From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 19 00:40:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE4816A4D0 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 00:40:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0AA343D46 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 00:40:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 30593 invoked by uid 65534); 19 Sep 2004 00:40:43 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) (62.245.232.135) by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 19 Sep 2004 02:40:43 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 02:40:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <00d001c49dd4$7382dc40$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> In-Reply-To: <00d001c49dd4$7382dc40$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> X-OS: FreeBSD X-Birthday: 10/06/72 X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-Tel: +49 89 18947781 X-CelPhone: +49 173 9967781 X-Country: Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409190240.41508.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org cc: timh@tjhawkins.com Subject: Re: Please explain. X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 00:40:45 -0000 Am Sonntag, 19. September 2004 01:08 schrieb timh@tjhawkins.com: > 2 Major Issues: > > - FreeBSD has a processor affinity design issue > > - The core kernel issues with FreeBSD is the horrible threading > support.There is so much crap in FreeBSD kernel. The multithreading issue > in freebsd has been delayed for nearly 6 years. They have just made work > arounds, not fixing the actual problem. It seems that the only real BSD > that has made big progress on the core issues is DragonflyBSD. > > It appears that FreeBSD have a clear Multi-threading lock-in issue that > needs to be fixed. Not work arounds. According to many freebsd developers > nobody simply wants to fix this, is it true that the current smp work are > just 'work-arounds' not real fixing? > > The only thing holding FreeBSD back is the Multithreading issue. > > Please clarify this. Why should one answer to this email? Use what ever you think qualifies your needs! > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"