From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 12 23:23:47 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A1F16A4BF for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 23:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dns1.popstick.com (dns1.popstick.com [66.37.210.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 248AD43FEA for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 23:23:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mlists@northglobe.com) Received: (qmail 15450 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2003 06:23:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO hemingway) (24.131.146.56) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2003 06:23:44 -0000 From: Nicholas Basila To: Eric Masson , Sam Napier Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 02:23:44 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <3F53603E.7070300@mchsi.com> <86llt7go3g.fsf@notbsdems.interne.kisoft-services.com> In-Reply-To: <86llt7go3g.fsf@notbsdems.interne.kisoft-services.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200309130223.44292.mlists@northglobe.com> cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: option Hyperthreading X-BeenThere: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD SMP implementation group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 06:23:47 -0000 On Tuesday 02 September 2003 12:19 pm, Eric Masson wrote: > >>>>> "Sam" == Sam Napier writes: > > Sam> I have a quad P-Pro machine (IBM PC-704) running FreeBSD 4.8 > Sam> p-7, I wanted to know if there is an advantage to enabling > Sam> hyperthreading in the kernel config when you are using more > than 2 Sam> physical processors? > > I really doubt PPros have HT capabilities. So in the best case, your > box won't use HT code. I've used the PC 704 machines before - they are 6+ year (probably 7 year) old technology. I understand that you can update them by adding new processor boards, but I doubt they were even upgradeable to a P2, let alone a P4. I worked with several of them - and they all developed problems recognizing processors, after a couple of years of use. Oh well - they do make a sturdy table.... Regards, Nicholas > > Eric Masson