From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 18 01:12:38 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D68E37B401; Sun, 18 May 2003 01:12:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msr22.hinet.net (msr22.hinet.net [168.95.4.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C2743F85; Sun, 18 May 2003 01:12:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mtlin1@ms36.hinet.net) Received: from morton (paradise.mtlin.org [202.39.10.196]) by msr22.hinet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA08975; Sun, 18 May 2003 16:12:31 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <000b01c31d17$251b5f30$c40a27ca@morton> From: "Morton Lin" To: "Ruslan Ermilov" References: <00af01c31c3d$a404b2e0$c40a27ca@morton> <20030517065605.GD23902@sunbay.com> Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 16:26:10 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make installworld fails : touch not found ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Morton Lin List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 08:12:38 -0000 Brave ! It's OK now !!! Many thanks for your prompt. After I googling for few minutes, I found my stupid question is a kind of "F.A.Q.". Sorry for disturbance. Best Regards, Morton Lin. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ruslan Ermilov" To: "Morton Lin" Cc: Sent: Saturday, May 17, 2003 2:56 PM Subject: Re: make installworld fails : touch not found ? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 18 15:41:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509CA37B401 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 15:41:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from paiol.terra.com.br (paiol.terra.com.br [200.176.3.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671F543F75 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 15:41:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smux@terra.com.br) Received: from altamira.terra.com.br (altamira.terra.com.br [200.176.3.40]) by paiol.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6942FC50F for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 19:41:23 -0300 (BRT) Received: from terra.com.br (camboa.terra.com.br [200.176.3.187]) (authenticated user smux) by altamira.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710E43DC05B for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 19:41:23 -0300 (BRT) Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 22:41:23 +0000 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sensitivity: 3 From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?smux?=" To: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?freebsd-stable?=" X-XaM3-API-Version: 3.2 R28 (B53 pl3) X-type: 0 X-SenderIP: 200.163.7.60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: counter-strike server in freebsd4-8S X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 22:41:26 -0000 hi all,=0D=0A I am try some problems with cs server in mine freebsd4.8S, = the error I am the following one: all time that I initiate the server of = cs says an error that is not possible to record logs, would be a conflict= of version with the emulator of linux? I am thankful since now! From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 18 18:20:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6858F37B401 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 18:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from casa.michosa.com (cip-68-37.bbs.surfcity.net [66.116.68.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC81443F93 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 18:19:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from federico@michosa.com) Received: from sala (sala [192.168.0.2]) by casa.michosa.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4J1SSeK001953 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 18:28:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from federico@michosa.com) From: "Federico Canton" To: Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 18:20:06 -0700 Message-ID: <000001c31da4$c82229b0$0200a8c0@ntd.michosa.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Compile of boot blocks fails, please help. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: federico@michosa.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 01:20:00 -0000 Hello, I am trying to set a computer running FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE so that = it can boot using a serial console. To this effect I am trying to compile = new boot blocks, but I get this error: casa# cd /usr/src/sys/i386/boot/biosboot && make=20 cc -O2 -malign-functions=3D0 -malign-jumps=3D0 -malign-loops=3D0 = -DBOOTWAIT=3D5000 -DTIMEOUT=3D -DBOOTSEG=3D0x1000 -DBOOTSTACK=3D0xFFF0 -Wall = -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes = -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DCOMCONSOLE=3D0x3F8 -DCONSPEED=3D115200 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 -aout -nostdinc -I/usr/src/sys/i386/boot/biosboot/../../../../include -I/usr/src/sys/i386/boot/biosboot/../../.. = -I/usr/src/sys/i386/boot/biosboot -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -N -T 0 -nostdlib -static -o boot start.o = table.o boot2.o boot.o asm.o bios.o serial.o probe_keyboard.o io.o disk.o sys.o=20 serial.o: Undefined symbol `COMBRD' referenced from text segment serial.o: Undefined symbol `COMBRD' referenced from text segment *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/boot/biosboot. casa# Can any one please help? federico From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 18 18:58:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F3737B401 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 18:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE5C43FA3 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 18:58:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03FE3D28 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 21:58:44 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Langille" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 21:58:44 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <3EC80214.5515.7DA30AAB@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: ad0: READ command timeout.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 01:58:46 -0000 This morning I found a frozen box. On the console was this: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata0: resetting devices .. ata0-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded done After reboot, those messages were found in /var/log/messages. I'm running FreeBSD 4.8-RC from Apr 4 10:45:49 EST 2003. Any ideas? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 18 19:48:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0B937B401 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 19:48:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.156.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD9143FA3 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 19:48:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Received: from workstation.forrie.com (workstation.forrie.net. [192.168.1.21]) by forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com with id h4J2mUH00593 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 22:48:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.2.20030518224706.020428d8@192.168.1.1> X-Sender: forrie@192.168.1.1 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 22:48:21 -0400 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Forrest Aldrich Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.3.0(snapshot 20010925) (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com) X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: make buildworld ignoring NO_MAILWRAPPER=true X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 02:48:32 -0000 For the last few system builds, I've noticed that the variable in /etc/make.conf NO_MAILWRAPPER=true is being ignored, resulting in my sendmail (different than stock version) being overwritten. This applies to 4.8-STABLE; is this a known issue. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 18 22:12:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C511837B401 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 22:12:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.156.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2C943F85 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 22:12:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Received: from workstation.forrie.com (workstation.forrie.net. [192.168.1.21]) by forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com with id h4J5CIH21803 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 01:12:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519011055.0201b698@192.168.1.1> X-Sender: forrie@192.168.1.1 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 01:12:16 -0400 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Forrest Aldrich Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.3.0(snapshot 20010925) (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com) X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: New system build overwrites perl modules? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 05:12:24 -0000 I've had a problem with 4.8-STABLE whereby a new system build/install appears to nudge out the module File::Spec (perhaps others), which I usually have to reinstall every time. I'm curious about what's happening here, why, etc. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 18 22:17:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817CA37B401 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 22:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [64.105.95.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DC243F75 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 22:16:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gshapiro@gshapiro.net) Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) h4J5Ga47015316 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 May 2003 22:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gshapiro@localhost)h4J5GaoT015315; Sun, 18 May 2003 22:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 22:16:36 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro To: BSD Message-ID: <20030519051636.GW78572@horsey.gshapiro.net> References: <5.2.0.9.0.20030515165142.00b6a008@fsfaz.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20030515165142.00b6a008@fsfaz.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail --- HELP! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 05:17:45 -0000 > If anybody has any clues as to why this is happening, any input would be > much appreciated. The only thing I can figure out from this is that > sendmail is getting a restart signal but not coming back up when it does. My guess is that sendmail is getting flodded with SIGHUP's and eventually, one comes in before the signal handler can be setup. What you have to find is what is sending all of those SIGHUPs. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 18 23:20:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589FE37B401 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 23:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F80243F75 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 23:20:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h4J6KEEd089006 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 May 2003 09:20:14 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id h4J6KD7m089005; Mon, 19 May 2003 09:20:13 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:20:13 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Forrest Aldrich Message-ID: <20030519062013.GC40604@sunbay.com> References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030518224706.020428d8@192.168.1.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20030518224706.020428d8@192.168.1.1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make buildworld ignoring NO_MAILWRAPPER=true X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 06:20:40 -0000 --FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:48:21PM -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > For the last few system builds, I've noticed that the variable in=20 > /etc/make.conf NO_MAILWRAPPER=3Dtrue is being ignored, resulting in my=20 > sendmail (different than stock version) being overwritten. >=20 > This applies to 4.8-STABLE; is this a known issue. >=20 Could you please be more specific? NO_MAILWRAPPER controls the mailwrapper(8), and is not to sendmail(8) installation. If NO_MAILWRAPPER is set, the mailwrapper is just a symlink to /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail. So, what do you see broken here? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+yHecUkv4P6juNwoRAtUJAJ9l7CLpXaZzHC/wvQ0PYXTL2onwEwCaA2Q7 sSuS4uxjx+mUCfDhGRbCbRE= =/JXJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FsscpQKzF/jJk6ya-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 18 23:24:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4254737B401 for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 23:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kirk.giovannelli.it (kirk.giovannelli.it [194.184.65.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F3243FBD for ; Sun, 18 May 2003 23:24:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gmarco@giovannelli.it) Received: from usul.giovannelli.it (freebsd.giovannelli.com [194.184.65.139]) by kirk.giovannelli.it (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4J6PfF5022820; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:25:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from gmarco@giovannelli.it) Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519082230.02c55e00@194.184.65.4> X-Sender: gmarco@194.184.65.4 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 08:26:49 +0200 To: stable@freebsd.org From: Gianmarco Giovannelli Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.3.1(snapshot 20020109) (kirk.giovannelli.it) cc: esperti@gufi.org Subject: pkg_add -r broke pkg info ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 06:24:58 -0000 Hi, I installed a lot of packages by using: pkg_add -r pkgname But now when I do a pkg_info I get : lifebook:/home/gmarco# pkg_info -Ia Mesa-3.4.2_2 A\ graphics\ library\ similar\ to\ SGI\'s\ OpenGLXFree86-4.3 .0,1 X11/XFree86\ core\ distribution\ \(complete,\ using\ mini/m XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0 XFree86-4\ font\ serverXFree86-Server-4.3.0_6 XFree86-4 \ X\ server\ and\ related\ programsXFree86-clients-4.3.0_1 XFree86-4\ client\ pr ograms\ and\ related\ filesXFree86-documents-4.3.0 XFree86-4\ documentationXFree 86-font100dpi-4.3.0 XFree86-4\ bitmap\ 100\ dpi\ fontsXFree86-font75dpi-4.3.0 XF ree86-4\ bitmap\ 75\ dpi\ fontsXFree86-fontCyrillic-4.3.0 XFree86-4\ Cyrillic\ f ontsXFree86-fontDefaultBitmaps-4.3.0 XFree86-4\ default\ bitmap\ fontsXFree86-fo ntEncodings-4.3.0 XFree86-4\ font\ encoding\ filesXFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0 XFr ee86-4\ scalable\ fontsXFree86-libraries-4.3.0_3 XFree86-4\ libraries\ and\ head ersXft-2.1_8 A\ client-sided\ font\ API\ for\ X\ applicationsarts-1.1. 1,1 Audio\ system\ for\ the\ KDE\ integrated\ X11\ desktopcups-base-1.1.1 8.0_4 The\ Common\ UNIX\ Printing\ System:\ headers,\ libs,\ \&\ expat-1.95.6_1 XML\ 1.0\ parser\ written\ in\ Cfam-2.6.9_2 A\ file\ alteration\ monitorfontconfig-2.2.0 An\ XML-based\ font\ configuration\ API\ for\ X\ Windowsfreetype2-2.1.4_1 A\ free\ and\ portable\ TrueType\ font\ rend ering\ enginegettext-0.11.5_1 GNU\ gettext\ packageglib-2.2.1_1 Some\ useful\ routines\ of\ C\ programming\ \(current\ stab imake-4.3.0 Imake\ and\ other\ utilities\ from\ XFree86jpeg-6b_1 IJG\'s\ jpeg\ compression\ utilitieskdebase-3.1.1a This\ package\ provid es\ the\ basic\ applications\ for\ the kdegraphics-3.1.1 Graphics\ utilities\ for\ the\ KDE3\ integrated\ X11\ deskt kdelibs-3.1.1a This\ is\ the\ base\ set\ of\ libraries\ needed\ by\ KDE\ p lcms-1.10 Light\ Color\ Management\ System\ --\ a\ color\ management\ libart_lgpl2-2.3.12 Library\ for\ high-performance\ 2D\ graphicslibaudiofile-0.2 .3 A\ sound\ library\ for\ SGI\ audio\ filelibiconv-1.8_2 A\ character\ se t\ conversion\ librarylibmng-1.0.5 Multiple-image\ Network\ Graphics\ \(M NG\)\ reference\ libr libslang-1.4.8 Routines\ for\ rapid\ alpha-numeric\ terminal\ applications libxml2-2.5.7_1 Xml\ parser\ library\ for\ GNOMElibxslt-1.0.30 The\ XSL T\ C\ library\ for\ GNOMEmc-4.6.0_2 Midnight\ Commander,\ a\ free\ Nort on\ Commander\ Clonepcre-3.9 Perl\ Compatible\ Regular\ Expressions\ librarypkgconfig-0.15.0 An\ utility\ used\ to\ retrieve\ information\ about\ instal png-1.2.5_2 Library\ for\ manipulating\ PNG\ imagespython-2.2.2_2 A n\ interpreted\ object-oriented\ programming\ languageqt-3.1.1_5 A\ C++ \ X\ GUI\ toolkitscreen-3.9.15_1 A\ multi-screen\ window\ managertiff-3.5.7 Tools\ and\ library\ routines\ for\ working\ with\ TIFF\ im wrapper-1.0_3 Wrapper\ for\ XFree86-4\ serverlifebook:/home/gmarco# This is not a cut and paste error is really what I get :-) This happens on a couple of box 4.8-STABLE (update not so much time ago). Any idea ? Best Regards, Gianmarco Giovannelli , "Unix expert since yesterday" http://www.gufi.org/~gmarco From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 02:23:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FE937B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 02:23:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAF743F93 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 02:22:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h4J9MBEd009062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 May 2003 12:22:11 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id h4J9MB8w009057; Mon, 19 May 2003 12:22:11 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 12:22:11 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Forrest Aldrich Message-ID: <20030519092211.GB1035@sunbay.com> References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030518224706.020428d8@192.168.1.1> <5.2.1.1.2.20030518224706.020428d8@192.168.1.1> <5.2.1.1.2.20030519051208.021014e8@192.168.1.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519051208.021014e8@192.168.1.1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make buildworld ignoring NO_MAILWRAPPER=true X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:23:06 -0000 --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 05:13:19AM -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > Correct, despite that setting in my /etc/make.conf, it continues to=20 > overwrite sendmail and my other links to sendmail (mailq, newaliases, etc= =2E)=20 > to that of the mailwrapper program. It's very annoying, and thus I=20 > presume there is something broken somewhere in the installation process= =20 > that does not consult the settings in /etc/make.conf. >=20 > If there's anything else I can provide, please let me know, and thanks fo= r=20 > responding. >=20 Don't get it? mailq, newaliases, etc. are ALWAYS symlinked to mailwrapper. But if NO_MAILWRAPPER is also set, the mailwrapper itself is symlinked to the real sendmail binary, so everything works correctly. > At 09:20 AM 5/19/2003 +0300, you wrote: > >On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 10:48:21PM -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > >> For the last few system builds, I've noticed that the variable in > >> /etc/make.conf NO_MAILWRAPPER=3Dtrue is being ignored, resulting in my > >> sendmail (different than stock version) being overwritten. > >> > >> This applies to 4.8-STABLE; is this a known issue. > >> > >Could you please be more specific? NO_MAILWRAPPER controls > >the mailwrapper(8), and is not to sendmail(8) installation. > >If NO_MAILWRAPPER is set, the mailwrapper is just a > >symlink to /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail. > > > >So, what do you see broken here? --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+yKJCUkv4P6juNwoRArtVAJ92W9la4KTlexkXE/9XBzuuUFF33wCfa7Sm aVtTYSL53PieIb8ZsMY0s8E= =aQI/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 02:42:46 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DD837B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 02:42:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-75-172.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.75.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9D443FA3 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 02:42:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBFD66B9B; Mon, 19 May 2003 02:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9F7A3443; Mon, 19 May 2003 02:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 02:42:45 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Gianmarco Giovannelli Message-ID: <20030519094245.GA3918@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519082230.02c55e00@194.184.65.4> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519082230.02c55e00@194.184.65.4> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: esperti@gufi.org Subject: Re: pkg_add -r broke pkg info ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 09:42:46 -0000 --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:26:49AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: > But now when I do a pkg_info I get : >=20 > lifebook:/home/gmarco# pkg_info -Ia > Mesa-3.4.2_2 A\ graphics\ library\ similar\ to\ SGI\'s\=20 This is a known problem with a recent bsd.port.mk commit. lioux is working on fixing it. Kris --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+yKcVWry0BWjoQKURAjnwAKDhR1dbrTn0TvxBl5/u/Y5yzF1ruQCbBwGc 3cJDXvdmqx9RsYlqcaAeJ+E= =9oPd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 03:00:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3F437B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postit.adam.com.au (postit.adam.com.au [203.2.124.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C3143F75 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:00:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bastill@adam.com.au) Received: from lightning.adam.com.au (lightning.adam.com.au [203.2.124.20]) by postit.adam.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h4JA2b26034515 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 19:32:38 +0930 (CST) Received: (qmail 35031 invoked from network); 19 May 2003 10:00:34 -0000 Received: from 202-6-151-210.ip.adam.com.au (HELO BAPhD.gihon.org.au) (202.6.151.210) by eden.adam.com.au with SMTP; 19 May 2003 10:00:34 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Brian Astill To: Kris Kennaway , Gianmarco Giovannelli Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 19:31:27 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519082230.02c55e00@194.184.65.4> <20030519094245.GA3918@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030519094245.GA3918@rot13.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200305191931.27254.bastill@adam.com.au> cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_add -r broke pkg info ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:00:39 -0000 On Mon, 19 May 2003 07:12 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:26:49AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: > > But now when I do a pkg_info I get : > > > > lifebook:/home/gmarco# pkg_info -Ia > > Mesa-3.4.2_2 A\ graphics\ library\ similar\ to\ SGI\'s\ > > This is a known problem with a recent bsd.port.mk commit. lioux is > working on fixing it. Does this mean we shouldn't download/build/install ports until this=20 problem is fixed? --=20 Regards, Brian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 03:11:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3377337B401; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:11:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heechee.tobez.org (port485.ds1-ry.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.233.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF5D43FA3; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:11:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tobez@tobez.org) Received: by heechee.tobez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DDCF7175D0; Mon, 19 May 2003 12:11:45 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 12:11:45 +0200 From: Anton Berezin To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Message-ID: <20030519101145.GD78833@heechee.tobez.org> Mail-Followup-To: Anton Berezin , Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Doug Barton , stable@freebsd.org References: <20030516001541.U656@znfgre.qbhto.arg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: Doug Barton Subject: Re: Perl version in -STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:11:50 -0000 On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 10:02:06AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Doug Barton writes: > > I also think that this change would break faith with those users of > > RELENG_4 that were promised that the perl in that branch would never be > > upgraded. We don't even HAVE a 5.005_03 port, so those who depend on it > > would be left in the dust. > > Those people are better served with running a security branch, where > Perl will never be updated. Personally I agree with one of the opinions in this thread regarding the increasing amount of attention it requires to maintain perl-using ports to work with three different versions of perl (if this is at all possible). I would not like to see the base system perl updated, though. And the reason for that is that to me (some will differ with me here), the winning argument in favor of perl removal from 5.X was that perl's build process does not fit well into FreeBSD's build process and the consequent difficulty of base system perl upgrades. I can see the following alternatives to your suggestion: 1. Do nothing. It *is* likely that the ports will drop 4.X support in three/four months, however long 4.X is going to be with us. In this case we simply won't care. 2. *Remove* perl from 4.X. I could live with that. This will require sysinstall change to install perl package by default. 3. Make lang/perl5* to `use.perl port' automatically on 4.X (it already does that on 5.X). This will also require sysinstall change to install perl package by default. My priorities would be 1, 3, 2, 0, where 0 is your suggestion to update system perl to 5.6. As a side note, I don't really understand how people can use 5.8.0 in production. The inability to manually dispatch pending signals in XS code, combined with the current implementation of reliable signals is a single showstopper. 5.8.1 will fix that, and it is going to happen soon. Cheers, \Anton. -- You shouldn't be intimidated by this issue at all, since Perl is your friend. -- Apache mod_perl guide From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 03:31:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A14537B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:31:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heechee.tobez.org (port485.ds1-ry.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.233.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08DC43F93 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:31:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tobez@tobez.org) Received: by heechee.tobez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D09C3175D1; Mon, 19 May 2003 12:31:54 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 12:31:54 +0200 From: Anton Berezin To: Forrest Aldrich Message-ID: <20030519103154.GA80665@heechee.tobez.org> Mail-Followup-To: Anton Berezin , Forrest Aldrich , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519011055.0201b698@192.168.1.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519011055.0201b698@192.168.1.1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New system build overwrites perl modules? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:31:57 -0000 On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 01:12:16AM -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > I've had a problem with 4.8-STABLE whereby a new system build/install > appears to nudge out the module File::Spec (perhaps others), which I > usually have to reinstall every time. I'm curious about what's > happening here, why, etc. Do you install File::Spec from ports? Do you use lang/perl5 port? \Anton. -- You shouldn't be intimidated by this issue at all, since Perl is your friend. -- Apache mod_perl guide From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 03:52:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755EE37B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-75-172.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.75.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EE843FBF for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:52:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A2D66B9B; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:52:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 127D7506; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:52:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 03:52:16 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Gianmarco Giovannelli Message-ID: <20030519105215.GA4451@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519082230.02c55e00@194.184.65.4> <20030519094245.GA3918@rot13.obsecurity.org> <200305181154.07839.gmarco@gimbo.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200305181154.07839.gmarco@gimbo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: esperti@gufi.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: pkg_add -r broke pkg info ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:52:17 -0000 --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 11:54:07AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: > On Monday 19 May 2003 11:42, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:26:49AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: > > > But now when I do a pkg_info I get : > > > > > > lifebook:/home/gmarco# pkg_info -Ia > > > Mesa-3.4.2_2 A\ graphics\ library\ similar\ to\ SGI\'s\ > > > > This is a known problem with a recent bsd.port.mk commit. lioux is > > working on fixing it. >=20 > In the meantime may I fix in any way ? You could revert your ports collection to before that commit. Kris --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+yLdfWry0BWjoQKURAsGQAJ9xIkjUF9sFNkN8YJAOlcfb8yz7/QCg1Y4c napprBczvObf0N8abgkl1pY= =kW8t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --liOOAslEiF7prFVr-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 03:53:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C41537B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:53:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-115-75-172.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.115.75.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B233843F75 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:53:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653A866BE5; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:53:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 443B9506; Mon, 19 May 2003 03:53:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 03:53:43 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Brian Astill Message-ID: <20030519105343.GC4451@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519082230.02c55e00@194.184.65.4> <20030519094245.GA3918@rot13.obsecurity.org> <200305191931.27254.bastill@adam.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200305191931.27254.bastill@adam.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: Gianmarco Giovannelli cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: pkg_add -r broke pkg info ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 10:53:44 -0000 --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 07:31:27PM +0930, Brian Astill wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2003 07:12 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:26:49AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: > > > But now when I do a pkg_info I get : > > > > > > lifebook:/home/gmarco# pkg_info -Ia > > > Mesa-3.4.2_2 A\ graphics\ library\ similar\ to\ SGI\'s\ > > > > This is a known problem with a recent bsd.port.mk commit. lioux is > > working on fixing it. >=20 > Does this mean we shouldn't download/build/install ports until this=20 > problem is fixed? No, the problem is purely cosmetic. Kris --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+yLe2Wry0BWjoQKURAlq+AJ4g3dR6tLSDABgGxuwBc3yq2VncxACeKs60 1AWqWQfh3/SklhC+ALc/inM= =q+5y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 06:53:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2C037B40B for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 06:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail03.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (mail03.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net [159.134.118.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F71243F85 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 06:53:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from timbo@dansat.data-plan.com) Received: (qmail 17578 messnum 3735159 invoked from network[159.134.166.153/p665.as1.limerick1.eircom.net]); 19 May 2003 13:53:28 -0000 Received: from p665.as1.limerick1.eircom.net (HELO dansat.data-plan.com) (159.134.166.153) by mail03.svc.cra.dublin.eircom.net (qp 17578) with SMTP; 19 May 2003 13:53:28 -0000 Received: from dansat.data-plan.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dansat.data-plan.com (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4JDrT2f016087 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 14:53:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from timbo@dansat.data-plan.com) Received: (from timbo@localhost) by dansat.data-plan.com (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h4JDrS6S016086 for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 May 2003 14:53:28 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 14:53:28 +0100 From: Tim Bunce To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030519135328.GJ14999@dansat.data-plan.com> References: <200305151602.20378.wes@softweyr.com> <1053039904.76608.2.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.apk.net> <200305160049.11423.wes@softweyr.com> <20030516214057.GB33461@hal9000.halplant.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030516214057.GB33461@hal9000.halplant.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: Re: Perl version in -STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 13:53:32 -0000 On Fri, May 16, 2003 at 05:40:57PM -0400, Andrew J Caines wrote: > > On Thursday 15 May 2003 16:05, Brandon S. Allbery wrote: > > > On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 19:02, Wes Peters wrote: > > > > Has anyone run a recent -STABLE with Perl 5.6.1 in place of the > > > > system Perl? ... > > > I've been doing that (and more recently 5.8.0) via "use.perl port" on > > > -STABLE for a while now; no problems. > > Likewise for months with 5.6.1 and "use.perl port" on my up-to-date > -STABLE box. No observed problems with the system or any of my ports > [currently 245] which have been updated since then. > > Wes Peters said... > > We've considered jumping straight to 5.8.0; your input helps make that > > decision. > > As for the "bleeding edge vs. stable" argument, I'd consider perl in the > middle ground between bleeding edge and obsolescence. Evidence reported > here shows that obsolescence is setting in and that 5.8 substantially > `works', so I'd say it's much nearer the latter than the former. > > If a perl update in src isn't too hard and doesn't cause any significant > problems which can't be fixed in a reasonable time, then I'm in favour of > an update to whatever most recent version works well (5.8, apparently). perl 5.8.0 has utf8 problems. Some were fixed for the maintenance version of 5.8.0 that went into red hat linux 9, but those that remain have caused problems for people using uft8. At this stage I'd have to recommend perl 5.6.1 over 5.8.0. I'd suggest 5.8.1 (release candidate due in a week or three) is targeted as a future upgrade. Tim. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 07:28:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBCC37B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 07:28:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivoti.terra.com.br (ivoti.terra.com.br [200.176.3.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F2F43F3F for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 07:28:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from smux@terra.com.br) Received: from marova.terra.com.br (marova.terra.com.br [200.176.3.39]) by ivoti.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id A890F40884B for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 11:28:45 -0300 (BRT) Received: from terra.com.br (alegrete.terra.com.br [200.176.3.179]) (authenticated user smux) by marova.terra.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6731A3DC16D for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 11:28:45 -0300 (BRT) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 14:28:45 +0000 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sensitivity: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?smux?=" To: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?freebsd-stable?=" X-XaM3-API-Version: 3.2 R28 (B53 pl3) X-type: 0 X-SenderIP: 200.163.7.216 Subject: Re: counter-strike server in freebsd4-8S X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 14:28:48 -0000 The following error that gives in psychostats is this: =0D=0A=0D=0A *FATA= L* 05-18-2003 : 23:24:32 - Error opening log directory: /extra/gamez/hld= s/4fun/cstrike/logs=0D=0A=0D=0Abeing that this folder exists, if he can b= e the problem of the emulator, then I must bring up to date it, the versi= on of the emulator is linux_base-6.1_1=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0Ayou wrote:=0D=0A>= read the error that it gives you and then symlink that pathfile to where= you=0D=0A> auctually want it to log ;) It IS a problem with the emulator= looking for=0D=0A> folders that dont exist.=0D=0A> =0D=0A> =0D=0A> =0D=0A= > Regards,=0D=0A> Nick H.=0D=0A> Level II Technical Support Engineer=0D=0A= > nickh@supportteam.net=0D=0A> =0D=0A> Please rate my performance! http:/= /www.supportteam.net/rate.php3=0D=0A> Please submit all new support reque= sts to=0D=0A> http://ticketmonster.hostingsupport.com/=0D=0A> =0D=0A> ---= ----------------------------------------=0D=0A> Privileged/Confidential I= nformation may be contained in this message. If=0D=0A> you are not the ad= dressee indicated in this message (or responsible for=0D=0A> delivery of = the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this=0D=0A> mess= age to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly=0D= =0A> notify the sender by reply email. Please advise immediately if you o= r your=0D=0A> employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of t= his kind.=0D=0A> Opinions, conclusions and other information in this mess= age that do not=0D=0A> relate to the official business of my firm shall b= e understood as neither=0D=0A> given nor endorsed by it.=0D=0A> =0D=0A> -= ---- Original Message -----=0D=0A> From: "smux" =0D=0A> To: "freebsd-stab= le" =0D=0A> Sent: Sunday, May 18, 2003 5:41 PM=0D=0A> Subject: counter-st= rike server in freebsd4-8S=0D=0A> =0D=0A> =0D=0A> : hi all,=0D=0A> : I am= try some problems with cs server in mine freebsd4.8S, the error I am=0D=0A= > the following one: all time that I initiate the server of cs says an er= ror=0D=0A> that is not possible to record logs, would be a conflict of ve= rsion with the=0D=0A> emulator of linux? I am thankful since now!=0D=0A> = : _______________________________________________=0D=0A> : freebsd-stable= @freebsd.org mailing list=0D=0A> : http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listi= nfo/freebsd-stable=0D=0A> : To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sta= ble-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0D=0A> =0D=0A> =0D=0A> =0D=0A> From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 08:21:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA1037B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vorbis.noc.easynet.net (vorbis.noc.easynet.net [195.40.1.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDE443F75 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:21:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chrisy@vorbis.noc.easynet.net) Received: from chrisy by vorbis.noc.easynet.net with local (Exim 4.10) id 19HmSC-000EId-00; Mon, 19 May 2003 16:21:32 +0100 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 16:21:32 +0100 From: Chris Luke To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030519152132.GA54382@flix.net> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Luke , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: The Flirble Internet Exchange X-URL: http://www.flix.net/ X-FTP: ftp://ftp.flirble.org/ Sender: Chris Luke Subject: Boot problem HP/Compaq DL360 G3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 15:21:34 -0000 The machine in question is a DL360 G3 R03 Xeon DP 3060-512/533 (part number: 322471-421). It's the first HP-branded model we've had so far (previously all Compaq branded). It has 1Gb of memory and a couple of drives on the on-board SCSI controller (setup for mirroring in the SCSI bios). No SMP is setup right now (doesn't get far enough to do anything with it!). In any case, this happens on boxes with a single processor. The bootstrap fails - appears to get as far as starting the FICL interpreter and then dumps the register contents to console and stops. A screen dump of the console (from ilo/lightsout/rsc) is at http://www.flirble.org/chrisy/images/Random/DL360G3.jpg It does exactly this booting from floppy or cdrom, on STABLE, CURRENT and various flavours of 4.x-RELEASE. The dump was from a 4.8 boot floppy. I've had no joy trying to work out where the eip pointed to in the code at the point of departure. Does anybody have any ideas? Linux succeeds in booting, and is what this machine is now running. There's no obvious tweaks in the BIOS config that seem relevant, but we did for instance disable PXE everywhere and tweaked most other things in vain hope. Disabling the on-board SCSI doesn't help either. Regards, Chris. -- == chrisy@flix.net From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 08:29:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0025A37B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vorbis.noc.easynet.net (vorbis.noc.easynet.net [195.40.1.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600B743F3F for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:29:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chrisy@vorbis.noc.easynet.net) Received: from chrisy by vorbis.noc.easynet.net with local (Exim 4.10) id 19HmZg-000EMn-00; Mon, 19 May 2003 16:29:16 +0100 Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 16:29:16 +0100 From: Chris Luke To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030519152916.GA55188@flirble.org> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Luke , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20030519152132.GA54382@flix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030519152132.GA54382@flix.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: The Flirble Organisation X-URL: http://www.flirble.org/ X-FTP: ftp://ftp.flirble.org/ Sender: Chris Luke Subject: Re: Boot problem HP/Compaq DL360 G3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 15:29:18 -0000 Scrap that. Disabling "Virtual boot device" under advanced options in the BIOS appears to have resolved the issue. I hate it when I resolve stuff 5 seconds after asking about it on a list. :) Chris. Chris Luke wrote (on May 19): > The machine in question is a DL360 G3 R03 Xeon DP 3060-512/533 (part > number: 322471-421). It's the first HP-branded model we've had so > far (previously all Compaq branded). It has 1Gb of memory and > a couple of drives on the on-board SCSI controller (setup for > mirroring in the SCSI bios). No SMP is setup right now (doesn't > get far enough to do anything with it!). In any case, this happens > on boxes with a single processor. > -- == chrisy@flirble.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 08:33:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3764537B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from isber.ucsb.edu (research.isber.ucsb.edu [128.111.147.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4DC43F75 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:33:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from randall@ucsb.edu) Received: from casino.isber.ucsb.edu ([128.111.147.11] helo=casino) by isber.ucsb.edu with esmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.36 #2) id 19HmdI-000Doh-00; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:33:00 -0700 Message-ID: <013801c31e1b$ee0c4e40$0b936f80@net.isber.ucsb.edu> From: "randall s. ehren" To: "Anton Berezin" , "Forrest Aldrich" References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519011055.0201b698@192.168.1.1> <20030519103154.GA80665@heechee.tobez.org> Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 08:33:00 -0700 Organization: ISBER MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Scanner: exiscan *19HmdI-000Doh-00*OAUfI4fqzas* (ISBER - Institute for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Research) cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New system build overwrites perl modules? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 15:33:09 -0000 > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 01:12:16AM -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > > I've had a problem with 4.8-STABLE whereby a new system build/install > > appears to nudge out the module File::Spec (perhaps others), which I > > usually have to reinstall every time. I'm curious about what's > > happening here, why, etc. > > Do you install File::Spec from ports? > Do you use lang/perl5 port? same thing happened to me, i installed File::Spec from CPAN, which hasn't been a problem in previous upgrades. -randall From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 08:44:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3007637B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:44:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from steeltoe.niceboots.com (steeltoe.niceboots.com [66.117.154.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBED43FB1 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:44:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tenebrae_BSD@niceboots.com) Received: from steeltoe.niceboots.com (tenebrae@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h4JFgLEx046799; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:42:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tenebrae_BSD@niceboots.com) Received: from localhost (tenebrae@localhost)h4JFgLLX046796; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:42:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: steeltoe.niceboots.com: tenebrae owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 08:42:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Tenebrae X-X-Sender: tenebrae@steeltoe.niceboots.com To: Dan Langille In-Reply-To: <3EC80214.5515.7DA30AAB@localhost> Message-ID: <20030519083626.B46730@steeltoe.niceboots.com> References: <3EC80214.5515.7DA30AAB@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ad0: READ command timeout.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 15:44:04 -0000 On Sun, 18 May 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > This morning I found a frozen box. On the console was this: > > ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > ata0: resetting devices .. ata0-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded > done > > After reboot, those messages were found in /var/log/messages. > > I'm running FreeBSD 4.8-RC from Apr 4 10:45:49 EST 2003. > > Any ideas? Hey dvl, I've had similar problems. This has come up a few times on the mailing list in the past, especially regarding certain lines of IBM drives. Suggestions include replacing your IDE cable, making sure it's not longer than 18 inches...and replacing the drive as it's probably on its last leg. Back it up while you can. -Tenebrae. --- The sending of any unsolicited email advertising messages to this domain may result in the imposition of civil liability against you in accordance with Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Section 17538.45. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 08:52:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C289F37B413 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:52:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bast.unixathome.org (bast.unixathome.org [66.11.174.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C4843FCB for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 08:52:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.unixathome.org [192.168.0.99]) by bast.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775183D28; Mon, 19 May 2003 11:52:47 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Langille" To: Tenebrae Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 11:52:47 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <3EC8C58F.31591.809EB050@localhost> Priority: normal References: <3EC80214.5515.7DA30AAB@localhost> In-reply-to: <20030519083626.B46730@steeltoe.niceboots.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ad0: READ command timeout.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 15:52:50 -0000 On 19 May 2003 at 8:42, Tenebrae wrote: > On Sun, 18 May 2003, Dan Langille wrote: > > > This morning I found a frozen box. On the console was this: > > > > ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting > > ata0: resetting devices .. ata0-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded > > done > > > > After reboot, those messages were found in /var/log/messages. > > > > I'm running FreeBSD 4.8-RC from Apr 4 10:45:49 EST 2003. > > > > Any ideas? > > Hey dvl, > I've had similar problems. This has come up a few times on the mailing > list in the past, especially regarding certain lines of IBM drives. ad0: 516MB [1049/16/63] at ata0-master PIO3 For what it's worth, it's been in there since the box was put together in November 2000 and this is the first indication of a problem. It's probably getting old. > Suggestions include replacing your IDE cable, making sure it's not longer > than 18 inches...and replacing the drive as it's probably on its last leg. > Back it up while you can. Luckily, it's not really an important drive (from a data point of view) in this system: $ df | grep ad0 /dev/ad0s1a 99183 50162 41087 55% / /dev/ad0s1e 413695 1 380599 0% /slow I'll get a new drive in there ASAP. I'm glad it's not the SCSI drives which are failing: $ df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 99183 50162 41087 55% / /dev/da1s1f 17130052 15553651 205997 99% /home /dev/ad0s1e 413695 1 380599 0% /slow /dev/da0s1e 17130052 10675758 5083890 68% /usr /dev/da1s1e 254063 156203 77535 67% /var procfs 4 4 0 100% /pro -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 09:53:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960AD37B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 09:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heechee.tobez.org (port485.ds1-ry.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.233.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F1C43FA3 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 09:53:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tobez@tobez.org) Received: by heechee.tobez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A08C0175D0; Mon, 19 May 2003 18:53:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 18:53:05 +0200 From: Anton Berezin To: "randall s. ehren" Message-ID: <20030519165305.GA86282@heechee.tobez.org> Mail-Followup-To: Anton Berezin , "randall s. ehren" , Forrest Aldrich , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519011055.0201b698@192.168.1.1> <20030519103154.GA80665@heechee.tobez.org> <013801c31e1b$ee0c4e40$0b936f80@net.isber.ucsb.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <013801c31e1b$ee0c4e40$0b936f80@net.isber.ucsb.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i cc: Forrest Aldrich cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New system build overwrites perl modules? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 16:53:10 -0000 On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 08:33:00AM -0700, randall s. ehren wrote: > > On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 01:12:16AM -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > > > I've had a problem with 4.8-STABLE whereby a new system build/install > > > appears to nudge out the module File::Spec (perhaps others), which I > > > usually have to reinstall every time. I'm curious about what's > > > happening here, why, etc. > > > > Do you install File::Spec from ports? > > Do you use lang/perl5 port? > > same thing happened to me, i installed File::Spec from CPAN, which hasn't > been a problem in previous upgrades. Well. If you were to use perl port and install File::Spec from CPAN, you'd be safe. If you were to use base system perl and install File::Spec from the ports (devel/p5-File-Spec), you'd be safe. Needless to say, you'd be safe to use both perl port and File::Spec from the ports. As it is now, base system perl does not provide the protection from the modules which insist on setting INSTALLDIRS => 'perl' in their Makefile.PL. If you use the port, this protection is provided by the ports maintainer. If you use perl from ports, this protection is provided by BSDPAN, which is not present in the base system perl. Apart from the two workarounds I mentioned, the third one is to set NOPERL=yes in your /etc/make.conf, so that buildworld/installworld process will not overwrite existing perl installation. Cheers, \Anton. -- You shouldn't be intimidated by this issue at all, since Perl is your friend. -- Apache mod_perl guide From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 10:24:08 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF3537B413; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:24:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3A743F75; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:24:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4JHO0sp025758; Mon, 19 May 2003 21:24:00 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 21:24:00 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20030516111440.GA517@sunbay.com> Message-ID: <20030519212320.R22315@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <1053081121.658.23005.camel@pcgm3> <20030516103616.GA11381@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030516111440.GA517@sunbay.com> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Gerard Milhaud cc: Kris Kennaway cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Subject: Re: Help please : make buildworld fails when upgrading to 4.8 stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:24:08 -0000 On Fri, 16 May 2003, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: RE> > > > cd /usr/src RE> > > > make cleandir RE> > > > make cleandir RE> > > It's so much easier and faster to just trash the entire /usr/obj. RE> > RE> > That won't remove trash that might have snuck into the source tree. RE> > The recommended procedure is 'make cleandir ; make cleandir'. RE> > RE> Oops, right. Hot day here. ;) RE> RE> In that case, a slight optimization to the above is still: RE> ``cd /usr/src; rm -rf /usr/obj/usr/src; make cleandir''. ... unless /usr/src is linked somewhere. ``cd /usr/src; rm -rf /usr/obj/*; make cleandir'' should work, though. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 10:54:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5886E37B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4C043F75 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 10:54:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h4JHsLEd071544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 May 2003 20:54:22 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@whale.sunbay.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id h4JHsKPV071543; Mon, 19 May 2003 20:54:20 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 20:54:20 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Forrest Aldrich Message-ID: <20030519175420.GD62209@sunbay.com> References: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519125446.02104d40@192.168.1.1> <5.2.1.1.2.20030519051208.021014e8@192.168.1.1> <5.2.1.1.2.20030518224706.020428d8@192.168.1.1> <5.2.1.1.2.20030518224706.020428d8@192.168.1.1> <5.2.1.1.2.20030519051208.021014e8@192.168.1.1> <5.2.1.1.2.20030519125446.02104d40@192.168.1.1> <5.2.1.1.2.20030519133820.02111de8@192.168.1.1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DrWhICOqskFTAXiy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.2.20030519133820.02111de8@192.168.1.1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make buildworld ignoring NO_MAILWRAPPER=true X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:54:52 -0000 --DrWhICOqskFTAXiy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm sending your followup to the list. On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 01:39:25PM -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > Okay, I see where this is my mistake for not installing sendmail in=20 > /usr/libexec/sendmail. >=20 > Sorry about that, and thank you for taking the time to write, etc. >=20 > I'm using 8.11.7, and I've been compiling it on my own. >=20 >=20 > Thank you, > Forrest >=20 >=20 > At 08:29 PM 5/19/2003 +0300, you wrote: > >On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 12:55:36PM -0400, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > >> > >> >Don't get it? mailq, newaliases, etc. are ALWAYS symlinked to=20 > >mailwrapper. > >> >But if NO_MAILWRAPPER is also set, the mailwrapper itself is symlinke= d=20 > >to > >> >the real sendmail binary, so everything works correctly. > >> [ ... ] > >> > >> That was my understanding, but it is not happening on my system > >> (4.8-STABLE), the sendmail binary is being removed and symlinked to > >> mailwrapper. I don't want this to happen, and a few revisions ago th= is > >> wasn't a problem. > >> > >lurker# cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/mailwrapper/ > >lurker# make -DNO_MAILWRAPPER install DESTDIR=3D/tmp/test > >/tmp/test/usr/sbin/sendmail -> /usr/sbin/mailwrapper > >/tmp/test/usr/sbin/hoststat -> /usr/sbin/mailwrapper > >/tmp/test/usr/sbin/purgestat -> /usr/sbin/mailwrapper > >/tmp/test/usr/bin/newaliases -> /usr/sbin/mailwrapper > >/tmp/test/usr/bin/mailq -> /usr/sbin/mailwrapper > >/tmp/test/usr/sbin/mailwrapper -> /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail > > > >If you complaining about /usr/sbin/sendmail being symlinked to > >/usr/sbin/mailwrapper, it's not the real sendmail, the real one > >lives in /usr/libexec/sendmail/sendmail, which the last one > >above does handle. > > > > > >Cheers, > >-- > >Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, > >ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, > >ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, > >+380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine > > > >http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve > >http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age >=20 --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --DrWhICOqskFTAXiy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+yRpMUkv4P6juNwoRAu1sAJsEd6bqWfARGCUwcNQE0BvLJ2TOCACZAbuy M+RxUcnSinXSq5dM4vzGy0c= =e+ol -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DrWhICOqskFTAXiy-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 18:38:48 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3C637B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 18:38:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [199.243.201.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87EBF43FA3 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 18:38:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from don@sandvine.com) Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 19 May 2003 21:38:46 -0400 Message-ID: From: Don Bowman To: "'stable@freebsd.org'" Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 21:38:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Subject: ichsmb SMB, interrupt, SMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 01:38:48 -0000 I have a problem with an SMP 4.7 kernel with ichsmb. My BIOS has not assigned an interrupt, so the kernel does on startup: ichsmb0: port 0x1100-0x111f irq 0 at device 31.3 on pci0 pci_cfgintr_virgin: using routable interrupt 3 pci_cfgintr: 0:31 INTB routed to irq 3 smbus0: on ichsmb0 smb0: on smbus0 however, I don't seem to ever get an interrupt to the ichsmb driver. I'm suspicious of the choice of irq 3 above, that's the edge interrupt for the serial port, not a level PCI interrupt ??? Anybody seen anything similar? Any idea on how to choose a proper interrupt for my system? Interestingly with a non SMP kernel, the ichsmb works, so in the non IO-APIC config a proper irq must be chosen(?) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 19:16:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED9737B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 19:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sundance.wranglers.com.au (sundance.wranglers.com.au [61.88.122.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD4843F3F for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 19:16:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from charles@wranglers.com.au) Received: from feynman (feynman [10.10.0.35])h4K2Bs4U069639 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 12:11:55 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from charles@wranglers.com.au) X-Authentication-Warning: sundance.wranglers.com.au: feynman [10.10.0.35] didn't use HELO protocol From: Charles Young To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: digital Wranglers Message-Id: <1053396987.243.28.camel@feynman> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.3.3 (Preview Release) Date: 20 May 2003 02:16:27 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: fontconfig and FT_Get_BDF_Property X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: charles@wranglers.com.au List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 02:16:37 -0000 Hi all, After upgrading my fontconfig to 2.2.0, fc-cache -vf gives me an error: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libfontconfig.so.1: Undefined symbol "FT_Get_BDF_Property" when it tries to build the cache for non bitmapped fonts. I have: 1. updated my CVS ports tree 2. rebuilt fontconfig, freetype, expat and Xft using portupgrade (portupgrade -frR ) 3. rebuilt my all (portupgrade -afr) and fc-cache still chokes. XFree86-clients, XFree86-fontScalable and several other ports also fail to build with the same error. There is only one copy of libfontconfig.so.1 in ldconfig -r. I'm sure that there is something really obvious, but ... Thanks in advance, Charles sig. removed in the interest of good taste From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 22:33:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8752037B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 22:33:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.evo6.net (mx1.evo6.net [80.76.194.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FD843F3F for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 22:33:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andy@evo6.org) Received: from vx (vx.noc.evo6.net [10.0.1.1]) by mx1.evo6.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h4K5XU7Y069215 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 06:33:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from andy@evo6.org) Message-ID: <000f01c31e91$58b00e10$0101000a@vx> From: "Andy Gilligan" To: Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 06:33:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none version=2.54-evo6.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.54-evo6.net (1.174.2.17-2003-05-11-exp) Subject: 4GB limit with netstat X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 05:33:42 -0000 Hi, Was wondering if there are any plans to update either the kernel structures and/or netstat to show more than 4GB of traffic stats. For example, on a 4.8-STABLE machine: $ netstat -bI sis0 Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Ibytes ... sis0 1500 8789598 0 4103727771 ... This shows that sis0 has received around 3.9GB. Then, after transferring approximately 200MB: $ netstat -bI sis0 Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Ibytes ... sis0 1500 9245518 0 18874368 ... The Ibytes line has dropped from 3.9GB to 18MB. It should of course be 4.1GB. How much would need to change in either the kernel or netstat to make >4GB possible? Best regards - Andy From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 19 23:24:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C3B37B401 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 23:24:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.itga.com.au (ns1.itga.com.au [202.53.40.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BE843F75 for ; Mon, 19 May 2003 23:24:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns1.itga.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4K6O7m2031836; Tue, 20 May 2003 16:24:07 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA20280; Tue, 20 May 2003 16:24:07 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <200305200624.QAA20280@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 05/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Gregory Bond To: "Andy Gilligan" In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 20 May 2003 06:33:29 +0100. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:24:07 +1000 Sender: gnb@itga.com.au cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4GB limit with netstat X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 06:24:26 -0000 andy@evo6.org said: > How much would need to change in either the kernel or netstat to make > > 4GB possible? At the very least: - edit sys/net/if.h & change struct if_data entries to u_int64_t. - edit usr.bin/netstat/if.c intpr() & change variables to be u_int64_t and use %ull in printf strings - redo all the layouts in if.c to handle the wider fields - recompile everything in the entire system - kernel, world, all ports that might look at network interfaces or routing tables, etc - hope that the broken binary compatibility doesn't hurt too bad From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 00:03:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CAA37B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 00:03:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.evo6.net (mx1.evo6.net [80.76.194.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B43C43F75 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 00:03:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andy@evo6.org) Received: from vx (vx.noc.evo6.net [10.0.1.1]) by mx1.evo6.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h4K72rFV097216; Tue, 20 May 2003 08:02:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from andy@evo6.org) Message-ID: <001301c31e9d$d5523860$0101000a@vx> From: "Andy Gilligan" To: "Gregory Bond" References: <200305200624.QAA20280@lightning.itga.com.au> Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 08:02:52 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES version=2.54-evo6.net X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.54-evo6.net (1.174.2.17-2003-05-11-exp) cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4GB limit with netstat X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 07:03:03 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gregory Bond" To: "Andy Gilligan" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 7:24 AM Subject: Re: 4GB limit with netstat > > andy@evo6.org said: > > How much would need to change in either the kernel or netstat to make > > > 4GB possible? > > At the very least: > - edit sys/net/if.h & change struct if_data entries to u_int64_t. > - edit usr.bin/netstat/if.c intpr() & change variables to be u_int64_t > and use %ull in printf strings > - redo all the layouts in if.c to handle the wider fields > - recompile everything in the entire system - kernel, world, all ports that > might look at network interfaces or routing tables, etc > - hope that the broken binary compatibility doesn't hurt too bad I expected it might break a few things :) On that basis, I imagine it will be a long time before these changes will happen in -STABLE, if at all? On another note, I noticed -CURRENT seems to have the same limit. - Andy From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 04:08:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5DB37B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 04:08:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A5C43FB1 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 04:08:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 9319D530E; Tue, 20 May 2003 13:08:04 +0200 (CEST) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: "Andy Gilligan" References: <200305200624.QAA20280@lightning.itga.com.au> <001301c31e9d$d5523860$0101000a@vx> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 13:08:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <001301c31e9d$d5523860$0101000a@vx> (Andy Gilligan's message of "Tue, 20 May 2003 08:02:52 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: Gregory Bond cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4GB limit with netstat X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 11:08:09 -0000 "Andy Gilligan" writes: > On that basis, I imagine it will be a long time before these changes will > happen in -STABLE, if at all? I think "never" is a safe bet. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 06:09:28 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA01D37B404 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 06:09:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from angelica.unixdaemons.com (angelica.unixdaemons.com [209.148.64.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A689943FE0 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 06:09:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmilekic@unixdaemons.com) Received: from angelica.unixdaemons.com (bmilekic@localhost.unixdaemons.com [127.0.0.1])h4KD9EY9016104; Tue, 20 May 2003 09:09:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from bmilekic@localhost) by angelica.unixdaemons.com (8.12.9/8.12.1/Submit) id h4KD9B6a016101; Tue, 20 May 2003 09:09:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bmilekic@unixdaemons.com) X-Authentication-Warning: angelica.unixdaemons.com: bmilekic set sender to bmilekic@unixdaemons.com using -f Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 09:09:11 -0400 From: Bosko Milekic To: Andy Gilligan Message-ID: <20030520130911.GB14649@unixdaemons.com> References: <200305200624.QAA20280@lightning.itga.com.au> <001301c31e9d$d5523860$0101000a@vx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001301c31e9d$d5523860$0101000a@vx> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Gregory Bond cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4GB limit with netstat X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 13:09:29 -0000 If you're willing to do them and roll a patch, I would be willing to look at it and commit it, barring objections, of course. -Bosko On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:02:52AM +0100, Andy Gilligan wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gregory Bond" > To: "Andy Gilligan" > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 7:24 AM > Subject: Re: 4GB limit with netstat > > > > > andy@evo6.org said: > > > How much would need to change in either the kernel or netstat to make > > > > 4GB possible? > > > > At the very least: > > - edit sys/net/if.h & change struct if_data entries to u_int64_t. > > - edit usr.bin/netstat/if.c intpr() & change variables to be u_int64_t > > and use %ull in printf strings > > - redo all the layouts in if.c to handle the wider fields > > - recompile everything in the entire system - kernel, world, all ports that > > might look at network interfaces or routing tables, etc > > - hope that the broken binary compatibility doesn't hurt too bad > > I expected it might break a few things :) > > On that basis, I imagine it will be a long time before these changes will > happen in -STABLE, if at all? > > On another note, I noticed -CURRENT seems to have the same limit. > > - > Andy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Bosko Milekic bmilekic@unixdaemons.com bmilekic@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 08:50:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9456F37B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 08:50:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pop016.verizon.net (pop016pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C5243F93 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 08:50:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com ([129.44.60.214]) by pop016.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.05.33 201-253-122-126-133-20030313) with ESMTP id <20030520155043.ZEVK3199.pop016.verizon.net@mac.com> for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 10:50:43 -0500 Message-ID: <3ECA4ED0.8030709@mac.com> Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 11:50:40 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030507 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <200305200624.QAA20280@lightning.itga.com.au> <001301c31e9d$d5523860$0101000a@vx> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.75.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at pop016.verizon.net from [129.44.60.214] at Tue, 20 May 2003 10:50:43 -0500 Subject: Re: 4GB limit with netstat X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 15:50:45 -0000 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: [ ... ] > I think "never" is a safe bet. It's hard to change the existing if_data structure without breaking things, understood. However, there are still some things that could be done to make the situation better, I think. One would be to test for overflow when incrementing the counters and at least log (via the kernel message buffer) when a counter value has wrapped. This should be easy to do, relatively cheap in terms of overhead-- most architectures have a conditional branch on the V flag-- and would be helpful for quantifying how frequently this situation happens. It might be reasonable to do something like zero all of the counters when overflow happens (logging their values to dmesg, first), so that their relative values remain meaningful for the sake of comparision. And if the old stats are logged, it would be possible to accumulate those entries in a program using 64-bit counters and obtain the complete stats if one needed to. Or one could even keep track of the number of times a 32-bit counter has overflowed, which suspiciously resembles keeping the high bits of a 64-bit counter in a second 32-bit value, which could then be appended to the end of (struct if_data) without breaking backwards compatibility. ifi_ibytes_msb and ifi_obytes_msb...? While I'm thinking about it, is there a reason why nobody seems to put a version # into structures? -Chuck From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 09:08:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9CD37B408 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 09:08:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B3043F93 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 09:08:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158])h4KG5ZNK020174; Tue, 20 May 2003 12:05:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com (vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4])h4KG6wrT065218; Tue, 20 May 2003 12:06:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) X-Authentication-Warning: creme-brulee.marcuscom.com: vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4] didn't use HELO protocol From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: charles@wranglers.com.au In-Reply-To: <1053396987.243.28.camel@feynman> References: <1053396987.243.28.camel@feynman> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-IL0EtOP71KIa5pDLgJqm" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1053446872.317.5.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.3.3 (Preview Release) Date: 20 May 2003 12:07:52 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-39.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fontconfig and FT_Get_BDF_Property X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:08:06 -0000 --=-IL0EtOP71KIa5pDLgJqm Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 22:16, Charles Young wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > After upgrading my fontconfig to 2.2.0, fc-cache -vf gives me an error: > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libfontconfig.so.1: Undefined > symbol "FT_Get_BDF_Property" when it tries to build the cache for non > bitmapped fonts.=20 >=20 > I have: >=20 > 1. updated my CVS ports tree > 2. rebuilt fontconfig, freetype, expat and Xft using portupgrade > (portupgrade -frR ) > 3. rebuilt my all (portupgrade -afr) >=20 > and fc-cache still chokes. >=20 > XFree86-clients, XFree86-fontScalable and several other ports also fail > to build with the same error. >=20 > There is only one copy of libfontconfig.so.1 in ldconfig -r. >=20 > I'm sure that there is something really obvious, but ... Did you update freetype2, then rebuild fontconfig and Xft in that order? Joe >=20 > Thanks in advance, > Charles >=20 > sig. removed in the interest of good taste >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-IL0EtOP71KIa5pDLgJqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+ylLYb2iPiv4Uz4cRAq4mAJ9eXXMuqMLnyTjTf15O80mAwshNVgCfdSKa 3qZTGnJ6zWifqz8zOANiiyc= =yByf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-IL0EtOP71KIa5pDLgJqm-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 09:24:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00CE37B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 09:24:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blueyonder.co.uk (pcow058o.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.53.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B532143F93 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 09:24:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave_bradshaw@blueyonder.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([62.30.130.21]) by blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75); Tue, 20 May 2003 17:24:03 +0100 From: Dave Bradshaw To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Wn76xgtLWgoRZ+tOjkfi" Organization: Message-Id: <1053447987.277.20.camel@saturn.bradshaw.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 20 May 2003 17:26:27 +0100 Subject: Gnome Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:24:04 -0000 --=-Wn76xgtLWgoRZ+tOjkfi Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear All, This is probably not the place for this but the gnome people have not answered. Last weekend I upgraded to 4.8 stable, since then every time I or the family log out of Gnome we just end up with a black screen as if the system has lost contact with the terminal, leaving the system in a useless state. This then results in the system having to be powered off, though this is sometimes locked and I need to pull the power cord out the back. I am running Gnome 1.4. All was working fine prior to the upgrade. Has anyone else experienced this and resolved the problem? I then thought maybe I should upgrade Gnome to Gnome 2. I followed the instructions on the Gnome site with regards to upgrading from 1.4 to 2.=20 Though when I run make install form the Gnome2 directory in /usr/ports this works fine until it tries to install Nautilus2 and fails with a libxml conflict though running portupgrade I get an =3D sign for both libxml and libxml2, so I assume I have the latest versions. If anybody is able to help or require more information I can supply them with a list of packages installed on my system and the nautilus2-config.log that was created.=20 Thanks in advance, Regards, Dave. --=-Wn76xgtLWgoRZ+tOjkfi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+ylczn6/gJymJ42gRAmQVAJ0Z2194nj53mgDNru0OesFxJwfUOwCfe8WR rh/WmwJbTPoUEcnJCWK3Xhs= =4ROQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Wn76xgtLWgoRZ+tOjkfi-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 09:46:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB7837B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 09:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Shenton.org (23.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA38143F75 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 09:46:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chris@Shenton.Org) Received: (qmail 49850 invoked by uid 1000); 20 May 2003 16:46:23 -0000 To: Marc Schneiders References: <20030517002507.I6842-100000@voo.doo.net> From: Chris Shenton Date: 20 May 2003 12:46:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20030517002507.I6842-100000@voo.doo.net> Message-ID: <87brxxlg68.fsf@Pectopah.shenton.org> Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Via EPIA Mini-ITX motherboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 16:46:27 -0000 Marc Schneiders writes: > Is it actually in the kitchen? And what room is "Pectopah"? In fact, it is in the kitchen. I used to have a Sun IPX which I ran NetBSD diskless but it became too slow. A net-connected box in the kitchen is a real nice thing, for looking up recipes, checking email, sometimes writing code. But it has to be quiet, like an appliance. "PECTOPAH" looks identical to the Cyrillic for the Russian word for "restaurant". Saw a sign that said PECTOPAH when I visited Moscow and after sounding it out, realized it sounded almost like "restaurant". My machine Pectopah is my main server -- get it? restaurant, server... I have a thing about food. :-) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 11:06:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7FA137B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 11:06:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B0343F3F for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 11:06:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158])h4KI3cNK005730; Tue, 20 May 2003 14:03:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com (vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4])h4KI4xrT065927; Tue, 20 May 2003 14:04:59 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) X-Authentication-Warning: creme-brulee.marcuscom.com: vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4] didn't use HELO protocol From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Dave Bradshaw In-Reply-To: <1053447987.277.20.camel@saturn.bradshaw.home> References: <1053447987.277.20.camel@saturn.bradshaw.home> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-n3fMMMuL4wi90F6qBbAw" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1053453953.317.26.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.3.3 (Preview Release) Date: 20 May 2003 14:05:53 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-39.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES autolearn=ham version=2.53 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 18:06:08 -0000 --=-n3fMMMuL4wi90F6qBbAw Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2003-05-20 at 12:26, Dave Bradshaw wrote: > Dear All, >=20 > This is probably not the place for this but the gnome people have not > answered. To whom did you send the email? When? > Last weekend I upgraded to 4.8 stable, since then every time I or the > family log out of Gnome we just end up with a black screen as if the > system has lost contact with the terminal, leaving the system in a > useless state. This then results in the system having to be powered > off, though this is sometimes locked and I need to pull the power cord > out the back. I am running Gnome 1.4. All was working fine prior to the > upgrade. How are you logging into GNOME? Are you using gdm or startx? >=20 > Has anyone else experienced this and resolved the problem? No. My GNOME 1.4 -STABLE machine works fine. I use gdm from /etc/ttys to login to GNOME. >=20 > I then thought maybe I should upgrade Gnome to Gnome 2. I followed the > instructions on the Gnome site with regards to upgrading from 1.4 to 2.=20 > Though when I run make install form the Gnome2 directory in /usr/ports > this works fine until it tries to install Nautilus2 and fails with a > libxml conflict though running portupgrade I get an =3D sign for both > libxml and libxml2, so I assume I have the latest versions. Can you send exact details of this "libxml conflict?" >=20 > If anybody is able to help or require more information I can supply them > with a list of packages installed on my system and the > nautilus2-config.log that was created.=20 That and the output of the build would be helpful. Joe >=20 > Thanks in advance, >=20 > Regards, >=20 >=20 > Dave. --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-n3fMMMuL4wi90F6qBbAw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA+ym6Bb2iPiv4Uz4cRAnE0AJ48XVURslFdZpaXPzO0KBTUrDnE4wCcDc0+ RRTFacCI+6ZXeYMR9cT1vjE= =7C4e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-n3fMMMuL4wi90F6qBbAw-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 12:30:20 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6698037B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 12:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.takas.lt (mail-src.takas.lt [212.59.31.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0246C43FAF for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 12:30:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from razzmatazz@mail.lt) Received: from midway.tamsa ([213.190.36.209]) by mail.takas.lt with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Tue, 20 May 2003 22:30:17 +0300 Received: from highland.tamsa ([10.0.1.1] helo=highland) by midway.tamsa with smtp (Exim 4.20) id 19IDku-0000CA-Et for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 May 2003 22:30:40 +0200 From: Saulius Menkevièius To: X-Mailer: PocoMail 2.6 (1006) - Licensed Version Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 22:33:47 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 May 2003 19:30:17.0843 (UTC) FILETIME=[3EAF0C30:01C31F06] Subject: lots of sockets in TIME_WAIT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:30:20 -0000 =09Hi there, I have some DDOS(?) attack on my router going where my apache= HTTP server is flooded with short-timed connections from some host.= This results in LOTS of sockets in TIME_WAIT/LAST_ACK/CLOSING states= and eventually I'm out of mbufs, which, consequently means I can't= even connect to the router from LAN. The kern.ipc.nmbclusters is 2560,= (I guess high enough for router with DSL connection). =09After some time all mbufs are depleted (system says "All mbuf cluster exhausted"). However, unexpectedly the system panics= shortly in about 10 minutes (+/-) with: /kernel: All mbuf cluster exhausted, please see tuning(7) /kernel: looutput: mbuf allocation failed /kernel: panic: sbappendaddr /kernel: /kernel: syncing disks.... . . =09I don't think this behaviour (a panic) is normal. This crash is= happens often when I'm under such attack and I guess I can easily= give crash dump, kgdb output or something like, if you need. =09System is running 4.8-RELEASE, on iPentium166/mmx with 64MB of= RAM. 4 NICs, BRIDGE on two of them. =09Thanks for any response.. P.S. (is there some sysctl oid for setting TIME_WAIT duration?) -- Saulius Menkevicius, razzmatazz@mail.lt on 05.20.2003 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 13:18:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E4D37B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 13:18:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC37E43F93 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 13:18:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 93AB972FDC; Tue, 20 May 2003 13:18:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9250F72FD1; Tue, 20 May 2003 13:18:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 13:18:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: =?X-UNKNOWN?Q?Saulius_Menkevi=E8ius?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20030520131538.M9634@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lots of sockets in TIME_WAIT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 20:18:05 -0000 On Tue, 20 May 2003, Saulius Menkevi=E8ius wrote: > I have some DDOS(?) attack on my router going where my apache HTTP > server is flooded with short-timed connections from some host. This > results in LOTS of sockets in TIME_WAIT/LAST_ACK/CLOSING states and > eventually I'm out of mbufs, which, consequently means I can't even > connect to the router from LAN. The kern.ipc.nmbclusters is 2560, (I > guess high enough for router with DSL connection). TIME_WAIT is normal for a server. LAST_ACK/CLOSING looks like packet loss. Is your outbound link overloaded normally, or from the DoS? Can you block the host? :) > =09After some time all mbufs are depleted (system says "All mbuf > cluster exhausted"). However, unexpectedly the system panics shortly > in about 10 minutes (+/-) with: Then increase the mbufs & clusters. Did you read the tuning man page? --=20 Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 13:41:53 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB2437B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 13:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jet.kar.net (jet.kar.net [195.178.131.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889CD43F75 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 13:41:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from r0land@r0land.kiev.ua) Received: from pepelac (developex.kar.net [195.178.133.26]) by jet.kar.net (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with SMTP id h4KKfbg76522; Tue, 20 May 2003 23:41:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from r0land@r0land.kiev.ua) Message-ID: <053601c31f10$895235f0$8300a8c0@pepelac> From: "Maksym Shevchenko" To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Saulius_Menkevi=E8ius?= , References: Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 23:43:57 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 FL-Build: Fidolook Express 2000 UIExt. BuildID: 3BC00FAD (7/10/2001 11:17:49). Subject: Re: lots of sockets in TIME_WAIT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maksym Shevchenko List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 20:41:54 -0000 Hello, Saulius! You wrote to on Tue, 20 May 2003 22:33:47 +0200: SMi> P.S. (is there some sysctl oid for setting TIME_WAIT duration?) "TIME_WAIT duration" = 2 * `sysctl -n net.inet.tcp.msl` The default MSL (maximum segment lifetime) for BSD systems = 30 sec. -- With best regards, Maksym Shevchenko. E-mail: r0land@r0land.kiev.ua From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 14:04:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA8137B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 14:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.takas.lt (mail-src.takas.lt [212.59.31.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D004C43FDD for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 14:04:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from razzmatazz@mail.lt) Received: from midway.tamsa ([213.190.36.209]) by mail.takas.lt with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Wed, 21 May 2003 00:04:42 +0300 Received: from highland.tamsa ([10.0.1.1] helo=highland) by midway.tamsa with smtp (Exim 4.20) id 19IFEH-0000Hg-64 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 May 2003 00:05:05 +0200 From: Saulius Menkevièius To: X-Mailer: PocoMail 2.6 (1006) - Licensed Version Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 00:08:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20030520131538.M9634@carver.gumbysoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 May 2003 21:04:42.0817 (UTC) FILETIME=[6F457B10:01C31F13] Subject: Re: lots of sockets in TIME_WAIT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 21:04:45 -0000 Once Doug White wrote: >On Tue, 20 May 2003, Saulius Menkevi=E8ius wrote: > >>I have some DDOS(?) attack on my router going where my apache= HTTP >>server is flooded with short-timed connections from some host.= This >>results in LOTS of sockets in TIME_WAIT/LAST_ACK/CLOSING states= and >>eventually I'm out of mbufs, which, consequently means I can't= even >>connect to the router from LAN. The kern.ipc.nmbclusters is= 2560, >>(I >>guess high enough for router with DSL connection). > >TIME_WAIT is normal for a server. LAST_ACK/CLOSING looks like packet >loss. Is your outbound link overloaded normally, or from the= DoS? > >Can you block the host? :) > >> After some time all mbufs are depleted (system says "All= mbuf >>cluster exhausted"). However, unexpectedly the system panics >>shortly >>in about 10 minutes (+/-) with: > >Then increase the mbufs & clusters. Did you read the tuning man= page? Ahem, I did increase mbufs, according to man page. But I wonder= why it panics. It shouldn't panic when there are no mbufs free, or= should it ? -- Saulius Menkevi=E8ius, razzmatazz@mail.lt on 05.21.2003 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 16:20:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5A5337B401 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 16:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [199.243.201.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0376943FAF for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 16:20:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from don@sandvine.com) Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 20 May 2003 19:20:44 -0400 Message-ID: From: Don Bowman To: Don Bowman , "'stable@freebsd.org'" Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:20:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: ichsmb SMB, interrupt, SMP X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 23:20:46 -0000 From: Don Bowman [mailto:don@sandvine.com] > > I have a problem with an SMP 4.7 kernel with ichsmb. My > BIOS has not assigned an interrupt, so the kernel does > on startup: > > ichsmb0: port > 0x1100-0x111f irq 0 at > device 31.3 on pci0 > pci_cfgintr_virgin: using routable interrupt 3 > pci_cfgintr: 0:31 INTB routed to irq 3 > smbus0: on ichsmb0 > smb0: on smbus0 After obtaining a BIOS from the vendor which assigns an IRQ (11) to this device, it works properly. In the non-SMP kernel, the interrupt is properly assigned and routed even if the BIOS doesn't. In the SMP kernel, the interrupt assigned doesn't work (never get an interrupt). Does the pci_cfgintr_virgin understand IOAPIC routing? Anybody else seen something similar? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 18:32:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366C037B405 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 18:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.147.156.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653C643FA3 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 18:32:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Received: from workstation.forrie.com (workstation.forrie.net. [192.168.1.21]) by forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com with id h4L1Vsg48187 for ; Tue, 20 May 2003 21:31:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com: Host workstation.forrie.net. [192.168.1.21] claimed to be workstation.forrie.com Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.2.20030520213020.0230c628@192.168.1.1> X-Sender: forrie@192.168.1.1 (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 21:31:54 -0400 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Forrest Aldrich Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.3.0(snapshot 20010925) (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com) X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Package installation (port) problems... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 01:32:03 -0000 Recently, any package I install via the ports collection gets this error: is already installed - perhaps an older version? If so, you may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of imap-uw-2002c1,1 without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. And this is with new packages that have never been installed or new revisions of packages. So, something got corrupted somewhere; just not sure where. I have the pkg tools installed, but ran that to fix and it still happens. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 20 19:04:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A3637B401; Tue, 20 May 2003 19:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0481B43FAF; Tue, 20 May 2003 19:04:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Received: from kuzbass.ru (kost [213.184.65.82])h4L24iYt074282; Wed, 21 May 2003 10:04:44 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru) Message-ID: <3ECADE5C.EC1A2630@kuzbass.ru> Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 10:03:08 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein Organization: SVZServ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Saulius Menkevièius" References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lots of sockets in TIME_WAIT X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 02:04:50 -0000 "Saulius Menkevièius" wrote: > > Hi there, > > I have some DDOS(?) attack on my router going where my apache HTTP > server is flooded with short-timed connections from some host. This > results in LOTS of sockets in TIME_WAIT/LAST_ACK/CLOSING states and > eventually I'm out of mbufs, which, consequently means I can't even > connect to the router from LAN. The kern.ipc.nmbclusters is 2560, (I > guess high enough for router with DSL connection). > After some time all mbufs are depleted (system says "All mbuf > cluster exhausted"). However, unexpectedly the system panics shortly > in about 10 minutes (+/-) with: > /kernel: All mbuf cluster exhausted, please see tuning(7) > /kernel: looutput: mbuf allocation failed > /kernel: panic: sbappendaddr > /kernel: > /kernel: syncing disks.... > . > . > I don't think this behaviour (a panic) is normal. This crash is > happens often when I'm under such attack and I guess I can easily > give crash dump, kgdb output or something like, if you need. > System is running 4.8-RELEASE, on iPentium166/mmx with 64MB of RAM. > 4 NICs, BRIDGE on two of them. > > Thanks for any response.. I agree with you. I've got crashdump for mbuf-related kernel panic (sbappendaddr), see http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/50803 I believe a kernel must not panic due to DoS. Eugene Grosbein From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 21 02:18:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE1837B401 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 02:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from prg.traveller.cz (prg.traveller.cz [193.85.2.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C49543F85 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 02:18:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mime@traveller.cz) Received: from prg.traveller.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])h4L9Im1O084150 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 11:18:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (mime@localhost)id h4L9Im7c084147 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 11:18:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 11:18:48 +0200 (CEST) From: Michal Mertl To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20030521104442.G65751@prg.traveller.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: 4GB limit with netstat X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 09:18:51 -0000 I also didn't like the limitation and we had long discussions about 64 bit counters in Jan 2002. The problem is that there isn't really cheap way to do safe (atomic) updates of 64 bit numbers on SMP x86. The conclusion at time was mostly that counting in 64 bit on 32 bit arch was too expensive. I have a patch which increases the width and adds small api for safe updating of wide counters (for 4.5 or something). Other solution is to keep the type of kernel-updated counters and if needed (on 32 bit archs) have some aggregation counters which would be once in a while (e.g. 10 times a second) updated with some kernel thread. I also have proof-of-concept patch with this approach. As SMPng locking of network stack and drivers is taking place it seems some counters could be made u_int64 rather cheaply - the structures containing the counters should be locked for update anyway so the update can be achieved then by simple means even on 32bit arch. -- Michal Mertl mime@traveller.cz From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 21 10:19:42 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7EFF37B401 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 10:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net (pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D63B43F85 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 10:19:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mvh@ix.netcom.com) Received: from lsanca1-ar6-4-62-202-091.lsanca1.elnk.dsl.genuity.net ([4.62.202.91] helo=netcom1.netcom.com) by pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19IXFd-0003jP-00 for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 May 2003 10:19:41 -0700 Received: by netcom1.netcom.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 364325314; Wed, 21 May 2003 10:19:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Harding To: stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20030521171941.364325314@netcom1.netcom.com> Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 10:19:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: system slowdown - vnode related X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 17:19:43 -0000 I woke up to a frozen box this morning - it froze up a few more times before I got a handle on it. Basically, the box runs idle but refuses to do disk IO, or does it -very- slowly. Top shows processes stuck in 'ffsvget', 'inode', and 'vlruwk' state. I can get the box responsive again by setting sysctl kern.maxvnods=100000. It starts up with kern.maxnodes=36079. I don't know yet if this is a 'fix' - I wanted to send this mail out before the box froze again. I can reliably get the box in to this state by doing 'find /'. I do have a lot of files on the disk, and a things like squid and postgres that do a lot of file i/o, but I don't recall this happening before this week. I don't find anything in 'tuning' about bumping up vnodes, but I do see sporadic reports on a google group search - searching for 'ffsvgt'. Anybody run into this before? - Mike H. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 21 10:30:51 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F3D37B401 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 10:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.distalzou.net (203.141.139.231.user.ad.il24.net [203.141.139.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAC343F3F for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 10:30:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from devin@spamcop.net) Received: from borosilicate.pun-pun.prv ([192.168.7.29]) by mail.distalzou.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.20) id 19IXQM-00040o-I0; Thu, 22 May 2003 02:30:46 +0900 Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 02:30:46 +0900 (JST) From: Tod McQuillin X-X-Sender: devin@borosilicate.pun-pun.prv To: Mike Harding In-Reply-To: <20030521171941.364325314@netcom1.netcom.com> Message-ID: <20030522022137.D551@borosilicate.pun-pun.prv> References: <20030521171941.364325314@netcom1.netcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: system slowdown - vnode related X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 17:30:51 -0000 On Wed, 21 May 2003, Mike Harding wrote: > I woke up to a frozen box this morning - it froze up a few more times > before I got a handle on it. > > Basically, the box runs idle but refuses to do disk IO, or does it > -very- slowly. > > Top shows processes stuck in 'ffsvget', 'inode', and 'vlruwk' state. [...] > I can reliably get the box in to this state by doing 'find /'. I do > have a lot of files on the disk, and a things like squid and postgres > that do a lot of file i/o, but I don't recall this happening before > this week. I don't find anything in 'tuning' about bumping up vnodes, > but I do see sporadic reports on a google group search - searching for > 'ffsvgt'. > > Anybody run into this before? I can reproduce this at will with rsync. Here's how: 1) check out ports from the ports cvs repo using 'cvs co ports' (you can use an anoncvs server or your own local ports cvs repo from cvsup) 2) Since all the CVS/Root files are the same, change them all into hard links to the same file with a script like this: #!/usr/bin/perl # # First arg: file to link to # # remaining args: files to check if their contents is the same as first # file. If they are the same, they will be removed and replaced with a # hard link to the first file. my $master = shift @ARGV; print "Master file: $master\n"; local $/ = undef; open(M, $master) || die "$master: $!\n"; my $master_content = ; close M; while (my $file = shift @ARGV) { if ($file eq $master) { print "Skipping original $master\n"; next; } open (F, $file) || die "$file: $!\n"; my $content = ; close F; if ($content eq $master_content) { print "replacing $file\n"; unlink $file or die "$file: $!\n"; link $master, $file or die "link $master, $file: $!\n"; } } then: cd /usr/ports; find . -name Root | xargs /tmp/link-if-same.pl ./CVS/Root This will produce thousands of hard links to the same file, like: /usr/ports% ls -l CVS/Root -rw-r--r-- 13613 root wheel 18 May 19 15:03 CVS/Root 3) rsync your ports tree to another box with rsync -avHS source::ports/ /usr/ports/ (set up /usr/local/etc/rsyncd.conf and /etc/inetd.conf as appropriate) 4) watch the destination box hang with rsync in vlruwk wchan. Yes I know this is convoluted, but it reliably reproduces the same problem for me. In my case the fix was to use --exclude=CVS/ in the rsync flags -- I'm sure that doesn't help you. No, I don't have a fix, but maybe this recipe will help someone else debug it. -- Tod McQuillin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 21 07:18:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4819C37B401 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 07:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from marvin.muc.de (marvin.muc.de [193.149.48.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E12E43F75 for ; Wed, 21 May 2003 07:18:34 -0700 (PDT) moderators-muc-lists-freebsd-stable-owner@moderators.muc.de) Received: (qmail 45453 invoked by alias); 21 May 2003 14:18:14 -0000 Delivered-To: moderators-muc-lists-freebsd-stable@moderators.muc.de Received: (qmail 45448 invoked from network); 21 May 2003 14:18:14 -0000 Received: from mail.fu-berlin.de (root@160.45.11.165) by marvin.muc.de with SMTP; 21 May 2003 14:18:13 -0000 Received: by mail.fu-berlin.de (Smail3.2.0.98) from Curry.ZEDAT.FU-Berlin.DE (160.45.10.36) with esmtp id ; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:18:32 +0200 (MEST) Received: by Curry.ZEDAT.FU-Berlin.DE (Smail3.2.0.98) from news.fu-berlin.de with bsmtp id ; Wed, 21 May 2003 16:18:31 +0200 (MEST) To: muc-lists-freebsd-stable@moderators.muc.de Path: port-212-202-185-88.reverse.qdsl-home.DE!not-for-mail From: Christian Koch Newsgroups: muc.lists.freebsd.stable Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 16:18:59 +0200 Lines: 136 Message-ID: X-Orig-NNTP-Posting-Host: port-212-202-185-88.reverse.qdsl-home.de (212.202.185.88) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Orig-X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1053526711 28939186 212.202.185.88 (16 [193052]) User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 21 May 2003 12:20:54 -0700 Subject: 5.0-RELEASE --> cannot build any Mozilla Version X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 14:18:36 -0000 Hi, I am running FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE-p7 and cannot build any Mozilla version from ports. The build exits for all versions at the same point. A source file called jsdtoa.c. Thanks.. Here is my error report: ******************************************************************************* cc -o jsdtoa.o -c -DOSTYPE=\"FreeBSD5\" -DOSARCH=\"FreeBSD\" -DEXPORT_JS_API -DJS_USE_SAFE_ARENA -I../../dist/include/js -I../../dist/include -I/usr/ports/www/mozilla-devel-gtk2/work/mozilla/dist/include/nspr -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I. -I/usr/X11R6/include -fPIC -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -Wall -W -Wno-unused -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wno-long-long -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -O2 -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -ffunction-sections -O2 -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -include ../../mozilla-config.h -DMOZILLA_CLIENT jsdtoa.c jsdtoa.c: In function `mult': jsdtoa.c:696: warning: suggest parentheses around arithmetic in operand of | jsdtoa.c:709: warning: suggest parentheses around arithmetic in operand of | jsdtoa.c: In function `diff': jsdtoa.c:966: warning: suggest parentheses around arithmetic in operand of | jsdtoa.c:974: warning: suggest parentheses around arithmetic in operand of | jsdtoa.c: In function `ulp': jsdtoa.c:987: warning: `a' might be used uninitialized in this function jsdtoa.c: In function `b2d': jsdtoa.c:1018: warning: `d' might be used uninitialized in this function jsdtoa.c: In function `JS_strtod': jsdtoa.c:1239: warning: `rv0' might be used uninitialized in this function jsdtoa.c:1874: unable to find a register to spill in class `AREG' jsdtoa.c:1874: this is the insn: (insn:QI 1997 1996 1998 (set (reg:CCNO 17 flags) (compare:CCNO (and:SI (subreg:SI (reg/v:DI 21 rxmm0 [284]) 0) (const_int 1 [0x1])) (const_int 0 [0x0]))) 281 {testsi_1} (insn_list 1993 (nil)) (expr_list:REG_DEAD (reg/v:DI 21 rxmm0 [284]) (nil))) jsdtoa.c:1874: confused by earlier errors, bailing out gmake[3]: *** [jsdtoa.o] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/mozilla-devel-gtk2/work/mozilla/js/src' gmake[2]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/mozilla-devel-gtk2/work/mozilla/js' gmake[1]: *** [tier_2] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/mozilla-devel-gtk2/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mozilla-devel-gtk2. [root@belial /usr/ports/www/mozilla-devel-gtk2]# ******************************************************************************* as I said before, it is not only the developer version, even plain vanilla Mozilla fails at jsdtoa.c.... best regards Christian Koch P.S. here follows my dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE-p7 #2: Sat May 10 23:56:08 CEST 2003 root@belial.ordo.septenarius:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BELIAL2 Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc04b3000. Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc04b30a8. Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2669925032 Hz CPU: Pentium 4 (2669.93-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf27 Stepping = 7 Features=0xffffffffbfebfbff> real memory = 536805376 (511 MB) avail memory = 516386816 (492 MB) Initializing GEOMetry subsystem Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined as GPE0 to GPE31 Using $PIR table, 10 entries at 0xc00fdeb0 acpi0: power button is handled as a fixed feature programming model. Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0 acpi_cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_cpu1: on acpi0 acpi_tz0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xd0000000-0xd7ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pci1: at device 0.1 (no driver attached) uhci0: port 0xb800-0xb81f irq 10 at device 29.0 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ums0: B16_b_02 USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/98.02, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 7 buttons and Z dir. uhci1: port 0xb000-0xb01f irq 3 at device 29.1 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xb400-0xb41f irq 7 at device 29.2 on pci0 usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 29.7 (no driver attached) pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 xl0: <3Com 3c905B-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xa400-0xa47f mem 0xeb001000-0xeb00107f irq 11 at device 5.0 on pci2 xl0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:24:48:0c:3f miibus0: on xl0 xlphy0: <3Com internal media interface> on miibus0 xlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0x7 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ichsmb0: port 0x500-0x51f irq 12 at device 31.3 on pci0 smbus0: on ichsmb0 smb0: on smbus0 pcm0: port 0xc400-0xc43f,0xc000-0xc0ff mem 0xec002000-0xec0020ff,0xec001000-0xec0011ff irq 12 at device 31.5 on pci0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 orm0: