From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 8 00:12:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB4F16A4CE; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 00:12:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr [139.124.41.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECEF43D41; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 00:12:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) Received: from arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr (localhost.esil.univ-mrs.fr [127.0.0.1])i780C5Oj036390; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 02:12:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) Received: (from rv@localhost)i780C4gc036389; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 02:12:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr) X-Authentication-Warning: arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr: rv set sender to herve.quiroz@esil.univ-mrs.fr using -f Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 02:12:04 +0200 From: Herve Quiroz To: Alexey Zelkin Message-ID: <20040808001204.GA36351@arabica.esil.univ-mrs.fr> Mail-Followup-To: Alexey Zelkin , Greg Lewis , freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: <200407261752.i6QHqQ8a083489@freefall.freebsd.org> <20040727085040.GA85474@phantom.cris.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040727085040.GA85474@phantom.cris.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Greg Lewis cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/65335: [PATCH] java/jdk14: use bsd.java.mk for JDK bootstrap setting X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 00:12:07 -0000 Hi Alexey, On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 11:50:40AM +0300, Alexey Zelkin wrote: > In my opinion it's not good idea to make jdk14 port depend on additional > infrastructure. bsd.java.mk was designed to process java port. But > jdk14 is not a clear java port from this point of view. Additionally > it's very critical to be sure what no accidiental or unauthorized changes > will not be committed into this infrastucture. Espessially implicitly. > Making it depend on bsd.java.mk opens great perspective of such changes. > > So, I'd prefer to have clean jdk14 port which is not depending on unneeded > items and infrastructure. I respect your work very much guys, but being > conservative is also very good choice sometimes to avoid future problems. I understand. Shall I close this PR then ? Herve