From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct 24 04:00:10 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84E4316A4CF
	for <openoffice@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:00:10 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from satie.private.org (YahooBB219196184005.bbtec.net
	[219.196.184.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77E343D1F
	for <openoffice@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:00:09 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from chat95@mac.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by satie.private.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9O3xsel000788;
	Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:59:54 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from chat95@mac.com)
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 12:59:54 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20041024.125954.846936687.chat95@mac.com>
To: scott@sremick.net
From: NAKATA Maho <chat95@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <20041015131959.96403.qmail@web53603.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20041015.130037.576025872.chat95@mac.com>
	<20041015131959.96403.qmail@web53603.mail.yahoo.com>
Organization: private
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on XEmacs 21.4.14 (Reasonable Discussion)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: openoffice@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Still can't upgrade OO as of 1.1.3 (stuck on 1.1.0)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD <freebsd-openoffice.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>,
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>,
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:00:10 -0000

In Message-ID: <20041015131959.96403.qmail@web53603.mail.yahoo.com> 
"Scott I. Remick" <scott@sremick.net> wrote:

Dear Scott,

> Well I had WITH_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS set for another port, but I tried
> commenting it out and tried building OO again. It still segfaulted in a
> similar manner, although at a different point. I have the feeling it
> would've been a different point regardless of the WITH_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS
> setting (unfortunately this is hard to test because it doesn't fail until
> several hours into the compile):

Oh, I mean gcc32 should also be compiled without CFLAGS.

All the best,
-- NAKATA, Maho