From owner-freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Mar  9 09:29:03 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCB416A4CE
	for <freebsd-afs@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 Mar 2004 09:29:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from forrie.com (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.62.205.225])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7002643D46
	for <freebsd-afs@freebsd.org>; Tue,  9 Mar 2004 09:29:02 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from forrie@forrie.com)
Received: from forrie.com (i-95.forrie.net. [192.168.1.95])
         by forrie.com  with ESMTP id i29HSrXF047855
         for <freebsd-afs@freebsd.org>; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:28:55 -0500 (EST)
         (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com)
Message-ID: <404DFED3.6040707@forrie.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 12:28:51 -0500
From: Forrest Aldrich <forrie@forrie.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5+ (Windows/20040308)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.3.0(snapshot 20010925) (forrie.ne.client2.attbi.com)
X-MailScanner-LocalNet: Found to be clean
Subject: OpenAFS status?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-afs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Andrew File System and FreeBSD <freebsd-afs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-afs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-afs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-afs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-afs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-afs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-afs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-afs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 17:29:03 -0000

Hi there,

I wonder what the status is of OpenAFS porting to FreeBSD 5.x -- I've 
seen a few older posts on the net that indicated there were several 
issues that needed to be dealt with (client), etc.


Thanks,
Forrest