From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 9 11:02:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F08637B401 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF2544003 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:02:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h59I2aUp053213 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:02:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h59I2a9D053208 for scsi@freebsd.org; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200306091802.h59I2a9D053208@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: scsi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 18:02:44 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f [1999/12/21] kern/15608 scsi acd0 / cd0 give inconsistent errors on em 1 problem total. From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 9 11:29:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25AD37B401 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bricore.com (adsl-64-168-71-68.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.168.71.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6F843F93 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:29:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lchen@briontech.com) Received: from lchenpc (lchen-pc.bricore.com [192.168.1.130]) by bricore.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with SMTP id h59ITPT3071969 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:29:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lchen@briontech.com) From: "Luoqi Chen" To: Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2003 11:30:36 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Subject: 64-bit raid controller recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 18:29:28 -0000 Hi, I'm setting up a Supermicro 7043P-8R box with 8G of memory and I've just found out that the Adaptec 2010S ZCR card didn't support 64-bit addressing (being i2o based). So I'm looking for a card that could directly (no bouncing) address at least 8G physical memory, does anyone have any recommendation? Thanks in advance, -lq From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 01:55:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C5837B401 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 01:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic-mail.adaptec.com [208.236.45.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F83443FAF for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 01:55:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from redfish.adaptec.com (redfish.adaptec.com [162.62.50.11]) by magic.adaptec.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5A7oG810384; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 00:50:16 -0700 Received: from freebsd.org (hollin.btc.adaptec.com [10.100.253.56]) by redfish.adaptec.com (8.8.8p2+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA27809; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 01:55:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3EE59CF9.1010809@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 02:55:21 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luoqi Chen References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit raid controller recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 08:55:44 -0000 Luoqi Chen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm setting up a Supermicro 7043P-8R box with 8G of memory and > I've just found out that the Adaptec 2010S ZCR card didn't support > 64-bit addressing (being i2o based). So I'm looking for a card > that could directly (no bouncing) address at least 8G physical > memory, does anyone have any recommendation? > It's hard to tell from the asr driver where the 32-bit limitation comes from and/or if there is a way to fix it. To directly answer your question, the Adaptec aac cards and driver support 64-bit addressing with no bouncing. This includes the 5400, 2120, and 2200 cards. Scott From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 11:25:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12CE37B401; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:25:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bricore.com (adsl-64-168-71-68.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.168.71.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECF443F75; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:25:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lchen@briontech.com) Received: from lchenpc (lchen-pc.bricore.com [192.168.1.130]) by bricore.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with SMTP id h5AIPfT3079495; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:25:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lchen@briontech.com) From: "Luoqi Chen" To: "Scott Long" Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:27:07 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3EE59CF9.1010809@freebsd.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) cc: scsi@freebsd.org Subject: RE: 64-bit raid controller recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:25:45 -0000 > Luoqi Chen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm setting up a Supermicro 7043P-8R box with 8G of memory and > > I've just found out that the Adaptec 2010S ZCR card didn't support > > 64-bit addressing (being i2o based). So I'm looking for a card > > that could directly (no bouncing) address at least 8G physical > > memory, does anyone have any recommendation? > > > > It's hard to tell from the asr driver where the 32-bit limitation > comes from and/or if there is a way to fix it. To directly answer > your question, the Adaptec aac cards and driver support 64-bit > addressing with no bouncing. This includes the 5400, 2120, and 2200 > cards. > > Scott > The 32-bit limitation seems to come from the i2o architecture. I've checked with the linux driver, there's no 64-bit support either. The telltale sign is in the marketing literature it is NOT mentioned as IA-64 ready. The Adaptec 2200 sounds like a good fit for my need. How complete is the 64-bit support? Do you have any plan to back port it to -stable? (In)Stability makes me reluctant to install 5.x in a production system. I'm willing to do the back-porting if you don't have time. I've already done quite a few back-porting to be able to use 8G of memory. Thanks -lq From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 11:32:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E9E37B401 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.econolodgetulsa.com (mail.econolodgetulsa.com [198.78.66.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5608443FD7 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:32:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from user@mail.econolodgetulsa.com) Received: from mail (mail [198.78.66.163])h5AIWjnW080391 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:32:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from user@mail.econolodgetulsa.com) Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:32:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Josh Brooks To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030610112903.R81042-100000@mail.econolodgetulsa.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: two questions - one scsi, one 3ware RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:32:46 -0000 Hello, First, I have a system running a mylex SCSI raid controller: mlx0: mem 0xf6afe000-0xf6afffff irq 11 at device 8.1 on pci1 mlx0: DAC960PRL, 1 channel, firmware 4.08-0-33, 4MB RAM mlxd0: on mlx0 mlxd0: 8748MB (17915904 sectors) RAID 1 (online) mlxd1: on mlx0 mlxd1: 17501MB (35842048 sectors) RAID 1 (online) My question is, is there a command line utility/diagnostic for this card similar to the `aaccli` that I can use for the aacX cards ? --- Second, I am thinking of buying a 3ware 7500-8 card and using it with FreeBSD 5.x and using the 3dmd command line utility to manage it. My plan is to run the system and hot swap disks (either to solve drive failures or to just add more drives to the system, since I won't fill it up at first) - all of this without ever powering down the system, or entering the 3ware BIOS - I want to hot swap and configure with the 3dmd CLI. Is this a reasonable expectation ? Thanks From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 11:48:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD7B37B401 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:48:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail0.lsil.com (mail0.lsil.com [147.145.40.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B300743FDD for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:48:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from emoore@lsil.com) Received: from mhbs.lsil.com (mhbs.lsil.com [147.145.31.100]) by mail0.lsil.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h5AIFTY9012213 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atl1.se.lsil.com by mhbs.lsil.com with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 11:48:05 -0700 Received: by EXA-ATLANTA.se.lsil.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:48:04 -0400 Message-Id: <0E3FA95632D6D047BA649F95DAB60E5702777CD6@EXA-ATLANTA.se.lsil.com> From: "Moore, Eric Dean" To: Josh Brooks , freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:48:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: two questions - one scsi, one 3ware RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:48:46 -0000 mlxcontrol Josh Brooks wrote: > > Hello, > > First, I have a system running a mylex SCSI raid controller: > > mlx0: mem > 0xf6afe000-0xf6afffff irq 11 at > device 8.1 on pci1 > mlx0: DAC960PRL, 1 channel, firmware 4.08-0-33, 4MB RAM > mlxd0: on mlx0 > mlxd0: 8748MB (17915904 sectors) RAID 1 (online) > mlxd1: on mlx0 > mlxd1: 17501MB (35842048 sectors) RAID 1 (online) > > My question is, is there a command line utility/diagnostic > for this card > similar to the `aaccli` that I can use for the aacX cards ? > > --- > > Second, I am thinking of buying a 3ware 7500-8 card and using it with > FreeBSD 5.x and using the 3dmd command line utility to manage > it. My plan > is to run the system and hot swap disks (either to solve > drive failures or > to just add more drives to the system, since I won't fill it > up at first) > - all of this without ever powering down the system, or > entering the 3ware > BIOS - I want to hot swap and configure with the 3dmd CLI. > > Is this a reasonable expectation ? > > Thanks > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-scsi > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-scsi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 13:47:54 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D919637B401 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic-mail.adaptec.com [208.236.45.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA1643FE1 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:47:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from redfish.adaptec.com (redfish.adaptec.com [162.62.50.11]) by magic.adaptec.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5AJgP809082; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:42:25 -0700 Received: from freebsd.org (hollin.btc.adaptec.com [10.100.253.56]) by redfish.adaptec.com (8.8.8p2+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA14906; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 13:47:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3EE643E2.7070302@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 14:47:30 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luoqi Chen References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit raid controller recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 20:47:55 -0000 Luoqi Chen wrote: >>Luoqi Chen wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I'm setting up a Supermicro 7043P-8R box with 8G of memory and >>>I've just found out that the Adaptec 2010S ZCR card didn't support >>>64-bit addressing (being i2o based). So I'm looking for a card >>>that could directly (no bouncing) address at least 8G physical >>>memory, does anyone have any recommendation? >>> >> >>It's hard to tell from the asr driver where the 32-bit limitation >>comes from and/or if there is a way to fix it. To directly answer >>your question, the Adaptec aac cards and driver support 64-bit >>addressing with no bouncing. This includes the 5400, 2120, and 2200 >>cards. >> >>Scott >> > > The 32-bit limitation seems to come from the i2o architecture. I've > checked with the linux driver, there's no 64-bit support either. The > telltale sign is in the marketing literature it is NOT mentioned as > IA-64 ready. The information that I've seen in the dpti2o headers leaves me to believe that while the command data structures might be limited to the first 4GB, the data buffer s/g lists are not inherently limited by anything other than the firmware. Academic difference, though. > > The Adaptec 2200 sounds like a good fit for my need. How complete is > the 64-bit support? Do you have any plan to back port it to -stable? > (In)Stability makes me reluctant to install 5.x in a production system. > I'm willing to do the back-porting if you don't have time. I've already > done quite a few back-porting to be able to use 8G of memory. The 5.x driver is fully 64-bit capable for data buffers (the firmware limits command structures to the lower 4GB) and has been tested under PAE. I have no intention to backport to 4.x as there is no need for 64 bit support there. If you have PAE support in 4.x then I'd be happy to help you backport the 64 bit aac work. Scott From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 15:21:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC5B37B401; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:21:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bricore.com (adsl-64-168-71-68.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.168.71.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFD543FBD; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:21:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lchen@briontech.com) Received: from lchenpc (lchen-pc.bricore.com [192.168.1.130]) by bricore.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with SMTP id h5AMLZT3081301; Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:21:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lchen@briontech.com) From: "Luoqi Chen" To: "Scott Long" Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:23:03 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <3EE643E2.7070302@freebsd.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) cc: scsi@freebsd.org Subject: RE: 64-bit raid controller recommendation X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 22:21:42 -0000 > The information that I've seen in the dpti2o headers leaves me to > believe that while the command data structures might be limited to the > first 4GB, the data buffer s/g lists are not inherently limited by > anything other than the firmware. Academic difference, though. > It would be best if the asr could be made to work, it could save me a couple of grand. How hard is it to get hold of datasheet for the 2010S card? > The 5.x driver is fully 64-bit capable for data buffers (the firmware > limits command structures to the lower 4GB) and has been tested under > PAE. I have no intention to backport to 4.x as there is no need for > 64 bit support there. If you have PAE support in 4.x then I'd be happy > to help you backport the 64 bit aac work. > > Scott > Yes, I've PAE running in 4.x. If possible, I'd like to commit it back to the tree, what do you think as a release engineer? I'll start backporting aac driver 64 bit support, when I'm done, I'll run it through you, how does it sound? Thanks, really appreciate your help! -luoqi From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 11 18:42:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F7137B401 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.webspacesolutions.com (ns1.webspacesolutions.com [209.164.30.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3821643FAF for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:42:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nick@webspacesolutions.com) Received: (qmail 22929 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2003 01:42:28 -0000 Received: from 24-205-247-185.ata-cres.charterpipeline.net (HELO BEASTIE) (24.205.247.185) by mail.webspacesolutions.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2003 01:42:28 -0000 From: "Nick Twaddell" To: Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 18:42:27 -0700 Organization: Web Space Solutions Message-ID: <003001c33083$e167c870$0700a8c0@BEASTIE> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Subject: panic: page fault on FreeBSD 5.1 -RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 01:42:30 -0000 I downloaded the 5.1 -RELEASE isos yesterday and tried to install them on my server. My server is an IBM Xseries 330 server with an IBM ServeRAID 4LX Raid card. I tried it with and without ACPI kernels and both resulted in a panic. Here is the error.. Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode Fault code = supervisor read, page not present Instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc29ee760 Stack pointer = 0x10:0xcd33fce4 Frame pointer = 0x10:0xcd33fd0c Code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 Processor eflags = interupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 Current process = 29 (irq9: ahc0 ips0) Trap number = 12 Panic = page fault Did I do something wrong or is there a problem with the driver? :( Thanks Nick ----------------------------------------------------------- Nick Twaddell Web Space Solutions Ph: (805) 704-4038 Fx: (805) 434-2477 From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 11 19:09:15 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF20C37B401 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 19:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.webspacesolutions.com (ns1.webspacesolutions.com [209.164.30.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24A2A43F75 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 19:09:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ntwaddel@webspacesolutions.com) Received: (qmail 24101 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2003 02:09:14 -0000 Received: from 24-205-247-185.ata-cres.charterpipeline.net (HELO BEASTIE) (24.205.247.185) by mail.webspacesolutions.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2003 02:09:14 -0000 From: "Nick Twaddell" To: Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 19:09:13 -0700 Organization: Web Space Solutions Message-ID: <003101c33087$9ec93310$0700a8c0@BEASTIE> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal Subject: panic: page fault on FreeBSD 5.1 -RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 02:09:16 -0000 I downloaded the 5.1 -RELEASE isos yesterday and tried to install them on my server. My server is an IBM Xseries 330 server with an IBM ServeRAID 4LX Raid card. I tried it with and without ACPI kernels and both resulted in a panic. Here is the error.. Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode Fault code = supervisor read, page not present Instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc29ee760 Stack pointer = 0x10:0xcd33fce4 Frame pointer = 0x10:0xcd33fd0c Code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 Processor eflags = interupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 Current process = 29 (irq9: ahc0 ips0) Trap number = 12 Panic = page fault Did I do something wrong or is there a problem with the driver? :( Thanks Nick ----------------------------------------------------------- Nick Twaddell Web Space Solutions Ph: (805) 704-4038 Fx: (805) 434-2477 From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 11 23:04:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282B337B401 for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:04:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69BA443FDD for ; Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:04:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 42211 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Jun 2003 06:04:09 -0000 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 23:04:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson To: Nick Twaddell In-Reply-To: <003101c33087$9ec93310$0700a8c0@BEASTIE> Message-ID: <20030611225948.M42109@root.org> References: <003101c33087$9ec93310$0700a8c0@BEASTIE> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: page fault on FreeBSD 5.1 -RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 06:04:08 -0000 On Wed, 11 Jun 2003, Nick Twaddell wrote: > I downloaded the 5.1 -RELEASE isos yesterday and tried to install them > on my server. My server is an IBM Xseries 330 server with an IBM > ServeRAID 4LX Raid card. I tried it with and without ACPI kernels and > both resulted in a panic. Here is the error.. > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > Fault code = supervisor read, page not present > Instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc29ee760 > Stack pointer = 0x10:0xcd33fce4 > Frame pointer = 0x10:0xcd33fd0c > Code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > Processor eflags = interupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > Current process = 29 (irq9: ahc0 ips0) > Trap number = 12 > > Panic = page fault > > Did I do something wrong or is there a problem with the driver? :( I can't see an invalid eip, ebp, or esp in the above page fault. It would really help if you could get a backtrace ("tr" when you have DDB enabled). BTW, re@ people: could we add an option (under a sysctl but on by default in the release) that does a backtrace on page fault? We already have the backtrace code accessible w/o DDB I believe. -Nate