From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Nov  7 04:38:20 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BA5A116A4CF; Sun,  7 Nov 2004 04:38:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9BF0A43D2D; Sun,  7 Nov 2004 04:38:20 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from [192.160.235.2] (cs242746-26.austin.rr.com [24.27.46.26])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 33580148DC; Sat,  6 Nov 2004 22:38:20 -0600 (CST)
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
Organization: Lonesome Dove Computing Services
To: Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>, nsayer@kfu.com
Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2004 22:35:37 -0600
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0410231833040.8173-100000@pancho>
	<20041024104859.GE2768@grimoire.chen.org.nz>
In-Reply-To: <20041024104859.GE2768@grimoire.chen.org.nz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200411062235.37894.linimon@lonesome.com>
cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/72900: Upgrade jboss port to jboss4 (fwd)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 04:38:21 -0000

On Sunday 24 October 2004 05:48 am, Jonathan Chen wrote:

> I'd prefer a java/jboss4 port instead. The JBoss 4.0.0 release has
> some obscure problems (or so they say - I'm looking into this), so
> I'd prefer a new port for the JBoss-4 series instead.

So can we generate a consensus that this PR should be changed to
a repocopy request?

mcl