From owner-freebsd-standards Wed Jan 15 21:10:41 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CC237B401 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:10:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from web13407.mail.yahoo.com (web13407.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3496343F5F for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2003 21:10:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from giffunip@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20030116051040.74303.qmail@web13407.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.24.79.45] by web13407.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 06:10:40 CET Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 06:10:40 +0100 (CET) From: "=?iso-8859-1?q?Pedro=20F.=20Giffuni?=" Subject: flex vs POSIX To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi; I'm reading the flex(1) manpage, in particular the section "INCOMPATIBILITIES WITH LEX AND POSIX". I hate to suggest this for the performance implications it might bring, but for compliance reasons perhaps the -l option (maximum compatibility) should be turned on when flex is called as lex. cheers, Pedro. ps. Of course... this could break a lot of stuff if done right now. ______________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Cellulari: loghi, suonerie, picture message per il tuo telefonino http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/?http://it.mobile.yahoo.com/index2002.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message