From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May  9 04:15:54 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 28B6416A4D0; Sun,  9 May 2004 04:15:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D228443D49; Sun,  9 May 2004 04:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from brueffer@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (brueffer@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i49BFrdG090869;	Sun, 9 May 2004 04:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from brueffer@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from brueffer@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i49BFrFt090865;
	Sun, 9 May 2004 13:15:53 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from brueffer)
Date: Sun, 9 May 2004 13:15:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Christian Brueffer <brueffer@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200405091115.i49BFrFt090865@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: fox@vader.aacc.cc.md.us, brueffer@FreeBSD.org,
	freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org, brueffer@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/66289: [patch] lib/libc/gen/ualarm.3 refers to
	non-existent argument "value"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Documentation project <freebsd-doc.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-doc@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc>,
	<mailto:freebsd-doc-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 11:15:54 -0000

Synopsis: [patch] lib/libc/gen/ualarm.3 refers to non-existent argument "value"

State-Changed-From-To: open->patched
State-Changed-By: brueffer
State-Changed-When: Sun May 9 13:11:31 CEST 2004
State-Changed-Why: 
The issue was fixed in -CURRENT.  However, I chose to apply
the wording from OpenBSD.
1. to stay at least a bit in sync
2. because i liked it better :-)

Thanks for the submission!


Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-doc->brueffer
Responsible-Changed-By: brueffer
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun May 9 13:11:31 CEST 2004
Responsible-Changed-Why: 
MFC reminder

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=66289