From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 15 06:31:25 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B294516A4CE
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 06:31:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from darkness.comp.waw.pl (unknown [195.117.238.236])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7EA43D2D
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 06:31:24 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from pjd@darkness.comp.waw.pl)
Received: by darkness.comp.waw.pl (Postfix, from userid 1009)
	id B54B3ACAE0; Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:31:23 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 15:31:23 +0100
From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040315143123.GB8930@darkness.comp.waw.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc
X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC2 i386
Subject: Bitstring(9) in kernel.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:31:25 -0000


--mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello.

Ok, bitstring(9) is broken for kernel use atm, because leak of calloc()
function. What we should do about it?
Is this patch acceptable or maybe we should add calloc() macro?

	http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/bitstring.h.patch

Or maybe there is calloc() somewhere and I'm missing something?

--=20
Pawel Jakub Dawidek                       http://www.FreeBSD.org
pjd@FreeBSD.org                           http://garage.freebsd.pl
FreeBSD committer                         Am I Evil? Yes, I Am!

--mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAVb47ForvXbEpPzQRAnYKAKDVTw3Oy3Ww6VGDIVPoWuzBQv+S8wCggyhH
CGmnmRn2AL9EpKWQ5ohukJA=
=iFL3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--mxv5cy4qt+RJ9ypb--