From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 19 10:45:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F4C16A4CE for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 10:45:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D526D43D39 for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 10:45:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i4JHj2EE013178 for ; Wed, 19 May 2004 10:45:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i4JHj2Ts013177 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 May 2004 10:45:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 10:45:02 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <200405191745.i4JHj2Ts013177@bunrab.catwhisker.org> To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Blurb from ACM TechNews: "A Conversation With Sam Leffler" X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 17:45:04 -0000 For the benefit of those who don't subscribe to ACM's TechNews: I saw this item in today's digest, and thought it worth pointing out. "A Conversation With Sam Leffler" Independent consultant Sam Leffler, who has made valuable contributions to Unix and the Berkeley Software Distribution, explains that when comparing the open source software development model to the closed-source model, it is the people involved rather than the models themselves that determine the ... http://www.acm.org/technews/articles/2004-6/0519w.html#item19 Peace, david -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org I do not "unsubscribe" from email "services" to which I have not explicitly subscribed. Rather, I block spammers' access to SMTP servers I control, and encourage others who are in a position to do so to do likewise.