From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 01:39:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4831016A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:39:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EAE43D4C; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:39:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0B9dXip011822; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:39:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0B9dV4F011820; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:39:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:39:31 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Gary Jennejohn Message-ID: <20040111093931.GB11120@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200401090055.i090ts1m008538@peedub.jennejohn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401090055.i090ts1m008538@peedub.jennejohn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: soren@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: success with GA-K8VNXP but problem with IDE disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:39:53 -0000 On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:55:54AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > One strange thing is that my IDE disk, which worked at UDMA100 with my > old mobo, only runs at UDMA33 with the new mobo. I'm using UDMA100 cables. > I can't force the setting of UDMA100 or UDMA66 using atacontrol. Maybe a > bug in the handling of the VT8237? The disk is all by itself as master on > one channel, although I do have a DVD drive (UDMA33) by itself as master > on the second channel. I have checked the BIOS settings, but there's no > way to force UDMA100 in the BIOS that I can see. What's your /var/run/dmesg.boot? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 01:47:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B6116A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:47:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D589E43D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:47:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0B9lWip011912; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:47:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0B9lQeg011911; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:47:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:47:20 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Nakata Maho Message-ID: <20040111094720.GC11120@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040111.002702.783374572.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> <20040111.092317.846935805.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> <20040111015433.GA33258@malkavian.ghostar.ath.cx> <20040111.114720.730553329.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040111.114720.730553329.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: success with GA-K8VNXP but problem with IDE disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:47:38 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 11:47:20AM +0900, Nakata Maho wrote: > Hm, I know it, but unfortunately, there are no data for > Tyan thunder k8w (S2885) and Rioworks HDAMB-WO... anyway, > for Rioworks HDAMB-WO, > > o RIOWORKS HDAMB-WO > http://www.rioworks.co.jp/motherboard/popup/hdamb.html > I found a PDF (though it was written in Japanese). At work we're pretty sloppy about what random no-name DIMM's we use. Only the Shuttle box has been picky. That said, Micron (MT) / Crucial DIMM's are probably the best quality. Samsung DIMM's also. These are the two brands AMD uses in the development systems it sends out. I've got a case load of Kingston 1GB ValueRAM in which 1 out of 4 DIMM's is bad. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 02:21:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0465116A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:21:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout2.freenet.de (mout2.freenet.de [194.97.50.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2DC43D1F; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:21:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org) Received: from [194.97.50.135] (helo=mx2.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Afcj8-0007sg-Sm; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:21:50 +0100 Received: from d99d6.d.pppool.de ([80.184.153.214] helo=peedub.jennejohn.org) by mx2.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.30 #1) id 1Afcj8-0004kA-Gd; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:21:50 +0100 Received: from peedub.jennejohn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.jennejohn.org (8.12.10/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0BALnCJ001201; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:21:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.jennejohn.org) Message-Id: <200401111021.i0BALnCJ001201@peedub.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:39:31 PST." <20040111093931.GB11120@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:21:49 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn cc: sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: success with GA-K8VNXP but problem with IDE disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:21:54 -0000 "David O'Brien" writes: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:55:54AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > One strange thing is that my IDE disk, which worked at UDMA100 with my > > old mobo, only runs at UDMA33 with the new mobo. I'm using UDMA100 cables. > > I can't force the setting of UDMA100 or UDMA66 using atacontrol. Maybe a > > bug in the handling of the VT8237? The disk is all by itself as master on > > one channel, although I do have a DVD drive (UDMA33) by itself as master > > on the second channel. I have checked the BIOS settings, but there's no > > way to force UDMA100 in the BIOS that I can see. > > > What's your /var/run/dmesg.boot? > The relevant parts are: atapci0: port 0xac00-0xac0f at device 15.0 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata0: [MPSAFE] ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ata1: [MPSAFE] [snip] GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xc5abbe60 ad0: 78166MB [158813/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 --- Gary Jennejohn / garyj[at]jennejohn.org gj[at]freebsd.org gj[at]denx.de From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 02:23:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D709316A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:23:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC25843D1F; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:23:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0BAKOmd010465; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:20:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0BAKOue010464; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:20:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos) From: Soren Schmidt Message-Id: <200401111020.i0BAKOue010464@spider.deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <200401111021.i0BALnCJ001201@peedub.jennejohn.org> To: Gary Jennejohn Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:20:24 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.3 cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: success with GA-K8VNXP but problem with IDE disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:23:54 -0000 It seems Gary Jennejohn wrote: > "David O'Brien" writes: > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:55:54AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > One strange thing is that my IDE disk, which worked at UDMA100 with my > > > old mobo, only runs at UDMA33 with the new mobo. I'm using UDMA100 cables. > > > I can't force the setting of UDMA100 or UDMA66 using atacontrol. Maybe a > > > bug in the handling of the VT8237? The disk is all by itself as master on > > > one channel, although I do have a DVD drive (UDMA33) by itself as master > > > on the second channel. I have checked the BIOS settings, but there's no > > > way to force UDMA100 in the BIOS that I can see. > > > > What's your /var/run/dmesg.boot? > > The relevant parts are: > > atapci0: port 0xac00-0xac0f at device 15.0 on pci0 Right, your ATA controller is not found, could you mail me the output of pciconf -l ? -Søren Yes I know it works under windows!! From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 02:38:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5466F16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:38:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout1.freenet.de (mout1.freenet.de [194.97.50.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D77D43D58 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:38:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org) Received: from [194.97.50.144] (helo=mx1.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Afcz3-000275-75; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:38:17 +0100 Received: from d99d6.d.pppool.de ([80.184.153.214] helo=peedub.jennejohn.org) by mx1.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.30 #1) id 1Afcz2-0000VB-Bl; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:38:16 +0100 Received: from peedub.jennejohn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.jennejohn.org (8.12.10/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0BAcFCJ001795; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:38:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.jennejohn.org) Message-Id: <200401111038.i0BAcFCJ001795@peedub.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Veronica Brainfluff In-Reply-To: Message from Veronica Brainfluff <20040111071802.36159.qmail@web21509.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:38:15 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Confused X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:38:22 -0000 Veronica Brainfluff writes: > I have an AMD Athlon XP processor. Is this going to > cause any problems for me? I see different downloads > for specific builds, AMD64, i386. > For the XP you want the i386 release. > Another question is why is there only release notes for i386 for v.5.2 but > not for v.5.1? > Don't know. --- Gary Jennejohn / garyj[at]jennejohn.org gj[at]freebsd.org gj[at]denx.de From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 05:54:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F7216A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 05:54:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from fed1mtao06.cox.net (fed1mtao06.cox.net [68.6.19.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C05D43D53; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 05:54:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from xcas@cox.net) Received: from cox.net ([68.2.134.143]) by fed1mtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040111135427.MCBA11223.fed1mtao06.cox.net@cox.net>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:54:27 -0500 Message-ID: <400155BB.4060801@cox.net> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:55:07 -0700 From: "Greg J." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Soren Schmidt References: <200401111020.i0BAKOue010464@spider.deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <200401111020.i0BAKOue010464@spider.deepcore.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: success with GA-K8VNXP but problem with IDE disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:54:34 -0000 Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Gary Jennejohn wrote: > >>"David O'Brien" writes: >> >>>On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:55:54AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: >>> >>>>One strange thing is that my IDE disk, which worked at UDMA100 with my >>>>old mobo, only runs at UDMA33 with the new mobo. I'm using UDMA100 cables. >>>>I can't force the setting of UDMA100 or UDMA66 using atacontrol. Maybe a >>>>bug in the handling of the VT8237? The disk is all by itself as master on >>>>one channel, although I do have a DVD drive (UDMA33) by itself as master >>>>on the second channel. I have checked the BIOS settings, but there's no >>>>way to force UDMA100 in the BIOS that I can see. >>> >>>What's your /var/run/dmesg.boot? >> >>The relevant parts are: >> >>atapci0: port 0xac00-0xac0f at device 15.0 on pci0 > > > Right, your ATA controller is not found, could you mail me the output of > pciconf -l ? > I'm having the same problem with my 'MSI K8T Neo-FIS2R' motherboard.. which uses the same chipset. atapci0: port 0xfc00-0xfc0f at device 15.0 on pci0 ehci0: mem 0xcffffd00-0xcffffdff irq 21 at device 16.4 on pci0 usb4: on ehci0 ### pciconf -l ### hostb0@pci0:0:0: class=0x060000 card=0x31881106 chip=0x31881106 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 pcib1@pci0:1:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000080 chip=0xb1881106 rev=0x00 hdr=0x01 pcm0@pci0:6:0: class=0x040100 card=0x10021102 chip=0x00041102 rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 emujoy0@pci0:6:1: class=0x098000 card=0x00601102 chip=0x70031102 rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 fwohci0@pci0:6:2: class=0x0c0010 card=0x00101102 chip=0x40011102 rev=0x04 hdr=0x00 re0@pci0:11:0: class=0x020000 card=0x702c1462 chip=0x816910ec rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 fwohci1@pci0:14:0: class=0x0c0010 card=0x702d1462 chip=0x30441106 rev=0x80 hdr=0x00 atapci0@pci0:15:0: class=0x01018a card=0x70201462 chip=0x05711106 rev=0x06 hdr=0x00 uhci0@pci0:16:0: class=0x0c0300 card=0x70201462 chip=0x30381106 rev=0x81 hdr=0x00 uhci1@pci0:16:1: class=0x0c0300 card=0x70201462 chip=0x30381106 rev=0x81 hdr=0x00 uhci2@pci0:16:2: class=0x0c0300 card=0x70201462 chip=0x30381106 rev=0x81 hdr=0x00 uhci3@pci0:16:3: class=0x0c0300 card=0x70201462 chip=0x30381106 rev=0x81 hdr=0x00 ehci0@pci0:16:4: class=0x0c0320 card=0x70201462 chip=0x31041106 rev=0x86 hdr=0x00 isab0@pci0:17:0: class=0x060100 card=0x32271106 chip=0x32271106 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 hostb1@pci0:24:0: class=0x060000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x11001022 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 hostb2@pci0:24:1: class=0x060000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x11011022 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 hostb3@pci0:24:2: class=0x060000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x11021022 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 hostb4@pci0:24:3: class=0x060000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x11031022 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 none0@pci1:0:0: class=0x030000 card=0x00021002 chip=0x4e481002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 none1@pci1:0:1: class=0x038000 card=0x00031002 chip=0x4e681002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 06:41:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB4916A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:41:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A78543D45 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:41:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thomas.pasch@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 6241 invoked by uid 65534); 11 Jan 2004 14:41:04 -0000 Received: from p508E75DB.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO pourquoi.netzgeneration.com) (80.142.117.219) by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 15:41:04 +0100 X-Authenticated: #2928575 From: Thomas Pasch To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:41:06 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401111541.06765.thomas.pasch@gmx.de> Subject: ia32 compatibility layer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:41:08 -0000 Hello, is there some (easy) way to install a (/usr)/compat/ia32 layer on top of a FreeBSD-5.2-RC2/amd64 installation? Cheers, Thomas From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 06:44:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E65B16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:44:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout1.freenet.de (mout1.freenet.de [194.97.50.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C7943D49 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:44:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org) Received: from [194.97.55.147] (helo=mx4.freenet.de) by mout1.freenet.de with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Afgp1-0004y1-FW for freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:44:11 +0100 Received: from d99d6.d.pppool.de ([80.184.153.214] helo=peedub.jennejohn.org) by mx4.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.30 #1) id 1Afgp1-0000jA-6z for freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:44:11 +0100 Received: from peedub.jennejohn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.jennejohn.org (8.12.10/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0BEi9CJ013710 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:44:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.jennejohn.org) Message-Id: <200401111444.i0BEi9CJ013710@peedub.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:55:07 MST." <400155BB.4060801@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:44:09 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn Subject: Re: success with GA-K8VNXP but problem with IDE disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:44:15 -0000 "Greg J." writes: > Soren Schmidt wrote: > > It seems Gary Jennejohn wrote: > >>atapci0: port 0xac00-0xac0f at device 15.0 on pci0 > > > > > > Right, your ATA controller is not found, could you mail me the output of > > pciconf -l ? > > > I'm having the same problem with my 'MSI K8T Neo-FIS2R' motherboard.. > which uses the same chipset. > > atapci0: port 0xfc00-0xfc0f at device 15.0 on pci0 > ehci0: mem 0xcffffd00-0xcffffdff irq > 21 at device 16.4 on pci0 > usb4: on ehci0 > [snip] > atapci0@pci0:15:0: class=0x01018a card=0x70201462 chip=0x05711106 > rev=0x06 hdr=0x00 [snip] > I see the same ID and REV with my VT8237. The weird thing is that 0x05711106 is listed as the ID for the ATA_VIA82C571 in /sys/dev/ata/ata-pci.h. I wonder if VIA is recycling ID numbers? Christ, that would be a real PITA! --- Gary Jennejohn / garyj[at]jennejohn.org gj[at]freebsd.org gj[at]denx.de From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 07:30:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEC816A4D0 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:30:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD6D43D1F for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:30:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0BFUNOl011907 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:30:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: amd64@freebsd.org From: Poul-Henning Kamp Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:30:23 +0100 Message-ID: <11906.1073835023@critter.freebsd.dk> Subject: Data corruption on SATA on HDAMA mobo ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:30:25 -0000 Is anybody else seing data corruption on SATA disks on a HDAMA motherboard ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 10:11:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C484A16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:11:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF7243D2F; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:11:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (marcel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0BIBgFR064472; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:11:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0BIBf63064468; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:11:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:11:41 -0800 (PST) From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-Id: <200401111811.i0BIBf63064468@freefall.freebsd.org> To: marcel@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: amd64/61209: ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:11:42 -0000 Synopsis: ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ia64->freebsd-amd64 Responsible-Changed-By: marcel Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Jan 11 10:11:14 PST 2004 Responsible-Changed-Why: Misfiled PR amd64 != ia64. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=61209 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 11:06:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E77616A4ED; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:06:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org (cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482DA43D2F; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:06:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0BJ5xv9054413; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:05:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i0BJ5xeJ054412; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:05:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:05:59 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200401111905.i0BJ5xeJ054412@cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org> X-Authentication-Warning: cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org: des set sender to Tinderbox using -f Sender: Tinderbox From: Tinderbox To: current@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:06:03 -0000 TB --- 2004-01-11 18:02:19 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2004-01-11 18:02:19 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-01-11 18:02:19 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2004-01-11 18:04:28 - building world TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything.. TB --- 2004-01-11 19:05:04 - building generic kernel TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sun Jan 11 19:05:04 GMT 2004 [...] awk -f /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/mixer_if.m -h awk -f /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/usb/usb_if.m -h awk -f /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/isa/isa_if.m -h if [ -f .olddep ]; then mv .olddep .depend; fi rm -f .newdep /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/make.i386/make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES -V GEN_M_CFILES | MKDEP_CPP="cc -E" CC="cc" xargs mkdep -a -f .newdep -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=20000 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-r! ed-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/sound/pci/emu10k1.c:32:50: gnu/dev/sound/pci/emu10k1-alsa%diked.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/GENERIC. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/GENERIC. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2004-01-11 19:05:59 - TB --- /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-01-11 19:05:59 - TB --- ERROR: failed to build generic kernel TB --- 2004-01-11 19:05:59 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:53:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFAA16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:53:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C8543D4C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:53:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.kitchenlab.org) Received: from intruder.kitchenlab.org (adsl-64-142-31-106.sonic.net [64.142.31.106]) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i0BKrrF4025986 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:53:53 -0800 Received: from intruder.kitchenlab.org (bmah@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0BKrqpW070846; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:53:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.kitchenlab.org) Message-Id: <200401112053.i0BKrqpW070846@intruder.kitchenlab.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Veronica Brainfluff In-Reply-To: <20040111071802.36159.qmail@web21509.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040111071802.36159.qmail@web21509.mail.yahoo.com> Comments: In-reply-to Veronica Brainfluff message dated "Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:18:02 -0800." From: bmah@acm.org (Bruce A. Mah) X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1277671208P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:53:52 -0800 Sender: bmah@intruder.kitchenlab.org cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Confused X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bmah@acm.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:53:55 -0000 --==_Exmh_1277671208P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Veronica Brainfluff wrote: > Another question is > why is there only release notes for i386 for v.5.2 but > not for v.5.1? The release documentation for 5.2 isn't on www.freebsd.org (yet). Where did you look? Bruce. --==_Exmh_1277671208P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 iD8DBQFAAbfg2MoxcVugUsMRAmN9AJ9BmOP71sRZLQqw3/Q4oMwb9BUtEgCglDd3 eD/fzsOaXUbdyWTfbfsdXNU= =INDb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1277671208P-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 14:04:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754F416A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:04:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from malkavian.ghostar.ath.cx (rrcs-sw-24-153-201-7.biz.rr.com [24.153.201.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA0C43D5E for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:04:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hcoyote@malkavian.ghostar.ath.cx) Received: from malkavian.ghostar.ath.cx (hcoyote@localhost.ghostar.ath.cx [127.0.0.1])i0BM43va036357 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:04:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hcoyote@malkavian.ghostar.ath.cx) Received: (from hcoyote@localhost) by malkavian.ghostar.ath.cx (8.12.9/8.12.8/Submit) id i0BM43xg036356 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:04:03 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:04:03 -0600 From: HCoyote To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040111220403.GC33258@malkavian.ghostar.ath.cx> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <20040111.002702.783374572.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> <20040111.092317.846935805.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> <20040111015433.GA33258@malkavian.ghostar.ath.cx> <20040111.114720.730553329.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> <20040111094720.GC11120@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040111094720.GC11120@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Subject: Re: success with GA-K8VNXP but problem with IDE disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:04:40 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 01:47:20AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 11:47:20AM +0900, Nakata Maho wrote: > > Hm, I know it, but unfortunately, there are no data for > > Tyan thunder k8w (S2885) and Rioworks HDAMB-WO... anyway, > > for Rioworks HDAMB-WO, > > > > o RIOWORKS HDAMB-WO > > http://www.rioworks.co.jp/motherboard/popup/hdamb.html > > I found a PDF (though it was written in Japanese). > > At work we're pretty sloppy about what random no-name DIMM's we use. > Only the Shuttle box has been picky. That said, Micron (MT) / Crucial > DIMM's are probably the best quality. Samsung DIMM's also. These are > the two brands AMD uses in the development systems it sends out. Well, for the other internal stuff, we know atleast the following works on the Tyan 2885. MFG: WINTEC MFG P/N: 35954754L Description: PC-333. PC2700, 1GB, LOW PROFILE, DDR SDRAM -FSB333, ECC, Registered btw, that PDF that Nakata mentions above is also in english and can be found at HDAMA http://www.rioworks.com/Download/hdama/manual/HDAMA%20MEMORY%20TEST%20LIST.zip HDAMB http://www.rioworks.com/Download/hdamb/manual/HDAMB%20MEMORY%20TEST%20LIST.zip It lists the ATP we're using on our HDAMA's. I'll don't have the info on our Infineon stuff at the moment, but we're using it on the Celestica 4p's with no problem. I've also run it on a Rioworks HDAMA. Buffalo reportedly works on Tyan 2885's *if* you get the right kind. You'd have to ask them which is correct, though. We opted not to use them and stick with ATP for the Thunder's during our testing. > > I've got a case load of Kingston 1GB ValueRAM in which 1 out of 4 DIMM's > is bad. Yeah, we've found memory to be a sticky situation right now. Travis (And yes, David, I'm the same Travis that works at AMD in Austin :-) -- Travis Campbell hcoyote@ghostar.ath.cx From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 16:29:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D573016A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:29:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C641543D2D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:29:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0C0TGip057191; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:29:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0C0TFFh057190; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:29:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:29:15 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Gary Jennejohn Message-ID: <20040112002915.GA57169@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <400155BB.4060801@cox.net> <200401111444.i0BEi9CJ013710@peedub.jennejohn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401111444.i0BEi9CJ013710@peedub.jennejohn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: success with GA-K8VNXP but problem with IDE disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:29:17 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:44:09PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > I see the same ID and REV with my VT8237. The weird thing is that > 0x05711106 is listed as the ID for the ATA_VIA82C571 in > /sys/dev/ata/ata-pci.h. I wonder if VIA is recycling ID numbers? > Christ, that would be a real PITA! AFAIK, VIA only created an AGP controller for AMD64 -- they use their existing southbridges as VIA uses "V-Link" between their chips. So there was no need to create a new southbridge for AMD64. So I'm surprised there's a problem recognizing the ATA controller. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 16:32:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B928416A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:32:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EF243D45 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:32:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0C0Wjip057259; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:32:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0C0WiaX057258; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:32:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:32:44 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Thomas Pasch Message-ID: <20040112003244.GC57169@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200401111541.06765.thomas.pasch@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401111541.06765.thomas.pasch@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ia32 compatibility layer? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:32:47 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:41:06PM +0100, Thomas Pasch wrote: > is there some (easy) way to install a (/usr)/compat/ia32 > layer on top of a FreeBSD-5.2-RC2/amd64 installation? Not yet. It isn't stable enough for general consumption yet. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 16:40:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1E816A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0642F43D54 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:40:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0C0eJFR097787 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:40:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0C0eJcm097786; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:40:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:40:19 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200401120040.i0C0eJcm097786@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org From: "David O'Brien" Subject: Re: ia64/61209: ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David O'Brien List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:40:20 -0000 The following reply was made to PR amd64/61209; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "David O'Brien" To: Thomas Pasch Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ia64/61209: ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:33:56 -0800 On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 08:58:21AM -0800, Thomas Pasch wrote: > >Description: > Can't use the parallel port of the computer. > (dmesg: ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range) Please post a verbose boot dmesg. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 17:30:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834DF16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:30:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2E643D4C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:30:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from RonDzierwa@comcast.net) Received: from comcast.net (esx132dhcp973.essex01.md.comcast.net[68.33.135.205]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <20040112013009012008rct9e> (Authid: rondzierwa); Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:30:09 +0000 Message-ID: <4001F8AA.E7A09DD9@comcast.net> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:30:18 -0500 From: Ron Dzierwa Organization: Innovative Engineering, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: ata X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:30:11 -0000 Message: 9 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:20:24 +0100 (CET) From: Soren Schmidt Subject: Re: success with GA-K8VNXP but problem with IDE disk To: Gary Jennejohn Cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <200401111020.i0BAKOue010464@spider.deepcore.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 It seems Gary Jennejohn wrote: > "David O'Brien" writes: > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:55:54AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > One strange thing is that my IDE disk, which worked at UDMA100 with my > > > old mobo, only runs at UDMA33 with the new mobo. I'm using UDMA100 cables. > > > I can't force the setting of UDMA100 or UDMA66 using atacontrol. Maybe a > > > bug in the handling of the VT8237? The disk is all by itself as master on > > > one channel, although I do have a DVD drive (UDMA33) by itself as master > > > on the second channel. I have checked the BIOS settings, but there's no > > > way to force UDMA100 in the BIOS that I can see. > > > > What's your /var/run/dmesg.boot? > > The relevant parts are: > > atapci0: port 0xac00-0xac0f at device 15.0 on pci0 Right, your ATA controller is not found, could you mail me the output of pciconf -l ? -Søren Yes I know it works under windows!! STILL haven't got the ol' driver working yet, eh Soren? ron. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 11:02:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A2616A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:02:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545E643DA5 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:01:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0CJ1VFR025267 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:01:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0CJ1VI2025262 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:01:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:01:31 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200401121901.i0CJ1VI2025262@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:02:22 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/11/26] amd64/59713 amd64 Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC6316A4CE; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org (cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EA843D6B; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:26:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0CJQjv9088728; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:26:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: (from des@localhost) by cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i0CJQiCO088727; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:26:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:26:44 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200401121926.i0CJQiCO088727@cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org> X-Authentication-Warning: cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org: des set sender to Tinderbox using -f Sender: Tinderbox From: Tinderbox To: current@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:26:53 -0000 TB --- 2004-01-12 18:22:52 - tinderbox 2.2 running on cueball.rtp.FreeBSD.org TB --- 2004-01-12 18:22:52 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-01-12 18:22:52 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2004-01-12 18:25:15 - building world TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything.. TB --- 2004-01-12 19:25:50 - building generic kernel TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Mon Jan 12 19:25:50 GMT 2004 [...] awk -f /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/mixer_if.m -h awk -f /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/usb/usb_if.m -h awk -f /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/tools/makeobjops.awk /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/isa/isa_if.m -h if [ -f .olddep ]; then mv .olddep .depend; fi rm -f .newdep /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/make.i386/make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES -V GEN_M_CFILES | MKDEP_CPP="cc -E" CC="cc" xargs mkdep -a -f .newdep -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=20000 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-r! ed-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/dev/sound/pci/emu10k1.c:32:32: emu10k1-alsa%diked.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/GENERIC. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/GENERIC. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /vol/vol1/users/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2004-01-12 19:26:44 - TB --- /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-01-12 19:26:44 - TB --- ERROR: failed to build generic kernel TB --- 2004-01-12 19:26:44 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 11:42:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CC616A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:42:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout2.freenet.de (mout2.freenet.de [194.97.50.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D62543D3F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:42:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from garyj@jennejohn.org) Received: from [194.97.50.138] (helo=mx0.freenet.de) by mout2.freenet.de with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Ag7xZ-0006KN-5P for freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:42:49 +0100 Received: from d95b0.d.pppool.de ([80.184.149.176] helo=peedub.jennejohn.org) by mx0.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.30 #1) id 1Ag7xY-0000R4-Ow for freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:42:48 +0100 Received: from peedub.jennejohn.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by peedub.jennejohn.org (8.12.10/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i0CJglJr002997 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:42:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from garyj@peedub.jennejohn.org) Message-Id: <200401121942.i0CJglJr002997@peedub.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:29:15 PST." <20040112002915.GA57169@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:42:47 +0100 From: Gary Jennejohn Subject: Re: success with GA-K8VNXP but problem with IDE disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gary Jennejohn List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:42:51 -0000 "David O'Brien" writes: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:44:09PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > I see the same ID and REV with my VT8237. The weird thing is that > > 0x05711106 is listed as the ID for the ATA_VIA82C571 in > > /sys/dev/ata/ata-pci.h. I wonder if VIA is recycling ID numbers? > > Christ, that would be a real PITA! > > AFAIK, VIA only created an AGP controller for AMD64 -- they use their > existing southbridges as VIA uses "V-Link" between their chips. So there > was no need to create a new southbridge for AMD64. So I'm surprised > there's a problem recognizing the ATA controller. > But it doesn't have the ID listed in the header-file for the VT8237. --- Gary Jennejohn / garyj[at]jennejohn.org gj[at]freebsd.org gj[at]denx.de From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:11:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF4016A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:11:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5095043D2F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:11:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gofda-freebsd-amd64@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ag8Ov-00051h-00 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:11:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ag8Ot-00051Z-00 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:11:03 +0100 Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ag8Ot-0000g2-00 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:11:03 +0100 From: david Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:11:02 -0500 Lines: 50 Message-ID: References: <17426.6989030459$1073697945@news.gmane.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031013 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en In-Reply-To: <17426.6989030459$1073697945@news.gmane.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: AMD64 support in 5.x versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:11:08 -0000 Jem Matzan wrote: > On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 20:08, david wrote: > > > Well, about the only GNU/Linux distros that will work are the ones made > for AMD64. SuSE 9.0 for x86 will work to a reasonable degree. I had a > beta copy of SuSE 9.0 for AMD64 and it didn't work very well at all, > neither did the RC2 of Mandrake 9.2 AMD64. It's since been overwritten > and I've requested a retail edition of SuSE 9.0/AMD64 for review but it > hasn't come. > > 3D accerleration for ATI video cards in Linux/AMD64 seems out of the > question for right now. On the other hand it was out of the question for > FreeBSD anyway. The most common problem I had with Linux was drivers for > the SysKonnect LAN, and I don't have another card for testing. Some, > like Fedora Core and Lycoris Update 3, would lock up or restart the > machine. I wish I could just get an x86 GNU/Linux distro installed > properly with all of the right drivers just so I can run VMWare 4 and > maybe play UT2003 again now and then. > > Gentoo/AMD64 will install, but there are no boot loaders ported to AMD64 > yet (for GNU/Linux anyway) and I had trouble compiling nearly everything > I was interested in running. The last time I tried Gentoo/AMD64 was a > week and a half ago and it was unusable. > > I tried FreeBSD 5.2-RC2 last night again, but there seems to be some > kind of problem with dhclient and the SysKonnect LAN. It will try to > connect to the DHCP server for about two minutes and then give up, > leaving me with no Internet access. 5.2-CURRENT/x86 will do this now and > then too, but usually when I see it stay too long at the dhclient > message during startup, I hit ctrl-alt-del to restart the system and it > generally loads fine after that. Sometimes I have to restart the system > two or three times to get dhclient to load properly. On the AMD64 port > though, I restarted a dozen times, reset my cable modem and router, > switched cat5 cables... nothing works. So it's back to x86 again. > > Let me know if you get anything working in terms of GNU/Linux, > specifically community distros... > I will. However, as this will mainly be a server, my particular concerns are with the linux compatibility. This is an absolute must for this machine and from my understanding, this is completely broke in freebsd with and amd64 running in 64bit. So, if this doesn't work(i will test) then I will go with SUSE which I have talked to several people who run it in 64bit and say it works fine. Regardless, I will know something in a week or so. David From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:28:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F0216A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:28:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB85843D1D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:28:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) Received: from daemon.mj.niksun.com (daemon.mj.niksun.com [10.70.0.244]) i0CMSVuv019311; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:28:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) X-RAV-AntiVirus: This e-mail has been scanned for viruses. From: Jung-uk Kim Organization: Niksun, Inc. To: Jem Matzan , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:28:24 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <1073697769.733.27.camel@.rochester.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <1073697769.733.27.camel@.rochester.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401121728.24167.jkim@niksun.com> Subject: Re: AMD64 support in 5.x versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:28:40 -0000 On Friday 09 January 2004 08:22 pm, Jem Matzan wrote: > I tried FreeBSD 5.2-RC2 last night again, but there seems to be > some kind of problem with dhclient and the SysKonnect LAN. It will > try to connect to the DHCP server for about two minutes and then > give up, leaving me with no Internet access. Have you tried the following patches? http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031215231022.GA15082 http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031217145924.GA12258 They are little bit out of date but they should work. Jung-uk Kim From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 23:02:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702F716A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:02:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from curacao.n2it.nl (62-177-157-186.bbeyond.nl [62.177.157.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49FEF43D6B for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:02:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billsf@curacao.n2it.nl) Received: by curacao.n2it.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2FC8220F9; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:02:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:02:04 +0100 From: Bill Squire To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040113070204.GA764@curacao.n2it.nl> References: <17426.6989030459$1073697945@news.gmane.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: AMD64 support in 5.x versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:02:45 -0000 Hello, This is my first post to this list as an actual member of the list. I purchased system at a bi-monthly tradefair here in Amsterdam last summer. I've got several large SCSI disks spinning and have since purchased an ordinary ATA-133 IDE and a SATA drive. Yes, the IDE's work but like any serious Unix system you need the top line SCSI drives. (SATA is very promising with speed, but like IDE in general, it can result in a surprise freeze with allot of bus activity.) So use SCSI, and certainly if you want to run Linux! I could go on about the machine, but its a 'single' and using what I consider reasonable benchmarks (intense mathematical calculation, build world and Gimp, etc.) At 2200MHz, in 64-bit mode and 1G of 400MHz memory, I get the equivalent performance of a P4-5400MHz if such a chip existed. Now I want a dual or bigger Opteron. The speed allows for some heavy hacking and fine grain tuning. Yes, when I put it together, I tried FreeBSD 5.0 and upgraded to 5.1-CURRENT which was not 'released yet'. It worked, but I got the feeling it was going to be like the Alpha ev56/533MHz monster I picked up years ago while still technically a prototype. (Really great machine and has ran 24/7 for over six years using probably every OS it could run except WindowsNT.) Unlike the amd64, this was a very slow development and my skills weren't what they are today. Unlike Alpha where Linux was right there, Linux has been somewhat of a disappointment. It seems like you simply can NOT have ANY IDE and get Linux to work. Yes, I check Gentoo, RedHat, Mandrake and Suse as new distros come out but the majority still simply 'panic' when you try to boot the CD. All (AFAIK) panic if there is ANYTHING on the IDE busses at all! I've gone the bootstrap route but that is allot of work and tests my otherwise patient outlook on life. Linprocfs can be hacked and to work (mostly) on FreeBSD- amd64. I did manage to _compile_ a Linux kernel that way. It is quite bro- ken, but better than the 'installer kernels' in the distros. This Linux, while I think its the greatest thing for the i386, needs allot of work on the amd64 hardware platform. So back to FreeBSD. At this time I'm quite convinced FreeBSD is ahead with this machine. My only complaint is the whole system can go through rapid swings. It was possible upto a month or so ago to have a i386 compat collection in /usr/compat/ia32 symlinked to /compat It did work as i386 apps used /compat/ia32/ld-elf.so.1 (this is a 32bit rtld) but it was by no means perfect and i386 applications, particularly Mozilla, would 'white out' and freeze the entire system. There were some other nasty interactions and some 64-bit programs would not run after a successful compile but would on a pure 64-bit system. Is the present strategy of using /libexec/ld-elf-32.so.1 planned to remain? If so, its a matter of hacking a 32-bit rtld (ld-elf-32.so.1) to re-direct to the /compat/ia32 compatibility area. When the amd64 sees i386 instructions (read: "pentium-pro", complete with a fake serial number) it executes them! Still, its better to run true64, but indeed, 32bit binaries in Linux may be all that is on offer for many commercial applications, for most developers. Presumably i386 compatibility is of some use. Remember it may be more ecco- nomical to run 32bit binaries on i386 machines and optionally network them with your amd64? Personally, I think its more of a show-off stunt than any- thing, but computer games are not part of my world. Game developers can quickly adapt to 64bits and infact it is urgent that 'gaming development environments' for amd64 be put out there. Reading the recent archives, it does seem that backward compatibility is desired. My question are simple: Will the FreeBSD amd64 kernel and systems handle 32bit programs in a similar manner from now on or will I get something working again and find my whole project wrecked soon after? Would reverse- engineering binaries (and supplying the tools to do it) be more productive? Atleast for us in Europe those lines against this activity EULA's are NULL and VOID, particularly if you have attempted to point out that 'interoper- ability is the law' to anti-open-source firms. BillSF On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 03:11:02PM -0500, david wrote: > Jem Matzan wrote: > >On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 20:08, david wrote: > > > > > >Let me know if you get anything working in terms of GNU/Linux, > >specifically community distros... > > > > I will. However, as this will mainly be a server, my particular concerns > are with the linux compatibility. This is an absolute must for this > machine and from my understanding, this is completely broke in freebsd > with and amd64 running in 64bit. So, if this doesn't work(i will test) > then I will go with SUSE which I have talked to several people who run > it in 64bit and say it works fine. Regardless, I will know something in > a week or so. > > David This looks like an interesting thread. At the higher end of the Internet connectivity spectrum this *BSD system is a very good server in any form. At my co-location provider, (I can say 'mine' as i own a comfortable per- centage as an 'active participant.) I maintain a FreeBSD-CURRENT server on an athlon-xp1800+ (1533MHz) with reasonable results. At 100Mbit/s it can take quite a beating, especially since there are many hosted sites, 'jails', databases and just about anything 30+ people want. On my desk is a Gentoo system and an old Mac that will soon be taken offline and used for secure matters. My coworkers use RedHat and some Windows2000 server is a workstation we all occasionally use. There are two real 'show stoppers' for the Unix market: IDE and Adaptec SCSI host adapters. On OpenBSD (our primary OS) IDE works better and the shamed host adapter is worse. Linux is much the same story. The non-Unix OS that makes up a small fraction of the server market is a nightmare, but small companies pay a premium for Win2k or the 'server2003' stuff. I'll see it in the archive soon, but why is so important to have Linux? In not too long, I'm going to put my first amd64 in a rack and connect it to 1Gbit/s. Without a GUI, it is exceedingly stable with FreeBSD. To be honest, I've not had the need to try DHCP. I will try it out of curiosity. If you need that stuff, PC's (and Cisco) should be just fine. Finally, to somewhat recap, a good server has SCSI drives, a Symbios (sym) host adapter and Intel 'eepro100' (fxp) network cards. I have SysKonnect (sk) for Gigabit ether. The jury's out on the sk's. B. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 08:48:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724AA16A4CE; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:48:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from fed1mtao02.cox.net (fed1mtao02.cox.net [68.6.19.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94DB43D5C; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:48:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from xcas@cox.net) Received: from cox.net ([68.2.134.143]) by fed1mtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040113164843.VSKY27510.fed1mtao02.cox.net@cox.net>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:48:43 -0500 Message-ID: <40042196.20101@cox.net> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:49:26 -0700 From: "Greg J." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Soren Schmidt References: <200401111020.i0BAKOue010464@spider.deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <200401111020.i0BAKOue010464@spider.deepcore.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: success with GA-K8VNXP but problem with IDE disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:48:46 -0000 Soren Schmidt wrote: > It seems Gary Jennejohn wrote: > >>"David O'Brien" writes: >> >>>On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:55:54AM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote: >>> >>>>One strange thing is that my IDE disk, which worked at UDMA100 with my >>>>old mobo, only runs at UDMA33 with the new mobo. I'm using UDMA100 cables. >>>>I can't force the setting of UDMA100 or UDMA66 using atacontrol. Maybe a >>>>bug in the handling of the VT8237? The disk is all by itself as master on >>>>one channel, although I do have a DVD drive (UDMA33) by itself as master >>>>on the second channel. I have checked the BIOS settings, but there's no >>>>way to force UDMA100 in the BIOS that I can see. >>> >>>What's your /var/run/dmesg.boot? >> >>The relevant parts are: >> >>atapci0: port 0xac00-0xac0f at device 15.0 on pci0 > > > Right, your ATA controller is not found, could you mail me the output of > pciconf -l ? I'm not a C expert.. but I added the following to sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c & it seems to work for me. :) --- sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c.orig Tue Jan 13 08:59:52 2004 +++ sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c Tue Jan 13 08:52:19 2004 @@ -2122,6 +2122,7 @@ { ATA_VIA8233A, 0x00, VIA133, 0x00, ATA_UDMA6, "VIA 8233A" }, { ATA_VIA8235, 0x00, VIA133, 0x00, ATA_UDMA6, "VIA 8235" }, { ATA_VIA8237, 0x00, VIA133, 0x00, ATA_UDMA6, "VIA 8237" }, + { ATA_VIA82C571, 0x06, VIA133, 0x00, ATA_UDMA6, "VIA 8237" }, { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }}; static struct ata_chip_id new_ids[] = {{ ATA_VIA8237, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, ATA_SA150, "VIA 8237" }, From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 12:59:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4B216A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:59:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from pillage.dreamhost.com (pillage.dreamhost.com [66.33.213.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E0743D5A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:59:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-amd64@retrovertigo.com) Received: from laredo.retrovertigo.com (ool-4356e456.dyn.optonline.net [67.86.228.86]) by pillage.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EEE1496A3 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:59:17 -0800 (PST) From: To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:59:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.94 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200401131559.13024.freebsd-amd64@retrovertigo.com> Subject: Sil3114 controller? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:59:18 -0000 Greetings, I have a dual Opteron system on a Tyan Tiger K8W (S2875). I have attempted to install via the 5.2-RELEASE ISO's. Problem: CD boots fine, but my SATA drives (two Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 120G) were not detected. I don't see anything in the release notes specific to the controller or the drives. The motherboard has the same Sil3114 SATA controller as the Tyan Thunder K8W (S2885). I have seen other posts to this list that indicate success in installing FreeBSD on the Thunder K8W, so I'm wondering why I can't see the drives on my system. The drives came with Windows XP pre-installed which seems to work ok for Windows. Any suggestions? Cheers, From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 13:24:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5535A16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:24:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.kpnqwest.ch (mail.eunet.ch [146.228.10.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A65B43D5A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:24:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mw@kpnqwest.ch) Received: from mail.eunet.ch (localhost.kpnqwest.ch [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kpnqwest.ch (8.12.10/1.34) via ESMTP id i0DLO8IN009194; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:24:08 +0100 (CET) env-from (mw@kpnqwest.ch) Received: (from mw@localhost) by mail.eunet.ch (8.12.10/8.12.6/Submit) id i0DLO7L2009193; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:24:07 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200401132124.i0DLO7L2009193@mail.eunet.ch> In-Reply-To: <200401131559.13024.freebsd-amd64@retrovertigo.com> To: freebsd-amd64@retrovertigo.com Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:24:07 +0100 (CET) Sender: mw@kpnqwest.ch From: Markus@kpnqwest.ch, Wild X-NCC-RegID: ch.vianetworks X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Filter-Version: 1.14 (mail.eunet.ch) cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sil3114 controller? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:24:18 -0000 > I have a dual Opteron system on a Tyan Tiger K8W (S2875). I have a S2885. > I have attempted to install via the 5.2-RELEASE ISO's. Problem: CD boots > fine, but my SATA drives (two Seagate Barracuda 7200.7 120G) were not > detected. I don't see anything in the release notes specific to the > controller or the drives. > > The motherboard has the same Sil3114 SATA controller as the Tyan Thunder K8W > (S2885). I have seen other posts to this list that indicate success in > installing FreeBSD on the Thunder K8W, so I'm wondering why I can't see the > drives on my system. I made a simple modification to the driver which essentially maps the 3114 as a 3112, which works, sort of (not with the recent changes though, I'm getting those "TIMEOUT - ATAPI_IDENTIFY retrying messages" that others had mentioned as well). The drives do not go into SATA DMA mode (150Mbps), but I have the slight suspicion the code doesn't really support those yet with the SiL chipsets. On very high load on the drives, I sometimes get ad4: WARNING - WRITE_DMA UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) style errors, but all in all, it's working very nicely. Index: ata-chipset.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c,v retrieving revision 1.54 diff -r1.54 ata-chipset.c 1587c1587,1588 < {{ ATA_SII3112, 0x02, SIIMEMIO, 0, ATA_SA150, "SiI 3112" }, --- > {{ ATA_SII3114, 0x02, SIIMEMIO, 0, ATA_SA150, "SiI 3114" }, > { ATA_SII3112, 0x02, SIIMEMIO, 0, ATA_SA150, "SiI 3112" }, Index: ata-pci.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-pci.h,v retrieving revision 1.20 diff -r1.20 ata-pci.h 163a164 > #define ATA_SII3114 0x31141095 atapci0: port 0x8400-0x840f,0x8480-0x8483,0x8800-0x8807,0x8880-0x8883,0x8c00-0x8c07 mem 0xff3ffc00-0xff3fffff irq 17 at device 11.0 on pci3 atapci0: [MPSAFE] ad4: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA100 ad6: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata3-master UDMA100 GEOM: create disk ad4 dp=0xffffff0001110ea0 ad4: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA100 GEOM: create disk ad6 dp=0xffffff00015d04a0 ad6: 76319MB [155061/16/63] at ata3-master UDMA100 GEOM: create disk ar0 dp=0xffffff007b687270 ar0: 76319MB [9729/255/63] status: READY subdisks: disk0 READY on ad4 at ata2-master disk1 READY on ad6 at ata3-master Note: this is a FreeBSD type ATA-Raid, there's no support yet for native RAID that is understood by the BIOS. Cheers, Markus -- VIA NET.WORKS (Schweiz) AG Riedstrasse 1, CH-6343 Rotkreuz, Switzerland Telefon: +41 41 798 2121 / Fax: +41 41 798 2122 Markus Wild, Manager Engineering, e-mail: mwild@vianetworks.ch From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 00:28:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F0616A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:28:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.omnis.com (smtp.omnis.com [216.239.128.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E3343D48 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:28:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from techsupport@thejemreport.com) Received: from localhost (balder.omnis.com [216.239.128.60]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C805272DC2 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:28:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1074066811.4004f57b5adb0@webmail.thejemreport.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:53:31 -0800 From: "" To: "" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 66.66.218.250 Subject: VESA driver in X X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:28:13 -0000 Anyone know why there is no VESA driver in XFree86, or when one will be available? That's the only one that I can get working with my Radeon 9800 (in the i386 build). The VGA driver is not usable. -Jem From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 04:24:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401DC16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:24:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (rrcs-sw-24-73-246-106.biz.rr.com [24.73.246.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB1F43D67 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:24:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@bigtex.jrv.org) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i0ECObo8093996 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:24:37 -0600 (CST) Received: (from james@localhost) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id i0ECObwr093993; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:24:37 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:24:37 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200401141224.i0ECObwr093993@bigtex.jrv.org> From: James Van Artsdalen To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <17426.6989030459$1073697945@news.gmane.org> <20040113070204.GA764@curacao.n2it.nl> Subject: ATA (Re: AMD64 support in 5.x versions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:24:49 -0000 > Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:02:04 +0100 > From: Bill Squire > I've got several large SCSI disks spinning and have since purchased an > ordinary ATA-133 IDE and a SATA drive. SCSI vs. ATA can be a religious argument. On the practical side if you have more than 4 GB of RAM I don't know of any cost-effective solution that can address memory above 4 GB directly, without using bounce-buffers. I understand that some Adaptec SCSI host adapters can do this (PCI "dual address cycle" or a full 64-bit bus if available) without resorting to exotic RAID controllers. Highpoint sells an RR-1820 PCI-X (64-bit 133 MHz) serial ATA controller but I cannot get them to send me any technical documentation and cannot get it to work with Windows with the supplied drivers. Silicon Image has a 3124 chip which is PCI-X and ought to be able to directly address more than 4 GB of RAM but I don't know of any card that uses this yet. I have 8 GB of RAM and use a HighPoint 1542 sATA controller, and am no doubt exercising the bounce buffers extensively. This seems entirely stable but for performance I wouldn't want to do it with a disk-bound system in a production environment. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 04:58:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FC116A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:58:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (rrcs-sw-24-73-246-106.biz.rr.com [24.73.246.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11C143D2F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:58:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@bigtex.jrv.org) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i0ECwFo8094922 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:58:15 -0600 (CST) Received: (from james@localhost) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id i0ECwF5p094919; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:58:15 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:58:15 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200401141258.i0ECwF5p094919@bigtex.jrv.org> From: James Van Artsdalen To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 5.2 RC2 stability? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:58:17 -0000 > From: James Van Artsdalen > To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: 5.2 RC2 stability? > > Has anyone else has trouble wiith the 5.2 RC2 ISO spontaneously > rebooting? This appears to be a false alarm. The power supply later failed and no build has failed since it was replaced. I'm hard pressed to explain why I was able to switch between disks and repeatably have one fail and the other work over the period of a week if the power supply was the culprit. Gremlins do that I guess. I'm give RC2 24 more hours to fail and then go to 5.2-release. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 04:58:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8C816A4D8 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:58:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from fed1mtao02.cox.net (fed1mtao02.cox.net [68.6.19.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A6E43D72 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:58:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from xcas@cox.net) Received: from cox.net ([68.2.134.143]) by fed1mtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040114125801.JCRV27510.fed1mtao02.cox.net@cox.net>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:58:01 -0500 Message-ID: <40053D06.5030808@cox.net> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:58:46 -0700 From: "Greg J." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: techsupport@thejemreport.com References: <1074066811.4004f57b5adb0@webmail.thejemreport.com> In-Reply-To: <1074066811.4004f57b5adb0@webmail.thejemreport.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VESA driver in X X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:58:28 -0000 techsupport@thejemreport.com wrote: > Anyone know why there is no VESA driver in XFree86, or when one will be > available? That's the only one that I can get working with my Radeon 9800 (in > the i386 build). The VGA driver is not usable. > > -Jem My 9800Pro works fine on my FreeBSD/amd64 machine with XFree86 4.3.0's vesa driver. I'm not quite sure what you're asking. Section "Device" Identifier "Card0" Driver "vesa" VendorName "ATI" BoardName "Radeon 9800 Pro" BusID "PCI:1:0:0" EndSection From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:43:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E4816A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:43:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net (mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82DF43D3F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:43:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@behanna.org) Received: from user183.net446.oh.sprint-hsd.net ([65.40.131.183] helo=192.168.1.2) by mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AgnAg-0000OG-00 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:43:06 -0800 From: Chris BeHanna Organization: Western Pennsylvania Pizza Disposal Unit To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:43:04 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401141043.04455.chris@behanna.org> Subject: Cost of a Bare-Bones Box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: chris@behanna.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:43:28 -0000 Is it possible to build an Opteron-based box for under a grand, if I re-use my existing NIC, hard disks, and video board (will they even work?): Adaptec 3950U2B hosting a pair of LVD drives Adaptec 2400A IDE RAID hosting a quartet of WD 120GB Sp. Editions ATI Radeon 7200 (aka Radeon VIVO) Netgear FA310TX serving the outside world Netgear FA302T serving the inside LAN Can I re-use my 500W ATX power supply? What about my 1GB stick of registered PC2100 ECC? Can I get an SMP mobo and just stick one CPU on it for now? Can I re-use my tower ATX case? This is being driven by the death of my wife's and son's XP box. I'm thinking of swapping my workstation out to them and building myself a spiffy new box, or swapping my crashbox out to them, my workstation out to my crashbox, and building myself a spiffy new box. Thanks, -- Chris BeHanna Software Engineer (Remove "bogus" before responding.) chris@bogus.behanna.org Turning coffee into software since 1990. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:50:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7B416A4E0 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:50:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from bragi.housing.ufl.edu (bragi.housing.ufl.edu [128.227.47.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212BE43D7D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:50:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from WillS@housing.ufl.edu) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:50:20 -0500 Message-ID: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED8CBBE10@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Cost of a Bare-Bones Box? Thread-Index: AcPatTyZrfJQJgmwQzOWeQPUdbNEDgAACZkg From: "Will Saxon" To: , Subject: RE: Cost of a Bare-Bones Box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:50:27 -0000 > Is it possible to build an Opteron-based box for under a grand, if > I re-use my existing NIC, hard disks, and video board (will they even > work?): >=20 > Adaptec 3950U2B hosting a pair of LVD drives > Adaptec 2400A IDE RAID hosting a quartet of WD 120GB Sp. Editions > ATI Radeon 7200 (aka Radeon VIVO) > Netgear FA310TX serving the outside world > Netgear FA302T serving the inside LAN >=20 > Can I re-use my 500W ATX power supply? What about my 1GB stick of > registered PC2100 ECC? Can I get an SMP mobo and just stick one CPU > on it for now? >=20 > Can I re-use my tower ATX case? >=20 > This is being driven by the death of my wife's and son's XP box. > I'm thinking of swapping my workstation out to them and building > myself a spiffy new box, or swapping my crashbox out to them, my > workstation out to my crashbox, and building myself a spiffy new box. It should be doable. If you used an Opteron 240 on an MSI K8T = Master2-FAR board you would spend ~$600. That board is ATX-sized so it doesn't = require any special case. Your RAM is too slow, and I don't know if you can run the memory bus=20 asynchronously, so if it were me I would figure on buying more RAM. I = think you can get 1GB of Corsair Registered ECC DDR400 in a 'matched pair' of=20 512MB modules for less than $400, so that would put you under your = spending limit. I am not sure that would be a particularly effective use of $1000 = though. -Will From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 13:41:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CEF16A4FE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (rrcs-sw-24-73-246-106.biz.rr.com [24.73.246.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9679643D72 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:41:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@bigtex.jrv.org) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i0ELfGo8011810 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:41:16 -0600 (CST) Received: (from james@localhost) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id i0ELfG05011807; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:41:16 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:41:16 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200401142141.i0ELfG05011807@bigtex.jrv.org> From: James Van Artsdalen To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: CPU throttling X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:41:20 -0000 Is CPU throttling possible with AMD64? $ sysctl -a | grep hw.acpi.cpu hw.acpi.cpu.max_speed: 8 hw.acpi.cpu.current_speed: 8 hw.acpi.cpu.performance_speed: 8 hw.acpi.cpu.economy_speed: 4 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported: C1/0 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: 0 hw.acpi.cpu.cx_history: 59641109/0 $ sysctl hw.acpi.cpu.current_speed=4 sysctl: oid 'hw.acpi.cpu.current_speed' is read only $ From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:31:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9891A16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:31:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (rrcs-sw-24-73-246-106.biz.rr.com [24.73.246.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A8143D2F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:31:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@bigtex.jrv.org) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i0ENVjo8015362 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:31:45 -0600 (CST) Received: (from james@localhost) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id i0ENVj11015359; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:31:45 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:31:45 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200401142331.i0ENVj11015359@bigtex.jrv.org> From: James Van Artsdalen To: chris@behanna.org In-reply-to: <200401141043.04455.chris@behanna.org> (message from Chris BeHanna on Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:43:04 -0500) References: <200401141043.04455.chris@behanna.org> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cost of a Bare-Bones Box? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:31:48 -0000 > From: Chris BeHanna > Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:43:04 -0500 > > Is it possible to build an Opteron-based box for under a grand, if > I re-use my existing NIC, hard disks, and video board (will they even > work?): > > Adaptec 3950U2B hosting a pair of LVD drives > Adaptec 2400A IDE RAID hosting a quartet of WD 120GB Sp. Editions > ATI Radeon 7200 (aka Radeon VIVO) > Netgear FA310TX serving the outside world > Netgear FA302T serving the inside LAN > > Can I re-use my 500W ATX power supply? What about my 1GB stick of > registered PC2100 ECC? Can I get an SMP mobo and just stick one CPU > on it for now? The power supply pinout needs to match the pinout of the motherboard. Not all flavors of ATX use electrically compatible power pinouts even when the connector is mechanically compatible (i.e. "just because you can plug it in doesn't mean it won't smoke"). 500 W should be ample power; if not, that means you're generating half a kilowatt of heat in the chassis and are probably going to have cooling problems. The drives and CPU should be enough to keep the power stable (too little load is a problem sometimes). > Can I re-use my tower ATX case? As long as the motherboard fits. There are at least three different form-factors for ATX. You also need to make sure the heat sink on the CPU clears the chassis. I use a Tyan K8W S2885 motherboard in an Antec SX835II chassis and the primary CPU's heat sink & fan just barely clears the brace for the internal hard disk holder (which had to be removed). You might be able to save some money by using an Athlon64 CPU and motherboard instead of Opteron, but registered DIMM might not work. A dual processor motherboard should work with only one CPU. I'm not sure how closely matched CPUs must be to work together, i.e. if you buy one CPU now and a different stepping next fall it might not work. An AMD64 price reduction may be coming soon with Intel's Prescott introduction. Also, AMD is getting ready to switch to a new fab process and there may be a price cut associated with tha too, although I suspect this is still a few months away. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 15:31:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871B116A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:31:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.omnis.com (smtp.omnis.com [216.239.128.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A950043D31 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:31:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from techsupport@thejemreport.com) Received: from localhost (balder.omnis.com [216.239.128.60]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E284881BC0; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:31:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1074121024.4005c940ac817@webmail.thejemreport.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:57:04 -0800 From: "" To: "Greg J." References: <1074066811.4004f57b5adb0@webmail.thejemreport.com> <40053D06.5030808@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <40053D06.5030808@cox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 66.66.218.250 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VESA driver in X X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:31:51 -0000 Quoting "Greg J." : > techsupport@thejemreport.com wrote: > > > Anyone know why there is no VESA driver in XFree86, or when one will be > > available? That's the only one that I can get working with my Radeon 9800 > (in > > the i386 build). The VGA driver is not usable. > > > > -Jem > > My 9800Pro works fine on my FreeBSD/amd64 machine with XFree86 4.3.0's > vesa driver. I'm not quite sure what you're asking. > > Section "Device" > Identifier "Card0" > Driver "vesa" > VendorName "ATI" > BoardName "Radeon 9800 Pro" > BusID "PCI:1:0:0" > EndSection > > I solved it -- the XFree86 package somehow doesn't include some of the video driver modules. Removing the package and installing from ports gave me the ability to use the VESA driver. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 18:23:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3AEC16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:23:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from colo2.RCousins.com (colo2.rcousins.com [198.144.196.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8D143D5A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:23:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rec@RCousins.com) Received: from RCousins.com (unknown [10.0.2.5]) by colo2.RCousins.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4335117222 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:23:45 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4005FA53.3000301@RCousins.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:26:27 -0800 From: Robert Cousins User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <20040114200042.1AE8716A4FB@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20040114200042.1AE8716A4FB@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Query about ext[32]fs X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 02:23:47 -0000 Hello: Does anyone know if the ext[23]fs code works for AMD64? I'm in the process of building a triple boot machine (XP, Linux, FreeBSD) and it appears that the best option for sharing data between the environments is ext[23]fs since there is now 3rd party support for ext2fs under XP. My obvious fallback is FAT which is obviously less functional from FreeBSD and Linux. Thanx Bob Cousins From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 20:38:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E567B16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:38:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.omnis.com (smtp.omnis.com [216.239.128.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E8743D69 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:38:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from techsupport@thejemreport.com) Received: from [192.168.0.163] (roc-66-66-218-250.rochester.rr.com [66.66.218.250]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4537D881BC9 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:38:53 -0800 (PST) From: Jem Matzan To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1074141532.50575.1.camel@.rochester.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:38:52 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Java X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 04:38:55 -0000 If there's a working JDK port or package, I haven't found it. Sun's site has no information that I could see... anyone know if there's any progress in porting Java to FreeBSD/AMD64? -- Jem Matzan From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 07:27:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7A116A4CF for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:27:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from alt.strg.at (alt.strg.at [62.116.124.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D0143D7B for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:27:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mic@alt.strg.at) Received: (qmail 33999 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Jan 2004 15:27:37 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:27:37 +0100 From: Michael Dosser To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040115152737.GA36960@alt.strg.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: strg.at X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE-p23 X-sig-random-gen: http://cfml.sourceforge.net/perl/chsig.tar.gz X-spam-note: Sending SPAM is a violation of both Austrian and US law and will at least trigger a complaint at your providers postmaster. Subject: which graphic card ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:27:40 -0000 Hi, I'm yust curious: which graphic card do you use for a amd athlon64 workstation? Are there any advices/recommendations (xfree)? Thank you, mic -- I love standards. There are so many to choose from ... From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 12:30:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F5716A4E3 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:30:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B0C43D58 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:30:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0GKUEFR095382 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:30:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0GKUE6D095381; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:30:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:30:14 -0800 (PST) Resent-Message-Id: <200401162030.i0GKUE6D095381@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, fredrik@widell.net Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D00116A4CE for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:21:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from nic2.widell.net (nic2.widell.net [194.68.48.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645F043D2D for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:21:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fredrik@nic2.widell.net) Received: from nic2.widell.net (localhost.widell.net [127.0.0.1]) by nic2.widell.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0H3NQ3d018322 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 04:23:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fredrik@nic2.widell.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by nic2.widell.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0H3NPGC018321; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 04:23:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fredrik) Message-Id: <200401170323.i0H3NPGC018321@nic2.widell.net> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 04:23:25 +0100 (CET) From: fredrik@widell.net To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Subject: amd64/61440: /usr/ports/net/tightvnc does not install on amd64 fbsd 5.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fredrik@widell.net List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 20:30:28 -0000 >Number: 61440 >Category: amd64 >Synopsis: /usr/ports/net/tightvnc does not install on amd64 fbsd 5.2 >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-amd64 >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri Jan 16 12:30:14 PST 2004 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Fredrik Widell >Release: FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE amd64 >Organization: KTHNOC >Environment: System: FreeBSD nic2 5.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan 15 20:29:11 CET 2004 root@nic2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NIC2 amd64 CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) 64 Processor 142 (1600.01-MHz K8-class CPU) FreeBSD nic2 5.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Jan 15 20:29:11 CET 2004 tightvnc does not install, cvsup of the system made 15 Jan. bash-2.05b# pwd /usr/ports/net/tightvnc bash-2.05b# make <....> -c -O -pipe -ansi -pedantic -Dasm=__asm -I../../.././/include/fonts -I../include -I../../.././ -I../../.././/exports/include -DCSRG_BASED -DSHAPE -DGCCUSESGAS XFree86ServerDefines -DNDEBUG -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO bitmap.c cc: XFree86ServerDefines: No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/tightvnc/work/vnc_unixsrc/Xvnc/lib/font/bitmap. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/tightvnc/work/vnc_unixsrc/Xvnc/lib/font. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/tightvnc/work/vnc_unixsrc/Xvnc/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/tightvnc/work/vnc_unixsrc/Xvnc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/tightvnc/work/vnc_unixsrc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/tightvnc. >Description: >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 17:34:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0BD316A4CE for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:34:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms1.din.or.jp (ms1.din.or.jp [210.135.65.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717A943D2D for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:34:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from satoshi@din.or.jp) Received: from localhost (ppd01-0730.din.or.jp [210.135.82.130]) by ms1.din.or.jp (8.11.7+Sun/3.7W) with ESMTP id i0H1YAn02456 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:34:10 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:36:04 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040117.103604.846934997.satoshi@din.or.jp> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org From: Satoshi Sato X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on XEmacs 21.1.14 (Cuyahoga Valley) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: trouble with K8T Master2-FAR (dual Opteron) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:34:12 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to install FreeBSD/amd64 to dual Opteron machine. M/B: MSI K8T Master2-FAR CPU: AMD Opteron 240 x 2 Mem: 512MB x 2 ( in Slot 1 and 3, Single channel) I had some trouble with this installation. I couldn't boot FreeBSD normally. Even from CD-ROM. 1. dual CPU : Normal boot HUNG UP after memory check(?). (dmesg) real memory = 1072627712 (1022MB) avail memory = 1009385472 (962MB) Messages flow very fast! Looks like broken... So, I couldn't read all. But It's something like this Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x6c fault code = supervisor read, page not present : 2. dual CPU : Safe Mode / disable ACPI Trouble 1. did not occur. But, after mounting root(/) filesystem, it HUNGs. So.... I removed one CPU, and installed FreeBSD/amd64. Succeeded! And I re-compile kernel without SMP option. Now, this dual Opteron machine boot normally. But vainly. Does anyone have any idea? If this is known bug, what can I do for ethis. I'll appreciate any help. Sincerely ---- Satoshi Sato (satoshi@din.or.jp) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 17:38:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84D516A4CE for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:38:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms1.din.or.jp (ms1.din.or.jp [210.135.65.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D6A43D45 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:38:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from satoshi@din.or.jp) Received: from localhost (ppd01-0730.din.or.jp [210.135.82.130]) by ms1.din.or.jp (8.11.7+Sun/3.7W) with ESMTP id i0H1c5n04127 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:38:06 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:39:59 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040117.103959.607952766.satoshi@din.or.jp> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org From: Satoshi Sato In-Reply-To: <20040117.103604.846934997.satoshi@din.or.jp> References: <20040117.103604.846934997.satoshi@din.or.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on XEmacs 21.1.14 (Cuyahoga Valley) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: trouble with K8T Master2-FAR (dual Opteron) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:38:09 -0000 Hello again, I wrote, Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:36:04 +0900 (JST) > I'm trying to install FreeBSD/amd64 to dual Opteron machine. > > M/B: MSI K8T Master2-FAR > CPU: AMD Opteron 240 x 2 > Mem: 512MB x 2 ( in Slot 1 and 3, Single channel) > > I had some trouble with this installation. I'm so sorry. I fogot very important information. I'm using 5.2-Release. Sincerely ---- Satoshi Sato (satoshi@din.or.jp) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 19:59:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBE616A4CE for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:59:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from bragi.housing.ufl.edu (bragi.housing.ufl.edu [128.227.47.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A5443D53 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:59:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from WillS@housing.ufl.edu) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0 Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:59:54 -0500 Message-ID: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED8CBBE15@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: trouble with K8T Master2-FAR (dual Opteron) Thread-Index: AcPcmptFP/R3ZQ2ISKOLg3BjNEcqJAAEoeaA From: "Will Saxon" To: "Satoshi Sato" , Subject: RE: trouble with K8T Master2-FAR (dual Opteron) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 03:59:57 -0000 > Hello again, >=20 > I wrote, > Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 10:36:04 +0900 (JST) >=20 > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD/amd64 to dual Opteron machine. > >=20 > > M/B: MSI K8T Master2-FAR > > CPU: AMD Opteron 240 x 2 > > Mem: 512MB x 2 ( in Slot 1 and 3, Single channel) > >=20 > > I had some trouble with this installation. >=20 > I'm so sorry. >=20 > I fogot very important information. >=20 > I'm using 5.2-Release. I have not tried 5.2-RELEASE but with 5.2RC2 on the same motherboard = with dual Opteron 244's and the same memory configuration I had the same = problem with ACPI causing a kernel panic when using the install CD. I = was able to boot with ACPI disabled and then install the system without = trouble. After than I was able to compile a new kernel with ACPI and = that kernel booted correctly without panicking. What BIOS revision do you have? Maybe we have different ones. What type = of hard drive are you installing to? I am using a Western Digital Raptor = connected to the onboard serial ATA, and was installing from CDROM. The problem I have had is that the bge driver does not initialize the = onboard bcm5705 controller. Since I have some other buggy hardware, I am = now using a linux distribution for the time being. I noticed that their = tg3 driver also does not initialize the controller correctly, while the = (vendor supplied?) bcm5700 driver works fine. -Will From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 23:25:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9E416A4CE for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:25:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms1.din.or.jp (ms1.din.or.jp [210.135.65.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B185143D3F for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:25:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from satoshi@din.or.jp) Received: from localhost (ppd01-0730.din.or.jp [210.135.82.130]) by ms1.din.or.jp (8.11.7+Sun/3.7W) with ESMTP id i0H7PLn04760 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 16:25:21 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 16:27:16 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040117.162716.640900528.satoshi@din.or.jp> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org From: Satoshi Sato In-Reply-To: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED8CBBE15@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> References: <0E972CEE334BFE4291CD07E056C76ED8CBBE15@bragi.housing.ufl.edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on XEmacs 21.1.14 (Cuyahoga Valley) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: trouble with K8T Master2-FAR (dual Opteron) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 07:25:24 -0000 Thank you Will, From: "Will Saxon" Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:59:54 -0500 > I have not tried 5.2-RELEASE but with 5.2RC2 on the same motherboard with dual Opteron 244's and the same memory configuration I had the same problem with ACPI causing a kernel panic when using the install CD. I was able to boot with ACPI disabled and then install the system without trouble. After than I was able to compile a new kernel with ACPI and that kernel booted correctly without panicking. I just tried another kernel without ACPI. Kernel panic after memory status didn't occur. But other one occur. Now I think, this is not amd64 problem. May be. I'll try i386 CD. > What BIOS revision do you have? Maybe we have different ones. What type of hard drive are you installing to? I am using a Western Digital Raptor connected to the onboard serial ATA, and was installing from CDROM. I'm using Rev. 1.1 BIOS. I got it from MSI Taiwan. http://www.msi.com.tw/program/support/bios/bos/spt_bos_detail.php?UID=484 If yours is 1.0, I'll try it. And my hard drive is Seagate ST3120022A(IDE 120GB). > The problem I have had is that the bge driver does not initialize the onboard bcm5705 controller. Since I have some other buggy hardware, I am now using a linux distribution for the time being. I noticed that their tg3 driver also does not initialize the controller correctly, while the (vendor supplied?) bcm5700 driver works fine. In my case, I can use network via bge... Sincerely --- Satoshi Sato From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 00:06:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E381D16A4CE for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:06:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (rrcs-sw-24-73-246-106.biz.rr.com [24.73.246.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8682443D5D for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:06:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@bigtex.jrv.org) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i0H86jo8081837 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sat, 17 Jan 2004 02:06:45 -0600 (CST) Received: (from james@localhost) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id i0H86jZa081834; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 02:06:45 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 02:06:45 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200401170806.i0H86jZa081834@bigtex.jrv.org> From: James Van Artsdalen To: fredrik@widell.net In-reply-to: <200401170323.i0H3NPGC018321@nic2.widell.net> (fredrik@widell.net) References: <200401170323.i0H3NPGC018321@nic2.widell.net> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/61440: /usr/ports/net/tightvnc does not install on amd64 fbsd 5.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 08:06:48 -0000 This change make tightvnc compile. Someone familiar with tightvnc needs to install it and see what happens. There are a number of pointer/int size mismatch warnings, and grep finds a number of asm's, so I'm not real optimistic. *** work/vnc_unixsrc/Xvnc/config/cf/FreeBSD.cf.~1~ Fri Jan 16 14:36:43 2004 --- work/vnc_unixsrc/Xvnc/config/cf/FreeBSD.cf Fri Jan 16 14:54:19 2004 *************** *** 359,364 **** #include ! #ifdef i386Architecture #include ! #endif --- 359,364 ---- #include ! /* #ifdef i386Architecture */ #include ! /* #endif */ > Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 04:23:25 +0100 (CET) > From: fredrik@widell.net > > -c -O -pipe -ansi -pedantic -Dasm=__asm -I../../.././/include/fonts -I../include -I../../.././ -I../../.././/exports/include -DCSRG_BASED -DSHAPE -DGCCUSESGAS XFree86ServerDefines -DNDEBUG -DFUNCPROTO=15 -DNARROWPROTO bitmap.c > cc: XFree86ServerDefines: No such file or directory From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 13:25:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C696A16A4DB for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:25:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.131.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A1543D41 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:25:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jlfenton@citlink.net) Received: (qmail 14601 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 21:25:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO citlink.net) ([67.136.81.47]) (envelope-sender ) by relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.6) with SMTP for ; 17 Jan 2004 21:25:14 -0000 Message-ID: <4009A83F.4020208@citlink.net> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:25:19 -0700 From: Joe Fenton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <20040117200034.D19BA16A4D6@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20040117200034.D19BA16A4D6@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: trouble with K8T Master2-FAR (dual Opteron) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:25:20 -0000 >Satoshi Sato wrote: > >Hello, > >I'm trying to install FreeBSD/amd64 to dual Opteron machine. > > M/B: MSI K8T Master2-FAR > CPU: AMD Opteron 240 x 2 > Mem: 512MB x 2 ( in Slot 1 and 3, Single channel) > > > Is there some reason you run your memory in single channel mode as opposed to dual channel? You are needlessly cutting your memory throughput in half. CPU 1 does NOT control slots 1 and 2 while CPU 2 controlls slots 2 and 3. CPU 1 controls ALL the memory, and CPU 2 accesses the memory through the HyperTransport link. Unless your memory sticks are badly mismatched, you should have them in slot 1 and 2 for dual channel access. That is how I have my MSI Master2-FAR setup and it runs just peachy. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 17:01:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF87C16A4CE for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 17:01:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms1.din.or.jp (ms1.din.or.jp [210.135.65.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3365643D5C for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 17:01:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from satoshi@din.or.jp) Received: from localhost (ppd01-0730.din.or.jp [210.135.82.130]) by ms1.din.or.jp (8.11.7+Sun/3.7W) with ESMTP id i0I11Pn05045; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 10:01:26 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 10:03:23 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040118.100323.730552313.satoshi@din.or.jp> To: jlfenton@citlink.net From: Satoshi Sato In-Reply-To: <4009A83F.4020208@citlink.net> References: <20040117200034.D19BA16A4D6@hub.freebsd.org> <4009A83F.4020208@citlink.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on XEmacs 21.1.14 (Cuyahoga Valley) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: trouble with K8T Master2-FAR (dual Opteron) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 01:01:31 -0000 Thank you Joe, From: Joe Fenton Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:25:19 -0700 > Is there some reason you run your memory in single > channel mode as opposed to dual channel? You are > needlessly cutting your memory throughput in half. I totally misunderstood the memory installation. I've read the manual and modified memory installation. But panic after "avail memory" still occurs... Sincerely, ---- Satoshi Sato From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 17 18:06:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8002816A4CE for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 18:06:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.131.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D5E43D53 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 18:06:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jlfenton@citlink.net) Received: (qmail 12556 invoked from network); 18 Jan 2004 02:06:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO citlink.net) ([67.136.81.47]) (envelope-sender ) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.6) with SMTP for ; 18 Jan 2004 02:06:53 -0000 Message-ID: <4009EA40.7000104@citlink.net> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 19:06:56 -0700 From: Joe Fenton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Satoshi Sato References: <20040117200034.D19BA16A4D6@hub.freebsd.org> <4009A83F.4020208@citlink.net> <20040118.100323.730552313.satoshi@din.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <20040118.100323.730552313.satoshi@din.or.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: trouble with K8T Master2-FAR (dual Opteron) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 02:06:55 -0000 Satoshi Sato wrote: >Thank you Joe, > >From: Joe Fenton >Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:25:19 -0700 > > > >>Is there some reason you run your memory in single >>channel mode as opposed to dual channel? You are >>needlessly cutting your memory throughput in half. >> >> > >I totally misunderstood the memory installation. >I've read the manual and modified memory installation. > >But panic after "avail memory" still occurs... > > > I know. Someone else mentioned what that problem is, I just wanted to get your memory configured to run as fast as possible so you can panic as quick as possible. :) Eventually, when you work out the problem, the extra speed will come in handy.