From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 29 14:33:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BF016A4CE; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:33:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr (postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A2B43D39; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:33:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsidd@online.fr) Received: from imp1-q.free.fr (imp1-q.free.fr [212.27.42.1]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5A7173B8E; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:33:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by imp1-q.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id D3E3436F08; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:32:22 +0200 (MEST) Received: from 210-210-39-26.lan.sify.net (210-210-39-26.lan.sify.net [210.210.39.26]) by imp1-q.free.fr (IMP) with HTTP for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:32:22 +0200 Message-ID: <1093789942.4131e8f6b486a@imp1-q.free.fr> Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 16:32:22 +0200 From: Rahul Siddharthan To: Brad Knowles References: <41248C2F.8020401@quadspeed.com> <417F9703-F1DC-11D8-AE79-000393BB56F2@HiWAAY.net> <007001c485ec$9d3bbb10$3300a8c0@verizon.net> <9FDC1E28-F1E2-11D8-AE79-000393BB56F2@HiWAAY.net> <20040819134840.GA3104@online.fr> <20040822015558.GO92256@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20040827114038.GA2453@online.fr> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.5 X-Originating-IP: 210.210.39.26 cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why top-posting is bad X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2004 14:33:11 -0000 Brad Knowles wrote: > At 5:10 PM +0530 2004-08-27, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: > > >> [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] > >> > >> at the top of such replies and > > > > First comment: you included this message at the top of this mail, but > > the only difference in format I see between your message and mine is > > the quoting ">" marks. Why your "format recovered" message? > > Lines re-wrapped, I should think. Or, if he's responding to > e-mail that was formatted in HTML, then it's probably the first ASCII > conversion/line-wrapping job that has been done to them. None of the above. As you'd have known if you saw my mail (it's in the archives). Rahul