From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 2 7:10:30 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B9237B401 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 07:10:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [212.66.1.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F354B43F85 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 07:10:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h22FAOdK008200 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 16:10:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h22FAO3Y008199; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 16:10:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 16:10:24 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200303021510.h22FAO3Y008199@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mozilla window won't open after upgrade - FIXED In-Reply-To: <20030228225209.GB45826@klapaucius.zer0.org> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.7-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Gregory Sutter wrote: > On 2003-02-27 16:40 -0500, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: > > Mozilla has looked awful here ever since going past > > 1.1.-something, i.e. with addition of Xft. Disabling Xft > > in the (newer) Mozilla build/install hasn't help much. > > If you have the mozilla-fonts package installed, then remove it. > Ironically, the newer mozillas don't get along with mozilla-fonts. > Go figure. Ironically, the mozilla-fonts package was intended for older versions of Mozilla (i.e. Netscape 2.x/3.x/4.x) to work around a bug in MS Internet Explorer. The MS IE had a bug to display certain fonts too large. Consequently, web authors started using smaller font sizes ( and the like). While those came out the right size on MS IE, they were much too small and unreadable on browsers which tried to render the fonts correctly, such as Netscape/Mozilla. Therefore, the mozilla-fonts package was "invented" as a work-around: It contains fonts at a readable size whose recorded sizes (in the font files) are smaller than they actually are. The result is, that the browser uses these fonts, thinking that they are as small as the web page author specified, but actually they come out larger (i.e. readable). In other words: These fonts simulate the old font bug of MS IE. I agree that it should be removed if installed. :-) Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. I worry about my child and the Internet all the time, even though she's too young to have logged on yet. Here's what I worry about. I worry that 10 or 15 years from now, she will come to me and say "Daddy, where were you when they took freedom of the press away from the Internet?" -- Mike Godwin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 2 9: 4:50 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF1237B401 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 09:04:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3223543FA3 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 09:04:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from pooh.strauser.com (kirk@pooh.honeypot.net [10.0.5.128]) by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h22H4ixc054563 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 11:04:44 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: pkgtools.conf From: Kirk Strauser Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 11:04:40 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20030227215751.GH10572@moya.lambermont.dyndns.org> (hans@lambermont.dyndns.org's message of "Thu, 27 Feb 2003 22:57:51 +0100") Message-ID: <8765r1ya1j.fsf_-_@strauser.com> Lines: 19 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.090015 (Oort Gnus v0.15) Emacs/21.2 References: <20030227163439.A13145D04@ptavv.es.net> <8765r5hahj.fsf@strauser.com> <20030227215751.GH10572@moya.lambermont.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2003-02-27T21:57:51Z, hans@lambermont.dyndns.org (Hans Lambermont) write= s: > Btw, I'd like to see your modified pkgtools.conf files. Is there a place > where these are discussed already ? (because it's a bit off-topic ;-) My local changes are pretty simple. I want mail/cclient and mail/imap-uw to be build with plaintext authentication, and I don't like to mess with mod_php4's configuration menu: MAKE_ARGS =3D { 'www/mod_php4' =3D> 'BATCH=3DYES PHP4_OPTIONS=3D\'\"GD2\" \"zlib\" \"bz= ip2\" \"mcrypt\" \"mhash\" \"MySQL\" \"PostgreSQL\" \"mnoGoSearch\" \"XML\"= \"XMLRPC\" \"CURL\" \"gettext\" \"iconv\" \"pspell\" \"BCMath\" \"MCAL\" \= "sockets\" \"sysvsem\" \"sysvshm\" \"transsid\"\'', 'mail/cclient' =3D> 'WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT=3Dyes', 'mail/imap-uw' =3D> 'WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT=3Dyes' } =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser In Googlis non est, ergo non est. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQA+Yjms5sRg+Y0CpvERAnFNAJ40tp+difEUn9XyDds/iV8sq2H8qACeMSnS 9c4t4EKA4ClTs2FcmUU7/P0= =QwEF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 2 14:18: 5 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C696E37B401 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 14:18:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 739EB43FAF for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 14:18:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828C78B2C70 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 18:18:00 -0400 (AST) Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2003 18:18:00 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: libskey not in CVSROOT? Message-ID: <20030302181538.M72167@hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Evening ... In order to try and do some debugging of recent issues with vnodes, I decided to pull down CVSROOT, so that cvsup doesn't overwrite any of my changes ... after doign a 'cvs checkout -rRELENG_4_7', I tried to do a 'make buildworld', but the libskey directory is empty, and, therefore, fails the build process ... in my CVSROOT, its empty as well: freebsd47# ls /home/ncvs/src/lib/libskey Attic freebsd47# is there a seperate package I need to download for this? Thanks ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 2 15: 3:35 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B141437B401 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 15:03:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219B943FE5 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 15:03:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id E691551A52; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:33:56 +1030 (CST) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:33:56 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libskey not in CVSROOT? Message-ID: <20030302230356.GE84581@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20030302181538.M72167@hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J4XPiPrVK1ev6Sgr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030302181538.M72167@hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --J4XPiPrVK1ev6Sgr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday, 2 March 2003 at 18:18:00 -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Evening ... > > In order to try and do some debugging of recent issues with vnodes, I > decided to pull down CVSROOT, so that cvsup doesn't overwrite any of my > changes ... after doign a 'cvs checkout -rRELENG_4_7', I tried to do a > 'make buildworld', but the libskey directory is empty, and, therefore, > fails the build process ... > > in my CVSROOT, its empty as well: > > freebsd47# ls /home/ncvs/src/lib/libskey > Attic > freebsd47# > > is there a seperate package I need to download for this? > > Thanks ... $ rlog /home/ncvs/src/lib/libskey/Attic/Makefile,v RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libskey/Attic/Makefile,v Working file: Makefile head: 1.17 ... revision 1.17 date: 2001/07/09 17:52:32; author: markm; state: dead; lines: +1 -1 Axe S/Key. OPIE is the legal successor. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers Please note: we block mail from major spammers, notably yahoo.com. See http://www.lemis.com/yahoospam.html for further details. --J4XPiPrVK1ev6Sgr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+Yo3cIubykFB6QiMRAp+9AJ0ZY4fSdxabWq4ohPk731G1s1ilpACbB/9V qWe2O9i20oC+3X1/qIUmdj4= =XuOO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J4XPiPrVK1ev6Sgr-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 2 23:30:11 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FEE637B401 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 23:30:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from twin.enter.net.pl (www.enter.net.pl [195.116.206.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F6843FA3 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 23:30:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marekd@enter.net.pl) Received: from master (sv50.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [80.55.99.50]) (authenticated) by twin.enter.net.pl (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h238pux32475 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:51:56 +0100 Message-ID: <000102460d15$96f6e900$dc0aa8c0@master> From: "MArek" To: Subject: problem with cvsup Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2120 11:23:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have problem with installing cvsup from ports...I had installed fresh 4.5 release on my HDD an tried to get cvsup-without-gui from the ports colection. It was always ok until yesterday....an error code interupted ecerything.... my output: Script started on Sat Jan 24 03:21:17 1914 marek# make iall build ===> Extracting for cvsup-without-gui-16.1f >> Checksum OK for cvsup-snap-16.1f.tar.gz. ===> cvsup-without-gui-16.1f depends on file: /usr/local/lib/m3/pkg/tcp/FreeBSD4/libm3tcp.a - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/m3/pkg/tcp/FreeBSD4/libm3tcp.a in /usr/ports/lang/ezm3 ===> Extracting for ezm3-1.0 >> Checksum OK for ezm3/ezm3-1.0-FreeBSD4-boot.tar.bz2. >> Checksum OK for ezm3/ezm3-1.0-src.tar.bz2. ===> ezm3-1.0 depends on executable: gmake - not found ===> Verifying install for gmake in /usr/ports/devel/gmake ===> Extracting for gmake-3.79.1 >> Checksum OK for make-3.79.1.tar.gz. ===> gmake-3.79.1 depends on shared library: intl.1 - not found ===> Verifying install for intl.1 in /usr/ports/devel/gettext ===> Extracting for gettext-0.10.35_1 >> Checksum OK for gettext-0.10.35.tar.gz. ===> gettext-0.10.35_1 depends on executable: libtool - not found ===> Verifying install for libtool in /usr/ports/devel/libtool ===> Extracting for libtool-1.3.4_2 >> Checksum OK for libtool-1.3.4.tar.gz. ===> Patching for libtool-1.3.4_2 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for libtool-1.3.4_2 ===> Configuring for libtool-1.3.4_2 creating cache ./config.cache checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes checking for working aclocal... missing checking for working autoconf... missing checking for working automake... missing checking for working autoheader... missing checking for working makeinfo... found checking for gcc... cc checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe ) works... yes checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe ) is a cross-compiler... no checking whether we are using GNU C... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for ranlib... ranlib checking host system type... i386--freebsd4.5 checking build system type... i386--freebsd4.5 checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/libexec/elf/ld checking if the linker (/usr/libexec/elf/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B checking whether ln -s works... yes checking for mawk... no checking for gawk... no checking for nawk... no checking for awk... awk updating cache ./config.cache creating ./config.status creating Makefile creating doc/Makefile creating tests/Makefile configuring in libltdl running /bin/sh ./configure --prefix=/usr/local i386--freebsd4.5 --enable-ltdl-install --cache-file=.././config.cache --srcd ir=. loading cache .././config.cache checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... (cached) yes checking for working aclocal... missing checking for working autoconf... missing checking for working automake... missing checking for working autoheader... missing checking for working makeinfo... found checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for gcc... (cached) cc checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe ) works... yes checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe ) is a cross-compiler... no checking whether we are using GNU C... (cached) yes checking whether cc accepts -g... (cached) yes checking for working const... yes checking for inline... inline checking host system type... i386--freebsd4.5 checking build system type... i386--freebsd4.5 checking for ranlib... (cached) ranlib checking for ld used by GCC... (cached) /usr/libexec/elf/ld checking if the linker (/usr/libexec/elf/ld) is GNU ld... (cached) yes checking for BSD-compatible nm... (cached) /usr/bin/nm -B checking whether ln -s works... (cached) yes updating cache .././config.cache loading cache .././config.cache within ltconfig checking for object suffix... o checking for executable suffix... no checking for cc option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if cc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.lo... yes checking if cc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions ... yes checking if cc static flag -static works... -static checking if the linker (/usr/libexec/elf/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking whether the linker (/usr/libexec/elf/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output... ok checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking for /usr/libexec/elf/ld option to reload object files... -r checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd4.5 ld.so checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes checking for objdir... .libs creating libtool updating cache .././config.cache loading cache .././config.cache checking which extension is used for shared libraries... .so checking which variable specifies run-time library path... LD_LIBRARY_PATH checking for objdir... .libs checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for malloc.h... no checking for memory.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for stdio.h... yes checking for ctype.h... yes checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking for dl.h... no checking for dld.h... no checking for string.h... yes checking for strchr... yes checking for strrchr... yes checking whether libtool supports -dlopen/-dlpreopen... yes checking for dlopen in -ldl... no checking for dlopen... yes checking for shl_load... no checking for shl_load in -ldld... no checking for dld_link in -ldld... no checking for dlerror... yes checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output... yes checking for _ prefix in compiled symbols... (cached) no updating cache .././config.cache creating ./config.status creating Makefile creating config.h ===> Building for libtool-1.3.4_2 Making all in . cd . && CONFIG_FILES=Makefile CONFIG_HEADERS= /bin/sh ./config.status creating Makefile rm -f ltmain.shT date=`/bin/sh ./mkstamp < ./ChangeLog` && sed -e 's/@''PACKAGE@/libtool/' -e 's/@''VERSION@/1.3.4/' -e "s%@""TIMESTAMP@%$date%" ./ltmain.in > ltmain.shT mv -f ltmain.shT ./ltmain.sh || (rm -f ./ltmain.sh && cp ltmain.shT ./ltmain.sh && rm -f ltmain.shT) rm -f ltconfig.T date=`/bin/sh ./mkstamp < ./ChangeLog` && awk '/@LINENO@/ { printf "%d:", NR } { print }' ./ltconfig.in | sed -e 's/@''PACKAGE@/libtool/' -e 's/@''VERSION@/1.3.4/' -e "s%@""TIMESTAMP@%$date%" -e '/@LINENO@/s/^\([0-9][0-9]*\):\(.*\)@LINENO@/\2\1/' > ltconfig.T chmod +x ltconfig.T mv -f ltconfig.T ./ltconfig || (rm -f ./ltconfig && cp ltconfig.T ./ltconfig && rm -f ltconfig.T) CC="cc" CFLAGS="-O -pipe" CPPFLAGS="" LD="/usr/libexec/elf/ld" LDFLAGS="" LIBS="" LN_S="ln -s" NM="/usr/bin/nm -B" RANLIB="ranlib" DLLTOOL="" OBJDUMP="" AS="" /bin/sh ./ltconfig --cache-file=./config.cache --with-gcc --with-gnu-ld --enable-dlo pen --srcdir=. --output=libtool ./ltmain.sh loading cache ./config.cache within ltconfig checking host system type... i386-unknown-freebsdelf4.5 checking for object suffix... o checking for executable suffix... (cached) no checking for cc option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if cc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.lo... yes checking if cc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions ... yes checking if cc static flag -static works... -static checking if the linker (/usr/libexec/elf/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking whether the linker (/usr/libexec/elf/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output... ok checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking for /usr/libexec/elf/ld option to reload object files... -r checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsdelf4.5 ld.so checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes checking for objdir... .libs checking for dlopen in -ldl... (cached) no checking for dlopen... (cached) yes checking for dlfcn.h... (cached) yes checking whether a program can dlopen itself... yes checking whether a statically linked program can dlopen itself... no creating libtool updating cache ./config.cache CONFIG_FILES=libtoolize CONFIG_HEADERS= ./config.status creating libtoolize chmod +x libtoolize Making all in libltdl cd . && /usr/ports/devel/libtool/work/libtool-1.3.4/missing automake --foreign Makefile WARNING: `automake' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && CONFIG_FILES=Makefile CONFIG_HEADERS= /bin/sh ./config.status creating Makefile cd . && CONFIG_FILES= CONFIG_HEADERS=config.h /bin/sh ./config.status creating config.h config.h is unchanged /bin/sh ./config.status --recheck running /bin/sh ./configure --prefix=/usr/local i386--freebsd4.5 --enable-ltdl-install --cache-file=.././config.cache --srcd ir=. --no-create --no-recursion loading cache .././config.cache checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... (cached) yes checking for working aclocal... missing checking for working autoconf... missing checking for working automake... missing checking for working autoheader... missing checking for working makeinfo... found checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking for gcc... (cached) cc checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe ) works... yes checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe ) is a cross-compiler... no checking whether we are using GNU C... (cached) yes checking whether cc accepts -g... (cached) yes checking for working const... (cached) yes checking for inline... (cached) inline checking host system type... i386--freebsd4.5 checking build system type... i386--freebsd4.5 checking for ranlib... (cached) ranlib checking for ld used by GCC... (cached) /usr/libexec/elf/ld checking if the linker (/usr/libexec/elf/ld) is GNU ld... (cached) yes checking for BSD-compatible nm... (cached) /usr/bin/nm -B checking whether ln -s works... (cached) yes updating cache .././config.cache ltconfig: unrecognized option `--disable-ltlibs' Try `ltconfig --help' for more information. configure: error: libtool configure failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/libtool/work/libtool-1.3.4/libltdl. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/libtool/work/libtool-1.3.4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/libtool. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/libtool. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/libtool. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/libtool. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gettext. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gettext. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gettext. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gettext. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gettext. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gettext. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gettext. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gmake. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gmake. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gmake. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gmake. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gmake. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gmake. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/gmake. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ezm3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ezm3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ezm3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ezm3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ezm3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ezm3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/ezm3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui. marek# ^Dexit Script done on Sat Jan 24 03:21:47 1914 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 2 23:39:42 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB40D37B401 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 23:39:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from util.inch.com (ns.inch.com [216.223.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748B543F85 for ; Sun, 2 Mar 2003 23:39:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from shell.inch.com (inch.com [216.223.192.20]) by util.inch.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/UTIL-INCH-3.0.10) with ESMTP id h237dcOV022178 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 02:39:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from shell.inch.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.inch.com (8.12.7/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h237dcwY092691 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 02:39:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from spork@inch.com) Received: from localhost (spork@localhost) by shell.inch.com (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) with ESMTP id h237db3W092687 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 02:39:38 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: shell.inch.com: spork owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 02:39:37 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Sprickman To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: soundblaster live(!) and -stable Message-ID: <20030303023455.N49642@shell.inch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I'm running -stable and I just put in an older "SoundBlaster Live!" PCI card I had laying around. I added "device pcm" to my kernel config and built a new kernel. Something is detected at boot: pcm0: port 0xdc00-0xdc1f irq 10 at device 19.0 on pci0 pcm0: The first entry may be the SB, I'm not sure of the chipset on that card. The second entry is a mystery. There is no onboard sound on my mainboard, only this one card. No sound emanates from the card no matter what app. I throw at it. No "device not configured" errors, and catting .au's to /dev/audio does not produce any errors. Any ideas? It seems odd that I'm getting that second line on boot. FreeBSD green.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com 4.8-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.8-PRERELEASE #5: Thu Feb 27 18:27:49 EST 2003 root@green.nat.fasttrackmonkey.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GREEN i386 Thanks, Charles -- Charles Sprickman spork@inch.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 1:27:28 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44C537B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 01:27:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1419243FDD for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 01:27:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA05928; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 01:27:22 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: "MArek" , Subject: Re: problem with cvsup Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 01:27:22 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <000102460d15$96f6e900$dc0aa8c0@master> In-Reply-To: <000102460d15$96f6e900$dc0aa8c0@master> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303030127.22066.kstewart@owt.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wednesday 31 December 1969 04:00 pm, MArek wrote: > I have problem with installing cvsup from ports...I had installed > fresh 4.5 release on my HDD an tried to get cvsup-without-gui from > the ports colection. > It was always ok until yesterday....an error code interupted > ecerything.... > > my output: > > Script started on Sat Jan 24 03:21:17 1914 > marek# make iall build > 2 things. Your date is really out of touch To: Subject: problem with cvsup Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2120 11:23:36 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Your system thinks it is the year 2120. Set your date to the correct date and time. The string "make i [Kall build" looks like a typo. Did you mean "make install"? Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 3:31:29 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A56237B401; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 03:31:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from builder.freebsdmall.com (builder.freebsdmall.com [65.86.180.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5A2F43FBD; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 03:31:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from murray@builder.freebsdmall.com) Received: (from root@localhost) by builder.freebsdmall.com (8.12.7/8.11.6) id h23BVPCm060487; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 03:31:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from murray) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 03:31:25 -0800 From: Murray Stokely To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: 4.8 RC1 Now Available Message-ID: <20030303033125.D236@freebsdmall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline The first release candidate is now available. The i386 FTP installation directory and mini-ISO is available now from our many mirrors, and the Alpha bits should be available in the next 48 hours. I found a few inconsistencies with the latest package set that we were going to use for this one, so I haven't uploaded a full disc1 ISO at this time. When those problems are resolved a full disc1 ISO will be made available. In the mean time, there are a lot of new features in 4.8-RC base system that could use testing. I've started the usual testing guide here : http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.8R/qa.html Please email re@ if you have an open issue that should be reflected on this page (actually, it's in CVS so sending a diff would be best!). It would be nice to close some of the open sysinstall buglets before this release goes out. Please consider looking through the PR database and helping us squash some subtle sysinstall bugs. There's a lot of low-hanging fruit here : http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=&severity=&priority=&class=&state=&sort=none&text=&responsible=freebsd-qa&multitext=&originator=&release= As always, thanks for your help making this FreeBSD release a success. - Murray / Release Engineering Team --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE+Yz0MtNcQog5FH30RAvdhAKCijiq8KGcnlu/FTn3k6Oubm61t3QCgqcRS phTPKhUYckuNRRFNNKtFaTA= =Xwh8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 4:36: 0 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB7037B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 04:35:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ccl.ru (mail.ccl.ru [195.222.130.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1667443F75 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 04:35:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from emz@norma.perm.ru) Received: from freedom.norma.perm.ru. (norma.perm.ru [195.222.139.182]) by mail.ccl.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h23CZt6P033180 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:35:56 +0500 (YEKT) Received: from emz.norma.com (emz.norma.com [192.168.0.42]) by freedom.norma.perm.ru. (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h23CZmiD083488 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:35:50 +0500 (YEKT) (envelope-from emz@norma.perm.ru) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:35:48 +0500 From: "Eugene M. Zheganin" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62 Christmas Edition) Personal Reply-To: "Eugene M. Zheganin" Organization: Norma, Ltd. X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <73800380859.20030303173548@norma.perm.ru> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: wrong CPU frequency detection MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, All. Why does my 4.8-PRERELEASE detect my CPU as 1000 MHz instead of real 1200 MHz ? ===Cut=== FreeBSD 4.8-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Mar 1 12:01:00 YEKT 2003 emz@freedom.norma.perm.ru.:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEDOM Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU 1000MHz (1009.95-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6b1 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383f9ff ===Cut=== I have the same problem on 4.6-RELEASE (real CPU frequency is 1700 MHz): ===Cut=== FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE #0: Mon Oct 7 17:54:30 YEKST 2002 emz@tiger.norma.perm.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TIGER Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (1009.95-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6b1 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383f9ff; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 05:32:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from midway.uchicago.edu (midway.uchicago.edu [128.135.12.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8E543FAF for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 05:32:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dsyphers@uchicago.edu) Received: from adsl-68-20-36-91.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net (adsl-68-20-36-91.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.20.36.91]) by midway.uchicago.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h23DW7Zk022045; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 07:32:07 -0600 (CST) From: David Syphers To: Charles Sprickman , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: soundblaster live(!) and -stable Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 07:32:07 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030303023455.N49642@shell.inch.com> In-Reply-To: <20030303023455.N49642@shell.inch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303030732.07800.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Monday 03 March 2003 01:39 am, Charles Sprickman wrote: > The first entry may be the SB, I'm not sure of the chipset on that card. > The second entry is a mystery. There is no onboard sound on my mainboard, > only this one card. ... > Any ideas? It seems odd that I'm getting that second line on boot. Unfortunately I don't know what your problem might be, but it's not the existence of that second entry. The AC97 bit is just another component of the sound card. For example, I see pcm0: port 0x1840-0x185f irq 11 at device 13.0 on pci0 pcm0: in my dmesg for a SoundBlaster Live 5.1, and my sound works fine (okay, I'm using -current, but it worked fine on -stable too). The question marks with your AC97 might indicate a recognition problem, but I don't know... Does 'cat /dev/sndstat' show an installed sound card? -David -- http://www.seektruth.org Astronomy and Astrophysics Center The University of Chicago To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 6: 9:27 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0AA37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 06:09:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net (pa-plum1b-13.pit.adelphia.net [24.53.161.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8783C43F75 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 06:09:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from potentialtech.com (working [172.16.0.95]) by pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h23E9LrX014685; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:09:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Message-ID: <3E636211.6070409@potentialtech.com> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 09:09:21 -0500 From: Bill Moran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030301 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eugene M. Zheganin" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wrong CPU frequency detection References: <73800380859.20030303173548@norma.perm.ru> In-Reply-To: <73800380859.20030303173548@norma.perm.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi, All. > > Why does my 4.8-PRERELEASE detect my CPU as 1000 MHz instead of real > 1200 MHz ? Just because the processor is rated at 1200 doesn't mean that the motherboard is running it at that speed. Any time I've seen this problem, it was because the motherboard was left to autodetect the CPU speed and didn't do so correctly (don't know why they seem to incorrectly guess 1G) Check your BIOS settings. > > ===Cut=== > FreeBSD 4.8-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Mar 1 12:01:00 YEKT 2003 > emz@freedom.norma.perm.ru.:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEDOM > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz > CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU 1000MHz (1009.95-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6b1 Stepping = 1 > Features=0x383f9ff > ===Cut=== > > I have the same problem on 4.6-RELEASE (real CPU frequency is 1700 > MHz): > > ===Cut=== > FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE #0: Mon Oct 7 17:54:30 YEKST 2002 > emz@tiger.norma.perm.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TIGER > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz > CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (1009.95-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6b1 Stepping = 1 > Features=0x383f9ff ===Cut=== > > I have some FreeBSD-boxes running with CPU frequency lower than 1GHz - > FreeBSD detects them correctly. > > Is it some kind of misconfiguration ? Can it cause problems ? > > Thanks a lot. > > WBR. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 7:26:35 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8756237B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 07:26:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.trigger.net (ip-209-29-143-5.trigger.net [209.29.143.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD34343FA3 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 07:26:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikej@trigger.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.trigger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F81130920; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:26:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from mike (wettoast.org [199.166.206.4]) by mx1.trigger.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A89BD308EE; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:26:20 -0500 (EST) From: "Mike Jakubik" To: "Bill Moran" , "Eugene M. Zheganin" Cc: Subject: RE: wrong CPU frequency detection Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:25:32 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-reply-to: <3E636211.6070409@potentialtech.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG FYI: Some bioses will reset the cpu frequency to a lower value if the machine is reset during a post. (Thinking the user overclocked the cpu, which caused the system to not boot) -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Bill Moran Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 9:09 AM To: Eugene M. Zheganin Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wrong CPU frequency detection Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi, All. > > Why does my 4.8-PRERELEASE detect my CPU as 1000 MHz instead of real > 1200 MHz ? Just because the processor is rated at 1200 doesn't mean that the motherboard is running it at that speed. Any time I've seen this problem, it was because the motherboard was left to autodetect the CPU speed and didn't do so correctly (don't know why they seem to incorrectly guess 1G) Check your BIOS settings. > > ===Cut=== > FreeBSD 4.8-PRERELEASE #0: Sat Mar 1 12:01:00 YEKT 2003 > emz@freedom.norma.perm.ru.:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEDOM > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz > CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU 1000MHz (1009.95-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6b1 Stepping = 1 > Features=0x383f9ff > ===Cut=== > > I have the same problem on 4.6-RELEASE (real CPU frequency is 1700 > MHz): > > ===Cut=== > FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE #0: Mon Oct 7 17:54:30 YEKST 2002 > emz@tiger.norma.perm.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TIGER > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz > CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (1009.95-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6b1 Stepping = 1 > Features=0x383f9ff ===Cut=== > > I have some FreeBSD-boxes running with CPU frequency lower than 1GHz - > FreeBSD detects them correctly. > > Is it some kind of misconfiguration ? Can it cause problems ? > > Thanks a lot. > > WBR. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 7:48:12 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8837B37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 07:48:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cloud9.net (camomile.cloud9.net [168.100.1.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE1743F75 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 07:48:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@cloud9.net) Received: from localhost.cloud9.net (localhost.cloud9.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cloud9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C22564CCB for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:48:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.cloud9.net (localhost.cloud9.net [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.cloud9.net (VaMailArmor-2.0.1.7) id 08382-12A54D6F; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 10:48:09 -0500 Received: from earl-grey.cloud9.net (earl-grey.cloud9.net [168.100.1.1]) by mail.cloud9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7A264C97 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:47:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:47:39 -0500 (EST) From: Mark Hennessy To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD 5.0 and MySQL on NFS-mounted partition (NetApp) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 2.0.1.7; VAE: 6.18.0.2; VDF: 6.18.0.10; host: camomile.cloud9.net) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From mysql compiled from ports: Can't lock file (errno: 45) I just rebuilt mysql 3.23.55 on FreeBSD 5.0, and I am trying to start mysqld with my databases, and all of a sudden I'm getting this error. I was wondering if anyone has seen this and might know where I should start looking? Additionally, it appears that this error only comes up when the DATADIR for MySQL is set to a directory on an NFS-mounted drive. I have also asked one of the MySQL lists, and they suggested looking at rpc.lockd, but would that be needed if no writes were being made? -- Mark P. Hennessy mark@cloud9.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 7:55: 6 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500CD37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 07:55:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.wananchi.com (ns2.wananchi.com [62.8.64.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C204A43FCB for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 07:55:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from wash by ns2.wananchi.com (Exim 4.12 #1 (FreeBSD)) protocol: local id 18psGJ-000C3f-00 for ; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 18:53:55 +0300 Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:53:55 +0300 From: Odhiambo Washington To: FBSD-STABLE Subject: php4 build fail from ports Message-ID: <20030303155355.GA43924@ns2.wananchi.com> Mail-Followup-To: Odhiambo Washington , FBSD-STABLE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Disclaimer: Any views expressed in this message,where not explicitly attributed otherwise, are mine alone!. X-Fortune: Food for thought is no substitute for the real thing. -- Walt Kelly, "Putluck Pogo" X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.8-RC i386 X-Best-Window-Manager: Blackbox X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.1i (2002-05-02) X-Designation: Systems Administrator, Wananchi Online Ltd. X-Location: Nairobi, KE, East Africa. X-Uptime: 6:52PM up 1:14, 2 users, load averages: 0.21, 0.54, 0.67 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Message-ID: <18psGJ-000C3f-00@ns2.wananchi.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Are there any experienced takers? FreeBSD-4.{7|8} cd /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/ && make fails with error below: ===> Building for mod_php4-4.3.1 /bin/sh libtool --silent --mode=compile cc -Iext/zlib/ -I/usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/zlib/ -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/include -I/usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/main -I/usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1 -I/usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/Zend -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include/c-client -I/usr/local/include/mysql -I/usr/local/include/pspell -DMOD_SSL=208112 -DMOD_PERL -DUSE_PERL_SSI -DAPPLLIB_EXP="/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/BSDPAN" -DEAPI -DAPPLLIB_EXP=/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/BSDPAN -I/usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/TSRM -O -pipe -I/usr/local/include -prefer-pic -c /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/zlib/zlib.c -o ext/zlib/zlib.lo In file included from /usr/include/sys/param.h:104, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/TSRM/tsrm_config_common.h:14, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.h:26, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/main/php.h:360, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/zlib/zlib.c:28: /usr/include/machine/limits.h:81: warning: `LONG_MAX' redefined /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/Zend/zend.h:189: warning: this is the location of the previous definition /usr/include/machine/limits.h:82: warning: `LONG_MIN' redefined /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/Zend/zend.h:193: warning: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/TSRM/tsrm_config_common.h:14, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.h:26, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/main/php.h:360, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/zlib/zlib.c:28: /usr/include/sys/param.h:193: warning: `MAXPATHLEN' redefined /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/main/php.h:237: warning: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/Zend/zend.h:202, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/main/php.h:34, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/zlib/zlib.c:28: /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/Zend/zend_hash.h:119: syntax error before `va_list' In file included from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/Zend/zend.h:203, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/main/php.h:34, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/zlib/zlib.c:28: /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/Zend/zend_llist.h:34: syntax error before `va_list' In file included from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/main/php.h:34, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/zlib/zlib.c:28: /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/Zend/zend.h:285: syntax error before `va_list' /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/Zend/zend.h:423: syntax error before `va_list' In file included from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/main/php.h:224, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/zlib/zlib.c:28: /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/main/spprintf.h:40: syntax error before `va_list' In file included from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/zlib/zlib.c:28: /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/main/php.h:277: syntax error before `va_list' In file included from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/main/php.h:360, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/zlib/zlib.c:28: /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.h:159: warning: `struct utimbuf' declared inside parameter list /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/TSRM/tsrm_virtual_cwd.h:159: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want. In file included from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/standard/fsock.h:38, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/standard/php_standard.h:44, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/zlib/zlib.c:48: /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/main/php_network.h:113: syntax error before `socklen_t' /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/main/php_network.h:113: warning: `struct sockaddr' declared inside parameter list In file included from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/standard/php_standard.h:44, from /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/zlib/zlib.c:48: /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1/ext/standard/fsock.h:43: warning: `struct in_addr' declared inside parameter list *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.3.1. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mod_php4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mod_php4. -Wash -- Odhiambo Washington "The box said 'Requires Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com Windows 95, NT, or better,' Tel: +254 2 313985-9 +254 2 313922 so I installed FreeBSD." GSM: +254 72 743223 +254 733 744121 This sig is McQ! :-) "Speed is subsittute fo accurancy." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 8:39: 6 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB3D37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 08:39:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from sinamail.com (61-221-29-145.HINET-IP.hinet.net [61.221.29.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4796D43F75 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 08:39:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from suppergeorge@sinamail.com) From: star@yahoo.com.tw To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?B?prO+97d8p0HEQLdOpWi5wbjVttw/Pw==?= Reply-To: suppergeorge@sinamail.com Date: 04 Mar 2003 00:44:06 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20030303163900.4796D43F75@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ¬°¤°»ò¦³¤H·|¤ñ§A¦¨¥\10­¿
¥D¦®: ³o©Î³\¬O±z¥¿¦b´M§äªº¾÷·|³á
³o©Î³\¬O±z¥¿¦b§äªº¾÷·|®@¡I
¹ï¤£°_¡I¥´ÂZ¤F¡A¦pªG¦]¦¹³y¦¨±zªº§xÂZ¡A½Ðª½±µ§R°£¥»«H¤ÎÂI¿ï¤U¤è¡u¤£·Q¦A¦¬«H¡v¡A§Ú­Ì·|±N±zªº¸ê®Æ§R°£¡I

¬°¤°»ò¦³¤H·|¤ñ§A¦¨¥\10­¿¡A¦¬¤J¦h100­¿¡B¬Æ¦Ü¦h1000­¿¡AÃø¹D¥L¦³¤ñ§A¦hÁo©ú³o»ò¦h¶Ü¡H
µª®×ªÖ©w¤£¬Oªº¡I
·Q¤@·Q¡I¨º¨Ç¦¬¤J¤ñ§Ú­Ì°ª«Ü¦h¡A¥Í¬¡¤ñ§Ú­Ì¦n«Ü¦hªº¤H¡I
¥L­Ì¨ì©³°µ¤F¤°»ò¬O§Ú­Ì©Ò¤£ª¾¹Dªº¨Æ¡H
¦Ó§Ú­Ì¨ì©³°µ¿ù¤F¤°»ò¡B¤S¿ù¹L¤F¤°»ò¡H
·Q¤£·Qª¾¹D¤H®a«ç»ò°µ­Ëªº¡I
§A¬Û«H¡u®É¶¡¡×ª÷¿ú¡v¡BÁÙ¬O¡u®É¶¡¡Öª÷¿ú¡v

Á|¨Ò¡G

§Ú­Ì¤@¤Ñ¤u§@8¤p®É¡A¤@¦~¤u§@365¤Ñ¡A¤@½ú¤l¤u§@30¦~¡I¨º§Ú­Ì¤@½ú¤lªºÁ`¤u§@®É¼Æ¡H
¢·¤p®É¡¯¢²¢µ¢´¤Ñ¡¯¢²¢¯¦~¡×¢·¢¶,¢µ¢¯¢¯¤p®É
¦pªG§Aªº®ÉÁ~100¤¸¡A§A¤@½ú¤lÁÈ876¸U¤¸¡I
¦pªG§Aªº®ÉÁ~150¤¸¡A§A¤@½ú¤lÁÈ1314¸U¤¸¡I
¦pªG§Aªº®ÉÁ~200¤¸¡A§A¤@½ú¤lÁÈ1752¸U¤¸¡I
¬Ý°_¨Ó¦n¹³«Ü¦h¡A¬Ý²M·¡¡I¤@¦~¤u§@365¤Ñ¡A­n¤u§@30¦~¡I¦Ó¥B¤£¦Y¤£³Ü¡I
³o¼Ëªº¦¬¤J¡A¨¬°÷¤TÀ\·Å¹¡¡F¶R¨®¤l¡B©Ð¤l«j±j°÷¥Î¡F§O§Ñ¤F¡AÁÙ¦³¤l¤kªº±Ð¨|¶O¡B¦Û¤vªº¾i¦Ñª÷¡BÁÙ¦³¡y¹Ú·Q¡zµ¥«Ý¹ê²{¡I
³o¼Ëªº¤@½ú¤l¡A§A¥Ì¤ß¶Ü¡H
¨­¬°­û¤uªº§A¡A¨C¤Ñ¨¯­W¬°ªº¬O¤°»ò¡H®a®x¡B¤p«Ä¡H§A¦³¨S¦³·Q¹L¡A§A¤W¯Z¤@½ú¤l¡A±N¨Ó§Aªº¤p«Ä¯à©Ó±µ§AªºÂ¾¦ìÄ~Äò°µ¤U¥h¶Ü¡H¡]°£«D§A¦Û¤v¬O¦ÑÁó¡^
·Q¤£·Q§ïÅܦۤv¤Î¤U¤@¥Nªº¤@¥Í¡H

¤£·Q¦A¦¬«H(Unsubscribe)

¡@

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 9:26:44 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E08337B6F0; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:26:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27894426C; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:23:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h23HMbpG098377; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:22:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030303122518.056f4300@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 12:26:56 -0500 To: security@FreeBSD.ORG From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200303031711.h23HBbax059425@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (lava/20020517) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 09:11 AM 03/03/2003 -0800, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote: >Module: contrib_sendmail >Announced: 2003-03-03 >Credits: Mark Dowd (ISS) >Affects: All releases prior to 4.8-RELEASE and 5.0-RELEASE-p4 > FreeBSD 4-STABLE prior to the correction date >Corrected: 2003-03-03 >1) Upgrade your vulnerable system to 4-STABLE; or to the RELENG_5_0, Hi, I dont see this in the cvsup commit logs yet ? ---Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 9:34:24 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 850D037B409 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:34:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from sinamail.com (61-221-29-145.HINET-IP.hinet.net [61.221.29.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3387443FCB for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:34:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from suppergeorge@sinamail.com) From: star@yahoo.com.tw To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: =?ISO-8859-1?B?prO+97d8p0HEQLdOpWi5wbjVttw/Pw==?= Reply-To: suppergeorge@sinamail.com Date: 04 Mar 2003 01:39:22 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20030303173415.3387443FCB@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ¬°¤°»ò¦³¤H·|¤ñ§A¦¨¥\10­¿
¥D¦®: ³o©Î³\¬O±z¥¿¦b´M§äªº¾÷·|³á
³o©Î³\¬O±z¥¿¦b§äªº¾÷·|®@¡I
¹ï¤£°_¡I¥´ÂZ¤F¡A¦pªG¦]¦¹³y¦¨±zªº§xÂZ¡A½Ðª½±µ§R°£¥»«H¤ÎÂI¿ï¤U¤è¡u¤£·Q¦A¦¬«H¡v¡A§Ú­Ì·|±N±zªº¸ê®Æ§R°£¡I

¬°¤°»ò¦³¤H·|¤ñ§A¦¨¥\10­¿¡A¦¬¤J¦h100­¿¡B¬Æ¦Ü¦h1000­¿¡AÃø¹D¥L¦³¤ñ§A¦hÁo©ú³o»ò¦h¶Ü¡H
µª®×ªÖ©w¤£¬Oªº¡I
·Q¤@·Q¡I¨º¨Ç¦¬¤J¤ñ§Ú­Ì°ª«Ü¦h¡A¥Í¬¡¤ñ§Ú­Ì¦n«Ü¦hªº¤H¡I
¥L­Ì¨ì©³°µ¤F¤°»ò¬O§Ú­Ì©Ò¤£ª¾¹Dªº¨Æ¡H
¦Ó§Ú­Ì¨ì©³°µ¿ù¤F¤°»ò¡B¤S¿ù¹L¤F¤°»ò¡H
·Q¤£·Qª¾¹D¤H®a«ç»ò°µ­Ëªº¡I
§A¬Û«H¡u®É¶¡¡×ª÷¿ú¡v¡BÁÙ¬O¡u®É¶¡¡Öª÷¿ú¡v

Á|¨Ò¡G

§Ú­Ì¤@¤Ñ¤u§@8¤p®É¡A¤@¦~¤u§@365¤Ñ¡A¤@½ú¤l¤u§@30¦~¡I¨º§Ú­Ì¤@½ú¤lªºÁ`¤u§@®É¼Æ¡H
¢·¤p®É¡¯¢²¢µ¢´¤Ñ¡¯¢²¢¯¦~¡×¢·¢¶,¢µ¢¯¢¯¤p®É
¦pªG§Aªº®ÉÁ~100¤¸¡A§A¤@½ú¤lÁÈ876¸U¤¸¡I
¦pªG§Aªº®ÉÁ~150¤¸¡A§A¤@½ú¤lÁÈ1314¸U¤¸¡I
¦pªG§Aªº®ÉÁ~200¤¸¡A§A¤@½ú¤lÁÈ1752¸U¤¸¡I
¬Ý°_¨Ó¦n¹³«Ü¦h¡A¬Ý²M·¡¡I¤@¦~¤u§@365¤Ñ¡A­n¤u§@30¦~¡I¦Ó¥B¤£¦Y¤£³Ü¡I
³o¼Ëªº¦¬¤J¡A¨¬°÷¤TÀ\·Å¹¡¡F¶R¨®¤l¡B©Ð¤l«j±j°÷¥Î¡F§O§Ñ¤F¡AÁÙ¦³¤l¤kªº±Ð¨|¶O¡B¦Û¤vªº¾i¦Ñª÷¡BÁÙ¦³¡y¹Ú·Q¡zµ¥«Ý¹ê²{¡I
³o¼Ëªº¤@½ú¤l¡A§A¥Ì¤ß¶Ü¡H
¨­¬°­û¤uªº§A¡A¨C¤Ñ¨¯­W¬°ªº¬O¤°»ò¡H®a®x¡B¤p«Ä¡H§A¦³¨S¦³·Q¹L¡A§A¤W¯Z¤@½ú¤l¡A±N¨Ó§Aªº¤p«Ä¯à©Ó±µ§AªºÂ¾¦ìÄ~Äò°µ¤U¥h¶Ü¡H¡]°£«D§A¦Û¤v¬O¦ÑÁó¡^
·Q¤£·Q§ïÅܦۤv¤Î¤U¤@¥Nªº¤@¥Í¡H

¤£·Q¦A¦¬«H(Unsubscribe)

¡@

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 9:57:12 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C2937B401; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:57:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03.attbi.com [204.127.202.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB9A43F75; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:57:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@employees.org) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org (12-240-204-110.client.attbi.com[12.240.204.110]) by sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03) with ESMTP id <2003030317570700300ak5tve>; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:57:08 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.7/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h23Hv6st008863; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:57:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h23Hv6eq008862; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:57:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:57:06 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: Mike Tancsa Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail Message-ID: <20030303175706.GA8807@intruder.bmah.org> References: <200303031711.h23HBbax059425@freefall.freebsd.org> <5.2.0.9.0.20030303122518.056f4300@marble.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030303122518.056f4300@marble.sentex.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 09:11 AM 03/03/2003 -0800, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote: > >Module: contrib_sendmail > >Announced: 2003-03-03 > >Credits: Mark Dowd (ISS) > >Affects: All releases prior to 4.8-RELEASE and 5.0-RELEASE-p4 > > FreeBSD 4-STABLE prior to the correction date > >Corrected: 2003-03-03 > >1) Upgrade your vulnerable system to 4-STABLE; or to the RELENG_5_0, >=20 >=20 > Hi, > I dont see this in the cvsup commit logs yet ? Every cvsup mirror updates on a periodic schedule. The commits to the src tree (which happened about 30 minutes ago) probably haven't made it to all the mirrors yet. (You can see the changes in cvsweb, probably the cvs-all mailing list archives as well.) Bruce. --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+Y5dy2MoxcVugUsMRAlSNAJ9DPsUsyswsPRmHnwUTzfAeYtds7QCZAZhF sc4wttVvmBzLaI8e1oORCwA= =qsfg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 10:51:58 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB73137B405; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:51:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from pit.databus.com (p70-227.acedsl.com [66.114.70.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86EB43FDD; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:51:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: from pit.databus.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pit.databus.com (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h23IprFZ081702; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:51:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from barney@pit.databus.com) Received: (from barney@localhost) by pit.databus.com (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h23IprWq081701; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:51:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from barney) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:51:53 -0500 From: Barney Wolff To: "Bruce A. Mah" Cc: Mike Tancsa , security@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail Message-ID: <20030303185153.GA81524@pit.databus.com> References: <200303031711.h23HBbax059425@freefall.freebsd.org> <5.2.0.9.0.20030303122518.056f4300@marble.sentex.ca> <20030303175706.GA8807@intruder.bmah.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030303175706.GA8807@intruder.bmah.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.30 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:57:06AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > Every cvsup mirror updates on a periodic schedule. The commits to the > src tree (which happened about 30 minutes ago) probably haven't made > it to all the mirrors yet. (You can see the changes in cvsweb, > probably the cvs-all mailing list archives as well.) As of 13:06 EST, the commits had made it to head but were NOT tagged with RELENG_4 or RELENG_5_0 from cvsup3. I gave up and downloaded the patch, which worked fine on both of the above. -- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I'm available by contract or FT, in the NYC metro area or via the 'Net. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 11: 1:57 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8448F37B405 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:01:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E11143FE0 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:01:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h23J1rpI084146 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:01:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h23J1qRn084145; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:01:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:01:52 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200303031901.h23J1qRn084145@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: barney@pit.databus.com Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail In-Reply-To: <20030303185153.GA81524@pit.databus.com> References: <200303031711.h23HBbax059425@freefall.freebsd.org> <5.2.0.9.0.20030303122518.056f4300@marble.sentex.ca> <20030303175706.GA8807@intruder.bmah.org> Organization: MIT Laboratory for Computer Science Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In article <20030303185153.GA81524@pit.databus.com> Barney Wolff writes: >As of 13:06 EST, the commits had made it to head but were NOT tagged >with RELENG_4 or RELENG_5_0 from cvsup3. cvsup3 updates every hour at 15 after. I'm afraid you were just unlucky. - -GAWollman -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+Y6adI+eG6b7tlG4RAm8mAJ9zvDTk24BAwUdcPCyOgunxCaVTTwCfZG3s 4XdMunELySmG5NpUTrOuMnA= =Cw+h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 11:16:27 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D0C37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:16:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4B643FCB for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:16:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@employees.org) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org (12-240-204-110.client.attbi.com[12.240.204.110]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53) with ESMTP id <20030303191624053001u5nne>; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:16:24 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.7/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h23JGOst015514; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:16:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h23JGN7L015499; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:16:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:16:23 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: Corey Holcomb-Hockin Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- Message-ID: <20030303191623.GA9526@intruder.bmah.org> References: <3E5ECF8C.1000902@ipeg.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E5ECF8C.1000902@ipeg.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline At this point, I'd guess probably not, given that there was (is?) some amount of work for the MAINTAINER to do to get it to build correctly, and there's not much chance for testing before the release, which is only two weeks away. That's just my guess, though, not a policy statement. :-) Bruce. --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+Y6oH2MoxcVugUsMRAsCcAKDUjH+Zp0VzbnibCy6pm54KCJAHKgCg6frP lVAbj/OJwGRECckAYGMYUms= =bPKG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 11:38:13 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F84037B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:38:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from linda.pathlink.com (linda.pathlink.com [129.250.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AA443FD7 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:38:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kachun@pathlink.com) Received: from dvl-1 (dvl-1.pathlink.com [129.250.170.211]) by linda.pathlink.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h23Jc8569147; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 11:38:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kachun@pathlink.com) Message-Id: <200303031938.h23Jc8569147@linda.pathlink.com> To: sewall@ix.netcom.com Subject: Re: VM issues in -stable? Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: kachun@pathlink.com (Kachun Lee) Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 11:38:07 -0800 X-Mailer: WinVN 0.99.8 (x86 32bit) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article , you say... > > > >David Schultz wrote: > >> Thus spake Scott Sewall : >> > >> > The FreeBSD July - August 2002 Status Report mentions some VM issues in >> > -stable related to vm_map corruption >> > on large-memory systems under heavy loads. The report indicates there is >> > ongoing work to MFC the bug fixes. >> > >> > Has the work to MFC the bug fixes to -stable been completed? >> > >> > I have a 4.6.2 system with 2GB of memory that's getting a page fault >> > while in kernel mode. The failure occurs >> > when "periodic daily" is run. The active process is always find. I >> > suspect this system may be experiencing the >> > problem described by the report. >> >> If you post the panic message and a backtrace, people might be >> able to tell you more about the particular bug you're running >> into. > >Here's the panic message, the gdb backtrace and dmesg boot ouput. > >-- Scott > > >Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >fault virtual address = 0x0 >fault code = supervisor write, page not present >instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc02d4f53 >stack pointer = 0x10:0xff605c70 >frame pointer = 0x10:0xff605ca4 >code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 >processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 >current process = 275 (find) >interrupt mask = bio >panic: from debugger >panic: from debugger If you don't think you had hardware problem, one possibility could be your kernel reached the default 1G size limit (esp with 2G or RAM). Check with: sysctl -a | fgrep kvm if you kvm_free is get very close to the kvm_size, you may want to increase KVM_PAGES and see if that fixes your problem. > [snip To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 12:43:12 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C49E37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:43:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from matrix.42.org (matrix.42.org [194.246.250.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9956D43F93 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 12:43:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sec@42.org) Received: (from sec@localhost) by matrix.42.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id VAA12258 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org (sender ); Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:43:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:43:06 +0100 From: Stefan `Sec` Zehl To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail Message-ID: <20030303204306.GA12159@matrix.42.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i I-love-doing-this: really X-Modeline: vim:set ts=8 sw=4 smarttab tw=72 si noic notitle: Accept-Languages: de, en X-URL: http://sec.42.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 09:11 AM 03/03/2003 -0800, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote: >Module: contrib_sendmail >Announced: 2003-03-03 >Credits: Mark Dowd (ISS) >Affects: All releases prior to 4.8-RELEASE and 5.0-RELEASE-p4 > FreeBSD 4-STABLE prior to the correction date >Corrected: 2003-03-03 >1) Upgrade your vulnerable system to 4-STABLE; or to the RELENG_5_0, I still have a FreeBSD-2.8 (-STABLE) system running which includes sendmail-8.8.8. As the patches on sendmail.org only apply to sendmail-8.9 - sendmail-8.12, i ported the patch. Perhaps someone else needs this patch, so I've put it up for ftp at ftp://ftp.42.org/sendmail.8.8.8.patch As I don't have an example E-Mail to test, I can not _guarantee_ that this fixes it. But given the fact that I only had to change two lines (which both were function declarations) from the official supported patch, I'm sure that this patch fixes the problem. CU, Sec -- ``oh no! the gronkulator is broken!'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 13:37:46 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF2237B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:37:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from chrome.verticalscope.com (nat.verticalscope.com [209.82.14.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F9743FCB for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 13:37:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdunn@verticalscope.com) Received: from jedi.office.verticalscope.com (jedi.office.verticalscope.com [10.10.10.7]) by chrome.office.verticalscope.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19401CC; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:15:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jedi.office.verticalscope.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D879C19A7; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:15:50 -0500 (EST) Received: by jedi.office.verticalscope.com (Postfix, from userid 533) id E57B31932; Thu, 27 Feb 2003 17:15:48 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Dell PowerVault 725N support From: "Julian C. Dunn" Reply-To: jdunn@verticalscope.com To: Patrick Bihan-Faou Cc: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: VerticalScope Inc. Message-Id: <1046384148.7977.92.camel@jedi.office.verticalscope.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 27 Feb 2003 17:15:48 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 2003-02-27 at 12:33, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote: > I tried to get as much information as possible from Dell's web site, but the > only reference to chipsets and such was 'ServerWorks GC-SL w/CIOB-E'. > Looking at the hardware notes for the upcoming FreeBSD 4.8 I don't see this > mentionned anywhere, but it might be just a marketing name for something > old. We are using boards with ServerWorks chipsets on all our production machines running 4.6 and 4.7-STABLE and we have had no problems in almost two years. The PCI bridge on these boards shows up as a pcib0: on motherboard Now, like all good BIOS manufacturers :-) they probably called them something different even when we bought them. - Julian -- -- Julian C. Dunn, B.A.Sc. -- Senior Software Developer / UNIX Systems Administrator -- VerticalScope Inc. -- 111 Peter St., Suite 700, Toronto, ON -- Tel: (416) 341-8950 x236 Fax: (416) 341-8959 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 14:36:36 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B7337B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:36:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.allcaps.org (allcaps.org [216.240.173.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA45D43FBD for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:36:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsder@allcaps.org) Received: from mail.allcaps.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.allcaps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A59692FAF; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:36:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (bsder@localhost) by mail.allcaps.org (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id h23MaY6m027571; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:36:34 -0800 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.allcaps.org: bsder owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:36:34 -0800 (PST) From: "Andrew P. Lentvorski, Jr." To: Mark Hennessy Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.0 and MySQL on NFS-mounted partition (NetApp) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mark, You are more likely to get a response about a 5.0 problem on -current than on -stable. Did you enable the rpc.lockd and rpc.statd in rc.conf and see if the problem goes away? -a On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Mark Hennessy wrote: > >From mysql compiled from ports: > Can't lock file (errno: 45) > > I just rebuilt mysql 3.23.55 on FreeBSD 5.0, and I am trying to start > mysqld with my databases, and all of a sudden I'm getting this error. I > was wondering if anyone has seen this and might know where I should start > looking? > > Additionally, it appears that this error only comes up when the DATADIR > for MySQL is set to a directory on an NFS-mounted drive. I have also > asked one of the MySQL lists, and they suggested looking at rpc.lockd, > but would that be needed if no writes were being made? > > -- > Mark P. Hennessy mark@cloud9.net > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 14:43: 7 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9655E37B401; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:43:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-52.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B625543F93; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:43:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA7866B60; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:43:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7311EFD4; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:43:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 14:43:04 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libskey not in CVSROOT? Message-ID: <20030303224304.GD73696@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030302181538.M72167@hub.org> <20030302230356.GE84581@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gE7i1rD7pdK0Ng3j" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030302230356.GE84581@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --gE7i1rD7pdK0Ng3j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:33:56AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > $ rlog /home/ncvs/src/lib/libskey/Attic/Makefile,v >=20 > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libskey/Attic/Makefile,v > Working file: Makefile > head: 1.17 > ... > revision 1.17 > date: 2001/07/09 17:52:32; author: markm; state: dead; lines: +1 -1 > Axe S/Key. OPIE is the legal successor. It's still present in RELENG_4 though. Perhaps the original poster used the wrong checkout command. Kris --gE7i1rD7pdK0Ng3j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+Y9p3Wry0BWjoQKURAtnZAJwPtGgTuOZKJipItItSwIGxLok+uwCeJINw /9zOozINLlUXjxwBGIHCeNk= =+Ell -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gE7i1rD7pdK0Ng3j-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 15: 5:29 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 422A337B401; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:05:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA62F43F75; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:05:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EE88CC0C8; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:05:25 -0400 (AST) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:05:25 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: libskey not in CVSROOT? In-Reply-To: <20030303224304.GD73696@rot13.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20030303190500.Q34481@hub.org> References: <20030302181538.M72167@hub.org> <20030302230356.GE84581@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030303224304.GD73696@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG actually, I don't know *what* I did ... as soon as I saw Greg's email, I did a second cvs update and it came in *shrug* thanks .. On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:33:56AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > > $ rlog /home/ncvs/src/lib/libskey/Attic/Makefile,v > > > > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libskey/Attic/Makefile,v > > Working file: Makefile > > head: 1.17 > > ... > > revision 1.17 > > date: 2001/07/09 17:52:32; author: markm; state: dead; lines: +1 -1 > > Axe S/Key. OPIE is the legal successor. > > It's still present in RELENG_4 though. Perhaps the original poster > used the wrong checkout command. > > Kris > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 15:39: 4 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94F237B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:39:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF82143F93 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 15:38:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.4/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h23Ncojs029894; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 10:08:51 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) X-Authentication-Warning: cain.gsoft.com.au: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] claimed to be [127.0.0.1] Subject: Re: soundblaster live(!) and -stable From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: David Syphers Cc: Charles Sprickman , stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200303030732.07800.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> References: <20030303023455.N49642@shell.inch.com> <200303030732.07800.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1046734726.61123.1.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 04 Mar 2003 10:08:47 +1030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.3 () CARRIAGE_RETURNS,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 00:02, David Syphers wrote: > > Any ideas? It seems odd that I'm getting that second line on boot. The second line is the AC97 codec attached to the SB Live. > pcm0: port 0x1840-0x185f irq 11 at device 13.0 on pci0 > pcm0: > > in my dmesg for a SoundBlaster Live 5.1, and my sound works fine (okay, I'm > using -current, but it worked fine on -stable too). The question marks with > your AC97 might indicate a recognition problem, but I don't know... > > Does 'cat /dev/sndstat' show an installed sound card? If it shows up in dmesg it will almost certainly be available for use. There was a commit recently about no sound for the SB Live in 5.x, but I don't know if that applies. Also, as you say the question marks may indicate untested or poorly tested code. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 16:18:26 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25AF37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 16:18:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mm.seattleu.edu (mm2.seattleu.edu [216.137.26.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1C4243FBF for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 16:18:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from laughlj@seattleu.edu) Received: (qmail 12587 invoked by uid 89); 4 Mar 2003 00:09:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO seattleu.edu) (216.231.49.44) by mm2 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 00:09:27 -0000 Message-ID: <3E6380B1.9040700@seattleu.edu> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 16:20:01 +0000 From: Joe Laughlin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.7 locks up when detecting second IDE controller. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have an nforce motherboard with 2 hard drives attached to the primary IDE controller and another hard drive and a cdrom drive attached to the secondary one. Back in the 4.4 through 4.6 days, there was no problem. I recently wiped everything out and installed 4.7. The install program worked great, but upon booting the system, the kernel would crash right after recognizing the secondary ide controller. Disabling the secondary ide in the bios did the trick. If I need to provide more detailed information, let me know. I'm not subscribed to this list, so if you could cc me any responses, that would be great. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 17:19:14 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFA637B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:19:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mm.seattleu.edu (mm2.seattleu.edu [216.137.26.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1DFA43F75 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:19:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from laughlj@seattleu.edu) Received: (qmail 12522 invoked by uid 89); 4 Mar 2003 01:10:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO seattleu.edu) (216.231.49.44) by mm2 with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 01:10:14 -0000 Message-ID: <3E638EF1.7020506@seattleu.edu> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 17:20:49 +0000 From: Joe Laughlin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Casper Warming , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.7 locks up when detecting second IDE controller. References: <3E6380B1.9040700@seattleu.edu> <20030304011617.GA66441@usr.bin.dk> In-Reply-To: <20030304011617.GA66441@usr.bin.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Casper Warming wrote: > On 2003.03.03 16:20:01 +0000, Joe Laughlin wrote: > >>I have an nforce motherboard with 2 hard drives attached to the primary >>IDE controller and another hard drive and a cdrom drive attached to the >>secondary one. >> >>Back in the 4.4 through 4.6 days, there was no problem. >> >>I recently wiped everything out and installed 4.7. The install program >>worked great, but upon booting the system, the kernel would crash right >>after recognizing the secondary ide controller. Disabling the secondary >>ide in the bios did the trick. >> >>If I need to provide more detailed information, let me know. >> >>I'm not subscribed to this list, so if you could cc me any responses, >>that would be great. >> > > Just FYI. I experienced the same problem just recently (updating to 4.7- > STABLE). As fair as I could see, my problem was a recent change in the ata > drivers when handling a UDMA33 drive that had failed into PIO mode. > So if you have disk on the secondary controller running in PIO mode > (atacontrol mode 1), that might be a clue to your problem. I just switched > hardware. :) > > Cheers, > Casper Warming > - > The Scandinavian Perl Workshop - http://perlworkshop.dk Thanks. But both drives on the secondary channel are in UDMA 33. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 17:33:43 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1276A37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:33:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from midway.uchicago.edu (midway.uchicago.edu [128.135.12.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24ED643F75 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:33:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dsyphers@uchicago.edu) Received: from adsl-68-20-36-91.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net (adsl-68-20-36-91.dsl.chcgil.ameritech.net [68.20.36.91]) by midway.uchicago.edu (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h241XdE7006480; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:33:40 -0600 (CST) From: David Syphers To: "Daniel O'Connor" Subject: Re: soundblaster live(!) and -stable Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:33:39 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: Charles Sprickman , stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030303023455.N49642@shell.inch.com> <200303030732.07800.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> <1046734726.61123.1.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <1046734726.61123.1.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303031933.39944.dsyphers@uchicago.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Monday 03 March 2003 05:38 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > There was a commit recently about no sound for the SB Live in 5.x, but I > don't know if that applies. That problem existed only for a short time, and only in CURRENT. -David -- http://www.seektruth.org Astronomy and Astrophysics Center The University of Chicago To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 17:54:54 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE5637B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:54:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from netbsd.xinetd.com (sc-66-75-77-250.socal.rr.com [66.75.77.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1261643FB1 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:54:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gross@xinetd.com) Received: from xinetd.com (gospel.xinetd.com [192.168.2.177]) by netbsd.xinetd.com (8.12.6/8.9.1) with ESMTP id h241sgNL018242 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 17:54:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3E640768.8090306@xinetd.com> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 17:54:48 -0800 From: "Glendon M. Gross" Reply-To: gross@xinetd.ath.cx Organization: Xinetd Communications User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: (no subject) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG unsubscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 18: 6:42 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EDA37B401; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:06:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from haystack.lclark.edu (haystack.lclark.edu [149.175.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 946F343F85; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:06:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from [149.175.30.191] ([149.175.30.191]) by haystack.lclark.edu (SAVSMTP 3.0.0.44) with SMTP id M2003030318063807500 ; Mon, 03 Mar 2003 18:06:38 -0800 Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- From: Eric Anholt To: "Bruce A. Mah" Cc: Corey Holcomb-Hockin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20030303191623.GA9526@intruder.bmah.org> References: <3E5ECF8C.1000902@ipeg.com> <20030303191623.GA9526@intruder.bmah.org> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1046743791.638.13.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 03 Mar 2003 18:09:52 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 11:16, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > At this point, I'd guess probably not, given that there was (is?) some > amount of work for the MAINTAINER to do to get it to build correctly, > and there's not much chance for testing before the release, which is > only two weeks away. (cross-posted to ports, who might be interested in this) I've got imake-4 and XFree86-4-libraries, clients, documents, manuals, and Server building and running on my machine and looking mostly correct in their plists (-Server still needs work for non-x86). The fonts ports should be quick to update. I am still not sure what do do with XFree86-4-(Font,Nest,VirtualFramebuffer,Print)Server. Current version of the diff is at: http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files/x430diff-1 Haven't given up hope for getting it in 4.8, but it's probably not likely. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 18: 9:40 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E272637B405 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:09:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from orwell.lost-angel.com (134.153.252.64.snet.net [64.252.153.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8950243F85 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:09:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sammy@lost-angel.com) Received: from orwell.lost-angel.com (localhost.lost-angel.com [127.0.0.1]) by orwell.lost-angel.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2428dN8008962 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:08:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from sammy@lost-angel.com) Received: from localhost (sammy@localhost) by orwell.lost-angel.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id h2428d3C008773 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:08:39 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: orwell.lost-angel.com: sammy owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:08:38 -0500 (EST) From: sammy!!! To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: 4.8 RC locks when starting Apache mod SSL mod DAV In-Reply-To: <3E638EF1.7020506@seattleu.edu> Message-ID: <20030303210658.I87260@orwell.lost-angel.com> References: <3E6380B1.9040700@seattleu.edu> <20030304011617.GA66441@usr.bin.dk> <3E638EF1.7020506@seattleu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG My Apache core dumps when starting it (apachectl startssl) with Apache+Mod_SSL+DAV+PHP Normal apachectl start does not produce a core dump Any hints? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 18:24: 1 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF82C37B401; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:23:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5DCA43FB1; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:23:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com) Received: from localhost (eischen@localhost) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.3/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h242Nv3v024361; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:23:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:23:57 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen To: Eric Anholt Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" , Corey Holcomb-Hockin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- In-Reply-To: <1046743791.638.13.camel@leguin> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 3 Mar 2003, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 11:16, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > At this point, I'd guess probably not, given that there was (is?) some > > amount of work for the MAINTAINER to do to get it to build correctly, > > and there's not much chance for testing before the release, which is > > only two weeks away. > > (cross-posted to ports, who might be interested in this) > > I've got imake-4 and XFree86-4-libraries, clients, documents, manuals, > and Server building and running on my machine and looking mostly correct > in their plists (-Server still needs work for non-x86). Cool! > The fonts ports should be quick to update. I am still not sure what do > do with XFree86-4-(Font,Nest,VirtualFramebuffer,Print)Server. > > Current version of the diff is at: > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files/x430diff-1 > > Haven't given up hope for getting it in 4.8, but it's probably not > likely. With all the problems supposedly fixed in 4.3 (especially the ATI drivers (*)), it might be worth it to delay 4.8 a few days just to include this port. (*) I can confirm that 4.3 works with my ATI Radeon 7500 whereas it doesn't with 4.2.1. -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 18:38: 2 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD2C37B401; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:38:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from procyon.firepipe.net (procyon.firepipe.net [198.78.66.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B4243F75; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:38:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@csociety.org) Received: by procyon.firepipe.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6254C21E29; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:37:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 18:37:59 -0800 From: Will Andrews To: Daniel Eischen Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- Message-ID: <20030304023759.GZ37397@procyon.firepipe.net> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Eischen , "Bruce A. Mah" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <1046743791.638.13.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 09:23:57PM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > With all the problems supposedly fixed in 4.3 (especially the > ATI drivers (*)), it might be worth it to delay 4.8 a few days just > to include this port. Please note that the ports freeze is not a hard-and-fast deadline. Portmgr will hear cases for anything that people consider should be included. It should be noted that we will generally approve things that re@ thinks should be included. Regards, -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 19:27:56 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AF537B401; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:27:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF8543FCB; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:27:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (athlon.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.3]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h243RqSd000365; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:27:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h243RqUF001710; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:27:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) id h243RqQk001709; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:27:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:27:52 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Eric Anholt Cc: "Bruce A. Mah" , Corey Holcomb-Hockin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- Message-ID: <20030304032752.GA1670@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <3E5ECF8C.1000902@ipeg.com> <20030303191623.GA9526@intruder.bmah.org> <1046743791.638.13.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1046743791.638.13.camel@leguin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 06:09:52PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 11:16, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > At this point, I'd guess probably not, given that there was (is?) some > > amount of work for the MAINTAINER to do to get it to build correctly, > > and there's not much chance for testing before the release, which is > > only two weeks away. > > (cross-posted to ports, who might be interested in this) > > I've got imake-4 and XFree86-4-libraries, clients, documents, manuals, > and Server building and running on my machine and looking mostly correct > in their plists (-Server still needs work for non-x86). As for non-i386 -Server: I have an almost finished set of diffs for ia64 to build and install the official source tree. Building is ok, but the install fails due to some additional server related builds. Since ia64 is only for -current I'll wait until the dust settles with 4.3.0 and 4.8 and pitch my patches to you for review so that we can work on them for inclusion in the XFree86 source tree... JFYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 19:59:54 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0EE37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:59:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from svr1.fsfaz.com (fsfaz.com [140.99.28.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9B043FB1 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 19:59:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@fsfaz.com) Received: from A-4u.fsfaz.com (ca-whlywd-cuda7-c2b-34.stmnca.adelphia.net [68.64.114.34]) by svr1.fsfaz.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h223G9Nw024872 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 2003 19:16:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@fsfaz.com) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030301192252.00ade548@hheinc.com> X-Sender: anthony@fsfaz.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 19:23:06 -0800 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org From: "FreeBSD@fsfaz.com" Subject: Subscribe Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 21:35:57 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515AC37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:35:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from net2.dinoex.sub.org (net2.dinoex.sub.org [212.184.201.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B61043F75 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 21:35:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: from net2.dinoex.sub.org (dinoex@net2.dinoex.de [212.184.201.182]) by net2.dinoex.sub.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2455Fmo010808; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:05:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: net2.dinoex.sub.org: Host dinoex@net2.dinoex.de [212.184.201.182] claimed to be net2.dinoex.sub.org Received: from gate.dinoex.sub.org (dinoex@localhost) by net2.dinoex.sub.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) with BSMTP id h2455Emk010789; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:05:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, sec@42.org (Stefan `Sec` Zehl) Message-ID: From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) Organization: privat Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-03:04.sendmail Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 06:01:25 +0100 X-Mailer: Dinoex 1.79 References: <20030303204306.GA12159@matrix.42.org> X-Gateway: ZCONNECT gate.dinoex.sub.org [UNIX/Connect 0.94] X-Accept-Language: de,en X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 16 EC 0A D3 3A 4F 28 8A 8A 47 93 F1 CF 2F 12 X-Noad: Please don't send me ad's by mail. I'm bored by this type of mail. X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2001 by Dirk Meyer -- All rights reserved. X-Note: sending SPAM is a violation of both german and US law and will at least trigger a complaint at your provider's postmaster. X-PGP-Key-Avail: mailto:pgp-public-keys@keys.de.pgp.net Subject:GET 0x331CDA5D X-No-Archive: yes X-ZC-VIA: 20030304000000W+1@dinoex.sub.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Stefan `Sec` Zehl schrieb:, > I still have a FreeBSD-2.8 (-STABLE) system running which includes > sendmail-8.8.8. As the patches on sendmail.org only apply to > sendmail-8.9 - sendmail-8.12, i ported the patch. Thanks, but you can use the sendmail-old (8.11.6) and sendmail (8.12.8) port. I can create packages for 2.2.8 if needed. kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 22:53:27 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3394137B401; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 22:53:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns0.binep.ac.ru (serv2.binep.ac.ru [193.233.44.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBC243F3F; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 22:53:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from goshik@binep.ac.ru) Received: from byfi (byfi.binep.ac.ru [193.233.44.234]) by ns0.binep.ac.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id h246u5a29435; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:56:05 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from goshik@binep.ac.ru) Message-ID: <054e01c2e21a$ab2d6060$ea2ce9c1@binep.ac.ru> From: "Igor B. Bykhalo" To: Cc: Subject: Forgotten MFCs? (Was: 4.8 RC1 Now Available) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:52:44 +0300 Organization: BINEPCP RAS MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The first release candidate is now available. The i386 FTP [...] > Please email re@ if you have an open issue that should be reflected [...] > - Murray / Release Engineering Team I'm not jumping on anyone, but i just compared contents of my "MFC candidates" mail folder with http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/?only_with_tag=RELENG_4 and it seems to me that following commits were forgotten somehow... Well, if cvsweb isn't fooling me. Sorry if i made a mistake... (BTW, sysinstall is a mystery for me: why cvsweb doesn't show its files in usr/sbin/sysinstall with RELENG_4 tag?) Igor > ume 2003/02/03 09:43:20 PST > > Modified files: > sys/alpha/linux linux.h > sys/compat/linux linux_socket.c > sys/i386/linux linux.h > sys/modules/linux Makefile > Log: > Add IPv6 support for Linuxlator. > > Reviewed by: dwmalone > MFC after: 10 days > > Revision Changes Path > 1.57 +1 -0 src/sys/alpha/linux/linux.h > 1.35 +372 -88 src/sys/compat/linux/linux_socket.c > 1.61 +1 -0 src/sys/i386/linux/linux.h > 1.61 +5 -2 src/sys/modules/linux/Makefile > > joerg 2003/02/05 13:02:57 PST > > Modified files: > sys/conf options > sys/dev/vinum vinum.c vinumhdr.h vinumio.c > Log: > Finally make vinum ready for the root filesystem in FreeBSD 5.x. (A > similar patch has been in 4.x for a while, but is more hacky there.) > > For this to work, vinum has to be loaded early (e. g. from > boot/loader), for obvious reasons. If the kernel env variable > (aka. loader variable) "vinum.autostart" is set, vinum then asks the > sysctl kern.disks for all available disks in the system, and scans > them for possible vinum headers. > > For statically compiled kernels, this behaviour can be obtained even > without boot/loader by using "options VINUM_AUTOSTART" (though this is > not the recommended way). > > Alternatively, the 4.x way to specify "vinum.drives" is also supported. > > No further hacks (like the 4.x "vinum.root" variable) are needed, > since in 5.x, mountroot() asks back at the drivers to have them > resolve the name of the root FS into a dev_t (using the dev_clone > eventhandler). > > (The MFC reminder below is for a partial MFC for vinum.autostart, the > rest is already there in 4.x.) > > Timed out on: grog > MFC after: 2 weeks > > Revision Changes Path > 1.373 +1 -0 src/sys/conf/options > 1.50 +82 -0 src/sys/dev/vinum/vinum.c > 1.28 +1 -0 src/sys/dev/vinum/vinumhdr.h > 1.80 +7 -22 src/sys/dev/vinum/vinumio.c > > joerg 2003/02/05 13:05:03 PST > > Modified files: > share/man/man4 vinum.4 > Log: > Document the recent changes for vinum as root filesystem. > > MFC after: 2 weeks > > Revision Changes Path > 1.46 +62 -9 src/share/man/man4/vinum.4 > > njl 2003/02/09 13:49:45 PST > > Modified files: > sys/cam/scsi scsi_da.c > Log: > Quirk for Lexar Media Jumpdrive > > PR: kern/47006 > Tested by: George Hartzell > MFC after: 1 week > > Revision Changes Path > 1.124 +8 -0 src/sys/cam/scsi/scsi_da.c > > mbr 2003/02/09 14:04:50 PST > > Modified files: > usr.sbin/sysinstall tcpip.c > Log: > Explicitly release a existing lease before we start dhclient (again). > If we already have a lease and restart sysinstall (or something with > the net configuration goes wrong), we would have to reboot just > because there is a dhclient hanging around. > > Reviewed by: murray (re) > MFC after: 5 days > > Revision Changes Path > 1.126 +1 -0 src/usr.sbin/sysinstall/tcpip.c > > gallatin 2003/02/16 09:30:49 PST > > Modified files: > sys/alpha/alpha machdep.c > Log: > When trimming memory to fit Maxmem, and we discard an entire cluster, > make certain to subtract its pages from physmem. Otherwise we end up > running phys_avail_cnt negative, and bad stuff happens. > > MFC After: 1 week > > Revision Changes Path > 1.193 +1 -0 src/sys/alpha/alpha/machdep.c > > gallatin 2003/02/16 11:25:04 PST > > Modified files: > sys/alpha/alpha machdep.c > Log: > zero the end of the memory cluster we're disposing of. Otherwise teh > vm page startup code finds a 20GB cluster on this wacky alphaserver I'm > working on.. > > MFC After: 7 days > > Revision Changes Path > 1.194 +1 -0 src/sys/alpha/alpha/machdep.c > > maxim 2003/02/17 05:41:56 PST > > Modified files: > sys/net if_spppsubr.c > Log: > o Restore an interrupt priority level before return. > > Submitted by: Roman Kurakin > Reviewed by: joerg > MFC after: 5 days > > Revision Changes Path > 1.99 +2 -0 src/sys/net/if_spppsubr.c > > kris 2003/02/17 17:35:58 PST > > Modified files: > usr.sbin/keyserv keyserv.c > Log: > Use arc4random() instead of random() when generating the master key. > > MFC after: 1 week > > Revision Changes Path > 1.11 +3 -2 src/usr.sbin/keyserv/keyserv.c > > des 2003/02/18 06:30:43 PST > > Modified files: > usr.bin/find option.c > Log: > Correctly alphabetize options[] so we don't stop at -nouser when searching > for -not. > > PR: bin/48423 > Submitted by: Matsumura Naoki > MFC after: 3 days > > Revision Changes Path > 1.19 +1 -1 src/usr.bin/find/option.c > > ceri 2003/02/19 13:48:28 PST > > Modified files: > usr.sbin/sysinstall install.c > Log: > s/to try and retry/to retry/ > > PR: misc/48226 > Submitted by: Gary W. Swearingen > MFC After: 2 days > Approved by: murray (mentor) > > Revision Changes Path > 1.340 +1 -1 src/usr.sbin/sysinstall/install.c > > mikeh 2003/02/20 12:13:07 PST > > Modified files: > usr.sbin/pkg_install/sign sign.c > Log: > Initialize sign to NULL so that we don't attempt to free() it in case > of failure. > > MFC after: 1 week > > Revision Changes Path > 1.3 +1 -0 src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/sign/sign.c > > bmilekic 2003/02/21 15:12:32 PST > > Modified files: > sys/dev/tx if_txvar.h > Log: > Nuke EPIC_MGETCLUSTER entirely. Since 1.60 we don't use it anymore and > instead use our optimized m_getcl(). > > Submitted by: Hiten Pandya > MFC After: 1 week > > Revision Changes Path > 1.17 +0 -13 src/sys/dev/tx/if_txvar.h > > bmilekic 2003/02/22 06:46:31 PST > > Modified files: > sys/pci if_xl.c > Log: > Make xl use m_getcl() to allocate an mbuf and a cluster in one shot, > as opposed to one after the other. This is faster in both -CURRENT > and -STABLE. Additionally, there is less code duplication for > error-checking. > > One thing to note is that this code seems to return(1) when no buffers > are available; perhaps ENOBUFS should be the correct return value? > > mikeh 2003/02/23 21:56:37 PST > > Modified files: > usr.sbin/zic zic.c > Log: > Check whether setmode(3) fails and deallocate its return value after > calling getmode(3). > > Approved by: wollman > MFC after: 1 week > > Revision Changes Path > 1.15 +5 -1 src/usr.sbin/zic/zic.c > > des 2003/02/25 07:01:54 PST > > Modified files: > usr.sbin/pkg_install/delete Makefile perform.c > Log: > Fix a long-standing bug where if the package being deleted had no > post-deinstall script, the variable intended to hold the name of that > script would be used uninitialized. In some cases, fexists() would > succeed, causing pkg_delete to try to chmod +x it, then execute it, > resulting in bizarre error messages such as: > > .//: Permission denied > > This bug would normally only occur when multiple packages were > specified on the command line; otherwise post_script would be located > in a previously unused part of the stack, and implicitly (but quite > accidentally) initialized to all-zeros. > > MFC after: 3 days > > Revision Changes Path > 1.18 +1 -1 src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/delete/Makefile > 1.38 +11 -13 src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/delete/perform.c > > simokawa 2003/02/27 04:51:24 PST > > Modified files: > sys/dev/firewire firewire.c firewirereg.h fwdev.c fwmem.c > sbp.c > Log: > MFp4(simokawa_sbp branch) > > Improve SBP device probeing: > - Wait 2 sec before issuing LOGIN ORB expecting the reconnection > hold timer expires. > - Serialize management ORB and scanning LUN by CAM on each target. > This should fix the problem for devices which have multiple LUNs. > Test device is donated by: Jaye Mathisen > - Freeze SIM queue for 2 sec after BUS RESET. > - Retry with LOGIN rather than RECONNECT after LOGIN is not completed for > BUS RESET. > - Use appropriate CAM status for BUS RESET and DEVICE RESET. > - Let CAM to scan targets after BUS REST. > - Implement CAM scan target function. > - Keep our own devq freeze count. > - Let CAM to know that SBP does tagged queuing. > > These should be merged to RELENG_4 before 4.8-RELEASE. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.43 +4 -8 src/sys/dev/firewire/firewire.c > 1.21 +6 -0 src/sys/dev/firewire/firewirereg.h > 1.21 +8 -0 src/sys/dev/firewire/fwdev.c > 1.15 +4 -0 src/sys/dev/firewire/fwmem.c > 1.35 +288 -100 src/sys/dev/firewire/sbp.c > > sobomax 2003/02/27 12:43:52 PST > > Modified files: > usr.sbin/sysinstall index.c > Log: > Increase size of the static buffer used to hold runtime dependency list > read from CD from 2k to 16k, because in the modern world of meta-packages > (Gnome et al) the length of this list could easily owerflow limit causing > strange things to happen, ranging from installation failure due to list > truncation to complete stack trashing (there is very vague bounds checking). > For example, x11/gnome2-fifth-toe runtime dependencies list is 2,418 bytes > long. > > Due to obvious reasons, this is an immediate MFC candidate. > > Sponsored by: Porta Software Ltd > MFC after: 1 day > > Revision Changes Path > 1.100 +4 -4 src/usr.sbin/sysinstall/index.c > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 23: 0:28 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0B837B401; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:00:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from builder.freebsdmall.com (builder.freebsdmall.com [65.86.180.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE30F43F3F; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:00:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from murray@builder.freebsdmall.com) Received: (from root@localhost) by builder.freebsdmall.com (8.12.7/8.11.6) id h246xTMC064282; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 22:59:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from murray) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 22:59:25 -0800 From: Murray Stokely To: "Igor B. Bykhalo" Cc: re@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Forgotten MFCs? (Was: 4.8 RC1 Now Available) Message-ID: <20030303225925.X236@freebsdmall.com> References: <054e01c2e21a$ab2d6060$ea2ce9c1@binep.ac.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <054e01c2e21a$ab2d6060$ea2ce9c1@binep.ac.ru>; from goshik@binep.ac.ru on Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:52:44AM +0300 X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/0E451F7D X-GPG-Key-Fingerprint: E2CA 411D DD44 53FD BB4B 3CB5 B4D7 10A2 0E45 1F7D Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 09:52:44AM +0300, Igor B. Bykhalo wrote: > (BTW, sysinstall is a mystery for me: why cvsweb doesn't show > its files in usr/sbin/sysinstall with RELENG_4 tag?) Because it was repo-copied. The RELENG_4 files are in src/release/sysinstall. I don't expect it would be a quick fix to cvsweb to get this working properly. CVS just doesn't deal well with moving directories around on the repository. - Murray To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 23: 5:54 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF42A37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:05:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from maila.telia.com (maila.telia.com [194.22.194.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6683243FAF for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:05:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from watchman@ludd.luth.se) Received: from d1o1000.telia.com (d1o1000.telia.com [217.208.12.241]) by maila.telia.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h2475orw002705 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:05:50 +0100 (CET) X-Original-Recipient: Received: from ludd.luth.se (h77n4fls20o1078.telia.com [81.224.195.77]) by d1o1000.telia.com (8.10.2/8.10.1) with ESMTP id h2475oR21237 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:05:50 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3E645062.3000100@ludd.luth.se> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 08:06:10 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Joachim_Str=F6mbergson?= Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Str=F6mbergson_Intergalactic_AB?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030227 X-Accept-Language: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable Subject: sendmail_enable="NO" ignored in 4.7+? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Aloha! Due to my less than perfect memory I can't pinpoint exactly when, but after upgrading my 4.x-system it seems like the sendmail_enable="NO" in /etc/rc.conf is being ignored and sendmail gets started anyway. AFAIK, this happened after upgrading from 4.6 to 4.7. I'm currently at 4.8-RC and the same behaviour is present. Checking processes after boot I see: root 106 0,0 0,3 3196 1788 ?? Ss 11:04pm 0:00,97 sendmail: accepting connections (sendmail) smmsp 109 0,0 0,3 3076 1404 ?? Is 11:04pm 0:00,01 sendmail: Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) What have I missed? Why is the setting in rc.conf being ignored. Where/what is starting sendmail? Any pointers and help greatly appreciated. -- Med vänlig hälsning, Cheers! Joachim Strömbergson ============================================================================ Joachim Strömbergson - ASIC designer, nice to *cute* animals. snail: phone: mail & web: Sävenäsgatan 5A +46 31 - 27 98 47 watchman@ludd.luth.se 416 72 Göteborg +46 733 75 97 02 www.ludd.luth.se/~watchman ============================================================================ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 23:10: 3 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFCB737B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:10:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.holmstam.com (skumt.net [212.112.174.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6644B43FA3 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:10:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from turbo@skumt.net) Received: (qmail 19675 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Mar 2003 07:09:58 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 07:09:58 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:09:58 +0100 (CET) From: Henrik Holmstam To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Joachim_Str=F6mbergson?= Cc: stable Subject: Re: sendmail_enable="NO" ignored in 4.7+? In-Reply-To: <3E645062.3000100@ludd.luth.se> Message-ID: <20030304080835.Y90110-100000@anakin.skumt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Joachim Str=F6mbergson wrote: > Aloha! > > Due to my less than perfect memory I can't pinpoint exactly when, but > after upgrading my 4.x-system it seems like the sendmail_enable=3D"NO" in > /etc/rc.conf is being ignored and sendmail gets started anyway. > > AFAIK, this happened after upgrading from 4.6 to 4.7. I'm currently at > 4.8-RC and the same behaviour is present. > > Checking processes after boot I see: > > root 106 0,0 0,3 3196 1788 ?? Ss 11:04pm 0:00,97 sendmail: > accepting connections (sendmail) > smmsp 109 0,0 0,3 3076 1404 ?? Is 11:04pm 0:00,01 sendmail: > Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) > > What have I missed? Why is the setting in rc.conf being ignored. > Where/what is starting sendmail? > > Any pointers and help greatly appreciated. > -- > Med v=E4nlig h=E4lsning, Cheers! > > Joachim Str=F6mbergson > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D > Joachim Str=F6mbergson - ASIC designer, nice to *cute* animals. > snail: phone: mail & web: > S=E4ven=E4sgatan 5A +46 31 - 27 98 47 watchman@ludd.luth.= se > 416 72 G=F6teborg +46 733 75 97 02 www.ludd.luth.se/~wat= chman > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > Have you checked /usr/src/UPDATING? :-) 20020404: The sendmail startup code in /etc/rc has been changed to deal with a non-set-user-ID sendmail binary. Setting the rc.conf variable sendmail_enable to "NO" no longer prevents any sendmail daemons from starting. Instead, set sendmail_enable to "NONE" to prevent any MTA from being started at boot. Best regards, Henrik Holmstam To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 3 23:11:11 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E910837B401 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:11:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from colossus.systems.pipex.net (colossus.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7290343FDF for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2003 23:11:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stacey@vickiandstacey.com) Received: from [192.168.1.8] (81-86-129-77.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.129.77]) by colossus.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA4016000452; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:11:05 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: sendmail_enable="NO" ignored in 4.7+? From: Stacey Roberts Reply-To: stacey@vickiandstacey.com To: Joachim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Str=F6mbergson?= Cc: stable In-Reply-To: <3E645062.3000100@ludd.luth.se> References: <3E645062.3000100@ludd.luth.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: Message-Id: <1046761873.20729.223.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 04 Mar 2003 07:11:14 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 07:06, Joachim Strömbergson wrote: > Aloha! > > Due to my less than perfect memory I can't pinpoint exactly when, but > after upgrading my 4.x-system it seems like the sendmail_enable="NO" in > /etc/rc.conf is being ignored and sendmail gets started anyway. > > AFAIK, this happened after upgrading from 4.6 to 4.7. I'm currently at > 4.8-RC and the same behaviour is present. > > Checking processes after boot I see: > > root 106 0,0 0,3 3196 1788 ?? Ss 11:04pm 0:00,97 sendmail: > accepting connections (sendmail) > smmsp 109 0,0 0,3 3076 1404 ?? Is 11:04pm 0:00,01 sendmail: > Queue runner@00:30:00 for /var/spool/clientmqueue (sendmail) > > What have I missed? Why is the setting in rc.conf being ignored. > Where/what is starting sendmail? To completely disable sendmail on startup, use: sendmail_enable="NONE" Regards, Stacey > > Any pointers and help greatly appreciated. -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 0:39: 7 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B878737B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 00:39:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from cadillac.meteo.fr (cadillac.meteo.fr [137.129.1.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0236443FA3 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 00:39:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from igor.pokrovsky@cnrm.meteo.fr) Received: from cti825.cnrm.meteo.fr (localhost.meteo.fr [127.0.0.1]) by cadillac.meteo.fr (8.9.3 (PHNE_22672)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA05066 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:38:57 GMT Received: from xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr (xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr [137.129.150.2]) by cti825.cnrm.meteo.fr (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA19967; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:38:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from cnrm.meteo.fr (mai3.cnrm.meteo.fr [137.129.157.34]) by xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.7.1) id JAA14859; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:38:45 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <3E646615.BDEE8404@cnrm.meteo.fr> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 09:38:45 +0100 From: Igor Pokrovsky X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/780) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Eischen Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (cti825/CNRM) Organization: METEO FRANCE(CNRM) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > With all the problems supposedly fixed in 4.3 (especially the > ATI drivers (*)), it might be worth it to delay 4.8 a few days just > to include this port. > > (*) I can confirm that 4.3 works with my ATI Radeon 7500 whereas > it doesn't with 4.2.1. It is strange, that your ATI card is not working with 4.2.1 I have the same card and with the latest port of XFree it is working fine, even DRI is perfect. -- Igor To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 0:45: 8 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4741037B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 00:45:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from chainsoftware.nl (chain.xs4all.nl [80.126.25.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227A143FBD for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 00:45:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sven@hazejager.nl) Received: from chainsoftware.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chainsoftware.nl (8.12.7/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h248j3Tr092083 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:45:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sven@hazejager.nl) Received: from localhost (sven@localhost) by chainsoftware.nl (8.12.7/8.12.7/Submit) with ESMTP id h248j3of092080 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:45:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sven@hazejager.nl) X-Authentication-Warning: proxy.chain.loc: sven owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:45:03 +0100 (CET) From: Sven Hazejager X-X-Sender: sven@proxy.chain.loc To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: IPv6/IPFilter troubles with 4-STABLE Message-ID: <20030304094059.X91896-100000@proxy.chain.loc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,X_AUTH_WARNING X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.24 (chainsoftware.nl) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, After upgrading my 4.7-RELEASE to 4-STABLE of Feb. 24, I'm experiencing intermittent IPv6 problems. Specifically, once every few days, I lose IPv6 connectivity and I have to manually reload my IPFilter firewall rules with "ipf -6 -f /etc/ipf6.rules". IPv4 traffic is not affected. Has anyone seen this before? Thanks, Sven To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 1:17:28 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B44637B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 01:17:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c18609.belrs1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [210.49.80.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25D1E43FBF for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 01:17:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h249GlLZ090896; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 20:16:47 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from jeremyp@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from jeremyp@localhost) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h249GiIG090895; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 20:16:44 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 20:16:44 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Igor Pokrovsky Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problems with getting through firewall using CVSup Message-ID: <20030304091644.GA90837@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <200302281442.h1SEg0RV042490@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <3E5F77B4.4392E9FD@cnrm.meteo.fr> <20030228151033.GE424@freebsd.org.ru> <3E5F7C82.9A9EA6CD@cnrm.meteo.fr> <20030228151819.GF424@freebsd.org.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030228151819.GF424@freebsd.org.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 06:18:19PM +0300, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: >On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:13:06PM +0100, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: >> It seems to me that yes. But can I get whole repository with CTM, >> as I did with cvsup? > >Just look at ctm(1) and >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ctm.html In the past, the CTM package 'cvs-cur' would fetch the entire CVS repository. This has stopped since the repository split at the end of February and I haven't seen any announcement regarding its future. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 2: 8:45 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF96337B401; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 02:08:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from cheer.mahoroba.org (flets19-133.kamome.or.jp [218.45.19.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB2D43FA3; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 02:08:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from localhost (IDENT:WFt6wZz5VN6/NF4tGt1laBaaUaphlEvV0yYhjc0F67QthiyawqNbh2uJJeHQsJ+T@localhost [IPv6:::1]) (user=ume mech=CRAM-MD5 bits=0) by cheer.mahoroba.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP/inet6 id h24A5AjS037789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Mar 2003 19:05:10 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 19:05:10 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: "Igor B. Bykhalo" Cc: , Subject: Re: Forgotten MFCs? (Was: 4.8 RC1 Now Available) In-Reply-To: <054e01c2e21a$ab2d6060$ea2ce9c1@binep.ac.ru> References: <054e01c2e21a$ab2d6060$ea2ce9c1@binep.ac.ru> User-Agent: xcite1.38> Wanderlust/2.10.0 (Venus) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.4 Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.8-PRERELEASE MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.9 required=5.0 tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,USER_AGENT version=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, >>>>> On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:52:44 +0300 >>>>> "Igor B. Bykhalo" said: > ume 2003/02/03 09:43:20 PST > > Modified files: > sys/alpha/linux linux.h > sys/compat/linux linux_socket.c > sys/i386/linux linux.h > sys/modules/linux Makefile > Log: > Add IPv6 support for Linuxlator. > > Reviewed by: dwmalone > MFC after: 10 days I thought to do MFC it at the time, and added `MFC after:'. But, since there are some issue reminds, I stopped doing MFC it at the moment. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 4: 1: 4 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7827C37B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 04:00:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.online.bg (gandalf.online.bg [217.75.128.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8282943FE1 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 04:00:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) Received: (qmail 23025 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 11:56:34 -0000 Received: from office.sbnd.net (HELO straylight.ringlet.net) (217.75.140.130) by gandalf.online.bg with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 11:56:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 10887 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Mar 2003 11:59:18 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 13:59:18 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: 4.8-PRE (and earlier) crash - syncookies? Message-ID: <20030304115918.GA554@straylight.oblivion.bg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K8nIJk4ghYZn606h" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --K8nIJk4ghYZn606h Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I think this has been going on for a couple of months; unfortunately, I cannot remember exactly when it started :( Several machines, which have always been updated synchronously at intervals of a couple of weeks or so, have been experiencing panics every few days with recent 4.6-STABLE, 4.7-STABLE, and 4.8-PRERELEASE kernel+world. Attached is the kernel config and a gdb session of the most recent crashdump. Maybe the most interesting part is at the end of the gdb session: is there a normal reason why a TAILQ structure would have a null start pointer, and an end pointer pointing back to itself? G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 This sentence was in the past tense. --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=PAN-GB-HQ # # PAN-GB-HQ - kernel configuration for the Gabrovo Office 1 FreeBSD/i386 gw # # $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC,v 1.246.2.35 2001/09/27 17:43:06 alfred Exp $ machine i386 cpu I686_CPU ident PAN-GB-HQ maxusers 32 makeoptions DEBUG="-ggdb -g3" #Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE options INET #InterNETworking options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols options IPSEC options IPSEC_ESP options IPSEC_DEBUG options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 options IPV6FIREWALL options IPV6FIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPV6FIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 options IPDIVERT options DUMMYNET options RANDOM_IP_ID options ACCEPT_FILTER_DATA options ACCEPT_FILTER_HTTP options TCP_DROP_SYNFIN options ICMP_BANDLIM options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem options FFS_ROOT #FFS usable as root device [keep this!] options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_DIRHASH options PROCFS #Process filesystem options SUIDDIR options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options SCSI_DELAY=15000 #Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory options SHMMNI=2048 options SHMSEG=128 options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues options MSGMNI=2048 options MSGTQL=2048 options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores options SEMMNI=128 options SEMMNS=2048 options SEMMNU=1024 options SEMUME=128 options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time extensions options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies device isa device pci # Floppy drives device fdc0 at isa? port IO_FD1 irq 6 drq 2 device fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 device psm0 at atkbdc? irq 12 device vga0 at isa? # splash screen/screen saver pseudo-device splash # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc0 at isa? flags 0x100 options SC_MOUSE_CHAR=0x3 # Floating point support - do not disable. device npx0 at nexus? port IO_NPX irq 13 # Serial (COM) ports device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 irq 3 #device sio2 at isa? disable port IO_COM3 irq 5 #device sio3 at isa? disable port IO_COM4 irq 9 # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code. # NOTE: Be sure to keep the 'device miibus' line in order to use these NICs! device miibus # MII bus support device xl # 3Com 3c90x (``Boomerang'', ``Cyclone'') # Pseudo devices - the number indicates how many units to allocate. pseudo-device loop # Network loopback pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support pseudo-device tun # Packet tunnel. pseudo-device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) pseudo-device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling pseudo-device snp 3 # The `bpf' pseudo-device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! pseudo-device bpf #Berkeley packet filter --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pan-pl.crash.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Script started on Tue Mar 4 11:50:48 2003 Setting up interactive shell params.. [roam@flat:p2 ~]$ cd /var/crash [roam@flat:p2 /var/crash]$ sudo gdb -k /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PAN-GB-HQ/kerne= l.debug vmcore.2 Password: GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain condition= s. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd"...Deprecated bfd_read cal= led at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../../contrib/gdb/gdb/dbxrea= d.c line 2627 in elfstab_build_psymtabs Deprecated bfd_read called at /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdb/../../../..= /contrib/gdb/gdb/dbxread.c line 933 in fill_symbuf IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x0033b000 initial pcb at physical address 0x002a54e0 panicstr: page fault panic messages: --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address =3D 0x8 fault code =3D supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer =3D 0x8:0xc01b2768 stack pointer =3D 0x10:0xc0284e3c frame pointer =3D 0x10:0xc0284e48 code segment =3D base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b =3D DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags =3D interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL =3D 0 current process =3D Idle interrupt mask =3D=20 trap number =3D 12 panic: page fault syncing disks...=20 Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address =3D 0x30 fault code =3D supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer =3D 0x8:0xc01f9ab4 stack pointer =3D 0x10:0xc0284c5c frame pointer =3D 0x10:0xc0284c64 code segment =3D base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b =3D DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags =3D interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL =3D 0 current process =3D Idle interrupt mask =3D bio=20 trap number =3D 12 panic: page fault Uptime: 6d11h8m49s dumping to dev #ad/0x20001, offset 524456 dump ata0: resetting devices .. done 255 254 253 252 251 250 249 248 247 246 245 244 243 242 241 240 239 238 237= 236 235 234 233 232 231 230 229 228 227 226 225 224 223 222 221 220 219 21= 8 217 216 215 214 213 212 211 210 209 208 207 206 205 204 203 202 201 200 1= 99 198 197 196 195 194 193 192 191 190 189 188 187 186 185 184 183 182 181 = 180 179 178 177 176 175 174 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 165 164 163 162= 161 160 159 158 157 156 155 154 153 152 151 150 149 148 147 146 145 144 14= 3 142 141 140 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 132 131 130 129 128 127 126 125 1= 24 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 = 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 = 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 = 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 = 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 = 6 5 4 3 2 1 0=20 --- #0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 487 if (dumping++) { (kgdb) bt #0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 #1 0xc0151020 in boot (howto=3D260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:3= 16 #2 0xc0151454 in poweroff_wait (junk=3D0xc027d7ac, howto=3D-1071131953) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 #3 0xc023d9e7 in trap_fatal (frame=3D0xc0284c1c, eva=3D48) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:974 #4 0xc023d6a1 in trap_pfault (frame=3D0xc0284c1c, usermode=3D0, eva=3D48) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867 #5 0xc023d277 in trap (frame=3D{tf_fs =3D 16, tf_es =3D 16, tf_ds =3D -107= 2431088,=20 tf_edi =3D 0, tf_esi =3D 2, tf_ebp =3D -1071100828, tf_isp =3D -10711= 00856,=20 tf_ebx =3D -1071017220, tf_edx =3D 6864960, tf_ecx =3D -1070874464,= =20 tf_eax =3D 0, tf_trapno =3D 12, tf_err =3D 0, tf_eip =3D -1071670604,= tf_cs =3D 8,=20 tf_eflags =3D 66050, tf_esp =3D -1071100708, tf_ss =3D 2}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 #6 0xc01f9ab4 in acquire_lock (lk=3D0xc02992fc) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:266 #7 0xc01fe202 in softdep_fsync_mountdev (vp=3D0xcbb2eb40) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:4024 #8 0xc0202512 in ffs_fsync (ap=3D0xc0284cdc) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vnops.c:134 #9 0xc0201150 in ffs_sync (mp=3D0xc0ef0000, waitfor=3D2, cred=3D0xc0a3b600= ,=20 p=3D0xc02bc0a0) at vnode_if.h:558 #10 0xc0182107 in sync (p=3D0xc02bc0a0, uap=3D0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:576 #11 0xc0150ddb in boot (howto=3D256) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:2= 35 #12 0xc0151454 in poweroff_wait (junk=3D0xc027d7ac, howto=3D-1071131953) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 #13 0xc023d9e7 in trap_fatal (frame=3D0xc0284dfc, eva=3D8) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:974 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- #14 0xc023d6a1 in trap_pfault (frame=3D0xc0284dfc, usermode=3D0, eva=3D8) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867 #15 0xc023d277 in trap (frame=3D{tf_fs =3D 6422544, tf_es =3D -1072300016,= =20 tf_ds =3D -1071120368, tf_edi =3D 6422528, tf_esi =3D -1058083972,=20 tf_ebp =3D -1071100344, tf_isp =3D -1071100376, tf_ebx =3D -880342144= ,=20 tf_edx =3D 0, tf_ecx =3D 0, tf_eax =3D -1, tf_trapno =3D 12, tf_err = =3D 0,=20 tf_eip =3D -1071962264, tf_cs =3D 8, tf_eflags =3D 66182, tf_esp =3D = -880342144,=20 tf_ss =3D -1054661004}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 #16 0xc01b2768 in syncache_insert (sc=3D0xcb870b80, sch=3D0xc0eeeb7c) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c:289 #17 0xc01b3639 in syncache_add (inc=3D0xc0284ee8, to=3D0xc0284f54, th=3D0xc= 0ab0024,=20 sop=3D0xc0284ee4, m=3D0xc0aadc00) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.= c:1021 #18 0xc01adcc3 in tcp_input (m=3D0xc0aadc00, off0=3D20, proto=3D6) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:826 #19 0xc01a8cba in ip_input (m=3D0xc0aadc00) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c:910 #20 0xc01a8d37 in ipintr () at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c:934 #21 0xc02330b9 in swi_net_next () (kgdb) bt full #0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 error =3D 0 #1 0xc0151020 in boot (howto=3D260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:3= 16 howto =3D 260 #2 0xc0151454 in poweroff_wait (junk=3D0xc027d7ac, howto=3D-1071131953) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 fmt =3D 0xc027d7ac "%s" bootopt =3D 260 buf =3D "page fault", '\000' #3 0xc023d9e7 in trap_fatal (frame=3D0xc0284c1c, eva=3D48) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:974 frame =3D (struct trapframe *) 0x104 eva =3D 0 code =3D -1071130708 type =3D 12 ss =3D -1071130708 esp =3D 0 softseg =3D {ssd_base =3D 0, ssd_limit =3D 1048575, ssd_type =3D 27,=20 ssd_dpl =3D 0, ssd_p =3D 1, ssd_xx =3D 4, ssd_xx1 =3D 2, ssd_def32 =3D 1,= ssd_gran =3D 1} #4 0xc023d6a1 in trap_pfault (frame=3D0xc0284c1c, usermode=3D0, eva=3D48) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867 va =3D 0 vm =3D (struct vmspace *) 0x0 map =3D 0xc rv =3D 0 ftype =3D 192 '=C0' p =3D (struct proc *) 0x0 #5 0xc023d277 in trap (frame=3D{tf_fs =3D 16, tf_es =3D 16, tf_ds =3D -107= 2431088,=20 tf_edi =3D 0, tf_esi =3D 2, tf_ebp =3D -1071100828, tf_isp =3D -10711= 00856,=20 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- tf_ebx =3D -1071017220, tf_edx =3D 6864960, tf_ecx =3D -1070874464,= =20 tf_eax =3D 0, tf_trapno =3D 12, tf_err =3D 0, tf_eip =3D -1071670604,= tf_cs =3D 8,=20 tf_eflags =3D 66050, tf_esp =3D -1071100708, tf_ss =3D 2}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 p =3D (struct proc *) 0x0 sticks =3D 13847272392516173825 i =3D 0 ucode =3D 0 type =3D 12 code =3D 0 eva =3D 48 #6 0xc01f9ab4 in acquire_lock (lk=3D0xc02992fc) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:266 lk =3D (struct lockit *) 0x6ac040 holder =3D 2 #7 0xc01fe202 in softdep_fsync_mountdev (vp=3D0xcbb2eb40) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:4024 bp =3D (struct buf *) 0xc0284cdc nbp =3D (struct buf *) 0xc0284cb4 wk =3D (struct worklist *) 0x0 #8 0xc0202512 in ffs_fsync (ap=3D0xc0284cdc) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_vnops.c:134 vp =3D (struct vnode *) 0xcbb2eb40 bp =3D (struct buf *) 0xc0284cdc nbp =3D (struct buf *) 0xc0284cf0 s =3D -1070874464 error =3D 0 wait =3D 0 passes =3D -877466816 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- skipmeta =3D -1071097632 lbn =3D 2147483647 #9 0xc0201150 in ffs_sync (mp=3D0xc0ef0000, waitfor=3D2, cred=3D0xc0a3b600= ,=20 p=3D0xc02bc0a0) at vnode_if.h:558 a =3D {a_desc =3D 0xc0285620, a_vp =3D 0xcbb2eb40, a_cred =3D 0xc0a3b600,= =20 a_waitfor =3D 2, a_p =3D 0xc02bc0a0} vp =3D (struct vnode *) 0x0 cred =3D (struct ucred *) 0xc0a3b600 waitfor =3D 2 p =3D (struct proc *) 0xc02bc0a0 waitfor =3D 2 nvp =3D (struct vnode *) 0x0 vp =3D (struct vnode *) 0xc0284cdc ip =3D (struct inode *) 0x0 ump =3D (struct ufsmount *) 0xc0f04e00 fs =3D (struct fs *) 0xc0f03000 error =3D 0 allerror =3D 0 #10 0xc0182107 in sync (p=3D0xc02bc0a0, uap=3D0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:576 p =3D (struct proc *) 0xc02bc0a0 mp =3D (struct mount *) 0xc0ef0000 nmp =3D (struct mount *) 0x0 asyncflag =3D 0 #11 0xc0150ddb in boot (howto=3D256) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:2= 35 bp =3D (struct buf *) 0x0 iter =3D 5 nbusy =3D -1071130708 pbusy =3D -1071100576 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- howto =3D 256 #12 0xc0151454 in poweroff_wait (junk=3D0xc027d7ac, howto=3D-1071131953) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 fmt =3D 0xc027d7ac "%s" bootopt =3D 256 buf =3D "page fault", '\000' #13 0xc023d9e7 in trap_fatal (frame=3D0xc0284dfc, eva=3D8) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:974 frame =3D (struct trapframe *) 0x100 eva =3D 0 code =3D -1071130708 type =3D 12 ss =3D -1071130708 esp =3D 0 softseg =3D {ssd_base =3D 0, ssd_limit =3D 1048575, ssd_type =3D 27,=20 ssd_dpl =3D 0, ssd_p =3D 1, ssd_xx =3D 0, ssd_xx1 =3D 0, ssd_def32 =3D 1,= ssd_gran =3D 1} #14 0xc023d6a1 in trap_pfault (frame=3D0xc0284dfc, usermode=3D0, eva=3D8) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867 va =3D 0 vm =3D (struct vmspace *) 0x0 map =3D 0xc rv =3D 0 ftype =3D 192 '=C0' p =3D (struct proc *) 0x0 #15 0xc023d277 in trap (frame=3D{tf_fs =3D 6422544, tf_es =3D -1072300016,= =20 tf_ds =3D -1071120368, tf_edi =3D 6422528, tf_esi =3D -1058083972,=20 tf_ebp =3D -1071100344, tf_isp =3D -1071100376, tf_ebx =3D -880342144= ,=20 tf_edx =3D 0, tf_ecx =3D 0, tf_eax =3D -1, tf_trapno =3D 12, tf_err = =3D 0,=20 tf_eip =3D -1071962264, tf_cs =3D 8, tf_eflags =3D 66182, tf_esp =3D = -880342144,=20 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- tf_ss =3D -1054661004}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 p =3D (struct proc *) 0x0 sticks =3D 22531436045668236 i =3D 0 ucode =3D 0 type =3D 12 code =3D 0 eva =3D 8 #16 0xc01b2768 in syncache_insert (sc=3D0xcb870b80, sch=3D0xc0eeeb7c) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c:289 sc =3D (struct syncache *) 0x620000 sch =3D (struct syncache_head *) 0xc0eeeb7c sc2 =3D (struct syncache *) 0x0 s =3D 6422528 i =3D 0 #17 0xc01b3639 in syncache_add (inc=3D0xc0284ee8, to=3D0xc0284f54, th=3D0xc= 0ab0024,=20 sop=3D0xc0284ee4, m=3D0xc0aadc00) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.= c:1021 inc =3D (struct in_conninfo *) 0xc1232674 th =3D (struct tcphdr *) 0x0 tp =3D (struct tcpcb *) 0xcb813d40 so =3D (struct socket *) 0xcb785980 sc =3D (struct syncache *) 0xcb870b80 sch =3D (struct syncache_head *) 0xc0eeeb7c ipopts =3D (struct mbuf *) 0x0 taop =3D (struct rmxp_tao *) 0xc1232674 i =3D 0 s =3D 4 #18 0xc01adcc3 in tcp_input (m=3D0xc0aadc00, off0=3D20, proto=3D6) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c:826 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- inc =3D {inc_flags =3D 0 '\000', inc_len =3D 101 'e', inc_pad =3D 49178,= =20 inc_ie =3D {ie_fport =3D 14348, ie_lport =3D 20480, ie_dependfaddr =3D { ie46_foreign =3D {ia46_pad32 =3D {3237187428, 131072, 3232422912},=20 ia46_addr4 =3D {s_addr =3D 4196968640}}, ie6_foreign =3D {__u6_addr= =3D { __u6_addr8 =3D "d\217=F3=C0\000\000\002\000\000=DC=AA=C0=C0=A8(= =FA", __u6_addr16 =3D { 36708, 49395, 0, 2, 56320, 49322, 43200, 64040}, __u6_addr32 = =3D { 3237187428, 131072, 3232422912, 4196968640}}}}, ie_dependladdr = =3D { ie46_local =3D {ia46_pad32 =3D {3232422912, 3238793776, 0}, ia46_addr= 4 =3D { s_addr =3D 2349844673}}, ie6_local =3D {__u6_addr =3D { __u6_addr8 =3D "\000=DC=AA=C00\022\f=C1\000\000\000\000=C1=C8\017= \214",=20 __u6_addr16 =3D {56320, 49322, 4656, 49420, 0, 0, 51393, 35855},= =20 __u6_addr32 =3D {3232422912, 3238793776, 0, 2349844673}}}}},=20 inc_dependroute =3D {inc4_route =3D {ro_rt =3D 0x0, ro_dst =3D {sa_len = =3D 0 '\000',=20 sa_family =3D 80 'P',=20 sa_data =3D "\f8\000\000\000@\024\000\000\000\000\200=D4=C0"}},=20 inc6_route =3D {ro_rt =3D 0x0, ro_dst =3D {sin6_len =3D 0 '\000',=20 sin6_family =3D 80 'P', sin6_port =3D 14348, sin6_flowinfo =3D 1073= 741824,=20 sin6_addr =3D {__u6_addr =3D { __u6_addr8 =3D "\024\000\000\000\000\200=D4=C0\020\000=AB=C0=C8= O(=C0",=20 __u6_addr16 =3D {20, 0, 32768, 49364, 16, 49323, 20424, 49192},= =20 __u6_addr32 =3D {20, 3235151872, 3232432144, 3223867336}}},=20 sin6_scope_id =3D 3223867340}}}} th =3D (struct tcphdr *) 0xc0ab0024 ip =3D (struct ip *) 0xc0ab0010 ipov =3D (struct ipovly *) 0xcb813c80 inp =3D (struct inpcb *) 0xcb813c80 optp =3D (u_char *) 0xc0ab0038 "\002\004\005=B4\001\001\004\002" optlen =3D 8 len =3D -1071100076 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- tlen =3D 0 off =3D -1071100076 drop_hdrlen =3D 48 tp =3D (struct tcpcb *) 0xcb813d40 thflags =3D 2 so =3D (struct socket *) 0xcb785980 todrop =3D -1071100076 acked =3D -880722816 ourfinisacked =3D -1071100076 needoutput =3D 0 tiwin =3D 64240 to =3D {to_flags =3D 16, to_tsval =3D 0, to_tsecr =3D 0, to_cc =3D 0,=20 to_ccecho =3D 0, to_mss =3D 1460, to_requested_s_scale =3D 0 '\000',=20 to_pad =3D 0 '\000'} taop =3D (struct rmxp_tao *) 0xc0284f54 tao_noncached =3D {tao_cc =3D 1, tao_ccsent =3D 3235151872, tao_mssopt =3D= 2} next_hop =3D (struct sockaddr_in *) 0xc0f3807c rstreason =3D -1071100076 ip6 =3D (struct ip6_hdr *) 0x0 isipv6 =3D 0 #19 0xc01a8cba in ip_input (m=3D0xc0aadc00) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c:910 tag =3D {mh_next =3D 0xc0aadc00, mh_nextpkt =3D 0xc0d482f0,=20 mh_data =3D 0xc0f3807c "\020\0028\f=C0=A8(=FE", mh_len =3D -1071717142, m= h_type =3D 13,=20 mh_flags =3D 18} m =3D (struct mbuf *) 0xc0aadc00 ip =3D (struct ip *) 0xc0ab0010 fp =3D (struct ipq *) 0xc0284fb8 ia =3D (struct in_ifaddr *) 0xc0f35f00 ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- ifa =3D (struct ifaddr *) 0x0 i =3D 0 hlen =3D 20 checkif =3D 0 sum =3D 0 pkt_dst =3D {s_addr =3D 4264077504} divert_info =3D 0 args =3D {m =3D 0xc0aadc00, oif =3D 0x0, next_hop =3D 0xc0f3807c, rule =3D= 0x0,=20 eh =3D 0x0, ro =3D 0xc014f22a, dst =3D 0xc02a50b0, flags =3D -1070877576,= f_id =3D { dst_ip =3D 3251113868, src_ip =3D 3232246010, dst_port =3D 80, src_port= =3D 3128,=20 proto =3D 6 '\006', flags =3D 2 '\002'}, divert_rule =3D 0, retval =3D = 3223998624} #20 0xc01a8d37 in ipintr () at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c:934 s =3D 0 m =3D (struct mbuf *) 0xc0aadc00 #21 0xc02330b9 in swi_net_next () No symbol table info available. (kgdb) fr 16 #16 0xc01b2768 in syncache_insert (sc=3D0xcb870b80, sch=3D0xc0eeeb7c) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c:289 289 sc2 =3D TAILQ_FIRST(&sch->sch_bucket); (kgdb) print sch $1 =3D (struct syncache_head *) 0xc0eeeb7c (kgdb) print *sch $2 =3D {sch_bucket =3D {tqh_first =3D 0x0, tqh_last =3D 0xc0eeeb7c},=20 sch_length =3D 4294967295} (kgdb) q [roam@flat:p2 /var/crash]$ exit exit Script done on Tue Mar 4 11:51:49 2003 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp-- --K8nIJk4ghYZn606h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+ZJUW7Ri2jRYZRVMRAvJPAJ0c+OMnciHI5ePcgEq2mAximluW7wCeOv5Q hexyzDpbh6MrSoslLmSr6aI= =HUrd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --K8nIJk4ghYZn606h-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 5: 9:10 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4398937B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:09:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from lucifer.we.lc.ehu.es (lucifer.we.lc.ehu.es [158.227.6.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA0643F75 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:09:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jose@we.lc.ehu.es) Received: from we.lc.ehu.es (titan.we.lc.ehu.es [158.227.6.155]) (authenticated) by lucifer.we.lc.ehu.es (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h24D8pm12325 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified NO); Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:08:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jose@we.lc.ehu.es) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 14:08:52 +0100 Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: Daniel Eischen , stable@FreeBSD.ORG To: Igor Pokrovsky From: "Jose M. Alcaide" In-Reply-To: <3E646615.BDEE8404@cnrm.meteo.fr> Message-Id: <723002BB-4E42-11D7-90DE-000A9566C46A@we.lc.ehu.es> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Probably, there are several Radeon 7500 chips with different IDs, and=20 some recent ones are not being recognized by XFree86 4.2.1. BTW, I think that 4.8-RELEASE should include XFree86 4.3, which=20 supports additional harware (ATI Radeon 9x00 models, for example), even=20= if that implies a delay of one or two weeks. El martes, 4 marz, 2003, a las 09:38 Europe/Madrid, Igor Pokrovsky=20 escribi=F3: >> With all the problems supposedly fixed in 4.3 (especially the >> ATI drivers (*)), it might be worth it to delay 4.8 a few days just >> to include this port. >> >> (*) I can confirm that 4.3 works with my ATI Radeon 7500 whereas >> it doesn't with 4.2.1. > > It is strange, that your ATI card is not working with 4.2.1 > I have the same card and with the latest port of XFree it is working > fine, even DRI is perfect. -- ***** Jose M. Alcaide // jose@we.lc.ehu.es // jmas@FreeBSD.org ***** ***** "Go ahead... make my day" -- Harry Callahan ***** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 5:10:59 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6510437B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:10:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mirage.nlink.com.br (mirage.nlink.com.br [200.249.195.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E9E243FE9 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:10:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from paulo@nlink.com.br) Received: (qmail 1005 invoked by uid 85); 4 Mar 2003 13:10:52 -0000 Received: from paulo@nlink.com.br by mirage.nlink.com.br by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.12 (avp. Clear:. Processed in 0.548045 secs); 04 Mar 2003 13:10:52 -0000 Received: from foker.nlink.com.br (HELO nlink.com.br) (200.249.197.10) by mirage.nlink.com.br with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 13:10:52 -0000 Message-ID: <3E64A5D7.7020102@nlink.com.br> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 10:10:47 -0300 From: Paulo Fragoso User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030207 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Eischen Cc: Eric Anholt , "Bruce A. Mah" , Corey Holcomb-Hockin , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > With all the problems supposedly fixed in 4.3 (especially the > ATI drivers (*)), it might be worth it to delay 4.8 a few days just > to include this port. > > (*) I can confirm that 4.3 works with my ATI Radeon 7500 whereas > it doesn't with 4.2.1. > And problems with NVIDIA GeForce4 420 Go was solved, too. Now I'm using XFree-4.3.0 (binaries for 4.x from xfree86.org) on Toshiba Satellite 1415-S173 running 5.0-RELEASE. It's working fine but I had problems with mozilla. Paulo. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 5:25:28 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7236B37B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:25:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (dav46.sea2.hotmail.com [207.68.164.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F5943FB1 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:25:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kmays2000@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:25:25 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [24.197.166.206] Reply-To: "Ken Mays" From: "Ken Mays" To: "Igor Pokrovsky" , "Jose M. Alcaide" Cc: "Daniel Eischen" , References: <723002BB-4E42-11D7-90DE-000A9566C46A@we.lc.ehu.es> Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:25:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Mar 2003 13:25:25.0657 (UTC) FILETIME=[841DD090:01C2E251] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Would the FreeBSD team consider the benefits of integrating Xfree86 v4.3.x for v4.8?!? The upgrade that was done on the video drivers alone was worth it for me. -Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jose M. Alcaide" To: "Igor Pokrovsky" Cc: "Daniel Eischen" ; Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 8:08 AM Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- Probably, there are several Radeon 7500 chips with different IDs, and some recent ones are not being recognized by XFree86 4.2.1. BTW, I think that 4.8-RELEASE should include XFree86 4.3, which supports additional harware (ATI Radeon 9x00 models, for example), even if that implies a delay of one or two weeks. El martes, 4 marz, 2003, a las 09:38 Europe/Madrid, Igor Pokrovsky escribió: >> With all the problems supposedly fixed in 4.3 (especially the >> ATI drivers (*)), it might be worth it to delay 4.8 a few days just >> to include this port. >> >> (*) I can confirm that 4.3 works with my ATI Radeon 7500 whereas >> it doesn't with 4.2.1. > > It is strange, that your ATI card is not working with 4.2.1 > I have the same card and with the latest port of XFree it is working > fine, even DRI is perfect. -- ***** Jose M. Alcaide // jose@we.lc.ehu.es // jmas@FreeBSD.org ***** ***** "Go ahead... make my day" -- Harry Callahan ***** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 5:36:21 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C7637B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:36:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.online.bg (gandalf.online.bg [217.75.128.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2023A43FAF for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:36:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) Received: (qmail 3696 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 13:31:57 -0000 Received: from office.sbnd.net (HELO straylight.ringlet.net) (217.75.140.130) by gandalf.online.bg with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 13:31:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 62818 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Mar 2003 13:34:42 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:34:42 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: Vikash Badal - PCS Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.8-PRE (and earlier) crash - syncookies? Message-ID: <20030304133442.GD554@straylight.oblivion.bg> References: <501BF453CDCFD111A6E40080C83DAC04E4C2ED@PSICS001> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RpqchZ26BWispMcB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <501BF453CDCFD111A6E40080C83DAC04E4C2ED@PSICS001> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --RpqchZ26BWispMcB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 02:10:39PM +0200, Vikash Badal - PCS wrote: > Greetings, >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Peter Pentchev [mailto:roam@ringlet.net] > > Sent: 04 March 2003 01:59 > > To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: 4.8-PRE (and earlier) crash - syncookies? > >=20 > >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > I think this has been going on for a couple of months;=20 > > unfortunately, I > > cannot remember exactly when it started :( Several machines,=20 > > which have > > always been updated synchronously at intervals of a couple of weeks or > > so, have been experiencing panics every few days with recent=20 > > 4.6-STABLE, > > 4.7-STABLE, and 4.8-PRERELEASE kernel+world. > >=20 > > Attached is the kernel config and a gdb session of the most recent > > crashdump. Maybe the most interesting part is at the end of the gdb > > session: is there a normal reason why a TAILQ structure would have a > > null start pointer, and an end pointer pointing back to itself? > >=20 > > G'luck, > > Peter > >=20 >=20 > Have you checked your RAM or tried different RAM modules, >=20 > >Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > >fault code =3D supervisor read, page not present >=20 > I had a problem recently with my 4.7-STABLE server with trap 12 > and it turned out to be the RAM that was shot! I do not really think this is a case of faulty RAM; as I mentioned above, this happens on several machines, with always the same faults with the same backtrace in the same kernel locations. G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If this sentence didn't exist, somebody would have invented it. --RpqchZ26BWispMcB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+ZKty7Ri2jRYZRVMRAmaQAJ4tluXD+DlhMysVb0wExfLLPf0XEACeOeuL QZAQkqnyC1OJC7vmmBRrxHc= =3G32 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RpqchZ26BWispMcB-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 5:36:25 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AABF37B429 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:36:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-08.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2234043FB1 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:36:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nigelt@iinet.net.au) Received: (qmail 5059 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 13:26:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iinet.net.au) (203.59.206.173) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 13:26:09 -0000 Message-ID: <3E64A901.6020909@iinet.net.au> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 21:24:17 +0800 From: Nigel Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: XFree86 4.3 References: <1046743791.638.13.camel@leguin> <20030304023759.GZ37397@procyon.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <20030304023759.GZ37397@procyon.firepipe.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all Does anyone know if XFree86 4.3 going to be in the ports soon? like i mean in the next day or two because i would really like to be there :), only coz i have a ATI Radeon 9700 Pro and i would love to use it in freebsd, so i can get rid of this horrible windows. Thanks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 5:53:53 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D60237B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:53:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from c18070.belrs1.nsw.optusnet.com.au (c18070.belrs1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [210.49.78.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F401743F85 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 05:53:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajmawer@optusnet.com.au) Received: (qmail 66307 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 13:53:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO optusnet.com.au) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 13:53:44 -0000 Message-ID: <3E64AFF1.5000800@optusnet.com.au> Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 00:53:53 +1100 From: Antony Mawer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030130 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Pentchev Cc: Vikash Badal - PCS , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.8-PRE (and earlier) crash - syncookies? References: <501BF453CDCFD111A6E40080C83DAC04E4C2ED@PSICS001> <20030304133442.GD554@straylight.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <20030304133442.GD554@straylight.oblivion.bg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Pentchev wrote: *snip* >>>Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >>>fault code = supervisor read, page not present > > I do not really think this is a case of faulty RAM; as I mentioned > above, this happens on several machines, with always the same faults > with the same backtrace in the same kernel locations. I also have noticed this on a number of machines my company has installed. Unfortunately the problems have not been frequent enough or readily repeatable enough to warrant spending time debugging it... -Antony To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 6:40:38 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2B437B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:40:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.flugsvamp.com (ts46-01-qdr3643.mdfrd.or.charter.com [68.118.36.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E74A343FA3 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:40:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jlemon@flugsvamp.com) Received: (from jlemon@localhost) by mail.flugsvamp.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) id h24Ee9ha074389; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:40:09 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jlemon) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:40:09 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan Lemon Message-Id: <200303041440.h24Ee9ha074389@mail.flugsvamp.com> To: roam@ringlet.net, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.8-PRE (and earlier) crash - syncookies? X-Newsgroups: local.mail.freebsd-stable In-Reply-To: Organization: Cc: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Hi, > >I think this has been going on for a couple of months; unfortunately, I >cannot remember exactly when it started :( Several machines, which have >always been updated synchronously at intervals of a couple of weeks or >so, have been experiencing panics every few days with recent 4.6-STABLE, >4.7-STABLE, and 4.8-PRERELEASE kernel+world. > >Attached is the kernel config and a gdb session of the most recent >crashdump. Maybe the most interesting part is at the end of the gdb >session: is there a normal reason why a TAILQ structure would have a >null start pointer, and an end pointer pointing back to itself? [ ... ] >#16 0xc01b2768 in syncache_insert (sc=0xcb870b80, sch=0xc0eeeb7c) > at /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c:289 >289 sc2 = TAILQ_FIRST(&sch->sch_bucket); >(kgdb) print sch >$1 = (struct syncache_head *) 0xc0eeeb7c >(kgdb) print *sch >$2 = {sch_bucket = {tqh_first = 0x0, tqh_last = 0xc0eeeb7c}, > sch_length = 4294967295} It looks to me like the tailq is empty (first == null, last == &head), but the code path to remove an entry was taken because the length counter indicated it was over the bucket limit. sch_length == -1. So my guess is the code dropped a syncache entry twice, and this is the resulting mess. Can you print out the contents of tcp_syncache and tcpstat? -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 6:47: 7 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956A037B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:47:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from shrek.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (shrek.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de [134.147.86.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F1B43F3F for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:47:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from strattbo@stud.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de) Received: from m50.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de ([134.147.86.50]) by shrek.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18qDhA-00020y-00 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 15:47:04 +0100 Received: from strattbo by m50.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18qDhA-00051S-00 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 15:47:04 +0100 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:47:04 +0100 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: hard error writing... Message-ID: <20030304144704.GA19305@m50.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Thomas Stratmann Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi everyone, I just opened my box from hibernation (Toshiba Libretto 110ct) to see lots of messages like ad0s1a: hard error writing fsbn 4880895 of 2340416-2340439 (ad0s1 bn 468 ***something** status=51 error=04 (sorry unable to exactly reproduce since I have to copy this from the screen, they keep coming every few seconds and litter up the screen) The HD is just freshly installed. What is going on here, is my disk dying? Regards Thomas Stratmann To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 6:52:45 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A1C37B405 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:52:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandalf.online.bg (gandalf.online.bg [217.75.128.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BFE343FCB for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:52:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) Received: (qmail 14296 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2003 14:48:27 -0000 Received: from office.sbnd.net (HELO straylight.ringlet.net) (217.75.140.130) by gandalf.online.bg with SMTP; 4 Mar 2003 14:48:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 67734 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Mar 2003 14:51:12 -0000 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:51:12 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.8-PRE (and earlier) crash - syncookies? Message-ID: <20030304145112.GE554@straylight.oblivion.bg> References: <200303041440.h24Ee9ha074389@mail.flugsvamp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UKNXkkdQCYZ6W5l3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200303041440.h24Ee9ha074389@mail.flugsvamp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --UKNXkkdQCYZ6W5l3 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="UBnjLfzoMQYIXCvq" Content-Disposition: inline --UBnjLfzoMQYIXCvq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:40:09AM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > In article you write: > >-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- > >-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D-=3D- > > > >Hi, > > > >I think this has been going on for a couple of months; unfortunately, I > >cannot remember exactly when it started :( Several machines, which have > >always been updated synchronously at intervals of a couple of weeks or > >so, have been experiencing panics every few days with recent 4.6-STABLE, > >4.7-STABLE, and 4.8-PRERELEASE kernel+world. > > > >Attached is the kernel config and a gdb session of the most recent > >crashdump. Maybe the most interesting part is at the end of the gdb > >session: is there a normal reason why a TAILQ structure would have a > >null start pointer, and an end pointer pointing back to itself? >=20 > [ ... ] >=20 > >#16 0xc01b2768 in syncache_insert (sc=3D0xcb870b80, sch=3D0xc0eeeb7c) > > at /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c:289 > >289 sc2 =3D TAILQ_FIRST(&sch->sch_bucket); > >(kgdb) print sch > >$1 =3D (struct syncache_head *) 0xc0eeeb7c > >(kgdb) print *sch > >$2 =3D {sch_bucket =3D {tqh_first =3D 0x0, tqh_last =3D 0xc0eeeb7c},=20 > > sch_length =3D 4294967295} >=20 >=20 > It looks to me like the tailq is empty (first =3D=3D null, last =3D=3D &h= ead), > but the code path to remove an entry was taken because the length > counter indicated it was over the bucket limit. sch_length =3D=3D -1. >=20 > So my guess is the code dropped a syncache entry twice, and this is=20 > the resulting mess. Can you print out the contents of tcp_syncache > and tcpstat? See attached; I could provide the whole corefile on request, if it will be helpful. G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 This sentence would be seven words long if it were six words shorter. --UBnjLfzoMQYIXCvq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pan-pl.tcpstat.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable (kgdb) fr 16 #16 0xc01b2768 in syncache_insert (sc=3D0xcb870b80, sch=3D0xc0eeeb7c) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_syncache.c:289 289 sc2 =3D TAILQ_FIRST(&sch->sch_bucket); (kgdb) print tcp_syncache $1 =3D {hashbase =3D 0xc0eee000, zone =3D 0xc0d94c80, hashsize =3D 512,=20 hashmask =3D 511, bucket_limit =3D 30, cache_count =3D 4294967295,=20 cache_limit =3D 15359, rexmt_limit =3D 3, hash_secret =3D 1416729105,=20 next_reseed =3D 0, timerq =3D {{tqh_first =3D 0x0, tqh_last =3D 0xc02a874= 8}, { tqh_first =3D 0x0, tqh_last =3D 0xc02a8750}, {tqh_first =3D 0x0,=20 tqh_last =3D 0xc02a8758}, {tqh_first =3D 0x0, tqh_last =3D 0xc02a8760= }},=20 tt_timerq =3D {{c_links =3D {sle =3D {sle_next =3D 0xc603a2e8}, tqe =3D { tqe_next =3D 0xc603a2e8, tqe_prev =3D 0xc603c620}}, c_time =3D 55= 852000,=20 c_arg =3D 0x0, c_func =3D 0, c_flags =3D 0}, {c_links =3D {sle =3D { sle_next =3D 0x0}, tqe =3D {tqe_next =3D 0x0, tqe_prev =3D 0xc603= e200}},=20 c_time =3D 55658332, c_arg =3D 0x1, c_func =3D 0, c_flags =3D 0}, {c_= links =3D { sle =3D {sle_next =3D 0xc603a2e8}, tqe =3D {tqe_next =3D 0xc603a2e8= ,=20 tqe_prev =3D 0xc603c130}}, c_time =3D 52482882, c_arg =3D 0x2, c_= func =3D 0,=20 c_flags =3D 0}, {c_links =3D {sle =3D {sle_next =3D 0xc603a2e8}, tqe = =3D { tqe_next =3D 0xc603a2e8, tqe_prev =3D 0xc603cc30}}, c_time =3D 52= 485282,=20 c_arg =3D 0x3, c_func =3D 0, c_flags =3D 0}}} (kgdb) print tcpstat $2 =3D {tcps_connattempt =3D 598918, tcps_accepts =3D 32652, tcps_connects = =3D 612607,=20 tcps_drops =3D 11716, tcps_conndrops =3D 13231, tcps_closed =3D 636232,= =20 tcps_segstimed =3D 1956837, tcps_rttupdated =3D 2499750, tcps_delack =3D = 615940,=20 tcps_timeoutdrop =3D 23, tcps_rexmttimeo =3D 98711, tcps_persisttimeo =3D= 55,=20 tcps_keeptimeo =3D 6166, tcps_keepprobe =3D 204, tcps_keepdrops =3D 5962,= =20 tcps_sndtotal =3D 5368356, tcps_sndpack =3D 1503648, tcps_sndbyte =3D 388= 668829,=20 tcps_sndrexmitpack =3D 13994, tcps_sndrexmitbyte =3D 10990401,=20 tcps_sndacks =3D 2587703, tcps_sndprobe =3D 48, tcps_sndurg =3D 0,=20 tcps_sndwinup =3D 53833, tcps_sndctrl =3D 1209130, tcps_rcvtotal =3D 4122= 112,=20 tcps_rcvpack =3D 2027883, tcps_rcvbyte =3D 301857290, tcps_rcvbadsum =3D = 45,=20 tcps_rcvbadoff =3D 0, tcps_rcvmemdrop =3D 0, tcps_rcvshort =3D 0,=20 tcps_rcvduppack =3D 571696, tcps_rcvdupbyte =3D 1922742,=20 tcps_rcvpartduppack =3D 27, tcps_rcvpartdupbyte =3D 14961,=20 tcps_rcvoopack =3D 23227, tcps_rcvoobyte =3D 24974272,=20 tcps_rcvpackafterwin =3D 637, tcps_rcvbyteafterwin =3D 677422,=20 tcps_rcvafterclose =3D 479, tcps_rcvwinprobe =3D 4, tcps_rcvdupack =3D 61= 2690,=20 tcps_rcvacktoomuch =3D 0, tcps_rcvackpack =3D 2551692,=20 tcps_rcvackbyte =3D 384639652, tcps_rcvwinupd =3D 12215, tcps_pawsdrop = =3D 83,=20 tcps_predack =3D 58265, tcps_preddat =3D 255753, tcps_pcbcachemiss =3D 0,= =20 tcps_cachedrtt =3D 852, tcps_cachedrttvar =3D 852, tcps_cachedssthresh = =3D 282,=20 tcps_usedrtt =3D 11154, tcps_usedrttvar =3D 11154, tcps_usedssthresh =3D = 2053,=20 tcps_persistdrop =3D 0, tcps_badsyn =3D 24, tcps_mturesent =3D 0,=20 tcps_listendrop =3D 0, tcps_sc_added =3D 32716, tcps_sc_retransmitted =3D= 197,=20 tcps_sc_dupsyn =3D 165, tcps_sc_dropped =3D 0, tcps_sc_completed =3D 3265= 2,=20 tcps_sc_bucketoverflow =3D 0, tcps_sc_cacheoverflow =3D 0, tcps_sc_reset = =3D 52,=20 tcps_sc_stale =3D 13, tcps_sc_aborted =3D 0, tcps_sc_badack =3D 0,=20 tcps_sc_unreach =3D 0, tcps_sc_zonefail =3D 0, tcps_sc_sendcookie =3D 0,= =20 tcps_sc_recvcookie =3D 0} (kgdb) q --UBnjLfzoMQYIXCvq-- --UKNXkkdQCYZ6W5l3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+ZL1g7Ri2jRYZRVMRAjIvAJ4ntEc3PLrf/5GryfePorrZvldeNACfSasa xFtp5E2D+otJOeDRAD4Goag= =hWsO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UKNXkkdQCYZ6W5l3-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 6:54:43 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7034E37B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:54:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from shrek.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (shrek.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de [134.147.86.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FD843FA3 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 06:54:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from strattbo@stud.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de) Received: from m50.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de ([134.147.86.50]) by shrek.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18qDoX-000240-00 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 15:54:41 +0100 Received: from strattbo by m50.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18qDoW-00051f-00 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 15:54:40 +0100 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:54:40 +0100 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: hard reading error (follow up) Message-ID: <20030304145440.GB19305@m50.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Thomas Stratmann Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, rebooting seems to have fixed it, strangely. The permanent disk action accompanied with these error messages came from the mail spooling system. Several other places were infected as well, typing 'man' would not work etc. Rebooting gave 'giving up on 21 buffers'. After reboot all seems fine, but I don't trust this... Cheers Thomas Stratmann To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 7: 3:35 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C3937B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:03:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from cadillac.meteo.fr (cadillac.meteo.fr [137.129.1.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D87743F85 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:03:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from igor.pokrovsky@cnrm.meteo.fr) Received: from cti825.cnrm.meteo.fr (localhost.meteo.fr [127.0.0.1]) by cadillac.meteo.fr (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183+JAGae58098)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA09264 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:03:29 GMT Received: from xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr (xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr [137.129.150.2]) by cti825.cnrm.meteo.fr (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA15360; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:03:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from cnrm.meteo.fr (mai3.cnrm.meteo.fr [137.129.157.34]) by xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.7.1) id QAA22848; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:03:28 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <3E64C03E.3630377D@cnrm.meteo.fr> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 16:03:26 +0100 From: Igor Pokrovsky X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/780) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Stratmann Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hard error writing... References: <20030304144704.GA19305@m50.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (cti825/CNRM) Organization: METEO FRANCE(CNRM) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thomas Stratmann wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I just opened my box from hibernation > (Toshiba Libretto 110ct) to see lots of messages like > > ad0s1a: hard error writing fsbn 4880895 of 2340416-2340439 (ad0s1 bn 468 > ***something** status=51 error=04 > > (sorry unable to exactly reproduce since I have to copy this from the > screen, they keep coming every few seconds and litter up the screen) > > The HD is just freshly installed. What is going on here, is my disk > dying? I had the same problem just one week ago on my laptop. It happend on / filesystem. What I did is just remade filesystem on this slice and during this procedure bad sectors have been remapped by firmware, transparently to me. Now everything is fine. So perhaps you ran into the same problem. Good luck, -- Igor To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 7: 4:36 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2BF37B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:04:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from PIKES.panasas.com (gw2.panasas.com [65.194.124.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200ED43FE1 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:04:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from behanna@zbzoom.net) Received: from waumbek.panasas.com ([172.17.2.36]) by PIKES.panasas.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id XA31812V; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 10:04:30 -0500 From: Chris BeHanna Reply-To: behanna@zbzoom.net Organization: Western Pennsylvania Pizza Disposal Unit To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hard error writing... Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 10:04:30 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030304144704.GA19305@m50.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> In-Reply-To: <20030304144704.GA19305@m50.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303041004.30636.behanna@zbzoom.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tuesday 04 March 2003 09:47, Thomas Stratmann wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I just opened my box from hibernation > (Toshiba Libretto 110ct) to see lots of messages like > > ad0s1a: hard error writing fsbn 4880895 of 2340416-2340439 (ad0s1 bn 468 > ***something** status=51 error=04 > > (sorry unable to exactly reproduce since I have to copy this from the > screen, they keep coming every few seconds and litter up the screen) > > The HD is just freshly installed. What is going on here, is my disk > dying? It looks like it. Just because a disk is new doesn't mean it's not defective. :-( If you want to live dangerously, keep good backups. -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer (Remove "bogus" before responding.) behanna@bogus.zbzoom.net Turning coffee into software since 1990. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 7: 4:53 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C3037B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:04:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from shrek.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de (shrek.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de [134.147.86.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0267543FE0 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:04:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from strattbo@stud.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de) Received: from m50.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de ([134.147.86.50]) by shrek.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18qDyL-00025V-00 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 16:04:49 +0100 Received: from strattbo by m50.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18qDyL-00051z-00 for ; Tue, 04 Mar 2003 16:04:49 +0100 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:04:49 +0100 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: kern.fallback_elf_brand defunct? and e2fsprogs Message-ID: <20030304150449.GC19305@m50.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i From: Thomas Stratmann Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, to a completely different topic: What's the correct mnemonics for the kern.fallback_elf_brand sysctl? Is is 'when I encounter an ELF not branded for FreeBSD, treat it as -branded'? Please correct me if I (and probably others) am getting this wrong! I use sysctl kern.fallback_elf_brand=3 and try to launch a linux bash but get an error message I currently cannot reproduce, something like 'Unknown ELF brand '0'. Abort trap.' Is this behaviour ok? By the way: I just had a crash as you could read in my previous mail and now need to fsck my ext2fs partition. This gives me the same problem as in creating it (I had to get a one-floppy linux distro to be able to create the fs): both mke2fs and fsck.ext2 do one-byte (!) reads on the special file which of course is not supported: dscheck(#ad/0x30002): b_bcount 1 is not on a sector boundary (ssize 512) Has anyone successfully worked with the e2fsprogs port? Is it broken? Or DOES linux fs software do byte reads? (Are linux people nuts?) Help appreciated. I'm currently stuck. Cheers Thomas Stratmann To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 7: 9:58 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C2837B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:09:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from vivaldi.meteo.fr (vivaldi.meteo.fr [137.129.28.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F5A43F3F for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:09:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from igor.pokrovsky@cnrm.meteo.fr) Received: from cti825.cnrm.meteo.fr (localhost.meteo.fr [127.0.0.1]) by vivaldi.meteo.fr (8.9.3 (PHNE_25183+JAGae58098)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA25313 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 15:09:46 GMT Received: from xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr (xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr [137.129.150.2]) by cti825.cnrm.meteo.fr (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16403; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:09:41 +0100 (MET) Received: from cnrm.meteo.fr (mai3.cnrm.meteo.fr [137.129.157.34]) by xdata.cnrm.meteo.fr with ESMTP (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.7.1) id QAA23364; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:09:42 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <3E64C1B4.D862C347@cnrm.meteo.fr> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 16:09:40 +0100 From: Igor Pokrovsky X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.06 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/780) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Stratmann Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hard reading error (follow up) References: <20030304145440.GB19305@m50.physik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (cti825/CNRM) Organization: METEO FRANCE(CNRM) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thomas Stratmann wrote: > > Hi, > > rebooting seems to have fixed it, strangely. The permanent disk action > accompanied with these error messages came from the mail spooling > system. Several other places were infected as well, typing 'man' would > not work etc. Rebooting gave 'giving up on 21 buffers'. After reboot > all seems fine, but I don't trust this... As I told, your hard disk remapped bad sectors itself, in your case even without remaking of filesystem. You are lucky. Anyway I suggest you not to keep important data on this disk, because some day it may not be able to remap bad sectors, because it will ran out of extra sectors, to remap onto. -- Igor To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 7:29:33 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B34937B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:29:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690F643F3F for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:29:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018F742; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:29:29 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DDD8478C28; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:29:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 09:29:29 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: roam@ringlet.net, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.8-PRE (and earlier) crash - syncookies? Message-ID: <20030304152929.GF92031@madman.celabo.org> References: <200303041440.h24Ee9ha074389@mail.flugsvamp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200303041440.h24Ee9ha074389@mail.flugsvamp.com> X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i-ja.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:40:09AM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > It looks to me like the tailq is empty (first == null, last == &head), > but the code path to remove an entry was taken because the length > counter indicated it was over the bucket limit. sch_length == -1. > > So my guess is the code dropped a syncache entry twice, and this is > the resulting mess. Can you print out the contents of tcp_syncache > and tcpstat? Hi Jonathan, This looks like the same issue that I contacted you about in the following message from September (originally reported by Defacto ). Message-ID: <20020925132524.GH82779@hellblazer.nectar.cc> Message-ID: <20020923143811.14F8D13FB09@cvd.pl> I can resend if you like. Just hoping to help you connect the dots. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.celabo.org/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 4 7:44:24 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4508637B401 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:44:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAFB43F75 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:44:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h24FiIA7019752 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2003 08:44:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2003 08:39:49 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20030304.083949.03156349.imp@bsdimp.com> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Changes to interrupt routing in 4.8? From: "M. Warner Losh" X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I updated my 4.6 box to 4.8. In 4.8 there's a problem using fast interrupts for some reason. This is a dead simple 486 box, without pci or pccard. I've included the entire dmesg, since it is so short. Looking at the code, it fails because it fails. No clue why it might be failing. Since this is my main firewall box, I'd like to get it using fast interrupts again to make the console working. Warner Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.8-RC #1: Mon Mar 3 21:51:01 MST 2003 imp@harmony.village.org:/home/imp/FreeBSD/4x/src/sys/compile/ROVER Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Cyrix 486DX2 (486-class CPU) Origin = "CyrixInstead" DIR=0x0c1b Stepping=0 Revision=12 real memory = 25165824 (24576K bytes) avail memory = 21782528 (21272K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc02d7000. md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface isa0: on motherboard orm0: ¤Q¤À¤§¤@ªºÂsÄýªÌ ¿ï¾Ü¶i¤J

¡@

¤Q¤À¤§¤@ªºÂsÄýªÌ¡@¿ï¾Ü¶i¤J

¤Q¤§¤EªºÂsÄýªÌ¡@¿ï¾ÜÃö³¬µøµ¡

µM¦Ó¡@§Ú­Ì«Üº¡·N³o¼Ëªº¤ñ¨Ò¡@

¦]¬°¡K

³o¸Ìªº¤H¡@©Ò¾Ö¦³ªº«D¤Z¥Í¬¡

¦h¬O¦b¤@ºØ¤£¤Z«äºû¤U©Ò¤Þµoªº¤£¤Z¨M©w«á¡@°½°½¶}©lªº

enter

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 6:21:26 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A55837B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 06:21:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (dav57.sea2.hotmail.com [207.68.164.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E6443F85 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 06:21:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kmays2000@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 06:21:21 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [24.197.166.206] Reply-To: "Ken Mays" From: "Ken Mays" To: "FreeBSD Stable" References: <20030306093212.GF86982@sr.se> <20030306132936.GB12820@sr.se> Subject: Re: XFree86 4.3.0 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:21:25 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Mar 2003 14:21:21.0590 (UTC) FILETIME=[A93C0D60:01C2E3EB] Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The main thing is that Gnome 2.2 and KDE 3.1.x works fine with Xfree86 v4.3.x. This is the usual 'customer experience' since many people use FreeBSD as a desktop OS as well as a server. Great job. Mostly what I have an issue with is KDE or Gnome related. I have to review the Fonts/Fontserver to make sure no old issues still exist! ~Ken ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gunnar Flygt" To: "FreeBSD Stable" Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 8:29 AM Subject: Re: XFree86 4.3.0 > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 10:32:12AM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote: > > I just want to report one more good thing. I recompiled mozilla > > from scratch right out of the ports directory, and it runs fine now > > with Xft support and all. > > Again I have to reply to my own answer. The good thing is still > good, but only on one of the 3 systems I test 4.3.0 on. > > The system working OK is a newly installed laptop which runs > 5.0-CURRENT. The second system is an ordinary desktop 1.4GHz > Dell, which runs 4.7-STABLE. Here mozilla behaves as earlier > described. The info "No Windows found" is shown and then I get > the prompt back again. No mozilla started. I'm trying a recompile > of Xft using `portupgrade -r -f Xft` to see if this makes any > difference. > > But at least XFree86 4.3.0 runs fine. > > -- > Gunnar Flygt, SR > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 6:34:14 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F9D37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 06:34:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from goliath.siemens.de (goliath.siemens.de [192.35.17.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8664043F3F for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 06:34:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@siemens.com) Received: from mail1.siemens.de (mail1.siemens.de [139.23.33.14]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h26EXvE05598; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:33:57 +0100 (MET) Received: from mars.cert.siemens.de (ust.mchp.siemens.de [139.23.201.17]) by mail1.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h26EXu710617; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:33:56 +0100 (MET) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [139.25.42.7]) by mars.cert.siemens.de (8.12.8/8.12.6/$SiemensCERT: mail/cert.mc,v 1.42 2003/02/21 12:06:56 ust Exp $) with ESMTP id h26EXu3R085653; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:33:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andre@curry.mchp.siemens.de) Received: (from localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h26EXtP4079457; Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 15:33:55 +0100 From: Andre Albsmeier To: Francesco Casadei Cc: Joan Picanyol i Puig , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Unexpected busfree in Data-in phase and other weirdness Message-ID: <20030306153355.A12907@curry.mchp.siemens.de> References: <20030228235031.GE5033@grummit.biaix.org> <20030301094934.GA547@goku.kasby> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030301094934.GA547@goku.kasby>; from fcasadei@inwind.it on Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 10:49:34AM +0100 X-Echelon: top secret, IDEA, InfoSec, BND, president X-Advice: Drop that crappy M$-Outlook, I'm tired of your viruses! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 01-Mar-2003 at 10:49:34 +0100, Francesco Casadei wrote: > On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 12:50:31AM +0100, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote: > > [reposted from -scsi@, maybe that's not the right place] > > > > Hi, > > > > On an Adaptec 2940 I have an IBM DNES-309170W and a SEAGATE ST318438LW, > > soft-raided with vinum. Lately it seems that the Seagate disc has become > > 'unstable', and I don't know how to diagnose any further. I've checked > > the cabling and I've tried the SeaTools floppy disk from Seagate but it > > hangs on my system :( > > > > Please have a look at the excerpt of kernel logs at > > http://biaix.org/pk/debug/. messages.1.kernel shows what happened (look > > for Feb 4) while recording a cd with my SCSI cd-writer. The system > > appeared to hang for anything between 3 and 20 minutes while I was > > getting those. messages.0.kernel shows what happened today (Feb 27) for > > no apparent reason. Problems persisted across reboots, even though some > > of them were not logged (could not fsck). > > > > For further reference, please look at this thread from two months ago: > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2329637+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2002/freebsd-questions/20021222.freebsd-questions > > > > I'm really stumped so I'd appreciate any help in the lines of: > > > > 1.- What's causing these problems? > > 2.- How can I solve them? > > > > tks > > -- > > pica > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > end of the original message > > I'm having this problem too. When this happens the SCSI bus is reset. Here's > the error message (not wrapped): > > ... > > Here's the system configuration: > > # camcontrol devlist > at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0) > at scbus0 target 1 lun 0 (pass1,da1) > at scbus0 target 2 lun 0 (pass2,cd0) > at scbus0 target 3 lun 0 (pass3,cd1) (I assume the cabling/termination has been checked already.) I had bus problems with my DNES until I upgraded the firmware to: da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device In general, I have often seen bus problems when a lot of different devices are hanging on the same SCSI bus and some drives are being hit really hard. They always went away with a new fw, especially on my IBM DDYS drives. The Plextor fw seems a bit old as well (at least compared to my PLEXTOR CD-ROM PX-40TS 1.13) but I don't know if the 32TS uses the same as the 40TS. I have written a program to upgrade the firmware on IBM and Plextor (and some other devices) under FreeBSD in case you are interested... However, IMO one should play with the fw only in case of problems and not just to get lastest version... -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 7:10:46 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2779837B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:10:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from f20.mail.ru (f20.mail.ru [194.67.57.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA3C43F3F for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:10:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tovarisch-drug@mail.ru) Received: from mail by f20.mail.ru with local (Exim FE.1) id 18qx16-0007cc-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:10:40 +0300 Received: from [194.85.25.186] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:10:40 +0300 From: "Tovarisch Drug" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: SQUID building fails after upgrade Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: unknown via proxy [194.85.25.186] Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 18:10:40 +0300 Reply-To: "Tovarisch Drug" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, stable! Basing on security advisory SA-03:02.openssl I was upgraded to RELENG_4 successfully at Feb 27 14:02 (from 4.6-stable with appling previously issuedpatches). Rebuilding "Squid-2.5stable1" caused the following error (before upgrade squid has been build without errors so I've decided to mail FreeBSD first): ----------------------- Making all in lib Making all in snmplib Making all in scripts Making all in src make all-recursive Making all in fs Making all in repl Making all in auth Making all in basic Making all in digest Making all in ntlm source='ssl_support.c' object='ssl_support.o' libtool=no depfile='.deps/ssl_support.Po' tmpdepfile='.deps/ssl_support.TPo' depmode=gcc /bin/sh ../cfgaux/depco mp gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DEFAULT_CONFIG_FILE=\"/usr/local/squid/etc/squid.conf\ " -I. -I. -I../include -I. -I. -I../include -I../include -g -O2 -Wall -c `test -f ssl_support.c || echo './'`ssl_support.c ssl_support.c:141: `SSL_OP_NON_EXPORT_FIRST' undeclared here (not in a function) ssl_support.c:141: initializer element is not constant ssl_support.c:141: (near initialization for `ssl_options[15].value') *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/distfiles/squid-2.5.STABLE1/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/distfiles/squid-2.5.STABLE1/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/distfiles/squid-2.5.STABLE1/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/distfiles/squid-2.5.STABLE1. --------------------- Does it resolvable? There are my squid's configure options: ./configure \ --enable-gnurexec \ --enable-splaytree \ --enable-xmalloc-debug \ --enable-xmalloc-debug-trace \ --enable-xmalloc-statistics \ --enable-carp \ --enable-icmp \ --enable-delay-pools \ --enable-mem-gen-trace \ --enable-useragent-log \ --enable-referer-log \ --enable-kill-parent-hack \ --enable-snmp \ --enable-cachemgr-hostname \ --enable-httc \ --enable-ssl \ --with-openssl \ --enable-forw-via-db \ --enable-default-err-language=Russian-koi8-r \ --enable-err-languages="Russian-koi8-r Russian-1251 English" \ --disable-poll \ --disable-http-violations \ --enable-ipf-transparent \ --enable-auth="basic digest ntlm" \ --enable-basic-auth-helpers="MSNT NCSA PAM SMB YP \ getpwnam multi-domain-NTLM winbind" \ --enable-ntlm-auth-helpers="SMB fakeauth no_check winbind" \ --enable-digest-auth-helpers="password" \ --enable-external-acl-helpers="ip_user unix_group \ wbinfo_group winbind_group" Best regards, Illia Baidakov. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 7:46: 0 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB6337B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:45:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from siralan.org (12-222-67-235.client.insightBB.com [12.222.67.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DEB43FBD for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:45:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mikes@siralan.org) Received: from siralan.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by siralan.org (8.12.8/8.12.7) with ESMTP id h26Fjulg003347; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:45:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mikes@siralan.org) Received: (from mikes@localhost) by siralan.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h26FjtBk003346; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:45:55 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael L. Squires" Message-Id: <200303061545.h26FjtBk003346@siralan.org> Subject: Re: Still seeing SMP panics on a older dual PIII (with debug kernel and crash dumps) In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030306071303.081fe368@192.168.0.12> "from Mike Tancsa at Mar 6, 2003 07:22:49 am" To: Mike Tancsa Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:45:55 -0500 (EST) Cc: FreeBSD Stable X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL88 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Its an older dual PIII. Can anyone tell me if the dumps point to a > hardware issue, or if its crashing in the same spot each time ? I can blast > it with buildworlds and it never dies. Generally I have yet to find bad > hardware that could pass that.... But always a first time. I have a P6DGH with two PII/300's running 4.8-RC2; mptable crashes with a "HOSED" error message for the extended table (indicative of a BIOS problems) but no crashes. MLS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 7:47:56 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A11837B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:47:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE1643F85 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 07:47:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h26Flr57042539; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:47:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030306105222.079caf78@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 10:52:56 -0500 To: "Michael L. Squires" From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Still seeing SMP panics on a older dual PIII (with debug kernel and crash dumps) Cc: FreeBSD Stable In-Reply-To: <200303061545.h26FjtBk003346@siralan.org> References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030306071303.081fe368@192.168.0.12> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (lava/20020517) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:45 AM 06/03/2003 -0500, Michael L. Squires wrote: > > Its an older dual PIII. Can anyone tell me if the dumps point to a > > hardware issue, or if its crashing in the same spot each time ? I can > blast > > it with buildworlds and it never dies. Generally I have yet to find bad > > hardware that could pass that.... But always a first time. > >I have a P6DGH with two PII/300's running 4.8-RC2; mptable crashes with >a "HOSED" error message for the extended table (indicative of a BIOS >problems) but no crashes. A BIOS problem ? In what way ? ---Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 8:41: 4 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F2C37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:41:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-relay.omnis.com (smtp-relay.omnis.com [216.239.128.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF3343FBF for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:41:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from salty.rapid.stbernard.com (corp-2.ipinc.com [199.245.188.2]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3A2431ED; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:40:59 -0800 (PST) From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr.com To: Eric Anholt Subject: Re: XFree86 4.3.0 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:40:56 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: Gunnar Flygt , FreeBSD Stable References: <20030305151914.GB58739@sr.se> <200303052336.47779.wes@softweyr.com> <1046940758.611.29.camel@leguin> In-Reply-To: <1046940758.611.29.camel@leguin> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303060840.56484.wes@softweyr.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thursday 06 March 2003 00:52, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 23:36, Wes Peters wrote: > > On Wednesday 05 March 2003 08:57, Eric Anholt wrote: > > > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 07:19, Gunnar Flygt wrote: > > > > I find it working very fine on my troublesome 5.0-CURRENT > > > > box. I've had big problems for some weeks getting 4.2 > > > > to work. I gave up the other day, but 4.3.0 worked > > > > straight "out of the box", if you can say so after a > > > > portupgrade XFree86 > > > > > > > > What didn't work was the installation of XFree86-FontServer > > > > but I can live without that, I hope. > > > > > > Okay, got that fixed, it'll be in the -8 diff. (got to run to > > > class). Thanks! > > > > Is this working with the nvidia driver? I gotta track down that > > PCI TNT2 card for my -current machine... > > Are you talking about the binary driver? If it's a proper XFree86 > module and XFree86 didn't screw up compatibility (I don't think they > did), it should continue working, but it could do things that would > prevent it from working in a new server. > > I haven't tested cards besides the radeon due to lack of time so far. > > The -9 diff is up (http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html) > and I haven't had any reports of problems with it so far. If you get > X 4.3.0 working with it in the next couple of days, it would be great > if people could mail me and mention what card, if they had to change > anything from a 4.2.0 installation to get it to work, and briefly how > they've tested it (i.e. started up gnome2 and did something, not just > "it built" or "startx works") I'll give it a whirl. Probably not until the weekend though. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 8:46:15 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E9237B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:46:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.dbitech.ca (radius.wavefire.com [64.141.13.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3163F43FBD for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:46:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from darcy@wavefire.com) Received: (qmail 19580 invoked from network); 6 Mar 2003 17:07:33 -0000 Received: from dbitech.wavefire.com (HELO dbitech) (darcy@64.141.15.253) by radius.wavefire.com with SMTP; 6 Mar 2003 17:07:33 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Darcy Buskermolen Organization: Wavefire Technologies Corp. To: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 08:46:07 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200303060846.07649.darcy@wavefire.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have had simular experiances with this very phenominom under 3.X, altho= ugh I=20 have only ever seen it when you fill the partition ie 101% used and it on= ly=20 happens on partitions with softupdates. On Wednesday 05 March 2003 16:53, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > I rebooted my server 20hrs ago, and had 20gig of free space ... now I'm > down to 4.6gig ... > > venus# df -t ufs > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/amrd0s1a 103777974 90836532 4639206 95% / > > Before I rebooted it 20hrs ago, it had drop'd down <500Meg, and after t= he > reboot, pop'd back up to 20gig ... > > I can't seem to find where 16gig of disk space is being used though, bu= t, > for instance, I had 12gig of files in /var/vmcore (from crash dumps) th= at > I removed, which should have increased me to 16gig free, but I'm still = at > 4.6gig and drop'ng ... > > The system isn't particularly busy: > > venus# iostat 5 > tty amrd0 cpu > tin tout KB/t tps MB/s us ni sy in id > 1 116 0.00 0 0.00 32 0 28 1 40 > 1 452 4.29 343 1.43 39 0 52 0 9 > 0 225 5.21 258 1.31 32 0 47 1 21 > 2 35 6.21 270 1.64 13 0 51 0 36 > 1 38 4.46 268 1.17 19 0 49 1 31 > 1 32 4.81 261 1.23 16 0 51 1 32 > > And the drive is 7x18gig in a RAID5 configuration .. > > OS is 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #38: Tue Mar 4 22:43:18 CST 2003 with a pa= tch > from Tor Egge to fix a problem with how vnodes are kept track of and > reclaimed/reused ... > > I've tried doing a 'sync', figuring that maybe it would force all > outstanding writes to the drive, but that seems to make no difference > either ... > > I'm doing a du right now to see if I can see anything large out of the > ordinary, but is there any way (maybe using lsof?) of finding out what, > if any, processes are holding open a large file? > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message --=20 Darcy Buskermolen Wavefire Technologies Corp. ph: 250.717.0200 fx: 250.763.1759 http://www.wavefire.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 9:22:42 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1B737B405 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:22:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from haystack.lclark.edu (lclark.edu [149.175.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA1AB43F75 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:22:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from [149.175.30.191] ([149.175.30.191]) by haystack.lclark.edu (SAVSMTP 3.0.0.44) with SMTP id M2003030609222404638 ; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 09:22:24 -0800 Subject: Re: XFree86 4.3.0 From: Eric Anholt To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3E674DA4.6050403@math.missouri.edu> References: <20030305151914.GB58739@sr.se> <1046883464.635.26.camel@leguin> <200303052336.47779.wes@softweyr.com> <1046940758.611.29.camel@leguin> <200303061234.h26CY2cE037865@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp> <3E674DA4.6050403@math.missouri.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1046971546.625.1.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 06 Mar 2003 09:25:46 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 05:31, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > > > > > On 06 Mar 2003 00:52:38 -0800 > > Eric Anholt wrote: > > > > >The -9 diff is up (http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html) and I > > >haven't had any reports of problems with it so far. If you get X 4.3.0 > > >working with it in the next couple of days, it would be great if people > > >could mail me and mention what card, if they had to change anything from > > >a 4.2.0 installation to get it to work, and briefly how they've tested > > >it (i.e. started up gnome2 and did something, not just "it built" or > > >"startx works") > > > I am building kde3 with X 4.3.0. One problem is that installation of kdelibs3 > has the line > RUN_DEPENDS= ${FONTSCALE}:${PORTSDIR}/x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontScalable \ > where > FONTSCALE= ${X11BASE}/lib/X11/fonts/PEX/Roman.phont > But x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontScalable does not install > ${X11BASE}/lib/X11/fonts/PEX/* in X 4.3.0. Is PEX/Roman.phont required for > kde3, or is it just a convenient way to make sure that this dependency is loaded? That was the dependency that the XFree86-4 port used for the fontScalable package, so I assume it was a copy and paste. For that one I switched to one of the truetype fonts. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 9:31:17 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A7037B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:31:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from haystack.lclark.edu (lclark.edu [149.175.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B06FB43FAF for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:31:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from [149.175.30.191] ([149.175.30.191]) by haystack.lclark.edu (SAVSMTP 3.0.0.44) with SMTP id M2003030609311224021 ; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 09:31:12 -0800 Subject: Re: DRI errors with the XFree86 4.3.0 installation From: Eric Anholt To: Gunnar Flygt Cc: FreeBSD Stable In-Reply-To: <20030306093858.GG86982@sr.se> References: <20030306093858.GG86982@sr.se> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1046972073.625.11.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 06 Mar 2003 09:34:34 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 01:38, Gunnar Flygt wrote: > I found when reading the /var/log/XFree86.0.log > > (WW) RADEON(0): [dri] Some DRI features disabled because of version mismatch. > [dri] radeon.o kernel module version is 1.1.1 but 1.3.1 or later is preferred. The DRI should still work fine, you just won't have some of the extra features that are in 4.3.0 (TCL and sync-to-vblank for example). I'm working on the DRM update for -current, which should be done RSN, and then I'll MFC it after the freeze. For those remembering last time I said this, I was never able to track down what in the new DRM caused problems with 4.2.0 X installations with the new DRM, so I never committed it. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 9:59:39 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3505C37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:59:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from green.qeng-ho.org (dsl-217-155-128-242.zen.co.uk [217.155.128.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDF343FBF for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 09:59:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from arthur-list-bsd@erewhon.demon.co.uk) Received: from arthur by green.qeng-ho.org with local (Exim 3.20 #4) id 18qzea-0006ka-00 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 17:59:36 +0000 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jails update References: <20030305135652.GA83413@ei.bzerk.org> <020c01c2e340$ee8f5c60$19fd2fd8@westbend.net> <20030306140038.M43664@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: Dmitry Morozovsky's message of "Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:02:37 +0300 (MSK)" From: Arthur Chance Date: 06 Mar 2003 17:59:36 +0000 Message-ID: <873cm074vr.fsf@pooh.wired.qeng-ho.org> Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dmitry Morozovsky writes: > On Wed, 5 Mar 2003, Frank Tegtmeyer wrote: > > FT> One problem with the DESTDIR approach may be the use of > FT> symlinks by a jail administrator - if there are symlinks set for > FT> directories containing the binaries you may overwrite the hosts > FT> directories. Maybe "make installworld" does a check for this too - I > FT> didn't look at it. > > We avoid this (and the whole need to update multiple jails) by installing to > dedicated partition and the do multiple read-only null mounts, so each jail has > perfectly equal read-only /usr (with symlinks outside to /home, /local, etc) I'm probably misreading this as I'm only just starting to look at the jail facilities but are you saying symlinks from inside a jail to outside it work within the jail? Doesn't that defeat the entire point? Or are you saying /usr/local is e.g. a symlink to /local and you have a different /local per jail and one for the host as well? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 11:12:35 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8D737B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:12:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from aji.wilshire.net (worm.wilshire.net [64.161.77.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB49543FB1 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:12:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rileyjmc@pacbell.net) Received: from emilyd ([10.100.123.232]) by aji.wilshire.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with SMTP id h26JAVY2074603; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:11:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rileyjmc@pacbell.net) From: "Riley" To: "MArek" Cc: "FreeBSD Stable" Subject: RE: buildworld fails Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:11:15 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <000a01c2e28c$699ef880$dc0aa8c0@master> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Trying to upgrade from 4.4-20020114-STABLE to 4.7-R-p7. /usr isn't big > > enough but /var is so: > > > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 8 Mar 4 12:28 /usr/obj@ -> /var/obj > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel - 8 Mar 4 12:28 /usr/src@ -> /var/src > > > > Ran mergemaster.sh -p, but for 2 buildworlds it fails with: > > > > /var/src/lib/libutil/login_times.c: In function `in_lts': > > /var/src/lib/libutil/login_times.c:159: warning: passing arg 2 of > `in_ltms' > > makes pointer from integer without a cast > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /var/src/lib/libutil. > > *** Error code 1 > > Any ideas? > > > > yes, two: > system....and if you want to have really fresh system you ought to make a > many step updating...I mean..... > update it to 4.5 then 4.6 and to newest STABLE.... many mechanisms in > compiling had changed, so updating from 4.4 =>> 4.7 wouldn;t be > good fo you, > because make buildworld is no only to use make, gcc and install > -C but many > many others programs. Thanks for the reply--I'm not sure what the actually problem was. The only sources on this machine were kernel sources in /sys--when /usr/src/ was completely removed and re-cvsup'ed, the buildworld went find and the upgrade was successful. Regards, Riley To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 11:36:47 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C4337B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:36:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from grummit.biaix.org (213-97-212-86.uc.nombres.ttd.es [213.97.212.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E7F9843F75 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:36:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joan@grummit.biaix.org) Received: (qmail 99916 invoked by uid 1000); 6 Mar 2003 19:34:34 -0000 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 20:34:34 +0100 From: Joan Picanyol i Puig To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Unexpected busfree in Data-in phase and other weirdness Message-ID: <20030306193434.GA99778@grummit.biaix.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030228235031.GE5033@grummit.biaix.org> <20030301094934.GA547@goku.kasby> <20030306153355.A12907@curry.mchp.siemens.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030306153355.A12907@curry.mchp.siemens.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Andre Albsmeier [20030306 15:32]: > On Sat, 01-Mar-2003 at 10:49:34 +0100, Francesco Casadei wrote: > (I assume the cabling/termination has been checked already.) Yep, I also run the controler's BIOS drive check on the drives. > I had bus problems with my DNES until I upgraded the firmware to: > > da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > > In general, I have often seen bus problems when a lot of different > devices are hanging on the same SCSI bus and some drives are being > hit really hard. That could be my case: 2 drives 1 cdrw, cd burning and compiling (if that qualifies as 'really hard'. > I have written a program to upgrade the firmware on IBM and Plextor > (and some other devices) under FreeBSD in case you are interested... Does it work for Seagate drives? (20:29:52 <~>) 0 $ camcontrol devlist at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,da0) at scbus0 target 2 lun 0 (pass1,cd0) at scbus0 target 6 lun 0 (pass2,da1) qvb -- pica To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 14:59: 6 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9FF37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:59:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.tiscali.it (mail-6.tiscali.it [195.130.225.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9290E43F3F for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 14:59:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fcasadei@inwind.it) Received: from goku.kasby (217.133.209.128) by mail.tiscali.it (6.5.032) id 3E662164000BDCB8 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:59:00 +0100 Received: (qmail 1319 invoked by uid 1000); 6 Mar 2003 22:58:37 -0000 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:58:37 +0100 From: Francesco Casadei To: Andre Albsmeier Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Unexpected busfree in Data-in phase and other weirdness Message-ID: <20030306225837.GA1277@goku.kasby> Mail-Followup-To: Andre Albsmeier , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030228235031.GE5033@grummit.biaix.org> <20030301094934.GA547@goku.kasby> <20030306153355.A12907@curry.mchp.siemens.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030306153355.A12907@curry.mchp.siemens.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:33:55PM +0100, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > (I assume the cabling/termination has been checked already.) >=20 > I had bus problems with my DNES until I upgraded the firmware to: >=20 > da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device=20 >=20 > In general, I have often seen bus problems when a lot of different > devices are hanging on the same SCSI bus and some drives are being > hit really hard. They always went away with a new fw, especially > on my IBM DDYS drives. The Plextor fw seems a bit old as well (at > least compared to my PLEXTOR CD-ROM PX-40TS 1.13) but I don't know > if the 32TS uses the same as the 40TS. >=20 > I have written a program to upgrade the firmware on IBM and Plextor > (and some other devices) under FreeBSD in case you are interested... > However, IMO one should play with the fw only in case of problems > and not just to get lastest version... >=20 > -Andre >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > end of the original message I'm having SCSI-related problems on the home PC, which has run fine for thr= ee years now whithout being hardware-upgraded. I update the system on a regular basis, though (last buildworld/installword was on Thu Dec 26 2002). The IBM drive fitness test showed that hard drives are ok. The error seems = to appear randomly, whithout particular conditions (load avg, used mem, progra= ms running, etc.). A couple of days ago the SCSI bus has been reset five consecutive times! Is= it time to change my AHA2940 or this has nothing to do with the SCSI controlle= r? Francesco Casadei --=20 You can download my public key from http://digilander.libero.it/fcasadei/ or retrieve it from a keyserver (pgpkeys.mit.edu, wwwkeys.pgp.net, ...) Key fingerprint is: 1671 9A23 ACB4 520A E7EE 00B0 7EC3 375F 164E B17B --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+Z9KdfsM3XxZOsXsRAlWnAJ9tvnwDgBhqXs47wK4vOcjLcPVtrQCgiEoW UK8iuch17OHtA7MyYDpd6qc= =7vCC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Dxnq1zWXvFF0Q93v-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 16:20:52 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE7037B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 16:20:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACE043FBF for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 16:20:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mspitze1@optonline.net) Received: from asv7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (asv7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.43]) by mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.05 (built Nov 6 2002)) with ESMTP id <0HBC00K1NRMK66@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 19:20:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from bogomips (ool-18b868ca.dyn.optonline.net [24.184.104.202]) by asv7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (8.12.6/8.12.5) with SMTP id h270KfAY021531 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 19:20:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 19:29:39 -0500 From: Marc Spitzer Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? In-reply-to: <200303060846.07649.darcy@wavefire.com> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <20030306192939.3ec42f5e.mspitze1@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.7) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <200303060846.07649.darcy@wavefire.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 08:46:07 -0800 Darcy Buskermolen wrote: > > I have had simular experiances with this very phenominom under 3.X, > although I have only ever seen it when you fill the partition ie 101% > used and it only happens on partitions with softupdates. > I do not mean to state the obvious, but have you tried to look for open files on the partition, especially ones that have been deleted but are still held open by the process? lsof will give you a list. I am just mentioning it because it has got me in the past. You could also try turning off daemon processes one at a time and see if that helps. Good luck marc > > On Wednesday 05 March 2003 16:53, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > I rebooted my server 20hrs ago, and had 20gig of free space ... now > > I'm down to 4.6gig ... > > > > venus# df -t ufs > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > /dev/amrd0s1a 103777974 90836532 4639206 95% / > > > > Before I rebooted it 20hrs ago, it had drop'd down <500Meg, and > > after the reboot, pop'd back up to 20gig ... > > > > I can't seem to find where 16gig of disk space is being used though, > > but, for instance, I had 12gig of files in /var/vmcore (from crash > > dumps) that I removed, which should have increased me to 16gig free, > > but I'm still at 4.6gig and drop'ng ... > > > > The system isn't particularly busy: > > > > venus# iostat 5 > > tty amrd0 cpu > > tin tout KB/t tps MB/s us ni sy in id > > 1 116 0.00 0 0.00 32 0 28 1 40 > > 1 452 4.29 343 1.43 39 0 52 0 9 > > 0 225 5.21 258 1.31 32 0 47 1 21 > > 2 35 6.21 270 1.64 13 0 51 0 36 > > 1 38 4.46 268 1.17 19 0 49 1 31 > > 1 32 4.81 261 1.23 16 0 51 1 32 > > > > And the drive is 7x18gig in a RAID5 configuration .. > > > > OS is 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #38: Tue Mar 4 22:43:18 CST 2003 with a > > patch from Tor Egge to fix a problem with how vnodes are kept track > > of and reclaimed/reused ... > > > > I've tried doing a 'sync', figuring that maybe it would force all > > outstanding writes to the drive, but that seems to make no > > difference either ... > > > > I'm doing a du right now to see if I can see anything large out of > > the ordinary, but is there any way (maybe using lsof?) of finding > > out what, if any, processes are holding open a large file? > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > -- > Darcy Buskermolen > Wavefire Technologies Corp. > ph: 250.717.0200 > fx: 250.763.1759 > http://www.wavefire.com > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 16:38:10 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6017337B405; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 16:38:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (genesi.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.136.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0084843FDD; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 16:38:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.4/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h270bujs016903; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:07:56 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) X-Authentication-Warning: cain.gsoft.com.au: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] claimed to be [127.0.0.1] Subject: Re: XFree86 4.3.0 From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: Norikatsu Shigemura Cc: Eric Anholt , FreeBSD Stable List In-Reply-To: <200303061234.h26CY2cE037865@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp> References: <20030305151914.GB58739@sr.se> <1046883464.635.26.camel@leguin> <200303052336.47779.wes@softweyr.com> <1046940758.611.29.camel@leguin> <200303061234.h26CY2cE037865@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1046997475.40757.17.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 07 Mar 2003 11:07:56 +1030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1 () CARRIAGE_RETURNS,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 23:04, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > > haven't had any reports of problems with it so far. If you get X 4.3.0 > > working with it in the next couple of days, it would be great if people > > could mail me and mention what card, if they had to change anything from > > a 4.2.0 installation to get it to work, and briefly how they've tested > > it (i.e. started up gnome2 and did something, not just "it built" or > > "startx works") I don't have the original mail, so I'll reply here :) You need to have an up to date fontconfig port before XFree86 (and a bunch of other apps) will build. Mostly a peripheral issue, but it would be nice if there was a way to teach the dependent ports about the differences between the two. FC_RGBA_UNKNOWN is the #define which causes the problem. I don't remember the exact versions but my laptop has fontconfig 2.0_2 and it is missing the #define, the latest is 2.1_5. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 17:53:14 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FC937B405 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:53:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.parrett.net (smtp.parrett.net [12.39.16.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2F543F93 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:53:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from postmaster@netfang.net) Received: from host14.interlink.qtm.net ([216.163.33.190] helo=netfang.netfang.net) by smtp.parrett.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18r72s-0005jb-00 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 20:53:10 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 20:53:21 -0500 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: In-Reply-To: <1046852244.613.149.camel@leguin> References: <723002BB-4E42-11D7-90DE-000A9566C46A@we.lc.ehu.es> <1046852244.613.149.camel@leguin> Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.25rc9; build=1960 X-Mailer-Platform: FreeBSD; architecture=i386; version=4.8-RC X-Mailer-Java-VM: Sun Microsystems Inc.; version=1.3.1-p7; compiler=NONE Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ** Reply to message from Eric Anholt on 05 Mar 2003 00:17:24 -0800 > The release engineers have been considering allowing XFree86 4.3 in > 4.8-RELEASE, but it needs widespread testing. Anyone interested, please > apply the diffs at: > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html > to your ports tree and install. Is it necessary to deinstall XFree86 4.2 before installing the 4.3 patches? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 21:56:32 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD3A37B405 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:56:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mobile.hub.org (u173n136.eastlink.ca [24.224.173.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE9643FD7 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 21:56:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by mobile.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C221D3F92; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:56:21 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobile.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B639C3F8B; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:56:21 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:56:21 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker X-X-Sender: scrappy@localhost To: Marc Spitzer Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? In-Reply-To: <20030306192939.3ec42f5e.mspitze1@optonline.net> Message-ID: <20030307014946.A40489@localhost> References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <200303060846.07649.darcy@wavefire.com> <20030306192939.3ec42f5e.mspitze1@optonline.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Marc Spitzer wrote: > On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 08:46:07 -0800 > Darcy Buskermolen wrote: > > > > > I have had simular experiances with this very phenominom under 3.X, > > although I have only ever seen it when you fill the partition ie 101% > > used and it only happens on partitions with softupdates. > > > > I do not mean to state the obvious, but have you tried to > look for open files on the partition, especially ones that have > been deleted but are still held open by the process? lsof will > give you a list. I am just mentioning it because it has got me > in the past. You could also try turning off daemon processes > one at a time and see if that helps. Tried that, using both lsof and fstat ... nothing is showing up ... in my case, I'm suspecting that the system is to busy for softupates to be able to sync to disk properly ... if I type 'reboot' to reboot the machine, it seems to take longer then normal to actually drop my connection, which I'm guessing is the time its taking to write everything to the drive ... I just disabled softupdates on that file system, so will see if that makes any difference ... And before you say anything about the 'too busy' comment, Tor Egge just spent the past week with me identifyng a "bug" in vnlru_proc where it couldn't reclaim vnodes fast enough, causing the server to hang ... he provided me with a patch to changes it reclaimation algorithm to speed things up to a reasonable level ... > > Good luck > > marc > > > > > On Wednesday 05 March 2003 16:53, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > I rebooted my server 20hrs ago, and had 20gig of free space ... now > > > I'm down to 4.6gig ... > > > > > > venus# df -t ufs > > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > > > /dev/amrd0s1a 103777974 90836532 4639206 95% / > > > > > > Before I rebooted it 20hrs ago, it had drop'd down <500Meg, and > > > after the reboot, pop'd back up to 20gig ... > > > > > > I can't seem to find where 16gig of disk space is being used though, > > > but, for instance, I had 12gig of files in /var/vmcore (from crash > > > dumps) that I removed, which should have increased me to 16gig free, > > > but I'm still at 4.6gig and drop'ng ... > > > > > > The system isn't particularly busy: > > > > > > venus# iostat 5 > > > tty amrd0 cpu > > > tin tout KB/t tps MB/s us ni sy in id > > > 1 116 0.00 0 0.00 32 0 28 1 40 > > > 1 452 4.29 343 1.43 39 0 52 0 9 > > > 0 225 5.21 258 1.31 32 0 47 1 21 > > > 2 35 6.21 270 1.64 13 0 51 0 36 > > > 1 38 4.46 268 1.17 19 0 49 1 31 > > > 1 32 4.81 261 1.23 16 0 51 1 32 > > > > > > And the drive is 7x18gig in a RAID5 configuration .. > > > > > > OS is 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #38: Tue Mar 4 22:43:18 CST 2003 with a > > > patch from Tor Egge to fix a problem with how vnodes are kept track > > > of and reclaimed/reused ... > > > > > > I've tried doing a 'sync', figuring that maybe it would force all > > > outstanding writes to the drive, but that seems to make no > > > difference either ... > > > > > > I'm doing a du right now to see if I can see anything large out of > > > the ordinary, but is there any way (maybe using lsof?) of finding > > > out what, if any, processes are holding open a large file? > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > -- > > Darcy Buskermolen > > Wavefire Technologies Corp. > > ph: 250.717.0200 > > fx: 250.763.1759 > > http://www.wavefire.com > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 23: 1:15 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E9237B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:01:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumina.student.iastate.edu (lumina.student.iastate.edu [64.113.68.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 885B543FE0 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:01:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rtdean@lumina.cytherianage.net) Received: (qmail 36019 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Mar 2003 07:04:05 -0000 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:04:05 -0600 (CST) From: "Ryan T. Dean" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD on an IBM PC Server 325 Message-ID: <20030307002629.Y27320@lumina.cytherianage.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Greetings and Howdy- I was gifted with an IBM PC Server 325 a few months back, and I've been trying on and off since then to get FreeBSD loaded onto it. Its nothing too special - dual PPro motherboard with an onboard AIC7880 SCSI controller. There is currently only one processor in it (unchanged since its arrival). I cannot, for the life of me, get FreeBSD to load on it. The machine hardlocks while loading the kernel, right after 'Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle...' (complete boot -v output displayed below). I've tried everything I can think of - loading the system with just one drive attached, every different possible combination of drives attached - hell, even with no drives attached. Same deal every time. I've changed SCSI BIOS options as well (one change at a time, and then every possible permutation of options) - no dice. I've tried with different memory as well. Heres how the system is sitting at the moment: internal SCSI chain ID0: IBM DFHSS2W ID1: IBM DCHS04W ID6: IBM CDRM00203 ID7: scsi controller ID10: IBMAS400 DCHS09W ID12: IBMAS400 DCHS09W the internal cable runs from the motherboard, to the CD-ROM, to HDD ID#0, HDD ID#1, HDD ID#10, then HDD ID#12. external SCSI chain (nothing) While booting, the SCSI BIOS reports the following (versioning, etc) Adaptec AIC-7880 Ultra/Ultra W BIOS v1.25 (c) 1996 Adaptec, Inc. All Rights Reseved. A boot -v provides the following output (well, at the tail end anyways, as I can't pause the scrolling nor scroll up): sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: not probed (disabled) sio2: not probed (disabled) sio3: not probed (disabled) sio4: not probed (disabled) ppc0: not probed (disabled) ed0: not probed (disabled) fe0: not probed (disabled) ie0: not probed (disabled) lnc1: not probed (disabled) cs0: not probed (disabled) sn0: not probed (disabled) isa_probe_children: probing PnP devices BIOS Geometries: 0: 0111f33f 0..273=274 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors 1: 0223fe3f 0..547=548 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors 2: 03fefe3f 0..1022=1023 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors 3: 03fefe3f 0..1022=1023 cylinders, 0..254=255 heads, 1..63=63 sectors 4: 004f0124 0..79=80 cylinders, 0..1=2 heads, 1..36=36 sectors 0 accounted for Device configuration finished bpf: lo0 attached bpf: sl0 attached Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle (noperiph:ahc0:0:-1:-1): SCSI bus reset delivered. 0 SCBs aborted. and thats it - nothing after that. I've tried -questions, no luck there. I decieded to try and brave new terrirory and bug -scsi, but I received a nice yet firm notice that that wasn't the place for this, and was pointed here (-stable). I'm not sure what else to do, so I turn to you. I've never had a problem like this on any of my other FBSD boxes (numbering seven at the moment), but then, I've never had onboard SCSI (or any sort of SCSI) on any of the other machines. I don't think its a termination issue - the machine came to me with Win2k loaded on it, and I've been able to successfully reload Win2k on it again. So, as I said, I'm not sure whats up - hopefully someone can point me in the right direction. I'd appreciate it if I could be CC:'d on any response, as I'm not currently tracking -STABLE. Many thanks in advance. -Ryan T. Dean rtdean@cytherianage.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 23:15:48 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4EB37B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:15:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DCD43FBF for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:15:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@siemens.com) Received: from mail3.siemens.de (mail3.siemens.de [139.25.208.14]) by david.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h277Fh623742 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:15:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from mars.cert.siemens.de (ust.mchp.siemens.de [139.23.201.17]) by mail3.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h277Fgg15173 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:15:42 +0100 (MET) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [139.25.42.7]) by mars.cert.siemens.de (8.12.8/8.12.6/$SiemensCERT: mail/cert.mc,v 1.42 2003/02/21 12:06:56 ust Exp $) with ESMTP id h277Fg3R096729 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:15:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andre@curry.mchp.siemens.de) Received: (from localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h277FgP4087719; Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:15:41 +0100 From: Andre Albsmeier To: Andre Albsmeier , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Unexpected busfree in Data-in phase and other weirdness Message-ID: <20030307081541.B71305@curry.mchp.siemens.de> References: <20030228235031.GE5033@grummit.biaix.org> <20030301094934.GA547@goku.kasby> <20030306153355.A12907@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030306225837.GA1277@goku.kasby> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030306225837.GA1277@goku.kasby>; from fcasadei@inwind.it on Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:58:37PM +0100 X-Echelon: DefCon V, Taliban, Spy, KLM, codes X-Advice: Drop that crappy M$-Outlook, I'm tired of your viruses! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 06-Mar-2003 at 23:58:37 +0100, Francesco Casadei wrote: > On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 03:33:55PM +0100, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > (I assume the cabling/termination has been checked already.) > > > > I had bus problems with my DNES until I upgraded the firmware to: > > > > da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device > > > > In general, I have often seen bus problems when a lot of different > > devices are hanging on the same SCSI bus and some drives are being > > hit really hard. They always went away with a new fw, especially > > on my IBM DDYS drives. The Plextor fw seems a bit old as well (at > > least compared to my PLEXTOR CD-ROM PX-40TS 1.13) but I don't know > > if the 32TS uses the same as the 40TS. > > > > I have written a program to upgrade the firmware on IBM and Plextor > > (and some other devices) under FreeBSD in case you are interested... > > However, IMO one should play with the fw only in case of problems > > and not just to get lastest version... > > > > -Andre > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > end of the original message > > I'm having SCSI-related problems on the home PC, which has run fine for three > years now whithout being hardware-upgraded. I update the system on a regular > basis, though (last buildworld/installword was on Thu Dec 26 2002). > The IBM drive fitness test showed that hard drives are ok. The error seems to > appear randomly, whithout particular conditions (load avg, used mem, programs > running, etc.). > A couple of days ago the SCSI bus has been reset five consecutive times! Is it > time to change my AHA2940 or this has nothing to do with the SCSI controller? I am no expert in these things, but: I have never seen a bad Adaptec controller (and I used lots of them from 2940 to 39160). I _have_ seen many bad cables/terminators. I _have_ seen many bad cables/terminators that used to work without a glitch and suddenly started to become bad. The possibility that this happens is reciprocally proportional to the price you pay for them :-) I have SCSI systems that worked for years and started to spit out bus error messages when changes were commmitted to the driver. In most cases it turned out that these changes only triggered bad cable/ terminator errors or even firmware problems with the drive. Don't you have a friend who can give you a spare AHA2940 for testing? -Andre > > Francesco Casadei > -- > You can download my public key from http://digilander.libero.it/fcasadei/ > or retrieve it from a keyserver (pgpkeys.mit.edu, wwwkeys.pgp.net, ...) > > Key fingerprint is: 1671 9A23 ACB4 520A E7EE 00B0 7EC3 375F 164E B17B > -- Your mouse has moved. Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take effect! Reboot now? [OK] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 6 23:28:22 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4B637B401 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:28:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from sv07e.atm-tzs.kmjeuro.com (sv07e.atm-tzs.kmjeuro.com [193.81.94.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6942243FB1 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2003 23:28:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from k.joch@kmjeuro.com) Received: from kmjeuro.com (adsl.ooe.kmjeuro.com [193.81.94.78]) (authenticated bits=0) by sv07e.atm-tzs.kmjeuro.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h277S2mt061215 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:28:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from k.joch@kmjeuro.com) Message-ID: <3E684A27.1070207@kmjeuro.com> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 08:28:39 +0100 From: "Karl M. Joch" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-AT; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130 X-Accept-Language: de-at, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Jail ssh and x11 forwarding Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Mail Server protected by CTS Austria www.ctseuro.com Message found to be clean Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, are there any restrictions to get x11 forwarding to run in a jail? i get x11 to work on the base system, but when i run it in the jail i get an authentication error to the putty x11 proxy. disabling all security in putty and the local x server doesnt help. -- Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Karl M. Joch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 0: 0:21 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F110537B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 00:00:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c18609.belrs1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [210.49.80.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8082E43F75 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 00:00:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h2776nLZ095468 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:18:55 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from jeremyp@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from jeremyp@localhost) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h2776lXH095467 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:06:47 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:06:47 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problems with getting through firewall using CVSup Message-ID: <20030307070647.GB90837@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <200302281442.h1SEg0RV042490@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <3E5F77B4.4392E9FD@cnrm.meteo.fr> <20030228151033.GE424@freebsd.org.ru> <3E5F7C82.9A9EA6CD@cnrm.meteo.fr> <20030228151819.GF424@freebsd.org.ru> <20030304091644.GA90837@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030304091644.GA90837@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 08:16:44PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: >In the past, the CTM package 'cvs-cur' would fetch the entire CVS >repository. This has stopped since the repository split at the end >of February and I haven't seen any announcement regarding its future. Just to clarify for the archives: CTM continues to operate. Some of the repository re-arrangement triggered a bug that required manual intervention to recover from. cvs-cur is again functioning normally. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 1: 0:39 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C3B37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:00:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-224.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA49B43FA3 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:00:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h2790XLT061193; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:00:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h2790XsB061192; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:00:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:00:33 -0800 From: David Schultz To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Message-ID: <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Marc G. Fournier : > OS is 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #38: Tue Mar 4 22:43:18 CST 2003 with a patch > from Tor Egge to fix a problem with how vnodes are kept track of and > reclaimed/reused ... Hmmm...did you run into the problem before applying the patch? I can't imagine softupdates getting several gigabytes behind. > I've tried doing a 'sync', figuring that maybe it would force all > outstanding writes to the drive, but that seems to make no difference > either ... By the way, sync(8) doesn't guarantee that all outstanding dependencies are written to disk. It does write out all buffers that can be written at the time sync is called, but while those buffers are being written, dependencies may be uncovered and more buffers may come along. Since it could potentially have to keep trying forever in the face of an infinite stream of requests, sync doesn't keep trying. You can guarantee that everything is flushed to disk (if even for a brief moment) by attempting to unmount the filesystem you want to sync (without -f). The unmount will fail because the filesystem is in use, but everything will be written out before it does. What I really don't understand is how you seem to manage to run into more bugs than everyone else. (FYI, the libc_r/KVA_PAGES bug is now fixed in -STABLE.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 1: 4:56 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9332B37B405 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:04:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-224.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FF543F93 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:04:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h2794nLT061210; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:04:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h2794nXw061209; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:04:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:04:49 -0800 From: David Schultz To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bug in aac driver ... ? Message-ID: <20030307090449.GB61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030305224856.R38115@hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030305224856.R38115@hub.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Marc G. Fournier : > I have an Intel server (SVW7500, or some designation like that) setup > with an Adaptec 2120S controller in it: > > aac0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 2 at device 9.0 on pci1 > aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 48MB cache memory, optional battery present > aac0: Kernel 4.0-0, Build 5770, S/N 232fb7 > > Originally, when we installed it, we had a problem where, while booting, > you would suddenly get the 'aac timeout' message scroll up the screen, > that has/had since been fixed ... > > Yesterday, after doing some work on one of our servers to increase the # > of vnodes, I added and built a new kernel with: > > options VM_KMEM_SIZE="(400*1024*1024)" > options VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX="(400*1024*1024)" > > Which I have running on venus (its using an AMI RAID card) without any > hassles ... upon reboot of the Adaptec/Intel server, I once more am > getting the Timeouts and inability to boot ... a kernel built 10 minutes > earlier, without those options, but the exact same code, runs fine, so > something with the VM_KMEM_SIZE increase is causing the problem ... I don't know why VM_KMEM_SIZE would tickle a RAID controller problem, but I've seen timeout message similar to the one you describe with a flaky SCSI controller. (Try statically compiling all relevant drivers into the kernel if you're not already.) The fix for me was to reduce the tag depth with camcontrol. Try a value around 8 or so; there shouldn't be much, if any, of a performance difference. camcontrol tags devicename -N8 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 1:30:18 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB41937B405 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:30:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c18609.belrs1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [210.49.80.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AB143F3F for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:30:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h279UDiM095790; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:30:13 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from jeremyp@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from jeremyp@localhost) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h279U9Um095789; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:30:09 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:30:09 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Martin Blapp Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.8 PR1 locks up for rm(1) big files Message-ID: <20030307093009.GC90837@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <20030305011304.T93334@levais.imp.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030305011304.T93334@levais.imp.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 01:19:18AM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote: >After deleting a 80GB file on a IDE disk, the disk got >empty about 50% then rm(1) begun to consume all cpu and the >system got more and more unresponsive. I could not interrupt >the rm in any way, even kill -9 did not help, it was really >busy with unlink(). It's not clear whether you have console access or not. If you have access to the console (and a kernel with DDB), break into ddb and run "ps" - this will show what all the processes are going (and specifically, what they are blocked on). If you can't use DDB, another option would be to run "top" in another session and see what it reports as the state of the top few processes. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 1:44:16 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D0A37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:44:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.tiscali.it (mail-1.tiscali.it [195.130.225.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6DF43F3F for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:44:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fcasadei@inwind.it) Received: from goku.kasby (217.133.209.178) by mail.tiscali.it (6.5.032) id 3E66386D000ED6F6 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:44:11 +0100 Received: (qmail 945 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Mar 2003 09:43:53 -0000 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:43:53 +0100 From: Francesco Casadei To: Andre Albsmeier Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Unexpected busfree in Data-in phase and other weirdness Message-ID: <20030307094353.GA860@goku.kasby> Mail-Followup-To: Andre Albsmeier , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030228235031.GE5033@grummit.biaix.org> <20030301094934.GA547@goku.kasby> <20030306153355.A12907@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030306225837.GA1277@goku.kasby> <20030307081541.B71305@curry.mchp.siemens.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030307081541.B71305@curry.mchp.siemens.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:15:41AM +0100, Andre Albsmeier wrote: [snip] > I am no expert in these things, but: I have never seen a bad Adaptec > controller (and I used lots of them from 2940 to 39160). I _have_ seen > many bad cables/terminators. I _have_ seen many bad cables/terminators > that used to work without a glitch and suddenly started to become bad. > The possibility that this happens is reciprocally proportional to the > price you pay for them :-) >=20 > I have SCSI systems that worked for years and started to spit out bus > error messages when changes were commmitted to the driver. In most > cases it turned out that these changes only triggered bad cable/ > terminator errors or even firmware problems with the drive. >=20 > Don't you have a friend who can give you a spare AHA2940 for > testing? >=20 > -Andre >=20 [snip] > end of the original message Yeah, it's hard to think about an Adaptec 2940 failing, but I'm just guessing the cause of the error. I had ATA 'fallback to PIO mode' errors with three IBM 40G, and I found that one of the three hd fans installed had failed. I removed it and the the problem disappeared (system uptime is 31 days now). Could it be an electrical problem due to a failing hd fan attached to the D= NES power cable? Thanks for your help. Francesco Casadei --=20 You can download my public key from http://digilander.libero.it/fcasadei/ or retrieve it from a keyserver (pgpkeys.mit.edu, wwwkeys.pgp.net, ...) Key fingerprint is: 1671 9A23 ACB4 520A E7EE 00B0 7EC3 375F 164E B17B --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+aGnYfsM3XxZOsXsRAoUxAJ9EaMvpEJwYnRRtsXar2Odk0YUlbACcCrlF irnQoq2sBOY00o12tOoF2mY= =1TJC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 1:52:27 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6BC37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:52:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from dart.sr.se (dart.SR.SE [134.25.0.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A80043FBD for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 01:52:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: from honken.sr.se (honken.sr.se [134.25.128.27]) by dart.sr.se (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h279qOfU041136 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:52:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: from oldie.sr.se (oldie [134.25.200.100]) by honken.sr.se (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h279qO1j041337 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:52:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: from oldie.sr.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oldie.sr.se (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h279qOeD050053 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:52:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: (from gunnar@localhost) by oldie.sr.se (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h279qNKw050052 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:52:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:52:23 +0100 From: Gunnar Flygt To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Comment to the XFree86 =?iso-8859-1?B?NC4z?= =?iso-8859-1?B?LjCn?= Message-ID: <20030307095223.GA49698@sr.se> Reply-To: Gunnar Flygt Mail-Followup-To: Gunnar Flygt , FreeBSD Stable Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG cvsuped a few minutes ago the ports tree. In all of the directories connected to XFree86-4 4.3.0 the pkg-comment is missing. Therefore patches don't apply clean. Used the ver -11 of the pacthes leading to 4.3.0 -- Gunnar Flygt, SR To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 2:10:45 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCBD37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:10:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27B543F85 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:10:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@siemens.com) Received: from mail2.siemens.de (mail2.siemens.de [139.25.208.11]) by david.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h27AAeD07610; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:10:40 +0100 (MET) Received: from mars.cert.siemens.de (ust.mchp.siemens.de [139.23.201.17]) by mail2.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h27AAdN28737; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:10:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [139.25.42.7]) by mars.cert.siemens.de (8.12.8/8.12.6/$SiemensCERT: mail/cert.mc,v 1.42 2003/02/21 12:06:56 ust Exp $) with ESMTP id h27AAd3R013807; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:10:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andre@curry.mchp.siemens.de) Received: (from localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h27AAdP4090481; Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:10:39 +0100 From: Andre Albsmeier To: Andre Albsmeier , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: fcasadei@inwind.it Subject: Re: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Unexpected busfree in Data-in phase and other weirdness Message-ID: <20030307111039.A76900@curry.mchp.siemens.de> References: <20030228235031.GE5033@grummit.biaix.org> <20030301094934.GA547@goku.kasby> <20030306153355.A12907@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030306225837.GA1277@goku.kasby> <20030307081541.B71305@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030307094353.GA860@goku.kasby> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030307094353.GA860@goku.kasby>; from fcasadei@inwind.it on Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:43:53AM +0100 X-Echelon: DefCon V, InfoSec, Surveillance, Firewalls, MD5 X-Advice: Drop that crappy M$-Outlook, I'm tired of your viruses! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 07-Mar-2003 at 10:43:53 +0100, Francesco Casadei wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:15:41AM +0100, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > [snip] > > I am no expert in these things, but: I have never seen a bad Adaptec > > controller (and I used lots of them from 2940 to 39160). I _have_ seen > > many bad cables/terminators. I _have_ seen many bad cables/terminators > > that used to work without a glitch and suddenly started to become bad. > > The possibility that this happens is reciprocally proportional to the > > price you pay for them :-) > > > > I have SCSI systems that worked for years and started to spit out bus > > error messages when changes were commmitted to the driver. In most > > cases it turned out that these changes only triggered bad cable/ > > terminator errors or even firmware problems with the drive. > > > > Don't you have a friend who can give you a spare AHA2940 for > > testing? > > > > -Andre > > > [snip] > > end of the original message > > Yeah, it's hard to think about an Adaptec 2940 failing, but I'm just > guessing the cause of the error. > > I had ATA 'fallback to PIO mode' errors with three IBM 40G, and > I found that one of the three hd fans installed had failed. I removed it and > the the problem disappeared (system uptime is 31 days now). > Could it be an electrical problem due to a failing hd fan attached to the DNES > power cable? It could, but I don't think so. Why don't you measure the temp of the DNES with the following script. The DNES usually doesn't get very hot... #!/bin/sh shit () { if [ ! $sflag ]; then echo >&2 echo "$@" >&2 echo >&2 fi exit 1 } sflag="" if [ "x$1" = x-s ]; then sflag=1 shift fi for d in "$@"; do set -- `camcontrol cmd $d -c "4d 0 6f 0 0 0 0 0 0C 0" -i 12 "i1 *i1 i2 i2 *i1 i1 i1 i1 i1 i1"` [ "$1" != 47 ] && shit "Byte 0 is not 47" [ "$2" != 8 ] && shit "Bytes 2/3 are not 8" [ "$3" != 0 ] && shit "Bytes 4/5 are not 0" [ "$4" != 4 ] && shit "Byte 7 is not 4" if [ $sflag ]; then echo -n "$7 " continue fi echo echo "Device $d" echo "---------------------------------------" echo "SMART Sense Code Byte : $5" echo "SMART Alert Reason Code : $6" echo "Most Recent Temperature Reading : $7" echo "Vendor HDA Temperature Trip Point: $8" done echo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 2:17:26 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DB237B405; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:17:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from MX3.estpak.ee (ld3.estpak.ee [194.126.101.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413EB43F75; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:17:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kalts@estpak.ee) Received: from kevad.internal (80-235-33-209-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.33.209]) by MX3.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4DF288044; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:17:21 +0200 (EET) Received: (from vallo@localhost) by kevad.internal (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h27AHIAv001999; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:17:18 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vallo) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:17:18 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: David Schultz Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Message-ID: <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i-ja.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:00:33AM -0800, David Schultz wrote: [...] > What I really don't understand is how you seem to manage to run > into more bugs than everyone else. (FYI, the libc_r/KVA_PAGES > bug is now fixed in -STABLE.) He has rather unusual requirements compared to a lot of others. As I understand he runs hundreds of jails and has thousands of processes, putting real challenge to VM. All this means that FreeBSD isn't ready to enterprise yet, no matter what advocacy has to say. I'm glad Marc hasn't gave up and every now-and-then sends the findings out to lists, for the benefit of others, particularly developers. One word about "enterprise"; I'm sure Yahoo and similar big players run also FreeBSD on "big boxes", but they have real engineers in the field and have customised installations, I guess. Off-the-shelf FreeBSD isn't ready yet. -- Vallo Kallaste To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 2:57:41 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9E637B405 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:57:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx7.mail.ru (mx7.mail.ru [194.67.57.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D31343F3F for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 02:57:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from h-k@mail.ru) Received: from [194.84.56.194] (helo=194.84.56.194) by mx7.mail.ru with esmtp (Exim SMTP.7) id 18rFXi-000F5U-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 13:57:35 +0300 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:57:18 +0300 From: dawnshade X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62 Christmas Edition) Reply-To: dawnshade X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <10316693534.20030307135718@mail.ru> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: subscribe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe -- ...The daemons find works for the idle hands.... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 3:18:13 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E817A37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 03:18:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.tiscali.it (mail-7.tiscali.it [195.130.225.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE3043FA3 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 03:18:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fcasadei@inwind.it) Received: from goku.kasby (217.133.209.178) by mail.tiscali.it (6.5.032) id 3E66202C0010F8B2 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:18:08 +0100 Received: (qmail 1354 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Mar 2003 11:17:45 -0000 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:17:45 +0100 From: Francesco Casadei To: Andre Albsmeier Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, fcasadei@inwind.it Subject: Re: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Unexpected busfree in Data-in phase and other weirdness Message-ID: <20030307111745.GA1332@goku.kasby> Mail-Followup-To: Andre Albsmeier , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, fcasadei@inwind.it References: <20030228235031.GE5033@grummit.biaix.org> <20030301094934.GA547@goku.kasby> <20030306153355.A12907@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030306225837.GA1277@goku.kasby> <20030307081541.B71305@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030307094353.GA860@goku.kasby> <20030307111039.A76900@curry.mchp.siemens.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030307111039.A76900@curry.mchp.siemens.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:10:39AM +0100, Andre Albsmeier wrote: >=20 [snip] > It could, but I don't think so. Why don't you measure the temp of > the DNES with the following script. The DNES usually doesn't get > very hot... >=20 > #!/bin/sh >=20 > shit () { > if [ ! $sflag ]; then > echo >&2 > echo "$@" >&2 > echo >&2 > fi > exit 1 > } >=20 > sflag=3D"" > if [ "x$1" =3D x-s ]; then > sflag=3D1 > shift > fi >=20 > for d in "$@"; do > set -- `camcontrol cmd $d -c "4d 0 6f 0 0 0 0 0 0C 0" -i 12 "i1 *i1 i2 = i2 *i1 i1 i1 i1 i1 i1"` > [ "$1" !=3D 47 ] && shit "Byte 0 is not 47" > [ "$2" !=3D 8 ] && shit "Bytes 2/3 are not 8" > [ "$3" !=3D 0 ] && shit "Bytes 4/5 are not 0" > [ "$4" !=3D 4 ] && shit "Byte 7 is not 4" >=20 > if [ $sflag ]; then > echo -n "$7 " > continue > fi >=20 > echo > echo "Device $d" > echo "---------------------------------------" > echo "SMART Sense Code Byte : $5" > echo "SMART Alert Reason Code : $6" > echo "Most Recent Temperature Reading : $7" > echo "Vendor HDA Temperature Trip Point: $8" > done > echo >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > end of the original message Thanks a lot for the script. Here's the output: Device da1 --------------------------------------- SMART Sense Code Byte : 0 SMART Alert Reason Code : 0 Most Recent Temperature Reading : 33 Vendor HDA Temperature Trip Point: 85 I assume that 33 stands for 33 Celsius degree. It's not a high temperature,= at least not as high as I thought. Francesco Casadei --=20 You can download my public key from http://digilander.libero.it/fcasadei/ or retrieve it from a keyserver (pgpkeys.mit.edu, wwwkeys.pgp.net, ...) Key fingerprint is: 1671 9A23 ACB4 520A E7EE 00B0 7EC3 375F 164E B17B --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+aH/YfsM3XxZOsXsRApQvAJwPeeGIucIdMjaPRn7XCig5+uLpoQCfY9r3 i1ZjuSz607l33JUyo5YRVAs= =EKa3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 3:55:53 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653E237B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 03:55:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from thoth.sbs.de (thoth.sbs.de [192.35.17.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC7E43F93 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 03:55:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@siemens.com) Received: from mail3.siemens.de (mail3.siemens.de [139.25.208.14]) by thoth.sbs.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h27Btm110928; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:55:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from mars.cert.siemens.de (ust.mchp.siemens.de [139.23.201.17]) by mail3.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h27BtmH01366; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:55:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [139.25.42.7]) by mars.cert.siemens.de (8.12.8/8.12.6/$SiemensCERT: mail/cert.mc,v 1.42 2003/02/21 12:06:56 ust Exp $) with ESMTP id h27Btl3R013829; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:55:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andre@curry.mchp.siemens.de) Received: (from localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h27BtlP4091379; Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:55:47 +0100 From: Andre Albsmeier To: Andre Albsmeier , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, fcasadei@inwind.it Subject: Re: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Unexpected busfree in Data-in phase and other weirdness Message-ID: <20030307125547.A77994@curry.mchp.siemens.de> References: <20030228235031.GE5033@grummit.biaix.org> <20030301094934.GA547@goku.kasby> <20030306153355.A12907@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030306225837.GA1277@goku.kasby> <20030307081541.B71305@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030307094353.GA860@goku.kasby> <20030307111039.A76900@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030307111745.GA1332@goku.kasby> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030307111745.GA1332@goku.kasby>; from fcasadei@inwind.it on Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 12:17:45PM +0100 X-Echelon: plutonium, Undercover, Taliban, 707, Nuclear X-Advice: Drop that crappy M$-Outlook, I'm tired of your viruses! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 07-Mar-2003 at 12:17:45 +0100, Francesco Casadei wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:10:39AM +0100, Andre Albsmeier wrote: > > > [snip] > > It could, but I don't think so. Why don't you measure the temp of > > the DNES with the following script. The DNES usually doesn't get > > very hot... > > > > #!/bin/sh > > > > shit () { > > if [ ! $sflag ]; then > > echo >&2 > > echo "$@" >&2 > > echo >&2 > > fi > > exit 1 > > } > > > > sflag="" > > if [ "x$1" = x-s ]; then > > sflag=1 > > shift > > fi > > > > for d in "$@"; do > > set -- `camcontrol cmd $d -c "4d 0 6f 0 0 0 0 0 0C 0" -i 12 "i1 *i1 i2 i2 *i1 i1 i1 i1 i1 i1"` > > [ "$1" != 47 ] && shit "Byte 0 is not 47" > > [ "$2" != 8 ] && shit "Bytes 2/3 are not 8" > > [ "$3" != 0 ] && shit "Bytes 4/5 are not 0" > > [ "$4" != 4 ] && shit "Byte 7 is not 4" > > > > if [ $sflag ]; then > > echo -n "$7 " > > continue > > fi > > > > echo > > echo "Device $d" > > echo "---------------------------------------" > > echo "SMART Sense Code Byte : $5" > > echo "SMART Alert Reason Code : $6" > > echo "Most Recent Temperature Reading : $7" > > echo "Vendor HDA Temperature Trip Point: $8" > > done > > echo > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > end of the original message > > Thanks a lot for the script. Here's the output: > > Device da1 > --------------------------------------- > SMART Sense Code Byte : 0 > SMART Alert Reason Code : 0 > Most Recent Temperature Reading : 33 > Vendor HDA Temperature Trip Point: 85 > > I assume that 33 stands for 33 Celsius degree. It's not a high temperature, at Yep. > least not as high as I thought. No, that's quite OK. -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 4: 8:20 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F53937B405 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 04:08:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from grummit.biaix.org (213-97-212-86.uc.nombres.ttd.es [213.97.212.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 50EFC43F3F for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 04:08:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joan@grummit.biaix.org) Received: (qmail 4439 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Mar 2003 12:06:08 -0000 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:06:08 +0100 From: Joan Picanyol i Puig To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Unexpected busfree in Data-in phase and other weirdness Message-ID: <20030307120608.GB4174@grummit.biaix.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030228235031.GE5033@grummit.biaix.org> <20030301094934.GA547@goku.kasby> <20030306153355.A12907@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030306225837.GA1277@goku.kasby> <20030307081541.B71305@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030307094353.GA860@goku.kasby> <20030307111039.A76900@curry.mchp.siemens.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030307111039.A76900@curry.mchp.siemens.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Andre Albsmeier [20030307 11:08]: > It could, but I don't think so. Why don't you measure the temp of > the DNES with the following script. The DNES usually doesn't get > very hot... Could you post a version for a (that's the one that's giving me problems) or point me to some reading to figure out the magic for the camcontrol command? Right now I get: (13:01:52 <~>) 0 $ sudo hdcheck.sh da0 Password: camcontrol: error sending command Byte 0 is not 47 tks -- pica To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 4:27:34 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AAE337B401; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 04:27:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C1243F85; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 04:27:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB128B5C0F; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:27:27 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:27:27 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Vallo Kallaste Cc: David Schultz , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? In-Reply-To: <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> Message-ID: <20030307081643.B15693@hub.org> References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:00:33AM -0800, David Schultz > wrote: > > [...] > > What I really don't understand is how you seem to manage to run > > into more bugs than everyone else. (FYI, the libc_r/KVA_PAGES > > bug is now fixed in -STABLE.) > > He has rather unusual requirements compared to a lot of others. As I > understand he runs hundreds of jails and has thousands of processes, > putting real challenge to VM. All this means that FreeBSD > isn't ready to enterprise yet, no matter what advocacy has to say. > I'm glad Marc hasn't gave up and every now-and-then sends the > findings out to lists, for the benefit of others, particularly > developers. One word about "enterprise"; I'm sure Yahoo and similar > big players run also FreeBSD on "big boxes", but they have real > engineers in the field and have customised installations, I guess. > Off-the-shelf FreeBSD isn't ready yet. As Vallo says above ... the 'bug' that Tor helped me fix this past week, with vnlru_proc, being a good example ... how many ppl are running their server with 132 active mount points? From what I can tell, the bugs I'm hitting are all 'fringe bugs', stuff that you really have to be doing something extreme to hit ... but, as such, if I can get the bug fixed, its also one less bug that has the chance of hurting someone else ... As for 'the enterprise', I think the only thing that I really find about FreeBSD that 'hurts' is that I can't go above the 4Gig of RAM limit within ia32, even though there are boards that do support it ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 4:28: 7 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA0837B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 04:28:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF9343F3F for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 04:28:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from house.sentex.net (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h27CS2x6006668; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:28:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.0.20030307072636.084b9348@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 07:30:04 -0500 To: "Michael L. Squires" From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: Still seeing SMP panics on a older dual PIII (with debug kernel and crash dumps) Cc: FreeBSD Stable In-Reply-To: <200303061545.h26FjtBk003346@siralan.org> References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030306071303.081fe368@192.168.0.12> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is this not the same place as the last 2 panics ? SMP 2 cpus IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x0038c000 initial pcb at physical address 0x002ed580 panicstr: page fault panic messages: --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode mp_lock = 01000002; cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 00000000 fault virtual address = 0xf5257d97 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0192a6c stack pointer = 0x10:0xdda6ae40 frame pointer = 0x10:0xdda6ae5c code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 33568 (sendmail) interrupt mask = <- SMP: XXX trap number = 12 panic: page fault mp_lock = 01000002; cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 00000000 boot() called on cpu#1 #0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 487 if (dumping++) { (kgdb) bt #0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 #1 0xc0155878 in boot (howto=256) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:316 #2 0xc0155ce0 in poweroff_wait (junk=0xc02c0d19, howto=-1070856209) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 #3 0xc0283d71 in trap_fatal (frame=0xdda6ae00, eva=4112874903) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:974 #4 0xc02839e9 in trap_pfault (frame=0xdda6ae00, usermode=0, eva=4112874903) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867 #5 0xc0283547 in trap (frame={tf_fs = -578748392, tf_es = -577699824, tf_ds = -576323568, tf_edi = -1016904475, tf_esi = -1027665755, tf_ebp = -576278948, tf_isp = -576278996, tf_ebx = -182092393, tf_edx = -1027665721, tf_ecx = -1027665723, tf_eax = 28, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1072092564, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66178, tf_esp = 13568, tf_ss = -1016904480}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 #6 0xc0192a6c in ifa_ifwithnet (addr=0xc36344e0) at /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:611 #7 0xc01b6e05 in in_pcbladdr (inp=0xdb942e00, nam=0xc36344e0, plocal_sin=0xdda6ae94) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/in_pcb.c:459 #8 0xc01b6ef3 in in_pcbconnect (inp=0xdb942e00, nam=0xc36344e0, p=0xdd913040) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/in_pcb.c:526 #9 0xc01cc7e9 in udp_connect (so=0xdb704c40, nam=0xc36344e0, p=0xdd913040) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c:866 #10 0xc0174a54 in soconnect (so=0xdb704c40, nam=0xc36344e0, p=0xdd913040) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:389 #11 0xc0178118 in connect (p=0xdd913040, uap=0xdda6af80) at /usr/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c:394 #12 0xc02840b5 in syscall2 (frame={tf_fs = 673906735, tf_es = 673906735, tf_ds = -1078001617, tf_edi = -1077983904, tf_esi = 59, tf_ebp = -1077996464, tf_isp = -576278572, tf_ebx = 673944780, tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = 0, tf_eax = 98, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = 673621160, tf_cs = 31, tf_eflags = 659, tf_esp = -1077997132, tf_ss = 47}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1175 #13 0xc027085b in Xint0x80_syscall () cannot read proc at 0 (kgdb) Also, if it were a hardware issue, would not the crashes be a little more random than 24hrs ? ---Mike At 10:45 AM 3/6/2003 -0500, Michael L. Squires wrote: > > Its an older dual PIII. Can anyone tell me if the dumps point to a > > hardware issue, or if its crashing in the same spot each time ? I can > blast > > it with buildworlds and it never dies. Generally I have yet to find bad > > hardware that could pass that.... But always a first time. > >I have a P6DGH with two PII/300's running 4.8-RC2; mptable crashes with >a "HOSED" error message for the extended table (indicative of a BIOS >problems) but no crashes. > >MLS > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 5: 9: 2 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AE337B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 05:09:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from grummit.biaix.org (213-97-212-86.uc.nombres.ttd.es [213.97.212.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC41F43FA3 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 05:08:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joan@grummit.biaix.org) Received: (qmail 9367 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Mar 2003 13:06:51 -0000 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:06:51 +0100 From: Joan Picanyol i Puig To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Sony Cybershot should be in hardware notes (supported by umass) Message-ID: <20030307130651.GA9165@grummit.biaix.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I haven't found where the 4.8 hardware notes are, so I thought I'd just mention that my Sony Cybershot camera (DSC-P7) works with the umass driver so someone can add it: umass0: Sony Sony DSC, rev 1.10/4.10, addr 3 da2 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da2: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da2: 150KB/s transfers da2: 123MB (253696 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 123C) I'm such a happy puppy :) tks -- pica To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 5:53:50 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FED37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 05:53:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw1-mail.cict.fr (gw1-mail.cict.fr [195.220.59.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DE443F85 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 05:53:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Olivier.Saut@gmm.insa-tlse.fr) Received: from gw1-mail.cict.fr (localhost.cict.fr [127.0.0.1]) by gw1-mail.cict.fr (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h27DrhmY025136 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:53:43 +0100 Received: from mail.mip.ups-tlse.fr (mail.mip.ups-tlse.fr [130.120.36.13]) by gw1-mail.cict.fr (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h27DrhQP025128 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:53:43 +0100 Received: from localhost (mip-dell-223.ups-tlse.fr [172.16.3.71]) by mail.mip.ups-tlse.fr (8.12.6/8.12.1) with SMTP id h27Dqu2a029115 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:52:56 +0100 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:49:14 +0100 From: Olivier Saut To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Bad hardware? Message-Id: <20030307144914.51918ca8.Olivier.Saut@gmm.insa-tlse.fr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, for several days, I am starting to see the following errors in my log Mar 6 20:17:54 banquo /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting Mar 6 20:17:54 banquo /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device Mar 6 20:17:54 banquo /kernel: done Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. ad0: timeout sending command=ec s=d0 e=00 Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: ATA identify failed Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: timeout sending command=c6 s=d0 e=00 Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: timeout sending command=ef s=d0 e=00 Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo last message repeated 4 times Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: done Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: timeout sending command=c5 s=d0 e=00 Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: error executing command - resetting Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. done My computer is running a recent 4-STABLE banquo% uname -a FreeBSD banquo 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #1: Thu Mar 6 18:43:38 CET 2003 root@banquo:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/banquo i386 with the relevant lines of dmesg /kernel: atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0x7 irq 0 at device 31.1 on pci0 /kernel: ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 /kernel: ad0: 29314MB [59560/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 Should I worry for my hard drive and save for a new one? Thanks a lot, Olivier To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 5:55:55 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D4837B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 05:55:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.dev.itouchnet.net (devco.net [196.15.188.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FD843F75 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 05:55:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bvi@itouchlabs.com) Received: from nobody by mx1.dev.itouchnet.net with scanned_ok (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18rIL6-0007aE-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 15:56:44 +0200 Received: from devco.net ([196.15.188.2] helo=Beastie) by mx1.dev.itouchnet.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18rIL5-0007Zw-00; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 15:56:43 +0200 Message-ID: <020f01c2e4b0$bb1d93d0$4508a8c0@Beastie> From: "Barry Irwin" To: "Olivier Saut" , References: <20030307144914.51918ca8.Olivier.Saut@gmm.insa-tlse.fr> Subject: Re: Bad hardware? Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:52:01 +0200 Organization: iTouch Labs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Checked: This message has been scanned for any virusses and unauthorized attachments. X-iScan-ID: 29148-1047045404-93939@unconfigured version $Name: REL_2_0_4 $ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Quote possibly, however try another IDE cable first, this could be the cause of the problem. Barry ----- Original Message ----- From: "Olivier Saut" To: Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 3:49 PM Subject: Bad hardware? > Hello, > > for several days, I am starting to see the following errors in my log > > Mar 6 20:17:54 banquo /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > Mar 6 20:17:54 banquo /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device > Mar 6 20:17:54 banquo /kernel: done > > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. ad0: timeout sending > command=ec s=d0 e=00 > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: ATA identify failed > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: timeout sending command=c6 s=d0 e=00 > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: timeout sending command=ef s=d0 e=00 > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo last message repeated 4 times > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: done > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: timeout sending command=c5 s=d0 e=00 > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: error executing command - resetting > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. done > > My computer is running a recent 4-STABLE > > banquo% uname -a > FreeBSD banquo 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #1: Thu Mar 6 18:43:38 CET 2003 > root@banquo:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/banquo i386 > > with the relevant lines of dmesg > /kernel: atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0x7 irq 0 at device 31.1 on pci0 > /kernel: ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 > /kernel: ad0: 29314MB [59560/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 > > Should I worry for my hard drive and save for a new one? > > Thanks a lot, > > Olivier > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 6: 3:45 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED8737B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 06:03:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C201D43FAF for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 06:03:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@siemens.com) Received: from mail2.siemens.de (mail2.siemens.de [139.25.208.11]) by david.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h27E3dD21858; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:03:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from mars.cert.siemens.de (ust.mchp.siemens.de [139.23.201.17]) by mail2.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h27E3cN07356; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:03:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [139.25.42.7]) by mars.cert.siemens.de (8.12.8/8.12.6/$SiemensCERT: mail/cert.mc,v 1.42 2003/02/21 12:06:56 ust Exp $) with ESMTP id h27E3c3R065900; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:03:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andre@curry.mchp.siemens.de) Received: (from localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.12.8/8.12.8) id h27E3cP4092600; Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:03:38 +0100 From: Andre Albsmeier To: Joan Picanyol i Puig Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (da0:ahc0:0:0:0): Unexpected busfree in Data-in phase and other weirdness Message-ID: <20030307150338.A78569@curry.mchp.siemens.de> References: <20030228235031.GE5033@grummit.biaix.org> <20030301094934.GA547@goku.kasby> <20030306153355.A12907@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030306225837.GA1277@goku.kasby> <20030307081541.B71305@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030307094353.GA860@goku.kasby> <20030307111039.A76900@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20030307120608.GB4174@grummit.biaix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030307120608.GB4174@grummit.biaix.org>; from lists-freebsd-stable@biaix.org on Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:06:08PM +0100 X-Echelon: S/Key, SWAT, MD2, CIO, Pretoria X-Advice: Drop that crappy M$-Outlook, I'm tired of your viruses! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 07-Mar-2003 at 13:06:08 +0100, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote: > * Andre Albsmeier [20030307 11:08]: > > It could, but I don't think so. Why don't you measure the temp of > > the DNES with the following script. The DNES usually doesn't get > > very hot... > Could you post a version for a (that's the one > that's giving me problems) or point me to some reading to figure out the > magic for the camcontrol command? Right now I get: > > (13:01:52 <~>) 0 $ sudo hdcheck.sh da0 > Password: > camcontrol: error sending command > > Byte 0 is not 47 I can't since I don't know if (or how) it works on Seagate drives. I think it is an IBMish thing: It works on the IBM DNES, DDYS and those ICL35 (don't know the exact name) drives; it does not work on the IBM DDRS. Ask Seagate about a firmware updates for your drive. I have an ST318404LW which behave badly until I updated it to a new one. -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 6:36: 6 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D56637B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 06:36:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B30243FBF for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 06:36:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (orb_rules@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h27EZxbi006330; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:35:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h27EZw2p006329; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:35:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:35:58 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop To: Eric Anholt Cc: Ken Mays , Igor Pokrovsky , "Jose M. Alcaide" , Daniel Eischen , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- Message-ID: <20030307143558.GA6292@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <723002BB-4E42-11D7-90DE-000A9566C46A@we.lc.ehu.es> <1046852244.613.149.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jI8keyz6grp/JLjh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1046852244.613.149.camel@leguin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 12:17:24AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 05:25, Ken Mays wrote: > > Would the FreeBSD team consider the benefits of integrating Xfree86 v4.= 3.x > > for v4.8?!? The upgrade that was done on the video drivers alone was wo= rth > > it for me. >=20 > The release engineers have been considering allowing XFree86 4.3 in > 4.8-RELEASE, but it needs widespread testing. Anyone interested, please > apply the diffs at: > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html > to your ports tree and install. >=20 > Besides basic problems I may have caused with the ports, oddities in > cursor handling would be particularly likely because of changes in 4.3.0 > which were somewhat last-minute. Some changes have been made in XFree86 > CVS post-4.3.0 already, so if you report anything I may be able to track > down a fix. With the -7 diff (I know there is a later version but I had only intermitte= nt time to work on this) on a Dec 16 4.7-STABLE using a Matrox G450 it works great, FWIW. --Stijn --=20 Beware of he who would deny you access to information. For in his heart he thinks himself your master. -- Sid Meier, "Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri" --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+aK5OY3r/tLQmfWcRAjB4AJ9Br22C+Xm5yriKAENzDMwW6B+TBQCfVZKu 47LJiqVou+p+XN11hx/i+6I= =6rp4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jI8keyz6grp/JLjh-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 6:48:34 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BA837B405; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 06:48:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-relay.omnis.com (smtp-relay.omnis.com [216.239.128.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9AFB43F85; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 06:48:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.homeunix.net (66-75-151-22.san.rr.com [66.75.151.22]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507A14380F; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 06:48:28 -0800 (PST) From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr To: "Marc G. Fournier" , Vallo Kallaste Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 06:48:26 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: David Schultz , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <20030307081643.B15693@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20030307081643.B15693@hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303070648.26984.wes@softweyr.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday 07 March 2003 04:27, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 01:00:33AM -0800, David Schultz > > wrote: > > > > [...] > > > > > What I really don't understand is how you seem to manage to run > > > into more bugs than everyone else. (FYI, the libc_r/KVA_PAGES > > > bug is now fixed in -STABLE.) > > > > He has rather unusual requirements compared to a lot of others. As I > > understand he runs hundreds of jails and has thousands of processes, > > putting real challenge to VM. All this means that FreeBSD > > isn't ready to enterprise yet, no matter what advocacy has to say. > > I'm glad Marc hasn't gave up and every now-and-then sends the > > findings out to lists, for the benefit of others, particularly > > developers. One word about "enterprise"; I'm sure Yahoo and similar > > big players run also FreeBSD on "big boxes", but they have real > > engineers in the field and have customised installations, I guess. > > Off-the-shelf FreeBSD isn't ready yet. Off-the-shelf FreeBSD is about as good as most commercial UNIX systems; you seem to have either overestimated their ability to handle loads that are absurd for the hardware or have had a much better experience than I have. > As Vallo says above ... the 'bug' that Tor helped me fix this past > week, with vnlru_proc, being a good example ... how many ppl are > running their server with 132 active mount points? From what I can > tell, the bugs I'm hitting are all 'fringe bugs', stuff that you really > have to be doing something extreme to hit ... but, as such, if I can > get the bug fixed, its also one less bug that has the chance of hurting > someone else ... Yes, indeed, and I suspect bugs like that generally get fixed a lot faster here than when you submit a similar bug report in Solaris or HP-UX. > As for 'the enterprise', I think the only thing that I really find > about FreeBSD that 'hurts' is that I can't go above the 4Gig of RAM > limit within ia32, even though there are boards that do support it ... Being worked on. Not so hard to do, much harder to do right. Guess who took the easy sleazy path? ;^) The other good news is that the intel network cards, both 10/100 (fxp) and 10/100/1000 (em) support 64-bit addressing, even in 32-bit PCI slots, so you'll have at least ONE enet interface that'll work reasonably fast. -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 7:13:40 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD25237B401; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:13:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic-mail.adaptec.com [208.236.45.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C77D43FBD; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:13:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott_long@btc.adaptec.com) Received: from redfish.adaptec.com (redfish.adaptec.com [162.62.50.11]) by magic.adaptec.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h27FCOc13888; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:12:24 -0800 Received: from btc.btc.adaptec.com (btc.btc.adaptec.com [10.100.0.52]) by redfish.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA25908; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:13:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from btc.adaptec.com (hollin [10.100.253.56]) by btc.btc.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA15806; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:13:21 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <3E68B705.4070409@btc.adaptec.com> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 08:13:09 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030206 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Schultz Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bug in aac driver ... ? References: <20030305224856.R38115@hub.org> <20030307090449.GB61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20030307090449.GB61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Marc G. Fournier : > >> I have an Intel server (SVW7500, or some designation like that) setup >>with an Adaptec 2120S controller in it: >> >>aac0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 2 at device 9.0 on pci1 >>aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 48MB cache memory, optional battery present >>aac0: Kernel 4.0-0, Build 5770, S/N 232fb7 >> >> Originally, when we installed it, we had a problem where, while booting, >>you would suddenly get the 'aac timeout' message scroll up the screen, >>that has/had since been fixed ... >> >> Yesterday, after doing some work on one of our servers to increase the # >>of vnodes, I added and built a new kernel with: >> >>options VM_KMEM_SIZE="(400*1024*1024)" >>options VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX="(400*1024*1024)" >> >> Which I have running on venus (its using an AMI RAID card) without any >>hassles ... upon reboot of the Adaptec/Intel server, I once more am >>getting the Timeouts and inability to boot ... a kernel built 10 minutes >>earlier, without those options, but the exact same code, runs fine, so >>something with the VM_KMEM_SIZE increase is causing the problem ... > > > I don't know why VM_KMEM_SIZE would tickle a RAID controller > problem, but I've seen timeout message similar to the one you > describe with a flaky SCSI controller. (Try statically compiling > all relevant drivers into the kernel if you're not already.) The > fix for me was to reduce the tag depth with camcontrol. Try a > value around 8 or so; there shouldn't be much, if any, of a > performance difference. > > camcontrol tags devicename -N8 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message The aac driver does not use the CAM SCSI interface for accessing its RAID arrays, so changing parameters there will have no effect. Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 7:17: 6 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599B937B405 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:17:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic-mail.adaptec.com [208.236.45.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66DB743F85 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:17:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott_long@btc.adaptec.com) Received: from redfish.adaptec.com (redfish.adaptec.com [162.62.50.11]) by magic.adaptec.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h27FFlc00611; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:15:47 -0800 Received: from btc.btc.adaptec.com (btc.btc.adaptec.com [10.100.0.52]) by redfish.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA26572; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:16:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from btc.adaptec.com (hollin [10.100.253.56]) by btc.btc.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA15810; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:16:57 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <3E68B7DC.2040701@btc.adaptec.com> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 08:16:44 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030206 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bug in aac driver ... ? References: <20030305224856.R38115@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20030305224856.R38115@hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Evening all ... > > I have an Intel server (SVW7500, or some designation like that) setup > with an Adaptec 2120S controller in it: > > aac0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 2 at device 9.0 on pci1 > aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 48MB cache memory, optional battery present > aac0: Kernel 4.0-0, Build 5770, S/N 232fb7 > > Originally, when we installed it, we had a problem where, while booting, > you would suddenly get the 'aac timeout' message scroll up the screen, > that has/had since been fixed ... > > Yesterday, after doing some work on one of our servers to increase the # > of vnodes, I added and built a new kernel with: > > options VM_KMEM_SIZE="(400*1024*1024)" > options VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX="(400*1024*1024)" > > Which I have running on venus (its using an AMI RAID card) without any > hassles ... upon reboot of the Adaptec/Intel server, I once more am > getting the Timeouts and inability to boot ... a kernel built 10 minutes > earlier, without those options, but the exact same code, runs fine, so > something with the VM_KMEM_SIZE increase is causing the problem ... > > Help? I'll investigate why this happens. How much physical RAM do you have in the system? Can you put the card on the other PCI bus that's on that motherboard and see if there is any difference? Also, as a tip, I don't read stable@ on a daily basis. If you (or anyone else) has aac(4) problems, cc:ing me directly will bring the fastest response. Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 7:24:40 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462AE37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:24:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop.tenebras.com (laptop.tenebras.com [66.92.188.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D72843F3F for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:24:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: (qmail 51932 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2003 15:24:35 -0000 Received: from sapphire.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (192.168.188.241) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2003 15:24:35 -0000 Message-ID: <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 07:24:35 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kalts@estpak.ee Cc: David Schultz , "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> In-Reply-To: <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Vallo Kallaste wrote: > He has rather unusual requirements compared to a lot of others. As I > understand he runs hundreds of jails and has thousands of processes, > putting real challenge to VM. All this means that FreeBSD > isn't ready to enterprise yet .... What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. If the concern is with stability and performance, one would track -SECURITY and not -STABLE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 7:29: 7 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D3037B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:29:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop.tenebras.com (laptop.tenebras.com [66.92.188.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24DF743F3F for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:29:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: (qmail 51964 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2003 15:29:04 -0000 Received: from sapphire.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (192.168.188.241) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2003 15:29:04 -0000 Message-ID: <3E68BAC0.5080301@tenebras.com> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 07:29:04 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <20030307081643.B15693@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20030307081643.B15693@hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Marc G. Fournier wrote: > As for 'the enterprise', I think the only thing that I really find about > FreeBSD that 'hurts' is that I can't go above the 4Gig of RAM limit within > ia32, even though there are boards that do support it ... This is definitely an area of concern, and I *am* glad that you're doing boundary testing ;-) The biggest obstacles to adoption in the enterprise aren't technical, however. It's all about mind share, and IT staff tolerate all manner of stupid limitations from Sun, HP, IBM, etc. FreeBSD's sales and marketing force is -- er -- small. What might help us get out of the dedicated hobbyist market is capital. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 7:31:43 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDAF037B405 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:31:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from klingon.borderworlds.dk (borderworlds.dk [62.79.110.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32D443F3F for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:31:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dev-null@borderworlds.dk) Received: from borg.borderworlds.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klingon.borderworlds.dk (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386)) with ESMTP id 94C43280A7 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:31:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by borg.borderworlds.dk (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9E4933B8038; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:31:34 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Jail ssh and x11 forwarding References: <3E684A27.1070207@kmjeuro.com> From: Christian Laursen Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: 07 Mar 2003 16:31:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3E684A27.1070207@kmjeuro.com> Message-ID: Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Karl M. Joch" writes: > are there any restrictions to get x11 forwarding to run in a jail? i > get x11 to work on the base system, but when i run it in the jail i > get an authentication error to the putty x11 proxy. disabling all > security in putty and the local x server doesnt help. My experience is, that you need to set X11UseLocalhost no in sshd_config inside the jail for X11 forwarding to work. -- Best regards Christian Laursen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 7:59:32 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5237437B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:59:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81FE143FDD for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 07:59:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 18rKFt-0000sV-00 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 10:59:29 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:59:29 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: XFree86 4.3.0 Message-ID: <20030307155929.GB2028@pir.net> Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Stable List References: <20030305151914.GB58739@sr.se> <1046883464.635.26.camel@leguin> <200303052336.47779.wes@softweyr.com> <1046940758.611.29.camel@leguin> <200303061234.h26CY2cE037865@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp> <1046997475.40757.17.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1046997475.40757.17.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Daniel O'Connor probably said: > You need to have an up to date fontconfig port before XFree86 (and a > bunch of other apps) will build. > > Mostly a peripheral issue, but it would be nice if there was a way to > teach the dependent ports about the differences between the two. > > FC_RGBA_UNKNOWN is the #define which causes the problem. I don't > remember the exact versions but my laptop has fontconfig 2.0_2 and it is > missing the #define, the latest is 2.1_5. I also had 2.0_2 and xfree86 4.3.0 failed to build with the same #define problem. Thanks for posting this, saved me the time tracking it down, and I agree that it's a dependency that should probably be dealt with. Thanks, P. -- pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 8: 2: 8 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C837937B401; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:02:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from MX2.estpak.ee (ld3.estpak.ee [194.126.101.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3484F43FE0; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:02:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kalts@estpak.ee) Received: from kevad.internal (80-235-33-209-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.33.209]) by MX2.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9106F734CA; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:00:33 +0200 (EET) Received: (from vallo@localhost) by kevad.internal (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h27G1lPt003542; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:01:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from vallo) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:01:47 +0200 From: Vallo Kallaste To: Wes Peters Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , David Schultz , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Message-ID: <20030307160147.GA3422@kevad.internal> Reply-To: kalts@estpak.ee References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <20030307081643.B15693@hub.org> <200303070648.26984.wes@softweyr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200303070648.26984.wes@softweyr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i-ja.1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 06:48:26AM -0800, Wes Peters wrote: > > > putting real challenge to VM. All this means that FreeBSD > > > isn't ready to enterprise yet, no matter what advocacy has to say. > > > I'm glad Marc hasn't gave up and every now-and-then sends the > > > findings out to lists, for the benefit of others, particularly > > > developers. One word about "enterprise"; I'm sure Yahoo and similar > > > big players run also FreeBSD on "big boxes", but they have real > > > engineers in the field and have customised installations, I guess. > > > Off-the-shelf FreeBSD isn't ready yet. > > Off-the-shelf FreeBSD is about as good as most commercial UNIX systems; > you seem to have either overestimated their ability to handle loads that > are absurd for the hardware or have had a much better experience than I > have. It's more like I have too high expectations for FreeBSD, probably. You are right I guess, but all this talk about system auto-tuning for high capacity systems has not progressed to reality, as far as I know. The talk comes up occasionally and after some discussion about the benefits of such auto-tuning, dies off. Lack of manpower I guess, so I shut up. But that's the point why I made the "enterprise" comment. -- Vallo Kallaste To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 8:31:55 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A36337B401; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:31:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-relay.omnis.com (smtp-relay.omnis.com [216.239.128.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805D643F3F; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:31:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from salty.rapid.stbernard.com (corp-2.ipinc.com [199.245.188.2]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C013143885; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:31:49 -0800 (PST) From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr.com To: kalts@estpak.ee Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:31:46 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , David Schultz , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <200303070648.26984.wes@softweyr.com> <20030307160147.GA3422@kevad.internal> In-Reply-To: <20030307160147.GA3422@kevad.internal> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200303070831.46495.wes@softweyr.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday 07 March 2003 08:01, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 06:48:26AM -0800, Wes Peters > > wrote: > > > > putting real challenge to VM. All this means that FreeBSD > > > > isn't ready to enterprise yet, no matter what advocacy has to > > > > say. I'm glad Marc hasn't gave up and every now-and-then sends > > > > the findings out to lists, for the benefit of others, > > > > particularly developers. One word about "enterprise"; I'm sure > > > > Yahoo and similar big players run also FreeBSD on "big boxes", > > > > but they have real engineers in the field and have customised > > > > installations, I guess. Off-the-shelf FreeBSD isn't ready yet. > > > > Off-the-shelf FreeBSD is about as good as most commercial UNIX > > systems; you seem to have either overestimated their ability to > > handle loads that are absurd for the hardware or have had a much > > better experience than I have. > > It's more like I have too high expectations for FreeBSD, probably. > You are right I guess, but all this talk about system auto-tuning > for high capacity systems has not progressed to reality, as far as I > know. The talk comes up occasionally and after some discussion about > the benefits of such auto-tuning, dies off. Lack of manpower I > guess, so I shut up. But that's the point why I made the > "enterprise" comment. A lot depends on the size of the "enterprise" as well. I'm once again building embedded FreeBSD systems, but the tuning requirements on this one are wildly different from the last one. Here we're spec'ing the next generation of our hardware, which will probably be PIII embedded for longevity and pushing the vendors to make sure they'll support all the way up to the 1.26 GHz clock, though we'll probably ship about 800 MHz to start. Most of these systems are based on the Intel reference design and have only one DIMM slot, so we get 256M or 512M SDRAM. At my last gig, we were pushing P4s at 2.4 GHz to their limits and looking into PAE so we could cram 16GB RAM onto the board. (They ended up moving to Linux for the PAE support, which turned out to not really get them what they needed, but it's no longer my problem. ;^) One of these may seem more enterprise-y to you, but both are "bet the company" hardware decisions for the respective companies, and designed to be installed in the customers enterprise data center -- just different sized customers. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 8:54: 7 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F98837B422 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:54:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from haystack.lclark.edu (haystack.lclark.edu [149.175.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 550E343F75 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:54:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from [149.175.30.191] ([149.175.30.191]) by haystack.lclark.edu (SAVSMTP 3.0.0.44) with SMTP id M2003030708540015719 ; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 08:54:00 -0800 Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- From: Eric Anholt To: postmaster@netfang.net Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <723002BB-4E42-11D7-90DE-000A9566C46A@we.lc.ehu.es> <1046852244.613.149.camel@leguin> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1047056245.616.14.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 07 Mar 2003 08:57:25 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 17:53, postmaster@netfang.net wrote: > ** Reply to message from Eric Anholt on 05 Mar 2003 00:17:24 > -0800 > > > The release engineers have been considering allowing XFree86 4.3 in > > 4.8-RELEASE, but it needs widespread testing. Anyone interested, please > > apply the diffs at: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html > > to your ports tree and install. > > Is it necessary to deinstall XFree86 4.2 before installing the 4.3 patches? It should work just fine, as long as you have both of the patches. Note that the diffs won't work with an up to date ports tree until I update them to handle the pkg-comment changes that just happened. That'll be -12, later today. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 8:55:52 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C457C37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:55:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-52.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6D343FBD for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:55:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08CE66B9B for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:55:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D3659126C; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:55:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 08:55:49 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFree86 4.3.0 Message-ID: <20030307165549.GD49729@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030305151914.GB58739@sr.se> <1046883464.635.26.camel@leguin> <200303052336.47779.wes@softweyr.com> <1046940758.611.29.camel@leguin> <200303061234.h26CY2cE037865@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp> <1046997475.40757.17.camel@chowder.gsoft.com.au> <20030307155929.GB2028@pir.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="76DTJ5CE0DCVQemd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030307155929.GB2028@pir.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --76DTJ5CE0DCVQemd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:59:29AM -0500, Peter Radcliffe wrote: > Thanks for posting this, saved me the time tracking it down, and I > agree that it's a dependency that should probably be dealt with. Whenever you upgrade a port you're supposed to upgrade its' dependencies first, precisely to avoid this problem. portupgrade -R will do this for you automatically. Kris --76DTJ5CE0DCVQemd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+aM8VWry0BWjoQKURApx9AJ0TFC0xFwtDKijnDqmq3/H5Cdss+ACfc0A9 hQBOParw63zT96sJrSbd3l8= =bZKT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --76DTJ5CE0DCVQemd-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 9: 0:59 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36D637B401; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:00:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310C243F75; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:00:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id DB6095315; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:00:53 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Michael Sierchio Cc: kalts@estpak.ee, David Schultz , "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 18:00:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> (Michael Sierchio's message of "Fri, 07 Mar 2003 07:24:35 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Michael Sierchio writes: > What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. If the concern is > with stability and performance, one would track -SECURITY and > not -STABLE. What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 9:20: 7 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B0937B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:20:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.flugsvamp.com (ts46-01-qdr3643.mdfrd.or.charter.com [68.118.36.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62B343FAF for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:20:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jlemon@flugsvamp.com) Received: (from jlemon@localhost) by mail.flugsvamp.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) id h27HJb8R069234; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:19:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jlemon) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:19:37 -0600 (CST) From: Jonathan Lemon Message-Id: <200303071719.h27HJb8R069234@mail.flugsvamp.com> To: mike@sentex.net, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Still seeing SMP panics on a older dual PIII (with debug kernel and crash dumps) X-Newsgroups: local.mail.freebsd-stable In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Cc: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article you write: > >Is this not the same place as the last 2 panics ? > >SMP 2 cpus >IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x0038c000 >initial pcb at physical address 0x002ed580 >panicstr: page fault >panic messages: >--- >Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode >mp_lock = 01000002; cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 00000000 >fault virtual address = 0xf5257d97 >fault code = supervisor read, page not present >instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0192a6c >stack pointer = 0x10:0xdda6ae40 >frame pointer = 0x10:0xdda6ae5c >code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 >processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 >current process = 33568 (sendmail) >interrupt mask = <- SMP: XXX >trap number = 12 >panic: page fault >mp_lock = 01000002; cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 00000000 >boot() called on cpu#1 > >#0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 >487 if (dumping++) { >(kgdb) bt >#0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 >#1 0xc0155878 in boot (howto=256) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:316 >#2 0xc0155ce0 in poweroff_wait (junk=0xc02c0d19, howto=-1070856209) at >/usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 >#3 0xc0283d71 in trap_fatal (frame=0xdda6ae00, eva=4112874903) at >/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:974 >#4 0xc02839e9 in trap_pfault (frame=0xdda6ae00, usermode=0, >eva=4112874903) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867 >#5 0xc0283547 in trap (frame={tf_fs = -578748392, tf_es = -577699824, >tf_ds = -576323568, tf_edi = -1016904475, > tf_esi = -1027665755, tf_ebp = -576278948, tf_isp = -576278996, >tf_ebx = -182092393, tf_edx = -1027665721, > tf_ecx = -1027665723, tf_eax = 28, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, >tf_eip = -1072092564, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66178, > tf_esp = 13568, tf_ss = -1016904480}) at >/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466 >#6 0xc0192a6c in ifa_ifwithnet (addr=0xc36344e0) at /usr/src/sys/net/if.c:611 Can you print (in hex) ifp and ifa at frame 6? -- Jonathan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 9:31:22 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D97A037B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:31:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E35843FBD for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 09:31:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.12.8/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h27HUx63064621; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:30:59 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:30:59 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Arthur Chance Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: jails update In-Reply-To: <873cm074vr.fsf@pooh.wired.qeng-ho.org> Message-ID: <20030307202738.I55014@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20030305135652.GA83413@ei.bzerk.org> <020c01c2e340$ee8f5c60$19fd2fd8@westbend.net> <20030306140038.M43664@woozle.rinet.ru> <873cm074vr.fsf@pooh.wired.qeng-ho.org> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Arthur Chance wrote: AC> > FT> One problem with the DESTDIR approach may be the use of AC> > FT> symlinks by a jail administrator - if there are symlinks set for AC> > FT> directories containing the binaries you may overwrite the hosts AC> > FT> directories. Maybe "make installworld" does a check for this too - I AC> > FT> didn't look at it. AC> > AC> > We avoid this (and the whole need to update multiple jails) by installing to AC> > dedicated partition and the do multiple read-only null mounts, so each jail has AC> > perfectly equal read-only /usr (with symlinks outside to /home, /local, etc) AC> AC> I'm probably misreading this as I'm only just starting to look at the AC> jail facilities but are you saying symlinks from inside a jail to AC> outside it work within the jail? Doesn't that defeat the entire point? AC> Or are you saying /usr/local is e.g. a symlink to /local and you have AC> a different /local per jail and one for the host as well? Sorry for clarifying not enough ;-) Of course, /local, /home etc are slashed relative to each jail root. Actually, jail's /usr/local is a symlink to ../local (to make it work even for the host machine environment), etc. And, of course, you are right, the main purpose of jails is to hide outside file tree from jail environment. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 10: 7:33 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9601937B405 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:07:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [212.66.1.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA2343FCB for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:07:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h27I7QdK077335 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:07:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h27I7QUj077334; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:07:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:07:26 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200303071807.h27I7QUj077334@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cdcontrol via atapicam in 4.8-RC In-Reply-To: <20030306124454.5330.qmail@pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.7-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mamoru Iwaki wrote: > I cannot playback music from audio CD via atapicam using cdcontrol > [...] > # cdcontrol -f /dev/cd1c Did you try using cdcontrol on the ATAPI device, i.e. # cdcontrol -d /dev/acd0c ? using atapicam doesn't prevent you from still using it as an ATAPI device. Works fine for me. Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "The only reasonable alternative we can come up with is to close off the Internet to America Online users until they have passed an entrance test. But that would break federal laws that prohibit discrimination against the intellectually challenged." -- hhahn@boardwatch.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 10:23: 3 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADC737B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:23:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C7243FA3 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:23:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h27IMxPD014226; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:22:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h27IMx8o014225; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:22:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:22:59 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte To: Michael Sierchio Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Message-ID: <20030307192259.A14187@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <20030307081643.B15693@hub.org> <3E68BAC0.5080301@tenebras.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3E68BAC0.5080301@tenebras.com>; from kudzu@tenebras.com on Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 07:29:04AM -0800 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.8-RC X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 07:29:04AM -0800, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > As for 'the enterprise', I think the only thing that I really find about > > FreeBSD that 'hurts' is that I can't go above the 4Gig of RAM limit within > > ia32, even though there are boards that do support it ... > > This is definitely an area of concern, and I *am* glad that you're > doing boundary testing ;-) > > The biggest obstacles to adoption in the enterprise aren't technical, > however. It's all about mind share, and IT staff tolerate all > manner of stupid limitations from Sun, HP, IBM, etc. s/IT staff/IT management/ in most cases. The actual staff are not the folks deciding on purchasing A. over B. -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 10:24:44 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB0B37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:24:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1479C43F85 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:24:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 18rMWO-000239-00 ; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 13:24:40 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:24:40 -0500 From: Peter Radcliffe To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: xfree86@xfree86.org Subject: XFree86 4.3.0 problem on FreeBSD 4.8-RC (Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt-) Message-ID: <20030307182440.GA6614@pir.net> Reply-To: stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, xfree86@xfree86.org References: <723002BB-4E42-11D7-90DE-000A9566C46A@we.lc.ehu.es> <1046852244.613.149.camel@leguin> <1047056245.616.14.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1047056245.616.14.camel@leguin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Eric Anholt probably said: > Note that the diffs won't work with an up to date ports tree until I > update them to handle the pkg-comment changes that just happened. > That'll be -12, later today. IBM Thinkpad X30 with I830MG graphics. FreeBSD disapp 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #6: Fri Mar 7 00:47:41 EST 2003 pir@disapp:/usr/src/sys/compile/DISAPP i386 XFree86 4.3.0 with FreeBSD port patches version -11. I'm testing 4.3.0 to get support for the Intel I830 (it's only in 4.3.0), with 4.2.x I was using VESA support which is, well, slow and somewhat cranky. It seems to work ok generally, I can start X and kill it and it seems fine, but if I try and switch virtual terminals while it's running I lose anything reasonable. Screen is corrupted, graphics all over the place, if I try and switch back to the X vty I get a black screen, blank other than sometime getting the mouse pointer back for a while. Once X has died I can't use the console. All vtys are corrupted and the only way I've found to reset them is to reboot (vidcontrol does nothing). In the logs I get; (II) Keyboard "Keyboard0" handled by legacy driver (II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Mouse0" (type: MOUSE) (II) Mouse0: SetupAuto: hw.iftype is 4, hw.model is 0 (II) Mouse0: SetupAuto: protocol is SysMouse Error in I830WaitLpRing(), now is 6724, start is 4723 pgetbl_ctl: 0x3ff60001 pgetbl_err: 0x0 ipeir: 0 iphdr: 0 LP ring tail: 180 head: 0 len: 1f001 start 7fde000 eir: 0 esr: 1 emr: ffff instdone: ffc1 instpm: 0 memmode: 108 instps: 20 hwstam: ffff ier: 0 imr: ffff iir: 0 space: 130680 wanted 131064 Fatal server error: lockup The full log can be found in; http://p.pir.net/bits/XFree86.0.log-2003-03-07 Thanks, Peter. -- pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 10:38:39 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7B437B401; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:38:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8F443FD7; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:38:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB97E8B6CF2; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:38:35 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:38:35 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Scott Long Cc: David Schultz , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bug in aac driver ... ? In-Reply-To: <3E68B705.4070409@btc.adaptec.com> Message-ID: <20030307143810.O18433@hub.org> References: <20030305224856.R38115@hub.org> <20030307090449.GB61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <3E68B705.4070409@btc.adaptec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Scott Long wrote: > David Schultz wrote: > > Thus spake Marc G. Fournier : > > > >> I have an Intel server (SVW7500, or some designation like that) setup > >>with an Adaptec 2120S controller in it: > >> > >>aac0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 2 at device 9.0 on pci1 > >>aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 48MB cache memory, optional battery present > >>aac0: Kernel 4.0-0, Build 5770, S/N 232fb7 > >> > >> Originally, when we installed it, we had a problem where, while booting, > >>you would suddenly get the 'aac timeout' message scroll up the screen, > >>that has/had since been fixed ... > >> > >> Yesterday, after doing some work on one of our servers to increase the # > >>of vnodes, I added and built a new kernel with: > >> > >>options VM_KMEM_SIZE="(400*1024*1024)" > >>options VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX="(400*1024*1024)" > >> > >> Which I have running on venus (its using an AMI RAID card) without any > >>hassles ... upon reboot of the Adaptec/Intel server, I once more am > >>getting the Timeouts and inability to boot ... a kernel built 10 minutes > >>earlier, without those options, but the exact same code, runs fine, so > >>something with the VM_KMEM_SIZE increase is causing the problem ... > > > > > > I don't know why VM_KMEM_SIZE would tickle a RAID controller > > problem, but I've seen timeout message similar to the one you > > describe with a flaky SCSI controller. (Try statically compiling > > all relevant drivers into the kernel if you're not already.) The > > fix for me was to reduce the tag depth with camcontrol. Try a > > value around 8 or so; there shouldn't be much, if any, of a > > performance difference. > > > > camcontrol tags devicename -N8 > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > The aac driver does not use the CAM SCSI interface for accessing its > RAID arrays, so changing parameters there will have no effect. Oh good, I thought I was doing something wrong when I kept getting errors trying to access it through camcontrol :) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 10:38:56 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C3237B401; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:38:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from gatekeeper.oremut01.us.wh.verio.net (gatekeeper.oremut01.us.wh.verio.net [198.65.168.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFDB43FCB; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:38:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fclift@verio.net) Received: from mx.dmz.orem.verio.net (mx.dmz.orem.verio.net [10.1.1.10]) by gatekeeper.oremut01.us.wh.verio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4C83BF195; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:38:53 -0700 (MST) Received: from vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net (vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net [10.1.1.59]) by mx.dmz.orem.verio.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h27Icqx07545; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:38:52 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:39:42 -0700 (MST) From: Fred Clift X-X-Sender: To: David Schultz Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? In-Reply-To: <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Message-ID: <20030307111122.N88812-100000@vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Marc G. Fournier : > > OS is 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #38: Tue Mar 4 22:43:18 CST 2003 with a patch > > from Tor Egge to fix a problem with how vnodes are kept track of and > > reclaimed/reused ... > > Hmmm...did you run into the problem before applying the patch? > I can't imagine softupdates getting several gigabytes behind. I've seen this happen in production enviroments - a 'large' process (X server for instance) would start up, run for 10 seconds and then core dump. The program is re-run by some nanny-type program (init in my example) and the program dumps core again. etc etc. You end up with a never ending series of new 200 MB files and the disk fills up faster than soft-updates can free up the space. an even simpler way to reproduce this problem is (in csh) while 1 dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/testfile bs=1024k count=100 end and you might see your available diskspace vanish. Note that I haven't tried to reproduce this in a year or so... Things might have changed since then. Fred -- Fred Clift - fclift@verio.net -- Remember: If brute force doesn't work, you're just not using enough. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 10:41: 7 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C2D37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:41:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514B843FA3 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:41:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 621EC8C9FB6; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:41:05 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:41:05 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Scott Long Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bug in aac driver ... ? In-Reply-To: <3E68B7DC.2040701@btc.adaptec.com> Message-ID: <20030307143841.T18433@hub.org> References: <20030305224856.R38115@hub.org> <3E68B7DC.2040701@btc.adaptec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Scott Long wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Evening all ... > > > > I have an Intel server (SVW7500, or some designation like that) setup > > with an Adaptec 2120S controller in it: > > > > aac0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 2 at device 9.0 on pci1 > > aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 48MB cache memory, optional battery present > > aac0: Kernel 4.0-0, Build 5770, S/N 232fb7 > > > > Originally, when we installed it, we had a problem where, while booting, > > you would suddenly get the 'aac timeout' message scroll up the screen, > > that has/had since been fixed ... > > > > Yesterday, after doing some work on one of our servers to increase the # > > of vnodes, I added and built a new kernel with: > > > > options VM_KMEM_SIZE="(400*1024*1024)" > > options VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX="(400*1024*1024)" > > > > Which I have running on venus (its using an AMI RAID card) without any > > hassles ... upon reboot of the Adaptec/Intel server, I once more am > > getting the Timeouts and inability to boot ... a kernel built 10 minutes > > earlier, without those options, but the exact same code, runs fine, so > > something with the VM_KMEM_SIZE increase is causing the problem ... > > > > Help? > > I'll investigate why this happens. How much physical RAM do you have in > the system? Can you put the card on the other PCI bus that's on that > motherboard and see if there is any difference? the server has 4gig of RAM, with KVA_PAGES set to 512 and the above settings for VM_KMEM_SIZE* ... As for switching slots, difficult as the server is a remote server ... :( To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 10:43:12 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B7A337B405 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:43:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop.tenebras.com (laptop.tenebras.com [66.92.188.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FFC343FAF for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:43:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: (qmail 52459 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2003 18:43:08 -0000 Received: from sapphire.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (192.168.188.241) by 0 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2003 18:43:08 -0000 Message-ID: <3E68E839.1080009@tenebras.com> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 10:43:05 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: kalts@estpak.ee, David Schultz , "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Michael Sierchio writes: > >>What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. If the concern is >>with stability and performance, one would track -SECURITY and >>not -STABLE. > > > What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. You expect stability from pre-release software (i.e. "beta")? You're surprised that the integration of new features breaks working systems? You think the yen for the latest rev is good for a production environment? Are the five best years in a Norwegian's life still spent in the first grade? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 10:43:18 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C2237B405; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:43:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EBD43FAF; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:43:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4328CAF34; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:43:17 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:43:17 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: Michael Sierchio , kalts@estpak.ee, David Schultz , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030307144201.M18433@hub.org> References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Michael Sierchio writes: > > What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. If the concern is > > with stability and performance, one would track -SECURITY and > > not -STABLE. > > What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. Agreed ... -SECURITY is less stable then -STABLE in my environment ... been there, done that, got the t-shirt ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 10:48:17 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A11537B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:48:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic-mail.adaptec.com [208.236.45.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB5C43F85 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:48:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott_long@btc.adaptec.com) Received: from redfish.adaptec.com (redfish.adaptec.com [162.62.50.11]) by magic.adaptec.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h27Ikuc12111; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:46:56 -0800 Received: from btc.btc.adaptec.com (btc.btc.adaptec.com [10.100.0.52]) by redfish.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA23029; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 10:48:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from btc.adaptec.com (hollin [10.100.253.56]) by btc.btc.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA15882; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:48:01 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <3E68E8D4.50507@btc.adaptec.com> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 11:45:40 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021216 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bug in aac driver ... ? References: <20030305224856.R38115@hub.org> <3E68B7DC.2040701@btc.adaptec.com> <20030307143841.T18433@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20030305224856.R38115@hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Scott Long wrote: > > > >Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > >>Evening all ... > >> > >> I have an Intel server (SVW7500, or some designation like that) setup > >>with an Adaptec 2120S controller in it: > >> > >>aac0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 2 at device 9.0 on pci1 > >>aac0: i960RX 100MHz, 48MB cache memory, optional battery present > >>aac0: Kernel 4.0-0, Build 5770, S/N 232fb7 > >> > >> Originally, when we installed it, we had a problem where, while > booting, > >>you would suddenly get the 'aac timeout' message scroll up the screen, > >>that has/had since been fixed ... > >> > >> Yesterday, after doing some work on one of our servers to increase > the # > >>of vnodes, I added and built a new kernel with: > >> > >>options VM_KMEM_SIZE="(400*1024*1024)" > >>options VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX="(400*1024*1024)" > >> > >> Which I have running on venus (its using an AMI RAID card) > without any > >>hassles ... upon reboot of the Adaptec/Intel server, I once more am > >>getting the Timeouts and inability to boot ... a kernel built 10 minutes > >>earlier, without those options, but the exact same code, runs fine, so > >>something with the VM_KMEM_SIZE increase is causing the problem ... > >> > >> Help? > > > >I'll investigate why this happens. How much physical RAM do you have in > >the system? Can you put the card on the other PCI bus that's on that > >motherboard and see if there is any difference? > > > the server has 4gig of RAM, with KVA_PAGES set to 512 and the above > settings for VM_KMEM_SIZE* ... > > As for switching slots, difficult as the server is a remote server ... :( There are some strange interactions in the aac firmware when you get to 4GB of RAM. I'm not sure if I have enough of the right kind of DIMM sticks to populate my 7500WV2 motherboard to 4GB, so would you mind doing some tests for me? If the aac driver is compiled into the kernel, add the line 'options aac_DEBUG' to teh config file and rebuild. You'll also have to edit /sys/conf/files and remove the '#' at the beginning of the line that contains 'aac_debug.c'. If you load it as a module, then edit /sys/modules/aac/Makefile and remove the '#' before the two lines at the bottom that are marked as being for debugging purposes. Once you have debugging enabled, send me a console log that shows your complete dmesg and the output given when commands start timing out. Thanks! Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 11:19:52 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F8C37B401; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:19:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6577643FA3; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:19:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDF88CB4A5; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:19:49 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:19:49 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Michael Sierchio Cc: kalts@estpak.ee, David Schultz , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? In-Reply-To: <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> Message-ID: <20030307151723.L18433@hub.org> References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Vallo Kallaste wrote: > > > He has rather unusual requirements compared to a lot of others. As I > > understand he runs hundreds of jails and has thousands of processes, > > putting real challenge to VM. All this means that FreeBSD > > isn't ready to enterprise yet .... > > What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. If the concern is > with stability and performance, one would track -SECURITY and > not -STABLE. Actually, I've tried -SECURITY ... my servers crashed more often :) And have you ever tried to get someone to investigate/fix something that is considered a 'dead line'? The thing with -SECURITY is that its exactly that ... no bug fixes go into it, only critical security stuff ... so, if I were to report a bug on -SECURITY, it would most likely get ignored, since there is a very good chance that its already fixed in -STABLE, but nobody is going to back-patch it ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 11:28: 1 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217B337B401; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:28:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5C443F85; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:27:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AB38CB54E; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:27:59 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:27:59 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Wes Peters Cc: Vallo Kallaste , David Schultz , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? In-Reply-To: <200303070648.26984.wes@softweyr.com> Message-ID: <20030307152045.P18433@hub.org> References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <20030307081643.B15693@hub.org> <200303070648.26984.wes@softweyr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Wes Peters wrote: > > As Vallo says above ... the 'bug' that Tor helped me fix this past > > week, with vnlru_proc, being a good example ... how many ppl are > > running their server with 132 active mount points? From what I can > > tell, the bugs I'm hitting are all 'fringe bugs', stuff that you really > > have to be doing something extreme to hit ... but, as such, if I can > > get the bug fixed, its also one less bug that has the chance of hurting > > someone else ... > > Yes, indeed, and I suspect bugs like that generally get fixed a lot faster > here than when you submit a similar bug report in Solaris or HP-UX. Solaris fixes bugs? Seriously though, I really can't say that I can complain about the speed and effort that bugs get fixed ... the bug I just experienced with vnodes, Tor did one better (for which I *really* appreciate) ... he guided me, and forced me, to figure out what was wrong and come up with a solution ... he ended up doing the final patch, since there is no way I would have been able to come up with the same solution (nor as cleanly), but I *understood* what his patch did by the time we were finished ... even when Matt helped with some VM issues awhile back, the messages that he included me in literally flew over my head, but I appreciate having been kept in that loop, and know I've absorb bits and pieces that will help improve my understanding ... > Being worked on. Not so hard to do, much harder to do right. Guess who > took the easy sleazy path? ;^) The other good news is that the intel > network cards, both 10/100 (fxp) and 10/100/1000 (em) support 64-bit > addressing, even in 32-bit PCI slots, so you'll have at least ONE enet > interface that'll work reasonably fast. Yes, I don't recall who it was that explained it to me (Terry, maybe?), but I understand the problem with going above 4gig under ia32, and was personally just sitting back and waiting for Intel to go full steam ahead on the ia64 stuff ... but they just sacked it :( Man, did that ever throw a shiver up my back ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 11:42:35 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9620937B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:42:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8B143F85 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 11:42:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D4D8CBB36; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:42:32 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:42:32 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Mike Jakubik Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: "leak" in softupdates? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030307154213.P18433@hub.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG not as far as I'm aware ... On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Hi, im just wondering if you know whether these patches were MFC'd to STABLE > yet. > > Thanks. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2003 2:28 PM > To: Wes Peters > Cc: Vallo Kallaste; David Schultz; freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? > > > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Wes Peters wrote: > > > > As Vallo says above ... the 'bug' that Tor helped me fix this past > > > week, with vnlru_proc, being a good example ... how many ppl are > > > running their server with 132 active mount points? From what I can > > > tell, the bugs I'm hitting are all 'fringe bugs', stuff that you really > > > have to be doing something extreme to hit ... but, as such, if I can > > > get the bug fixed, its also one less bug that has the chance of hurting > > > someone else ... > > > > Yes, indeed, and I suspect bugs like that generally get fixed a lot faster > > here than when you submit a similar bug report in Solaris or HP-UX. > > Solaris fixes bugs? > > Seriously though, I really can't say that I can complain about the speed > and effort that bugs get fixed ... the bug I just experienced with vnodes, > Tor did one better (for which I *really* appreciate) ... he guided me, and > forced me, to figure out what was wrong and come up with a solution ... he > ended up doing the final patch, since there is no way I would have been > able to come up with the same solution (nor as cleanly), but I > *understood* what his patch did by the time we were finished ... even when > Matt helped with some VM issues awhile back, the messages that he > included me in literally flew over my head, but I appreciate having been > kept in that loop, and know I've absorb bits and pieces that will help > improve my understanding ... > > > Being worked on. Not so hard to do, much harder to do right. Guess who > > took the easy sleazy path? ;^) The other good news is that the intel > > network cards, both 10/100 (fxp) and 10/100/1000 (em) support 64-bit > > addressing, even in 32-bit PCI slots, so you'll have at least ONE enet > > interface that'll work reasonably fast. > > Yes, I don't recall who it was that explained it to me (Terry, maybe?), > but I understand the problem with going above 4gig under ia32, and was > personally just sitting back and waiting for Intel to go full steam ahead > on the ia64 stuff ... but they just sacked it :( Man, did that ever throw > a shiver up my back ... > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 12:29:41 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CCF37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:29:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhost.det2.ameritech.net (mailhost1-sfldmi.sfldmi.ameritech.net [206.141.193.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA35F43FBF for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:29:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from elh@outreachnetworks.com) Received: from preacher ([66.73.186.169]) by mailhost.det2.ameritech.net (InterMail vM.4.01.02.17 201-229-119) with SMTP id <20030307202936.GBTD8853.mailhost.det2.ameritech.net@preacher> for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:29:36 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 971 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 07 Mar 2003 20:29:36 -0000 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:29:36 -0500 From: Eric L Howard To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Message-ID: <20030307202935.GA487@outreachnetworks.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> <20030307151723.L18433@hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030307151723.L18433@hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Favorite-Scripture: Romans 8:18 X-Theocratic-Rule-Advocate: http://www.crossmovement.com X-Registered-Secret-Agent: Agent Double-Naught Seven X-Operating-System: Linux 2.4.18-bf2.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At a certain time, now past [Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:19:49PM -0400], Marc G. Fournier spake thusly: > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Michael Sierchio wrote: > > > Vallo Kallaste wrote: > > > > > He has rather unusual requirements compared to a lot of others. As I > > > understand he runs hundreds of jails and has thousands of processes, > > > putting real challenge to VM. All this means that FreeBSD > > > isn't ready to enterprise yet .... > > > > What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. If the concern is > > with stability and performance, one would track -SECURITY and > > not -STABLE. > > Actually, I've tried -SECURITY ... my servers crashed more often :) And I would think that such a problem speaks more toward the quality of the FreeBSD release that you choose to run...or your hardware...or God knows what... When you hunted down the cause of the crash...what exactly was it? I've got servers tracking the release branch that have been up for anywhere from 6 to 9 months. Before that, I was flirting w/ a year. > have you ever tried to get someone to investigate/fix something that is > considered a 'dead line'? The thing with -SECURITY is that its exactly > that ... no bug fixes go into it, only critical security stuff ... so, if > I were to report a bug on -SECURITY, it would most likely get ignored, > since there is a very good chance that its already fixed in -STABLE, but > nobody is going to back-patch it ... Bugs do get fixed in the release branch, just depends on the severity. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html That said... My case [I've had wonderful success running the release branch] is no weightier than yours [you've had wonderful success running -STABLE]. Too many details left out... http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html ~elh -- Eric L. Howard e l h @ o u t r e a c h n e t w o r k s . c o m ------------------------------------------------------------------------ www.OutreachNetworks.com 313.297.9900 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ JabberID: elh@jabber.org Advocate of the Theocratic Rule To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 13:26:24 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D96037B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:26:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-224.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00AA43F3F for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:26:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h27LQGLT063961; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:26:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h27LQF7c063960; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:26:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:26:15 -0800 From: David Schultz To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: Scott Long , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bug in aac driver ... ? Message-ID: <20030307212615.GA63881@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Marc G. Fournier" , Scott Long , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030305224856.R38115@hub.org> <20030307090449.GB61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <3E68B705.4070409@btc.adaptec.com> <20030307143810.O18433@hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030307143810.O18433@hub.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Marc G. Fournier : > > David Schultz wrote: > > > I don't know why VM_KMEM_SIZE would tickle a RAID controller > > > problem, but I've seen timeout message similar to the one you > > > describe with a flaky SCSI controller. (Try statically compiling > > > all relevant drivers into the kernel if you're not already.) The > > > fix for me was to reduce the tag depth with camcontrol. Try a > > > value around 8 or so; there shouldn't be much, if any, of a > > > performance difference. > > > > > > camcontrol tags devicename -N8 > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > The aac driver does not use the CAM SCSI interface for accessing its > > RAID arrays, so changing parameters there will have no effect. > > Oh good, I thought I was doing something wrong when I kept getting errors > trying to access it through camcontrol :) Brain fart, my apologies. aac != ahc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 13:43:17 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000D337B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:43:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-224.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A7843F85 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:43:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h27Lh7LT064011; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:43:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h27Lh6n0064010; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:43:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 13:43:06 -0800 From: David Schultz To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: Wes Peters , Vallo Kallaste , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Message-ID: <20030307214306.GB63881@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Marc G. Fournier" , Wes Peters , Vallo Kallaste , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <20030307081643.B15693@hub.org> <200303070648.26984.wes@softweyr.com> <20030307152045.P18433@hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030307152045.P18433@hub.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Marc G. Fournier : > > Being worked on. Not so hard to do, much harder to do right. Guess who > > took the easy sleazy path? ;^) The other good news is that the intel > > network cards, both 10/100 (fxp) and 10/100/1000 (em) support 64-bit > > addressing, even in 32-bit PCI slots, so you'll have at least ONE enet > > interface that'll work reasonably fast. > > Yes, I don't recall who it was that explained it to me (Terry, maybe?), > but I understand the problem with going above 4gig under ia32, and was > personally just sitting back and waiting for Intel to go full steam ahead > on the ia64 stuff ... but they just sacked it :( Man, did that ever throw > a shiver up my back ... It's amazing how many times bank switching has been reinvented, eh? FreeBSD now runs on sparc64, you know, and that's an architecture that's designed for Really Big Machines. Sun has 128-processor machines with 512 GB of RAM running Solaris. Just think about it: all of your problems about address space size and KVA_PAGES conveniently vanish for the low, low price of 10 million dollars. ;-) Granted, the FreeBSD port may take some time to mature, and you'd be journeying once again into uncharted territory if you tried it on a machine that big. There is also x86-64 around the corner, which is not aesthetically pleasing in that it's just another hack on top of the idiosyncratic 8086, but AMD seems to have tried to address most of the fundamental problems with x86, such as the shortage of general-purpose registers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 14: 4:33 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F4137B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:04:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from web10504.mail.yahoo.com (web10504.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C9C343F75 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:04:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from b_oshea@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030307220431.75419.qmail@web10504.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [156.153.254.42] by web10504.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 14:04:31 PST Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:04:31 -0800 (PST) From: Brian O'Shea Subject: Apparent problem with pcn driver on 5.0-RELEASE To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm not sure if this is the correct place to post this since most discussion seems to be related to the 4-STABLE branch. Please feel free to redirect me if necessary. I am having problems with the pcn driver for the AMD PCnet fast ethernet chip on a PC (Intel PII 400MHz) running FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE. I can configure the interface but it does not seem to work. I'm sorry that I don't have more diagnostic information, but I don't know what else to check. Here's what I have: From dmesg: pcib2: device pcn0 requested decoded I/O range 0x7ce0-0x7cff pcn0: port 0x7ce0-0x7cff mem 0xfdfff400-0xfdfff41f irq 9 at device 5.0 on pci2 pcn0: Ethernet address: 00:60:b0:3d:06:1e miibus0: on pcn0 Interface configuration: # ifconfig pcn0 inet 15.0.65.119 netmask 0xfffff800 # ifconfig pcn0 pcn0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet6 fe80::260:b0ff:fe3d:61e%pcn0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 15.0.65.119 netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast 15.0.71.255 ether 00:60:b0:3d:06:1e media: Ethernet autoselect (100BaseTX ) status: active I can ping the interface address, but can not ping other hosts on the same subnet. The hardware is known to work with other OS's. Any help would be much appreciated. Thanks, -brian __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 14:20: 5 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EC937B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:20:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from dart.sr.se (dart.SR.SE [134.25.0.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B1B43FE0 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:19:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: from honken.sr.se (honken.sr.se [134.25.128.27]) by dart.sr.se (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h27MJxhG076697; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:19:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: from oldie.sr.se (oldie [134.25.200.100]) by honken.sr.se (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h27MJw1j076019; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:19:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: from oldie.sr.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oldie.sr.se (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h27MJweD055635; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:19:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: (from gunnar@localhost) by oldie.sr.se (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h27MJwri055634; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:19:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:19:58 +0100 From: Gunnar Flygt To: Greg Smith Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: Compaq Evo N800c and FreeBSD Message-ID: <20030307221958.GC55414@sr.se> Mail-Followup-To: Gunnar Flygt , Greg Smith , FreeBSD Stable References: <20030307085934.GB49372@sr.se> <20030307112724.GJ424@freebsd.org.ru> <20030307123438.GA51261@sr.se> <20030307164501.GA53132@sr.se> <200303070850380652.297A5BA5@smtp.myrealbox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200303070850380652.297A5BA5@smtp.myrealbox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:50:38AM -0800, Greg Smith wrote: > Gunnar, > > Did you have pccardd running? With pccard_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf > or wherever it might go in 5.0. > > It won't be automatically started with NEWCARD. Yes, it was activated. i.e it says pccard_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf but it isn't running when I look closer after a boot, so I added pccardd_flags="-z" which used to help. But not this time. When I put a card in the port it says: end (ffffffff) > sc->memlimit (803fffff) pccard0: Card has no functions! cbb0: PC Card card activation failed And that's it. So I put in the pccardd_flags="-z" But that makes no difference. The machine doesn't like pccard when running CURRENT. > > Greg > > -----Original Message----- > > >OK! So now I've also tested with OLDCARD. It isn't any better. Result: > >pccard: card inserted, slot 0 > > > >And that's it. It doesn't detect the card or inform anything more. > > > >So should I say that this brand new Compaq Laptop is NO GO for FreeBSD > >CURRENT? Just to inform you, I've tried Linux RedHat 8 and Mandrake of > >some brand (8.x probably) with even worse result. They don't even > boot. > > > >So it seems Compaq has done it. Being totally dedicated to M$ > > > >Boring. I won't ever buy a Compaq laptop again. Pity I didn't stay > >with Toshiba. Had only good things to say about my Tecra 9100. > >Until it died electrically for me. > > > >-- > >Gunnar Flygt, SR > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message > > > -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 14:26: 5 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5BA37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:26:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3782143FBD for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:26:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h27MQ0PD015629; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:26:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h27MQ0fg015628; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:26:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:26:00 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte To: Gunnar Flygt Cc: Greg Smith , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: Compaq Evo N800c and FreeBSD Message-ID: <20030307232600.B15547@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20030307085934.GB49372@sr.se> <20030307112724.GJ424@freebsd.org.ru> <20030307123438.GA51261@sr.se> <20030307164501.GA53132@sr.se> <200303070850380652.297A5BA5@smtp.myrealbox.com> <20030307221958.GC55414@sr.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20030307221958.GC55414@sr.se>; from gunnar.flygt@sr.se on Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:19:58PM +0100 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.8-RC X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 11:19:58PM +0100, Gunnar Flygt wrote: > On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:50:38AM -0800, Greg Smith wrote: > > Gunnar, > > > > Did you have pccardd running? With pccard_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf > > or wherever it might go in 5.0. > > > > It won't be automatically started with NEWCARD. > > Yes, it was activated. i.e it says pccard_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf > but it isn't running when I look closer after a boot, so I added > pccardd_flags="-z" which used to help. But not this time. > > When I put a card in the port it says: > end (ffffffff) > sc->memlimit (803fffff) > pccard0: Card has no functions! > cbb0: PC Card card activation failed My EVO N160 is slightly different (NEWCARD works) but it moans a bit as well: cbb0: irq 10 at device 6.0 on pci2 start (88000000) < sc->membase (d0200000) end (ffffffff) > sc->memlimit (d02fffff) cardbus0: on cbb0 pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 For OLDCARD I have to set hint.pcic.0.maddr="0xd0000" Just a datapoint. -- | / o / /_ _ wilko@FreeBSD.org |/|/ / / /( (_) Bulte To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 14:39: 3 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C49F37B401; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:39:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr (postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7BC43F3F; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:39:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kfk@free.fr) Received: from imp2-1.free.fr (imp2-1.free.fr [213.228.0.22]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C774C0F1; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:39:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp2-1.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 644F458055; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:39:00 +0100 (CET) To: src-all@freebsd.org Subject: unsubscribe cvs-all Message-ID: <1047076740.3e691f84560d4@imp.free.fr> Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 23:39:00 +0100 (CET) From: kfk@online.fr Cc: stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6 X-Originating-IP: 80.14.63.198 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG unsubscribe cvs-all To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 15:31: 6 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C02B37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:31:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.halplant.com (ip68-98-167-210.nv.nv.cox.net [68.98.167.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B27843F85 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:31:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from A.J.Caines@halplant.com) Received: by mail.halplant.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 370B0BD; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:30:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:30:59 -0500 From: Andrew J Caines To: FreeBSD-STABLE Subject: 4.8-RC dhclient error: dhclient.c(2018): null pointer Message-ID: <20030307233059.GD1500@hal9000.halplant.com> Reply-To: Andrew J Caines Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD-STABLE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: H.A.L. Plant X-PGP-Fingerprint: C59A 2F74 1139 9432 B457 0B61 DDF2 AA61 67C3 18A1 X-Powered-by: FreeBSD 4.8-RC X-URL: http://halplant.com:88/ X-Yahoo-Profile: AJ_Z0 Importance: Normal User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sources updated 04:06 on 6th March. Installed today and during boot dhclient hangs for some minutes and logs the following: dhclient: New Network Number: 68.98.160.0 dhclient: New Broadcast Address: 68.98.175.255 dhclient: New IP Address (dc0): 68.98.167.210 dhclient: New Subnet Mask (dc0): 255.255.240.0 dhclient: New Broadcast Address (dc0): 68.98.175.255 dhclient: New Routers: 68.98.160.1 dhclient: /home/src/sbin/dhclient/client/../../../contrib/isc-dhcp/client/dhclient.c(2018): null pointer Note that IP, mask and route are updated. It may be worth noting that this is a new lease, which is very unusual for my ISP. This could be a conincidence, but is highly unlikely. The last update includes the following changes : Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/COPYRIGHT Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.37 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/FREEBSD-upgrade Add delta 1.9.2.5 2003.03.02.16.42.37 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/Makefile Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.37 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/Makefile.conf Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.4 2003.03.02.16.42.37 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/Makefile.dist Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.3 2003.03.02.16.42.37 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/README Add delta 1.1.1.6.2.6 2003.03.02.16.42.37 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/RELNOTES Add delta 1.1.1.6.2.6 2003.03.02.16.42.37 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/client/Makefile.dist Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.4 2003.03.02.16.42.37 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/client/clparse.c Add delta 1.4.2.4 2003.03.02.16.42.37 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/client/dhclient-script.8 Add delta 1.5.2.5 2003.03.02.16.42.37 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/client/dhclient.8 Add delta 1.8.2.4 2003.03.02.16.42.37 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/client/dhclient.c Add delta 1.9.2.7 2003.03.02.16.42.37 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/client/dhclient.conf.5 Add delta 1.7.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/client/dhclient.leases.5 Add delta 1.2.4.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/client/scripts/freebsd Add delta 1.9.2.6 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/alloc.c Add delta 1.1.1.3.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/bpf.c Add delta 1.1.1.5.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/comapi.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/conflex.c Add delta 1.1.1.3.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/ctrace.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/dhcp-eval.5 Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/dhcp-options.5 Add delta 1.2.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/discover.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/dispatch.c Add delta 1.1.1.4.2.3 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/dlpi.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/dns.c Add delta 1.1.1.2.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/ethernet.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.4.3 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/execute.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/fddi.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/icmp.c Add delta 1.1.1.2.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/inet.c Add delta 1.1.1.2.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/lpf.c Add delta 1.1.1.4.2.3 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/memory.c Add delta 1.1.1.3.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/nit.c Add delta 1.1.1.4.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/options.c Add delta 1.1.1.3.2.4 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/packet.c Add delta 1.1.1.3.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/parse.c Add delta 1.1.1.3.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/print.c Add delta 1.1.1.3.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/raw.c Add delta 1.1.1.3.2.3 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/resolv.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/socket.c Add delta 1.1.1.4.2.3 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/tables.c Add delta 1.5.2.4 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/tr.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.4.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/tree.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.4.2 2003.03.02.16.42.38 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/common/upf.c Add delta 1.1.1.4.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.39 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/configure Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.3 2003.03.02.16.42.37 murray Checkout src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dhcpctl/Makefile.dist Checkout src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dhcpctl/callback.c Checkout src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dhcpctl/cltest.c Checkout src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dhcpctl/dhcpctl.3 Checkout src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dhcpctl/dhcpctl.c Checkout src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dhcpctl/dhcpctl.h Checkout src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dhcpctl/omshell.1 Checkout src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dhcpctl/omshell.c Checkout src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dhcpctl/remote.c Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dst/Makefile.dist Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.39 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dst/dst_api.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.39 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dst/dst_support.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dst/hmac_link.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/dst/prandom.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/includes/cf/freebsd.h Add delta 1.3.4.2 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/includes/dhcpd.h Add delta 1.1.1.4.2.4 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/includes/osdep.h Add delta 1.1.1.4.2.3 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/includes/site.h Add delta 1.1.1.1.4.2 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/includes/version.h Add delta 1.1.1.1.4.7 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/minires/ns_name.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/minires/ns_samedomain.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/minires/ns_sign.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/minires/res_findzonecut.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/minires/res_send.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/omapip/alloc.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/omapip/convert.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray Edit src/contrib/isc-dhcp/omapip/message.c Add delta 1.1.1.1.2.2 2003.03.02.16.42.40 murray There have been no updates to isc-dhcp since these, according to cvsup from a few moments ago. # uname -srv FreeBSD 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #0: Thu Mar 6 07:53:57 EST 2003 root@hal9000.halplant.com:/.disk/obj/home/src/sys/HAL9000 More systems details at http://halplant.com:88/server/config/ I've not seen mention of this in the list and don't see anything in the -questions archive either. -Andrew- -- _______________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer A.J.Caines@halplant.com | | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary | | safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 15:47:13 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA6637B405 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:47:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.parrett.net (smtp.parrett.net [12.39.16.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1233C43FBF for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:47:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from postmaster@netfang.net) Received: from host14.interlink.qtm.net ([216.163.33.190] helo=netfang.netfang.net) by smtp.parrett.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18rRYS-0006nE-00; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 18:47:08 -0500 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 18:47:23 -0500 To: Eric Anholt Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: In-Reply-To: <1047056245.616.14.camel@leguin> References: <723002BB-4E42-11D7-90DE-000A9566C46A@we.lc.ehu.es> <1046852244.613.149.camel@leguin> <1047056245.616.14.camel@leguin> Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: The Polarbar Mailer; version=1.25rc9; build=1960 X-Mailer-Platform: FreeBSD; architecture=i386; version=4.8-RC X-Mailer-Java-VM: Sun Microsystems Inc.; version=1.3.1-p7; compiler=NONE Message-Id: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ** Reply to message from Eric Anholt on 07 Mar 2003 08:57:25 -0800 > > Is it necessary to deinstall XFree86 4.2 before installing the 4.3 patches? > > It should work just fine, as long as you have both of the patches. I ended up having to run pkg_delete on all of the 4.2 XFree-86 packages before I was able to build 4.3. But I suppose that could be because I don't know the right way to install an update. Here's what I did: 1) Download both patch files. 2) Run the -11 patch from /usr/ports. 3) Run the make patch from the /usr/ports/Mk. 4) Run 'make' from /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4. The only thing that resulted from step 4 was a few console messages indicating that everything was already done. 5) Run 'make clean' from /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4. 6) Run 'make' again. Same thing. 7) Run pkg_delete on all XFree86 packages found using 'ls -l /var/db/pkg/XF*' (I had to use -f on one of them). 8) Run 'make' again. This time, things started building. 9) Run 'make install'. Which finished building everything and installed everything. 10) Run 'xf86config'. 11) Run 'startx'. Success! Most imporantly, I can use the mouse again (with 4.2, any movement of the mouse caused the mouse cursor to disappear off the bottom of the screen). I use cvsup to update both ports and source and the last time I ran cvsup in ports was a day or two ago, which is why I was able to use the -11 patch. Would the build and installation have worked properly if I had simply run 'make install' instead of 'make' in step 4? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 15:51:17 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8B537B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:51:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from haystack.lclark.edu (lclark.edu [149.175.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C15FF43F93 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:51:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from [149.175.30.191] ([149.175.30.191]) by haystack.lclark.edu (SAVSMTP 3.0.0.44) with SMTP id M2003030715511205355 ; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 15:51:12 -0800 Subject: Re: Is XFree86 4.3.0 going to be in 4.8? -nt- From: Eric Anholt To: postmaster@netfang.net Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <723002BB-4E42-11D7-90DE-000A9566C46A@we.lc.ehu.es> <1046852244.613.149.camel@leguin> <1047056245.616.14.camel@leguin> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1047081278.613.1.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 07 Mar 2003 15:54:39 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 15:47, postmaster@netfang.net wrote: > Would the build and installation have worked properly if I had simply run 'make > install' instead of 'make' in step 4? It would have made sure that the component parts were installed. The ports system can't ensure things are updated, though, so you need to use a tool like portupgrade to make sure that everything is updated. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 15:52:33 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C3F37B405 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:52:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from haystack.lclark.edu (lclark.edu [149.175.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BC7443FA3 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 15:52:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from [149.175.30.191] ([149.175.30.191]) by haystack.lclark.edu (SAVSMTP 3.0.0.44) with SMTP id M2003030715522723512 ; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 15:52:27 -0800 Subject: Re: Comment to the XFree86 =?ISO-8859-1?Q?4=2E3=2E0=A7?= From: Eric Anholt To: Gunnar Flygt Cc: FreeBSD Stable In-Reply-To: <20030307095223.GA49698@sr.se> References: <20030307095223.GA49698@sr.se> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1047081353.613.3.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 07 Mar 2003 15:55:53 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 01:52, Gunnar Flygt wrote: > cvsuped a few minutes ago the ports tree. In all of the directories > connected to XFree86-4 4.3.0 the pkg-comment is missing. Therefore > patches don't apply clean. > > Used the ver -11 of the pacthes leading to 4.3.0 The -12 patches at the site now should fix that. http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 16:26:42 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC21137B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:26:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from web10503.mail.yahoo.com (web10503.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5508F43F3F for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:26:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from b_oshea@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030308002639.91734.qmail@web10503.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [156.153.254.41] by web10503.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 07 Mar 2003 16:26:39 PST Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:26:39 -0800 (PST) From: Brian O'Shea Subject: Re: Apparent problem with pcn driver on 5.0-RELEASE To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030307220431.75419.qmail@web10504.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Here's some more background information, as requested by a private responder: # netstat -rn -f inet Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 15.0.71.254 UGSc 0 0 pcn0 15.0.64/21 link#1 UC 2 0 pcn0 15.0.64.12 link#1 UHRLW 0 12 pcn0 9 15.0.71.254 link#1 UHLW 1 0 pcn0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 I don't know where the 15.0.64.12 route came from. It might be the IP address of a DHCP server. I was using dhclient to configure the interface initially but it would always time out, leaving the interface "UP" but configured with 0.0.0.0 address. Rebooting the system without configuring the network interface resulted in the same routing table except without the 15.0.64.12 entry. Thanks, -brian --- Brian O'Shea wrote: > I'm not sure if this is the correct place to post this since most > discussion seems to be related to the 4-STABLE branch. Please feel > free to redirect me if necessary. > > I am having problems with the pcn driver for the AMD PCnet fast ethernet > chip on a PC (Intel PII 400MHz) running FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE. I can configure > the interface but it does not seem to work. I'm sorry that I don't have > more diagnostic information, but I don't know what else to check. Here's > what I have: > > From dmesg: > > pcib2: device pcn0 requested decoded I/O range 0x7ce0-0x7cff > pcn0: port 0x7ce0-0x7cff mem > 0xfdfff400-0xfdfff41f > irq 9 at device 5.0 on pci2 > pcn0: Ethernet address: 00:60:b0:3d:06:1e > miibus0: on pcn0 > > > Interface configuration: > > # ifconfig pcn0 inet 15.0.65.119 netmask 0xfffff800 > # ifconfig pcn0 > pcn0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet6 fe80::260:b0ff:fe3d:61e%pcn0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet 15.0.65.119 netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast 15.0.71.255 > ether 00:60:b0:3d:06:1e > media: Ethernet autoselect (100BaseTX ) > status: active > > I can ping the interface address, but can not ping other hosts on the > same subnet. The hardware is known to work with other OS's. > > Any help would be much appreciated. > Thanks, > -brian > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 16:32: 1 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E64B37B401; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:32:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6213A43FBF; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:31:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BAF8F7E0C; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:31:55 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:31:55 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: David Schultz Cc: Wes Peters , Vallo Kallaste , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? In-Reply-To: <20030307214306.GB63881@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Message-ID: <20030307203014.D66674@hub.org> References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <20030307081643.B15693@hub.org> <200303070648.26984.wes@softweyr.com> <20030307152045.P18433@hub.org> <20030307214306.GB63881@HAL9000.homeunix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Marc G. Fournier : > > > Being worked on. Not so hard to do, much harder to do right. Guess who > > > took the easy sleazy path? ;^) The other good news is that the intel > > > network cards, both 10/100 (fxp) and 10/100/1000 (em) support 64-bit > > > addressing, even in 32-bit PCI slots, so you'll have at least ONE enet > > > interface that'll work reasonably fast. > > > > Yes, I don't recall who it was that explained it to me (Terry, maybe?), > > but I understand the problem with going above 4gig under ia32, and was > > personally just sitting back and waiting for Intel to go full steam ahead > > on the ia64 stuff ... but they just sacked it :( Man, did that ever throw > > a shiver up my back ... > > It's amazing how many times bank switching has been reinvented, eh? Just curious here, but with the speed of CPUs nowadays, how much impact would bank switching have on performance? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 16:43:33 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5105D37B405 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:43:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mobile.hub.org (u173n136.eastlink.ca [24.224.173.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4BB43FAF for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:43:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by mobile.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 373C63F88; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:43:30 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobile.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2651A3F81; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:43:30 -0400 (AST) Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 20:43:30 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker X-X-Sender: scrappy@localhost To: Michael Sierchio Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? In-Reply-To: <3E68BAC0.5080301@tenebras.com> Message-ID: <20030307204200.T58063@localhost> References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <20030307081643.B15693@hub.org> <3E68BAC0.5080301@tenebras.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > As for 'the enterprise', I think the only thing that I really find about > > FreeBSD that 'hurts' is that I can't go above the 4Gig of RAM limit within > > ia32, even though there are boards that do support it ... > > This is definitely an area of concern, and I *am* glad that you're > doing boundary testing ;-) > > The biggest obstacles to adoption in the enterprise aren't technical, > however. It's all about mind share, and IT staff tolerate all > manner of stupid limitations from Sun, HP, IBM, etc. Actually, one of our techs (I work at a University) got a call from IBM the other day wondering what RAID controller we were using with our IBM Servers, since another University is looking at buying a server from them and will be running FreeBSD on it ... they know we're running it and keep beating them up over it, so turned to us for advice ... very scary ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 16:53:23 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C43E37B405 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:53:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from cmailm1.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailm1.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17EF43FB1 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 16:53:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Robin.Melville@nadt.org.uk) Received: from modem-1176.arbok.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.135.20.152] helo=jade.robmel.net) by cmailm1.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 18rSaU-0006Ua-00; Sat, 08 Mar 2003 00:53:19 +0000 Received: from nadt.org.uk (robslap.robmel.net [10.0.1.175]) by jade.robmel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5426F18C8B; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 00:52:46 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 00:54:09 +0000 Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG To: Eric L Howard From: Robin.Melville@nadt.org.uk In-Reply-To: <20030307202935.GA487@outreachnetworks.com> Message-Id: <78A61AED-5100-11D7-B150-00039303F496@nadt.org.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 08:29 pm, Eric L Howard wrote: > At a certain time, now past [Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:19:49PM -0400], > Marc G. Fournier spake thusly: >> [...] Bugs do get fixed in the release branch, just depends on the >> severity. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html > > That said... > > My case [I've had wonderful success running the release branch] is no > weightier than yours [you've had wonderful success running -STABLE]. > Too > many details left out... Yes, me too. Not huge numbers of jails/terabyte file systems, etc... but crunching a large department with biggish clinical databases, intranet, windows/mac networking/printing, email, network glue etc, etc... on a couple of 586 class servers with uptimes of over 365 days and excellent response times throughout the entire period. I really don't have any complaints about the stability of FreeBSD-STABLE. Robin Melville Addiction Information Nottingham Alcohol & Drug Team To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 21: 2:20 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D005B37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:02:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.backtech.com (wilma.backtech.com [209.198.99.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6E043FA3 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:02:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dexter@backtech.com) Received: by mail.backtech.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 61665594B; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 00:02:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 00:02:12 -0500 From: Dexter McNeil To: Brian O'Shea Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apparent problem with pcn driver on 5.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <20030308050212.GA3774@net-1.backtech.com> References: <20030307220431.75419.qmail@web10504.mail.yahoo.com> <20030308002639.91734.qmail@web10503.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030308002639.91734.qmail@web10503.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems that the pcn driver has been broken sometime after 4.3 & before 4.4. I've got the same problems with the driver in 4.5 up to 4.8. I can make hardware available remotely via ssh over the internet if someone wants to work on it. Test box is an IBM Netfinity 5500 w/quad 550Mhz P-III Xeon, AMD 79C971 on m/b w/ Nat. Semi PHI, AMD 79C971 w/ LevelI PHY on PCI card, Intel 82559 for primary network connectivity as well for test system, and another machine to gain console access and reach the AMD test interfaces. Also a Cisco switch with console access to the switch to allow looking at the network. This is a copy of the message that I had posted to freebsd-net: - On the same basic subject - it seems that sometime after the release of - FreeBSD 4.3 the pcn ethernet driver was broken. I did find PR kern/34071 - which indicated that the driver was broken in 4.5RC2. I've tried the - following versions of FreeBSD from the fixit CDROMS: - - 4.3 - works fine - 4.4 - doesn't work - ping can't get to the outside world (host - unreachable - it's a directly connected machine I'm trying to ping...), - though interface status info appears good as reported by ifconfig. Media & - mediaopt options don't seem to make any difference. While the line will go - to half-duplex or 10baseT/UTP modes, it doesn't solve the problem of not - getting bits out the door... - - 4.5 - same as 4.4 - - 4.6.2 - doesn't work - after ifconfig'ing the interface with an IP - address & such, ifconfig reports that the interface is in hardware - loopback. This is confirmed by the loss of link status on the switch the - interface is connected to. Media & mediaopt options don't change this - state. - 4.7 - same as 4.6.2 - 4.8-prerelease - same as 4.6.2 - - 5.0 - has the same issues as 4.6.2. - - The main interest in this driver is that IBM uses the AMD 79C971 chip with - a National Semiconductor DP83840 PHY on the motherboard in the - Netfinity 5500 server. The 79C971 chip with a Level 1 PHY is used in their - fault tolerant 10/100 PCI NIC of the same vintage. I've got a number of - these machines that I need/want to run FreeBSD on. Cheers, Dexter McNeil On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 04:26:39PM -0800, Brian O'Shea wrote: > Here's some more background information, as requested by a private responder: > > # netstat -rn -f inet > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > default 15.0.71.254 UGSc 0 0 pcn0 > 15.0.64/21 link#1 UC 2 0 pcn0 > 15.0.64.12 link#1 UHRLW 0 12 pcn0 9 > 15.0.71.254 link#1 UHLW 1 0 pcn0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 0 lo0 > > I don't know where the 15.0.64.12 route came from. It might be the IP > address of a DHCP server. I was using dhclient to configure the interface > initially but it would always time out, leaving the interface "UP" but > configured with 0.0.0.0 address. > > Rebooting the system without configuring the network interface resulted > in the same routing table except without the 15.0.64.12 entry. > > Thanks, > -brian > > --- Brian O'Shea wrote: > > I'm not sure if this is the correct place to post this since most > > discussion seems to be related to the 4-STABLE branch. Please feel > > free to redirect me if necessary. > > > > I am having problems with the pcn driver for the AMD PCnet fast ethernet > > chip on a PC (Intel PII 400MHz) running FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE. I can configure > > the interface but it does not seem to work. I'm sorry that I don't have > > more diagnostic information, but I don't know what else to check. Here's > > what I have: > > > > From dmesg: > > > > pcib2: device pcn0 requested decoded I/O range 0x7ce0-0x7cff > > pcn0: port 0x7ce0-0x7cff mem > > 0xfdfff400-0xfdfff41f > > irq 9 at device 5.0 on pci2 > > pcn0: Ethernet address: 00:60:b0:3d:06:1e > > miibus0: on pcn0 > > > > > > Interface configuration: > > > > # ifconfig pcn0 inet 15.0.65.119 netmask 0xfffff800 > > # ifconfig pcn0 > > pcn0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > inet6 fe80::260:b0ff:fe3d:61e%pcn0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > > inet 15.0.65.119 netmask 0xfffff800 broadcast 15.0.71.255 > > ether 00:60:b0:3d:06:1e > > media: Ethernet autoselect (100BaseTX ) > > status: active > > > > I can ping the interface address, but can not ping other hosts on the > > same subnet. The hardware is known to work with other OS's. > > > > Any help would be much appreciated. > > Thanks, > > -brian > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more > > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more > http://taxes.yahoo.com/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- The ultimate destination on the journey of life is a hole 6 feet deep. Enjoy the journey - the destination is nothing to write home about. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 21:57:12 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08D337B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:57:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from ws5-8.us4.outblaze.com (205-158-62-74.outblaze.com [205.158.62.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B20043FA3 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 21:57:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from illoai@operamail.com) Received: (qmail 6925 invoked by uid 1001); 8 Mar 2003 05:57:10 -0000 Message-ID: <20030308055710.6923.qmail@operamail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.41 (Entity 5.404) Received: from [65.28.11.36] by ws5-8.us4.outblaze.com with http for illoai@operamail.com; Sat, 08 Mar 2003 13:57:10 +0800 From: "Belphoebe Niressi" To: kfk@online.fr Cc: stable@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 13:57:10 +0800 Subject: Re: unsubscribe cvs-all [Hamburg helper] X-Originating-Ip: 65.28.11.36 X-Originating-Server: ws5-8.us4.outblaze.com Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: kfk@online.fr Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 23:39:00 +0100 (CET) To: src-all@freebsd.org Subject: unsubscribe cvs-all > unsubscribe cvs-all > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message I parsed this twice. 1) This is the machine that goes *ping* . . . 2) They were running a two-for-one deal on amputations so I got my head done free! 3) (provisional) If that's the best you can do by Friday pull out a rib and try running a randomiser on the logic functions. -- _______________________________________________ http://www.operamail.com Now with OperaMail Premium for only US$29.99/yr Powered by Outblaze To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 23:13:53 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62D4D37B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:13:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp (pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp [133.35.85.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04DCB43F85 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:13:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iwaki@bc.niigata-u.ac.jp) Received: (qmail 8267 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2003 16:13:45 +0900 Message-ID: <20030308071345.8265.qmail@pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 16:13:44 +0900 (JST) To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cdcontrol via atapicam in 4.8-RC From: Mamoru Iwaki In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 19:07:26 +0100 (CET) > From: Oliver Fromme > Subject: Re: cdcontrol via atapicam in 4.8-RC > > Mamoru Iwaki wrote: > > I cannot playback music from audio CD via atapicam using cdcontrol > > [...] > > # cdcontrol -f /dev/cd1c > > Did you try using cdcontrol on the ATAPI device, i.e. > # cdcontrol -d /dev/acd0c > ? No, not yet. > using atapicam doesn't prevent you from still using it as > an ATAPI device. Works fine for me. I tried that and got the following. % cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0c Compact Disc Control utility, version 2.0 Type `?' for command list cdcontrol> info cdcontrol: no disc in drive /dev/acd0c cdcontrol> play cdcontrol: no disc in drive /dev/acd0c cdcontrol> quit I think this result is natural in my environment. In my kernel configuration, there is no atapicd because atapicam is enabled. # ATA and ATAPI devices #device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 #device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives #device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives #device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives #device atapist # ATAPI tape drives #options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering device atapicam # emulate ATAPI devices as SCSI ditto via CAM # needs CAM to be present (scbus & pass) I don't know possible combinations of atapicam and atapi??. Anyway, I'll try enabling all of them, but I need a time. Thank you. --- ----- Mamoru IWAKI (iwaki@bc.niigata-u.ac.jp) Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 7 23:36:53 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4197837B401 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:36:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from dart.sr.se (dart.SR.SE [134.25.0.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937D343FAF for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2003 23:36:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: from honken.sr.se (honken.sr.se [134.25.128.27]) by dart.sr.se (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h287ajxr085763; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 08:36:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: from oldie.sr.se (oldie [134.25.200.100]) by honken.sr.se (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h287aj1j086109; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 08:36:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: from oldie.sr.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oldie.sr.se (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h287aieD068079; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 08:36:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: (from gunnar@localhost) by oldie.sr.se (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h287aiO6068078; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 08:36:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 08:36:44 +0100 From: Gunnar Flygt To: Greg Smith Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: Compaq Evo N800c and FreeBSD Message-ID: <20030308073644.GA67939@sr.se> Reply-To: Gunnar Flygt Mail-Followup-To: Gunnar Flygt , Greg Smith , FreeBSD Stable References: <20030307085934.GB49372@sr.se> <20030307112724.GJ424@freebsd.org.ru> <20030307123438.GA51261@sr.se> <20030307164501.GA53132@sr.se> <200303070850380652.297A5BA5@smtp.myrealbox.com> <20030307221958.GC55414@sr.se> <200303071424310873.2AAC07EE@smtp.myrealbox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200303071424310873.2AAC07EE@smtp.myrealbox.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 02:24:31PM -0800, Greg Smith wrote: > Gunnar, > > Maybe running of pccardd along with the memory setting of Kevin will do > the job. I just rebooted with the following setting: hw.cbb.start_memory="0x20000000" And now my Netgear card is detected as wi0 Will try to configure the card to see if it is working properly :) So it seems I'm cosing up to a solution!? > > Good luck. > > Greg > > -----Original Message----- > > >On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 08:50:38AM -0800, Greg Smith wrote: > >> Gunnar, > >> > >> Did you have pccardd running? With pccard_enable="YES" in > /etc/rc.conf > >> or wherever it might go in 5.0. > >> > >> It won't be automatically started with NEWCARD. > > > >Yes, it was activated. i.e it says pccard_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf > >but it isn't running when I look closer after a boot, so I added > >pccardd_flags="-z" which used to help. But not this time. > > > >When I put a card in the port it says: > >end (ffffffff) > sc->memlimit (803fffff) > >pccard0: Card has no functions! > >cbb0: PC Card card activation failed > > > >And that's it. > > > >So I put in the pccardd_flags="-z" > > > >But that makes no difference. The machine doesn't like pccard when > >running CURRENT. > >> > >> Greg > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> > >> >OK! So now I've also tested with OLDCARD. It isn't any better. > Result: > >> >pccard: card inserted, slot 0 > >> > > >> >And that's it. It doesn't detect the card or inform anything more. > >> > > >> >So should I say that this brand new Compaq Laptop is NO GO for > FreeBSD > >> >CURRENT? Just to inform you, I've tried Linux RedHat 8 and Mandrake > of > >> >some brand (8.x probably) with even worse result. They don't even > >> boot. > >> > > >> >So it seems Compaq has done it. Being totally dedicated to M$ > >> > > >> >Boring. I won't ever buy a Compaq laptop again. Pity I didn't stay > >> >with Toshiba. Had only good things to say about my Tecra 9100. > >> >Until it died electrically for me. > >> > > >> >-- > >> >Gunnar Flygt, SR > >> > > >> >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >> >with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message > >> > >> > >> > > > >-- > >Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR > > > -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 0:31:14 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2B937B405 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 00:31:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from dart.sr.se (dart.SR.SE [134.25.0.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306AF43FD7 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 00:31:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: from honken.sr.se (honken.sr.se [134.25.128.27]) by dart.sr.se (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h288V8xr086560; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 09:31:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: from oldie.sr.se (oldie [134.25.200.100]) by honken.sr.se (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h288V71j087003; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 09:31:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: from oldie.sr.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oldie.sr.se (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h288V6eD068469; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 09:31:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from gunnar@oldie.sr.se) Received: (from gunnar@localhost) by oldie.sr.se (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h288V6gO068468; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 09:31:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 09:31:06 +0100 From: Gunnar Flygt To: Eric Anholt Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: Comment to the =?iso-8859-1?Q?XFree86_?= =?iso-8859-1?B?NC4zLjCn?= Message-ID: <20030308083106.GA68434@sr.se> Reply-To: Gunnar Flygt Mail-Followup-To: Gunnar Flygt , Eric Anholt , FreeBSD Stable References: <20030307095223.GA49698@sr.se> <1047081353.613.3.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1047081353.613.3.camel@leguin> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 03:55:53PM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 01:52, Gunnar Flygt wrote: > > cvsuped a few minutes ago the ports tree. In all of the directories > > connected to XFree86-4 4.3.0 the pkg-comment is missing. Therefore > > patches don't apply clean. > > > > Used the ver -11 of the pacthes leading to 4.3.0 > > The -12 patches at the site now should fix that. > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html The patch applies fine, but I still have problem with: bash-2.05b# portupgrade -R -p XFree86-FontServer ---> Upgrading 'XFree86-FontServer-4.2.0_1' to 'XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0' (x11- servers/XFree86-4-FontServer) ---> Building '/usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer' ===> Cleaning for libiconv-1.8_2 ===> Cleaning for gettext-0.11.5_1 ===> Cleaning for gmake-3.80 ===> Cleaning for imake-4.3.0 ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.3.4_4 ===> Cleaning for pkgconfig-0.15.0 ===> Cleaning for perl-5.6.1_11 ===> Cleaning for freetype2-2.1.3_1 ===> Cleaning for expat-1.95.6_1 ===> Cleaning for fontconfig-2.1_5 ===> Cleaning for XFree86-libraries-4.3.0 ===> Cleaning for XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0 ===> Extracting for XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0 >> Checksum OK for xc/X430src-1.tgz. >> Checksum OK for xc/X430src-2.tgz. >> Checksum OK for xc/X430src-3.tgz. ===> Patching for XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0 I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere. ===> Ignoring patchfile /usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer/../../x11/ XFree86-4-libraries/files/patch-2.orig I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere. ===> Ignoring patchfile /usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer/../../x11/ XFree86-4-libraries/files/patch-DRI.orig Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. 5 out of 5 hunks ignored--saving rejects to config/cf/FreeBSD.cf.rej >> Patch patch-FreeBSD.cf failed to apply cleanly. >> Patch(es) patch-2 patch-DRI applied cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade821.4 make DEPENDS_TARGET=package ** Fix the problem and try again. ** The following packages were not installed or upgraded (*:skipped / !:failed) ! x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer (XFree86-FontServer-4.2.0_1) (patch e rror) I cvsupped right before applying the patch > > -- > Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org -- Gunnar Flygt, Postmaster SR To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 1:42:51 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5587B37B401 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 01:42:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org (melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org [62.212.105.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E8A43FDD for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 01:42:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thomas@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: by melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5082F2C3D1; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:42:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:42:47 +0100 From: Thomas Quinot To: Mamoru Iwaki Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cdcontrol via atapicam in 4.8-RC Message-ID: <20030308094247.GA62341@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> Reply-To: Thomas Quinot References: <20030308071345.8265.qmail@pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20030308071345.8265.qmail@pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-message-flag: WARNING! Using Outlook can damage your computer. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Le 2003-03-08, Mamoru Iwaki écrivait : > I don't know possible combinations of atapicam and atapi??. > Anyway, I'll try enabling all of them, but I need a time. You can enable both devices, as long as you do not try to access them simultaneously. -- Thomas.Quinot@Cuivre.FR.EU.ORG To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 3:25:57 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51A537B405 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 03:25:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (c18609.belrs1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [210.49.80.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9BC43F3F for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 03:25:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (localhost.alcatel.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h28BPriM000223 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 22:25:53 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from jeremyp@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au) Received: (from jeremyp@localhost) by cirb503493.alcatel.com.au (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h28BPpkp000222 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 22:25:51 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 22:25:51 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: High wired page count Message-ID: <20030308112551.GA202@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just happened to have a close look at the memory usage figures on various -STABLE machines and noticed that all of them are reporting vm.stats.vm.v_wire_count roughly 1/3 of total RAM. (My look was triggered by the sound of my firewall paging when I sent a query to its named). Having 1/3 of memory wired strikes me as excessive - especially since none of the machines were particularly busy or doing anything that would be mlock()ing lots of memory. It was also consistent on 4 different machines having between 20MB and 512MB RAM and running versions between 4.5-STABLE and 4.7-STABLE, so it isn't an anomoly on a single machine. "vmstat -m" doesn't suggest anything (in fact it only accounts for about 15% of the wires pages). Can anyone explain why so much RAM is wired? Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 3:34:24 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DD737B401 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 03:34:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from solfertje.student.utwente.nl (solfertje.student.utwente.nl [130.89.167.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4D843FBD for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 03:34:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl) Received: from solfertje.student.utwente.nl (failways.internal [10.236.150.2]) by solfertje.student.utwente.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A04214A; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 12:40:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 12:34:18 +0100 (CET) From: Alban Hertroys Reply-To: Alban Hertroys Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_Comment_to_the_XFree86_4.3.0=C2=A7?= To: Eric Anholt Cc: FreeBSD Stable In-Reply-To: <1047081353.613.3.camel@leguin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20030308114020.0A04214A@solfertje.student.utwente.nl> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 7 Mar, Eric Anholt punched keys in this particular order: > On Fri, 2003-03-07 at 01:52, Gunnar Flygt wrote: >> cvsuped a few minutes ago the ports tree. In all of the directories >> connected to XFree86-4 4.3.0 the pkg-comment is missing. Therefore >> patches don't apply clean. >> >> Used the ver -11 of the pacthes leading to 4.3.0 > > The -12 patches at the site now should fix that. > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html I suppose this is planned after things install properly?: warning: `_POSIX_C_SOURCE' is not defined I believe one of the patches in 4.2.1 fixed this "back then". Wasn't this one of the reasons not to run XFree86 from source, but from ports? I followed CVS (X) for a while, and got bitten by problems apparently related to this (sorry, I don't know the details - they stem from this list, though, IIRC). -- Alban Hertroys http://solfertje.student.utwente.nl - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - The world is filled with fools, and I enjoy every one of them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 4:41:41 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B7937B405 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 04:41:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp (pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp [133.35.85.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A430343F75 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 04:41:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iwaki@bc.niigata-u.ac.jp) Received: (qmail 8504 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2003 21:41:32 +0900 Message-ID: <20030308124131.8499.qmail@pikachu.bsp.bc.niigata-u.ac.jp> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 21:41:27 +0900 (JST) To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cdcontrol via atapicam in 4.8-RC From: Mamoru Iwaki In-Reply-To: <20030308.161344.74755745.iwaki@bc.niigata-u.ac.jp> <20030308094247.GA62341@melusine.cuivre.fr.eu.org> References: <20030308.161344.74755745.iwaki@bc.niigata-u.ac.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From: Thomas Quinot Subject: Re: cdcontrol via atapicam in 4.8-RC Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:42:47 +0100 > Le 2003-03-08, Mamoru Iwaki =E9crivait : > = > > I don't know possible combinations of atapicam and atapi??. > > Anyway, I'll try enabling all of them, but I need a time. = > = > You can enable both devices, as long as you do not try to access them= > simultaneously. Thank you, Thomas. = I have found atapicam(4), maybe written by you, shows its possibility in BUGS part. = I changed kernel configuration as follows, i.e. all atapi?? device are enabled. = # ATA and ATAPI devices #device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 #device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives device atapist # ATAPI tape drives #options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering device atapicam # emulate ATAPI devices as SCSI ditto v= ia CAM # needs CAM to be present (scbus & pass= ) Now, my new kernel has recognized cd related devices as follows. The same ata CDROM drive(FX120T) appears twice, one is acd0 and the other cd1. = % dmesg | grep 'ata\|ahc\|cd' atapci0: port 0xefa0-0xefaf at device 7.1 = on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ahc0: port 0xf800-0xf8ff mem 0xff9fe0= 00-0xff9fefff irq 11 at device 4.0 on pci1 ahc1: port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem 0xff9ff0= 00-0xff9fffff irq 11 at device 5.0 on pci1 ata2: at port 0x168-0x16f,0x36e-0x36f= irq 10 on isa0 ata1-slave: ATAPI identify retries exceeded ad0: 3681MB [7480/16/63] at ata0-master WDMA= 2 ad1: 28629MB [58168/16/63] at ata0-slave WDMA2 acd0: CDROM at ata1-master PIO3 sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0 da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0 at ahc1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd1 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd1: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device = cd1: 11.000MB/s transfers cd1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present= cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device = cd0: 5.681MB/s transfers (5.681MHz, offset 15) cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present= Under this new kernel, cdcontrol works OK for cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0c, but still NG for cdcontrol -f /dev/cd1c. = As I wrote in previous email, cdcontrol -f /dev/cd0c of real SCSI CD device works well. = It looks a problem between atapicam and cam subsystem for audio CD control. = Thank you. = --- ----- Mamoru IWAKI (iwaki@bc.niigata-u.ac.jp) Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 5: 5:43 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C589F37B401 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 05:05:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp (nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp [61.202.250.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E212943F75 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 05:05:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cl-server.enusure-tech.co.jp (cl-server.ensure-tech.co.jp [211.18.249.19]) (authenticated bits=0) by nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp (8.12.8/8.12.8/NinthNine) with ESMTP id h28D5dcE005867 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 8 Mar 2003 22:05:40 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200303081305.h28D5dcE005867@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp> Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 22:05:39 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: Gunnar Flygt Cc: eta@lclark.edu, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Comment to the XFree86 =?ISO-2022-JP?B?NC4zLjBfXw==?= In-Reply-To: <20030308083106.GA68434@sr.se> References: <20030307095223.GA49698@sr.se> <1047081353.613.3.camel@leguin> <20030308083106.GA68434@sr.se> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.8 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.7) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 09:31:06 +0100 Gunnar Flygt wrote: > ===> Ignoring patchfile /usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer/../../x11/ > XFree86-4-libraries/files/patch-DRI.orig > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 5 out of 5 hunks ignored--saving rejects to config/cf/FreeBSD.cf.rej > >> Patch patch-FreeBSD.cf failed to apply cleanly. > >> Patch(es) patch-2 patch-DRI applied cleanly. > *** Error code 1 (snip) > I cvsupped right before applying the patch Please use gpatch(devel/patch) or remove backup files(*.orig) after patch. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 10:44:52 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC56937B401 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:44:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from cymru.serf.org (pc2-cdif2-6-cust109.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.101.154.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B578F43FE1 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 10:44:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gedge@cymru.serf.org) Received: from gedge by cymru.serf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18rjJN-00073u-00; Sat, 08 Mar 2003 18:44:45 +0000 Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 18:44:45 +0000 From: Geraint A Edwards To: Robert English Cc: Joe Marcus Clarke , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Runaway Galeon - further further info Message-ID: <20030308184445.GE10657@cymru.serf.org> References: <1046817905.310.90.camel@gyros> <20030305012824.32975.qmail@web80109.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030305012824.32975.qmail@web80109.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organisation: Caerdydd, Cymru / Cardiff, Wales X-MotD: Hacking: pushing until it hurts. Cracking: pushing until it hurts others. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Robert English said (on Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:28:24PM -0800): > More experiments are necessary before I leap to any conclusions > on this one, but the permissions on those two files are > currently "0644". Before this is over, I may have to modify > those two to "0444" as well. My partner uses Galeon, and last night it threw up bazillions (well, dozens) of popup windows (for the first time) and, coincidentally, I read this thread today. That box has never run Mozilla or Galeon as root, to my knowledge. If it has, then that would be my other personality, EvilUser, and I have repressed the memories from such periods of possession. The aforementioned file looks as follows: -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 154856 Dec 10 01:09 /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla/components/compreg.dat FWIW, -- Geraint A. Edwards "Gedge" Caerdydd(Cardiff), Cymru(Wales) gedge@serf.org http://serf.org/gedge/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 12:52: 3 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D616B37B401 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 12:52:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from web13304.mail.yahoo.com (web13304.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8D4E43F85 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 12:51:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andyelf@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030308205158.84603.qmail@web13304.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.76.98.12] by web13304.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 08 Mar 2003 12:51:58 PST Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 12:51:58 -0800 (PST) From: Andrei Popov Subject: XFree86 4.3 and Cyrillic Xkb layouts To: stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Cc: andrei@ceesaxp.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG There's something fishy with Xkb in 4.3: whenever I try cyrillic layouts (e.g. ru, bg, ua, etc.), I cannot type a thing (and yes, cyrillic fonts are listed in font path). Once I change it to any latin-based (us, pl, sk, cz, fr, etc.) -- all is ok. Running xev shows that event is there. Anyone seen the same behavior/knows what may be the cause? This is with 11th diff on a 4-5 days old -CURRENT (sorry for cross-posting, most of 4.3 discussion was on -stable list, but this is a -current system). A computer is a Toshiba Portege 7200. -- Andrei __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 13:51:29 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCA437B401 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 13:51:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (12-233-57-224.client.attbi.com [12.233.57.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B2B43F85 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 13:51:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.org) Received: from HAL9000.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h28LpILT070490; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 13:51:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.homeunix.com (8.12.6/8.12.5/Submit) id h28LpG92070489; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 13:51:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 13:51:16 -0800 From: David Schultz To: "Marc G. Fournier" Cc: Wes Peters , Vallo Kallaste , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Message-ID: <20030308215116.GA70447@HAL9000.homeunix.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Marc G. Fournier" , Wes Peters , Vallo Kallaste , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <20030307081643.B15693@hub.org> <200303070648.26984.wes@softweyr.com> <20030307152045.P18433@hub.org> <20030307214306.GB63881@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307203014.D66674@hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030307203014.D66674@hub.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Marc G. Fournier : > On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, David Schultz wrote: > > > Thus spake Marc G. Fournier : > > > > Being worked on. Not so hard to do, much harder to do right. Guess who > > > > took the easy sleazy path? ;^) The other good news is that the intel > > > > network cards, both 10/100 (fxp) and 10/100/1000 (em) support 64-bit > > > > addressing, even in 32-bit PCI slots, so you'll have at least ONE enet > > > > interface that'll work reasonably fast. > > > > > > Yes, I don't recall who it was that explained it to me (Terry, maybe?), > > > but I understand the problem with going above 4gig under ia32, and was > > > personally just sitting back and waiting for Intel to go full steam ahead > > > on the ia64 stuff ... but they just sacked it :( Man, did that ever throw > > > a shiver up my back ... > > > > It's amazing how many times bank switching has been reinvented, eh? > > Just curious here, but with the speed of CPUs nowadays, how much impact > would bank switching have on performance? I don't know exactly what impact PAE would have on performance, but an 8 GB PAE machine can't be worse than a 4 GB machine that's swapping like mad. I do know that I/O performance will suffer if your I/O devices can't address more than 4 GB of RAM, since that means much of your data will have to be copied to bounce buffers below 4 GB. Does anyone have Actual Data on how well it works? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 14:52:58 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F138437B401; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 14:52:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C860843FA3; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 14:52:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 54F2B5315; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 23:52:53 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Michael Sierchio Cc: kalts@estpak.ee, David Schultz , "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 23:52:52 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3E68E839.1080009@tenebras.com> (Michael Sierchio's message of "Fri, 07 Mar 2003 10:43:05 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090014 (Oort Gnus v0.14) Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> <3E68E839.1080009@tenebras.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Michael Sierchio writes: > You expect stability from pre-release software (i.e. "beta")? Actually, most of my systems run -CURRENT, and they generally do very well. Then again, I'm a committer. > You're surprised that the integration of new features breaks > working systems? You think the yen for the latest rev is good > for a production environment? No, but I know for a fact that there are bugs in the 4.7 security branch that have been fixed in -STABLE. > Are the five best years in a > Norwegian's life still spent in the first grade? I don't know where you're trying to go with this one, as I have never attended a Norwegian school. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 15:21: 5 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C257137B401 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 15:21:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from laptop.tenebras.com (laptop.tenebras.com [66.92.188.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21C3043F75 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 15:21:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: (qmail 58142 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2003 23:21:00 -0000 Received: from sapphire.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (192.168.188.241) by 0 with SMTP; 8 Mar 2003 23:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <3E6A7ADB.8020600@tenebras.com> Date: Sat, 08 Mar 2003 15:20:59 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> <3E68E839.1080009@tenebras.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > No, but I know for a fact that there are bugs in the 4.7 security > branch that have been fixed in -STABLE. No argument on that point, but PRERELEASE versions have, in my experience, tended to break things that previously worked. But that's just since 2.2.2 or so. >> Are the five best years in a >>Norwegian's life still spent in the first grade? > > > I don't know where you're trying to go with this one, as I have never > attended a Norwegian school. It's the punch line to an old and stupid joke, translated from Svenska. Maybe I was caffeine-deficient at the time I wrote that. My apologies. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 15:31:57 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EA937B404 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 15:31:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mobile.hub.org (u173n136.eastlink.ca [24.224.173.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C672B43FCB for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 15:31:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by mobile.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 248ED3F54; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 19:31:53 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobile.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1943B3F51; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 19:31:53 -0400 (AST) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 19:31:52 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker X-X-Sender: scrappy@localhost To: Michael Sierchio Cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? In-Reply-To: <3E6A7ADB.8020600@tenebras.com> Message-ID: <20030308192912.I58710@localhost> References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> <3E68E839.1080009@tenebras.com> <3E6A7ADB.8020600@tenebras.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > No, but I know for a fact that there are bugs in the 4.7 security > > branch that have been fixed in -STABLE. > > No argument on that point, but PRERELEASE versions have, in my > experience, tended to break things that previously worked. But > that's just since 2.2.2 or so. Its happened ... and I get the server rebooted onto kernel.old, put in a bug report, and try again when I see a commit message go through cvs-all that appears to pertain to the bug ... or someone provides me with a patch to try if I'm the only one experiencing it ... How do you think PRERELEASE gets tested? :) How do you think that -STABLE stays relatively stable? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 23: 5: 9 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1206C37B40A for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 23:05:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from steeltoe.niceboots.com (steeltoe.niceboots.com [66.117.154.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E076442A3 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:30:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tenebrae_BSD@niceboots.com) Received: from steeltoe.niceboots.com (tenebrae@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by steeltoe.niceboots.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h295UChY006866; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:30:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tenebrae_BSD@niceboots.com) Received: from localhost (tenebrae@localhost) by steeltoe.niceboots.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) with ESMTP id h295UArZ006863; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:30:11 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: steeltoe.niceboots.com: tenebrae owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:30:09 -0800 (PST) From: Tenebrae X-X-Sender: tenebrae@steeltoe.niceboots.com To: Olivier Saut Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bad hardware? (WRITE command timeout) In-Reply-To: <20030307144914.51918ca8.Olivier.Saut@gmm.insa-tlse.fr> Message-ID: <20030308212640.G5975-100000@steeltoe.niceboots.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Olivier Saut wrote: > Hello, > > for several days, I am starting to see the following errors in my log > > Mar 6 20:17:54 banquo /kernel: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > Mar 6 20:17:54 banquo /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device > Mar 6 20:17:54 banquo /kernel: done > > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. ad0: timeout sending > command=ec s=d0 e=00 > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: ATA identify failed > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: timeout sending command=c6 s=d0 e=00 > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: timeout sending command=ef s=d0 e=00 > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo last message repeated 4 times > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: done > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: timeout sending command=c5 s=d0 e=00 > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ad0: error executing command - resetting > Mar 7 12:26:15 banquo /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. done > > My computer is running a recent 4-STABLE > > banquo% uname -a > FreeBSD banquo 4.8-RC FreeBSD 4.8-RC #1: Thu Mar 6 18:43:38 CET 2003 > root@banquo:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/banquo i386 > > with the relevant lines of dmesg > /kernel: atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0x7 irq 0 at device 31.1 on pci0 > /kernel: ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 > /kernel: ad0: 29314MB [59560/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 > > Should I worry for my hard drive and save for a new one? Yes. Please search the archives for my own experience. Mine was, er, WERE (there have been more than one that have failed in this manner) also a "newer" IBM drive. Try a different cable like someone else suggested, but... Back it up if you haven't been already. Save for a new one. Get ready for an RMA. -Tenebrae. --- The sending of any unsolicited email advertising messages to this domain may result in the imposition of civil liability against you in accordance with Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Section 17538.45. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 23: 5:35 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F9E237B408 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 23:05:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mobile.hub.org (u173n136.eastlink.ca [24.224.173.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9A2442BE for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 21:14:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by mobile.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5B76E3F6A; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 01:14:42 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mobile.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7B83F69; Sun, 9 Mar 2003 01:14:41 -0400 (AST) Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 01:14:41 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker X-X-Sender: scrappy@localhost To: Scott Long Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bug in aac driver ... ? In-Reply-To: <3E68E8D4.50507@btc.adaptec.com> Message-ID: <20030309010842.F58710@localhost> References: <20030305224856.R38115@hub.org> <3E68B7DC.2040701@btc.adaptec.com> <20030307143841.T18433@hub.org> <3E68E8D4.50507@btc.adaptec.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Scott Long wrote: > There are some strange interactions in the aac firmware when you get to > 4GB of RAM. I'm not sure if I have enough of the right kind of DIMM > sticks to populate my 7500WV2 motherboard to 4GB, so would you mind > doing some tests for me? If the aac driver is compiled into the kernel, > add the line 'options aac_DEBUG' to teh config file and rebuild. > You'll also have to edit /sys/conf/files and remove the '#' at the > beginning of the line that contains 'aac_debug.c'. If you load it as a > module, then edit /sys/modules/aac/Makefile and remove the '#' before > the two lines at the bottom that are marked as being for debugging > purposes. Well, got all this done ... > Once you have debugging enabled, send me a console log that shows your > complete dmesg and the output given when commands start timing out. But this one kinda screwed up the works, as the server is remote :( This isn't going ot be one I can easily debug from this end :( From the description I've been given, the 'timeouts' start right after the login: prompt is provided ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 8 23: 5:49 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D19F37B41A for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 23:05:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4984544033 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 19:25:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267BC8A1630; Sat, 8 Mar 2003 23:25:24 -0400 (AST) Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2003 23:25:24 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Tor.Egge@cvsup.no.freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vlrureclaim update In-Reply-To: <20030308195134A.tegge@cvsup.no.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20030308231951.X6638@hub.org> References: <20030308051800.G66674@hub.org> <20030308174057Y.tegge@cvsup.no.freebsd.org> <20030308153059.J6638@hub.org> <20030308195134A.tegge@cvsup.no.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 8 Mar 2003 Tor.Egge@cvsup.no.freebsd.org wrote: > I believe the vnlru_proc was intended as a fallback method for freeing > vnodes. A vnode is normally added to the free list when the last page > owned by a object of type OBJT_VNODE is freed, see vm_page_free_toq() in > vm_page.c. Was just thinking of this ... I just kill'd off 18 jails (and unmounted the associated union and proc fs's) on one of the servers, and right now, I'm seeing: debug.numvnodes: 234726 - debug.freevnodes: 3518 - debug.vnlru_nowhere: 2 - vlruwt debug.numvnodes: 234726 - debug.freevnodes: 3240 - debug.vnlru_nowhere: 2 - vlruwt debug.numvnodes: 234726 - debug.freevnodes: 3064 - debug.vnlru_nowhere: 2 - vlruwt Now, if the free vnodes are *supposed* to be auto-reclaiming, and teh vnlru_proc is meant to provide a fallback, then is there a bug with how vm_page_free_toq is working (or not being called, maybe?) ... ? Similar to the problem I had mentioend in relation to softupdates? Where the space for files being deleted didn't look like it was being reclaimed until the server is/was rebooted ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message