From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 20 11:02:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83FF16A4CE
	for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:02:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E3643D1D
	for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:02:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBKB20jb046932
	for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:02:00 GMT
	(envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org)
Received: (from peter@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBKB1xHx046926
	for emulation@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:01:59 GMT
	(envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org)
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:01:59 GMT
Message-Id: <200412201101.iBKB1xHx046926@freefall.freebsd.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to
	owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f
From: FreeBSD bugmaster <bugmaster@freebsd.org>
To: emulation@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:02:01 -0000

Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems

S  Submitted   Tracker     Resp.       Description
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
o [2002/12/28] kern/46576  emulation   FreeBSD 4.6 broke linux emulation install
o [2003/06/28] kern/53874  emulation   /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base isn't wor
o [2003/07/30] ports/55032 emulation   java/jdk13: SVr4 emulation interferes wit

3 problems total.

Serious problems

S  Submitted   Tracker     Resp.       Description
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
o [2000/09/22] kern/21463  emulation   Linux compatability mode should not allow
o [2000/11/13] kern/22826  emulation   Memory limits have no effect in linux com
o [2001/03/28] kern/26171  emulation   not work Linux-emulator, but hi is work i
o [2001/07/14] kern/28966  emulation   [patch] math libraries in linux emulation
p [2002/04/16] kern/37161  emulation   ext2 linux file system, error handling la
o [2002/11/07] kern/45023  emulation   flexlm does not run with linux-base-7, st
o [2003/09/24] kern/57192  emulation   linux-ibm-java1.4 freeze
f [2004/03/04] ports/63747 emulation   vmmon is not performing
o [2004/06/20] kern/68131  emulation   java/linux-ibm-jdk14: linux ibm jdk 1.4.1
o [2004/06/22] ports/68202 emulation   [patch] Make vmware2 compile on -current
o [2004/06/24] ports/68265 emulation   [patch] Make rtc compile on -current (nee
o [2004/10/20] kern/72922  emulation   linux emulation: suid/sgid threaded appli
o [2004/11/10] kern/73778  emulation   [patch] linux emulation: semctl(IPC_STAT)

13 problems total.

Non-critical problems

S  Submitted   Tracker     Resp.       Description
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
o [1999/04/16] i386/11165  emulation   IBCS2 don't work correctly with PID_MAX 9
o [2000/12/15] kern/23561  emulation   Linux compatibility mode does not support
o [2001/08/14] kern/29698  emulation   linux ipcs doesn'work
o [2002/06/12] kern/39201  emulation   ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confuse 
o [2002/08/11] kern/41543  emulation   Easier wine/w23 support
p [2002/09/04] kern/42404  emulation   TIOCSCTTY not implemented in linuxulator
s [2002/09/06] kern/42466  emulation   linux: 'ipc' typ=258 not implemented
p [2003/01/22] kern/47349  emulation   Fake a sound ioctl (plus linux hook)
o [2003/08/21] kern/55835  emulation   Linux IPC emulation missing SETALL syscal
f [2004/06/30] ports/68532 emulation   Add support for multiple VMWare instances
o [2004/09/09] ports/71536 emulation   emulators/rtc: kernel msg "rtc: [number] 
o [2004/10/19] ports/72865 emulation   emulators/vmware3 crashes on 5.3-STABLE
o [2004/10/20] kern/72920  emulation   linux emulation : path "prefixing" is not
o [2004/10/26] kern/73165  emulation   [patch] getting rid of COMPAT_43 dependan
o [2004/11/10] kern/73777  emulation   [patch] linux emulation: root dir special
o [2004/11/23] kern/74302  emulation   [PATCH] Our Linux binary support does not

16 problems total.

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec 20 23:37:41 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D810F16A4CE
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:37:41 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net
	[205.152.59.70])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9146F43D1F
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:37:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from wrightcs@comcast.net)
Received: from jonathanwin.comcast.net ([67.32.222.187])
	by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.netESMTP
	<20041220233735.SAEI2051.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@jonathanwin.comcast.net>
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 20 Dec 2004 18:37:35 -0500
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20041220150500.02899008@wheresmymailserver.com>
X-Sender: wrightcs@mail.comcast.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:44:26 -0600
To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
From: Jonathan Wright <wrightcs@comcast.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: vmware3 - causing local net downstream 1/14 original speed,
 but upstream unchanged?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2004 23:37:42 -0000


Hello,

After installing vmware3 and recompiling the kernel for various vmware3 
changes, I now get about 1/14 the speed for all local network traffic 
downstream.  *Upstream however, everything is about what it used to 
be.  There are no other problems - strange kernel or vmware error messages, 
and the speed of vmware3 and my native bsd programs are excellent.  This 
occurs after vmware3 is installed.  Vmware3 does not have to be running for 
the downstream speed issue to be present.

My first reaction is this is unavoidable due to the kernel settings 
required for vmware to work, but because everything works OK upstream, 
perhaps I have set something up improperly?

   The only other thing I noticed was that I can't set debug.mpsafenet=0, 
as it is readonly.  But I do have the kernel option NET_WITH_GIANT compiled.

Below are the configuration options I set, and my system information.

I appreciate any help!
Thanks,

- Jonathan

5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE
kernel is GENERIC plus these options:
	options         NET_WITH_GIANT
	options         HZ=1200

/boot/loader.conf (contains only):
	aio_load="YES"

/etc/sysctl.conf (contains only):
	debug.mpsafenet=0
	kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1

VMware settings (I'm only using bridged)
	vmnet1.Bridged = "YES"
	vmnet1.BridgeInterface = "vr0"
	vmnet1.HostOnlyAddress = "192.168.0.1"
	vmnet1.HostOnlyNetMask = "255.255.255.0"

* - Speeds measured with bsd programs (outside the VM).  Tried both FTP and 
a Samba connection to a machine that normally gives out data at 7MB/s.


==============================
Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
         The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #6: Sun Dec 19 17:26:36 CST 2004
     jonathan@jonathan.bluegrass:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JDW
WARNING: Network stack Giant-free, but aio requires Giant.
     Consider adding 'options NET_WITH_GIANT' or setting debug.mpsafenet=0
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) processor (1100.04-MHz 686-class CPU)
   Origin = "AuthenticAMD"  Id = 0x642  Stepping = 2
   Features=0x183f9ff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR>
   AMD Features=0xc0440000<RSVD,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!>
real memory  = 603914240 (575 MB)
avail memory = 581304320 (554 MB)
npx0: [FAST]
npx0: <math processor> on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 interface
acpi0: <VT8371 AWRDACPI> on motherboard
acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0
cpu0: <ACPI CPU (3 Cx states)> on acpi0
acpi_button0: <Power Button> on acpi0
acpi_button1: <Sleep Button> on acpi0
pcib0: <ACPI Host-PCI bridge> port 
0x6000-0x607f,0x5000-0x500f,0x4080-0x40ff,0x4000-0x407f,0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
pci0: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib0
agp0: <VIA 82C8363 (Apollo KT133A) host to PCI bridge> mem 
0xe8000000-0xebffffff at device 0.0 on pci0
pcib1: <PCI-PCI bridge> at device 1.0 on pci0
pci1: <PCI bus> on pcib1
pci1: <display, VGA> at device 0.0 (no driver attached)
isab0: <PCI-ISA bridge> at device 7.0 on pci0
isa0: <ISA bus> on isab0
atapci0: <VIA 82C686B UDMA100 controller> port 
0xd000-0xd00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 7.1 on pci0
atapci0: Correcting VIA config for southbridge data corruption bug
ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
uhci0: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 7 at device 7.2 
on pci0
uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
usb0: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> on uhci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
ums0: Logitech USB Optical Mouse, rev 1.10/21.00, addr 2, iclass 3/1
ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir.
uhci1: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xd800-0xd81f irq 7 at device 7.3 
on pci0
uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED]
usb1: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> on uhci1
usb1: USB revision 1.0
uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
pci0: <bridge, PCI-unknown> at device 7.4 (no driver attached)
sym0: <875> port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem 
0xef000000-0xef000fff,0xef001000-0xef0010ff irq 11 at device 9.0 on pci0
sym0: Tekram NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking
sym0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
vr0: <VIA VT3043 Rhine I 10/100BaseTX> port 0xe000-0xe07f mem 
0xef002000-0xef00207f irq 10 at device 15.0 on pci0
miibus0: <MII bus> on vr0
amphy0: <Am79C873 10/100 media interface> on miibus0
amphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
vr0: Ethernet address: 00:50:ba:04:37:16
pci0: <multimedia, audio> at device 17.0 (no driver attached)
pci0: <input device> at device 17.1 (no driver attached)
fdc0: <floppy drive controller> port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0
fdc0: [FAST]
fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0
ppc0: <Standard parallel printer port> port 0x278-0x27f irq 5 on acpi0
ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode
ppbus0: <Parallel port bus> on ppc0
ppbus0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE
Probing for PnP devices on ppbus0:
ppbus0: <  Brother MFC 4350> HBP,PCL4
plip0: <PLIP network interface> on ppbus0
lpt0: <Printer> on ppbus0
lpt0: Interrupt-driven port
ppi0: <Parallel I/O> on ppbus0
atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0
atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> irq 1 on atkbdc0
kbd0 at atkbd0
atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
pmtimer0 on isa0
sc0: <System console> at flags 0x100 on isa0
sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300>
sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
sio0: port may not be enabled
sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
sio0: type 8250 or not responding
sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
sio1: port may not be enabled
vga0: <Generic ISA VGA> at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0
Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1100043983 Hz quality 800
Timecounters tick every 0.833 msec
acpi_cpu: throttling enabled, 2 steps (100% to 50.0%), currently 100.0%
ad0: 8693MB <WDC AC29100D/J74OA30K> [17662/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66
acd0: DVDROM <DVD-ROM DVD-16X6S/DSG2> at ata1-master UDMA33
Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
cd0 at sym0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
cd0: <PLEXTOR CD-ROM PX-40TW 1.04> Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device
cd0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit)
cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present - 
tray closed
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
WARNING: driver "vmmon" used unreserved major device number 200
vmmon: Module vmmon: registered with major=200 minor=0 tag=$Name: build-570 
(3.2.x mvm) $
vmmon: Module vmmon: initialized
vmnet1: Ethernet address: 00:bd:15:76:00:01
vr0: promiscuous mode enabled
vmnet1: promiscuous mode enabled

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 21 10:06:34 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E61116A4D0
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:06:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from llca513-a.servidoresdns.net (llca513-a.servidoresdns.net
	[217.76.128.120])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7597A43D2F
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:06:33 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from juancr@dsa.es)
Received: from mail.dsa.es (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by llca513-a.servidoresdns.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 62C7046BA08
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org.>;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:06:29 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 217.114.136.133
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user faf352c)
        by llca513-a.servidoresdns.net with HTTP;
        Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:06:29 -0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <2902.217.114.136.133.1103623589.squirrel@llca513-a.servidoresdns.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:06:29 -0000 (GMT)
From: "DSA - JCR" <juancr@dsa.es>
To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2-0.1.7.x
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
Subject: FreeBSD and SCO UNIX
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:06:34 -0000

Hi all :

I have a system (goverment type one) running SCO UNIX on an old system
without RAID and so, and I would like to port it to FreeBSD 5.3, in order
to take all its advantages.

My question are:
- Is FreeBSD 5.3 well tested in order to emulate SCO UNIX?
- This system uses a database from Progress Software Corp. v. 8.3, has
anyone used/ported it under FreeBSD ? it is safe?
- If I port to FreeBSD, the tree structure is the same than SCO? may I
have problems or can I solve them?

I have no problems (I think) with the users, because they use a W2K
application to access the database in the server. My question basically
are for the server.

If anyone has anything more that can help to me, please... ;-)


Thanks in advance

Juan Coruña
Desarrollo de Software Atlantico



From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 21 16:53:57 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9B80616A4CE; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:53:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from multiplay.co.uk (www1.multiplay.co.uk [212.42.16.7])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B7FB843D49; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:53:56 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk)
Received: from vader ([212.135.219.179])
	by multiplay.co.uk (multiplay.co.uk [212.42.16.7])
	(MDaemon.PRO.v7.2.1.R)
	with ESMTP id md50000815610.msg;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:44:14 +0000
Message-ID: <021101c4e77d$81dae0b0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
To: <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:52:47 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
X-Spam-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:44:14 +0000
	(not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-MDRemoteIP: 212.135.219.179
X-Return-Path: killing@multiplay.co.uk
X-MDAV-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:44:16 +0000
Subject: gdb not finding shared libraries for emulated binaries
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 16:53:57 -0000

Is there a way or a patch to make gdb search the relevant compat
directories when debugging a emulated binary.

As it stands I have to symlink all the libs from /compat/linux/lib
which is really messy.

    Steve


================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 

In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 21 18:06:44 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C10DA16A4CE; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 18:06:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from multiplay.co.uk (www1.multiplay.co.uk [212.42.16.7])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0B6A643D41; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 18:06:44 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk)
Received: from vader ([212.135.219.179])
	by multiplay.co.uk (multiplay.co.uk [212.42.16.7])
	(MDaemon.PRO.v7.2.1.R)
	with ESMTP id md50000815853.msg;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:58:01 +0000
Message-ID: <027801c4e787$cfd10600$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
To: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk>,
	<freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
References: <021101c4e77d$81dae0b0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 18:06:32 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
X-Spam-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:58:01 +0000
	(not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-MDRemoteIP: 212.135.219.179
X-Return-Path: killing@multiplay.co.uk
X-MDAV-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Tue, 21 Dec 2004 17:58:01 +0000
Subject: Re: gdb not finding shared libraries for emulated binaries
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 18:06:44 -0000

Can someone remove:
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> from the lists until he disables his auto responder:
[quote]
you have sent a message to me which seems to contain a legal
warning on who can read it, or how it may be distributed, or
whether it may be archived, etc.

i do not accept such email.  my mail user agent detected a legal
notice when i was opening your mail, and automatically deleted it.
so do not expect further response.

yes, i know your mail environment automatically added the legal
notice.  well, my mail environment automatically detected it,
deleted it, and sent this message to you.  so don't expect a lot
of sympathy.

randy
[/quote]


================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 

In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 21 18:27:03 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D04416A4ED
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 18:27:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from hyperreal.org (taz3.hyperreal.org [209.237.226.90])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D38E543D49
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 18:27:02 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from brian@collab.net)
Received: (qmail 24550 invoked from network); 21 Dec 2004 18:27:04 -0000
Received: from localhost.hyperreal.org (HELO fez.hyperreal.org) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost.hyperreal.org with SMTP; 21 Dec 2004 18:27:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 12863 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Dec 2004 18:27:01 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 21 Dec 2004 18:27:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 10:27:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Brian Behlendorf <brian@collab.net>
X-X-Sender: brian@fez.hyperreal.org
To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <027801c4e787$cfd10600$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
Message-ID: <20041221102601.K12087@fez.hyperreal.org>
References: <021101c4e77d$81dae0b0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
 <027801c4e787$cfd10600$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Spam-Rating: localhost.hyperreal.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gdb not finding shared libraries for emulated binaries
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 18:27:03 -0000


Doesn't it seem more appropriate for you to remove your legal disclaimer? 
It's totally inappropriate for a forum like this.  If you can't, get a 
gmail or hotmail account, or something.

 	Brian

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Can someone remove:
> Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> from the lists until he disables his auto 
> responder:
> [quote]
> you have sent a message to me which seems to contain a legal
> warning on who can read it, or how it may be distributed, or
> whether it may be archived, etc.
>
> i do not accept such email.  my mail user agent detected a legal
> notice when i was opening your mail, and automatically deleted it.
> so do not expect further response.
>
> yes, i know your mail environment automatically added the legal
> notice.  well, my mail environment automatically detected it,
> deleted it, and sent this message to you.  so don't expect a lot
> of sympathy.
>
> randy
> [/quote]
>
>
> ================================================
> This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the 
> person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the 
> recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise 
> disseminating it or any information contained in it. 
> In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please 
> telephone (023) 8024 3137
> or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 21 19:21:00 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914DD16A4CE
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:21:00 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3EC43D5D
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:21:00 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu)
Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iBLJL71q005810;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:21:07 -0800
Received: (from brdavis@localhost)
	by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id iBLJL7mB005809;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:21:07 -0800
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 11:21:07 -0800
From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To: DSA - JCR <juancr@dsa.es>
Message-ID: <20041221192107.GB3607@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
References: <2902.217.114.136.133.1103623589.squirrel@llca513-a.servidoresdns.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2902.217.114.136.133.1103623589.squirrel@llca513-a.servidoresdns.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu
cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD and SCO UNIX
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 19:21:00 -0000


--FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 10:06:29AM -0000, DSA - JCR wrote:
> Hi all :
>=20
> I have a system (goverment type one) running SCO UNIX on an old system
> without RAID and so, and I would like to port it to FreeBSD 5.3, in order
> to take all its advantages.
>=20
> My question are:
> - Is FreeBSD 5.3 well tested in order to emulate SCO UNIX?

Not really.  I think I saw a post from someone about it fairly recently,
but it's certaintly not well tested.

> - This system uses a database from Progress Software Corp. v. 8.3, has
> anyone used/ported it under FreeBSD ? it is safe?

I have no idea.

> - If I port to FreeBSD, the tree structure is the same than SCO? may I
> have problems or can I solve them?

The directory struct is probably fairly different since SCO is a SysV
derivative and we're obvioulys BSD based.   Is there some particular
reason you need to migrate?  If the existing system works and the
hardware is in decent shape, I'd be strong tempted to leave it alone.

-- Brooks

--=20
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

--FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFByHeiXY6L6fI4GtQRAqNtAJ4/asJAcKlriSKVVY7uEyFuZbX2QgCgwOy8
czgSSR7qYKBVSV9X1b2hu6U=
=sKXF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW--

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 21 20:16:36 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0D78B16A4D1; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:16:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from multiplay.co.uk (www1.multiplay.co.uk [212.42.16.7])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EE6BF43D45; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:16:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk)
Received: from vader ([212.135.219.179])
	by multiplay.co.uk (multiplay.co.uk [212.42.16.7])
	(MDaemon.PRO.v7.2.1.R)
	with ESMTP id md50000816244.msg;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:06:52 +0000
Message-ID: <02d701c4e799$d19c9910$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
From: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
To: "Brian Behlendorf" <brian@collab.net>
References: <021101c4e77d$81dae0b0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
	<027801c4e787$cfd10600$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
	<20041221102601.K12087@fez.hyperreal.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:15:26 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527
X-Spam-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:06:52 +0000
	(not processed: message from valid local sender)
X-MDRemoteIP: 212.135.219.179
X-Return-Path: killing@multiplay.co.uk
X-MDAV-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:06:54 +0000
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gdb not finding shared libraries for emulated binaries
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 20:16:36 -0000

No not really. I see it as totally inappropriate that someone registering
with a public list should have an auto responder based in harmless content.
I don't want to receive mails from this guy every time I post to the list
just because there's something he doesn't like in the sig of my mails
especially when I have no control over it. What next responding to mails
that include phone numbers?

I don't intend to use another account as why should I, I've been on this
list for years now and don't see why I should have to change because
someone cant get their act together. Totally fair enough for things like
this if I was mailing him personally but Im not and hence it is inappropriate
in my eyes.

Anyway far off topic, discussion closed.

    Steve
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brian Behlendorf" <brian@collab.net>
 
> Doesn't it seem more appropriate for you to remove your legal disclaimer? 
> It's totally inappropriate for a forum like this.  If you can't, get a 
> gmail or hotmail account, or something.


================================================
This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 

In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137
or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 21 21:57:52 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C13416A4CE
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:57:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from delight.idiom.com (delight.idiom.com [216.240.32.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F1F43D46
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:57:51 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from mwm-dated-1104530258.3603c0@mired.org)
Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1])
	by delight.idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8B01D1E0A
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 13:57:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mired.org (mwm@idiom [216.240.32.1])
	by idiom.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id iBLLvd9e081811
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 13:57:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mwm-dated-1104530258.3603c0@mired.org)
Received: (qmail 43086 invoked by uid 1001); 21 Dec 2004 21:57:38 -0000
Received: by guru.mired.org (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1001);
	Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:57:38 -0600 (CST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16840.40017.555403.733008@guru.mired.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:57:37 -0600
To: "Steven Hartland" <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <02d701c4e799$d19c9910$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
References: <021101c4e77d$81dae0b0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
	<027801c4e787$cfd10600$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
	<20041221102601.K12087@fez.hyperreal.org>
	<02d701c4e799$d19c9910$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 15) "Security Through Obscurity" XEmacs
	Lucid
X-Primary-Address: mwm@mired.org
X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`;
	h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\
X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew)
From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
cc: Brian Behlendorf <brian@collab.net>
Subject: Re: gdb not finding shared libraries for emulated binaries
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:57:52 -0000

[Format recovered from top posting.]

In <02d701c4e799$d19c9910$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>, Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> typed:
> From: "Brian Behlendorf" <brian@collab.net>
>  
> > Doesn't it seem more appropriate for you to remove your legal disclaimer? 
> > It's totally inappropriate for a forum like this.  If you can't, get a 
> > gmail or hotmail account, or something.
> No not really. I see it as totally inappropriate that someone registering
> with a public list should have an auto responder based in harmless content.
> I don't want to receive mails from this guy every time I post to the list
> just because there's something he doesn't like in the sig of my mails
> especially when I have no control over it. What next responding to mails
> that include phone numbers?
> 
> I don't intend to use another account as why should I, I've been on this
> list for years now and don't see why I should have to change because
> someone cant get their act together. Totally fair enough for things like
> this if I was mailing him personally but Im not and hence it is inappropriate
> in my eyes.

Just black-list the mail address his notices are coming from.

	<mike
-- 
Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>		http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Dec 21 23:02:14 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AC88616A4CE; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 23:02:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from stella.fs.ei.tum.de (stella.fs.ei.tum.de [129.187.54.7])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D9D7743D2D; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 23:02:09 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from corecode@fs.ei.tum.de)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.fs.ei.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F743697;
	Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:02:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.150.180.180] (r180180.olydorf.swh.mhn.de [10.150.180.180])
	(using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by stella.fs.ei.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4461A68C;
	Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:02:04 +0100 (CET)
From: Simon 'corecode' Schubert <corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 00:01:57 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <021101c4e77d$81dae0b0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <021101c4e77d$81dae0b0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart2725789.5Xr29bxoIc";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200412220002.02741.corecode@fs.ei.tum.de>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS 0.3.12
cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gdb not finding shared libraries for emulated binaries
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 23:02:14 -0000

--nextPart2725789.5Xr29bxoIc
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday, 21. December 2004 17:52, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Is there a way or a patch to make gdb search the relevant compat
> directories when debugging a emulated binary.
>
> As it stands I have to symlink all the libs from /compat/linux/lib
> which is really messy.

you should be using an "emulated" gdb, too.

cheers
  simon

=2D-=20
/"\
\ /
 \     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/ \  Against HTML Mail and News

--nextPart2725789.5Xr29bxoIc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBByKtqr5S+dk6z85oRAg3NAKD1g+DvV6eIm7rQxwp8GyUWCS/j5wCg/K4S
XChHQciRL7W224OSkQl1BwQ=
=6FL3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2725789.5Xr29bxoIc--

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 22 11:32:02 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1A8F116A4CE; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:32:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
	[128.131.111.2])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B6B2143D3F; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:32:01 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from [128.131.111.60] (acrux [128.131.111.60])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3B0FD13787; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:31:56 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 12:31:58 +0100 (CET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <02d701c4e799$d19c9910$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.61.0412221230500.82198@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <021101c4e77d$81dae0b0$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
	<20041221102601.K12087@fez.hyperreal.org>
	<02d701c4e799$d19c9910$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
cc: Brian Behlendorf <brian@collab.net>
Subject: Re: [emulation] gdb not finding shared libraries for emulated
	binaries
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:32:02 -0000

On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Steven Hartland wrote:
> No not really. I see it as totally inappropriate that someone registering
> with a public list should have an auto responder based in harmless content.

Rather to the contrary, I consider *your* disclaimer completely 
inappropriate for public lists.

> I don't intend to use another account as why should I, I've been on this
> list for years now and don't see why I should have to change because
> someone cant get their act together.

Please get *your* act together, thanks.

Gerald
-- 
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry)   gerald@pfeifer.com   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 24 06:19:38 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B1C16A4CE
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:19:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137F843D1D
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:19:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sanjaymakadia@gmail.com)
Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so97550wra
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:19:37 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	b=KkkPpwVA4hcabDRCWorrss1JnLfa8v3VGj7XFACHlNuLreqK7qPiU/I+LLcMRvCjwImKwVxzUMpsblara6ILQxs8+ugIgbRTapVWzbYkejIPCw0YWtcQJaB0m72Ed3xg4hvcFTxMKtvLCMSlWnAczPDgmiMWvMfaaY8EZWAfnIg=
Received: by 10.54.6.61 with SMTP id 61mr370594wrf;
        Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:19:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.54.48.1 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2004 22:19:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <e173e7c104122322194d6ef4cb@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:19:37 +0000
From: Sanjay Makadia <sanjaymakadia@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: ndis wrapper question
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Sanjay Makadia <sanjaymakadia@gmail.com>
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 06:19:38 -0000

I am using freebsd 5.3 with ndis support.  I am using netgear wg311
wireless pci card.  I was able to load the ndis module and it was able
to recognize my pci card.  I can use it perfectly fine when i am
browsing on the internet.  However when i try to download a binary
file, the ndis driver gets stuck after some time and becomes
unresponsive.  I have to unload the module and reload it to make it
work.  I am sure i am missing some configuration.  Here is the output
i am getting for ifconfig ndis0:
freebsd# ifconfig ndis0
ndis0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        inet6 fe80::20f:b5ff:fe06:e3a3%ndis0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
        inet 192.168.2.51 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255
        ether 00:0f:b5:06:e3:a3
        media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect
        status: associated
        ssid MSHOME 1:MSHOME
        channel 6 authmode OPEN powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100
        rtsthreshold 2312 protmode CTS
        wepmode OFF weptxkey 1

Thank for your help in advance.  -Sanjay.

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 24 08:40:17 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EC64F16A4CE; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:40:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C0F3943D55; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:40:17 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phantom@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (phantom@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBO8eHRf079358;
	Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:40:17 GMT
	(envelope-from phantom@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from phantom@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBO8eHMx079354;
	Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:40:17 GMT
	(envelope-from phantom)
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:40:17 GMT
From: Alexey Zelkin <phantom@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200412240840.iBO8eHMx079354@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: brucegb@realtime.net, phantom@FreeBSD.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/46576: FreeBSD 4.6 broke linux emulation install w/SVR4
	emulation enabled.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:40:18 -0000

Synopsis: FreeBSD 4.6 broke linux emulation install w/SVR4 emulation enabled.

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: phantom
State-Changed-When: Fri Dec 24 08:36:23 GMT 2004
State-Changed-Why: 
All linux binaries are SYSV elf branded.  When svr4.ko is loaded -- it handles
them.  So, in order to run linux binaries while svr4 enabled, you have to
rebrand them first.  (call 'brandelf -t Linux <execfile>' for each binary)


http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=46576

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 24 08:42:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2C41716A4CE; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:42:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0080343D49; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:42:13 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phantom@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (phantom@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBO8gCLD079533;
	Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:42:12 GMT
	(envelope-from phantom@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from phantom@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBO8gCS0079529;
	Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:42:12 GMT
	(envelope-from phantom)
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:42:12 GMT
From: Alexey Zelkin <phantom@FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <200412240842.iBO8gCS0079529@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: materribile@yahoo.com, phantom@FreeBSD.org,
	emulation@FreeBSD.org, phantom@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/55032: java/jdk13: SVr4 emulation interferes with install
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 08:42:13 -0000

Synopsis: java/jdk13: SVr4 emulation interferes with install

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: phantom
State-Changed-When: Fri Dec 24 08:40:36 GMT 2004
State-Changed-Why: 
All linux binaries are SYSV elf branded.  When svr4.ko is loaded -- it handles
them.  So, in order to run linux binaries while svr4 enabled, you have to
rebrand them first.  (call 'brandelf -t Linux <execfile>' for each binary)



Responsible-Changed-From-To: emulation->phantom
Responsible-Changed-By: phantom
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Dec 24 08:40:36 GMT 2004
Responsible-Changed-Why: 


http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=55032

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 24 13:17:49 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E3C16A4CE
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:17:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail4.speakeasy.net (mail4.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.204])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF9343D1D
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:17:48 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from omniBSD@speakeasy.net)
Received: (qmail 22741 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2004 13:17:48 -0000
Received: from acute.anhedonia.com (HELO [10.20.30.10]) (omni@[66.93.24.213])
          (envelope-sender <omniBSD@speakeasy.net>)
          by mail4.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <wrightcs@comcast.net>; 24 Dec 2004 13:17:48 -0000
Message-ID: <41CC1747.1060104@speakeasy.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 07:19:03 -0600
From: Ash <omniBSD@speakeasy.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US;
	rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041104 Netscape/7.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jonathan Wright <wrightcs@comcast.net>
References: <5.0.0.25.2.20041220150500.02899008@wheresmymailserver.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.2.20041220150500.02899008@wheresmymailserver.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: vmware3 - causing local net downstream 1/14 original speed, but
 upstream unchanged?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:17:49 -0000

Jonathan Wright wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> After installing vmware3 and recompiling the kernel for various vmware3 
> changes, I now get about 1/14 the speed for all local network traffic 
> downstream.  *Upstream however, everything is about what it used to be.  
> There are no other problems - strange kernel or vmware error messages, 
> and the speed of vmware3 and my native bsd programs are excellent.  This 
> occurs after vmware3 is installed.  Vmware3 does not have to be running 
> for the downstream speed issue to be present.

When you say "VMware does not have to be running", I assume you mean a 
virtual machine is not running. VMWare puts your interface in 
promiscuous mode. IIRC, the interface remains in promiscuous mode even 
when VMWare is not running (unless you stop disable vmnet or use 
ifconfig -promisc to disable promiscuous mode on your interface). I'm 
wondering if for some reason promiscuous mode is affecting your speed.

What happens if you exit out of a VMware virtual machine and then run 
the following command:

	# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/001.vmware.sh stop

Does your performance improve? If not, check to make sure the interface 
is no longer in promiscuous mode (look for the word "PROMISC" in the 
first line of output when you run "ifconfig vr0"). You can manually 
disable promiscuous mode by running the following command:

	# ifconfig vr0 -promisc


What is vr0 plugged into (hub or switch? brand?)?

> 
> My first reaction is this is unavoidable due to the kernel settings 
> required for vmware to work, but because everything works OK upstream, 
> perhaps I have set something up improperly?
> 
>   The only other thing I noticed was that I can't set debug.mpsafenet=0, 
> as it is readonly.  But I do have the kernel option NET_WITH_GIANT 
> compiled.

How are you trying to change the value of debug.mpsafenet? I don't think 
  you can change it using sysctl from the command line. You must change 
this at boot time by added the following in /boot/loader.conf and then 
rebooting your system:

	debug.mpsafenet=0


> 
> Below are the configuration options I set, and my system information.
> 
> I appreciate any help!
> Thanks,
> 
> - Jonathan
> 
> 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE
> kernel is GENERIC plus these options:
>     options         NET_WITH_GIANT
>     options         HZ=1200
> 
> /boot/loader.conf (contains only):
>     aio_load="YES"
> 
> /etc/sysctl.conf (contains only):
>     debug.mpsafenet=0
>     kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1
> 
> VMware settings (I'm only using bridged)
>     vmnet1.Bridged = "YES"
>     vmnet1.BridgeInterface = "vr0"
>     vmnet1.HostOnlyAddress = "192.168.0.1"
>     vmnet1.HostOnlyNetMask = "255.255.255.0"
> 
> * - Speeds measured with bsd programs (outside the VM).  Tried both FTP 
> and a Samba connection to a machine that normally gives out data at 7MB/s.
> 
> 
> ==============================
> Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project.
> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
>         The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
> FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #6: Sun Dec 19 17:26:36 CST 2004
>     jonathan@jonathan.bluegrass:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JDW
> WARNING: Network stack Giant-free, but aio requires Giant.
>     Consider adding 'options NET_WITH_GIANT' or setting debug.mpsafenet=0
> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
> CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) processor (1100.04-MHz 686-class CPU)
>   Origin = "AuthenticAMD"  Id = 0x642  Stepping = 2
>   
> Features=0x183f9ff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR> 
> 
>   AMD Features=0xc0440000<RSVD,AMIE,DSP,3DNow!>
> real memory  = 603914240 (575 MB)
> avail memory = 581304320 (554 MB)
> npx0: [FAST]
> npx0: <math processor> on motherboard
> npx0: INT 16 interface
> acpi0: <VT8371 AWRDACPI> on motherboard
> acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
> Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
> acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0
> cpu0: <ACPI CPU (3 Cx states)> on acpi0
> acpi_button0: <Power Button> on acpi0
> acpi_button1: <Sleep Button> on acpi0
> pcib0: <ACPI Host-PCI bridge> port 
> 0x6000-0x607f,0x5000-0x500f,0x4080-0x40ff,0x4000-0x407f,0xcf8-0xcff on 
> acpi0
> pci0: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib0
> agp0: <VIA 82C8363 (Apollo KT133A) host to PCI bridge> mem 
> 0xe8000000-0xebffffff at device 0.0 on pci0
> pcib1: <PCI-PCI bridge> at device 1.0 on pci0
> pci1: <PCI bus> on pcib1
> pci1: <display, VGA> at device 0.0 (no driver attached)
> isab0: <PCI-ISA bridge> at device 7.0 on pci0
> isa0: <ISA bus> on isab0
> atapci0: <VIA 82C686B UDMA100 controller> port 
> 0xd000-0xd00f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 7.1 on pci0
> atapci0: Correcting VIA config for southbridge data corruption bug
> ata0: channel #0 on atapci0
> ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
> uhci0: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 7 at device 
> 7.2 on pci0
> uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
> usb0: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> on uhci0
> usb0: USB revision 1.0
> uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
> ums0: Logitech USB Optical Mouse, rev 1.10/21.00, addr 2, iclass 3/1
> ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir.
> uhci1: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> port 0xd800-0xd81f irq 7 at device 
> 7.3 on pci0
> uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED]
> usb1: <VIA 83C572 USB controller> on uhci1
> usb1: USB revision 1.0
> uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
> uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
> pci0: <bridge, PCI-unknown> at device 7.4 (no driver attached)
> sym0: <875> port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem 
> 0xef000000-0xef000fff,0xef001000-0xef0010ff irq 11 at device 9.0 on pci0
> sym0: Tekram NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking
> sym0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
> vr0: <VIA VT3043 Rhine I 10/100BaseTX> port 0xe000-0xe07f mem 
> 0xef002000-0xef00207f irq 10 at device 15.0 on pci0
> miibus0: <MII bus> on vr0
> amphy0: <Am79C873 10/100 media interface> on miibus0
> amphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
> vr0: Ethernet address: 00:50:ba:04:37:16
> pci0: <multimedia, audio> at device 17.0 (no driver attached)
> pci0: <input device> at device 17.1 (no driver attached)
> fdc0: <floppy drive controller> port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0
> fdc0: [FAST]
> fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0
> ppc0: <Standard parallel printer port> port 0x278-0x27f irq 5 on acpi0
> ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode
> ppbus0: <Parallel port bus> on ppc0
> ppbus0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE
> Probing for PnP devices on ppbus0:
> ppbus0: <  Brother MFC 4350> HBP,PCL4
> plip0: <PLIP network interface> on ppbus0
> lpt0: <Printer> on ppbus0
> lpt0: Interrupt-driven port
> ppi0: <Parallel I/O> on ppbus0
> atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0
> atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> irq 1 on atkbdc0
> kbd0 at atkbd0
> atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
> pmtimer0 on isa0
> sc0: <System console> at flags 0x100 on isa0
> sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300>
> sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
> sio0: port may not be enabled
> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
> sio0: type 8250 or not responding
> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
> sio1: port may not be enabled
> vga0: <Generic ISA VGA> at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0
> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1100043983 Hz quality 800
> Timecounters tick every 0.833 msec
> acpi_cpu: throttling enabled, 2 steps (100% to 50.0%), currently 100.0%
> ad0: 8693MB <WDC AC29100D/J74OA30K> [17662/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66
> acd0: DVDROM <DVD-ROM DVD-16X6S/DSG2> at ata1-master UDMA33
> Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
> cd0 at sym0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
> cd0: <PLEXTOR CD-ROM PX-40TW 1.04> Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device
> cd0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit)
> cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present 
> - tray closed
> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
> WARNING: driver "vmmon" used unreserved major device number 200
> vmmon: Module vmmon: registered with major=200 minor=0 tag=$Name: 
> build-570 (3.2.x mvm) $
> vmmon: Module vmmon: initialized
> vmnet1: Ethernet address: 00:bd:15:76:00:01
> vr0: promiscuous mode enabled
> vmnet1: promiscuous mode enabled
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Dec 24 13:47:37 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8FC16A4CE
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:47:37 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mailrelay02.solcon.nl (maillb.solcon.nl [212.45.32.200])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AB643D1D
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:47:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from lists@asphalia.nl)
Received: from fransjan.asphalia.local (dsl-213-233-254-117.solcon.nl
	[213.233.254.117])id iBODlWjm003282
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>; Fri, 24 Dec 2004 14:47:32 +0100
From: "Frans-Jan v. Steenbeek" <lists@asphalia.nl>
Organization: Asphalia VOF
To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 14:47:34 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200412241447.34755.lists@asphalia.nl>
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/540/Tue Oct 19 14:59:23 2004
	clamav-milter version 0.80j
	on mailrelay02
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Wine-20041201
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2004 13:47:37 -0000

Hi folks,

I have been working lately to provide our company with a "Terminal 
Service"-like solution using FreeBSD (5.3-STABLE). Since we have to use a 
software suite only available on windows (AccountView 6.1, based on Visual 
Foxpro) I have worked it all out using Wine-20040505. Anything after this 
release is reported to fail, but I have heard rumors that 20041201 is 
working, albeit by patching the kernel.

So, are these rumors true? What should I do to get it running, and what are 
the consequences? I still have some issues (mostly filesystem-related) wich I 
hope (but not expect) are better solvable with the new wine. Apart from that: 
I would like to put AccountView in the wine-AppDb, and it would be nicer to 
report that it works with recent wine's to...

(btw: my email-adres seems bogus, but I use it for lists and lists only... My 
other mail-adres is strictly for suppliers and clients, so...)

Regards,

Frans-Jan v. Steenbeek
Asphalia VOF
http://www.asphalia.nl
lists@asphalia.nl

From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 25 10:12:45 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA43816A4CE
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:12:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
	[128.131.111.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8947B43D1D
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:12:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from [128.131.111.60] (acrux [128.131.111.60])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DC3AF137C2; Sat, 25 Dec 2004 11:12:38 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 11:12:40 +0100 (CET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: "Frans-Jan v. Steenbeek" <lists@asphalia.nl>
In-Reply-To: <200412241447.34755.lists@asphalia.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.61.0412251110370.90476@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <200412241447.34755.lists@asphalia.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [emulation] Wine-20041201
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>,
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 10:12:46 -0000

On Fri, 24 Dec 2004, Frans-Jan v. Steenbeek wrote:
> I have been working lately to provide our company with a "Terminal 
> Service"-like solution using FreeBSD (5.3-STABLE). Since we have to use a 
> software suite only available on windows (AccountView 6.1, based on Visual 
> Foxpro) I have worked it all out using Wine-20040505. Anything after this 
> release is reported to fail, but I have heard rumors that 20041201 is 
> working, albeit by patching the kernel.

20041201 is working, and doing so without patching the kernel.

> So, are these rumors true? What should I do to get it running, and what 
> are the consequences?

cd ports/emulators/wine ; make ; make install

I wouldn't claim 20041201 to be perfect on FreeBSD, but there have been
several positive reports on FreeBSD 5.3 (and anything between 20040505
and 20041201 definitely was broken).

Gerald
-- 
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry)   gerald@pfeifer.com   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/