From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun  6 07:12:03 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC5716A4CE
	for <arch@FreeBSD.org>; Sun,  6 Jun 2004 07:12:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.macomnet.ru (relay.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE05043D1D
	for <arch@FreeBSD.org>; Sun,  6 Jun 2004 07:12:02 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru)
Received: from mp3 (2zzdxehp@mp3files.int.ru [195.128.64.20])
	by relay.macomnet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i56EBqu515758754;
	Sun, 6 Jun 2004 18:11:52 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 18:11:52 +0400 (MSD)
From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su>
In-Reply-To: <20040605204823.GC692@comp.chem.msu.su>
Message-ID: <20040606181135.R25373@mp3files.int.ru>
References: <20040605204823.GC692@comp.chem.msu.su>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 14:12:03 -0000

On Sun, 6 Jun 2004, 00:48+0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:

> Hi folks,
>
> The SysV way to get rid of child zombies seems to have been supported
> by CURRENT for about 2 years, but I can see no pointers to it in
> the man pages.  Can we conclude that the testing of the feature has
> succeeded, and finally document it?

Yes, please.

-- 
Maxim Konovalov