From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 15 00:47:39 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D74A16A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 00:47:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postfix3-1.free.fr (postfix3-1.free.fr [213.228.0.44])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5284F43D1F
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 00:47:39 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from llevier@argosnet.com)
Received: from osgiliath.argosnet.com
	(stbarthelemy-2-82-224-1-141.fbx.proxad.net [82.224.1.141])
	by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1818BC4186; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:47:38 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20040215094221.01f410b0@213.30.158.180>
X-Sender: llevier@213.30.158.180
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:47:36 +0100
To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>,
	Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
From: Laurent LEVIER <llevier@argosnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <200402150027.i1F0Rkqe016839@cwsys.cwsent.com>
References: <200402150027.i1F0Rkqe016839@cwsys.cwsent.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:47:39 -0000

Cy, Kris,

>The deed has been done. That was simple.  :)
If that is what you feel. I am still a bit puzzle.
Do I need to take action on my side?
If so, is this action is to change the value of NO_LATEST_LINK in the makefile?

Notice also I sent 2 weeks ago the built for Hydra 2.6 (the last version) 
and it seems CVSup does not reflect this change yet.
So I cant do a diff of a makefile that is not the one that should be in the 
ports/ tree.

Kris, are you able to determine the status of my 2.6 update?
Here was my answer to Jonathan:

>Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 19:36:29 +0100
>To: Jonathan Weiss <tomonage1@gmx.de>, <Yonatan@xpert.com>
>From: Laurent LEVIER <llevier@argosnet.com>
>Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: hydra-2.2
>Cc: <ports@FreeBSD.org>
>
>Jonathan,
>
>Port 2.6 for Hydra on FreeBSD 4.x now done. See .tar.gz attached file.
>
>Brgrds

Thanks

Brgrds

Laurent LEVIER
Systems & Networks Security Expert, CISSP CISM