Date: Sun, 17 Aug 2003 08:54:56 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> Cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KSE/ia64: NULL thread pointer in _thr_sig_add() Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10308170850530.4870-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20030817004956.GA52247@dhcp42.pn.xcllnt.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 07:29:12PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Aug 16, 2003 at 06:13:36AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > > > > > There's at least a problem with the mutex_d test, so I suspect that > > > we still have some lingering issues. This does not look to be > > > related to thread pointers. I don't know to what extend it will affect > > > ACE. > > > > One question. When you call (the syscall) setcontext() from > > _ia64_break_setcontext(), do you ignore the signal mask (uc.uc_sigmask)? > > Good point. I don't think so. OK, this will cause signal handling problems. You can use another flag, but that would dirty up MI setcontext(). Perhaps a separate ia64-specific system call? -- Dan Eischen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10308170850530.4870-100000>