From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 10 06:52:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA06F16A4CE for ; Mon, 10 May 2004 06:52:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omoikane.mb.skyweb.ca (64-42-246-34.mb.skyweb.ca [64.42.246.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EB543D2D for ; Mon, 10 May 2004 06:52:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@skyweb.ca) Received: by omoikane.mb.skyweb.ca (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9C0F861CBA; Mon, 10 May 2004 08:52:44 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Johnston To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 08:52:44 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <200405080907.i48974WB026257@shark.levkov.com> In-Reply-To: <200405080907.i48974WB026257@shark.levkov.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200405100852.44320.mjohnston@skyweb.ca> Subject: Re: bg proccess limit X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 13:52:02 -0000 "Coldfade" wrote: > i mean limit the background proccesses amount ... i work in a shell > providing company but can`t find suitable solution for the BSD > platform This is a Simple Matter of Scripting. Start with: ps -x -U $THEUSER | egrep '^[0-9]+ +\?\?' to find processes owned by THEUSER with no controlling terminal (?? in the TT column in ps). You can use egrep -c to count the processes, then pipe the results of the same grep through tail to find some processes to kill off. Run that once a minute and you're set. For a nicer fix, I'd go to Perl or Python - just run ps aux once, store the results into a hash of arrays (dictionary of lists) by username, then go through that hash/dict, comparing it to your policies, and kill off processes that are over the limit. You could also use ulimit, but that will only let you limit the total number of processes (instead of the number of background processes.) Still, for most users, the number of background processes allowed plus two or three will be sufficient. HTH, Mark From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 10 07:45:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FC916A4CE for ; Mon, 10 May 2004 07:45:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from personainc.net (mail.personainc.net [24.139.0.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC06143D1F for ; Mon, 10 May 2004 07:45:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from afortin-lists@personainc.ca) Received: (qmail 26804 invoked by uid 1372); 10 May 2004 14:45:35 -0000 Received: from afortin-lists@personainc.ca by larry by uid 103 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (clamuko: 0.67. Clear:RC:1(10.64.0.82):. Processed in 0.030444 secs); 10 May 2004 14:45:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO AFORTIN) (10.64.0.82) by mail.personainc.net with SMTP; 10 May 2004 14:45:34 -0000 From: "Andre Fortin" To: Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 10:45:34 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 14:45:37 -0000 Hello, I'm having a problem with qmail-ldap, which I've posted before on the qmail-ldap lists but have never had any response.. The problem only occurs on FreeBSD machines (I've had a couple of Redhat Linux machines with the same software which didn't display this behavior). Quite often, qmail-pop3d and qmail-local won't exit properly, and continue running forever. They continue putting a load on our NetApp NFS server, as well as on the NFS clients. Here is some output from top: 54487 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 1 26:32 6.10% 6.10% qmail-pop3d 26611 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 1 8:00 6.05% 6.05% qmail-pop3d 3094 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 1 16:38 6.01% 6.01% qmail-pop3d 2905 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 1 8:43 5.96% 5.96% qmail-pop3d 86259 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 0 21:23 5.91% 5.91% qmail-pop3d 96153 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 0 18:59 5.91% 5.91% qmail-pop3d 16095 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 1 16:25 5.91% 5.91% qmail-pop3d 45949 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 0 26:52 5.86% 5.86% qmail-pop3d 68325 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 1 21:43 5.86% 5.86% qmail-pop3d 10475 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 1 8:24 5.86% 5.86% qmail-pop3d 68651 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 0 6:56 5.81% 5.81% qmail-pop3d 48657 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 0 13:03 5.76% 5.76% qmail-pop3d 33260 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 1 10:51 5.71% 5.71% qmail-pop3d 93965 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 1 28:21 5.66% 5.66% qmail-pop3d 58937 vmail -1 0 920K 472K nfsrcv 1 21:50 5.62% 5.62% qmail-local 61677 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 0 21:49 5.52% 5.52% qmail-pop3d 41602 vmail 2 0 912K 464K sbwait 0 15:46 5.52% 5.52% qmail-pop3d 99084 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 0 2:43 5.42% 5.42% qmail-pop3d 91885 vmail -1 0 920K 472K nfsrcv 0 14:29 5.32% 5.32% qmail-pop3d 46140 vmail -1 0 912K 464K nfsrcv 0 32:09 5.27% 5.27% qmail-pop3d The qmail-local process writes the message succesfully.. This doesn't happen for all deliveries or POP3 requests, only some, but they never exit and I have to kill them off manually. I am using FreeBSD 4.10-PRERELEASE and 4.9-STABLE (3 machines clustered, 2 using 4.9 1 using 4.10). I have a Vpopmail installation on a seperate cluster, using the same netapp filer and there is no problem with that setup (also running 4.9-STABLE but from a different CVS). I am using qmail 1.03 with qmail-ldap-1.03-20040401.patch . Thanks in advance for any help.. This is not causing any major problems, but it is very annoying to have to kill off these processes every couple of hours.. Thanks Andre From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 11 05:37:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E70916A4CE for ; Tue, 11 May 2004 05:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from services.sendmail.org (services.Sendmail.org [209.246.26.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D483843D1F for ; Tue, 11 May 2004 05:37:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mailnull@services.sendmail.org) Received: from services.sendmail.org (services.sendmail.org [209.246.26.22]) i4BCbmkS002806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 11 May 2004 05:37:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mailnull@services.sendmail.org) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by services.sendmail.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i4BCbmrx002805; Tue, 11 May 2004 05:37:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mailnull) Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 05:37:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200405111237.i4BCbmrx002805@services.sendmail.org> From: listmanager@lists.sendmail.org (Mailing List Manager) To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-List-Software: listmanager v2.109, Copyright (c) 1994-2001, M. S. Kucherawy Errors-To: listmanager-admin@lists.sendmail.org In-Reply-To: <200405111237.i4BCbQFA062682@horsey.gshapiro.net> Subject: Re: Delivery (majordomo@lists.sendmail.org) X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: listmanager@lists.sendmail.org List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 12:37:51 -0000 Welcome to listmanager v2.109, Copyright (c) 1994-2001, M. S. Kucherawy > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. Unrecognized command "This". Use the "help" command for assistance. > ------=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016 Unrecognized command "------=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016". Use the "help" command for assistance. > Content-Type: text/plain; Unrecognized command "Content-Type:". Use the "help" command for assistance. > charset="Windows-1252" Unrecognized command "charset=Windows-1252". Use the "help" command for assistance. > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Unrecognized command "Content-Transfer-Encoding:". Use the "help" command for assistance. Too many unrecognized commands; aborting *** END OF INPUT *** 5 commands processed. Resources used: Times: 0.0s real, 0.000s user, 0.019s kernel Memory: 130 page faults, 0 swaps, 1168 max. resident I/O: 0 reads, 0 writes From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 12 19:02:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEF516A4CE; Wed, 12 May 2004 19:02:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.yazzy.org (mail.yazzy.org [217.8.140.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195A043D48; Wed, 12 May 2004 19:02:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@yazzy.org) Received: from localhost (yazzy [192.168.98.11]) by mail.yazzy.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E592339814; Thu, 13 May 2004 04:02:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 04:02:22 +0200 From: Martin Jessa To: z3l3zt@hackunite.net Message-Id: <20040513040222.2b80e76e.freebsd@yazzy.org> In-Reply-To: <1886.213.112.193.11.1084410012.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net> References: <1886.213.112.193.11.1084410012.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net> Organization: WRS ASA X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 02:02:35 -0000 Hi. To begin with this email should rather go to the ISP list. My advice is to run Exim on your email gateway. I've tested and ran postfix, messagewall, qmail+qmailscanner, mailscanner and exim is just the best stuff ever. Not only it's way faster than perl based messagewall, amavisd and mailscanner etc but it also has neat stuff like making connections back to the sender's MX checking for validity of the sender's email. Since most of the spam is sent with forged reply to address this is one heck of a anti-spam solution. Aditionally you should use RBLs to check your emails, and regular expressions to filter out certain attachement types. Spamassassin can use Bayesian classification to help you perform scanning more efficiently. Search for razor in the ports too. There are many howtos around about that. I personally run Exim on my email router/gw and postfix on my "real" email server. Cheers, YazzY On Thu, 13 May 2004 03:00:12 +0200 (CEST) "Jesper Wallin" wrote: > Heya folks > > First of all, sorry if this isn't the correct list, but yet, I think spam is a kind of > network attack and should be treated as a security issue.. I run a working mail server > using Postfix, MySQL, Courier-IMAP, SpamAssassin and ClamAV (amavisd-new) .. > > I've checked the configuration file for SpamAssassin, but yet I havn't find any good > solution for spam.. Sure, spam will always be a problem and I guess it's impossible to > filter 100% of all spam.. > > Currently, I've made a filter in my mail client which move all mails with a header > containing "Spam-Level: ***" to a "spam" directory.. The last 2 months, spam and spam > only has been triggered/filtered.. so I think it's quite useful.. yet, it does send the > mail.. if it's triggered spam, why does it even send it to the mailbox instead of just > blocking it? I assume that's because of a bad configuration made by myself.. > > Also, a lot of mail which is spam is not triggered as spam, is it possible to improve > spamassassin to filter more mails? Like, the way a antivirus program works, (have ids > for each virus), does spamassassin has any "spam ids" or something similar to make it > filter new mails? > > Once again, sorry if this mail has been sent to the wrong list, and sorry for asking > alot of questions which might already been documented. > > > Regards, > Jesper Wallin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-security@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-security-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 13 00:53:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F01416A4CE; Thu, 13 May 2004 00:53:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cyclades.de (mail.cyclades.de [62.225.173.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8144943D1F; Thu, 13 May 2004 00:53:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mh@kernel32.de) Received: from [192.168.10.145] (helo=kernel32.de) by www.cyclades.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BOB1k-0005nt-00; Thu, 13 May 2004 09:53:12 +0200 Message-ID: <40A32939.9000100@kernel32.de> Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 09:52:25 +0200 From: Marian Hettwer User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040414) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Jessa References: <1886.213.112.193.11.1084410012.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net> <20040513040222.2b80e76e.freebsd@yazzy.org> In-Reply-To: <20040513040222.2b80e76e.freebsd@yazzy.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: z3l3zt@hackunite.net cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 07:53:35 -0000 Hi Martin, Martin Jessa wrote: > Not only it's way faster than perl based messagewall, amavisd and mailscanner etc but it also has neat stuff like making connections back to the sender's MX checking for validity of the sender's email. This Feature sounds interesting. How is it actually called in exim ? I'd like to check the exim docu to see some details, because it really sounds interesting. Could you provide me with some keywords to search for ? TIA, Marian From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 13 01:01:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE84016A4CE for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 01:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp21.singnet.com.sg (smtp21.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65C743D46 for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 01:01:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sajari@singnet.com.sg) Received: from staff.singnet.com.sg (singapura.singnet.com.sg [165.21.10.10]) i4D814nY031814 for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 16:01:04 +0800 Received: from staff.singnet.com.sg (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by staff.singnet.com.sg (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i4D813ir024240 for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 16:01:03 +0800 Received: from localhost (sajari@localhost)i4D813ZI024237 for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 16:01:03 +0800 X-Authentication-Warning: staff.singnet.com.sg: sajari owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 16:01:03 +0800 (SGT) From: SaJaRi To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: gif interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 08:01:11 -0000 Hi there! Is there a limit to the number of gif interface (tunnel interface) that can be created? Cheers! ***************************** Sajari Bin Sarkan * Network Support * Corporate Product * IP Business Domestic Market * ***************************** -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.i mQBtAjc9fI4AAAEDAMx6kkJcuhMq9TJEecb3JaiHe6fHRMlaVX/5Om7eCi2xdONO HfVeuTUryabhb7J2mRgKo7z4YWoNxOdNdDtRVaMfD7H18mdV0KYvlR/+9NAgKGxi UEaOYPJsKNHWCAKV1QAFEbQeU2FKYVJpIDxzYWphcmlAc2luZ25ldC5jb20uc2c+ =gG2n -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 13 04:25:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F76016A4CE for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 04:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl (antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl [193.0.78.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1CA43D48 for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 04:25:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mcson@obta.uw.edu.pl) Received: from pf139.warszawa.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl (pf139.warszawa.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl [213.76.101.139]) by antyk.obta.uw.edu.pl (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i4DBONQG066124 for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 13:24:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mcson@obta.uw.edu.pl) Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 13:25:25 +0200 From: Maksymilian Wrzesinski X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.49) Personal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <5911262001.20040513132525@obta.uw.edu.pl> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: unix-account creation via web-form X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maksymilian Wrzesinski List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 11:25:55 -0000 Hello all, To ease proces of account creation and removal i need to develope some kind of small web form/template to provide me with web interface for simple account management. It has to be secure but may be robust. Are there any sort of utils of this kind in ports/packages collection? I cant see any. tia, -- Maksymilian mailto:mcson@obta.uw.edu.pl From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 13 04:47:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D7D16A4CE for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 04:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from flash.mipk.kharkiv.edu (flash.mipk.kharkiv.edu [194.44.157.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D56D43D2D for ; Thu, 13 May 2004 04:46:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from artem@mipk.kharkiv.edu) Received: from mipk.kharkiv.edu (rainbow.mipk.kharkiv.edu [192.168.9.241]) i4DBjIT1033442; Thu, 13 May 2004 14:45:19 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from artem@mipk.kharkiv.edu) Message-ID: <40A35FCE.4040506@mipk.kharkiv.edu> Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 14:45:18 +0300 From: Artyom Viklenko Organization: IIAT NTU "KhPI" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: ru, uk, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maksymilian Wrzesinski References: <5911262001.20040513132525@obta.uw.edu.pl> In-Reply-To: <5911262001.20040513132525@obta.uw.edu.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unix-account creation via web-form X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 11:47:14 -0000 Maksymilian Wrzesinski wrote: > Hello all, > > To ease proces of account creation and removal i need to develope some > kind of small web form/template to provide me with web interface for > simple account management. It has to be secure but may be robust. > > Are there any sort of utils of this kind in ports/packages collection? > I cant see any. > tia, webmin and usermin are in ports collection. -- Sincerely yours, Artyom V. Viklenko. ====================================================== System Administrator artem@mipk.kharkiv.edu ------------------------------------------------------ IIAT NTU "KhPI" 21, Frunze Str., Kharkov Ukraine 61002 Phone: +38 (0572) 400026 Fax: +38 (057) 7062749 ====================================================== From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 13 14:17:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52FE016A4CE; Thu, 13 May 2004 14:17:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carrick.bishnet.net (carrick.bishnet.net [217.204.9.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B431B43D31; Thu, 13 May 2004 14:17:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tim@bishnet.net) Received: from 82-68-45-195.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk ([82.68.45.195] helo=bishnet.net) by carrick.bishnet.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.33; FreeBSD) id 1BONZk-0009e5-VG; Thu, 13 May 2004 22:17:09 +0100 Message-ID: <40A3E5D4.1090807@bishnet.net> Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 22:17:08 +0100 From: Tim Bishop User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040508 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marian Hettwer References: <1886.213.112.193.11.1084410012.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net> <20040513040222.2b80e76e.freebsd@yazzy.org> <40A32939.9000100@kernel32.de> In-Reply-To: <40A32939.9000100@kernel32.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bishnet-MailScanner-Information: Contact postmaster@bishnet.net X-Bishnet-MailScanner-VirusCheck: Found to be clean X-Bishnet-MailScanner-From: tim@bishnet.net cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 21:17:13 -0000 Marian Hettwer wrote: >> Not only it's way faster than perl based messagewall, amavisd and >> mailscanner etc but it also has neat stuff like making connections >> back to the sender's MX checking for validity of the sender's email. > > This Feature sounds interesting. How is it actually called in exim ? I'd > like to check the exim docu to see some details, because it really > sounds interesting. > > Could you provide me with some keywords to search for ? You're looking for sender callout verification. http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.30/doc/html/spec_38.html#SECT38.21 Cheers, Tim. -- Tim Bishop http://www.bishnet.net/tim PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984 From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 13 14:21:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E73816A4CE; Thu, 13 May 2004 14:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from carrick.bishnet.net (carrick.bishnet.net [217.204.9.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B857043D3F; Thu, 13 May 2004 14:21:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tdb@carrick.bishnet.net) Received: from tdb by carrick.bishnet.net with local (Exim 4.33; FreeBSD) id 1BONeC-0009js-VY; Thu, 13 May 2004 22:21:44 +0100 Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 22:21:44 +0100 From: Tim Bishop To: Marian Hettwer Message-ID: <20040513212144.GA37257@carrick.bishnet.net> References: <1886.213.112.193.11.1084410012.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net> <20040513040222.2b80e76e.freebsd@yazzy.org> <40A32939.9000100@kernel32.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40A32939.9000100@kernel32.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-PGP-Key: 0x5AE7D984 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1453 086E 9376 1A50 ECF6 AE05 7DCE D659 5AE7 D984 Sender: "T.D.Bishop" X-Bishnet-MailScanner-Information: Contact postmaster@bishnet.net X-Bishnet-MailScanner-VirusCheck: Found to be clean X-Bishnet-MailScanner-From: tdb@carrick.bishnet.net cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 21:21:49 -0000 --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 09:52:25AM +0200, Marian Hettwer wrote: > Martin Jessa wrote: > >Not only it's way faster than perl based messagewall, amavisd and > >mailscanner etc but it also has neat stuff like making connections > >back to the sender's MX checking for validity of the sender's email. >=20 > This Feature sounds interesting. How is it actually called in exim ? > I'd like to check the exim docu to see some details, because it really > sounds interesting. >=20 > Could you provide me with some keywords to search for ? In Exim you're looking for sender callout verification. http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.30/doc/html/spec_38.html#SECT38.21 It's pretty trivial to turn on, and in my experience works well. Cheers, Tim. --=20 Tim Bishop http://www.bishnet.net/tim PGP Key: 0x5AE7D984 --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAo+bofc7WWVrn2YQRArwBAJ9xN4xcQdhYlwhOMETzDsH/ryqr4wCgnN1g c/f1xNAz1hGYOslRO1wNBEI= =bH6k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 14 01:08:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC70716A4CE for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 01:08:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.telsatgp.com.pl (pa79.pleszew.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.96.180.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0953743D2F for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 01:08:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgp@telsatgp.com.pl) Received: (qmail 95027 invoked from network); 14 May 2004 08:08:20 -0000 Received: from slawek.telsatgp.com.pl (HELO Slawek) (192.168.5.5) by pa79.pleszew.sdi.tpnet.pl with SMTP; 14 May 2004 08:08:20 -0000 Message-ID: <00e201c4398a$e56aac60$0505a8c0@Slawek> From: "Slawek" To: , References: <1886.213.112.193.11.1084410012.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net><20040513040222.2b80e76e.freebsd@yazzy.org> <40A32939.9000100@kernel32.de> <20040513212144.GA37257@carrick.bishnet.net> Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 10:10:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 FL-Build: Fidolook 2002 (SL) 6.0.2800.85 - 28/1/2003 19:07:30 X-Organisation: Telsat GP Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 08:08:23 -0000 Hello! In message to "Marian Hettwer" sent Thu, 13 May 2004 22:21:44 +0100 you wrote: >>> Not only it's way faster than perl based messagewall, amavisd and >>> mailscanner etc but it also has neat stuff like making connections >>> back to the sender's MX checking for validity of the sender's email. >> >> This Feature sounds interesting. How is it actually called in exim ? >> I'd like to check the exim docu to see some details, because it really >> sounds interesting. >> >> Could you provide me with some keywords to search for ? TB> In Exim you're looking for sender callout verification. TB> http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.30/doc/html/spec_38.html#SECT38.21 TB> It's pretty trivial to turn on, and in my experience works well. One should be careful with source address checking as it may block mails in e-mail discussion lists when source e-mail address is nonexistent. Using things like "NO_SPAM" or "DELETE_THIS" in e-mail address is common (and justified) in discussion lists. -- Slawomir Piotrowski From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 14 03:04:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD8316A4CE; Fri, 14 May 2004 03:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8CF43D2F; Fri, 14 May 2004 03:04:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd-security@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i4EA7Fg7062524; Fri, 14 May 2004 12:07:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fbsd-security@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i4EA7BAS062523; Fri, 14 May 2004 12:07:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from fbsd-security@bzerk.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ei.bzerk.org: bulk set sender to fbsd-security@bzerk.org using -f Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 12:07:11 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Martin Jessa Message-ID: <20040514100711.GA62071@ei.bzerk.org> References: <1886.213.112.193.11.1084410012.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net> <20040513040222.2b80e76e.freebsd@yazzy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040513040222.2b80e76e.freebsd@yazzy.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: z3l3zt@hackunite.net cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 10:04:58 -0000 On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 04:02:22AM +0200, Martin Jessa typed: > Not only it's way faster than perl based messagewall, amavisd and mailscanner etc but it also has neat stuff like making connections back to the sender's MX checking for validity of the sender's email. Off course, this can be done using sendmail (milter-sender) or postfix (http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html) just as well. Ruben From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 14 03:35:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EDF116A4CF for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 03:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grummit.biaix.org (86.Red-213-97-212.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.212.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44B9F43D1D for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 03:35:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lists-freebsd-security@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 5260 invoked by uid 1000); 14 May 2004 10:34:47 -0000 Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 12:34:47 +0200 From: Joan Picanyol To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040514103447.GA5131@grummit.biaix.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <1886.213.112.193.11.1084410012.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net> <3063.151.31.34.32.1084484911.squirrel@mail.redix.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3063.151.31.34.32.1084484911.squirrel@mail.redix.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 10:35:17 -0000 * roberto@redix.it [20040513 23:48]: > 2) use Sender Policy Framework (see http://spf.pobox.com); http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/smtp-spf-is-harmful.html qvb -- pica From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 14 04:29:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A122F16A4CF for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 04:29:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from relent.cedata.com (mail.cedata.com [65.167.180.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EB83843D58 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 04:29:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gcirino@cirelle.com) Received: (qmail 12923 invoked from network); 14 May 2004 11:32:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO relent.cedata.com) (127.0.0.1) by relent.cedata.com with SMTP; 14 May 2004 11:32:39 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (relent.cedata.com) Received: from [65.167.180.251] by relent.cedata.com (MessageWall 1.1.0) with SMTP; 14 May 2004 11:32:39 -0000 Message-ID: <024501c439a6$e348f420$fbb4a741@cedata.net> From: "Cirelle Enterprises" To: , References: <1886.213.112.193.11.1084410012.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net><3063.151.31.34.32.1084484911.squirrel@mail.redix.it> <20040514103447.GA5131@grummit.biaix.org> Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 07:30:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 11:29:45 -0000 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Joan Picanyol" To: ; Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 6:34 AM Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.. | * roberto@redix.it [20040513 23:48]: | > 2) use Sender Policy Framework (see http://spf.pobox.com); |=20 | = http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/smtp-spf-is-harmful.html= |=20 | qvb | -- | pica Actually, SPF is not a spam tool. It was designed to protect against the Joe Job and only if everyone adopts it. Anything beyond this is a stretch. The rest of the complaints in the spf is harmful link are moot as a growing trend is to do away with certain portions of RFC's=20 such as bounces. We have put it in place to monitor the results, and contrary to the=20 article, AOL has not adopted the policy, all they have done is place a DNS text entry indicating anybody using an AOL address is ok with them. We do tag email that has an out and out SPF failure so our content filters can have their way with it. Regards Greg From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 14 11:20:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1207E16A4CE for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 11:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8775643D2D for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 11:20:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-isp@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BOhIY-0003KC-00 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 20:20:44 +0200 Received: from 86.red-213-97-212.pooles.rima-tde.net ([213.97.212.86]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 20:20:42 +0200 Received: from lists-gmane by 86.red-213-97-212.pooles.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 20:20:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Joan Picanyol i Puig Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 17:02:46 +0200 Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <1886.213.112.193.11.1084410012.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net> <3063.151.31.34.32.1084484911.squirrel@mail.redix.it> <20040514103447.GA5131@grummit.biaix.org> <024501c439a6$e348f420$fbb4a741@cedata.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.red-213-97-212.pooles.rima-tde.net Sender: news Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 18:20:46 -0000 On Fri, 14 May 2004 08:30:30 -0400, Cirelle Enterprises wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Joan Picanyol" > To: ; > Sent: Friday, May 14, 2004 6:34 AM > Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.. > > > | * roberto@redix.it [20040513 23:48]: > | > 2) use Sender Policy Framework (see http://spf.pobox.com); > | > | http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/smtp-spf-is-harmful.html > | > > Actually, SPF is not a spam tool. It was designed > to protect against the Joe Job and only if everyone adopts it. If you are willing to adopt this, you might as well wish to try to implement im2000: http://cr.yp.to/im2000.html http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/Proposals/IM2000/ specifically, to remain OT, http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/Proposals/IM2000/anti-ubm.html qvb -- pica From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 14 16:15:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4420A16A4CE for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 16:15:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smithers.pixi.com (mail.pixi.com [206.127.224.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EEA43D1F for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 16:15:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dawn@alphamedia.org) Received: from [209.84.67.245] (dsl-84-67-245.pixi.com [209.84.67.245]) by smithers.pixi.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i4ENBqND003980 for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 13:15:02 -1000 (HST) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: vwplq30y@pop.alphamedia.org Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <04May10.184416-0400_edt.319274-6534+15227@ams.ftl.affinity.com> References: <04May10.184416-0400_edt.319274-6534+15227@ams.ftl.affinity.com> Precedence: bulk Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 13:10:54 -1000 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: "Dawn K. Kaniaupio" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Subject: Out of town automatic reply (was Re: Notify) X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 23:15:05 -0000 Aloha, I will be out of town from April 30 through May 14. While I am gone I will not be checking email. If this is of urgent nature, contact our offices at (808) 973-4100 or leave a message for me at (808) 973-4103 as I will be checking messages periodically. -- Dawn K. Kaniaupio Alphamedia Corporation 1600 Kapiolani Blvd. Suite 214 Honolulu, HI 96814 (808) 973-4100 Fax (808) 973-4111 www.alphamedia.org NEW! HD 24P Editing Suite From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 15 02:04:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DE416A4CF for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.yazzy.org (mail.yazzy.org [217.8.140.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDFA43D1D for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 02:04:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@yazzy.org) Received: from localhost (yazzy [192.168.98.11]) by mail.yazzy.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4ED33981D for ; Fri, 14 May 2004 07:36:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 07:36:44 +0200 From: Martin Jessa To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040514073644.28afb08f.freebsd@yazzy.org> In-Reply-To: <40A32939.9000100@kernel32.de> References: <1886.213.112.193.11.1084410012.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net> <20040513040222.2b80e76e.freebsd@yazzy.org> <40A32939.9000100@kernel32.de> Organization: WRS ASA X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: How do fix a good solution against spam.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 09:04:32 -0000 Hi. This would be the option: require verify = sender/callout=use_sender,60s AFAIR it's new in 4.33 and before that it was done automatically if not disabled. exim-4.34 is in the ports anyway so this should not be a problem. On Thu, 13 May 2004 09:52:25 +0200 Marian Hettwer wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Martin Jessa wrote: > > Not only it's way faster than perl based messagewall, amavisd and mailscanner etc but it also has neat stuff like making connections back to the sender's MX checking for validity of the sender's email. > This Feature sounds interesting. How is it actually called in exim ? I'd > like to check the exim docu to see some details, because it really > sounds interesting. > > Could you provide me with some keywords to search for ? > > TIA, > Marian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 15 15:19:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314DC16A4CE for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 15:19:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE46343D53 for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 15:19:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from esayer1@san.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.1.29] (66-75-225-77.san.rr.com [66.75.225.77]) i4FMJoce002238 for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 15:19:51 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Evan Sayer Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 15:19:34 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613) X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Modem Pool X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 22:19:53 -0000 Hello- I have a question about modem pools. If I have several dial in lines, and I want them to be acessable via one number, is a modem pool what I want? How exactly do they work and is freebsd equipped to handle them? Thanks.