From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 11:29:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C9716A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:29:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.act.co.za (mail.act.co.za [196.15.213.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F7343D45 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:29:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spidey@act.co.za) Received: from localhost.act.co.za ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by mail.act.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 5.0) id 1CBtnE-000BHr-5B for FreeBSD-isp@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:35:44 +0200 Received: from mail.act.co.za ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.act.co.za [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42834-08 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:35:42 +0200 (SAST) Received: from [10.0.1.11] (helo=SPIDEY) by mail.act.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 5.0) id 1CBtnC-000BHm-T6 for FreeBSD-isp@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:35:42 +0200 From: "Spidey Knepscheld" To: Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:29:11 +0200 Organization: ACT Computers Message-ID: <000701c4a485$36761350$0b01000a@SPIDEY> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at act.co.za Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Thank You X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: spidey@act.co.za List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:29:18 -0000 Hi Guys I would like to thank all of you for your reply to my mail regarding the the administrator needed for my ISP setup.I nevere thought there were so many FreeBSD users in South Africa. Thanks again Spidey From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 14:47:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEA016A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:47:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.act.co.za (mail.act.co.za [196.15.213.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DDE43D1D for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:47:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spidey@act.co.za) Received: from localhost.act.co.za ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by mail.act.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 5.0) id 1CBwtJ-000G83-Nj for FreeBSD-isp@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:54:13 +0200 Received: from mail.act.co.za ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.act.co.za [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 61760-09 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:54:12 +0200 (SAST) Received: from [10.0.1.11] (helo=SPIDEY) by mail.act.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 5.0) id 1CBwtI-000G7y-82 for FreeBSD-isp@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:54:12 +0200 From: "Spidey Knepscheld" To: Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:47:42 +0200 Organization: ACT Computers Message-ID: <006001c4a4a0$f14fadb0$0b01000a@SPIDEY> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at act.co.za Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Banned incoming mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: spidey@act.co.za List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:47:51 -0000 Hi Guys I receive a lot of these warnings on my mail server ,It states that it is not a virus so I thought that my scanner is setup to strict perhaps or something any ideas please. Thank you Spidey No viruses were found. A banned name was found: P=p002,M=application/ms-tnef,T=tnef,N=winmail.dat | P=p003,T=jpg,N=image001.jpg,N=image001.jpg The mail originated from: According to the 'Received:' trace, the message originated at: Hans (port38.ds1-rd.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.50.103]) The message WAS NOT delivered to: : 550 5.7.1 Message content rejected, id=05495-10 - BANNED: P=p002,M=application/ms-tnef,T=tnef,N=winmail.dat | P=p003,T=jpg,N=image001.jpg,N=image001.jpg Not quarantined. ------------------------- BEGIN HEADERS ----------------------------- Return-Path: Received: from cicero0.cybercity.dk ([212.242.40.52]) by mail.act.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 5.0) id 1CANYm-0001Vb-03 for isak@snell.co.za; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:58:32 +0200 Received: from Hans (port38.ds1-rd.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.50.103]) by cicero0.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B953299B6 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:51:46 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hans_Gr=F8nb=E6k_Hansen?= To: "'Isak de Necker'" Subject: VS: Cleaner Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:52:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0014_01C4A14A.AF4B3550" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Thread-Index: AcSgcPiRjwutyrUBRXKB4PNKD0Q9gQAyJ8gA X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 000000009E69A4CA77EF4A4E960DC44030D0CCF084022200 Message-Id: <20040923065146.3B953299B6@cicero0.cybercity.dk> -------------------------- END HEADERS ------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 18:08:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA73A16A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:08:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from intime.com.br (jacare.intime.com.br [200.103.155.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E08343D48 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:08:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lgcosta@intime.com.br) Received: (qmail 12223 invoked by uid 1013); 27 Sep 2004 17:53:51 -0000 Received: from lgcosta@intime.com.br by jacare by uid 1016 with qmail-scanner-1.22st (clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(192.168.1.1):. Processed in 0.057519 secs); 27 Sep 2004 17:53:51 -0000 X-Antivirus-InTime-Mail-From: lgcosta@intime.com.br via jacare X-Antivirus-InTime: 1.22st (Clear:RC:1(192.168.1.1):. Processed in 0.057519 secs Process 12216) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.51?) (192.168.1.1) by intime.com.br with SMTP; 27 Sep 2004 17:53:51 -0000 Message-ID: <41585443.5060103@intime.com.br> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:56:19 -0300 From: Gustavo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: pt-br, pt MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: squid in other route X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 18:08:28 -0000 I have a FreeBSD 5.2 with 3 external interfaces (WAN) and with squid twirling. xl0 -> 200.x.x.x (default route) rl0 -> 192.168.254.253 (dsl) rl1 -> 192.168.254.254 (dsl) He would like to make squid to leave for the interface rl1 the same being that this twirling in this exactly gateway with default route xl0. how I could implement some soluction for this? thankz From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:05:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A66816A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:05:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rena.mysmt.net (rena.mysmt.net [82.150.137.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678EC43D31 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:05:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erik@microcontroller.nl) Received: (qmail 49275 invoked by uid 1003); 28 Sep 2004 14:05:13 -0000 Received: from erik@microcontroller.nl by rena.mysmt.net by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (clamdscan: 0.70-rc. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(213.84.50.76):. Processed in 0.949218 secs); 28 Sep 2004 14:05:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.14?) (microcon@microcontroller.nl@213.84.50.76) by 82-150-137-14.mysmt.net with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 14:05:12 -0000 From: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-Id: <1096380086.31926.9.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:01:27 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: mysql X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:05:16 -0000 Hi all,. Are you using any mysql tuning settings in my.cnf? I'm having a bit of trouble with some have mysql sites with big query's resulting in a mysqld process at 80% continue. any tips are welcome. -Erik. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:24:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 973F416A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:24:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.palnet.com (mail2.palnet.com [217.66.226.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FE543D5F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:24:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mustafa@palnet.com) Received: from dogbert.palnet.com ([192.116.17.51] helo=felfel) by mail2.palnet.com with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CCIs3-0005Ow-6n; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:22:23 +0200 Message-ID: <11ab01c4a567$30b2df60$8800000a@felfel> From: "Mustafa N. Deeb" To: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" , References: <1096380086.31926.9.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:26:44 +0300 Organization: Palnet Communications Ltd. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2096 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2096 Subject: Re: mysql X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Mustafa N. Deeb" List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:24:11 -0000 what is your configuration ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:01 PM Subject: mysql > > Hi all,. > Are you using any mysql tuning settings in my.cnf? > I'm having a bit of trouble with some have mysql sites with big query's > resulting in a mysqld process at 80% continue. > > any tips are welcome. > > -Erik. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:52:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B341316A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:52:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rena.mysmt.net (rena.mysmt.net [82.150.137.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E098343D53 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:52:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erik@microcontroller.nl) Received: (qmail 58032 invoked by uid 1003); 28 Sep 2004 14:52:30 -0000 Received: from erik@microcontroller.nl by rena.mysmt.net by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (clamdscan: 0.70-rc. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(213.84.50.76):. Processed in 0.050869 secs); 28 Sep 2004 14:52:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.14?) (microcon@microcontroller.nl@213.84.50.76) by 82-150-137-14.mysmt.net with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 14:52:29 -0000 From: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" To: "Mustafa N. Deeb" In-Reply-To: <11ab01c4a567$30b2df60$8800000a@felfel> References: <1096380086.31926.9.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> <11ab01c4a567$30b2df60$8800000a@felfel> Message-Id: <1096382924.31926.27.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:48:44 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:52:31 -0000 On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 16:26, Mustafa N. Deeb wrote: > what is your configuration ? I put: [mysqld] query_cache_type = ON query_cache_size = 10M in /usr/local/etc/my.cnf I read that doing mysqld --help will give me all parameters,. but how do we do that on a freebsd install where I use mysqld_safe? > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:01 PM > Subject: mysql > > > > > > Hi all,. > > Are you using any mysql tuning settings in my.cnf? > > I'm having a bit of trouble with some have mysql sites with big query's > > resulting in a mysqld process at 80% continue. > > > > any tips are welcome. > > > > -Erik. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Erik @ Microcontroller.nl From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:59:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E9416A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:59:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.palnet.com (mail2.palnet.com [217.66.226.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFB643D46 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:59:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mustafa@palnet.com) Received: from dogbert.palnet.com ([192.116.17.51] helo=felfel) by mail2.palnet.com with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CCJPn-0008Bf-JS; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:57:15 +0200 Message-ID: <122c01c4a56c$0fe603c0$8800000a@felfel> From: "Mustafa N. Deeb" To: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" References: <1096380086.31926.9.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> <11ab01c4a567$30b2df60$8800000a@felfel> <1096382924.31926.27.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:01:40 +0300 Organization: Palnet Communications Ltd. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2096 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2096 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Mustafa N. Deeb" List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:59:03 -0000 i've meant our server configuration and are u doing big DBs? Cheers ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Erik @ Microcontroller.nl=20 To: Mustafa N. Deeb=20 Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org=20 Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:48 PM Subject: Re: mysql On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 16:26, Mustafa N. Deeb wrote:=20 what is your configuration ? I put: [mysqld] query_cache_type =3D ON query_cache_size =3D 10M in /usr/local/etc/my.cnf I read that doing mysqld --help will give me all parameters,. but how = do we do that on a freebsd install where I use mysqld_safe? ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:01 PM Subject: mysql >=20 > Hi all,. > Are you using any mysql tuning settings in my.cnf? > I'm having a bit of trouble with some have mysql sites with big = query's > resulting in a mysqld process at 80% continue. >=20 > any tips are welcome. >=20 > -Erik. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"-- Erik @ Microcontroller.nl = =20 From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 15:18:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151DC16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:18:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rena.mysmt.net (rena.mysmt.net [82.150.137.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C92543D1F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:18:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erik@microcontroller.nl) Received: (qmail 62760 invoked by uid 1003); 28 Sep 2004 15:18:10 -0000 Received: from erik@microcontroller.nl by rena.mysmt.net by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.21 (clamdscan: 0.70-rc. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(213.84.50.76):. Processed in 0.061151 secs); 28 Sep 2004 15:18:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.14?) (microcon@microcontroller.nl@213.84.50.76) by 82-150-137-14.mysmt.net with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 15:18:10 -0000 From: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" To: "Mustafa N. Deeb" In-Reply-To: <122c01c4a56c$0fe603c0$8800000a@felfel> References: <1096380086.31926.9.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> <11ab01c4a567$30b2df60$8800000a@felfel> <1096382924.31926.27.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> <122c01c4a56c$0fe603c0$8800000a@felfel> Message-Id: <1096384464.31926.41.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:14:25 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:18:12 -0000 On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 17:01, Mustafa N. Deeb wrote: >  > i've meant our server configuration > > and are u doing big DBs? ah o.k., freebsd 4.9 with mysql 4.018 there is one site with a big index, a big select query for every visit. this generates the problem. Should I increase the number of connections? I don't believe this is the issue Should I increase some kind of read buffer? but is this not dynamically regulated by mysql already? hmm,. I now switched to the my-large.cnf configuration in /usr/local/share/mysql/ I copied it to /usr/local/share/mysql/my.cnf and restarted mysql let's see how that goes.. Greetings, -Erik. > > Cheers > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Erik @ Microcontroller.nl > To: Mustafa N. Deeb > Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:48 PM > Subject: Re: mysql > > On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 16:26, Mustafa N. Deeb wrote: > > > what is your configuration ? > > > I put: > [mysqld] > query_cache_type = ON > query_cache_size = 10M > > in /usr/local/etc/my.cnf > > I read that doing mysqld --help will give me all parameters,. > but how do we do that on a freebsd install where I use > mysqld_safe? > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:01 PM > > Subject: mysql > > > > > > > > > > Hi all,. > > > Are you using any mysql tuning settings in my.cnf? > > > I'm having a bit of trouble with some have mysql sites with big query's > > > resulting in a mysqld process at 80% continue. > > > > > > any tips are welcome. > > > > > > -Erik. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- > Erik @ Microcontroller.nl -- Erik @ Microcontroller.nl From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 15:27:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E2E16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:27:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.palnet.com (mail2.palnet.com [217.66.226.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4401C43D41 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:27:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mustafa@palnet.com) Received: from dogbert.palnet.com ([192.116.17.51] helo=felfel) by mail2.palnet.com with smtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CCJqv-0002Jh-3u; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:25:17 +0200 Message-ID: <127501c4a56f$fa327460$8800000a@felfel> From: "Mustafa N. Deeb" To: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" References: <1096380086.31926.9.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> <11ab01c4a567$30b2df60$8800000a@felfel> <1096382924.31926.27.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> <122c01c4a56c$0fe603c0$8800000a@felfel> <1096384464.31926.41.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:29:42 +0300 Organization: Palnet Communications Ltd. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2096 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2096 cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Mustafa N. Deeb" List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:27:05 -0000 hi you might be suffering from an I/O problem if it takes a long time in big queries, consider raid and using InnoDB Cheers ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" To: "Mustafa N. Deeb" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 6:14 PM Subject: Re: mysql On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 17:01, Mustafa N. Deeb wrote: >  > i've meant our server configuration > > and are u doing big DBs? ah o.k., freebsd 4.9 with mysql 4.018 there is one site with a big index, a big select query for every visit. this generates the problem. Should I increase the number of connections? I don't believe this is the issue Should I increase some kind of read buffer? but is this not dynamically regulated by mysql already? hmm,. I now switched to the my-large.cnf configuration in /usr/local/share/mysql/ I copied it to /usr/local/share/mysql/my.cnf and restarted mysql let's see how that goes.. Greetings, -Erik. > > Cheers > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Erik @ Microcontroller.nl > To: Mustafa N. Deeb > Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:48 PM > Subject: Re: mysql > > On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 16:26, Mustafa N. Deeb wrote: > > > what is your configuration ? > > > I put: > [mysqld] > query_cache_type = ON > query_cache_size = 10M > > in /usr/local/etc/my.cnf > > I read that doing mysqld --help will give me all parameters,. > but how do we do that on a freebsd install where I use > mysqld_safe? > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:01 PM > > Subject: mysql > > > > > > > > > > Hi all,. > > > Are you using any mysql tuning settings in my.cnf? > > > I'm having a bit of trouble with some have mysql sites with > big query's > > > resulting in a mysqld process at 80% continue. > > > > > > any tips are welcome. > > > > > > -Erik. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- > Erik @ Microcontroller.nl -- Erik @ Microcontroller.nl _______________________________________________ freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 21:12:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D708816A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:12:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.62.118.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489AB43D39 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:12:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jim@Thehousleys.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thehousleys.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8SLCBqm093200; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:12:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@Thehousleys.net) Received: from thehousleys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cat.int.thehousleys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93062-04; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:12:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by thehousleys.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8SLC2Nh093195; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:12:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jim@Thehousleys.net) Message-ID: <4159D3A0.1000102@Thehousleys.net> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:12:00 -0400 From: James Housley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040810 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <1096380086.31926.9.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> <11ab01c4a567$30b2df60$8800000a@felfel> <1096382924.31926.27.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> In-Reply-To: <1096382924.31926.27.camel@tessa.mysmt.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms060700050209060102050809" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thehousleys.net cc: "Erik @ Microcontroller.nl" Subject: Re: mysql X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:12:15 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms060700050209060102050809 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Erik @ Microcontroller.nl wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 16:26, Mustafa N. Deeb wrote: > > >>what is your configuration ? > > > > I put: > [mysqld] > query_cache_type = ON > query_cache_size = 10M > > in /usr/local/etc/my.cnf > > I read that doing mysqld --help will give me all parameters,. but how do > we do that on a freebsd install where I use mysqld_safe? > Have you optimized the queries? Specifically read the section on optimizing in the documentation. Use "EXPLAIN" to make sure that these big queries are actually using the indexes you think they are. Jim -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X - NO Word docs in e-mail . / \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- jeh@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve jim@TheHousleys.Net http://www.TheHousleys.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- A Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer is to computing what a McDonalds Certified Food Specialist is to fine cuisine. -- Jack O'Neill --------------ms060700050209060102050809 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIJIzCC AuwwggJVoAMCAQICAwucmTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UE ChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNv bmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDQwMTMxMTkxMTAwWhcNMDUwMTMwMTkxMTAw WjBeMRAwDgYDVQQEEwdIb3VzbGV5MQ4wDAYDVQQqEwVKYW1lczEWMBQGA1UEAxMNSmFtZXMg SG91c2xleTEiMCAGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYTamltQHRoZWhvdXNsZXlzLm5ldDCCASIwDQYJKoZI hvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAM70siVrpNeIN29fGXTeZx4DuD8BQDzS4F9QLhypRRv2 aL+B1DvaX3spU9O7TktIKeXwJ4pN7iiL6RFXX53QdyXht96ILFVuSsYxM3vaAI+M446KmMKL 1PT033SFCQVb8/DsbJPGQqMauWfon9hdjx8B+PqZyMDRoprj2mJrlUtaGwUGDMYzsE+qG+dY v20Z9JH1nXVxMpsktz1kON2oFWmemobcoGO2swhb5CmG7KYiKKZW/ItsDwhu5ZebeB63UkUl SL/+GiUPiieGxnptEDYf5RH/wdN/29I7IeZuab8YajAk2WO+68vAYA3+d/nTgX9YCeGdkPS6 9KxDELa7c8MCAwEAAaMwMC4wHgYDVR0RBBcwFYETamltQHRoZWhvdXNsZXlzLm5ldDAMBgNV HRMBAf8EAjAAMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBALGpfU4DorG1pNJyzuGAeJY0QWUrZMDmryk/ r08DfcBpE/BicfJXEuee41NWh+7Y2Y4fVdaAo5UAtjDjj8novARRt2rtGv9M9+7OKoTsx20O JKNBCiJWc53MscEapsc4fvvCl2Cf/TBl1AESJgTkjHHxoyTDNaadvV0lowHakwhOMIIC7DCC AlWgAwIBAgIDC5yZMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxU aGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwg RnJlZW1haWwgSXNzdWluZyBDQTAeFw0wNDAxMzExOTExMDBaFw0wNTAxMzAxOTExMDBaMF4x EDAOBgNVBAQTB0hvdXNsZXkxDjAMBgNVBCoTBUphbWVzMRYwFAYDVQQDEw1KYW1lcyBIb3Vz bGV5MSIwIAYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhNqaW1AdGhlaG91c2xleXMubmV0MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAzvSyJWuk14g3b18ZdN5nHgO4PwFAPNLgX1AuHKlFG/Zov4HU O9pfeylT07tOS0gp5fAnik3uKIvpEVdfndB3JeG33ogsVW5KxjEze9oAj4zjjoqYwovU9PTf dIUJBVvz8Oxsk8ZCoxq5Z+if2F2PHwH4+pnIwNGimuPaYmuVS1obBQYMxjOwT6ob51i/bRn0 kfWddXEymyS3PWQ43agVaZ6ahtygY7azCFvkKYbspiIoplb8i2wPCG7ll5t4HrdSRSVIv/4a JQ+KJ4bGem0QNh/lEf/B03/b0jsh5m5pvxhqMCTZY77ry8BgDf53+dOBf1gJ4Z2Q9Lr0rEMQ trtzwwIDAQABozAwLjAeBgNVHREEFzAVgRNqaW1AdGhlaG91c2xleXMubmV0MAwGA1UdEwEB /wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAsal9TgOisbWk0nLO4YB4ljRBZStkwOavKT+vTwN9 wGkT8GJx8lcS557jU1aH7tjZjh9V1oCjlQC2MOOPyei8BFG3au0a/0z37s4qhOzHbQ4ko0EK IlZzncyxwRqmxzh++8KXYJ/9MGXUARImBOSMcfGjJMM1pp29XSWjAdqTCE4wggM/MIICqKAD AgECAgENMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVy biBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5n MSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtU aGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZy ZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcNMDMwNzE3MDAwMDAwWhcNMTMwNzE2MjM1OTU5WjBiMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoG A1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcN AQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAMSmPFVzVftOucqZWh5owHUEcJ3f6f+jHuy9zfVb8hp2vX8MOmHy v1HOAdTlUAow1wJjWiyJFXCO3cnwK4Vaqj9xVsuvPAsH5/EfkTYkKhPPK9Xzgnc9A74r/rsY Pge/QIACZNenprufZdHFKlSFD0gEf6e20TxhBEAeZBlyYLf7AgMBAAGjgZQwgZEwEgYDVR0T AQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADBDBgNVHR8EPDA6MDigNqA0hjJodHRwOi8vY3JsLnRoYXd0ZS5jb20v VGhhd3RlUGVyc29uYWxGcmVlbWFpbENBLmNybDALBgNVHQ8EBAMCAQYwKQYDVR0RBCIwIKQe MBwxGjAYBgNVBAMTEVByaXZhdGVMYWJlbDItMTM4MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4GBAEiM0VCD 6gsuzA2jZqxnD3+vrL7CF6FDlpSdf0whuPg2H6otnzYvwPQcUCCTcDz9reFhYsPZOhl+hLGZ GwDFGguCdJ4lUJRix9sncVcljd2pnDmOjCBPZV+V2vf3h9bGCE6u9uo05RAaWzVNd+NWIXiC 3CEZNd4ksdMdRv9dX2VPMYIDOzCCAzcCAQEwaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMc VGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFs IEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECAwucmTAJBgUrDgMCGgUAoIIBpzAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMx CwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0wNDA5MjgyMTEyMDFaMCMGCSqGSIb3DQEJ BDEWBBTE2gOfii13O+AyO2Lw7T1JePotKTBSBgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xRTBDMAoGCCqGSIb3DQMH MA4GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgIAgDANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIBQDAHBgUrDgMCBzANBggqhkiG9w0DAgIB KDB4BgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxazBpMGIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMSUwIwYDVQQKExxUaGF3dGUgQ29u c3VsdGluZyAoUHR5KSBMdGQuMSwwKgYDVQQDEyNUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJlZW1haWwg SXNzdWluZyBDQQIDC5yZMHoGCyqGSIb3DQEJEAILMWugaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMG A1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBl cnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECAwucmTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAASCAQBt22sf ZJdjHsKbCsBHn/AV54OVfzt/YgdX6QFJxCqdYjgftVzTEWsIBhG0URVct5UA/QAMLdbaCfM6 pcwMQLoyXv3fgW9IdCIUIXRv7kI2W1iq6kgNx5Mzw91KVLqlQryztFQAQz+kCg5FfEvponco T6YKaQJ65Yz2piTu5UKWLDcyJAr6U6/HLVh5GZsKy+69MEA5g9aqLDQJhc1ib8DwQk/B87eF cu238XwRPFk8EixleIpj8QFRvQQks/YhXDMJpkJrwMmcB/9DeGPse2Y9kX9mk6/W/81tOrDu W2+4o/qyvsYR6xOQkVUYPtDuNmAjWuu1UmfmXatLBbE57y80AAAAAAAA --------------ms060700050209060102050809-- From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 05:43:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0FE16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:43:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from beer.ux6.net (beer.ux6.net [64.62.253.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A0F443D4C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:43:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from miha@ghuug.org) Received: (qmail 94253 invoked by uid 113); 30 Sep 2004 22:43:46 -0700 Received: from 205.177.65.128 by beer.ux6.net (envelope-from , uid 112) with qmail-scanner-1.23 (clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:0(205.177.65.128):SA:0(4.7/6.0):. Processed in 1.59693 secs); 01 Oct 2004 05:43:46 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=6.0 X-Spam-Level: ++++ Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (miha@beer.ux6.net@205.177.65.128) by localhost with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 22:43:44 -0700 From: "Mikhail P." Organization: Ghana Unix Users Group To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:43:42 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410010543.42789.miha@ghuug.org> cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: confusion with natd X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: miha@ghuug.org List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 05:43:47 -0000 Hello FreeBSD Users, I have been playing with OpenVPN for a while, and have successfully configured pretty simple tunnel between local router (FreeBSD, which NATs LAN into inet) and remote host. Now my next target is to route some of the computers in the LAN into above VPN tunnel - that's where I'm stuck. Here's my detailed setup (should be pretty basic and regular): HOST_A: FreeBSD, serves as gateway (NAT) for LAN (192.168.0.0/24) has two NICs: rl0 - internal (192.168.0.1) rl1 - external (connected to DSL modem), runs natd (natd -n rl1) net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 openvpn from ports HOST_B: FreeBSD, remote host, single NIC, public IP. net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 openvpn from ports What has been done so far - I have configured OpenVPN between HOST_A and HOST_B. As in tunnel, HOST_A has ip of 192.168.10.1 and HOST_B has 192.168.10.2, so basically there is P-t-P link over tun0 on each side. I should probably note that HOST_B has no public ip, as it sees inet via DSL modem (which is also most likely NAT'ed by ISP). All is great, and both parties can ping each other via tun0 iface. Now, as noted above, I want to route some of computers in 192.168.0.0/24 into this tunnel, so basically they go internet via HOST_B as the end point. My attempts to play with route never ended well, so I thought of natd on tun0 on HOST_B. I ran into small problem where I can't run more than one instance of natd, but it has been quickly solved by searching google database, so I ended up running natd on tun0 of HOST_B as: natd -interface rl1 natd -port 8568 -interface tun0 As mentioned above, there is already natd on rl1, and thus I have the following rules (the only rules in ipfw) in ipfw: 10 divert 8668 ip from 192.168.0.0/24 to any out xmit rl1 12 divert 8668 ip from any to 192.168.254.1 in recv rl1 (192.168.254.1 is the IP given by DSL modem via DHCP) Next (well, they are actually before these rules) two rules I added into ipfw ipfw add 4 divert 8568 ip from 192.168.0.3 to any out xmit tun0 ipfw add 6 divert 8568 ip from any to any in recv tun0 So basically, this supposed to give me the following picture: 192.168.0.3 travels to "any" via tun0. That picture, however, does not work in real life, and that's why I'm posting here for advise of more experienced users. I can ping "192.168.10.1" (which is HOST_A, remote host) from 192.168.0.3, and packets travel via tun0 with src/dst addresses overwritten by natd. However, if I try to ping any other host on the internet from 192.168.0.3, packets travel via natd on rl1 (I found that using tcpdump), and not via tun0 - that's my major confusion right now. There are no blocking ipfw rules - the only 4 rules sitting in ipfw are those divert rules. I have been pulling hair off my poor head for few hours on this issue, but did not come to solution, so I'm looking for advises. kind regards, M. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 06:52:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A17E16A4CE; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 06:52:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from asum.kodu.ee (asum.kodu.ee [212.27.241.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1321743D2F; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 06:52:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from juhani@kernel.ee) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (panic.kernel.ee [212.27.241.3]) by asum.kodu.ee (8.12.9p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i916pvNC091419; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:51:58 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from juhani@kernel.ee) Message-ID: <415CFE85.8040005@kernel.ee> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:51:49 +0300 From: Juhani Tali User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040824) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: miha@ghuug.org References: <200410010543.42789.miha@ghuug.org> In-Reply-To: <200410010543.42789.miha@ghuug.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: confusion with natd X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 06:52:02 -0000 Mikhail P. wrote: > HOST_A: > FreeBSD, serves as gateway (NAT) for LAN (192.168.0.0/24) > has two NICs: > rl0 - internal (192.168.0.1) > rl1 - external (connected to DSL modem), runs natd (natd -n rl1) > net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 > openvpn from ports > > HOST_B: > FreeBSD, remote host, single NIC, public IP. > net.inet.ip.forwarding=1 > openvpn from ports I would set it up like so: This one in host B > natd -interface rl1 And this in host A > natd -port 8568 -interface tun0 You need to translate all the 192.168.0.x to tunnel's address and you cannot do it in host B, because it has no direct connection to 192.168.0.x. Another solution is with routing, so host B has direct access to the 192.168.0.x network. > I have been pulling hair off my poor head for few hours on this issue, but did > not come to solution, so I'm looking for advises. Juhani Tali From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 07:11:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F5F16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:11:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from beer.ux6.net (beer.ux6.net [64.62.253.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4047943D31 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:11:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from miha@ghuug.org) Received: (qmail 64636 invoked by uid 113); 1 Oct 2004 00:11:29 -0700 Received: from 205.177.65.128 by beer.ux6.net (envelope-from , uid 112) with qmail-scanner-1.23 (clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:0(205.177.65.128):SA:0(4.7/6.0):. Processed in 1.545129 secs); 01 Oct 2004 07:11:29 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=6.0 X-Spam-Level: ++++ Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (miha@beer.ux6.net@205.177.65.128) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Oct 2004 00:11:27 -0700 From: "Mikhail P." Organization: Ghana Unix Users Group To: Juhani Tali Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:11:24 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200410010543.42789.miha@ghuug.org> <415CFE85.8040005@kernel.ee> In-Reply-To: <415CFE85.8040005@kernel.ee> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410010711.24829.miha@ghuug.org> cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: confusion with natd X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: miha@ghuug.org List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 07:11:31 -0000 On Friday 01 October 2004 06:51, Juhani Tali wrote: > I would set it up like so: > > This one in host B > > > natd -interface rl1 > > And this in host A > > > natd -port 8568 -interface tun0 > > You need to translate all the 192.168.0.x to tunnel's address and you > cannot do it in host B, because it has no direct connection to 192.168.0.x. Did not quite understand what you meant here. I can translate 192.168.0.0/24 into tunnel, but as my original message states, only packets to HOST_A fall into that route, any other packets (even ipfw has "ip from 192.168.0.3 to any") travel out regular way (not via tun0). That's the most confusing part ("any != "any"), and I'm stuck there. HOST_B (which is seen as "192.168.0.1" to LAN) has direct connection to 192.168.0.x, and basically it acts as a gateway for 192.168.0.x, so I dance from there. > Another solution is with routing, so host B has direct access to the > 192.168.0.x network. Tried that already as - on HOST_A (remote host) - route add 192.168.0.0/24 192.168.10.2 After that, I can ping 192.168.0.x directly (no NAT) from remote VPN host and backwards. This, however, does not change anything apart from giving me direct access to "HOST_A <<-->> 192.168.0.0/24". > > > I have been pulling hair off my poor head for few hours on this issue, > > but did not come to solution, so I'm looking for advises. > > Juhani Tali regards, M. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 07:18:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA03616A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:18:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (support.codesourcery.com [65.74.133.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15C143D53 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:18:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oldham@mail.codesourcery.com) Received: (qmail 4896 invoked by uid 502); 1 Oct 2004 07:18:24 -0000 Message-ID: <20041001071824.4895.qmail@mail.codesourcery.com> From: oldham@mail.codesourcery.com Date: 1 Oct 2004 00:18:24 -0700 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Precedence: junk Subject: Away from my mail. X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 07:18:24 -0000 Thank you for your mail concerning "I cannot forget you!". My internet access will be intermittent 24 September to 01 October. If you need an immediate response during this time, please contact Mark Mitchell at mark@codesourcery.com. Thank you. Jeffrey D. Oldham oldham@codesourcery.com From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 07:38:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF1A16A4CE; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:38:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from asum.kodu.ee (asum.kodu.ee [212.27.241.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A1643D1D; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:38:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from juhani@kernel.ee) Received: from [192.168.1.9] (panic.kernel.ee [212.27.241.3]) by asum.kodu.ee (8.12.9p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i917cdNC095520; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:38:40 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from juhani@kernel.ee) Message-ID: <415D0977.4000006@kernel.ee> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:38:31 +0300 From: Juhani Tali User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040824) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: miha@ghuug.org References: <200410010543.42789.miha@ghuug.org> <415CFE85.8040005@kernel.ee> <200410010711.24829.miha@ghuug.org> In-Reply-To: <200410010711.24829.miha@ghuug.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: confusion with natd X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 07:38:46 -0000 Mikhail P. wrote: > On Friday 01 October 2004 06:51, Juhani Tali wrote: > > Did not quite understand what you meant here. ---- ended up running natd on tun0 of HOST_B as: natd -interface rl1 natd -port 8568 -interface tun0 ---- I should have read it as HOST_A, because HOST_B does not have a rl1, only rl0. ---- ipfw add 4 divert 8568 ip from 192.168.0.3 to any out xmit tun0 ipfw add 6 divert 8568 ip from any to any in recv tun0 ---- replace these with ipfw add 4 divert 8568 ip from 192.168.0.3 to any prior to this rule the packet was not destined to go out through tun0 but rl1, so the (xmit tun0) condition does not match. ipfw add 6 divert 8568 ip from any to any in recv tun0 or perhaps ipfw add 6 divert 8568 ip from any to 192.168.10.1 > I can translate 192.168.0.0/24 > into tunnel, but as my original message states, only packets to HOST_A fall > into that route, any other packets (even ipfw has "ip from 192.168.0.3 to > any") travel out regular way (not via tun0). That's the most confusing part > ("any != "any"), and I'm stuck there. Hope this works. Juhani Tali From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 08:18:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7846616A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:18:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from beer.ux6.net (beer.ux6.net [64.62.253.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2792443D49 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:18:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from miha@ghuug.org) Received: (qmail 73749 invoked by uid 113); 1 Oct 2004 01:18:21 -0700 Received: from 205.177.65.128 by beer.ux6.net (envelope-from , uid 112) with qmail-scanner-1.23 (clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:0(205.177.65.128):SA:0(4.7/6.0):. Processed in 5.086475 secs); 01 Oct 2004 08:18:21 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=6.0 X-Spam-Level: ++++ Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (miha@beer.ux6.net@205.177.65.128) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Oct 2004 01:18:15 -0700 From: "Mikhail P." Organization: Ghana Unix Users Group To: Juhani Tali Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:18:07 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200410010543.42789.miha@ghuug.org> <200410010711.24829.miha@ghuug.org> <415D0977.4000006@kernel.ee> In-Reply-To: <415D0977.4000006@kernel.ee> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410010818.07826.miha@ghuug.org> cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: confusion with natd X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: miha@ghuug.org List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:18:21 -0000 On Friday 01 October 2004 07:38, Juhani Tali wrote: > ---- > ipfw add 4 divert 8568 ip from 192.168.0.3 to any out xmit tun0 > ipfw add 6 divert 8568 ip from any to any in recv tun0 > ---- > > replace these with > ipfw add 4 divert 8568 ip from 192.168.0.3 to any > prior to this rule the packet was not destined to go out through tun0 > but rl1, so the (xmit tun0) condition does not match. I see your point, and I tried suggested ipfw rules, but I'm still unable to get it working. What I ended with now (with above ipfw rules applied) - e.g. I ping "216.239.37.99" (google's ip) from 192.168.0.3, the 4th ipfw rule matches (see below), however pings don't get back and no traffic passes through tun0 (as supposed), instead packet travels via rl0 and then rl1: core# ipfw show 00004 55 3923 divert 8568 ip from 192.168.0.3 to any 00006 0 0 divert 8568 ip from any to any in recv tun0 00010 809517 109015055 divert 8668 ip from 192.168.0.0/24 to any out xmit rl1 00010 804261 407529807 divert 8668 ip from any to 192.168.254.1 in recv rl1 65535 3304709 1040001522 allow ip from any to any core# core# tcpdump -n -i rl0 host 216.239.37.99 tcpdump: listening on rl0 08:00:25.829749 192.168.0.3 > 216.239.37.99: icmp: echo request 08:00:26.839735 192.168.0.3 > 216.239.37.99: icmp: echo request 08:00:27.849675 192.168.0.3 > 216.239.37.99: icmp: echo request ^C 100 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel core# core# tcpdump -n -i rl1 host 216.239.37.99 tcpdump: listening on rl1 08:00:37.949283 192.168.10.2 > 216.239.37.99: icmp: echo request 08:00:38.959154 192.168.10.2 > 216.239.37.99: icmp: echo request 08:00:39.969102 192.168.10.2 > 216.239.37.99: icmp: echo request 08:00:40.979069 192.168.10.2 > 216.239.37.99: icmp: echo request ^C 57 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel core# core# netstat -nr|grep tun0 192.168.10.1 192.168.10.2 UH 0 49 tun0 core# ps ax | grep nat|grep tun0 52578 ?? Ss 0:00.51 natd -port 8568 -interface tun0 core# core# netstat -nr|grep tun0 192.168.10.1 192.168.10.2 UH 0 49 tun0 and tcpdump on tun0 shows nothing. Basically we got back to the point where we all started - I can ping remote party (HOST_B) from 192.168.0.x, but no further. Some piece in this mosaic is probably missing.. launched ping from 192.168.0.3 to 192.168.10.1: core# tcpdump -n -i tun0 tcpdump: listening on tun0 08:14:36.959198 192.168.10.1 > 192.168.10.2: icmp: echo reply 08:14:37.711774 192.168.10.2 > 192.168.10.1: icmp: echo request ^C 3 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel core# > Juhani Tali regards, M. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 08:21:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF6E16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:21:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from beer.ux6.net (beer.ux6.net [64.62.253.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B798C43D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:21:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from miha@ghuug.org) Received: (qmail 67087 invoked by uid 113); 1 Oct 2004 01:21:41 -0700 Received: from 205.177.65.128 by beer.ux6.net (envelope-from , uid 112) with qmail-scanner-1.23 (clamdscan: 0.70. spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:0(205.177.65.128):SA:0(4.7/6.0):. Processed in 0.572309 secs); 01 Oct 2004 08:21:41 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.7 required=6.0 X-Spam-Level: ++++ Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (miha@beer.ux6.net@205.177.65.128) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Oct 2004 01:21:41 -0700 From: "Mikhail P." Organization: Ghana Unix Users Group To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:21:39 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200410010543.42789.miha@ghuug.org> <415D0977.4000006@kernel.ee> <200410010818.07826.miha@ghuug.org> In-Reply-To: <200410010818.07826.miha@ghuug.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410010821.39284.miha@ghuug.org> cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: Juhani Tali Subject: Re: confusion with natd X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: miha@ghuug.org List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:21:42 -0000 On Friday 01 October 2004 08:18, Mikhail P. wrote: > Basically we got back to the point where we > all started - I can ping remote party (HOST_B) from 192.168.0.x, but no > further. Sorry, supposed to be HOST_A in above sentence. regards, M. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 15:48:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2994916A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:48:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.mytechsupport.com (ns1.mytechsupport.com [67.50.42.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D438243D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:48:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john@mytechsupport.com) Received: (qmail 26179 invoked by uid 106); 1 Oct 2004 15:45:51 -0000 Received: from john@mytechsupport.com by bsd1.mytechsupport.com by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.22st Clear:RC:1(67.50.46.38):. Processed in 0.020727 secs); 01 Oct 2004 15:45:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.7?) (67.50.46.38) by 0 with SMTP; 1 Oct 2004 15:45:50 -0000 Message-ID: <415D7C86.7010609@mytechsupport.com> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:49:26 -0600 From: John Peterson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 5.X apache / php problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:48:01 -0000 I do web hosting and 2 of my machines are running freebsd 5.x one 5.1 and the other 5.2 . Everything works great except for php always get these weird errors like these: PHP Warning: Unexpected character in input: '^A' (ASCII=1) state=1 in /home/mytech/public_html/horde/lib/Browser. php on line 133 PHP Warning: Unexpected character in input: '^F' (ASCII=6) state=1 in /home/wecare/public_html/app/login.html on line 22 then you reload the page and it goes away. Its totally random it will be fine for awhile then just have a bunch of these errors then go away... Its like it randomly swaps characters in memory like a curly brace for something else in the php script, causing the script to error. It seems if I restart apache it fixes it for awhile as well... Making me think it may be something with apache and the way it handles memory, maybe its overrunning its allocated memory and swapping grabage for the memory location that the php script is running ... ? Just wonder if 5.x and apache/php has problems I have tried apache 2.x and 1.3.x and php any version with the same results. Has anyone else had these sorts of problem with 5.x and apache/php ???? Thanks, John Peterson From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 16:10:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C2F16A4D0 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:10:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kickflip.avantguard.org (kickflip.avantguard.org [69.55.236.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB6043D5A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:10:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryan@ryanhunt.net) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (82-68-65-14.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.68.65.14]) (authenticated bits=0)i92GA3Ox049594 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 02:10:05 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from ryan@ryanhunt.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v667) In-Reply-To: <415D0977.4000006@kernel.ee> References: <200410010543.42789.miha@ghuug.org> <415CFE85.8040005@kernel.ee> <200410010711.24829.miha@ghuug.org> <415D0977.4000006@kernel.ee> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <8C51ED16-148D-11D9-8805-000A95D35E66@ryanhunt.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ryan Hunt Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:10:16 +0100 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.667) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c on kickflip.avantguard.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: FreeBSD Jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 16:10:25 -0000 Dear list, I was wondering if anyone knew of the best mailing list to be on for discussion of FreeBSD jails? I'm also wondering what people's suggestions would be running multiple Jails and handling partition resizing for the jails. (The jails would be resold to clients and they would be able to request more hard drive space) at this point the best solution would be to use 'vinum' but I'm not sure how appropriate it may be for Jails. Many thanks in advance! Ryan Hunt. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 18:17:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CB816A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:17:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE42143D45 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:17:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaron.glenn@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 74so96832rnk for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.181.36 with SMTP id d36mr2996907rnf; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.151.65 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <18f60194041002111765f1ad8f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:17:53 -0700 From: Aaron Glenn To: Ryan Hunt , freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <8C51ED16-148D-11D9-8805-000A95D35E66@ryanhunt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200410010543.42789.miha@ghuug.org> <415CFE85.8040005@kernel.ee> <200410010711.24829.miha@ghuug.org> <415D0977.4000006@kernel.ee> <8C51ED16-148D-11D9-8805-000A95D35E66@ryanhunt.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Aaron Glenn List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:17:54 -0000 What branch of FreeBSD: 4.x or 5.x? On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:10:16 +0100, Ryan Hunt wrote: > Dear list, > I was wondering if anyone knew of the best mailing list to be on for > discussion of FreeBSD jails? > > I'm also wondering what people's suggestions would be running multiple > Jails and handling partition resizing for the jails. (The jails would > be resold to clients and they would be able to request more hard drive > space) at this point the best solution would be to use 'vinum' but I'm > not sure how appropriate it may be for Jails. > > Many thanks in advance! > > Ryan Hunt. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 18:21:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478DD16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:21:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kickflip.avantguard.org (kickflip.avantguard.org [69.55.236.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A6C43D31 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:21:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryan@ryanhunt.net) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (82-68-65-14.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.68.65.14]) (authenticated bits=0)i92ILZOx000211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Oct 2004 04:21:37 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from ryan@ryanhunt.net) In-Reply-To: <18f60194041002111765f1ad8f@mail.gmail.com> References: <200410010543.42789.miha@ghuug.org> <415CFE85.8040005@kernel.ee> <200410010711.24829.miha@ghuug.org> <415D0977.4000006@kernel.ee> <8C51ED16-148D-11D9-8805-000A95D35E66@ryanhunt.net> <18f60194041002111765f1ad8f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v667) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ryan Hunt Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:21:49 +0100 To: Aaron Glenn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.667) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c on kickflip.avantguard.org X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:21:38 -0000 I'm running a box with 5.3-BETA6... I'm interested in 5.3 (which will be stable soon as you all know) as it has support for raw icmp access (whatever you call it, ping/traceroute/etc) and the possibility for multiple IP's. I'd also like to know the major changes in jail() from 4.x -> 5.x (The ability to ping for example) Thanks! Ryan. On 2 Oct 2004, at 19:17, Aaron Glenn wrote: > What branch of FreeBSD: 4.x or 5.x? > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:10:16 +0100, Ryan Hunt wrote: >> Dear list, >> I was wondering if anyone knew of the best mailing list to be >> on for >> discussion of FreeBSD jails? >> >> I'm also wondering what people's suggestions would be running multiple >> Jails and handling partition resizing for the jails. (The jails would >> be resold to clients and they would be able to request more hard drive >> space) at this point the best solution would be to use 'vinum' but I'm >> not sure how appropriate it may be for Jails. >> >> Many thanks in advance! >> >> Ryan Hunt.