping = 4 Features=0x80f9ff -- Paul Beard whois -h whois.networksolutions.com ha=pb202 A university is what a college becomes when the faculty loses interest in students. -- John Ciardi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 15:30:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0359C16A4BF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F18444001 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:30:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paulbeard@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (12-231-115-57.client.attbi.com[12.231.115.57]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2003092822304501500f164be>; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:30:45 +0000 Message-ID: <3F776115.9000102@mac.com> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:30:45 -0700 From: paul beard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5a) Gecko/20030731 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3F76B9B3.6030805@intersonic.se> <00f701c385ad$c9a18cb0$0201a8c0@dredster> <3F76C421.1000104@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <3F76C421.1000104@intersonic.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: how to get system information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:30:47 -0000 Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >>> >>> I am wondering how to find out system hardware information from a >>> running system, I know for instance pciconf(8) but what are the >>> corresponding ones for memory, cpu etc? >>> >> >> >> more /var/run/dmesg.boot to get the info at boot time. >> vmstat 5 5 will give you 5 items 5 sconds apart to show you procs, >> memory, >> page, disks, faults and cpu info. >> > > Thanks, that was a good start. Now, if I wanted to see more detailed > info on the processor than the dmesg.boot output: > > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 > > Like cache size etc.? You could try seeing what values are available through SNMP, if you're interested in dynamic values like memory usage, CPU usage, disk usage, etc. Manufacturing details on the CPU won't change between reboots, but there should be other ways to find that out. dmesg.boot gives me all this data, some of which might be useful for what you're after. CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (233.29-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x634 Stepping = 4 Features=0x80f9ff -- Paul Beard whois -h whois.networksolutions.com ha=pb202 A university is what a college becomes when the faculty loses interest in students. -- John Ciardi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 14:45:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6859B16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:45:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B7E43FB1 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:45:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from a.hilliar@worldnet.att.net) Received: from hilliard1 (slip-32-103-153-50.ca.us.prserv.net[32.103.153.50]) by mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc13) with SMTP id <2003092821452711300r3o81e>; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:45:28 +0000 Message-ID: <000801c38609$d3d4eb80$6400a8c0@HILLIARD1> From: "Andrew Hilliard" To: Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:45:23 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:36:02 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: INSTALLATIONM ON A HP PAVILION 8670C X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:45:31 -0000 Hi, I am haviing the worst time trying to install FreeBSD on a HP Pavilion 8670C.It has ATAPI CD-ROMS and when I attempted to do an installation of FreeBSD with version 4.7 of the software it failed. I attempted to do an installation from a=20 MS-DOS partition and thatb also failed. The softwae error message was that it couldnot swap to the swap space I created for it through Partition magic. Please if there is any help you van offer me I will sinserly appreciae it. I am almost at the end with FreeBSD. I have been trying for nearly a month. I had no troble with my Dell but the Hewlett Packard has been giving me trouble.. Thank you Andrew Hillard a.hilliar@worldnet.att.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 15:39:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D1A16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7578644025 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:39:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas.kohn@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 2002 invoked by uid 65534); 28 Sep 2003 22:39:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [172.16.32.190]) (212.204.32.190) by mail.gmx.net (mp022) with SMTP; 29 Sep 2003 00:39:44 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2431876 From: Andreas Kohn To: frank@franklee.net In-Reply-To: <1090.203.141.149.2.1064789067.squirrel@www.franklee.net> References: <200309290427.41673.frank@franklee.net> <200309290613.23626.frank@franklee.net> <200309281436.55254.kstewart@owt.com> <1090.203.141.149.2.1064789067.squirrel@www.franklee.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064788797.939.24.camel@klamath> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:39:57 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Kent Stewart Subject: Re: How to mount USB drive in FreeBSD 5.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:39:46 -0000 On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 00:44, frank@franklee.net wrote: > On Sunday 28 September 2003 2:36 pm, Kent Stewart wrote: > > On Sunday 28 September 2003 11:13 pm, Frank Lee wrote: > >> On Sunday 28 September 2003 20:57, Andreas Kohn wrote: > >> > It doesn't even look like your usb drive is plugged in? Even if > >> > umass hadn't accepted it, ugen should have had attached (outputting > >> > some messages) > >> > >> ughh..... well, it helps to plug it *all the way* in. :-( It's new > >> and I didn't want break it... > >> > >> The message I get is: > >> umass0: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, > >> addr 2 umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) > >> > >> The system just halts there... > > Let me clarify this statement. There's a On/Off switch on the drive. > It's when I turn it (usb drive) off, the messages scroll (which I'd > post if I could get them) and systems reboots. Happened twice. The > third time, it says it got disconnected and the system continues to > run fine. You could try two things: 1) If that is a kernel panic (which I assume), it should tell you that is going to reboot IFF you do not press a key on your keyboard. Pressing a key should stop the reboot timer and give you time to copy the message by hand. 2) What happens if you plug the drive in _after_ the system has started? Dumbing down the drive should not be needed, as it can't (normally) do any USB 2.x stuff over a USB 1.1 link (ie. it should dumb down itself) > > > > I find that FreeBSD gets really confused if you have a msdos formatted > > zip in the zip drive when you boot. > > It is a msdos formatted usb drive (2.5" laptop type drive in a > IDE-to-USB2.0 case). Not a zip drive, but thank you for sharing that > piece of info. > > Frank Lee -- Andreas Kohn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 15:43:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D4C16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C2444025 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:43:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (blackwater.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756782BD41 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:43:17 +1000 (EST) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 9CDA851836; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:13:14 +0930 (CST) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:13:14 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Mikko =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ty=F6l=E4j=E4rvi?= Message-ID: <20030928224314.GE11520@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <3F76B9B3.6030805@intersonic.se> <00f701c385ad$c9a18cb0$0201a8c0@dredster> <3F76C421.1000104@intersonic.se> <20030928084915.Q44010@atlas.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OZkY3AIuv2LYvjdk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030928084915.Q44010@atlas.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to get system information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:43:22 -0000 --OZkY3AIuv2LYvjdk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday, 28 September 2003 at 9:02:05 -0700, Mikko Tyljrvi wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > >>>> >>>> I am wondering how to find out system hardware information from a >>>> running system, I know for instance pciconf(8) but what are the >>>> corresponding ones for memory, cpu etc? >>>> >>> >>> >>> more /var/run/dmesg.boot to get the info at boot time. >>> vmstat 5 5 will give you 5 items 5 sconds apart to show you procs, memo= ry, >>> page, disks, faults and cpu info. >>> >> >> Thanks, that was a good start. Now, if I wanted to see more detailed >> info on the processor than the dmesg.boot output: >> >> Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0x673 Stepping =3D 3 >> >> Like cache size etc.? > > You should be able to get some cpu info with ports/sysutils/x86info. This gives some information; ports/misc/cpuid gives you more. Here's an example: x86info: x86info v1.11. Dave Jones 2001, 2002 Feedback to . =20 Found 1 CPU Family: 6 Model: 10 Stepping: 0 CPU Model : Unknown CPU Processor name string: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+ =20 PowerNOW! Technology information Available features: Temperature sensing diode present. =20 cpuid: =20 eax in eax ebx ecx edx 00000000 00000001 68747541 444d4163 69746e65 00000001 000006a0 00000000 00000000 0383fbff 80000000 80000008 68747541 444d4163 69746e65 80000001 000007a0 00000000 00000000 c1c3fbff 80000002 20444d41 6c687441 74286e6f 5820296d 80000003 32332050 002b3030 00000000 00000000 80000004 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 80000005 0408ff08 ff20ff10 40020140 40020140 80000006 00000000 41004100 02008140 00000000 80000007 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000001 80000008 00002022 00000000 00000000 00000000 =20 Vendor ID: "AuthenticAMD"; CPUID level 1 =20 AMD-specific functions Version 000006a0: Family: 6 Model: 10 [Duron/Athlon model 10] =20 Standard feature flags 0383fbff: Floating Point Unit Virtual Mode Extensions Debugging Extensions Page Size Extensions Time Stamp Counter (with RDTSC and CR4 disable bit) Model Specific Registers with RDMSR & WRMSR PAE - Page Address Extensions Machine Check Exception COMPXCHG8B Instruction APIC SYSCALL/SYSRET or SYSENTER/SYSEXIT instructions MTRR - Memory Type Range Registers Global paging extension Machine Check Architecture Conditional Move Instruction PAT - Page Attribute Table PSE-36 - Page Size Extensions MMX instructions FXSAVE/FXRSTOR 25 - reserved Generation: 7 Model: 10 Extended feature flags c1c3fbff: Floating Point Unit Virtual Mode Extensions Debugging Extensions Page Size Extensions Time Stamp Counter (with RDTSC and CR4 disable bit) Model Specific Registers with RDMSR & WRMSR PAE - Page Address Extensions Machine Check Exception COMPXCHG8B Instruction APIC SYSCALL/SYSRET or SYSENTER/SYSEXIT instructions MTRR - Memory Type Range Registers Global paging extension Machine Check Architecture Conditional Move Instruction PAT - Page Attribute Table PSE-36 - Page Size Extensions AMD MMX Instruction Extensions MMX instructions FXSAVE/FXRSTOR 3DNow! Instruction Extensions 3DNow instructions =20 Processor name string: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 3200+ L1 Cache Information: 2/4-MB Pages: Data TLB: associativity 4-way #entries 8 Instruction TLB: associativity 255-way #entries 8 4-KB Pages: Data TLB: associativity 255-way #entries 32 Instruction TLB: associativity 255-way #entries 16 L1 Data cache: size 64 KB associativity 2-way lines per tag 1 line size 64 L1 Instruction cache: size 64 KB associativity 2-way lines per tag 1 line size 64 =20 L2 Cache Information: 2/4-MB Pages: Data TLB: associativity L2 off #entries 0 Instruction TLB: associativity L2 off #entries 0 4-KB Pages: Data TLB: associativity Direct mapped #entries 0 Instruction TLB: associativity Direct mapped #entries 0 size 2 KB associativity L2 off lines per tag 129 line size 64 =20 Advanced Power Management Feature Flags Has temperature sensing diode Maximum linear address: 32; maximum phys address 34 Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. NOTE: Due to the currently active Microsoft-based worms, I am limiting all incoming mail to 131,072 bytes. This is enough for normal mail, but not for large attachments. Please send these as URLs. --OZkY3AIuv2LYvjdk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/d2QCIubykFB6QiMRAgdDAJ9qsy1vUES6rN82h/YZCAjzQ72XqwCeP59m +OzaBaIJjZ9VOGgK4G6GDRs= =1+P3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OZkY3AIuv2LYvjdk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 15:44:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4175216A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C57DC44014 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:44:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas.kohn@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 4309 invoked by uid 65534); 28 Sep 2003 22:44:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [172.16.32.190]) (212.204.32.190) by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 29 Sep 2003 00:44:22 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2431876 From: Andreas Kohn To: Grant Peel In-Reply-To: <008501c38606$6a725770$6501a8c0@grant> References: <008501c38606$6a725770$6501a8c0@grant> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064789076.939.29.camel@klamath> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:44:36 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bad Super Block Count X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:44:25 -0000 On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 23:20, Grant Peel wrote: > Hello all, > > One of my Dell servers has rebooted itself twice in the past week. No panics > or anything showing in any log. No overheating noted in mbmon. I don't know > if the diskstuff below is related. > > Dell called me and told me I had to do a PERC III ROM flash, so I went to > the POP and did that. At that time I ran an fsck. I am seeing what look to > be (I hope) none critical disk errors. I cant find anything specific in the > FreeBSD archives and was hoping some here might have some knowledge. > > Here is the complete list from fsck, also I will post disklabel -r output at > the bottom. > > As a side note, I could not get fsck to be interactive. Not even at the > console, but I was never in single user mode either...should it matter? As you can see, fsck is unable to write to your partitions (which is why it answers "no" to all questions). You should try to run fsck from single user mode. > > Dell 1400SC, 933Mhz, 512 MB, RAID5 PERC 3/DC. > > BTW, I ran a consistency check before booting back into FReeBSD and > according to the PERC software the stripes etc are perfect. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------------- > > enterprise# fsck > ** /dev/amrd0s1a (NO WRITE) ... > ** /dev/amrd0s1d (NO WRITE) ... > ** /dev/amrd0s1h (NO WRITE) ... -- Andreas Kohn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 16:05:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F7316A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 336A743FF2 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:05:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas.kohn@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 17219 invoked by uid 65534); 28 Sep 2003 23:05:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [172.16.32.190]) (212.204.32.190) by mail.gmx.net (mp027) with SMTP; 29 Sep 2003 01:05:45 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2431876 From: Andreas Kohn To: Grant Peel In-Reply-To: <00e501c38613$17612950$6501a8c0@grant> References: <008501c38606$6a725770$6501a8c0@grant> <00e501c38613$17612950$6501a8c0@grant> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064790358.939.33.camel@klamath> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:05:59 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bad Super Block Count X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:05:47 -0000 [redirected mail to list, remember to use reply-to-all] On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 00:51, Grant Peel wrote: > I am now 120 miles from the server. Since it seems that the root filesystem > has no errors, can I simply umount the other filesystems and run fsck, (it > will be able to write then?) and then reboot? > > TIA, > > > -Grant You could try it at least. But then you wouldn't even need to reboot, just remounting the drives with mount -a should bring them back. But I'm not completely sure about this. > Andreas Kohn wrote > > On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 23:20, Grant Peel wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > > > One of my Dell servers has rebooted itself twice in the past week. No > panics > > > or anything showing in any log. No overheating noted in mbmon. I don't > know > > > if the diskstuff below is related. > > > > > > Dell called me and told me I had to do a PERC III ROM flash, so I went > to > > > the POP and did that. At that time I ran an fsck. I am seeing what look > to > > > be (I hope) none critical disk errors. I cant find anything specific in > the > > > FreeBSD archives and was hoping some here might have some knowledge. > > > > > > Here is the complete list from fsck, also I will post disklabel -r > output at > > > the bottom. > > > > > > As a side note, I could not get fsck to be interactive. Not even at the > > > console, but I was never in single user mode either...should it matter? > > > > As you can see, fsck is unable to write to your partitions (which is why > > it answers "no" to all questions). You should try to run fsck from > > single user mode. > > > > > > > > Dell 1400SC, 933Mhz, 512 MB, RAID5 PERC 3/DC. > > > > > > BTW, I ran a consistency check before booting back into FReeBSD and > > > according to the PERC software the stripes etc are perfect. > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > > ------------- > > > > > > enterprise# fsck > > > ** /dev/amrd0s1a (NO WRITE) > > ... > > > ** /dev/amrd0s1d (NO WRITE) > > ... > > > ** /dev/amrd0s1h (NO WRITE) > > ... > > > > -- > > Andreas Kohn > > -- Andreas Kohn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 16:27:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B82616A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:27:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au [210.50.30.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D287C44029 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:27:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ekrem@ozemail.com.au) Received: from [210.50.132.156] (210.50.132.156) by smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.0.018) (authenticated as ekrem@iprimus.com.au) id 3F674905004E7B15; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:27:00 +1000 From: Ekrem To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: References: <1064761546.65061.4.camel@beynam.ecko.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064791633.65061.14.camel@beynam.ecko.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:27:14 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Sendmail: Do I need it running? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:27:03 -0000 On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 02:00, Rus Foster wrote: > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Ekrem wrote: > > > Hi people, > > > > I'm using FreeBSD on my standalone desktop PC. I use dialup for the > > internet and use Evolution as the email client, but the following 2 > > processes always running; > > > > sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) > > sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) > > > > Do they need to be running for things like daily/weekly cron jobs that > > send emails to root, or for any other purpose? > > No if you aren't using SMTP to receive email from outside your can disable > these by putting sendmail_enable="no" in /etc/rc.conf then just kill of > the processes > > Rus Thanks for your reply. Actually, I am retrieving my emails from my ISP's SMTP server but I know I don't need to run sendmail to retrieve them. I did kill those 2 processes. I'm just too sure if it will have some impact on email notifications. Interestingly, I do have sendmail_enable="NO" in my /etc/rc.conf file, yet sendmail continues to automatically start whenever I reboot. I might have to go learn more about auto-start processes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 16:33:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2CBD16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net (outbound05.telus.net [199.185.220.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6206E43FF3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:33:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cpressey@catseye.mine.nu) Received: from catseye.biscuit.boo ([154.5.84.203]) by priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.netSMTP <20030928233354.NZKC10150.priv-edtnes40.telusplanet.net@catseye.biscuit.boo>; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:33:54 -0600 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:36:21 -0700 From: Chris Pressey To: Ekrem Message-Id: <20030928163621.13cb70af.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <1064791633.65061.14.camel@beynam.ecko.net.au> References: <1064761546.65061.4.camel@beynam.ecko.net.au> <1064791633.65061.14.camel@beynam.ecko.net.au> Organization: Cat's Eye Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail: Do I need it running? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:33:56 -0000 On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:27:14 +1000 Ekrem wrote: > Interestingly, I do have sendmail_enable="NO" in my /etc/rc.conf file, > yet sendmail continues to automatically start whenever I reboot. You need sendmail_enable="NONE" if you want to disable it completely. -Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 16:39:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9276916A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:39:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zim.0x7e.net (zim.0x7e.net [203.38.184.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15ABD4400B for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:39:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from listone@deathbeforedecaf.net) Received: from goo.0x7e.net ([203.38.184.164] helo=goo) by zim.0x7e.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1A3l8d-0008od-00; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:09:39 +0930 Message-ID: <003d01c38619$c8db1050$a4b826cb@goo> From: "Rob" To: "Chris Pressey" , "Ekrem" References: <1064761546.65061.4.camel@beynam.ecko.net.au><1064791633.65061.14.camel@beynam.ecko.net.au> <20030928163621.13cb70af.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:09:38 +0930 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail: Do I need it running? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:39:49 -0000 With the default configuration, this may disable sending mail from the command line (eg cron jobs). Have a look at /etc/defaults/rc.conf for the different sendmail_* variables, and read /etc/mail/README for more information on mail submission. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Pressey" Subject: Re: Sendmail: Do I need it running? > On Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:27:14 +1000 > Ekrem wrote: > > > Interestingly, I do have sendmail_enable="NO" in my /etc/rc.conf file, > > yet sendmail continues to automatically start whenever I reboot. > > You need sendmail_enable="NONE" if you want to disable it completely. > > -Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 16:45:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C3D16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail014.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail014.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6716643F3F for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:45:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anthony@carmoda.com) Received: from carmoda3 (c211-28-220-147.kelvn1.qld.optusnet.com.au [211.28.220.147])h8SNjZ710490 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:45:36 +1000 From: "Anthony Carmody" To: Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:49:57 +1000 Message-ID: <004b01c3861b$39767790$6600a8c0@carmoda3> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal Subject: Ethernet Drivers with 5.1 not happening X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: anthony@carmoda.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:45:39 -0000 Hiya, I posted a question about this last week. I have done a little homework and I am resubmitting my question with more information and i hope someone can help this time around. I am building a FreeBSD 5.1 box for a client using a fairly new ASUS Mainboard, that SHOULD according to the HARDWARE.TXT file on my installer CDROM, work with all the hardware chip-sets concerned. precisely, an "Intel 82562EZ LAN PHY". These are the relevant lines i get from "pciconf -lv" : none3@pci1:8:0: class=0x2020000 card=0x80f81043 chip=0x10508086 rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' class = network subclass = ethernet AND this is what i get from "dmesg | more" : pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) is there a way i might just install some drivers without reinstalling the whole system? I think someone has made some recently, although i am not familiar with the procedure of obtaining and installing them. I have experience installing from ISO images and adding the odd port but not much beyond that. Here is the link to the mailing.freebsd.cvs-current thread im not sure about: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&th=c2cc18e7fd2e3621&rnum= 1 any info is greatly appreciated always. Regards, Carmoda iamcarmoda[remove-spam]@hotmail.com ==================================== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 16:46:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5860B16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411F743FCB for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:46:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from judmarc@fastmail.fm) Received: from mail.messagingengine.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E88522EB7A; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:44:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 10.202.2.150 ([10.202.2.150] helo=mail.messagingengine.com) by messagingengine.com with SMTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:44:34 -0400 X-Epoch: 1064792674 X-Sasl-enc: pwjBJZ1rwH03IfSsHEGO9Q Received: from sparky (dialup-67.74.84.28.Dial1.Philadelphia1.Level3.net [67.74.84.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FED2233E57; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:44:32 -0400 (EDT) To: christian serb , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3F77393D.7777.1B3E57A@localhost> Message-ID: From: Jud Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:44:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3F77393D.7777.1B3E57A@localhost> User-Agent: Opera7.20/Win32 M2 build 3131 Subject: Re: can FreeBSD run dos X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:46:39 -0000 On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:40:45 +0200, christian serb wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:51:50AM -0500, fred wrote: >> > I am new to different OS's . >> > Can this Os run Wordperfect 5.1 for dos??? >> >> You can use vmware2 (version 3 works only for FreeBSD 5.x) to run a >> vertual machine. This way you could run your old programs. > i've coincidentally found that: > > Xdos is available at 1. sunsite.unc.edu /pub/Linux/Incoming (will > probably be moved to > /pub/Linux/ALPHA/dosemu ) > > source: > http://groups.google.de/groups?q=xdos&hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF- > 8&newwindow=1&selm=2ji219%24qkv%40klaava.Helsinki.FI&rnum=1 I believe xdos/dosemu requires an actual DOS partition on the machine (someone please let me know if that's incorrect). So again, the point would be, if you are going to install DOS, why not just run WordPerfect from it? Jud From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 16:50:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDAE16A4BF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867134404D for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:50:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sandshrimp@comcast.net) Received: from comcast.net (unknown[12.242.162.139]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <2003092823501201100npdo0e> (Authid: sandshrimp); Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:50:12 +0000 Message-ID: <3F7773B3.7080508@comcast.net> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:50:11 -0700 From: Ryan Merrick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030524 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ekrem References: <1064761546.65061.4.camel@beynam.ecko.net.au> <1064791633.65061.14.camel@beynam.ecko.net.au> In-Reply-To: <1064791633.65061.14.camel@beynam.ecko.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Sendmail: Do I need it running? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:50:19 -0000 Ekrem wrote: > On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 02:00, Rus Foster wrote: > >>On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Ekrem wrote: >> >> >>>Hi people, >>> >>>I'm using FreeBSD on my standalone desktop PC. I use dialup for the >>>internet and use Evolution as the email client, but the following 2 >>>processes always running; >>> >>>sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) >>>sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) >>> >>>Do they need to be running for things like daily/weekly cron jobs that >>>send emails to root, or for any other purpose? >> >>No if you aren't using SMTP to receive email from outside your can disable >>these by putting sendmail_enable="no" in /etc/rc.conf then just kill of >>the processes >> >>Rus > > > Thanks for your reply. > > Actually, I am retrieving my emails from my ISP's SMTP server but I know > I don't need to run sendmail to retrieve them. I did kill those 2 > processes. I'm just too sure if it will have some impact on email > notifications. > > Interestingly, I do have sendmail_enable="NO" in my /etc/rc.conf file, > yet sendmail continues to automatically start whenever I reboot. > > I might have to go learn more about auto-start processes. > To completely disable sendmail in #/etc/rc.conf use sendmail_enable="none" Sendmail is used as the default mailer for cron. This only works if an email address is mapped to root in #/etc/aliases. -Ryan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 17:03:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0245316A4C1 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:03:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A1E43FE0 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:03:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from judmarc@fastmail.fm) Received: from mail.messagingengine.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B2D235C03; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:01:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 10.202.2.150 ([10.202.2.150] helo=mail.messagingengine.com) by messagingengine.com with SMTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:01:58 -0400 X-Epoch: 1064793718 X-Sasl-enc: uIusw5rxi/LJV481EFwUKQ Received: from sparky (dialup-67.74.84.28.Dial1.Philadelphia1.Level3.net [67.74.84.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0823E235C3B; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:01:57 -0400 (EDT) To: christian serb , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3F77393D.7777.1B3E57A@localhost> Message-ID: From: Jud Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:01:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera7.20/Win32 M2 build 3131 Subject: Re: can FreeBSD run dos - whoops X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:03:54 -0000 On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:44:31 -0400, Jud wrote: > On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:40:45 +0200, christian serb > wrote: > >>> On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 09:51:50AM -0500, fred wrote: >>> > I am new to different OS's . >>> > Can this Os run Wordperfect 5.1 for dos??? >>> >>> You can use vmware2 (version 3 works only for FreeBSD 5.x) to run a >>> vertual machine. This way you could run your old programs. > >> i've coincidentally found that: >> >> Xdos is available at 1. sunsite.unc.edu /pub/Linux/Incoming (will >> probably be moved to >> /pub/Linux/ALPHA/dosemu ) >> >> source: >> http://groups.google.de/groups?q=xdos&hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF- >> 8&newwindow=1&selm=2ji219%24qkv%40klaava.Helsinki.FI&rnum=1 > > I believe xdos/dosemu requires an actual DOS partition on the machine > (someone please let me know if that's incorrect). So again, the point > would be, if you are going to install DOS, why not just run WordPerfect > from it? [Sound of palm contacting forehead, remind self once again to be more careful in future.] Sorry, xdos/dosemu uses DOS installed to a disk image that lives in a directory, by default /usr/local/lib/dosemu. Jud From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 17:05:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69B816A4BF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:05:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.solone.net (outbound.solone.net [203.81.46.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B986E43FD7 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:05:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from email@edylie.net) Received: (qmail 78624 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 18:19:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (202.166.15.65) by 10.10.10.10 with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 18:19:00 -0000 From: Edy Lie To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064599696.2572.14.camel@ps2.consoledojo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 02:08:16 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: module_register: module miibus/ukphy already exists! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: email@edylie.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:05:46 -0000 Greetings, module_register: module miibus/ukphy already exists! linker_file_sysinit "miibus.ko" failed to register! 17 Anyone seen that before during intial bootup ? I was watching on console and somehow something was trying to init ifconfig rl0 (realtek). This box only has fxp0 and xl0 nic cards. Cheers, Ed -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 17:21:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E42D16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragoncrest.jasnetworks.net (dragoncrest.jasnetworks.net [65.194.254.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355CE43FF5 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:21:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dragoncrest@voyager.net) Received: from j2v6e9.voyager.net (testbox [192.168.0.4]) h8SJPCmF010997 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:25:12 GMT (envelope-from dragoncrest@voyager.net) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030928201854.022a7ec0@pop.voyager.net> X-Sender: dragoncrest@pop.voyager.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:30:03 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Dragoncrest Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Questions about mkisofs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:21:17 -0000 Hi all. Just curious of something. I'm probably doing something wrong and totally not paying attention, but for some reason when I run mkisofs, all my files get truncated at 12 charecters and some weird 001 is appended to the rest of the name. I use the following command when building an iso file for burning: mkisofs -R -U -o mycd.iso /path.to.files/to.be.burned/ I'm obviously missing something because I've gotten files with names up to 128 charecters long to be included in an iso when burning them in windows, but not in freebsd using mkisofs. I've also been able to make the disk name 16 charecters long in windows but only 12 with mkisofs. Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong with the options on mkisofs and help me fix it? Like I said, I've read the man file and I thought I had it all correct, but apparently that's not true. Much apreciated on the help. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 17:36:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583CC16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.30.200.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A58D43F75 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:36:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id A8E433AFA; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:36:48 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Jesse Sheidlower References: <20030926033951.GA9516@panix.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 28 Sep 2003 20:36:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20030926033951.GA9516@panix.com> Message-ID: <44u16wig67.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 43 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading HD difficulties X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:36:50 -0000 Jesse Sheidlower writes: > Originally I tried with dump, but I kept getting loads of > errors, so I switched to tar. I made one tarfile of /usr > (which is relatively large), and one of everything else. There might have been a hint in the errors you were getting with dump. Note that you can't make a copy of a whole system with tar, because there are several kinds of special files it won't handle well. > (I actually had to install mount and tar onto the NFS > filesystem and run them from there; I'm not showing that > here.) They should've been on the fixit disk you booted from. > I then rebooted, from the new HD this time, rather than > the CD, and things started to work OK. But eventually I > ran into filesystem problems--sync problems, or other > things, and I had to run fsck -y manually to fix them. But > though this did clean the filesystem, the stuff that was > there wasn't what I had untar'd into place--it seemed to > be a bare minimun copy of the OS. This has repeated more > than once. You didn't mention ever doing a minimum install. However, you *must* have done at some point. > I obviously don't know what I'm doing, but would be very > grateful for any suggestions for how to get this new HD > in. I want it to be exactly the same as the existing one, > but with more room; I'm not trying to do anything fancy > or switch anything around. Especially by this point I'm > willing to do anything to get things working again, as > I really need my computer back! I recommend doing a clean install, and then restoring the original disk's contents to a separate subdirectory tree, to move the user data in from. I would even do a new install of your ports/packages, using the restored data to rebuild the configuration information. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 17:44:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B8616A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (207-173-226-17.bras01.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [207.173.226.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA0643F85 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:44:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from L035522 (unknown [192.168.1.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66AC3BF424; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:44:06 -0700 (PDT) To: Nathan Kinkade References: <002f01c38547$10d89ef0$0301a8c0@bigdaddy> <20030927165534.GB696@npkfbsd> Message-ID: From: Drew Tomlinson Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:44:05 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20030927165534.GB696@npkfbsd> User-Agent: Opera7.20/Win32 M2 build 3144 cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: ARP Question - Maybe? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:44:09 -0000 On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:55:35 +0000, Nathan Kinkade wrote: > On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 03:31:16PM -0700, Drew Tomlinson wrote: >> I'm trying to get a Linksys WET11 Wireless Ethernet Bridge working with >> a >> D-Link 530 NIC that uses the rl driver. I have configured the bridge >> and >> gotten it to work with a Windows XP box if I tell the bridge to use "MAC >> address cloning". However I can not get it working on my 4.8 FBSD box. >> >> I'm not really sure but I suspect my problem might be with ARP? The rl0 >> interface is configured as 192.168.100.2 and the bridge is connected to >> this >> interface. The bridge is configured with an IP address of >> 192.168.100.225 >> but as I understand it, this is only the address to use when connecting >> to >> the web based configuration utility. I have a Linksys access point with >> IP >> of 192.168.100.1. >> >> Anyway, after attempting connections to these three addresses, my arp >> table >> looks like this: >> >> ? (192.168.100.1) at (incomplete) on rl0 [ethernet] >> ? (192.168.100.2) at 00:05:5d:d0:ba:67 on rl0 permanent [ethernet] >> ? (192.168.100.225) at (incomplete) on rl0 [ethernet] >> >> I can not get any response from any device beyond the rl0 interface. I >> setup ipfw to log all traffic to that interface and can see the traffic >> going out: >> >> Sep 27 15:18:04 blacksheep /kernel: ipfw: 50 Accept ICMP:8.0 >> 192.168.100.2 >> 192.168.100.1 out via rl0 >> >> Sep 27 15:24:00 blacksheep /kernel: ipfw: 50 Accept ICMP:8.0 >> 192.168.100.2 >> 192.168.100.225 out via rl0 >> >> Can anyone educate me on arp and if it's my problem, tell me what I >> might >> need to add to my arp table to get things going? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Drew Thank you for your response. > I had this problem recently. Turns out that ipfw when used in > conjunction with bridging (net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1) that your I don't seem to have this. I'm running 4.8. Here's all of my net.link sysctls: net.link.generic.system.ifcount: 8 net.link.ether.inet.prune_intvl: 300 net.link.ether.inet.max_age: 1200 net.link.ether.inet.host_down_time: 20 net.link.ether.inet.maxtries: 5 net.link.ether.inet.useloopback: 1 net.link.ether.inet.proxyall: 0 net.link.ether.inet.log_arp_wrong_iface: 1 net.link.ether.ipfw: 0 net.link.gif.max_nesting: 1 net.link.gif.parallel_tunnels: 0 > default rule must be to allow all. You can mitigate this by making your > last rule something like: > > deny { tcp or udp } from any to any I am already set up like this. > This should basically block pretty much any traffic that you are > probably worried about. To test that this is the problem, disable the > firewall temporarily, maybe with something like: > > # sysctl net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=0 > > then try your network. if it works, the re-enable ipfw by setting the > above parameter back to 1. then take a look at your arp cache expiry > with `arp -an' and make note as to wether the net breaks again as soon > as the arp entry expires. > > you can set ipfw to use a default rule of accepting by adding this > option to you kernel config: > > options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT As I understand it, I don't need to configure my FBSD box as a bridge. Please let me know if I am incorrect. Basically, I want to use my neighbor's connection as a backup link to the Internet. He has a Linksys Wireless Access Point/Router in his home. Instead of installing a wireless card in my FBSD box, I bought a Linksys Wireless Bridge so I could install it by a window to get a better signal. The Linksys bridge connects via ethernet cable to the D-Link NIC in my FBSD box. Here's a diagram of the setup: Internet | Public IP | ADSL Modem/Router 192.168.10.1 | dc0 192.168.10.2 | FBSD 4.8 --------- rl0 | 192.168.100.2 dc1 | 192.168.1.2 192.168.100.225 | Wireless Bridge Internal LAN | 192.168.100.1 Neighbor's AP I can get to the wireless bridge from my neighbor's network and I can get to the rl0 from my internal LAN. The breakage is between the rl0 interface and the linksys wireless bridge. Do you have any idea what I need to configure to make things work? Thanks again for your time!!! Drew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 17:51:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873C216A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dragoncrest.jasnetworks.net (dragoncrest.jasnetworks.net [65.194.254.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F3D44022 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:51:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dragoncrest@voyager.net) Received: from j2v6e9.voyager.net (testbox [192.168.0.4]) h8SJtOmF011052 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:55:25 GMT (envelope-from dragoncrest@voyager.net) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030928205847.021aa580@pop.voyager.net> X-Sender: dragoncrest@pop.voyager.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:00:16 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Dragoncrest Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Make world but not make kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:51:29 -0000 Just curious. If I wanted to upgrade all my sources, could I do a "Make World" without having to do a "Make Kernel" or are the two intertwined where if I do the one I have to do the other? Just curious. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 17:53:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E67416A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fed1mtao08.cox.net (fed1mtao08.cox.net [68.6.19.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016F94403B for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:53:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from daniel@hawton.org) Received: from hawton.org ([68.99.178.107]) by fed1mtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20030929005310.YUFQ14291.fed1mtao08.cox.net@hawton.org> for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:53:10 -0400 Message-ID: <3F77827E.7030302@hawton.org> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:53:18 -0700 From: Daniel Hawton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030928205847.021aa580@pop.voyager.net> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030928205847.021aa580@pop.voyager.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Make world but not make kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:53:22 -0000 It's better to go: make buildworld make buildkernel KERNCONF=(Kernel Config name) make installkernel KERNCONF=(Kernel Config name) make installworld Basically, if you're upgrading from 4.6 to 4.7 for example, you need to upgrade your kernel to match your userland. -Daniel Dragoncrest wrote: > Just curious. If I wanted to upgrade all my sources, could I do a > "Make World" without having to do a "Make Kernel" or are the two > intertwined where if I do the one I have to do the other? Just curious. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 17:57:02 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D05F16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.mi.celestial.com (dagney.celestial.com [192.136.111.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B94A44027 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:57:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bill@celestial.com) Received: by mail.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id 4740711F1A4; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:57:01 -0700 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20030929005701.GB13084@alexis.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030928201854.022a7ec0@pop.voyager.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030928201854.022a7ec0@pop.voyager.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Questions about mkisofs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:57:02 -0000 On Sun, Sep 28, 2003, Dragoncrest wrote: > Hi all. Just curious of something. I'm probably doing something >wrong and totally not paying attention, but for some reason when I run >mkisofs, all my files get truncated at 12 charecters and some weird 001 is >appended to the rest of the name. I use the following command when >building an iso file for burning: mkisofs -R -U -o mycd.iso >/path.to.files/to.be.burned/ I usually use ``mkisof -l -r -L ...'' where: -L Allow more than one ``.'' in names. -l Allow full 31 character filenames -r File ownership set to something ``useful''. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ ``Rights'' is a fictional abstraction. No one has ``Rights'', neither machines nor flesh-and-blood. Persons... have opportunities, not rights, which they use or do not use. -- Lazarus Long From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 17:59:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCE916A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44D184402F for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:59:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas.kohn@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 2386 invoked by uid 65534); 29 Sep 2003 00:59:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO [172.16.32.190]) (212.204.32.190) by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 29 Sep 2003 02:59:45 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2431876 From: Andreas Kohn To: Dragoncrest In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030928201854.022a7ec0@pop.voyager.net> References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030928201854.022a7ec0@pop.voyager.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064797198.939.37.camel@klamath> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 02:59:59 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Questions about mkisofs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:59:48 -0000 On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 02:30, Dragoncrest wrote: > Hi all. Just curious of something. I'm probably doing something > wrong and totally not paying attention, but for some reason when I run > mkisofs, all my files get truncated at 12 charecters and some weird 001 is > appended to the rest of the name. I use the following command when > building an iso file for burning: mkisofs -R -U -o mycd.iso > /path.to.files/to.be.burned/ > > I'm obviously missing something because I've gotten files with > names up to 128 charecters long to be included in an iso when burning them > in windows, but not in freebsd using mkisofs. I've also been able to make > the disk name 16 charecters long in windows but only 12 with mkisofs. Can > someone tell me what I'm doing wrong with the options on mkisofs and help > me fix it? Like I said, I've read the man file and I thought I had it all > correct, but apparently that's not true. Much apreciated on the help. Thanks. > > Hi, Read the man page again, and pay attention to the -J option and any occurences of RockRidge and Joliet =) HTH -- Andreas Kohn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 17:59:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DDA16A4BF for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:59:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (207-173-226-17.bras01.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [207.173.226.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B8143FF7 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:59:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from L035522 (unknown [192.168.1.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C1603BF424; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <008601c38624$fb556c50$1c01a8c0@lc.ca.gov> From: "Drew Tomlinson" To: , "Dragoncrest" References: <5.2.0.9.2.20030928205847.021aa580@pop.voyager.net> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:59:48 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: Make world but not make kernel? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:59:50 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dragoncrest" To: Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 6:00 PM Subject: Make world but not make kernel? > Just curious. If I wanted to upgrade all my sources, could I do a "Make > World" without having to do a "Make Kernel" or are the two intertwined > where if I do the one I have to do the other? Just curious. Sources are updated using cvsup. make world builds the userland, i.e. all of the programs that are part of the OS but not in the kernel. make kernel builds the actual kernel. World and kernel should be in sync or you will have strange problems and some stuff won't work. Read about this in the handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 18:15:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2AD16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:15:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web21104.mail.yahoo.com (web21104.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.227.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9418144017 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:15:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from materribile@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030929011506.24823.qmail@web21104.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.228.74.10] by web21104.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:15:05 PDT Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:15:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Terribile To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030928230553.BA55416A510@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: Charles Howse Subject: Re: Comparing buildworld times on twin machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:15:07 -0000 Charles Howse writes: > I have 2 machines on my home network with (almost) > identical hardware. ... The only difference is > that curly has 128 MB ram where larry has only 64. Memory available for caching certainly can make a difference. Remember that FreeBSD uses ALL otherwise uncommitted memory for caching, and so a machine with more memory may do less disk I/O. > They *do not*, however have identical hard drives, > even though each machine has 2 drives, with > /usr/obj on the second drive of each machine. And building things can do a lot of disk I/O, and a lot of directory lookups, especially if you have recursive make(1) operations. > Larry can buildworld in 1 hr 57 mins. It takes > curly 3 hrs 16 mins, even though curly has twice > the ram. > If I watch the compile, with one eye on the disk > activity light, it seems to me that the process is > largely CPU intensive, therefore I would expect > that the buildworld times should be roughly equal. Instead of watching just the disk lights, start up systat 1 -vmstat in a free window or console. Learn what the various indicators mean. You'll probably be able to find your answers there. systat(8) is really an incredible tool for understanding where the system is spending its time, and how. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 19:46:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C1516A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DAF43FE0 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:46:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from pooh.strauser.com (pooh.honeypot.net [10.0.5.128]) by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8T2kLGf085136 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:46:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000001c385f7$f948a5d0$04fea8c0@moe> From: Kirk Strauser Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:46:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <000001c385f7$f948a5d0$04fea8c0@moe> (Charles Howse's message of "Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:37:37 -0500") Message-ID: <87smmgmhvr.fsf@strauser.com> Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: Comparing buildworld times on twin machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 02:46:25 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-09-28T19:37:37Z, "Charles Howse" writes: > The only difference is that curly has 128 MB ram where larry has only 64. Is the RAM of the exact same type on both machines, i.e. 133MHz non-ECC vs. 100MHz ECC? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser "94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/d5z95sRg+Y0CpvERAjcHAKCaSxf7EfCPar6wZxusARLLZFnKUwCgnFvU RO+2g02bCAa+vkJl1dFKb9I= =j1mL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 19:55:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B6116A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elitists.org (gb.elitists.org [64.40.72.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F84443FB1 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:55:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsdlists@elitists.org) Received: by elitists.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id B0E042FE; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:57:04 -0500 (CDT) From: "F. Even" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.23 X-IPAddress: 12.34.246.37 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: <20030929025704.B0E042FE@elitists.org> Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:57:04 -0500 (CDT) Subject: upgrading 4.0 to stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 02:55:29 -0000 I would like to upgrade a 4.0 machine to STABLE, or at least to the RELENG security level. How difficult will this be? Is there anything special that I need to be concerned about, so I don't get bit? This is kind of an important box....and I don't want it to take a nose-dive after I reboot it remotely. Thanks, Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 20:02:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BB216A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:02:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ms-smtp-03.rdc-kc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.166.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60FB44030 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:02:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwitt1@kc.rr.com) Received: from CPE-24-94-181-213.kc.rr.com (CPE-24-94-181-213.kc.rr.com [24.94.181.213])h8T32Hrv000581 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:02:23 -0500 (CDT) From: Derek J Witt To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-aPA7t4bgc71TsKVdnPq+" Message-Id: <1064804476.1057.12.camel@saiya-jin.kc.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:01:51 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Ambit Cable Modem (Model 60194A-004) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dwitt1@kc.rr.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 03:02:26 -0000 --=-aPA7t4bgc71TsKVdnPq+ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Good evening, everyone. I have the above modem (Which is actually cable modem router; it allows two simultaneous connections through the ethernet and USB ports on separate computers). I have found out that I was getting carrier droppage through my ethernet card (I'll mess with a new cable later ;-). Anyway, I decided to try the USB interface. I have the usb kernel modules installed right now. Both of my devices (a Compaq IJ650 InkJet, and the modem) are detected by the UHCI kernel modules. When I try inserting the aue module, it doesn't activate my modem. When I do insert the modem, the ugen module receives the USB connection. Ok, seemed fine thus far. But when I try to setup my DHCP connection using ugen0 as my network interface, no go. In linux, I get the following class/vendor ID (output from lsusb): Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0bb2:6098 Ambit Microsystems Corp. Also, in Linux, I'm using the acm and CDCEther kernel modules. So, I know it's a CDCE-type device. So, my question is this: Is this modem's USB interface supported in FreeBSD 4.8 and/or 5.1? If so, which kernel module(s) can be used. If not, oh well. Time to buy the replacement Ethernet cable. --=20 Derek J Witt --=-aPA7t4bgc71TsKVdnPq+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA/d6B82lgVX+zXThwRAkVPAJ0ejFVrkR1yvpkxCzNZhmWFBqcaRgCfTyjB LZCp5Q8wZOkYyeKAP0KTssU= =uu4l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-aPA7t4bgc71TsKVdnPq+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 20:11:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2197F16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:11:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remt20.cluster1.charter.net (remt20.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.8.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4AE44005 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:11:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chowse@charter.net) Received: from [66.168.145.25] (HELO moe) by remt20.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with ESMTP id 6673307; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:11:48 -0400 From: "Charles Howse" To: "'Kirk Strauser'" , Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:11:36 -0500 Message-ID: <002001c38637$66b46ed0$04fea8c0@moe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: <87smmgmhvr.fsf@strauser.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: RE: Comparing buildworld times on twin machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 03:11:59 -0000 > At 2003-09-28T19:37:37Z, "Charles Howse" writes: >=20 > > The only difference is that curly has 128 MB ram where=20 > larry has only 64. >=20 > Is the RAM of the exact same type on both machines, i.e.=20 > 133MHz non-ECC > vs. 100MHz ECC? The first 64 MB on each machine is identical. The additional 64 MB on curly is a spare stick I had laying around. I said to myself, "I wonder if this ram will work in curly?" =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 20:20:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9887C16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 561DF44013 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:20:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from adam.mclaurin@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 29049 invoked by uid 65534); 29 Sep 2003 03:20:45 -0000 Received: from dsl-cust-145.openweb.ca (EHLO jake) (64.39.186.145) by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 29 Sep 2003 05:20:45 +0200 X-Authenticated: #19934200 Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:20:43 -0400 From: Adam McLaurin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030928232043.0b2e95b0.adam.mclaurin@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20030929025704.B0E042FE@elitists.org> References: <20030929025704.B0E042FE@elitists.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.5-gtk2-20030906 (GTK+ 2.2.4; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: upgrading 4.0 to stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 03:20:47 -0000 On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:57:04 -0500 (CDT) "F. Even" wrote: > I would like to upgrade a 4.0 machine to STABLE, or at least to the > RELENG security level. How difficult will this be? Is there anything > > special that I need to be concerned about, so I don't get bit? This > is kind of an important box....and I don't want it to take a nose-dive > > after I reboot it remotely. The most common advice is to upgrade incrementally. Upgrading directly from 4.0 to 4.8 is likely to encounter problems. I personally would recommend 4.0 to 4.3, then 4.3 to 4.6.2, then 4.6.2 to 4.8. Check the handbook for the appropriate CVS tags. In any case, it is *very* important that you read /usr/src/UPDATING each time you update your source. This will inform you of any special steps you need to take before upgrading to that respective version. If you're especially paranoid and have plenty of time, you could even do the upgraded in more increments than I recommended. Just be sure to read the UPDATING file each time. Hope that helps, Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 22:20:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C611816A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.tele-kom.ru (mx.tele-kom.ru [213.80.148.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBD0C44030 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 22:20:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from doublef@tele-kom.ru) Received: (qmail 62272 invoked by uid 555); 29 Sep 2003 09:20:42 +0400 Received: from hal.localdomain (213.80.149.225) by t-k.ru with TeleMail/2 id 1064812842-62265 for dgw@liwest.at; Mon, 29 Sep 09:20:42 2003 +0400 (MSD) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:21:10 +0000 From: Sergey "DoubleF" Zaharchenko To: Daniela Message-Id: <20030929092110.1da10066.doublef@tele-kom.ru> In-Reply-To: <200309281845.39349.dgw@liwest.at> References: <200309281845.39349.dgw@liwest.at> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="=.658GZkBSEDCTgM" cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with audio recording X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:20:46 -0000 --=.658GZkBSEDCTgM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 18:45:39 +0000 Daniela probably wrote: > Probably a stupid question: > > I need to record sound and it just won't work. I set the recording level to > 75:75 and the recording source to "Line" (I'm not sure this is correct) This depends on what you are actually tring to record. If you are recording from a microphone, it should be "mic",if you are recording from line input - "line". -- DoubleF When outrageous expenditures are divided finely enough the public will not have enough stake in any one expenditure to squelch it. --=.658GZkBSEDCTgM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/d/mYwo7hT/9lVdwRAlTcAJ9svhI1JX47ewk4YCod88MhMwQN/gCeJvT3 hiyGZ0m4LgVUbccpGQLr290= =n+gM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=.658GZkBSEDCTgM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 23:46:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CCC16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:46:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from office.paramon.ru (ns4.paramon.ru [217.107.29.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031BA4400D for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 23:46:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ilia@paramon.ru) Received: from localhost.paramon.ru. (localhost.paramon.ru. [127.0.0.1]) by office.paramon.ru (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8T6kWxb072964 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:46:34 +0600 (YEKST) (envelope-from ilia@paramon.ru) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:46:32 +0600 (YEKST) From: Ilia Chipitsine To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20030929124428.P72920@office.paramon.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: utf8locale is being removed from system after "make installworld" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:46:39 -0000 Dear Sirs, I noticed that utf8locale is not found by PostgreSQL, for instance, after "make installworld". How should I fix that ? (I don't want to reinstall misc/utf8locale every time I "make installworld", it is not any clever) Cheers, Ilia Chipitsine From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 00:35:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7BA16A4B3 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.solone.net (outbound.solone.net [203.81.46.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D07644027 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:35:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from email@edylie.net) Received: (qmail 34216 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2003 07:35:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (202.166.15.65) by 10.10.10.10 with SMTP; 29 Sep 2003 07:35:50 -0000 From: Edy Lie To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1064820938.988.5.camel@ps2.consoledojo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:35:38 +0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Backup and Restore strategy X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: email@edylie.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:35:53 -0000 Greetings, Anyone has a good backup/restore from bare metal procedure? IE. when the disaster happens, admin just need to type few commands to get those raw disk restore to where it was backup or insert the backup image (CD) and it will start restoring. Mondo rescue is fairly interesting but it does not "support" FreeBSD ? Could not find it in the ports tree (4.8 and 5.1) http://www.microwerks.net/~hugo/ TIA. Cheers, Ed -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 00:49:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC35616A4BF for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7955043F85 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:49:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from b_cassidy@bellsouth.net) Received: from bellsouth.net ([68.214.80.129]) by imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.netSMTP <20030929074859.IMFV1781.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@bellsouth.net> for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 03:48:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 02:51:57 -0500 From: Bryan Cassidy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030929025157.5d005b32.b_cassidy@bellsouth.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 4.8 v/s 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:49:01 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I was just wondering what people on the list thought. I don't want to know any details on which is better or whatever just in general which is better for whatever reasons people use it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/d+SdKjx9X0nK5vwRArY5AJ44i24ywDRWdL7cWN8dQJM5RRqN3ACghAg6 VUx2SDWZiY5AU3ObTQhCtJ0= =tTb3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 00:51:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D2D16A4BF for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stanley.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de (stanley.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.137.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2060644039 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:51:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tfie@lrs.eei.uni-erlangen.de) Received: from lrs.eei.uni-erlangen.de (mcdowell.e-technik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.137.108])JAA01287 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:51:34 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3F77E485.3070107@lrs.eei.uni-erlangen.de> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:51:33 +0200 From: Thomas Fiebig Organization: Institute for Computer Aided Circuit Design User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.1a+) Gecko/20020703 X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Which PATH is set for daemons? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:51:40 -0000 Hello, my question concerns the path settings for daemons like lpd, if started from rc.conf with lpd_enable="YES". I have inserted a driver in /etc/printcap that uses a script installed by ghostscript. This script located in /usr/local/bin itself uses gs without an explicite path (/usr/local/bin/gs). Now starting anything to print with this driver results in an lpd error message 'gs: not found'. Stopping lpd and starting it as root from a terminal seems to work (but don't know exactly!). So my question is: For daemons started in rc.conf (like lpd) which path do they see during startup? Thanks, Thomas BTW: My /.profile (or /.cshrc) contents the /usr/local/bin path! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 00:58:31 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672EB16A4B3 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from goblin.sonhosting.net (CCCXIV.dsl.saunalahti.fi [62.142.241.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A317843F93 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:58:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sonhosting.net) Received: from sonhosting.net (localhost.sonhosting.net [127.0.0.1]) h8T7wU5I001192 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:58:31 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from mike@sonhosting.net) Received: from 137.163.145.226 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mike) by www.sonhosting.net with HTTP; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:58:31 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <34863.137.163.145.226.1064822311.squirrel@www.sonhosting.net> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:58:31 +0300 (EEST) From: "Lego Builder" To: X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: No mail notification over ssh! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 07:58:31 -0000 I'm currently setting up a FreeBSD 4.8 mailserver with sendmail, but noticed that when I log in through ssh to my box I don't get any mail notification from bash. Unlike when I physicaly log in at the box. I'd just like to know how I can get mail notification enabled over ssh so I know when I've got new/unread mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 01:08:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBDA16A4B3 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA72B4400D for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:08:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from anthony@carmoda.com) Received: from carmoda3 (c211-28-220-147.kelvn1.qld.optusnet.com.au [211.28.220.147])h8T88n103350 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:08:50 +1000 From: "Anthony Carmody" To: Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:13:11 +1000 Message-ID: <005901c38661$86b1ba10$6600a8c0@carmoda3> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <20030929025157.5d005b32.b_cassidy@bellsouth.net> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: FreeBSD 4.8 v/s 5.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: anthony@carmoda.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:08:57 -0000 ok, i am using 5.1 for 2 developemnt servers, 1 programming workstation. i.e: not production, internal network behind firewall. so, security and stability are not critical as far as i am concerened. there is another important reason, my hardware tends to require later versions of FreeBSD, for example: i am currently supplied with late model Intel P4 systems, they need 5.1 to run hyper-threading CPUs. i hope that is some help. => -----Original Message----- => Hash: SHA1 => => I was just wondering what people on the list thought. I don't want to => know any details on which is better or whatever just in => general which is => better for whatever reasons people use it. => From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 01:12:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C733416A4B3 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DFC43F75 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:12:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h8T8Bsfs018676 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:11:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id h8T8BsTG018675; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:11:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:11:54 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Lego Builder Message-ID: <20030929081154.GA18241@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Lego Builder , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <34863.137.163.145.226.1064822311.squirrel@www.sonhosting.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <34863.137.163.145.226.1064822311.squirrel@www.sonhosting.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No mail notification over ssh! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:12:06 -0000 --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 10:58:31AM +0300, Lego Builder wrote: > I'm currently setting up a FreeBSD 4.8 mailserver with sendmail, but > noticed that when I log in through ssh to my box I don't get any mail > notification from bash. Unlike when I physicaly log in at the box. >=20 > I'd just like to know how I can get mail notification enabled over ssh > so I know when I've got new/unread mail. It's the login(1) program that prints the "You have new mail" line when you log in at the console. Since login(1) isn't involved when you ssh(1) into the box, as you've observed you don't get the message. However, bash(1) has it's own mechanism for telling you if you have e-mail. Check the documentation in the bash(1) man page for the MAIL, MAILCHECK and MAILPATH environment variables. Note too that you should be careful to only print out banner messages and so forth for interactive logins -- for sh(1) alikes the ~/.profile, ~/.bash_login, or ~/.bashrc files are only sourced if the system thinks the shell is interactive -- as otherwise you will find that commands like rsync(1) mysteriously fall over. Cheers, Matthew=09 --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/d+lKdtESqEQa7a0RAgpGAJ47yoZdo7Y0YbZCMY6pJ1Ob8PiA0gCglZYA YryE3N73ah+9TNE74ZV29Mc= =4kVq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 01:16:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847A616A4C0 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:16:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thor.65535.net (thor.65535.net [216.17.104.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42CD44400F for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:16:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rghf@fsck.me.uk) Received: from jvds.demon.co.uk ([212.228.151.253] helo=bitch.localdomain) by thor.65535.net with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A3tAb-000GVz-Jk for questions@Freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:14:14 -0700 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:17:52 +0100 (BST) From: Rus Foster X-X-Sender: rghf@bitch.localdomain To: questions@Freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Limiting Memory at boot time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:16:01 -0000 Hi All, I've got a machine with 1 GB of ram but would like to temporarily limit it to 512Mb. Is there anyway I can do this from the boot loader or will I have to remove the RAM physically? Rgds Rus -- w: http://www.jvds.com | Dedicated FreeBSD,Debian and RedHat Servers e: rghf@jvds.com | Dontations made to Debian, FreeBSD t: +44 7919 373537 | and Slackware t: 1-888-327-6330 | email: sales@jvds.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 29 01:31:55 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9397116A4B3 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:31:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from b3mail2.barakitc.co.il (b3mail2.barak.net.il [206.49.94.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B389B4400E for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 01:31:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gklein@barak013.net.il) Received: from b1mail2.BARAKITC.CO.IL (unverified) by b3mail2.barakitc.co.il for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:36:00 +0200 Received: by b1mail1.barakitc.co.il with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:33:48 +0200 Message-ID: <3376EA9D41D233428960E9AE687569C40656A281@b1mail1.barakitc.co.il> From: Gil Klein To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:33:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Dell PowerEdge 2650 - PCI PARITY E13F4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:31:55 -0000 Hello, I am running FreeBSD 4.8R on 2 servers with the same hardware configuration. Both Dell PowerEdge 2650 with 2 x 3Ghz CPU and 4GB RAM. Once in a while both servers reboots at a random time with no error message at any log file and the LCD says PCI PARITY E13F4. I tried replacing mother boards + expansion packs as Dell recommended, but the problem persists. I also removed all PCI adapters and the external disks but no luck solving the problem. When running Windows 2000 on the same servers it work smoothly with no alerts and no reboots at all. Do you have any idea what may be causing the problem ? I attached the dmesg.boot + kernel diff. Thanks, Gil dmesg.boot Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #4: Wed Aug 6 11:46:18 IDT 2003 root@moria:/usr/src/sys/compile/MORIA Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz (3056.51-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebfbff Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 4026466304 (3932096K bytes) avail memory = 3920564224 (3828676K bytes) Changing APIC ID for IO APIC #0 from 0 to 8 on chip Changing APIC ID for IO APIC #1 from 0 to 9 on chip Changing APIC ID for IO APIC #2 from 0 to 10 on chip Programming 16 pins in IOAPIC #0 IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0 Programming 16 pins in IOAPIC #1 Programming 16 pins in IOAPIC #2 FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard cpu0 (BSP): apic id: 0, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000 cpu1 (AP): apic id: 6, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000 io0 (APIC): apic id: 8, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec00000 io1 (APIC): apic id: 9, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec01000 io2 (APIC): apic id: 10, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec02000 Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0532000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk Using $PIR table, 9 entries at 0xc00fc430 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard IOAPIC #1 intpin 3 -> irq 2 IOAPIC #1 intpin 7 -> irq 7 IOAPIC #1 intpin 11 -> irq 10 pci0: on pcib0 pci0: (vendor=0x1028, dev=0x000c) at 4.0 irq 2 pci0: (vendor=0x1028, dev=0x0008) at 4.1 irq 7 pci0: (vendor=0x1028, dev=0x000d) at 4.2 irq 10 pci0: at 14.0 atapci0: port 0x8b0-0x8bf,0x8d8-0x8db,0x8d0-0x8d7,0x8c8-0x8cb,0x8c0-0x8c7 at device 15.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ohci0: mem 0xfe100000-0xfe100fff irq 5 at device 15.2 on pci0 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: (0x1166) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered isab0: at device 15.3 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pcib1: on motherboard IOAPIC #1 intpin 4 -> irq 11 IOAPIC #1 intpin 5 -> irq 13 pci1: on pcib1 ahc0: port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem 0xfcf01000-0xfcf01fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci1 aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs ahc1: port 0xd800-0xd8ff mem 0xfcf00000-0xfcf00fff irq 13 at device 8.1 on pci1 aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs pcib2: on motherboard pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: on motherboard IOAPIC #1 intpin 12 -> irq 16 IOAPIC #1 intpin 13 -> irq 17 pci3: on pcib3 bge0: mem 0xfcd10000-0xfcd1ffff irq 16 at device 6.0 on pci3 bge0: Ethernet address: 00:0b:db:d5:1a:c6 miibus0: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus0 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: mem 0xfcd00000-0xfcd0ffff irq 17 at device 8.0 on pci3 bge1: Ethernet address: 00:0b:db:d5:1a:c7 miibus1: on bge1 brgphy1: on miibus1 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto pcib4: on motherboard IOAPIC #1 intpin 14 -> irq 18 pci4: on pcib4 pcib8: at device 8.0 on pci4 IOAPIC #1 intpin 15 -> irq 19 pci5: on pcib8 pci5: (vendor=0x9005, dev=0x00c5) at 6.0 irq 18 pci5: (vendor=0x9005, dev=0x00c5) at 6.1 irq 19 aac0: mem 0xf0000000-0xf7ffffff irq 18 at device 8.1 on pci4 aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 118MB cache memory, optional battery present aac0: Kernel 2.7-1, Build 3170, S/N 7620d3 pcib5: on motherboard pci6: on pcib5 pcib6: on motherboard pci7: on pcib6 pcib7: on motherboard pci8: on pcib7 orm0: