From owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 14 01:30:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugbusters@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA2916A4CE
	for <freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Apr 2004 01:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7424343D46
	for <freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Apr 2004 01:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from neuhauser@chello.cz)
Received: (qmail 89373 invoked by uid 0); 14 Apr 2004 08:30:49 -0000
Received: from r3al16.mistral.cz (HELO isis.wad.cz) (213.220.229.16)
  by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 14 Apr 2004 08:30:49 -0000
Received: by isis.wad.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 178DA2FDA01; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:31:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:31:19 +0200
From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@chello.cz>
To: freebsd-bugbusters <freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20040414073119.GC1544@isis.wad.cz>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-bugbusters <freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Subject: per-user send-pr defaults: ~/.send-pr.rc?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Coordination of the Problem Report handling effort.
	<freebsd-bugbusters.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugbusters>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugbusters-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugbusters>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugbusters@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugbusters-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugbusters>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugbusters-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:30:51 -0000

I'm aware of the Ceri's testing of GNATS 4, but don't know how far that
got, hence the question instead of a pr with a patch.

Would a patch for send-pr adding support for defaults handling using
an rc file be welcome? If so, should I target send-pr as is in our tree,
the one from the 4.0 tarball, or upstream cvs?

I'm growing tired of fixing several fields in every pr I'm submitting,
and don't want to introduce local hacks to send-pr as I would surely
have to recreate them with every installworld on each of my boxes thanks
to my bad memory.

-- 
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message.    see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html