From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 01:28:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3686E16A4CE; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 01:28:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from satie.private.org (qclgw.qcl.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.70.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34B843D1D; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 01:28:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by satie.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9I1RarO051416; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:27:49 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:27:36 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20041018.102736.640930027.chat95@mac.com> To: Dwayne.MacKinnon@xwave.com From: NAKATA Maho In-Reply-To: <4170006B.6010601@xwave.com> References: <4170006B.6010601@xwave.com> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: maho@FreeBSD.org cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice ports & packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 01:28:19 -0000 In Message-ID: <4170006B.6010601@xwave.com> Dwayne MacKinnon wrote: > I was wondering, do you folks plan to switch your target platform from > 5.2.1-RELEASE to 5.3-RELEASE whenever it comes out? Now I'd moved to 5.3-BETA7 as build environment, and 1.1.3 port is working. I'll provide packages when 5.3-RELEASE is going to be released. All the best, -- NAKATA, Maho From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 01:51:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D0216A4CE for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 01:51:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from satie.private.org (qclgw.qcl.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.70.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EA043D4C for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 01:51:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by satie.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9I1ourO052994; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:50:57 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 10:50:56 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20041018.105056.1025239442.chat95@mac.com> To: kris@obsecurity.org From: NAKATA Maho In-Reply-To: <20041015173517.GA35194@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041015173517.GA35194@xor.obsecurity.org> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [ports-i386@FreeBSD.org: openoffice-1.1.4.20041012 failed on i386 4] X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 01:51:12 -0000 In Message-ID: <20041015173517.GA35194@xor.obsecurity.org> Kris Kennaway wrote: > Also failing on 4.x. Okay now I have an enviroment, I'll take a look. best regards, -- NAKATA, Maho From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 09:13:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A04E16A4CE for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:13:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from uranus.ubs.com (uranus.ubs.com [193.134.254.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CCD43D49 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:13:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from georg.wagner@ubs.com) Received: from svpegasus1-outbound.flur.zuerich.ubs.ch (svpegasus1 [160.59.228.177]) by uranus.ubs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330413E54; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:13:53 +0200 (MEST) Received: from svpegasus1.flur.zuerich.ubs.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by svpegasus1-outbound.flur.zuerich.ubs.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3BB6F2; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:13:52 +0200 (MEST) Received: from s01b1f4r.rzud.urdorf.ubs.ch (s01b1f4r.rzud.urdorf.ubs.ch [137.156.144.6]) by svpegasus1.flur.zuerich.ubs.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6BD686; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:13:52 +0200 (MEST) Received: from s01b1f3b.flur.zuerich.ubs.ch ([160.59.177.11]) by s01b1f4r.rzud.urdorf.ubs.ch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:13:52 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:13:52 +0200 Message-ID: <8287EE790874564D83BF85FDAD8A8C52015DEBFE@s01b1f3b.flur.zuerich.ubs.ch> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: problems with arabic fonts with openoffice 1.1.2 and 1.1.3 on FreeBSD Thread-Index: AcScDZ5S9bCdj8MaTrq69lJTvqgiMAY5Hzxg From: To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Oct 2004 09:13:52.0621 (UTC) FILETIME=[C956C9D0:01C4B4F2] Subject: RE: problems with arabic fonts with openoffice 1.1.2 and 1.1.3 on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:13:55 -0000 Hi Matthew, The latest version (1.1.3) for FBSD 4.10 does not have this problem = anymore. On the older 1.1.3-Version for 5.3 I found a work-araound by setting export SAL_AUTOHINTING_PRIORITY=3D0 in soffice This fixed the glyph positioning-problem for arabic fonts. Thanks Georg -- -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Reimer [mailto:mreimer@vpop.net] Sent: Donnerstag, 16. September 2004 18:53 To: openoffice@freebsd.org Cc: Wagner, Georg Subject: Re: problems with arabic fonts with openoffice 1.1.2 and 1.1.3 on FreeBSD Georg Wagner wrote: > I have tested OOo 1.1.2 and OOo 1.1.3 on FreeBSD 5.2.1 (XFree86 and > Xorg) and 4.10/XFree86 . >=20 > On both platforms there is a problem with arabic fonts. They are not > rendered correctly. All letters of arabic texts are more or less > written on a heap (above each other). >=20 > I suppose that these error is platform dependant since I did not hear > about any problems with linux recently. But I know that Mandrake Linux > has had this problem too. On this platform it was related to the = version > of libfreetype. >=20 > Is this error already known or even beeing actively investigated? = Since > this error seems to be platform related to whom should I send an error > report? >=20 > Regards >=20 > Georg Wagner Does this describe your problem: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3D28567 Matt From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 18 11:03:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E097116A4CE for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:03:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C7C43D2F for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:03:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9IB3XTg049591 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:03:33 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i9IB3X8l049585 for openoffice@freebsd.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:03:33 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:03:33 GMT Message-Id: <200410181103.i9IB3X8l049585@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:03:34 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- a [2003/05/11] ports/52068 openoffice portupgrade of editors/openoffice .org-1. a [2003/05/12] ports/52087 openoffice error while building japanese/openoffice o [2004/01/23] ports/61760 openoffice OpenOffice-1.1 still stalls in install on o [2004/03/24] ports/64678 openoffice openoffice 1.1 upgrade fails due to JDK c o [2004/05/31] ports/67413 openoffice OpenOffice 1.1 PDF Export is BROKEN o [2004/10/07] ports/72414 openoffice Precompiled el-openoffice-1.1.2_1 first t 6 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2004/04/03] ports/65115 openoffice incomplete distinfo o [2004/05/10] ports/66480 openoffice openoffice-1.1.1 port uses root's $HOME f 2 problems total. From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 19 01:38:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA1716A4CE for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:38:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03.rdc-nyc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-smtplb.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.109.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A75043D39 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:38:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottro@nyc.rr.com) Received: from scottro11.homeunix.net (68-175-68-211.nyc.rr.com [68.175.68.211])i9J1cn20021911 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:38:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by scottro11.homeunix.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:38:49 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:38:49 -0400 From: Scott Robbins To: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20041019013849.GA84365@scottro11.homeunix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: possible PR? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 01:38:58 -0000 --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have run into the following issue--I'm not sure how unique my situation may or may not be, which is why I'm not sure if it merits a PR or not. FreeBSD 5.3-BETA7. This is an upgrade from 5.2.1 and I have the compat4x libraries. I had openoffice-1.1.3 installed. I attempted to do a portupgrade of openoffice as follows portupgrade -Rr -m WITHOUT_JAVA=3Dyes -m WITHOUT_MOZILLA=3Dyes. It failed (I'll give more specifics in a moment.) I then tried uninstalling OO completely and removed all distfiles in the /usr/ports/distfiles/openoffice-1.1/ directory. I tried doing it WITHOUT_JAVA=3Dyes and WITHOUT_MOZILLA=3Dyes and then tried doing it while leaving those two out. =20 This is the output--this is from an example where I didn't do WITHOUT_JAVA and WITHOUT_MOZILLA =3D=3D> Extracting for openoffice-1.1.4.20041012 >> Checksum OK for openoffice1.1/OOo_1.1.4.20041012_source.tar.bz2. >> Checksum OK for openoffice1.1/gpc231.tar.Z. >> Checksum OK for openoffice1.1/patch-openoffice-mozilla101-2002-10-14. >> Checksum OK for openoffice1.1/mozilla-vendor-1.0.2a.tgz. =3D=3D=3D> openoffice-1.1.4.20041012 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.5 - found =3D=3D=3D> Patching for openoffice-1.1.4.20041012 =3D=3D=3D> openoffice-1.1.4.20041012 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.5 - found =3D=3D=3D> Applying FreeBSD patches for openoffice-1.1.4.20041012 Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to instsetoo/util/openoffice.lst.rej >> Patch patch-1.1.3-1.1.4 failed to apply cleanly. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1-devel. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade78762.1 make ** Fix the problem and try again. The rejected hunk is *************** *** 5,11 **** variables { PRODUCTNAME OpenOffice.org - PRODUCTVERSION 1.1.4 PRODUCTEXTENSION LONG_PRODUCTEXTENSION EVAL --- 5,11 ---- variables { PRODUCTNAME OpenOffice.org + PRODUCTVERSION 1.1.3 PRODUCTEXTENSION LONG_PRODUCTEXTENSION EVAL My /etc/make.conf has X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=3Dxorg and BATCH=3Dyes--aside from that I believe everything is standard. =20 I am not knowledgeable enough to know what other information is essential--I have looked at the pr guide, and hope that I am giving enough information. =20 I have searched the pr's and don't find this issue. I have also read /usr/ports/UPDATING and don't find it. Lastly I searched the mailing lists (specifying current, questions, ports and ports-bugs) without finding it. Thank you for your time and I apologize if my lack of knowledge means that I have sent the wrong information or not sent sufficient information. Most sincerely --=20 Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Xander: What do you feel? Anya: Upset, afraid of being without you, and a little hungry. Xander: I meant about the house. Anya: Oh. Still haunted. --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBdHAp+lTVdes0Z9YRAudiAKCyeUJljKIG7VYgQshRzAZnvb420wCdFOne tMzS9/LYxRB90+6MGi0IcNI= =qH9M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 19 04:01:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EC316A4CE for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:01:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3293443D2F for ; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:01:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9J411Kl090451; Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:01:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200410190401.i9J411Kl090451@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:01:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis To: scottro@nyc.rr.com In-Reply-To: <20041019013849.GA84365@scottro11.homeunix.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: possible PR? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:01:09 -0000 On 18 Oct, Scott Robbins wrote: > I have run into the following issue--I'm not sure how unique my > situation may or may not be, which is why I'm not sure if it merits a PR > or not. > FreeBSD 5.3-BETA7. This is an upgrade from 5.2.1 and I have the > compat4x libraries. > > > I had openoffice-1.1.3 installed. > > I attempted to do a portupgrade of openoffice as follows > portupgrade -Rr -m WITHOUT_JAVA=yes -m WITHOUT_MOZILLA=yes. > > It failed (I'll give more specifics in a moment.) > I then tried uninstalling OO completely and removed all distfiles > in the /usr/ports/distfiles/openoffice-1.1/ directory. > > I tried doing it WITHOUT_JAVA=yes and WITHOUT_MOZILLA=yes and then tried > doing it while leaving those two out. > > This is the output--this is from an example where I didn't do > WITHOUT_JAVA and WITHOUT_MOZILLA > > > ==> Extracting for openoffice-1.1.4.20041012 >>> Checksum OK for openoffice1.1/OOo_1.1.4.20041012_source.tar.bz2. >>> Checksum OK for openoffice1.1/gpc231.tar.Z. >>> Checksum OK for openoffice1.1/patch-openoffice-mozilla101-2002-10-14. >>> Checksum OK for openoffice1.1/mozilla-vendor-1.0.2a.tgz. > ===> openoffice-1.1.4.20041012 depends on file: > /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.5 - found > ===> Patching for openoffice-1.1.4.20041012 > ===> openoffice-1.1.4.20041012 depends on file: > /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.5 - found > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for openoffice-1.1.4.20041012 > Ignoring previously applied (or reversed) patch. > 1 out of 1 hunks ignored--saving rejects to > instsetoo/util/openoffice.lst.rej >>> Patch patch-1.1.3-1.1.4 failed to apply cleanly. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1-devel. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa > /tmp/portupgrade78762.1 make > ** Fix the problem and try again. Same here. It looks like the first chunk of files/patch-1.1.3-1.1.4 is reversed. Applying the following patch (to the patch) allows "make patch" succeed. I don't yet know if the build will succeed. Index: editors/openoffice-1.1-devel/files/patch-1.1.3-1.1.4 =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1-devel/files/patch-1.1.3-1.1.4,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 patch-1.1.3-1.1.4 --- editors/openoffice-1.1-devel/files/patch-1.1.3-1.1.4 15 Oct 2004 06:02:39 -0000 1.1 +++ editors/openoffice-1.1-devel/files/patch-1.1.3-1.1.4 19 Oct 2004 03:46:26 -0000 @@ -7,8 +7,8 @@ variables { PRODUCTNAME OpenOffice.org -- PRODUCTVERSION 1.1.4 -+ PRODUCTVERSION 1.1.3 +- PRODUCTVERSION 1.1.3 ++ PRODUCTVERSION 1.1.4 PRODUCTEXTENSION LONG_PRODUCTEXTENSION EVAL From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 19 04:22:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE6516A4CE; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:22:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from satie.private.org (qclgw.qcl.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp [133.11.70.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C23343D2F; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:22:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by satie.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9J4LmXP048021; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:21:48 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from chat95@mac.com) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:21:47 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20041019.132147.730598349.chat95@mac.com> To: truckman@FreeBSD.org From: NAKATA Maho In-Reply-To: <200410190401.i9J411Kl090451@gw.catspoiler.org> References: <20041019013849.GA84365@scottro11.homeunix.net> <200410190401.i9J411Kl090451@gw.catspoiler.org> Organization: private X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: scottro@nyc.rr.com cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: possible PR? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:22:05 -0000 Dear Scott and Don this is my fault, and fixed. In Message-ID: <200410190401.i9J411Kl090451@gw.catspoiler.org> Don Lewis wrote: > -- PRODUCTVERSION 1.1.4 > -+ PRODUCTVERSION 1.1.3 > +- PRODUCTVERSION 1.1.3 > ++ PRODUCTVERSION 1.1.4 you are correct. all the best, -- NAKATA, Maho From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 19 04:34:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBA916A4CE; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:34:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02.rdc-nyc.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-smtplb.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.109.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3B743D58; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:34:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottro@nyc.rr.com) Received: from scottro11.homeunix.net (68-175-68-211.nyc.rr.com [68.175.68.211])i9J4YfBM019628; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:34:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by scottro11.homeunix.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:34:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 00:34:40 -0400 From: User Scottro To: NAKATA Maho Message-ID: <20041019043440.GA18071@scottro11.homeunix.net> References: <20041019013849.GA84365@scottro11.homeunix.net> <200410190401.i9J411Kl090451@gw.catspoiler.org> <20041019.132147.730598349.chat95@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041019.132147.730598349.chat95@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: truckman@FreeBSD.org cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: possible PR? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 04:34:45 -0000 --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:21:47PM +0900, NAKATA Maho wrote: > Dear Scott and Don > this is my fault, and fixed. =E6=97=A9=E3=81=8B=E3=81=A3=E3=81=9F=E3=82=93=E3=81=A7=E3=81=99!!! Don, that was simply "Wow that was quick," in Japanese.=20 --=20 Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Buffy: I didn't jump to conclusions. I took a small step, and=20 conclusions there were.=20 --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBdJlg+lTVdes0Z9YRAjtPAKCaJTmJwsHCAZGn4LYXNejRhxMY9gCfVbIT U6fSm3IPOK7Dgc1LqpEjz2I= =XMIN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 19 21:33:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877B016A4CE; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:33:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.109.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F6D43D45; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:33:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottro@nyc.rr.com) Received: from scottro11.homeunix.net (68-175-68-211.nyc.rr.com [68.175.68.211])i9JLXQ6l010269; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:33:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by scottro11.homeunix.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:33:26 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:33:26 -0400 From: User Scottro To: NAKATA Maho Message-ID: <20041019213326.GA61607@scottro11.homeunix.net> References: <20041019013849.GA84365@scottro11.homeunix.net> <200410190401.i9J411Kl090451@gw.catspoiler.org> <20041019.132147.730598349.chat95@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041019.132147.730598349.chat95@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: truckman@FreeBSD.org cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: possible PR? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 21:33:31 -0000 --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 01:21:47PM +0900, NAKATA Maho wrote: > Dear Scott and Don > this is my fault, and fixed. Just a note to both of you. Don, your patch did work and the entire build did complete successfully. Nakata-san, today on another machine at work, I did a fresh cvsup which included your changes and that build too completed successfully. Thank you very much to both of you for your quick fix of the problem. Most sincerely -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Xander: Oh, hey, do you want to come to our place for dinner? Mom's making her famous phone call to the Chinese place. Willow: Xander, do you guys even have a stove? --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBdYgm+lTVdes0Z9YRAnS+AKC3Jdsb9rG6Q4HDb2V9nGEVS2J2DACfYBsq xjZEiHsaLZ9jYg0Er6SP5WQ= =edKD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 20 15:11:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A40516A4CF for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:11:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [80.86.187.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12BCF43D31 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:11:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: (qmail 80626 invoked from network); 20 Oct 2004 15:10:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO curry.salatschuessel.net) (80.86.187.43) by avocado.salatschuessel.net with SMTP; 20 Oct 2004 15:10:28 -0000 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:11:12 +0200 From: Oliver Lehmann To: openoffice@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20041020171112.26e98ef0.lehmann@ans-netz.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12-gtk2-20040918 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Multipart=_Wed__20_Oct_2004_17_11_12_+0200_ajMfvwB.L5pv0wH7" Subject: (open|s)office 1.1.3 coredumpes right after startup X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:11:05 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Multipart=_Wed__20_Oct_2004_17_11_12_+0200_ajMfvwB.L5pv0wH7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, I've installed OOO 1.1.3 on Monday (That was the time I started the installation procedure ;) When it comes the the registration screen after startup (1st start ever), it coredumpes: olivleh1@curry OpenOffice.org1.1.3> ./soffice ICE default IO error handler doing an exit(), pid = 67141, errno = 0 pure virtual method called crash_report: not found Fatal exception: Signal 6 Stack: Abort (core dumped) Exit 134 I'm running FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT i386 as of Sept 18th Backtrace is attached, keep me CCed, I'm not subscribed to the list. -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/ --Multipart=_Wed__20_Oct_2004_17_11_12_+0200_ajMfvwB.L5pv0wH7 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="soffice.bin.trace" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="soffice.bin.trace" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 KGdkYikgYnQKIzAgIDB4MjkyNDBkMWIgaW4gcHRocmVhZF90ZXN0Y2FuY2VsICgpIGZyb20gL3Vz ci9saWIvbGlicHRocmVhZC5zby4xCiMxICAweDI5MjMwZjMyIGluIHNpZ2FjdGlvbiAoKSBmcm9t IC91c3IvbGliL2xpYnB0aHJlYWQuc28uMQojMiAgMHgyOTIyYTVkNCBpbiBwdGhyZWFkX2tpbGwg KCkgZnJvbSAvdXNyL2xpYi9saWJwdGhyZWFkLnNvLjEKIzMgIDB4MjkyMjllMjEgaW4gcmFpc2Ug KCkgZnJvbSAvdXNyL2xpYi9saWJwdGhyZWFkLnNvLjEKIzQgIDB4MjkzY2UxMDIgaW4gYWJvcnQg KCkgZnJvbSAvbGliL2xpYmMuc28uNQojNSAgMHgyOGM1YmM0MyBpbiBvc2xfcmVsZWFzZVZvbHVt ZURldmljZUhhbmRsZSAoKSBmcm9tIC91c3IvbG9jYWwvT3Blbk9mZmljZS5vcmcxLjEuMy9wcm9n cmFtL2xpYnNhbC5zby4zCiM2ICAweDI4YzViZDA2IGluIG9zbF9yZWxlYXNlVm9sdW1lRGV2aWNl SGFuZGxlICgpIGZyb20gL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9PcGVuT2ZmaWNlLm9yZzEuMS4zL3Byb2dyYW0vbGli c2FsLnNvLjMKIzcgIDB4MjkyMmY4NjYgaW4gc2lnYWN0aW9uICgpIGZyb20gL3Vzci9saWIvbGli cHRocmVhZC5zby4xCiM4ICAweDI5MjJmNjk4IGluIHNpZ2FjdGlvbiAoKSBmcm9tIC91c3IvbGli L2xpYnB0aHJlYWQuc28uMQojOSAgMHgyOTIzMDNiNyBpbiBzaWdhY3Rpb24gKCkgZnJvbSAvdXNy L2xpYi9saWJwdGhyZWFkLnNvLjEKIzEwIDB4MjkyMzA2ODUgaW4gc2lnYWN0aW9uICgpIGZyb20g L3Vzci9saWIvbGlicHRocmVhZC5zby4xCiMxMSAweDI5MjM4MTQ0IGluIHB0aHJlYWRfbXV0ZXhh dHRyX2luaXQgKCkgZnJvbSAvdXNyL2xpYi9saWJwdGhyZWFkLnNvLjEKIzEyIDB4MjkyNDE1ZDkg aW4gcHRocmVhZF90ZXN0Y2FuY2VsICgpIGZyb20gL3Vzci9saWIvbGlicHRocmVhZC5zby4xCiMx MyAweDI5MjJhNWU2IGluIHB0aHJlYWRfa2lsbCAoKSBmcm9tIC91c3IvbGliL2xpYnB0aHJlYWQu c28uMQojMTQgMHgyOTIyOWUyMSBpbiByYWlzZSAoKSBmcm9tIC91c3IvbGliL2xpYnB0aHJlYWQu c28uMQojMTUgMHgyOTNjZTEwMiBpbiBhYm9ydCAoKSBmcm9tIC9saWIvbGliYy5zby41CiMxNiAw eDI5MmUzODI1IGluIF9fY3h4YWJpdjE6Ol9fdGVybWluYXRlICgpIGZyb20gL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9P cGVuT2ZmaWNlLm9yZzEuMS4zL3Byb2dyYW0vbGlic3RscG9ydF9nY2Muc28KIzE3IDB4MjkyZTM4 NTUgaW4gc3RkOjp0ZXJtaW5hdGUgKCkgZnJvbSAvdXNyL2xvY2FsL09wZW5PZmZpY2Uub3JnMS4x LjMvcHJvZ3JhbS9saWJzdGxwb3J0X2djYy5zbwojMTggMHgyOGJjZTEwYiBpbiBfX2N4YV9wdXJl X3ZpcnR1YWwgKCkgZnJvbSAvdXNyL2xvY2FsL09wZW5PZmZpY2Uub3JnMS4xLjMvcHJvZ3JhbS9s aWJ2b3MzZ2NjMy5zbwojMTkgMHgyYTc0MWNkZiBpbiBjb21wb25lbnRfZ2V0RmFjdG9yeSAoKSBm cm9tIC91c3IvbG9jYWwvT3Blbk9mZmljZS5vcmcxLjEuMy9wcm9ncmFtL2xpYmNmZ21ncjIuc28K IzIwIDB4MmE3NDFkN2QgaW4gY29tcG9uZW50X2dldEZhY3RvcnkgKCkgZnJvbSAvdXNyL2xvY2Fs L09wZW5PZmZpY2Uub3JnMS4xLjMvcHJvZ3JhbS9saWJjZmdtZ3IyLnNvCiMyMSAweDJhNjBjZGU3 IGluID8/ICgpIGZyb20gL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9PcGVuT2ZmaWNlLm9yZzEuMS4zL3Byb2dyYW0vbGli Y2ZnbWdyMi5zbwojMjIgMHgyYTYwOTZiZCBpbiA/PyAoKSBmcm9tIC91c3IvbG9jYWwvT3Blbk9m ZmljZS5vcmcxLjEuMy9wcm9ncmFtL2xpYmNmZ21ncjIuc28KIzIzIDB4MmE2MDVlYTQgaW4gPz8g KCkgZnJvbSAvdXNyL2xvY2FsL09wZW5PZmZpY2Uub3JnMS4xLjMvcHJvZ3JhbS9saWJjZmdtZ3Iy LnNvCiMyNCAweDJhNjE4NDgxIGluID8/ICgpIGZyb20gL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9PcGVuT2ZmaWNlLm9y ZzEuMS4zL3Byb2dyYW0vbGliY2ZnbWdyMi5zbwojMjUgMHgyYTZlOWFmMCBpbiBjb21wb25lbnRf Z2V0RmFjdG9yeSAoKSBmcm9tIC91c3IvbG9jYWwvT3Blbk9mZmljZS5vcmcxLjEuMy9wcm9ncmFt L2xpYmNmZ21ncjIuc28KIzI2IDB4MmE3MDUzMjYgaW4gY29tcG9uZW50X2dldEZhY3RvcnkgKCkg ZnJvbSAvdXNyL2xvY2FsL09wZW5PZmZpY2Uub3JnMS4xLjMvcHJvZ3JhbS9saWJjZmdtZ3IyLnNv CiMyNyAweDJhNzA0MjM3IGluIGNvbXBvbmVudF9nZXRGYWN0b3J5ICgpIGZyb20gL3Vzci9sb2Nh bC9PcGVuT2ZmaWNlLm9yZzEuMS4zL3Byb2dyYW0vbGliY2ZnbWdyMi5zbwojMjggMHgyYTcwMjBj NCBpbiBjb21wb25lbnRfZ2V0RmFjdG9yeSAoKSBmcm9tIC91c3IvbG9jYWwvT3Blbk9mZmljZS5v cmcxLjEuMy9wcm9ncmFtL2xpYmNmZ21ncjIuc28KIzI5IDB4MmE3MTA0NWYgaW4gY29tcG9uZW50 X2dldEZhY3RvcnkgKCkgZnJvbSAvdXNyL2xvY2FsL09wZW5PZmZpY2Uub3JnMS4xLjMvcHJvZ3Jh bS9saWJjZmdtZ3IyLnNvCiMzMCAweDJhNzBjNDczIGluIGNvbXBvbmVudF9nZXRGYWN0b3J5ICgp IGZyb20gL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9PcGVuT2ZmaWNlLm9yZzEuMS4zL3Byb2dyYW0vbGliY2ZnbWdyMi5z bwojMzEgMHgyYTcyYTNmZCBpbiBjb21wb25lbnRfZ2V0RmFjdG9yeSAoKSBmcm9tIC91c3IvbG9j YWwvT3Blbk9mZmljZS5vcmcxLjEuMy9wcm9ncmFtL2xpYmNmZ21ncjIuc28KIzMyIDB4Mjg5Nzlm Y2MgaW4gdXRsOjpDb25maWdJdGVtOjp+Q29uZmlnSXRlbSAoKSBmcm9tIC91c3IvbG9jYWwvT3Bl bk9mZmljZS5vcmcxLjEuMy9wcm9ncmFtL2xpYnV0bDY0NWZpLnNvCiMzMyAweDI4MjNhMTczIGlu IHZjbDo6RGVmYXVsdEZvbnRDb25maWdJdGVtOjp+RGVmYXVsdEZvbnRDb25maWdJdGVtICgpIGZy b20gL3Vzci9sb2NhbC9PcGVuT2ZmaWNlLm9yZzEuMS4zL3Byb2dyYW0vbGlidmNsNjQ1Zmkuc28K IzM0IDB4MjgxOWVjMjAgaW4gSW1wbERlSW5pdFNWRGF0YSAoKSBmcm9tIC91c3IvbG9jYWwvT3Bl bk9mZmljZS5vcmcxLjEuMy9wcm9ncmFtL2xpYnZjbDY0NWZpLnNvCiMzNSAweDI4MTliYmMyIGlu IEFwcGxpY2F0aW9uOjp+QXBwbGljYXRpb24gKCkgZnJvbSAvdXNyL2xvY2FsL09wZW5PZmZpY2Uu b3JnMS4xLjMvcHJvZ3JhbS9saWJ2Y2w2NDVmaS5zbwojMzYgMHgwODA1OTM2OCBpbiBkZXNrdG9w OjpSZXBsYWNlU3RyaW5nSG9va1Byb2MgKCkKIzM3IDB4MDgwNjVlMjggaW4gZGVza3RvcDo6RGVz a3RvcDo6TGlua1N0dWJFbmFibGVBY2NlcHRvcnNfSW1wbCAoKQojMzggMHgwODA2NWU1ZSBpbiBk ZXNrdG9wOjpEZXNrdG9wOjpMaW5rU3R1YkVuYWJsZUFjY2VwdG9yc19JbXBsICgpCiMzOSAweDA4 MDU3YTYyIGluID8/ICgpCiM0MCAweDI5MjM1YjQ5IGluIHB0aHJlYWRfbXV0ZXhfdW5sb2NrICgp IGZyb20gL3Vzci9saWIvbGlicHRocmVhZC5zby4xCiM0MSAweDA4MDgxZTRkIGluIF9maW5pICgp CiM0MiAweDI5M2NmOTRhIGluIF9fY3hhX2ZpbmFsaXplICgpIGZyb20gL2xpYi9saWJjLnNvLjUK IzQzIDB4MjkzY2Y2NGEgaW4gZXhpdCAoKSBmcm9tIC9saWIvbGliYy5zby41CiM0NCAweDI5NWQ2 NDUzIGluIF9JY2VEZWZhdWx0SU9FcnJvckhhbmRsZXIgKCkgZnJvbSAvdXNyL1gxMVI2L2xpYi9s aWJJQ0Uuc28uNgojNDUgMHgyOTVkNzkzOCBpbiBfSWNlUmVhZCAoKSBmcm9tIC91c3IvWDExUjYv bGliL2xpYklDRS5zby42CiM0NiAweDI5NWQ3ZWY1IGluIEljZVByb2Nlc3NNZXNzYWdlcyAoKSBm cm9tIC91c3IvWDExUjYvbGliL2xpYklDRS5zby42CiM0NyAweDI4MzU1ZDJjIGluIElDRUNvbm5l Y3Rpb25Xb3JrZXIgKCkgZnJvbSAvdXNyL2xvY2FsL09wZW5PZmZpY2Uub3JnMS4xLjMvcHJvZ3Jh bS9saWJ2Y2w2NDVmaS5zbwojNDggMHgyOGM1MzA2MyBpbiBvc2xfZ2V0VGV4dEVuY29kaW5nRnJv bUxvY2FsZSAoKSBmcm9tIC91c3IvbG9jYWwvT3Blbk9mZmljZS5vcmcxLjEuMy9wcm9ncmFtL2xp YnNhbC5zby4zCiM0OSAweDI5MjJjMDBiIGluIHB0aHJlYWRfY3JlYXRlICgpIGZyb20gL3Vzci9s aWIvbGlicHRocmVhZC5zby4xCiM1MCAweDI5M2I3MTAzIGluIF9jdHhfc3RhcnQgKCkgZnJvbSAv bGliL2xpYmMuc28uNQooZ2RiKSAKCg== --Multipart=_Wed__20_Oct_2004_17_11_12_+0200_ajMfvwB.L5pv0wH7-- From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 20 15:56:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EBA16A4CE for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:56:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vogon.ccgis.de (vogon.ccgis.de [212.79.172.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3202943D39 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:56:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from amavis by vogon.ccgis.de with virus-scanned (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKIvH-0000Tu-00 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:02:47 +0200 Received: from center.sz ([192.168.1.20] helo=center.shared) by vogon.ccgis.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKIvB-0000Tm-00; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 18:02:41 +0200 Received: from [192.168.2.109] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by center.shared with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKImK-0006nB-00; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:53:32 +0200 Message-ID: <41768B54.9090002@ccgis.de> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:59:16 +0200 From: Benjamin Thelen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: AMaViS-ng at Geo-Consortium Bonn cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Install error OOo-1.1.3 on 4.10p3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 15:56:28 -0000 Hi lists, I am now really stumped and appreciate you for your assistance. I had this very error already with OOo-1.1.2 on three 4.10p2 FreeBSD boxes in the end of August, posted it to the list, but got no answer. I got along by installing a 1.1.0 package and hoped that this error will be solved in future ports. Compiling seems alright. This error-message occurs right after "make install". # # UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. # /usr/X11R6/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & echo $! > /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/.Xvfb.pid cd: can't cd to /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/instsetoo/ *.pro/01/normal/ *** Error code 2 Stop in /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. Does anybody know, what's wrong here? I then tried "pkg_add -r openoffice-1.1", but the files couldn't be found. After this I asked google, found packages, but they were build against x.org (see thread initiated by Nakata Maho, diskussing using x.org or xFree86). Are there any packages built against xFree86 available? ... or do you generally recommend switching to x.org? Sorry, to bother, thanks for your help! Ben From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 20 16:55:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8D016A4CF; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:55:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CFA43D2F; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:55:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq69-045.dial.allstream.net [216.123.128.173]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id E98F65731F; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:55:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 12:55:03 -0400 From: epilogue To: Benjamin Thelen Message-Id: <20041020125503.65ef6fcd@localhost> In-Reply-To: <41768B54.9090002@ccgis.de> References: <41768B54.9090002@ccgis.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install error OOo-1.1.3 on 4.10p3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 16:55:16 -0000 On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:59:16 +0200 Benjamin Thelen wrote: > Hi lists, > > I am now really stumped and appreciate you for your assistance. I had > this very error already with OOo-1.1.2 on three 4.10p2 FreeBSD boxes > in the end of August, posted it to the list, but got no answer. I got > along by installing a 1.1.0 package and hoped that this error will be > solved in future ports. > > > Compiling seems alright. This error-message occurs right after "make > install". > > # > # UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. > # > /usr/X11R6/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & echo > $! > /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/.Xvfb.pid > cd: can't cd to > /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/instsetoo/ > *.pro/01/normal/ > *** Error code 2 > Stop in /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. > > > Does anybody know, what's wrong here? > > > > > I then tried "pkg_add -r openoffice-1.1", but the files couldn't be > found. After this I asked google, found packages, but they were build > against x.org (see thread initiated by Nakata Maho, diskussing using > x.org or xFree86). Are there any packages built against xFree86 > available? until such time as other packages are made available, you can try what i have done in the past - installing OO despite having the wrong X server. this method has been successful for me numerous times: 1) download the pkg for your system 2) pkg_add -f openoffice-[ver] 3) pkgdb -Fu # almost all the xorg/xfree pieces have very similar names, so selecting the correct dependency is straightforward. only with XFree86-fontScalable might you have to make a choice between Type1 or TrueType. both seem to work, but with slightly different results (i'm not sure which is best and don't much care - but if you read-up on it, you should be able to figure it out). 4) start openoffice and enjoy. > ... or do you generally recommend switching to x.org? while xorg is now default on 5.3, what they will do with 4.11 is unclear (at least to me). either system (xorg/xfree) will work and both should be available via ports for the forseeable future. in short, it is a matter of preference (or features) -- and a decision which is entirely up to you. =] hth, epi > Sorry, to bother, thanks for your help! > > > Ben > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-openoffice-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 20 17:30:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB6416A4CE for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:30:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093B243D31 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:30:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9KHU3pj001657; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:30:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200410201730.i9KHU3pj001657@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:30:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis To: bt@ccgis.de In-Reply-To: <41768B54.9090002@ccgis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Install error OOo-1.1.3 on 4.10p3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:30:16 -0000 On 20 Oct, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > Hi lists, > > I am now really stumped and appreciate you for your assistance. I had > this very error already with OOo-1.1.2 on three 4.10p2 FreeBSD boxes > in the end of August, posted it to the list, but got no answer. I got > along by installing a 1.1.0 package and hoped that this error will be > solved in future ports. > > > Compiling seems alright. This error-message occurs right after "make > install". > > # > # UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. > # > /usr/X11R6/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & echo > $! > /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/.Xvfb.pid > cd: can't cd to > /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/instsetoo/ > *.pro/01/normal/ > *** Error code 2 > Stop in /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. No problems here building and installing on 4.10-STABLE, though in my case $DISPLAY is set so my build didn't use Xvfb. That shouldn't matter, though because the directory passed to the cd command appears to be the same in either case: ${WRKSRC}/instsetoo/*.pro/${LANG_EXT}/normal/ I wonder if you ran into some sort of build problem that didn't get caught. The end of the build should look like: Replacing ${PRODUCTNAME} with OpenOffice.org Replacing ${PRODUCTVERSION} with 1.1.3 time needed: 0:1:0 WARNING! Project(s): gtk not found and couldn't be built. Correct build.lsts. Do you still have the work directory around? If so, can you look under /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/instsetoo/ to see what is missing? It looks like there is a problem on the next line of the Makefile, though. do-install: .if !defined(DISPLAY) # # UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. # ${X11BASE}/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & ${ECHO } $$! > ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid @sleep 5 @cd ${WRKSRC}/instsetoo/*.pro/${LANG_EXT}/normal/ ; \ ===> SAL_IGNOREXERRORS=1 TEMP=${WRKDIR} DISPLAY=${DISPLAY} ./install --prefix =${PREFIX} @-${CAT} ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid | ${XARGS} kill @${RM} -f ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid I think "DISPLAY=${DISPLAY}" is incorrect because DISPLAY is not defined. Judging by another place in the Makefile where Xvfb is used, I think this should be "DISPLAY=${DISPLAYHACK}". From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 11:54:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4211016A4CF for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:54:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [80.86.187.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD5843D4C for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:54:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: (qmail 7165 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2004 11:53:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO curry.salatschuessel.net) (80.86.187.43) by avocado.salatschuessel.net with SMTP; 21 Oct 2004 11:53:45 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:54:31 +0200 From: Oliver Lehmann To: openoffice@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20041021135431.23eeaf61.lehmann@ans-netz.de> In-Reply-To: <20041020171112.26e98ef0.lehmann@ans-netz.de> References: <20041020171112.26e98ef0.lehmann@ans-netz.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12-gtk2-20040918 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (open|s)office 1.1.3 coredumpes right after startup X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:54:21 -0000 Oliver Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > I've installed OOO 1.1.3 on Monday (That was the time I started the > installation procedure ;) > > When it comes the the registration screen after startup (1st start > ever), it coredumpes: > > olivleh1@curry OpenOffice.org1.1.3> ./soffice > ICE default IO error handler doing an exit(), pid = 67141, errno = 0 > pure virtual method called > crash_report: not found > > Fatal exception: Signal 6 > Stack: > Abort (core dumped) > Exit 134 > > I'm running FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT i386 as of Sept 18th > > Backtrace is attached, keep me CCed, I'm not subscribed to the list. Which might be interessting too is, I've compiled with WITHOUT_MOZILLA= yo WITHOUT_JAVA= yo -- Oliver Lehmann http://www.pofo.de/ http://wishlist.ans-netz.de/ From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 17:40:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F6F16A4CE for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:40:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vogon.ccgis.de (vogon.ccgis.de [212.79.172.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE58A43D1D for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:40:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from amavis by vogon.ccgis.de with virus-scanned (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKh2C-0008AN-00 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:47:32 +0200 Received: from center.sz ([192.168.1.20] helo=center.shared) by vogon.ccgis.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKh1y-0008A6-00; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:47:18 +0200 Received: from [192.168.2.109] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by center.shared with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKgsq-0000Z0-00; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:37:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4177F54C.20508@ccgis.de> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:43:40 +0200 From: Benjamin Thelen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Lewis References: <200410201730.i9KHU3pj001657@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <200410201730.i9KHU3pj001657@gw.catspoiler.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: AMaViS-ng at Geo-Consortium Bonn cc: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Install error OOo-1.1.3 on 4.10p3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:40:58 -0000 Don Lewis wrote: > On 20 Oct, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > >>Hi lists, >> >>I am now really stumped and appreciate you for your assistance. I had >>this very error already with OOo-1.1.2 on three 4.10p2 FreeBSD boxes >>in the end of August, posted it to the list, but got no answer. I got >>along by installing a 1.1.0 package and hoped that this error will be >>solved in future ports. >> >> >>Compiling seems alright. This error-message occurs right after "make >>install". >> >># >># UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. >># >>/usr/X11R6/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & echo >>$! > /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/.Xvfb.pid >>cd: can't cd to >>/data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/instsetoo/ >>*.pro/01/normal/ >>*** Error code 2 >>Stop in /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. > > > No problems here building and installing on 4.10-STABLE, though in my > case $DISPLAY is set so my build didn't use Xvfb. Hi Down, thanks for your reply. Well, I did not decide to use Xvfb. Did not know there is such a variable. > That shouldn't > matter, though because the directory passed to the cd command appears to > be the same in either case: > ${WRKSRC}/instsetoo/*.pro/${LANG_EXT}/normal/ > > I wonder if you ran into some sort of build problem that didn't get > caught. The end of the build should look like: > > Replacing ${PRODUCTNAME} with OpenOffice.org > Replacing ${PRODUCTVERSION} with 1.1.3 > > time needed: 0:1:0 > > > WARNING! Project(s): > gtk > > not found and couldn't be built. Correct build.lsts. I now remember again, I saw that ending on a posting some time ago. No mine looks really different (that is how it allways looked): then mv -f ".deps/rulparse.Tpo" ".deps/rulparse.Po"; \ else rm -f ".deps/rulparse.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi if gcc32 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I. -I. -I./unix/linux -I./unix -I./unix/li nux/gnu -g -O2 -MT percent.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/percent.Tpo" \ -c -o percent.o `test -f 'percent.c' || echo './'`percent.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/percent.Tpo" ".deps/percent.Po"; \ else rm -f ".deps/percent.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi if gcc32 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I. -I. -I./unix/linux -I./unix -I./unix/linux/gnu -g -O2 -MT function.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/function.Tpo" \ -c -o function.o `test -f 'function.c' || echo './'`function.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/function.Tpo" ".deps/function.Po"; \ else rm -f ".deps/function.Tpo"; exit 1; \ fi gcc32 -g -O2 -o dmake infer.o make.o stat.o expand.o dmstring.o hash.o dag.o dmake.o path.o imacs.o sysintf.o parse.o getinp.o quit.o state.o dmdump.o macpa rse.o rulparse.o percent.o function.o unix/libunix.a gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3 rc/dmake' gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_s rc/dmake' dmake has been successfully built > > Do you still have the work directory around? If so, can you look under > /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/instsetoo/ to see > what is missing? Yes. There are the following folders in .../instsettoo: CVS prj util No ".../instsettoo/*.pro/01/normal/". > > > It looks like there is a problem on the next line of the Makefile, > though. > > do-install: > .if !defined(DISPLAY) > # > # UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. > # > ${X11BASE}/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & ${ECHO > } $$! > ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid > @sleep 5 > @cd ${WRKSRC}/instsetoo/*.pro/${LANG_EXT}/normal/ ; \ > ===> SAL_IGNOREXERRORS=1 TEMP=${WRKDIR} DISPLAY=${DISPLAY} ./install --prefix > =${PREFIX} > @-${CAT} ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid | ${XARGS} kill > @${RM} -f ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid > > I think "DISPLAY=${DISPLAY}" is incorrect because DISPLAY is not > defined. Judging by another place in the Makefile where Xvfb is used, I > think this should be "DISPLAY=${DISPLAYHACK}". > > I can see what you mean, but I'm absolutely not enough in such "Makefile-things". I've just changed it and building OOo again. But it'll take an hour. I'll tell (tomorrow). But, what is obvious, that the end of OOo buildings looks so different!? Thanks very much, Ben From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 18:29:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27A116A4CE for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:29:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vogon.ccgis.de (vogon.ccgis.de [212.79.172.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826B943D3F for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:29:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from amavis by vogon.ccgis.de with virus-scanned (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKhnD-00008R-00 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:36:07 +0200 Received: from center.sz ([192.168.1.20] helo=center.shared) by vogon.ccgis.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKhmy-00008A-00; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:35:52 +0200 Received: from [192.168.2.109] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by center.shared with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKhdq-0000cU-00; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:26:26 +0200 Message-ID: <417800AE.2040605@ccgis.de> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:32:14 +0200 From: Benjamin Thelen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Lewis References: <200410201730.i9KHU3pj001657@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <200410201730.i9KHU3pj001657@gw.catspoiler.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: AMaViS-ng at Geo-Consortium Bonn cc: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Install error OOo-1.1.3 on 4.10p3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:29:32 -0000 Don Lewis wrote: > On 20 Oct, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > ... snip ... > .if !defined(DISPLAY) > # > # UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. > # > ${X11BASE}/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & ${ECHO > } $$! > ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid > @sleep 5 > @cd ${WRKSRC}/instsetoo/*.pro/${LANG_EXT}/normal/ ; \ > ===> SAL_IGNOREXERRORS=1 TEMP=${WRKDIR} DISPLAY=${DISPLAY} ./install --prefix > =${PREFIX} > @-${CAT} ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid | ${XARGS} kill > @${RM} -f ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid > > I think "DISPLAY=${DISPLAY}" is incorrect because DISPLAY is not > defined. Judging by another place in the Makefile where Xvfb is used, I > think this should be "DISPLAY=${DISPLAYHACK}". > > Hi Don, Well, building of OOo still ends as I know, except this kill-command. I had that month ago. dmake has been successfully built kill: 70823: No such process *** Error code 1 (ignored) Installing still fails with the same error. Nevertheless, thanks for your time and help Don! I don't understand why I have three 4.10 boxes, all with the same error and all with the same ending of building OOo? I suppose OOo expects somethings what I do not supply. I could try a generic kernel...don't know. Won't really help, I think. Best Regards, Benjamin From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 18:32:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71C416A4CE for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:32:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C4243D49 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:32:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9LIVx8g004615; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:32:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200410211832.i9LIVx8g004615@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:31:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis To: bt@ccgis.de In-Reply-To: <4177F54C.20508@ccgis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Install error OOo-1.1.3 on 4.10p3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:32:12 -0000 On 21 Oct, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > Don Lewis wrote: >> On 20 Oct, Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> >>>Hi lists, >>> >>>I am now really stumped and appreciate you for your assistance. I had >>>this very error already with OOo-1.1.2 on three 4.10p2 FreeBSD boxes >>>in the end of August, posted it to the list, but got no answer. I got >>>along by installing a 1.1.0 package and hoped that this error will be >>>solved in future ports. >>> >>> >>>Compiling seems alright. This error-message occurs right after "make >>>install". >>> >>># >>># UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. >>># >>>/usr/X11R6/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & echo >>>$! > /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/.Xvfb.pid >>>cd: can't cd to >>>/data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/instsetoo/ >>>*.pro/01/normal/ >>>*** Error code 2 >>>Stop in /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. >> >> >> No problems here building and installing on 4.10-STABLE, though in my >> case $DISPLAY is set so my build didn't use Xvfb. > > Hi Down, > thanks for your reply. > > Well, I did not decide to use Xvfb. Did not know there is such a variable. Some parts of the OpenOffice build want to access an X11 server. If you are running the build in a terminal window under X11, $DISPLAY should be automatically set. If $DISPLAY isn't set, the Makefile for the port will start Xvfb, which is an X11 server for a virtual frame buffer. In my case, $DISPLAY is set because I'm doing the build in an xterm window. >> That shouldn't >> matter, though because the directory passed to the cd command appears to >> be the same in either case: >> ${WRKSRC}/instsetoo/*.pro/${LANG_EXT}/normal/ >> >> I wonder if you ran into some sort of build problem that didn't get >> caught. The end of the build should look like: >> >> Replacing ${PRODUCTNAME} with OpenOffice.org >> Replacing ${PRODUCTVERSION} with 1.1.3 >> >> time needed: 0:1:0 >> >> >> WARNING! Project(s): >> gtk >> >> not found and couldn't be built. Correct build.lsts. > > > > I now remember again, I saw that ending on a posting some time ago. No > mine looks really different (that is how it allways looked): > > > then mv -f ".deps/rulparse.Tpo" ".deps/rulparse.Po"; \ > else rm -f ".deps/rulparse.Tpo"; exit 1; \ > fi > if gcc32 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I. -I. -I./unix/linux -I./unix > -I./unix/li nux/gnu -g -O2 -MT percent.o -MD -MP -MF > ".deps/percent.Tpo" \ -c -o percent.o `test -f 'percent.c' || echo > './'`percent.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/percent.Tpo" ".deps/percent.Po"; \ > else rm -f ".deps/percent.Tpo"; exit 1; \ > fi > if gcc32 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I. -I. -I./unix/linux -I./unix > -I./unix/linux/gnu -g -O2 -MT function.o -MD -MP -MF > ".deps/function.Tpo" \ -c -o function.o `test -f 'function.c' || echo > './'`function.c; \ then mv -f ".deps/function.Tpo" > ".deps/function.Po"; \ else rm -f ".deps/function.Tpo"; exit 1; \ > fi > gcc32 -g -O2 -o dmake infer.o make.o stat.o expand.o dmstring.o > hash.o dag.o > dmake.o path.o imacs.o sysintf.o parse.o getinp.o quit.o state.o > dmdump.o macpa > rse.o rulparse.o percent.o function.o unix/libunix.a > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3 > rc/dmake' > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > `/data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_s > rc/dmake' > dmake has been successfully built Your build appears to be terminating way too early. I see the matching output about 21% of the way through my successful portupgrade run. gcc32 -g -O2 -o dmake infer.o make.o stat.o expand.o dmstring.o hash.o dag.o dmake.o path.o imacs.o sysintf.o parse.o getinp.o quit.o state.o dmdump.o macpa rse.o rulparse.o percent.o function.o unix/libunix.a gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/scratch/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_ 1.1.3_src/dmake' gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/scratch/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_ 1.1.3_src/dmake' dmake has been successfully built build -- version: 1.86.18.2 Checking dmake... ============= Building project x11_extensions ============= deliver -- version: 1.50.8.8 COPY: build.lst -> /scratch/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/ solver/645/unxfbsd.pro/inc/x11_extensions/build.lst >> >> Do you still have the work directory around? If so, can you look under >> /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/instsetoo/ to see >> what is missing? > > Yes. There are the following folders in .../instsettoo: > > CVS > prj > util > > > No ".../instsettoo/*.pro/01/normal/". This appears to get created near the end of the build. Replacing ${PRODUCTVERSION} with 1.1.3 time needed: 0:0:59 mkdir -p ../unxfbsd.pro/01/normal rm -f ../unxfbsd.pro/01/normal/* rm: No match. lzip -p . -e ../unxfbsd.pro/misc/lzip.log -l 01 -f openoffice.lst -d ../unxfbsd. pro/01 -n OfficeOSL -e ../unxfbsd.pro/01/Logfile.txt -C ../unxfbsd.pro/01/checks ums.txt Local Script Particel Zip (c) 2000 Sun Microsystems >> >> >> It looks like there is a problem on the next line of the Makefile, >> though. >> >> do-install: >> .if !defined(DISPLAY) >> # >> # UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. >> # >> ${X11BASE}/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & ${ECHO >> } $$! > ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid >> @sleep 5 >> @cd ${WRKSRC}/instsetoo/*.pro/${LANG_EXT}/normal/ ; \ >> ===> SAL_IGNOREXERRORS=1 TEMP=${WRKDIR} DISPLAY=${DISPLAY} ./install --prefix >> =${PREFIX} >> @-${CAT} ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid | ${XARGS} kill >> @${RM} -f ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid >> >> I think "DISPLAY=${DISPLAY}" is incorrect because DISPLAY is not >> defined. Judging by another place in the Makefile where Xvfb is used, I >> think this should be "DISPLAY=${DISPLAYHACK}". >> >> > > I can see what you mean, but I'm absolutely not enough in such > "Makefile-things". I've just changed it and building OOo again. But > it'll take an hour. I'll tell (tomorrow). That's way too fast ... It takes more than 13 hours on my 1.113 GHZ Pentium III. > But, what is obvious, that the end of OOo buildings looks so different!? > > > Thanks very much, > Ben > > > > From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 20:01:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DE716A4CE for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:01:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vogon.ccgis.de (vogon.ccgis.de [212.79.172.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1259343D45 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:01:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from amavis by vogon.ccgis.de with virus-scanned (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKjEV-00017G-00 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:08:23 +0200 Received: from center.sz ([192.168.1.20] helo=center.shared) by vogon.ccgis.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKjEO-000178-00 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 22:08:16 +0200 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=center.sz) by center.shared with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CKj5F-0000kO-00 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:58:49 +0200 Received: from 192.168.0.5 (proxying for 80.133.104.112) (SquirrelMail authenticated user thelen) by vogon.ccgis.de with HTTP; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:58:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <56844.192.168.0.5.1098388729.squirrel@vogon.ccgis.de> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:58:49 +0200 (CEST) From: "Benjamin Thelen" To: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Scanned-By: AMaViS-ng at Geo-Consortium Bonn Subject: Re: Install error OOo-1.1.3 on 4.10p3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:01:48 -0000 Hi Don, I cut this posting, as it got a little complex. > On 21 Oct, Benjamin Thelen wrote: ... snip ... > > Some parts of the OpenOffice build want to access an X11 server. If you are running the build in a terminal window under X11, $DISPLAY should be automatically set. If $DISPLAY isn't set, the Makefile for the port will start Xvfb, which is an X11 server for a virtual frame buffer. In my case, $DISPLAY is set because I'm doing the build in an xterm window. > I understand this. I'm building OOo in a xterm under X11 at the moment. I'm used to do the most without X, because up to now I'm running FreeBSD just on server machines. Getting OOo to run is part of my project "FreeBSD for desktop (and notebook)" :-)! I also want to change at home, but therfore I really need OOo. ... snip ... >> dmake has been successfully built > > Your build appears to be terminating way too early. I see the matching output about 21% of the way through my successful portupgrade run. Wow, that is interesting! No surprise that installing OOo fails. But why does building terminate so early? There is no error message. I could maybe pipe the building output into a file and check... > > ... snip ... >> I can see what you mean, but I'm absolutely not enough in such >> "Makefile-things". I've just changed it and building OOo again. But it'll take an hour. I'll tell (tomorrow). > > That's way too fast ... It takes more than 13 hours on my 1.113 GHZ Pentium III. That is of course a huge difference! Amazing. It's a P4 2.4, but that would of course not explain a difference of 12 hours. Thanks again for your detailed feedback. Ben > >> But, what is obvious, that the end of OOo buildings looks so different!? >> >> >> Thanks very much, >> Ben >> >> >> >> > > > From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 21 20:27:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DA0C16A4CE for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:27:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (217-ip-163.nccn.net [209.79.217.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8060C43D2D for ; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:26:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i9LKQmll004920; Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:26:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <200410212026.i9LKQmll004920@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 13:26:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis To: bt@ccgis.de In-Reply-To: <56844.192.168.0.5.1098388729.squirrel@vogon.ccgis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Install error OOo-1.1.3 on 4.10p3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:27:00 -0000 On 21 Oct, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > Hi Don, > I cut this posting, as it got a little complex. > > >> On 21 Oct, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > ... > snip > ... >> >> Some parts of the OpenOffice build want to access an X11 server. If you > are running the build in a terminal window under X11, $DISPLAY should be > automatically set. If $DISPLAY isn't set, the Makefile for the port > will start Xvfb, which is an X11 server for a virtual frame buffer. In > my case, $DISPLAY is set because I'm doing the build in an xterm window. >> > > I understand this. I'm building OOo in a xterm under X11 at the moment. > I'm used to do the most without X, because up to now I'm running FreeBSD > just on server machines. > > Getting OOo to run is part of my project "FreeBSD for desktop (and > notebook)" :-)! I also want to change at home, but therfore I really need > OOo. > > ... > snip > ... > > >>> dmake has been successfully built >> >> Your build appears to be terminating way too early. I see the matching > output about 21% of the way through my successful portupgrade run. > > > Wow, that is interesting! No surprise that installing OOo fails. But why > does building terminate so early? There is no error message. I could maybe > pipe the building output into a file and check... I'm not able to reproduce the problem you're seeing by unsetting $DISPLAY. Can you try removing the leading @'s in this section of the Makefile so that we can see where things are dying? .if !defined(DISPLAY) # # This is a UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. # ${X11BASE}/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & ${ECHO } $$! > ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid @sleep 5 .endif @cd ${WRKSRC} ; PATH="${PATH}:${LOCALBASE}/bin:${LOCALBASE}/sbin" ./boot strap .if defined(L10NHELP) || defined(ALL_LOCALIZED_LANGS) @${MKDIR} ${WRKSRC}/solver/${BUILD_NR}/unxfbsd.pro/pck @${CP} ${WRKDIR}/L10NHELP/*.zip ${WRKSRC}/solver/${BUILD_NR}/unxfbsd.pro /pck .endif .if !defined(DISPLAY) @cd ${WRKSRC} ; DISPLAY=${DISPLAYHACK} PATH="${PATH}:${LOCALBASE}/bin:${ LOCALBASE}/sbin" ; \ ${TCSH} -c 'source FreeBSDEnv.Set ; unsetenv TOP ; ${BUILD}' @-${CAT} ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid | ${XARGS} kill @${RM} -f ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid .else @cd ${WRKSRC} ; DISPLAY=${DISPLAY} PATH="${PATH}:${LOCALBASE}/bin:${LOCA LBASE}/sbin" ; \ ${TCSH} -c 'source FreeBSDEnv.Set ; unsetenv TOP ; ${BUILD}' .endif After editing the Makefile, run "make" in the port directory and capture the stdout and stderr to a file. Base on what you've posted, it looks like ./bootstrap is getting run, but ${BUILD} is not. From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 22 15:44:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B998216A4CE for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:44:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vogon.ccgis.de (vogon.ccgis.de [212.79.172.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE2743D2F for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:44:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from amavis by vogon.ccgis.de with virus-scanned (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CL1hN-0005JR-00 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:51:25 +0200 Received: from center.sz ([192.168.1.20] helo=center.shared) by vogon.ccgis.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CL1gu-0005It-00; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:50:56 +0200 Received: from [192.168.2.109] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by center.shared with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CL1XZ-0002Jn-00; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:41:17 +0200 Message-ID: <41792B7B.9070504@ccgis.de> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:47:07 +0200 From: Benjamin Thelen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Lewis References: <200410212026.i9LKQmll004920@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <200410212026.i9LKQmll004920@gw.catspoiler.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: AMaViS-ng at Geo-Consortium Bonn cc: freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Install error OOo-1.1.3 on 4.10p3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:44:40 -0000 Don Lewis wrote: > On 21 Oct, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > >>Hi Don, >>I cut this posting, as it got a little complex. >> >> >> >>>On 21 Oct, Benjamin Thelen wrote: >> >>... >>snip >>... >> >>>Some parts of the OpenOffice build want to access an X11 server. If you >> >>are running the build in a terminal window under X11, $DISPLAY should be >>automatically set. If $DISPLAY isn't set, the Makefile for the port >>will start Xvfb, which is an X11 server for a virtual frame buffer. In >>my case, $DISPLAY is set because I'm doing the build in an xterm window. >> >>I understand this. I'm building OOo in a xterm under X11 at the moment. >>I'm used to do the most without X, because up to now I'm running FreeBSD >>just on server machines. >> >>Getting OOo to run is part of my project "FreeBSD for desktop (and >>notebook)" :-)! I also want to change at home, but therfore I really need >>OOo. >> >>... >>snip >>... >> >> >> >>>>dmake has been successfully built >>> >>>Your build appears to be terminating way too early. I see the matching >> >>output about 21% of the way through my successful portupgrade run. >> >> >>Wow, that is interesting! No surprise that installing OOo fails. But why >>does building terminate so early? There is no error message. I could maybe >>pipe the building output into a file and check... > > > I'm not able to reproduce the problem you're seeing by unsetting > $DISPLAY. Can you try removing the leading @'s in this section of the > Makefile so that we can see where things are dying? > > .if !defined(DISPLAY) > # > # This is a UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. > # > ${X11BASE}/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & ${ECHO > } $$! > ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid > @sleep 5 > .endif > @cd ${WRKSRC} ; PATH="${PATH}:${LOCALBASE}/bin:${LOCALBASE}/sbin" ./boot > strap > .if defined(L10NHELP) || defined(ALL_LOCALIZED_LANGS) > @${MKDIR} ${WRKSRC}/solver/${BUILD_NR}/unxfbsd.pro/pck > @${CP} ${WRKDIR}/L10NHELP/*.zip ${WRKSRC}/solver/${BUILD_NR}/unxfbsd.pro > /pck > .endif > .if !defined(DISPLAY) > @cd ${WRKSRC} ; DISPLAY=${DISPLAYHACK} PATH="${PATH}:${LOCALBASE}/bin:${ > LOCALBASE}/sbin" ; \ > ${TCSH} -c 'source FreeBSDEnv.Set ; unsetenv TOP ; ${BUILD}' > @-${CAT} ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid | ${XARGS} kill > @${RM} -f ${WRKDIR}/.Xvfb.pid > .else > @cd ${WRKSRC} ; DISPLAY=${DISPLAY} PATH="${PATH}:${LOCALBASE}/bin:${LOCA > LBASE}/sbin" ; \ > ${TCSH} -c 'source FreeBSDEnv.Set ; unsetenv TOP ; ${BUILD}' > .endif > > > After editing the Makefile, run "make" in the port directory and capture > the stdout and stderr to a file. Hi Don, sorry, took me a while. Just finished compiling with changed Makefile and 'make >& logfile'. I skimmed through the log file and had the impression, that most of the staff is from building mozilla. So I started again "with make WITHOUT_MOZILLA=YES >& logfile" and what a surprise, bulding of OOo over was even much faster! I would send both attachments (zipped 7kb/338kb) to you directly, to not send this huge output to the list, if it's ok for you!? But I'll do that only if you tell me that it's ok for you! I hope you'll see something that leads the way to a solution! Thank's for your help. I'm just compiling OOo on another machine (PIII-1GHz) to check back, but that will take a while, because we're just on compiling java. Ben > > Base on what you've posted, it looks like ./bootstrap is getting run, > but ${BUILD} is not. > > From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 22 15:45:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3C016A4CE for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:45:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vogon.ccgis.de (vogon.ccgis.de [212.79.172.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FE443D39 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:45:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from amavis by vogon.ccgis.de with virus-scanned (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CL1i6-0005Js-00 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:52:10 +0200 Received: from center.sz ([192.168.1.20] helo=center.shared) by vogon.ccgis.de with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CL1hs-0005Jb-00; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:51:56 +0200 Received: from [192.168.2.109] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by center.shared with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1CL1YW-0002KA-00; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:42:16 +0200 Message-ID: <41792BB7.5060406@ccgis.de> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 17:48:07 +0200 From: Benjamin Thelen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: epilogue References: <41768B54.9090002@ccgis.de> <20041020125503.65ef6fcd@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20041020125503.65ef6fcd@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: AMaViS-ng at Geo-Consortium Bonn cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install error OOo-1.1.3 on 4.10p3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:45:26 -0000 epilogue wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004 17:59:16 +0200 > Benjamin Thelen wrote: > > >>Hi lists, >> >>I am now really stumped and appreciate you for your assistance. I had >>this very error already with OOo-1.1.2 on three 4.10p2 FreeBSD boxes >>in the end of August, posted it to the list, but got no answer. I got >>along by installing a 1.1.0 package and hoped that this error will be >>solved in future ports. >> >> >>Compiling seems alright. This error-message occurs right after "make >>install". >> >># >># UGLY hack to not have to specify a X-Display. >># >>/usr/X11R6/bin/Xvfb :1001 -screen 0 800x600x24 > /dev/null 2>&1 & echo >>$! > /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/.Xvfb.pid >>cd: can't cd to >>/data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/instsetoo/ >>*.pro/01/normal/ >>*** Error code 2 >>Stop in /data/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1. >> >> >>Does anybody know, what's wrong here? >> >> >> >> >>I then tried "pkg_add -r openoffice-1.1", but the files couldn't be >>found. After this I asked google, found packages, but they were build >>against x.org (see thread initiated by Nakata Maho, diskussing using >>x.org or xFree86). Are there any packages built against xFree86 >>available? > > > until such time as other packages are made available, you can try what i > have done in the past - installing OO despite having the wrong X server. > this method has been successful for me numerous times: > > 1) download the pkg for your system > > 2) pkg_add -f openoffice-[ver] > > 3) pkgdb -Fu # almost all the xorg/xfree pieces have very similar > names, so selecting the correct dependency is straightforward. only > with XFree86-fontScalable might you have to make a choice between > Type1 or TrueType. both seem to work, but with slightly different > results (i'm not sure which is best and don't much care - but if you > read-up on it, you should be able to figure it out). > > 4) start openoffice and enjoy. Hi, Sounds very good! I'll check it out as soon Don and I got along with debugging this error! Thank's to you as well! Ben > > >>... or do you generally recommend switching to x.org? > > > while xorg is now default on 5.3, what they will do with 4.11 is > unclear (at least to me). either system (xorg/xfree) will work and > both should be available via ports for the forseeable future. in short, > it is a matter of preference (or features) -- and a decision which is > entirely up to you. =] > > > hth, > epi > > >>Sorry, to bother, thanks for your help! >> >> >>Ben >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-openoffice-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >