From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 04:17:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CC716A4CF for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 04:17:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F132143D31 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 04:17:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 8829 invoked by uid 505); 4 Jan 2004 12:20:55 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.14 (spamassassin: 2.43. Clear:SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.301816 secs); 04 Jan 2004 12:20:55 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 4 Jan 2004 12:20:54 -0000 Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:23:19 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: David Raistrick In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040104132107.M755@pukruppa.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qcad 2.0.1.3_1, fonts X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 12:17:15 -0000 On Sat, 3 Jan 2004, David Raistrick wrote: > > Folks, > > I've been twiddling with qcad a bit lately, trying to learn it...I finally > tracked down part of the problems I've been having: > > qcad can't find it's fonts. Did you try qcad's edit --> application preferences --> path ? You can set all your font and library paths there and don't need to symlink anything. Regards, Uli. > > >From what I gather, it's looking for fonts in the following locations > (from kdump): > > 66388 qcad NAMI "/usr/share/qcad/fonts" > 66388 qcad NAMI "/usr/X11R6/qcad/fonts" > 66388 qcad NAMI "/usr/X11R6/share/qcad/fonts" > 66388 qcad NAMI "/home/keen/.qcad/fonts" > > > This fairly matches the documentation, > http://linux-cd.com.ar/manuales/qcad/016.html > > The docs don't mention the X11R6, though. > > The _1 port installs the fonts in /usr/local/share/qcad/fonts, instead. > > As test, I symlinked /usr/share/qcad to /usr/local/share/qcad, restarted > qcad, and it can now find its fonts. > > I've also tested a symlink to /usr/X11R6/share/qcad, which also works. > > Perhaps such a symlink should be performed by the port? (or install the > share/qcad in a different location?) > > > thanks. > > > > ...david > > > > > --- > david raistrick > drais@atlasta.net http://www.expita.com/nomime.html > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 07:00:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E0016A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 07:00:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com (mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE6143D1F for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 07:00:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd10.aul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1Ad9ga-0002LC-03; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 15:57:00 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (bpAyMOZcZeIHOn0+Z-pqM+2mfkyzvYsG5+jd-3JJ4XKTuRUQklENZb@[80.131.123.251]) by fmrl10.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1Ad9gW-1qzT1M0; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:56:56 +0100 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i04EupJb032186; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:56:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i04Euun8083150; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:56:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:56:56 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Simon Barner Message-Id: <20040104155656.66cebc30@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20040102174121.GA41727@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20040102121235.568bdf46@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040102135358.468.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <20040102171837.573e88fb@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <3FF5A24B.1030202@ciam.ru> <20040102174121.GA41727@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: bpAyMOZcZeIHOn0+Z-pqM+2mfkyzvYsG5+jd-3JJ4XKTuRUQklENZb@t-dialin.net cc: Sergey Matveychuk cc: Keishi Katoux cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Maintaining devel/boost (was: Re: Lost maintainers) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 15:00:40 -0000 On Fri, 2 Jan 2004 18:41:21 +0100 Simon Barner wrote: > > The same for devel/boost. The last maintainer update was in 2002/05/26 - > > one and half year ago! The last maintainer approval was in 2003/07/18... > I'd volunteer to take this one. I need it for a project at university > right now, so there is a good chance that I _will_ keep this port in a > usable state (preferred maintainer address is > barner [a t] gmx [d o t] de). Sergey did some build fixes for 1.30.2 and Keishi Katoux did the 1.30.2 update. It seems all of you are somewhat interested in the port. Could you please coordinate who would be best suited and willing to volunteer for this task? I'm also seeking a volunteer for devel/kprof and textproc/isearch. For devel/stlport I already asked someone with icc experience (stlport-icc is a slave port at the moment; the entire construct needs a rewrite so someone with icc experience is needed). Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 07:30:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E17B16A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 07:30:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kraslan.ru (smtp.kraslan.ru [80.253.229.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1ABB243D3F for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 07:30:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from s0lver@kraslan.ru) Received: (qmail 88500 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2004 15:30:18 -0000 Received: from s0lver.kraslan.ru (80.253.229.145) by smtp.kraslan.ru with SMTP; 4 Jan 2004 15:30:18 -0000 Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:30:23 +0700 From: Vadim Guchenko X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62i) Business X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <16369754453.20040104223023@kraslan.ru> To: ache@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: drwebd-1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Vadim Guchenko List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 15:30:23 -0000 Hello ache, DrWeb 4.30 for FreeBSD is available on http://www.drweb.ru during a long time. When will ports collection be updated? -- Best regards, Vadim mailto:s0lver@kraslan.ru From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 10:23:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D92E16A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 10:23:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (ol.freeshell.org [192.94.73.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345DC43D45 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 10:23:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nunotex@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:nunotex@norge.freeshell.org [192.94.73.3]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i04INRc1004219 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 18:23:27 GMT Received: (from nunotex@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i04INROU016636 for ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 18:23:27 GMT Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 18:23:27 +0000 From: Nuno Teixeira To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040104182327.GA20957@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: NetBSD 1.6.1_STABLE Subject: linux_mesa3 doesn't compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 18:23:33 -0000 --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hello to all, I'm trying to install linux_mesa3 on a 5.2 RC: ===> Configuring for linux_mesa-3.4.2_2 creating cache ./config.cache checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking whether make sets ${MAKE}... yes checking for working aclocal... missing checking for working autoconf... found checking for working automake... missing checking for working autoheader... found checking for working makeinfo... found checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for gcc... cc checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe -march=athlon-xp ) works... no configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to ports@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the "/async/work_ports/usr/ports/graphics/linux_mesa3/work/Mesa-3.4.2/config.log" including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/linux_mesa3. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall38462.0 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** The following packages were not installed or upgraded (*:skipped / !:failed) ! graphics/linux_mesa3 (configure error) I have attached config.log and `ls /var/db/pkg`. Thanks, -- Nuno Teixeira SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="config.log" This file contains any messages produced by compilers while running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake. configure:603: checking for a BSD compatible install configure:656: checking whether build environment is sane configure:713: checking whether make sets ${MAKE} configure:759: checking for working aclocal configure:772: checking for working autoconf configure:785: checking for working automake configure:798: checking for working autoheader configure:811: checking for working makeinfo configure:844: checking host system type configure:914: checking for gcc configure:1027: checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe -march=athlon-xp ) works configure:1043: cc -o conftest -O -pipe -march=athlon-xp conftest.c 1>&5 cc1: bad value (athlon-xp) for -march= switch configure: failed program was: #line 1038 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" main(){return(0);} --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=pkgs FlightGear-0.9.3 Hermes-1.3.3 ImageMagick-5.5.7.14 ORBit-0.5.17_1 ORBit2-2.8.3 SimGear-0.3.4 XFree86-4.3.0,1 XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0_3 XFree86-Server-4.3.0_12 XFree86-clients-4.3.0_6 XFree86-documents-4.3.0 XFree86-font100dpi-4.3.0 XFree86-font75dpi-4.3.0 XFree86-fontCyrillic-4.3.0 XFree86-fontDefaultBitmaps-4.3.0 XFree86-fontEncodings-4.3.0 XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0 XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6 Xft-2.1.2 aalib-1.4.r5_1 acm-5.0 acme-2.4.2 acroread-5.08 aspell-0.50.4.1 at-spi-1.3.9 atk-1.4.1_1 autoconf-2.13.000227_5 autoconf-2.53_1 automake-1.4.5_9 bison-1.75_1 bitstream-vera-1.10 boehm-gc-6.2 bugbuddy2-2.4.1.1 buildtool-0.14 bzflag-1.10.0 cdrdao-1.1.7_4 cdrtools-2.0.3 curl-7.10.8 cyrus-sasl-1.5.28_2 docbook-1.2_1 docbook-241_2 docbook-3.0_2 docbook-3.1_2 docbook-4.0_2 docbook-4.1_2 docbook-sk-4.1.2_1 docbook-xml-4.2_1 docbook-xsl-1.63.0 dri-4.3.0,1 dvdrip-0.50.13_1 eel2-2.4.1 eog2-2.4.1 epiphany-1.0.6 esound-0.2.32_1 expat-1.95.6_1 fileroller-2.4.2_1,1 flac-1.1.0_3 fontconfig-2.2.90_3 fping-2.4b2 freetype2-2.1.5_1 gail-1.4.1 gcalctool-4.3.31_2 gconf-editor-2.4.0,1 gconf2-2.4.0.1 gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0 gdm2-2.4.4.7 gedit2-2.4.1 getmail-3.2.1 gettext-0.12.1 ggv2-2.4.0.2 ghostscript-gnu-7.07_4 gle-3.0.3 glib-1.2.10_10 glib-2.2.3 gmake-3.80_1 gnome-icon-theme-1.0.9 gnome-themes-2.4.1_1 gnome2-2.4.1 gnomeapplets2-2.4.1_3 gnomeaudio2-2.0.0 gnomecontrolcenter2-2.4.0 gnomedesktop-2.4.1.1_1 gnomegames2-2.4.1.1_1 gnomehier-1.0_10 gnomemag-0.10.4 gnomemedia2-2.4.1.1 gnomemeeting-0.98.5_1 gnomemimedata-2.4.1 gnomepanel-2.4.1 gnomesession-2.4.1 gnomespeech-0.2.8 gnomesystemmonitor-2.4.0 gnometerminal-2.4.2 gnomeuserdocs2-2.4.1 gnomeutils2-2.4.1,1 gnomevfs2-2.4.1_1 gnopernicus-0.7.1 gok-0.8.4 gpdf-0.111 gstreamer-0.6.4 gstreamer-plugins-0.6.4_2 gtk-1.2.10_10 gtk-2.2.4_1 gtk-engines2-2.2.0 gtksourceview-0.7.0 gucharmap-gnome-1.2.0 guile-1.6.4_3 hdf-4.1r5 help2man-1.29 icewm-1.2.13 imake-4.3.0_2 intltool-0.28_1 iso8879-1986_2 jade-1.2.1_5 jasper-1.700.5 javavmwrapper-1.4 jbigkit-1.5 jdk-1.4.2p5 jpeg-6b_1 lame-3.93.1 lcms-1.09,1 libIDL-0.8.2 libao-0.8.4_1 libart_lgpl2-2.3.16 libaudiofile-0.2.5 libbonobo-2.4.2 libbonoboui-2.4.2 libdvdcss-1.2.8 libdvdread-0.9.4 libfpx-1.2.0.9 libgail-gnome-1.0.2_2 libglade2-2.0.1_1 libglut-5.0.2 libgnome-2.4.0_3 libgnomecanvas-2.4.0 libgnomeprint-2.4.2 libgnomeprintui-2.4.2 libgnomeui-2.4.0.1_1 libgsf-1.8.2 libgtkhtml-2.4.1_1 libgtop2-2.0.8 libical-0.24_1 libiconv-1.9.1_3 libltdl-1.5 libmikmod-3.1.10_1 libmng-1.0.5_1 libmpeg2-0.3.1_1 libogg-1.1,3 librsvg2-2.4.0_1 libtool-1.3.5_1 libtool-1.4.3_2 libvorbis-1.0.1,3 libwmf-0.2.8.2 libwnck-2.4.0.1 libxml-1.8.17_1 libxml2-2.6.4 libxslt-1.1.2 linc-1.0.3 linux-flashplugin-6.0r79 linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.03 linux_base-7.1_5 linux_devtools-7.1_1 linuxdoc-1.1_1 linuxpluginwrapper-20031221 linuxthreads-2.2.3_13 m4-1.4_1 metacity-2.6.3 metakit-2.4.9.2_2 mkisofs-2.0.3 mozilla-1.5_1,2 mozilla-firebird-0.7_1 mozilla-gtk2-1.5_1 mozilla-headers-1.5_1,2 mozilla-thunderbird-0.4 mplayer-fonts-0.50 mplayer-gtk-0.92.0_4 mplayer-skins-1.1.0 mplayerplug-in-1.0 mutt-devel-1.5.5.1_1 nas-1.6 nasm-0.98.38_1,1 nautilus-cd-burner-0.5.3_6 nautilus-media-0.3.3.1 nautilus2-2.4.1 nmap-3.48_1 nspr-4.3_2 nvidia-driver-1.0.4365_1 ogmtools-1.1_1 open-motif-2.2.2_1 openldap-client-2.1.23 openoffice-1.1rc5 p5-Digest-1.05 p5-Digest-HMAC-1.01 p5-Digest-MD5-2.33 p5-Digest-Nilsimsa-0.06 p5-Digest-SHA1-2.07 p5-Event-0.87 p5-GdkPixbuf-0.7009 p5-Gtk-0.7009 p5-MIME-Base64-2.21 p5-Net-DNS-0.44 p5-Storable-2.08 p5-Test-Harness-2.38_1 p5-Test-Simple-0.47_1 p5-Time-HiRes-1.52,1 p5-URI-1.29 p5-XML-Parser-2.34 p5-XML-Writer-0.4.1 pango-1.2.5 pcre-4.4 perl-5.6.1_15 pkgconfig-0.15.0 pkgdb.db plib-1.7.0_1 png-1.2.5_3 popt-1.6.4_1 portupgrade-20030723 postfix-2.0.16,1 procmail-3.22_4 pstree-2.21 python-2.3.3 rar-3.20,1 razor-agents-2.36_3 rc_subr-1.16 rpm-3.0.6_8 rt2_demo-1.54b ruby-1.6.8.2003.10.15 ruby-bdb1-0.2.1 ruby-shim-ruby18-1.8.1.p3 scrollkeeper-0.3.14,1 sdocbook-xml-4.1.2.5_1 sgmlformat-1.7_2 sox-12.17.4_1 speex-1.0.3_1,1 startup-notification-0.5_1 svgalib-1.4.3_1 t1lib-5.0.0 tiff-3.6.1 transcode-0.6.10 unzip-5.50_2 urwfonts-1.0 vcdimager-0.7.14 vorbis-tools-1.0.1,3 vte-0.11.10_2 w3m-0.4.1 wget-1.8.2_5 win32-codecs-2.0.90_1,1 wine-20031212_2 wrapper-1.0_3 xchat2-2.0.7 xmlcatmgr-1.2 xmms-1.2.8_3 xpdf-2.03 xscreensaver-gnome-4.14 yelp-2.4.2 zenity-1.8 zip-2.3_1 --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 10:34:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8D616A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 10:34:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao06.cox.net (lakemtao06.cox.net [68.1.17.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9993643D1D for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 10:34:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.11]) by lakemtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040104183439.ZJWZ24575.lakemtao06.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:34:39 -0500 Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 12:33:42 -0600 To: Nuno Teixeira References: <20040104182327.GA20957@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> From: Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040104182327.GA20957@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> User-Agent: Opera7.23/Linux M2 build 518 cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_mesa3 doesn't compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 18:34:41 -0000 On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 18:23:27 +0000, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > > Hello to all, > > I'm trying to install linux_mesa3 on a 5.2 RC: > > checking for gcc... cc > checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe -march=athlon-xp ) works... > no > configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler > cannot create executables. The real issue is that the linux emulator has the GCC 2.9x.xx. The GCC 2.9x.xx doesn't supporth the athlon-xp, which meaning you will have to change it to i686 or whatever to what GCC 2.9x.xx support in the CPUTYPE at /etc/make.conf. I noticed that you use portupgrade, here's what I have in my pkgtools.conf: ================================ MAKE_ARGS = { 'graphics/linux_mesa3' => [ 'CFLAGS=" -O2 -pipe -march=i686"', 'STRIP="-s"', ], [...] } ================================ It works fine, I can play tuxracer and etc. Cheers, Mezz > I have attached config.log and `ls /var/db/pkg`. > > Thanks, -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 11:03:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3ED16A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 11:03:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (ol.freeshell.org [192.94.73.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7391B43D2F for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 11:03:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nunotex@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:nunotex@norge.freeshell.org [192.94.73.3]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i04J3Uc1010387; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:03:30 GMT Received: (from nunotex@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i04J3URX003205; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:03:30 GMT Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:03:30 +0000 From: Nuno Teixeira To: Jeremy Messenger Message-ID: <20040104190330.GA1643@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> References: <20040104182327.GA20957@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: NetBSD 1.6.1_STABLE cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_mesa3 doesn't compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 19:03:39 -0000 Hello, Thanks very much for your quick answer. It works. I'm trying to run bzflag game rpm to experiment linux emulation. I'm having problems with libstdc++.so.5 not found. How you install linux tuxracer? I thinking compiling it chrooted to /compat/linux ? Is that possible? Thanks again, Nuno Teixeira On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 12:33:42PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 18:23:27 +0000, Nuno Teixeira > wrote: > > > > >Hello to all, > > > >I'm trying to install linux_mesa3 on a 5.2 RC: > > > > >checking for gcc... cc > >checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe -march=athlon-xp ) works... > >no > >configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler > >cannot create executables. > > > The real issue is that the linux emulator has the GCC 2.9x.xx. The GCC > 2.9x.xx doesn't supporth the athlon-xp, which meaning you will have to > change it to i686 or whatever to what GCC 2.9x.xx support in the CPUTYPE > at /etc/make.conf. I noticed that you use portupgrade, here's what I have > in my pkgtools.conf: > > ================================ > MAKE_ARGS = { > 'graphics/linux_mesa3' => [ > 'CFLAGS=" -O2 -pipe -march=i686"', > 'STRIP="-s"', > ], > > [...] > > } > ================================ > > It works fine, I can play tuxracer and etc. > > Cheers, > Mezz > > >I have attached config.log and `ls /var/db/pkg`. > > > >Thanks, > > > -- > bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz. -- Nuno Teixeira SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 11:44:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B9616A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 11:44:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao08.cox.net (lakemtao08.cox.net [68.1.17.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E5A43D45 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 11:44:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.11]) by lakemtao08.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040104194424.NQWZ2412.lakemtao08.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 14:44:24 -0500 Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 13:43:28 -0600 To: Nuno Teixeira References: <20040104182327.GA20957@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> <20040104190330.GA1643@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> From: Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20040104190330.GA1643@SDF.LONESTAR.ORG> User-Agent: Opera7.23/Linux M2 build 518 cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_mesa3 doesn't compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 19:44:26 -0000 On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:03:30 +0000, Nuno Teixeira wrote: > Hello, > > Thanks very much for your quick answer. It works. > > I'm trying to run bzflag game rpm to experiment linux emulation. I'm > having problems with libstdc++.so.5 not found. I don't think the emulators/linux_base (version 7) has it, because I couldn't find any in my two systems. The emulators/linux_base-8 probably has it, but I can't promise you because I don't have it install. The real question is that why don't you use a native one instead? It's in games/bzflag .. > How you install linux tuxracer? I thinking compiling it chrooted to > /compat/linux ? Is that possible? You can install it by go to games/tuxracer, it works fine. Also, I even have the demo and full version (commerical one, binaries only) that work fine. I just need to install linux_base, linux_mesa3 and linux-esound then run installer and play tuxracer. Cheers, Mezz > Thanks again, > > Nuno Teixeira > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 12:33:42PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 18:23:27 +0000, Nuno Teixeira >> wrote: >> >> > >> >Hello to all, >> > >> >I'm trying to install linux_mesa3 on a 5.2 RC: >> > >> >> >checking for gcc... cc >> >checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe -march=athlon-xp ) >> works... >> >no >> >configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler >> >cannot create executables. >> >> >> The real issue is that the linux emulator has the GCC 2.9x.xx. The GCC >> 2.9x.xx doesn't supporth the athlon-xp, which meaning you will have to >> change it to i686 or whatever to what GCC 2.9x.xx support in the CPUTYPE >> at /etc/make.conf. I noticed that you use portupgrade, here's what I >> have >> in my pkgtools.conf: >> >> ================================ >> MAKE_ARGS = { >> 'graphics/linux_mesa3' => [ >> 'CFLAGS=" -O2 -pipe -march=i686"', >> 'STRIP="-s"', >> ], >> >> [...] >> >> } >> ================================ >> >> It works fine, I can play tuxracer and etc. >> >> Cheers, >> Mezz >> >> >I have attached config.log and `ls /var/db/pkg`. >> > >> >Thanks, >> >> >> -- >> bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz. -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 15:51:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC58316A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:51:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mfe1.prod.danger.com (mta.prod1.dngr.net [63.241.65.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F1A43D39 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:51:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kodiak04@tmail.com) Received: from [10.12.3.251] (HELO localhost.localdomain) by mfe1.prod.danger.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 57170389 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 15:51:51 -0800 Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:50:49 -0800 X-Mailer: Danger Service Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: ports@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Alan Curtis Message-Id: <1073260311.1D1C0E51@r31.dngr.org> Subject: Mailinglist me X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alan Curtis List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 23:51:53 -0000 --kodiak04 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 15:56:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DBD16A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:56:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from web21501.mail.yahoo.com (web21501.mail.yahoo.com [66.163.169.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AC2443D41 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:56:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from william_devries2000@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040104235639.67558.qmail@web21501.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.229.101.2] by web21501.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 15:56:39 PST Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 15:56:39 -0800 (PST) From: William DeVries To: Jeremy Messenger , Nuno Teixeira In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_mesa3 doesn't compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: william_devries@wsu.edu List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 23:56:41 -0000 My system has that file installed under /compat/linux/usr/lib. It is a link to a version libstdc++.so.5.0.1. I have linux_base-8-8.0_3 installed(the file would be in this), and linux_dri-4.3.0_1 for 3d gl acceleration. I was able to run wolfenstine et using this set up. I hope this helps. --Will --- Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 19:03:30 +0000, Nuno Teixeira > > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > Thanks very much for your quick answer. It works. > > > > I'm trying to run bzflag game rpm to experiment > linux emulation. I'm > > having problems with libstdc++.so.5 not found. > > I don't think the emulators/linux_base (version 7) > has it, because I > couldn't find any in my two systems. The > emulators/linux_base-8 probably > has it, but I can't promise you because I don't have > it install. > > The real question is that why don't you use a native > one instead? It's in > games/bzflag .. > > > How you install linux tuxracer? I thinking > compiling it chrooted to > > /compat/linux ? Is that possible? > > You can install it by go to games/tuxracer, it works > fine. Also, I even > have the demo and full version (commerical one, > binaries only) that work > fine. I just need to install linux_base, linux_mesa3 > and linux-esound then > run installer and play tuxracer. > > Cheers, > Mezz > > > Thanks again, > > > > Nuno Teixeira > > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 12:33:42PM -0600, Jeremy > Messenger wrote: > >> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 18:23:27 +0000, Nuno Teixeira > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> >Hello to all, > >> > > >> >I'm trying to install linux_mesa3 on a 5.2 RC: > >> > > >> > >> >checking for gcc... cc > >> >checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe > -march=athlon-xp ) > >> works... > >> >no > >> >configure: error: installation or configuration > problem: C compiler > >> >cannot create executables. > >> > >> > >> The real issue is that the linux emulator has the > GCC 2.9x.xx. The GCC > >> 2.9x.xx doesn't supporth the athlon-xp, which > meaning you will have to > >> change it to i686 or whatever to what GCC 2.9x.xx > support in the CPUTYPE > >> at /etc/make.conf. I noticed that you use > portupgrade, here's what I > >> have > >> in my pkgtools.conf: > >> > >> ================================ > >> MAKE_ARGS = { > >> 'graphics/linux_mesa3' => [ > >> 'CFLAGS=" -O2 -pipe -march=i686"', > >> 'STRIP="-s"', > >> ], > >> > >> [...] > >> > >> } > >> ================================ > >> > >> It works fine, I can play tuxracer and etc. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Mezz > >> > >> >I have attached config.log and `ls /var/db/pkg`. > >> > > >> >Thanks, > >> > >> > >> -- > >> bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz. > > > -- > bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003 http://search.yahoo.com/top2003 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 16:48:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E97A16A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:48:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from redmaple.bitnets.net (redmaple.bitnets.net [216.123.230.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECE943D2F for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 16:48:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from b03@interbaun.com) Received: from interbaun.com ([216.123.200.115]) by redmaple.bitnets.net (NO UCE) with ASMTP (SSL) id FFP37861; Sun, 04 Jan 2004 17:48:55 -0700 Message-ID: <3FF8B477.6060205@interbaun.com> Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2004 17:48:55 -0700 From: Gary Bajaj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-ca, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: apcupsd-3.10.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 00:48:57 -0000 Hello, More than one patch does not apply cleanly. After trying to manually patch configure due to errors with patch-configure, there were further errors with patch-doc-apcupds.man upon which I gave up and decided to e-mail you. Also, is the spelling of patch-doc-apcupds.man intentional or should it have been patch-doc-apcupsd.man? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 21:04:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAD7F16A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:04:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from skywalker.creative.net.au (skywalker.creative.net.au [203.56.168.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C33D143D39 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 21:04:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@skywalker.creative.net.au) Received: (qmail 45410 invoked by uid 1008); 5 Jan 2004 05:04:27 -0000 Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 13:04:27 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20040105050427.GC33645@skywalker.creative.net.au> References: <3FF4EBF6.90300@ciam.ru> <20040102061607.544.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <20040102121235.568bdf46@Magellan.Leidinger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040102121235.568bdf46@Magellan.Leidinger.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Thomas-Martin Seck Subject: Re: Lost maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 05:04:33 -0000 On Fri, Jan 02, 2004, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > I agree... as long as the old maintainer isn't better suited to do it > (e.g. author of the program). I think this can get resolved in a way > which is ok for both if such an issue shows up. I'm one of the authors, but I've been away for quite a long time. Please, if someone wants to take control of it they're more than welcome to. Adrian -- Adrian Chadd learning is bad it just makes the people around you dumber (angryskul == alfred@irc) :( From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 22:04:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31FD316A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:04:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.netcologne.de (smtp1.netcologne.de [194.8.194.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D73743D1F for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:03:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tmseck-lists@netcologne.de) Received: from laurel.tmseck.homedns.org (xdsl-195-14-223-91.netcologne.de [195.14.223.91]) by smtp1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 5811838B31 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 07:03:55 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 540 invoked by uid 1001); 5 Jan 2004 06:03:49 -0000 Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 07:03:27 +0100 From: Thomas-Martin Seck To: Adrian Chadd Message-ID: <20040105060327.GA523@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> References: <3FF4EBF6.90300@ciam.ru> <20040102061607.544.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <20040102121235.568bdf46@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040105050427.GC33645@skywalker.creative.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040105050427.GC33645@skywalker.creative.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Organization: private site in Germany X-PGP-KeyID: DF46EE05 X-PGP-Fingerprint: A38F AE66 6B11 6EB9 5D1A B67D 2444 2FE1 DF46 EE05 X-Attribution: tms cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lost maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 06:04:01 -0000 * Adrian Chadd (adrian@freebsd.org): > On Fri, Jan 02, 2004, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > I agree... as long as the old maintainer isn't better suited to do it > > (e.g. author of the program). I think this can get resolved in a way > > which is ok for both if such an issue shows up. > > I'm one of the authors, but I've been away for quite a long time. > Please, if someone wants to take control of it they're more than > welcome to. Well, as I already said on freebsd-ports, I'd really like to step in. I am glad that it will not look like a hostile takeover. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 22:13:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCE216A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:13:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from skywalker.creative.net.au (skywalker.creative.net.au [203.56.168.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD75F43D2D for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:13:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@skywalker.creative.net.au) Received: (qmail 47005 invoked by uid 1008); 5 Jan 2004 06:13:11 -0000 Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:13:11 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd To: Thomas-Martin Seck Message-ID: <20040105061311.GD33645@skywalker.creative.net.au> References: <3FF4EBF6.90300@ciam.ru> <20040102061607.544.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> <20040102121235.568bdf46@Magellan.Leidinger.net> <20040105050427.GC33645@skywalker.creative.net.au> <20040105060327.GA523@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040105060327.GA523@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lost maintainers X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 06:13:25 -0000 On Mon, Jan 05, 2004, Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: > > I'm one of the authors, but I've been away for quite a long time. > > Please, if someone wants to take control of it they're more than > > welcome to. > > Well, as I already said on freebsd-ports, I'd really like to step in. I > am glad that it will not look like a hostile takeover. Why would it be hostile? I've not really done much freebsd work in the last couple of years for various work reasons. Adrian -- Adrian Chadd learning is bad it just makes the people around you dumber (angryskul == alfred@irc) :( From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 22:28:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BCBB16A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:28:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from hills.ccsf.cc.ca.us (hills.ccsf.cc.ca.us [147.144.1.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AFCE43D39 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:28:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abozan01@ccsf.edu) Received: from localhost (abozan01@localhost) by hills.ccsf.cc.ca.us (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i056SfT28145 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:28:41 -0800 (PST) X-Authentication-Warning: hills.ccsf.cc.ca.us: abozan01 owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:28:40 -0800 (PST) From: Adam Bozanich X-X-Sender: abozan01@hills.ccsf.cc.ca.us To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: patch for security/sfs on 5.2-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 06:28:42 -0000 Hi all. This lets sfs compile on this system: FreeBSD voyage.flatland 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #3: Wed Dec 31 03:36:07 PST 2003 i386 I haven't tested it, I need to set up a bunch of stuff. Is this where I send these things? -Adam --- nfsconf.h.orig Sun Jan 4 22:00:30 2004 +++ nfsconf.h Sun Jan 4 21:58:41 2004 @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ # include #endif /* NEED_NFS_NFS_H */ #if NEED_NFSCLIENT_NFS_H -# include +# include #endif /* NEED_NFSCLIENT_NFS_H */ #if NEED_NFS_MOUNT_H # include From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 4 22:30:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DEA16A4CE for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:30:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.euronet.nl (smtp3.euronet.nl [194.134.35.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FD443D41 for ; Sun, 4 Jan 2004 22:30:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com) Received: from zaphod.euronet.nl (zaphod.euronet.nl [194.134.168.213]) by smtp3.euronet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265DF39FB8; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 07:30:25 +0100 (MET) From: Ernst de Haan Organization: Wanadoo Nederland B.V. To: Jeremy Messenger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 07:30:32 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: X-Address: Muiderstraat 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401050730.32619.ernst.dehaan@nl.wanadoo.com> Subject: Re: Poll: Rename binary opera -> linux-opera for www/linux-opera? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 06:30:28 -0000 Sounds good. Perhaps there should be a message at the end of the install explaining what the new name of the binary is? Ernst On woensdag 31 december 2003 20:17, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > Hello everybody, > > In the coming next version of Opera (7.5x) will have the ability of > change the name of binary, datadir and even personal directory (~/.opera) > too. So, I am wondering if I should change the www/linux-opera to install > as 'linux-opera' in binary, datadir and ~/.linux-opera? In the end, you > will can run native and linux version of Opera at the same time if you > wish to. > > Cheers, > Mezz From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 06:06:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9713F16A4CE; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 06:06:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de (mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de [193.174.154.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CD943D49; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 06:06:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from beagle (beagle [193.175.132.100])i05E6qL12794; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:06:52 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:06:52 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt To: Pete Fritchman In-Reply-To: <20040102224633.E97CC178EC@sirius.firepipe.net> Message-ID: <20040105150058.S13398@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <20040102224633.E97CC178EC@sirius.firepipe.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: help from a ports committer needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: harti@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 14:06:56 -0000 On Fri, 2 Jan 2004, Pete Fritchman wrote: PF>* Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:33:10 +0100 - Harti Brandt: PF>| I have attached what, I think, constitutes a minimal port infrastructure. PF>| Unfortunately the port makefile fails, while the package builds just fine PF>| standalone (just do a configure; make). This seems due to the arguments PF>| which are passed to the configure script. Perhaps something is missing in PF>| the Makefile. PF> PF>Ok. You'll need a distinfo, too, which you can generate with "make makesum". PF> PF>I think these modifications would be good (helps the port pass portlint PF>and configure), PF> PF>http://people.freebsd.org/~petef/atmsupport.diff PF> PF>However, I still can't compile this on a 4.x machine: PF> PF>cc1: Invalid option `-Wsystem-headers' PF>cc1: unknown C standard `c99' PF>ats_exp.c:41: syntax error before `expr' PF>cc1: warnings being treated as errors PF>[...] (full log on request) Well, it cannot compile on 4.x because the ATM stuff it tests is only in Current. Is there a way to stop this from beeing compiled on 4.x? Is sysutils the correct category for this? There seems to be no category for tests. How do I add this port (when the freeze lifts)? Thanks for your help, harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 09:34:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE12416A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:34:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C388443D1D for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:34:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i05HYKv0080160; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:34:20 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i05HYKXr080159; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:34:20 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:34:20 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov To: Vadim Guchenko Message-ID: <20040105173420.GB79935@nagual.pp.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov , Vadim Guchenko , ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <16369754453.20040104223023@kraslan.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16369754453.20040104223023@kraslan.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: drwebd-1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 17:34:23 -0000 On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 10:30:23PM +0700, Vadim Guchenko wrote: > DrWeb 4.30 for FreeBSD is available on http://www.drweb.ru during a long > time. When will ports collection be updated? I am not interested in this port anymore, please ask port maintainer. -- Andrey Chernov | http://ache.pp.ru/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 09:56:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4CA16A517; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:56:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C85243D2D; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 09:56:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: from zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (localhost.glhnet.mhn.de. [127.0.0.1]) by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i05HuWjS002289; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:56:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from simon@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) Received: (from simon@localhost) by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i05HuWoL002288; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:56:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from simon) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:56:32 +0100 From: Simon Barner To: harti@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040105175632.GC432@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20040102224633.E97CC178EC@sirius.firepipe.net> <20040105150058.S13398@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040105150058.S13398@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help from a ports committer needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 17:56:38 -0000 --ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, > Well, it cannot compile on 4.x because the ATM stuff it tests is only > in Current. Is there a way to stop this from beeing compiled on 4.x? This should work: .if ${OSVERSION} < 500000 IGNORE= ATM not implemented on FreeBSD 4.x and earlier .endif Simon --ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQE/+aVQCkn+/eutqCoRAmbFAJi9qgf6ZzcZwou1wY6nhrirWNO7AJ4kXQLZ NbahW3VzZ2Pe//4Xfs25YA== =FhXV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ADZbWkCsHQ7r3kzd-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 10:01:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965B316A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:01:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from Mail2.ElPaso.com (mail2.elpaso.com [12.40.24.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4B743D2F for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:01:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Gregory.Gonsoulin@elpaso.com) Received: from corhouexs02c.corp.epec.com (unverified) by Mail2.ElPaso.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.10) with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:57:57 -0600 Received: from corhouexs07m.corp.epec.com ([10.48.206.81]) by corhouexs02c.corp.epec.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC (5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:01:21 -0600 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6524.0 Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:01:21 -0600 Message-ID: <0598BA5153393E4189096E6BD08E1C3B02EE168C@corhouexs07m.corp.epec.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD Port: php4-4.3.4_2 Thread-Index: AcPTteyDXZw3b5WYQcCe/TjlNQGSVg== From: "Gonsoulin, Gregory P" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2004 18:01:21.0983 (UTC) FILETIME=[ED45ECF0:01C3D3B5] cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: php4-4.3.4_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 18:01:26 -0000 Alex, Hi, my name is Gregory, and I've parsed your Makefile and have been unable to get PHP to compile with sockets. I changed the line --disable-all to --enable-all, but am still not getting OpenSSL or Sockets. Is there something else I need to change to get this to work? Thanks, Gregory Gonsoulin Communications and WAN Services The El Paso Corporation ph: 713-420-4212 ****************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it from the ElPaso=20 Corporation are confidential and intended solely for the=20 use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.=20 If you have received this email in error please notify the=20 sender. ****************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 10:05:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A11616A4CE; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:05:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de (mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de [193.174.154.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F2143D48; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:05:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from beagle (beagle [193.175.132.100])i05I5JL25854; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:05:19 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:05:19 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt To: Simon Barner In-Reply-To: <20040105175632.GC432@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Message-ID: <20040105190428.J13398@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <20040102224633.E97CC178EC@sirius.firepipe.net> <20040105175632.GC432@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help from a ports committer needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: harti@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 18:05:23 -0000 On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Simon Barner wrote: SB>Hi, SB> SB>> Well, it cannot compile on 4.x because the ATM stuff it tests is only SB>> in Current. Is there a way to stop this from beeing compiled on 4.x? SB> SB>This should work: Seems that I need: .include SB>.if ${OSVERSION} < 500000 SB>IGNORE= ATM not implemented on FreeBSD 4.x and earlier SB>.endif .include Otherwise make gives me a syntax error. harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 10:59:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E473216A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:59:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E606943D39 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 10:59:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DB03037036; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:55:55 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0463702C for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:55:55 -0400 (AST) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 14:55:55 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040105145202.Q28998@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Mozilla libjs under FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 18:59:35 -0000 Anyone working on this? Taking a look at their current 'ported to platforms', the BSDs seems sorely lacking :( ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 11:03:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2385B16A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:03:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E42D43D2D for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:00:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i05J0pFR015119 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:00:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i05J0o0O015114 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:00:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:00:50 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200401051900.i05J0o0O015114@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: FreeBSD ports list Subject: Current unassigned ports problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 19:03:00 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Bugs can be in one of several states: o - open A problem report has been submitted, no sanity checking performed. a - analyzed The problem is understood and a solution is being sought. f - feedback Further work requires additional information from the originator or the community - possibly confirmation of the effectiveness of a proposed solution. p - patched A patch has been committed, but some issues (MFC and / or confirmation from originator) are still open. s - suspended The problem is not being worked on, due to lack of information or resources. This is a prime candidate for somebody who is looking for a project to do. If the problem cannot be solved at all, it will be closed, rather than suspended. c - closed A problem report is closed when any changes have been integrated, documented, and tested -- or when fixing the problem is abandoned. Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/06/28] ports/53874 ports-bugs /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base isn't wor o [2003/07/08] ports/54230 ports-bugs fsck_ext2fs is broken (unable to perform f [2003/11/16] ports/59360 ports-bugs port logjam2 does not compile o [2003/11/29] ports/59805 ports-bugs www/rt3: problem with RT 3.0.7 on FreeBSD o [2003/12/04] ports/59946 ports-bugs [fix] multimedia/mplayer: bktr input not o [2003/12/11] ports/60170 ports-bugs x11-clocks/xalarm (3.06) can fail in Dece o [2004/01/05] ports/60923 ports-bugs Update to netams-3.1(1790) 7 problems total. Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2000/10/02] ports/21714 ports-bugs audio problem with games/nil o [2002/04/07] ports/36846 ports-bugs fxtv 1.03 freezes the system when $LANG=d o [2002/04/22] ports/37361 ports-bugs installing gcc30 port breaks devel/gettex s [2002/05/27] ports/38602 ports-bugs x11-wm/tvtwm is confused about PREFIX f [2002/07/16] ports/40672 ports-bugs wsoundserver defaults to using esound and o [2002/11/27] ports/45805 ports-bugs security/sfs does not build on Alpha s [2002/12/17] ports/46338 ports-bugs security/cyrus-sasl 1.5.27_7 mysql_verify o [2002/12/25] ports/46530 ports-bugs x11-toolkits/gtkada links against unexist o [2003/01/10] ports/46964 ports-bugs Failure when running "make install" on ex f [2003/01/31] ports/47768 ports-bugs print/ghostscript-afpl gv (3.5.8_1) can't o [2003/04/10] ports/50795 ports-bugs misc/solfege does not function s [2003/04/11] ports/50844 ports-bugs MPlayer fails to build on Alpha o [2003/04/18] ports/51128 ports-bugs It is not possible to build security/drwe o [2003/05/02] ports/51711 ports-bugs /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base will not o [2003/05/02] ports/51714 ports-bugs emulators/linux_base port fails to instal o [2003/06/17] ports/53414 ports-bugs port security/amavis-perl open filedescri o [2003/07/28] ports/54970 ports-bugs emulators/linux_base Port Makefile "dange f [2003/08/15] ports/55611 ports-bugs Clamav port package build fails on 5.x wh o [2003/08/15] kern/55617 ports-bugs Accessing an nsmb-mounted drive via a smb o [2003/08/24] ports/55948 ports-bugs install of ports/emulators/linux_base fil o [2003/09/02] ports/56359 ports-bugs new port: www/adzap2squirm o [2003/09/07] ports/56567 ports-bugs mail/spamass-milter fails in configure st o [2003/09/21] ports/57056 ports-bugs libsm and libsmutil not installed -> fail o [2003/10/03] ports/57552 ports-bugs cannot install www/frontpage: pkg_create: o [2003/10/09] ports/57790 ports-bugs cdparanoia triggers kernel panic o [2003/10/12] ports/57897 ports-bugs Portupgrade of mplayer to latest version o [2003/10/13] ports/57956 ports-bugs New port: java/eclipse-pmd plugin o [2003/10/30] ports/58724 ports-bugs `www/mod_perl' install MAN3 pages on in s o [2003/11/04] ports/58920 ports-bugs lang/php4 compiles with unexcpected libs f [2003/11/06] ports/58998 ports-bugs [PATCH] Update security/drweb to 4.30 o [2003/11/18] ports/59444 ports-bugs New port: print/tipa, a package that prov o [2003/12/09] ports/60081 ports-bugs x11/nvidia driver should install in to /b o [2003/12/18] ports/60386 ports-bugs new ports/firebird has broken lang/php5 o [2003/12/21] ports/60479 ports-bugs x11-toolkits/p5-Tk800 o [2003/12/24] ports/60540 ports-bugs teamspeak is not litening on port 14534 f o [2004/01/05] ports/60921 ports-bugs [maintainer security update] update disti o [2004/01/05] ports/60940 ports-bugs Port ez-ipupdate requires updating to new o [2004/01/05] ports/60942 ports-bugs net/zabbix should depend on net/fping o [2004/01/05] ports/60949 ports-bugs Two packages overwrite the same man file: 39 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- s [2001/01/12] ports/24299 ports-bugs New port sysutils/tpconfig: configure the o [2001/01/30] ports/24749 ports-bugs mysql323-server pkg-install script doesn' o [2001/09/30] ports/30929 ports-bugs [net/pppoa] use usbd to initialize USB AD a [2001/11/12] ports/31943 ports-bugs mysql323-server port hostname look up fai o [2001/12/04] ports/32508 ports-bugs www/flashplugin-mozilla has malloc bug s [2002/03/01] ports/35459 ports-bugs portupgrade doesn't clean up dependencies o [2002/04/17] ports/37186 ports-bugs Dbview contains an error, because of whic o [2002/05/13] ports/38034 ports-bugs compaq-cc (under linux-emu) installes man s [2002/06/18] ports/39476 ports-bugs profxp will run but when you fxp a file i o [2002/08/25] ports/42018 ports-bugs pkg_info with PKG_PATH searches through t o [2002/09/10] ports/42642 ports-bugs cfexecd needs symlink, cfexecd, cfservd a f [2002/09/29] ports/43484 ports-bugs Update port net/arla to 0.35.9 o [2002/10/09] ports/43880 ports-bugs Names of Emacs ports are misleading o [2002/12/02] ports/45911 ports-bugs GEOM-related problem sysutils/diskcheckd o [2002/12/23] ports/46510 ports-bugs security/ssh does not correctly store the o [2003/02/02] ports/47834 ports-bugs mysql-server-3.23.55 upgrade should be mo o [2003/04/11] ports/50840 ports-bugs mail/squirrelmail - Port Docs in wrong lo o [2003/04/17] ports/51087 ports-bugs spamass-milter can not be built with send f [2003/06/02] ports/52877 ports-bugs Non-Maintainer-Update: mail/postfix add s o [2003/06/04] ports/52941 ports-bugs security/poc card-terminal problems o [2003/06/23] ports/53636 ports-bugs Suggestion for rc.d style startup scripts f [2003/06/25] ports/53740 ports-bugs New port: science/fluka - Linux Monte Car f [2003/07/03] ports/54059 ports-bugs New port: www/zope-psycopg, database adap o [2003/07/09] ports/54298 ports-bugs New port irc/kvirc, KVIrc 3.0.0 o [2003/07/10] ports/54352 ports-bugs Conversion rc.d scripts to RC_NG f [2003/07/24] ports/54814 ports-bugs New port: hungarian/hunspell version 0.9. o [2003/08/01] ports/55143 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] math/koctave3: KDEGUI for octa o [2003/08/08] ports/55371 ports-bugs xfig dumps core (unaligned access), if US o [2003/08/23] ports/55896 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] www/mozplugger o [2003/08/28] ports/56091 ports-bugs hp220 driver for print/ghostscript-gnu do o [2003/09/01] ports/56266 ports-bugs [new port] net/jffnms - Very advanced net f [2003/09/02] ports/56307 ports-bugs [PATCH] esound, sdl support for games/fre o [2003/09/02] ports/56308 ports-bugs NEW port math/itl (with LAM support) o [2003/09/06] ports/56536 ports-bugs New Port: www/CGI-Application-ValidateRM o [2003/09/08] ports/56597 ports-bugs bad startup perfomance of mpg123 with pcm o [2003/09/09] ports/56658 ports-bugs Convert security/amavisd startup scripts s [2003/09/16] ports/56928 ports-bugs jce-aba port should install to $JAVA_HOME o [2003/09/23] ports/57143 ports-bugs modules in flash shell broken o [2003/09/24] ports/57162 ports-bugs The latest stable release of DansGuardian f [2003/09/24] ports/57198 ports-bugs multimedia/xmms fix to work with CDDA und o [2003/10/02] ports/57521 ports-bugs New Port - databases/py-sybase o [2003/10/03] ports/57525 ports-bugs New port: databases/katalog, data CDs cat o [2003/10/09] ports/57789 ports-bugs New port of converters/asr10, access to E o [2003/10/10] ports/57860 ports-bugs New port: science/ovt: Orbit Visualizatio o [2003/10/13] ports/57943 ports-bugs isc-dhcp3 port broken with lots of interf o [2003/10/14] ports/58015 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] www/apache-forrest: A tool for o [2003/10/14] ports/58025 ports-bugs [New port] x11/xterm: xterm built with 88 f [2003/10/14] ports/58053 ports-bugs New port: chinese/ftpd o [2003/10/16] ports/58108 ports-bugs Update port: textproc/xhtml-1.1 (use xmlc o [2003/10/22] ports/58399 ports-bugs New port: java/phpeclipse - PHP Eclipse a o [2003/10/22] ports/58400 ports-bugs New port: java/phpeclipse_sql - PHPEclips o [2003/10/22] ports/58401 ports-bugs New port: java/phpeclipse_tidy - PHPEclip o [2003/10/22] ports/58402 ports-bugs New port: java/phpeclipse_phphelp - PHP a f [2003/10/25] ports/58516 ports-bugs Update port: devel/asmutils o [2003/10/28] ports/58661 ports-bugs New port: www/mozex, external programs in o [2003/10/28] ports/58662 ports-bugs New port: www/preferential, GUI interface o [2003/10/29] ports/58709 ports-bugs New port: net/ksambaplugin, a KDE 3.x Con f [2003/10/31] ports/58785 ports-bugs qcad build breaks o [2003/11/02] ports/58839 ports-bugs [REPOCOPY WAITING] add gtk2 ability to ga o [2003/11/02] ports/58847 ports-bugs New port: french/mozilla-flp - Mozilla Fr o [2003/11/07] ports/59047 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] multimedia/freevo: Freevo is a o [2003/11/08] ports/59059 ports-bugs New port: x11/silo: a simple X11 launcher o [2003/11/08] ports/59061 ports-bugs Error in NeverwinterNights install o [2003/11/10] ports/59157 ports-bugs [New Port]:: www/moregroupware o [2003/11/11] ports/59168 ports-bugs ports/lang/gauche does not install info f o [2003/11/12] ports/59221 ports-bugs New port: news/fidogate-ds. A fresh branc s [2003/11/12] ports/59239 ports-bugs new port audio/tse3, a midi library s [2003/11/12] ports/59243 ports-bugs new port audio/anthem, a KDE midi sequenc o [2003/11/14] ports/59293 ports-bugs New port: deskutils/journal is a tool for o [2003/11/17] ports/59371 ports-bugs new port: net/smb4k, KDE SMB network brow o [2003/11/19] ports/59479 ports-bugs Build depends not checked properly for se o [2003/11/23] ports/59630 ports-bugs lang/php4: PHP configuration options add o [2003/11/23] ports/59632 ports-bugs lang/php5: PHP configuration options add o [2003/11/27] ports/59724 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] net/aMule (supersedes ports/59 o [2003/11/30] ports/59817 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] irc/srvx: Srvx IRC services f [2003/11/30] ports/59862 ports-bugs update sysutils/LPRng to 3.8.23, also fix f [2003/11/30] ports/59863 ports-bugs [non maintainer] Unbreak graphics/evolvot o [2003/12/08] ports/60042 ports-bugs New port: Text manipulation and autodetec o [2003/12/12] ports/60185 ports-bugs [New Port] www/w3-emacs21 WWW browser bas o [2003/12/16] ports/60299 ports-bugs New port: print/kaspaliste (KDE/Postgres/ o [2003/12/19] ports/60408 ports-bugs New Port: Pnet 0.6.0 o [2003/12/19] ports/60409 ports-bugs new port: pnetlib 0.6.0.1 o [2003/12/19] ports/60413 ports-bugs New Port: pnetC 0.6.0 f [2003/12/20] ports/60431 ports-bugs [new port]: devel/oskit o [2003/12/21] ports/60453 ports-bugs New Port: lang/ml-pnet o [2003/12/21] ports/60472 ports-bugs [New Port] devel/doxymacs Doxymacs is Dox f [2003/12/21] ports/60473 ports-bugs New port databases/db3-tcl o [2003/12/21] ports/60476 ports-bugs devel/boost: Links to examples in online f [2003/12/22] ports/60497 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] net/p5-File-RsyncP: Perl Rsync o [2003/12/24] ports/60541 ports-bugs support Berkeley DB 4.1 in ports/lang/php o [2003/12/25] ports/60557 ports-bugs print/cups port lacks of building tunable s [2003/12/26] ports/60584 ports-bugs [REPOCOPY WAITING] sysutils/userneu-devel f [2003/12/26] ports/60585 ports-bugs ZMailer 2.99.56 is available, can be comp o [2003/12/26] ports/60604 ports-bugs [update] p5-Locale-Maketext-Simple o [2003/12/27] ports/60645 ports-bugs New port: japanese/multiskkserv f [2003/12/29] ports/60708 ports-bugs [non maintainer] Update editors/kile to 1 o [2003/12/29] ports/60715 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] deskutils/moregroupware: A web f [2003/12/30] ports/60728 ports-bugs [Change-request] ports: mail/amavis-perl o [2004/01/01] ports/60810 ports-bugs New port: textproc/srilm o [2004/01/03] ports/60858 ports-bugs New port: textproc/p5-Lingua-PT-Stemmer o [2004/01/03] ports/60859 ports-bugs New port: textproc/p5-Lingua-Stem-It o [2004/01/03] ports/60860 ports-bugs New port: textproc/Lingua-Stem-Snowball-D o [2004/01/03] ports/60861 ports-bugs New port: textproc/Lingua-Stem-Snowball-N o [2004/01/03] ports/60862 ports-bugs New port: textproc/Lingua-Stem-Snowball-S o [2004/01/03] ports/60863 ports-bugs New port: textproc/p5-Text-German o [2004/01/03] ports/60864 ports-bugs Update port: textproc/p5-Lingua-Stem o [2004/01/03] ports/60866 ports-bugs Remove port www/gnujsp? o [2004/01/03] ports/60879 ports-bugs Reintroduce port: sysutils/arson f [2004/01/04] ports/60910 ports-bugs [new port] mail/graphdefang o [2004/01/04] ports/60912 ports-bugs [MAINTAINER-UPDATE] Update lang/fpc to 1. o [2004/01/04] ports/60915 ports-bugs Update ports: japanese/yc.el o [2004/01/05] ports/60922 ports-bugs New port: www/opera-devel, preview versio o [2004/01/05] ports/60945 ports-bugs New port: bsdbktr_tvtune - a console bktr o [2004/01/05] ports/60948 ports-bugs [NEW PORT] devel/ace: A slave port to dev 114 problems total. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 11:26:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E706F16A4CE; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:26:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (tuminfo2.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762C543D1D; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:26:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: from zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (localhost.glhnet.mhn.de. [127.0.0.1]) by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i05JQHjS006851; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:26:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from simon@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) Received: (from simon@localhost) by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i05JQH6b006850; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:26:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from simon) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:26:16 +0100 From: Simon Barner To: harti@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040105192616.GE432@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20040102224633.E97CC178EC@sirius.firepipe.net> <20040105150058.S13398@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20040105175632.GC432@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20040105190428.J13398@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Xm/fll+QQv+hsKip" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040105190428.J13398@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help from a ports committer needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 19:26:22 -0000 --Xm/fll+QQv+hsKip Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Seems that I need: >=20 > .include >=20 > SB>.if ${OSVERSION} < 500000 > SB>IGNORE=3D ATM not implemented on FreeBSD 4.x and earlier > SB>.endif >=20 > .include >=20 > Otherwise make gives me a syntax error. Yes, sorry - I forgot to mention that. You will need the split version of the .include lines as soon as you start using .foo statements. Simon --Xm/fll+QQv+hsKip Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/+bpYCkn+/eutqCoRAtCAAJ4zbxGwFSJvwXIF6jwdubBmET5HTACffx++ 3cUzzwdDE+sCWwUG6yKZIgQ= =ZrBy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Xm/fll+QQv+hsKip-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 11:42:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9167816A4CE; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:42:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from sally.dts-online.net (sally.dts-online.net [212.62.68.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F409743D2D; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:42:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lkoeller@koellers.net) Received: from door.koellers.net (213-182-118-132.teleos-web.de [213.182.118.132]) by sally.dts-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D384EAB99; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:42:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from odie.koellers.net (root@odie.koellers.net [192.168.4.2]) by door.koellers.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i05JUlke008619; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:30:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lkoeller@koellers.net) Received: from odie.koellers.net (lkoeller@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by odie.koellers.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i05JUlKh001591; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:30:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lkoeller@odie.koellers.net) Message-Id: <200401051930.i05JUlKh001591@odie.koellers.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?= To: ports@FreeBSD.org X-Face: eCcoCV}FjV*O{6>[1$XP/e%]TJhEw2MF33dFh)^HM7Gfd=[/(4+0a$~ List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 19:42:33 -0000 -------- Hi, please reserve the UID and GID of 910 for the user/group bacula. They are needed to run bacula (ports/sysutils/bacula) with dropped down permissions. 910 is chosen cause bacula uses the TCP ports 9101, 9102 and 9103 (IANA registered). Perhaps they could be included into /etc/system: bacula-dir 9101/tcp #Bacula director daemon bacula-fd 9102/tcp #Bacula file daemon bacula-sd 9103/tcp #Bacula storage daemon Thanks and regards Lars -- = Lars K=F6ller E-Mail: lars@koellers.net (LKoeller@FreeBSD.ORG) -------- FreeBSD, was sonst? ---- http://www.de.freebsd.org -------- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 11:46:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E24B16A4CE; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:46:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from 21322530218.direct.eti.at (21322530218.direct.eti.at [213.225.30.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1807343D41; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 11:46:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from arved@arved.de) Received: from arved.de (mchammer.arved.de [192.168.2.8]) i05JMK7W000937; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:22:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from arved@arved.de) Received: from arved.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arved.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i05JFc2D039594; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:15:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from arved@arved.de) Received: by arved.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i05JFcts039593; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:15:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from arved) From: Tilman Linneweh To: lioux@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:15:38 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 Organization: FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_afb+/x6CGTCBXoY" Message-Id: <200401052015.38294.arved@FreeBSD.org> cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: arved@FreeBSD.org Subject: Fix Build on AMD64: djbfft, ffmpeg X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 19:46:34 -0000 --Boundary-00=_afb+/x6CGTCBXoY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hello Mario, With the following two patches mplayer works on AMD64 (at least for mpegs..) Please commit. regards tilman --Boundary-00=_afb+/x6CGTCBXoY Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset="us-ascii"; name="djbfft.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="djbfft.diff" Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/math/djbfft/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.6 Makefile --- Makefile 20 Nov 2003 15:06:05 -0000 1.6 +++ Makefile 5 Jan 2004 18:36:30 -0000 @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ @${PERL} -pi -e 's|("include)|\1/${PORTNAME}|' ${WRKSRC}/hier.c do-configure: - @${ECHO_CMD} '${CC} ${CFLAGS}' > ${WRKSRC}/conf-cc + @${ECHO_CMD} '${CC} ${CFLAGS} -fPIC' > ${WRKSRC}/conf-cc @${ECHO_CMD} '${CC}' > ${WRKSRC}/conf-ld @${ECHO_CMD} ${PREFIX} > ${WRKSRC}/conf-home .ifdef(WITH_OPT_PENTIUM) --Boundary-00=_afb+/x6CGTCBXoY Content-Type: text/x-diff; charset="us-ascii"; name="ffmpeg.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ffmpeg.diff" Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.25 diff -u -r1.25 Makefile --- Makefile 27 Dec 2003 23:02:44 -0000 1.25 +++ Makefile 5 Jan 2004 18:45:42 -0000 @@ -126,11 +126,11 @@ .endif ## optimization .ifdef(WITH_OPTIMIZED_CFLAGS) -CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --extra-cflags="-I${LOCALBASE}/include \ +CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --extra-cflags="-fPIC -I${LOCALBASE}/include \ -I${X11BASE}/include \ -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer" .else -CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --extra-cflags="-I${LOCALBASE}/include \ +CONFIGURE_ARGS+= --extra-cflags="-fPIC -I${LOCALBASE}/include \ -I${X11BASE}/include" \ --disable-opts .endif --Boundary-00=_afb+/x6CGTCBXoY-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 12:43:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B864616A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:43:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (sea1-f119.sea1.hotmail.com [207.68.163.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944B243D39 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:43:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from crollins666@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:43:25 -0800 Received: from 216.19.22.118 by sea1fd.sea1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 05 Jan 2004 20:43:25 GMT X-Originating-IP: [216.19.22.118] X-Originating-Email: [crollins666@hotmail.com] X-Sender: crollins666@hotmail.com From: "clayton rollins" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 20:43:25 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jan 2004 20:43:25.0294 (UTC) FILETIME=[90D170E0:01C3D3CC] Subject: possible new port, dd_rescue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 20:43:32 -0000 Hi list, This tool was suggested to me by a fellow developer who uses Linux. dd_rescue is similar to dd, but is meant to be graceful when errors are encountered, instead of faulting and not allowing the dump. I used it to get an image a bad floppy, but I assume it is suitable for other disk recovery too. (It is included in Knoppix, so it has somewhat of a serious following, I guess.) The homepage with source downloads is: http://www.garloff.de/kurt/linux/ddrescue/ The only modification required here was to edit the Makefile to include -I/usr/local/include/ in the CFLAGS. (A quick reinplace would solve.) I would be willing to make the required port directory, if there's interest. IMHO, it may be a welcome addition to the ports tree (if another tool/method for this doesn't exist), and might be considered for inclusion to the 'live filesystem' CD. Peace, Clayton Rollins _________________________________________________________________ Make your home warm and cozy this winter with tips from MSN House & Home. http://special.msn.com/home/warmhome.armx From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 18:31:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A6F16A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:31:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583C343D31 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:31:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (9ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.6]) i062VVLO026425 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:31:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i062VVrU021520 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:31:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:31:31 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401060231.i062VVrU021520@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 02:31:33 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: insub-7.0: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/irc/irssi+perl" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 U MOVED ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? perl.core U databases/qdbm/Makefile U databases/qdbm/distinfo U databases/qdbm/pkg-plist ? devel/glade2/make.core ? devel/gnomedebug/make.core ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc U emulators/gxmame/Makefile ? graphics/gphoto2/make.core ? graphics/pstoedit/make.core U irc/Makefile ? misc/flyway/make.core U multimedia/bsdbktr_tvtune/Makefile U multimedia/bsdbktr_tvtune/distinfo ? net/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? net/bmon/make.core ? net/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? print/p5-Net-Printer/sh.core ? print/pips880/sh.core U sysutils/tentakel/Makefile U sysutils/tentakel/distinfo U sysutils/tentakel/pkg-descr U sysutils/tentakel/pkg-plist U www/Makefile U www/mod_limitipconn2/Makefile U www/mod_limitipconn2/distinfo U www/mod_limitipconn2/pkg-descr U www/mod_limitipconn2/pkg-plist U www/tidy-devel/Makefile U www/tidy-devel/distinfo U x11-clocks/Makefile U x11-clocks/gdesklets-countdown/Makefile U x11-clocks/gdesklets-countdown/distinfo U x11-clocks/gdesklets-countdown/pkg-descr U x11-clocks/gdesklets-countdown/pkg-message U x11-clocks/gdesklets-countdown/pkg-plist ? x11-fm/vide/sh.core From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 18:33:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ECD16A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:33:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C0AF43D2D for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 18:33:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.5]) i062XuLO026428 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:33:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i062XuZC026485 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:33:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:33:56 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401060233.i062XuZC026485@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 02:33:57 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: insub-7.0: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/irc/irssi+perl" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 U MOVED ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? x U databases/qdbm/Makefile U databases/qdbm/distinfo U databases/qdbm/pkg-plist ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc U emulators/gxmame/Makefile U irc/Makefile ? mail/log U multimedia/bsdbktr_tvtune/Makefile U multimedia/bsdbktr_tvtune/distinfo U sysutils/tentakel/Makefile U sysutils/tentakel/distinfo U sysutils/tentakel/pkg-descr U sysutils/tentakel/pkg-plist U www/Makefile U www/mod_limitipconn2/Makefile U www/mod_limitipconn2/distinfo U www/mod_limitipconn2/pkg-descr U www/mod_limitipconn2/pkg-plist U www/tidy-devel/Makefile U www/tidy-devel/distinfo ? x11/gnome2/log U x11-clocks/Makefile U x11-clocks/gdesklets-countdown/Makefile U x11-clocks/gdesklets-countdown/distinfo U x11-clocks/gdesklets-countdown/pkg-descr U x11-clocks/gdesklets-countdown/pkg-message U x11-clocks/gdesklets-countdown/pkg-plist From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 19:31:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFE616A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:31:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA0743D41 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:31:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (9ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.6]) i063VRLO026514 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:31:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i063VR9J001935 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:31:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:31:27 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401060331.i063VR9J001935@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 03:31:29 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: insub-7.0: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/irc/irssi+perl" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? perl.core ? devel/glade2/make.core ? devel/gnomedebug/make.core ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? graphics/gphoto2/make.core ? graphics/pstoedit/make.core ? misc/flyway/make.core ? net/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? net/bmon/make.core ? net/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? print/p5-Net-Printer/sh.core ? print/pips880/sh.core ? x11-fm/vide/sh.core From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 19:34:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C12216A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:34:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D361D43D2D for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 19:34:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.5]) i063Y9LO026517 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:34:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i063Y9mG006911 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:34:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:34:09 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401060334.i063Y9mG006911@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 03:34:11 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: insub-7.0: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/irc/irssi+perl" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? x ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? mail/log ? x11/gnome2/log From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 20:31:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A1B16A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:31:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1AB43D31 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:31:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (9ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.6]) i064VSLO026633 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 23:31:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i064VS8Q082249 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 23:31:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 23:31:28 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401060431.i064VS8Q082249@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 04:31:30 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: insub-8.0: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/irc/irssi+perl" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? perl.core ? devel/glade2/make.core ? devel/gnomedebug/make.core ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? graphics/gphoto2/make.core ? graphics/pstoedit/make.core U irc/insub/Makefile U irc/insub/distinfo ? misc/flyway/make.core ? net/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? net/bmon/make.core ? net/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? print/p5-Net-Printer/sh.core ? print/pips880/sh.core U www/Makefile U www/mod_mya/Makefile U www/mod_mya/distinfo U www/mod_mya/pkg-descr U www/mod_mya/pkg-plist U www/mod_mya/files/patch-mod_mya.c U www/urchin5/Makefile U www/urchin5/distinfo U www/urchin5/pkg-plist ? x11-fm/vide/sh.core From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 20:33:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2014516A4D0 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:33:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0587C43D31 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:33:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.5]) i064XuLO026636 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 23:33:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i064Xuh2087231 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 23:33:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 23:33:56 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401060433.i064Xuh2087231@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 04:33:58 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: insub-8.0: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/irc/irssi+perl" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? x ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc U irc/insub/Makefile U irc/insub/distinfo ? mail/log U www/Makefile U www/mod_mya/Makefile U www/mod_mya/distinfo U www/mod_mya/pkg-descr U www/mod_mya/pkg-plist U www/mod_mya/files/patch-mod_mya.c U www/urchin5/Makefile U www/urchin5/distinfo U www/urchin5/pkg-plist ? x11/gnome2/log From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 21:35:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAD416A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:35:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6B643D5A for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:35:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (9ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.6]) i065ZiLO001333 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:35:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i065Zicg062703 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:35:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:35:44 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401060535.i065Zicg062703@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 05:35:46 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: insub-8.0: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/irc/irssi+perl" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? perl.core ? devel/glade2/make.core ? devel/gnomedebug/make.core ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? graphics/gphoto2/make.core ? graphics/pstoedit/make.core ? misc/flyway/make.core ? net/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? net/bmon/make.core ? net/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? print/p5-Net-Printer/sh.core ? print/pips880/sh.core ? x11-fm/vide/sh.core From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 21:38:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3DD516A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:38:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D667643D2D for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 21:38:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.5]) i065cYLO007246 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:38:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i065cYA0067686 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:38:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:38:34 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401060538.i065cYA0067686@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 05:38:35 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: insub-8.0: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/irc/irssi+perl" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? x ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? mail/log ? x11/gnome2/log From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 22:22:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4DE16A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:22:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from i170119.ap.plala.or.jp (i170119.ap.plala.or.jp [218.47.170.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECA043D3F for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:22:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sf@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 15:22:29 +0900 Message-ID: <867k05ppei.wl@gray.plala.or.jp> From: FUJISHIMA Satsuki To: Harti Brandt In-Reply-To: <20040102162252.C624@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <20040102162252.C624@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> Mail-Followup-To: harti@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, Harti Brandt User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/20.7 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.1 (AOI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help from a ports committer needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 06:22:33 -0000 At Fri, 2 Jan 2004 16:33:10 +0100 (CET), Harti Brandt wrote: > MASTER_SITES= http://people.freebsd.org/~harti/atm/ It would be better to use MASTER_SITE_LOCAL to reduce load of freefall(= people.freebsd.org). MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_LOCAL} MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= harti/atm and put your distfiles into freefall:~harti/public_distfiles/atm/. They will be mirrored to ftp.freebsd.org periodically. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 22:59:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3836016A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:59:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (sea1-f7.sea1.hotmail.com [207.68.163.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B24843D1F for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:59:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from crollins666@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 22:59:14 -0800 Received: from 216.19.22.118 by sea1fd.sea1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 06:59:13 GMT X-Originating-IP: [216.19.22.118] X-Originating-Email: [crollins666@hotmail.com] X-Sender: crollins666@hotmail.com From: "clayton rollins" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 06:59:13 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jan 2004 06:59:14.0077 (UTC) FILETIME=[98024CD0:01C3D422] Subject: Re: possible new port, dd_rescue X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 06:59:15 -0000 Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko wrote: >"clayton rollins" probably wrote: > > Hi list, > > > This tool was suggested to me by a fellow developer > > who uses Linux. dd_rescue is similar to dd, but is > > meant to be graceful when errors are encountered, > > instead of faulting and not allowing the dump. > ># dd conv=sync,noerror if=/dev/whatever of=/dev/whatever > >and no port is needed:) > >If you still think it's a good thing to have such a prgram, be so kind >as to send a PR. > Sergey, No, no, no. One of the reasons I wrote the list was to find if such functionality already existed. Thanks for clarifying for me. Happy hacking, :) Clayton _________________________________________________________________ Tired of slow downloads? Compare online deals from your local high-speed providers now. https://broadband.msn.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 01:19:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C431916A4D0; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:19:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs143215.pp.htv.fi (cs143215.pp.htv.fi [213.243.143.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A8443D46; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:19:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ekarkkai@pp.htv.fi) Received: from thunderbolt.my.domain (thunderbolt.my.domain [192.168.1.30]) by cs143215.pp.htv.fi (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i069JNGk000254; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:19:23 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ekarkkai@pp.htv.fi) Received: from thunderbolt.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i069JMwf040698; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:19:23 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ejk@thunderbolt.my.domain) Received: (from ejk@localhost) by thunderbolt.my.domain (8.12.9p1/8.12.9/Submit) id i069JMb5040697; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:19:22 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:19:22 +0200 (EET) Message-Id: <200401060919.i069JMb5040697@thunderbolt.my.domain> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org From: Esa Karkkainen X-send-pr-version: 3.113 X-GNATS-Notify: cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Esa Karkkainen Subject: audio/grip does not compile when "make WITH_CDPARANOIA=yes" is used X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Esa Karkkainen List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 09:19:31 -0000 >Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Esa Karkkainen >Organization: Is in state of disintegration >Confidential: no >Synopsis: audio/grip does not compile when "make WITH_CDPARANOIA=yes" is used >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Category: ports >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p11 i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p11 Sat Dec 13 17:28:07 EET 2003 Ports cvsupped at Tue Jan 6 10:52:51 EET 2004 >Description: Port audio/grip does not compile when "make WITH_CDPARANOIA=yes" is used >How-To-Repeat: cd /usr/ports/audio/grip && make WITH_CDPARANOIA=yes all [ snip ] cdpar.c:47:33: cdda/cdda_interface.h: No such file or directory cdpar.c:48:32: cdda/cdda_paranoia.h: No such file or directory cdpar.c: In function `CDPCallback': [ snip ] gmake[2]: *** [cdpar.o] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/audio/grip/work/grip-3.1.4/src' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/audio/grip/work/grip-3.1.4' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/audio/grip. >Fix: I have supplied two fixes which have same net effect. First patch is tad strange, but passes "portlint -A". Second patch is "traditional" fix. ---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<--- --- Makefile.orig Tue Jan 6 09:59:01 2004 +++ Makefile Tue Jan 6 11:07:45 2004 @@ -21,11 +21,14 @@ USE_GNOME= gnomehack gnomeprefix gnometarget libgnomeui vte USE_GMAKE= yes GNU_CONFIGURE= yes +USE_REINPLACE= yes CONFIGURE_ENV= CPPFLAGS="-I${LOCALBASE}/include" \ LDFLAGS="-L${LOCALBASE}/lib" .if defined(WITH_CDPARANOIA) LIB_DEPENDS+= cdda_paranoia.0:${PORTSDIR}/audio/cdparanoia +post-patch: + @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's# +-#include ++#include ++#include + + static void PutNum(long num,int f,int endianness,int bytes); + static void WriteWav(int f,long bytes); ---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<---8<--- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 01:35:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A126D16A4CE for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:35:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (gilmore.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.33.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3B143D41 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:35:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov) Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (IDENT:sS+ZDzUsafKZNEU1UsDqDTz52fFMcTCy@localhost.nas.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1]) i069ZI1p025656 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 01:35:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tweten@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Dave Tweten Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 01:35:18 -0800 Message-ID: <25655.1073381718@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov> Sender: tweten@nas.nasa.gov Subject: Java Plugin & Linux Firebird X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David.E.Tweten@nasa.gov List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 09:35:20 -0000 I've finally abandoned Linux Netscape Navigator 4.8 and have been trying to upgrade to Mozilla Firebird. Firebird itself, and the Shockwave Flash plugin work fine but Java plugins have been resisting me. It might be time to take a step back and ask some questions: 1. Does linux-mozillafirebird actually even need a Java plugin? I've been trying to install one because native Mozilla Firebird required java/jdk14, or it would complain (according to the build messages for Firebird). But, there aren't any build messages to similar effect with linux-mozillafirebird. Incidently, I abandoned native Mozilla Firebird because the Linux plugin wrapper required a modification to the 4.9 distribution source, and I don't want to have to make manual changes to the source every time I cvsup the latest from STABLE. 2. If linux-mozillafirebird doesn't need a Java plugin, what are the Blackdown, IBM, and Sun plugins good for, anyway? 3. If it does need a plugin, what are the relative advantages of linux-blackdown-jdk14, linux-ibm-jdk14, and linux-sun-jdk14? 4. Again, assuming that a plugin is needed, how do I provide linux-ibm-jdk14 and linux-sun-jdk14 with a libgcc_s.so.1 file, or provide linux-blackdown-jdk14 with the symbol, GetGlobalServiceManager__16nsServiceManagerPP17nsIServiceManager? They each complain that something is missing when linux-mozillafirebird starts. Any help will be appreciated. -- M/S 258-5 |1024-bit PGP fingerprint:|tweten@nas.nasa.gov NASA Ames Research Center | 41 B0 89 0A 8F 94 6C 59| (650) 604-4416 Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000| 7C 80 10 20 25 C7 2F E6|FAX: (650) 604-4377 Not an official NASA position. You can't even be certain who sent this! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 02:52:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEE716A4CE; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 02:52:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from shaft.techsupport.co.uk (shaft.techsupport.co.uk [212.250.77.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9CF43D31; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 02:52:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com ([81.103.67.204] helo=shrike.submonkey.net ident=mailnull) by shaft.techsupport.co.uk with esmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1AdopT-0008Uh-0r; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 10:52:55 +0000 Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1AdopQ-00026Z-VP; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 10:52:52 +0000 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:52:52 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Lars K?ller Message-ID: <20040106105252.GT33404@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Lars K?ller , ports@FreeBSD.org, lkoeller@freebsd.org References: <200401051930.i05JUlKh001591@odie.koellers.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uRjmd8ppyyws0Tml" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401051930.i05JUlKh001591@odie.koellers.net> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Ceri Davies cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: lkoeller@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 10:52:57 -0000 --uRjmd8ppyyws0Tml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 08:30:47PM +0100, Lars K?ller wrote: > -------- >=20 > Hi, >=20 > please reserve the UID and GID of 910 for the user/group bacula. Lars, Since you have a commit bit, the way to reserve the uid is to simply commit to the Porter's Handbook. Cheers, Ceri --=20 --uRjmd8ppyyws0Tml Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/+pOEocfcwTS3JF8RAjwwAKDEZGY+4AL0/dOlCQ4BC6uWB387sACfQKiy Vh4hVEyyFR7oKs1PXiaf3Bo= =GJkj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uRjmd8ppyyws0Tml-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 05:23:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2358216A4CE; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 05:23:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com (mailout07.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6FA43D39; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 05:23:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd03.aul.t-online.de by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1AdrB9-0002zi-00; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 14:23:27 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (Ee5qirZTYeFdBCdM1A3FdPk78t0ql0ZInHRCRTJ+QZqgFfP3rM70UP@[80.131.126.23]) by fmrl03.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1AdrAn-1Wh9Dk0; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:23:05 +0100 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i06DN1Jb026992; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:23:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i06DN8TL043550; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:23:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:23:08 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: harti@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040106142308.1c4beda8@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20040105150058.S13398@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <20040102224633.E97CC178EC@sirius.firepipe.net> <20040105150058.S13398@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: Ee5qirZTYeFdBCdM1A3FdPk78t0ql0ZInHRCRTJ+QZqgFfP3rM70UP@t-dialin.net cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help from a ports committer needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:23:34 -0000 On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:06:52 +0100 (CET) Harti Brandt wrote: > Is sysutils the correct category for this? There seems to be no % cat /usr/ports/sysutils/pkg/COMMENT System utilities What about "misc", "devel", "net" or "benchmarks" (perhaps your testsuite also produces some performance numbers)? > category for tests. How do I add this port (when the freeze lifts)? I suggest to let a ports committer add the port, as /usr/ports/Tools/scripts/addport makes some assumptions about your ssh setup and may fail in some cases (e.g. while adding an entry to CVSROOT/modules). We're in a soft freeze mode ATM (no sweeping commits or major updates which affect a lot of dependend ports), so the port can be added now. Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 06:08:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B8D16A4CE for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 06:08:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de (mailhub.fokus.fraunhofer.de [193.174.154.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2449543D1D for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 06:08:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from beagle (beagle [193.175.132.100])i06E8TL05429; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:08:29 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:08:29 +0100 (CET) From: Harti Brandt To: Alexander Leidinger In-Reply-To: <20040106142308.1c4beda8@Magellan.Leidinger.net> Message-ID: <20040106150717.Q66232@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <20040102224633.E97CC178EC@sirius.firepipe.net> <20040105150058.S13398@beagle.fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20040106142308.1c4beda8@Magellan.Leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help from a ports committer needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: harti@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 14:08:41 -0000 On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Alexander Leidinger wrote: AL>On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:06:52 +0100 (CET) AL>Harti Brandt wrote: AL> AL>> Is sysutils the correct category for this? There seems to be no AL> AL>% cat /usr/ports/sysutils/pkg/COMMENT AL>System utilities AL> AL>What about "misc", "devel", "net" or "benchmarks" (perhaps your AL>testsuite also produces some performance numbers)? Ok. I'll think "net" is best then (it does only conformance tests). AL>I suggest to let a ports committer add the port, as AL>/usr/ports/Tools/scripts/addport makes some assumptions about your ssh AL>setup and may fail in some cases (e.g. while adding an entry to AL>CVSROOT/modules). AL> AL>We're in a soft freeze mode ATM (no sweeping commits or major updates AL>which affect a lot of dependend ports), so the port can be added now. Ok. I'll do that. Thanks, harti -- harti brandt, http://www.fokus.fraunhofer.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private brandt@fokus.fraunhofer.de, harti@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 09:51:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA4116A4CE; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:51:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from odot.okladot.state.ok.us (odot.okladot.state.ok.us [192.149.244.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD65043D3F; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:51:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us) Received: from notes9c.okladot.state.ok.us (notes9a.okladot.state.ok.us [10.36.36.31])LAA23120; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:50:56 -0600 Received: from techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us ([199.27.9.37]) by notes9c.okladot.state.ok.us (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12) with ESMTP id 2004010611521905:384088 ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:52:19 -0600 Received: by techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us (Postfix, from userid 0) id 4355C5C29; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:52:38 -0600 (CST) To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1073064581.779.10.camel@gyros> References: <20031231234158.8EF1C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <20031231234158.8EF1C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <1073064581.779.10.camel@gyros> Message-Id: <20040106175238.4355C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:52:38 -0600 (CST) From: root@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us (UDSD387) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Notes9c/ODOT(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 01/06/2004 11:52:19 AM,2003) at 01/06/2004 11:52:19 AM, Serialize complete at 01/06/2004 11:52:19 AM cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Paul Seniura Subject: follow-up Re: I'm having an awful time updating gdm2 and other ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Seniura List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 17:51:47 -0000 On Friday January 02 2003, Joe Marcus Clarke said: > On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 18:41, Paul Seniura wrote: > > The root of this whole problem is that starting-up Gnome2 gets stuck after it shows the splash screen. Or if I have it bring up the Login Panel first, it won't go past you entering your id & password. I have no tell-tale signs in the logs that show what the problem actually is. > > > > I'm now trying to 'portupgrade gdm2' to get it updated with yesterday's CVS changes (I'm actually using CTM to track -Current). > > > > Talk about "when it rains, it pours..." > > > > The Makefile for gdm2 does no checking whatsoever for perl itself and perl macros in its BUILD_DEPENDS, as some other ports properly do. > > > > Earlier this week I had done a 'use.perl port' and have had no problems with configure/installing new ports or updating them. > > Not until yesterday's gdm2 changes came thru, that is. > > > > This is what 'portupgrade gdm2' shows today: > > > > [...] > > ===> Configuring for gdm2-2.4.4.6 > > checking for intltool >= 0.21... 0.28 found > > checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl > > configure: error: XML::Parser perl module is required for intltool > > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > Please report the problem to gnome@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach > > the "/src/ports/x11/gdm2/work/gdm-2.4.4.6/config.log" including the > > output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good > > idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system > > (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /src/ports/x11/gdm2. > > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade1357.57 make > > ** Fix the problem and try again. > > [...] > > This Perl module is included with intltool-0.28, and is installed in a ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Well, no -- not exactly. ;) Per your suggestion, with the CTM deltas as of this morning, I did a 'portupgrade --force' to re-install 'textproc/intltool' (only). Remember 'use.perl port' is now in effect. During the 'install' phase of 'textproc/intltool' (after the 'gmake' phase), it showed: [...] ===> Installing for intltool-0.28_1 ===> intltool-0.28_1 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/mach/XML/Parser.pm - not found ===> Verifying reinstall for /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/mach/XML/Parser.pm in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser ===> Extracting for p5-XML-Parser-2.34 >> Checksum OK for XML-Parser-2.34.tar.gz. ===> Patching for p5-XML-Parser-2.34 [...] So the perl58 version of the 'XML::Parser' module is in its own port (not in intltool). And the above produced the desired effect i.e. to get the p5-* version of such modules installed. But there isn't such a check in x11/gdm2's Makefile -- there's no check for depending on *any* perl pieces, period. This leads me back to the original question, please see below... > non-default location with regard to Perl. However, there is a hack in > the gdm2 Makefile that points intltool-merge to this file. You probably > should try reinstalling intltool. > > > So I did 'use.port system' and 'rehash' and checked to see that /etc/make.conf was updated properly and the symlinks -- and even rebooted -- to no avail, because 'perl -v' is still showing 5.8.2 and will still cause the above problem. > > > > Yes I have seen PR/55760 but what good will it do if the maintainer won't commit that huge patch to make it 'official'? Will 55760 fix _this_ problem with gdm2 anyway? I don't see how, because gdm2 itself has no logic to check for perl and co. > > > > I have no idea what other perl modules are required by gdm2 and in which p5-* collection. > > So I thought to try installing a meta-port such as print/p5-GnomePrint to get a bunch of p5-* parts installed which would include the XML::Parser module among others, and hopefully enough of them to make gdm2 happy. > > > > "When it rains, it pours..." > > > > ...because now doing a portupgrade --new for p5-GnomePrint is griping thusly: > > > > [...] > > install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 /src/ports/www/gtkhtml/work/gtkhtml-1.1.10/gtkhtmlConf.sh /usr/X11R6/etc/gtkhtmlConf.sh > > ===> Running ldconfig > > /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/X11R6/lib > > ===> Registering installation for gtkhtml-1.1.10_2 > > ===> Returning to build of p5-GnomePrint-0.7009 > > ===> Configuring for p5-GnomePrint-0.7009 > > Cannot load Gtk::Install::Files: Can't locate Gtk/Install/Files.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/mach > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.2 > > /BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.2/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.2 .) at ../Depends.pm line 93. > > > > *** Error code 2 > > > > Stop in /src/ports/print/p5-GnomePrint. > > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade44917.47 make > > ** Fix the problem and try again. > > [...] > > This looks like You need to reinstall p5-Gtk In my earlier msg, I mentioned trying to get the prerequisite p5-* modules by choosing the p5-GnomePrint port. This is something I merely picked out of thin air, after studying what port might be a good "catch-all" -- because there doesn't seem to be any docs written on what-all you need to do if you switch 'use.perl' from 'system' to 'port'. During that same run I quoted before for p5-GnomePrint, thru a long series of required ports, 'p5-Gtk' was attempted with problems: >>>>snip>>>> [...] ===> p5-GdkImlib-0.7009 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/mach/Gtk.pm - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/mach/Gtk.pm in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/p5-Gtk ===> Extracting for p5-Gtk-0.7009 >> Checksum OK for Gtk-Perl-0.7009.tar.gz. ===> Patching for p5-Gtk-0.7009 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for p5-Gtk-0.7009 ===> p5-Gtk-0.7009 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/XML/Writer.pm - found ===> p5-Gtk-0.7009 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/mach/XML/Parser.pm - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/mach/XML/Parser.pm in /usr/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser ===> Extracting for p5-XML-Parser-2.34 >> Checksum OK for XML-Parser-2.34.tar.gz. ===> Patching for p5-XML-Parser-2.34 ===> p5-XML-Parser-2.34 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.2 - found ===> p5-XML-Parser-2.34 depends on shared library: expat.4 - found ===> Configuring for p5-XML-Parser-2.34 Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good [...] ===> Checking if textproc/p5-XML-Parser already installed ===> p5-XML-Parser-2.34 is already installed You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of textproc/p5-XML-Parser without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/ports/textproc/p5-XML-Parser. ===> Returning to build of p5-Gtk-0.7009 ===> p5-Gtk-0.7009 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.2 - found ===> p5-Gtk-0.7009 depends on executable: pkg-config - found ===> p5-Gtk-0.7009 depends on shared library: glib12.3 - found ===> p5-Gtk-0.7009 depends on shared library: gtk12.2 - found ===> Configuring for p5-Gtk-0.7009 Packages to compile: Gtk. Checking if your kit is complete... Looks good Warning: prerequisite XML::Parser 0 not found. Argument "0.4.1" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.2/ExtUtils/MakeMaker.pm line 390. Subroutine MY::postamble redefined at ./Makefile.PL line 172. Current perl supports threads. Enabling thread support Located Gtk version 1.2.10... [...] Can't locate XML/Parser.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2 /$ FORCE installing header: GtkTypes.h FORCE installing header: GdkTypes.h FORCE installing header: MiscTypes.h Use of uninitialized value in join or string at ../Depends.pm line 229. Use of uninitialized value in concatenation (.) or string at ../Depends.pm line 194. Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.2/BSDPAN/ExtUtils/MM_Unix.pm line 44. Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-Wl,-E' Writing Makefile for Gtk Writing Makefile for Gtk::base ===> Building for p5-Gtk-0.7009 /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.2 ../tools/genext.pl Gtk [...] ===> Returning to build of p5-Gnome-0.7009 ===> p5-Gnome-0.7009 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/mach/Gtk.pm - not found ===> Verifying install for /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.2/mach/Gtk.pm in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/p5-Gtk ===> Building for p5-Gtk-0.7009 make: don't know how to make build/perl-gtk-ref.pod. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /src/ports/x11-toolkits/p5-Gtk/work/Gtk-Perl-0.7009. *** Error code 1 Stop in /src/ports/x11-toolkits/p5-Gtk. ===> Returning to build of p5-Gnome-0.7009 [...] <<< and probably all Perl > modules). Modules need to be built for the version of Perl under which > they will run. Well that is my _basic_ question in all this -- ;) How do we find out what "all Perl modules" are needed when we change 'use.ports' from 'system' to 'port'? And I'm only needing the pieces that are used by portupgrade (i.e. config/make scripts etc.). What brought all this on (re: my previous msg) was the fact that x11/gdm2 does not have any refs in its Makefile for requiring any perl stuff at all. Clearly gdm2 _does_ need _some_ perl pieces in order to do its 'install' phase. And there are probably many other ports that are lacking in their Makefiles in a similar manner. Some ports have such checks e.g. intltool itself; others don't that need 'em e.g. gdm2. I'll attempt to figure out the ports I got 'bit' on and try whipping up some patches (esp. gdm2 ;) if p5-GnomePrint still fails today. Unless y'all have such patches waiting in a queue somewhere? ;) > Joe > > > > The portupgrade run above had already installed a ton of prerequisite ports, and was "returning" to finish p5-GnomePrint. > > Something got missed somewhere, but I can't see where (I do the 2>&1 thing and 'tee' the output to a file for later review). > > > > I need help, please! > > > > I'm having similar trouble with KDE taking forever to start up, and once it is ready, it again takes forever to bring up a simple "Open File" dialog, no matter what app. > > > > If I keep getting into this much trouble with FreeBSD, I won't be able to show how free software can be used in our agency! 'They' will tell me to drop this project, and we'll forever be stuck with M$! When I get everything up-to-snuff with p5-* on Gnome2 and KDE, I'll see if we still have these "takes too long" problems. Thank you again, -- Paul Seniura System Specialist State of Okla. D.O.T. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 10:11:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5E016A4CE; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:11:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu (BACHE.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE0743D2F; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:11:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from allbery@ece.cmu.edu) Received: by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix, from userid 953) id F0D75B8; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:11:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from [128.2.138.11] (VPN11.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.138.11]) by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23206A0; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:10:52 -0500 (EST) From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" To: Paul Seniura In-Reply-To: <20040106175238.4355C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> References: <20031231234158.8EF1C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <20031231234158.8EF1C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <1073064581.779.10.camel@gyros> <20040106175238.4355C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1073412562.32632.3.camel@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 13:09:22 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-35.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_01,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES, REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN autolearn=ham version=2.50 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) cc: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: follow-up Re: I'm having an awful time updating gdm2 and other ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 18:11:26 -0000 On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 12:52, UDSD387 wrote: > Well that is my _basic_ question in all this -- ;) > How do we find out what "all Perl modules" are needed when we change 'use.ports' from 'system' to 'port'? > And I'm only needing the pieces that are used by portupgrade (i.e. config/make scripts etc.). Any time you run "use.perl", do "env FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1 portupgrade -f p5-\*". (I consider the need for the FORCE_PKG_REGISTER thing a bug, but don't know how to get around it. The problem appears to be that portupgrade doesn't actually upgrade them in dependency order, so the upgrade tends to lose when some module forces install of another, which discovers that it's "already installed" and aborts.) -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon univ. KF8NH From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 10:18:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B17316A4CE; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:18:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C10843D39; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:18:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from master.dougb.net (c-24-130-160-161.we.client2.attbi.com[24.130.160.161]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004010618181501500fimcee>; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 18:18:15 +0000 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:18:14 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton To: Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?= In-Reply-To: <200401051930.i05JUlKh001591@odie.koellers.net> Message-ID: <20040106101604.N88773@znfgre.qbhto.arg> References: <200401051930.i05JUlKh001591@odie.koellers.net> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" cc: "lkoeller@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 18:18:17 -0000 On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Lars Köller wrote: > 910 is chosen cause bacula uses the TCP ports 9101, 9102 and 9103 > (IANA registered). Perhaps they could be included into /etc/system: Since every line we add to /etc/services adds expense to the various getportby*() functions, we only add new lines when it can be demonstrated that it would benefit a large percentage of our userbase. How many people do you think use this bacula port? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 10:18:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E7C16A4D0 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:18:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A60C43D5C for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 10:18:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.30) id 1AdvmS-000DhX-Oi for ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:18:16 +0100 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:18:16 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040106181816.GB50567@voodoo.oberon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5I6of5zJg18YgZEa" Content-Disposition: inline X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon Sender: Kirill Ponomarew Subject: arpwatch-devel X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 18:18:18 -0000 --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I'm going to add net/arpwatch-devel to ports. It would be great if somebody could also hard test it. It can be found at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/59180 The information about this development version can be found at: http://www.secureworks.net/open/?p=ArpWatch It designed for multi-interface routers and provide threaded support. -Kirill --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/+vvoQC1G6a60JuURAiOIAKC/4IvSCo5VVz7aIp5LHWFVOYWedACg2DO3 53hj9J/ZRkFKXTi8c5mBhB4= =rFB6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5I6of5zJg18YgZEa-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 11:01:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E74816A4CE for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:01:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from redmaple.bitnets.net (redmaple.bitnets.net [216.123.230.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0C643D1D for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:01:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from b03@interbaun.com) Received: from interbaun.com ([24.65.200.253]) by redmaple.bitnets.net (NO UCE) with ASMTP (SSL) id FFP37861; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 12:00:59 -0700 Message-ID: <3FFB05EB.5020909@interbaun.com> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 12:00:59 -0700 From: Gary Bajaj User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-ca, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: apcupsd-3.10.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:01:02 -0000 In the event of a power failure, the following processes are started and remain hung. The CGI does not respond (also hung below). This has been an issue since 3.10.6. FreeBSD 4.9. I have recompiled all ports affected by the gettext upgrade before installing the current apcupsd port. Thanks. > # ps wax | grep apc > 19641 ?? I 0:00.00 /bin/sh /usr/local/etc/apcupsd/apccontrol > mainsback HOSTNAME 1 0 > 19642 ?? I 0:00.00 /bin/sh /usr/local/etc/apcupsd/mainsback > HOSTNAME 1 0 > 19644 ?? I 0:00.00 /bin/sh /usr/local/etc/apcupsd/mainsback > HOSTNAME 1 0 > 19646 ?? S 0:00.00 /usr/local/sbin/apcaccess status > 19985 ?? S 0:00.01 /usr/local/www/data/apcupsd/multimon.cgi > 89862 ?? Is 0:04.43 /usr/local/sbin/apcupsd --kill-on-powerfail From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 11:50:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B3C16A4D0; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:50:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from odot.okladot.state.ok.us (odot.okladot.state.ok.us [192.149.244.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4FE43D48; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 11:50:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us) Received: from notes9c.okladot.state.ok.us (notes9a.okladot.state.ok.us [10.36.36.31])NAA52674; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:49:19 -0600 Received: from techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us ([199.27.9.37]) by notes9c.okladot.state.ok.us (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12) with ESMTP id 2004010613504094:384720 ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:50:40 -0600 Received: by techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us (Postfix, from userid 0) id D07EB5C29; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:51:08 -0600 (CST) To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" From: "Paul Seniura aka UDSD387" In-Reply-To: <1073412562.32632.3.camel@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> References: <20031231234158.8EF1C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <20031231234158.8EF1C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <1073064581.779.10.camel@gyros> <20040106175238.4355C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <1073412562.32632.3.camel@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> Message-Id: <20040106195108.D07EB5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:51:08 -0600 (CST) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Notes9c/ODOT(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 01/06/2004 01:50:40 PM,2003) at 01/06/2004 01:50:41 PM, Serialize complete at 01/06/2004 01:50:41 PM cc: Paul Seniura cc: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: follow-up Re: I'm having an awful time updating gdm2 and other ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Seniura List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:50:51 -0000 > Any time you run "use.perl", do "env FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1 portupgrade -f > p5-\*". Ah, thank you for reminding me -- that was going to be my last-ditch effort, install all the p5-* ports to kingdom-come. ;) Guess I'll go git it running... > (I consider the need for the FORCE_PKG_REGISTER thing a bug, but don't > know how to get around it. The problem appears to be that portupgrade > doesn't actually upgrade them in dependency order, so the upgrade tends > to lose when some module forces install of another, which discovers that > it's "already installed" and aborts.) Of course one other way of 'fixing' this has come to mind: Have FreeBSD install perl-5.8.x as its 'system' instead of 5.6.x. ;) Now that Steve Jobs is thru with his spiel, the Internet ought to be un-clogged so we can grab all those p5 things. ;) Thank you again, -- Paul Seniura System Specialist State of Okla. D.O.T. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 12:33:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4ED16A4CE for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:33:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from imhotep.yuckfou.org (cust.89.117.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.89.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1FC43D58 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 12:33:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nivo@yuckfou.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imhotep.yuckfou.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449B216A for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:37:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from imhotep.yuckfou.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imhotep.yuckfou.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73483-04 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:37:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by imhotep.yuckfou.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 138DA148; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 21:37:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from yuckfou.org (turbata-xp [192.168.2.236]) by localhost.yuckfou.org (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 21:37:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3FFB1B8E.2000904@yuckfou.org> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 21:33:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030912 Thunderbird/0.3a X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org References: <001e01c3d232$cb142a40$0200a8c0@proton> In-Reply-To: <001e01c3d232$cb142a40$0200a8c0@proton> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Nils Vogels X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0 (Cannonade) X-TMDA-Fingerprint: j4ACs2kdKtiTAwn+EUByghPuguc X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at yuckfou.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: quakeserver X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 20:33:29 -0000 goldenamerican wrote: >Hello >im from poland and i have a question is a package of server to a quake3 arena ?? > > AFAIK, the correct package for q3-Arena dedicated server is games/q3server HTH & HAND ! -- Simple guidelines to happiness: Work like you don't need the money, love like your heart has never been broken and dance like no one can see you. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 14:14:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF7116A4F5; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:14:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from odot.okladot.state.ok.us (odot.okladot.state.ok.us [192.149.244.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E40243D4C; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:14:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us) Received: from notes9c.okladot.state.ok.us (notes9a.okladot.state.ok.us [10.36.36.31])QAA22280; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:13:34 -0600 Received: from techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us ([199.27.9.37]) by notes9c.okladot.state.ok.us (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.12) with ESMTP id 2004010616145617:385571 ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:14:56 -0600 Received: by techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us (Postfix, from userid 0) id CCACF5C29; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:15:30 -0600 (CST) To: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" From: "Paul Seniura" In-Reply-To: <1073412562.32632.3.camel@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> References: <20031231234158.8EF1C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <20031231234158.8EF1C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <1073064581.779.10.camel@gyros> <20040106175238.4355C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <1073412562.32632.3.camel@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> <20040106195108.D07EB5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> Message-Id: <20040106221530.CCACF5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:15:30 -0600 (CST) X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Notes9c/ODOT(Release 5.0.12 |February 13, 2003) at 01/06/2004 04:14:56 PM,2003) at 01/06/2004 04:14:57 PM, Serialize complete at 01/06/2004 04:14:57 PM cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org cc: Paul Seniura Subject: I need to clarify (Re: I'm having an awful time updating gdm2 and other ports) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Seniura List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 22:14:30 -0000 Here is the scenario: You don't have any p5-* pieces installed. You've freshly switched to 'use.perl port' from 'system'. Then comes a CVS update for x11/gdm2. You need to upgrade x11/gdm2; it's already installed. This time you need its configure/make/install scripts to run under perl-5.8.x. You hope gdm2's Makefile properly specifies what it requires, like other ports do. So you run portupgrade. And it breaks during gdm2's 'install' phase. What do you do? Okay now allow me to expand on that scenario with some details, please. I did the switch from perl-5.6.x to perl-5.8.x last week without having any of the p5-* items installed beforehand. Never needed any p5-* before -- the only items needing perl at this stage are ports during their configure / make / install / run-time phases (I myself haven't needed perl). There's nothing _specifically_ telling you _what else_ to do when you do this 'use.perl port' switch. Specifically. I was 'assuming' that any port needing a perl module -- for whatever reason e.g. configure / make / install / run-time -- would have appropriate entries in that port's Makefile (some '.if's around BUILD_DEPENDS, LIB_DEPENDS, etc., as appropriate, based on PERL_VERSION or SITE_PERL (unsure?)). Then came along some CTM deltas for x11/gdm2. The next time I ran portupgrade is what got broke. x11/gdm2's Makefile does *not* have checks for perl-anything but it *did* require certain perl modules for it to be installed successfully, as shown in my previous msgs e.g. gdm2 clearly needs the XML::Parser module during its install phase so an appropriate item should've been added to gdm2's Makefile -- probably in this case to the RUN_DEPENDS string (is there such a thing as INSTALL_DEPENDS ?). Suitable mechanisms _are_ available in the Makefile and many other ports use them, but gdm2 didn't say what it needed so I never got the requisite p5-* pieces it needed e.g. gdm2's Makefile should've caused the textproc/p5-XML-Parser port to be installed before gdm2 itself was installed. So I needed a workaround. To get those p5-* pieces needed by gdm2, I was 'hoping' the p5-GnomePrint port would pull in those missing pieces if _it_ had a correct Makefile. There I go 'assuming' again... (you know what 'assume' means... ;) > Any time you run "use.perl", do "env FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=1 portupgrade -f > p5-\*". It ran very quickly. It only re-installed the p5-XML-Parser and p5-XML-Writer ports because those were the only p5-* pieces I've managed to figure out being required by gdm2 and/or other ports -- after my assumption p5-GnomePrint properly pull in those missing pieces as noted. I'm running this portupgrade 'force' again on a list of ports that failed when I tried to install p5-GnomePrint, hoping it'll eventually fix other glitches, too. I ought to open a PR for gdm2 to be fixed -- because other ports do check for "which perl" and adjust themselves accordingly. Probably a lot of other ports need to similarly check on other things besides "which perl", too. ;) -- Paul Seniura System Specialist State of Okla. D.O.T. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 14:19:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F88016A4CE; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:19:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D774943D39; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 14:19:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) i06MJTHG016715; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:19:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from [10.2.1.4] (vpn-client-4.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.4]) i06MJKxc003037; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:19:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Paul Seniura In-Reply-To: <20040106221530.CCACF5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> References: <20031231234158.8EF1C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <20031231234158.8EF1C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <1073064581.779.10.camel@gyros> <20040106175238.4355C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <1073412562.32632.3.camel@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> <20040106195108.D07EB5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <20040106221530.CCACF5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-u6RS13yPCKAziY5GM3PI" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1073427579.776.37.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 17:19:40 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I need to clarify (Re: I'm having an awful time updating gdm2 and other ports) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 22:19:39 -0000 --=-u6RS13yPCKAziY5GM3PI Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 17:15, Paul Seniura wrote: > Here is the scenario: >=20 > You don't have any p5-* pieces installed. > You've freshly switched to 'use.perl port' from 'system'. > Then comes a CVS update for x11/gdm2. > You need to upgrade x11/gdm2; it's already installed. > This time you need its configure/make/install scripts to run under perl-5= .8.x. > You hope gdm2's Makefile properly specifies what it requires, like other = ports do. > So you run portupgrade. > And it breaks during gdm2's 'install' phase. >=20 > What do you do? You read the FAQ at http://www.freebsd.org/gnome, and do the update correctly. It does work. Your problem is you tried to upgrade gdm2 on a system were all the other ports were not up-to-date already. Bad idea (for just about anything). Instead, you should have used portupgrade -ra to do things properly, and in the correct order. Had you done that, all your Perl dependencies would have been recorded correctly. Joe >=20 >=20 > Okay now allow me to expand on that scenario with some details, please. >=20 > I did the switch from perl-5.6.x to perl-5.8.x last week > without having any of the p5-* items installed beforehand. >=20 > Never needed any p5-* before -- the only items needing perl at this stage > are ports during their configure / make / install / run-time phases > (I myself haven't needed perl). >=20 > There's nothing _specifically_ telling you _what else_ to do > when you do this 'use.perl port' switch. Specifically. >=20 > I was 'assuming' that any port needing a perl module -- for whatever reas= on > e.g. configure / make / install / run-time -- would have appropriate entr= ies > in that port's Makefile (some '.if's around BUILD_DEPENDS, LIB_DEPENDS, e= tc., > as appropriate, based on PERL_VERSION or SITE_PERL (unsure?)). >=20 > Then came along some CTM deltas for x11/gdm2. > The next time I ran portupgrade is what got broke. > x11/gdm2's Makefile does *not* have checks for perl-anything > but it *did* require certain perl modules for it to be > installed successfully, as shown in my previous msgs > e.g. gdm2 clearly needs the XML::Parser module > during its install phase > so an appropriate item should've been added to > gdm2's Makefile -- probably in this case > to the RUN_DEPENDS string > (is there such a thing as INSTALL_DEPENDS ?). >=20 > Suitable mechanisms _are_ available in the Makefile > and many other ports use them, > but gdm2 didn't say what it needed > so I never got the requisite p5-* pieces it needed > e.g. gdm2's Makefile should've caused the textproc/p5-XML-Parser port > to be installed before gdm2 itself was installed. >=20 > So I needed a workaround. > To get those p5-* pieces needed by gdm2, I was 'hoping' > the p5-GnomePrint port would pull in those missing pieces > if _it_ had a correct Makefile. >=20 > There I go 'assuming' again... > (you know what 'assume' means... ;) >=20 > > Any time you run "use.perl", do "env FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=3D1 portupgrade= -f > > p5-\*". >=20 > It ran very quickly. > It only re-installed the p5-XML-Parser and p5-XML-Writer ports > because those were the only p5-* pieces I've managed to > figure out being required by gdm2 and/or other ports -- after my > assumption p5-GnomePrint properly pull in those missing pieces > as noted. >=20 > I'm running this portupgrade 'force' again on a list of ports that > failed when I tried to install p5-GnomePrint, hoping it'll eventually > fix other glitches, too. >=20 >=20 > I ought to open a PR for gdm2 to be fixed -- > because other ports do check for "which perl" and > adjust themselves accordingly. > Probably a lot of other ports need to similarly > check on other things besides "which perl", too. ;) >=20 >=20 >=20 > -- Paul Seniura > System Specialist > State of Okla. D.O.T. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-u6RS13yPCKAziY5GM3PI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/+zR7b2iPiv4Uz4cRAt4DAJ4jdnS6zQHBV4aTg4fIbOtRSsEZ2QCfTIzU pXpxPx68FEmxKTx/PrK1GZE= =r9zs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-u6RS13yPCKAziY5GM3PI-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 15:23:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015BF16A4CE; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:23:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA8943D45; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:23:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from dougb.net ([24.130.160.161]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2004010623231301500bck79e>; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 23:23:14 +0000 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:23:13 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton To: Paul Seniura aka UDSD387 In-Reply-To: <20040106195108.D07EB5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> Message-ID: <20040106152154.I59047@qbhto.arg> References: <20031231234158.8EF1C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <1073064581.779.10.camel@gyros> <20040106175238.4355C5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <1073412562.32632.3.camel@pyanfar.ece.cmu.edu> <20040106195108.D07EB5C29@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" cc: "freebsd-perl@freebsd.org" cc: "freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: follow-up Re: I'm having an awful time updating gdm2 and other ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 23:23:16 -0000 [ For future reference, there is way too much cross posting here. ] On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Paul Seniura aka UDSD387 wrote: > > Of course one other way of 'fixing' this has come to mind: > Have FreeBSD install perl-5.8.x as its 'system' instead of 5.6.x. ;) There is no more "system" perl in FreeBSD. You can install whatever version you want on your 5.x system. This is how it should be. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 17:59:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A83B716A4CE for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:59:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21FA43D1D for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:59:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 520F6146FA; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:59:17 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:59:17 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: the latest statistics on the number of ports PRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 01:59:18 -0000 Some time back, we got to the point where there were less ports PRs than kern PRs. Now, we have just crossed the point (758) where there are less ports PRs than *bin* PRs. I want to specifically thank krion, pav, sergei, marcus, edwin, and a cast of many others for their recent work in chopping down the backlog. Oh yeah, we're down to a half-dozen maintainer-updates, too. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 19:33:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3084A16A4CE; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:33:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from imo-d02.mx.aol.com (imo-d02.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC3E43D39; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:32:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from johnmcooper@netscape.net) Received: from johnmcooper@netscape.net by imo-d02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r4.8.) id n.7.be908cc (16240); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 22:32:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from netscape.net ([206.63.201.3]) by air-in03.mx.aol.com (v97.14) with ESMTP id MAILININ34-3f703ffb7dde1d6; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 22:32:50 -0500 Message-ID: <3FFB7DDF.4070302@netscape.net> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:32:47 -0800 From: John Merryweather Cooper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AOL-IP: 206.63.201.3 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) cc: coop9211@uidaho.edu cc: Ports FreeBSD cc: johnmary@adelphia.net Subject: Re: ports/60912: [MAINTAINER-UPDATE] Update lang/fpc to 1.0.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 03:33:00 -0000 Is any committer out there will to take a look at this? Thanks, jmc From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 19:34:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A259216A4CE; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from imo-d01.mx.aol.com (imo-d01.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC8243D49; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 19:34:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from johnmcooper@netscape.net) Received: from johnmcooper@netscape.net by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r4.8.) id n.c2.afbabc3 (16239); Tue, 6 Jan 2004 22:34:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from netscape.net ([206.63.201.3]) by air-in03.mx.aol.com (v97.14) with ESMTP id MAILININ33-3f6f3ffb7e55298; Tue, 06 Jan 2004 22:34:47 -0500 Message-ID: <3FFB7E57.5020208@netscape.net> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 19:34:47 -0800 From: John Merryweather Cooper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AOL-IP: 206.63.201.3 X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) cc: coop9211@uidaho.edu cc: Ports FreeBSD cc: John Merryweather Cooper Subject: Re: kern/29621: Missing man page for ulpt X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 03:34:53 -0000 As I've noted before on feedback, this PR has been overtaken by events (there is now a man page). Could someone please close this PR? jmc From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 20:04:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D4516A4CE for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:04:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DFB43D1D for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:04:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 4FB84146F9; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 22:04:00 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 22:04:00 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20040107033504.GA25788@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Mark Linimon Subject: Re: the latest statistics on the number of ports PRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 04:04:01 -0000 > What's the next target? You? :-) Oh, it's a joke, it's a joke ... scottl wants to try to throw the KSE switch in a month or so, that'll be fun. Then there is the ongoing gcc3.3 grind. Apparently, Marcus is holding off any bento runs until 5.2 is out the door, which is probably wise, but there have been several hundred checkins since the last run so no telling where we are on that. (OTOH I think I have all the rest of the known-broken ones labeled now). But probably in a few days, once I get over the Creeping Crud, I'm going to start pushing towards, ah, "helping certain maintainers out with their decision to either fix their PRs or abandon their ports". There are ~600 assigned PRs and that's the only way to get much further than where we are right now. You'll probably get to your next round of port deletion before all that, though (Feb?), although I'd like to see my PR for trying to add a DEPRECATED makevar go in before that so people could look at the list. Then, there is my continuing hope to eventually move the ports monitoring code onto a FreeBSD server so I could get my second- fastest machine back ... Of course, now that everyone is back in town, I'll be able to start trying to find a full-time job again. If that happens, all bets are off, FreeBSD-wise :-) (And no fair calling prospective employers in Austin and telling them that I'm an asshole, just so the project can get more work out of me; even if it is true) mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 20:12:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4FD416A4CE for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:12:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A3543D5D for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:12:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 9BFA9146F9; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 22:12:07 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 22:12:07 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20040107033504.GA25788@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: the latest statistics on the number of ports PRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 04:12:09 -0000 So much for replying to email while you're under the weather. I kind of thought that was just going directly to Kris ... sigh. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 00:43:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01D016A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:43:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A377943D3F for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:43:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.5]) i078h8LO041288 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 03:43:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i078h8Wx098475 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 03:43:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 03:43:08 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401070843.i078h8Wx098475@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:43:10 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: gnome2-hacker-tools-2.4.1: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/texproc/meld" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 U MOVED ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? x U comms/Makefile U comms/py-lirc/Makefile U comms/py-lirc/distinfo U comms/py-lirc/pkg-descr U comms/py-lirc/pkg-plist U deskutils/glabels/Makefile U devel/Makefile U devel/anjuta/Makefile U devel/anjuta/distinfo U devel/anjuta/pkg-descr U devel/anjuta/pkg-plist U devel/anjuta/files/patch-Makefile.in U devel/anjuta/files/patch-configure U devel/anjuta/files/patch-data::Makefile.in U devel/anjuta/files/patch-doc::Makefile.in U devel/anjuta/files/patch-ltmain.sh U devel/anjuta/files/patch-scripts::anjuta_import.sh.in U devel/anjuta/files/patch-src::anjuta.c U devel/anjuta/files/patch-src::launcher.c U devel/anjuta/files/patch-src::source.c U devel/gnome2-hacker-tools/Makefile U devel/gnome2-hacker-tools/pkg-descr U devel/gnome2-hacker-tools/pkg-plist U devel/portlint/Makefile U devel/portlint/src/portlint.pl ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc U editors/Makefile U editors/gnome2-office/Makefile U editors/gnome2-office/pkg-descr U editors/gnome2-office/pkg-plist ? mail/log U net/Makefile U net/rtg/Makefile U net/rtg/distinfo U net/rtg/pkg-descr U net/rtg/pkg-plist U net/rtg/files/patch-configure U net/rtg/files/patch-etc-Makefile.in U net/straw/Makefile ? x11/gnome2/log U x11/gnome2-fifth-toe/Makefile U x11/gnome2-fifth-toe/pkg-descr From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 00:44:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A508316A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:44:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD5643D54 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:44:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (9ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.6]) i078ijLO042441 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 03:44:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i078ijVm042069 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 03:44:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 03:44:45 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401070844.i078ijVm042069@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:44:46 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: gnome2-hacker-tools-2.4.1: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/texproc/meld" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 U MOVED ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? perl.core U comms/Makefile U comms/py-lirc/Makefile U comms/py-lirc/distinfo U comms/py-lirc/pkg-descr U comms/py-lirc/pkg-plist U deskutils/glabels/Makefile U devel/Makefile U devel/anjuta/Makefile U devel/anjuta/distinfo U devel/anjuta/pkg-descr U devel/anjuta/pkg-plist U devel/anjuta/files/patch-Makefile.in U devel/anjuta/files/patch-configure U devel/anjuta/files/patch-data::Makefile.in U devel/anjuta/files/patch-doc::Makefile.in U devel/anjuta/files/patch-ltmain.sh U devel/anjuta/files/patch-scripts::anjuta_import.sh.in U devel/anjuta/files/patch-src::anjuta.c U devel/anjuta/files/patch-src::launcher.c U devel/anjuta/files/patch-src::source.c ? devel/glade2/make.core U devel/gnome2-hacker-tools/Makefile U devel/gnome2-hacker-tools/pkg-descr U devel/gnome2-hacker-tools/pkg-plist ? devel/gnomedebug/make.core U devel/portlint/Makefile U devel/portlint/src/portlint.pl ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc U editors/Makefile U editors/gnome2-office/Makefile U editors/gnome2-office/pkg-descr U editors/gnome2-office/pkg-plist ? graphics/gphoto2/make.core ? graphics/pstoedit/make.core ? misc/flyway/make.core U net/Makefile ? net/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? net/bmon/make.core ? net/powerdns/Makefile.inc U net/rtg/Makefile U net/rtg/distinfo U net/rtg/pkg-descr U net/rtg/pkg-plist U net/rtg/files/patch-configure U net/rtg/files/patch-etc-Makefile.in U net/straw/Makefile ? print/p5-Net-Printer/sh.core ? print/pips880/sh.core U x11/gnome2-fifth-toe/Makefile U x11/gnome2-fifth-toe/pkg-descr ? x11-fm/vide/sh.core From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 00:51:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353B016A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:51:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.162.142.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E91443D2F for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:51:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 55F9A2284E; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:51:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:51:29 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20040107085129.GB20767@droso.net> Mail-Followup-To: Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <200401070843.i078h8Wx098475@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401070843.i078h8Wx098475@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 5.1-CURRENT cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:51:31 -0000 --JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 03:43:08AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > INDEX build failed with errors: > gnome2-hacker-tools-2.4.1: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/texproc/meld= " non-existent -- dependency list incomplete >=20 Fixed. --=20 _._ _,-'""`-._ Erwin Lansing (,-.`._,'( |\`-/| erwin@lansing.dk http://droso.org `-.-' \ )-`( , o o) erwin@FreeBSD.org -bf- `- \`_`"'- --JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/+8iRqy9aWxUlaZARAk1/AKCwozBY1Y1eyhGULfcdjDeITmt1wgCgmYiJ zCSdMuDuJp8sQ6Sg0NCmQ0w= =Ft+B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 00:52:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC5316A4CE; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:52:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from sally.dts-online.net (sally.dts-online.net [212.62.68.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0078C43D49; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:52:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lkoeller@koellers.net) Received: from door.koellers.net (213-182-112-170.teleos-web.de [213.182.112.170]) by sally.dts-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE6148D84E; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:52:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from odie.koellers.net (root@odie.koellers.net [192.168.4.2]) by door.koellers.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i078kpke035615; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:46:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lkoeller@koellers.net) Received: from odie.koellers.net (lkoeller@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by odie.koellers.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i078kppZ001556; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:46:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lkoeller@odie.koellers.net) Message-Id: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 From: "Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?=" To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: Message from Doug Barton <20040106101604.N88773@znfgre.qbhto.arg> X-Face: eCcoCV}FjV*O{6>[1$XP/e%]TJhEw2MF33dFh)^HM7Gfd=[/(4+0a$~ cc: "lkoeller@freebsd.org" cc: Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?= Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:52:18 -0000 In reply to Doug Barton who wrote: >On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Lars K=F6ller wrote: > >> 910 is chosen cause bacula uses the TCP ports 9101, 9102 and 9103 >> (IANA registered). Perhaps they could be included into /etc/system: > >Since every line we add to /etc/services adds expense to the various >getportby*() functions, we only add new lines when it can be >demonstrated that it would benefit a large percentage of our userbase. >How many people do you think use this bacula port? Sorry, but I can't give you a number. But I think there is no "large percentage of our userbase" using it. Even some active FreeBSD = user are on the bacula mailing list. It's nice to have the ports in /etc/services when using tolls like = lsof. = Thanks = Lars -- = Lars K=F6ller E-Mail: lars@koellers.net (LKoeller@FreeBSD.ORG) -------- FreeBSD, was sonst? ---- http://www.de.freebsd.org -------- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 00:58:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD1A16A4CE; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:58:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lphp.org (APastourelles-107-1-5-108.w193-252.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.252.221.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63ACE43D1D; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 00:58:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) Received: from obsd.dioranews.com (modem210.metz.imaginet.fr [195.68.12.210] (may be forged)) by mail.lphp.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i076ufR1029109; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 07:56:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) From: Antoine Jacoutot To: "Lars =?iso-8859-1?q?K=F6ller?=" , Doug Barton Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:57:42 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> In-Reply-To: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401070957.42287.ajacoutot@lphp.org> cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:58:05 -0000 On Wednesday 07 January 2004 09:46, Lars K=F6ller wrote: > >Since every line we add to /etc/services adds expense to the various > >getportby*() functions, we only add new lines when it can be > >demonstrated that it would benefit a large percentage of our userbase. > >How many people do you think use this bacula port? Since we're at it, do you think it will also be possible to add the saned p= ort=20 in /etc/services too ? Something like this: sane 6566/tcp #Sane network scanner daemon The saned daemon won't work without it. Regards, Antoine From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 01:06:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E998D16A4D0; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:06:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [212.43.217.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E3143D55; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:06:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855454AA22F; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:06:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from pouet.in.mat.cc (l02v-11-220.d2.club-internet.fr [213.44.170.220]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDFB4AA204; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:06:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 10:06:40 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_K=F6ller?= , Doug Barton Message-ID: <1153421.1073470000@pouet.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> References: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========69CE86AC7CDED94559C0==========" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd 0.1 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: lkoeller@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 09:06:53 -0000 --==========69CE86AC7CDED94559C0========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline +-Le 07/01/2004 09:46 +0100, Lars K=F6ller =E9crivait : |=20 | In reply to Doug Barton who wrote: |=20 |> On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Lars K=F6ller wrote: |>=20 |>> 910 is chosen cause bacula uses the TCP ports 9101, 9102 and 9103 |>> (IANA registered). Perhaps they could be included into /etc/system: |>=20 |> Since every line we add to /etc/services adds expense to the various |> getportby*() functions, we only add new lines when it can be |> demonstrated that it would benefit a large percentage of our userbase. |> How many people do you think use this bacula port? |=20 | Sorry, but I can't give you a number. But I think there is no | "large percentage of our userbase" using it. Even some active FreeBSD=20 | user are on the bacula mailing list. |=20 | It's nice to have the ports in /etc/services when using tolls like=20 | lsof.=20 Maybe a simple pkg-{,de}install like this : pkg-install : PATH=3D/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin case "$2" in "POST-INSTALL") echo "# Bacula port start bacula-dir 9101/tcp #Bacula director daemon bacula-fd 9102/tcp #Bacula file daemon bacula-sd 9103/tcp #Bacula storage daemon # Bacule port end" >> /etc/services pkg-deinstall : PATH=3D/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin TMPFILE=3D/tmp/services-$RANDOM-$$ case "$2" in "DEINSTALL") sed -e '/# Bacula port start/,/# Bacule port end/{' \ -e 'd' \ -e '}' /etc/services > $TMPFILE mv -f $TMPFILE /etc/services ;; esac and add a : post-install: @${SETENV} ${INSTALL_ENV} ${SH} ${PKGINSTALL} ${PKGNAME} POST-INSTALL to the Makefile. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --==========69CE86AC7CDED94559C0========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQE/+8wmqYYpzGz/vmcRAuaZAJ9BZndvcCl4AB+kbbSCVJCqgG1EVACgiqQP kmbHCBNqSK1RkB0SxYvUHtY= =5hqv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========69CE86AC7CDED94559C0==========-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 01:38:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5E616A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:38:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD54043D2D for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:38:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (9ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.6]) i079cWLO043121 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 04:38:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i079cVaK022967 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 04:38:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 04:38:31 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401070938.i079cVaK022967@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 09:38:34 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: gnome2-hacker-tools-2.4.1: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/texproc/meld" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? perl.core ? devel/glade2/make.core ? devel/gnomedebug/make.core ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? graphics/gphoto2/make.core ? graphics/pstoedit/make.core ? misc/flyway/make.core ? net/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? net/bmon/make.core ? net/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? print/p5-Net-Printer/sh.core ? print/pips880/sh.core ? x11-fm/vide/sh.core From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 01:41:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B98216A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:41:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5239C43D46 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:41:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.5]) i079fILO044422 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 04:41:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i079fI6e079413 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 04:41:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 04:41:18 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401070941.i079fI6e079413@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 09:41:20 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: gnome2-hacker-tools-2.4.1: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/texproc/meld" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? x ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? mail/log ? x11/gnome2/log From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 01:54:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D1416A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:54:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from strippy.vizija.si (strippy.vizija.si [217.72.81.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AB843D45 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:54:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from uros.gruber@vizija.si) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strippy.vizija.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC16A6CA7; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:54:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from strippy.vizija.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (strippy.vizija.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29220-03; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:54:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from uros (BSN-95-243-216.dsl.siol.net [193.95.243.216]) by strippy.vizija.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3176A6CA4; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:54:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:54:03 +0100 From: Uro¹ Gruber Organization: Nova Vizija d.o.o. X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <17182544968.20040107105403@vizija.si> To: max@love2party.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at vizija.si X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER Non-encoded 8-bit data (char B9 hex) in message header 'From' From: Uro\271 Gruber List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 09:54:09 -0000 Hi, I have problems building this port. Here is error root@surf:/usr/ports/sysutils/pftop#make ===> Building for pftop-0.4 Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/ports/sysutils/pftop/work/pftop-0.4 cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -DOS_LEVEL=34 -c cache.c cache.c:40:23: net/pfvar.h: No such file or directory In file included from cache.c:48: if I add -I /usr/local/include/pf in /etc/make.conf it works and i can see it in cc command. -- Best regards Uros From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 01:54:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 269AA16A4D1 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:54:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipop3.tm.net.my (service.tm.net.my [202.188.95.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84FF043D4C for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 01:54:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kaeru@streamyx.com) Received: from av4 ([172.20.0.21]) by ipop3.tm.net.my (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HR40091E66JW4@ipop3.tm.net.my> for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 17:54:19 +0800 (SGT) Received: from wolverine.home.net ([219.95.34.186]) by ipop1.tm.net.my (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 1.6 (built Oct 18 2002)) with ESMTP id <0HR400BH666IWI@ipop1.tm.net.my> for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 17:54:19 +0800 (SGT) Received: from wolverine.home.net (localhost.home.net [127.0.0.1]) by wolverine.home.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i079sHx3079455; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 17:54:17 +0800 Received: (from kaeru@localhost) by wolverine.home.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i079s2fZ079454; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 17:54:02 +0800 (MYT envelope-from kaeru) Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 17:54:01 +0800 From: Khairil Yusof In-reply-to: <20031230065101.GA22443@i18n.org> To: Hye-Shik Chang Message-id: <20040107095401.GH49042@streamyx.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary=OpLPJvDmhXTZE4Lg Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i References: <20031229143701.GC947@streamyx.com> <20031230065101.GA22443@i18n.org> cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: python version, modules and Zope X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 09:54:23 -0000 --OpLPJvDmhXTZE4Lg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 03:51:01PM +0900, Hye-Shik Chang wrote: > Do you have up-to-date ports tree? Recursive version keeping in a > dependent builds is added recently into bsd.python.mk and python > modules that have same origin are co-exist even on my pkgdb too. Yup it is automatically done, and they do co-exist happily. > But we need to register py22-*, py21-* ports to HOLD_PKGS of > portupgrade, because there's no mechanism to keep build-time > environment variables on pkgdb. OK, this was what I wanted to confirm. Thanks. --=20 PGP ID:6FFEFD7F FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT i386 5:52pm up 2 days, 6:09, 3 users, load averages: 0.21, 0.48, 0.38 --OpLPJvDmhXTZE4Lg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/+9c5DAqnLW/+/X8RAnyXAKCVfhzWR/GPNBD1IxjCmNvyiI/SmACfVX3+ 8a8CzC1DLDDDOk590FW4Ux4= =KS17 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OpLPJvDmhXTZE4Lg-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 02:40:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2B616A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 02:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from cs.tin.it (rawyr.tin.it [212.216.172.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B14543D46 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 02:37:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ferruccio.vitale@tin.it) Received: (qmail 15183 invoked by uid 1000); 30 Dec 2003 17:29:52 -0000 Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 18:29:52 +0100 From: Ferruccio Vitale To: Peter Ulrich Kruppa Message-ID: <20031230172952.GA14624@cruiser.cs.tin.it> References: <20031230044140.P62462@pukruppa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031230044140.P62462@pukruppa.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysqlcc configure fails on -CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ferruccio Vitale List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 10:40:22 -0000 Location of the qmake binary depends on QTDIR variable, by default equals to /usr/X11R6 (see /usr/ports/Mk/*.mk files); I currently use qmake but its location is /usr/X11R6 (qt version is 3.1.1_4)!! Are you sure you didn't change any other settings? Ferruccio * Peter Ulrich Kruppa [30/12/03 04:53]: > Hi! > > I am trying to build mysqlcc-0.9.3 on my > > FreeBSD pukruppa.net 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Sun Dec > 28 10:2003 root@pukruppa.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMALL i386 > > and end up with this error message: > > ----------------------------------------------------- > checking "if Qt Version in /usr/X11R6 is >= 3.0.5"... yes > configure: creating ./config.status > config.status: creating mysqlcc.pro > Creating Makefile with qmake > ./configure.lineno: /usr/X11R6/bin/qmake: not found > qmake failed, aborting > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Indeed qmake is located in /usr/local/bin . > I tried to set a link to /usr/X11R6/bin/qmake but there will be > another configure error a minute later. > > In the attachment you will find my ls /var/db/pkg . > > Regards, > > Uli. > +---------------------------+ > | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | > | Wuppertal | > | Germany | > +---------------------------+ > AbiWord2-gnome-2.0.2 > Hermes-1.3.3 > ORBit-0.5.17_1 > ORBit2-2.8.3 > XFree86-4.3.0,1 > XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0_3 > XFree86-Server-4.3.0_12 > XFree86-clients-4.3.0_6 > XFree86-documents-4.3.0 > XFree86-font100dpi-4.3.0 > XFree86-font75dpi-4.3.0 > XFree86-fontCyrillic-4.3.0 > XFree86-fontDefaultBitmaps-4.3.0 > XFree86-fontEncodings-4.3.0 > XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0 > XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6 > Xft-2.1.2 > aalib-1.4.r5_1 > acme-2.4.2 > acroread-5.08 > apache-2.0.48 > apache-ant-1.6.0 > aspell-0.50.4.1 > at-spi-1.3.9 > atk-1.4.1_1 > autoconf-2.13.000227_5 > autoconf-2.53_1 > automake-1.4.5_9 > automake-1.5,1 > balsa2-2.0.15 > bash-2.05b.007 > bison-1.75_1 > bitstream-vera-1.10 > bluefish-0.12 > bugbuddy2-2.4.1.1 > cdrtools-2.0.3 > chkrootkit-0.42b > cmucl-18e > compat4x-i386-5.0.20030328 > cups-base-1.1.20.0 > cups-lpr-1.1.20.0 > cups-pstoraster-7.07 > cvsup-without-gui-16.1h > dia-gnome-0.92.2_1,1 > diablo-jdk-1.3.1.0 > djbfft-0.76 > docbook-sk-4.1.2_1 > docbook-xml-4.2_1 > docbook-xsl-1.62.4 > dri-4.3.0,1 > eel2-2.4.1 > eog2-2.4.1 > epiphany-1.0.6 > esound-0.2.32_1 > expat-1.95.6_1 > ezm3-1.1 > fam-2.6.9_3 > fetchmail-6.2.5 > fileroller-2.4.2_1,1 > flac-1.1.0_2 > flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.10_4 > flashpluginwrapper-0.20021113 > fontconfig-2.2.90_3 > freetype2-2.1.5_1 > fribidi-0.10.4_1 > gail-1.4.1 > gaim-0.74_3 > galeon2-1.3.11a > gcalctool-4.3.31_1 > gcl-2.5.3 > gcompris2-2.1_3 > gconf-editor-2.4.0,1 > gconf2-2.4.0.1 > gconfmm-2.0.1 > gd-2.0.15_1,1 > gdbm-1.8.3 > gdm2-2.4.4.5 > gedit2-2.4.1 > gettext-0.12.1 > ggv2-2.4.0.2 > ghex2-2.4.0.1 > ghostscript-gnu-7.07_4 > gimp-gnome-1.3.23_1,1 > gimp-print-4.2.5_1 > glade2-2.0.1 > gle-3.0.3 > glib-1.2.10_10 > glib-2.2.3 > gmake-3.80_1 > gnet-glib2-1.1.9_1 > gnet2-2.0.4 > gnome-icon-theme-1.0.9 > gnome-themes-2.4.1_1 > gnome-vfsmm-1.3.5_1 > gnome2-2.4.1 > gnome2-fifth-toe-2.4.1 > gnomeapplets2-2.4.1_2 > gnomeaudio2-2.0.0 > gnomecontrolcenter2-2.4.0 > gnomedesktop-2.4.1.1_1 > gnomegames2-2.4.1.1_1 > gnomehier-1.0_10 > gnomeicu2-0.99 > gnomemag-0.10.4 > gnomemedia2-2.4.1.1 > gnomemimedata-2.4.1 > gnomepanel-2.4.1 > gnomesession-2.4.1 > gnomespeech-0.2.8 > gnomesystemmonitor-2.4.0 > gnometerminal-2.4.2 > gnomeuserdocs2-2.4.1 > gnomeutils2-2.4.1,1 > gnomevfs2-2.4.1_1 > gnopernicus-0.7.1 > gnotime-2.1.7 > gnumeric2-1.2.3 > gnupg-1.2.3_4 > gnuplot-3.7.3_2 > gob2-2.0.6 > gok-0.8.4 > gpdf-0.111 > gpgme-0.3.15_1 > gstreamer-0.6.4 > gstreamer-plugins-0.6.4_2 > gswitchit-2.5.0_2 > gtetrinet-0.7.5 > gthumb2-2.2.0 > gtk-1.2.10_10 > gtk-2.2.4_1 > gtk-engines2-2.2.0 > gtkglarea-1.99.0_2 > gtkmm-2.2.8_1 > gtksourceview-0.7.0 > gtkspell2-2.0.4 > gucharmap-gnome-1.2.0 > guile-1.6.4_3 > help2man-1.29 > imake-4.3.0_2 > intltool-0.28 > ispell-3.2.06_4 > javavmwrapper-1.4 > jdk-1.3.1p8_2 > jdk-1.4.2p5 > jpeg-6b_1 > lame-3.93.1 > lcms-1.09,1 > libIDL-0.8.2 > liba52-0.7.4 > libao-esound-0.8.4_1 > libart_lgpl2-2.3.16 > libaudiofile-0.2.5 > libbonobo-2.4.2 > libbonoboui-2.4.2 > libdvdcss-1.2.8 > libdvdread-0.9.4 > libesmtp-1.0.1,1 > libexif-0.5.12_1 > libflash-0.4.10 > libgail-gnome-1.0.2_2 > libgda2-1.0.1_2 > libglade2-2.0.1_1 > libglademm-2.1.2 > libglut-5.0.2 > libgmp-4.1.2_2 > libgnome-2.4.0_3 > libgnomecanvas-2.4.0 > libgnomecanvasmm-2.0.1 > libgnomedb-1.0.1 > libgnomemm-2.0.1 > libgnomeprint-2.4.2 > libgnomeprintui-2.4.2 > libgnomeui-2.4.0.1_1 > libgnomeuimm-2.0.0_1 > libgsf-1.8.2 > libgtkhtml-2.4.1_1 > libgtop2-2.0.8 > libiconv-1.9.1_3 > libid3tag-0.15.0b > libijs-0.34 > libltdl-1.5 > libmad-0.15.0b > libmng-1.0.5_1 > libmrproject-0.10_6 > libogg-1.0_1,3 > librep-0.16.2_3 > librsvg2-2.4.0_1 > libsigc++-1.2.5 > libslang-1.4.9 > libtool-1.3.5_1 > libtool-1.4.3_2 > libvorbis-1.0_1,3 > libwmf-0.2.8.2 > libwnck-2.4.0.1 > libxine-1.0.r2_4 > libxklavier-0.96 > libxml2-2.6.4 > libxslt-1.1.2 > libzvt-2.0.1_6 > linc-1.0.3 > links-2.1.p11,1 > linux-blackdown-jdk-1.3.1_2 > linux-esound-0.2.22_1 > linux-flashplugin-5.0r51 > linux-libaudiofile-0.1.11_2 > linux-realplayer-8.cs2_4 > linux-sun-jdk-1.3.1.09 > linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.02 > linux_base-7.1_5 > lynx-2.8.4.1d > m4-1.4_1 > mad-0.15.0b > madplay-esound-0.15.0b_1 > maxima-5.9.0 > mc-4.6.0_6 > meld-0.9.1 > mergeant-0.12.1 > metacity-2.6.3 > mkisofs-2.0.3 > mod_php5-5.0.0.a3_2,1 > mozilla-firebird-0.7_1 > mozilla-gtk2-1.5_1 > mozilla-headers-1.5_1,2 > mrproject-0.10 > mysql-client-4.1.1 > mysql-server-4.1.1 > nasm-0.98.38,1 > nautilus-cd-burner-0.5.3_4 > nautilus-media-0.3.3.1 > nautilus2-2.4.1 > nspr-4.3_2 > nss-3.8 > open-motif-2.2.2_1 > openldap-client-2.1.23 > openoffice-1.1.0_1 > p5-Authen-PAM-0.14 > p5-DBD-mysql-2.9003 > p5-DBI-1.38 > p5-Net-SSLeay-1.23 > p5-XML-Parser-2.34 > pan2-0.14.2 > pango-1.2.5 > pcre-4.4 > pdflib-5.0.2 > perl-5.6.1_15 > pine-4.58 > pkgconfig-0.15.0 > pkgdb.db > png-1.2.5_3 > popt-1.6.4_1 > portupgrade-20030723 > pth-2.0.0 > py-gnome-2.0.0 > py23-gtk-2.0.0 > py23-numeric-23.0 > py23-orbit-2.0.0 > python-2.1.3_5 > python-2.3.2_3 > qmake-3.2.3_1 > qt-3.2.3 > rdesktop-1.3.0 > regexxer-0.6 > rep-gtk2-gnome-0.17_2,1 > rpm-3.0.6_8 > rpm2cpio-1.2_1 > ruby-1.6.8.2003.10.15 > ruby-bdb1-0.2.1 > ruby-shim-ruby18-1.8.1.p3 > samba-3.0.0,1 > sawfish2-1.3_4,2 > scrollkeeper-0.3.14,1 > sdl-1.2.5_3,1 > sdocbook-xml-4.1.2.5_1 > seahorse-0.7.3 > sodipodi-0.33 > sox-12.17.4_1 > speex-1.0.3,1 > startup-notification-0.5_1 > svgalib-1.4.3_1 > tcl-8.4.4_1,1 > tiff-3.6.0_1 > tk-8.4.4,1 > totem-0.99.8_1 > tsclient-0.132 > unzip-5.50_2 > urwfonts-1.0 > vte-0.11.10_2 > webalizer-2.1.10_4 > weblint-1.020 > webmin-1.121_1 > workrave-1.4.0_1 > wrapper-1.0_3 > xchat2-2.0.6_1 > xmlcatmgr-1.1 > xscreensaver-gnome-4.14 > yelp-2.4.2 > zenity-1.6 > zip-2.3_1 > zope-2.6.2_1 > zope-cmf-1.4 > zope-cmfforum-1.0 > zope-zwiki-0.9.8 > zzz From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 03:19:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1223116A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 03:19:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ulysses.noc.ntua.gr (ulysses.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.222.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0924443D46 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 03:19:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from past@noc.ntua.gr) Received: from ajax.noc.ntua.gr (ajax.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.220.1]) by ulysses.noc.ntua.gr (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i07BJoFO071238 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:19:51 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from past@noc.ntua.gr) Received: from hal.noc.ntua.gr (hal.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.220.45]) by ajax.noc.ntua.gr (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i07BJoKY035777 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:19:50 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from past@noc.ntua.gr) From: Panagiotis Astithas Organization: NTUA/NMC To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:19:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401071319.50295.past@noc.ntua.gr> Subject: detecting c++ headers idrectory X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:19:57 -0000 Hi all, I can't find an elegant way to check form a port's Makefile, whether the C++ header files are in /usr/include/g++ or /usr/include/c++/. Does anyone have an applicable method for a port that doesn't use autoconf? Cheers, -- Panagiotis Astithas Electrical & Computer Engineer, PhD Network Management Center National Technical University of Athens, Greece From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 03:58:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F8716A50A for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 03:58:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from deluge.umist.ac.uk (deluge.umist.ac.uk [130.88.120.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB4A43D31 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 03:58:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lewiz@black.lewiz.org) Received: from lh014.halls.umist.ac.uk ([130.88.163.14] helo=yellow.lewiz.org) by deluge.umist.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AeCKV-000429-Hz for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:58:31 +0000 Received: from ip31.lewiz.org ([192.168.0.31] helo=black.lewiz.org) by mail.lewiz.org with smtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1AeCLP-0004X2-E7 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:59:27 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 16475 invoked by uid 4001); Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:59:02 -0000 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:59:02 +0000 From: Lewis Thompson To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040107115901.GA16453@lewiz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline X-GPG-Fingerprint: 90A4 939E 3847 A3E4 8103 2A48 22DA B428 542F ED3F X-GPG-Info: http://www.lewiz.org/~lewiz/pgpkey / horowitz.surfnet.nl User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Handling removal of dir in /var. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:58:34 -0000 --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Just a quick question. I want to remove a dir in /var (/var/lirc) from my pkg-plist but I'm not sure how to go this way. Is this even the right thing to do? I'm trying to create some patches for comms/lirc that make it usable and right now it tries to put stuff in /dev, which just causes problems. I figured /var/lirc was as good a place as any to put sockets. Can anybody confirm that this is indeed a good way to go, or, suggest a suitable alternative? Thanks very much, -lewiz. --=20 I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. --Bob Dylan, 1964. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -| msn:purple@lewiz.net | jabber:lewiz@jabber.org | url:www.lewiz.org |- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/+/SFItq0KFQv7T8RAnBwAJoD52QcnbZJ/8GjENEAJVFD58cN6wCgh7Oo 2mwqnedl+Je8XokY+4mVLeI= =Y8jc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 05:18:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD62716A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 05:18:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from lilith.bellavista.cz (bellavista.worldonline.cz [212.90.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D7343D45 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 05:18:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from neuhauser@bellavista.cz) Received: from freepuppy.bellavista.cz (freepuppy.bellavista.cz [10.0.0.10]) by lilith.bellavista.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B105E5C for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:18:24 +0100 (CET) Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 93C172FDA09; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:18:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:18:24 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser To: freebsd-ports Message-ID: <20040107131824.GN54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: ports/60559: update to databases/mysql*-{client,server} ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 13:18:27 -0000 Could a cvsmeister please repocopy databases/mysql41-* as requested in ports/60559? -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 07:16:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371CB16A4CE; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 07:16:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com (mailout07.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7622743D64; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 07:16:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd04.aul.t-online.de by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1AeFPl-0001vw-00; Wed, 07 Jan 2004 16:16:09 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (rIrLyTZSre7JV8AIcNeK1f6+tjPOe8kZu27AHUudc0Wv4ro4k9pmQb@[217.229.210.170]) by fmrl04.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1AeFPK-1Qeteq0; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:15:42 +0100 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i07FFbJb043623; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:15:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i07FFl9g036438; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:15:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:15:47 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Mathieu Arnold Message-Id: <20040107161547.6f753357@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <1153421.1073470000@pouet.in.mat.cc> References: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> <1153421.1073470000@pouet.in.mat.cc> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: rIrLyTZSre7JV8AIcNeK1f6+tjPOe8kZu27AHUudc0Wv4ro4k9pmQb@t-dialin.net cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Lars =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?= Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 15:16:22 -0000 On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 10:06:40 +0100 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > | It's nice to have the ports in /etc/services when using tolls like > | lsof. > > Maybe a simple pkg-{,de}install like this : > > pkg-install : > PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin > > case "$2" in > "POST-INSTALL") > echo "# Bacula port start > bacula-dir 9101/tcp #Bacula director daemon > bacula-fd 9102/tcp #Bacula file daemon > bacula-sd 9103/tcp #Bacula storage daemon > # Bacule port end" >> /etc/services And with the next mergemaster run it may go out of the door ("I haven't edited /etc/services myself, so any change must be ok"). Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 10:05:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD8C16A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:05:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD7443D8C for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:04:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (fenner@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i07I2MFR031686 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:02:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i07I2M9U031684 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:02:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 10:02:22 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <200401071802.i07I2M9U031684@freefall.freebsd.org> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Unfetchable distfiles reminder X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 18:05:26 -0000 Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unfetchable distfiles at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ . In particular, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile problems is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ports@freebsd.org.html Since no one is responsible for these ports, the problem won't get fixed unless someone on this list takes the initiative. In addition, the list of all ports with any unfetchable distfile is http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/bad.html if you don't mind coordinating your fixes with the port MAINTAINER. Thanks for your help! Bill "distfiles" Fenner From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 11:34:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D8416A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:34:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from lilith.bellavista.cz (bellavista.worldonline.cz [212.90.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A677D43D54 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:34:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from neuhauser@bellavista.cz) Received: from freepuppy.bellavista.cz (freepuppy.bellavista.cz [10.0.0.10]) by lilith.bellavista.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB2B5B for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 20:34:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 336992FDA09; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 20:34:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 20:34:12 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser To: freebsd-ports Message-ID: <20040107193412.GP54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports References: <20040107131824.GN54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040107131824.GN54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: ports/60559: update to databases/mysql*-{client,server} ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 19:34:14 -0000 # neuhauser@bellavista.cz / 2004-01-07 14:18:24 +0100: > Could a cvsmeister please repocopy databases/mysql41-* as requested > in ports/60559? ah, I somehow missed the tree is frozen. nevermind. -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 13:48:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2596816A4CE; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:48:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB10743D31; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:48:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from dougb.net ([24.130.160.161]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20040107214843012008pj7de>; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 21:48:44 +0000 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:48:42 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton To: Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?= In-Reply-To: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> Message-ID: <20040107133553.O59570@qbhto.arg> References: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" cc: "lkoeller@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 21:48:46 -0000 On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Lars Köller wrote: > Sorry, but I can't give you a number. But I think there is no > "large percentage of our userbase" using it. Even some active FreeBSD > user are on the bacula mailing list. Ok, then I like the idea of the port itself adding some lines to /etc/services to accomodate this. As for the argument that they would get deleted by (improper decisions made while using) mergemaster, it would be up to the port author to make it clear ... something like: # These three lines are added by ports/sysutils/bacula bacula-1 9999/tcp # Added by ports/sysutils/bacula ... # End of lines added by ports/sysutils/bacula That way the user has a fighting chance of making the right mergemaster decision, and the port has an easy way to delete those lines when its uninstalled. There is precedent for ports writing stuff in /etc (/etc/shells for one),, and since this is a case that's worth pursuing (as is saned), I think it's definitely worth the "cost" of "polluting" the base with ports stuff. HTH, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 13:59:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B145716A4CE; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:59:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0AD43D45; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:59:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i07LxjA7027382; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:59:45 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.3/Submit) id i07Lxisq027360; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:59:44 -0800 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:59:44 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20040107215944.GB25920@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> <20040107133553.O59570@qbhto.arg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040107133553.O59570@qbhto.arg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" cc: "lkoeller@freebsd.org" cc: Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?= Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 21:59:58 -0000 --H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:48:42PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Lars K=F6ller wrote: >=20 > > Sorry, but I can't give you a number. But I think there is no > > "large percentage of our userbase" using it. Even some active FreeBSD > > user are on the bacula mailing list. >=20 > Ok, then I like the idea of the port itself adding some lines to > /etc/services to accomodate this. As for the argument that they would > get deleted by (improper decisions made while using) mergemaster, it > would be up to the port author to make it clear ... something like: >=20 > # These three lines are added by ports/sysutils/bacula > bacula-1 9999/tcp # Added by ports/sysutils/bacula > ... > # End of lines added by ports/sysutils/bacula >=20 > That way the user has a fighting chance of making the right mergemaster > decision, and the port has an easy way to delete those lines when its > uninstalled. At the very least it would be good to not add lines for services which already exist so the user doesn't end up with a new copy of the lines every time they do a portupgrade. That way you avoid situations like the way the perl ports spam make.conf with 11 lines of crap every time perl gets upgraded on a 5.x system. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE//IFOXY6L6fI4GtQRAuOUAKC4x1tEQuuRIFp0RKVEZdekZrzvhwCgnwKW CAdlxpgKYUHGRojciPipLMc= =9a5U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --H+4ONPRPur6+Ovig-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 14:12:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FD716A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:12:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from cowbert.2y.net (d46h180.public.uconn.edu [137.99.46.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A22E743D8B for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:12:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sirmoo@cowbert.2y.net) Received: (qmail 68873 invoked by uid 1001); 7 Jan 2004 22:12:33 -0000 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:12:33 -0500 From: "Peter C. Lai" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040107221233.GV218@cowbert.2y.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: gd versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: peter.lai@uconn.edu List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 22:12:36 -0000 I have a stupid question about the gd library. Will gd 2.0.5 coexist with gd 1.8.4 or would you pkg_delete gd 1.8.4 before installing 2.0.5? Thanks -- Peter C. Lai University of Connecticut Dept. of Molecular and Cell Biology Yale University School of Medicine SenseLab | Research Assistant http://cowbert.2y.net/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 14:36:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BF316A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:36:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A4643D3F for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:36:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (9ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.6]) i07Ma5LO040057 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:36:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i07Ma4al074904 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:36:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:36:04 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401072236.i07Ma4al074904@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 22:36:07 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: gcvs-1.0_3,1: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/devel/glade" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete p5-Glade-Perl-0.61: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/devel/glade" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 U MOVED ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? perl.core U Tools/scripts/addport U archivers/hffzip/Makefile U astro/mymoon/Makefile U astro/phoon/Makefile U audio/mpg321/Makefile U audio/mpg321/files/patch-mpg321.c U converters/ktextdecode/Makefile U devel/Makefile ? devel/glade2/make.core ? devel/gnomedebug/make.core U devel/kyra/Makefile U devel/libzt/Makefile U devel/py-clientcookie/Makefile U devel/py-clientcookie/distinfo ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc U editors/conglomerate/Makefile U editors/conglomerate/distinfo U editors/conglomerate/pkg-plist U ftp/ncftp3/Makefile U ftp/ncftp3/distinfo U games/easysok/Makefile U games/kbilliards/Makefile U games/tictactoe3d/Makefile ? graphics/gphoto2/make.core U graphics/kimagemapeditor/Makefile ? graphics/pstoedit/make.core U irc/konversation/Makefile U mail/akpop3d/Makefile U math/fung-calc/Makefile U misc/bookcase/Makefile ? misc/flyway/make.core U misc/katalog/Makefile U misc/telbook/Makefile ? net/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? net/bmon/make.core U net/mldonkey/Makefile U net/mldonkey/files/patch-configure U net/portfwd/Makefile U net/portfwd/distinfo U net/portfwd/pkg-plist ? net/powerdns/Makefile.inc U news/slrnconf/Makefile U print/foomatic-db/Makefile U print/foomatic-db/pkg-plist ? print/p5-Net-Printer/sh.core ? print/pips880/sh.core U security/p5-File-Scan/Makefile U security/p5-File-Scan/distinfo U security/uvscan-dat/Makefile U security/uvscan-dat/distinfo U sysutils/gdesklets-sysinfo/Makefile U sysutils/gdesklets-sysinfo/distinfo U sysutils/gdesklets-sysinfo/pkg-plist U sysutils/gdesklets-sysinfo/files/patch-sysinfo.display U sysutils/gdesklets-sysinfo/files/postbuild-patch-__init__.py U sysutils/krename/Makefile U sysutils/pwg/Makefile ? x11-fm/vide/sh.core U x11-toolkits/Makefile U x11-toolkits/guile-gtk/Makefile U x11-toolkits/libbonoboui/Makefile U x11-toolkits/libbonoboui/distinfo From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 14:38:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA8016A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:38:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D7D43D62 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:38:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.5]) i07McjLO055695 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:38:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i07McjQs031607 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:38:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:38:45 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401072238.i07McjQs031607@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 22:38:46 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: gcvs-1.0_3,1: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/devel/glade" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete p5-Glade-Perl-0.61: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/devel/glade" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 U MOVED ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? x U Tools/scripts/addport U archivers/hffzip/Makefile U astro/mymoon/Makefile U astro/phoon/Makefile U audio/mpg321/Makefile U audio/mpg321/files/patch-mpg321.c U converters/ktextdecode/Makefile U devel/Makefile U devel/kyra/Makefile U devel/libzt/Makefile U devel/py-clientcookie/Makefile U devel/py-clientcookie/distinfo ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc U editors/conglomerate/Makefile U editors/conglomerate/distinfo U editors/conglomerate/pkg-plist U ftp/ncftp3/Makefile U ftp/ncftp3/distinfo U games/easysok/Makefile U games/kbilliards/Makefile U games/tictactoe3d/Makefile U graphics/kimagemapeditor/Makefile U irc/konversation/Makefile ? mail/log U mail/akpop3d/Makefile U math/fung-calc/Makefile U misc/bookcase/Makefile U misc/katalog/Makefile U misc/telbook/Makefile U net/mldonkey/Makefile U net/mldonkey/files/patch-configure U net/portfwd/Makefile U net/portfwd/distinfo U net/portfwd/pkg-plist U news/slrnconf/Makefile U print/foomatic-db/Makefile U print/foomatic-db/pkg-plist U security/p5-File-Scan/Makefile U security/p5-File-Scan/distinfo U security/uvscan-dat/Makefile U security/uvscan-dat/distinfo U sysutils/gdesklets-sysinfo/Makefile U sysutils/gdesklets-sysinfo/distinfo U sysutils/gdesklets-sysinfo/pkg-plist U sysutils/gdesklets-sysinfo/files/patch-sysinfo.display U sysutils/gdesklets-sysinfo/files/postbuild-patch-__init__.py U sysutils/krename/Makefile U sysutils/pwg/Makefile ? x11/gnome2/log U x11-toolkits/Makefile U x11-toolkits/guile-gtk/Makefile U x11-toolkits/libbonoboui/Makefile U x11-toolkits/libbonoboui/distinfo From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 14:42:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9A316A4CE; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:42:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.urchin.com (ns2.quantified.com [63.212.171.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A106F43D54; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:42:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Received: from support.urchin.com (support.urchin.com [63.212.171.7]) by mail.urchin.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i07Mg8EP086131; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:41:46 -0801 (PST) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) Received: from danzig.sd.quantified.net (web.urchin.com [63.212.171.5]) (authenticated bits=0) by support.urchin.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i07MhHrM060843; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:42:58 -0801 (PST) (envelope-from dsilver@urchin.com) From: Doug Silver Organization: Urchin Software Corporation To: Brooks Davis , Doug Barton Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 14:42:10 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> <20040107133553.O59570@qbhto.arg> <20040107215944.GB25920@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <20040107215944.GB25920@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401071442.10995.dsilver@urchin.com> X-Filter-Version: 1.7 (mail.urchin.com) cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 22:42:18 -0000 On Wednesday 07 January 2004 01:59 pm, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:48:42PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Lars K=F6ller wrote: > > > Sorry, but I can't give you a number. But I think there is no > > > "large percentage of our userbase" using it. Even some active FreeBSD > > > user are on the bacula mailing list. > > > > Ok, then I like the idea of the port itself adding some lines to > > /etc/services to accomodate this. As for the argument that they would > > get deleted by (improper decisions made while using) mergemaster, it > > would be up to the port author to make it clear ... something like: > > > > # These three lines are added by ports/sysutils/bacula > > bacula-1 9999/tcp # Added by ports/sysutils/bacula > > ... > > # End of lines added by ports/sysutils/bacula > > > > That way the user has a fighting chance of making the right mergemaster > > decision, and the port has an easy way to delete those lines when its > > uninstalled. > > At the very least it would be good to not add lines for services which > already exist so the user doesn't end up with a new copy of the lines > every time they do a portupgrade. That way you avoid situations like > the way the perl ports spam make.conf with 11 lines of crap every time > perl gets upgraded on a 5.x system. > > -- Brooks =46WIW - The www/urchin5 port by default also uses port 9999. This is not something= =20 that we desire to be reserved solely for our use since this can be changed = at=20 any time. Just thought I should point it out as the port was just recently= =20 added but we certainly don't have any desire to reserve 9999 as specific to= =20 Urchin. =2DDoug Silver From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 15:36:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9983B16A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:36:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6289F43D1F for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:36:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (9ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.6]) i07NatLO095630 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:36:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 9ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i07Nat87055863 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:36:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:36:55 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401072336.i07Nat87055863@9ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 23:36:57 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: gcvs-1.0_3,1: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/devel/glade" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete p5-Glade-Perl-0.61: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/devel/glade" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? perl.core ? devel/glade2/make.core ? devel/gnomedebug/make.core ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? graphics/gphoto2/make.core ? graphics/pstoedit/make.core ? misc/flyway/make.core ? net/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? net/bmon/make.core ? net/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? print/p5-Net-Printer/sh.core ? print/pips880/sh.core ? x11-fm/vide/sh.core From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 15:39:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4715D16A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:39:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org [192.58.184.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404AA43D46 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 15:39:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@rtp.FreeBSD.org) Received: from 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8ball.rtp.FreeBSD.Org [172.21.1.5]) i07NdcLO095633 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:39:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org) Received: (from kris@localhost) by 8ball.rtp.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i07NdcBt012578 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:39:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 18:39:38 -0500 (EST) From: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <200401072339.i07NdcBt012578@8ball.rtp.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 23:39:44 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: gcvs-1.0_3,1: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/devel/glade" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete p5-Glade-Perl-0.61: "/vol/vol0/users/kris/ports.clean/devel/glade" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete Most recent CVS update was: U INDEX U INDEX-5 ? 1 ? cvs.log ? index.errs ? index.out ? log ? x ? dns/bind9-dlz/Makefile.inc ? dns/powerdns/Makefile.inc ? mail/log ? x11/gnome2/log From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 16:19:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC70316A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:19:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8436743D58 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:19:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from dougb.net ([24.130.160.161]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <20040108001920012006hv9te>; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 00:19:20 +0000 Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 16:19:18 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton To: Doug Silver In-Reply-To: <200401071442.10995.dsilver@urchin.com> Message-ID: <20040107161749.F59652@qbhto.arg> References: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> <20040107133553.O59570@qbhto.arg> <20040107215944.GB25920@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <200401071442.10995.dsilver@urchin.com> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Brooks Davis cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 00:19:23 -0000 On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Doug Silver wrote: > The www/urchin5 port by default also uses port 9999. That was just an example of what one entry could look like. Bacula already has its own ports assigned by IANA. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 21:42:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152A316A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 21:42:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from dsl-mail.kamp.net (mail.kamp-dsl.de [195.62.99.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D922843D53 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 21:42:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@pukruppa.de) Received: (qmail 2379 invoked by uid 505); 8 Jan 2004 05:46:07 -0000 Received: from root@pukruppa.de by dsl-mail by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.14 (spamassassin: 2.43. Clear:SA:0(0.0/5.0):. Processed in 0.963703 secs); 08 Jan 2004 05:46:07 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO reverse-213-146-114-24.dialin.kamp-dsl.de) (213.146.114.24) by dsl-mail.kamp.net with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 05:46:06 -0000 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 06:45:52 +0100 (CET) From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa X-X-Sender: root@pukruppa.net To: Ferruccio Vitale In-Reply-To: <20031230172952.GA14624@cruiser.cs.tin.it> Message-ID: <20040108061649.L772@pukruppa.net> References: <20031230044140.P62462@pukruppa.net> <20031230172952.GA14624@cruiser.cs.tin.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysqlcc configure fails on -CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 05:42:08 -0000 On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Ferruccio Vitale wrote: > Location of the qmake binary depends on QTDIR variable, by default equals > to /usr/X11R6 (see /usr/ports/Mk/*.mk files); I currently use qmake but its > location is /usr/X11R6 (qt version is 3.1.1_4)!! > Are you sure you didn't change any other settings? Hmm..., not that I know about. I think everything was installed by ports. I went into /usr/ports/Mk/ and did a # grep QTDIR * bsd.kde.mk:QTDIR= ${PREFIX} bsd.kde.mk:QTDIR= ${X11BASE} bsd.kde.mk:CONFIGURE_ENV+= MOC="${MOC}" QTDIR="${QTDIR}" bsd.kde.mk: QTDIR="${QT_CVS_PREFIX}" KDEDIR="${KDE_CVS_PREFIX}" Do you have any idea how I could get qmake back where it belongs to? Just rebuilding and reinstalling won't change anything. Anyway: You shouldn't invest too much time into this, if I messed up something on my private machine. I mailed you in case this was a common problem. In the meantime I found phpmyadmin which does pretty well the things I need. Regards, Uli. > > Ferruccio > > * Peter Ulrich Kruppa [30/12/03 04:53]: > > Hi! > > > > I am trying to build mysqlcc-0.9.3 on my > > > > FreeBSD pukruppa.net 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Sun Dec > > 28 10:2003 root@pukruppa.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMALL i386 > > > > and end up with this error message: > > > > ----------------------------------------------------- > > checking "if Qt Version in /usr/X11R6 is >= 3.0.5"... yes > > configure: creating ./config.status > > config.status: creating mysqlcc.pro > > Creating Makefile with qmake > > ./configure.lineno: /usr/X11R6/bin/qmake: not found > > qmake failed, aborting > > ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. > > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > > Indeed qmake is located in /usr/local/bin . > > I tried to set a link to /usr/X11R6/bin/qmake but there will be > > another configure error a minute later. > > > > In the attachment you will find my ls /var/db/pkg . > > > > Regards, > > > > Uli. > > +---------------------------+ > > | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | > > | Wuppertal | > > | Germany | > > +---------------------------+ > > AbiWord2-gnome-2.0.2 > > Hermes-1.3.3 > > ORBit-0.5.17_1 > > ORBit2-2.8.3 > > XFree86-4.3.0,1 > > XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0_3 > > XFree86-Server-4.3.0_12 > > XFree86-clients-4.3.0_6 > > XFree86-documents-4.3.0 > > XFree86-font100dpi-4.3.0 > > XFree86-font75dpi-4.3.0 > > XFree86-fontCyrillic-4.3.0 > > XFree86-fontDefaultBitmaps-4.3.0 > > XFree86-fontEncodings-4.3.0 > > XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0 > > XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6 > > Xft-2.1.2 > > aalib-1.4.r5_1 > > acme-2.4.2 > > acroread-5.08 > > apache-2.0.48 > > apache-ant-1.6.0 > > aspell-0.50.4.1 > > at-spi-1.3.9 > > atk-1.4.1_1 > > autoconf-2.13.000227_5 > > autoconf-2.53_1 > > automake-1.4.5_9 > > automake-1.5,1 > > balsa2-2.0.15 > > bash-2.05b.007 > > bison-1.75_1 > > bitstream-vera-1.10 > > bluefish-0.12 > > bugbuddy2-2.4.1.1 > > cdrtools-2.0.3 > > chkrootkit-0.42b > > cmucl-18e > > compat4x-i386-5.0.20030328 > > cups-base-1.1.20.0 > > cups-lpr-1.1.20.0 > > cups-pstoraster-7.07 > > cvsup-without-gui-16.1h > > dia-gnome-0.92.2_1,1 > > diablo-jdk-1.3.1.0 > > djbfft-0.76 > > docbook-sk-4.1.2_1 > > docbook-xml-4.2_1 > > docbook-xsl-1.62.4 > > dri-4.3.0,1 > > eel2-2.4.1 > > eog2-2.4.1 > > epiphany-1.0.6 > > esound-0.2.32_1 > > expat-1.95.6_1 > > ezm3-1.1 > > fam-2.6.9_3 > > fetchmail-6.2.5 > > fileroller-2.4.2_1,1 > > flac-1.1.0_2 > > flashplugin-mozilla-0.4.10_4 > > flashpluginwrapper-0.20021113 > > fontconfig-2.2.90_3 > > freetype2-2.1.5_1 > > fribidi-0.10.4_1 > > gail-1.4.1 > > gaim-0.74_3 > > galeon2-1.3.11a > > gcalctool-4.3.31_1 > > gcl-2.5.3 > > gcompris2-2.1_3 > > gconf-editor-2.4.0,1 > > gconf2-2.4.0.1 > > gconfmm-2.0.1 > > gd-2.0.15_1,1 > > gdbm-1.8.3 > > gdm2-2.4.4.5 > > gedit2-2.4.1 > > gettext-0.12.1 > > ggv2-2.4.0.2 > > ghex2-2.4.0.1 > > ghostscript-gnu-7.07_4 > > gimp-gnome-1.3.23_1,1 > > gimp-print-4.2.5_1 > > glade2-2.0.1 > > gle-3.0.3 > > glib-1.2.10_10 > > glib-2.2.3 > > gmake-3.80_1 > > gnet-glib2-1.1.9_1 > > gnet2-2.0.4 > > gnome-icon-theme-1.0.9 > > gnome-themes-2.4.1_1 > > gnome-vfsmm-1.3.5_1 > > gnome2-2.4.1 > > gnome2-fifth-toe-2.4.1 > > gnomeapplets2-2.4.1_2 > > gnomeaudio2-2.0.0 > > gnomecontrolcenter2-2.4.0 > > gnomedesktop-2.4.1.1_1 > > gnomegames2-2.4.1.1_1 > > gnomehier-1.0_10 > > gnomeicu2-0.99 > > gnomemag-0.10.4 > > gnomemedia2-2.4.1.1 > > gnomemimedata-2.4.1 > > gnomepanel-2.4.1 > > gnomesession-2.4.1 > > gnomespeech-0.2.8 > > gnomesystemmonitor-2.4.0 > > gnometerminal-2.4.2 > > gnomeuserdocs2-2.4.1 > > gnomeutils2-2.4.1,1 > > gnomevfs2-2.4.1_1 > > gnopernicus-0.7.1 > > gnotime-2.1.7 > > gnumeric2-1.2.3 > > gnupg-1.2.3_4 > > gnuplot-3.7.3_2 > > gob2-2.0.6 > > gok-0.8.4 > > gpdf-0.111 > > gpgme-0.3.15_1 > > gstreamer-0.6.4 > > gstreamer-plugins-0.6.4_2 > > gswitchit-2.5.0_2 > > gtetrinet-0.7.5 > > gthumb2-2.2.0 > > gtk-1.2.10_10 > > gtk-2.2.4_1 > > gtk-engines2-2.2.0 > > gtkglarea-1.99.0_2 > > gtkmm-2.2.8_1 > > gtksourceview-0.7.0 > > gtkspell2-2.0.4 > > gucharmap-gnome-1.2.0 > > guile-1.6.4_3 > > help2man-1.29 > > imake-4.3.0_2 > > intltool-0.28 > > ispell-3.2.06_4 > > javavmwrapper-1.4 > > jdk-1.3.1p8_2 > > jdk-1.4.2p5 > > jpeg-6b_1 > > lame-3.93.1 > > lcms-1.09,1 > > libIDL-0.8.2 > > liba52-0.7.4 > > libao-esound-0.8.4_1 > > libart_lgpl2-2.3.16 > > libaudiofile-0.2.5 > > libbonobo-2.4.2 > > libbonoboui-2.4.2 > > libdvdcss-1.2.8 > > libdvdread-0.9.4 > > libesmtp-1.0.1,1 > > libexif-0.5.12_1 > > libflash-0.4.10 > > libgail-gnome-1.0.2_2 > > libgda2-1.0.1_2 > > libglade2-2.0.1_1 > > libglademm-2.1.2 > > libglut-5.0.2 > > libgmp-4.1.2_2 > > libgnome-2.4.0_3 > > libgnomecanvas-2.4.0 > > libgnomecanvasmm-2.0.1 > > libgnomedb-1.0.1 > > libgnomemm-2.0.1 > > libgnomeprint-2.4.2 > > libgnomeprintui-2.4.2 > > libgnomeui-2.4.0.1_1 > > libgnomeuimm-2.0.0_1 > > libgsf-1.8.2 > > libgtkhtml-2.4.1_1 > > libgtop2-2.0.8 > > libiconv-1.9.1_3 > > libid3tag-0.15.0b > > libijs-0.34 > > libltdl-1.5 > > libmad-0.15.0b > > libmng-1.0.5_1 > > libmrproject-0.10_6 > > libogg-1.0_1,3 > > librep-0.16.2_3 > > librsvg2-2.4.0_1 > > libsigc++-1.2.5 > > libslang-1.4.9 > > libtool-1.3.5_1 > > libtool-1.4.3_2 > > libvorbis-1.0_1,3 > > libwmf-0.2.8.2 > > libwnck-2.4.0.1 > > libxine-1.0.r2_4 > > libxklavier-0.96 > > libxml2-2.6.4 > > libxslt-1.1.2 > > libzvt-2.0.1_6 > > linc-1.0.3 > > links-2.1.p11,1 > > linux-blackdown-jdk-1.3.1_2 > > linux-esound-0.2.22_1 > > linux-flashplugin-5.0r51 > > linux-libaudiofile-0.1.11_2 > > linux-realplayer-8.cs2_4 > > linux-sun-jdk-1.3.1.09 > > linux-sun-jdk-1.4.2.02 > > linux_base-7.1_5 > > lynx-2.8.4.1d > > m4-1.4_1 > > mad-0.15.0b > > madplay-esound-0.15.0b_1 > > maxima-5.9.0 > > mc-4.6.0_6 > > meld-0.9.1 > > mergeant-0.12.1 > > metacity-2.6.3 > > mkisofs-2.0.3 > > mod_php5-5.0.0.a3_2,1 > > mozilla-firebird-0.7_1 > > mozilla-gtk2-1.5_1 > > mozilla-headers-1.5_1,2 > > mrproject-0.10 > > mysql-client-4.1.1 > > mysql-server-4.1.1 > > nasm-0.98.38,1 > > nautilus-cd-burner-0.5.3_4 > > nautilus-media-0.3.3.1 > > nautilus2-2.4.1 > > nspr-4.3_2 > > nss-3.8 > > open-motif-2.2.2_1 > > openldap-client-2.1.23 > > openoffice-1.1.0_1 > > p5-Authen-PAM-0.14 > > p5-DBD-mysql-2.9003 > > p5-DBI-1.38 > > p5-Net-SSLeay-1.23 > > p5-XML-Parser-2.34 > > pan2-0.14.2 > > pango-1.2.5 > > pcre-4.4 > > pdflib-5.0.2 > > perl-5.6.1_15 > > pine-4.58 > > pkgconfig-0.15.0 > > pkgdb.db > > png-1.2.5_3 > > popt-1.6.4_1 > > portupgrade-20030723 > > pth-2.0.0 > > py-gnome-2.0.0 > > py23-gtk-2.0.0 > > py23-numeric-23.0 > > py23-orbit-2.0.0 > > python-2.1.3_5 > > python-2.3.2_3 > > qmake-3.2.3_1 > > qt-3.2.3 > > rdesktop-1.3.0 > > regexxer-0.6 > > rep-gtk2-gnome-0.17_2,1 > > rpm-3.0.6_8 > > rpm2cpio-1.2_1 > > ruby-1.6.8.2003.10.15 > > ruby-bdb1-0.2.1 > > ruby-shim-ruby18-1.8.1.p3 > > samba-3.0.0,1 > > sawfish2-1.3_4,2 > > scrollkeeper-0.3.14,1 > > sdl-1.2.5_3,1 > > sdocbook-xml-4.1.2.5_1 > > seahorse-0.7.3 > > sodipodi-0.33 > > sox-12.17.4_1 > > speex-1.0.3,1 > > startup-notification-0.5_1 > > svgalib-1.4.3_1 > > tcl-8.4.4_1,1 > > tiff-3.6.0_1 > > tk-8.4.4,1 > > totem-0.99.8_1 > > tsclient-0.132 > > unzip-5.50_2 > > urwfonts-1.0 > > vte-0.11.10_2 > > webalizer-2.1.10_4 > > weblint-1.020 > > webmin-1.121_1 > > workrave-1.4.0_1 > > wrapper-1.0_3 > > xchat2-2.0.6_1 > > xmlcatmgr-1.1 > > xscreensaver-gnome-4.14 > > yelp-2.4.2 > > zenity-1.6 > > zip-2.3_1 > > zope-2.6.2_1 > > zope-cmf-1.4 > > zope-cmfforum-1.0 > > zope-zwiki-0.9.8 > > zzz > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > +---------------------------+ | Peter Ulrich Kruppa | | Wuppertal | | Germany | +---------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 22:18:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A930416A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 22:18:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from pony-express.cs.rit.edu (pony-express.cs.rit.edu [129.21.30.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BC8743D45 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 22:18:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dis5149@cs.rit.edu) Received: (qmail 28688 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 06:18:11 -0000 Received: from ai.rh.rit.edu (HELO cs.rit.edu) (129.21.145.142) by pony-express.cs.rit.edu with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 06:18:11 -0000 Message-ID: <3FFCF5D5.7080406@cs.rit.edu> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 01:16:53 -0500 From: Dmitriy Shnayder User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, ru, es-es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.7.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: gimp-1.2.5,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 06:18:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am unable to start version 1.2.5,1 of GIMP. When I run GIMP for the first time, it prompts me for the installation directory. The installation succeeds, but when I press "Continue" to start the program, it hangs after loading all the plugins. The window shows the message "Extensions" and on the next line "extensions_script_fu", with a progress bar that is empty. On the console, I see the following, after which I terminate the program. I tried reinstalling the program, and it did not help. dmitriy@ai[219]$ gimp LibGimp-ERROR **: could not attach to gimp shared memory segment aborting... LibGimp-WARNING **: gimp: wire_read: unexpected EOF gimp: Plug-In crashed: "script-fu" (/usr/X11R6/libexec/gimp/1.2/plug-ins/script-fu) The dying Plug-In may have messed up GIMP's internal state. You may want to save your images and restart GIMP to be on the safe side. ^Cgimp terminated: Interrupt - -- Dmitriy Shnayder Telephone: 585-292-8981 Resume: http://www.cs.rit.edu/~dis5149/resume.doc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE//PXUvepOHXmSZpsRAk+FAJ46aLhHcn7LIe58qokTVk6sZFWi/QCeMIFX oSlpgMJUIsV/4eg1YHqY55c= =rBIz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 23:32:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5B016A4CE; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:32:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB8B43D54; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:32:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DDD0D66E61; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:32:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:32:03 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dmitriy Shnayder Message-ID: <20040108073203.GA53635@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3FFCF5D5.7080406@cs.rit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FFCF5D5.7080406@cs.rit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: gimp-1.2.5,1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 07:32:05 -0000 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 01:16:53AM -0500, Dmitriy Shnayder wrote: > I am unable to start version 1.2.5,1 of GIMP. When I run GIMP for the fir= st > time, it prompts me for the installation directory. The installation succ= eeds, > but when I press "Continue" to start the program, it hangs after loading = all the > plugins. The window shows the message "Extensions" and on the next line > "extensions_script_fu", with a progress bar that is empty. On the console= , I see > the following, after which I terminate the program. I tried reinstalling = the > program, and it did not help. >=20 > dmitriy@ai[219]$ gimp >=20 > LibGimp-ERROR **: could not attach to gimp shared memory segment >=20 > aborting... You need to have SYSV shared memory enabled in your kernel. This is enabled by default in the GENERIC kernel, but you might have removed it in your kernel config. Kris --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//QdzWry0BWjoQKURAnC0AKCaKB6QVTti9q/PzE8XkxAl/FAh7QCgifN7 wSOaJBTyJm0A0xr0gZwhCxs= =7fUR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 23:34:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D4A16A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:34:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E1E43D1F for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:34:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E59A466E69; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:34:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:34:16 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: peter.lai@uconn.edu Message-ID: <20040108073416.GB53635@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040107221233.GV218@cowbert.2y.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040107221233.GV218@cowbert.2y.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gd versions X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 07:34:25 -0000 --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:12:33PM -0500, Peter C. Lai wrote: > I have a stupid question about the gd library. Will gd 2.0.5 coexist with > gd 1.8.4 or would you pkg_delete gd 1.8.4 before installing 2.0.5? They will coexist peacefully. FYI, conflicting ports (that stomp on files installed by another port) are being marked as such and will refuse to install, so you don't have to worry about this possibility as much any more (there may still be some that have not been marked). Kris --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//Qf4Wry0BWjoQKURAutFAKDVQ6K+3NOnoB3GY9DaA7xr7g2nMACdHzjy fwe79pqEhYd90kkfXk2OCpg= =MRQq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LyciRD1jyfeSSjG0-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 23:36:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5656816A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:36:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517F943D66 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:35:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF71A66E61; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:35:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:35:28 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Gary Bajaj Message-ID: <20040108073528.GC53635@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <3FFB05EB.5020909@interbaun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jy6Sn24JjFx/iggw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FFB05EB.5020909@interbaun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.de Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: apcupsd-3.10.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 07:36:02 -0000 --jy6Sn24JjFx/iggw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:00:59PM -0700, Gary Bajaj wrote: > In the event of a power failure, the following processes are started and= =20 > remain hung. The CGI does not respond (also hung below). This has been= =20 > an issue since 3.10.6. FreeBSD 4.9. I have recompiled all ports=20 > affected by the gettext upgrade before installing the current apcupsd=20 > port. Thanks. You should raise this bug report with the software authors (FreeBSD does not usually provide support for third party software) Kris --jy6Sn24JjFx/iggw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//Qg/Wry0BWjoQKURAtLgAJ0fyB1SZrpIwGtOa5D8Wyi2V5DVLwCeOBKF 5qEm47Nvrv8pOEbm38or3qw= =ypSn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jy6Sn24JjFx/iggw-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 7 23:37:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4071916A4CE for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:37:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEB743D67 for ; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:37:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 675A266E61; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:37:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:37:08 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20040108073708.GA53777@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040105145202.Q28998@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040105145202.Q28998@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mozilla libjs under FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 07:37:14 -0000 --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 02:55:55PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >=20 > Anyone working on this? Taking a look at their current 'ported to > platforms', the BSDs seems sorely lacking :( Try asking on freebsd-mozilla, as that list seems to have more interested mozilla developers than this one. Kris --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//QikWry0BWjoQKURAlWIAJ4yAGyW0hNM20TmEaOSc5rUhZEVTwCgzq34 JOgGAAJPVy0dF0FIa3l4TMo= =YpPB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 01:10:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7716D16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:10:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-relay02.x-mailer.co.uk (smtp-relay02.x-mailer.co.uk [212.69.217.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D280443D1D for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:10:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from djg39@cam.ac.uk) Received: from [212.69.196.156] (helo=davegoode.dsvr.co.uk) by smtp-relay02.x-mailer.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AeWBS-0005zN-C2 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 09:10:30 +0000 Received: from cpc3-cmbg5-4-0-cust183.cmbg.cable.ntl.com (cpc3-cmbg5-4-0-cust183.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [81.104.197.183]) by davegoode.dsvr.co.uk (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i089AT217562 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:10:30 GMT From: Dave Goode Organization: Faculty of Divinity, University of Cambridge To: ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:10:29 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401080910.29161.djg39@cam.ac.uk> Subject: FreeBSD Port: tuxcards-1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: djg39@cam.ac.uk List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 09:10:33 -0000 I've got an unusual error I've not seen before. I'm stumped by this and would be very grateful for any help. The same happens if I compile from the ports directory: dave# portupgrade -N tuxcards [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 432 packages found (-0 +1) . done] ---> Installing 'tuxcards-1.1' from a port (deskutils/tuxcards) ---> Building '/usr/ports/deskutils/tuxcards' ===> Cleaning for libiconv-1.9.1_3 ===> Cleaning for autoconf-2.53_1 ===> Cleaning for gettext-0.12.1 ===> Cleaning for gmake-3.80_1 ===> Cleaning for imake-4.3.0_2 ===> Cleaning for libtool-1.3.5_1 ===> Cleaning for m4-1.4_1 ===> Cleaning for pkgconfig-0.15.0 ===> Cleaning for qmake-3.2.3_1 ===> Cleaning for jpeg-6b_1 ===> Cleaning for lcms-1.09,1 ===> Cleaning for libmng-1.0.5_1 ===> Cleaning for png-1.2.5_3 ===> Cleaning for tiff-3.6.1 ===> Cleaning for help2man-1.29 ===> Cleaning for cups-base-1.1.20.0 ===> Cleaning for freetype2-2.1.5_1 ===> Cleaning for expat-1.95.6_1 ===> Cleaning for Xft-2.1.2 ===> Cleaning for fontconfig-2.2.90_3 ===> Cleaning for qt-3.2.3 ===> Cleaning for XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_6 ===> Cleaning for tuxcards-1.1 ===> Extracting for tuxcards-1.1 >> Checksum OK for tuxcards-1.1.tar.gz. ===> Patching for tuxcards-1.1 ===> tuxcards-1.1 depends on file: /usr/X11R6/bin/moc - found ===> Configuring for tuxcards-1.1 env: qmake: No such file or directory *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/ports/deskutils/tuxcards. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade15124.0 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** The following packages were not installed or upgraded (*:skipped / !:failed) ! deskutils/tuxcards (unknown build error) dave# -- Faculty of Divinity, University of Cambridge West Road, Cambridge, CB3 9BS http://www.breviary.info/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 01:13:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D10C16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:13:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-relay02.x-mailer.co.uk (smtp-relay02.x-mailer.co.uk [212.69.217.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7F043D1F for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:13:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from djg39@cam.ac.uk) Received: from [212.69.196.156] (helo=davegoode.dsvr.co.uk) by smtp-relay02.x-mailer.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AeWEM-0006Sw-OA for ports@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 09:13:30 +0000 Received: from cpc3-cmbg5-4-0-cust183.cmbg.cable.ntl.com (cpc3-cmbg5-4-0-cust183.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [81.104.197.183]) by davegoode.dsvr.co.uk (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i089DUx17911 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:13:30 GMT From: Dave Goode Organization: Faculty of Divinity, University of Cambridge To: ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:13:30 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401080913.30232.djg39@cam.ac.uk> Subject: FreeBSD Port: tuxcards-1.1 (further) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: djg39@cam.ac.uk List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 09:13:37 -0000 Further to my last email, I see the following when using a package. Is the qt error the real cause of my problem with the port? dave# pkg_add ftp://ftp.uk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages/deskutils/tuxcards-1.1.tgz Fetching ftp://ftp.uk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages/deskutils/tuxcards-1.1.tgz... Done. pkg_add: warning: package 'tuxcards-1.1' requires 'libglut-5.0.2', but 'Mesa-3.4.2_2' is installed pkg_add: warning: package 'tuxcards-1.1' requires 'qt-3.2.1', but 'qt-3.2.3' is installed dave# -- Faculty of Divinity, University of Cambridge West Road, Cambridge, CB3 9BS http://www.breviary.info/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 01:20:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863D716A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:20:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from hex.athame.co.uk (guru164.netsonic.fi [194.29.193.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7216043D31 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:20:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andy@athame.co.uk) Received: from hex.int.athame.co.uk ([192.168.1.1] helo=localhost.localdomain) by hex.athame.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 5.1) id 1AeWLK-0008of-Pa; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:20:43 +0200 From: Andy Fawcett To: djg39@cam.ac.uk, ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:19:28 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.94 References: <200401080913.30232.djg39@cam.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <200401080913.30232.djg39@cam.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200401081119.28044.andy@athame.co.uk> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: tuxcards-1.1 (further) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 09:20:50 -0000 On Thursday 08 January 2004 11:13, Dave Goode wrote: > Further to my last email, I see the following when using a package. > Is the qt error the real cause of my problem with the port? > > dave# pkg_add > ftp://ftp.uk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages/deskutils/tu >xcards-1.1.tgz Fetching > ftp://ftp.uk.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages/deskutils/tu >xcards-1.1.tgz... Done. > pkg_add: warning: package 'tuxcards-1.1' requires 'libglut-5.0.2', > but 'Mesa-3.4.2_2' is installed > pkg_add: warning: package 'tuxcards-1.1' requires 'qt-3.2.1', but > 'qt-3.2.3' is installed > dave# tuxcards will need devel/qmake adding as a BUILD dep. qmake was split off from the main qt port at the last upgrade of Qt. if you install devel/qmake, you should find that tuxcards should build ok. A. -- Andy Fawcett | andy@athame.co.uk | tap@kde.org "In an open world without walls and fences, | tap@lspace.org we wouldn't need Windows and Gates." -- anon | tap@fruitsalad.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 01:26:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DCC16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:26:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp-relay03.x-mailer.co.uk (smtp-relay03.x-mailer.co.uk [212.69.217.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8BF43D39 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 01:26:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from djg39@cam.ac.uk) Received: from [212.69.196.156] (helo=davegoode.dsvr.co.uk) by smtp-relay03.x-mailer.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AeWQu-0004ny-6y; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 09:26:28 +0000 Received: from cpc3-cmbg5-4-0-cust183.cmbg.cable.ntl.com (cpc3-cmbg5-4-0-cust183.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [81.104.197.183]) by davegoode.dsvr.co.uk (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i089QR519383; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:26:28 GMT From: Dave Goode Organization: Faculty of Divinity, University of Cambridge To: Andy Fawcett Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 09:26:27 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200401080913.30232.djg39@cam.ac.uk> <200401081119.28044.andy@athame.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200401081119.28044.andy@athame.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401080926.27252.djg39@cam.ac.uk> cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: tuxcards-1.1 (further) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: djg39@cam.ac.uk List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 09:26:31 -0000 On Thursday 08 Jan 2004 09:19, Andy Fawcett wrote: > tuxcards will need devel/qmake adding as a BUILD dep. > qmake was split off from the main qt port at the last upgrade of Qt. Ah, I didn't know that. > if you install devel/qmake, you should find that tuxcards should build > ok. Thanks, Andy. I'll give it a try now and let the list know how I get on. Dave -- Faculty of Divinity, University of Cambridge West Road, Cambridge, CB3 9BS http://www.breviary.info/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 02:23:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1184416A4CE; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 02:23:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [212.43.217.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87DC43D49; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 02:23:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D06C4AA3B7; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:23:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from pouet.in.mat.cc (pouet.in.mat.cc [212.43.217.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E33954AA3B5; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:23:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 11:23:27 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Brooks Davis , Doug Barton Message-ID: <92160468.1073561007@pouet.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <20040107215944.GB25920@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> <20040107215944.GB25920@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========76544924BEDF25D00515==========" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd 0.1 cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" cc: lkoeller@freebsd.org cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_K=F6ller?= Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 10:23:36 -0000 --==========76544924BEDF25D00515========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline +-Le 07/01/2004 13:59 -0800, Brooks Davis =E9crivait : | On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:48:42PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: |> On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Lars K=F6ller wrote: |>=20 |> > Sorry, but I can't give you a number. But I think there is no |> > "large percentage of our userbase" using it. Even some active FreeBSD |> > user are on the bacula mailing list. |>=20 |> Ok, then I like the idea of the port itself adding some lines to |> /etc/services to accomodate this. As for the argument that they would |> get deleted by (improper decisions made while using) mergemaster, it |> would be up to the port author to make it clear ... something like: |>=20 |> # These three lines are added by ports/sysutils/bacula |> bacula-1 9999/tcp # Added by ports/sysutils/bacula |> ... |> # End of lines added by ports/sysutils/bacula |>=20 |> That way the user has a fighting chance of making the right mergemaster |> decision, and the port has an easy way to delete those lines when its |> uninstalled. |=20 | At the very least it would be good to not add lines for services which | already exist so the user doesn't end up with a new copy of the lines | every time they do a portupgrade. That way you avoid situations like | the way the perl ports spam make.conf with 11 lines of crap every time | perl gets upgraded on a 5.x system. Well, what I proposed contained an echo to add the lines at post-install, and a sed to remove the lines at deinstall, which would work well for portupgrade or any other way of updating ports which make use of deinstallation and not FORCE_PKG_REGISTER. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --==========76544924BEDF25D00515========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (MingW32) iD8DBQE//S+hqYYpzGz/vmcRAnZuAJ45eEB7pTJsY8hd2lle3GJy9ets+wCdEIsj aIMvWcIn+kBq17rStbuDcas= =cs8K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========76544924BEDF25D00515==========-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 04:18:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B99816A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 04:18:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (bay8-f50.bay8.hotmail.com [64.4.27.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEAD43D2F for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 04:18:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lee_ver_mx@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 04:18:37 -0800 Received: from 200.78.46.167 by by8fd.bay8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 12:18:36 GMT X-Originating-IP: [200.78.46.167] X-Originating-Email: [lee_ver_mx@hotmail.com] X-Sender: lee_ver_mx@hotmail.com From: "Lee Mx" To: ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 04:18:36 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2004 12:18:37.0239 (UTC) FILETIME=[8AF84470:01C3D5E1] cc: yds@CoolRat.org Subject: mail/courier doesn't seem to want to compile authdaemond.ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 12:18:39 -0000 I have been trying for some time to upgrade, through ports, mail/courier but can't get it to compile authdaemond.ldap nor install authldaprc using the port script. Any suggestions or help would be appreciated. I'm running current and openldap21. I get no errors and only authdaemon authdaemond.plain authdaemond changepwd are installed in /usr/local/libexec/authlib Thanks, P.S. I've copied Yarema, but I'm not sure that he is still the maintainer. I seem to remember that someone else updated the port. _________________________________________________________________ Enjoy a special introductory offer for dial-up Internet access — limited time only! http://join.msn.com/?page=dept/dialup From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 07:35:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3E616A4CE; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 07:35:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com (mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72C243D5A; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 07:35:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd00.aul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1AecBl-0000I0-01; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 16:35:13 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (VahXWBZfweiiuwzLjHNBvl-es-UqcIsZ3Yv309MXyXqwDh-dii0Zsa@[217.83.29.13]) by fmrl00.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1AecA7-0fpuLI0; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:33:31 +0100 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i08FXSJb046964; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:33:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i08FXf9f032762; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:33:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:33:41 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Doug Barton Message-Id: <20040108163341.44a97df4@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20040107133553.O59570@qbhto.arg> References: <200401070846.i078kppZ001556@odie.koellers.net> <20040107133553.O59570@qbhto.arg> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: VahXWBZfweiiuwzLjHNBvl-es-UqcIsZ3Yv309MXyXqwDh-dii0Zsa@t-dialin.net cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" cc: Lars =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?= Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 15:35:16 -0000 On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:48:42 -0800 (PST) Doug Barton wrote: > > Sorry, but I can't give you a number. But I think there is no > > "large percentage of our userbase" using it. Even some active FreeBSD > > user are on the bacula mailing list. > > Ok, then I like the idea of the port itself adding some lines to > /etc/services to accomodate this. As for the argument that they would > get deleted by (improper decisions made while using) mergemaster, it > would be up to the port author to make it clear ... something like: [example] > That way the user has a fighting chance of making the right mergemaster > decision, and the port has an easy way to delete those lines when its > uninstalled. What about unattended installs, or what if bacula is a dependency of another port. Typically I don't sit in front of the build and wait for it to finish. I do something else instead. So the chance of missing such lines is high. > There is precedent for ports writing stuff in /etc (/etc/shells for > one),, and since this is a case that's worth pursuing (as is saned), I > think it's definitely worth the "cost" of "polluting" the base with > ports stuff. /etc/shells is a different beast. People which use mergemaster and have another shell installed know about it. I'm not against changing files in /etc, but the user should know about it (POLA). What about a wrapper script which greps for bacula in /etc/services and starts the original bacula executable if it finds an entry and moans if not? It could tell the use to add the lines. And perhaps add a "addservice" target to the port makefile, which does it for the user if he want it (like those MTA makefiles which modify /etc/mail/mailer.conf upon request) and let the wrapper script explain how to use it ("make addservice"). Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 14:31:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E3416A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:31:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1000.radiant.net (smtp1000.radiant.net [216.21.149.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B789143D8C for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:30:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from moose@mmoose.net) Received: (qmail 21835 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 22:15:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mmoose.net) (207.232.126.240) by smtp1000.radiant.net with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 22:15:16 -0000 Message-ID: <3FFDD99E.3080700@mmoose.net> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:28:46 -0800 From: Matty Moose User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031201 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lars.Koeller@Uni-Bielefeld.DE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: bacula-1.32f X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:31:25 -0000 Hi there! I was just trying out the latest version of bacula (1.32f), installing from ports, freshly cvsup'd, and I encountered the error pasted below. Trivial, I know. I just mkdir /var/db/bacula , and everything worked fine. I've included the make options and some output from the make for you to look at, in case you really need to look at it. :) ===> Installing for bacula-1.32f Added group "bacula". Added user "bacula". chown: /var/db/bacula: No such file or directory *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/bacula. This is the make options I used: # make install WITH_MYSQL=yes Output from Make: Host: i386-portbld-freebsd4.9 -- freebsd 4.9-RELEASE Bacula version: 1.32f (31 Dec 2003) Source code location: . Install binaries: /usr/local/sbin Install config files: /usr/local/etc Scripts directory: /usr/local/etc Working directory: /var/db/bacula PID directory: /var/run Subsys directory: /var/run/subsys C Compiler: cc 2.95.4 C++ Compiler: c++ 2.95.4 Compiler flags: -O2 -pipe -funroll-loops -march=pentiumpro -D_THREAD_SAFE Linker flags: -L/usr/local/lib -pthread Libraries: -D_THREAD_SAFE -lwrap -lxpg4 Statically Linked Tools: no Statically Linked FD: no Statically Linked SD: no Statically Linked DIR: no Statically Linked CONS: no Database type: MySQL Database lib: -L/usr/local/lib/mysql -lmysqlclient -lz Job Output Email: root@localhost Traceback Email: root@localhost SMTP Host Address: localhost Director Port: 9101 File daemon Port: 9102 Storage daemon Port: 9103 Director User: bacula Director Group: bacula Storage Daemon User: bacula Storage DaemonGroup: operator File Daemon User: root File Daemon Group: wheel SQL binaries Directory /usr/local/bin Large file support: yes readline support: yes TCP Wrappers support: yes ZLIB support: yes enable-smartalloc: yes enable-gnome: no client-only: no From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 14:43:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB7916A4CE; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:43:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from shellma.zin.lublin.pl (shellma.zin.lublin.pl [212.182.126.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30B143D2F; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:43:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl) Received: by shellma.zin.lublin.pl (Postfix, from userid 1018) id B7CF15F103; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 23:53:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 23:53:59 +0100 From: Pawel Malachowski To: nbm@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040108225359.GA66385@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: PR ports/59968 (update databases/phppgadmin from 3.0.1 to 3.2.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:43:13 -0000 Hello, Are there any plans for commiting this? PR for v3.2.1 was opened and assigned to maintainer one month ago. -- Pawe³ Ma³achowski From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 14:47:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071EC16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:47:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from web21502.mail.yahoo.com (web21502.mail.yahoo.com [66.163.169.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80A8E43D49 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:47:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from william_devries2000@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040108224756.43304.qmail@web21502.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.229.101.2] by web21502.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 14:47:56 PST Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:47:56 -0800 (PST) From: William DeVries To: Doug Barton In-Reply-To: <20040108163341.44a97df4@Magellan.Leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" cc: Lars Köller Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: william_devries@wsu.edu List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:47:59 -0000 If bacula needs an entry in /etc/services, then its binary should check for it and complain if its absent anyway shouldn't it? Maybe the program should be changed instead of wraping it with a script. Just a thought. --Will --- Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 13:48:42 -0800 (PST) > Doug Barton wrote: > > > > Sorry, but I can't give you a number. But I > think there is no > > > "large percentage of our userbase" using it. > Even some active FreeBSD > > > user are on the bacula mailing list. > > > > Ok, then I like the idea of the port itself adding > some lines to > > /etc/services to accomodate this. As for the > argument that they would > > get deleted by (improper decisions made while > using) mergemaster, it > > would be up to the port author to make it clear > ... something like: > [example] > > That way the user has a fighting chance of making > the right mergemaster > > decision, and the port has an easy way to delete > those lines when its > > uninstalled. > > What about unattended installs, or what if bacula is > a dependency of > another port. Typically I don't sit in front of the > build and wait for > it to finish. I do something else instead. So the > chance of missing such > lines is high. > > > There is precedent for ports writing stuff in /etc > (/etc/shells for > > one),, and since this is a case that's worth > pursuing (as is saned), I > > think it's definitely worth the "cost" of > "polluting" the base with > > ports stuff. > > /etc/shells is a different beast. People which use > mergemaster and have > another shell installed know about it. I'm not > against changing files in > /etc, but the user should know about it (POLA). > > What about a wrapper script which greps for bacula > in /etc/services and > starts the original bacula executable if it finds an > entry and moans if > not? It could tell the use to add the lines. And > perhaps add a > "addservice" target to the port makefile, which does > it for the user if > he want it (like those MTA makefiles which modify > /etc/mail/mailer.conf > upon request) and let the wrapper script explain how > to use it ("make > addservice"). > > Bye, > Alexander. > > -- > I will be available to get hired in April > 2004. > > http://www.Leidinger.net > Alexander @ Leidinger.net > GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 > 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 16:04:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 949) id 7194016A4DA; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:04:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:04:05 +0000 From: Hye-Shik Chang To: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040109000405.GA7283@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: New mailing list: freebsd-python X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:04:05 -0000 Hello, ports buddies! The freebsd-python mailing is just created. This list is for discussions related to porting Python, its 3rd party modules and Zope stuff to FreeBSD. And any related topics are welcome. If you are interested in Python ports, it's time to enter the list. ;) http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-python Thanks to Khairil Yusof for the suggestion and David Wolfskill for setting list up. Regards, Hye-Shik From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 16:29:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620A516A4CE; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:29:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mag.barnet.com.au (mag.barnet.com.au [218.185.88.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E173343D67; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:28:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from extmail.barnet.com.au (tim.direct.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.10.2]) by mag.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2F373; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:28:55 +1100 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <3FFDF5C70000FCA50163316B@VIRUSCAN-127.0.0.1> Received: from extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by extmail.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2F91F24; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:28:55 +1100 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21CB1F1E; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:28:54 +1100 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8E7D86A7101; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:28:54 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:28:54 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Hye-Shik Chang Message-ID: <20040109002854.GA1667@k7.mavetju> References: <20040109000405.GA7283@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040109000405.GA7283@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:29:02 -0000 On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 12:04:05AM +0000, Hye-Shik Chang wrote: > Hello, ports buddies! > > The freebsd-python mailing is just created. This list is for > discussions related to porting Python, its 3rd party modules and > Zope stuff to FreeBSD. And any related topics are welcome. If you > are interested in Python ports, it's time to enter the list. ;) Can we change the owner of a PR to python now just like the java@ and gnome@ PRs and lists? Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 16:32:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 949) id 16F7A16A4D0; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:32:36 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:32:36 +0000 From: Hye-Shik Chang To: Edwin Groothuis Message-ID: <20040109003236.GA9047@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20040109000405.GA7283@hub.freebsd.org> <20040109002854.GA1667@k7.mavetju> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040109002854.GA1667@k7.mavetju> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:32:36 -0000 On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:28:54AM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 12:04:05AM +0000, Hye-Shik Chang wrote: > > Hello, ports buddies! > > > > The freebsd-python mailing is just created. This list is for > > discussions related to porting Python, its 3rd party modules and > > Zope stuff to FreeBSD. And any related topics are welcome. If you > > are interested in Python ports, it's time to enter the list. ;) > > Can we change the owner of a PR to python now just like the java@ > and gnome@ PRs and lists? Sure. Any python PRs except py-qt and py-gtk. :-) Hye-Shik From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 16:41:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C92A16A4D7; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:41:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E84F43D5A; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:41:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id CC3D3146F9; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:41:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:41:29 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Edwin Groothuis In-Reply-To: <20040109002854.GA1667@k7.mavetju> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Hye-Shik Chang cc: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:41:31 -0000 > Can we change the owner of a PR to python now just like the java@ > and gnome@ PRs and lists? Recently when the perl@ mailing list was created, there was discussion about assigning all the perl ports to it. I objected at that time, saying that there was a canonical name for "unmaintained" and that was "ports@FreeBSD.org". I think the consensus was that only the critical (for some definition of critical) PRs would be so assigned. My own research shows me that PRs assigned to kde, gnome, emulation, and phoenix, tend to rot. The java folks are a little more focussed and thus tend to be better. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 16:49:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2318D16A4CE; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:49:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.server.rpi.edu (smtp1.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9426543D41; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:49:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp1.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i090nQLJ028441; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:49:26 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:49:25 -0500 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 00:49:29 -0000 I have been pondering a possible change for the way the ports collection is done. I've done a little exploration into the idea, but I thought I'd ask for more feedback before sinking more time into it. I believe I have someone who would do much of the actual work for this change, so I think I can make it happen, but I want to know if the FreeBSD ports project would be interested in this idea if I come up with some working version. To keep this as a "doable" project, I also have a fairly modest goal: Further reduce the inode-count of the ports collection. That's it. There are many things which could be done as a follow-on to this, but that's all I want to try for right now. The method is also pretty modest. The only thing that makes this a big project is the need to do it across the entire ports collection, and without causing any disruption. What I want to do is create one new file per port, and then move almost all the other files into that new file. Ideally each port would end up with just two files. The Makefile, and this new file (some ports might also need a Makefile.inc file). Especially as disks get ever-larger, I think we're better off with fewer-but-larger files, instead of a larger number of tiny files. I would also write a single simple program, which knows how to find the correct info for any given purpose. Thus, the format of the file should not be important. The program would know what to do for both "old-style" and "new-style" ports, so we don't have to convert the entire collection at once. I think the easiest and clearest way to implement this would be one C program, and not 800 lines of /bin/sh commands and deep make-magic. Does this seem like a reasonable project for me to pursue? Does it conflict with other projects which are already in the works to do a similar restructuring? I wouldn't want to start this project if no one thinks it is worth doing. [This message is BCC'ed to FreeBSD-arch, but I expect the discussion to happen on FreeBSD-ports] -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:07:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7068116A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:07:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA7143D54 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:06:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 3DA31146F9; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:06:59 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:06:59 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Garance A Drosihn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:07:02 -0000 Well, I'd have to say that, despite the merits of the idea, there are many more pressing problems facing the ports collection than filesize. My order would be something more like: 1. Fix the remaining ports, if any, that do not deal with the threads metadefinitions, because KSE is scheduled to become the default in 3-4 weeks. 2. Fix the remaining gcc3.3-inflicted problems before 5.3 becomes the new -stable branch, which is 3-4 months. 3. Remove broken ports which stand no chance of working on 5.3, in that same timeframe. 4. Try to assess the impact of the new guidelines for timeouts, in that same timeframe. 5. Try to get the 74 PRs currently in the "portmgr" queue integrated into bsd.*.mk and extensively QAed. 6. Try to attack the extensive 'unfetchable distfiles'. Those are my own priorities. Other people's mileage may, and probably will, vary considerably. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:15:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 949) id 34CE716A4D0; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:15:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 01:15:14 +0000 From: Hye-Shik Chang To: Mark Linimon Message-ID: <20040109011514.GA11169@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20040109002854.GA1667@k7.mavetju> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:15:14 -0000 On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:41:29PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > > Can we change the owner of a PR to python now just like the java@ > > and gnome@ PRs and lists? > > Recently when the perl@ mailing list was created, there was discussion > about assigning all the perl ports to it. I objected at that time, > saying that there was a canonical name for "unmaintained" and that > was "ports@FreeBSD.org". I think the consensus was that only the > critical (for some definition of critical) PRs would be so assigned. > > My own research shows me that PRs assigned to kde, gnome, emulation, > and phoenix, tend to rot. The java folks are a little more focussed > and thus tend to be better. > I will not assign MAINTAINER of python ports to python@freebsd.org yet, because python ports are simple enough to maintain by myself. But I think assigning PR to python@ is okay. Any other committers interested in python will be able to track them easily by that and python-related port maintainers will be able to test co-operation between their ports before it's committed. Hye-Shik From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:20:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C50D16A4CE; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:20:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mag.barnet.com.au (mag.barnet.com.au [218.185.88.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E0F43D5C; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:20:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from extmail.barnet.com.au (tim.direct.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.10.2]) by mag.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D5716E; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:20:21 +1100 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <3FFE01D50001668301329644@VIRUSCAN-127.0.0.1> Received: from extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by extmail.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6FE1E0C; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:20:20 +1100 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFEC1F22; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:20:20 +1100 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E2EBC6A7107; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:20:19 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:20:19 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: ports@FreeBSD.org, python@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040109012019.GK1665@k7.mavetju> References: <20040109002854.GA1667@k7.mavetju> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:20:28 -0000 On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:41:29PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > > Can we change the owner of a PR to python now just like the java@ > > and gnome@ PRs and lists? > > Recently when the perl@ mailing list was created, there was discussion > about assigning all the perl ports to it. I objected at that time, > saying that there was a canonical name for "unmaintained" and that > was "ports@FreeBSD.org". I think the consensus was that only the > critical (for some definition of critical) PRs would be so assigned. > > My own research shows me that PRs assigned to kde, gnome, emulation, > and phoenix, tend to rot. The java folks are a little more focussed > and thus tend to be better. There is a reason why I asked in advance :-) Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:27:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 734C816A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:27:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mag.barnet.com.au (mag.barnet.com.au [218.185.88.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9113043D64 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:26:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from extmail.barnet.com.au (tim.direct.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.10.2]) by mag.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E5D16E; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:26:53 +1100 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <3FFE035C0001721F01F53F21@VIRUSCAN-127.0.0.1> Received: from extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by extmail.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AC51F18; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:26:52 +1100 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E881EE3; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:26:51 +1100 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B52FD6A7101; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:26:51 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:26:51 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040109012651.GB1667@k7.mavetju> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:27:20 -0000 On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:49:25PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > The method is also pretty modest. The only thing that makes > this a big project is the need to do it across the entire > ports collection, and without causing any disruption. That's always a good goal :-) > What I want to do is create one new file per port, and then > move almost all the other files into that new file. Ideally > each port would end up with just two files. The Makefile, > and this new file (some ports might also need a Makefile.inc > file). Especially as disks get ever-larger, I think we're > better off with fewer-but-larger files, instead of a larger > number of tiny files. Don't get me wrong on this, I'm not saying that you shouldn't do this. All I want is to give my experience with the current system. The Makefile contains two kinds of text: configurable data and executable data. The configurable data is the portname, version, maintainer etc. Pretty much static, and manually entered. The executable data is mostly the post-extract (REINPLACE_CMD), the do-install (INSTALL_DATA) and post-install stuff (CAT). This one too, static and manually entered. pkg-descr is only static data, doesn't change too often (if at all). The other two files (distinfo and pkg-plist) are machine generated (distinfo by "make makesum", pkg-plist often bij a bunch of seperate tools (no official standard too)). > I would also write a single simple program, which knows how > to find the correct info for any given purpose. Thus, the > format of the file should not be important. The program > would know what to do for both "old-style" and "new-style" > ports, so we don't have to convert the entire collection > at once. if [ type = oldstyle ]; then run make; else do-your-magic; fi > I think the easiest and clearest way to implement > this would be one C program, and not 800 lines of /bin/sh > commands and deep make-magic. There you make a wrong assumption about the bsd.*.mk and make(1). bsd.*.mk is doing the same as the local Makefile, it sets global configurable data and has executable data in it. Make(1) is doing the magic of glueing the the configurable data and the executable data. That is what you're going to make again. Except that the executable data is moved from bsd.*.mk to your make(U). Then we have the bootstrap problem. You will have to make a port which installs your make(U). That's okay, it's a one time thing. The next step will be more difficult, the re-distribution of changes. At this moment the executable data is in bsd.*.mk, which means that when you cvsup, you have the latest (and compatible) ports and executable data. For ports following your make(U), how do you know if your make(U) has to be recompiled because of new configurable or executable data? > Does this seem like a reasonable project for me to pursue? > Does it conflict with other projects which are already in > the works to do a similar restructuring? I wouldn't want > to start this project if no one thinks it is worth doing. Only one way to find out... Despite of your fear for bsd.*.mk, the whole system actually makes sense: The glue (in this case: make(1)) is fixed, the globally executable and configurable data which is hard to understand (sometimes) is controlled by a small group of people who do QA on it, while the executable and configurable data in the ports itself are very dumb, most of the time only some configurable data. But yeah, making one thing smarter (for example, the MAN, USE_GNOME, PORTDOCS and INFOFILES variables) make the ports files smaller and smaller... This has ended up about 80 lines longer than I hoped it would be :-) Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:31:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCA016A4D0; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:31:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A550143D5E; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:30:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) i091UsYr000242; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:30:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i091Uaxc029240; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:30:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-D+xOayZNkywMZlcDojQQ" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1073611849.799.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:30:49 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Hye-Shik Chang cc: python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:31:00 -0000 --=-D+xOayZNkywMZlcDojQQ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 19:41, Mark Linimon wrote: > > Can we change the owner of a PR to python now just like the java@ > > and gnome@ PRs and lists? >=20 > Recently when the perl@ mailing list was created, there was discussion > about assigning all the perl ports to it. I objected at that time, > saying that there was a canonical name for "unmaintained" and that > was "ports@FreeBSD.org". I think the consensus was that only the > critical (for some definition of critical) PRs would be so assigned. >=20 > My own research shows me that PRs assigned to kde, gnome, emulation, > and phoenix, tend to rot. The java folks are a little more focussed > and thus tend to be better. What? PRs assigned to gnome tend to rot? You may want to have a look at your stats before saying something like that. We have historically been very good at closing PRs in a very reasonable time frame. In fact, we only have one PR opened that assigned to gnome, and this one will most likely be closed shortly. As for PRs assigned to phoenix@, those should be moved over to gnome@. Joe >=20 > mcl >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-D+xOayZNkywMZlcDojQQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA//gRJb2iPiv4Uz4cRAsqHAJwJmRUGuKZTmtqbYH3BFJ4xeuxFPACfTcul zgmk2wERkoox9cxGX3p+7Sw= =2yBB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-D+xOayZNkywMZlcDojQQ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:33:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD78016A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:33:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.server.rpi.edu (smtp1.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BFD43D2F for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:33:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp1.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i091XfLJ002169; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:33:41 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:33:40 -0500 To: Mark Linimon From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:33:43 -0000 At 7:06 PM -0600 1/8/04, Mark Linimon wrote: >Well, I'd have to say that, despite the merits of the idea, >there are many more pressing problems facing the ports >collection than filesize. My order would be something >more like: Well, I have someone to work on this idea, and we would do our best to make sure that what we're working on would not disrupt anyone else's work. He isn't a super-experienced sysadmin with years of porting experience, so you can't just give me a wish list of things for him to work on... I'm going to be paying him, so it's going to be a project that I feel like spending my money on, or it's nothing. While I do like all the goals on your list, none of them are things that I would pay this particular person for. He just does not have the right experience for those projects. (he doesn't really have much experience for the project I want him to do, but at least it's one big project, with a single startup cost, instead of hundreds of small projects and infinite startup cost). >1. Fix the remaining ports, if any, that do not deal with > the threads metadefinitions, because KSE is scheduled > to become the default in 3-4 weeks. Let me also say that I fully expect that the project I'm talking about is going to take more than 3-4 weeks before we would be ready to have *anything* change in the official ports tree. No one should change or delay what they are working on "to wait for" what we're doing. One of my main goals is that we (darren and I) should come up with the tools to do what needs to be done, to minimize the work that has to be done by everyone else who works on ports. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:33:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0496016A4D3 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:33:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A817643D55 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:33:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.179] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AelX9-0005Qp-00 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 02:33:55 +0100 Received: from [80.131.150.51] (helo=vampire.homelinux.org) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AelX8-0005gL-00 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 02:33:54 +0100 Received: (qmail 3678 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2004 01:38:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fbsd52.laiers.local) (192.168.4.88) by 192.168.4.1 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2004 01:38:14 -0000 From: Max Laier To: Garance A Drosihn , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 02:33:51 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401090233.51499.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:e28873fbe4dbe612ce62ab869898ff08 Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:33:58 -0000 On Friday 09 January 2004 01:49, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Especially as disks get ever-larger, I think we're > better off with fewer-but-larger files, instead of a larger > number of tiny files. As disks get lager there is fewer concern about lost space (in my personal perception). If one is concered, however, she/he could keep /usr/ports on a seperate (smaler) partition and be okay. Not a compelling arument to change a working system. > I would also write a single simple program, which knows how > to find the correct info for any given purpose. Thus, the > format of the file should not be important. The program > would know what to do for both "old-style" and "new-style" > ports, so we don't have to convert the entire collection > at once. I think the easiest and clearest way to implement > this would be one C program, and not 800 lines of /bin/sh > commands and deep make-magic. You will never catch all the (crude) hacks spread all around the ports Makefiles and pkg-* with a "simple program". There are things like sed and friends messing all about the plist and I believe even worse hacks. There is a "simple program" to handle such things already - it's called make(1) and it's working well. There are things that the "deep make-magic" could handle better, but that's something that can be adressed by hacking/cleaning-up bsd.port.mk and _not_ by writting something new (which introduces new problems). > Does this seem like a reasonable project for me to pursue? > Does it conflict with other projects which are already in > the works to do a similar restructuring? I wouldn't want > to start this project if no one thinks it is worth doing. IMO (which applies to the whole writting), it's a waste of time. The ports tree is - rightfully - precepted as "one of the best things about FreeBSD" and found entrance into the other *BSDs as well. Even Linux (gentoo) has /borrowed/ the idea. As long as the only benefit is reduced disk usage you don't make a point (see above), plus you have to mind several things that will come as a consequence. 1) Changes are much harder to do: With the currently used scheme it's fairly easy to add a patch when needed. Be it due to security issues, or just because -current moves a header, or whatsoever. With your change this will (at least) get more difficult. 2) Changes are much harder to track: With the currently used scheme one can easily get information about what happend since the last version. Webcvs provides nice changelogs and with the freshports.org framework these are easily accessed. With your change this will change as the changes might be spread all over the new big file and one'd have to read all through to get what really happend. 3) It will get harder to create ports: Now you can just start with a very simple Makefile and see what happens, hack things to compile and clean up a bit (see the porters-handbook for an impersion of what I mean). With your newly created big-file system, this will be interrupted by syntax problems and endless scroll up/down sessions, just to back out the patch that just wasn't right ... > [This message is BCC'ed to FreeBSD-arch, but I expect the > discussion to happen on FreeBSD-ports] I am not subscribed to -ports, but I'll keep track via web (no need to CC me - really) -- Best regards, | max@love2party.net Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:39:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E80D16A4CE; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:39:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238E243D55; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:39:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id C188E146F9; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:39:37 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:39:37 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1073611849.799.2.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Mark Linimon cc: Hye-Shik Chang cc: python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:39:39 -0000 > What? PRs assigned to gnome tend to rot? You may want to have a look > at your stats before saying something like that. I have checked, and you are completely correct and I am completely wrong. I apologize. In fact (including the phoenix ones), there are exactly four, one of which I'm attempting to work on with the submitter. All I can say is that I must be confusing the build error reports with the PR reports, or am still not over my sinus infection, or ... "something". (There _are_ more than 4 build errors :-) , some of which look like they were from a bad run on ia64-5-full.) > As for PRs assigned to phoenix@, those should be moved over to gnome@. I will do this. Again, sorry about shooting from the hip. IMHO we all have the same goals here: make the ports collection as useful as possible. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:45:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FE516A4CE; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:45:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07E943D5A; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:45:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) i091j2KY005724; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:45:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i091ihxc029317; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:44:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MYWgRsoJzIY2ozuKe6Dd" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1073612696.799.7.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:44:57 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: Hye-Shik Chang cc: python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:45:08 -0000 --=-MYWgRsoJzIY2ozuKe6Dd Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 20:39, Mark Linimon wrote: > > What? PRs assigned to gnome tend to rot? You may want to have a look > > at your stats before saying something like that. >=20 > I have checked, and you are completely correct and I am completely wrong. > I apologize. Not a problem. gnome@ likes to keep as neat of a house as possible.=20 Some PRs may languish for a while, but anything serious we try to get on immediately. >=20 > In fact (including the phoenix ones), there are exactly four, one > of which I'm attempting to work on with the submitter. I think you still have a bug in your reporting tool. I see three (including the two phoenix bugs). The foomatic thing (58460) is not part of GNOME, and we don't maintain any of the foomatic ports (somehow you have that linked to libxml2). >=20 > All I can say is that I must be confusing the build error reports > with the PR reports, or am still not over my sinus infection, or ... > "something". >=20 > (There _are_ more than 4 build errors :-) , some of which look > like they were from a bad run on ia64-5-full.) Yeah, I saw that. After the latest 5.2-RELEASE build, the GNOME errors we fairly low. We still need to work out some porting problems on amd64, but after that, we should be in good shape. >=20 > > As for PRs assigned to phoenix@, those should be moved over to gnome@. >=20 > I will do this. Thanks. >=20 > Again, sorry about shooting from the hip. IMHO we all have > the same goals here: make the ports collection as useful as > possible. Indeed. Joe >=20 > mcl --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-MYWgRsoJzIY2ozuKe6Dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA//geYb2iPiv4Uz4cRApj2AJ4prJB9zBcGyAb/X66KkE6TUjsBYgCeOVwc dexDiInGe30I45fkCvttCv4= =qfhu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MYWgRsoJzIY2ozuKe6Dd-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:51:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157EB16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:51:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from kiri.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp (kiri.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp [133.51.14.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5BD43D5D for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:51:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kiri@kiri.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp) Received: from kiri.pis.kiri.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i091pdkF086093 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:51:40 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kiri@kiri.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp) Message-Id: <200401090151.i091pdkF086093@kiri.slis.tsukuba.ac.jp> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 10:51:39 +0900 From: KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko To: ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20040109000405.GA7283@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20040109000405.GA7283@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) MULE XEmacs/21.4 (patch 14) (Reasonable Discussion) (i386--freebsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.7 - "Awazu") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: New mailing list: freebsd-python X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:51:03 -0000 Hi all. At Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:04:05 +0000, Hye-Shik Chang wrote: > > The freebsd-python mailing is just created. This list is for > discussions related to porting Python, its 3rd party modules and > Zope stuff to FreeBSD. And any related topics are welcome. If you > are interested in Python ports, it's time to enter the list. ;) That's fine! But I prefer to join freebsd-ruby list :p # Is there any plan to create freebsd-ruby list? > knu-san -kiri@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:56:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A60016A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:56:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from catseye.mine.nu (d207-81-17-215.bchsia.telus.net [207.81.17.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 98C3143D73 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:56:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from catseye@catseye.mine.nu) Received: (qmail 67998 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Jan 2004 02:01:00 -0000 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:01:00 -0800 From: Chris Pressey To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040108180100.0da13630.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Cat's Eye Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:56:56 -0000 On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:49:25 -0500 Garance A Drosihn wrote: > I have been pondering a possible change for the way the ports > collection is done. I've done a little exploration into the > idea, but I thought I'd ask for more feedback before sinking > more time into it. I believe I have someone who would do much > of the actual work for this change, so I think I can make it > happen, but I want to know if the FreeBSD ports project would > be interested in this idea if I come up with some working > version. > > To keep this as a "doable" project, I also have a fairly > modest goal: Further reduce the inode-count of the ports > collection. That's it. There are many things which could > be done as a follow-on to this, but that's all I want to > try for right now. This sounds like it would be a simple job requiring no more than a file archiver like tar(1), were it not for the fact that the ports tree is cvsup'ed file by file. Maybe some sort of CVS->shar gateway server mirror thingy? You could cvsup to it to keep a shar'ed ports tree up to date, and any time you wanted to built an individual port, you'd just unshar it first... Just a random brainfart. -Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 17:57:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10ECE16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:57:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C0643D54 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 17:56:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i091uiMr025842; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:56:47 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040109012651.GB1667@k7.mavetju> References: <20040109012651.GB1667@k7.mavetju> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:56:43 -0500 To: Edwin Groothuis From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:57:11 -0000 At 12:26 PM +1100 1/9/04, Edwin Groothuis wrote: >Garance writes: > > Especially as disks get ever-larger, I think we're > > better off with fewer-but-larger files, instead of > > a larger number of tiny files. > >Don't get me wrong on this, I'm not saying that you >shouldn't do this. All I want is to give my experience >with the current system. Sounds like a good thing for me to hear... :-) >The Makefile contains two kinds of text: configurable data and >executable data. The configurable data is the portname, version, >maintainer etc. Pretty much static, and manually entered. The >executable data is mostly the post-extract (REINPLACE_CMD), the >do-install (INSTALL_DATA) and post-install stuff (CAT). This one >too, static and manually entered. I'm immediately confused. I am not proposing changes to any of the port's Makefiles, except maybe that I'd pull PKG_COMMENT out of the make files and into the new file. In fact, I started to look into this project as an alternative to the PKG_COMMENT changes, but I didn't get far enough along before that change was done. >pkg-descr is only static data, doesn't change too often >(if at all). > >The other two files (distinfo and pkg-plist) are machine >generated (distinfo by "make makesum", pkg-plist often just >a bunch of seperate tools (no official standard too)). My list of "common files" has: files (a directory, and as such can be multiple files) scripts (a directory) src (? - a directory, but I forgot why I check for it) distinfo Makefile Makefile.inc pkg-comment (well, I guess that's gone now) pkg-deinstall pkg-descr pkg-install pkg-message pkg-plist pkg-req Remember that all i want to do is decrease inodes. If I can collapse even half of those into a new file, it'll be a step forward. The fact that distinfo and pkg-plist are machine-generated does not mean that they can not be collapsed into this new file. It just means that if they *are* collapsed into it, then the program which generates the info has to know about the new file. > > I think the easiest and clearest way to implement >> this would be one C program, and not 800 lines of /bin/sh >> commands and deep make-magic. > >There you make a wrong assumption about the bsd.*.mk and make(1). >bsd.*.mk is doing the same as the local Makefile, it sets global >configurable data and has executable data in it. > >Make(1) is doing the magic of glueing the the configurable data and >the executable data. That is what you're going to make again. Except >that the executable data is moved from bsd.*.mk to your make(U). I'm not sure why you mention 'make'. The program I'm talking about is going to be a trivial little thing which will do nothing more than read info from the new file, and (most likely) write it out to separate files under the 'work' directory, when building a port. Nothing to do with dependencies, last-chg times, make variables. What I was refering to was all the pain that people went through when trying to move PKG-COMMENT into a make variable, to get rid of that one file. There are quoting issues when you try to do that via sed commands and make-magic that I just don't want to get into -- particularly when handling things like patch files! >This has ended up about 80 lines longer than I hoped it >would be :-) I think one of the biggest challenges of this project will be trying to read everyone's thoughts on it... :-) -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 18:01:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148E316A4D0 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:01:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from h2.liquidneon.com (h2.liquidneon.com [216.38.206.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A49D43D46 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:01:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bdavis@house.so14k.com) Received: (qmail 28233 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2004 02:01:44 -0000 Received: from c-24-8-51-173.client.comcast.net (HELO mccaffrey.house.so14k.com) (24.8.51.173) by h2.liquidneon.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2004 02:01:44 -0000 Received: by mccaffrey.house.so14k.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3010AA32; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:01:18 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:01:18 -0700 From: Brad Davis To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20040109020118.GA57636@mccaffrey.house.so14k.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 02:01:47 -0000 Why not start small and move the distinfo file into the Makefile? (This follows the path the pkg-comment went) This would be fairly easy to implement IMHO and not quite as radical as the change your suggesting. Regards, Brad Davis On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:49:25PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > I have been pondering a possible change for the way the ports > collection is done. I've done a little exploration into the > idea, but I thought I'd ask for more feedback before sinking > more time into it. I believe I have someone who would do much > of the actual work for this change, so I think I can make it > happen, but I want to know if the FreeBSD ports project would > be interested in this idea if I come up with some working > version. > > To keep this as a "doable" project, I also have a fairly > modest goal: Further reduce the inode-count of the ports > collection. That's it. There are many things which could > be done as a follow-on to this, but that's all I want to > try for right now. > > The method is also pretty modest. The only thing that makes > this a big project is the need to do it across the entire > ports collection, and without causing any disruption. > > What I want to do is create one new file per port, and then > move almost all the other files into that new file. Ideally > each port would end up with just two files. The Makefile, > and this new file (some ports might also need a Makefile.inc > file). Especially as disks get ever-larger, I think we're > better off with fewer-but-larger files, instead of a larger > number of tiny files. > > I would also write a single simple program, which knows how > to find the correct info for any given purpose. Thus, the > format of the file should not be important. The program > would know what to do for both "old-style" and "new-style" > ports, so we don't have to convert the entire collection > at once. I think the easiest and clearest way to implement > this would be one C program, and not 800 lines of /bin/sh > commands and deep make-magic. > > Does this seem like a reasonable project for me to pursue? > Does it conflict with other projects which are already in > the works to do a similar restructuring? I wouldn't want > to start this project if no one thinks it is worth doing. > > [This message is BCC'ed to FreeBSD-arch, but I expect the > discussion to happen on FreeBSD-ports] > > -- > Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu > Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 18:07:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3898716A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:07:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.server.rpi.edu (smtp1.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB3D43D5F for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:07:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp1.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0927BLJ006530 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:07:11 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200401090233.51499.max@love2party.net> References: <200401090233.51499.max@love2party.net> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:07:10 -0500 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 02:07:22 -0000 At 2:33 AM +0100 1/9/04, Max Laier wrote: >On Friday 09 January 2004 01:49, Garance A Drosihn wrote: >> Especially as disks get ever-larger, I think we're >> better off with fewer-but-larger files, instead of a larger >> number of tiny files. > >As disks get lager there is fewer concern about lost space >(in my personal perception). If one is concered, however, >she/he could keep /usr/ports on a seperate (smaler) partition >and be okay. Not a compelling arument to change a working system. As disks get larger, the minimum size of a file will grow. More to the point, however, is that the sheer number of inodes is a headache. If that is not true, then why did the ports collection just go thru a whole lot of work to remove one file (pkg-comment) from all the ports? > > I would also write a single simple program, which knows how > > to find the correct info for any given purpose. > >You will never catch all the (crude) hacks spread all around >the ports Makefiles and pkg-* with a "simple program". I suspect I was too brief in my initial message. I had started with a much-longer message, but figured everyone would give up on it before trying to read it all... The simple-program is *only* for pulling information out of the suggested new file. That's all it will do. You might run it with a parameter of "patches", and it will create the directory work/patches and then fill that directory with files patch.001 through patch.042. Then the standard port-processing would apply *those* patch files, instead of each port (as it comes from cvsup) containing a directory of patch files. I should stress that I do not expect *all* ports to put *all* their patches into this single new file. But for ports which only have a few lines to change, they could put the patch(es) in this new file instead of separate files. >1) Changes are much harder to do: > With the currently used scheme it's fairly easy to add a > patch when needed. I do not expect this to get any harder. (of course, I might be wrong on that) >2) Changes are much harder to track: On the contrary, changes should be *easier* to track. All the information for any given port will be in two files. This will not be true for all ports (particularly for ports which have a lot of patch files). >3) It will get harder to create ports: I really do not expect this to happen -- particularly since the simple-program will know how to find the appropriate information for EITHER old-style or new-style ports. Thus, it CANNOT be harder to do than it is now, because someone can just do exactly what they do now and the makefiles will handle it all. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 18:15:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F96216A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:15:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E42343D1D for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:15:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i092FvMr029536; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:15:58 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040109020118.GA57636@mccaffrey.house.so14k.com> References: <20040109020118.GA57636@mccaffrey.house.so14k.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:15:56 -0500 To: Brad Davis , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 02:15:59 -0000 At 7:01 PM -0700 1/8/04, Brad Davis wrote: >Why not start small and move the distinfo file into the >Makefile? (This follows the path the pkg-comment went) >This would be fairly easy to implement IMHO and not quite >as radical as the change your suggesting. I'm afraid that makes it TOO small a project! :-) Besides, it won't scale up to all the other files I'd like to collapse into "somewhere". Initially I did consider collapsing files into the Makefile, but decided that would get too messy. So while I did like the idea of collapsing everything for any single port into a single file, I moved away from that idea. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 18:33:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E7516A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:33:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED2243D60 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:33:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.161] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AemT6-00085M-00 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 03:33:48 +0100 Received: from [80.131.150.51] (helo=vampire.homelinux.org) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AemT5-0005Kf-00 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 03:33:47 +0100 Received: (qmail 4417 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2004 02:38:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fbsd52.laiers.local) (192.168.4.88) by 192.168.4.1 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2004 02:38:07 -0000 From: Max Laier To: Garance A Drosihn , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 03:33:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401090333.44516.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:e28873fbe4dbe612ce62ab869898ff08 Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 02:33:53 -0000 At 2:33 AM +0100 1/9/04, Max Laier wrote: I suspect I was too brief in my initial message. I had started > with a much-longer message, but figured everyone would give up > on it before trying to read it all... > > The simple-program is *only* for pulling information out of the > suggested new file. That's all it will do. You might run it > with a parameter of "patches", and it will create the directory > work/patches > and then fill that directory with files patch.001 through > patch.042. Then the standard port-processing would apply > *those* patch files, instead of each port (as it comes from > cvsup) containing a directory of patch files. Indeed, that makes it much more understandable. > >1) Changes are much harder to do: > > With the currently used scheme it's fairly easy to add a > > patch when needed. > > I do not expect this to get any harder. (of course, I might > be wrong on that) At least you have to do an additional export (from the big file) and (in the end) an import. > >2) Changes are much harder to track: > > On the contrary, changes should be *easier* to track. All the > information for any given port will be in two files. This will > not be true for all ports (particularly for ports which have a > lot of patch files). Look a the full quote: "changes might be spread all over the new big file", you can't come around this and it's a pain to read this (even - or especially - in a unified diff). > >3) It will get harder to create ports: > > I really do not expect this to happen -- particularly since > the simple-program will know how to find the appropriate > information for EITHER old-style or new-style ports. Thus, > it CANNOT be harder to do than it is now, because someone > can just do exactly what they do now and the makefiles will > handle it all. Yes, I got your idea completely wrong. Still, if you want to do this: I'd suggest to avoid to write new tools that need compilation, there are quite a few default unix tools that can do the work for you: tar, shar ... which are in the default install. The additional targets to bsd.port.mk could be done in a very small and clean way. -- Best regards, | max@love2party.net Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 18:38:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC61416A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:38:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from gatekeeper.oremut02.us.wh.verio.net (gatekeeper.oremut02.us.wh.verio.net [198.65.168.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0277443D1D for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:38:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oz@nixil.net) Received: from mx.dmz.orem.verio.net (mx.dmz.orem.verio.net [172.16.146.6]) 3513E1E74EA for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:12:25 -0700 (MST) Received: from nixil.net (demigorgon.dmz.orem.verio.net [172.16.146.132]) i08NCG1d083611; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:12:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from oz@nixil.net) Message-ID: <3FFDE3B4.6030201@nixil.net> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 16:11:48 -0700 From: Phil Oleson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031020 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gh@ghaering.de Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050801060706090003040908" cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: sqlite-2.8.8 Upgrade [patch] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 02:38:05 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050801060706090003040908 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I attempted to create a PR for this.. but anyways.. here is a patch to update sqlite to the latest stable version. Phil. --------------050801060706090003040908 Content-Type: text/plain; name="sqlite-patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="sqlite-patch" diff -ru sqlite.old/Makefile sqlite/Makefile --- sqlite.old/Makefile Tue Nov 11 08:13:08 2003 +++ sqlite/Makefile Thu Jan 8 15:13:23 2004 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ # SQLITE_WITH_TCL83 and SQLITE_WITH_TCL84. PORTNAME= sqlite -PORTVERSION= 2.8.6 +PORTVERSION= 2.8.8 PORTREVISION= 0 CATEGORIES= databases MASTER_SITES= http://www.hwaci.com/sw/sqlite/ diff -ru sqlite.old/distinfo sqlite/distinfo --- sqlite.old/distinfo Tue Nov 11 08:13:08 2003 +++ sqlite/distinfo Thu Jan 8 15:12:57 2004 @@ -1 +1 @@ -MD5 (sqlite-2.8.6.tar.gz) = 3047e24370d7e49d7bfd9728addf76cf +MD5 (sqlite-2.8.8.tar.gz) = 0fe7af15a9747727db81fe011bb46d4a diff -ru sqlite.old/files/patch-Makefile.in sqlite/files/patch-Makefile.in --- sqlite.old/files/patch-Makefile.in Tue Nov 11 08:13:08 2003 +++ sqlite/files/patch-Makefile.in Thu Jan 8 15:32:34 2004 @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ ---- Makefile.in.orig Thu Aug 21 22:36:16 2003 -+++ Makefile.in Tue Nov 11 14:02:32 2003 +--- Makefile.in.orig Thu Jan 8 15:26:45 2004 ++++ Makefile.in Thu Jan 8 15:32:16 2004 @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ prefix = @prefix@ exec_prefix = @exec_prefix@ INSTALL = @INSTALL@ -LIBTOOL = ./libtool +LIBTOOL = %%LIBTOOL%% + RELEASE = @ALLOWRELEASE@ # Compiler options needed for programs that use the TCL library. - # -@@ -168,12 +168,12 @@ +@@ -177,12 +177,12 @@ libsqlite.la: $(LIBOBJ) - $(LIBTOOL) $(TCC) -o libsqlite.la $(LIBOBJ) -rpath $(exec_prefix)/lib \ + $(LIBTOOL) $(TCC) -o libsqlite.la $(LIBOBJ) ${RELEASE} -rpath $(exec_prefix)/lib \ - -version-info "8:6:8" + -version-info "2:0:0" @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ sqlite: $(TOP)/src/shell.c libsqlite.la sqlite.h $(LIBTOOL) $(TCC) $(READLINE_FLAGS) -o sqlite $(TOP)/src/shell.c \ -@@ -341,67 +341,67 @@ +@@ -356,67 +356,67 @@ ./testfixture $(TOP)/test/quick.test index.html: $(TOP)/www/index.tcl last_change @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ # Files to be published on the website. -@@ -435,13 +435,19 @@ +@@ -450,13 +450,19 @@ install: sqlite libsqlite.la sqlite.h $(INSTALL) -d $(exec_prefix)/lib @@ -125,8 +125,8 @@ + $(INSTALL) .libs/sqlite $(exec_prefix)/bin $(INSTALL) -d $(prefix)/include $(INSTALL) -m 0644 sqlite.h $(prefix)/include - $(INSTALL) -d $(exec_prefix)/lib/pkgconfig; \ - $(INSTALL) -m 0644 sqlite.pc $(exec_prefix)/lib/pkgconfig; \ + $(INSTALL) -d $(exec_prefix)/lib/pkgconfig; + $(INSTALL) -m 0644 sqlite.pc $(exec_prefix)/lib/pkgconfig; + +install-tcl: libtclsqlite.la + $(INSTALL) -d $(prefix)/lib/sqlite --------------050801060706090003040908-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 18:40:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E410B16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:40:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from gatekeeper.oremut02.us.wh.verio.net (gatekeeper.oremut02.us.wh.verio.net [198.65.168.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF9743D1D for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:40:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oz@nixil.net) Received: from mx.dmz.orem.verio.net (mx.dmz.orem.verio.net [172.16.146.6]) 70E611E73A0 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:31:16 -0700 (MST) Received: from nixil.net (demigorgon.dmz.orem.verio.net [172.16.146.132]) i08NVF1d091073; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 16:31:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from oz@nixil.net) Message-ID: <3FFDE827.7060904@nixil.net> Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 16:30:47 -0700 From: Phil Oleson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031020 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gh@ghaering.de Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------060508030405020108010805" cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: sqlite-2.8.9 Upgrade [patch] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 02:40:40 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060508030405020108010805 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Blah.. as soon as I send off the previous email I notice that a new revision was released this week. Teaches me to not check for updates prior to sending out email to others.. here is a patch to bring it up to date.. Phil. --------------060508030405020108010805 Content-Type: text/plain; name="sqlite-patch2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="sqlite-patch2" diff -ru sqlite.old/Makefile sqlite/Makefile --- sqlite.old/Makefile Tue Nov 11 08:13:08 2003 +++ sqlite/Makefile Thu Jan 8 16:14:59 2004 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ # SQLITE_WITH_TCL83 and SQLITE_WITH_TCL84. PORTNAME= sqlite -PORTVERSION= 2.8.6 +PORTVERSION= 2.8.9 PORTREVISION= 0 CATEGORIES= databases MASTER_SITES= http://www.hwaci.com/sw/sqlite/ diff -ru sqlite.old/distinfo sqlite/distinfo --- sqlite.old/distinfo Tue Nov 11 08:13:08 2003 +++ sqlite/distinfo Thu Jan 8 16:14:51 2004 @@ -1 +1 @@ -MD5 (sqlite-2.8.6.tar.gz) = 3047e24370d7e49d7bfd9728addf76cf +MD5 (sqlite-2.8.9.tar.gz) = 0b19989fe083fd547d3baff619d62cda diff -ru sqlite.old/files/patch-Makefile.in sqlite/files/patch-Makefile.in --- sqlite.old/files/patch-Makefile.in Tue Nov 11 08:13:08 2003 +++ sqlite/files/patch-Makefile.in Thu Jan 8 16:25:00 2004 @@ -1,18 +1,18 @@ ---- Makefile.in.orig Thu Aug 21 22:36:16 2003 -+++ Makefile.in Tue Nov 11 14:02:32 2003 +--- Makefile.in.orig Mon Dec 22 07:29:33 2003 ++++ Makefile.in Thu Jan 8 16:23:56 2004 @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ prefix = @prefix@ exec_prefix = @exec_prefix@ INSTALL = @INSTALL@ -LIBTOOL = ./libtool +LIBTOOL = %%LIBTOOL%% + RELEASE = @ALLOWRELEASE@ # Compiler options needed for programs that use the TCL library. - # -@@ -168,12 +168,12 @@ +@@ -178,12 +178,12 @@ libsqlite.la: $(LIBOBJ) - $(LIBTOOL) $(TCC) -o libsqlite.la $(LIBOBJ) -rpath $(exec_prefix)/lib \ + $(LIBTOOL) $(TCC) -o libsqlite.la $(LIBOBJ) ${RELEASE} -rpath $(exec_prefix)/lib \ - -version-info "8:6:8" + -version-info "2:0:0" @@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ - -version-info "8:6:8" + -version-info "2:0:0" - sqlite: $(TOP)/src/shell.c libsqlite.la sqlite.h + sqlite@TARGET_EXEEXT@: $(TOP)/src/shell.c libsqlite.la sqlite.h $(LIBTOOL) $(TCC) $(READLINE_FLAGS) -o sqlite $(TOP)/src/shell.c \ -@@ -341,67 +341,67 @@ +@@ -357,67 +357,67 @@ ./testfixture $(TOP)/test/quick.test index.html: $(TOP)/www/index.tcl last_change @@ -112,25 +112,25 @@ # Files to be published on the website. -@@ -435,13 +435,19 @@ +@@ -451,13 +451,19 @@ - install: sqlite libsqlite.la sqlite.h + install: sqlite@TARGET_EXEEXT@ libsqlite.la sqlite.h $(INSTALL) -d $(exec_prefix)/lib - $(LIBTOOL) $(INSTALL) libsqlite.la $(exec_prefix)/lib + $(INSTALL) .libs/libsqlite.a $(exec_prefix)/lib + $(INSTALL) .libs/libsqlite.so $(exec_prefix)/lib + $(INSTALL) .libs/libsqlite.so.2 $(exec_prefix)/lib $(INSTALL) -d $(exec_prefix)/bin -- $(LIBTOOL) $(INSTALL) sqlite $(exec_prefix)/bin -+ $(INSTALL) .libs/sqlite $(exec_prefix)/bin +- $(LIBTOOL) $(INSTALL) sqlite@TARGET_EXEEXT@ $(exec_prefix)/bin ++ $(INSTALL) .libs/sqlite@TARGET_EXEEXT@ $(exec_prefix)/bin $(INSTALL) -d $(prefix)/include $(INSTALL) -m 0644 sqlite.h $(prefix)/include - $(INSTALL) -d $(exec_prefix)/lib/pkgconfig; \ - $(INSTALL) -m 0644 sqlite.pc $(exec_prefix)/lib/pkgconfig; \ + $(INSTALL) -d $(exec_prefix)/lib/pkgconfig; + $(INSTALL) -m 0644 sqlite.pc $(exec_prefix)/lib/pkgconfig; + +install-tcl: libtclsqlite.la + $(INSTALL) -d $(prefix)/lib/sqlite + $(INSTALL) .libs/libtclsqlite.so $(prefix)/lib/sqlite clean: - rm -f *.lo *.la *.o sqlite libsqlite.la sqlite.h opcodes.* + rm -f *.lo *.la *.o sqlite@TARGET_EXEEXT@ libsqlite.la sqlite.h opcodes.* --------------060508030405020108010805-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 18:48:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF92A16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:48:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mag.barnet.com.au (mag.barnet.com.au [218.185.88.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD1543D3F for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:48:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from extmail.barnet.com.au (tim.direct.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.10.2]) by mag.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7652918A; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:48:15 +1100 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <3FFE166F00008D2001732368@VIRUSCAN-127.0.0.1> Received: from extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by extmail.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399231F18; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:48:14 +1100 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D211F23; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:48:14 +1100 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2E5156A7101; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:48:14 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:48:14 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Phil Oleson Message-ID: <20040109024814.GC1667@k7.mavetju> References: <3FFDE827.7060904@nixil.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FFDE827.7060904@nixil.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: gh@ghaering.de Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: sqlite-2.8.9 Upgrade [patch] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 02:48:19 -0000 Phil, On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 04:30:47PM -0700, Phil Oleson wrote: > Blah.. as soon as I send off the previous email I notice that a new > revision was released this week. Teaches me to not check for updates > prior to sending out email to others.. Could you do this via send-pr(1) so it comes in the PR tracking system and your patch doesn't get lost in the flow of traffic and time? Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 18:50:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB75E16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:50:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.server.rpi.edu (smtp3.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9427143D31 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 18:50:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp3.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i092oRAI010677; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:50:28 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200401090333.44516.max@love2party.net> References: <200401090333.44516.max@love2party.net> Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:50:26 -0500 To: Max Laier , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 02:50:30 -0000 At 3:33 AM +0100 1/9/04, Max Laier wrote: >Garance wrote: >At 2:33 AM +0100 1/9/04, Max Laier wrote: > > >2) Changes are much harder to track: >> >> On the contrary, changes should be *easier* to track. All the >> information for any given port will be in two files. This will >> not be true for all ports (particularly for ports which have a >> lot of patch files). > >Look a the full quote: "changes might be spread all over the new >big file", you can't come around this and it's a pain to read >this (even - or especially - in a unified diff). Eh, I often find it harder to understand a change if it has to be spread around a lot of small files, but I can see your point. And I do expect that my idea will have to support ways to break some of the information out of the single-new-file, for the case where the single-new-file gets too large and unwieldy. I am thinking that it could have an '#include' ability, for instance. I'm not completely set on how this should work, but I suspect it will be useful to have some sort of escape hatch. Still, my goal is that at least 90% of the ports will wind up as just two or three files. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 19:49:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F89616A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:49:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from gate.bitblocks.com (bitblocks.com [209.204.185.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B8443D6B for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:49:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gate.bitblocks.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i093niic084402; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:49:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Message-Id: <200401090349.i093niic084402@gate.bitblocks.com> To: Garance A Drosihn In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 08 Jan 2004 19:49:25 EST." Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 19:49:44 -0800 From: Bakul Shah cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 03:49:46 -0000 Why not add something to bsd.ports.mk so that all you need is a single Makefile per port. For example, make should not only fetch the distfiles but also a tar.gz of the bits for that particular port, unpack everything, verify bits, patch, configure and build. You can go one step further where only the INDEX file is needed! As an example, make PORT=www/links should fetch www/links and run make in it. This way you have the normal ports tree but populated with only the things you are actually using so the number of inodes in use is not a big issue (unless you have all of the 9K+ ports installed)! There are other things worth considering if you are upgrading the ports infrastructure (independent of worrying about what builds and what doesn't and what PRs need to be closed). - it should be possible to automatically cache make options used for subsequent package upgrades. - a lot of portupgrade functionality should be subsumed by make + some helper program, preferably written in C or C++ or perl. make deinstall reinstall is rather clunky! I want to be able to say, for example, cd /usr/ports/www/links make upgrade and have links updated. I want to be able to say cd /usr/ports make upgrade and have all the installed ports upgraded. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 19:54:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F48016A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:54:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (hueytecuilhuitl.mtu.ru [195.34.32.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA9343D41 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 19:54:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sem@ciam.ru) Received: from ciam.ru (ppp130-240.dialup.mtu-net.ru [62.118.130.240]) by hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B11717F041; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:54:42 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from sem@ciam.ru) Message-ID: <3FFE2602.3000105@ciam.ru> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 06:54:42 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6a) Gecko/20031028 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Garance A Drosihn References: <200401090233.51499.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 03:54:47 -0000 Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 2:33 AM +0100 1/9/04, Max Laier wrote: > >> On Friday 09 January 2004 01:49, Garance A Drosihn wrote: >> >>> Especially as disks get ever-larger, I think we're >>> better off with fewer-but-larger files, instead of a larger >>> number of tiny files. As a port maintainer I'd like to say. It will harder to support. Much harder. >> 2) Changes are much harder to track: > > > On the contrary, changes should be *easier* to track. All the > information for any given port will be in two files. This will > not be true for all ports (particularly for ports which have a > lot of patch files). Let's image a situation: port has changed. What is chaneged? Let's see in WebCVS. Does distfile has changed? If yes, I know tarball has changed. pkg-plist has changed? I know a files structure has changed. I got this information even without opening this files. I'll open only Makefile to see a changes in it. It may be much harder to look at a big diff instead. > >> 3) It will get harder to create ports: > > > I really do not expect this to happen -- particularly since > the simple-program will know how to find the appropriate > information for EITHER old-style or new-style ports. Thus, > it CANNOT be harder to do than it is now, because someone > can just do exactly what they do now and the makefiles will > handle it all. How I create a port? I create a Makefile, pkg-descr, run make makesum, write pkg-plist with a files structure. It's logicaly separated: make logic, port description, distfiles info, files structure. You gave an example for pkg-comment. But this one-line file IMHO really was useless. Collapsing distfile, pkg-desc and pkg-plist will mix comprehension. Even separated pkg-install and pkg-deinstall has a logic: pkg-install will run only when you install a package not a port. pkg-deistall will run always you deinstall the port. And I absolutely object against of collapsing patch files. When patch files number grew more then five, I've renamed them from patch-0n in patch-WHERE_PLACED::FILE_NAME because I began to tangle them. But if it will one file I have no idea how can I change one of them easy. --- Sem. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 20:04:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51EB16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:04:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (hueytecuilhuitl.mtu.ru [195.34.32.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B4343D53 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:04:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sem@ciam.ru) Received: from ciam.ru (ppp130-240.dialup.mtu-net.ru [62.118.130.240]) by hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8813F17F6D5 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 07:04:29 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from sem@ciam.ru) Message-ID: <3FFE284D.9040006@ciam.ru> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 07:04:29 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6a) Gecko/20031028 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Oliver's work (PR/56961) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 04:04:33 -0000 Oliver Eikemeier (oliver@) has done a big useful work. But he's placed a patch on his ftp. Now ftp is unavailable and his email too (domain fillmore-labs.com is unresolved). Somebody know how to find Oliver? Or may be someone has downloaded a patch when ftp was alive? May be Oliver read this list himself? --- Sem. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 20:16:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64CF16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:16:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA4443D46 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:16:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) i094GXTe011945; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 23:16:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i094G7xc030245; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 23:16:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Sergey Matveychuk In-Reply-To: <3FFE284D.9040006@ciam.ru> References: <3FFE284D.9040006@ciam.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-oXsFagOmnNVI0vCCKtaT" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1073621780.799.39.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 23:16:21 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Oliver's work (PR/56961) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 04:16:47 -0000 --=-oXsFagOmnNVI0vCCKtaT Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 23:04, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Oliver Eikemeier (oliver@) has done a big useful work. But he's placed a=20 > patch on his ftp. >=20 > Now ftp is unavailable and his email too (domain fillmore-labs.com is=20 > unresolved). >=20 > Somebody know how to find Oliver? Or may be someone has downloaded a=20 > patch when ftp was alive? I haven't hard from him in some time. I haven't been able to contact him in a month or so at any of his known addresses. Honestly, I'm worried, but I don't know of any other way to contact him. I had downloaded this patch a long time ago, but it has changed since then. >=20 > May be Oliver read this list himself? Hopefully he'll surface again soon. Joe >=20 > --- > Sem. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-oXsFagOmnNVI0vCCKtaT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA//isUb2iPiv4Uz4cRAqu9AKCjhZCa97EXiidzbtLp+QWx/KQD/ACgk+WL UfnMBRxnkSg5HCER2CRZtUE= =kL0E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-oXsFagOmnNVI0vCCKtaT-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 20:17:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECAA16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:17:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from catseye.mine.nu (d207-81-17-215.bchsia.telus.net [207.81.17.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90CA943D5D for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:17:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from catseye@catseye.mine.nu) Received: (qmail 69066 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Jan 2004 04:21:18 -0000 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:21:18 -0800 From: Chris Pressey To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040108202118.009a5dce.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <3FFE2602.3000105@ciam.ru> References: <200401090233.51499.max@love2party.net> <3FFE2602.3000105@ciam.ru> Organization: Cat's Eye Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 04:17:13 -0000 On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 06:54:42 +0300 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > At 2:33 AM +0100 1/9/04, Max Laier wrote: > >> 2) Changes are much harder to track: > > > > On the contrary, changes should be *easier* to track. All the > > information for any given port will be in two files. This will > > not be true for all ports (particularly for ports which have a > > lot of patch files). > > Let's image a situation: port has changed. What is chaneged? Let's see > in WebCVS. Does distfile has changed? If yes, I know tarball has > changed. pkg-plist has changed? I know a files structure has changed. > I got this information even without opening this files. I'll open only > Makefile to see a changes in it. > It may be much harder to look at a big diff instead. FWIW I agree with this point. IMO a much better idea would be: Hack cvsup so that it can automatically create/update sharfiles of specified directories on the client. This approach would: - achieve the stated goal (save inodes) - be virtually seamless (nothing in CVS would have to change) - have greater applicability (i.e. it could be useful to other projects, not just the ports tree.) Plus you'd get to code in Modula-3 :) -Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 20:17:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4484216A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:17:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E366043D2F for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:17:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 5F381146FA; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:17:44 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:17:44 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Garance A Drosihn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 04:17:54 -0000 > and then fill that directory with files patch.001 through > patch.042. I think this is a step backwards. Let's consider the problem from a maintainence standpoint. The files that change the most rapidly are files/patch-*, because they are affected both by port updates, and also changes to the underlying infrastructure such as the recent gcc3.3 import which we are still struggling with. Giving these things symbolic names helps to keep clear what's doing what. Next most rapid to change are Makefile and distinfo and that's just talking about version tracking. Some external code is released on a quite regular basis. Sometimes this can be dealt with by just a change to portrevision and checksum; sometimes not, and something else needs to change such as portepoch or the install tweaks. The next most rapid to change are plist and those tend to change less often than the distinfo changes, but there are the occasional exceptions (generally chasing down plist bugs found during packaging). The next most rapid is the pkg-descr and that's generally because the URL move around (of course, that affects Makefiles too). The pkg-message and pkg-comment files were the ones that were mostly static. The reason pkg-comment was nuked was that it was only one line. Remember, too, that during the conversion, the ports tree was unstable for a time (having a free-form text line with all kinds of special characters really gave the make infrastructure a bad case of gas), and in addition there was a lot of repo-churn. I'm still not personally convinced it was worth the pain, but that's water under the bridge. I think the same arguments pro and con could be made for incorporating pkg-message. There would be N less files, but N more opportunities to mess up the Makefiles (if that was the way you were going to go about it). And then, there's the repo-churn. Every single consumer of cvsup would wind up having to reload a copy of every single port. That's a lot of bandwidth, too. But in your plan, if I understand it, a change in any of these things results in a change to a single, unified, file. Now I can't go to the CVS logs and quickly say, oh, the last year's worth of Makefile changes were just to keep up with infrastructure changes; the distfile hasn't changed in 2 years. (This is a very common situation). Now, for each change, you have to go through and find out exactly what it applied to. Now let's consider maintainability once again. The ability to separate the patches into discrete files with descriptive names is a very powerful thing if you're someone like me who winds up trying to do updates to a large number of ports. I find the ports with a large number of patches stuck together in patch-aa, patch-ab, etc., to be incredibly frustrating to work with. You can't even tell from glancing at them if they even overlap. I think it would be a mistake to take away the ability to rapidly browse these files. In any case worrying about inode count strikes me as an early- to mid-90s kind of problem. Fry's has 250Gs on the shelf. ISTM that there's room for lots of inodes on that. Honestly, I think if some work was done that would touch every port in the ports system, it ought to be something that gave us so much generalization as a tradeoff for the pain that would ensue (something like some kind of meta- descriptor language?) that it would be worth it. I really can't agree that this is it. To me, I really think you're trying to solve a problem here that just isn't a problem for the majority of users, at least with respect to the amount of repo-churn and bandwidth-churn it would entail. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 20:30:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED0816A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:30:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601E143D64 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:30:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 081A7146F9; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:30:36 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:30:36 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1073621780.799.39.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Sergey Matveychuk cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Oliver's work (PR/56961) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 04:30:41 -0000 In his introductory message, Oliver did not include the city where he lives. Does anyone remember? If he once emailed it to me, I don't have it anymore. Whether he comes back to the project or not, I sure hope he's ok. Since he and I were basically in constant email contact before the site went down, I'm starting to get really worried. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 20:42:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C0C16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:42:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from mag.barnet.com.au (mag.barnet.com.au [218.185.88.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D481243D5C for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:41:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from extmail.barnet.com.au (tim.direct.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.10.2]) by mag.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A95B16B; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:41:46 +1100 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <3FFE310A000172E20174B9E1@VIRUSCAN-127.0.0.1> Received: from extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by extmail.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA2F1F22; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:41:45 +1100 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECE81F1E; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:41:45 +1100 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 129836A7101; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:41:45 +1100 (EST) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:41:45 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Joe Marcus Clarke Message-ID: <20040109044145.GD1667@k7.mavetju> References: <3FFE284D.9040006@ciam.ru> <1073621780.799.39.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1073621780.799.39.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Oliver's work (PR/56961) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 04:42:00 -0000 On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 11:16:21PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 23:04, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > Oliver Eikemeier (oliver@) has done a big useful work. But he's placed a > > patch on his ftp. > > > > Now ftp is unavailable and his email too (domain fillmore-labs.com is > > unresolved). > > > > Somebody know how to find Oliver? Or may be someone has downloaded a > > patch when ftp was alive? > > I haven't hard from him in some time. I haven't been able to contact > him in a month or so at any of his known addresses. Honestly, I'm > worried, but I don't know of any other way to contact him. I had > downloaded this patch a long time ago, but it has changed since then. Maybe one of our German collegues[sp] on this list wants to spend 25 euro-cents on a phonecall to the number mentioned in whois for fillmore-labs.com to figure out if Oliver is still breathing. http://mightymueller.de/links_en.htm Or at least give us peace of heart... Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 20:48:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E96C16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:48:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (hueytecuilhuitl.mtu.ru [195.34.32.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D35A43D46 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 20:48:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sem@ciam.ru) Received: from ciam.ru (ppp131-12.dialup.mtu-net.ru [62.118.131.12]) by hueymiccailhuitl.mtu.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9ED17ED33; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 07:48:38 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from sem@ciam.ru) Message-ID: <3FFE329F.7010608@ciam.ru> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 07:48:31 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6a) Gecko/20031028 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Linimon References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Oliver's work (PR/56961) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 04:48:45 -0000 Mark Linimon wrote: > In his introductory message, Oliver did not include the > city where he lives. Does anyone remember? If he once > emailed it to me, I don't have it anymore. He told me he is from Germany. No more. > > Whether he comes back to the project or not, I sure > hope he's ok. Since he and I were basically in constant > email contact before the site went down, I'm starting > to get really worried. I hope it's a technical problems with his employer firm. And may be he has no another internet account. So we need just wait with no information :( 2marcus: Can you send me the patch please? --- Sem. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 21:06:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25DE16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:06:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9529343D55 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:06:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i09565A7007036; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:06:05 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.3/Submit) id i09565tC007033; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:06:05 -0800 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:06:05 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Sergey Matveychuk Message-ID: <20040109050604.GA5276@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <3FFE284D.9040006@ciam.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J/dobhs11T7y2rNN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FFE284D.9040006@ciam.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Oliver's work (PR/56961) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:06:18 -0000 --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 07:04:29AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Oliver Eikemeier (oliver@) has done a big useful work. But he's placed a= =20 > patch on his ftp. >=20 > Now ftp is unavailable and his email too (domain fillmore-labs.com is=20 > unresolved). The Way Back Machine has some snapshots of www.fillmore-labs.com which includes the following contact information: Fillmore Labs GmbH Triforum C2 Frankfurter Stra=DFe 233 D-63263 Neu-Isenburg Fon +49 (0) 61 02 88 47 8-6 Fax +49 (0) 61 02 88 47 8-70 http://web.archive.org/web/*/fillmore-labs.com -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE//ja7XY6L6fI4GtQRAuS7AJ9wGOLFgEEZ8/edWFwYoQW/qu3tzQCfWX39 FIzhWq5BW0sozMPZXYhRFoc= =8zS9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J/dobhs11T7y2rNN-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 21:08:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D922C16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:08:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.server.rpi.edu (smtp1.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD9743D46 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:07:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp1.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0957tLJ027359; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:07:55 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:07:53 -0500 To: Mark Linimon From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:08:01 -0000 At 10:17 PM -0600 1/8/04, Mark Linimon wrote: >But in your plan, if I understand it, a change in any >of these things results in a change to a single, unified, >file. Now I can't go to the CVS logs and quickly say, >oh, the last year's worth of Makefile changes were just >to keep up with infrastructure changes; the distfile hasn't >changed in 2 years. (This is a very common situation). It could very well be that some of the files should *NOT* be collapsed into this new file, for reasons like you describe above. That's certainly the kind of insight that I do not have a good-enough feel for. >Now let's consider maintainability once again. The ability >to separate the patches into discrete files with descriptive >names is a very powerful thing if you're someone like me >who winds up trying to do updates to a large number of >ports. I find the ports with a large number of patches >stuck together in patch-aa, patch-ab, etc., to be >incredibly frustrating to work with. You can't even >tell from glancing at them if they even overlap. I think >it would be a mistake to take away the ability to rapidly >browse these files. Inside the proposed pkg-data file, the patches can have whatever names you want. (That was already part of my plan). For instance, you could name each patch for the exact filename it modifies (if you wanted to) -- including directory names and using '/'s as separators. It's just that when the program spits them out, it'll do it into boring-named files. That was my thought, at least, I'm certainly willing to spit them out with other names. >In any case worrying about inode count strikes me as an >early- to mid-90s kind of problem. Fry's has 250Gs on the >shelf. ISTM that there's room for lots of inodes on that. That's a lot of DISK SPACE, but no matter how large the disk is, it is unwieldy to have files which are 100 bytes per inode, instead of (maybe) 2000 bytes per inode. When I'm talking about larger disks, I'm thinking that as the size of the disk increases, the more you're going to have larger values for f_bsize or f_frsize (in statfvs). You don't want a 200gig disk with a 256 byte block-size. And if you have a 8192-byte block size, then you're wasting disk space on almost every file in the ports-tree. Not only that, but you're killing performance when doing operations on the entire ports tree (an operation such as 'cvsup'). The amount of time to find-and-read ten small files is going to be much more than to find-and-read one larger file (particularly if that entire larger file can still fit in a single block on the disk). >Honestly, I think if some work was done that would touch >every port in the ports system, it ought to be something >that gave us so much generalization as a tradeoff for the >pain that would ensue (something like some kind of meta- >descriptor language?) that it would be worth it. I really >can't agree that this is it. Let me just say that I have some long-term ideas which are a bit more ambitious, but this idea is a doable first-step towards those ideas. I don't really think *I* can do the longer-term ideas, but I can leave the ports-tree in a more flexible state for other projects to take advantage of. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 21:20:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A62416A4D0 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:20:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFC743D2D for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:20:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DAF1FF90C for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:20:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 5F0961FF91D; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:20:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 095EF154EC; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 05:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36AF153CA for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 05:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 05:14:27 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040109050604.GA5276@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> Message-ID: References: <3FFE284D.9040006@ciam.ru> <20040109050604.GA5276@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de Subject: Re: Oliver's work (PR/56961) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:20:12 -0000 On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 07:04:29AM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > Oliver Eikemeier (oliver@) has done a big useful work. But he's placed a > > patch on his ftp. > > > > Now ftp is unavailable and his email too (domain fillmore-labs.com is > > unresolved). > > The Way Back Machine has some snapshots of www.fillmore-labs.com which > includes the following contact information: googling for eik_e_meier you will also find a VCARD of him but someone may also want to try http://sourceforge.net/users/eikemeier/ or http://sourceforge.net/users/eik/ -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74 http://www.zabbadoz.net/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 21:20:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BB916A4F3 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:20:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561E643D4C for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:20:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i095KJA7008831; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:20:19 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.3/Submit) id i095KJ22008830; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:20:19 -0800 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:20:19 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040109052019.GA8007@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: Mark Linimon cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:20:24 -0000 --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 12:07:53AM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 10:17 PM -0600 1/8/04, Mark Linimon wrote: > >Now let's consider maintainability once again. The ability > >to separate the patches into discrete files with descriptive > >names is a very powerful thing if you're someone like me > >who winds up trying to do updates to a large number of > >ports. I find the ports with a large number of patches > >stuck together in patch-aa, patch-ab, etc., to be > >incredibly frustrating to work with. You can't even > >tell from glancing at them if they even overlap. I think > >it would be a mistake to take away the ability to rapidly > >browse these files. >=20 > Inside the proposed pkg-data file, the patches can have > whatever names you want. (That was already part of my > plan). For instance, you could name each patch for the > exact filename it modifies (if you wanted to) -- including > directory names and using '/'s as separators. It's just > that when the program spits them out, it'll do it into > boring-named files. That was my thought, at least, I'm > certainly willing to spit them out with other names. What I'd really like to see from you is, what does the port maintanence cycle look like to the port maintainer and how is it different from today. I can think of different ways it would work, but I want to know how you see it happening. One thing I like about the idea of stuffing the patches into some sort of single file is that it would actually reduce the amount of information I have to put in PRs since path addition and removal would just happen. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE//joRXY6L6fI4GtQRApXFAJ9YFdreU+RK3O9bReSVRoXexxusaQCfQrmW hLFuh9bphhmdSORFTpZ/ofo= =t3FY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PNTmBPCT7hxwcZjr-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 21:30:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39FA16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:30:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.server.rpi.edu (smtp3.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF0243D2F for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:30:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp3.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i095UPAI032306; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:30:25 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040109052019.GA8007@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <20040109052019.GA8007@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:30:24 -0500 To: Brooks Davis From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:30:27 -0000 At 9:20 PM -0800 1/8/04, Brooks Davis wrote: >On Fri, Jan 09, 2004, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > Inside the proposed pkg-data file, the patches can have >> whatever names you want. (That was already part of my >> plan). For instance, you could name each patch for the >> exact filename it modifies (if you wanted to) -- including >> directory names and using '/'s as separators. It's just >> that when the program spits them out, it'll do it into >> boring-named files. That was my thought, at least, I'm >> certainly willing to spit them out with other names. > >What I'd really like to see from you is, what does the port >maintanence cycle look like to the port maintainer and how >is it different from today. I can think of different ways >it would work, but I want to know how you see it happening. Basically, I don't have a finalized idea on that. That's the kind of feedback that I need from developers who are more experienced with ports than I am. From other comments in this thread, I'm thinking that maybe I need some kind of "export" and "import" option on the simple-program for managing the pkg-data file. So (maybe) you would: 1) run: pdatamgr export patches which would create a directory that has all the patches in the present patch file. 2) make whatever changes you want to make. 3) run: pdatamgr import patches and the program pulls those patches into the pkg-data file. 4) run: cvs commit pkg-data but really, I'm open to other ideas. This project has plenty of work to keep me busy before I need to write that code. >One thing I like about the idea of stuffing the patches into >some sort of single file is that it would actually reduce the >amount of information I have to put in PRs since path addition >and removal would just happen. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 21:43:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FB616A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:43:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from catseye.mine.nu (d207-81-17-215.bchsia.telus.net [207.81.17.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AEDF43D2D for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:43:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from catseye@catseye.mine.nu) Received: (qmail 69559 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Jan 2004 05:47:59 -0000 Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 21:47:59 -0800 From: Chris Pressey To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040108214759.6fd85d09.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Cat's Eye Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 05:43:55 -0000 On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:07:53 -0500 Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Inside the proposed pkg-data file, the patches can have > whatever names you want. Names that you will rarely, if ever, see in a unified diff between two pkg-data files - I think that's the most common objection so far. > Not only that, but you're killing performance when doing > operations on the entire ports tree (an operation such as > 'cvsup'). The amount of time to find-and-read ten small > files is going to be much more than to find-and-read one > larger file (particularly if that entire larger file can > still fit in a single block on the disk). So fix cvsup :) > Let me just say that I have some long-term ideas which are a bit more > ambitious, but this idea is a doable first-step towards those ideas. > I don't really think *I* can do the longer-term ideas, but I can leave > the ports-tree in a more flexible state for other projects to take > advantage of. Ah, well that's a slightly different goal than "Just reduce the inode count" isn't it? Sorry, I don't mean to sound snarky, but when you stated that goal I took it on face value... and now you go and change it :) But actually, I don't see how bundling everything up into a single (or a couple of) pkg-data file(s) leaves the ports tree in a more flexible state, either... -Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 22:27:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B8C16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:27:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DC743D1F for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:27:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) i096QsTe001997; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 01:26:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i096QZxc031047; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 01:26:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Sergey Matveychuk In-Reply-To: <3FFE329F.7010608@ciam.ru> References: <3FFE329F.7010608@ciam.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-9LgA8Ee6dPYEPqQuQhi5" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1073629610.799.43.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 01:26:50 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: Mark Linimon cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Oliver's work (PR/56961) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 06:27:07 -0000 --=-9LgA8Ee6dPYEPqQuQhi5 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 23:48, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Mark Linimon wrote: > > In his introductory message, Oliver did not include the > > city where he lives. Does anyone remember? If he once > > emailed it to me, I don't have it anymore. >=20 > He told me he is from Germany. No more. >=20 > >=20 > > Whether he comes back to the project or not, I sure > > hope he's ok. Since he and I were basically in constant > > email contact before the site went down, I'm starting > > to get really worried. >=20 > I hope it's a technical problems with his employer firm. > And may be he has no another internet account. > So we need just wait with no information :( >=20 > 2marcus: Can you send me the patch please? Sorry, it seems I no longer have it. Joe >=20 > --- > Sem. --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-9LgA8Ee6dPYEPqQuQhi5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA//kmqb2iPiv4Uz4cRAvF5AJ9ZvHPfj+2g1V9INwDKVic+3oS5xQCffG4P /W2XhdOKc8e4Obu7Wj+j9o4= =wS+A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-9LgA8Ee6dPYEPqQuQhi5-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 22:46:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84EA16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:46:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from web21505.mail.yahoo.com (web21505.mail.yahoo.com [66.163.169.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D6E643D31 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:46:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from william_devries2000@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040109064639.70858.qmail@web21505.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.229.101.2] by web21505.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 08 Jan 2004 22:46:39 PST Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:46:39 -0800 (PST) From: William DeVries To: Garance A Drosihn , Mark Linimon In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: william_devries@wsu.edu List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 06:46:41 -0000 --- Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 10:17 PM -0600 1/8/04, Mark Linimon wrote: > >But in your plan, if I understand it, a change in > any > >of these things results in a change to a single, > unified, > >file. Now I can't go to the CVS logs and quickly > say, > >oh, the last year's worth of Makefile changes were > just > >to keep up with infrastructure changes; the > distfile hasn't > >changed in 2 years. (This is a very common > situation). > > It could very well be that some of the files should > *NOT* > be collapsed into this new file, for reasons like > you > describe above. That's certainly the kind of > insight > that I do not have a good-enough feel for. The pkg* files in this directory, and the packing list(p-list) are copied in the package manager's database directory for the port, so the way it's set up now is logical, except for the remove of pkg_comment file. This some of these file are modified in some rules, like the p-list, so in your > > >Now let's consider maintainability once again. The > ability > >to separate the patches into discrete files with > descriptive > >names is a very powerful thing if you're someone > like me > >who winds up trying to do updates to a large number > of > >ports. I find the ports with a large number of > patches > >stuck together in patch-aa, patch-ab, etc., to be > >incredibly frustrating to work with. You can't > even > >tell from glancing at them if they even overlap. I > think > >it would be a mistake to take away the ability to > rapidly > >browse these files. > > Inside the proposed pkg-data file, the patches can > have > whatever names you want. (That was already part of > my > plan). For instance, you could name each patch for > the > exact filename it modifies (if you wanted to) -- > including > directory names and using '/'s as separators. It's > just > that when the program spits them out, it'll do it > into > boring-named files. That was my thought, at least, > I'm > certainly willing to spit them out with other names. What do you mean by "spit them out." If you mean extract the files then the changes needed to do this would probably be fairly trivial(I haven't read the whole file). As I understand this stuff, you could use tar to bundle up the files, then add an a new rule to bsd.port.mk to extract the files. Then in the default rule, the one that gets called when you type 'make,' you could call your special rule. To maintain compatibility with current ports, this new rule should not crash and burn if one of your new files is not present, thus allowing the use of the old system. I not going to pretend to know if this is suggestion is actually correct. If you plan on storing them in variables in make, then it would be much more complicated. For the pkg* and p-list files the changes to bsd.port.mk would be fairly easy, but the patches would be somewhat complicated. It sounds like(from other post) you mean the first. > > >In any case worrying about inode count strikes me > as an > >early- to mid-90s kind of problem. Fry's has 250Gs > on the > >shelf. ISTM that there's room for lots of inodes > on that. > > That's a lot of DISK SPACE, but no matter how large > the > disk is, it is unwieldy to have files which are 100 > bytes > per inode, instead of (maybe) 2000 bytes per inode. > > When I'm talking about larger disks, I'm thinking > that as > the size of the disk increases, the more you're > going to > have larger values for f_bsize or f_frsize (in > statfvs). > You don't want a 200gig disk with a 256 byte > block-size. > And if you have a 8192-byte block size, then you're > wasting > disk space on almost every file in the ports-tree. I would imagine that most people don't care about a few megabytes of disk space. A clean understandable design is probably more important, not that we have that now. > > Not only that, but you're killing performance when > doing > operations on the entire ports tree (an operation > such as > 'cvsup'). The amount of time to find-and-read ten > small > files is going to be much more than to find-and-read > one > larger file (particularly if that entire larger file > can > still fit in a single block on the disk). The time that the port system spends reading and writing to these files is probably very small, and thus not important. "Premature optimization is the root of all evil" - D. Knuth I don't understand how > > >Honestly, I think if some work was done that would > touch > >every port in the ports system, it ought to be > something > >that gave us so much generalization as a tradeoff > for the > >pain that would ensue (something like some kind of > meta- > >descriptor language?) that it would be worth it. I > really > >can't agree that this is it. > > Let me just say that I have some long-term ideas > which are > a bit more ambitious, but this idea is a doable > first-step > towards those ideas. I don't really think *I* can > do the > longer-term ideas, but I can leave the ports-tree in > a > more flexible state for other projects to take > advantage of. I don't think what you are suggesting is needed, but there are many things that could probably be done here that would be very useful, like documenting of all the rules in bsd.port.mk. What are the other ideas, just because one idea is not liked, does not mean the other will be. If I got something wrong, forgive me. --William DeVries > > -- > Garance Alistair Drosehn = > gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu > Senior Systems Programmer or > gad@freebsd.org > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or > drosih@rpi.edu > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 22:52:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A1216A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:52:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.netcologne.de (smtp1.netcologne.de [194.8.194.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690BA43D62 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:52:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thomas@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org) Received: from laurel.tmseck.homedns.org (xdsl-213-168-110-146.netcologne.de [213.168.110.146]) by smtp1.netcologne.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 62EE738BB4 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 07:52:27 +0100 (MET) Received: (qmail 718 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Jan 2004 06:52:20 -0000 Date: 9 Jan 2004 06:52:20 -0000 Message-ID: <20040109065220.717.qmail@laurel.tmseck.homedns.org> From: tmseck-lists@netcologne.de (Thomas-Martin Seck) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Organization: private site In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports X-Attribution: tms Subject: Re: Oliver's work (PR/56961) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 06:52:30 -0000 * Mark Linimon : > In his introductory message, Oliver did not include the > city where he lives. Does anyone remember? If he once > emailed it to me, I don't have it anymore. According to whois, the company that owns fillmore-labs.com used to be registered in Offenbach IIRC, currently it's registerd to be in Neu-Isenburg. Both towns are in the Frankfurt area. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 22:55:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E36F16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:55:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.server.rpi.edu (smtp1.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0082243D46 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 22:55:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp1.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i096toLJ007709; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 01:55:50 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040108214759.6fd85d09.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> References: <20040108214759.6fd85d09.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 01:55:48 -0500 To: Chris Pressey , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 06:55:53 -0000 At 9:47 PM -0800 1/8/04, Chris Pressey wrote: >On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:07:53 -0500 >Garance A Drosihn wrote: > >> Inside the proposed pkg-data file, the patches can have >> whatever names you want. > >Names that you will rarely, if ever, see in a unified diff >between two pkg-data files - I think that's the most common >objection so far. Well, we could fix 'diff' for that... :-) > > Not only that, but you're killing performance when doing >> operations on the entire ports tree (an operation such as >> 'cvsup'). The amount of time to find-and-read ten small >> files is going to be much more than to find-and-read one >> larger file (particularly if that entire larger file can >> still fit in a single block on the disk). > >So fix cvsup :) It isn't an issue with CVSup. It's the reality of disk I/O. There are already people talking about how we will soon have hard disks which are huge and fast, but which you will *never* be able to fill up if you're writing billions of little random-access files. Seek-times and look-up times will completely overwhelm any actual data-transfer times. I'm not saying *that* is a valid justification for doing my project, but I'll try to subliminally get you to think that it is significant without me ever actually saying it is... :-) > > Let me just say that I have some long-term ideas which are > > a bit more ambitious, but this idea is a doable first-step > > towards those ideas. > >Ah, well that's a slightly different goal than "Just reduce >the inode count" isn't it? Well, the inode-count is (IMO) the main justification of *this* project. I didn't want to try to sell this project based on some follow-on project, when I have no idea that I'll ever get to any follow-on projects... >Sorry, I don't mean to sound snarky, No problem. I didn't want to write up a huge message with all the details until I had some feedback on a simplistic overview of the idea. >but when you stated that goal I took it on face value... >and now you go and change it :) > >But actually, I don't see how bundling everything up into a >single (or a couple of) pkg-data file(s) leaves the ports >tree in a more flexible state, either... Well, because you can then add more fields to the new file, without adding more files to the overall ports collection... -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 8 23:51:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF0A16A4CE for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 23:51:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.net [193.162.142.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A3843D39 for ; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 23:51:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 15FA422881; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:51:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:51:12 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040109075111.GA78450@droso.net> References: <1073621780.799.39.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 5.1-CURRENT Subject: Re: Oliver's work (PR/56961) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 07:51:16 -0000 --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 10:30:36PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: > In his introductory message, Oliver did not include the > city where he lives. Does anyone remember? If he once > emailed it to me, I don't have it anymore. Frankfurt am Main (not the other one) >=20 > Whether he comes back to the project or not, I sure > hope he's ok. Since he and I were basically in constant > email contact before the site went down, I'm starting > to get really worried. >=20 Last message I got was in the beginning of December, saying he was changing appartments and should have his new DSL up in a few days. Hopefully this caused some outage and combined with the holidays this is all, but I sure am worried. -erwin --=20 _._ _,-'""`-._ Erwin Lansing (,-.`._,'( |\`-/| erwin@lansing.dk http://droso.org `-.-' \ )-`( , o o) erwin@FreeBSD.org -bf- `- \`_`"'- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//l1vqy9aWxUlaZARAikXAKDxfiGp43uR6uj6822o+93DAHCYtgCfVtCY geF567nIiZjW5mic4qpm/l0= =w59B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 00:23:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE2B16A4CE; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:23:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CC443D2D; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 00:23:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id E760B531A; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:23:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 8497D5319; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:23:28 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 6DCEB33C9A; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:23:28 +0100 (CET) To: Alfred Perlstein References: <20031226233542.GM77132@elvis.mu.org> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:23:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20031226233542.GM77132@elvis.mu.org> (Alfred Perlstein's message of "Fri, 26 Dec 2003 15:35:42 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port fix. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 08:23:36 -0000 Alfred Perlstein writes: > Can I commit this? Sure. Could you also change MAINTAINER to java@? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 01:52:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A7916A4CE; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 01:52:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from lilith.bellavista.cz (bellavista.worldonline.cz [212.90.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A0F43D4C; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 01:52:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from neuhauser@bellavista.cz) Received: from freepuppy.bellavista.cz (freepuppy.bellavista.cz [10.0.0.10]) by lilith.bellavista.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2AF5B; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:52:46 +0100 (CET) Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7F4622FDA09; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:52:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:52:46 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20040109095246.GT54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports References: <3FFC03E5.7010305@iconoplex.co.uk> <200401071429.i07ETZMI068819@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20040107200838.GD86935@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040108071730.GA53328@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040108173642.GS54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109003630.GA63979@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040109003630.GA63979@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 09:52:55 -0000 # kris@obsecurity.org / 2004-01-08 16:36:30 -0800: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:36:42PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > That might be technically true, but the precise semantics of > > "(semi-)freeze" aren't as widely known as you seem to think. > > E. g. yesterday or today I received an email from a committer in > > response to my two mails to ports@ (the first urging a repocopy > > requested in a PR some time ago, the other retracting the request > > because of the freeze) saying (paraphrased) "to my surprise I was > > told repocopies are allowed during freeze". Some people just prefer > > to err on the safe side. > > Repo-copies are not allowed during the freeze, but are any other time. ok, so someone (at least two people) out there is confused about this, and this only further proves my statement about the uncertainty. > > > > Porter's handbook, and FDP Primer, while valuable (esp. the former) > > > > leave many questions unanswered. (I'm not going to further this > > > > rant, but will gladly provide feedback to anyone who asks.) > > > > > > I would have thought the procedure to rectify this would be obvious: > > > > The procedure really is obvious, but there's only so much time in a > > day. > > > > Also, I would have thought the Porter's handbook would e. g. contain > > info on preventing installation of .la files (I gathered from the > > ports@ list that they shouldn't be installed), isn't this lack quite > > obvious? > > No, please raise this on the ports list. ok, cc'd to ports, Mail-Followup-To set. -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 03:55:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC1016A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 03:55:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from lilith.bellavista.cz (bellavista.worldonline.cz [212.90.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA36D43D4C for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 03:55:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from neuhauser@bellavista.cz) Received: from freepuppy.bellavista.cz (freepuppy.bellavista.cz [10.0.0.10]) by lilith.bellavista.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5822D; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:55:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 46B0D2FDA10; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:55:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:55:42 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040109115542.GU54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Garance A Drosihn , Edwin Groothuis , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, Brooks Davis References: <20040109052019.GA8007@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20040109012651.GB1667@k7.mavetju> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: Brooks Davis cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:55:48 -0000 # drosih@rpi.edu / 2004-01-08 20:56:43 -0500: > At 12:26 PM +1100 1/9/04, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > >Garance writes: > > > I think the easiest and clearest way to implement > >> this would be one C program, and not 800 lines of /bin/sh > >> commands and deep make-magic. > > > >There you make a wrong assumption about the bsd.*.mk and make(1). > >bsd.*.mk is doing the same as the local Makefile, it sets global > >configurable data and has executable data in it. > > > >Make(1) is doing the magic of glueing the the configurable data and > >the executable data. That is what you're going to make again. Except > >that the executable data is moved from bsd.*.mk to your make(U). > > I'm not sure why you mention 'make'. The program I'm talking > about is going to be a trivial little thing which will do nothing > more than read info from the new file, and (most likely) write it > out to separate files under the 'work' directory, when building > a port. Nothing to do with dependencies, last-chg times, make > variables. such program (and file format) already exist: /bin/sh and shar # drosih@rpi.edu / 2004-01-09 00:30:24 -0500: > At 9:20 PM -0800 1/8/04, Brooks Davis wrote: > >What I'd really like to see from you is, what does the port > >maintanence cycle look like to the port maintainer and how > >is it different from today. I can think of different ways > >it would work, but I want to know how you see it happening. > > Basically, I don't have a finalized idea on that. That's > the kind of feedback that I need from developers who are > more experienced with ports than I am. that won't work. you'll have to convince all the port maintainers and submitters that the change you propose won't make port creation and maintanance more laborous than it is, and if you want to convince anybody, you need a proof backed by experience. -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 03:59:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA21A16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 03:59:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from lilith.bellavista.cz (bellavista.worldonline.cz [212.90.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA3943D5D for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 03:59:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from neuhauser@bellavista.cz) Received: from freepuppy.bellavista.cz (freepuppy.bellavista.cz [10.0.0.10]) by lilith.bellavista.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7925B for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:59:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 039A12FDA09; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:59:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:59:13 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20040109115913.GV54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20040109020118.GA57636@mccaffrey.house.so14k.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040109020118.GA57636@mccaffrey.house.so14k.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 11:59:16 -0000 # so14k@so14k.com / 2004-01-08 19:01:18 -0700: > Why not start small and move the distinfo file into the Makefile? (This > follows the path the pkg-comment went) This would be fairly easy to > implement IMHO and not quite as radical as the change your suggesting. breaks the makesum target -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 04:19:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442E316A4D0 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 04:19:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2913B43D3F for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 04:19:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 075F85C78C; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 04:19:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 04:19:23 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20040109121923.GK9623@elvis.mu.org> References: <20031226233542.GM77132@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port fix. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:19:24 -0000 * Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav [040109 00:23] wrote: > Alfred Perlstein writes: > > Can I commit this? > > Sure. Could you also change MAINTAINER to java@? > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav - des@des.no done -- - Alfred Perlstein - Research Engineering Development Inc. - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 04:52:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC5916A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 04:52:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com (mailout10.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBC243D45 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 04:52:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd09.aul.t-online.de by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1Aew6Z-00013i-03; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:51:11 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (EBW3RoZEreOWsOP7zuNlodaFdhDHrNsLhYpzeBFogetNDb3YfQEPoq@[217.229.212.142]) by fmrl09.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1Aew6B-0XgUS00; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:50:47 +0100 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i09CogJb028381; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:50:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i09Cov8C098455; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:50:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:50:57 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Edwin Groothuis Message-Id: <20040109135057.785c7750@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20040109044145.GD1667@k7.mavetju> References: <3FFE284D.9040006@ciam.ru> <1073621780.799.39.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20040109044145.GD1667@k7.mavetju> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Seen: false X-ID: EBW3RoZEreOWsOP7zuNlodaFdhDHrNsLhYpzeBFogetNDb3YfQEPoq@t-dialin.net cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Oliver's work (PR/56961) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:52:12 -0000 On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:41:45 +1100 Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Maybe one of our German collegues[sp] on this list wants to spend > 25 euro-cents on a phonecall to the number mentioned in whois for > fillmore-labs.com to figure out if Oliver is still breathing. I searched the public phonebook (http://www.telefonbuch.de/). There's one Eikemeier in Frankfurt am Main, but calling the number gives a strange result. First it sounds as if there's no connection behind this number ("t=FC t=FC t=FC - Kein Anschluss unter dieser Nummer"), but after t= he first 3 tones it switches over to the no free line indication ("tut tut tut tut ..."). If this is his old address, it seems he has no phone number forwarding. But judging from reports in some computer magazines about the way DSL get handled sometimes (you may get a "yes, no problem to use DSL", you order it, and it doesn't work) it may not be far fetched to say, the phone company may have something fucked up and because of the holidays it isn't fixed yet. Bye, Alexander. --=20 I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint =3D C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 05:01:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D5616A4CE; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 05:01:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from shaft.techsupport.co.uk (shaft.techsupport.co.uk [212.250.77.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4446F43D41; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 05:01:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com ([81.103.67.204] helo=shrike.submonkey.net ident=mailnull) by shaft.techsupport.co.uk with esmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1AewGP-000Iwv-Q6; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:01:21 +0000 Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1AewGN-0000S5-DB; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:01:19 +0000 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:01:19 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: lioux@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040109130119.GL8322@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , lioux@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DHdTHwZuIuFUI+Ax" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: Ceri Davies Subject: qmails uid clashes with msql uid X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:01:25 -0000 --DHdTHwZuIuFUI+Ax Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just noticed in the list of reserved uids (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.htm= l#DADS-UID_ that the qmails and msql users both use uid 87. Since msql is unmaintained it should probably change. Ceri --=20 --DHdTHwZuIuFUI+Ax Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//qYfocfcwTS3JF8RAiLpAKCJlcxc0McoenQUc2RNm9gL0zthXwCbBng+ SoN2LNJosx1/m74C6uUnNck= =TErr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DHdTHwZuIuFUI+Ax-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 05:30:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E8116A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 05:30:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B211843D5D for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 05:30:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adamw@magnesium.net) Received: (qmail 8000 invoked by uid 1252); 9 Jan 2004 13:30:01 -0000 Date: 9 Jan 2004 08:30:01 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:30:01 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger To: freebsd-ports Message-ID: <20040109133001.GK30356@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <3FFC03E5.7010305@iconoplex.co.uk> <200401071429.i07ETZMI068819@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20040107200838.GD86935@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040108071730.GA53328@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040108173642.GS54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109003630.GA63979@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040109095246.GT54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040109095246.GT54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> X-Editor: Vim 6.2 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx X-ASL: 6/m/behind you User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 13:30:08 -0000 >> (01.09.2004 @ 0452 PST): Roman Neuhauser said, in 1.9K: << > # kris@obsecurity.org / 2004-01-08 16:36:30 -0800: > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:36:42PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > That might be technically true, but the precise semantics of > > > "(semi-)freeze" aren't as widely known as you seem to think. > > > E. g. yesterday or today I received an email from a committer in > > > response to my two mails to ports@ (the first urging a repocopy > > > requested in a PR some time ago, the other retracting the request > > > because of the freeze) saying (paraphrased) "to my surprise I was > > > told repocopies are allowed during freeze". Some people just prefer > > > to err on the safe side. > > > > Repo-copies are not allowed during the freeze, but are any other time. > > ok, so someone (at least two people) out there is confused about > this, and this only further proves my statement about the uncertainty. Messages stating what Kris said are sent out at the beginning of every freeze. > > > Also, I would have thought the Porter's handbook would e. g. contain > > > info on preventing installation of .la files (I gathered from the > > > ports@ list that they shouldn't be installed), isn't this lack quite > > > obvious? > > > > No, please raise this on the ports list. > > ok, cc'd to ports, Mail-Followup-To set. A fix for this is given in http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/porting.html in the section entitled "Libtool Issues." # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net http://www.vectors.cx From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 06:03:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303F116A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:03:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750CD43D3F for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:03:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.206] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AexEj-0001BA-00 for ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:03:41 +0100 Received: from [217.227.153.7] (helo=vampire.homelinux.org) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AexEj-0003fx-00 for ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:03:41 +0100 Received: (qmail 9554 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2004 14:08:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO fbsd52.laiers.local) (192.168.4.88) by 192.168.4.1 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2004 14:08:00 -0000 From: Max Laier To: Chris Pressey Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:03:36 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401091503.36990.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:e28873fbe4dbe612ce62ab869898ff08 cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 14:03:44 -0000 > On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 06:54:42 +0300 > Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > > Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > > At 2:33 AM +0100 1/9/04, Max Laier wrote: > > >> 2) Changes are much harder to track: > > > > > > On the contrary, changes should be *easier* to track. All the > > > information for any given port will be in two files. This will > > > not be true for all ports (particularly for ports which have a > > > lot of patch files). > > > > Let's image a situation: port has changed. What is chaneged? Let's see > > in WebCVS. Does distfile has changed? If yes, I know tarball has > > changed. pkg-plist has changed? I know a files structure has changed. > > I got this information even without opening this files. I'll open only > > Makefile to see a changes in it. > > It may be much harder to look at a big diff instead. > > FWIW I agree with this point. IMO a much better idea would be: > > Hack cvsup so that it can automatically create/update sharfiles of > specified directories on the client. > > This approach would: > - achieve the stated goal (save inodes) > - be virtually seamless (nothing in CVS would have to change) > - have greater applicability (i.e. it could be useful to other projects, > not just the ports tree.) IMO that's the way to go (if we find that inode reduction is really an aim). Strange that no-one followed up on this. However, you have to keep in mind that you'd couple the bsd.port.mk and cvsup (if I got you right there). This is something that has to be resolved. This is alike what some of the "better" ftp servers do: "get dirname.tar.gz" will create a tarball on the fly. Of course, this should be handled on the client side in our case ... while thinking about it, if you just hack the cvsup client you can adapt to the needs of the portstree as you like. All that'd need to change in the bsd.*.mk is an additional target that'd extract the shar/tarball/whatsoever. -- Best regards, | max@love2party.net Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 06:56:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC08116A4CE; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:56:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from lilith.bellavista.cz (bellavista.worldonline.cz [212.90.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B63BC43D2D; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 06:56:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from neuhauser@bellavista.cz) Received: from freepuppy.bellavista.cz (freepuppy.bellavista.cz [10.0.0.10]) by lilith.bellavista.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F9B5B; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:56:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2E1282FDA15; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:56:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:56:49 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Adam Weinberger Message-ID: <20040109145649.GA5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Adam Weinberger , freebsd-ports References: <3FFC03E5.7010305@iconoplex.co.uk> <200401071429.i07ETZMI068819@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20040107200838.GD86935@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040108071730.GA53328@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040108173642.GS54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109003630.GA63979@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040109095246.GT54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109133001.GK30356@toxic.magnesium.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040109133001.GK30356@toxic.magnesium.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 14:56:56 -0000 # adamw@FreeBSD.org / 2004-01-09 08:30:01 -0500: > >> (01.09.2004 @ 0452 PST): Roman Neuhauser said, in 1.9K: << > > # kris@obsecurity.org / 2004-01-08 16:36:30 -0800: > > > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:36:42PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > > That might be technically true, but the precise semantics of > > > > "(semi-)freeze" aren't as widely known as you seem to think. > > > > E. g. yesterday or today I received an email from a committer in > > > > response to my two mails to ports@ (the first urging a repocopy > > > > requested in a PR some time ago, the other retracting the request > > > > because of the freeze) saying (paraphrased) "to my surprise I was > > > > told repocopies are allowed during freeze". Some people just prefer > > > > to err on the safe side. > > > > > > Repo-copies are not allowed during the freeze, but are any other time. > > > > ok, so someone (at least two people) out there is confused about > > this, and this only further proves my statement about the uncertainty. > > Messages stating what Kris said are sent out at the beginning of every > freeze. But it wouldn't hurt if this info was part of a) porters-handbook b) freebsd-releng with a pointer from porters-handbook right? > > > > Also, I would have thought the Porter's handbook would e. g. > > > > contain info on preventing installation of .la files (I > > > > gathered from the ports@ list that they shouldn't be > > > > installed), isn't this lack quite > > > > obvious? > > > > > > No, please raise this on the ports list. > > > > ok, cc'd to ports, Mail-Followup-To set. > > A fix for this is given in > http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/porting.html > in the section entitled "Libtool Issues." www.freebsd.org/gnome/ is pehaps the last place I would be looking in search for this. doesn't the para belong in porters-handbook? -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 08:16:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 683) id 3CC1016A4D0; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:16:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:16:26 -0800 From: Eivind Eklund To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040109161626.GA64772@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 16:16:26 -0000 Note: I do not read ports@, so any On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 07:49:25PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > What I want to do is create one new file per port, and then > move almost all the other files into that new file. Ideally > each port would end up with just two files. The Makefile, > and this new file (some ports might also need a Makefile.inc > file). Especially as disks get ever-larger, I think we're > better off with fewer-but-larger files, instead of a larger > number of tiny files. I think this would be a step backward, at least for the way I work with ports. * It makes it harder to separate out information for generic processing Example: Today, I can find that there is a bunch of ports with the same pkg-descr by doing # find /usr/ports -name pkg-descr | xargs md5 > md5list # egrep $(echo $(awk '{print $1}' < md5list | sort | uniq -d) | sed s/\ /\|/g) md5list That's something that I can just type out, by knowing the standard Unix utilities. I would be (pleasantly :-) surprised if this was as easy after collecting to one file (and remember, learning new syntax etc makes it harder.) [The above is not tested, BTW - I redo these each time I think I should get around to fixing the people that duplicate pkg-descrs when they get a repo-copy, and then I always find the amount of work involved in contacting that many people too daunting, and go off do something else instead.] * It makes normal development harder; e.g, creating patchsets, and testing variations in patches. * It makes it harder for users to understand what is going on (there is an extra level of indirection, more or less) * It adds another complication for the day when we will be able to get rid of make from ports (this is a personal interest - I believe that there are other script languages than make that probably are more appropriate to use.) The inode goal is laudable, but I think we should focus on ease of development (and thus features) in preference to saving disk space. Disks are getting cheaper all the time, while developer time is always scarce. (Of course, any solution that also improve developer productivity seems nice :-) Eivind. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 08:32:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE3816A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:32:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from lilith.bellavista.cz (bellavista.worldonline.cz [212.90.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2877C43D5D for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:32:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from neuhauser@bellavista.cz) Received: from freepuppy.bellavista.cz (freepuppy.bellavista.cz [10.0.0.10]) by lilith.bellavista.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E655C for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:32:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 40B6F2FDA09; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:32:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:32:20 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser To: freebsd-ports Message-ID: <20040109163220.GB5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Subject: CONFIGURE_TARGET X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 16:32:48 -0000 bsd.port.mk defines CONFIGURE_TARGET?= ${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} but porters-handbook/makefile-build.html says Note: If your package uses GNU configure, and the resulting executable file has a ``strange'' name like i386-portbld-freebsd4.7-appname, you will need to additionally override the CONFIGURE_TARGET variable to specify the target in the way required by scripts generated by recent versions of autoconf. Add the following line immediately after the GNU_CONFIGURE=yes line in your Makefile: CONFIGURE_TARGET=--build=${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} now, couple of questions: * what is the first recent of version of autoconf to require --build=? * what is the percentage of ports that want --build=? (IOW, wouldn't it already make more sense to make that the default value in bsd.port.mk? * how about suggesting CONFIGURE_TARGET:=--build=${CONFIGURE_TARGET} instead? * can't the value be decided automagically? e. g. CONFIGURE_TARGET!=.../configure --help|grep -Fe --build... -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 08:35:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE18916A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:35:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from outpost.globcon.net (outpost.globcon.net [62.141.88.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 535B743D46 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 08:35:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sergei@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 42169 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2004 16:35:12 -0000 Received: from agdcgw01.akingump.com (HELO kolobov.com) (12.40.174.2) by outpost.globcon.net (62.141.88.161) with SMTP; 09 Jan 2004 16:35:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 94259 invoked by uid 911); 9 Jan 2004 16:34:48 -0000 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:34:47 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040109163447.GD706@chetwood.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Garance A Drosihn , Mark Linimon , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T7mxYSe680VjQnyC" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i cc: Mark Linimon cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 16:35:13 -0000 --T7mxYSe680VjQnyC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004-01-09 at 00:07 -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 10:17 PM -0600 1/8/04, Mark Linimon wrote: > >In any case worrying about inode count strikes me as an > >early- to mid-90s kind of problem. Fry's has 250Gs on the > >shelf. ISTM that there's room for lots of inodes on that. >=20 > That's a lot of DISK SPACE, but no matter how large the > disk is, it is unwieldy to have files which are 100 bytes > per inode, instead of (maybe) 2000 bytes per inode. >=20 > When I'm talking about larger disks, I'm thinking that as > the size of the disk increases, the more you're going to > have larger values for f_bsize or f_frsize (in statfvs). > You don't want a 200gig disk with a 256 byte block-size. > And if you have a 8192-byte block size, then you're wasting > disk space on almost every file in the ports-tree. >=20 > Not only that, but you're killing performance when doing > operations on the entire ports tree (an operation such as > 'cvsup'). The amount of time to find-and-read ten small > files is going to be much more than to find-and-read one > larger file (particularly if that entire larger file can > still fit in a single block on the disk). How about putting the effort into improving UFS2 then? Or, perhaps, creating a new file system that handles=20 a lot of tiny files better than the existing file systems? FWIW, I think that the port infrastructure change you proposing creates more problems than it solves. ;) Sergei --T7mxYSe680VjQnyC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//tgnFOxuaTulNAERAjXmAJ9knu9MZYn1hfp7By+nhsmWybSvlACeI/aL UukLMDOgJ7rMQaUU6Vdvb88= =GBab -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T7mxYSe680VjQnyC-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 09:07:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E41316A4D0 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:07:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from outpost.globcon.net (outpost.globcon.net [62.141.88.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6381243D2D for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:07:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sergei@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 42447 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2004 17:07:36 -0000 Received: from agdcgw01.akingump.com (HELO kolobov.com) (12.40.174.2) by outpost.globcon.net (62.141.88.161) with SMTP; 09 Jan 2004 17:07:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 7985 invoked by uid 911); 9 Jan 2004 17:07:12 -0000 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:07:12 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov To: freebsd-ports Message-ID: <20040109170712.GE706@chetwood.ru> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports References: <20040109163220.GB5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FeAIMMcddNRN4P4/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040109163220.GB5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Subject: Re: CONFIGURE_TARGET X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:07:44 -0000 --FeAIMMcddNRN4P4/ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="CGDBiGfvSTbxKZlW" Content-Disposition: inline --CGDBiGfvSTbxKZlW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004-01-09 at 17:32 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > bsd.port.mk defines >=20 > CONFIGURE_TARGET?=3D ${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} >=20 > but porters-handbook/makefile-build.html says >=20 > Note: If your package uses GNU configure, and the resulting > executable file has a ``strange'' name like > i386-portbld-freebsd4.7-appname, you will need to additionally > override the CONFIGURE_TARGET variable to specify the target in the > way required by scripts generated by recent versions of autoconf. > Add the following line immediately after the GNU_CONFIGURE=3Dyes line > in your Makefile: >=20 > CONFIGURE_TARGET=3D--build=3D${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} >=20 > now, couple of questions: >=20 > * what is the first recent of version of autoconf to require --build=3D? 2.5x =20 > * what is the percentage of ports that want --build=3D? (IOW, wouldn't it > already make more sense to make that the default value in bsd.port.mk? I would venture to say that most of recently updated ports require --build. > * how about suggesting >=20 > CONFIGURE_TARGET:=3D--build=3D${CONFIGURE_TARGET} I have suggested another (but similar) approach:=20 see ports/52917 (currently suspended). > * can't the value be decided automagically? e. g. >=20 > CONFIGURE_TARGET!=3D.../configure --help|grep -Fe --build... I have suggested something like that in a thread on this list on 2003-12-01 (attached). I haven't received any response. :( Sergei --CGDBiGfvSTbxKZlW Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: Delivered-To: sgk-freebsd-ports@kolobov.com Received: (qmail 73453 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2003 15:21:44 -0000 Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (216.136.204.119) by outpost.globcon.net (62.141.88.161) with ESMTP; 01 Dec 2003 15:21:44 -0000 Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B09C5639E; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:21:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BB516A4D4; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:21:30 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4633B16A4CE for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:20:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from outpost.globcon.net (outpost.globcon.net [62.141.88.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31D4643F93 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 07:20:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sergei@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 73432 invoked from network); 1 Dec 2003 15:20:55 -0000 Received: from agdcgw01.akingump.com (HELO kolobov.com) (12.40.174.2) by outpost.globcon.net (62.141.88.161) with SMTP; 01 Dec 2003 15:20:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 2102 invoked by uid 911); 1 Dec 2003 15:08:03 -0000 Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 18:08:03 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov To: Oliver Eikemeier Message-ID: <20031201150803.GA977@chetwood.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Oliver Eikemeier , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20031115211641.GA786@chetwood.ru> <3FB6B89D.9050808@fillmore-labs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FB6B89D.9050808@fillmore-labs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/59254: ports that write something after bsd.port.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2003-11-16 at 00:37 +0100, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > How about doing something like > cd ${CONFIGURE_WRKSRC} && ${CONFIGURE_ENV} ./${CONFIGURE_SCRIPT} --versio= n=20 > | sed -ne 's/.*autoconf version \([0-9.]*\).*/\1/p' I took slightly different approach: CONFIGURE_VERSION!=3D ${AWK} '/Generated by GNU Autoconf/ {print $$6;}' \ ${CONFIGURE_WRKSRC}/${CONFIGURE_SCRIPT} =2Eif ${CONFIGURE_VERSION} =3D=3D "2.13"=20 CONFIGURE_TARGET?=3D ${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} else CONFIGURE_TARGET?=3D --build=3D${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} =2Eendif Now, equivalent of this should be included in do-configure target,=20 but I have difficult time figuring out how to rewrite it=20 so it would do the awk call, etc. only at the do-configure time,=20 but not every time bsd.port.mk is sourced.=20 Anyone? Sergei --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/y1lTFOxuaTulNAERAsRFAKCdXZzJrZD9E8bnGcRKwXF5O5st/ACeLiI9 6H343MDfkXry2f0Vl+Ca2GM= =Lmtx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW-- --CGDBiGfvSTbxKZlW-- --FeAIMMcddNRN4P4/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//t/AFOxuaTulNAERAhxOAJ9IFxHvMLqBDCkGjSJN8Q39qCVkmQCdGOhf TR9lO17C8RZ7khZ87w/nQ3A= =sQBf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FeAIMMcddNRN4P4/-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 09:19:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD84A16A4D0; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:19:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7644343D5D; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:19:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) i09HJ2Te012723; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:19:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i09HIZxc036070; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:18:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Sergei Kolobov In-Reply-To: <20040109170712.GE706@chetwood.ru> References: <20040109163220.GB5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109170712.GE706@chetwood.ru> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-aXs2nwqQFgmifiFywfo+" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1073668732.42838.12.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 12:18:53 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: CONFIGURE_TARGET X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:19:54 -0000 --=-aXs2nwqQFgmifiFywfo+ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 12:07, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > On 2004-01-09 at 17:32 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > bsd.port.mk defines > >=20 > > CONFIGURE_TARGET?=3D ${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} > >=20 > > but porters-handbook/makefile-build.html says > >=20 > > Note: If your package uses GNU configure, and the resulting > > executable file has a ``strange'' name like > > i386-portbld-freebsd4.7-appname, you will need to additionally > > override the CONFIGURE_TARGET variable to specify the target in the > > way required by scripts generated by recent versions of autoconf. > > Add the following line immediately after the GNU_CONFIGURE=3Dyes li= ne > > in your Makefile: > >=20 > > CONFIGURE_TARGET=3D--build=3D${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL= } > >=20 > > now, couple of questions: > >=20 > > * what is the first recent of version of autoconf to require --build=3D= ? >=20 > 2.5x > =20 > > * what is the percentage of ports that want --build=3D? (IOW, wouldn't= it > > already make more sense to make that the default value in bsd.port.mk= ? >=20 > I would venture to say that most of recently updated ports require --bui= ld. >=20 > > * how about suggesting > >=20 > > CONFIGURE_TARGET:=3D--build=3D${CONFIGURE_TARGET} >=20 > I have suggested another (but similar) approach:=20 > see ports/52917 (currently suspended). >=20 > > * can't the value be decided automagically? e. g. > >=20 > > CONFIGURE_TARGET!=3D.../configure --help|grep -Fe --build... >=20 > I have suggested something like that in a thread on this list > on 2003-12-01 (attached). I haven't received any response. :( You might want to look at PKG_ARGS and $${_LATE_PKG_ARGS}. Then go down, and look at do-package. We used late expansion there so we could evaluate certain variables in an executable target. The same could be done with CONFIGURE_TARGET, I think. If you get something working by early next week, we can test it in the next 4-exp build on bento. Joe >=20 > Sergei >=20 > ______________________________________________________________________ > From: Sergei Kolobov > To: Oliver Eikemeier > Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: ports/59254: ports that write something after bsd.port.mk > Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 18:08:03 +0300 >=20 > On 2003-11-16 at 00:37 +0100, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > > How about doing something like > > cd ${CONFIGURE_WRKSRC} && ${CONFIGURE_ENV} ./${CONFIGURE_SCRIPT} --vers= ion=20 > > | sed -ne 's/.*autoconf version \([0-9.]*\).*/\1/p' >=20 > I took slightly different approach: >=20 > CONFIGURE_VERSION!=3D ${AWK} '/Generated by GNU Autoconf/ {print $$6;}' \ > ${CONFIGURE_WRKSRC}/${CONFIGURE_SCRIPT} > .if ${CONFIGURE_VERSION} =3D=3D "2.13"=20 > CONFIGURE_TARGET?=3D ${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} > else > CONFIGURE_TARGET?=3D --build=3D${MACHINE_ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} > .endif >=20 > Now, equivalent of this should be included in do-configure target,=20 > but I have difficult time figuring out how to rewrite it=20 > so it would do the awk call, etc. only at the do-configure time,=20 > but not every time bsd.port.mk is sourced.=20 > Anyone? >=20 > Sergei --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-aXs2nwqQFgmifiFywfo+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA//uJ8b2iPiv4Uz4cRAmjtAJ9aFi9GCxq/6o3QjE/aarF6SYP98gCghtV4 2OtVjgUTOfc7IWffpRzIkb4= =VzGx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-aXs2nwqQFgmifiFywfo+-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 09:38:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039DE16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:38:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from outpost.globcon.net (outpost.globcon.net [62.141.88.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF07143D31 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 09:38:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sergei@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 57165 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2004 17:38:23 -0000 Received: from agdcgw01.akingump.com (HELO kolobov.com) (12.40.174.2) by outpost.globcon.net (62.141.88.161) with SMTP; 09 Jan 2004 17:38:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 25378 invoked by uid 911); 9 Jan 2004 17:37:59 -0000 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:37:59 +0300 From: Sergei Kolobov To: Joe Marcus Clarke Message-ID: <20040109173759.GA7919@chetwood.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Marcus Clarke , freebsd-ports References: <20040109163220.GB5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109170712.GE706@chetwood.ru> <1073668732.42838.12.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1073668732.42838.12.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: CONFIGURE_TARGET X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:38:26 -0000 --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004-01-09 at 12:18 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 12:07, Sergei Kolobov wrote: > > I have suggested something like that in a thread on this list > > on 2003-12-01 (attached). I haven't received any response. :( >=20 > You might want to look at PKG_ARGS and $${_LATE_PKG_ARGS}. Then go > down, and look at do-package. We used late expansion there so we could > evaluate certain variables in an executable target. The same could be > done with CONFIGURE_TARGET, I think. Thanks for the hint. I'll take a look at that. =20 > If you get something working by early next week, we can test it in the > next 4-exp build on bento. I'll try to work that this weekend. Sergei --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//ub3FOxuaTulNAERAijrAJ4iUY1jpBK/kACGpEmo92XJ6mTPpwCdEccR LgGL+oUFRJ2BCnZDN33xZDs= =3J5X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 10:56:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B83416A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:56:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7E043D31 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:56:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i09ItuMr014445; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:55:57 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040109115542.GU54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> References: <20040109052019.GA8007@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <20040109012651.GB1667@k7.mavetju> <20040109115542.GU54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:55:55 -0500 To: Roman Neuhauser From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 18:56:07 -0000 At 12:55 PM +0100 1/9/04, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > >> Basically, I don't have a finalized idea on that. That's >> the kind of feedback that I need from developers who are >> more experienced with ports than I am. > > that won't work. you'll have to convince all the port > maintainers and submitters that the change you propose > won't make port creation and maintanance more laborous > than it is, and if you want to convince anybody, you > need a proof backed by experience. I would like to think that asking the people who DO have the experience, and making changes to my proposal based on THEIR experience, would be enough. There is no way that I am able to become more-experienced than everyone who is already working on ports. There are a few things which are clear to me. One of them is that I have no direct access to the ports repository. Thus, I can not force this change upon the ports-committers unless they themselves are attracted to the change. So, here I am, asking for input. My goal is not to force something down anyone's throats. My goal is to come up with some workable changes which would improve the ports collection. I'm not even too fixed on what "improve" has to mean. I've got some ideas, but if those ideas don't catch on then I'll just move on to other projects. I know I'm asking for time from everyone just to *think* about my proposals, and that everyone is already busy. But I can not think of any other way to suggest changes to anything as large and as constantly-dynamic as the ports collection. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 10:58:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B94216A4D0 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:58:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from scuzzy.ben.algroup.co.uk (dsl-217-155-92-105.zen.co.uk [217.155.92.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C9D43D1D for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:58:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ben@algroup.co.uk) Received: from algroup.co.uk (eandbwin.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.100]) by scuzzy.ben.algroup.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413E5107CA7 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 18:58:11 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3FFEF9D6.9080105@algroup.co.uk> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 18:58:30 +0000 From: Ben Laurie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.82.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: mod_perl? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 18:58:16 -0000 So, if you try to install (using CPAN) Apache::Request after installing the mod_perl port, it doesn't work at all. The reason appears to be that all the mod_perl bits get installed in site_perl/5.8.0, but what's actually running is 5.8.2, so that directory isn't searched. AFAICS working around this by using PERL5LIB and the like is fraught with danger, because it will then include 5.8.0 stuff in preference to 5.8.2 stuff, which is obviously ungood. Am I missing something obvious? Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 11:16:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F05E16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:16:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.blarg.net (zoot.blarg.net [206.124.128.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66E543D5C for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:16:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abowhill@blarg.net) Received: from kosmos.my.net (12-230-212-176.client.attbi.com [12.230.212.176]) by mail.blarg.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C34634286 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:13:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from kosmos.my.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kosmos.my.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i09JDaLP092601 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:13:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kosmos@kosmos.my.net) Received: (from kosmos@localhost) by kosmos.my.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i09JDa0H092600 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:13:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kosmos) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:13:35 -0800 From: Allan Bowhill To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040109191335.GA91968@kosmos.my.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-URL: http://www.blarg.net/~abowhill/ Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:16:10 -0000 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 0, Garance A Drosihn wrote: :What I want to do is create one new file per port, and then :move almost all the other files into that new file. Ideally :each port would end up with just two files. The Makefile, :and this new file (some ports might also need a Makefile.inc :file). Especially as disks get ever-larger, I think we're :better off with fewer-but-larger files, instead of a larger :number of tiny files. : :I would also write a single simple program, which knows how :to find the correct info for any given purpose. Thus, the :format of the file should not be important. The program :would know what to do for both "old-style" and "new-style" :ports, so we don't have to convert the entire collection :at once. I think the easiest and clearest way to implement :this would be one C program, and not 800 lines of /bin/sh :commands and deep make-magic. : :Does this seem like a reasonable project for me to pursue? :Does it conflict with other projects which are already in :the works to do a similar restructuring? I wouldn't want :to start this project if no one thinks it is worth doing. The one file-per-port idea gets discussed at times, usually with XML as the proposed file format. What you are talking about sounds similar. You could revise the current system, but from my perspective, it sounds like another kludge to an already somewhat overengineered system. If you are going to make a change this radical, why not go further than this, and just design an all around better ports system? The inode problem is legitimate in terms of updating. And if you really think about it the cure for inode clutter is simply not to distribute the whole physical ports tree to anyone's disk in the first place. Since network connectivity is required to use ports anyway, it doesn't make sense to have a lot of build scaffolding in place for so many programs most people will never use. Ports usage is very mission-oriented. For example, I as a user, browse, select and install. 90 percent of what exists in my /usr/ports tree will never be installed. And when I enter the ports tree to install a version of soemthing, I usually ask myself: when's the last time I cvsupped? Then I usually end up going into /usr/src and updating to get the latest patches.=20 So unneccesary scaffolding is useless. Out-of-date uncessary=20 scaffolding is time-consuming. The whole problem suggests virtualization of the ports tree somehow, keeping unused and stale data on a user's disk to a minimum. A somewhat standard approach would be to store all port data in a centralized, network-accessible relational database. Ports tables could be updated from version control at a central server. The online databases could serve client requests, directly or indirectly from userland machines. A userland client could be some program like a ports command shell. You don't want some knob-laden monstrosity like RPM to fetch and install and programs, but something that emulates the behaviour of the ports tree as it stands now. The user should be able to browse the tree over the network, search and select ports much in same the way directory navigation works. When "make" is issued, the shell would fetch the port's XML file from the server, (provided dynamically by some backend database query) un- archive in the right place in /usr/ports, and proceed as normal with the other targets. Some general scaffolding on user's machines would have to pre-exist, as it does now, and some would accumulate with use. A Ports database, afaik, has already been in existence for a few years. (http://www.freshports.org). I don't know what their position is=20 on sharing their design and tools. Anyway, there are lots of design possibilities, but if you want to make big changes, go all the way with it. Build a prototype, demo it, and sell people on adopting it. --=20 Allan Bowhill abowhill@blarg.net I don't care for the Sugar Smacks commercial. I don't like the idea of a frog jumping on my Breakfast. -- Lowell, Chicago Reader 10/15/82 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//v1eBC/kSIeFE54RAn4gAJ4iCTo+H9kXCOBKgz14uP9Ae7vGswCfdJ25 l8OJLCFgVutydoppUEFfOF0= =i1zL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 11:45:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E9416A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:45:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.server.rpi.edu (smtp3.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F0E43D53 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:45:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp3.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i09JixAI017214; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:44:59 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040109191335.GA91968@kosmos.my.net> References: <20040109191335.GA91968@kosmos.my.net> Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:44:58 -0500 To: Allan Bowhill , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:45:02 -0000 At 11:13 AM -0800 1/9/04, Allan Bowhill wrote: >On 0, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > >You could revise the current system, but from my >perspective, it sounds like another kludge to an >already somewhat overengineered system. Possibly true... >If you are going to make a change this radical, why >not go further than this, and just design an all >around better ports system? Because "just designing a better ports system" is a very major job. I expect to have two or three months at the *most* to design, implement, and install whatever we can come up with. Once my friend has a full-time job, he will have no time to work on this. And I already have no time to work on it, or I wouldn't consider paying him to do it. Those are just the realities of my side of this proposal. On my mind is the fact that the simple change to "get rid of pkg-comment" took more than a month before it was successfully accomplished. It is really easy (IMO) to underestimate how much time it will take to make *any* change which effects the entire ports tree. So, what I'm shooting for is a *doable* project, but one which leaves the ports-tree in a state where it would be easier to do some follow-up projects that would have much more obvious benefits than this step will have. Please understand that I agree completely that we could use much more significant improvements than this proposal provides -- but I'm just trying to pick off a "doable" project. I am also not dismissing alternate ideas, but I do fear that we could spend months trying to pick the most-perfect alternate-idea, and then have no time to implement any actual changes. >So unneccesary scaffolding is useless. Out-of-date >uneccessary scaffolding is time-consuming. I am thinking about the remainder of your comments, but I do not have anything useful to say about them right now... -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 11:49:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1AC16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:49:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from convex.cs.unb.ca (convex.cs.unb.ca [131.202.244.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B761943D48 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:49:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bremner-dated-1074282543.c5ef88@convex.cs.unb.ca) Received: from bremner by convex.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1Af2cx-000Aqi-Cy for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:49:03 -0400 Received: by convex.cs.unb.ca (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1266); Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:49:03 -0400 (AST) Received: from bremner (helo=convex.cs.unb.ca.unb.ca) by convex.cs.unb.ca with local-esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1Af2cw-000AqZ-It for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:49:02 -0400 Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:49:02 -0400 Message-ID: <0tr7y83ntd.wl@nohost.unb.ca> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: David Bremner X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.87 (Carry Back) X-TMDA-Fingerprint: dYuJ81B0Q9OCGW7Lj8aNC54gTrE X-Primary-Address: bremner@unb.ca X-Tmda-Bare: David Bremner Sender: David Bremner Subject: pkg-plist confusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Bremner List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:49:07 -0000 Background: I am (finally!) updating the port graphics/ipe to version 6. I am having difficulties getting a clean deinstall After the install, I have lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15 Jan 9 15:37 /usr/local/lib/libipe.so -> libipe.so.1.0.0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15 Jan 9 15:37 /usr/local/lib/libipe.so.1 -> libipe.so.1.0.0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15 Jan 9 15:37 /usr/local/lib/libipe.so.1.0 -> libipe.so.1.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 448278 Jan 9 15:37 /usr/local/lib/libipe.so.1.0.0 (as an aside, I noticed this violates the FreeBSD shared library guidelines. But so does e.g. libqt. I blame qmake) When I make deinstall, I get ===> Deinstalling for graphics/ipe pkg_info: package bsdpan-Accel_inlines-1.15 has no origin recorded pkg_info: package bsdpan-CPAN-1.76 has no origin recorded pkg_info: package bsdpan-Digest-SHA256-0.01 has no origin recorded pkg_info: package bsdpan-Palm-Zetetic-Strip-1.01 has no origin recorded pkg_info: package bsdpan-Term-ReadLine-Perl-1.0203 has no origin recorded pkg_info: package bsdpan-TermReadKey-2.21 has no origin recorded pkg_info: package bsdpan-strip-dump-1.0.1 has no origin recorded ===> Deinstalling Ipe-6.0.p12 pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/lib/libipe.so.1' doesn't really exist pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libalign.so.1' doesn't really exist pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libgoodies.so.1' doesn't really exist pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libimage.so.1' doesn't really exist pkg_delete: file '/usr/local/libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libkgon.so.1' doesn't really exist pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets' pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/libexec/ipe/6.0pre12' pkg_delete: unable to completely remove directory '/usr/local/libexec/ipe' pkg_delete: couldn't entirely delete package (perhaps the packing list is incorrectly specified?) [more complaints about bsdpan ports deleted.] the pkg-plist is at the end of the message. I'm not a very experienced porter; am I doing something obviously stupid? Do I need to treat symlinks specially in pkg-plist? If it matters, I am running FreeBSD 5.2 current of 10 December. pkg-plist: bin/ipe bin/ipe5toxml bin/pdftoipe lib/libipe.so lib/libipe.so.1 lib/libipe.so.1.0 lib/libipe.so.1.0.0 libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libalign.so libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libalign.so.1 libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libalign.so.1.0 libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libalign.so.1.0.0 libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libgoodies.so libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libgoodies.so.1 libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libgoodies.so.1.0 libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libgoodies.so.1.0.0 libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libimage.so libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libimage.so.1 libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libimage.so.1.0 libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libimage.so.1.0.0 libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libkgon.so libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libkgon.so.1 libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libkgon.so.1.0 libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets/libkgon.so.1.0.0 share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/annotated.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/blank.png share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_all_attributes-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_all_attributes.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_angle-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_angle.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_arc-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_arc.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_attribute-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_attribute.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_bezier-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_bezier.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_bitmap-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_bitmap.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_buffer-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_buffer.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_closed_spline-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_closed_spline.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_color-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_color.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_document-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_document.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_ellipse-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_ellipse.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_file_stream-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_file_stream.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_fillable-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_fillable.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_group-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_group.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_image-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_image.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_iml_parser-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_iml_parser.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_layer-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_layer.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_lex-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_lex.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_line-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_line.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_linear-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_linear.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_mark-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_mark.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_matrix-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_matrix.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_object-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_object.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_object_factory-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_object_factory.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_page-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_page.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_painter-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_painter.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_path-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_path.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_path_segment-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_path_segment.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_pg_object-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_pg_object.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_presentation-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_presentation.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_rect-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_rect.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_reference-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_reference.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_repository-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_repository.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_segment-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_segment.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_segment_sub_path-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_segment_sub_path.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_snap_data-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_snap_data.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_stream-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_stream.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_string-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_string.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_string_stream-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_string_stream.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_stroke_style-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_stroke_style.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_style_sheet-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_style_sheet.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_sub_path-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_sub_path.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_text-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_text.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_item-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_item.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_obj_insertion-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_obj_insertion.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_object_edit-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_object_edit.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_page_del-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_page_del.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_page_edit-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_page_edit.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_page_ins-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_page_ins.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_presentation-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_presentation.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_stack-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_undo_stack.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_vector-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_vector.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_visitor-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_visitor.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_xml_attributes-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_xml_attributes.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_xml_data_source-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_xml_data_source.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_xml_file_source-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_xml_file_source.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_xml_parser-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipe_xml_parser.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipelet-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipelet.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipelet_helper-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/class_ipelet_helper.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/colors.xml share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/doxygen.css share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/doxygen.png share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/example1.png share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/example2.png share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/example3.png share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/example4.png share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/example5.png share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/example6.png share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/functions.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/functions_enum.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/functions_func.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/functions_type.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/functions_vars.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/group__attr.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/group__base.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/group__doc.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/group__geo.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/group__high.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/group__ipelet.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/group__obj.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/hierarchy.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/index.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/intersection.png share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/ipe_copyright.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual.pdf share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_1.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_10.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_11.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_12.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_13.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_14.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_15.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_16.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_17.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_18.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_19.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_2.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_20.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_21.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_22.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_23.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_24.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_25.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_26.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_27.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_28.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_29.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_3.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_30.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_31.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_32.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_33.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_34.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_35.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_36.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_37.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_38.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_39.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_4.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_41.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_42.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_5.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_6.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_7.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_8.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/manual_9.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/modules.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/next.png share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/previous.png share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/snaplines.png share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/struct_ipe_document_1_1_s_properties-members.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/struct_ipe_document_1_1_s_properties.html share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc/up.png @dirrm libexec/ipe/6.0pre12/ipelets @dirrm libexec/ipe/6.0pre12 @dirrm libexec/ipe @dirrm share/ipe/6.0pre12/doc @dirrm share/ipe/6.0pre12 @dirrm share/ipe From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 11:53:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8FA16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:53:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E8943D2F for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:53:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id A3AB6531E; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:53:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id E5325531A; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:53:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 86C4D33C9A; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:53:20 +0100 (CET) To: Ben Laurie References: <3FFEF9D6.9080105@algroup.co.uk> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:53:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3FFEF9D6.9080105@algroup.co.uk> (Ben Laurie's message of "Fri, 09 Jan 2004 18:58:30 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mod_perl? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 19:53:31 -0000 Ben Laurie writes: > So, if you try to install (using CPAN) Apache::Request after > installing the mod_perl port, it doesn't work at all. The reason > appears to be that all the mod_perl bits get installed in > site_perl/5.8.0, but what's actually running is 5.8.2, so that > directory isn't searched. Pilot error. If you have 5.8.2 installed, and did 'use.perl port' after installing Perl, mod_perl will be installed in site_perl/5.8.2. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 12:22:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44C416A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:22:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org [80.65.226.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645A643D45 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:22:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org) Received: (qmail 35996 invoked by uid 85); 9 Jan 2004 21:22:18 +0100 Received: from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20rc2 (spamassassin: 2.61. Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 0.520241 secs); 09 Jan 2004 20:22:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO persephone.cultdeadsheep.org) (192.168.0.8) by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org with SMTP; 9 Jan 2004 21:22:16 +0100 Received: (qmail 99341 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2004 21:21:41 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO lucifer.cultdeadsheep.org) (192.168.0.2) by persephone.cultdeadsheep.org with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 9 Jan 2004 21:21:41 +0100 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 21:22:57 +0100 From: Clement Laforet To: David Bremner Message-Id: <20040109212257.47500966.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <0tr7y83ntd.wl@nohost.unb.ca> References: <0tr7y83ntd.wl@nohost.unb.ca> Organization: tH3 cUlt 0f tH3 d3@d sH33p X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__9_Jan_2004_21_22_57_+0100_WBWXCMu7CPqTP/i=" cc: bremner@unb.ca cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg-plist confusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:22:23 -0000 --Signature=_Fri__9_Jan_2004_21_22_57_+0100_WBWXCMu7CPqTP/i= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:49:02 -0400 David Bremner wrote: > lib/libipe.so.1.0.0 ^^^^^ define NO_FILTER_SHLIBS is your Makefile. It should help. clem --Signature=_Fri__9_Jan_2004_21_22_57_+0100_WBWXCMu7CPqTP/i= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//w2hsRhfjwcjuh0RAo0vAJ9PnuQ5m9S3aXDi7BCl4lCJhUycaQCgwl12 twdMY4lToiXsNScZGeAtd/Y= =w5fc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__9_Jan_2004_21_22_57_+0100_WBWXCMu7CPqTP/i=-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 13:11:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2178B16A4D0; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:11:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C2F43D53; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:11:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.30) id 1Af3uz-00041C-IN; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:11:45 +0100 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:11:45 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: Adam Weinberger , freebsd-ports Message-ID: <20040109211145.GB14531@voodoo.oberon.net> Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Ponomarew , Adam Weinberger , freebsd-ports References: <3FFC03E5.7010305@iconoplex.co.uk> <200401071429.i07ETZMI068819@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20040107200838.GD86935@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040108071730.GA53328@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040108173642.GS54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109003630.GA63979@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040109095246.GT54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109133001.GK30356@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040109145649.GA5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ftEhullJWpWg/VHq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040109145649.GA5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon Sender: Kirill Ponomarew Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 21:11:51 -0000 --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 03:56:49PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > > > Also, I would have thought the Porter's handbook would e. g. > > > > > contain info on preventing installation of .la files (I > > > > > gathered from the ports@ list that they shouldn't be > > > > > installed), isn't this lack quite > > > > > obvious? > > > >=20 > > > > No, please raise this on the ports list. > > >=20 > > > ok, cc'd to ports, Mail-Followup-To set. > >=20 > > A fix for this is given in > > http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/porting.html > > in the section entitled "Libtool Issues." >=20 > www.freebsd.org/gnome/ is pehaps the last place I would be looking > in search for this. doesn't the para belong in porters-handbook? Preventing installation of .la files is not always good, I think also that this problem should be mentioned in porters-handbook. -Kirill --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQE//xkQQC1G6a60JuURAtYmAJ9ST/+58MnzOdMBKktnb0FYldxJygCYjPac XjJuclm/agNdqRWipHpS4Q== =bLXD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ftEhullJWpWg/VHq-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 13:27:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671F216A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:27:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from convex.cs.unb.ca (convex.cs.unb.ca [131.202.244.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B073D43D49 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:27:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bremner-dated-1074288472.10b00c@convex.cs.unb.ca) Received: from bremner by convex.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1Af4Aa-000Bzd-Vd for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:27:52 -0400 Received: by convex.cs.unb.ca (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1266); Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:27:52 -0400 (AST) Received: from bremner (helo=convex.cs.unb.ca.unb.ca) by convex.cs.unb.ca with local-esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1Af4Aa-000BzS-3M; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:27:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 17:27:52 -0400 Message-ID: <0tvfnkers7.wl@nohost.unb.ca> To: Clement Laforet In-Reply-To: <20040109212257.47500966.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> References: <0tr7y83ntd.wl@nohost.unb.ca> <20040109212257.47500966.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> User-Agent: SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: David Bremner X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.87 (Carry Back) X-TMDA-Fingerprint: YV4ezeyRBh4qwr73SRHBJAPhmDQ X-Primary-Address: bremner@unb.ca X-Tmda-Bare: David Bremner Sender: David Bremner cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg-plist confusion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Bremner List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 21:27:55 -0000 At Fri, 9 Jan 2004 21:22:57 +0100, Clement Laforet wrote: > > [1 ] > On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 15:49:02 -0400 > David Bremner wrote: > > > lib/libipe.so.1.0.0 > ^^^^^ > define NO_FILTER_SHLIBS is your Makefile. > It should help. > > clem > [2 ] > That did it. Thanks. db From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 13:39:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAE416A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:39:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-10.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F1A043D58 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:38:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gdeering@acslink.net.au) Received: (qmail 11059 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2004 21:38:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO acslink.net.au) (203.220.179.127) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 9 Jan 2004 21:38:03 -0000 Message-ID: <3FFF1F0E.5040402@acslink.net.au> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:37:18 +1100 From: Geoff Deering User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-au, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: cocoon-1.8.2_3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Geoff Deering List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 21:39:03 -0000 Hi, I'm wondering why the version of Cocoon is so out of date, that not even 2.x, let alone 2.1.x is available? Yours Truly Geoff Deering From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 13:49:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D079516A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:49:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mag.barnet.com.au (mag.barnet.com.au [218.185.88.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C8943D3F for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:49:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from extmail.barnet.com.au (tim.direct.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.10.2]) by mag.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614EF17D; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:49:44 +1100 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <3FFF21F800008E4B016614E0@VIRUSCAN-127.0.0.1> Received: from extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by extmail.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264CD1F18; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:49:44 +1100 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D3E1EE3; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:49:43 +1100 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6458B6A7101; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:49:43 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:49:43 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Geoff Deering Message-ID: <20040109214943.GF1667@k7.mavetju> References: <3FFF1F0E.5040402@acslink.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FFF1F0E.5040402@acslink.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cocoon-1.8.2_3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 21:49:46 -0000 On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 08:37:18AM +1100, Geoff Deering wrote: > I'm wondering why the version of Cocoon is so out of date, that not even > 2.x, let alone 2.1.x is available? There are no open PRs regarding cocoon. If you can submit a patch to upgrade it we will be happy to update the port. If you're really adventurous you can take maintainership for the port and be immortalised forever as "the maintainer who updates cocoon to version 2.1.x" Think about it, it's worth it :-) Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 13:59:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4BF16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:59:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (meitner.wh.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.129.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA63143D6E for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 13:57:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (pc2-105.intern.meitner [10.3.12.105]) by meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A17E167788 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 21:57:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from gmx.net (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i09LvhiG055401 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:57:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Message-ID: <3FFF23D4.4070104@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:57:40 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3FFC03E5.7010305@iconoplex.co.uk> <200401071429.i07ETZMI068819@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20040107200838.GD86935@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040108071730.GA53328@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040108173642.GS54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109003630.GA63979@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040109095246.GT54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109133001.GK30356@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040109145649.GA5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109211145.GB14531@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <20040109211145.GB14531@voodoo.oberon.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.7.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3C820EC1529132A203BD2B81" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 21:59:10 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3C820EC1529132A203BD2B81 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > Preventing installation of .la files is not always good, I > think also that this problem should be mentioned in > porters-handbook. Actually there would be no KDE on FreeBSD without them, and I'd like that whole "don't do .la-files" purged from whatever documentation or utilities (like portlint) it appears in. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --------------enig3C820EC1529132A203BD2B81 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE//yPXXhc68WspdLARAosVAKCq8F3A2wWOcUOkBcdNvd51lRgkSwCeK22Z m3JwQFaXha27fHohinNyMKE= =2NaB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3C820EC1529132A203BD2B81-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 14:07:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0AA16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:07:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout08.sul.t-online.com (mailout08.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48ED43D2F for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:07:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd09.aul.t-online.de by mailout08.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1Af4my-0007Ll-00; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 23:07:32 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (rIJFZmZ-oeMM2gNQaZKIiYOdBAKylqTtrUBM3IXl5-qAniOQRhiZrV@[80.131.117.35]) by fmrl09.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1Af4ml-1V84xM0; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:07:19 +0100 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i09M7FJb007555; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:07:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i09M7U8C006411; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:07:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:07:30 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Michael Nottebrock Message-Id: <20040109230730.4946d62b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <3FFF23D4.4070104@gmx.net> References: <3FFC03E5.7010305@iconoplex.co.uk> <200401071429.i07ETZMI068819@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20040107200838.GD86935@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040108071730.GA53328@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040108173642.GS54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109003630.GA63979@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040109095246.GT54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109133001.GK30356@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040109145649.GA5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109211145.GB14531@voodoo.oberon.net> <3FFF23D4.4070104@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: rIJFZmZ-oeMM2gNQaZKIiYOdBAKylqTtrUBM3IXl5-qAniOQRhiZrV@t-dialin.net cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:07:39 -0000 On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:57:40 +0100 Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Actually there would be no KDE on FreeBSD without them, and I'd like that > whole "don't do .la-files" purged from whatever documentation or utilities > (like portlint) it appears in. And I would like to fix libldl to not depend on .la-files on FreeBSD... Can someone please offer me some free time, I need some... :-) Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 14:14:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1E516A4D0 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:14:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F5AF43D54 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:13:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.30) id 1Af4t5-0006pf-Tf for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 23:13:51 +0100 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:13:51 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: freebsd-ports Message-ID: <20040109221351.GD14531@voodoo.oberon.net> Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Ponomarew , freebsd-ports References: <200401071429.i07ETZMI068819@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20040107200838.GD86935@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040108071730.GA53328@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040108173642.GS54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109003630.GA63979@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040109095246.GT54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109133001.GK30356@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040109145649.GA5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109211145.GB14531@voodoo.oberon.net> <3FFF23D4.4070104@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3Pql8miugIZX0722" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FFF23D4.4070104@gmx.net> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon Sender: Kirill Ponomarew Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:14:12 -0000 --3Pql8miugIZX0722 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 10:57:40PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: =20 > Actually there would be no KDE on FreeBSD without them, and I'd like that= =20 > whole "don't do .la-files" purged from whatever documentation or utilitie= s=20 > (like portlint) it appears in. portlint(1) shows only warnings and they are ok. My point is to explain the users *why* these files are sometimes important and sometimes aren't, and such information must be included in porters-handbook.=20 -Kirill --3Pql8miugIZX0722 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//yefQC1G6a60JuURAmtOAJ0STMZRm+DC0plLMuCdoMW4HrbDJACdE4S7 bSfytFDVGC3SZiwHI1tXQMs= =HU07 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3Pql8miugIZX0722-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 14:22:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02DC916A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:22:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (meitner.wh.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.129.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9399B43D53 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:21:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (pc2-105.intern.meitner [10.3.12.105]) by meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E00B16773E for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:21:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from gmx.net (kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i09MLjiG055754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:21:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Message-ID: <3FFF2976.6070707@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 23:21:42 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3FFC03E5.7010305@iconoplex.co.uk> <200401071429.i07ETZMI068819@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20040107200838.GD86935@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040108071730.GA53328@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040108173642.GS54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109003630.GA63979@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040109095246.GT54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109133001.GK30356@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040109145649.GA5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109211145.GB14531@voodoo.oberon.net> <3FFF23D4.4070104@gmx.net> <20040109230730.4946d62b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20040109230730.4946d62b@Magellan.Leidinger.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.7.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB9D940A9C4E0F27FC2A894E2" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:22:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB9D940A9C4E0F27FC2A894E2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Alexander Leidinger wrote: > And I would like to fix libldl to not depend on .la-files on FreeBSD... > > Can someone please offer me some free time, I need some... :-) Can't we just put a tiny tiny fraction of all those gigabytes on our cheap harddisks to the good use of storing .la files, save your and other porters' time in the process and just live with them like very other platform supported by libtool out there does (how did those people on Linux ever manage to store real data when their hdds were so full of .la files anyway?). I'm sick and tired of this ever repeating non-topic. Chant with me: "We LIKE libtool archives!". Think about it. It's simply a matter of deleting a few words in a few places. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --------------enigB9D940A9C4E0F27FC2A894E2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE//yl5Xhc68WspdLARAgSAAJ4uoQ59PQoMyWycGdGQqaw+2QTlLACgidbR 91BkVcqooflCNsGSnx/baR8= =ZLhc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB9D940A9C4E0F27FC2A894E2-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 14:28:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A09B16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:28:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com (mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E47043D53 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:26:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd06.aul.t-online.de by mailout09.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1Af54o-0000dp-04; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 23:25:58 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (Z4DFNOZroeEyaAYy242Kv41o2eNANF5FworEgmoP0exTUJuOIQ81YK@[80.131.117.35]) by fmrl06.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1Af54i-0HeykS0; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:25:52 +0100 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i09MPmJb010130 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:25:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i09MQ38C008774 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:26:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:26:03 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040109232603.3486c0da@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <3FFE2602.3000105@ciam.ru> References: <200401090233.51499.max@love2party.net> <3FFE2602.3000105@ciam.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: Z4DFNOZroeEyaAYy242Kv41o2eNANF5FworEgmoP0exTUJuOIQ81YK@t-dialin.net Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:28:06 -0000 On Fri, 09 Jan 2004 06:54:42 +0300 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Even separated pkg-install and pkg-deinstall has a logic: pkg-install > will run only when you install a package not a port. pkg-deistall will > run always you deinstall the port. ---snip--- /usr/ports/chinese/pine4/Makefile: ${SH} pkg-install /usr/ports/databases/postgresql-devel/Makefile: @${SH} ${PKGDIR}/pkg-install ${PORTNAME} BACKUPWARNING /usr/ports/databases/postgresql-devel/Makefile: ${SH} ${PKGDIR}/pkg-install ${PORTNAME} PRE-INSTALL /usr/ports/databases/postgresql72/Makefile: ${SH} ${PKGDIR}/pkg-install ${PORTNAME} PRE-INSTALL /usr/ports/devel/perforce/Makefile: ${SH} ${PKGDIR}/pkg-install ${PORTNAME} PRE-INSTALL /usr/ports/games/lbreakout2/Makefile: ${SH} pkg-install ${PKGNAME} POST-INSTALL [...] ---snip--- So I think we can collapse both into one, as both can get called regardless of port of package. But I don't see much more potential in the actual ports infrastructure to safe inodes while maintaining the actual ease of use for a port developer. For simple ports which just need a barebones Makefile, a plist, a distinfo an a descr, a collapsed format may be easy to handle, but we have a lot of ports which are not that simple. Creating lang/icc in such a scheme would have been much more time consuming for me. Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 14:29:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A917B16A4D1 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:29:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (meitner.wh.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.129.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E045543D1F for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:28:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (pc2-105.intern.meitner [10.3.12.105]) by meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69F816773E for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:27:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from gmx.net (kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i09MRriG055842 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:27:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Message-ID: <3FFF2AE9.7010304@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 23:27:53 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200401071429.i07ETZMI068819@grimreaper.grondar.org> <20040107200838.GD86935@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040108071730.GA53328@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040108173642.GS54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109003630.GA63979@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040109095246.GT54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109133001.GK30356@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040109145649.GA5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109211145.GB14531@voodoo.oberon.net> <3FFF23D4.4070104@gmx.net> <20040109221351.GD14531@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <20040109221351.GD14531@voodoo.oberon.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.7.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6450753B787FE43DC8D64FEB" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:29:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6450753B787FE43DC8D64FEB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > portlint(1) shows only warnings and they are ok. The warning is bogus. Libtool archives aren't things anyone needs to be warned about, they do no harm. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --------------enig6450753B787FE43DC8D64FEB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE//yrpXhc68WspdLARAm4eAJ4i1zIAryYE3Uq9TF/ZceRo15p/ZACdFDuN Q7UMYyDQQbQG3iqSj34LnlI= =WsX6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6450753B787FE43DC8D64FEB-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 14:41:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413BB16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:41:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A810743D53 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:40:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net) Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.30) id 1Af5JK-00077N-3K for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2004 23:40:58 +0100 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:40:58 +0100 From: Kirill Ponomarew To: freebsd-ports Message-ID: <20040109224058.GE14531@voodoo.oberon.net> Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Ponomarew , freebsd-ports References: <20040108071730.GA53328@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040108173642.GS54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109003630.GA63979@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040109095246.GT54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109133001.GK30356@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040109145649.GA5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109211145.GB14531@voodoo.oberon.net> <3FFF23D4.4070104@gmx.net> <20040109221351.GD14531@voodoo.oberon.net> <3FFF2AE9.7010304@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="maH1Gajj2nflutpK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FFF2AE9.7010304@gmx.net> X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon Sender: Kirill Ponomarew Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:41:02 -0000 --maH1Gajj2nflutpK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:27:53PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: =20 > The warning is bogus. Libtool archives aren't things anyone needs to be= =20 > warned about, they do no harm. Well, I can't say that it is *really* bogus: if ($_ =3D~ /\.la$/) { &perror("WARN: $file [$.]: installing libtool archives, ". "please use USE_LIBTOOL in Makefile if possible"); } -Kirill --maH1Gajj2nflutpK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//y36QC1G6a60JuURAmy1AKCWoMySkcxyvWfa9Kv9aEL77+DX7QCeMjeO iAAS6YV2nM58etdJZ//2x8Y= =fYZb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --maH1Gajj2nflutpK-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 15:00:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E8C16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:00:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.blarg.net (floyd.blarg.net [206.124.128.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA4343D58 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:58:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from abowhill@blarg.net) Received: from kosmos.my.net (12-230-212-176.client.attbi.com [12.230.212.176]) by mail.blarg.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD481385FB for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:56:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from kosmos.my.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kosmos.my.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i09MuULP093200 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:56:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kosmos@kosmos.my.net) Received: (from kosmos@localhost) by kosmos.my.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i09MuTf0093199 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:56:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kosmos) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 14:56:29 -0800 From: Allan Bowhill To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040109225629.GB91968@kosmos.my.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20040109191335.GA91968@kosmos.my.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-URL: http://www.blarg.net/~abowhill/ Subject: Re: Call for feedback on a Ports-collection change X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 23:00:05 -0000 --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Garance A Drosihn wrote: : :So, what I'm shooting for is a *doable* project, but one :which leaves the ports-tree in a state where it would be :easier to do some follow-up projects that would have much :more obvious benefits than this step will have. Raising the bar one notch at a time is sensible from a production perspective, especially if you have a limited time frame and resources. This change sounds like it does have immediate benefits for the user, if the user interface doesn't change. It would probably have a positive effect on the size of locate database and execution time for find, as well as CVSup execution time. I have no idea what, if anything would change in the packaging utilites, sysinstall, package building scripts, CVS support utils, and SGML/Web/Printed documents. There are also several third-party utilities that interface with the ports tree directly that might be broken. Not many. It also might break some scripts at larger ISPs who build or track ports with their own systems, but these groups are usually equipped to handle changes. They might complain a bit, as big directory changes mean they have to script for two different file and directory structures in their repositories, based on date. This might also be a compelling reason to make all the big changes at once, if it can be done. Too many global changes to historically uniform directories and files creates repository muddle, based on dates of change. Maybe this is not all that important an issue to many *BSD users. I can vaguely recall the last really big global change to ports, when Satoshi (then Ports Manager) consolidated some files and directories to reduce inode usage. One thing I remember was CVSup having problems cleaning up old files and directories. Perhaps I didn't have the delete option set, or the sup datafiles got mangled, I can't recall. I can remember solving it by deleting ports entirely, then re-CVSupping. At the ISP I worked, it did cause automation problems, as we had built our toolset around the older set of directories. We had to do some up-conversion of custom ports we offered, and were forced to upgrade and re-evaluate new=20 versions of ports that we offered as-is. Not the end of the world by any stretch, but it cost programming hours to rectify. What I'm saying is that the impact at tier-1 service providers is not insignificant, especially those who offer jailed environments with ports trees for their customers. If you can afford to, I think it might be worthwhile to publish a short document describing the anticipated design, benefits, and impact of your idea. Then nobody can complain changes were dropped on them by surprise. --=20 Allan Bowhill abowhill@blarg.net Chef, n.: Any cook who swears in French. --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//zGcBC/kSIeFE54RAl6YAJ9FZXgPSjTLnHA9o/4XMLoExrpfAwCeMxOT PfWH/JDGD+vi8KGW0Q6NTrY= =ypRe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --PmA2V3Z32TCmWXqI-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 15:04:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B3D16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:04:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (meitner.wh.Uni-Dortmund.DE [129.217.129.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8A843D54 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 15:03:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Received: from lofi.dyndns.org (pc2-105.intern.meitner [10.3.12.105]) by meitner.wh.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DD4167591 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 23:03:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from gmx.net (kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i09N3tiG056363 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:03:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Message-ID: <3FFF335B.2060004@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:03:55 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20040108071730.GA53328@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040108173642.GS54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109003630.GA63979@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040109095246.GT54743@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109133001.GK30356@toxic.magnesium.net> <20040109145649.GA5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <20040109211145.GB14531@voodoo.oberon.net> <3FFF23D4.4070104@gmx.net> <20040109221351.GD14531@voodoo.oberon.net> <3FFF2AE9.7010304@gmx.net> <20040109224058.GE14531@voodoo.oberon.net> In-Reply-To: <20040109224058.GE14531@voodoo.oberon.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.76.7.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig52241DD7EF412AC324EF7619" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Where is FreeBSD going? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 23:04:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig52241DD7EF412AC324EF7619 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Kirill Ponomarew wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 11:27:53PM +0100, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Well, I can't say that it is *really* bogus: > > if ($_ =~ /\.la$/) { > &perror("WARN: $file [$.]: installing libtool archives, ". > "please use USE_LIBTOOL in Makefile if possible"); > } True, however, it becomes bogus once you put in USE_LIBTOOL into a port Makefile, yet it still installs libtool archives (which happens more often than not) and you'll still get the warning. -- ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --------------enig52241DD7EF412AC324EF7619 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows 2000) Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQE//zNbXhc68WspdLARAmieAKCWx4up+KcUYvlwnjQ5QhkGWe/B3gCgqfGD hXBFefDSz55bgJ1hnlElIq8= =eDav -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig52241DD7EF412AC324EF7619-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 16:11:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4672C16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:11:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB5743D3F for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:11:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adam@migus.org) Received: from ludo.migus.org ([68.55.80.136]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004011000112001600nl9nhe>; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:11:20 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554EFA1017 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:11:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from ludo.migus.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ludo.migus.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 36800-03 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:11:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from ganyopa.migus.org (ganyopa.migus.org [192.168.4.2]) by ludo.migus.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7524AA1001 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:11:19 -0500 (EST) From: "Adam C. Migus" Organization: Migus Dot Org To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:11:19 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401091911.19186.adam@migus.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at migus.org Subject: textproc/p5-XML-LibXML broken, why? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:11:24 -0000 su-2.05b# uname -a FreeBSD ludo.migus.org 5.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10 #5: Sat Oct 25 23:51:05 EDT 2003 amigus@ludo.migus.org:/obj/freebsd/sys/src/freebsd/RELENG_5_1/src/sys/SMP_FAST i386 su-2.05b# pwd /src/freebsd/ports/textproc/p5-XML-LibXML su-2.05b# make ===> p5-XML-LibXML-1.56 is marked as broken: Does not compile on FreeBSD 501000. su-2.05b# I attempted to locate the error in the bento logs but the log file's gone so I'm not entirely sure why it's broken but when I remove the broken marking from Makefile it compiles however I get the following warnings under both FreeBSD and NetBSD: LibXML.xs:73: warning: duplicate `extern' LibXML.xs:74: warning: duplicate `extern' LibXML.xs:76: warning: duplicate `extern' LibXML.xs:77: warning: duplicate `extern' LibXML.xs:78: warning: duplicate `extern' LibXML.xs:79: warning: duplicate `extern' Is this the reason it was marked as broken? The following patch removes them: diff -Nru --exclude=CVS p5-XML-LibXML.orig/Makefile p5-XML-LibXML/Makefile --- p5-XML-LibXML.orig/Makefile Tue Dec 23 01:50:53 2003 +++ p5-XML-LibXML/Makefile Fri Jan 9 18:49:32 2004 @@ -36,8 +36,4 @@ .include -.if ${OSVERSION} >= 500113 -BROKEN= "Does not compile on FreeBSD ${OSVERSION}" -.endif - .include diff -Nru --exclude=CVS p5-XML-LibXML.orig/files/patch-LibXML.xs p5-XML-LibXML/files/patch-LibXML.xs --- p5-XML-LibXML.orig/files/patch-LibXML.xs Wed Dec 31 19:00:00 1969 +++ p5-XML-LibXML/files/patch-LibXML.xs Sat Jan 3 03:27:21 2004 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +--- LibXML.xs.orig 2003-12-22 10:38:06.000000000 -0500 ++++ LibXML.xs 2003-12-22 10:38:12.000000000 -0500 +@@ -64,20 +64,6 @@ + } + #endif + +-#ifdef VMS +-extern int xmlDoValidityCheckingDefaultVal; +-#define xmlDoValidityCheckingDefaultValue xmlDoValidityCheckingDefaultVal +-extern int xmlSubstituteEntitiesDefaultVal; +-#define xmlSubstituteEntitiesDefaultValue xmlSubstituteEntitiesDefaultVal +-#else +-LIBXML_DLL_IMPORT extern int xmlDoValidityCheckingDefaultValue; +-LIBXML_DLL_IMPORT extern int xmlSubstituteEntitiesDefaultValue; +-#endif +-LIBXML_DLL_IMPORT extern int xmlGetWarningsDefaultValue; +-LIBXML_DLL_IMPORT extern int xmlKeepBlanksDefaultValue; +-LIBXML_DLL_IMPORT extern int xmlLoadExtDtdDefaultValue; +-LIBXML_DLL_IMPORT extern int xmlPedanticParserDefaultValue; +- + #define TEST_PERL_FLAG(flag) \ + SvTRUE(perl_get_sv(flag, FALSE)) ? 1 : 0 + FWIW I contacted the perl package maintainer some time ago and got no response. The cvs log for the port indicates that the port maintainer was contacted. Can this patch be put in place to unbreak the port until such a time as someone comes up with a better fix? -- Adam C. Migus - http://people.migus.org/~amigus/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 16:16:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB7116A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:16:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C190043D31 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:16:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcov@stack.nl) Received: from toad.stack.nl (zen.stack.nl [2001:610:1108:5010::130]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FFF4455#AD97E1F00D for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:16:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 816) id 8DEAD8E; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:16:21 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:16:21 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL88 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20040110001621.8DEAD8E@toad.stack.nl> From: marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) Subject: lang/fpc-devel, my first port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:16:24 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to make a port for the development branch of lang/fpc, which I named fpc-devel (this is the beta series for the next major version, 2.0). I came pretty far, but I didn't advance one little bit in the last few hours, so time to get help :-) The fpc-devel branch nearly completes FPC's Delphi compability, including default params, dyn arrays, interfaces and implements the fundaments for a multi arch computer (powerpc runs, Sparc says hello world) ( content of the portsdir: http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/fpcdevelport.tar.gz distfile: ftp://freepascal.stack.nl/pub/fpc/beta/freebsd-1.9.2-ports/fpc-1.9.2-ports.tar.bz2 ) The port does a build from source, it downloads the above tarball (+/- 12 MB) that contains: - FPC 1.9.2 sources. ( work/fpc after extract) - two static binaries needed for bootstrapping. ( work/cmdlinecomp) - Docs in PDF format. ( work/docs) - One sample configfile ( work/fpc.cfg) ($prefix specific stuff appended by the port's makefile) I've only one problem left, I have %%PORTVERSION%% 's in pkg-plist, and when deinstalling this variable doesn't expand. I copied it from the "stable" fpc port by John M. Cooper. The port isn't very tested yet (just did it today), and I'm no real scripting/pmake wizard either, so if somebody would have a look what the problem is, and what else I did wrong, then I'd appreciate it :) ------------- P.s. Some directories might not match exactly the desired BSD layout, but it comes close enough I think. This is all by design though, most of the port is installed by the target systems own makefiles. So the main port doesn't use install_xxx. I hope to remedy somewhat for the next beta version (1.9.4) on the FPC makefile generator side. It could be fixed for 1.9.2 too by installing to dummy prefix, and then redistributing it with INSTALL_XXX, but it would increase discspace, and I don't want to spend the time for a relatively short lived beta anyway. Anyway, thnks in advance. Marco van de Voort From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 16:24:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AA116A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:24:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org [80.65.226.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29D1B43D31 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:24:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org) Received: (qmail 60488 invoked by uid 85); 10 Jan 2004 01:24:17 +0100 Received: from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20rc2 (spamassassin: 2.61. Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 0.117548 secs); 10 Jan 2004 00:24:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO persephone.cultdeadsheep.org) (192.168.0.8) by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2004 01:24:16 +0100 Received: (qmail 445 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2004 01:23:41 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO lucifer.cultdeadsheep.org) (192.168.0.2) by persephone.cultdeadsheep.org with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Jan 2004 01:23:41 +0100 Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:24:55 +0100 From: Clement Laforet To: "Adam C. Migus" Message-Id: <20040110012455.3fdc3c89.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <200401091911.19186.adam@migus.org> References: <200401091911.19186.adam@migus.org> Organization: tH3 cUlt 0f tH3 d3@d sH33p X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sat__10_Jan_2004_01_24_55_+0100_.ti0KCSs9gTbMk=h" cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: textproc/p5-XML-LibXML broken, why? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:24:22 -0000 --Signature=_Sat__10_Jan_2004_01_24_55_+0100_.ti0KCSs9gTbMk=h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 19:11:19 -0500 "Adam C. Migus" wrote: Hi Adam, > FWIW I contacted the perl package maintainer some time ago and got no > response. The cvs log for the port indicates that the port maintainer > > was contacted. Can this patch be put in place to unbreak the port > until such a time as someone comes up with a better fix? Since yesterday, we have an official "maintainer timeout" guideline. As you already contacted maintainer, and never get a reply, fill a PR and if the maintainer won't approve/disapprove your patch within 2 weeks (countdown starts when the PR State is changed to feedback), it will be committed. regards, clem --Signature=_Sat__10_Jan_2004_01_24_55_+0100_.ti0KCSs9gTbMk=h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//0ZXsRhfjwcjuh0RAnZ8AKCrmJXe95B/ccBYpLhG3idLuaU4tACghmhi FMBdpt9zf2nSsvDy11TaRV0= =2ZwY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__10_Jan_2004_01_24_55_+0100_.ti0KCSs9gTbMk=h-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 16:44:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3A016A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:44:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mag.barnet.com.au (mag.barnet.com.au [218.185.88.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5B743D88 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 16:43:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from extmail.barnet.com.au (tim.direct.int.barnet.com.au [10.10.10.2]) by mag.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873D8181 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:43:53 +1100 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <3FFF4AC900005F2A011F5806@VIRUSCAN-127.0.0.1> Received: from extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by extmail.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480171F18 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:43:53 +1100 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (unknown [192.168.1.1]) by extmail-auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A261EE3 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:43:52 +1100 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8A39A6A7101; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:43:51 +1100 (EST) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:43:51 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040110004351.GG1667@k7.mavetju> References: <200401091911.19186.adam@migus.org> <20040110012455.3fdc3c89.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040110012455.3fdc3c89.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Maintainer timeout (was: Re: textproc/p5-XML-LibXML broken, why?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:44:50 -0000 On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 01:24:55AM +0100, Clement Laforet wrote: > Since yesterday, we have an official "maintainer timeout" guideline. > As you already contacted maintainer, and never get a reply, fill a PR > and if the maintainer won't approve/disapprove your patch within 2 weeks > (countdown starts when the PR State is changed to feedback), it will be > committed. For people who haven't seen the announcement: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml.diff?r1=1.346&r2=1.347 If the maintainer of a port does not respond to an update request from a user after two weeks (excluding major public holidays), then that is considered a maintainer timeout, and the update may be made without explicit maintainer approval. If the maintainer does not respond within three months, then that maintainer is considered absent without leave, and can be replaced as the maintainer of the particular port in question. Exceptions to this are anything maintained by the &a.portmgr;, or the &a.security-officer;. No unauthorized commits may ever be made to ports maintained by those groups. The &a.portmgr; reserves the right to revoke or override anyone's maintainership for any reason, and the &a.security-officer; reserves the right to revoke or override maintainership for security reasons. Thanks to sheepkill@irc for the pointer. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 17:10:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D3C16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:10:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from cultdeadsheep.org (charon.cultdeadsheep.org [80.65.226.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AF043D1F for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:10:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org) Received: (qmail 64691 invoked by uid 85); 10 Jan 2004 02:10:40 +0100 Received: from sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.20rc2 (spamassassin: 2.61. Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 0.048876 secs); 10 Jan 2004 01:10:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO persephone.cultdeadsheep.org) (192.168.0.8) by goofy.cultdeadsheep.org with SMTP; 10 Jan 2004 02:10:39 +0100 Received: (qmail 644 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2004 02:10:04 +0100 Received: from unknown (HELO lucifer.cultdeadsheep.org) (192.168.0.2) by persephone.cultdeadsheep.org with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Jan 2004 02:10:04 +0100 Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 02:11:23 +0100 From: Clement Laforet To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040110021123.28ae8435.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <20040110004351.GG1667@k7.mavetju> References: <200401091911.19186.adam@migus.org> <20040110012455.3fdc3c89.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> <20040110004351.GG1667@k7.mavetju> Organization: tH3 cUlt 0f tH3 d3@d sH33p X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Sat__10_Jan_2004_02_11_23_+0100_r6+xiVNe3CUDJnAr" Subject: Re: Maintainer timeout (was: Re: textproc/p5-XML-LibXML broken, why?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:10:46 -0000 --Signature=_Sat__10_Jan_2004_02_11_23_+0100_r6+xiVNe3CUDJnAr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:43:51 +1100 Edwin Groothuis wrote: > If the maintainer of a port does not respond to an update request > from a user after two weeks (excluding major public holidays), I would just add a foot note ;) Unless it's a security or a critical fix, please contact maintainer first. If you don't received an answer within a reasonable timeout (3 days to 1 week), feel free to fill a PR. clem --Signature=_Sat__10_Jan_2004_02_11_23_+0100_r6+xiVNe3CUDJnAr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE//1E7sRhfjwcjuh0RAjL1AJ0TY8EMvPR7sSM+Arxb1AkHQNcDFQCfaGzO uv8cZ6EYAWed1dT8fxMIyYQ= =UtHb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sat__10_Jan_2004_02_11_23_+0100_r6+xiVNe3CUDJnAr-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 17:14:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E46116A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:14:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6BA43D58 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:14:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rrcs-midsouth-24-172-16-118.biz.rr.com [24.172.16.118]) i0A1EWKY000401; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:14:33 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i0A1E9xc040634; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:14:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Clement Laforet In-Reply-To: <20040110021123.28ae8435.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> References: <200401091911.19186.adam@migus.org> <20040110012455.3fdc3c89.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> <20040110004351.GG1667@k7.mavetju> <20040110021123.28ae8435.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-w0KzFtcl0hkzl/u+zRdA" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1073697268.42838.61.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2004 20:14:28 -0500 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maintainer timeout (was: Re: textproc/p5-XML-LibXML broken, why?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:14:43 -0000 --=-w0KzFtcl0hkzl/u+zRdA Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 20:11, Clement Laforet wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:43:51 +1100 > Edwin Groothuis wrote: >=20 > > If the maintainer of a port does not respond to an update request > > from a user after two weeks (excluding major public holidays), >=20 > I would just add a foot note ;) > Unless it's a security or a critical fix, please contact maintainer > first. If you don't received an answer within a reasonable timeout (3 day= s > to 1 week), feel free to fill a PR. This includes emails as well as PRs. Of course, it's best to formalize requests as PRs. =20 With regard to p5-XML-LibXML, I had contacted the maintainer (skv@) on September 4, 2003 about this port as it was breaking during the 4.9-RELEASE build. That is sufficiently long to constitute an AWOL maintainer. If someone has a patch, and would like to maintain this port, they are welcome to do so. Joe >=20 > clem --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-w0KzFtcl0hkzl/u+zRdA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA//1H0b2iPiv4Uz4cRAoGfAJ9QyykjhH1bzqDGbrZsyhEChNkouwCcDcLS JUCkEG61BPLg1r5+fDIkOFw= =QvLF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-w0KzFtcl0hkzl/u+zRdA-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 9 17:42:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3305E16A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:42:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5B043D55 for ; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 17:42:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adam@migus.org) Received: from ludo.migus.org ([68.55.80.136]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20040110014208013008kceee>; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:42:08 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2D0A1017; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:42:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from ludo.migus.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ludo.migus.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 68322-06-2; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:42:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from ganyopa.migus.org (ganyopa.migus.org [192.168.4.2]) by ludo.migus.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FADA1001; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:42:07 -0500 (EST) From: "Adam C. Migus" Organization: Migus Dot Org To: Joe Marcus Clarke Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 20:42:07 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <200401091911.19186.adam@migus.org> <20040110021123.28ae8435.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> <1073697268.42838.61.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <1073697268.42838.61.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401092042.07182.adam@migus.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at migus.org cc: ports@freebsd.org cc: dom@happygiraffe.net Subject: Re: Maintainer timeout (was: Re: textproc/p5-XML-LibXML broken, why?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 01:42:12 -0000 On Friday 09 January 2004 8:14 pm, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Fri, 2004-01-09 at 20:11, Clement Laforet wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:43:51 +1100 > > > > Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > > If the maintainer of a port does not respond to an update > > > request from a user after two weeks (excluding major public > > > holidays), > > > > I would just add a foot note ;) > > Unless it's a security or a critical fix, please contact maintainer > > first. If you don't received an answer within a reasonable timeout > > (3 days to 1 week), feel free to fill a PR. > > This includes emails as well as PRs. Of course, it's best to > formalize requests as PRs. > > With regard to p5-XML-LibXML, I had contacted the maintainer (skv@) > on September 4, 2003 about this port as it was breaking during the > 4.9-RELEASE build. That is sufficiently long to constitute an AWOL > maintainer. If someone has a patch, and would like to maintain this > port, they are welcome to do so. > > Joe > > > clem I have been asked to accept maintainership of another set of ports; specifically the www/p5-AxKit-* ports by their current maintainer after I submitted patches to him privately. Since these ports rely on this one I will accept maintainership of it if no one else wishes to do so. Please let me know. -- Adam C. Migus - http://people.migus.org/~amigus/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 00:19:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6767616A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:19:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from scuzzy.ben.algroup.co.uk (dsl-217-155-92-105.zen.co.uk [217.155.92.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0222043D41 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 00:19:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ben@algroup.co.uk) Received: from algroup.co.uk (eandbwin.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.100]) by scuzzy.ben.algroup.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CD7107CA7; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:18:59 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <3FFFB58B.2040107@algroup.co.uk> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:19:23 +0000 From: Ben Laurie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= References: <3FFEF9D6.9080105@algroup.co.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.82.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mod_perl? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:19:02 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Ben Laurie writes: > >>So, if you try to install (using CPAN) Apache::Request after >>installing the mod_perl port, it doesn't work at all. The reason >>appears to be that all the mod_perl bits get installed in >>site_perl/5.8.0, but what's actually running is 5.8.2, so that >>directory isn't searched. > > > Pilot error. If you have 5.8.2 installed, and did 'use.perl port' > after installing Perl, mod_perl will be installed in site_perl/5.8.2. Thanks. Are you aware that if you haven't done use.perl port some of mod_perl uses 5.8.2 anyway? Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 02:39:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019A716A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 02:39:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF2043D41 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 02:39:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 2DCD25323; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:39:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id A01815334; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:39:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 6CC7333C9A; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:39:18 +0100 (CET) To: Ben Laurie References: <3FFEF9D6.9080105@algroup.co.uk> <3FFFB58B.2040107@algroup.co.uk> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:39:18 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3FFFB58B.2040107@algroup.co.uk> (Ben Laurie's message of "Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:19:23 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mod_perl? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:39:29 -0000 Ben Laurie writes: > Thanks. Are you aware that if you haven't done use.perl port some of > mod_perl uses 5.8.2 anyway? If you don't run 'use.perl port', the results are effectively undefined. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 03:38:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C38616A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 03:38:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from boleskine.patpro.net (boleskine.patpro.net [62.4.20.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804B743D1D for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 03:38:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from patrick.proniewski@free.fr) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (cassandre [192.168.0.1]) by boleskine.patpro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D053175 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:38:53 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <9148780C-4361-11D8-95FB-0030654D97EC@free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: ports@FreeBSD.org From: patrick.proniewski@free.fr Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:38:53 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) Subject: ports/comms/mlan3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:38:56 -0000 Hello, I would like to know if support for Thermocron (Maxim-Dallas part # DS1921G-F5) is to be included in the mlan3 port ? Currently bin/thermo is not in the port. I've tried to compile it from the public domain kit (http://www.ibutton.com/software/1wire/wirekit.html) but with no success, I'm definitively not a developer. thank you for your work. patpro -- je cherche un poste d'admin-sys Mac/UNIX (ou une jeune et jolie femme riche) http://patpro.net/cv.php From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 08:02:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2494316A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:02:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3D243D62 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:02:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcov@stack.nl) Received: from toad.stack.nl (zen.stack.nl [2001:610:1108:5010::130]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40002207#5585C1F00D for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:02:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 816) id 35B5692; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:02:15 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:02:15 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL88 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20040110160215.35B5692@toad.stack.nl> From: marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) Subject: %%PORTVERSION%% X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:02:18 -0000 Ok, shorter version then :) I made a port (lang/fpc-devel), which installs file, but when deinstalling I get a lot of pkg_delete: file '/fpc/porttest/lib/fpc/%%PORTVERSION%%/msg/errord.msg' doesn't really exist It seems that %%PORTVERSION%% isn't expanded as it should. What could I be doing wrong? The old port (lang/fpc) also does have %%PORTVERSION%% in pkg-plist, so it should be possible Makefile contains: PORTVERSION= 1.9.2 and I made sure that the makefiles do indeed end up in /fpc/porttest/lib/fpc/1.9.2/msg/errord.msg The whole (68 line) Makefile is at http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/fpcdevelport.tar.gz From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 08:05:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EE516A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:05:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 329C343D1D for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:05:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adamw@magnesium.net) Received: (qmail 2866 invoked by uid 1252); 10 Jan 2004 16:05:36 -0000 Date: 10 Jan 2004 11:05:36 -0500 Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 11:05:36 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger To: Marco van de Voort Message-ID: <20040110160535.GA57459@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <20040110160215.35B5692@toad.stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040110160215.35B5692@toad.stack.nl> X-Editor: Vim 6.2 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx X-ASL: 6/m/behind you User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: %%PORTVERSION%% X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:05:37 -0000 >> (01.10.2004 @ 1102 PST): Marco van de Voort said, in 0.8K: << > > Ok, shorter version then :) > > I made a port (lang/fpc-devel), which installs file, but when deinstalling I get a lot of > > pkg_delete: file '/fpc/porttest/lib/fpc/%%PORTVERSION%%/msg/errord.msg' doesn't really exist > > It seems that %%PORTVERSION%% isn't expanded as it should. What could I be doing wrong? > > The old port (lang/fpc) also does have %%PORTVERSION%% in pkg-plist, so it should be possible > > Makefile contains: > > PORTVERSION= 1.9.2 > > and I made sure that the makefiles do indeed end up in > /fpc/porttest/lib/fpc/1.9.2/msg/errord.msg > > The whole (68 line) Makefile is at http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/fpcdevelport.tar.gz >> end of "%%PORTVERSION%%" from Marco van de Voort << Add PLIST_SUB+= PORTVERSION="${PORTVERSION}" # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adam@vectors.cx // adamw@FreeBSD.org // adamw@magnesium.net http://www.vectors.cx From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 08:22:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905E816A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:22:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [81.56.186.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514A843D49 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 08:22:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 78903752D; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:21:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:21:09 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas To: Marco van de Voort Message-ID: <20040110162109.GB94617@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: Marco van de Voort , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20040110160215.35B5692@toad.stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040110160215.35B5692@toad.stack.nl> X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: %%PORTVERSION%% X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:22:51 -0000 --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Sam 10 jan 04 =E0 17:02:15 +0100, Marco van de Voort =E9crivait=A0: > pkg_delete: file '/fpc/porttest/lib/fpc/%%PORTVERSION%%/msg/errord.msg' d= oesn't really exist >=20 > It seems that %%PORTVERSION%% isn't expanded as it should. What could I b= e doing wrong? What does report `make -V PLIST_SUB' ? --=20 Th. Thomas. --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAACZ1c95pjMcUBaIRAl/pAJ4nBJRUtNlC8I532+IhEzxh0r5i+ACdEYUO XN27v+HpqpeAXrqWlBJqs1E= =3BQb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 09:22:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F52416A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 09:22:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD7A43D5A for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 09:22:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcov@stack.nl) Received: from toad.stack.nl (zen.stack.nl [2001:610:1108:5010::130]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400034CE#1A66A1F00B for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:22:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 816) id 0112C92; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:22:21 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:22:21 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL88 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20040110172221.0112C92@toad.stack.nl> From: marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) Subject: Re: %%PORTVERSION%% X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:22:25 -0000 > >=20 > > PORTVERSION=3D 1.9.2 > >=20 > > and I made sure that the makefiles do indeed end up in > > /fpc/porttest/lib/fpc/1.9.2/msg/errord.msg=20 > >=20 > > The whole (68 line) Makefile is at http://www.stack.nl/~marcov/fpcdevel= port.tar.gz > >> end of "%%PORTVERSION%%" from Marco van de Voort << >=20 > Add >=20 > PLIST_SUB+=3D PORTVERSION=3D"${PORTVERSION}" Thanks. The port now does make install/deinstall ok. pkg-plist was ok, but = a part was not negatively sorted. Nothing is left behind except $PREFIX/src and other= standard dirs ($PREFIX/lib man bin and share, there are no FPC generated subdirs in there= ), should I try to remove these too, or will this result in errors. However make package after a make install (as advised in the test sequence = in the porters handbook) now goes wrong: make install PREFIX=3D/fpc/porttest [goes fine, ends with registering the port.] make package [_restarts_ building adding the prefix doesn't help] =3D=3D=3D> Installing for fpc-devel-1.9.2 =3D=3D=3D> Generating temporary packing list =3D=3D=3D> Checking if lang/fpc-devel already installed =3D=3D=3D> fpc-devel-1.9.2 is already installed You may wish to =0Dake deinstall'' and install this port again by =0Dake reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of lang/fpc-devel without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/fpc/fpc-devel. make deinstall PREFIX=3D/fpc/porttest [generally goes ok, with already mentioned exceptions. making a mistake wit= h the prefix (like appending a backslash), will deregister the port though] -- I suspect something goes wrong with the semaphore flags that signal build d= one. Since restarting building for the package seems not necessary: 56 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 233611 Jan 10 17:40 .PLIST.mktmp 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Jan 10 17:40 .build_done.fpc-devel= -1.9.2._fpc_porttest 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Jan 10 17:39 .configure_done.fpc-d= evel-1.9.2._fpc_porttest 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Jan 10 17:39 .extract_done.fpc-dev= el-1.9.2._fpc_porttest 0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Jan 10 17:39 .patch_done.fpc-devel= -1.9.2._fpc_porttest P.s. sorry for mailing it personally. Adam. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 10:35:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7132516A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:35:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from scuzzy.ben.algroup.co.uk (dsl-217-155-92-105.zen.co.uk [217.155.92.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F55B43D1F for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:34:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ben@algroup.co.uk) Received: from algroup.co.uk (eandbwin.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.100]) by scuzzy.ben.algroup.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B2A107CA7; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:34:57 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <400045D0.4080503@algroup.co.uk> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:34:56 +0000 From: Ben Laurie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= References: <3FFEF9D6.9080105@algroup.co.uk> <3FFFB58B.2040107@algroup.co.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.82.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mod_perl? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:35:00 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Ben Laurie writes: > >>Thanks. Are you aware that if you haven't done use.perl port some of >>mod_perl uses 5.8.2 anyway? > > > If you don't run 'use.perl port', the results are effectively > undefined. So why doesn't the port run it? -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 10:38:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370C416A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:38:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1866E43D2F for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 10:38:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id B726E530E; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 19:38:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 02E1B5308; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 19:38:43 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id BDEC333C9A; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 19:38:42 +0100 (CET) To: Ben Laurie References: <3FFEF9D6.9080105@algroup.co.uk> <3FFFB58B.2040107@algroup.co.uk> <400045D0.4080503@algroup.co.uk> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 19:38:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <400045D0.4080503@algroup.co.uk> (Ben Laurie's message of "Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:34:56 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mod_perl? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:38:52 -0000 Ben Laurie writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > If you don't run 'use.perl port', the results are effectively > > undefined. > So why doesn't the port run it? You'll have to ask the maintainer that question... DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 12:42:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4684E16A4CE; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:42:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from sally.dts-online.net (sally.dts-online.net [212.62.68.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BCA43D45; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:42:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lkoeller@koellers.net) Received: from door.koellers.net (213-182-114-50.teleos-web.de [213.182.114.50]) by sally.dts-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B93A4DF0F0; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:42:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from odie.koellers.net (root@odie.koellers.net [192.168.4.2]) by door.koellers.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0AKTvke003681; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:29:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lkoeller@koellers.net) Received: from odie.koellers.net (lkoeller@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by odie.koellers.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0AKTvAj001752; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:29:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lkoeller@odie.koellers.net) Message-Id: <200401102029.i0AKTvAj001752@odie.koellers.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 From: Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?= To: Ceri Davies In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 07 Jan 2004 11:06:32 GMT." <20040107110632.GA8322@submonkey.net> X-Face: eCcoCV}FjV*O{6>[1$XP/e%]TJhEw2MF33dFh)^HM7Gfd=[/(4+0a$~ Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:42:27 -0000 ---------- In reply to Ceri Davies who wrote: >> I will just try ...... >> >> lkoeller@odie:~/ >> 98310 : cvs checkout doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml >> cvs server: cannot find module `doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml' - ignored >> cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules >> >> sorry, but I cant checkout the boot ..... > >You need to be using the doc tree root; I use the alias: > >dcvs (env CVS_RSH=ssh cvs -d ceri@dcvs.freebsd.org:/home/dcvs) > >If that still won't work then I'll make the commit for you; no point >causing stress! O.k. I was some days offline (reorganize my disks) and finally can checkout the book: CVSROOT=lkoeller@dcvs.freebsd.org:/home/dcvs cvs checkout doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml After I've done this I see tha someone has done the job for me. Next time I can do the job myself .... but I don't have check the commit bit .... ;-) Thanks and regards Lars From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 12:57:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C33116A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:57:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.texas.rr.com [24.93.47.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9E143D39 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:57:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from bento.lonesome.com (cs242719-195.austin.rr.com [24.27.19.195]) i0AKvo4a015267 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:57:50 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:57:50 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200401102057.i0AKvo4a015267@ms-smtp-01-eri0.texas.rr.com> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: ports@FreeBSD.org X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:57:57 -0000 Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we are attempting to notify maintainers of ports that are marked as BROKEN by the Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. The most common problem is that the latest -CURRENT includes gcc3.3, which is much stricter about such things as function declarations, literal strings constants that continue over several physical lines, and forcing the deprecation of antique header files such as varargs.h (we should now be using stdargs.h). The next most common problem is that compiles succeed on the i386 architecture (e.g. the common Intel PC), but fail on one or more of the other architectures due to assumptions about things such as size of various types, byte-alignment issues, and so forth. In occasional cases we see that the same port may have different errors in different build environments. The script that runs on the build cluster uses heuristics to try to 'guess' the error type to help you isolate problems, but it is only a rough guide. If you need help in one ore more build environments that you do not have access to, please ask for help on the freebsd-ports mailing list. The build errors are listed below. In the case where the same problem exists on more than one build environment, the URL points to the latest errorlog for that type. (By 'build environment' here we mean 'combination of 4.x or 5.x, with target architecture'.) portname: audio/fcplay build errors: compiler error (Nov 11 22:58:02 GMT 2003) portname: audio/quelcom build errors: bad C++ code (Dec 1 08:28:46 GMT 2003) portname: audio/rebler build errors: compiler error (Dec 1 12:06:51 GMT 2003) portname: benchmarks/postal build errors: ??? (Nov 18 12:41:52 GMT 2003) portname: chinese/cle_base build errors: ??? (Dec 1 09:53:18 GMT 2003) portname: chinese/vflib build errors: ??? arch (Dec 1 11:17:02 GMT 2003) portname: comms/mlan3 build errors: ??? (Dec 24 06:28:44 GMT 2003) portname: databases/msql build errors: none. portname: devel/asmutils build errors: ??? (Dec 1 09:34:19 GMT 2003) portname: devel/ccdoc build errors: install error (Dec 1 09:29:31 GMT 2003) portname: devel/crossgo32 build errors: ??? (Dec 1 09:34:24 GMT 2003) arch (Oct 13 11:07:02 GMT 2003) portname: devel/freescope build errors: compiler error (Nov 18 12:55:11 GMT 2003) portname: devel/libcache build errors: none. portname: devel/libg++ build errors: missing header (Dec 24 05:54:40 GMT 2003) portname: devel/moonshine build errors: bad C++ code (Nov 15 08:39:11 GMT 2003) portname: devel/p5-Devel-Peek build errors: compiler error (Dec 24 06:46:36 GMT 2003) portname: devel/titano build errors: bad C++ code (Dec 1 12:09:19 GMT 2003) portname: devel/veepee build errors: compiler error (Nov 11 07:41:23 GMT 2003) portname: devel/yacl build errors: bad C++ code (Dec 1 13:23:16 GMT 2003) portname: editors/bed build errors: missing header (Nov 29 22:53:05 GMT 2003) runaway process (Dec 1 12:41:09 GMT 2003) portname: editors/thoteditor build errors: new compiler error (Dec 24 21:24:42 GMT 2003) portname: emulators/dlx build errors: compiler error (Nov 30 17:57:56 GMT 2003) missing header (Nov 18 13:34:39 GMT 2003) portname: emulators/ia64sim build errors: ??? (Dec 1 08:44:26 GMT 2003) compiler error (Oct 13 11:13:40 GMT 2003) portname: ftp/libfxp build errors: compiler error (Dec 1 08:42:49 GMT 2003) portname: games/clanbomber build errors: configure error (Dec 1 12:03:24 GMT 2003) missing header (Nov 11 07:40:20 GMT 2003) portname: games/nethack33-qt build errors: gcc bug (Oct 3 04:08:39 GMT 2003) new compiler error (Nov 15 10:51:45 GMT 2003) portname: graphics/dynamechs build errors: ??? (Nov 13 14:57:00 GMT 2003) portname: graphics/ivtools build errors: ??? makefile (Dec 1 10:37:37 GMT 2003) new compiler error (Oct 13 12:33:53 GMT 2003) portname: graphics/panorama build errors: ??? (Dec 24 19:07:54 GMT 2003) portname: japanese/gnomelibs build errors: ??? new compiler error (Dec 25 06:15:18 GMT 2003) portname: japanese/oleo build errors: ??? compiler error (Dec 24 16:36:41 GMT 2003) portname: java/guavac build errors: bad C++ code (Dec 1 09:37:04 GMT 2003) portname: lang/Sather build errors: ??? (Dec 1 13:42:32 GMT 2003) coredump (Oct 13 13:31:28 GMT 2003) portname: lang/egcs build errors: ??? (Dec 1 09:37:03 GMT 2003) arch (Nov 12 06:02:01 GMT 2003) compiler error (Dec 1 08:47:41 GMT 2003) portname: lang/gcc27 build errors: ??? (Dec 1 08:47:26 GMT 2003) portname: lang/gcc30 build errors: missing header (Dec 1 09:37:25 GMT 2003) portname: lang/glibstdc++28 build errors: none. portname: lang/objc build errors: ??? (Dec 1 09:26:25 GMT 2003) arch (Nov 18 15:09:35 GMT 2003) coredump (Nov 30 17:58:38 GMT 2003) portname: lang/tensile build errors: ??? coredump (Dec 1 09:56:33 GMT 2003) portname: mail/dkimap4 build errors: bad C++ code (Nov 12 09:20:35 GMT 2003) portname: mail/gmail build errors: checksum (Nov 13 18:38:26 GMT 2003) portname: mail/ml build errors: ??? (Dec 1 11:11:48 GMT 2003) arch (Dec 24 21:29:20 GMT 2003) portname: math/qscanplot build errors: bad C++ code (Dec 1 12:05:17 GMT 2003) gcc bug (Oct 3 04:55:57 GMT 2003) portname: math/simpack build errors: ??? bad C++ code (Dec 1 10:40:41 GMT 2003) compiler error (Oct 13 12:44:44 GMT 2003) portname: misc/estic build errors: ??? bad C++ code (Dec 1 11:58:19 GMT 2003) portname: misc/gtl build errors: bad C++ code (Nov 18 16:05:15 GMT 2003) portname: multimedia/mpegedit build errors: compiler error (Nov 29 22:14:30 GMT 2003) portname: net/cap build errors: ??? PLIST (Dec 1 08:14:33 GMT 2003) portname: net/eudc-emacs20 build errors: none. portname: net/freewais-sf build errors: ??? bad C++ code (Nov 30 18:02:49 GMT 2003) compiler error (Oct 3 00:58:33 GMT 2003) portname: net/oproute build errors: compiler error (Dec 1 08:15:21 GMT 2003) portname: net/py-ldap1 build errors: none. portname: net/sting build errors: compiler error (Dec 24 06:24:05 GMT 2003) portname: palm/prc-tools build errors: compiler error (Nov 11 06:44:42 GMT 2003) portname: print/xmbibtex build errors: bad C++ code (Dec 1 11:13:14 GMT 2003) portname: security/py-twofish build errors: arch (Nov 29 19:18:07 GMT 2003) linker error (Nov 30 18:12:16 GMT 2003) portname: sysutils/ffsrecov build errors: compiler error (Dec 1 09:28:06 GMT 2003) portname: sysutils/xlogmaster build errors: compiler error (Nov 14 05:52:37 GMT 2003) portname: textproc/sp build errors: compiler error (Dec 1 09:28:35 GMT 2003) portname: www/Mosaic build errors: none. portname: www/web500gw build errors: none. portname: x11-toolkits/jx build errors: ??? portname: x11/XFree86-aoutlibs build errors: install error (Dec 1 10:46:08 GMT 2003) portname: x11/decurs build errors: ??? (Dec 25 18:17:08 GMT 2003) depend package (Nov 30 17:35:03 GMT 2003) If these build errors are ones that you are already aware of, please accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts in the past. Every effort has been made to make sure that these build errors really do correspond to a port that you maintain. However, due to the fact that this is an automated process, it may indeed generate false matches. If one of these build errors fits that description, please forward this email to the author of this software, Mark Linimon , so that he can attempt to fix the problem in the future. Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 13:42:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF51716A4CE; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:42:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from sally.dts-online.net (sally.dts-online.net [212.62.68.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4229343D31; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 13:42:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lkoeller@koellers.net) Received: from door.koellers.net (213-182-112-61.teleos-web.de [213.182.112.61]) by sally.dts-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283F523D95C; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:42:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from odie.koellers.net (root@odie.koellers.net [192.168.4.2]) by door.koellers.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0AKmjke003959; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:48:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lkoeller@koellers.net) Received: from odie.koellers.net (lkoeller@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by odie.koellers.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0AKmiAj002167; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:48:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lkoeller@odie.koellers.net) Message-Id: <200401102048.i0AKmiAj002167@odie.koellers.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4 From: "Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=F6ller?=" To: Mathieu Arnold In-Reply-To: Message from Mathieu Arnold of "Wed, 07 Jan 2004 10:06:40 +0100." <1153421.1073470000@pouet.in.mat.cc> X-Face: eCcoCV}FjV*O{6>[1$XP/e%]TJhEw2MF33dFh)^HM7Gfd=[/(4+0a$~ cc: lkoeller@freebsd.org cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Lars_K=F6ller?= Subject: Re: Please reserve UID/GID for bacula port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:42:51 -0000 Hi all, In reply to Mathieu Arnold who wrote: >Maybe a simple pkg-{,de}install like this : > >pkg-install : >PATH=3D/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin > >case "$2" in >"POST-INSTALL") > echo "# Bacula port start >bacula-dir 9101/tcp #Bacula director daemon >bacula-fd 9102/tcp #Bacula file daemon >bacula-sd 9103/tcp #Bacula storage daemon ># Bacule port end" >> /etc/services > >pkg-deinstall : >PATH=3D/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin >TMPFILE=3D/tmp/services-$RANDOM-$$ > >case "$2" in >"DEINSTALL") > sed -e '/# Bacula port start/,/# Bacule port end/{' \ > -e 'd' \ > -e '}' /etc/services > $TMPFILE > mv -f $TMPFILE /etc/services > ;; >esac > >and add a : >post-install: > @${SETENV} ${INSTALL_ENV} ${SH} ${PKGINSTALL} ${PKGNAME}= >POST-INSTALL > >to the Makefile. I like this idea. I will try to include this in the make plus a check = if the lines are already in /etc/services. Thanks to all for the replys = Lars = -- = Lars K=F6ller E-Mail: lars@koellers.net (LKoeller@FreeBSD.ORG) -------- FreeBSD, was sonst? ---- http://www.de.freebsd.org -------- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 14:08:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5038716A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:08:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (vaak.stack.nl [131.155.140.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B303843D69 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:07:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcov@stack.nl) Received: from toad.stack.nl (zen.stack.nl [2001:610:1108:5010::130]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400077BB#B750A1F006 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:07:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 816) id 893FE92; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:07:55 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20040110172221.0112C92@toad.stack.nl> "from Marco van de Voort at Jan 10, 2004 06:22:21 pm" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:07:55 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL88 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20040110220755.893FE92@toad.stack.nl> From: marcov@stack.nl (Marco van de Voort) Subject: Re: %%PORTVERSION%% X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:08:04 -0000 Thanks, succeeded I think. For the interested committer: ports/61183 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 15:39:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7392916A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:39:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from scuzzy.ben.algroup.co.uk (dsl-217-155-92-105.zen.co.uk [217.155.92.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00DC43D1D for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 15:39:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ben@algroup.co.uk) Received: from algroup.co.uk (eandbwin.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.100]) by scuzzy.ben.algroup.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACCC107CA7; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:39:45 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <40008D43.8020801@algroup.co.uk> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:39:47 +0000 From: Ben Laurie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= References: <3FFEF9D6.9080105@algroup.co.uk> <3FFFB58B.2040107@algroup.co.uk> <400045D0.4080503@algroup.co.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.82.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mod_perl? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:39:48 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Ben Laurie writes: > >>Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: >> >>>If you don't run 'use.perl port', the results are effectively >>>undefined. >> >>So why doesn't the port run it? > > > You'll have to ask the maintainer that question... I did (the maintainer is ports@freebsd.org). Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 16:07:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA7416A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:07:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C1C43D3F for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:06:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 32097 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2004 00:06:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19) by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 00:06:54 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:08:15 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <20040111020815.243055fa@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: dcgui breakes with s/-lpthread/${PTHREAD_LIBS}/g X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:07:00 -0000 Hi, On my FreeBSD 5.2-RC #0: Fri Jan 9 02:11:52 EET 2004 root@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC (an on 5.1) if I compile net/dcgui from ports, it freezes any input in X (KDE) and, and the only thing I can do is to swich to a console and kill it. However, if I delete the s/-lpthread/${PTHREAD_LIBS}/g from Makefile's: post-patch: @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's/-O2//g; s/-lpthread/${PTHREAD_LIBS}/g' \ ${CONFIGURE_WRKSRC}/${CONFIGURE_SCRIPT} it just works. I'm failling to understand why. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 17:00:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6122416A4D3 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:00:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from hood.oook.cz (hood.oook.cz [212.27.205.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CA043D41 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 16:59:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hood.oook.cz (localhost.oook.cz [127.0.0.1]) by hood.oook.cz (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0B0xrjW095772; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:59:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by hood.oook.cz (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0B0xrhc095771; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:59:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: hood.oook.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Ben Laurie In-Reply-To: <40008D43.8020801@algroup.co.uk> References: <3FFEF9D6.9080105@algroup.co.uk> <3FFFB58B.2040107@algroup.co.uk> <400045D0.4080503@algroup.co.uk> <40008D43.8020801@algroup.co.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-sIjabfSqQjbJEuzu9pKf" Message-Id: <1073782793.94923.10.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:59:53 +0100 cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= Subject: Re: mod_perl? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:00:00 -0000 --=-sIjabfSqQjbJEuzu9pKf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable V ne, 11. 01. 2004 v 00:39, Ben Laurie p=ED=B9e: > >>>If you don't run 'use.perl port', the results are effectively > >>>undefined. > >> > >>So why doesn't the port run it? > >=20 > >=20 > > You'll have to ask the maintainer that question... >=20 > I did (the maintainer is ports@freebsd.org). No, maintainer of port port is tobez@FreeBSD.org --=20 Pav Lucistnik The answer to the all-encompassing question on life, the universe and everything: close windows and reboot. --=-sIjabfSqQjbJEuzu9pKf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAAKAJntdYP8FOsoIRAmCrAKCYyrGBOv++fZqo8ebqgSD7Z0n2cgCgoVVH k/zzd/znEPTjaLEcEf1CCr4= =jAKZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-sIjabfSqQjbJEuzu9pKf-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 22:10:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4048E16A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:10:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from mgr2.xmission.com (mgr2.xmission.com [198.60.22.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA04A43D31 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:10:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from [198.60.22.207] (helo=mx1.xmission.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AfYne-00050O-02; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:10:14 -0700 Received: from [207.135.128.145] (helo=misty.eyesbeyond.com) by mx1.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AfYnd-0004av-RN; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:10:14 -0700 Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) i0B6EYYh014880; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:14:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0B6EV5A014879; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:14:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:14:30 -0700 From: Greg Lewis To: Edwin Groothuis Message-ID: <20040111061430.GA14670@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <3FFF1F0E.5040402@acslink.net.au> <20040109214943.GF1667@k7.mavetju> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040109214943.GF1667@k7.mavetju> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on mx1.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.61 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: glewis@eyesbeyond.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 3.1 (built Wed Aug 20 09:38:54 PDT 2003) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes cc: Geoff Deering cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cocoon-1.8.2_3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:10:20 -0000 On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 08:49:43AM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 08:37:18AM +1100, Geoff Deering wrote: > > I'm wondering why the version of Cocoon is so out of date, that not even > > 2.x, let alone 2.1.x is available? > > There are no open PRs regarding cocoon. If you can submit a patch Not so. See PR 44219. Unfortunately this is basically just "Note to self: this port needs updating". > to upgrade it we will be happy to update the port. If you're really > adventurous you can take maintainership for the port and be > immortalised forever as "the maintainer who updates cocoon to version > 2.1.x" > > Think about it, it's worth it :-) Definitely! -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 23:08:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B7F16A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:08:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-05.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF3BA43D1F for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:08:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gdeering@acslink.net.au) Received: (qmail 22830 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2004 07:05:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO acslink.net.au) (203.220.179.253) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 07:05:54 -0000 Message-ID: <4000F5C4.6050603@acslink.net.au> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:05:40 +1100 From: Geoff Deering User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-au, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lewis References: <3FFF1F0E.5040402@acslink.net.au> <20040109214943.GF1667@k7.mavetju> <20040111061430.GA14670@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20040111061430.GA14670@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cocoon-1.8.2_3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gdeering@acslink.net.au List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:08:52 -0000 Greg Lewis wrote: >On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 08:49:43AM +1100, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > >>On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 08:37:18AM +1100, Geoff Deering wrote: >> >> >>>I'm wondering why the version of Cocoon is so out of date, that not even >>>2.x, let alone 2.1.x is available? >>> >>> >>There are no open PRs regarding cocoon. If you can submit a patch >> >> > >Not so. See PR 44219. Unfortunately this is basically just "Note to >self: this port needs updating". > > > That's good to know >>to upgrade it we will be happy to update the port. If you're really >>adventurous you can take maintainership for the port and be >>immortalised forever as "the maintainer who updates cocoon to version >>2.1.x" >> >>Think about it, it's worth it :-) >> >> > >Definitely! > > > As I said to Edwin, my biggest obstacle is that I live in a rural environment on a link that is currently rated 26.4 Kbps, so slow I get time outs on Google!. Currently, there's no way known I can work with such a large package as a contributor. :-( Thanks for your efforts :-) Geoff From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 10 23:52:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796F716A4CE; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:52:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from scuzzy.ben.algroup.co.uk (dsl-217-155-92-105.zen.co.uk [217.155.92.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36B343D41; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 23:52:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ben@algroup.co.uk) Received: from algroup.co.uk (eandbwin.ben.algroup.co.uk [193.133.15.100]) by scuzzy.ben.algroup.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CED5107CA7; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:52:37 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <400100C5.2060706@algroup.co.uk> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:52:37 +0000 From: Ben Laurie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: pav@FreeBSD.org References: <3FFEF9D6.9080105@algroup.co.uk> <3FFFB58B.2040107@algroup.co.uk> <400045D0.4080503@algroup.co.uk> <40008D43.8020801@algroup.co.uk> <1073782793.94923.10.camel@hood.oook.cz> In-Reply-To: <1073782793.94923.10.camel@hood.oook.cz> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.82.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org cc: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=3Frgrav?= Subject: Re: mod_perl? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:52:40 -0000 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > V ne, 11. 01. 2004 v 00:39, Ben Laurie pí¹e: > > >>>>>If you don't run 'use.perl port', the results are effectively >>>>>undefined. >>>> >>>>So why doesn't the port run it? >>> >>> >>>You'll have to ask the maintainer that question... >> >>I did (the maintainer is ports@freebsd.org). > > > No, maintainer of port port is tobez@FreeBSD.org Doh, I was looking at mod_perl, not perl, sorry. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff