From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 20 00:01:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E62BC16A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:01:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outmx023.isp.belgacom.be (outmx023.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.2.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4538043D39 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:01:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from geert@lori.mine.nu) Received: from outmx023.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id i5K00ujA007068 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 02:00:56 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from lori.mine.nu (65-23.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.23.65]) with ESMTP id i5K00qde007042; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 02:00:52 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: by lori.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B2F3C4E9; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 02:00:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 02:00:51 +0200 From: Geert Hendrickx To: Chris Smith Message-ID: <20040620000050.GA5563@lori.mine.nu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-GPG-Key: http://www.win.ua.ac.be/~s005085/gnupgkey.txt X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/766C1E92 X-Accept-Language: nl,en cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: An easy virtual pop solution not involving qmail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 00:01:01 -0000 On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 12:15:30AM +0100, Chris Smith wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently writing a proposal to replace our crapped out Redhat 9 web > server with FreeBSD 5-STABLE when it appears. In the process, I need to do > something with the mail server running on it. It's currently sendmail with > virtual domains and one user account per mailbox etc. Its performance is > piss poor and the users are complaining (there are 500 of the buggers and > they poll it all day and night). > > Is there an easier to manage solution that DOESN'T involve qmail where I > don't need to give users REAL accounts? I've seen several qmail-centric > documents floating around on the web but nothing concise and > straightforward. > > BTW - I'm not getting into a mail server religious war so don't even go > there ;-) > > Many Thanks, > > - Chris. Dovecot is an excellent and MTA-independant POP/IMAP-server, supporting virtual domains, virtual users, and various authentication mechanisms. Checkout ports/mail/dovecot or http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/ GH