From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 16 01:14:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5230316A4CE for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:14:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from brisefer.cediti.be (porquepix.cediti.be [213.189.188.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02CE43D2F for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:14:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Olivier.Cherrier@cediti.be) Received: by brisefer.nat.cediti.be with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:13:06 +0100 Message-ID: From: Olivier Cherrier To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:13:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: Anybody Use 2 or More CPU at Production Env. ( SMP ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:14:52 -0000 >Seconded. We have a few hundred Dual SMP PIII and Dual Xeon (2.4Ghz w/ >HT) machines running 4.9 without any hiccups whatsoever. Not so luck for me. I tried some times to run a 4.7-smp and 4.8-smp on a dual PIII - 733 MHz but I always falled in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/48029 which is still in the 'open' state. I can imagine that 5.x is far more stable. oc