From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 4 16:32:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB38116A4CE; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 16:32:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from erg.verweg.com (erg.verweg.com [217.77.141.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1359D43D5C; Sun, 4 Jul 2004 16:32:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephanb@whacky.net) Received: from [192.168.1.104] (152.14.static.dsl.luna.net [217.77.152.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by erg.verweg.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i64GWkWs097757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 4 Jul 2004 18:32:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stephanb@whacky.net) X-Authentication-Warning: erg.verweg.com: Host 152.14.static.dsl.luna.net [217.77.152.14] claimed to be [192.168.1.104] Message-ID: <40E8311F.9060100@whacky.net> Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 18:32:31 +0200 From: Stephan van Beerschoten User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040703) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: newbie@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on erg.verweg.com Subject: newbie to hw raid and lvm X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 16:32:52 -0000 Hi all, I jus this morning installed a new copy of -current onto a desktop platform with a raidcontroller on its motherboard. It is a promise controller and it works. However, I wonder now if there is such a thing as a LVM for FreeBSD ? Vinum, I noticed, cannot help me with this, but having a blob of 160GB (2x 160gb mirrored) would be a lot more helpfull if I could put so-called softpartitions on top of it. Much like what I'm used to on the Solaris platform that allows me on-the-fly creations and resizes of volumes. Also, I noticed the kernel recognized each individual disk which is part of my mirror. Is it possible to do anything with the raid configuration from a userland perspective or is this information given only because the kernel happends to be able to register it, but one cannot actually DO anything with this information ? /Stephan