From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 00:13:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81E716A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:13:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp13.wxs.nl (smtp13.wxs.nl [195.121.6.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2676643D55 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:13:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: from kruij557.speed.planet.nl (ipd50a97ba.speed.planet.nl [213.10.151.186]) by smtp13.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4M00AE9GMFID@smtp13.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:13:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alex.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kruij557.speed.planet.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8Q0DNRk076063; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:13:23 +0200 Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by alex.lan (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8Q0DMOO076062; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:13:22 +0200 Content-return: prohibited Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:13:22 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff In-reply-to: <200409251618.47785.mnavarre@cox.net> To: Matt Navarre Message-id: <20040926001322.GC796@alex.lan> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i References: <200409251435.48200.mnavarre@cox.net> <200409251618.47785.mnavarre@cox.net> X-Authentication-warning: alex.lan: akruijff set sender to freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl using -f cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:13:29 -0000 On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 04:18:47PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote: > On Saturday 25 September 2004 02:35, Matt Navarre wrote: > > I'm trying to upgrade gnucash, but portupgrade is choking: > > > > reichlieu# portupgrade -R gnucash > > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:323:in `deorigin': cannot > > convert nil into String (PkgDB::DBError) > > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:916:in > > `tsort_build' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:915:in `each' > > from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:915:in `tsort_build' from > > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:907:in `each' from > > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:907:in `tsort_build' from > > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:929:in `sort_build' from > > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:933:in `sort_build!' from > > /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:674:in `main' > > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `initialize' > > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `new' > > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:207:in `main' > > from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:1845 > > > > It looks like the pkgdb has something wrong with it, but pkgdb -Fu doesn't > > report anything that seems like it would cause portupgrade to bomb. There's > > a duplicate origin for cdrtools, but that doesn't seem to pertain. > > > > Should I move /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db out of the way and regenerate it? Will > > pkgdb -u recreate pkgdb.db? > > Ok, that didn't work. I regenerated pkgdb.db using pkgdb -u and got the same > problem. Odd thing is that so far gnucash is the only installed package that > generates this error. I suppose I can pkg_delete it and try reinstalling. It could be a problem with the DBDriver. You could try this: Edit /root/.cs... and add PORTS_DBDRIVER=bdb1_hash PKG_DBDRIVER=bdb1_hash Then execute this in your shell also. Then do: pkgdb -u && portsdb -u && portupgrade -R gnucash -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 00:20:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905CF16A4CF for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:20:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53908.mail.yahoo.com (web53908.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B9DD43D49 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:20:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stheg_olloydson@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040926002039.10710.qmail@web53908.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.18.10.70] by web53908.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:20:39 PDT Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:20:39 -0700 (PDT) From: stheg olloydson To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: charmlang@rogers.com Subject: Re: Star Office for Mac OS10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:20:40 -0000 it was said: > A friend of mine recommended I download Star Office for my Mac, to >take the place of MSW, which I cannot afford. I don't understand how >your website works; ergo, how to access information on this software >and instructions as to downloading it. > >Please help! Hello, You are lost. FreeBSD is an operating system. As such, the website has no links for downloading Mac software. Ask your friend where to get it. Regards, Stheg __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 00:30:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CCC16A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:30:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp19.wxs.nl (smtp19.wxs.nl [195.121.6.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD1043D49 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:30:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: from kruij557.speed.planet.nl (ipd50a97ba.speed.planet.nl [213.10.151.186])3questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:30:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alex.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kruij557.speed.planet.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8Q0UoRk076239; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:30:50 +0200 Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by alex.lan (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8Q0Um6l076238; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:30:48 +0200 Content-return: prohibited Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:30:48 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff In-reply-to: <4155E2CD.4080407@thingy.apana.org.au> To: Benjamin Walkenhorst Message-id: <20040926003048.GD796@alex.lan> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i References: <41555A2E.20800@thingy.apana.org.au> <4155E2CD.4080407@thingy.apana.org.au> X-Authentication-warning: alex.lan: akruijff set sender to freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl using -f cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mouse wheel on XOrg 6.7.0 (FreeBSD 5.3-beta5) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:30:56 -0000 On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 10:27:41PM +0100, David Gerard wrote: > Benjamin Walkenhorst wrote: > >David Gerard wrote: > > >>I've just installed the latest 5.3 beta with XOrg 6.7.0. > >>The mouse works, except I can't get the mouse wheel to work. > >>The mouse section of xorg.conf is as follows: > > >I recently switched to X.org without changing any of my configuration. > >My mouse section looks like this: > >Section "InputDevice" > > Identifier "Mouse0" > > Driver "mouse" > > Option "Protocol" "SysMouse" > > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" > >EndSection > >Works fine. I guess you have to change the protocol to SysMouse. > > Alex de Kruijff wrote: > > > This needs to go in /etc/rc.conf > > moused_flags="-a .4" > > moused_port="/dev/psm0" > > moused_type="auto" > > moused_enable="YES" > > The value afther a is a correction factor. > Benjamin, This one setup the driver and gives you directly mouse access to the console. Consentrate on that first. > Unfortunately, neither of these suggestions work, either separately > or together! The need to be togther. > More detail: the mouse is a Compaq (Logitech) USB optical mouse. > I did try moused_port="/dev/ums0" as well. man moused says: You can attach multiple USB mice to your system or to your USB hub. They are accessible as /dev/ums0, /dev/ums1, and so on. -- Alex P.S. Its common on these list to reply to all. I usaly miss mail thats not send to but no to me. Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 00:36:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BCDB16A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:36:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C681143D39 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:36:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barno@amadeus.demon.nl) Received: from amadeus.demon.nl ([82.161.18.200]:52356 helo=[10.0.1.1]) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CBN23-0006K0-KA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:36:51 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <20040926002039.10710.qmail@web53908.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040926002039.10710.qmail@web53908.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <256731E0-0F54-11D9-9C81-0003939726F0@amadeus.demon.nl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Barno Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:36:46 +0200 To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Re: Star Office for Mac OS10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:36:53 -0000 http://wwws.sun.com/software/star/staroffice/ On 26 sep 2004, at 02:20, stheg olloydson wrote: > it was said: > >> A friend of mine recommended I download Star Office for my Mac, to >> take the place of MSW, which I cannot afford. I don't understand how >> your website works; ergo, how to access information on this software >> and instructions as to downloading it. >> >> Please help! > > Hello, > > You are lost. FreeBSD is an operating system. As such, the website has > no links for downloading Mac software. Ask your friend where to get it. > > Regards, > > Stheg > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! > http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 01:14:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CE616A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 01:14:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (fed1rmmtao09.cox.net [68.230.241.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFD143D3F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 01:14:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mnavarre@cox.net) Received: from reichlieu.lan ([68.6.195.68]) by fed1rmmtao09.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.04 201-2131-111-106-20040729) with ESMTP id <20040926011420.IZER21102.fed1rmmtao09.cox.net@reichlieu.lan>; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 21:14:20 -0400 Received: from reichlieu.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by reichlieu.lan (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8Q1EJeu024493; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:14:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mnavarre@cox.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by reichlieu.lan (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i8Q1EIeU024492; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:14:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mnavarre@cox.net) X-Authentication-Warning: reichlieu.lan: mnavarre set sender to mnavarre@cox.net using -f From: Matt Navarre To: Alex de Kruijff Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:14:18 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200409251435.48200.mnavarre@cox.net> <200409251618.47785.mnavarre@cox.net> <20040926001322.GC796@alex.lan> In-Reply-To: <20040926001322.GC796@alex.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409251814.18846.mnavarre@cox.net> X-SA-Scanned: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.41 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 01:14:22 -0000 On Saturday 25 September 2004 05:13, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 04:18:47PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote: > > On Saturday 25 September 2004 02:35, Matt Navarre wrote: > > > I'm trying to upgrade gnucash, but portupgrade is choking: > > > <*snip*> > > > > > > It looks like the pkgdb has something wrong with it, but pkgdb -Fu > > > doesn't report anything that seems like it would cause portupgrade to > > > bomb. There's a duplicate origin for cdrtools, but that doesn't seem to > > > pertain. > > > > > > Should I move /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db out of the way and regenerate it? > > > Will pkgdb -u recreate pkgdb.db? > > > > Ok, that didn't work. I regenerated pkgdb.db using pkgdb -u and got the > > same problem. Odd thing is that so far gnucash is the only installed > > package that generates this error. I suppose I can pkg_delete it and try > > reinstalling. > > It could be a problem with the DBDriver. You could try this: > Edit /root/.cs... > and add > PORTS_DBDRIVER=bdb1_hash > PKG_DBDRIVER=bdb1_hash Doesn't the DBDRIVER bug result in ruby dumping core? 'Cuz it isn't in this case, it fails gracefully. I'll go ahead and try this, but I suspect that the /var/db/pkg info for gnucash or one of it's dependancies got horked up. We'll see. > Then execute this in your shell also. Then do: > pkgdb -u && portsdb -u && portupgrade -R gnucash -- "We all enter this world in the same way: naked, screaming, and soaked in blood. But if you live your life right, that kind of thing doesn't have to stop there." -- Dana Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 02:02:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055DC16A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:02:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web40001.mail.yahoo.com (web40001.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E499B43D45 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:02:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sach_anna@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040926020223.20848.qmail@web40001.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [172.175.245.192] by web40001.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:02:23 PDT Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:02:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Saccheen Martin To: questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <4155ABD5.20305@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: cannot see Windows after installing FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:02:24 -0000 Help! I still don't know what to type at the boot: prompt. > Saccheen Martin wrote: > > Hi Malcolm, > > Thank you so much for replying. I did what you > said > > and I got the following: > > > > F1 FreeBSD > > F5 Drive 1 > > > > When I press F5, I get: > > > > > >>>FreeBSD/i386 BOOT > > > > Default: 0:ad0(0,a)/boot/loader > > boot: _ > > > > What do I type at the boot: prompt to get windows? > > Thanks > > > > Saccheen > > > > > > > > --- Malcolm Kay > wrote: > > > > > >>On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 03:18 pm, Saccheen Martin > wrote: > >> > >>>Hi, > >>> > >>>I am a newbie to FreeBSD. I have a Pentium 3, 5oo > >> > >>IBM > >> > >>>computer that I put two hard drives in. I added a > >> > >>4.3G > >> > >>>hard drive (master) and an 80G hard drive > (slave). > >>>Initially, windows XP was installed on both hard > >>>drives. > >>> > >>>Last night, I decided to install FreeBSD 4.10 on > >> > >>the > >> > >>>4.3G hard drive and keep windows on the 80G. > >> > >>Anyway, > >> > >>>after I installed FreeBSD, I couldn't gain any > >> > >>access > >> > >>>to Windows XP on the 80G hard drive. What > >> > >>happened? Do > >> > >>>I have to reinstall windows? Is there a way to > set > >> > >>the > >> > >>>BIOS so that I can boot from a particular > >> > >>operating > >> > >>>system? > >>> > >>>Also, a second question-I have tried to access > the > >>>BIOS by typing different combinations of Fs and > >>>ALT-CTRL-INS and I am unable to access my BIOS. > >> > >>Help! > >> > >>If you go back to the FreeBSD installation and > >>install > >>the boot manager on the MBR of the master you > should > >>get > >>a message offering F1 for FreeBSD or F5 for the > next > >>drive; > >>ie when you next boot. > >> > >>Malcolm > > In addition to the above, is there a way to "edit" > the boot menu? > > > -- > Best regards, > Chris > > Cleanliness is next to impossible. > _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 02:26:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E2116A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:26:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7566743D41 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:26:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp34-117.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.34.117])i8Q2QGOU063134; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:56:16 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: Saccheen Martin Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:56:15 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040925145329.776.qmail@web40002.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040925145329.776.qmail@web40002.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409261156.15910.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cannot see Windows after installing FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:26:19 -0000 On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:23 am, Saccheen Martin wrote: > Hi Malcolm, > Thank you so much for replying. I did what you said > and I got the following: > > F1 FreeBSD > F5 Drive 1 > > When I press F5, I get: > >>FreeBSD/i386 BOOT > > Default: 0:ad0(0,a)/boot/loader > boot: _ > > What do I type at the boot: prompt to get windows? > Thanks > Sorry, I don't understand how this has come about. It would seem that somehow you have some partial FreeBSD installation on Drive 1 (the Slave). It might help if you can post the outputs from # /sbin/fdisk ad0 and # /sbin/fdisk ad1 run as root under FreeBSD Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 02:50:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB6B16A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:50:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71B943D45 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:50:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apeiron@comcast.net) Received: from prophecy.dyndns.org ([68.83.169.224]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <2004092602500801200fnv7qe> (Authid: apeiron); Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:50:08 +0000 From: Christopher Nehren To: "R. W." In-Reply-To: <200409252137.06803.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> References: <200409252137.06803.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-U4R048pJW8hBsVx8WtqR" Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:48:09 -0400 Message-Id: <1096166889.32109.6.camel@prophecy.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.0FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: No Sound after upgrading KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:50:10 -0000 --=-U4R048pJW8hBsVx8WtqR Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 21:37 +0100, R. W. wrote: > I recently upgraded to KDE 3.3 (under FreeBSD 5.2.1) and the sound=20 > stopped working properly. I hear the tune as KDE starts up, but then=20 > there is no sound after that. Multimedia applications still work=20 > properly under XFce, it's just KDE. I suspect that you may be seeing the same issue that I do when I start KDE. Next time you start KDE (after freshly rebooting the system or proceeding from a setup where you know sound works properly), open a console login somewhere and run the mixer command. Note its output: what are the values for the various devices? I've seen that, after starting KDE 3.3, all of my mixer devices are set to 0 -- thus muted. They're not broken; you just need to manually reset them. The two important ones (at least with the sound cards that I've used on FreeBSD) are mixer and pcm, though cd may be important if you have your CD-ROM drive hooked up to your sound card, but I don't know for sure as I've never used that configuration. On my machine, with my Creative SBLive! PCI sound card (as supported by snd_emu10k1), here are the default, working settings: Mixer vol is currently set to 75:75 Mixer pcm is currently set to 75:75 Mixer speaker is currently set to 75:75 Mixer line is currently set to 0:0 Mixer mic is currently set to 0:0 Mixer cd is currently set to 75:75 Mixer rec is currently set to 0:0 Mixer ogain is currently set to 75:75 Mixer line1 is currently set to 0:0 Mixer phin is currently set to 0:0 Mixer phout is currently set to 0:0 Mixer video is currently set to 75:75 Note that, as the manual for mixer states, not all devices may be present in your configuration, and you may have more devices than I list here. --=-U4R048pJW8hBsVx8WtqR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBVi3pk/lo7zvzJioRAoGNAKC1ZAnp4h5W9xEs7aGHkGpHhQsSIgCgoqd8 iyqOAmeKoLdp69L3025YeUE= =Xhkf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-U4R048pJW8hBsVx8WtqR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 03:07:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF8916A5AB for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:07:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [208.187.29.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD64643D2D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:06:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 98369 invoked by uid 1001); 26 Sep 2004 03:07:04 -0000 Received: from 24.148.51.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com); by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:07:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3518.24.148.51.115.1096168024.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: <00a001c4a1de$51e636f0$4c22fea9@winxp> References: <00e901c4a0c9$26e810b0$4c22fea9@winxp><200409221901.17579.steve@howes-macnaghten.com> <008601c4a195$1a3163e0$4c22fea9@winxp> <00a001c4a1de$51e636f0$4c22fea9@winxp> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:07:04 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: "kinux" User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail X-Mailer: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: snort+mysql+acid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:07:00 -0000 kinux wrote: > Fatal error: Call to undefined function: preg_replace() in > /usr/local/www/acid/acid_signature.inc on line 194 You have managed to install PHP *without* the PCRE module (module of PHP). http://php.net/pcre should lead you to something useful about how/where to get PCRE. Not sure how that translates into FreeBSD ports system, however. You can check what PHP modules are installed by creating a PHP file in your web server with (only) this in it: I *thought* the PCRE module was built-in to PHP -- at least after 4.0 anyway... Check your version of PHP in that output -- You may have managed to install it twice, and are somehow using an "old" PHP version with snort/mysql/acid... Also try "php -v" on the command line as the Snort user (or whatever user[s] seem appropriate). -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 03:16:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB07916A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:16:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54104.mail.yahoo.com (web54104.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C6DA43D41 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:16:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saigon_ca@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040926031613.61998.qmail@web54104.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.231.182.211] by web54104.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:16:13 CST Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:16:13 +0800 (CST) From: Kangaroo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: ps2 moused freezing while accessing Qonquor. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:16:13 -0000 Hello, I have problems with PS2 moused when acccsing quonqor. the mouse freeze while moving the mouse. it happens every 5 to 10 minutes. I have to "Kill -HUP `cat /var/run/moused.pid". The mouse works again after doing kill -hup. What is the reason causing the mouse freezed? How do I prevent this? Cheers. Khai Dao From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 03:23:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F48416A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:23:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web40006.mail.yahoo.com (web40006.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82E7C43D5C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:23:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sach_anna@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040926032304.47194.qmail@web40006.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [172.175.245.192] by web40006.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:23:04 PDT Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:23:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Saccheen Martin To: questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <200409261156.15910.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: cannot see Windows after installing FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:23:04 -0000 Hi Malcolm, The other computer is not on a network so I will try to type the outputs. # /sbin/fdisk ad0 *****Working on device /dev/ad0/ ****** Parameters extracted are cyl=787 heads 128 sectors/track=63 (8064 blks/cyl) parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cyl=787 heads=128 sectors/track=63. (8064 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is : The data for partition 1 is sysid 165,(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size 6346305 (3098Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 786/ head 127/ sector 63 The data for partition 2 is The data for partition 3 is The data for partition 4 is # # /sbin/fdisk ad1 *****Working on device /dev/ad1/ ****** Parameters extracted are cyl=9729 heads 255 sectors/track=63 Figures below won't work with Bios for partitions not in cyl 1. parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cyl=9729 heads=255 sectors/track=63. (16065 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is : The data for partition 1 is sysid 7,(OS/2 HPFS, NTFS, QNX-2 (16 bit) or Advanced Unix) start 63, size 156280257 (76308Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 The data for partition 2 is The data for partition 3 is The data for partition 4 is # --- Malcolm Kay wrote: > On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:23 am, Saccheen Martin wrote: > > Hi Malcolm, > > Thank you so much for replying. I did what you > said > > and I got the following: > > > > F1 FreeBSD > > F5 Drive 1 > > > > When I press F5, I get: > > >>FreeBSD/i386 BOOT > > > > Default: 0:ad0(0,a)/boot/loader > > boot: _ > > > > What do I type at the boot: prompt to get windows? > > Thanks > > > > Sorry, I don't understand how this has come about. > It would seem that somehow you have some partial > FreeBSD installation on Drive 1 (the Slave). > > It might help if you can post the outputs from > # /sbin/fdisk ad0 > and > # /sbin/fdisk ad1 > run as root under FreeBSD > > Malcolm > > > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 03:34:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA8816A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:34:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postal.netaxs.com (postal.netaxs.com [207.8.186.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20CFF43D1F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:34:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rmchugh@netaxs.com) Received: from unix2.netaxs.com (mail@unix2.netaxs.com [207.8.186.4]) i8Q3YLRT021606 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 23:34:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rmchugh@localhost) by unix2.netaxs.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) id XAA16885; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 23:34:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 23:34:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert McHugh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Adding ISA Parallel Port Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:34:23 -0000 Before I describe my problem I would like to thank all of the people who monitor and reply to this list... it is a great resource. I am running 5.2.1-RELEASE on a Pentium 3. The PC has an integrated parallel port that works fine, but I am trying to add a new ISA parallel port card that worked fine on my RedHat 7.2 box. In RedHat I could cat /proc/dma, /proc/ioports and /proc/interrupts to get a list of resources that are not in use, but I'm not sure how to get the same information from BSD. I found vmstat -i for interrupts, but how do I get the data for io ports and dma channels? My /boot/device.hints file has 2 entries for ppc: hint.ppc.0.at="isa" hint.ppc.0.irq="7" Would I need to specify DMA or io port for the new card which I think would be ppc.1 Thanks! Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 03:36:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D88FE16A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:36:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [208.187.29.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9626643D1D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:36:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 34919 invoked by uid 1001); 26 Sep 2004 03:36:58 -0000 Received: from 24.148.51.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com); by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3917.24.148.51.115.1096169818.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: <001101c4a1a3$bb731880$460011ac@SATPC> References: <001101c4a1a3$bb731880$460011ac@SATPC> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:36:58 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: "Andrew" User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail X-Mailer: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ultimately Safe User Account X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:36:53 -0000 Andrew wrote: > I have a production FreeBSD box. My friend is starting to learn Unix > essentials and is asking me for an account. He doesn't require any > special rights, but he certainly wants to be able to use shell and read > most manual pages. He'll access the server via Internet, SSH. A slightly different take on this: Unless you're *REALLY* poor/underpaid, the time you would spend making a "safe" way for your friend to poke at a production box to learn would be a lot more expensive than a cheap-o eBay computer... Give him his own box with FreeBSD on it and let him be root -- He'll learn a heck of a lot more by screwing up things as root than any other way of learning. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 03:44:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD8B16A4CF for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:44:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [208.187.29.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E38F43D4C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:44:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 46584 invoked by uid 1001); 26 Sep 2004 03:45:04 -0000 Received: from 24.148.51.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com); by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:45:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4027.24.148.51.115.1096170304.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:45:04 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail X-Mailer: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: PHP Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 03:44:59 -0000 JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil wrote: > You installed the CGI port.. You need to install the apache module. CGI > doesn't allow embedded php in the page. Just for the record: Unless the FreeBSD port does something really really really bogus, the above statement is 100% wrong. :-) Perhaps you are thinking of Perl CGI versus Mod_Perl (sp?) where such a distinction (I think) does exist. PHP as CGI and PHP as Module have very minor differences, primarily related to functions/security that would make no sense in CGI or vice versa. EG: You can't do HTTP Auth via CGI in PHP because, by definition, you'd be passing the password between applications in an insecure way. This is not to say that the rest of the post [cut] isn't true -- In 99% of the cases of using PHP to spew out HTML, you want PHP installed as a Module. You may also, as I do, find it incredibly easy to use as a command line scripting language and thus also want the CGI (or CLI these days) install as well. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 05:18:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB3616A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 05:18:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A2543D1D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 05:18:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp34-117.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.34.117])i8Q5I4OU000828; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:48:04 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: Saccheen Martin , questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:48:03 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040926032304.47194.qmail@web40006.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040926032304.47194.qmail@web40006.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409261448.03587.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: Re: cannot see Windows after installing FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 05:18:07 -0000 On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:53 pm, Saccheen Martin wrote: > Hi Malcolm, > Please try to avoid top posting. Instead embed your comments/questions at the apropriate part of the thread. > The other computer is not on a network so I will try > to type the outputs. > > # /sbin/fdisk ad0 > *****Working on device /dev/ad0/ ****** > Parameters extracted are > cyl=787 heads 128 sectors/track=63 (8064 blks/cyl) > > parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: > cyl=787 heads=128 sectors/track=63. (8064 blks/cyl) > > Media sector size is 512 > Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 > Information from DOS bootblock is : > The data for partition 1 is > sysid 165,(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 63, size > 6346305 (3098Meg), flag 0 > beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; > end: cyl 786/ head 127/ sector 63 > The data for partition 2 is > > The data for partition 3 is > > The data for partition 4 is > > # > > > > # /sbin/fdisk ad1 > *****Working on device /dev/ad1/ ****** > Parameters extracted are > cyl=9729 heads 255 sectors/track=63 > > Figures below won't work with Bios for partitions not > in cyl 1. parameters to be used for BIOS calculations > are: cyl=9729 heads=255 sectors/track=63. (16065 > blks/cyl) > > Media sector size is 512 > Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 > Information from DOS bootblock is : > The data for partition 1 is > sysid 7,(OS/2 HPFS, NTFS, QNX-2 (16 bit) or Advanced > Unix) start 63, size 156280257 (76308Meg), flag 80 > (active) > beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; > end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63 > The data for partition 2 is > > The data for partition 3 is > > The data for partition 4 is > > # > These look OK, i.e. as expected. > --- Malcolm Kay wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:23 am, Saccheen Martin wrote: > > > Hi Malcolm, > > > Thank you so much for replying. I did what you > > > > said > > > > > and I got the following: > > > > > > F1 FreeBSD > > > F5 Drive 1 > > > > > > When I press F5, I get: > > > >>FreeBSD/i386 BOOT > > > > > > Default: 0:ad0(0,a)/boot/loader > > > boot: _ > > > If the boot process has really switched over to Drive 1 then it is difficult (for me) to understand where these messages come from -- unless perhaps some part of the FreeBSD installation has overwritten part of your windows installation. But I would have expected you would need to try very hard to do this without changing the slice (in windows parlance - partition) to a BSD type. > > > What do I type at the boot: prompt to get windows? I don't believe there is anything that will do that from here. > > > Thanks > > > > Sorry, I don't understand how this has come about. > > It would seem that somehow you have some partial > > FreeBSD installation on Drive 1 (the Slave). > > > > It might help if you can post the outputs from > > # /sbin/fdisk ad0 > > and > > # /sbin/fdisk ad1 > > run as root under FreeBSD > > > > Malcolm You could try installing a boot manager also on the slave drive which should offer F1 Windows (or something similar) or F5 Drive 0; when you get there from the initial F5 -> Drive 1 But I'm not optimistic -- or at least I believe you'll get the offer but F1 will still lead into never-never land. I believe that what you have should have worked unless something became corrupted along the way; but I am sure there are people out there whose understanding is much better than mine. Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 07:06:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD2416A4CE; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:06:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0844543D1D; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:06:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC525771; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13121-04; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:10:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 76BEC54A6; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:10:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040926071002.76BEC54A6@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:10:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2004-09-05 - 2004-09-25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:06:36 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 07:43:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4759816A4CF for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:43:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dnsmail2.ior.navy.mil (nocc.ior.navy.mil [205.56.210.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25A643D1D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:43:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil) Received: from cg69ubd01.vicksburg.navy.mil ([205.95.65.21]) i8Q7gGas016190 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:42:19 GMT Received: by CG69UBD01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:46:29 +0300 Message-ID: From: JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:46:29 +0300 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Subject: RE: PHP Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:43:50 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: Richard Lynch [mailto:ceo@l-i-e.com] Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 5:45 AM To: JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: PHP Problem JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil wrote: > You installed the CGI port.. You need to install the apache module. CGI > doesn't allow embedded php in the page. Just for the record: Unless the FreeBSD port does something really really really bogus, the above statement is 100% wrong. :-) Perhaps you are thinking of Perl CGI versus Mod_Perl (sp?) where such a distinction (I think) does exist. PHP as CGI and PHP as Module have very minor differences, primarily related to functions/security that would make no sense in CGI or vice versa. EG: You can't do HTTP Auth via CGI in PHP because, by definition, you'd be passing the password between applications in an insecure way. This is not to say that the rest of the post [cut] isn't true -- In 99% of the cases of using PHP to spew out HTML, you want PHP installed as a Module. You may also, as I do, find it incredibly easy to use as a command line scripting language and thus also want the CGI (or CLI these days) install as well. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm For the record, I helped this person in installing the mod_php4 and some misc extensions and everything worked as wanted. So statement being true or not, for a newbie it should be assumed at the least. And unless you install the module, and load it into the httpd.conf for the html interpreter to see php in the raw, it will not work. You can't load the cgi port of php into apache. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 07:45:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8272716A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:45:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (conn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0FA43D39 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:45:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from seahawk@visi.com) Received: from isis.visi.com (isis.visi.com [209.98.98.8]) by conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8809585E8; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:45:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: by isis.visi.com (Postfix, from userid 20347) id 5595576C5A; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:45:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by isis.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E5D76C58; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:45:00 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 02:45:00 -0500 (CDT) From: Seahawk To: David Gerard In-Reply-To: <4155E2CD.4080407@thingy.apana.org.au> Message-ID: References: <41555A2E.20800@thingy.apana.org.au> <20040925150103.48507e74.krylon@gmx.net> <4155E2CD.4080407@thingy.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mouse wheel on XOrg 6.7.0 (FreeBSD 5.3-beta5) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:45:01 -0000 I've had my mousewheel running under XOrg, these are the following lines I put in the two following files rc.conf: moused_enable="YES" moused_type="auto" moused_flags="-z 4" xorg.conf: Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "Buttons" "5" EndSection I just used the instructions on the FreeBSD faq here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/x.html#X-AND-WHEEL and just used the examples for XFree86 4.x in my xorg.conf file -Chad On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, David Gerard wrote: > >>I've just installed the latest 5.3 beta with XOrg 6.7.0. > >>The mouse works, except I can't get the mouse wheel to work. > >>The mouse section of xorg.conf is as follows: > > > I recently switched to X.org without changing any of my configuration. > > My mouse section looks like this: > > Section "InputDevice" > > Identifier "Mouse0" > > Driver "mouse" > > Option "Protocol" "SysMouse" > > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" > > EndSection > > Works fine. I guess you have to change the protocol to SysMouse. > > Alex de Kruijff wrote: > > > This needs to go in /etc/rc.conf > > moused_flags="-a .4" > > moused_port="/dev/psm0" > > moused_type="auto" > > moused_enable="YES" > > The value afther a is a correction factor. > > > Unfortunately, neither of these suggestions work, either separately > or together! > > More detail: the mouse is a Compaq (Logitech) USB optical mouse. > I did try moused_port="/dev/ums0" as well. > > Any other ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 09:14:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C6D16A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:14:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA5F43D1D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:14:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1] (may be forged))i8Q9Ds3A048604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:13:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8Q9DsPM048603; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:13:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:13:54 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Matt Navarre Message-ID: <20040926091354.GB48181@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Matt Navarre , Alex de Kruijff , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200409251435.48200.mnavarre@cox.net> <200409251618.47785.mnavarre@cox.net> <20040926001322.GC796@alex.lan> <200409251814.18846.mnavarre@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9zSXsLTf0vkW971A" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409251814.18846.mnavarre@cox.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:13:54 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:14:02 -0000 --9zSXsLTf0vkW971A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 06:14:18PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote: > On Saturday 25 September 2004 05:13, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > > It could be a problem with the DBDriver. You could try this: > > Edit /root/.cs... > > and add > > PORTS_DBDRIVER=3Dbdb1_hash > > PKG_DBDRIVER=3Dbdb1_hash > Doesn't the DBDRIVER bug result in ruby dumping core? 'Cuz it isn't in th= is=20 > case, it fails gracefully. The core dump is seen with portsdb(1) trying to create /usr/ports/INDEX.db -- however, the underlying bug can affect anywhere that ruby uses bdb1_btree files. pkgdb(1) occasionally going a bit funny is a problem that's been known about for some time; usually just deleting and rebuilding /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db will sort things out. However, I don't think anyone had ever tracked down the root cause of the problem. Then the portsdb coredumping thing came along, and it seems an obvious conclusion that the same thing might be affecting both programs. Note that a fix for the bdb1_btree problem has been in HEAD for a few weeks, and was MFC'd to both RELENG_4 and RELENG_5 a week or so ago. So an alternative fix could be cvsup+buildworld. Unfortunately, I don't think the fix will be applied to any of the existing 4.x-RELEASE or 5.x-RELEASE branches -- it will of course be in 5.3-RELEASE when that comes out, and it's pretty easy to do if you want to patch things yourself. =20 > I'll go ahead and try this, but I suspect that the /var/db/pkg info for= =20 > gnucash or one of it's dependancies got horked up. We'll see. >=20 > > Then execute this in your shell also. Then do: > > pkgdb -u && portsdb -u && portupgrade -R gnucash Yup. That should ensure you get a clean install of gnucash and all of its dependencies. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --9zSXsLTf0vkW971A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBVohSiD657aJF7eIRAsnLAJ0bkjQgQM/gpPdMlDBLfYCo5uYxVACglJlv JsPT+HjVqbfN72kP27gUiRU= =viTN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9zSXsLTf0vkW971A-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 09:24:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD30816A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:24:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C822243D3F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:24:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1] (may be forged)) i8Q9O4cf048679 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:24:04 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8Q9O3N2048678; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:24:03 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:24:03 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Charmian Lang Message-ID: <20040926092403.GC48181@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Charmian Lang , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <842E3A5A-0F40-11D9-89AB-000393685F66@rogers.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <842E3A5A-0F40-11D9-89AB-000393685F66@rogers.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:24:04 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Star Office for Mac OS10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:24:10 -0000 --1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 06:16:15PM -0400, Charmian Lang wrote: > A friend of mine recommended I download Star Office for my Mac, to=20 > take the place of MSW, which I cannot afford. I don't understand how=20 > your website works; ergo, how to access information on this software=20 > and instructions as to downloading it. >=20 > Please help! You seem to be confused. StarOffice is a proprietary product of Sun Microsystems -- you'ld need to start at this URL: http://wwws.sun.com/software/star/staroffice/index.html and pay to licence and download the package. Unfortunately it appears that Sun do not provide a MacOS X version. Instead, might I suggest the very similar OpenOffice package? That's based on the same original code base as StarOffice, but it's available for free. MacOS X packages can be downloaded from: http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.2/index.html or the English localised MacOS X version can be had directly from here: http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/ooo-osx_downloads.html Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBVoqziD657aJF7eIRAshnAJ4z0Prh2kYhTHIxF4t2XG+Tjj/UMACfUV4i Z2X/Xd2qEMo7F4m3cbfwDPM= =qbIk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1SQmhf2mF2YjsYvc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 10:08:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2F116A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:08:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ALPHA8.ITS.MONASH.EDU.AU (alpha8.its.monash.edu.au [130.194.1.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A16243D1D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:08:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bawig1@student.monash.edu) Received: from localhost ([130.194.13.88]) by vaxh.its.monash.edu.au (PMDF V5.2-31 #39306) with ESMTP id <01LFC35MOWTG8X32JB@vaxh.its.monash.edu.au> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 20:05:53 +1000 Received: from moe.its.monash.edu.au (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8570FAB54D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 20:05:52 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (portal-web4.its.monash.edu.au [130.194.13.180]) by moe.its.monash.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617C34FB07 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 20:05:52 +1000 (EST) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:05:52 +0000 From: Brett Wiggins To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <220.253.39.209.1096192326.51987@my.monash.edu.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: my.monash Portal Mail Reader Content-type: text/plain Content-disposition: inline Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: adduser error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:08:36 -0000 Hi everyone, I am having some problems adding new users to my system. When I use adduser or sysinstall to create a user I get the following error message; pw: user 'testuser' disappeared during update adduser: ERROR: There was an error adding user (testuser). What does this error message mean? Is there another way to add a user that I have missed? I am using FreeBSd 5.2.1 -RELEASE. Brett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 10:47:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B038516A4CF for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:47:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alpha.logic.tuwien.ac.at (alpha.logic.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.175.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B3F43D39 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:46:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from preining@logic.at) Received: from gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at ([128.130.175.3]) by alpha.logic.tuwien.ac.at with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CBWYU-0000AF-00 for FreeBSD-Questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:46:58 +0200 Received: from preining by gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CBWYT-0007sx-00 for FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:46:57 +0200 Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:46:57 +0200 To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20040926104657.GA29418@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i From: Norbert Preining Subject: problems with boot loader stage1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:47:00 -0000 Hi FreeBSD-Gurus! [Please Cc: me] Short Description: FreeBSD 4.10, installed on /dev/hde (linux lingo), booting via lilo (on hda) -> hde goes to stage0 but stops there. Longer: Recently I have installed FreeBSD (4.10) for compiling TeXlive binaries for i386-freebsd. I used some disk space on ad4/hde (bsd/linux lingo). linux fdisk shows: /dev/hde1 1 20887 167774796 83 Linux /dev/hde2 * 20888 24321 27583605 a5 FreeBSD Then I booted from the CDROM, selected ad4s2, made (bsd-)partitions therein (automatic: btw: Whay is there no /home allocated in the automatic system?) and installed the system. I decided to install the boot0 loader into the MBR of ad4. Then I added the following to my lilo.conf: other=/dev/hde loader=/boot/chain.b label=FreeBSD and tried to boot from there. But what happened: I arrived at boot0 with the following `menu': F1 Linux F2 FreeBSD F5 ?? Default: F2 and that was it, here no Enter, F2 or anything else worked, no reaction, beside Ctrl-Alt-Del and back to lilo. I tried similar lilo entries: other=/dev/hde2 table=/dev/hde loader=/boot/chain.b label=FreeBSD but here the screen stays black at all. To me it looks like there is no boot1 installed anywhere, or boot0 cannot access it. I suspect that this is a problem of the cylinder border. The slice 2 starts well above the 1024 cylinder (or was it sector). Can one of you tell me how I can boot this FreeBSD installation? I can access the bsd partitions in rw mode from linux (kernel-2.6 self compiled) and see all the files, but would really like to boot the beast ;-) [Please Cc: me] Thanks a lot and best wishes Norbert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Norbert Preining Technische Universität Wien gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLBATHIC (adj.) Gifted with ability to manipulate taps using only the feet. --- Douglas Adams, The Meaning of Liff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 11:15:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CB216A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:15:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pegasus.siol.net (pegasus.siol.net [193.189.160.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EA543D1F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:15:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 15218162@users.siol.net) Received: from [10.10.10.22] by pegasus.siol.net 1cbf71897a39210db31154c99f0b4628) <20040926111518.JKQD11799.pegasus@[10.10.10.22]> for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:15:18 +0200 From: <15218162@users.siol.net> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:15:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20040926111518.JKQD11799.pegasus@[10.10.10.22]> Subject: Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:15:28 -0000 Regards, I have one question. When will come FreeBSD 5.3 release ? If you can tell me approximately date.. Thanks, Urh Lednik Email: slovan@si-cert.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 12:02:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552AC16A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:02:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 29C4243D2F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:02:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 30381 invoked by uid 65534); 26 Sep 2004 12:02:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) (129.187.19.157) by mail.gmx.net (mp014) with SMTP; 26 Sep 2004 14:02:22 +0200 X-Authenticated: #147403 Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 55A70C0D4; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:02:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:02:49 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: 15218162@users.siol.net Message-ID: <20040926120249.GA12683@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20040926111518.JKQD11799.pegasus@[10.10.10.22]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040926111518.JKQD11799.pegasus@[10.10.10.22]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:02:25 -0000 --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 15218162@users.siol.net wrote: > Regards, >=20 > I have one question. > When will come FreeBSD 5.3 release ? > If you can tell me approximately date.. "When it's ready." The schedule is here: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/schedule.html --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBVq/pCkn+/eutqCoRAsZTAJ9rLr/XTSa+n5pH8UkB6cO5d7h8XgCggg/o QYJjfs2pHTttVRqVMoFHHKw= =PmPY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 12:05:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058C116A4CF for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:05:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D097F43D46 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:05:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1] (may be forged)) i8QC5UBG026169 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:05:31 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8QC5UTt026168; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:05:30 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:05:30 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: 15218162@users.siol.net Message-ID: <20040926120530.GA26039@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , 15218162@users.siol.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040926111518.JKQD11799.pegasus@[10.10.10.22]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040926111518.JKQD11799.pegasus@[10.10.10.22]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:05:31 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:05:37 -0000 --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 01:15:18PM +0200, 15218162@users.siol.net wrote: > I have one question. > When will come FreeBSD 5.3 release ? > If you can tell me approximately date.. Plan is 10th October. =20 http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/schedule.html Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBVrCKiD657aJF7eIRAsl0AKCuvzOWmP8gLpWLqiP8E63pTeVkMACeJY3d h5h3TbmkY6QRZiMPqNOnuFg= =5tln -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 12:46:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8795616A501 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:46:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from prime.gushi.org (prime.gushi.org [65.125.228.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF10C43D2F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:46:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danm@prime.gushi.org) Received: from prime.gushi.org (danm@prime.gushi.org [65.125.228.130]) by prime.gushi.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8QClc29041661 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 08:47:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 08:47:38 -0400 (EDT) From: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040926084650.Q41437@prime.gushi.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: BEEP on halt? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:46:53 -0000 Hey all, I've seen this addressed in various places, and I can't find a solid answer. Is there some way to make a FreeBSD system beep when it's been successfully shut down. -Dan -- Hate fedora with a white hot burning passion right now though ... damn thing is Linux-XP(tm) -Bill Nolan 2/24/04 --------Dan Mahoney-------- Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC ICQ: 13735144 AIM: LarpGM Site: http://www.gushi.org --------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 13:00:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE1A16A4D0 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:00:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from brian.firebadger.net (82-69-4-157.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.4.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0325643D1F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:00:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@firebadger.net) Received: (qmail 43601 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2004 14:00:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.10?) (192.168.1.10) by 192.168.1.15 with SMTP; 26 Sep 2004 14:00:53 -0000 Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:00:38 +0100 From: Richard Collyer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040926133332.A156.RICHARD@firebadger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.10 [en] (beta4) Subject: PHP Install Options Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:00:47 -0000 Hi All, I'm running FBSD 4.10 and recently had some problems with php. So i decided to de-install it and start again to see if that would help. Basically functions started to fail in "Fatal Errors" after upgrading to a newer version. Now when installing the package (from ports) it does not give any options to select what i want to install (i.e. no window saying mysql, xml support etc.). Is I think this is the root of the problem and php must not be installing the requred modules to handle the pages I am asking it to serve. PHP installs fine and the test page ( echo php_info(); ) works fine however alot of functons dont work such as preg_match() and mysql_connect() i get Fatal Error: etc... if these are called. Is thier a way to force the install to bring up these options or is thier a file where the values are installed that i could edit? when doing make it says: ===> Found saved configuration for mod_php4-4.3.8_2,1 Is thier a way to locate and delete this file. Atm using: cd /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/ make clean make make install make clean I have googled and searched the archive and nothing (as of yet) has turned up to be of much help. Found this: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-questions/2004-July/053077.html and followed what it said however when doing "make config" i only get 3 options Apache2, Debug and IPV4. Cheers in advance Richard -- Richard Collyer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 13:04:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0616816A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:04:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from congo.princess.dyns.cx (cpc1-cmbg6-6-0-cust54.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [81.104.213.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756C943D1D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:04:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@acidy.com) Received: by congo.princess.dyns.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 706D4C2F7; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:04:40 +0100 (BST) From: Steve Hodgson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:04:39 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20040926133332.A156.RICHARD@firebadger.net> In-Reply-To: <20040926133332.A156.RICHARD@firebadger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409261404.39993.steve@acidy.com> cc: Richard Collyer Subject: Re: PHP Install Options Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:04:43 -0000 On Sunday 26 September 2004 14:00, Richard Collyer wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm running FBSD 4.10 and recently had some problems with php. So i > decided to de-install it and start again to see if that would help. > Basically functions started to fail in "Fatal Errors" after upgrading > to a newer version. > > Now when installing the package (from ports) it does not give any > options to select what i want to install (i.e. no window saying mysql, > xml support etc.). > > Is I think this is the root of the problem and php must not be > installing the requred modules to handle the pages I am asking it to > serve. PHP installs fine and the test page ( echo php_info(); ) works > fine however alot of functons dont work such as preg_match() and > mysql_connect() i get Fatal Error: etc... if these are called. > > Is thier a way to force the install to bring up these options or is > thier a file where the values are installed that i could edit? > > > when doing make it says: > ===> Found saved configuration for mod_php4-4.3.8_2,1 > > Is thier a way to locate and delete this file. > > Atm using: > > cd /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/ > make clean > make > make install > make clean > > I have googled and searched the archive and nothing (as of yet) has > turned up to be of much help. > this is becoming a FAQ from /usr/ports/UPDATING 20040719: AFFECTS: users of PHP AUTHOR: ale@FreeBSD.org The old lang/php4 and lang/php5 ports have been splitted into 'base' PHP, PEAR, and shared extensions to allow more flexibility and add new features. Upgrading your current PHP installation will result in a 'base' PHP installation (no PEAR and no extensions). PEAR can be found in the new devel/php4-pear and devel/php5-pear ports, while the set of PHP extensions to install can be choosen via the meta-ports lang/php4-extensions and lang/php5-extensions, or installing singular extensions individually. If you have a previous php.ini configuration file, be sure to comment out the extension_dir parameter, since the correct path is statically compiled into the PHP binary. For an overview of the modules used with the old PHP binary, use the command "php -m". Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 13:35:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B36816A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:35:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from codegurus.org (cpc2-stoc7-3-0-cust147.midd.cable.ntl.com [81.104.76.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F0943D1D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:35:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwalker@codegurus.org) Received: from [198.168.1.1] (codegurus.org [198.168.1.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by codegurus.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8QDZMbM040517 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:35:22 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mwalker@codegurus.org) From: Mick Walker To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040926133332.A156.RICHARD@firebadger.net> References: <20040926133332.A156.RICHARD@firebadger.net> Message-Id: <1096205721.884.2.camel@codegurus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:35:22 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: PHP Install Options Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 13:35:02 -0000 On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 14:00, Richard Collyer wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm running FBSD 4.10 and recently had some problems with php. So i > decided to de-install it and start again to see if that would help. > Basically functions started to fail in "Fatal Errors" after upgrading > to a newer version. > > Now when installing the package (from ports) it does not give any > options to select what i want to install (i.e. no window saying mysql, > xml support etc.). > > Is I think this is the root of the problem and php must not be > installing the requred modules to handle the pages I am asking it to > serve. PHP installs fine and the test page ( echo php_info(); ) works > fine however alot of functons dont work such as preg_match() and > mysql_connect() i get Fatal Error: etc... if these are called. > > Is thier a way to force the install to bring up these options or is > thier a file where the values are installed that i could edit? > > > when doing make it says: > ===> Found saved configuration for mod_php4-4.3.8_2,1 > > Is thier a way to locate and delete this file. > > Atm using: > > cd /usr/ports/www/mod_php4/ > make clean > make > make install > make clean > > I have googled and searched the archive and nothing (as of yet) has > turned up to be of much help. > > Found this: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-questions/2004-July/053077.html > and followed what it said however when doing "make config" i only get 3 > options Apache2, Debug and IPV4. > > Cheers in advance > Richard Check /usr/ports/lang/php4-extensions From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 14:41:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C56D16A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:41:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp03.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEACB43D55 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:41:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@jwebmedia.com) Received: from webmail.nuvox.net (webmail.nuvox.net [64.89.70.59]) i8QEflwM009420 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:41:47 -0400 Received: from 69.29.89.98 (authenticated user jkoenig@nuvox.net); by webmail.nuvox.net with HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:41:20 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <52356.69.29.89.98.1096209680.squirrel@69.29.89.98> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:41:20 -0500 (CDT) From: "Joseph Koening (jWeb)" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-0.e3.1 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-0.e3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: locating origin of spammer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: joe@jwebmedia.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:41:22 -0000 I got up this morning and discovered that someone sent some spam through one of my servers. The messages were sent from the 'www' user on localhost, which is leading me to think somewhere someone has an insecure php or perl script that is allowing someone to designate the recipient, the subject, body, etc. I know the machine is not open-relay (I tested it to double check) and I checked to make sure no one had actually logged in. I grepped all of apache's log files looking for sites that received hits about the same time the mail started going out. What else can I do to find how the mail is being sent? Thanks, Joe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 14:42:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9610216A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:42:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web10703.mail.yahoo.com (web10703.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6542843D41 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:42:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shubinzhu@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040926144206.99169.qmail@web10703.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.36.44.50] by web10703.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:42:06 PDT Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 07:42:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Shu Bin Zhu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Running NAT and can't Ping X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:42:08 -0000 I have a strange problem. Here is my setup. ISP 1 ISP 2 | | Router 1 Router 2 192.168.0.1 Internet Address A | | | | ---------------------- Switch -------------------- | | | FreeBSD1 FreeBSD2 Windows 2000 192.168.0.254 192.168.0.2 192.168.0.253 Internet Address B (NAT) The problem is if NAT on FreeBSD2 is not running, all the machines can ping each other. If FreeBSD2 runs NAT, ping still works, except FreeBSD2 can't ping Router1 (192.168.0.1) and FreeBSD1 (192.168.0.254). FreeBSD2 can ping to the interent fine. The Windows 2000 machines gets it's IP from DHCP running on FreeBSD2. For a day, FreeBSD can't ping Windows 2000 either. But now it is able to. The NAT configuration on FreeBSD2 is : /sbin/natd -u -a (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Internet Address B) /sbin/ipfw -f flush /sbin/ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx Internet Address B) /sbin/ipfw add pass all from any to any The unusual setup is the FreeBSD2 only has one ethernet card, and is doing IP aliasing. I have another setup with 2 FreeBSD boxes, and one or both of them are doing NAT, and doesn't have this 'one way' ping problem. Thanks in advance. Shu --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 14:54:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2727816A4D1 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:54:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp04.gnvlscdb.sys.nuvox.net (smtp.nuvox.net [64.89.70.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC9043D1F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:54:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@jwebmedia.com) Received: from webmail.nuvox.net (webmail.nuvox.net [64.89.70.59]) i8QEt7Yv031589; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:55:07 -0400 Received: from 69.29.89.98 (authenticated user jkoenig@nuvox.net); by webmail.nuvox.net with HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:54:32 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <52452.69.29.89.98.1096210472.squirrel@69.29.89.98> In-Reply-To: <52356.69.29.89.98.1096209680.squirrel@69.29.89.98> References: <52356.69.29.89.98.1096209680.squirrel@69.29.89.98> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:54:32 -0500 (CDT) From: "Joseph Koening (jWeb)" To: joe@jwebmedia.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-0.e3.1 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-0.e3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: locating origin of spammer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: joe@jwebmedia.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:54:35 -0000 Right after I posted this I did locate an old version of formmail.pl and disabled it until the customer can replace it with a more secure version. Thanks. > I got up this morning and discovered that someone sent some spam through > one of my servers. The messages were sent from the 'www' user on > localhost, which is leading me to think somewhere someone has an insecure > php or perl script that is allowing someone to designate the recipient, > the subject, body, etc. I know the machine is not open-relay (I tested it > to double check) and I checked to make sure no one had actually logged in. > I grepped all of apache's log files looking for sites that received hits > about the same time the mail started going out. What else can I do to find > how the mail is being sent? Thanks, > > Joe > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 14:57:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 210B716A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:57:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DA343D2F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:57:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1]) i8QEvdhK020707; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:57:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Message-ID: <4156D8E3.2070203@circlesquared.com> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 15:57:39 +0100 From: Peter Risdon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: joe@jwebmedia.com References: <52356.69.29.89.98.1096209680.squirrel@69.29.89.98> In-Reply-To: <52356.69.29.89.98.1096209680.squirrel@69.29.89.98> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: locating origin of spammer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:57:40 -0000 Joseph Koening (jWeb) wrote: > I got up this morning and discovered that someone sent some spam through > one of my servers. The messages were sent from the 'www' user on > localhost, which is leading me to think somewhere someone has an insecure > php or perl script that is allowing someone to designate the recipient, > the subject, body, etc. I know the machine is not open-relay (I tested it > to double check) and I checked to make sure no one had actually logged in. > I grepped all of apache's log files looking for sites that received hits > about the same time the mail started going out. What else can I do to find > how the mail is being sent? Thanks, My first act would be to search for formail.pl or variations thereof in users' cgi-bins. There have been some hideous holes in some versions of this Matt's Script Archive script. Peter. -- the circle squared network systems and software http://www.circlesquared.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 19:21:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6343D16A4CE for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:21:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pop-3.dnv.wideopenwest.com (pop-3.dnv.wideopenwest.com [64.233.207.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A6E43D2F for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:21:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chriswin212@wideopenwest.com) Received: from homepc (d14-69-47-105.try.wideopenwest.com [69.14.105.47]) i8PJLfc21984 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:21:41 -0500 Message-ID: <000501c4a334$e10981a0$2f690e45@homepc> From: "Chris Winkler" To: Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:21:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:03:56 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Installing Free BSD 5.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:21:42 -0000 I have had a crash on my computer I try to install McAfee Internet = Security 6.0 I keep getting this error message. The Wizard was interrupted before 6.o could be completely installed. It say new program = when I check McAfee it says it is empty. Will installing this=20 help this problem. I don't know much about computers but I am trying to = follow all the directions from McAfee support but there instructions are = just not working. Kind Regards Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 00:30:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D3B16A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:30:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A897843D48 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:30:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from asothinathan@sympatico.ca) Received: from user5eg7poyqkw ([64.231.245.36]) by tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.netSMTP <20040926003023.BABM15612.tomts16-srv.bellnexxia.net@user5eg7poyqkw> for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:30:23 -0400 Message-ID: <000801c4a379$2474a110$b9f7fea9@user5eg7poyqkw> From: "anton Sothinathan" To: Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:30:16 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:03:56 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: UNIX X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 00:30:28 -0000 Hi I was told that I could learn UNIX for free on this site. If so please = let me know how. My email address is asothinathan@sympatico.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 19:15:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F2F16A4CE for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:15:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay14-f41.bay14.hotmail.com [64.4.49.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0C243D1D for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:15:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rajunpl@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 12:15:02 -0700 Received: from 80.41.215.255 by by14fd.bay14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:14:24 GMT X-Originating-IP: [80.41.215.255] X-Originating-Email: [rajunpl@hotmail.com] X-Sender: rajunpl@hotmail.com From: "raju raju" To: questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:14:24 +0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Sep 2004 19:15:02.0459 (UTC) FILETIME=[F52308B0:01C4A333] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:05:46 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rajunpl@yahoo.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:15:03 -0000 % man 1 chmo whaT does (%) sign means here? root ,user or something else? Note ! [greypixel.gif] Alternatively please send me mails on [i.p.emphone.gif] [1]rajunpl@yahoo.co.uk and also please add me in your messenger [greypixel.gif] _________________________________________________________________ MSN Premium gives you PC protection, junk-mail filters, advanced communication tools and great software like MSN Encarta® Premium. [2]Click here for a FREE trial! References 1. mailto:rajunpl@yahoo.co.uk 2. http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUK/2749??PS=47575 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 16:11:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979FF16A4CF for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:11:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D8043D41 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:11:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C32569A71; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:11:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:11:23 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: rajunpl@yahoo.co.uk Message-Id: <20040926121123.40fa439b.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@FreeBSD.org cc: rajunpl@hotmail.com Subject: Re: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:11:25 -0000 "raju raju" wrote: > > % man 1 chmo > > whaT does (%) sign means here? root ,user or something else? % is the prompt. In the FreeBSD docs, the % prompt means the example was done as root, while the $ prompt means that the example was done as a normal user. Most shells have a configurable prompt, so the prompts on your machine may not be $ and %. For example, on my computer: bash-2.05b$ su Password: working# -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 16:12:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0451E16A4E3 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:12:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE59743D39 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:12:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03E8569A71; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:12:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:12:25 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "anton Sothinathan" Message-Id: <20040926121225.2990ca6f.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <000801c4a379$2474a110$b9f7fea9@user5eg7poyqkw> References: <000801c4a379$2474a110$b9f7fea9@user5eg7poyqkw> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: UNIX X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 16:12:30 -0000 "anton Sothinathan" wrote: > Hi > I was told that I could learn UNIX for free on this site. If so please > let me know how. My email address is asothinathan@sympatico.ca http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:05:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD93816A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:05:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53904.mail.yahoo.com (web53904.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D0A143D1F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:05:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stheg_olloydson@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040926170522.38393.qmail@web53904.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.210.39.121] by web53904.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:05:22 PDT Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:05:22 -0700 (PDT) From: stheg olloydson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: chriswin212@wideopenwest.com Subject: Re: Installing Free BSD 5.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:05:23 -0000 It was said: >I have had a crash on my computer I try to install McAfee Internet = >Security 6.0 I keep getting this error message. The Wizard was >interrupted before 6.o could be completely installed. It say new >program = >when I check McAfee it says it is empty. Will installing this=20 >help this problem. I don't know much about computers but I am trying >to = >follow all the directions from McAfee support but there instructions >are = >just not working. >Kind Regards Chris Hello, Just to be clear, you are trying to install a Windows program on to a FreeBSD 5.2.1 system. Is that correct? If it is, this is not going to work. Look on the side of the box under System Requirements to see which operatings systems the software is designed for. If you are trying to install a Windows program on Windows, you need to contact your software vendor (support@mcafee.com) for assistance. HTH, Stheg __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:14:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED9316A4D1 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:14:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53906.mail.yahoo.com (web53906.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEE5443D46 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:14:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stheg_olloydson@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040926171458.11357.qmail@web53906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.210.39.121] by web53906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:14:58 PDT Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:14:58 -0700 (PDT) From: stheg olloydson To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: asothinathan@sympatico.ca Subject: Re: UNIX X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:14:59 -0000 it was said: >I was told that I could learn UNIX for free on this site. If so please = >let me know how. My email address is asothinathan@sympatico.ca Hello, Welcome to FreeBSD! You certainly can learn about unix type OSs here. The best place to start is with the Handbook. the URL is http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html (URL may have wrapped). Regards, Stheg _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:20:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C1116A4DF for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:20:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3610C43D39 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:20:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [63.228.14.242] (theologicka.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.242]) (authenticated bits=0)i8QHL5lY039609 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:21:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <493F1EDF-0FE0-11D9-A586-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Eric Crist Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:19:56 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Backup Mail Server Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:20:49 -0000 Hello list, I was wondering if anyone has any insight as to having a remote backup mail server and the setup of such. I'm currently using sendmail, and I don't want to change that, so please don't recommend any of the other servers out there. ;) One of my friends needs backup DNS/Mail in the even their connection goes down. How do I go about setting it up so that his user base (about 80 users) will not see any problems in mail transmission and reception if their primary servers go offline. I would like mine to automatically pickup the slack. Thanks for your replies! Eric F Crist Secure-Computing Networks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:31:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76C716A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:31:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53906.mail.yahoo.com (web53906.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.216]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39C2343D31 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:31:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stheg_olloydson@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040926173103.14740.qmail@web53906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.210.39.121] by web53906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:31:03 PDT Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 10:31:03 -0700 (PDT) From: stheg olloydson To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: rajunpl@hotmail.com Subject: Re: question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 17:31:04 -0000 it was said: > % man 1 chmo > > whaT does (%) sign means here? root ,user or something else? > > Note ! [greypixel.gif] > Alternatively please send me mails on [i.p.emphone.gif] > [1]rajunpl@yahoo.co.uk and also please add me in your messenger > [greypixel.gif] Hello, The % is the "shell prompt." It marks the place where you should type in the command you wish to execute. The symbol depends on which shell you are using. The % is used by csh and tcsh, the default shell for FreeBSD. If you "su" to root, the symbol changes to #. Of course, you can change these symbols to whatever you want; but if I were you, I would learn a great deal more about FreeBSD before worrying about that. You should read the handbook at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html (URL may have wrapped) because many of these types of questions are answered there. Also, I suggest reading http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/freebsd-questions/ (URL may have wrapped) so that when you ask a question on this list, you get the best possible answer. Regards, Stheg __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 18:30:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7509E16A4CE; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:30:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (outbound01.telus.net [199.185.220.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81B043D58; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:30:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mayo@mayo.sk) Received: from [192.168.0.20] (really [206.116.18.248]) by priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.netESMTP <20040926183036.JYLI3300.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@[192.168.0.20]>; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:30:36 -0600 From: Mayo Jordanov To: Andrew Boothman In-Reply-To: <200409251446.30563.steve@howes-macnaghten.com> References: <9F67035A-48C9-11D7-8C19-0030656DD690@foolishgames.com> <1046192310.3e5ba0b6aa039@sms.ed.ac.uk> <200409251446.30563.steve@howes-macnaghten.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZTxPtdUKsWQLcDHxtI68" Message-Id: <1096223435.765.7.camel@einstein.local.nfy> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:30:36 -0700 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: dwbear75@gmail.com cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "NTLDR missing" after 5-RELEASE install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:30:38 -0000 --=-ZTxPtdUKsWQLcDHxtI68 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You could also try BootPart (http://www.winimage.com/bootpart.htm) which should be able to either repair the nt loader or be able to figure out what's on which partition and change your boot.ini appropriately. (At least it used to be able to do that back when I used it) m On Sat, 2004-09-25 at 06:46, Steve Hodgson wrote: > On Tuesday 25 February 2003 16:58, Andrew Boothman wrote: > > Quoting Lucas Holt : > > > It probably is. You need to put in the win 2k CD and do a repair on > > > your windows install.. unfortunetely this may screw up your freebsd > > > install. > > > > > > On Tuesday, February 25, 2003, at 05:58 AM, Andrew Boothman wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > I've just installed 5-RELEASE, and I asked for the FreeBSD Boot > > > > Manager to be installed on both my HDDs. > > > > > > > > When the machine boots I'm given options for : > > > > > > > > F1 - DOS > > > > F5 - Drive 2 > > > > > > > > Hitting F5 takes me to a second menu, where I can boot FreeBSD no > > > > problem. My problem is that Win2k will no longer boot.... Hitting F= 1 > > > > displays a message that, "NTLDR is missing". I've tried all the rep= air > > > > > > > > options on the Win2k setup disc to no avail I think. > > > > > > > > I'm sorry this isn't directly FreeBSD related, but I really hope my > > > > Win2k installation isn't hosed. > > > > Thanks for replying! > > > > I can't understand how the 5.x boot manager has managed to break my win= dows > > boot, i've never had any trouble under 3.x or 4.x, both of which played > > with windows perfectly nicely. > > > > I think i've tried all of the various repair options on the Win2k CD, > > including getting it to do a fresh installation into a different folder > > (c:\tempwin), but even that failed with the "NTLDR missing" message! > > However you no longer get the booteasy (F1.... F2) menu anymore, so Win= dows > > must have rewritten something. It still doesn't explain why Win2k still > > won't boot. > > > > I'm running out of ideas and I *really* don't want to have to reformat = my > > windows drive! > > > > Other than this (fairly major) problem, my 5.0 installation went really > > well, even ACPI seems to be working perfectly and I even found a KLD to > > support my on- board sound card! :) > > > > I really want to get windows booting again so I can continue to play wi= th > > 5.0 without worrying... > > > > Any help is much appricated! > > > It could well be that windows has become confused about the partition=20 > numbering. the important file is c:\boot.ini. It will have a line like... >=20 > multi(0)disk(0)rdisk(0)partition(1)\WINNT=3D"Windows" /fastdetect >=20 > I can't recall what all the numbers mean and IIRC documentation is slight= ly=20 > scant, but try changing the numbers, in particular the partition() part a= nd=20 > see if that helps. Since you can't boot windows its not obvious how to ed= it=20 > the file, recovery console or knoppix are the two methods i would try. >=20 > Steve > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " --=-ZTxPtdUKsWQLcDHxtI68 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBVwrL3IqYlN3K/uYRAtNJAJ0cqnY6t+KFk8/T5Xv/P6oXzwKOEgCfTZta b+6ji6kXOSSOWK7UIVyH6oE= =GSNZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZTxPtdUKsWQLcDHxtI68-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 18:32:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B8E16A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:32:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3AC643D4C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:32:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90EA69A71; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:32:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:32:11 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Eric Crist Message-Id: <20040926143211.02d40949.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <493F1EDF-0FE0-11D9-A586-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> References: <493F1EDF-0FE0-11D9-A586-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup Mail Server Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:32:14 -0000 Eric Crist wrote: > Hello list, > > I was wondering if anyone has any insight as to having a remote backup > mail server and the setup of such. I'm currently using sendmail, and I > don't want to change that, so please don't recommend any of the other > servers out there. ;) > > One of my friends needs backup DNS/Mail in the even their connection > goes down. How do I go about setting it up so that his user base > (about 80 users) will not see any problems in mail transmission and > reception if their primary servers go offline. I would like mine to > automatically pickup the slack. I'm going to go out on a limb and input my extremely biased opinion. First off, what does setting up backup DNS/mail gain the end user? Unless you have mirrors on radically different networks, of things like WWW and mail, backup DNS doesn't really accomplish anything. If the net connection goes down, you're offline anyway, so who cares if DNS still works? Backup SMTP is even more difficult to justify. The SMTP standard has transient failure recovery built into it, so if your net connection is down for an hour or so, mail delivery will resume when the connection comes back up. If you set up a backup MX on a different network and your primary MX goes down, end users can't get to their mail anyway, since their POP/IMAP boxes are not configured on the backup server. Backup SMTP is a complicated and expensive thing to get working correctly. You can't set up secondary POP/IMAP boxes on the backup, because then you'd have to have everyone check both. This creates two single points of failure (which is worse than a single single point of failure) You could have mail delivered to both the backup and the primary, but then how does the backup know when the user deletes mail from the primary, or vice-versa? Simple fact of the matter is that the only way for 100% reliable mail delivery is to have a single point where the mail gets delivered to. You'd probably be better off setting up a redundant Internet connection, if mail is that important to this customer, and they get the additional benefit that that creates as a bonus. Additionally, for mail to work smoothly, the backup MX needs to have an updated user list from the primary at all times. It also needs to have the same spam/virus filtering setup as the primary MX or spammers _WILL_ use your backup MX to bypass spam controls. If you don't do these correctly, you will have problems with junk mail, as well as generate collateral spam and piss off other mail admins. (I've seen a badly configured backup SMTP system bring a small ISP to its knees) Now that I've been all doom and gloom ... 1) Ensure that the benefit of backup SMTP/DNS for this customer is really justified. 2) Make sure the backup MX has all the same filtering as the primary. Otherwise, spammers WILL QUICKLY learn to relay their spam through the backup. In fact, many spammers try the MXs in reverse order on the assumption that only the primary has properly maintained junk mail controls. 3) Make sure you have a system to replicate the user list from the primary to the backup, so the backup doesn't accept undeliverable mail. I've done this as simply as a cron job with rsync, but fancy stuff like SQL databases and LDAP are possible as well. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 18:45:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD41416A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:45:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6770B43D39 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:45:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1] (may be forged))i8QIjC6G048406 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Sep 2004 19:45:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8QIjCV3048405; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 19:45:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 19:45:12 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Eric Crist Message-ID: <20040926184512.GA48082@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Eric Crist , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <493F1EDF-0FE0-11D9-A586-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <493F1EDF-0FE0-11D9-A586-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 26 Sep 2004 19:45:13 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup Mail Server Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:45:19 -0000 --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 26, 2004 at 12:19:56PM -0500, Eric Crist wrote: > I was wondering if anyone has any insight as to having a remote backup=20 > mail server and the setup of such. I'm currently using sendmail, and I= =20 > don't want to change that, so please don't recommend any of the other=20 > servers out there. ;) >=20 > One of my friends needs backup DNS/Mail in the even their connection=20 > goes down. How do I go about setting it up so that his user base=20 > (about 80 users) will not see any problems in mail transmission and=20 > reception if their primary servers go offline. I would like mine to=20 > automatically pickup the slack. >=20 > Thanks for your replies! Actually, it's pretty simple. Starting with the more fundamental things: to provide a backup DNS, configure a server to secondary for your friends domains. Under Bind9 that means something like this in named.conf: zone "yourfriend.com" { type slave; masters { dns0.yourfriend.com; }; file "s/yourfriend.com"; allow-query { any; }; allow-transfer { none; }; }; If you want that to be available to the world in general (which you usually do, for a mail server) then you need to get your friend to do two things: add a NS record for your server to the "yourfriend.com" zone file and alter the registration of the domain so that your server is listed as one of the registered name servers for the domain. Your friend should also check and make sure that his nameserver has appropriate 'allow-transfer' statements so that your server can AXFR a copy of the zone from it. That's the hard part. The Secondary MX'ing part is fairly easy. All you do is get your friend to add an MX record to the DNS 'yourfriend.com' zone listing your server as a high numbered MXer: $ORIGIN yourfriend.com. @ IN MX 0 smtp.yourfriend.com. 10 smtp2.yourfriend.com. 30 smtp.you.com. And then add: yourfriend.com RELAY to /etc/mail/access and rebuild access.db. That means your machine will accept e-mails addressed to users @yourfriend.com and queue them up for relaying onto to his servers as soon as they come back up again. If his site has to go down for an extended length of time, you can make special arrangements to store incoming mail for longer than the usual 5 days and then flush it over to him when he comes back up. Recommended reading: The Bat Book: Sendmail, Bryan Costales and Eric Allman, O'Reilly & Ass= oc.=20 3rd Ed. 2002. http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/sendmail3/index.html The Cricket Book: DNS and BIND, Paul Ablitz and Cricket Liu, O'Reilly & Assoc. 4th Ed. 2001. http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/dns4/ Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBVw44iD657aJF7eIRAkosAJ97Z2xozKkg+Mn5uOpyvliOhUOhhQCfeqjG +A2h4PQgp91XlQFm+nKpnCQ= =e/Q0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 18:50:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE8E16A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:50:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [208.187.29.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4C9343D3F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:50:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 46617 invoked by uid 1001); 26 Sep 2004 18:50:05 -0000 Received: from 67.167.52.21 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com); by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3394.67.167.52.21.1096224605.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: <52356.69.29.89.98.1096209680.squirrel@69.29.89.98> References: <52356.69.29.89.98.1096209680.squirrel@69.29.89.98> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 11:50:05 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: joe@jwebmedia.com User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail X-Mailer: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: locating origin of spammer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:50:04 -0000 Joseph Koening (jWeb) wrote: > I got up this morning and discovered that someone sent some spam through > one of my servers. The messages were sent from the 'www' user on > localhost, which is leading me to think somewhere someone has an insecure > php or perl script that is allowing someone to designate the recipient, > the subject, body, etc. I know the machine is not open-relay (I tested it > to double check) and I checked to make sure no one had actually logged in. > I grepped all of apache's log files looking for sites that received hits > about the same time the mail started going out. What else can I do to find > how the mail is being sent? Thanks, While this has been resolved for the original poster, for the next guy who has this problem... For PHP, one could do something like: grep "mail.*\(" /path/to/htdocs and find mostly all of the places somebody is using PHP's internal http://php.net/mail function. I did that soon after the formmail alert, and made sure that I was cleaning all the input. Of course, if some user is doing this maliciously rather than from ignorance, they could use "mail\n(" and this grep wouldn't find it... A grep expert could probably suggest a better expression to use. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 18:58:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1773416A4CE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:58:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.nyroc.rr.com [24.24.2.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C1643D1F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:58:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from acarranza@nubiandirections.org) Received: from smtp-server.hvc.rr.com (24-161-25-80.hvc.rr.com [24.161.25.80]) i8QIw7aX009365 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:58:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Aaron Organization: Nubian Directions To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 14:58:06 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_+ExVB0HYURhPuK+" Message-Id: <200409261458.06180.acarranza@nubiandirections.org> X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: help please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: acarranza@nubiandirections.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 18:58:11 -0000 --Boundary-00=_+ExVB0HYURhPuK+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I will like to thank you before hand for what you are doing for bsd user. I am a new bsd user who is trying to learn how to buil a kernel or custimize it. I am reading the book absolute bsd and I am using 5.1 version . I followed the step in configuring my kernel. I ran the cvsup update before trying to build the kernel so everything will be up to date. However, I am getting these messeges SecondAdvent# cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf SecondAdvent# ls GENERIC Makefile OLDCARD SECONDADVENT GENERIC.hints NOTES PAE gethints.awk SecondAdvent# config SECONDADVENT ERROR: version of config(8) does not match kernel! config version = 500012, version required = 600000 Make sure that /usr/src/usr.sbin/config is in sync with your /usr/src/sys and install a new config binary before trying this again. If running the new config fails check your config file against the GENERIC or LINT config files for changes in config syntax, or option/device naming conventions SecondAdvent# Here is the output of uname -a SecondAdvent# uname -a FreeBSD SecondAdvent.hvc.rr.com 5.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jun 5 02:55:42 GMT 2003 root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 SecondAdvent# Hope you could please help me thank you. Aaron Carranza --Boundary-00=_+ExVB0HYURhPuK+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="dmesg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmesg" SecondAdvent# dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE #0: Thu Jun 5 02:55:42 GMT 2003 root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0689000. Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 298535327 Hz CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (298.54-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x66a Stepping = 10 Features=0x183f9ff real memory = 100597760 (95 MB) avail memory = 90644480 (86 MB) Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcibios: BIOS version 2.10 Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00fdf40 pcib0: at pcibus 0 on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff at d evice 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 2.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xfc90-0xfc9f at device 2.1 on pci 0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xfca0-0xfcbf irq 11 at de vice 2.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 2.3 (no driver attached) cbb0: mem 0x10000000-0x10000fff irq 11 at device 3.0 on pci0 cardbus0: on cbb0 pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 cbb1: mem 0x20000000-0x20000fff irq 11 at device 3.1 on pci0 cardbus1: on cbb1 pccard1: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb1 pci0: at device 6.0 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 7.0 (no driver attached) orm0: NNN/
/g means I can use from the CL or as a script to make this doc more easy (for me) to read. The document is formatted like this: 1 Paragraph1. 2 Paragraph2. ... 29 Paragraph29. ... 747 Paragraph747. I would like it to be like this: 1
Paragraph1. 2
Paragraph2. ... 29
Paragraph29. ... 747
Paragraph747. I've used perls subsitiution as a simple command line script dozens of times, but this one (yes, I'm using HTML) is a bit over my head. Can anybody clue me in? thanks in advance, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 19:35:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B082E16A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:35:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F0643D58 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:35:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so3220669rnk for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.171.30 with SMTP id t30mr285168rne; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.75.49 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 12:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff0409271234412a6ce6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 14:34:50 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel To: dwbear75@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <20030122100925.O3206-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <001101c2c252$03ebd850$12387618@q1d0p9> <20030122100925.O3206-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.7->5.0, ran out of space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scot Hetzel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:35:02 -0000 On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:11:02 -1000 (HST), Vincent Poy wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Kirk R. Wythers wrote: > > > I just ran into a problem trying to install the 5.0 world. I thought I > > checked and had 30M free on / before I started this. However, after > > building, the world, building the kernel, installing the kernel, running > > mergemaster -p, I went to install the world and got the error 'out of > > space on /' > > > > I need to find some room, but I'm a little nervous about what I can rm. > > Here is what I'm looking at: > > > > 1) / partition is 79M, 64M are used (I was almost sure there was > > more room than that on / before I satarted). > > 2) /tmp is on it's own partition > > 3) du -h on subdirectories breakdown like this. > > a. 18M /boot > > b. 1.4M /etc > > c. 3.7M /kernel > > d. 3.9M /kern.GENERIC > > e. 6M /modules > > f. 21M /sbin > > g. 2.1M /stand > > > > as you can see that pretty much accounts for it. The rest of the stuff > > is pretty small. > > > > I need to know if I can delete any of this stuff and still successfully > > do a 'make installworld'? > > > /modules can all be deleted since these are now in /boot > /sbin > /stand > should stay > You could also remove /stand, as most of it's functionality has been moved to the the /rescue directory. Also, make sure that Soft-Updates is turned off on your root directory. Because Soft-Updates doesn't immediately free the space on the drive. Scot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 19:38:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0077D16A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:38:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CAA843D1F for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:38:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836E869A71; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:38:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:38:15 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Nico Meijer Message-Id: <20040927153815.12a7ed24.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <41585E4B.9040108@zonnet.nl> References: <493F1EDF-0FE0-11D9-A586-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <20040926143211.02d40949.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4157A0F9.6010007@zonnet.nl> <20040927090142.1719d106.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <41585E4B.9040108@zonnet.nl> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup Mail Server Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:38:18 -0000 Nico Meijer wrote: > Hey Bill, > > Black mode is on, here. ;-) I'm not familiar with that metaphor. > > Are you saying that it's better for users not to know that their mail > > has been delayed? > > Unfortunately, yes. That is what I am saying. > > On a technical level, I totally disagree with myself. On a practical, > day-to-day operations level I have to admit I'd rather not handle the calls. Don't know what to tell you there. My major concern is that: a) When other servers reply with "could not deliver after x hours" messages, they'll still run around like idiots, and you'll have to explain anyway. b) You're punishing educated people by having their mail disappear into the ether with no warning. When I have a choice of punishing idiots or smart people, I punish idiots. > > If folks run around in a panic, then it's a training issue, not an > > excuse for you to quell useful informational messages. > > As much as I hate to admit it: regular people don't want their > mailservers to bitch at them *no matter what happens*, unless they are > down (in which case they don't bitch either ;-) ). You know, the same > people that shut their brain off when turning their computers on. My point is that we're obligated to force these people to turn their brains back on, before they ruin the world with their screwed up politics and other nonsense. Look at the vehicle situation. If people would force stupid drivers to wise up, instead of trying to cover up their stupidity with airbags, we'd have a lot less deaths due to vehicle accidents. > Regular folks don't understand how mail works. They have no clue > whatsoever. They don't _want_ to have a clue either. They are just > behaving like consumers, again. Do you *really* want to know what's on > your plate at dinner? ;-) I do, maybe you too, but most people don't. I disagree just a _little_. I don't _want_ to know, but I feel obligated that I _have_ to know. Others would rather just have their doctor prescribe something when thier shitty diet makes them sick. Then I have to pay the elevated health insurance costs ... now they want to turn the US into a socialized medicin country, so every citizen is _forced_ to pay for all the people who don't take care of themselves. > If I had a dime for every time I have had to discuss how mail delivery > actually works to Joe Average or his Windows NT/2000 systems > administrator... boy. Write up a web page and point people to it. Sometimes I think that if people enjoyed answering the same question over and over, there would be no FreeBSD handbook! > > Again, I have many _very_ strong opinions on how email should be > > managed, this is one of them. > > I happen to have a very strong opinion on the grim state of humanity > in general and regular, everyday, Joe Average computer users in > particular. I am therefore strongly biased. ;-) > > I disagree with you on the secondary DNS part (but I'm leaving that, I > have work to do ;-) ), I technically agree with you on the MX part. > > I'll try to get out of black mode now :-) ... Nico I still don't know what that means, but I guess _I_ was in rant mode. I'll turn that off now. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 19:44:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484DE16A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:44:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D880D43D1D for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:44:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nico.meijer@zonnet.nl) Received: from piweblw.demon.nl ([82.161.24.55]:21830 helo=[192.168.2.100]) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CC1Q1-0000Z9-QW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:44:18 +0000 Message-ID: <41586D91.9040508@zonnet.nl> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:44:17 +0200 From: Nico Meijer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040908 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Question List References: <493F1EDF-0FE0-11D9-A586-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <20040926143211.02d40949.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4157A0F9.6010007@zonnet.nl> <20040927090142.1719d106.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <41585E4B.9040108@zonnet.nl> <764C01E1-10B9-11D9-8AA7-000393681B06@lafn.org> In-Reply-To: <764C01E1-10B9-11D9-8AA7-000393681B06@lafn.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [OT] Re: Backup Mail Server Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:44:19 -0000 Hi Doug, Point taken. Wrong example, imho, but point taken. ;-) > They will have no problem > convincing Joe Sub-Average juror (of which there will be more than > enough to go around) that you were the cause of Joe Average computer > users' loss of his entire retirement savings. I have just enough faith in even the American legal system that the judge will rule that Joe Average should not have put his entire retirement savings on an email line, but rather some real time (or as close as can be), secured communication channel. I may be wrong though, who knows. If what you say were real life, what about the standard 4 hour delay in the default 'deferred' message to Joe Average? Don't answer that. This is turning OT way too fast (my bad). Bye... Nico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 20:07:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1499C16A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:07:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAD643D54 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:07:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ababurko@adelphia.net) Received: from ample.adelphia.net ([24.52.224.96]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040927200722.YHAR9204.mta10.adelphia.net@ample.adelphia.net>; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:07:22 -0400 Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.0.20040927160438.01d6ec58@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> X-Sender: ababurko@mail.dc2.adelphia.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:07:22 -0400 To: David Rio Deiros From: Bob Ababurko In-Reply-To: <20040927195822.GA18051@eracks.com> References: <5.2.1.1.0.20040927142904.00a7dbd8@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> <5.2.1.1.0.20040927142904.00a7dbd8@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: serial port config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:07:24 -0000 At 12:58 PM 9/27/2004 -0700, you wrote: > > 4. Make sure the configuration file of your kernel has appropriate > > flags set for COM1 (sio0). > > where I should be seeing or adding a line such as : > > device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 > >You should add that to the kernel configuration file. >Please, refer to >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig.html So, let me get this straight....I am going to add: >device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 to the kernel configuration, aka the GENERIC file in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf if the system is not customized at all? -Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 20:24:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C89116A4CF for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:24:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cowabunga.canyon.eracks.com (wbar25.lax1-4.28.136.44.lax1.dsl-verizon.net [4.28.136.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E113443D45 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:24:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drio@cowabunga.canyon.eracks.com) Received: from cowabunga.canyon.eracks.com (cowabunga.canyon.eracks.com [127.0.0.1]) by cowabunga.canyon.eracks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3222441CE; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from drio@localhost)i8RKOd0W018232; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:24:39 -0700 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 13:24:39 -0700 From: David Rio Deiros To: Bob Ababurko Message-ID: <20040927202439.GA18223@eracks.com> References: <5.2.1.1.0.20040927142904.00a7dbd8@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> <5.2.1.1.0.20040927142904.00a7dbd8@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> <5.2.1.1.0.20040927160438.01d6ec58@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20040927160438.01d6ec58@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: serial port config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:24:40 -0000 > So, let me get this straight....I am going to add: > > >device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 > > to the kernel configuration, aka the GENERIC file in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf > if the > system is not customized at all? What you are doing is to tell the kernel what he needs to do to configure that device. If by not "customized at all" you mean you don't have the hardware in the computer yet, there is no problem, when you will boot the kernel it will give up if there is no hardware. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 20:47:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3DE16A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:47:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9565743D2F for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:47:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ababurko@adelphia.net) Received: from ample.adelphia.net ([24.52.224.96]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with ESMTP id <20040927204723.ZOFH9204.mta10.adelphia.net@ample.adelphia.net>; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:47:23 -0400 Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.0.20040927164658.01a45690@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> X-Sender: ababurko@mail.dc2.adelphia.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:47:22 -0400 To: David Rio Deiros From: Bob Ababurko In-Reply-To: <20040927202439.GA18223@eracks.com> References: <5.2.1.1.0.20040927160438.01d6ec58@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> <5.2.1.1.0.20040927142904.00a7dbd8@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> <5.2.1.1.0.20040927142904.00a7dbd8@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> <5.2.1.1.0.20040927160438.01d6ec58@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: serial port config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:47:24 -0000 At 01:24 PM 9/27/2004 -0700, David Rio Deiros wrote: > > So, let me get this straight....I am going to add: > > > > >device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 > > > > to the kernel configuration, aka the GENERIC file in > /usr/src/sys/i386/conf > > if the > > system is not customized at all? > >What you are doing is to tell the kernel what he needs to do to >configure that device. If by not "customized at all" you mean you don't >have the hardware in the computer yet, there is no problem, when you >will boot the kernel it will give up if there is no hardware. By not customized, I mean that the file will be the GENERIC kernel config file. This doesn't seem to be the correct way as I get this error message: config: /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC:279: devices with zero units are not likely to be correct What file do I add this line to?: device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 -Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 21:42:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5377216A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:42:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D3343D3F for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:42:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@monsterjam.org) Received: from monsterjam.org (cpe-024-211-171-119.nc.rr.com [24.211.171.119]) i8RLgL4I007197 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:42:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 59475 invoked by uid 1001); 27 Sep 2004 21:42:20 -0000 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:42:20 -0400 From: Jason To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040927214220.GA58910@monsterjam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: 3ddesktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:42:24 -0000 ive installed 3ddesktop 0.2.7 from ports im running x.org 6.7 on a 386 box with a voodoo 3 2000 box.. I have tdfx.ko loaded and dmesg reports info: [drm] Initialized tdfx 1.0.0 20010216 on minor 0 but when I run 3ddesk, I get [root@bush]# 3ddesk Attempting to start 3ddesktop server. Daemon started. Run 3ddesk to activate. 3ddeskd: glXIsDirect failed, no Direct Rendering possible! 3ddeskd: Please configure hardware acceleration. Exiting. any ideas? regards, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 22:39:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C28516A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:39:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (conn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B2543D2D for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:39:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drue@therub.org) Received: from egypt.therub.org (therub.org [209.98.146.43]) by conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C62184BD for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:39:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: by egypt.therub.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 12416455E1B; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:39:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:39:18 -0500 From: Dan Rue To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040927223917.GB62325@therub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Apache upgrads thrashing certs; index.html.* crud X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:39:19 -0000 Hey Fellas, Whenever I do an apache upgrade - whether it be apache 1.3 or apache 2, it always spews all these index.html.language files in my web root that I have to go in and remove - but more annoyingly it overwrites my certs in /usr/local/etc/apache[2]/ssl.*. What gives? There a command line option I should be usign to prevent such madness? Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 23:23:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA1116A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:23:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp14.wxs.nl (smtp14.wxs.nl [195.121.6.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C09843D46 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:22:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: from kruij557.speed.planet.nl (ipd50a97ba.speed.planet.nl [213.10.151.186]) by smtp14.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4Q009XU3M8TM@smtp14.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:22:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alex.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kruij557.speed.planet.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8RNMoMH004415; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:22:50 +0200 Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by alex.lan (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8RNMosE004414; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:22:50 +0200 Content-return: prohibited Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:22:50 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff In-reply-to: <4157AB8B.2020007@optonline.net> To: bsdfsse Message-id: <20040927232250.GC1494@alex.lan> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i References: <4157AB8B.2020007@optonline.net> X-Authentication-warning: alex.lan: akruijff set sender to freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl using -f cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: Is it safe to run a webserver on 5.x ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:23:00 -0000 On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 01:56:27AM -0400, bsdfsse wrote: > > I started running FreeBSD because a friend of mine is going to run a > website on 4.10-STABLE. Someone had told him that 4.x was "safer" to > run than 5.x. > > Recently I had a hardware problems on one of my machines that is forcing > me to run 5.x on it, instead of 4.x. Should I lobby my friend to also > run 5.x ? His webserver will be behind a hardware firewall. I would let him leaf his server on 4.x and wait untill 5.3 or untill there are no more 4 releases plus fixes. But would go with 5.2.1 if I had to do a fresh install. And would do a fresh install if I switched to 5 because of UFS2. > Its my understanding servers on the web often run the "security > release", which is RELEASE+fixes. That way, no new features in STABLE > introduce more exploitable bugs. Other people run web servers on STABLE > (they must feel confident that nothing new is going to break). This is true for every release stable or not. I run 5.2 plus fixes. -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 23:49:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2E816A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:49:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cowabunga.canyon.eracks.com (wbar25.lax1-4.28.136.44.lax1.dsl-verizon.net [4.28.136.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB61F43D41 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:49:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drio@cowabunga.canyon.eracks.com) Received: from cowabunga.canyon.eracks.com (cowabunga.canyon.eracks.com [127.0.0.1]) by cowabunga.canyon.eracks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6292441CE; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:49:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from drio@localhost)i8RNnAeV020816; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:49:10 -0700 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 16:49:10 -0700 From: David Rio Deiros To: Bob Ababurko Message-ID: <20040927234910.GA20802@eracks.com> References: <5.2.1.1.0.20040927160438.01d6ec58@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> <5.2.1.1.0.20040927142904.00a7dbd8@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> <5.2.1.1.0.20040927142904.00a7dbd8@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> <5.2.1.1.0.20040927160438.01d6ec58@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> <5.2.1.1.0.20040927164658.01a45690@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20040927164658.01a45690@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: serial port config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:49:11 -0000 > config: /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC:279: devices with zero units are not > likely to be correct > > What file do I add this line to?: > > device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4 Check out this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/archive77-2004-1-50488.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 23:59:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A215516A4CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:59:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pd4mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591B743D3F for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:59:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flowers@nekulturny.org) Received: from pd5mr1so.prod.shaw.ca (pd5mr1so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.232]) by l-daemon (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4Q00E6H58ZG490@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:58:12 -0600 (MDT) Received: from pn2ml8so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.152]) by pd5mr1so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar 15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4Q006BH58ZT990@pd5mr1so.prod.shaw.ca> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:58:12 -0600 (MDT) Received: from procyon.nekulturny.org (S0106000c41b2b9a3.cg.shawcable.net [68.144.91.127]) by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I4Q0082J58ZYU@l-daemon> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:58:11 -0600 (MDT) Received: from procyon.nekulturny.org (localhost.nekulturny.org [127.0.0.1]) i8RNwBfT001935; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:58:11 -0600 (MDT envelope-from flowers@nekulturny.org) Received: (from flowers@localhost) by procyon.nekulturny.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8RNwAR3001934; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:58:10 -0600 (MDT envelope-from flowers) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:58:09 -0600 From: Danny MacMillan In-reply-to: <20040927153815.12a7ed24.wmoran@potentialtech.com> To: Bill Moran Message-id: <20040927235809.GB977@procyon.nekulturny.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline References: <493F1EDF-0FE0-11D9-A586-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <20040926143211.02d40949.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4157A0F9.6010007@zonnet.nl> <20040927090142.1719d106.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20040927153815.12a7ed24.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Nico Meijer cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup Mail Server Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:59:07 -0000 On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 01:38:15PM -0600, Bill Moran wrote: > > > > When I have a choice of punishing idiots or smart people, I punish > idiots. This is excellent. It should be on a bumper sticker or something. > > > Look at the vehicle situation. If people would force stupid drivers > to wise up, instead of trying to cover up their stupidity with airbags, > we'd have a lot less deaths due to vehicle accidents. Another bumper sticker: "Airbags: The Backup Mail Exchangers of the Automobile Industry" You could probably add a couple of {fnord}s in there for good measure. > > > Others would rather just have their doctor prescribe something when thier > shitty diet makes them sick. Then I have to pay the elevated health > insurance costs ... now they want to turn the US into a socialized > medicin country, so every citizen is _forced_ to pay for all the people > who don't take care of themselves. Speaking as a citizen of a country that has socialized medicine (Canada), I can say that the expense probably does not nearly approach what you think. I compared notes with an American friend just the other day. She pays in a month what I pay in a year. I think our health care is subdisized by our income tax (we pay much more than you Americans as I understand it) but even that probably doesn't make up the difference. That having been said, I do agree with your point as it relates to user education, simply because by adopting a policy of misinforming users you are committing yourself to maintaining a more and more elaborate structure of, essentially, lies. Reductio ad absurdum &c. Better to let them know off the bat what the limitations are. Example: Users already have a completely unjustified perception of email as being a reliable and immediate transmission medium, which it clearly is not. Since users are the ones who will have to bear the cost when reality pays them a wake-up call, it serves everyone to disabuse them of this notion as quickly as possible. Gently if you have to, rudely if you can. :) > > > -- > Bill Moran > Potential Technologies > http://www.potentialtech.com -- Danny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 00:16:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256DD16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:16:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D460C43D1D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:16:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:12:31 -0500 Message-ID: <4158AD01.401@daleco.biz> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:14:57 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <2D8BB15C7B5C214F81C32D3A83B32736013D46C8@idbexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net> <20040927081638.GA26247@math.jussieu.fr> <20040927184827.GB31494@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040927184827.GB31494@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2004 00:12:42.0435 (UTC) FILETIME=[DF569930:01C4A4EF] cc: "Sheets, Jason \(OZ CEEDR\)" cc: Albert Shih cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Very very slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:16:16 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:16:38AM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > > >> 32 sec to do >> >>cd /usr/src >>time find . -type f -print > /dev/null >> >>and on other computer I just need 0.8 sec to do that. >> >> > >I don't believe that, unless you already have all of /usr/src in >cache. 32 seconds seems quite normal for searching and reading ~55000 >directory entries (on the machine I just tried it took 42 seconds). > >Kris > > Hmm. Didn't take that long here. Celeron 2.4, 768MB DDR, full src (enough to buildworld on 5.2.1-p3, anyway): [/usr/src] [19:10] % sudo time find . -type f -print > /dev/null 3.60 real 0.34 user 1.86 sys KDK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 00:23:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACAC16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:23:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fincher.users.accretive-networks.net (fincher.users.accretive-networks.net [216.127.44.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD0143D31 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:23:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atlev@flyingcroc.net) Received: from fincher.users.accretive-networks.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8S0N35b086503 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:23:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from atlev@flyingcroc.net) Received: from localhost (atlev@localhost)ESMTP id i8S0N3Jg086500 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:23:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from atlev@flyingcroc.net) X-Authentication-Warning: fincher.users.accretive-networks.net: atlev owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 17:23:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Atle Veka X-X-Sender: atlev@fincher.users.accretive-networks.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040927235915.082C416A4E5@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20040927171855.J72052@fincher.users.accretive-networks.net> References: <20040927235915.082C416A4E5@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: regex replacement wizard advice needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:23:05 -0000 How about something like (assuming space between numbering and paragraph is a tab): perl -pi -e 's,^(\d)\t,$1
,' Atle - Flying Crocodile Inc, Unix Systems Administrator From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 03:09:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690A716A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:09:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from f05n03.cac.psu.edu (f05s03.cac.psu.edu [128.118.141.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD9143D48 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:09:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@psu.edu) Received: from tmm324.rh.psu.edu (TMM324.rh.psu.edu [66.71.101.5]) by f05n03.cac.psu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8S39veJ115596 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:09:57 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:09:59 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Moyer X-X-Sender: tom@tmm324.rh.psu.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040927230412.W736@tmm324.rh.psu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Problems with USB Detach X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:09:59 -0000 I have a USB Sony Clie PEG-SJ20 which I have gotten to Sync with jpilot. However the processes that are run when the Clie is attached continue to run even after the Clie is detached. The processes are spawned from usbd.conf with the attach option and should be killed by the detach options. None of the processes are killed though. I'm running FreeBSD 5.2.1 Any thoughts? Following is the usbd.conf and other pertinent files. # Sony Clie (PDA) device "Sony Clie" devname "ucom0" vendor 0x054c product 0x0066 release 0x0100 # pilot-link attach "/usr/sbin/ppp -auto palm; /usr/local/bin/pi-csd -H tmm324 -a 66.71.101.5 -n 255.255.255.0&" detach "/usr/local/bin/pi-detach" pi-detach is a shell script containing: #!/bin/sh /usr/bin/killall ppp /usr/bin/killall pi-csd Thomas Moyer tmm324@psu.edu DracoYung From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 03:20:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC1B16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:20:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB2E43D3F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:20:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) i8S3Kgq38887; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:20:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Matthew Seaman" , "Tim Aslat" Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:20:42 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20040927092217.GB57485@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: RE: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:20:51 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Seaman > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 2:22 AM > To: Tim Aslat > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: IP address conflicts > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:51:47AM +0930, Tim Aslat wrote: > > > I have an annoying situation in a school I do casual work in their IT > > department. There are a number of individuals within the system who > > think it's funny to allocate an IP address on a workstation identical to > > the network's proxy/web/mail servers. What I'd like to know is, would > > there be any way of preventing this short of spending quite a lot of > > money on managed switches an the like? > > Well, you could move all of the servers onto a separate network to any > of the individual client machines (and make sure that the server > network isn't accessible from any of the network ports your clients > have access to, clearly). That way, even if one of your pet idiots > decides to 'borrow' a server IP address, the network routing means > that all they are going to do is hurt themselves. > You must want to HELP the little shits then. Think of this for a second. Right now he has maybe 4-5 different servers that people are putting the IP numbers on. Once you move all those servers onto a separate subnet, now all the little twits have to do is put the IP number of the gateway router onto their systems, then the entire subnet that ALL the servers are on becomes inaccessible. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 03:22:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D98916A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:22:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBA343D2D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:22:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-197-67.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.197.67] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1CC8Zi-0007ZO-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:22:46 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16728.55473.937040.597552@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 23:21:21 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040927230412.W736@tmm324.rh.psu.edu> References: <20040927230412.W736@tmm324.rh.psu.edu> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta16) "celeriac" XEmacs Lucid Subject: Problems with USB Detach X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:22:47 -0000 Thomas Moyer writes: > #!/bin/sh > /usr/bin/killall ppp This may not be the correct tool - see "man pppctl". Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 03:25:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A335D16A4CF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:25:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744D643D41 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:25:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4BE8251385; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:25:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:25:40 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." Message-ID: <20040928032540.GA62632@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <2D8BB15C7B5C214F81C32D3A83B32736013D46C8@idbexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net> <20040927081638.GA26247@math.jussieu.fr> <20040927184827.GB31494@xor.obsecurity.org> <4158AD01.401@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4158AD01.401@daleco.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: "Sheets, Jason \(OZ CEEDR\)" cc: Albert Shih cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Very very slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:25:13 -0000 --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 07:14:57PM -0500, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. wro= te: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > >On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:16:38AM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > >=20 > > > >> 32 sec to do > >> > >>cd /usr/src > >>time find . -type f -print > /dev/null > >> > >>and on other computer I just need 0.8 sec to do that. > >> =20 > >> > > > >I don't believe that, unless you already have all of /usr/src in > >cache. 32 seconds seems quite normal for searching and reading ~55000 > >directory entries (on the machine I just tried it took 42 seconds). > > > >Kris > >=20 > > >=20 > Hmm. Didn't take that long here.=20 >=20 > Celeron 2.4, 768MB DDR, full src > (enough to buildworld on 5.2.1-p3, anyway): >=20 > [/usr/src] [19:10] > % sudo time find . -type f -print > /dev/null >=20 > 3.60 real 0.34 user 1.86 sys I can only reproduce those kind of numbers when everything is already cached: > /usr/bin/time find /usr/src/ -type f -print > /dev/null 45.28 real 0.30 user 1.51 sys > /usr/bin/time find /usr/src/ -type f -print > /dev/null 1.34 real 0.26 user 1.07 sys If your system is quiet, /usr/src may still be cached from the last nightly run of locate.updatedb. Try running the test from single-user mode after the system has just been rebooted. Kris --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWNmzWry0BWjoQKURAmtHAKCujwqIvf06cxAMkcE5VW+MFzfH4QCfWEIz /JxLJxlMimaLbVGztL2B2bs= =XPsu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZPt4rx8FFjLCG7dd-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 03:25:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C0516A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:25:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FED543D2D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:25:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) i8S3Pmq38914; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:25:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "russell" , "bsdfsse" Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:25:48 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <253578F8-1047-11D9-83E5-000A95DA456C@slofith.org> cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: RE: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:25:54 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of russell > Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 10:36 PM > To: bsdfsse > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: IP address conflicts > > > or use a tool like arpwatch that is specifically designed to let you > know when MAC/IP relationships change on your network. > You don't even need to do that - any router on the network is going to log the MAC address because they will see the arp change, as will the other servers. > you log the MAC addresses of all the fixed workstations in the school, > then when one of them starts doing the wrong thing you know *exactly* > where to go to nab the culprit. How, exactly? Do you think that he has a list of all MAC addresses on the network and who is using them? Getting the MAC address is not the problem. Finding it on what is essentially a completely flat network is. You need managed switches for this so you can see what port the offending MAC address is on. > If it's not one of the fixed > workstations then you've got a bit more work to find the kiddie, but > it's nothing insurmountable. > Unless of course the kiddies are using made up MAC addresses like BADBEEF, DEADBEEF, CO1DCOED, and such. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 03:49:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B8916A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:49:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51605.mail.yahoo.com (web51605.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9479D43D31 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:49:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay2xra@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040928034910.32013.qmail@web51605.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.90.128.21] by web51605.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:49:10 PDT Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:49:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Jayson Alvarez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: How can I route through a pc that is also using a router?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:49:11 -0000 Good day! I have two workstations at work, 1 my personal, and the other, a test machine. My boss told me to configure a pcrouter, that is, the testmachine and let my personal pc connect through the internet through the testmachine: Here's the scenario: The testmachine already knows how to connect through the outside world but, also through a gateway.... testmachine(10.10.8.111)--->gateway(10.10.8.254)---->[proxy]---->[DNS]---->internet And to let my pc connect to the internet through the testmachine, I've set its default gateway to the ip of the test machine. But it doesn't seem to work. When I tried to lauch my browser, the error indicates that it cannot seem to find its way to the proxy server. I've tried adding another line in my routing table like this: Destination Gateway proxy(202.90.128.14) testmachine(10.10.8.111) But it still won't work. Do you know what i've been missing here? I'm thinking perhaps the test machine should connect to the internet directly without using a gateway anymore.. Any idea? _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 04:03:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9999D16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:03:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E50A43D2D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:03:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) i8S42vq39039; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:02:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Tim Aslat" , Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:02:57 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20040927141959.789dc1ea@bofh.spyderweb.com.au> Subject: RE: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:03:01 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Tim Aslat > Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 9:50 PM > I agree, and this is what we are trying to do. However a school with > 20+ buildings, and 1000+ network points and a considerable number of > switches makes it a little more difficult. > And, let me guess, most switches purchased at different times, different models, different number of ports, etc. And all of them on a single network, not broken up into small subnets - that is the first mistake. Probably many of the predicessors didn't understand you can use cheap servers as routers. What a nightmare. > > I actually think it's more than 1 culprit, and I couldn't be 100% > certain whether they are using their own notebooks or school machines > until I catch them in the act. > Well, as these things go when you do finally catch one it's going to be the slowest and stupidest one of the lot. When he gets expelled the rest of them are going to call an all-out war and get a lot more sophisticated a lot faster. > > Please bear in mind that I have over 50 switches kicking around in > various parts of the school, and only 4 of them are managed. This could > be a very expensive exercise. > It's not the number of switches that matter it's the number of active ports. 50 what, 8 port switches? or 24 port switches? Of course, there are some other ways of handling this too. "Oppps, looks like another switch died, we are just having a rash of these failures lately! Must be bad power. And amazing - it's the switch that the head of the Engineering department and his staff are using! Guess they will just have to go without since we don't have the money for new switches" It's amazing how money will appear out of thin air if certain oxen get gored. > > Also, if you are a bona-fied school, contact some of the switch > > vendors, they > > may make a deal with you under the table. > > This isn't a bad idea. Might be well worth looking into, especially > with the number we are going to need. > If you do go this route then screw the desktop switches, get yourself some decent slotted hubs. You want a much higher port density than the crummy 24 in a typical rack mounted switch. Besides that, the switch vendor is gonna want to use your school as an example of how to do things right. Remember, if your going to go begging then you need to beg for the best stuff they have. > > I appreciate the sentiment :) however if a quick hack can cover my butt > until I get budget clearance to get real switches in place, then I'm all > for it. Like you, I don't like quick hacks, but it they do the job > until I can put something better in place, it's better than nothing. > > One question though. Would it be enough to get some half decent > switches just on the servers, or would I need to replace every single > switch in the network? > You need to replace every single switch. When one of these bozos assumes a server IP number, he's going to most likely use a different MAC address. You need to be able to query the mac table in the switch to see what port that address is coming in from. Later on, when you have expelled a few of them, they are going to cop wise and start using the SAME mac address of your server, either with the same IP number or a different IP number. At that point, your going to need to use the filters provided in good switches so that the switches will only allow the MAC addresses of your servers to come in to the physical port that is plugged into those servers. (or the physical port that is plugged into the uplink port) > > What you merely do is go around to ALL of the machines on the network > > that need > > to get to the proxy/web/mailservers and put in static ARP entries for > > the MAC > > addresses of the legitimate servers. Then when your little friends > > try their > > trick, nobody is going to notice it, except of course for the machine > > that they make their modification to. > > This sounds like more trouble than it's worth, but maybe there's a way I > can distribute the settings somehow at logon. > If the logon server is being interfered with by the kiddies, then nobody can logon and get the settings. And, until you get the decent switches online, as soon as the kiddies realize you are on to them, they are going to start coming all over themselves with excitement to play the "Let's see if I'm smarter than the admin" game. It's like the original Star Wars movie. They had to break the tractor beam at it's source, not at the central computer where someone could just lock it back on. You can maybe distribute the initial batch file with the static arp in it one time - that of course will let the kiddies know that something's up. They won't give you a second chance so you better have a whole collection of arp entries in that batch file. Eventually your going to be forced into getting more intelligent switches. What your going to have to do is put 1 of them at each uplink point - such as at the entry point of each building, if that is how your laid out - and then put MAC filters into them. When that is done at least you can contain it - if the kiddie is doing a MAC spoof then he's going to be isolated to the building that all the dumb hubs and switches are on that he is in and all the users in that building will be trashed - but at least the rest of the school won't be. > > After a semester or two the kiddies will give up and you won't have to > > do this > > anymore. > > More than likely. Unfortunately this is a legacy network held together > with band-aids and fencing wire. I'm gradually making changes to the > infrastructure, but it all costs money and in this case, it definitely > won't happen overnight, but it is happening. > It will happen overnight once the kiddies declare war and start making all your servers unavailable. Right now you have it at the early stages. The people your battling are probably so stupid they are using Windows boxes and just changing the IP, and don't know the difference between a MAC spoof and a horse hoof. But once you realize this is a layer-2 battle, and start fighting them effectively on the MAC front, they are going to learn quick. Your a lot more vulnerable than you realize. There's quite a lot that a knowledgeable network cracker can do to tear apart a network held together with bandaids and bailing wire. You need to start banging the drum now for an immediate cash infusion, because a year from now when the network is offline for long periods and people are desperate, you won't have any credibility unless you have been predicting doom for a long enough time that their brains remember you have been doing it. Good luck! Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 04:31:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09EA116A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:31:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12F3643D39 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:31:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 30785 invoked by uid 65534); 28 Sep 2004 04:31:11 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) (62.245.232.135) by mail.gmx.net (mp015) with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 06:31:11 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 06:30:49 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20040927114237.12821.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> In-Reply-To: <20040927114237.12821.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> X-OS: FreeBSD X-Birthday: 10/06/72 X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-Tel: +49 89 18947781 X-CelPhone: +49 173 9967781 X-Country: Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6412050.SJy4bd9kfR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409280631.06004.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> cc: Omer Faruk Sen Subject: Re: Single Board Computers for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:31:14 -0000 --nextPart6412050.SJy4bd9kfR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Montag, 27. September 2004 13:42 schrieb Omer Faruk Sen: > Hi, > > I need some suggestions (and maybe URL if you send) for Single Board > Computers that runs FreeBSD without any problem. > > I am sure there are lots of people here that use FreeBSD on a SBC for > different purposes. Can you point me where to start for Single Board > Computers.(To learn conceptual terms that I have to be carefull on) I want > to know what should I be carefull on if I want to use Single Board > Computers as the FreeBSD will run on it. > > > REGARDS > > PS: I have heard about Soekris. But I want to know about other producers. Soekris was my first advise, alternatively there is nexcom, I have been ver= y=20 satisfied in the past with (but they have lots of new products I don't know= ).=20 http://www.nexcom.com/0330/NexWeb/WebEN/WebGrp.aspx?GrpIDX=3D52000027 They also sell their boards alone, without the chassis and power supply. If you can cope with a highly contrained (no USB, no IDE connector, no=20 PCI-Slot, only one serial port) SBC have a look at=20 http://www.pcengines.ch/wrap.htm These are the absolutely cheapest boards I know but compared to the soekris= =20 4801 like mentioned very contraind regarding extension. Then there is http://www.routerboard.com/, also GEODE based and very promis= ing=20 but I have absolutely no experience nor any report from others about their= =20 products. Best regards, =2DHarry > > > > ----------------------- > Omer Faruk Sen > http://www.EnderUNIX.ORG > Software Development Team @ Turkey > http://www.Faruk.NET > For Public key: http://www.enderunix.org/ofsen/ofsen.asc > ******************************************************** > > > First Turkish FreeBSD book is out! Go check it. > Duydunuz mu! Turkiye'nin ilk FreeBSD kitabi cikti. > http://www.acikkod.com/freebsd.php > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart6412050.SJy4bd9kfR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBWOkJBylq0S4AzzwRAut/AJ4571O4NKRlMYkjR+NzGnn6y/GgnQCeKq4E 1Md4DSxteg/LIfIbGZqa9bs= =dUQ0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6412050.SJy4bd9kfR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 04:40:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245CE16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:40:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bofh.spyderweb.com.au (static-9.235.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.235.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B6543D1D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:40:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@spyderweb.com.au) Received: from spyderweb.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.spyderweb.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id i8S4csHZ049435 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:08:55 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from tim@spyderweb.com.au) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:08:54 +0930 From: Tim Aslat To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040928140854.6e771dda@bofh.spyderweb.com.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20040927141959.789dc1ea@bofh.spyderweb.com.au> Organization: Spyderweb Consulting X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:40:42 -0000 In the immortal words of "Ted Mittelstaedt" ... > And, let me guess, most switches purchased at different times, > different models, > different number of ports, etc. Very much so. > And all of them on a single network, not broken up into small subnets > - that is the first mistake. Again, this is a legacy network that I am trying (within budgetary constraints) to make it a little more functional. > Probably many of the predicessors didn't understand you can use cheap > servers > as routers. I'm about the 4th or 5th successor to this network. At least I've managed to get rid of the last of the 10 base 2 stuff. > What a nightmare. You said it. > Well, as these things go when you do finally catch one it's going to > be the slowest and stupidest one of the lot. When he gets expelled > the rest of them are going to call an all-out war and get a lot more > sophisticated a lot faster. That's what I'm afraid of. > It's not the number of switches that matter it's the number of active > ports. 50 what, 8 port switches? or 24 port switches? Approximately 30 24 port switches, and a mix 'n' match of 8 - 48 port units. Being a legacy network, it's not what you would call standardised. > Of course, there are some other ways of handling this too. "Oppps, > looks like another switch died, we are just having a rash of these > failures lately! > Must be bad power. And amazing - it's the switch that the head of the > Engineering department and his staff are using! Guess they will just > have to go without since we don't have the money for new switches" > It's amazing how money will appear out of thin air if certain oxen get > gored. I'm tempted to try it. However, the bureaucracy in this place is incredible. They would rather cannibalise a smaller part of the network than just buy a new router/switch/whatever. > If you do go this route then screw the desktop switches, get yourself > some decent slotted hubs. You want a much higher port density than > the crummy 24 in a typical rack mounted switch. Besides that, the > switch vendor is gonna want to use your school as an example of how to > do things right. Remember, > if your going to go begging then you need to beg for the best stuff > they have. Anything in particular that you would recommend? > You need to replace every single switch. When one of these bozos > assumes a server IP number, he's going to most likely use a different > MAC address. You need to be able to query the mac table in the switch > to see what port that address is coming in from. There are some parts of the network that are completely under my control (staff areas and such) so I could probably get away without changing those ones for the time being and get the managed switches for the areas that it's more likely to come from. > Later on, when you have expelled a few of them, they are going to cop > wise and start using the SAME mac address of your server, either with > the same IP number or a different IP number. At that point, your > going to need to use the filters provided in good switches so that the > switches will only allow the MAC addresses of your servers to come in > to the physical port that is plugged into those servers. (or the > physical port that is plugged into the uplink port) Looks like I'm going to be caught between a rock and a hard place for a while til I can swing the budget in my favour. Maybe I can blame someone else for it and get some cash shuffled back to IT where it belongs.... > If the logon server is being interfered with by the kiddies, then > nobody can logon and get the settings. Good point. > And, until you get the decent switches online, as soon as the kiddies > realize > you are on to them, they are going to start coming all over themselves > with excitement to play the "Let's see if I'm smarter than the admin" > game. I'll just have to be smarter than them, or faster. That's why I'm asking for help here. At least I'm finally moving away from the NT servers that were here, and replacing them with FreeBSD. Only 2 more to go and I'm MS Free, at least as far as the servers are concerned, which should make my job a bit easier. > It's like the original Star Wars movie. They had to break the tractor > beam at it's source, not at the central computer where someone could > just lock it back on. Very good point. > You can maybe distribute the initial batch file with the static arp in > it one time - that of course will let the kiddies know that > something's up. They won't give you a second chance so you better have > a whole collection of arp entries in that batch file. True, however it's only 1% or less of the kids I have to watch out for, the rest haven't got enough clue to be a real problem. > Eventually your going to be forced into getting more intelligent > switches. What your going to have to do is put 1 of them at each > uplink point - such as at the entry point of each building, if that is > how your laid out - and then put MAC filters into them. None of this network is standardised, some buildings switches are in a central location, others are in the building itself, some are even daisy chained through different buildings. It's a nightmare. > When that is done at least you can contain it - if the kiddie is doing > a MAC spoof then he's going to be isolated to the building that all > the dumb hubs and switches are on that he is in and all the users in > that building will be trashed - but at least the rest of the school > won't be. This might be a good stopgap measure in this case, definitely better than setting up the arp tables manually. > Right now you have it at the early stages. The people your battling > are probably so stupid they are using Windows boxes and just changing > the IP, and don't know the difference between a MAC spoof and a horse > hoof. Thankfully, I think you are right. I just want to be a step or three ahead of these people. > But once you realize this is a layer-2 battle, and start fighting them > effectively on the MAC front, they are going to learn quick. Your a > lot more vulnerable than you realize. There's quite a lot that a > knowledgeable network cracker can do to tear apart a network held > together with bandaids and bailing wire. You need to start banging > the drum now for an immediate cash infusion, because a year from now > when the network is offline for long periods and people are desperate, > you won't have any credibility unless you have been predicting doom > for a long enough time that their brains remember you have been doing > it. Should I get a sandwich board made up with "The End of the World is NIGH" written on it? It might work, it's a private/catholic school. Perhaps predictions of Armageddon would be better...... I might even be able to dig up a few horsemen :) Thanks for the suggestions, I'm sure I can implement most of them fairly quickly, the rest might have to wail for next year's budget. Cheers Tim -- Tim Aslat Spyderweb Consulting http://www.spyderweb.com.au Phone: +61 0401088479 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 04:43:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294E416A4CF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:43:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au (adsl-20-121.swiftdsl.com.au [218.214.20.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420A243D5A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:43:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jb@cimlogic.com.au) Received: by freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au (Postfix, from userid 102) id BCF316A9AB; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:43:40 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:43:40 +1000 From: John Birrell To: Omer Faruk Sen Message-ID: <20040928044340.GC24267@freebsd3.cimlogic.com.au> References: <20040927114237.12821.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040927114237.12821.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Single Board Computers for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:43:43 -0000 On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 02:42:37PM +0300, Omer Faruk Sen wrote: > Hi, > > I need some suggestions (and maybe URL if you send) for Single Board > Computers that runs FreeBSD without any problem. > > I am sure there are lots of people here that use FreeBSD on a SBC for > different purposes. Can you point me where to start for Single Board > Computers.(To learn conceptual terms that I have to be carefull on) I want > to know what should I be carefull on if I want to use Single Board > Computers as the FreeBSD will run on it. I run FreeBSD on . The Compulab support people are responsive. -- John Birrell From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 04:51:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4B716A4CF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:51:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail13.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail13.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB8F43D46 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:51:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from russm-freebsd-questions@slofith.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (c211-28-91-36.smelb1.vic.optusnet.com.au [211.28.91.36])i8S4pnWX011448; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:51:50 +1000 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <1B8BF170-110A-11D9-B224-000A95DA456C@slofith.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: russell Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:51:49 +1000 To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: bsdfsse cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:51:53 -0000 On 28/09/2004, at 1:25 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> or use a tool like arpwatch that is specifically designed to let you >> know when MAC/IP relationships change on your network. > > You don't even need to do that - any router on the network is going to > log > the MAC address because they will see the arp change, as will the other > servers. yeah, of course they'll see the change. but what will they do about it? update their internal ARP table and that's about it, unless they're smart enough (and correctly configured) to do more. arpwatch is simple to install and will notify you straight away when things happen that might need your attention. >> you log the MAC addresses of all the fixed workstations in the school, >> then when one of them starts doing the wrong thing you know *exactly* >> where to go to nab the culprit. > > How, exactly? Do you think that he has a list of all MAC addresses on > the > network and who is using them? the educational institutions I've worked in tend to be pretty anal about having a database of what computers they own and where they're located - something to do with stopping people from walking off with their assets. if your vendor is good they'll provide the machine MAC address along with the serial number and amount of installed RAM. if not then there's some walking to do. spend half a day and document the fixed machines on the network. > Getting the MAC address is not the problem. Finding it on what is > essentially > a completely flat network is. You need managed switches for this so > you can > see what port the offending MAC address is on. now you're assuming that there's documentation as to what ports come out at what wall points, and that there's not still a lab full of dead-ass old machines sitting on 10Base2. >> If it's not one of the fixed >> workstations then you've got a bit more work to find the kiddie, but >> it's nothing insurmountable. > > Unless of course the kiddies are using made up MAC addresses like > BADBEEF, DEADBEEF, CO1DCOED, and such. I'm assuming here, having worked in uni computer labs and seen this sort of crud being done, that what's happening is someone is changing the network settings on a PC... I don't recall seeing a text field next to the "enter your IP address" box that says "enter your MAC address"... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 05:07:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CBD16A4CE; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:07:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms06.mse1.mailstreet.com (ms06.mse1.mailstreet.com [69.25.50.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7E143D46; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:06:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jlschwab@jlschwab.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:55:04 -0400 Message-ID: <4CE77B740A7EEC41B52DAB5991421BD3022AA1C2@ms06> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Dell Remote Access Card 5.2.1 Thread-Index: AcSlF1F7R+wwLVl+QdynIkcXswVXNw== From: "Jason L. Schwab" To: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Dell Remote Access Card 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:07:01 -0000 Heya Folks; =20 I have multiple machines with Dell Remote Access Card's in them running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p#. =20 I cannot for the life of me, find a way to get the keyboard to work once the machine has booted into FreeBSD. =20 I know on 4.9-X you can set a kernel option that "forces" the machine to think it has a ps/2 keyboard plugged in. Although, that same option in 5.2.1 (it looks like) is for "auto probing" for a keyboard on the ps2 port...=20 =20 Any ideas how to get this to work? =20 I would love to get it working. =20 dmesg show's at-keyboard controller, but no atkb device directly. =20 Any help at all, please let me know! =20 If you need more specific details, like DRAC model# or anything, just ask. =20 -Jason L. Schwab jlschwab@jlschwab.com =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 05:07:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CBD16A4CE; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:07:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms06.mse1.mailstreet.com (ms06.mse1.mailstreet.com [69.25.50.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7E143D46; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:06:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jlschwab@jlschwab.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:55:04 -0400 Message-ID: <4CE77B740A7EEC41B52DAB5991421BD3022AA1C2@ms06> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Dell Remote Access Card 5.2.1 Thread-Index: AcSlF1F7R+wwLVl+QdynIkcXswVXNw== From: "Jason L. Schwab" To: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Dell Remote Access Card 5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:07:01 -0000 Heya Folks; =20 I have multiple machines with Dell Remote Access Card's in them running FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p#. =20 I cannot for the life of me, find a way to get the keyboard to work once the machine has booted into FreeBSD. =20 I know on 4.9-X you can set a kernel option that "forces" the machine to think it has a ps/2 keyboard plugged in. Although, that same option in 5.2.1 (it looks like) is for "auto probing" for a keyboard on the ps2 port...=20 =20 Any ideas how to get this to work? =20 I would love to get it working. =20 dmesg show's at-keyboard controller, but no atkb device directly. =20 Any help at all, please let me know! =20 If you need more specific details, like DRAC model# or anything, just ask. =20 -Jason L. Schwab jlschwab@jlschwab.com =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 05:28:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767F316A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:28:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp801.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp801.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.168.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9A2543D54 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:28:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (krinklyfig@pacbell.net@67.116.52.185 with plain) by smtp801.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 05:28:16 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 22:28:28 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20040913140920.34659.qmail@web52901.mail.yahoo.com> <200409131754.43462.krinklyfig@spymac.com> In-Reply-To: <200409131754.43462.krinklyfig@spymac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409272228.29198.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Subject: Re: booting beta3 on A7N8X X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: krinklyfig@spymac.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:28:17 -0000 On Monday 13 September 2004 05:54 pm, Joshua Tinnin wrote: > On Monday 13 September 2004 07:09 am, John DeStefano > wrote: > > You might also try disabling ACPI; I have the same board and this > > worked for me. Of course, getting the other onboard stuff to work > > properly has been a whole different challenge.... > > ~John > > Speaking of which, do you know which specific sound driver should be > enabled in the kernel? I have: > > device sound > device snd_sbc > > Which doesn't work. However, in 5.2.1 this worked (which is no longer > applicable in 5.3): > > device pcm > > I know this board uses MCP-T, but am not sure what it needs as far as > driver support. I finally got it to work with the snd_ich driver, which is loaded at boot with: snd_ich_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf, and: device sound in the kernel. Just in case anyone else is trying to get sound to work with the same board ... currently using 5.3beta6. Here it is in dmesg: # dmesg | grep pcm pcm0: port 0xd000-0xd07f,0xe400-0xe4ff mem 0xed080000-0xed080fff irq 5 at device 6.0 on pci0 pcm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcm0: - jt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 06:51:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F8FF16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 06:51:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B7E543D49 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 06:51:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.61.7] (port=1236 helo=SATPC) by mx2.mail.ru with smtp id 1CCBq3-000Lfj-00; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:51:51 +0400 Message-ID: <004501c4a527$d22898c0$4611a8c0@SATPC> From: "Andrew" To: "Mark Jayson Alvarez" References: <20040928034910.32013.qmail@web51605.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:53:11 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Spam: Not detected cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can I route through a pc that is also using a router?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 06:51:53 -0000 Hi! Describe the test-machine, please. If both workstations are on the same subnet, you should probably configure the test-machine as an ip-forwarder or even as an ethernet-level bridge. If your personal workstation is on a different subnet, which is not serviced by proxy or dns, you should configure NAT on the test-machine. In general, there's little problem in cascading gateway installations. Regards, Andrew P. > Good day! > I have two workstations at work, 1 my personal, and > the other, a test machine. > > My boss told me to configure a pcrouter, that is, the > testmachine and let my personal pc connect through the > internet through the testmachine: > > Here's the scenario: > > The testmachine already knows how to connect through > the outside world but, also through a gateway.... > > testmachine(10.10.8.111)--->gateway(10.10.8.254)---->[proxy]---->[DNS]-- -->internet > > > And to let my pc connect to the internet through the > testmachine, I've set its default gateway to the ip of > the test machine. > > > But it doesn't seem to work. When I tried to lauch my > browser, the error indicates that it cannot seem to > find its way to the proxy server. > > I've tried adding another line in my routing table > like this: > > Destination Gateway > proxy(202.90.128.14) testmachine(10.10.8.111) > > But it still won't work. > > Do you know what i've been missing here? I'm thinking > perhaps the test machine should connect to the > internet directly without using a gateway anymore.. > > Any idea? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 06:55:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE0F16A4CF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 06:55:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rtc.ro (mail.rtc.ro [212.93.139.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D79A443D45 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 06:55:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cristi.tauber@sbhost.ro) Received: (qmail 17816 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2004 09:41:42 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO sbhost.ro) (212.93.139.11) by mail.rtc.ro with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 09:41:42 +0300 Message-ID: <415918AA.C4433D9D@sbhost.ro> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:54:18 +0200 From: Cristi Tauber X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: pf for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 06:55:44 -0000 hello folks, i want to install the packet filter for FreeBSD so i recompile the kernel with the options : device bpf options PFIL_HOOKS options RANDOM_IP_ID and installed pf from ports ( i did a cvsup before installing to get the latest ports). Now my dilemma is ... in pf start script ... i have to enter a prefix ... but what prefix, 'cause after installing and rebooting .... the modules that I want to load are still in source directory . I installed pf with make WITH_ALTQ=yes make install after a deinstall I can't install it anymore, the install crashes with the error that is allready installed !! What can I do ??/ Cristi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 07:00:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EBF16A4CF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:00:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (s142-179-111-232.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.111.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D3D43D45 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:00:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sandy@krvarr.bc.ca) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8S703fm001018 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca) Received: (from sandy@localhost) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id i8S703Bs001015; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sandy) From: Sandy Rutherford MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16729.3059.545978.380994@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:00:03 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.3.1 Subject: dictd, UTF-8, & FreeBSD 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:00:07 -0000 Has anybody been able to get dictd working with UTF-8 dictionaries in FreeBSD 4.10? When I start "dictd --locale de_DE.UTF-8" it seg. faults. I do have the UTF-8 locales installed and the dictionary should be fine as it works for dictd running on a Linux machine. I'm using dictd-1.9.11 installed from the ports. Thanks, Sandy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 07:16:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E0A16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:16:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51604.mail.yahoo.com (web51604.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E42E43D4C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:16:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay2xra@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040928071623.5871.qmail@web51604.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.90.128.21] by web51604.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:16:23 PDT Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 00:16:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Jayson Alvarez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <004501c4a527$d22898c0$4611a8c0@SATPC> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: How can I route through a pc that is also using a router?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:16:24 -0000 My workstation and the testmachine both belongs to the same subnet: Here are the details: workstation --> 10.10.8.110 testmachine --> 10.10.8.111 Gateway --> 10.10.8.254 DNS ---> 202.90.128.3 202.90.158.101 Proxy ---> 202.90.128.14 Port: 3128 --- Andrew wrote: > Hi! > > Describe the test-machine, please. If both > workstations are on the same > subnet, you should probably configure the > test-machine as an > ip-forwarder or even as an ethernet-level bridge. If > your personal > workstation is on a different subnet, which is not > serviced by proxy or > dns, you should configure NAT on the test-machine. > > In general, there's little problem in cascading > gateway installations. > > Regards, > Andrew P. > > > > Good day! > > I have two workstations at work, 1 my personal, > and > > the other, a test machine. > > > > My boss told me to configure a pcrouter, that is, > the > > testmachine and let my personal pc connect through > the > > internet through the testmachine: > > > > Here's the scenario: > > > > The testmachine already knows how to connect > through > > the outside world but, also through a gateway.... > > > > > testmachine(10.10.8.111)--->gateway(10.10.8.254)---->[proxy]---->[DNS]-- > -->internet > > > > > > And to let my pc connect to the internet through > the > > testmachine, I've set its default gateway to the > ip of > > the test machine. > > > > > > But it doesn't seem to work. When I tried to lauch > my > > browser, the error indicates that it cannot seem > to > > find its way to the proxy server. > > > > I've tried adding another line in my routing table > > like this: > > > > Destination Gateway > > proxy(202.90.128.14) testmachine(10.10.8.111) > > > > But it still won't work. > > > > Do you know what i've been missing here? I'm > thinking > > perhaps the test machine should connect to the > > internet directly without using a gateway > anymore.. > > > > Any idea? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 07:48:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B97A16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:48:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E5643D58 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:48:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuri.vanovermeeren@reston.demon.nl) Received: from reston.demon.nl ([212.238.216.87]:1272 helo=[192.168.1.100]) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CCCiU-0005Mc-Uv; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:48:07 +0000 Message-ID: <41591743.8080900@reston.demon.nl> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:48:19 +0200 From: yuri van Overmeeren User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason References: <20040927214220.GA58910@monsterjam.org> In-Reply-To: <20040927214220.GA58910@monsterjam.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3ddesktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: yuri.vanovermeeren@reston.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:48:09 -0000 Jason wrote: >ive installed 3ddesktop 0.2.7 from ports >im running x.org 6.7 on a 386 box with a voodoo 3 2000 box.. I have >tdfx.ko loaded and >dmesg reports >info: [drm] Initialized tdfx 1.0.0 20010216 on minor 0 > >but when I run 3ddesk, I get >[root@bush]# 3ddesk >Attempting to start 3ddesktop server. >Daemon started. Run 3ddesk to activate. >3ddeskd: glXIsDirect failed, no Direct Rendering possible! >3ddeskd: Please configure hardware acceleration. Exiting. > >any ideas? > >regards, >Jason > > I'm not sure voodoo 3 is 100% standard OpenGL, voodoo 1 & 2 are not, maybe the card does not support all extensions required/requested to run 3ddesktop. Or it could be the bitdepth, I it can only do 16bit in 3D, it cannot do 32bit, that I know for sure. -yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 07:49:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A55C16A4CE; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:49:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from viger.playstos.com (viger.playstos.com [81.208.22.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A2143D1F; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:49:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from demanzano@playstos.com) Received: from sunshine.playstos.ldr (gw2.playstos.com [81.208.22.130]) by viger.playstos.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2825B20682; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:49:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:49:02 +0200 From: Alessandro de Manzano Organization: Playstos - TIMA SpA X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1471731738281.20040928094902@playstos.com> To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Max memory + swap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alessandro de Manzano List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:49:04 -0000 Hello, I'm deploying a new server with FreeBSD 4.10-Release and I'll need a quite big piece of memory. I was thinking of installing 1 Gb of RAM plus another Gigabytes of swap. I seems to remember some limit / problem when RAM + swap go over 2 or 4 Gbytes total, is this true ? (without PAE or similar things, it's a "normal" P4 machine) I would avoid to tweak kernel parameters, if possible, like KVA pages and similar things I don't know ;) Anyone with similar experiences could, please, remember me actual limits ? Many thanks in advance! -- Alessandro de Manzano System & Network Administrator Playstos - TIMA S.p.A. Corso Sempione 63 20149 Milano, Italy tel.: +39-023314153 fax : +39-02315678 email: demanzano@playstos.com http://www.playstos.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 07:52:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B11916A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:52:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DA443D1F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:52:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1] (may be forged))i8S7pwoM019157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:51:58 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8S7pvYU019152; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:51:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:51:57 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Ted Mittelstaedt Message-ID: <20040928075157.GA76460@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Ted Mittelstaedt , Tim Aslat , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" References: <20040927092217.GB57485@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="azLHFNyN32YCQGCU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:51:58 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:52:05 -0000 --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:20:42PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >=20 >=20 > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Seaman > > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 2:22 AM > > To: Tim Aslat > > Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > > Subject: Re: IP address conflicts > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:51:47AM +0930, Tim Aslat wrote: > > > > > I have an annoying situation in a school I do casual work in their IT > > > department. There are a number of individuals within the system who > > > think it's funny to allocate an IP address on a workstation identical= to > > > the network's proxy/web/mail servers. What I'd like to know is, would > > > there be any way of preventing this short of spending quite a lot of > > > money on managed switches an the like? > > > > Well, you could move all of the servers onto a separate network to any > > of the individual client machines (and make sure that the server > > network isn't accessible from any of the network ports your clients > > have access to, clearly). That way, even if one of your pet idiots > > decides to 'borrow' a server IP address, the network routing means > > that all they are going to do is hurt themselves. > > >=20 > You must want to HELP the little shits then. Please do not ascribe such motives to me in such an insulting manner. You have a point, but you need to learn how to be less inflammatory in making it. =20 > Think of this for a second. Right now he has maybe 4-5 different servers > that > people are putting the IP numbers on. Once you move all those servers on= to > a > separate subnet, now all the little twits have to do is put the IP number= of > the gateway router onto their systems, then the entire subnet that ALL the > servers are on becomes inaccessible. Yes, you are quite right. I missed that. However the OP is stuck between a rock and a hard place. He (or his school) is saying they can't afford the correct equipment to really solve the problem. As it is, he's getting the flak when things aren't working right (what else is new?) On consideration, it strikes me that the thing to realise is that this has gone beyond a technical argument. This is now also a political argument and a financial argument. His bosses do not either see the justification for investing in equipment to make the network proof against such attacks, neither do they have the incentive to come down like a ton of bricks on the malefactors. It's counter-intuitive I know, and goes against all of the best instincts of any good systems administrator, but the OPs arguments would be strengthened if the problem was or /appeared to be/ *worse* than it is currently. Machiavellianly, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWRgdiD657aJF7eIRAs4nAKC5sc8up0ayxoUrUT0fURJacUrFWwCeJKJG hbmqFr7ClJVglJdL9LZaQeM= =lNCW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --azLHFNyN32YCQGCU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 08:00:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BAC16A4D7 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:00:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4269E43D3F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:00:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) i8S80Yq39752; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:00:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "russell" Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:00:34 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1B8BF170-110A-11D9-B224-000A95DA456C@slofith.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: bsdfsse cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: RE: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:00:54 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of russell > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:52 PM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: bsdfsse; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: IP address conflicts > > > On 28/09/2004, at 1:25 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > >> or use a tool like arpwatch that is specifically designed to let you > >> know when MAC/IP relationships change on your network. > > > > You don't even need to do that - any router on the network is going to > > log > > the MAC address because they will see the arp change, as will the other > > servers. > > yeah, of course they'll see the change. but what will they do about it? > update their internal ARP table and that's about it, unless they're > smart enough (and correctly configured) to do more. arpwatch is simple > to install and will notify you straight away when things happen that > might need your attention. > My guess is that the phone calls from the people that suddenly cannot get mail are as effective as arpwatch would be in this situation. Even if arpwatch notifies him the instant it happens he's still going to be screwed without a managed switch the offender is coming from. Don't get me wrong I'm not advocating against putting more monitoring on the network. It is just with this situation no amount of monitoring is going to compensate for a bunch of dumb, unmanaged hubs all tied together. There's a danger of putting too much energy into software when what is going to help most is more powerful hardware. It's actually amazing that he's not already melted down under a host of broadcast storms and such already. From the description it sounds like the Ethernet rules have been broken many times here already. > >> you log the MAC addresses of all the fixed workstations in the school, > >> then when one of them starts doing the wrong thing you know *exactly* > >> where to go to nab the culprit. > > > > How, exactly? Do you think that he has a list of all MAC addresses on > > the > > network and who is using them? > > the educational institutions I've worked in tend to be pretty anal > about having a database of what computers they own and where they're > located - something to do with stopping people from walking off with > their assets. if your vendor is good they'll provide the machine MAC > address along with the serial number and amount of installed RAM. if > not then there's some walking to do. spend half a day and document the > fixed machines on the network. > He's already said they have over 2K nodes on the network many of which are student-owned laptops. You could take a month on something like this and still not have all of them. Not to mention that in a few seconds the owner of the offending system can easily spoof the mac address to a fake one, or more likely, that of another, innocent, machine on the network. > > Getting the MAC address is not the problem. Finding it on what is > > essentially > > a completely flat network is. You need managed switches for this so > > you can > > see what port the offending MAC address is on. > > now you're assuming that there's documentation as to what ports come > out at what wall points, and that there's not still a lab full of > dead-ass old machines sitting on 10Base2. > He already said most of his hubs are non-managed. To do any kind of tracking down to the port level means these hubs are going to have to be replaced with managed switches. When that happens you would definitely document the wiring if you haven't already. And as far as thinnet goes, I wouldn't pay a lot of attention to that because large thinnet segments go down so much already a few more problems won't even be noticed. Any of his thinnet chains are going to have to terminate in a switch eventually, you just make sure that the port they terminate in is in a managed switch. > >> If it's not one of the fixed > >> workstations then you've got a bit more work to find the kiddie, but > >> it's nothing insurmountable. > > > > Unless of course the kiddies are using made up MAC addresses like > > BADBEEF, DEADBEEF, CO1DCOED, and such. > > I'm assuming here, having worked in uni computer labs and seen this > sort of crud being done, that what's happening is someone is changing > the network settings on a PC... I don't recall seeing a text field next > to the "enter your IP address" box that says "enter your MAC > address"... > That is because it is not in that location. The MAC address is setup by the nic device driver, not by the OS. Most Windows nic device drivers have a field where a user-defined MAC address can be entered. For example, on a convenient system here, Win2K on a Taiwanese motherboard based on the VIA chipset, under the Administrator user you go: Start->Settings->Network & Dialup COnnections->right click Local Area Connection-> Properties->then click the Configure button underneath the VIA Rhine II Fast Ethernet Adapter->click the Advanced tab->click Network Address and change the radio button from Not Present to Value, then type in the new MAC address in the box to the right. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 08:08:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFB616A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:08:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915A543D4C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:08:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3])i8S88CLw067112 ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:08:12 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 164 Received: from galois1.math.jussieu.fr (galois1.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.116])i8S882Qa009306 ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:08:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from galois1.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) i8S882vg025766 ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:08:02 +0200 Received: (from jas@localhost) by galois1.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i8S881nf025765; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:08:01 +0200 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:08:01 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." Message-ID: <20040928080801.GE19337@math.jussieu.fr> References: <2D8BB15C7B5C214F81C32D3A83B32736013D46C8@idbexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net> <20040927081638.GA26247@math.jussieu.fr> <20040927184827.GB31494@xor.obsecurity.org> <4158AD01.401@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4158AD01.401@daleco.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: 0 () X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 41591BEC.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr cc: "Sheets, Jason \(OZ CEEDR\)" cc: Albert Shih cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Very very slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:08:18 -0000 Le 27/09/2004 à 19:14:57-0500, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. a écrit > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:16:38AM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > > > > > >> 32 sec to do > >> > >>cd /usr/src > >>time find . -type f -print > /dev/null > >> > >>and on other computer I just need 0.8 sec to do that. > >> > >> > > > >I don't believe that, unless you already have all of /usr/src in > >cache. 32 seconds seems quite normal for searching and reading ~55000 > >directory entries (on the machine I just tried it took 42 seconds). Anyway, but on this computer I need .... ~ 10 hours to do make buildworld, and I think.....it's verrrrrrrrrrrrrrryyy long. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. Heure local/Local time: Tue Sep 28 10:06:54 CEST 2004 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 08:20:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0EC16A4CF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:20:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC21743D3F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:20:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: by av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id ED3B737E53; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:20:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net [81.228.10.180]) by av13-1-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E010337E43 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:20:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se [212.181.162.201]) by smtp4-2-sn4.m-sp.skanova.net (Postfix) with SMTP id AC40037E44 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:20:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 28711 invoked by uid 1001); 28 Sep 2004 08:20:02 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:20:02 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Alessandro de Manzano Message-ID: <20040928082002.GA28679@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Alessandro de Manzano , freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1471731738281.20040928094902@playstos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1471731738281.20040928094902@playstos.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Max memory + swap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:20:08 -0000 On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:49:02AM +0200, Alessandro de Manzano wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm deploying a new server with FreeBSD 4.10-Release and I'll need a > quite big piece of memory. > I was thinking of installing 1 Gb of RAM plus another Gigabytes of > swap. > I seems to remember some limit / problem when RAM + swap go over 2 or > 4 Gbytes total, is this true ? > (without PAE or similar things, it's a "normal" P4 machine) There have been problems when *physical* RAM is above 2GB (and on a P4 without PAE enabled it is not possible to go above 4GB) but 1GB RAM + a few GB swap should not be any problem. > > I would avoid to tweak kernel parameters, if possible, like KVA pages > and similar things I don't know ;) Then don't go above 2GB RAM. To make that work I think you need to do exactly what ypu want to avoid. > > Anyone with similar experiences could, please, remember me actual > limits ? > > Many thanks in advance! -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 08:26:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4218216A4CF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:26:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hanoi.cronyx.ru (hanoi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663CF43D2D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:26:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by hanoi.cronyx.ru id i8S8NQYc028177 for questions@FreeBSD.ORG.checked; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:23:26 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Received: from cronyx.ru (hi.cronyx.ru [144.206.181.94]) by hanoi.cronyx.ru with ESMTP id i8S8MvDx028135; (8.12.8/vak/2.1) Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:22:57 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from rik@cronyx.ru) Message-ID: <41591FFE.3040206@cronyx.ru> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:25:34 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dimitry Andric References: <9F67035A-48C9-11D7-8C19-0030656DD690@foolishgames.com> <1046192310.3e5ba0b6aa039@sms.ed.ac.uk> <1565082305.20040927150136@andric.com> In-Reply-To: <1565082305.20040927150136@andric.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Andrew Boothman cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG cc: dwbear75@gmail.com cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "NTLDR missing" after 5-RELEASE install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:26:21 -0000 I've seen this before 5.0 release and made some investigation of this proble. I didn't look this thread carefully so excuse me if information I give to all you is useless. My investigation show that FreeBSD reads full partition table, and after modification puts it back. It fix all entries from its own point of view. Windows dies from change of end of partition entry. As I understand with large disk it shouldn't mean anything at all. But windows checks it. You may save this entry and after installation of FreeBSD put it back. rik Dimitry Andric wrote: >On 2003-02-25 at 18:58:30 Andrew Boothman wrote: > > > >>I can't understand how the 5.x boot manager has managed to break my windows >>boot, i've never had any trouble under 3.x or 4.x, both of which played with >>windows perfectly nicely. >> >> > >Sorry for catching up on this thread so late, but couldn't this be >some nasty problem with hard drive geometries? I.e. FreeBSD's >interpretation of the partition table could be totally different from >Windows', causing the rather flaky Microsoft bootloaders to fail. > >I personally have had complaints from PartitionMagic and various other >Windows-based tools about partitions being "invalid" or having >"different CHS and LBA boundaries" etc, after installing some versions >of FreeBSD, and creating partitions from its installer. > >Could you please give us some info about your drive geometry, and/or >or a somewhat low-level dump of your partition table data? > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 08:43:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F0316A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:43:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51303.mail.yahoo.com (web51303.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3951343D2D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:43:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gooober33-freebsd@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040928084305.52591.qmail@web51303.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.23.21.247] by web51303.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:43:05 PDT Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:43:05 -0700 (PDT) From: BSDjunkie To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: k3b cannot locate growisofs executable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gooober33-freebsd@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:43:06 -0000 --- BSDjunkie wrote: > I have now upgraded everything with portupgrade. Now > that I have the k3b-0.11.14 version, I still get the > same error message. :| Eureeka! I've found the problem! By executing growisofs under sudo I received the error message: growisofs -- executed under sudo -- exiting... I was executing k3b under sudo which makes growisofs exit. If I su to root, then I can run k3b and it finds growisofs. *WHEW* Thanks all who helped!!! Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 08:46:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8A716A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:46:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEBE43D31 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:46:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) i8S8k0q39873; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:46:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Tim Aslat" , Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:45:59 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20040928140854.6e771dda@bofh.spyderweb.com.au> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:46:04 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Tim Aslat > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 9:39 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: IP address conflicts > > > > It's not the number of switches that matter it's the number of active > > ports. 50 what, 8 port switches? or 24 port switches? > > Approximately 30 24 port switches, and a mix 'n' match of 8 - 48 port > units. Being a legacy network, it's not what you would call > standardised. So, about $10K, time, and a lot of judicious purchasing would get you all used switches that would be managed, same manufacturer. That's if you buy them yourself off Ebay. If you get a network vendor like Network Hardware Resale to put together a package like this your talking maybe $15-$20K > > > Of course, there are some other ways of handling this too. "Oppps, > > looks like another switch died, we are just having a rash of these > > failures lately! > > Must be bad power. And amazing - it's the switch that the head of the > > Engineering department and his staff are using! Guess they will just > > have to go without since we don't have the money for new switches" > > It's amazing how money will appear out of thin air if certain oxen get > > gored. > > I'm tempted to try it. However, the bureaucracy in this place is > incredible. They would rather cannibalise a smaller part of the network > than just buy a new router/switch/whatever. > "oops, the switch you are suggesting I cannibalise uses the EtherToken system, totally incompatible, would have to buy all new adapters for all the PC's" I've played that game too. What you have to keep in mind is that the people running things that think they know how stuff works, they really don't know how it works. If you dig in your heels, as long as you don't pull the broken switch routine too often, they will back down. When dealing with a bureaucracy I have found the most effective method is the "vise" treatment. Bureaucracies work to preserve themselves. Problems are viewed as threats that can disrupt the stability of the bureaucracy. If you have a couple heart-to-heart talks with the top kingpins of the administration (who are quite often fighting the bureaucracy themselves) completely off record of course, and then make things -very-bad- for the people at the bottom by simply doing nothing and allowing the bandaids to fall apart, the bureaucracy will find itself under pressure from the top and pressure from the bottom, and like a stuck turd being freed, money will come spewing out as the bureaucracy fights to keep itself preserved. An axiom you should remember is that no bureaucracy ever spends money unless it is afraid for it's life - and then in a panic it always spends far too much money on whatever solutions present themselves at the time. This is why you read stories about the competent network admin being fired because people were complaining about niggling problems, even though the admin was doing everything under budget, and an incompetent admin being hired to replace him who knows nothing whatsoever about anything, spends money like water, and rapidly creates so many bigger problems that the users forget all about the niggling ones that caused them to complain in the first place. (then the incompetent admin brings in an outside consulting firm and after getting it firmly established, quits his post and goes to work for the consulting firm, bleeding the organization dry.) But as a competent network admin, it is easy enough to figure all this out and do exactly what the incompetent admin does - and what that is, is make people scared that unless they spend a lot of money that they will not be able to keep their cushy jobs. > > If you do go this route then screw the desktop switches, get yourself > > some decent slotted hubs. You want a much higher port density than > > the crummy 24 in a typical rack mounted switch. Besides that, the > > switch vendor is gonna want to use your school as an example of how to > > do things right. Remember, > > if your going to go begging then you need to beg for the best stuff > > they have. > > Anything in particular that you would recommend? > Cisco is the obvious choice here to go beg from. First they are a rich company. Second they are still trying to break out of the "we're only a router manufacturer" image and they want people to believe that they actually know how to produce switches. heh. The top of the line in the business of course is the 3com Switch 7700 series, but good luck prying them free. 3com is tops, they know they are tops, everyone thinks they are tops, and everyone wants their stuff. They don't need to give away things to get market share. But, you can always try. Enterasys is also another good one to go begging to, particularly because they are still trying to create a name for themselves. As you may know they are a spawn of Cabletron. Cabletron had some very good switching products, and that technology has transferred over to Enterasys, unfortunately though the fame of the name didn't. Nortel is a wildcard to go begging to - their Passport 8600 fits the bill, but unfortunately Nortel is such an enormously bloated company that you may never get through the layers of flappers to someone who actually can help you. But, they definintely have a much better long term survival than Enterasys in my opinion - after all with a fat pig of a company if it loses money there's lots and lots of fat to prune away. > > I'll just have to be smarter than them, or faster. That's why I'm > asking for help here. At least I'm finally moving away from the NT > servers that were here, and replacing them with FreeBSD. Only 2 more to > go and I'm MS Free, at least as far as the servers are concerned, which > should make my job a bit easier. > No, it probably won't. The sooner you get it through your head that this is a layer-2 MAC war and the operating system is totally immaterial, the faster you will catch on. The exact same thing can be done with a Netware IPX network, or a Macintosh network or a UNIX network. It's the hubs, not the OS, that are your achillies heel. > > True, however it's only 1% or less of the kids I have to watch out for, > the rest haven't got enough clue to be a real problem. > Unfortunately when the 1% realize what the game is, they will start providing scripts for the script kiddies to run. > > None of this network is standardised, some buildings switches are in a > central location, others are in the building itself, some are even daisy > chained through different buildings. It's a nightmare. > Don't get overwhelmed by it, just break it down into a lot of smaller simpler problems and do those 1 by 1. > > Should I get a sandwich board made up with "The End of the World is > NIGH" written on it? It might work, it's a private/catholic school. > Perhaps predictions of Armageddon would be better...... I might even be > able to dig up a few horsemen :) > Set the MAC of the most attacked server to 00:EA:55:FE:ED:EE and the smart ones might get the message. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 08:56:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B2816A4CE; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:56:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mgr2.xmission.com (mgr2.xmission.com [198.60.22.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E413043D2D; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:56:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leporter@xmission.com) Received: from [198.60.22.201] (helo=mgr1.xmission.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CCDmu-0000Ms-02; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 02:56:44 -0600 Received: from [166.70.25.145] (helo=[192.168.0.3]) by mgr1.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCDmu-0005lq-QA; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 02:56:44 -0600 Message-ID: <41592748.2000905@xmission.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 02:56:40 -0600 From: Jason Porter User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040928) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mgr1.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.25.145 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: leporter@xmission.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.0 (built Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:31:30 +0200) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mgr1.xmission.com) Subject: Mozilla Calendar with Thunderbird / Firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:56:45 -0000 Has anyone gotten this to work yet? I've got the latest TB / FF from the ports and I'm running 5.3Beta3 and it doesn't work. I get the standard "ICAL Component is not registered properly" error or some might know it as TypeError: Components.classes['@mozilla.org/ical-container;1'] Does it have something to with this being a linux release and you have to fix the code to work on FreeBSD? Help here would be great, thanks! -- -Jason Porter Real Programmers think better when playing Adventure or Rogue. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 09:08:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACD716A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:08:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD1143D5A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:08:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) i8S980q40343; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 02:08:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Matthew Seaman" Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 02:07:59 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20040928075157.GA76460@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: RE: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:08:13 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew Seaman [mailto:m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk] > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:52 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: Tim Aslat; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: IP address conflicts > > > Please do not ascribe such motives to me in such an insulting manner. > You have a point, but you need to learn how to be less inflammatory in > making it. > Alright, alright, I'm sorry now quit taking it personally. My advice is worth exactly what you paid for it. How much was that, again? > > Yes, you are quite right. I missed that. However the OP is stuck > between a rock and a hard place. He (or his school) is saying they > can't afford the correct equipment to really solve the problem. Wellll, from my viewpoint, HE is saying that his school doesen't have the money. I didn't read anywhere that he was actually told flat out that they didn't have the money. fine line there. My suspicions are that his school has done an excellent job of giving him the IMPRESSION that they have no money, so don't bother asking for any. It is an impression that schools carefully cultivate. I'm so broke, we are so broke, wahhh wahhh wahhh. poor us. Schools cultivate this because it gets more alumni donations. But, if you look under the covers, schools always seem to have plenty of money to renovate buildings, and as a student, every time you turn around there's someone from the school with their hand out asking for another fee to be paid. For the last 20 years (since I left college) I've heard the same crying and pissing every fall from them. But they haven't dried up and blown away and always seem to have plenty of new programs going on. So, pardon me if it gets old after a while. Now, the elementary and secondary schools, that's an entirely different matter. > > On consideration, it strikes me that the thing to realise is that this > has gone beyond a technical argument. This is now also a political > argument and a financial argument. I would say "discussion" not argument here. And your absolutely correct. > His bosses do not either see the > justification for investing in equipment to make the network proof > against such attacks, neither do they have the incentive to come down > like a ton of bricks on the malefactors. It's counter-intuitive I > know, and goes against all of the best instincts of any good systems > administrator, but the OPs arguments would be strengthened if the > problem was or /appeared to be/ *worse* than it is currently. > Of course. But, the only people that do that are grotty old nasty systems administrators that have a resume that stretches into next week, and command 6 figure salaries. The people that run schools are scared to death of those people and run away from them as fast as they can, because they know that those folks can topple the system. Systems aren't toppled by young, green, wet behind the ears system admins that work for peanuts and are enormously grateful to their employers for getting the chance to gain work experience, little realizing that their employers couldn't give a fig how grateful they are, and only hire them because they work cheap. Every once in a while you get that rare combination of a young, green wet behind the ears system admin that works for peanuts and also knows that peanut jobs are a dime a dozen, and knows his employer is taking advantage of him, and is clever enough to make it -seem- like he isn't doing anything to topple the system - yet somehow the system seems to topple by itself. Amazing, how that happens. Heh Heh Heh. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 09:09:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C2616A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:09:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gregale.emea.mci.com (gregale.wcom.co.uk [193.131.254.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D08143D2D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:09:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philip.payne@uk.mci.com) Received: from breen.emea.mci.com ([166.59.191.248] helo=borg.emea.mci.com) by gregale.emea.mci.com with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CCDz8-0006nW-Bg; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:09:22 +0000 Received: from gblon1exch06.uk.mcilink.com ([170.127.79.25]) by borg.emea.mci.com with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CCDz7-0003Z0-82; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:09:21 +0000 Received: by gblon1exch06.uk.mcilink.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:09:18 +0100 Message-ID: From: Philip Payne To: Cristi Tauber , FreeBSD Question Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:08:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MCI-EMEA-Spam-Score: -98.5 (---------------------------------------------------) X-MCI-EMEA-Signature: 7a74ff57553e7d292e475bb376c095bb Subject: RE: pf for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:09:25 -0000 Hi, > hello folks, > i want to install the packet filter for FreeBSD so i recompile the > kernel with the options : > > device bpf > options PFIL_HOOKS > options RANDOM_IP_ID > > and installed pf from ports ( i did a cvsup before installing to > get the latest ports). Now my dilemma is ... in pf start script ... i > have to enter a prefix ... but what prefix, 'cause after > installing and > rebooting .... the modules that I want to load are still in source > directory . I installed pf with > > make WITH_ALTQ=yes > make install > > after a deinstall I can't install it anymore, the install > crashes with the error that is allready installed !! > > What can I do ??/ I'm using pf without a problem. Not sure what exact version of FreeBSD 5.x you're using. According to /usr/src/UPDATING Since 08-Mar-2004 pf has been part of the base system and doesn't require the pf port to be installed. So, a way forward could be to ensure you've updated to latest 5.x version (cvs tag RELENG_5). Then I suggest you read /usr/src/UPDATING as it also contains some info on the pf groups & users required. I have the following devices in my kernel: device PFIL_HOOKS device pf device pflog I have the following in /etc/rc.conf: pf_enable="YES" pflog_enable="YES" pf_rules="" You will also need the authpf group and the _pflogd user & group. You can get the details by downloading the latest source and checking the passwd & group files under /usr/src/etc. in /etc/passwd: _pflogd:*:64:64:pflogd privesp user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin in /etc/group: authpf:*:63: _pflogd:*:64: I will leave it to you on how you generate a ruleset. Personally I use fwbuilder.org . Thanks, Phil. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 09:33:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A9FE16A4CF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:33:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ux11.ltcm.net (ux11.ltcm.net [64.215.98.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F3B43D31 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:33:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mipam@ibb.net) Received: from ux11.ltcm.net (mipam@localhost.ltcm.net [IPv6:::1]) by ux11.ltcm.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/UX11TT) with ESMTP id i8S9X3Io024590 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:33:04 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (mipam@localhost) by ux11.ltcm.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id i8S9X2Yb002538 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:33:03 +0200 (MEST) X-Authentication-Warning: ux11.ltcm.net: mipam owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:33:02 +0200 (MEST) From: Mipam X-X-Sender: mipam@ux11.ltcm.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: ntop question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:33:07 -0000 Hi, I installed ntop 3.0 from the ports. I am running 5.2.1-10 But /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ntop.sh start does not create a daemon, ..... instead. ntop starts a connection to 131.114.21.22 on port 80. making a connection to that ip it appears its the website of Luca Deri himself. Very nice of course, but i hoped ntop would start sniffing and opening a webserver on port 3000. What is going on? Any hints? Bye, Mipam. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 10:32:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF8F816A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:32:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rtc.ro (mail.rtc.ro [212.93.139.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A809D43D4C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:32:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cristi.tauber@sbhost.ro) Received: (qmail 21742 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2004 13:18:44 +0300 Received: from 212.93.139.239 (SquirrelMail authenticated user tcristi@sbhost.ro) by mail.rtc.ro with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:18:44 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <1139.212.93.139.239.1096366724.squirrel@mail.rtc.ro> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:18:44 +0300 (EEST) From: "Cristi Tauber" To: "Philip Payne" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-AntivirusScanner: eTrust Antivirus v7 X-eTrust-Spam: 0 X-eTrust-Signatures: 23.66.67 cc: FreeBSD Question Subject: RE: pf for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:32:46 -0000 Hello, i'm using 5.2.1 and i want to recompile pf to take advantage of ALTQ. This was the reason for reinstalling. What about that prefix in startup script ... this is were i have no clues ... what's the path ... And another thing ... if i want to install pf now it says that is allready installed ... strange ... because i can't find it now, not the binaries nor the modules . Cristi > Hi, > >> hello folks, >> i want to install the packet filter for FreeBSD so i recompile the >> kernel with the options : >> >> device bpf >> options PFIL_HOOKS >> options RANDOM_IP_ID >> >> and installed pf from ports ( i did a cvsup before installing to >> get the latest ports). Now my dilemma is ... in pf start script ... i >> have to enter a prefix ... but what prefix, 'cause after >> installing and >> rebooting .... the modules that I want to load are still in source >> directory . I installed pf with >> >> make WITH_ALTQ=yes >> make install >> >> after a deinstall I can't install it anymore, the install >> crashes with the error that is allready installed !! >> >> What can I do ??/ > > I'm using pf without a problem. Not sure what exact version of FreeBSD 5.x > you're using. According to /usr/src/UPDATING Since 08-Mar-2004 pf has been > part of the base system and doesn't require the pf port to be installed. > So, > a way forward could be to ensure you've updated to latest 5.x version (cvs > tag RELENG_5). Then I suggest you read /usr/src/UPDATING as it also > contains > some info on the pf groups & users required. > > I have the following devices in my kernel: > device PFIL_HOOKS > device pf > device pflog > > I have the following in /etc/rc.conf: > pf_enable="YES" > pflog_enable="YES" > pf_rules="" > > You will also need the authpf group and the _pflogd user & group. You can > get the details by downloading the latest source and checking the passwd & > group files under /usr/src/etc. > > in /etc/passwd: > _pflogd:*:64:64:pflogd privesp user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin > > in /etc/group: > authpf:*:63: > _pflogd:*:64: > > I will leave it to you on how you generate a ruleset. Personally I use > fwbuilder.org . > > Thanks, > Phil. > > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for > transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. > This > message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected > information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the > addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, > you > are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please > notify the sender and return it.Thank you. > > > > --------------------------------------------------- This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please notify the sender and return it.Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 10:42:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E73CD16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:42:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lorna.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB07343D4C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:42:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.circlesquared.com [127.0.0.1]) i8SAgIhK029350; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:42:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Message-ID: <4159400A.6060308@circlesquared.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:42:18 +0100 From: Peter Risdon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040611 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ted Mittelstaedt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:42:36 -0000 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Seaman >>Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 2:22 AM >>To: Tim Aslat >>Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG >>Subject: Re: IP address conflicts >> >> >>On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 08:51:47AM +0930, Tim Aslat wrote: >> >> >>>I have an annoying situation in a school I do casual work in their IT >>>department. There are a number of individuals within the system who >>>think it's funny to allocate an IP address on a workstation identical to >>>the network's proxy/web/mail servers. What I'd like to know is, would >>>there be any way of preventing this short of spending quite a lot of >>>money on managed switches an the like? >> >>Well, you could move all of the servers onto a separate network to any >>of the individual client machines (and make sure that the server >>network isn't accessible from any of the network ports your clients >>have access to, clearly). That way, even if one of your pet idiots >>decides to 'borrow' a server IP address, the network routing means >>that all they are going to do is hurt themselves. >> > > > You must want to HELP the little shits then. > > Think of this for a second. Right now he has maybe 4-5 different servers > that > people are putting the IP numbers on. Once you move all those servers onto > a > separate subnet, now all the little twits have to do is put the IP number of > the gateway router onto their systems, then the entire subnet that ALL the > servers are on becomes inaccessible. It's nice to hear of kids understanding enough of their IT systems to do this sort of thing, and this is what they'll do if they can. But why can the pupils alter their network settings at all? Assuming they have Windows machines, the registries can be tweaked to deny access to network settings and other things that creative minds can play games with. This can be done through their network logins. Peter. -- the circle squared network systems and software http://www.circlesquared.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 10:53:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFB416A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:53:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [62.67.200.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248FC43D1F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:53:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 7401 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2004 10:53:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.48]) ([pbs]775067@[213.54.10.233]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 28 Sep 2004 10:53:38 -0000 From: Fabian Keil To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:53:12 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20040927192859.GA82254@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20040927192859.GA82254@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409281253.12887.freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> cc: Gary Kline Subject: Re: regex replacement wizard advice needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:53:41 -0000 On Monday 27 September 2004 21:28, Gary Kline wrote: > I have a document with numbered paragraphs, the numbers > to the far left of each paragraph. Is there a perl > s/NNN/NNN/
/g means I can use from the CL or > as a script to make this doc more easy (for me) to read. > > The document is formatted like this: > > 1 Paragraph1. > 2 Paragraph2. > ... > 29 Paragraph29. > ... > 747 Paragraph747. > > > I would like it to be like this: > > 1
> Paragraph1. > 2
> Paragraph2. > ... > 29
> Paragraph29. > ... > 747
> Paragraph747. I'd rather take something like: (echo "Title

Title

    "; perl -n -e 's@^\d+\s+(.*$)@

  1. $1

    2. @;print' input.txt; echo "
") >output.html Without the line breaks, of course. Semantic markup and valid HTML 2.0. Regards Fabian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 11:09:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD15816A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:09:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C837A43D2D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:09:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8SBA3J1072758; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:10:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8SBA3I3072757; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:10:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ei.bzerk.org: bulk set sender to mail25@bzerk.org using -f Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:10:03 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Dan Rue Message-ID: <20040928111003.GA72673@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Dan Rue , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040927223917.GB62325@therub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040927223917.GB62325@therub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on ei.bzerk.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Apache upgrads thrashing certs; index.html.* crud X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:09:56 -0000 On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 05:39:18PM -0500, Dan Rue typed: > Hey Fellas, > > Whenever I do an apache upgrade - whether it be apache 1.3 or apache 2, > it always spews all these index.html.language files in my web root that > I have to go in and remove - but more annoyingly it overwrites my certs > in /usr/local/etc/apache[2]/ssl.*. What gives? To avoid this I allways put the DocumentRoot of a webserver in a non-default location, e.g. under /home/www. Same goes for the certificates: SSLCertificateFile /usr/local/ssl/certs/apache.crt SSLCertificateKeyFile /usr/local/ssl/private/apache.key cheers, Ruben > There a command line option I should be usign to prevent such madness? > > Dan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 11:12:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E78B16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:12:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sirius.emea.mci.com (sirius.wcom.co.uk [193.131.254.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8FC43D2F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:12:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philip.payne@uk.mci.com) Received: from ocampa.wcom.co.uk ([166.59.189.250] helo=breen.emea.mci.com) by sirius.emea.mci.com with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CCFuQ-0002Wg-CC; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:12:39 +0000 Received: from gblon1exch06.uk.mcilink.com ([170.127.79.25]) by breen.emea.mci.com with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CCFuP-00034R-K8; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:12:37 +0000 Received: by gblon1exch06.uk.mcilink.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:12:35 +0100 Message-ID: From: Philip Payne To: Cristi Tauber Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:12:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MCI-EMEA-Spam-Score: -98.5 (---------------------------------------------------) X-MCI-EMEA-Signature: 588d025901a4e47d711641eae139f4d7 cc: FreeBSD Question Subject: RE: pf for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:12:43 -0000 Hi, I'm not sure of the dates of when 5.2.1 was released to tell you for sure whether pf is available in the kernel or not. I only started using 5.x when 5.3-Beta was released and pf has always been available in kernel for me. Never used the port. To check if pf is installed/available you could try the command line via which pf is configured i.e. # pfctl -sa (i.e. show all currently configured options for pf). To check if its available in the base system you could try configuring a kernel with the devices in my previous email and see if they're accepted. Thanks, Phil. > -----Original Message----- > From: Cristi Tauber [mailto:cristi.tauber@sbhost.ro] > Sent: 28 September 2004 11:19 > To: Philip Payne > Cc: FreeBSD Question > Subject: RE: pf for FreeBSD > > > Hello, > i'm using 5.2.1 and i want to recompile pf to take > advantage of ALTQ. > This was the reason for reinstalling. What about that prefix > in startup > script ... this is were i have no clues ... what's the path ... > And another thing ... if i want to install pf now it says that is > allready installed ... strange ... because i can't find it now, not > the binaries nor the modules . > Cristi > > > Hi, > > > >> hello folks, > >> i want to install the packet filter for FreeBSD so i > recompile the > >> kernel with the options : > >> > >> device bpf > >> options PFIL_HOOKS > >> options RANDOM_IP_ID > >> > >> and installed pf from ports ( i did a cvsup before > installing to > >> get the latest ports). Now my dilemma is ... in pf start > script ... i > >> have to enter a prefix ... but what prefix, 'cause after > >> installing and > >> rebooting .... the modules that I want to load are still in source > >> directory . I installed pf with > >> > >> make WITH_ALTQ=yes > >> make install > >> > >> after a deinstall I can't install it anymore, the install > >> crashes with the error that is allready installed !! > >> > >> What can I do ??/ > > > > I'm using pf without a problem. Not sure what exact version > of FreeBSD 5.x > > you're using. According to /usr/src/UPDATING Since > 08-Mar-2004 pf has been > > part of the base system and doesn't require the pf port to > be installed. > > So, > > a way forward could be to ensure you've updated to latest > 5.x version (cvs > > tag RELENG_5). Then I suggest you read /usr/src/UPDATING as it also > > contains > > some info on the pf groups & users required. > > > > I have the following devices in my kernel: > > device PFIL_HOOKS > > device pf > > device pflog > > > > I have the following in /etc/rc.conf: > > pf_enable="YES" > > pflog_enable="YES" > > pf_rules="" > > > > You will also need the authpf group and the _pflogd user & > group. You can > > get the details by downloading the latest source and > checking the passwd & > > group files under /usr/src/etc. > > > > in /etc/passwd: > > _pflogd:*:64:64:pflogd privesp user:/var/empty:/usr/sbin/nologin > > > > in /etc/group: > > authpf:*:63: > > _pflogd:*:64: > > > > I will leave it to you on how you generate a ruleset. > Personally I use > > fwbuilder.org . > > > > Thanks, > > Phil. > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > > This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for > > transmission as being free from malicious code by < Antivirus>>. > > This > > message may contain confidential, privileged or other > legally protected > > information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If > you are not the > > addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive > this message, > > you > > are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise > using it. Please > > notify the sender and return it.Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for > transmission as being free from malicious code by < Antivirus>>. This > message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally > protected > information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you > are not the > addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive > this message, you > are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using > it. Please > notify the sender and return it.Thank you. > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 11:52:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390CD16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:52:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fling.sanbi.ac.za (fling.sanbi.ac.za [196.38.142.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6738343D58 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:52:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from irvine@sanbi.ac.za) Received: from psytrance.egenetics.com ([196.38.142.87]) by fling.sanbi.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1CCGWa-000Nuw-00 for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:52:04 +0200 Message-ID: <41595063.8000600@sanbi.ac.za> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:52:03 +0200 From: Irvine Short Organization: SANBI User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040701) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ruby coredumping in 4.10 w. ports utils X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: irvine@sanbi.ac.za List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:52:10 -0000 Hey All What's the deal with ruby coredumping all over the place when using pkgdb -F and portsdb -Uu under 4.10 these days? I've read a bit about it and how you can possibly get around it eith either sorting the INDEX-5 file or randomizing it with rl. This strikes me as being a horrible kluge. Anyone got any ideas at to how to fix it properly? I have it happening using pkgdb -F and portsdb -Uu on two different machines. I seem to have just gotten around it by removing the whole ports tree and cvsupping a new one on one machine, I'm going to try that on another as well. Cheers, -- Irvine Short Sys Admin SANBI, University of the Western Cape, South Africa http://www.sanbi.ac.za tel: +27-21-959 3645 cel: +27-82-494 3828 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 12:33:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A334816A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:33:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.optidynamic.com (phobos.optidynamic.com [66.208.140.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E966F43D31 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:33:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tsmullins@optidynamic.com) Received: (qmail 30637 invoked by uid 89); 28 Sep 2004 12:33:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Shanelaptop) (66.208.141.79) by mail.optidynamic.com with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 12:33:53 -0000 Message-ID: <006301c4a557$6a387840$6e7dfea9@Shanelaptop> From: "shane mullins" To: "Cristi Tauber" References: <415918AA.C4433D9D@sbhost.ro> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:33:46 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:33:55 -0000 Why not just run OpenBSD if you want to use pf? I use both Free and OpenBSD. But, pf is much easier to set up on OpenBSD. Just install OpenBSD, enable routing, enable pf in rc.conf and you are done. Shane ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cristi Tauber" To: "FreeBSD Question" Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:54 AM Subject: pf for FreeBSD > hello folks, > i want to install the packet filter for FreeBSD so i recompile the > kernel with the options : > > device bpf > options PFIL_HOOKS > options RANDOM_IP_ID > > and installed pf from ports ( i did a cvsup before installing to > get the latest ports). Now my dilemma is ... in pf start script ... i > have to enter a prefix ... but what prefix, 'cause after installing and > rebooting .... the modules that I want to load are still in source > directory . I installed pf with > > make WITH_ALTQ=yes > make install > > after a deinstall I can't install it anymore, the install > crashes with the error that is allready installed !! > > What can I do ??/ > > Cristi > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 12:37:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B0616A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:37:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5749443D1D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:37:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@HiWAAY.net) Received: (qmail 15925 invoked by uid 0); 28 Sep 2004 12:37:45 -0000 Received: from user-69-73-60-132.knology.net (HELO ?10.0.0.68?) (69.73.60.132) by smtp2.knology.net with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 12:37:45 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <20040928032540.GA62632@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <2D8BB15C7B5C214F81C32D3A83B32736013D46C8@idbexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net> <20040927081638.GA26247@math.jussieu.fr> <20040927184827.GB31494@xor.obsecurity.org> <4158AD01.401@daleco.biz> <20040928032540.GA62632@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <22D69A06-114B-11D9-B14B-000393BB56F2@HiWAAY.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Kelly Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:37:18 -0500 To: FreeBSD_Questions FreeBSD_Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Re: Very very slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:37:25 -0000 I've been pretty pleased with the disk performance of this Dell PE400SC P4-2.8GHz, 1GB, even with this HD transplanted from my Athlon 800: % /usr/bin/time find /usr/src/ -type f -print > /dev/null 6.93 real 0.17 user 0.94 sys % /usr/bin/time find /usr/src/ -type f -print > /dev/null 1.03 real 0.10 user 0.91 sys % uname -a FreeBSD Opus.home 5.3-BETA6 FreeBSD 5.3-BETA6 #0: Sun Sep 26 21:26:17 CDT 2004 dkelly@Opus.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/OPUS i386 % du -sk /usr/src/ 441754 /usr/src/ -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 12:40:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4126D16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:40:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rtc.ro (mail.rtc.ro [212.93.139.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 26E4243D3F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:40:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cristi.tauber@sbhost.ro) Received: (qmail 22116 invoked by uid 99); 28 Sep 2004 15:26:16 +0300 Received: from 212.93.139.239 (SquirrelMail authenticated user tcristi@sbhost.ro) by mail.rtc.ro with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:26:16 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <1710.212.93.139.239.1096374376.squirrel@mail.rtc.ro> In-Reply-To: <006301c4a557$6a387840$6e7dfea9@Shanelaptop> References: <415918AA.C4433D9D@sbhost.ro> <006301c4a557$6a387840$6e7dfea9@Shanelaptop> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:26:16 +0300 (EEST) From: "Cristi Tauber" To: "shane mullins" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-AntivirusScanner: eTrust Antivirus v7 X-eTrust-Spam: 0 X-eTrust-Signatures: 23.66.67 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:40:20 -0000 Hello, it crossed my mind to run openBSD but i have to reinstall the server and the applications (mysql, qmail,etc ...) and besides that ... i know that openbsd can't take advantage of SMP servers. I don't know if newer versions 'see' SMP but an older (i don't precisely know the version but it was the lastest i got in january this year) one i was trying to setup can't ! Cristi > Why not just run OpenBSD if you want to use pf? I use both Free and > OpenBSD. But, pf is much easier to set up on OpenBSD. Just install > OpenBSD, enable routing, enable pf in rc.conf and you are done. > > Shane > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cristi Tauber" > To: "FreeBSD Question" > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:54 AM > Subject: pf for FreeBSD > > >> hello folks, >> i want to install the packet filter for FreeBSD so i recompile the >> kernel with the options : >> >> device bpf >> options PFIL_HOOKS >> options RANDOM_IP_ID >> >> and installed pf from ports ( i did a cvsup before installing to >> get the latest ports). Now my dilemma is ... in pf start script ... i >> have to enter a prefix ... but what prefix, 'cause after installing and >> rebooting .... the modules that I want to load are still in source >> directory . I installed pf with >> >> make WITH_ALTQ=yes >> make install >> >> after a deinstall I can't install it anymore, the install >> crashes with the error that is allready installed !! >> >> What can I do ??/ >> >> Cristi >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > --------------------------------------------------- > This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for > transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. > This > message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected > information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the > addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, > you > are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please > notify the sender and return it.Thank you. > > > > --------------------------------------------------- This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please notify the sender and return it.Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 12:45:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816A116A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:45:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dnsmail1.ior.navy.mil (nocc.ior.navy.mil [205.56.210.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76ADF43D41 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:45:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil) Received: from cg69ubd01.vicksburg.navy.mil ([205.95.65.21]) i8SCdwPV025282; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:40:02 GMT Received: by CG69UBD01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:41:52 +0300 Message-ID: From: JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil To: tsmullins@optidynamic.com Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:41:48 +0300 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: pf for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:45:39 -0000 The fact you only have to maintain one OS is one great advantage. One ports tree, one system to patch for security updates. The learning curve to use FreeBSD's pf is negligible imo. As long as kernel support is compiled in for it, and you have the users in your /etc/passwd it just works. Least for me as I have been using it since it was introduced as a kernel kld, and sometime shortly after it became a native module to freebsd. Its imo easier to maintain that say ipfw, as well as faster. -----Original Message----- From: shane mullins [mailto:tsmullins@optidynamic.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 2:34 PM To: Cristi Tauber Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf for FreeBSD Why not just run OpenBSD if you want to use pf? I use both Free and OpenBSD. But, pf is much easier to set up on OpenBSD. Just install OpenBSD, enable routing, enable pf in rc.conf and you are done. Shane ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cristi Tauber" To: "FreeBSD Question" Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:54 AM Subject: pf for FreeBSD > hello folks, > i want to install the packet filter for FreeBSD so i recompile the > kernel with the options : > > device bpf > options PFIL_HOOKS > options RANDOM_IP_ID > > and installed pf from ports ( i did a cvsup before installing to > get the latest ports). Now my dilemma is ... in pf start script ... i > have to enter a prefix ... but what prefix, 'cause after installing and > rebooting .... the modules that I want to load are still in source > directory . I installed pf with > > make WITH_ALTQ=yes > make install > > after a deinstall I can't install it anymore, the install > crashes with the error that is allready installed !! > > What can I do ??/ > > Cristi > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 12:47:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB00516A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:47:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cyclone.emea.mci.com (cyclone.wcom.co.uk [193.131.254.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F2743D5E for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:47:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philip.payne@uk.mci.com) Received: from borg.emea.mci.com ([166.59.191.249] helo=breen.emea.mci.com) by cyclone.emea.mci.com with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CCHOa-0007XM-CQ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:47:53 +0000 Received: from gblon1exch06.uk.mcilink.com ([170.127.79.25]) by breen.emea.mci.com with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1CCHOY-0000MI-LT; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:47:50 +0000 Received: by gblon1exch06.uk.mcilink.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:47:47 +0100 Message-ID: From: Philip Payne To: shane mullins , Cristi Tauber Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:47:37 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-MCI-EMEA-Spam-Score: -98.5 (---------------------------------------------------) X-MCI-EMEA-Signature: 7d8d45d8b9966393899f5be8dbeda7f8 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: pf for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:47:56 -0000 IMHO its not very hard in FreeBSD 5.3 either now its in the base. The only additional step to what you describe below is adding the kernel options & building/installing the kernel to include them, which is only 2 commands. However, some of the log analysis ports I've tried (fwanalog... & another the name of which slips my mind, damn) do not work with the FreeBSD implementation of tcpdump :-( I suppose, with OpenBSD's complete focus on security if I was building a dedicated firewall I would very probably select OpenBSD. Depends what other things Cristi is using FreeBSD for. Phil. > -----Original Message----- > From: shane mullins [mailto:tsmullins@optidynamic.com] > Sent: 28 September 2004 13:34 > To: Cristi Tauber > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: pf for FreeBSD > > > Why not just run OpenBSD if you want to use pf? I use > both Free and > OpenBSD. But, pf is much easier to set up on OpenBSD. Just install > OpenBSD, enable routing, enable pf in rc.conf and you are done. > > Shane > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Cristi Tauber" > To: "FreeBSD Question" > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 12:54 AM > Subject: pf for FreeBSD > > > > hello folks, > > i want to install the packet filter for FreeBSD so i > recompile the > > kernel with the options : > > > > device bpf > > options PFIL_HOOKS > > options RANDOM_IP_ID > > > > and installed pf from ports ( i did a cvsup before installing to > > get the latest ports). Now my dilemma is ... in pf start > script ... i > > have to enter a prefix ... but what prefix, 'cause after > installing and > > rebooting .... the modules that I want to load are still in source > > directory . I installed pf with > > > > make WITH_ALTQ=yes > > make install > > > > after a deinstall I can't install it anymore, the install > > crashes with the error that is allready installed !! > > > > What can I do ??/ > > > > Cristi > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 12:57:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0717E16A4D2 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:57:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D869643D5A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:57:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 17431 invoked by uid 1002); 28 Sep 2004 12:59:48 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.631999 secs); 28 Sep 2004 12:59:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 12:59:46 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:59:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3669.209.167.16.15.1096376386.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <20040928071623.5871.qmail@web51604.mail.yahoo.com> References: <004501c4a527$d22898c0$4611a8c0@SATPC> <20040928071623.5871.qmail@web51604.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:59:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "Mark Jayson Alvarez" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can I route through a pc that is also using a router?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:57:38 -0000 > My workstation and the testmachine both belongs to the > same subnet: > > Here are the details: > > workstation --> 10.10.8.110 > testmachine --> 10.10.8.111 > > Gateway --> 10.10.8.254 > > DNS ---> 202.90.128.3 > 202.90.158.101 > > Proxy ---> 202.90.128.14 Port: 3128 > First, enable bridging in your kernel, by adding: options BRIDGE Then add the following to /etc/sysctl.conf: net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1 net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1 net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=xl0,xl1 ...assuming xl0 and xl1 are your two physical interfaces. If you do not have IPFW enabled on the test gateway, leave out the line that says bridge_ipfw=1 in sysctl.conf. You can't route through the test gateway, as it is on the same subnet as everything else (both sides of it), so you must bridge it. Now you are in a position to tap into the bitstream for ALL network traffic. HTH, Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- Andrew wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Describe the test-machine, please. If both >> workstations are on the same >> subnet, you should probably configure the >> test-machine as an >> ip-forwarder or even as an ethernet-level bridge. If >> your personal >> workstation is on a different subnet, which is not >> serviced by proxy or >> dns, you should configure NAT on the test-machine. >> >> In general, there's little problem in cascading >> gateway installations. >> >> Regards, >> Andrew P. >> >> >> > Good day! >> > I have two workstations at work, 1 my personal, >> and >> > the other, a test machine. >> > >> > My boss told me to configure a pcrouter, that is, >> the >> > testmachine and let my personal pc connect through >> the >> > internet through the testmachine: >> > >> > Here's the scenario: >> > >> > The testmachine already knows how to connect >> through >> > the outside world but, also through a gateway.... >> > >> > >> > testmachine(10.10.8.111)--->gateway(10.10.8.254)---->[proxy]---->[DNS]-- >> -->internet >> > >> > >> > And to let my pc connect to the internet through >> the >> > testmachine, I've set its default gateway to the >> ip of >> > the test machine. >> > >> > >> > But it doesn't seem to work. When I tried to lauch >> my >> > browser, the error indicates that it cannot seem >> to >> > find its way to the proxy server. >> > >> > I've tried adding another line in my routing table >> > like this: >> > >> > Destination Gateway >> > proxy(202.90.128.14) testmachine(10.10.8.111) >> > >> > But it still won't work. >> > >> > Do you know what i've been missing here? I'm >> thinking >> > perhaps the test machine should connect to the >> > internet directly without using a gateway >> anymore.. >> > >> > Any idea? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > > _______________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! > http://vote.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 13:40:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B9F16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:40:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F23243D48 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:40:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [67.1.199.77] (0-1pool199-77.nas2.fargo1.nd.us.da.qwest.net [67.1.199.77]) (authenticated bits=0)i8SDd8S4045722; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:39:53 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <984880D8-1153-11D9-94B7-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric Crist Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:37:51 -0500 To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: bsdfsse cc: russell cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:40:10 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 For what it's worth, aside from some reconfiguration that could be a little time consuming, I would suggest putting the servers on a different subnet that everything else. If all the computers that are not servers are supposed to be configured for DHCP, insert a FreeBSD box that filters out any addresses outside that subnet. i.e. Server IP addresses are all 192.168.1.0 thru 192.168.1.50. Set your DHCP server to only assign IP addresses above 192.168.1.75 and up or so. I'm too lazy to do the math right now, but use the appropriate subnet mask and filter all the other stuff out. Aside from those students disrupting some of the other users on the network, they can't spoof the servers anymore. Just my $.02. - ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkFZaTAACgkQRAAY9knOW+qSsACghfRW0BGQg5Rq9tShVcTbcxzY C1IAn3FEjWy1BS4ROedTsC3MKIJehoOm =8XMh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 13:41:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE0F16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:41:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4F443D1D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:41:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nico.meijer@zonnet.nl) Received: from piweblw.demon.nl ([82.161.24.55]:28662 helo=[192.168.2.100]) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CCIEP-000OUQ-BK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:41:25 +0000 Message-ID: <41596A05.8030005@zonnet.nl> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:41:25 +0200 From: Nico Meijer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040908 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <415918AA.C4433D9D@sbhost.ro> <006301c4a557$6a387840$6e7dfea9@Shanelaptop> <1710.212.93.139.239.1096374376.squirrel@mail.rtc.ro> In-Reply-To: <1710.212.93.139.239.1096374376.squirrel@mail.rtc.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [OT] Re: pf for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:41:28 -0000 Hi Cristi, > it crossed my mind to run openBSD but i have to reinstall the server > and the applications (mysql, qmail,etc ...) and besides that ... i know > that openbsd can't take advantage of SMP servers. I don't know if newer > versions 'see' SMP but an older (i don't precisely know the version but > it was the lastest i got in january this year) one i was trying to > setup can't ! http://www.openbsd.org/36.html#new 3.6 is in CVS and will be released November 1. I believe that if you hurry and install a snapshot from September 17 or before, you'll be able to jump to 3.6. Don't take my word for it, though. Bye... Nico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:01:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41FB16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:01:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mymail.netmagicians.com (mymail.netmagicians.com [202.87.39.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AC9143D2F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:01:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sid@netmagicsolutions.com) Received: (qmail 13642 invoked by uid 549); 28 Sep 2004 14:16:30 -0000 Received: from 202.87.39.242 by mymail.netmagicsolutions.com (envelope-from , uid 504) with qmail-scanner-1.23 (clamdscan: 0.75. uvscan: v4.3.20/v4100. Clear:RC:0(202.87.39.242):. Processed in 0.837823 secs); 28 Sep 2004 14:16:30 -0000 Received: from intra.netmagicsolutions.com (HELO ?10.1.1.172?) (202.87.39.242) by mymail.netmagicians.com with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 14:16:29 -0000 Message-ID: <415970EF.5040801@netmagicsolutions.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:40:55 +0530 From: Siddhartha Jain User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: View dummynet connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:01:30 -0000 Hi, FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE I am using dummynet in the bridge mode. Is there a way that I can see the active connections going through each pipe in the form of source IP/port and destination IP/port pairs? Thanks, Siddhartha From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:15:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC3916A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:15:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from f04n01.cac.psu.edu (f04s01.cac.psu.edu [128.118.141.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097FC43D2F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:15:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@psu.edu) Received: from tmm324.rh.psu.edu (TMM324.rh.psu.edu [66.71.101.5]) by f04n01.cac.psu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8SEEwpo252532 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:14:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:15:00 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Moyer X-X-Sender: tom@tmm324.rh.psu.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040928101251.A897@tmm324.rh.psu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Problem with USB Still... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:15:00 -0000 I figured out that my pi-detach script wasn't working correctly so I fixed that but now it still is not run when the USB PDA is detached. Following is the console output. ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2 ucom0: Palm, Inc. Palm Handheld, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2 tmm324 ppp[864]: tun0: Error: Bad option length 0 (out of phase?) ucom0: ucomreadcb: IOERROR ucom0: at uhub0 port 1 (addr 2) disconnected ucom0: still open, forcing close ucom0: detached It seems to me that when the device is forced closed like that the script doesn't run. Any ideas? Thomas Moyer tmm324@psu.edu DracoYung From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:19:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB5016A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:19:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2419043D48 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:19:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3461094rnb for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:19:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.80 with SMTP id d80mr117371rng; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:19:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:19:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:49:46 +0530 From: Subhro To: Siddhartha Jain In-Reply-To: <415970EF.5040801@netmagicsolutions.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <415970EF.5040801@netmagicsolutions.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: View dummynet connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:19:47 -0000 ipfw pipe list Regards S. On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:40:55 +0530, Siddhartha Jain wrote: > Hi, > > FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE > > I am using dummynet in the bridge mode. Is there a way that I can see > the active connections going through each pipe in the form of source > IP/port and destination IP/port pairs? > > Thanks, > > Siddhartha > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:25:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C93516A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:25:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mymail.netmagicians.com (mymail.netmagicians.com [202.87.39.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDAB343D1D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:25:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sid@netmagicsolutions.com) Received: (qmail 14819 invoked by uid 549); 28 Sep 2004 14:40:15 -0000 Received: from 202.87.39.242 by mymail.netmagicsolutions.com (envelope-from , uid 504) with qmail-scanner-1.23 (clamdscan: 0.75. uvscan: v4.3.20/v4100. Clear:RC:0(202.87.39.242):. Processed in 0.848091 secs); 28 Sep 2004 14:40:15 -0000 Received: from intra.netmagicsolutions.com (HELO ?10.1.1.172?) (202.87.39.242) by mymail.netmagicians.com with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 14:40:14 -0000 Message-ID: <41597681.3050205@netmagicsolutions.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:04:41 +0530 From: Siddhartha Jain User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <415970EF.5040801@netmagicsolutions.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: View dummynet connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:25:14 -0000 I know that command but it doesn't seem to do the job. It doesn't show me the active connections thru/to the box. Cheers, Siddhartha Subhro wrote: >ipfw pipe list > >Regards >S. > > >On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:40:55 +0530, Siddhartha Jain > wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE >> >>I am using dummynet in the bridge mode. Is there a way that I can see >>the active connections going through each pipe in the form of source >>IP/port and destination IP/port pairs? >> >>Thanks, >> >>Siddhartha >> >> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:38:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB1216A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:38:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52506.mail.yahoo.com (web52506.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 863F743D46 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:38:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ronj_clark@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040928143827.57146.qmail@web52506.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.89.83.220] by web52506.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:38:27 PDT Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:38:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Ronnie Clark To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: newsyslog.conf question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ronj_clark@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:38:27 -0000 Hello all, Having read the man page for this file's configuration, I notice there is not an option to digitally sign the logs on rotation using PGP/GPG. Is there a workaround? or are there plans to add this functionality to future versions, like 5.3 -STABLE? Thanks, Ron Clark _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:44:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5493916A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:44:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail2.cableone.net [24.116.0.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E607043D53 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:44:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vvelox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.62.13]) by smail2.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 19404050 for multiple; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:27:58 -0700 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:43:49 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: shih@math.jussieu.fr Message-ID: <20040928094349.581065bc@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040928080801.GE19337@math.jussieu.fr> References: <2D8BB15C7B5C214F81C32D3A83B32736013D46C8@idbexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net> <20040927081638.GA26247@math.jussieu.fr> <20040927184827.GB31494@xor.obsecurity.org> <4158AD01.401@daleco.biz> <20040928080801.GE19337@math.jussieu.fr> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: "Sheets, Jason \(OZ CEEDR\)" cc: Kris Kennaway cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Very very slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:44:29 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:08:01 +0200 Albert Shih wrote: > Le 27/09/2004 =E0 19:14:57-0500, Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P. a > =E9crit > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >=20 > > >On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 10:16:38AM +0200, Albert Shih wrote: > > >=20 > > > > > >> 32 sec to do > > >> > > >>cd /usr/src > > >>time find . -type f -print > /dev/null > > >> > > >>and on other computer I just need 0.8 sec to do that. > > >> =20 > > >> > > > > > >I don't believe that, unless you already have all of /usr/src in > > >cache. 32 seconds seems quite normal for searching and reading > > >~55000 directory entries (on the machine I just tried it took 42 > > >seconds). >=20 > Anyway, but on this computer I need .... ~ 10 hours to do make > buildworld, and I think.....it's verrrrrrrrrrrrrrryyy long. The current mailing list may be useful as well as possibly waiting two weeks or so for 5.3 to become stable. Also dmesg could possibly be handy too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 15:04:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4641616A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:04:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tiny.smallweb.com (smallweb.com [216.85.125.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB8B343D2D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:04:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@Antero.com) Received: from silver.Antero.com (silver.nano.net [216.85.125.13]) by tiny.smallweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8SF4JhE024589 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:04:19 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928085447.04434ec0@nano.net> X-Sender: antero@nano.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:04:34 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Steve Suhre Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: FTP command line syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:04:33 -0000 I need to set up a cron job that will fetch a file using ftp and a password. I've tried several versions of the commands as described in the man page and the Auto-Fetch section but I'm getting an error that makes me think I'm missing something... If I use the suggested syntax: ftp ftp://user:password@host/path I get: Can't locate or login to host `user' It looks like ftp is not aware of the man page and wants the server where the login info is supposed to be. I've tried several variations of the line with no luck. Any help? --- Steve Suhre Antero web technologies 719.634.8161 steve@Antero.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 01:50:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E047E16A4CF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:50:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.huawei-3com.com (smtp.huawei-3com.com [219.133.0.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A520743D31 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:50:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chenheng@huawei-3com.com) Received: from smtp.huawei-3com.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.huawei-3com.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.16 (built May 14 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I4Q0064P96DXW@smtp.huawei-3com.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:23:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from c02042 ([10.153.21.48]) by smtp.huawei-3com.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.16 (built May 14 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0I4Q00ANP96C3G@smtp.huawei-3com.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:23:01 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:52:54 +0800 From: =?gb2312?B?s8K64w==?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <006f01c4a4fd$df201780$3015990a@JFZX.COM> Organization: huawei-3com MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 Content-type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:11:52 +0000 Subject: FreeBSD 5.2: kernel routine for open, close, ioctl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?gb2312?B?s8K64w==?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 01:50:47 -0000 Hi all, I want to open a "/home/user/info.txt" file from kernel module itself. Is there any interface to perfrom open, close and ioctl call ? I know that on linux filp_open calls exist. I'm looking for the same kind of interface.. Any pointers would be of great help. thanx and regards, chenheng From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 04:51:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575E116A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:51:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90A6143D31 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:51:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noorazmiomar@yahoo.co.uk) Message-ID: <20040928045104.84085.qmail@web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [61.6.64.2] by web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:51:04 BST Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 05:51:04 +0100 (BST) From: Noorazmi Omar To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:11:52 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: need to download freeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:51:06 -0000 Dear users support I'm new to FreeBSD, can any body give me the URL to download FreeBSD Best Regards Noorazmi Omar Kuala Lumpur Malaysia --------------------------------- ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 15:13:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C90B16A4F4 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:13:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D5943D41 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:13:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i8SFCp5m068892; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:12:51 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:12:51 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Steve Suhre Message-ID: <20040928151251.GG90839@dan.emsphone.com> References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928085447.04434ec0@nano.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928085447.04434ec0@nano.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-BETA5 X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTP command line syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:13:07 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 28), Steve Suhre said: > I need to set up a cron job that will fetch a file using ftp and a > password. I've tried several versions of the commands as described in > the man page and the Auto-Fetch section but I'm getting an error that > makes me think I'm missing something... > > If I use the suggested syntax: > > ftp ftp://user:password@host/path > > I get: Can't locate or login to host `user' Works for me: $ ftp ftp://doesnt:exist@ftp.netscape.com/path Connected to ftp.gftp.netscape.com. 220-35 220 ftpnscp.newaol.com FTP server (SunOS 5.8) ready. 331 Password required for doesnt. 530 Login incorrect. ftp: Login failed. ftp: Can't connect or login to host `ftp.netscape.com' 221 Goodbye. $ What version of FreeBSD are you running? -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 15:13:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD2616A50C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:13:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.hayers.net (82-34-128-159.cable.ubr02.gray.blueyonder.co.uk [82.34.128.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B80243D1D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:13:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gary@hayers.org) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (home.hayers.net [82.34.128.159]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx1.hayers.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8SFDF41022322; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:13:16 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gary@hayers.org) Message-ID: <41597F98.4060704@hayers.org> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:13:28 +0100 From: Gary Hayers User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Suhre References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928085447.04434ec0@nano.net> In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928085447.04434ec0@nano.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-99.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on thor.hayers.net X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter with Sophos (http://www.amavis.org) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTP command line syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:13:23 -0000 Steve Suhre wrote: > > > I need to set up a cron job that will fetch a file using ftp and a > password. I've tried several versions of the commands as described in > the man page and the Auto-Fetch section but I'm getting an error that > makes me think I'm missing something... > > If I use the suggested syntax: > > ftp ftp://user:password@host/path I needed the same sort of functionallity, found it with jmirror in ports/ftp/jmirror Hope this helps Regards, Gary Hayers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 15:27:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2A716A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:27:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E13743D1F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:27:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krylon@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 30970 invoked by uid 65534); 28 Sep 2004 15:27:36 -0000 Received: from i538748CE.versanet.de (EHLO neuromancer.krylon.net) (83.135.72.206) by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 17:27:36 +0200 X-Authenticated: #685629 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:27:33 +0200 From: Benjamin Walkenhorst To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040928172733.128bba72.krylon@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928085447.04434ec0@nano.net> References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928085447.04434ec0@nano.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1) User-Agent: Sylpheed 0.9.7 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FTP command line syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:27:39 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:04:34 -0600 Steve Suhre wrote: > If I use the suggested syntax: > > ftp ftp://user:password@host/path > > I get: Can't locate or login to host `user' > > It looks like ftp is not aware of the man page and wants the server > where the login info is supposed to be. I've tried several variations > of the line with no luck. Any help? The above command works for me (FreeBSD 5.2.1, i386). I have to give the path _relative to my login-directory_. krylon@neuromancer:~:: ftp ftp://krylon:xH3b0O@wintermute/distinfo Connected to wintermute. 220- 220 wintermute FTP server (NetBSD-ftpd 20020615) ready. 331 Password required for krylon. 230- NetBSD 1.6.2_STABLE (WINTERMUTE) #7: Sun Sep 26 02:09:00 CEST 2004 Welcome to NetBSD on wintermute! 230 User krylon logged in. Remote system type is UNIX. Using binary mode to transfer files. 200 Type set to I. local: distinfo remote: distinfo 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||65528|) 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for 'distinfo' (110 bytes). 100% |******************************************************| 110 7.94 KB/s 00:00 ETA 226 Transfer complete. 110 bytes received in 00:00 (1.09 KB/s) 221- Data traffic for this session was 110 bytes in 1 file. Total traffic for this session was 953 bytes in 1 transfer. 221 Thank you for using the FTP service on wintermute. krylon@neuromancer:~:: So if I wanted to grab the kernel-image from that machine I would have to say: ftp ftp://krylon:xH3b0O@wintermute/../../netbsd (My login-directory is, of course, /home/krylon.) Kind regards, Benjamin -- If cars had improved at [the computer industry's] rate, a Rolls Royce would now cost 10 dollars and get a billion miles per gallon. (Unfortunately, it would probably also have 200-page manual telling how to open the door.) -- Andrew Tanenbaum, "Introduction To Distributed Systems" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 15:41:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F77516A4D0 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:41:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tiny.smallweb.com (smallweb.com [216.85.125.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8AD43D5C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:41:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@Antero.com) Received: from silver.Antero.com (silver.nano.net [216.85.125.13]) by tiny.smallweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8SFfThE025570 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:41:30 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928094046.04597640@nano.net> X-Sender: antero@nano.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:41:44 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Steve Suhre Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: FTP command line syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:41:43 -0000 Thanks, wish I could say the same.... I'm running 4.6 on this machine. The man pages in 4.6 give the syntax so I assumed it would work. I tried "fetch" also and got a parsing error. I'll try grabbing a newer version of ftp and/or fetch and see if that works. At 09:12 AM 9/28/2004, you wrote: >In the last episode (Sep 28), Steve Suhre said: > > I need to set up a cron job that will fetch a file using ftp and a > > password. I've tried several versions of the commands as described in > > the man page and the Auto-Fetch section but I'm getting an error that > > makes me think I'm missing something... > > > > If I use the suggested syntax: > > > > ftp ftp://user:password@host/path > > > > I get: Can't locate or login to host `user' > >Works for me: > > $ ftp ftp://doesnt:exist@ftp.netscape.com/path > Connected to ftp.gftp.netscape.com. > 220-35 > 220 ftpnscp.newaol.com FTP server (SunOS 5.8) ready. > 331 Password required for doesnt. > 530 Login incorrect. > ftp: Login failed. > ftp: Can't connect or login to host `ftp.netscape.com' > 221 Goodbye. > $ > >What version of FreeBSD are you running? > >-- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com --- Steve Suhre Antero web technologies 719.634.8161 steve@Antero.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 15:46:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5CF16A543 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:46:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dnsmail3.ior.navy.mil (noca.ior.navy.mil [205.56.210.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8870B43D31 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:46:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil) Received: from cg69ubd01.vicksburg.navy.mil ([205.95.65.21]) i8SFk1Ub005242; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:46:04 GMT Received: by CG69UBD01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:49:32 +0300 Message-ID: From: JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil To: steve@Antero.com Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:49:26 +0300 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FTP command line syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:46:42 -0000 Try ncFTP. GREAT commandline client with resume and more features.. -----Original Message----- From: Steve Suhre [mailto:steve@Antero.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:42 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTP command line syntax Thanks, wish I could say the same.... I'm running 4.6 on this machine. The man pages in 4.6 give the syntax so I assumed it would work. I tried "fetch" also and got a parsing error. I'll try grabbing a newer version of ftp and/or fetch and see if that works. At 09:12 AM 9/28/2004, you wrote: >In the last episode (Sep 28), Steve Suhre said: > > I need to set up a cron job that will fetch a file using ftp and a > > password. I've tried several versions of the commands as described in > > the man page and the Auto-Fetch section but I'm getting an error that > > makes me think I'm missing something... > > > > If I use the suggested syntax: > > > > ftp ftp://user:password@host/path > > > > I get: Can't locate or login to host `user' > >Works for me: > > $ ftp ftp://doesnt:exist@ftp.netscape.com/path > Connected to ftp.gftp.netscape.com. > 220-35 > 220 ftpnscp.newaol.com FTP server (SunOS 5.8) ready. > 331 Password required for doesnt. > 530 Login incorrect. > ftp: Login failed. > ftp: Can't connect or login to host `ftp.netscape.com' > 221 Goodbye. > $ > >What version of FreeBSD are you running? > >-- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com --- Steve Suhre Antero web technologies 719.634.8161 steve@Antero.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 15:50:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0DA016A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:50:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (awd169.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.63.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18D443D1F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:50:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (blackacidevil.orchid.homeunix.org [192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8SFoJZW017335 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:50:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <41598840.7000207@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:50:24 +0200 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040913 X-Accept-Language: pl, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Noorazmi Omar References: <20040928045104.84085.qmail@web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040928045104.84085.qmail@web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need to download freeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:50:28 -0000 On 09/28/04 06:51, Noorazmi Omar wrote: > Dear users support > > I'm new to FreeBSD, > can any body give me the URL to download FreeBSD > > Best Regards > > Noorazmi Omar > > Kuala Lumpur > Malaysia Hello, welcome to FreeBSD! Please check the main site: http://www.freebsd.org/ Direct link to "Obtaining FreeBSD" in FreeBSD Handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors.html Regards, Karol -- Karol Kwiatkowski From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 15:55:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7F816A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:55:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tiny.smallweb.com (smallweb.com [216.85.125.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E991E43D3F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:55:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@Antero.com) Received: from silver.Antero.com (silver.nano.net [216.85.125.13]) by tiny.smallweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8SFsshE025798; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:55:21 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928095440.0263a9b0@nano.net> X-Sender: antero@nano.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:55:08 -0600 To: JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil From: Steve Suhre In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FTP command line syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:55:41 -0000 Thanks, I'll throw that into the pile too. At 09:49 AM 9/28/2004, JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil wrote: >Try ncFTP. GREAT commandline client with resume and more features.. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Steve Suhre [mailto:steve@Antero.com] >Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:42 PM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: FTP command line syntax > > > > > >Thanks, wish I could say the same.... I'm running 4.6 on this machine. The >man pages in 4.6 give the syntax so I assumed it would work. I tried >"fetch" also and got a parsing error. I'll try grabbing a newer version of >ftp and/or fetch and see if that works. > > > >At 09:12 AM 9/28/2004, you wrote: > >In the last episode (Sep 28), Steve Suhre said: > > > I need to set up a cron job that will fetch a file using ftp and a > > > password. I've tried several versions of the commands as described in > > > the man page and the Auto-Fetch section but I'm getting an error that > > > makes me think I'm missing something... > > > > > > If I use the suggested syntax: > > > > > > ftp ftp://user:password@host/path > > > > > > I get: Can't locate or login to host `user' > > > >Works for me: > > > > $ ftp ftp://doesnt:exist@ftp.netscape.com/path > > Connected to ftp.gftp.netscape.com. > > 220-35 > > 220 ftpnscp.newaol.com FTP server (SunOS 5.8) ready. > > 331 Password required for doesnt. > > 530 Login incorrect. > > ftp: Login failed. > > ftp: Can't connect or login to host `ftp.netscape.com' > > 221 Goodbye. > > $ > > > >What version of FreeBSD are you running? > > > >-- > > Dan Nelson > > dnelson@allantgroup.com > > > >--- >Steve Suhre >Antero web technologies >719.634.8161 >steve@Antero.com > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --- Steve Suhre Antero web technologies 719.634.8161 steve@Antero.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 16:15:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0409816A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:15:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9455343D31 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:15:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4R00LCBEI9IH@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:15:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:15:54 -0400 From: bsdfsse To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <41598E3A.7070504@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) Subject: How do I turn off "preemption" (getting "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:15:49 -0000 I am getting "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA" messages on my ad2 and ad3 hard-drives. I never get them on ad0 or the CD drive. I did some searching, and it sounds like I need to turn of "preemption" in the kernel. I'm running 5.3-BETA4 on the computer. I am going to guess this is turned on for the beta-testing. Any ideas? I just started running 5.x last night. %-) thx! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 16:20:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EEB16A4CF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:20:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tiny.smallweb.com (smallweb.com [216.85.125.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557F743D3F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:20:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@Antero.com) Received: from silver.Antero.com (silver.nano.net [216.85.125.13]) by tiny.smallweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8SGKBhE026385; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:20:11 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928101942.02e233c0@nano.net> X-Sender: antero@nano.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:20:25 -0600 To: JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil From: Steve Suhre In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FTP command line syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:20:26 -0000 Thanks to all, ncftp worked with a .netrc file. I'm good to go..... At 09:49 AM 9/28/2004, JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil wrote: >Try ncFTP. GREAT commandline client with resume and more features.. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Steve Suhre [mailto:steve@Antero.com] >Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:42 PM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: FTP command line syntax > > > > > >Thanks, wish I could say the same.... I'm running 4.6 on this machine. The >man pages in 4.6 give the syntax so I assumed it would work. I tried >"fetch" also and got a parsing error. I'll try grabbing a newer version of >ftp and/or fetch and see if that works. > > > >At 09:12 AM 9/28/2004, you wrote: > >In the last episode (Sep 28), Steve Suhre said: > > > I need to set up a cron job that will fetch a file using ftp and a > > > password. I've tried several versions of the commands as described in > > > the man page and the Auto-Fetch section but I'm getting an error that > > > makes me think I'm missing something... > > > > > > If I use the suggested syntax: > > > > > > ftp ftp://user:password@host/path > > > > > > I get: Can't locate or login to host `user' > > > >Works for me: > > > > $ ftp ftp://doesnt:exist@ftp.netscape.com/path > > Connected to ftp.gftp.netscape.com. > > 220-35 > > 220 ftpnscp.newaol.com FTP server (SunOS 5.8) ready. > > 331 Password required for doesnt. > > 530 Login incorrect. > > ftp: Login failed. > > ftp: Can't connect or login to host `ftp.netscape.com' > > 221 Goodbye. > > $ > > > >What version of FreeBSD are you running? > > > >-- > > Dan Nelson > > dnelson@allantgroup.com > > > >--- >Steve Suhre >Antero web technologies >719.634.8161 >steve@Antero.com > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --- Steve Suhre Antero web technologies 719.634.8161 steve@Antero.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 16:36:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C141B16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:36:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA6943D2D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:36:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4D77A5136E; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:36:31 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: bsdfsse Message-ID: <20040928163631.GA3437@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <41598E3A.7070504@optonline.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41598E3A.7070504@optonline.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do I turn off "preemption" (getting "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:36:02 -0000 --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:15:54PM -0400, bsdfsse wrote: >=20 > I am getting "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA" messages on my ad2 and ad3=20 > hard-drives. I never get them on ad0 or the CD drive. I did some=20 > searching, and it sounds like I need to turn of "preemption" in the=20 > kernel. I'm running 5.3-BETA4 on the computer. >=20 > I am going to guess this is turned on for the beta-testing. >=20 > Any ideas? I just started running 5.x last night. %-) Update to the latest beta, which has a fixed ata driver. Kris --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWZMPWry0BWjoQKURAkkJAJwN/3hcH36HLMECXTOtHJkMBkZN3wCfc/CZ rqu3GG6UMjcqIkMWZYjgzmc= =GEzt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 16:36:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC92A16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:36:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6A143D2F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:36:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (dhcp065-031-041-029.woh.rr.com [65.31.41.29]) i8SGaGJW024751 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:36:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001f01c4a57a$440d4510$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "dave" To: Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:43:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: connections from dialup IP's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:36:20 -0000 Hello, Last evening i had a pretty determined dialup user try to ssh in to my system as root, the logs showed he tried for over 15 minutes. What i'd like to know is is there a way of dropping a connection from an IP if it connects more than x times in a minute? Or any other suggestions of dealing with this? I did a host lookup on the IP, 211.206.125.39 which came back not found which kind of tells me he got offline. Suggestions welcome. Also i'm not familiar with the .kr domain i'd like to block connections from that one as well, same reason this one 4 minutes 165.132.58.56 Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 16:48:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F4D16A4DB for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:48:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C3743D48 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:48:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7F069A39; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:48:00 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:47:59 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: "dave" Message-Id: <20040928124759.64539196.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <001f01c4a57a$440d4510$0200a8c0@satellite> References: <001f01c4a57a$440d4510$0200a8c0@satellite> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: connections from dialup IP's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:48:04 -0000 "dave" wrote: > Hello, > Last evening i had a pretty determined dialup user try to ssh in to my > system as root, the logs showed he tried for over 15 minutes. What i'd like > to know is is there a way of dropping a connection from an IP if it connects > more than x times in a minute? Or any other suggestions of dealing with > this? I did a host lookup on the IP, 211.206.125.39 > which came back not found which kind of tells me he got offline. Suggestions > welcome. > Also i'm not familiar with the .kr domain i'd like to block connections > from that one as well, same reason this one 4 minutes 165.132.58.56 A whois lookup will tell you what IPs belong to a particular domain. You can then use the technique of your choice to block them, whether it be packet filter or host.allow-like functionality. I usually just add an ipfw rule, myself, but you've got lots of choices. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:02:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFB416A4CF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:02:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C06143D39 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:02:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i8SH24ps097253; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:02:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:02:04 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Steve Suhre Message-ID: <20040928170204.GI90839@dan.emsphone.com> References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928101942.02e233c0@nano.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928101942.02e233c0@nano.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-BETA5 X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTP command line syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:02:08 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 28), Steve Suhre said: > Thanks to all, ncftp worked with a .netrc file. I'm good to go..... For strictly batch purposes, ncftpget lets you specify everything on the commandline without requiring a .netrc, and returns a more specific error-code that helps you narrow down the cause of a failure. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:10:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5C916A4D1; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:10:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mgr2.xmission.com (mgr2.xmission.com [198.60.22.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1CA43D53; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:10:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leporter@xmission.com) Received: from [198.60.22.201] (helo=mgr1.xmission.com) by mgr2.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CCLUL-0000yV-02; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:10:05 -0600 Received: from [166.70.25.145] (helo=[192.168.0.3]) by mgr1.xmission.com with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCLUL-0002y2-Py; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:10:05 -0600 Message-ID: <41599AE9.70007@xmission.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:10:01 -0600 From: Jason Porter User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040928) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mgr1.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.25.145 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: leporter@xmission.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.0 (built Sat, 24 Apr 2004 12:31:30 +0200) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mgr1.xmission.com) Subject: enigmime doesn't install in 5.3BETA3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:10:29 -0000 Not sure if this one belongs in current, but I sent it to questions as well. I'm trying to get enigmail to work in thunderbird (latest from ports) but it won't install. I've tried installing in thunderbird and firefox, but I don't get anything. It looks like it goes through the install process, but there aren't any windows that pop up and say it failed or was successful. Then when I try to use enigmail it says that enigmime wasn't installed. Not sure what to do here, anyone? Thanks -- -Jason Porter Real Programmers think better when playing Adventure or Rogue. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:13:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D04B16A4EE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:13:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2044D43D48 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:13:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) X-Sasl-enc: tHF+Y/xM7FBR1nWi5VyTAg 1096391596 Received: from modem-1183.zebra.dialup.pol.co.uk (modem-1183.zebra.dialup.pol.co.uk [81.76.148.159]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00808C165C0 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:13:15 -0400 (EDT) From: "R. W." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:13:09 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <001f01c4a57a$440d4510$0200a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: <001f01c4a57a$440d4510$0200a8c0@satellite> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409281813.09398.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: connections from dialup IP's X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:13:18 -0000 On Tuesday 28 September 2004 17:43, dave wrote: > Hello, > Last evening i had a pretty determined dialup user try to ssh in > to my system as root, the logs showed he tried for over 15 minutes. > What i'd like to know is is there a way of dropping a connection from > an IP if it connects more than x times in a minute? Or any other > suggestions of dealing with this? I did a host lookup on the IP, > 211.206.125.39 > which came back not found which kind of tells me he got offline. > Suggestions welcome. > Also i'm not familiar with the .kr domain i'd like to block > connections from that one as well, same reason this one 4 minutes > 165.132.58.56 Thanks. One thing I think you should do is edit sshd_config to disallow direct root logins, I thought that was the default. You can still su to root, unless you disallow the wheel group. I have it setup so users have to be in a dedicted ssh-users group. I think you can force sshd to use login, which gives you some back-off options (see man login.conf). Another thing is to configure your firewall to allow ssh only from specified hosts or ip ranges. Take a look at the ipfw articles here: http://www.onlamp.com/topics/bsd/firewalls From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:19:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1933616A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:19:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978F043D45 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:19:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) i8SHJIq41805; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:19:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Eric Crist" Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:19:18 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <984880D8-1153-11D9-94B7-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Importance: Normal cc: bsdfsse cc: russell cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: RE: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:19:29 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Crist [mailto:ecrist@secure-computing.net] > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 6:38 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: russell; bsdfsse; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: IP address conflicts > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > For what it's worth, aside from some reconfiguration that could be a > little time consuming, I would suggest putting the servers on a > different subnet that everything else. If all the computers that are > not servers are supposed to be configured for DHCP, insert a FreeBSD > box that filters out any addresses outside that subnet. > > i.e. Server IP addresses are all 192.168.1.0 thru 192.168.1.50. Set > your DHCP server to only assign IP addresses above 192.168.1.75 and up > or so. I'm too lazy to do the math right now, but use the appropriate > subnet mask and filter all the other stuff out. Aside from those > students disrupting some of the other users on the network, they can't > spoof the servers anymore. > No, they just spoof the IP address of the router that the servers are behind, and accomplish exactly the same goal. It actually makes it easier because instead of multiple servers and multiple IP numbers the attackers need to spoof, they only now need spoof 1 IP number - that of the router the servers are behind. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:21:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB6F16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:21:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from broad.100mwh.com (broad.100mwh.com [205.214.86.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEE543D46 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:21:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rseals@vdsi.net) Received: from aqua.magellanhealth.com ([204.193.75.20] helo=[10.200.10.14]) by broad.100mwh.com with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CCLfo-0002VH-3r for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:21:34 -0500 From: Ray Seals To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1096392087.600.48.camel@blkbeard> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:21:27 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - broad.100mwh.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - vdsi.net X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: PAM and SSH configuration issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:21:58 -0000 Hi, I have a FreeBSD 5.2.1 box vanilla install. I want to configure ssh to use pam_tacplus to do the authentication. My ssh file in the /etc/pam directory looks like this: %<--------------------------------------------------------------------->% # # $FreeBSD: src/etc/pam.d/sshd,v 1.15 2003/04/30 21:57:54 markm Exp $ # # PAM configuration for the "sshd" service # # auth auth required pam_nologin.so no_warn auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_warn no_fake_prompts auth requisite pam_opieaccess.so no_warn allow_local #auth sufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn try_first_pass #auth sufficient pam_ssh.so no_warn try_first_pass auth required pam_tacplus.so debug try_first_pass #auth required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass # account #account required pam_krb5.so account required pam_login_access.so account required pam_unix.so # session #session optional pam_ssh.so session required pam_permit.so # password #password sufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn try_first_pass password required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass %<--------------------------------------------------------------------->% Sometimes this works and sometimes it doesn't work properly. I have a couple of questions. For example, for my userid it works like it should but for the guy in the cube from me, it still requires his old local password. - Once this is working, can I delete the userids our of the passwd file? - As long as the userid is in the groups will SU still work for those users? - Will the user still map to their proper home directory? - I guess that it's a good idea to keep a userid on the box that is non-root but is still stored local in case of any problems? -- Ray Seals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:24:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1334016A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:24:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aldisa.biz (ccn.mtl.istop.com [66.11.160.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097CB43D3F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:24:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from abid@saigol.biz) Received: from vgvlaptop1 ([192.168.1.1]) (AUTH: LOGIN abid) by aldisa.biz with esmtp; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:27:00 -0400 From: "Abid Saigol" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:24:10 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal Subject: pkg_add php4 with apache+ssl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:24:18 -0000 Hello, I am running FreeBSD 5.2.1 I have used pkg_add to setup apache with ssl (apache+mod_ssl-1.3.29+2.8.16) Now I am trying to setup PHP4 using pkg_add as well (php4-4.3.4_2) I had to use -force option as php4 looks for apache without mod_ssl. Now when I run "apachectl configtest" I get the following message: [warn] Loaded DSO modules/libphp4.so uses plain Apache 1.3 API, this module might crash under EAPI! (please recompile it with -DEAPI) I'm not sure I want to get in downloading ports and compiling at this stage. What are my options to fix this situation. Thanks for the help. Abid From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:31:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CAD16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:31:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at (lilzmailso02.liwest.at [212.33.55.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC6843D5E for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:31:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm248-230.liwest.at ([81.10.248.230]) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CCLpG-0004D3-Sv for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:31:42 +0200 From: Daniela To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:34:41 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409281934.41705.dgw@liwest.at> Subject: How to set source address for outgoing SSH? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:31:45 -0000 Hi list! I have some problems with an outgoing SSH connection to a machine on my LAN. Connections from the clients to the server work, but not vice versa. The server has two NICs and the connection should normally go through the inside interface, but the connection is initiated with the address of the outside interface instead. As a logical consequence, my firewall (which is running on the server) drops the response, with my outside address being shown in the firewall logs as source for the request, and my inside address being shown as destination for the response. The output of sockstat(1) shows the inside address being used as expected. I already examined the routing tables, to no avail. What else should I check? Regards, Daniela From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:41:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D0316A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:41:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from geofront.co.uk (port-179.dolphin.c4l.co.uk [80.253.114.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6225243D1F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:40:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk) Received: from [132.147.16.46] ([195.194.75.70]) by geofront.co.uk (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i8SHhjpc047262; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:43:45 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from Mike@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk) Message-ID: <4159A21F.3090400@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:40:47 +0100 From: Mike Woods User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Moyer References: <20040928101251.A897@tmm324.rh.psu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040928101251.A897@tmm324.rh.psu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with USB Still... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:41:00 -0000 Thomas Moyer wrote: >It seems to me that when the device is forced closed like that the script >doesn't run. Any ideas? > It's a kernel bug :) I had this same issue a little while bad and after a great deal of searching i found this http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=46488 The patch worked flawlessly for me, so you should try either the patch or simply updating your source and building a new kernel :) -------------- Mike Woods IT Technician From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:41:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF78D16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:41:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1936743D31 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:41:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8SHeZh0016482; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:40:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8SHewh3002628; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:40:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i8SHevaK002627; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:40:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:40:57 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Atle Veka Message-ID: <20040928174057.GB2525@thought.org> References: <20040927235915.082C416A4E5@hub.freebsd.org> <20040927171855.J72052@fincher.users.accretive-networks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040927171855.J72052@fincher.users.accretive-networks.net> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 18 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regex replacement wizard advice needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:41:04 -0000 On Mon, Sep 27, 2004 at 05:23:03PM -0700, Atle Veka wrote: > > How about something like (assuming space between numbering and paragraph > is a tab): > > perl -pi -e 's,^(\d)\t,$1
,' > > > Atle Right. I could've come up with something like this without digging out my REGEX book. But Tom Embt's example was right on the money. (FWIW, I've learned to never try to explain to non-nerds what a regular expression is. They give me strange looks!) thanks, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:42:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DAE16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:42:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pursued-with.net (adsl-66-125-9-244.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net [66.125.9.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D5843D2F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:42:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@pursued-with.net) Received: from babelfish.pursued-with.net (babelfish.pursued-with.net [10.0.0.42]) by pursued-with.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7EC29DC28; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:42:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:42:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Kevin Stevens To: Daniela In-Reply-To: <200409281934.41705.dgw@liwest.at> Message-ID: References: <200409281934.41705.dgw@liwest.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to set source address for outgoing SSH? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@pursued-with.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:42:45 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Daniela wrote: > I have some problems with an outgoing SSH connection to a machine on my > LAN. Connections from the clients to the server work, but not vice > versa. The server has two NICs and the connection should normally go > through the inside interface, but the connection is initiated with the > address of the outside interface instead. As a logical consequence, my > firewall (which is running on the server) drops the response, with my > outside address being shown in the firewall logs as source for the > request, and my inside address being shown as destination for the > response. The output of sockstat(1) shows the inside address being used > as expected. man ssh, look at the -b (bind) option. KeS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:45:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2D216A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:45:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8D843D3F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:45:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) i8SHSmq41852; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:28:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Peter Risdon" Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:28:48 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <4159400A.6060308@circlesquared.com> Importance: Normal cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: RE: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:45:02 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Risdon [mailto:peter@circlesquared.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 3:42 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: Matthew Seaman; Tim Aslat; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: IP address conflicts > > > It's nice to hear of kids understanding enough of their IT systems to do > this sort of thing, and this is what they'll do if they can. But why can > the pupils alter their network settings at all? Because they own the machines? > Assuming they have > Windows machines, the registries can be tweaked to deny access to > network settings and other things that creative minds can play games > with. This can be done through their network logins. > Which they can easily bypass by just not running the login script. The OP said that some of the systems on the network are student-owned laptops and student-owned desktops that students are bringing in from home to plug into the school network. Even if the admin successfully manages to lock out the administrative settings on the laptops, a nuke and repave will take care of that. And there's serious questions about having the authority to do this anyway. The school does not own these systems nor does it have the manpower to administrate all of them, even if every student was happy to turn over administrative control. Sure, you could say that the student has to give up administrative control over his Windows box before getting access to the school servers - but the people that are causing the trouble don't need access to the servers to do this kind of disruption in the first place. All they need is physical acess to a network port and they are in business. They don't even need an IP number assigned to their systems. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:56:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF81C16A4CE; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:56:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp15.wxs.nl (smtp15.wxs.nl [195.121.6.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0F643D55; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:56:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: from kruij557.speed.planet.nl (ipd50a97ba.speed.planet.nl [213.10.151.186]) by smtp15.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4R006WHJ68HC@smtp15.wxs.nl>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:56:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alex.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kruij557.speed.planet.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8SHuWaB004205; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:56:32 +0200 Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by alex.lan (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8SHuVrF004204; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:56:31 +0200 Content-return: prohibited Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:56:31 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff In-reply-to: <41599AE9.70007@xmission.com> To: Jason Porter Message-id: <20040928175631.GB764@alex.lan> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i References: <41599AE9.70007@xmission.com> X-Authentication-warning: alex.lan: akruijff set sender to freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl using -f cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: enigmime doesn't install in 5.3BETA3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:56:35 -0000 On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 11:10:01AM -0600, Jason Porter wrote: > Not sure if this one belongs in current, but I sent it to questions as > well. I'm trying to get enigmail to work in thunderbird (latest from > ports) but it won't install. I've tried installing in thunderbird and > firefox, but I don't get anything. It looks like it goes through the > install process, but there aren't any windows that pop up and say it > failed or was successful. Then when I try to use enigmail it says that > enigmime wasn't installed. Not sure what to do here, anyone? Thanks It could be just a bug in the latest version. I had trouble with firefox with the latest version on 5.2. A earlier verion did compile. If you can't wait, then you could install one of the precompiled packages that you can download of the ftp server. I don't know the exact commands, so you have to look at the handbook for those. -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:59:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4932116A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:59:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41D643D2D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:59:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8SHx1h0016531; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:59:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8SHxPnQ002680; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:59:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i8SHxOeU002679; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:59:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:59:23 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Fabian Keil Message-ID: <20040928175923.GC2525@thought.org> References: <20040927192859.GA82254@thought.org> <200409281253.12887.freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409281253.12887.freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 18 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: Gary Kline cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: regex replacement wizard advice needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:59:35 -0000 On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:53:12PM +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: > On Monday 27 September 2004 21:28, Gary Kline wrote: > [[ ... ]] > > 747
> > Paragraph747. > > I'd rather take something like: > > (echo "Title

Title

    "; > perl -n -e 's@^\d+\s+(.*$)@

  1. $1

    2. @;print' input.txt; > echo "
") >output.html > > Without the line breaks, of course. > This might be closer, plugging in your ";print" and Tom's regex, since the doc is plaintext, maybe ASCII. But then I'll want to put

or
tags before each (\d+) line. Your echo lines are great for turning text into HTML; save some typing. Thanks for the idea. gary > Semantic markup and valid HTML 2.0. > > Regards > Fabian > > > > > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 18:13:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF33C16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:13:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8123643D46 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:13:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1] (may be forged)) i8SIDLHw007011 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:13:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8SIDLip007006; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:13:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:13:21 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Abid Saigol Message-ID: <20040928181321.GA6767@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Abid Saigol , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:13:21 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_add php4 with apache+ssl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:13:29 -0000 --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 01:24:10PM -0400, Abid Saigol wrote: > I have used pkg_add to setup apache with ssl (apache+mod_ssl-1.3.29+2.8.1= 6) >=20 > Now I am trying to setup PHP4 using pkg_add as well (php4-4.3.4_2) >=20 > I had to use -force option as php4 looks for apache without mod_ssl. Now > when I run "apachectl configtest" I get the following message: >=20 > [warn] Loaded DSO modules/libphp4.so uses plain Apache 1.3 API, this modu= le > might crash under EAPI! (please recompile it with -DEAPI) >=20 > I'm not sure I want to get in downloading ports and compiling at this sta= ge. > What are my options to fix this situation. Ummm... downloading ports and compiling. That is your only option for running that combination of software. However, stories of the awfulness of compiling your own software are viciously exaggurated by those that have never had the pleasure of using the ports system. The worst problem you're going to have is the wait to download the ports, and even that can be minimized by installing from one of the FreeBSD installion disks and then by using cvsup(1) as shown in the cvsup FAQ to adopt the installed stuff and update it properly. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWanBiD657aJF7eIRAgK6AJ45Ku6SfdK9B1dEmD56ST8xV41MJwCfdXKZ 8TOnIXx0AuyPe+j6LI1roW4= =SIdB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 18:16:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E141516A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:16:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsmail.ro [193.231.236.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A8C43D4C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:16:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 32449 invoked by uid 89); 28 Sep 2004 18:16:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 18:16:16 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B42ED10A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:16:14 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:16:14 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040928211614.244a7917@it.buh.tecnik93.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: tcsh star-up files help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:16:18 -0000 Hi, Could someone explain to me what is the order tcsh's star-up file are processed ? The man page is rather unclear for me: The shell may read /etc/csh.login before instead of after /etc/csh.cshrc .... What I want and doesn't work if entered in /etc/csh.cshrc but works in ~/.cshrc, if possible, is to have the prompt for all users if (${TERM} == 'screen') then set SCREEN_NAME = "/${STY:e}" else set = '' endif set prompt = ........${SCREEN_NAME}..... with the intent of having screen(1) session name somewhere in the prompt if the shell runs under screen or nothing if it is not under screen, without having to add the above lines to all users ~/.cshrc Thanks, -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 18:23:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE69516A4CF for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:23:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDC5C43D5F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:23:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from incmc@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 11138 invoked by uid 65534); 28 Sep 2004 18:23:55 -0000 Received: from pD9FF1CBF.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO ms.homeip.net) (217.255.28.191) by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 20:23:55 +0200 X-Authenticated: #15946415 Received: from [10.0.0.101] (helo=[10.0.0.101]) by ms.homeip.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1CCMdj-000Bgh-VX; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:23:51 +0200 Message-ID: <4159AC2F.1010105@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:23:43 +0200 From: Jochen Gensch User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040826) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Porter , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <41599AE9.70007@xmission.com> In-Reply-To: <41599AE9.70007@xmission.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: enigmime doesn't install in 5.3BETA3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:23:58 -0000 Jason Porter wrote: > I'm trying to get enigmail to work in thunderbird (latest from > ports) but it won't install. From what I know, this port is marked as IGNORE. http://www.freshports.org/mail/enigmail-thunderbird/ > I've tried installing in thunderbird and > firefox, but I don't get anything. You have tried to install enigmail in Firefox? Isn't that for Thunderbird only? Jochen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 18:28:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8F416A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:28:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C93B43D39 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:28:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nico.meijer@zonnet.nl) Received: from piweblw.demon.nl ([82.161.24.55]:10046 helo=[192.168.2.100]) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CCMiX-000N50-AS for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:28:49 +0000 Message-ID: <4159AD61.4010609@zonnet.nl> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:28:49 +0200 From: Nico Meijer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040908 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <493F1EDF-0FE0-11D9-A586-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <20040926143211.02d40949.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4157A0F9.6010007@zonnet.nl> <20040927090142.1719d106.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <41585E4B.9040108@zonnet.nl> <20040927153815.12a7ed24.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040927153815.12a7ed24.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Backup Mail Server Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:28:50 -0000 Hi Bill, > When I have a choice of punishing idiots or smart people, I punish idiots. When black mode is on, I just want to get them all. ;-) When I arrange fallback MX for people/organisations, they expect their mail to be handled in a delicate, perhaps even 'professional' manner. No mail may be lost, mail must be manageable (within minutes, not hours) at all times. From the outside world, mail seems delivered when it is in fact not, true. However, mail *will* be delivered. So ultimately, mail gets delivered anyhow, I get no calls. Unless it is a mailserver under my supervision that is down. Maybe my fallback MX host. ;-) [The OT part starts here] > I disagree just a _little_. I don't _want_ to know, but I feel obligated > that I _have_ to know. You'd better make it a hobby then. ;-) My country is rapidly breaking down the social structures that took years of hard work to build up. Health care is getting too expensive, it is said. As long as 'health care' only deals with sick people instead of preventing them becoming sick, this will indeed be the case. > Write up a web page and point people to it. There are a lot of really fine pages already available to which I indeed point people. My own agenda includes other stuff which will be benificial in other ways. [The OT part ends here] Thanks and bye... Nico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 18:40:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E9316A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:40:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sol.quay.net (sol.quay.net [207.164.196.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C1443D2D for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:40:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from go@quay.net) Received: by sol.quay.net (Postfix, from userid 80) id 337BF225475; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:40:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from h242s152a135n47.user.nortelnetworks.com (h242s152a135n47.user.nortelnetworks.com [47.135.152.242]) by secure.quay.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:40:06 -0400 Message-ID: <1096396806.4159b00629bd8@secure.quay.net> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:40:06 -0400 From: Gabriel O'Brien To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.4 X-Originating-IP: 47.135.152.242 Subject: Can somebody explain how the autotools are configured in FreeBSD 4.10? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:40:09 -0000 Hi All, I'm hoping somebody can explain to me how to use the autotools (automake, autoconf, libtool, etc.) in FreeBSD 4.10 because plainly I'm doing something quite wrong. I am trying to build turck-mmcache-2.4.6 with PHP 4.3.9 and with this (and other PHP modules) I am continually getting aclocal and libtool related errors, even after installing *all* of the various autoconf and automake options. I see that they are all getting installed with names like "autoconf259" and so on so I suspect that it has something to do with the fact that "phpize" can't figure out what's going on. I've done quite a few web searches looking for info on how to do this sort of thing properly but I can't seem to find anything either on the FreeBSD site or elsewhere. If anyone can point me in the right direction that would be great. Here are some examples of the behavior I'm seeing: --- sol# ./pear install APC downloading APC-2.0.4.tgz ... Starting to download APC-2.0.4.tgz (44,606 bytes) ............done: 44,606 bytes 35 source files, building running: phpize aclocal: not found `phpize' failed --- sol# which aclocal aclocal: Command not found. sol# which aclocal18 /usr/local/bin/aclocal18 --- I've tried creating a soft link to the various utilities involved but this just results in unresolved m4 macros so I don't think this is a proper solution, even if I could get it working. Any help would be apreciated! -Gabe -- go at quay dot net http://web.quay.net/ http://web.quay.net/gpg/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 19:00:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CEF16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:00:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at (lilzmailso02.liwest.at [212.33.55.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D120443D48 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:00:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgw@liwest.at) Received: from cm248-230.liwest.at ([81.10.248.230]) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CCNDW-0006XT-Rq; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:00:50 +0200 From: Daniela To: freebsd@pursued-with.net Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:03:50 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <200409281934.41705.dgw@liwest.at> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409282103.50478.dgw@liwest.at> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to set source address for outgoing SSH? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dgw@liwest.at List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:00:55 -0000 On Tuesday 28 September 2004 17:42, Kevin Stevens wrote: > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Daniela wrote: > > I have some problems with an outgoing SSH connection to a machine on my > > LAN. Connections from the clients to the server work, but not vice > > versa. The server has two NICs and the connection should normally go > > through the inside interface, but the connection is initiated with the > > address of the outside interface instead. As a logical consequence, my > > firewall (which is running on the server) drops the response, with my > > outside address being shown in the firewall logs as source for the > > request, and my inside address being shown as destination for the > > response. The output of sockstat(1) shows the inside address being used > > as expected. > > man ssh, look at the -b (bind) option. I already tried this, but it doesn't work. I guess this option is just to actually transmit the packages over the respective interface, but not to adjust the source address written into the packages. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 19:21:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E45D416A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:21:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78DE443D3F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:21:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3479723rnb for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.80 with SMTP id d80mr135316rng; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:20:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:50:50 +0530 From: Subhro To: Siddhartha Jain In-Reply-To: <41597681.3050205@netmagicsolutions.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <415970EF.5040801@netmagicsolutions.com> <41597681.3050205@netmagicsolutions.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: View dummynet connections X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:21:01 -0000 Give us a view of ipfw pipe list and ipfw -c list Regards S. On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:04:41 +0530, Siddhartha Jain wrote: > I know that command but it doesn't seem to do the job. It doesn't show > me the active connections thru/to the box. > > Cheers, > > Siddhartha > > > > > Subhro wrote: > > >ipfw pipe list > > > >Regards > >S. > > > > > >On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:40:55 +0530, Siddhartha Jain > > wrote: > > > > > >>Hi, > >> > >>FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE > >> > >>I am using dummynet in the bridge mode. Is there a way that I can see > >>the active connections going through each pipe in the form of source > >>IP/port and destination IP/port pairs? > >> > >>Thanks, > >> > >>Siddhartha > >> > >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 19:46:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04E916A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:46:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [208.187.29.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91C3A43D49 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:46:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 41882 invoked by uid 1001); 28 Sep 2004 19:26:01 -0000 Received: from 66.243.5.202 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com); by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:26:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <33487.66.243.5.202.1096399561.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: <41585E4B.9040108@zonnet.nl> References: <493F1EDF-0FE0-11D9-A586-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <20040926143211.02d40949.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4157A0F9.6010007@zonnet.nl> <20040927090142.1719d106.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <41585E4B.9040108@zonnet.nl> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:26:01 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail X-Mailer: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: Re: Backup Mail Server Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:46:16 -0000 Nico Meijer wrote: > Hey Bill, >> Are you saying that it's better for users not to know that their mail >> has been delayed? > > Unfortunately, yes. That is what I am saying. > > On a technical level, I totally disagree with myself. On a practical, > day-to-day operations level I have to admit I'd rather not handle the > calls. As a user who understands, to some degree, how email is delivered, and who wouldn't be calling you to "fix it", I *STILL* don't want to get those stupid messages: "Your email has been delayed for 4 hours... Don't do anything" Here's why: A) *I* can't do anything about it -- It's up to some (probably incompetent) admin to fix their computer down the line somewhere. B) It never includes the email I sent, so I've got no clue what message it's bitching about anyway. C) If I'm not supposed to do anything, why are you bugging me? If you can manage to send me an email about the email you can't send, it's obvious that your computer isn't the broken one either. [Okay, I'm sure there's a counter-example to that, but it's not the norm.] D) 99.99999% of the time, the email ends of getting where it should go anyway, just later than I had hoped. I've seen USPS take seven (7) months to deliver paper mail. I ain't gonna bitch about a few days delay in email. Now, if you could manage to track down an email address of somebody who is probably/nominally responsible for the machine that isn't working right, and you want to warn them that their machine is toast, go for it! At least then you'd be bugging the person that can actually take some action to do something useful. Probably best to bug them once per X [day|week] about their broken machines, though, since bombarding them with email won't help either. But, hey, that's just my opinion. It *WOULD* be nice also if bounced messages contained the full message -- If I have an alternate way to send it to the recipient, that's WAY more convenient than me digging through my Outbox, which may or may not even be available at the time I receive the bounce anyway. I can't count the times I've gotten a bounce and realized the reconstructing (or finding) the email would be too time-consuming and/or would take too long, but if I had the email to send out again, I could have gotten the message through in time. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 20:09:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD3216A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:09:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [208.187.29.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62B1B43D75 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:09:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 89057 invoked by uid 1001); 28 Sep 2004 19:53:22 -0000 Received: from 66.243.5.202 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com); by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <33523.66.243.5.202.1096401202.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:53:22 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail X-Mailer: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: NIC Driver Hacking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:09:19 -0000 Since so many people gave me on -mobile and -questions gave me so much help, I'd like to *TRY* to continue working on adding support for the Broadcom 4401-B0 to FreeBSD. Here's where I came from: None of my CardBus, NIC, WiFi, etc devices were getting register memory: http://phpbootcamp.com/articles/inspiron700m/dmesg_verbose.txt All hardware worked fine under Windows. Well, as fine as anything works under Windows. :-) Here's where I am: I can use "allow_unsupported_io_range" and all my devices get identified and assigned what look like valid memory ranges: http://www.phpbootcamp.com/articles/inspiron700m/hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range/dmesg.txt Attempting to configure the NIC using ifconfig or the sysinstall GUI locks up the machine completely. So, which of the following most likely describes my current status: A) The unsupported_io_range is fine, but the driver source needs hacking B) I really haven't solved the device register memory issues -- they just *SEEM* to be okay. If it's A) I can start mucking with C code and hopefully not damage my hard drive too much in the process... If it's B) I'm still at a complete loss how to compute valid io_range... Use the Windows numbers, since they work? Use the Linux numbers, since they work? Some kind of tool/monitor to compute a base offset? If it's A) I can also start playing with the CardBus and WiFi with some hope of it working. If it's B) there's not much point in my buying a PCM/CIA WiFi card, now is there, as the Cardbus io_range ain't gonna be any good either, is it?... -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 20:16:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C3E16A4E3 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:16:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yoda.pixi.com (yoda.pixi.com [206.127.224.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE87A43D3F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:16:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from knowtree@aloha.com) Received: from yoda.pixi.com (yoda.pixi.com [206.127.224.41]) by yoda.pixi.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i8SJe7h22330 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:40:07 -1000 Message-Id: <200409281940.i8SJe7h22330@yoda.pixi.com> To: questions@freebsd.org From: knowtree@aloha.com Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:40:07 HST X-Posting-IP: 141.190.32.68 X-Mailer: Endymion MailMan Standard Edition v3.2.19 Subject: Repeating keys in XFree86 4.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:16:12 -0000 Anybody else having this problem, or know how to fix it? After upgrading XFree86 to 4.4 (Gnome 2.6.2) I have had problems with my keyboard. After a few minutes, keys seem to stick, repeating until the next keystroke. Or, a keypress produces no output. Eventually a key gets stuck permanently, forcing a reboot. This never happens in the text mode console, only in X. Just to be sure I tried two other keyboards, with no improvement. CPU is a Dell GX260 To get any work done at all I have disabled key repeat in the Gnome keyboard control panel. Awkward, and keys still drop out. Sounds like a previously reported bug (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xfree86&m=104879558008189&w=2): I've found the solution to a long-standing problem, which for example afflicted users of Sawfish WM. Under certain conditions (in fact during a long enough sync key/board grab), some keys were repeated: Explanation: ============ 1/ XKB-enabled Xfree86 implements key-repeating in software (w/ timers). When a hardware Key Release arrives, the software timer is canceled. 2/ Xfree86 implements key(board) grabs in GrabModeSync by switching a pointer dev->public.processInputProc to either dev->public.enqueueInputProc ... events are put in a queue for later processing or dev->public.realInputProc The problem is, that the public.enqueueInputProc (which is EnqueueEvent() in xc/programs/Xserver/dix/events.c) does not invoke function AccessXCancelRepeatKey(), which cancels the timer. So, if during Sync grab, key Release is signalled/read from kernel(hardware), the timer is not cancelled. Therefore it is run (later), and generates a pair of Release/Press events, and reschedules itself (so it can result in many incorrect key events). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 20:17:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2E216A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:17:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tiny.smallweb.com (smallweb.com [216.85.125.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3164843D39 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:17:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@Antero.com) Received: from silver.Antero.com (silver.nano.net [216.85.125.13]) by tiny.smallweb.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8SKGYhE031713; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:16:34 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928141356.043bfa80@nano.net> X-Sender: antero@nano.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:16:47 -0600 To: Dan Nelson From: Steve Suhre In-Reply-To: <20040928170204.GI90839@dan.emsphone.com> References: <6.0.3.0.2.20040928101942.02e233c0@nano.net> <20040928170204.GI90839@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTP command line syntax X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:17:08 -0000 Thanks Dan, I tried that and it wouldn't take. The remote server refused the login info using -u and -p. I think this will work for my purposes, the server here needs to download just one file each day. If I run into trouble I'll work on the command line thing some more... At 11:02 AM 9/28/2004, Dan Nelson wrote: >In the last episode (Sep 28), Steve Suhre said: > > Thanks to all, ncftp worked with a .netrc file. I'm good to go..... > >For strictly batch purposes, ncftpget lets you specify everything on >the commandline without requiring a .netrc, and returns a more specific >error-code that helps you narrow down the cause of a failure. > >-- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com --- Steve Suhre Antero web technologies 719.634.8161 steve@Antero.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 20:37:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02FD16A4CF; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:37:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.bitfreak.org (mail.bitfreak.org [65.75.198.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EFC43D45; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:37:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmp@bitfreak.org) Received: from speck.loki.lan (c-24-21-241-225.client.comcast.net [24.21.241.225]) by mail.bitfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3609419F3C; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:38:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spud (d2.loki.lan [172.21.42.22]) by speck.loki.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7165C322E; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:37:31 -0700 (PDT) From: "Darren Pilgrim" To: "'Roman Kurakin'" , "'Dimitry Andric'" Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:37:22 -0700 Message-ID: <000201c4a59a$f8294f60$162a15ac@spud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <41591FFE.3040206@cronyx.ru> cc: 'Andrew Boothman' cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG cc: dwbear75@gmail.com cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: "NTLDR missing" after 5-RELEASE install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:37:33 -0000 [ Note to Roman: Please adjust your mail client to wrap lines at more acceptable range of 72-76 characters. Thanks. ] From: Roman Kurakin > > I've seen this before 5.0 release and made some investigation of this > proble. I didn't look this thread carefully so excuse me if information > I give to all you is useless. > > My investigation show that FreeBSD reads full partition table, and after > modification puts it back. It fix all entries from its own point of view. > Windows dies from change of end of partition entry. As I understand with > large disk it shouldn't mean anything at all. But windows checks it. You > may save this entry and after installation of FreeBSD put it back. Just like in UFS, there are structures in NTFS that have to be changed if the size of the volume changes. Also like UFS, NTFS doesn't place data sequentially on the disk. A large, mostly-empty, NTFS volume can have data at or near the end of the volume. The slicing issue is well-known with NTFS. A reliable way to add a non-Windows slice to a computer with Windows installed is to use a volume management tool like PM. If you don't need to resize a slice, use the Disk Management administrative tool to create an unformatted partition, then change the media descriptor when you go to install FreeBSD. NT is so picky it's even recommended that you use the NT boot loader. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 20:51:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4102716A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:51:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from trueband.net (director.trueband.net [216.163.120.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 729F743D41 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:51:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 10542 invoked by uid 1006); 28 Sep 2004 20:51:53 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:SA:0(0.0/100.0):. Processed in 2.054581 secs); 28 Sep 2004 20:51:53 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 20:51:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 10434 invoked from network); 28 Sep 2004 20:51:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vandaliamo.net) (jhall@12.170.206.13) by -v with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 20:51:50 -0000 Message-ID: <4159C6D7.4050603@vandaliamo.net> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 15:17:27 -0500 From: Jay Hall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040429 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: panic: ufs_dirbad X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 20:51:55 -0000 Today, I have tried to install FBSD 4.10 on a Gateway 920 Server (Celeron 2.4 GHz, 128 MB RAM, 60 GB Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 HDD, two Intel Pro 10/100/1000 NICs). In order to make the server work correctly, I have to boot with hw.hasbrokenint12=1. After setting up the drive (fdisk and disklabel), the install begins just as it should. Shortly after creating the Emergency Holographic Shell, when the installation process starts to copy files, I receive a message stating, "panic: ufs_dirbad bad dir syncing disks ......." I have tried mutiple CDs downloaded from multiple sources with the same results. When this happens I am unable to use the shell created on VTY 4. I am able to install FreeBSD 4.8 without any problems on this system. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance for your assistance. Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 21:21:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A63616A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:21:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1432543D46 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:21:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4R004ZZSO2SI@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:21:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:21:47 -0400 From: bsdfsse To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <4159D5EB.3020009@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) Subject: "ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=5855" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:21:52 -0000 I reinstalled the latest, 5.3-Beta6. When I let the machine sit, then I do a "ls /mnt/ad2" I get the message: "ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=5855" When I reboot via "reboot", I get "ad2: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=xxxx" (where xxxx is some other number) This only affects my 2nd and 3rd HD. They are Maxtor 200GB ATA drives. Any suggestions? thx! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 21:33:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E1C16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:33:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.magma.ca (mx2.magma.ca [206.191.0.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F22443D49 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:33:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ebudd@grokking.org) Received: from in2.magma.ca (in2.magma.ca [206.191.0.224]) by mx2.magma.ca (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8SLXfeh024166 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:33:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.sohotech.ca (ottawa-hs-64-26-169-251.s-ip.magma.ca [64.26.169.251]) by in2.magma.ca (Magma's Mail Server) with ESMTP id i8SLWHsV013424 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:32:36 -0400 Received: from heinlein.sohotech.ca (heinlein.sohotech.ca [192.168.1.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx1.sohotech.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8SLWH4C037783 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:32:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ebudd@grokking.org) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:32:17 -0400 From: Ed Budd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040928173217.501889d6.ebudd@grokking.org> In-Reply-To: <415918AA.C4433D9D@sbhost.ro> References: <415918AA.C4433D9D@sbhost.ro> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Subject: Re: pf for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:33:44 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 09:54:18 +0200 Cristi Tauber wrote: > hello folks, > i want to install the packet filter for FreeBSD so i recompile the > kernel with the options : > > device bpf > options PFIL_HOOKS > options RANDOM_IP_ID > > and installed pf from ports ( i did a cvsup before installing to > get the latest ports). Now my dilemma is ... in pf start script ... i > have to enter a prefix ... but what prefix, 'cause after installing > and rebooting .... the modules that I want to load are still in source > directory . I installed pf with Does the prefix by chance refer to the full path to the script (i.e. /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pf.sh)? Read the comments in the script; it will tell you what you need to do to /etc/rc.conf to get things started on bootup. > > make WITH_ALTQ=yes > make install I've been running pf on two separate FBSD 5.2.1 boxes for weeks without adding this switch. Only thing that doesn't work that great is spamd logging but otherwise I prefer pf over ipf and ipfw any day -- even on a ported OS... Cheers, EB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 22:17:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839CE16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:17:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hermes.hyperhosting.gr (hermes.hyperhosting.gr [65.109.239.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA1C43D1F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:17:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nicx@ebox.gr) Received: from hermes.hyperhosting.gr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8SMHQmd008769 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:17:27 +0300 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:17:26 +0300 Message-Id: <200409282217.i8SMHQmd008769@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary From: Nicx To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: AtMail Pro 3.61 - http://webbasedemail.com/ X-Origin: 212.205.209.121 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: nicx@ebox.gr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:17:29 -0000 Hi Guy's I have problem with my floppy always said me : Can't open /dev/fd0: No such file or directory and my floppy disk is corectly installed at my BIOS I haven't problem with Linux or Solaris but i don't know why always happened this on Free BSD Thanks! ... Nicx ---- www.ebox.gr - Dwrea'n E-mail µe 15MB mailbox www.hyperhosting.gr Apokty%ste to diko' sa*s web site µe dw%ro to domain name! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 22:18:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A19316A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:18:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from f05n03.cac.psu.edu (f05s03.cac.psu.edu [128.118.141.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201DA43D46 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:18:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom@psu.edu) Received: from tmm324.rh.psu.edu (TMM324.rh.psu.edu [66.71.101.5]) by f05n03.cac.psu.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8SMI1eh049398 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:18:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:18:00 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Moyer X-X-Sender: tom@tmm324.rh.psu.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040928181609.O627@tmm324.rh.psu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Permssions Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:18:02 -0000 I have recently decided to switch from CUPS to apsfilter for printing and cannot remember the permssions on /usr/bin/lp, lpq, lpr, and lprm. They were changed to non-executable (through chmod 0) and now I need to set them back to their original values. Can someone tell me what they should be. Thomas Moyer tmm324@psu.edu DracoYung From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 22:45:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E49416A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:45:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 177AE43D39 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:45:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike.Jeays@rogers.com) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.100?) (mjeays2551@24.43.95.82 with plain) by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 28 Sep 2004 22:45:50 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: nicx@ebox.gr In-Reply-To: <200409282217.i8SMHQmd008769@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> References: <200409282217.i8SMHQmd008769@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: Message-Id: <1096411549.30508.15.camel@chaucer> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 Date: 28 Sep 2004 18:45:49 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:45:51 -0000 On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 18:17, Nicx wrote: > Hi Guy's > > I have problem with my floppy > > always said me : > > Can't open /dev/fd0: > > No such file or directory > > and my floppy disk is corectly installed at my BIOS > > I haven't problem with Linux or Solaris but i don't know why always > happened this on Free BSD > > Thanks! > ... Nicx > ---- www.ebox.gr - Dwrea'n E-mail µe 15MB mailbox www.hyperhosting.gr > Apokty%ste to diko' sa*s web site µe dw%ro to domain name! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Try mount /dev/fd0c /mnt (UFS floopy) or mount -t msdos /dev/fd0c /mnt (DOS FAT floppy) It may work if your system is an earlier version; I think it was changed to fd0 in 5.0. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 23:04:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C5316A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:04:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BCE43D1F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:04:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gad@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8SN48H1020901; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:04:09 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu (Unverified) Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040928143827.57146.qmail@web52506.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040928143827.57146.qmail@web52506.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:04:07 -0400 To: Ronj_clark@yahoo.com, FreeBSD Questions From: Garance A Drosehn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: newsyslog.conf question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:04:11 -0000 At 7:38 AM -0700 9/28/04, Ronnie Clark wrote: >Hello all, > >Having read the man page for this file's >configuration, I notice there is not an option to >digitally sign the logs on rotation using PGP/GPG. Is >there a workaround? or are there plans to add this >functionality to future versions, like 5.3 -STABLE? That is not on my list of things to add to newsyslog, but I could certainly put something for this on the list... If I do it, it will show up in 5.3-stable, and possibly even in 4.x-stable (although that is less likely once we have 5.3-stable). What I might add is some generic way to specify a program to run after a log file has been rotated, where newsyslog will specify the name of the (already rotated) log file when it runs the program. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@FreeBSD.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, NY; USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 23:19:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9B416A4CE; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:19:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFA043D1F; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:19:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [67.1.199.132] (0-1pool199-132.nas2.fargo1.nd.us.da.qwest.net [67.1.199.132]) (authenticated bits=0)i8SNJ1SD001023; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:19:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) In-Reply-To: References: <20040928143827.57146.qmail@web52506.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric Crist Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 18:18:04 -0500 To: Garance A Drosehn X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: Ronj_clark@yahoo.com cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: newsyslog.conf question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:19:12 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 28, 2004, at 6:04 PM, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > At 7:38 AM -0700 9/28/04, Ronnie Clark wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> Having read the man page for this file's >> configuration, I notice there is not an option to >> digitally sign the logs on rotation using PGP/GPG. Is >> there a workaround? or are there plans to add this >> functionality to future versions, like 5.3 -STABLE? > > That is not on my list of things to add to newsyslog, but > I could certainly put something for this on the list... > If I do it, it will show up in 5.3-stable, and possibly > even in 4.x-stable (although that is less likely once we > have 5.3-stable). What I might add is some generic way > to specify a program to run after a log file has been > rotated, where newsyslog will specify the name of the > (already rotated) log file when it runs the program. This is not something I had really thought of before today, but it would be a very handy feature to have. The PGP/GPG signature or an MD5 hash, something that could be used to verify the integrity of the log file once it's been rotated. Just my $.02. - ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkFZ8S0ACgkQRAAY9knOW+pDcQCcC/6RyI4NTU++us4teC3KEGgJ VTMAn14BNTrKhLv83KlYlBdDJdp9uk8h =PTBk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 23:53:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8FE16A4CE for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:53:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4DA43D3F for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:53:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ramang@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 77so3831238rnk for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.77.56 with SMTP id z56mr1248751rna; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.164.76 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 16:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:53:01 -0400 From: Raman To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: cvsup propagate? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Raman List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:53:04 -0000 Hi, I was just wondering when a new release of a port comes out how long does it take cvsup to get it and propagate to the other cvsup servers? - Raman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 00:19:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4920616A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:19:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1338343D1F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:19:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37A2F1956 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:19:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00648-02 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:19:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.199.45.54] (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3126F18DC for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:19:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean McNeil To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-CzT5XLt1UPgvx4VwqeJs" Message-Id: <1096417171.1078.11.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 17:19:31 -0700 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mcneil.com Subject: getting rid of disk selection on bootup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:19:33 -0000 --=-CzT5XLt1UPgvx4VwqeJs Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have -current installed and I get the following on bootup: F1 FreeBSD F5 Drive 1 Default: F1 I'd like to get rid of that and boot directly to the pitchfork dude. Is there a way to clear that out so it boots without the above selector? TIA, Sean --=-CzT5XLt1UPgvx4VwqeJs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBWf+TyQsGN30uGE4RAs0nAKCu5ghJKCoAPjFZVjpT4VapseXg+ACdEpE1 ilYL0Xr+H+XoHrezUjkGw/A= =05D9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-CzT5XLt1UPgvx4VwqeJs-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 00:51:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9178216A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:51:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gremlin.internode.com.au (gremlin.internode.com.au [192.83.231.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E5243D45 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:51:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adam@internode.com.au) Received: from gremlin.internode.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8T0pNta002055; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:21:23 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from adam@internode.com.au) Received: (from adam@localhost) by gremlin.internode.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8T0pMA0002054; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:21:22 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from adam@internode.com.au) X-Authentication-Warning: gremlin.internode.com.au: adam set sender to adam@internode.com.au using -f Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:21:22 +0930 From: Adam Smith To: Raman Message-ID: <20040929005122.GE696@internode.com.au> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Face: $vsV$1FNbZN\JVpjV#&+/!oVW`Kw$j?w_,te\SS}(tKD21c+l$t%\RCS(r$G; XXk]6,(!N:&(N3EV0bY`3):UrgG7'*qsj3l.75IaHV1<`i*{[L\:F*l6fH##C:-p2]xW/R-Z:!bo; 5g3GP-{I{}7O>tN}`Xm/=-:8NG?f-r'$Qc3y[aW-7'W_S<`KYU!_; `7K=kuC$-.7J2*kk=~`c@ADp+xhsv(!a@eW-R_5wtx+tC)(]%W+ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup propagate? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:51:26 -0000 On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:53:01PM -0400, Raman said: > Hi, I was just wondering when a new release of a port comes out how > long does it take cvsup to get it and propagate to the other cvsup > servers? It depends how it's configured. Have a look at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/mirror-howto.html and check section 3.4 "How often should I mirror?" for the FreeBSD reccomendations. -- Adam Smith Internode : http://www.internode.on.net Phone : (08) 8228 2999 Dog for sale: Eats lots and is fond of children. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 01:07:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E801816A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:07:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E76DC43D1F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:07:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 1304 invoked by uid 65534); 29 Sep 2004 01:07:16 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) (62.245.232.135) by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 03:07:16 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 03:07:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <41598E3A.7070504@optonline.net> <20040928163631.GA3437@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040928163631.GA3437@xor.obsecurity.org> X-OS: FreeBSD X-Birthday: 10/06/72 X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-Tel: +49 89 18947781 X-CelPhone: +49 173 9967781 X-Country: Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409290307.10470.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> cc: bsdfsse cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: How do I turn off "preemption" (getting "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:07:19 -0000 Am Dienstag, 28. September 2004 18:36 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:15:54PM -0400, bsdfsse wrote: > > I am getting "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA" messages on my ad2 and ad3 > > hard-drives. I never get them on ad0 or the CD drive. I did some > > searching, and it sounds like I need to turn of "preemption" in the > > kernel. I'm running 5.3-BETA4 on the computer. > > > > I am going to guess this is turned on for the beta-testing. > > > > Any ideas? I just started running 5.x last night. %-) > > Update to the latest beta, which has a fixed ata driver. > Kris Right, but I'd also like to know how I can turn it off. Just for curiosity. Thanks, -Mano From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 01:28:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8B816A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:28:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yoda.pixi.com (yoda.pixi.com [206.127.224.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7BB43D2F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:28:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from knowtree@aloha.com) Received: from yoda.pixi.com (yoda.pixi.com [206.127.224.41]) by yoda.pixi.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i8T0qSh06881 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:52:28 -1000 Message-Id: <200409290052.i8T0qSh06881@yoda.pixi.com> To: questions@freebsd.org From: knowtree@aloha.com Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:52:28 HST X-Posting-IP: 141.190.32.68 X-Mailer: Endymion MailMan Standard Edition v3.2.19 Subject: Gnome administrative interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:28:41 -0000 I am looking for ways to smooth out administrative tasks under Gnome. Is there a way to configure applications or menu launchers so that when an application requires administrative rights it will prompt, in a nice dialog box, for the administrator password? For example, on my system, Applications / System Tools / Login Screen Setup produces an error dialog "You must be the super user (root) to configure GDM." But I don't want to log on as root, and I don't want to require people to open a terminal window and fool around with su and sudo to make it happen. I want it as smooth as it is in OS X. Has anyone done this? Is there a nice, Gnome-like GUI tool for managing users, groups, printers, and network shares? I know about SWAT and WebMin, but what I seek is the Gnome family equivalent. Gary Dunn Honolulu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 02:17:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC5816A4CF for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 02:17:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from server1.suredid.com (server1.suredid.com [64.62.162.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429B243D48 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 02:17:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from salihin@suredid.com) Received: from server1.suredid.com ([64.62.162.77] helo=mail.suredid.com) by server1.suredid.com with asmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CCU25-0004iF-BE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:17:29 +0300 Received: from phpmailer ([81.52.242.200]) by mail.suredid.com with HTTP (PHPMailer); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:17:29 +0300 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:17:29 +0300 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: salihin Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHPMailer [version 1.71] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server1.suredid.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - suredid.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: error compile kernel in 5.2.1.Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 02:17:30 -0000 Dear all, i have problem with my freebsd 5.2.1RELEASE , when i compile kernel using make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL I got this error messages... should i upgrade to 5.3. BETA RELEASE :( or upgrade to 5.2.1.STABLE help me please,... cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/dev -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Werror aic7xxx_reg_print.c bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:189: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:189: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:190: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:190: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:191: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:191: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:192: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:192: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:193: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:193: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:194: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:194: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:195: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:195: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:196: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:196: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:197: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:197: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:198: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:198: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:199: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:199: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:200: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:200: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:201: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:201: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:202: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:202: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:203: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:203: warning: called from here pci_if.h:21: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_READ_CONFIG' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:213: warning: called from here pci_if.h:32: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_WRITE_CONFIG' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:219: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:234: warning: called from here bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:234: warning: called from here pci_if.h:59: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_ENABLE_BUSMASTER' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:255: warning: called from here pci_if.h:68: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_DISABLE_BUSMASTER' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:261: warning: called from here pci_if.h:77: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_ENABLE_IO' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:267: warning: called from here pci_if.h:86: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_DISABLE_IO' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:273: warning: called from here pci_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_SET_POWERSTATE' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:300: warning: called from here pci_if.h:41: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_GET_POWERSTATE' /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:306: warning: called from here machine/bus_at386.h:207: warning: inlining failed in call to `bus_space_read_1' /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:278: warning: called from here pci_if.h:21: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_READ_CONFIG' /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:213: warning: called from here pci_if.h:32: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_WRITE_CONFIG' /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:219: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:202: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:201: warning: called from here bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:200: warning: called from here *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. -salihin- - SureMail --> 1001 Mb storage ! http://mail.suredid.com Let's make things bigger ! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 02:33:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 841B816A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 02:33:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3C143D2D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 02:33:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i8T2X0iW080863; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:33:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 21:33:00 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Sean McNeil Message-ID: <20040929023300.GB26491@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1096417171.1078.11.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1096417171.1078.11.camel@server.mcneil.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-BETA5 X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getting rid of disk selection on bootup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 02:33:03 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 28), Sean McNeil said: > I have -current installed and I get the following on bootup: > > F1 FreeBSD > F5 Drive 1 > > Default: F1 > > I'd like to get rid of that and boot directly to the pitchfork dude. > Is there a way to clear that out so it boots without the above > selector? That's boot0 (aka booteasy). What you want is an MBR that just chains to the first active partition. Install it with "fdisk -B da0", or whatever your devicename is. If you want boot0 back, run "boot0cfg -B da0". -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 03:03:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DB6816A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 03:03:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF2143D2F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 03:03:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i8T32OsE090811; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:02:24 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: knowtree@aloha.com In-Reply-To: <200409290052.i8T0qSh06881@yoda.pixi.com> References: <200409290052.i8T0qSh06881@yoda.pixi.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hDpUVLa82nkMc6J8m4s6" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1096427016.61450.27.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:03:37 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome administrative interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 03:03:53 -0000 --=-hDpUVLa82nkMc6J8m4s6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 10:52, knowtree@aloha.com wrote: > I am looking for ways to smooth out administrative tasks under Gnome.=20 >=20 > Is there a way to configure applications or menu launchers so that when a= n > application requires administrative rights it will prompt, in a nice dial= og > box, for the administrator password? For example, on my system, > Applications / System Tools / Login Screen Setup produces an error dialog > "You must be the super user (root) to configure GDM." But I don't want to > log on as root, and I don't want to require people to open a terminal > window and fool around with su and sudo to make it happen. I want it as > smooth as it is in OS X. Has anyone done this? The application really has to have support for this (like the gnome-system-tools do). However, you could probably wrap "misbehaving" applications in sysutils/gnomesu to handle this for time being. Of course, gnomesu is just a su frontend, and not a sudo frontend (like MacOS X). >=20 > Is there a nice, Gnome-like GUI tool for managing users, groups, printers= , > and network shares? I know about SWAT and WebMin, but what I seek is the > Gnome family equivalent.=20 sysutils/gnomesystemtools. They are not a complete set, but they do offer some of the functionality you seek. Joe >=20 > Gary Dunn > Honolulu >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-hDpUVLa82nkMc6J8m4s6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBWiYIb2iPiv4Uz4cRAiMHAKCbkbSb1DX8g2cCYhDHdpbcr6F+6ACglAVI MT+ASWFPBxHKwPwhlptpqhg= =MCOp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hDpUVLa82nkMc6J8m4s6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 04:33:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB9416A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 04:33:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from teachershelper.exambuddy.com (teachershelper.exambuddy.com [205.214.91.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD6043D3F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 04:33:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bounce@teachertipnewsletter.com) Received: from [205.214.89.46] (helo=localhost) by teachershelper.exambuddy.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.42) id 1CCUl4-0006YX-Ej for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:03:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 23:03:58 -0400 From: "Weekly Teacher Tip Newsletter" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: ListMail v1.77 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - teachershelper.exambuddy.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - teachertipnewsletter.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Message-Id: <20040929043306.9BD6043D3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: Weekly Teacher Tip Newsletter Welcome Follow-up X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 04:33:07 -0000 We at TeAch-nology would like to take the time to thank you for subscribing to Weekly Teacher Tip Newsletter. We would like to make you aware of all of the resources available via the TeAch-nology network. TEACH-NOLOGY - The Art and Science of Teaching with Technology® represents a vision that embraces the future of teaching in a world driven by technology. Our goal is to actualize this vision by offering a range of services that are designed to assist and support educational agencies in their attempt to develop the knowledge, competencies, or skills that teachers need to effectively incorporate technology in teaching. It is our mission to assist educators in their quest to meet the challenges of the Twenty-First Century Learners: The Net-Generation. The TeAch-nology Network consists of several sites: 1. TeAch-nology.com- http://www.teach-nology.com/ Our main site was founded in 1998. This site is entirely free for all users and consists of: -19,000 reviewed lesson plans: http://www.teach-nology.com/teachers/lesson_plans/ -2,000 reviewed web quests: http://www.teach-nology.com/teachers/lesson_plans/computing/web_quests/ -5,600 printable worksheets: http://www.teach-nology.com/worksheets/ -200,000 reviewed web sites: http://www.teach-nology.com/teachers/ -Rubric generators: http://teach-nology.com/web_tools/rubrics/ -500+ teaching tips: http://www.teach-nology.com/ideas/ -80+ teaching themes: http://teachers.teach-nology.com/themes/ -1,000+ reviewed downloads for Mac and PC: http://www.teach-nology.com/downloads/ -25 educational games: http://www.teach-nology.com/games_start/ -Teacher tools: http://teachers.teach-nology.com/web_tools/ -50+ tutorials specifically for educators: http://www.teach-nology.com/tutorials/ -eReport virtual cards: http://search.teach-nology.com/ecard/ -Free web sites: http://signup.teach-nology.com/ -Monthly guides: http://www.teach-nology.com/monthly/ -2,000+ message, message board: http://teachers.teach-nology.com/cgi-bin/ikonboard//ikonboard.cgi -Today in history: http://search.teach-nology.com/today/today2.pl -Jokes you can tell in class: http://search.teach-nology.com/jokes/hints.pl -Educational Flash Movies: http://www.teach-nology.com/movie/ 2. ExamBuddy.com (Our Latest & Greatest Creation)- http://www.exambuddy.com HTML email users click this link to visit In 2003, we created our ExamBuddy membership which allows members to create: 30+ online activities, learning games, online quizzes, online calendars, printable tests, class web pages, electronic newsletters, learning units, class surveys. Student progress can be monitored through the automatic item analysis feature that can be used with on-line quizzes and surveys. Development is effortless; just add words and clues. 3. Getworksheets.com (Gold Membership)- http://getworksheets.com/ HTML email users click this link to visit In 2002, we created our gold membership in response to overwhelming need for high-quality classroom-ready materials. Our gold membership is now one of the largest subscription-based teacher resource sites on the web! TeAch-nology.com Gold Membership puts the power of countless hours of work at your fingertips in minutes. We offer unlimited access to over 5,000 worksheets, activities, animations, Office® templates, fonts and sounds! What Are Teachers Saying About Our Gold Membership? "I wish I knew about this site sooner. I just wasted over $150 of my own money purchasing workbooks for my room. The membership you guys have, is 20% of that, it has all that I need, and it grows. I like the reading themed worksheets you add all the time. Thanks for being there!"- Cris M., Grade 4 4. Makeworksheets.com (Platinum Membership)- http://www.makeworksheets.com/ HTML email users click this link to visit Our Teacher Tools Platinum Membership Package is the first of its kind! It provides you with unlimited use of templates and tools to create and save your own customized worksheets, graphic organizers, rubrics, lesson plans, word puzzles, printables, math worksheets, mazes, and much more. You create them, we save them for you on our hard drive for you to access, edit, and print at any time from any Internet location. Just think! No more disks to carry or search for; no more applications to up-grade; no more struggles creating templates for designing great lessons. What Are Teachers Saying About Our Platinum Membership? This platinum membership makes life so much easier! Thanks!" - Carol K. 5. Teacherworkbooks.com- http://teacherworkbooks.com/ HTML email users click this link to visit At Teacherworkbooks.com, we feature instant downloads of all of our workbooks! Each workbook is professionally edited and digitally delivered to your own personalized download account. As part of the package, we also offer a wide variety of complimentary teaching and home schooling materials at your fingertips! Thank you for taking the time to view all of our available resources. We hope to continue to serve the educational community for a long time to come. Have A Great Day, TeAch-nology Staff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 04:52:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B42116A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 04:52:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3541443D46 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 04:52:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4S00AGUDIRJU@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:52:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:52:12 -0400 From: bsdfsse To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <415A3F7C.3010208@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) Subject: "ad2: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=5855" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 04:52:04 -0000 Well, I think I found the problem. FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x do not like my new Asus P4SP-MX (Celeron) motherboard's IDE controller. I "fixed" this by using a leftover Adaptec 1200A Raid controller as an "alternate IDE controller". I plugged the 3 HD's in to the 1200A, and I no longer get the DMA errors. I havent' tried the DVD drive, but I expect I will get the DMA errors, since it is still connected to the mobo. I installed via FTP, so I didn't use the CD's. There was another problem with using some Compaq RAM chips on the Celeron, doing so generates Signal 11's in addition to the DMA errors. I guess I will buy some new RAM for the machine, if the functioning 128MB isn't enough for it. I have another machine, a Compaq Presario 6024 (P4 1.8Ghz). It has 3 big (Western Digital) drives, and is also running FBSD 5.3-Beta6 - and it does *not* get the DMA errors. My laptop (Toshiba 2805-S301) also runs Beta6 fine. Only my Asus P4SP-MX mobo has the DMA errors. thx! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 05:20:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11CD16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:20:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gwdu60.gwdg.de (gwdu60.gwdg.de [134.76.8.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C292843D5C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:20:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kheuer2@gwdg.de) Received: from gwdu60.gwdg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gwdu60.gwdg.de (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8T5KHFZ076870; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:20:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kheuer2@gwdg.de) Received: from localhost (kheuer2@localhost)i8T5KHUA076867; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:20:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: gwdu60.gwdg.de: kheuer2 owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:20:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Konrad Heuer To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu In-Reply-To: <20040928211614.244a7917@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Message-ID: <20040929071316.V69034@gwdu60.gwdg.de> References: <20040928211614.244a7917@it.buh.tecnik93.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcsh star-up files help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:20:29 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > Could someone explain to me what is the order tcsh's star-up file are > processed ? The man page is rather unclear for me: The shell may read > /etc/csh.login before instead of after /etc/csh.cshrc .... Normally, tcsh reads its start-up files in the following order: /etc/csh.cshrc /etc/csh.login ~/.tcshrc ~/.cshrc ~/.login You can check this by typing: echo $version If "lf" doesn't appear in the options list, the order given above is used. > What I want and doesn't work if entered in /etc/csh.cshrc but works in > ~/.cshrc, if possible, is to have the prompt for all users > > if (${TERM} == 'screen') then > set SCREEN_NAME = "/${STY:e}" > else > set = '' > endif > > set prompt = ........${SCREEN_NAME}..... > > with the intent of having screen(1) session name somewhere in the prompt > if the shell runs under screen or nothing if it is not under screen, > without having to add the above lines to all users ~/.cshrc I'd check the contents of $TERM within /etc/csh.cshrc by echoing it to make sure that it is set as expected. Did you? Regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, kheuer2@gwdg.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 05:58:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE1816A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:58:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from favirus.ukm.my (favirus.ukm.my [202.185.38.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5E2343D4C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:55:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaehsan@eng.ukm.my) From: "annuar" To: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:12:34 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD hardware specifications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:58:37 -0000 Hi All, I'm new to Linux/Unix. I've installed Fedora Core 1 on my AMD Sempron 1.67, 256 MB, 40GB and 17" monitor. It is running but the CD player does work (No sound) - can anyone help me on this? I'm interested on FreeBSD (download the 4.10) and would like to install it either on this machine or a new machine. Can anyone suggest a suitable machine (with specs so that I can go to the PC shops)? Regards, AA EHSAN Malaysia --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.768 / Virus Database: 515 - Release Date: 9/22/2004 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 06:17:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3413E16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:17:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rtc.ro (mail.rtc.ro [212.93.139.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B393143D31 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:17:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cristi.tauber@sbhost.ro) Received: (qmail 27580 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2004 09:03:18 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO sbhost.ro) (212.93.139.11) by mail.rtc.ro with SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 09:03:17 +0300 Message-ID: <415A612A.A9CC77EC@sbhost.ro> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:15:54 +0200 From: Cristi Tauber X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael E.Conlen" References: <415918AA.C4433D9D@sbhost.ro> <006301c4a557$6a387840$6e7dfea9@Shanelaptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntivirusScanner: eTrust Antivirus v7 X-eTrust-Spam: 0 X-eTrust-Signatures: 23.66.67 cc: shane mullins cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:17:22 -0000 Switching OSes is not a choice. Now i done it !!! It seems that pf was allready installed with the base system, although i can't seem to find the installed binaries. I issued a pkg_delete to remove the old pf and than reinstall pf from sources with ALTQ. Now it works smoothly ... and I am a happy man. Though I still wondering why the installed pf wasn't working .... Cristi "Michael E.Conlen" wrote: > On Sep 28, 2004, at 8:33 AM, shane mullins wrote: > > > Why not just run OpenBSD if you want to use pf? I use both Free > > and OpenBSD. But, pf is much easier to set up on OpenBSD. Just > > install OpenBSD, enable routing, enable pf in rc.conf and you are > > done. > > > > I can tell you in my case OpenBSD doesn't provide drivers for the > hardware I have. > > -- > Michael Conlen > meconlen@obfuscated.net > > --------------------------------------------------- > This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for > transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This > message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected > information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the > addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you > are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please > notify the sender and return it.Thank you. > > --------------------------------------------------- This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please notify the sender and return it.Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 06:32:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD5D16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:32:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paf.se (argv.paf.se [195.66.31.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCE243D46 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:32:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didi@yuebing.net) Received: from [213.88.236.3] (account didi@yuebing.net HELO yuebing.net) by paf.se (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 1846521 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:32:28 +0200 Message-ID: <415A56F2.3060300@yuebing.net> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:32:18 +0200 From: didi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040429) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: corrupt disklabel, how to restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:32:33 -0000 I did what you shouldn't do. I have two disks one 80gb and one 100gb I was not happy with FreeBSD 5.2.1 so I downgraded to 4.10. Problem is the disklabel on my second drive somehow got corrupt, on this drive i backed up all home/* folders etc and so on, but now I can't get to my backup. I really need a way to restore the disklabel. I have tried scan_ffs with no result is there any other way, The disk was mounted as ad1s1d one large slice. Any information could be usefull From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 06:54:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9572C16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:54:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F8C43D2D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:54:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:51:15 -0500 Message-ID: <415A5BDA.6010505@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:53:14 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Moyer References: <20040928181609.O627@tmm324.rh.psu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040928181609.O627@tmm324.rh.psu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Sep 2004 06:51:24.0325 (UTC) FILETIME=[BC4F1550:01C4A5F0] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Permssions Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:54:57 -0000 Thomas Moyer wrote: >I have recently decided to switch from CUPS to apsfilter for printing and >cannot remember the permssions on /usr/bin/lp, lpq, lpr, and lprm. They >were changed to non-executable (through chmod 0) and now I need to set >them back to their original values. Can someone tell me what they should >be. > >Thomas Moyer >tmm324@psu.edu >DracoYung > I'm running and enjoying apsfilter. I may have futzed around with things when I was installing apsfilter, but everything print-wise is working with the following. I have built world since, though, a few times, so probably these *are* correct.... % ll lp* -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2590 Apr 23 11:38 lp* -r-sr-sr-x 1 root daemon 25416 Apr 23 11:38 lpq* -r-sr-sr-x 1 root daemon 29132 Apr 23 11:38 lpr* -r-sr-sr-x 1 root daemon 24172 Apr 23 11:38 lprm* IIRC, you could look at mtree(8) to authoritatively get things back to the "original" ... Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 07:46:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9331616A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:46:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26AC43D2F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:46:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3505486rnb for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:46:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.80 with SMTP id 80mr65998rnh; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:46:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:46:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:16:35 +0530 From: Subhro To: didi In-Reply-To: <415A56F2.3060300@yuebing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <415A56F2.3060300@yuebing.net> cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: corrupt disklabel, how to restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:46:46 -0000 If you have partitioned your disk as UFS2, then there is no way in which you can access them running 4.10. Regards S, On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:32:18 +0200, didi wrote: > I did what you shouldn't do. I have two disks one 80gb and one 100gb > I was not happy with FreeBSD 5.2.1 so I downgraded to 4.10. > Problem is the disklabel on my second drive somehow got corrupt, on this > drive i backed up all home/* folders etc and so on, but now I can't get > to my backup. > I really need a way to restore the disklabel. > > I have tried scan_ffs with no result is there any other way, > > The disk was mounted as ad1s1d one large slice. > > Any information could be usefull > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 07:48:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2C716A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:48:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns2.khi.wol.net.pk (ns2.khi.wol.net.pk [202.154.255.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C6043D53 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:48:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mjk@bankalhabib.com) Received: from BAH03.Bankalhabib.com ([202.61.51.92]) by ns2.khi.wol.net.pk (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id i8T7VlI27608 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:32:09 +0500 (PKT) From: "Jahangir Khan" To: "freebsd-questions" X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: Sender: "Jahangir Khan" Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:53:46 +0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on BAH03/BankALHabib(Release 5.0.10 |March 22, 2002) at 09/29/2004 12:54:13 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: pURCHASE OF FREE BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:48:35 -0000 NAME OF MY COUNTRY- PAKISTA - "PK" IS NOT INCLUDED IN YOUR LIST. PLEASE DO TO ENABLE ME TO ORDER. THANKS & REGARDS JAHANGIR KHAN jahangir@jahangir.com ************************************************************************************** Disclaimer:- This email and any attachments to it (the "Communication") is confidential and is for the use only of the intended recipient. The Communication may contain copyright material of Bank AL Habib Limited (111-786-110). If you are not the intended recipient of the Communication, please notify the sender immediately by return email, delete the Communication, and do not read, copy, print, retransmit, store or act in reliance on the Communication. Any views expressed in the Communication are those of the individual sender only, unless expressly stated to be those of Bank AL Habib. Bank AL Habib does not guarantee the integrity of the Communication, or that it is free from errors, viruses or interference. ************************************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 07:51:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A0316A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:51:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns2.khi.wol.net.pk (ns2.khi.wol.net.pk [202.154.255.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2F343D49 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:51:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mjk@bankalhabib.com) Received: from BAH03.Bankalhabib.com ([202.61.51.92]) by ns2.khi.wol.net.pk (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id i8T7YlI27878 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:35:24 +0500 (PKT) From: "Jahangir Khan" To: "freebsd-questions" X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: Sender: "Jahangir Khan" Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:56:44 +0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on BAH03/BankALHabib(Release 5.0.10 |March 22, 2002) at 09/29/2004 12:57:28 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: FREE BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:51:52 -0000 NAME OF MY COUNTRY- PAKISTA N- "PK" IS NOT INCLUDED IN YOUR LIST. PLEASE DO TO ENABLE ME TO ORDER. THANKS & REGARDS JAHANGIR KHAN jahangir@jahangir.com ************************************************************************************** Disclaimer:- This email and any attachments to it (the "Communication") is confidential and is for the use only of the intended recipient. The Communication may contain copyright material of Bank AL Habib Limited (111-786-110). If you are not the intended recipient of the Communication, please notify the sender immediately by return email, delete the Communication, and do not read, copy, print, retransmit, store or act in reliance on the Communication. Any views expressed in the Communication are those of the individual sender only, unless expressly stated to be those of Bank AL Habib. Bank AL Habib does not guarantee the integrity of the Communication, or that it is free from errors, viruses or interference. ************************************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 07:51:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B80D16A4DA for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:51:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFABF43D5D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:51:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3505589rnb for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.80 with SMTP id d80mr159787rng; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:51:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:21:46 +0530 From: Subhro To: annuar In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD hardware specifications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:51:56 -0000 On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:12:34 +0800, annuar wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm new to Linux/Unix. I've installed Fedora Core 1 on my AMD Sempron 1.67, > 256 MB, 40GB and 17" monitor. It is running but the CD player does work (No > sound) - can anyone help me on this? You are in the wrong place. We do not answer anything about Linux/Fedora whatever. BTW off the list, go and check the audio cable on your CDROM drive. > > I'm interested on FreeBSD (download the 4.10) and would like to install it > either on this machine or a new machine. Can anyone suggest a suitable > machine (with specs so that I can go to the PC shops)? > You can install FBSD on the same system as dual boot. Although I do not have a valid reason why one would run Linux when he/she is also running FBSD. For running FBSD, without X windows, any hardware can go through. For example you can get hold of a 386 with 16 MB RAM and a 700MB hard disk and run FBSD like wind. Regards S. -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 07:52:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E2F16A4D0 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:52:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gizmo04ps.bigpond.com (gizmo04ps.bigpond.com [144.140.71.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0243343D5C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:52:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tom_oak@telstra.com) Received: (qmail 30076 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2004 07:52:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO psmam12.bigpond.com) (144.135.25.103) by gizmo04ps.bigpond.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 07:52:28 -0000 Received: from 144.140.102.51 ([144.140.102.51]) by psmam12.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 228/75274259) with SMTP id 75274259; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:52:29 +1000 Message-ID: <12881114.1096444348988.JavaMail.imail@owaxs02.opwv.email.bigpond.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:52:28 +1000 From: To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Sensitivity: Normal Subject: Which Development Environment/Tools For FreeBSD + PostgreSQL Service? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:52:32 -0000 Hello All, We are a company looking for a good development environment/tool(s) for a service-type application. The OS is FreeBSD and the database will be PostgreSQL. The first emphasis is placed on reliability, with secondary emphasis on performance. Third in importance would be the richness of the language/features and avoidance of "plumbing" code. - Is this the right place to be asking about development tools? Since this involves FreeBSD, we thought it might be appropriate. - We do not need any GUI. The programs will either run from the shell, or as services. - C/C++ comes to mind, but which flavour of compiler/debugger/third party add-ons/editor? An advantage here is the fact that this language is well established which should improve reliability to some extent (if we are careful with pointers). A disadvantage would be the extensive use of pointers, the cryptic and unreadable look of the code and the fact that C/C++ is getting a bit long in the tooth. - We are considering the Borland tools (JBuilder/Kylix) since we are familiar with Borland tools and like their database connectivity, rich components and elegant looking code (less plumbing). But on the other hand, we don't need any GUI, and we had some problems in the past with reliability. Do you have any thoughts on this? - We would prefer not to use ODBC/JDBC, and instead interface directly to the database. We had some bad experience in the past regarding reliability and performance. We can either use the library provided by Postgres or write our own wrappers to make things more readable. - We would prefer not to use an interpreted language such as Python, Java, and Perl etc for performance reasons. We know that Java can be compiled, but is it a good solution without using JDBC? How about reliability? Are there any particularly elegant solutions you have experience with? Thank you for your help. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 07:54:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BF216A4D0 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:54:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213BC43D49 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:54:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3505610rnb for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.80 with SMTP id 80mr66105rnh; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:24:00 +0530 From: Subhro To: salihin In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: error compile kernel in 5.2.1.Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:54:26 -0000 Did you cvsup with src-all ? If not then do it. Also can u just cat /etc/make.conf ? Regards S. On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:17:29 +0300, salihin wrote: > Dear all, > i have problem with my freebsd 5.2.1RELEASE , when i compile kernel using > make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL > I got this error messages... > should i upgrade to 5.3. BETA RELEASE :( or upgrade to 5.2.1.STABLE > > help me please,... > > cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -g -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/dev -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Werror aic7xxx_reg_print.c > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:189: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:189: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:190: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:190: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:191: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:191: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:192: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:192: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:193: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:193: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:194: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:194: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:195: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:195: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:196: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:196: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:197: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:197: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:198: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:198: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:199: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:199: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:200: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:200: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:201: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:201: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:202: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:202: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:203: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:203: warning: called from here > pci_if.h:21: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_READ_CONFIG' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:213: warning: called from here > pci_if.h:32: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_WRITE_CONFIG' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:219: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:234: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_WRITE_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:234: warning: called from here > pci_if.h:59: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_ENABLE_BUSMASTER' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:255: warning: called from here > pci_if.h:68: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_DISABLE_BUSMASTER' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:261: warning: called from here > pci_if.h:77: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_ENABLE_IO' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:267: warning: called from here > pci_if.h:86: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_DISABLE_IO' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:273: warning: called from here > pci_if.h:50: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_SET_POWERSTATE' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:300: warning: called from here > pci_if.h:41: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_GET_POWERSTATE' > /usr/src/sys/dev/pci/pcivar.h:306: warning: called from here > machine/bus_at386.h:207: warning: inlining failed in call to `bus_space_read_1' > /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:278: warning: called from here > pci_if.h:21: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_READ_CONFIG' > /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:213: warning: called from here > pci_if.h:32: warning: inlining failed in call to `PCI_WRITE_CONFIG' > /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:219: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:202: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:201: warning: called from here > bus_if.h:39: warning: inlining failed in call to `BUS_READ_IVAR' > /usr/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic7xxx_osm.h:200: warning: called from here > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > -salihin- > > - > SureMail --> 1001 Mb storage ! http://mail.suredid.com Let's make things bigger ! > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 07:58:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B9616A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:58:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paf.se (argv.paf.se [195.66.31.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3C543D3F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:58:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didi@yuebing.net) Received: from [213.88.236.3] (account didi@yuebing.net HELO yuebing.net) by paf.se (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 1846709; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:58:08 +0200 Message-ID: <415A6B0F.5000908@yuebing.net> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:58:07 +0200 From: didi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040429) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subhro References: <415A56F2.3060300@yuebing.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: corrupt disklabel, how to restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:58:10 -0000 It's partitioned and mounted from sysinstall in 5.2.1 And the machine rins 5.2.1 again :( So, I guess I could: use fdisk and/or disklabel from within sysinstall again. But how do I prevent sysinstall from making 'newfs' ? Thanks & Regards D-tail Subhro wrote: > If you have partitioned your disk as UFS2, then there is no way in > which you can access them running 4.10. > > Regards > S, > > > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:32:18 +0200, didi wrote: > >>I did what you shouldn't do. I have two disks one 80gb and one 100gb >>I was not happy with FreeBSD 5.2.1 so I downgraded to 4.10. >>Problem is the disklabel on my second drive somehow got corrupt, on this >>drive i backed up all home/* folders etc and so on, but now I can't get >>to my backup. >>I really need a way to restore the disklabel. >> >>I have tried scan_ffs with no result is there any other way, >> >>The disk was mounted as ad1s1d one large slice. >> >>Any information could be usefull >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 07:59:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0A816A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:59:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C3543D39 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:59:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3505719rnb for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.80 with SMTP id d80mr159887rng; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 00:59:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:29:34 +0530 From: Subhro To: didi In-Reply-To: <415A6B0F.5000908@yuebing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <415A56F2.3060300@yuebing.net> <415A6B0F.5000908@yuebing.net> cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: corrupt disklabel, how to restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:59:41 -0000 There is a key for toggling new filesystem. Probably Y..... sorry don't rember it. Regards S. On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:58:07 +0200, didi wrote: > It's partitioned and mounted from sysinstall in 5.2.1 > > And the machine rins 5.2.1 again :( > > So, I guess I could: > > use fdisk and/or disklabel from within sysinstall again. But how do I > prevent sysinstall from making 'newfs' ? > > Thanks & Regards D-tail > > > > > Subhro wrote: > > If you have partitioned your disk as UFS2, then there is no way in > > which you can access them running 4.10. > > > > Regards > > S, > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:32:18 +0200, didi wrote: > > > >>I did what you shouldn't do. I have two disks one 80gb and one 100gb > >>I was not happy with FreeBSD 5.2.1 so I downgraded to 4.10. > >>Problem is the disklabel on my second drive somehow got corrupt, on this > >>drive i backed up all home/* folders etc and so on, but now I can't get > >>to my backup. > >>I really need a way to restore the disklabel. > >> > >>I have tried scan_ffs with no result is there any other way, > >> > >>The disk was mounted as ad1s1d one large slice. > >> > >>Any information could be usefull > >>_______________________________________________ > >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > > > > > > -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 08:19:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1610B16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:19:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.pixi.com (relay.pixi.com [206.127.224.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD16B43D5C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:19:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from knowtree@aloha.com) Received: from carter.pixi.com ([206.127.224.102]:2582 "EHLO carter.pixi.com") by relay.pixi.com with ESMTP id S9488AbUI2ITH (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:19:07 -1000 Received: from Internal (206.127.224.85) by carter with SMTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:19:07 GMT X-Titankey-e_id: <4562641c-19ad-43b0-9524-6eed3b806c44> Received: from vaiosr7k.ozland (atm-251-63.pixi.com [206.127.251.63]) by koa.aloha.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i8T8I0BH027493; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:18:02 -1000 (HST) From: Gary Dunn To: dani In-Reply-To: <4156D8B0.2010209@volja.net> References: <4156D8B0.2010209@volja.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.13 (Preview Release) Date: 28 Sep 2004 22:15:39 -1000 Message-Id: <1096445742.2621.32.camel@vaiosr7k.ozland> Mime-Version: 1.0 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:19:09 -0000 On Sun, 2004-09-26 at 04:56, dani wrote: > Hey > > Sorry to steal your time, but I have a seriuos problem. > I have the Freebsd 4.10 operation system and its runing on > the i386 platform. > I have a problem with the sound card. My sound card is on the motherbord > and i think it is the Realtek'97 sound card. > I have no drivers and not enough knowledge to install this sound card. I solved a similar problem by following the instructions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html to load all sound drivers. You will see a long list of messages scroll by early in the boot sequence (before /etc/rc). I wonder if there is a way to deduce from this which driver hit? Gary Dunn Honolulu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 08:23:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4269716A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:23:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fling.sanbi.ac.za (fling.sanbi.ac.za [196.38.142.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB5143D46 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:23:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from irvine@sanbi.ac.za) Received: from psytrance.egenetics.com ([196.38.142.87]) by fling.sanbi.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1CCZk2-000P5U-00 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:23:14 +0200 Message-ID: <415A70F2.8000603@sanbi.ac.za> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:23:14 +0200 From: Irvine Short Organization: SANBI User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040701) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <41595063.8000600@sanbi.ac.za> In-Reply-To: <41595063.8000600@sanbi.ac.za> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ruby coredumping in 4.10 w. ports utils X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: irvine@sanbi.ac.za List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:23:18 -0000 Irvine Short wrote: > What's the deal with ruby coredumping all over the place when using > pkgdb -F and portsdb -Uu under 4.10 these days? Hmmm, well an upgrade to yesterday's STABLE did the trick on both boxes. Now to get kde-3.3 to build... -- Irvine From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 08:27:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A754E16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:27:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.pixi.com (relay.pixi.com [206.127.224.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7721943D2F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:27:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from knowtree@aloha.com) Received: from carter.pixi.com ([206.127.224.102]:2807 "EHLO carter.pixi.com") by relay.pixi.com with ESMTP id S9463AbUI2I1C (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:27:02 -1000 Received: from Internal (206.127.224.85) by carter with SMTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:27:03 GMT X-Titankey-e_id: <5a28449c-7f62-46a3-ad9c-ac2cd19ca1a0> Received: from vaiosr7k.ozland (atm-251-63.pixi.com [206.127.251.63]) by koa.aloha.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i8T8PvBH028798; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:25:58 -1000 (HST) From: Gary Dunn To: Scot Hetzel In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0409271234412a6ce6@mail.gmail.com> References: <001101c2c252$03ebd850$12387618@q1d0p9> <20030122100925.O3206-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> <790a9fff0409271234412a6ce6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.13 (Preview Release) Date: 28 Sep 2004 22:23:36 -1000 Message-Id: <1096446218.2625.40.camel@vaiosr7k.ozland> Mime-Version: 1.0 cc: dwbear75@gmail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.7->5.0, ran out of space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:27:03 -0000 On Mon, 2004-09-27 at 09:34, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:11:02 -1000 (HST), Vincent Poy > wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Kirk R. Wythers wrote: > > > > > I just ran into a problem trying to install the 5.0 world. I thought I > > > checked and had 30M free on / before I started this. However, after > > > building, the world, building the kernel, installing the kernel, running > > > mergemaster -p, I went to install the world and got the error 'out of > > > space on /' > > > > > > I need to find some room, but I'm a little nervous about what I can rm. > > > Here is what I'm looking at: > > > > > > 1) / partition is 79M, 64M are used (I was almost sure there was > > > more room than that on / before I satarted). > > > 2) /tmp is on it's own partition > > > 3) du -h on subdirectories breakdown like this. > > > a. 18M /boot > > > b. 1.4M /etc > > > c. 3.7M /kernel > > > d. 3.9M /kern.GENERIC If Scot's advice doesn't do it, as a last resort, delete the kernel you are not using. Only do this if the one you do use is working well. But this size problem could haunt you later on in 5.x anyway. Gary Dunn Honolulu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 08:37:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FAB16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:37:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B17243D48 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:37:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1] (may be forged))i8T8bJYY017309 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:37:19 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8T8bJJ6017308; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:37:19 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:37:19 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Jahangir Khan Message-ID: <20040929083719.GA16940@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Jahangir Khan , freebsd-questions References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:37:19 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: FREE BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:37:34 -0000 --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 12:56:44PM +0500, Jahangir Khan wrote: =20 > NAME OF MY COUNTRY- PAKISTA N- "PK" IS NOT INCLUDED IN YOUR LIST. PLEASE = DO > TO ENABLE ME TO ORDER. To order what? FreeBSD doesn't actually sell anything. On the other hand, it makes a great deal of stuff available for anyone to download for free. There's no limitation on downloading the system from anywhere, other than certain national restrictions on strong cryptography. Even so, unless your own locale forbids import of strong crypto, you can always download from, say, Canada or Germany perfectly legally. If you're after a set of the FreeBSD installation disks on CD Rom or DVD, those can be ordered from various companies around the world, some of which are listed here: http://www.freebsd.org/commercial/misc.html Those companies are not part of FreeBSD.org though: if you're having problems ordering from one of them, you should contact the customer support for the company directly. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWnQ/iD657aJF7eIRAheoAKCnFepU1mwu8XsYB7Efkm2yka4CNgCeOVWf hqysxhKOV1AtBHlDHA+KFDw= =t6MA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YiEDa0DAkWCtVeE4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 08:46:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F2D16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:46:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.pixi.com (relay.pixi.com [206.127.224.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6137C43D31 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:46:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from knowtree@aloha.com) Received: from carter.pixi.com ([206.127.224.102]:2881 "EHLO carter.pixi.com") by relay.pixi.com with ESMTP id S9376AbUI2Iqs (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:46:48 -1000 Received: from Internal (206.127.224.85) by carter with SMTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:46:51 GMT X-Titankey-e_id: <53757d1a-47a6-47cc-979c-0171625ed24e> Received: from vaiosr7k.ozland (atm-251-63.pixi.com [206.127.251.63]) by koa.aloha.com (8.12.10/8.12.2) with ESMTP id i8T8jgBH001283; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:45:43 -1000 (HST) From: Gary Dunn To: Geoffrey.Gloistein@wellsfargo.com In-Reply-To: <94BD514305B4A24C971E0FB32400B2E004380D@msgswbiadsm04.wellsfargo.com> References: <94BD514305B4A24C971E0FB32400B2E004380D@msgswbiadsm04.wellsfargo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.13 (Preview Release) Date: 28 Sep 2004 22:43:21 -1000 Message-Id: <1096447403.2621.48.camel@vaiosr7k.ozland> Mime-Version: 1.0 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Broken X fonts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:46:53 -0000 On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 11:39, Geoffrey.Gloistein@wellsfargo.com wrote: > The first time I used "portupgrade -arR". Slightly off topic, but are there args redundant? How would this differ from -a ? I'm still struggling to understand portupgrade. Gary Dunn Honolulu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 09:36:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A0016A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:36:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.act.co.za (mail.act.co.za [196.15.213.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E4143D54 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:36:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spidey@act.co.za) Received: from localhost.act.co.za ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by mail.act.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 5.0) id 1CCayd-000Bi6-Jr for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:42:23 +0200 Received: from mail.act.co.za ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.act.co.za [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44822-06 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:42:10 +0200 (SAST) Received: from [10.0.1.11] (helo=SPIDEY) by mail.act.co.za with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 5.0) id 1CCayQ-000Bhg-IZ for FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:42:10 +0200 From: "Spidey Knepscheld" To: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:35:44 +0200 Organization: ACT Computers Message-ID: <00fe01c4a607$b1a096d0$0b01000a@SPIDEY> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at act.co.za Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Attix Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: spidey@act.co.za List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:36:03 -0000 Hi Guys I would like to know if there is an app or someway of running a complete off-site backup system with FreeBSD and not having to use Attix for they want to have the backup faciclity with them and I would like to oppose the Attix idea for my customers. Spidey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 09:45:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BF016A4CF for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:45:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paf.se (argv.paf.se [195.66.31.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B1943D5C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:45:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didi@yuebing.net) Received: from [213.88.236.3] (account didi@yuebing.net HELO yuebing.net) by paf.se (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 1846941; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:45:27 +0200 Message-ID: <415A8436.2090205@yuebing.net> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:45:26 +0200 From: didi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040429) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subhro References: <415A56F2.3060300@yuebing.net> <415A6B0F.5000908@yuebing.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: corrupt disklabel, how to restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:45:29 -0000 Does : UFS2+S N in "freebsd disklabel editor" mean that no newfs will be created i.e that only the disklabel will be written and the acyual filesystem be left alone? as opposed to UFS+S Y ? d-tail (I'm a bit worried :| ) Subhro wrote: > There is a key for toggling new filesystem. Probably Y..... sorry > don't rember it. > > Regards > S. > > > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:58:07 +0200, didi wrote: > >>It's partitioned and mounted from sysinstall in 5.2.1 >> >>And the machine rins 5.2.1 again :( >> >>So, I guess I could: >> >>use fdisk and/or disklabel from within sysinstall again. But how do I >>prevent sysinstall from making 'newfs' ? >> >>Thanks & Regards D-tail >> >> >> >> >>Subhro wrote: >> >>>If you have partitioned your disk as UFS2, then there is no way in >>>which you can access them running 4.10. >>> >>>Regards >>>S, >>> >>> >>>On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:32:18 +0200, didi wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I did what you shouldn't do. I have two disks one 80gb and one 100gb >>>>I was not happy with FreeBSD 5.2.1 so I downgraded to 4.10. >>>>Problem is the disklabel on my second drive somehow got corrupt, on this >>>>drive i backed up all home/* folders etc and so on, but now I can't get >>>>to my backup. >>>>I really need a way to restore the disklabel. >>>> >>>>I have tried scan_ffs with no result is there any other way, >>>> >>>>The disk was mounted as ad1s1d one large slice. >>>> >>>>Any information could be usefull >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 09:49:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F6216A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:49:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hermes.hyperhosting.gr (hermes.hyperhosting.gr [65.109.239.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2949343D45 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:49:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nicx@ebox.gr) Received: from hermes.hyperhosting.gr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8T9nCmd024183 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:49:13 +0300 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:49:12 +0300 Message-Id: <200409290949.i8T9nCmd024183@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary From: Nicx To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: AtMail Pro 3.61 - http://webbasedemail.com/ X-Origin: 212.205.209.68 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: nicx@ebox.gr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:49:14 -0000 Hello! I have installed Win XP and Free BSD 5.2.1 in the same Hard disk. I have the option to sellect wich operating system to boot the option to BSD it seems corectly but the Win XP option in the Boot loader menu it's seems: press F1 ???????????? Is there any boot configuration file that i can rename the ?????????? option to Win XP? Thanks! ... Nicx ---- www.ebox.gr - Dwrea'n E-mail µe 15MB mailbox www.hyperhosting.gr Apokty%ste to diko' sa*s web site µe dw%ro to domain name! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 09:51:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AB3516A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:51:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsmail.ro [193.231.236.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD2A43D1F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:51:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 10448 invoked by uid 89); 29 Sep 2004 09:51:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 09:51:19 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 17F314C3; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:51:18 +0300 (EEST) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:51:17 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Konrad Heuer Message-ID: <20040929125117.039c432d@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20040929071316.V69034@gwdu60.gwdg.de> References: <20040928211614.244a7917@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20040929071316.V69034@gwdu60.gwdg.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Ion-Mihai Tetcu cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcsh star-up files help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:51:22 -0000 On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:20:17 +0200 (CEST) Konrad Heuer wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > Could someone explain to me what is the order tcsh's star-up file are > > processed ? The man page is rather unclear for me: The shell may read > > /etc/csh.login before instead of after /etc/csh.cshrc .... > > Normally, tcsh reads its start-up files in the following order: > > /etc/csh.cshrc > /etc/csh.login > ~/.tcshrc > ~/.cshrc > ~/.login > > You can check this by typing: > > echo $version > > If "lf" doesn't appear in the options list, the order given above is used. Thanks. This is the case. Are the file in /etc override by user files ? > > What I want and doesn't work if entered in /etc/csh.cshrc but works in > > ~/.cshrc, if possible, is to have the prompt for all users > > > > if (${TERM} == 'screen') then > > set SCREEN_NAME = "/${STY:e}" > > else > > set SCREEN_NAME = '' > > endif > > > > set prompt = ........${SCREEN_NAME}..... > > > > with the intent of having screen(1) session name somewhere in the prompt > > if the shell runs under screen or nothing if it is not under screen, > > without having to add the above lines to all users ~/.cshrc > > I'd check the contents of $TERM within /etc/csh.cshrc by echoing it to > make sure that it is set as expected. Did you? Now it works, donno why :) -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 09:55:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E25016A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:55:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kappa.voce.ru (ns.voce.ru [213.154.181.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA7243D31 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:55:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from unlim@voce.ru) Received: from nuclear.gepvoce.local (nuclear.gepvoce.local [192.168.2.104]) by kappa.voce.ru (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i8T9tMkq016070 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:55:22 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from unlim@voce.ru) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:56:39 +0400 From: Kostya Falkov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.10.03) Business Organization: GEP VOCE X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <837980166.20040929135639@voce.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: growfs over 500gb X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kostya Falkov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:55:30 -0000 Hello freebsd-questions, There were 3 drives in vinum concat drive. Now I add fourth # vinum list 4 drives: D vinumdrive4 State: up /dev/ad4s1d A: 0/152625 MB (0%) D vinumdrive2 State: up /dev/ad3s1d A: 0/152625 MB (0%) D vinumdrive1 State: up /dev/ad2s1d A: 0/152625 MB (0%) D vinumdrive3 State: up /dev/ad1s1d A: 0/152627 MB (0%) 1 volumes: V bigger State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 596 GB 1 plexes: P bigger.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 4 Size: 596 GB 4 subdisks: S bigger.p0.s0 State: up D: vinumdrive1 Size: 149 GB S bigger.p0.s1 State: up D: vinumdrive2 Size: 149 GB S bigger.p0.s2 State: up D: vinumdrive3 Size: 149 GB S bigger.p0.s3 State: up D: vinumdrive4 Size: 149 GB #growfs -y /dev/vinum/bigger ... bad inode number 1 to ginode Where is the problem? At start partition was 432 GB, using step by step growing(increasing -s option in growfs) I make 534GB and then I have the same: #growfs -y -s 1156529856 /dev/vunim/bigger ... bad inode number 1 to ginode in -N (Test mode) the same... Please help there are approximately 40 gb space on drive4 but partition couldn't be increased... P.S. FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE -- Best regards, Kostya mailto:unlim@voce.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 09:57:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B50C16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:57:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DFE43D2F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:57:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1] (may be forged))i8T9up0h022111 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:56:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8T9upSd022081; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:56:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:56:51 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Spidey Knepscheld Message-ID: <20040929095651.GA34232@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Spidey Knepscheld , FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org References: <00fe01c4a607$b1a096d0$0b01000a@SPIDEY> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00fe01c4a607$b1a096d0$0b01000a@SPIDEY> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:56:51 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Attix Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:57:12 -0000 --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:35:44AM +0200, Spidey Knepscheld wrote: > I would like to know if there is an app or someway of running a complete > off-site backup system with FreeBSD and not having to use Attix for they > want to have the backup faciclity with them and I would like to oppose > the Attix idea for my customers. Sure, it's fairly easy to set up a system that backs up to a remote server even using just the stuff that comes with FreeBSD. Virtually any network backup system out of ports (bacula, amanda) can be coerced into using a backup server at a separate location. You'll need plenty of bandwidth for the backup server, plus a disk array or tape library large enough to service all of your customers. The problems start when you consider things like security -- how do you guarrantee that /only/ one specific customer can access their data, especially in a disaster recovery situation where they may be operating out of temporary accomodation and not have access to all their old records? That includes preventing the data being snooped on in transit. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWobjiD657aJF7eIRAjumAJ9aLBvmWUcw8NWpx5xemppc2bW5TQCcCiZO /B+muds3gqTazRuE9IiEJ1w= =Oxqz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 09:58:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3835B16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:58:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gwdu60.gwdg.de (gwdu60.gwdg.de [134.76.8.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDA843D45 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:58:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kheuer2@gwdg.de) Received: from gwdu60.gwdg.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gwdu60.gwdg.de (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8T9w60d079101; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:58:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kheuer2@gwdg.de) Received: from localhost (kheuer2@localhost)i8T9w5tW079098; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:58:06 +0200 (CEST) X-Authentication-Warning: gwdu60.gwdg.de: kheuer2 owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:58:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Konrad Heuer To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu In-Reply-To: <20040929125117.039c432d@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Message-ID: <20040929115607.R69034@gwdu60.gwdg.de> References: <20040928211614.244a7917@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <20040929125117.039c432d@it.buh.tecnik93.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Ion-Mihai Tetcu cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tcsh star-up files help needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:58:09 -0000 On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:20:17 +0200 (CEST) > Konrad Heuer wrote: > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > > > Could someone explain to me what is the order tcsh's star-up file are > > > processed ? The man page is rather unclear for me: The shell may read > > > /etc/csh.login before instead of after /etc/csh.cshrc .... > > > > Normally, tcsh reads its start-up files in the following order: > > > > /etc/csh.cshrc > > /etc/csh.login > > ~/.tcshrc > > ~/.cshrc > > ~/.login > > > > You can check this by typing: > > > > echo $version > > > > If "lf" doesn't appear in the options list, the order given above is used. > > Thanks. This is the case. > Are the file in /etc override by user files ? Yes, system-wide settings can be overridden by user startup files. > > > What I want and doesn't work if entered in /etc/csh.cshrc but works in > > > ~/.cshrc, if possible, is to have the prompt for all users > > > > > > if (${TERM} == 'screen') then > > > set SCREEN_NAME = "/${STY:e}" > > > else > > > set SCREEN_NAME = '' > > > endif > > > > > > set prompt = ........${SCREEN_NAME}..... > > > > > > with the intent of having screen(1) session name somewhere in the prompt > > > if the shell runs under screen or nothing if it is not under screen, > > > without having to add the above lines to all users ~/.cshrc > > > > I'd check the contents of $TERM within /etc/csh.cshrc by echoing it to > > make sure that it is set as expected. Did you? > > Now it works, donno why :) Good news, nevertheless! Regards Konrad Heuer GWDG, Am Fassberg, 37077 Goettingen, Germany, kheuer2@gwdg.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 09:59:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5D316A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:59:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C1743D5C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:59:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1] (may be forged))i8T9x0o7033314 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:59:00 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8T9x0wX033313; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:59:00 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:58:59 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Nicx Message-ID: <20040929095859.GB34232@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Nicx , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200409290949.i8T9nCmd024183@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409290949.i8T9nCmd024183@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:59:00 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:59:15 -0000 --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 12:49:12PM +0300, Nicx wrote: > I have installed Win XP and Free BSD 5.2.1 > in the same Hard disk. I have the option > to sellect wich operating system to boot > the option to BSD it seems corectly > but the Win XP option in the Boot loader menu > it's seems: > press F1 ???????????? > Is there any boot configuration file that i can rename the > ?????????? option to Win XP? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/disks.html#CHANGIN= G-BOOTPROMPT Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWodjiD657aJF7eIRApNFAJwNXG9XbaMrx3CWVwyasieBndqmdgCfabn8 fR4t1xtThqfp/ZND3HcBNao= =4ek7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --kXdP64Ggrk/fb43R-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 10:49:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695D116A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:49:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy04.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147A843D46 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:49:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edwinculp@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from prodigy.net.mx (du-148-235-52-34.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.34]) by smtp.prodigy.net.mx (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I4S00BBBU22OA@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:49:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [148.235.52.103] (Forwarded-For: [201.129.94.187]) by nlpmail04.prodigy.net.mx (mshttpd); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:49:42 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 05:49:42 -0500 From: edwinculp To: Julian Stacey Message-id: <214f0220df6a.20df6a214f02@prodigy.net.mx> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-language: es Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: es Priority: non-urgent X-Priority: 5 (Lowest) cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Respuesta: Re: USB memory stick hotswap problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:49:15 -0000 ----- Mensaje original ----- De=3A Julian Stacey =3Cjhs=40berklix=2Eorg=3E Fecha=3A Mi=E9rcoles=2C Septiembre 29=2C 2004 4=3A34 am Asunto=3A Re=3A USB memory stick hotswap problems =3E Very telling mail that=2E Hopefully someone may find time to solve it= =2E Yes=2C I agree=2C basically because Micro=24oft has users accustomed to t= ransparently access and removal of floppies and cd=27s=2C if not my icons= wouldn=27t look like a hack=2E =3E = =3E What=27s a PITA by the way =3F Pain in the ass =3A) Have a great day=2C ed =3E = =3E Reference=3A =3E =3E From=3A edwinculp =3Cedwinculp=40prodigy=2Enet=2Emx=3E = =3E =3E Date=3A Mon=2C 27 Sep 2004 10=3A56=3A17 -0500 = =3E =3E Message-id=3A =3C1b79851b2436=2E1b24361b7985=40prodigy=2Enet=2Emx= =3E = =3E = =3E edwinculp wrote=3A =3E =3E Quoting Ivan Voras =3Civoras=40fer=2Ehr=3E=3A =3E =3E = =3E =3E =3E Daniel O=27Connor wrote=3A =3E =3E =3E=3E One possibility would be to add a facility to mark all the= = =3E data for =3E =3E =3E=3E a certain device to be non-critical so it will throw it aw= ay = =3E when it =3E =3E =3E=3E tries to flush it and fails instead of panicing=2E =3E =3E =3E =3E =3E =3E That (and a message in syslog) would be just fine=2E (=22Wind= ows = =3E does it=2C so =3E =3E =3E it=27s normal=22=2E) I know (and I think other USB drive user= s know = =3E too) that =3E =3E =3E I need to wait for the little LED on the device to stop = =3E blinking before =3E =3E =3E unplugging it=2E =3E =3E =3E =3E =3E =3E IIRC=2C Windows mounts removable drives with write caching = =3E disabled=2C so it =3E =3E =3E should probably be the same in FreeBSD=2E =3E =3E = =3E =3E Would it not be a good idea to do something like this for cd=27s = =3E and floppies=3F =3E =3E = =3E =3E I=27m substituting FreeBSD for windows in some internet cafes=2E = Not = =3E automatical=3E ly recovering from unmounted cd=27s=2C floppies and = =3E usbdev=27s=2C is probably the big =3E =3E gest PITA that I=27ve found and haven=27t been able to solve clea= nly=2E = =3E I=27ve had t =3E =3E o put icons on the kde-desktop for accessing and removing them = =3E that many just =3E =3E ignore=2E This is also the case in a corporate environment wher= e = =3E I have had t =3E =3E he same problem but they are a little better at using the =3E =3E icon because it is their pc that crashes =3A) =3E =3E = =3E =3E Thanks=2C =3E =3E = =3E =3E ed =3E =3E = =3E =3E =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =3E =3E freebsd-current=40freebsd=2Eorg mailing list =3E =3E http=3A//lists=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current =3E =3E To unsubscribe=2C send any mail to =22freebsd-current- =3E unsubscribe=40freebsd=2Eorg=22=3E = =3E =3E = =3E = =3E - =3E Julian Stacey=2E Unix=2CC=2CNet =26 Sys=2E Eng=2E Consultant=2C Muni= ch=2E = =3E http=3A//berklix=2EcomMail in Ascii=2C Html dumped as Spam=2E Ihr Ra= uch =3D = =3E mein allergischer Kopfschmerz=2E =3E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 11:57:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBA416A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:57:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D07B43D5E for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:57:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp51-93.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.51.93]) i8TBvk4Y048219; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:27:46 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: Saccheen Martin , questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:27:45 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040926214746.8775.qmail@web40002.mail.yahoo.com> <200409271956.56880.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <200409271956.56880.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409292127.45654.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> cc: "Walker, Michael" Subject: Re: cannot see Windows after installing FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:57:53 -0000 I received a direct response from Michael which I don't see copied to the mailing list. On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:00 pm, Walker, Michael wrote: > >It is my understanding that on installation windows by default > >places NTLDR is the first file system which is > >understood by the MS software. So if the 4.3G had some MS > >file system when you installed XP on the 80G drive then > >the chances are that NTLDR was placed on the 4.3G drive and > >is now overwritten by FreeBSD. > > > >I would expect that a MS expert might be able to replace the > >NTLDR file and reconstruct the data file that goes with it; > >but this is outside my ken. > > > >Malcolm > > Im pretty sure that if you boot from the XP cd enter the recovery console, > that there is a option to replace NTLDR. > Don't quote me on this, I have only ever had to do it once and that was > using a windows 2000 cd. > Also, the windows XP bootloader can boot freeBSD, you just have to set it > up to. > > Mick Walker Although I find it of interest it possibly has more relevance for Saccheen than me. Thanks Michael, on both our behalves. Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 12:30:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F4416A511 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:30:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from argo.ripn.net (argo.ripn.net [194.226.65.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD8043D2D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:30:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aronov@argo.ripn.net) Received: from aronov by argo.ripn.net with local (RIPN) id 1CCdbV-000KOT-HH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:30:41 +0400 From: Mikhail Aronov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:30:41 +0400 Subject: USB-2 DVD recorder X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:30:43 -0000 Is there anybody get an experience on using external USB-2 DVD recorder under FreeBSD-4.10? Any comments will be accepted with great acknowledgments. --- Mikhail Aronov. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 12:35:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C2516A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:35:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B20F43D69 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:35:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@HiWAAY.net) Received: (qmail 10783 invoked by uid 0); 29 Sep 2004 12:35:57 -0000 Received: from user-69-73-60-132.knology.net (HELO ?10.0.0.68?) (69.73.60.132) by smtp7.knology.net with SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 12:35:57 -0000 In-Reply-To: <837980166.20040929135639@voce.ru> References: <837980166.20040929135639@voce.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <1011F339-1214-11D9-93BC-000393BB56F2@HiWAAY.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Kelly Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:35:36 -0500 To: Kostya Falkov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: growfs over 500gb X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:35:43 -0000 On Sep 29, 2004, at 4:56 AM, Kostya Falkov wrote: > #growfs -y /dev/vinum/bigger > ... > bad inode number 1 to ginode > > Where is the problem? At start partition was 432 GB, using step by step > growing(increasing -s option in growfs) I make 534GB and then I have > the same: > #growfs -y -s 1156529856 /dev/vunim/bigger > ... > bad inode number 1 to ginode > > in -N (Test mode) the same... The 5.3 To-Do list says there is a problem in growfs: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.3R/todo.html -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 12:43:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B1C16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:43:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3445243D49 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:43:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD034C20588 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:43:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: uL3sj+95QR/yDE8BD2uaQA 1096461804 Received: from modem-1295.wolf.dialup.pol.co.uk (modem-1295.wolf.dialup.pol.co.uk [81.76.133.15]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8FE8771 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:43:24 -0400 (EDT) From: "R. W." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:43:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409291343.04779.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD hardware specifications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:43:39 -0000 On Wednesday 29 September 2004 04:12, annuar wrote: > I'm interested on FreeBSD (download the 4.10) and would like to > install it either on this machine or a new machine. If you are a new FreeBSD user, you might want to wait a week or two and download the 5.3 release. 5.x versions have been available for some time as new technology releases, but 5.3 will be a stable release. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 12:45:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7EC916A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:45:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from highland.isltd.insignia.com (highland.isltd.insignia.com [195.74.141.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6153043D2D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:45:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com) Received: from dailuaine.isltd.insignia.com (dailuaine.isltd.insignia.com [172.16.64.11])i8TCjcgh058311 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:45:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com) Received: from speyburn.isltd.insignia.com (speyburn [172.16.64.16]) i8TCjcgF097985 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:45:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com) From: Jim Hatfield To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:45:40 +0100 Organization: Insignia Solutions Message-ID: <30bll0dfbc3nhd9h7enu0vhil6odofkb16@4ax.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 2.0/32.640 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Subject: ipnat and "udp consistent translation" (Skype related) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:45:41 -0000 Using Skype on a machine behind a FreeBSD 4.x firewall using ipf/ipnat, if I try a file transfer I get "your connection is relayed" which suggests that there are problems using "UDP hole punching" to get a direct connection. The Skype help page sends you to: http://bgp.lcs.mit.edu/~dga/view.cgi where ipnat gets a "no" in the "udp consistent translation" column. I also ran the "natcheck" utility from here: http://midcom-p2p.sourceforge.net/ on the firewall box itself (ie no NAT) I get: >Request 20 of 20... > >TCP RESULTS: >TCP consistent translation: YES (GOOD for peer-to-peer) >TCP simultaneous open: YES (GOOD for peer-to-peer) >TCP loopback translation: YES (GOOD for peer-to-peer) >TCP unsolicited connections filtered: YES (GOOD for security) > >UDP RESULTS: >UDP consistent translation: YES (GOOD for peer-to-peer) >UDP loopback translation: YES (GOOD for peer-to-peer) >UDP unsolicited messages filtered: YES (GOOD for security) but on a machine inside I get: >Request 4 of 20... >Request 5 of 20... >checkloopback connect: Invalid argument which doesn't look good. Googling didn't find anything so I was wondering if anyone else had experienced this and if so what their resolution was. It would be a shame to have to switch to a different firewall when ipf/ipnat is so easy to use and works so well for everything else, but at the same time I don't like the idea of someone else having to relay the Skype traffic unnecessarily. jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 12:50:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A4916A4CF for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:50:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A830443D41 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:50:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp51-93.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.51.93]) i8TCoHOU070516; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:20:17 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: Saccheen Martin , questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:20:16 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040926214746.8775.qmail@web40002.mail.yahoo.com> <200409271956.56880.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <200409271956.56880.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409292220.16713.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: Re: cannot see Windows after installing FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:50:25 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:48 am, Saccheen Martin wrote: > Hi, > Thank you for your input. As I said before, I am a > newbie and I am just learning FreeBSD. I have no > problem formatting the 80G and the 4.3G hard drives > and reinstalling both WIndows XP and FreeBSD. I just > want to make sure that I do it right the next time. > This is really a learning process for me. > > Hence, my question is if I make the 80Gig the master > and the 4.3G, the slave, and I install Windows XP on > the 80G hard drive, can I install FreeBSD on the 4.3G > hard drive and not have its boot sector overwrite the > Windows boot files? I am asking this question because, > even though the boot sector for FreeBSD will be on the > slave hard drive, it still requires that its boot > sector be on the master as well, so that I can have > the option of booting Windows or FreeBSD on startup... > There are boot 'files' in the MBR (the first sector of one or more of the disk drives) and the first sector of each bootable slice (partition in MS terminology). The first of these is more or less OS independent -- in one way or another it passes on the boot activity to another MBR on another disk or to a boot sector heading a slice. Typically the boot sector at the head of the slice marked bootable on the first disk as seen by the BIOS is selected. But with the standard FreeBSD MBR this selection can be chosen by the operator at boot time. Using the FreeBSD MBR allows booting most OS including MS ones. System selection in WNT (including W2K and WXP) is quite different. The installation uses a straight forward MBR but replaces the boot 'file' at the head of the first slice with bootable filesystem understood by MS with a new one that loads the NTLDR program from that slice. The original boot sector from the slice is copied into the file system. On execution NTLDR offers a menu choice selecting the newly installed OS (which might be on a different disk or slice) or the original system on that slice by executing the copy stowed away. So if you make the 80G drive master and install WXP there using the entire drive then NTLDR should install on that disk and be safe from any installation of FreeBSD on the slave. And this should remain OK even after installing the FreeBSD MBR on the master drive. If you install (or reinstall) WXP after installing FreeBSD you may (probably will) find that the MS installation has overwritten your MBR on the master drive and the system will boot directly into WXP without offering a FreeBSD choice. This can be fixed by booting again from the FreeBSD installation CD and putting the FreeBSD MBR back. It is also possible to use the standard MBR and make FreeBSD an option offered by NTLDR which is fairly straight forward when both OS are on the master drive but gets a bit tricky to setup when you need to switch to FreeBSD on the slave drive. In either case I can't recall exactly what is required in either case, but I've certainly successfully used the first in the somewhat distant past. Hope this helps -- I'm not sure that my description is clear. Malcolm > --- Malcolm Kay wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 07:17 am, Saccheen Martin wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I still cannot boot Windows so I set the BIOS to > > > > boot > > > > > from the slave hard disk that has Windows first > > > > and it > > > > > gave me the following error: > > > > > > NTLDR is missing > > > press ATL-CTRL-DEL to restart > > > > It is my understanding that on installation windows > > by default > > places NTLDR is the first file system which is > > understood by the MS software. So if the 4.3G had > > some MS > > file system when you installed XP on the 80G drive > > then > > the chances are that NTLDR was placed on the 4.3G > > drive and > > is now overwritten by FreeBSD. > > > > I would expect that a MS expert might be able to > > replace the > > NTLDR file and reconstruct the data file that goes > > with it; > > but this is outside my ken. > > > > Malcolm > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 13:12:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C47C16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:12:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lists.surfnetkids.com (lists.surfnetkids.com [69.25.194.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 75FD243D1F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:12:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bounce-73484-1123525@lists.surfnetkids.com) From: "Barbara J. Feldman" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:00:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: [Surfnetkids Newsletter] World Maps ... Pls Fwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: newsletter@surfnetkids.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:12:59 -0000 Dear Reader, This week's Surfnetkids Newsletter is ready for you at: http://www.surfnetkids.com/newsletter.htm See ya on the Net, Barbara J. Feldman "Surfing the Net with Kids" P.S. To cancel the free weekly Surfnetkids Newsletter sent to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, send an email message to mailto:leave-surfnetkids-1123525M@lists.surfnetkids.com To get your own free weekly subscription: http://www.surfnetkids.com/emailedition.htm Surfnetkids.com, 991C Lomas Santa Fe Drive #415, Solana Beach, CA 92075 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 13:27:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8BE16A4D0 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:27:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52507.mail.yahoo.com (web52507.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A85143D53 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:27:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ronj_clark@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040929132703.96337.qmail@web52507.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.89.83.220] by web52507.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:27:03 PDT Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 06:27:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Ronnie Clark To: Garance A Drosehn , Ronj_clark@yahoo.com, FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: newsyslog.conf question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ronj_clark@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:27:05 -0000 Garance, Please add this. If I can help by testing out functionality, I definitely will. This will help out greatly in satisfying audit issues like Sarbanes-Oxley, etc... So, in the mean time, does anyone have a script that will do this via cron or something? Thanks, Ron Clark --- Garance A Drosehn wrote: > At 7:38 AM -0700 9/28/04, Ronnie Clark wrote: > >Hello all, > > > >Having read the man page for this file's > >configuration, I notice there is not an option to > >digitally sign the logs on rotation using PGP/GPG. > Is > >there a workaround? or are there plans to add this > >functionality to future versions, like 5.3 -STABLE? > > That is not on my list of things to add to > newsyslog, but > I could certainly put something for this on the > list... > If I do it, it will show up in 5.3-stable, and > possibly > even in 4.x-stable (although that is less likely > once we > have 5.3-stable). What I might add is some generic > way > to specify a program to run after a log file has > been > rotated, where newsyslog will specify the name of > the > (already rotated) log file when it runs the program. > > -- > Garance Alistair Drosehn = > gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu > Senior Systems Programmer or > gad@FreeBSD.org > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Troy, > NY; USA > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:09:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32ABD16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:09:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lists.surfnetkids.com (lists.surfnetkids.com [69.25.194.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D28D543D46 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:09:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bounce-73568-1123525@lists.surfnetkids.com) Message-Id: X-lyris-type: unsub-conf-req From: "Lyris ListManager" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:08:54 -0400 Subject: Your confirmation is needed (ok 1123525) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lyris ListManager List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:09:02 -0000 Your email address 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' has been submitted to be unsubscribed from the 'surfnetkids' mailing list. This unsubscribe command requires your confirmation that you want to be unsubscribed. To confirm that you do want to unsubscribe, reply to this message so that the words "ok 1123525" appear somewhere on the subject line. Make sure that your reply message is addressed to unsubscribe-confirm@lists.surfnetkids.com You will receive notification that your confirmation has been received, and that you have been unsubscribed. If you do not want to unsubscribe, do nothing. You will be kept on the mailing list. --- Return-Path: Received: from mailin-01.netatlantic.com ([69.25.193.201]) by lists.surfnetkids.com with SMTP (Lyris ListManager WIN32 version 7.8d); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:08:52 -0400 Received: from mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.193]) by mailin-01.netatlantic.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8TE8lYA003612 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:08:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from muetzelfeldt@optusnet.com.au) Received: from [10.1.0.204] (c211-28-91-36.smelb1.vic.optusnet.com.au [211.28.91.36]) by mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8TE8n9l012989 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:08:50 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <12924C25-1221-11D9-9601-000A95DA456C@optusnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain To: surfnetkids-request From: russm Subject: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:08:43 +1000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 # Mail sent to leave-surfnetkids-1123525m was converted to these commands: unsubscribe surfnetkids freebsd-questions@freebsd.org confirm end # This is the text of the message that triggered the action: Return-Path: Received: from mailin-01.netatlantic.com ([69.25.193.201]) by lists.surfnetkids.com with SMTP (Lyris ListManager WIN32 version 7.8d); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:08:52 -0400 Received: from mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.193]) by mailin-01.netatlantic.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8TE8lYA003612 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:08:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from muetzelfeldt@optusnet.com.au) Received: from [10.1.0.204] (c211-28-91-36.smelb1.vic.optusnet.com.au [211.28.91.36]) by mail12.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8TE8n9l012989 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:08:50 +1000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <12924C25-1221-11D9-9601-000A95DA456C@optusnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain To: leave-surfnetkids-1123525M@lists.surfnetkids.com From: russm Subject: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:08:43 +1000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:13:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0596F16A4CF for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:13:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687AF43D3F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:13:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pancho@acadia.net) Received: from NAPIERS-BONES.acadia.net ([68.68.149.178]) by mta11.adelphia.netESMTP <20040929141323.HLCF404.mta11.adelphia.net@NAPIERS-BONES.acadia.net> for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:13:23 -0400 X-Workspace: From the cluttered desk of Pancho Cole X-Lapdog: Fred the Dachshund Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20040929100921.028442b8@anvil.prexar.com> X-Sender: pancho@anvil.prexar.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:13:22 -0400 To: questions@FreeBSD.org From: Pancho Cole Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: considering installing FreeBSD on a Dell 2800 and need a wee bit of advice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:13:29 -0000 Greetings, I currently am using Solaris (SPARC) boxes in my small business, but I am considering migrating to FreeBSD when I build my next mail server. I am considering purchasing a Dell 2800 multi-processor with RAID 1 and RAID 5 on the disks. Whom might I contact to find out if this would work? I have had no experience with FreeBSD but I started off using BSDI years ago, so the BSD model is not a complete stranger to me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:14:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C5916A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:14:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E97043D31 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:14:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF61B54A56; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:14:36 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Emanuel Strobl Message-ID: <20040929141436.GA1054@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <41598E3A.7070504@optonline.net> <20040928163631.GA3437@xor.obsecurity.org> <200409290307.10470.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="huq684BweRXVnRxX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409290307.10470.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: bsdfsse cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: How do I turn off "preemption" (getting "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA") X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:14:16 -0000 --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 03:07:06AM +0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > Am Dienstag, 28. September 2004 18:36 schrieb Kris Kennaway: > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 12:15:54PM -0400, bsdfsse wrote: > > > I am getting "TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA" messages on my ad2 and ad3 > > > hard-drives. I never get them on ad0 or the CD drive. I did some > > > searching, and it sounds like I need to turn of "preemption" in the > > > kernel. I'm running 5.3-BETA4 on the computer. > > > > > > I am going to guess this is turned on for the beta-testing. > > > > > > Any ideas? I just started running 5.x last night. %-) > > > > Update to the latest beta, which has a fixed ata driver. > > Kris >=20 > Right, but I'd also like to know how I can turn it off. Just for curiosit= y. Don't include the PREEMPTION kernel config option (it's off by default). Kris --huq684BweRXVnRxX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWsNKWry0BWjoQKURAkJ1AKD0rPRCXGtuWHAdjN0/RQO42JerMwCggitP Awe6TCvfmYl7eHVhBxNgbRE= =+76A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --huq684BweRXVnRxX-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:15:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44E416A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:15:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C308043D41 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:15:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 99277548F1; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:15:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:15:25 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Raman Message-ID: <20040929141525.GB1054@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvsup propagate? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:15:05 -0000 --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:53:01PM -0400, Raman wrote: > Hi, I was just wondering when a new release of a port comes out how > long does it take cvsup to get it and propagate to the other cvsup > servers? Usually within a few hours of it being committed to CVS, depending on how the cvsup server is configured. Kris --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWsN7Wry0BWjoQKURAkVoAJ9WUS5/5FB1+/nnhoRuw9LHgOaqgwCg4rUF qnn7UZJtNJmwn/sj+4DvGB0= =jKPV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XOIedfhf+7KOe/yw-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:17:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E092616A4D1 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:17:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lists.surfnetkids.com (lists.surfnetkids.com [69.25.194.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73C0043D55 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:17:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bounce-73579-1123525@lists.surfnetkids.com) Message-Id: X-lyris-type: unsubscribed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Lyris ListManager" Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:17:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [Surfing the Net with Kids] Goodbye X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:17:29 -0000 This message confirms your cancellation of the free weekly "Surfing the Net with Kids" newsletter. ................................. RSS EDITION ................................. If you would prefer an RSS edition of the newsletter, you will find it at http://www.surfnetkids.com/newsletter-rss.xml For details on the what, how, and why of RSS, see: http://www.surfnetkids.com/rss.htm ............................... EXIT SURVEY ............................... If you could take a moment to answer two questions for me via email to mailto:newsletter@surfnetkids.com, it will help me create a better newsletter: 1) Why are you canceling? 2) What can I do to make the Surfnetkids newsletter better? Thank you, Barbara J. Feldman Surfing the Net with Kids http://www.surfnetkids.com P.S. If you would like to sign up under a different email address, you can do so at: http://www.surfnetkids.com/emailedition.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:22:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4033316A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:22:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lists.surfnetkids.com (lists.surfnetkids.com [69.25.194.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD5B043D45 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:22:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bounce-73582-1123525@lists.surfnetkids.com) Message-Id: X-lyris-type: unsubscribed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Lyris ListManager" Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:19:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [Surfing the Net with Kids] Goodbye X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:22:40 -0000 This message confirms your cancellation of the free weekly "Surfing the Net with Kids" newsletter. ................................. RSS EDITION ................................. If you would prefer an RSS edition of the newsletter, you will find it at http://www.surfnetkids.com/newsletter-rss.xml For details on the what, how, and why of RSS, see: http://www.surfnetkids.com/rss.htm ............................... EXIT SURVEY ............................... If you could take a moment to answer two questions for me via email to mailto:newsletter@surfnetkids.com, it will help me create a better newsletter: 1) Why are you canceling? 2) What can I do to make the Surfnetkids newsletter better? Thank you, Barbara J. Feldman Surfing the Net with Kids http://www.surfnetkids.com P.S. If you would like to sign up under a different email address, you can do so at: http://www.surfnetkids.com/emailedition.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:33:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E8616A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:33:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7972843D60 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:33:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nkinkade@fastmail.fm) X-Sasl-enc: d9SarPx3JogrGHvBo85YJQ 1096468420 Received: from gentoo-npk.bmp.ub (unknown [206.27.244.136]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD43C22B91; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:33:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nkinkade by gentoo-npk.bmp.ub with local (Exim 4.21) id 1CCfUW-0004Fe-9i; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:31:36 -0600 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:31:36 -0600 From: Nathan Kinkade To: nicx@ebox.gr Message-ID: <20040929143136.GE3633@gentoo-npk.bmp.ub> Mail-Followup-To: nicx@ebox.gr, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200409282217.i8SMHQmd008769@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> <1096411549.30508.15.camel@chaucer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xd7ZVmXU2EjaW0+X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1096411549.30508.15.camel@chaucer> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nathan Kinkade List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:33:41 -0000 --xd7ZVmXU2EjaW0+X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 06:45:49PM -0400, Mike Jeays wrote: > On Tue, 2004-09-28 at 18:17, Nicx wrote: > > Hi Guy's > >=20 > > I have problem with my floppy > >=20 > > always said me : > >=20 > > Can't open /dev/fd0: > >=20 > > No such file or directory > >=20 > > and my floppy disk is corectly installed at my BIOS > >=20 > > I haven't problem with Linux or Solaris but i don't know why always > > happened this on Free BSD > >=20 > > Thanks! > > ... Nicx >=20 > Try > mount /dev/fd0c /mnt (UFS floopy)=20 > or > mount -t msdos /dev/fd0c /mnt (DOS FAT floppy) >=20 > It may work if your system is an earlier version; I think it was changed > to fd0 in 5.0. >=20 Sounds to me like the device isn't being found at all in the /dev directory. If fd0 doesn't exist then certainly fd0c won't exist either. = =20 What does `ls -l /dev/fd*` reveal? Also, what does `dmesg | grep fd` show? Are you using devfs? Nathan --=20 PGP Public Key: pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xD8527E49 --xd7ZVmXU2EjaW0+X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBWsdIO0ZIEthSfkkRAk1dAJ4v2xAJxQIa6wJlcEjn94jwTZFCAACgtumj hJNN/owuas5Z7o8z5I2HSXc= =2QW2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xd7ZVmXU2EjaW0+X-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:35:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADF616A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:35:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D16C43D2D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:35:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3515417rnb for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.80 with SMTP id 80mr75383rnh; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:35:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 07:35:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:05:51 +0530 From: Subhro To: didi In-Reply-To: <415A8436.2090205@yuebing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <415A56F2.3060300@yuebing.net> <415A6B0F.5000908@yuebing.net> <415A8436.2090205@yuebing.net> cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: corrupt disklabel, how to restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:35:58 -0000 Y means a new file system would be created Regards S. On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:45:26 +0200, didi wrote: > > Does : > > UFS2+S N > > in "freebsd disklabel editor" > > mean that no newfs will be created i.e that only the disklabel will be > written and the acyual filesystem be left alone? > > as opposed to > > UFS+S Y > > ? > > d-tail > > (I'm a bit worried :| ) > > > > > Subhro wrote: > > There is a key for toggling new filesystem. Probably Y..... sorry > > don't rember it. > > > > Regards > > S. > > > > > > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:58:07 +0200, didi wrote: > > > >>It's partitioned and mounted from sysinstall in 5.2.1 > >> > >>And the machine rins 5.2.1 again :( > >> > >>So, I guess I could: > >> > >>use fdisk and/or disklabel from within sysinstall again. But how do I > >>prevent sysinstall from making 'newfs' ? > >> > >>Thanks & Regards D-tail > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>Subhro wrote: > >> > >>>If you have partitioned your disk as UFS2, then there is no way in > >>>which you can access them running 4.10. > >>> > >>>Regards > >>>S, > >>> > >>> > >>>On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:32:18 +0200, didi wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>I did what you shouldn't do. I have two disks one 80gb and one 100gb > >>>>I was not happy with FreeBSD 5.2.1 so I downgraded to 4.10. > >>>>Problem is the disklabel on my second drive somehow got corrupt, on this > >>>>drive i backed up all home/* folders etc and so on, but now I can't get > >>>>to my backup. > >>>>I really need a way to restore the disklabel. > >>>> > >>>>I have tried scan_ffs with no result is there any other way, > >>>> > >>>>The disk was mounted as ad1s1d one large slice. > >>>> > >>>>Any information could be usefull > >>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:46:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5D216A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:46:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4D843D39 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:46:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i8TEkL217028; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:46:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200409291446.i8TEkL217028@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: pancho@acadia.net (Pancho Cole) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:46:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040929100921.028442b8@anvil.prexar.com> from "Pancho Cole" at Sep 29, 2004 10:13:22 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: considering installing FreeBSD on a Dell 2800 and need a wee X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:46:24 -0000 > > Greetings, I currently am using Solaris (SPARC) boxes in my small business, > but I am considering migrating to FreeBSD when I build my next mail server. > I am considering purchasing a Dell 2800 multi-processor with RAID 1 and > RAID 5 on the disks. Whom might I contact to find out if this would work? I > have had no experience with FreeBSD but I started off using BSDI years ago, > so the BSD model is not a complete stranger to me. I would be very surprised if it wouldn't work. The Dell 2800 is so new - just officially announced a week or so ago - that I doubt many people have tried that specific model yet. But we have had good luck with 2300, 2550, 1550, 2600, 4600. We did run across a disk controller on a 500 that didn't seem to be supported and some of the onboard NICs have been useless (some were OK), but all the add-in NIC cards we have tried have worked. You can look in the lists of supported hardware and try to match the components listed with those installed in the 2800. Go to the FreeBSD web page http://www.freebsd.org/ and over on the right under whichever version of FreeBSD you plan to install (currently it lists 5.2.1 and 4.10) click on Hardware notes and follow it through to the parts in question. Otherwise, just get one and try it out, I guess. ////jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:52:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D33316A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:52:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paf.se (argv.paf.se [195.66.31.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B0343D4C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:52:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from didi@yuebing.net) Received: from [213.88.236.3] (account didi@yuebing.net HELO yuebing.net) by paf.se (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b1) with ESMTP id 1847682; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:52:41 +0200 Message-ID: <415ACC37.2090207@yuebing.net> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:52:39 +0200 From: didi User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040429) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subhro References: <415A56F2.3060300@yuebing.net> <415A6B0F.5000908@yuebing.net> <415A8436.2090205@yuebing.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: corrupt disklabel, how to restore? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:52:43 -0000 Ok, thanks I managed to rescue my disk from /usr/sbin/sysinstall Freebsd Disklabel Editor in combination with fdisk. It automatically fsck'd my filesystem in write of disklabel... Thanks :) -d Subhro wrote: > Y means a new file system would be created > > Regards > S. > > > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:45:26 +0200, didi wrote: > >>Does : >> >>UFS2+S N >> >>in "freebsd disklabel editor" >> >>mean that no newfs will be created i.e that only the disklabel will be >>written and the acyual filesystem be left alone? >> >>as opposed to >> >>UFS+S Y >> >>? >> >>d-tail >> >>(I'm a bit worried :| ) >> >> >> >> >>Subhro wrote: >> >>>There is a key for toggling new filesystem. Probably Y..... sorry >>>don't rember it. >>> >>>Regards >>>S. >>> >>> >>>On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:58:07 +0200, didi wrote: >>> >>> >>>>It's partitioned and mounted from sysinstall in 5.2.1 >>>> >>>>And the machine rins 5.2.1 again :( >>>> >>>>So, I guess I could: >>>> >>>>use fdisk and/or disklabel from within sysinstall again. But how do I >>>>prevent sysinstall from making 'newfs' ? >>>> >>>>Thanks & Regards D-tail >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Subhro wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>If you have partitioned your disk as UFS2, then there is no way in >>>>>which you can access them running 4.10. >>>>> >>>>>Regards >>>>>S, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:32:18 +0200, didi wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>I did what you shouldn't do. I have two disks one 80gb and one 100gb >>>>>>I was not happy with FreeBSD 5.2.1 so I downgraded to 4.10. >>>>>>Problem is the disklabel on my second drive somehow got corrupt, on this >>>>>>drive i backed up all home/* folders etc and so on, but now I can't get >>>>>>to my backup. >>>>>>I really need a way to restore the disklabel. >>>>>> >>>>>>I have tried scan_ffs with no result is there any other way, >>>>>> >>>>>>The disk was mounted as ad1s1d one large slice. >>>>>> >>>>>>Any information could be usefull >>>>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>>>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:57:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A298516A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:57:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alexandr.fdns.net (212-104-97-169.cable.evrocom.net [212.104.97.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534DD43D3F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:57:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from admin@alexandr.fdns.net) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alexandr.fdns.net) by alexandr.fdns.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CCikk-000G0l-AH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:00:34 +0000 Received: (from admin@localhost) by alexandr.fdns.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8TI0XrV061550 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:00:33 GMT (envelope-from admin) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:00:33 +0000 From: Alexandr To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040929180033.GB48492@alexandr.fdns.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Can I put any options for configure script with port ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:57:30 -0000 I install php from the source with many parametres. For example I run configure script: ./configure --with-mysql --with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache2/bin/apxs--with-openssl --with-curl --with-gd --with-iconv --with-mnogosearch --with-zlib I see in port collections ports - php-mnogosearch , php-tidy this extionsions I can to configure with options for php. Can I put any options for configure script from port www/php??? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:57:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977F216A4EF for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:57:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1602343D1D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:57:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i8TEvHQ17112; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:57:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200409291457.i8TEvHQ17112@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: mjk@bankalhabib.com (Jahangir Khan) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:57:16 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: from "Jahangir Khan" at Sep 29, 2004 12:53:46 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: pURCHASE OF FREE BSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:57:35 -0000 > > NAME OF MY COUNTRY- PAKISTA - "PK" IS NOT INCLUDED IN YOUR LIST. PLEASE DO > TO ENABLE ME TO ORDER. Which list?? ////jerry > > THANKS & REGARDS > > > JAHANGIR KHAN > jahangir@jahangir.com > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 15:05:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D20616A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:05:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp18.wxs.nl (smtp18.wxs.nl [195.121.6.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D88243D2F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:05:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: from kruij557.speed.planet.nl (ipd50a97ba.speed.planet.nl [213.10.151.186]) by smtp18.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4T00C575XWMH@smtp18.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:05:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alex.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kruij557.speed.planet.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8TF5tQF093565; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:05:55 +0200 Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by alex.lan (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8TF5rZm093560; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:05:53 +0200 Content-return: prohibited Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:05:53 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff In-reply-to: <20040928205839.L2872@genesis.ridley.unimelb.edu.au> To: sysadmin@ridley.unimelb.edu.au Message-id: <20040929150553.GB885@alex.lan> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i References: <20040928205839.L2872@genesis.ridley.unimelb.edu.au> X-Authentication-warning: alex.lan: akruijff set sender to freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl using -f cc: r.dridan@ridley.unimelb.edu.au cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: natd not doing anything X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:05:58 -0000 I changed the list from current@ to questions@, since you question is not only for CURRENT. On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:11:39PM +1000, Rebecca Dridan wrote: > Hi all: > > I am having some issues with network set-up. I'm running CURRENT as of > 26th September, with an ipfw firewall and natd. I have one gateway > machine with one external NIC and 3 internal NICs. At present nothing from > my internal machines can get out. I've reduced the firewall (temporarily) to > a basic > ipfw -f flush > divert natd ip from any to any via fxp0 > allow ip from any to any > > When I turn logging on, I see the packets being diverted, and then > accepted by later rules, but not being rewritten in between, ie > > ipfw: 30 Divert 8668 TCP 192.168.7.2:54619 :1025 out via fxp0 > ipfw: 70 Accept TCP 192.168.7.2:54619 :1025 out via fxp0 > > and the packets never get to the remote IP. I can see natd running with > ps, but even when I run it on the command line with -v it doesn't seem to > do anything. > > Is there something I'm missing? Something else I could check? I've attched > the relevant bits of my rc.conf and kernel conf below. Any other > information that would be useful, please ask. > > Thanks, > > Bec > > (please CC me with any replies) > > The relevant bits of rc.conf: > firewall_enable="YES" # Set to YES to enable firewall > functionality > firewall_script="/etc/rc.firewall.local" # Which script to run to set up > the firewall > firewall_quiet="YES" # Set to YES to suppress rule display > > # Enable routing > gateway_enable="YES" # Set to YES if this host will be a > gateway. > natd_enable="YES" > natd_interface="fxp0" > natd_flags="-u" Your rc.conf seems ok. > > kernel config: > > options IPFILTER #ipfilter support > options IPFILTER_LOG #ipfilter logging > options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK #block all packets by default > options IPFIREWALL #firewall - need for mac filtering > options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT #allow everything by > default > options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD #enables changing of packet dest > options IPDIVERT #divert IP sockets, used by ipfw divert Your kernel is fine. Otherwise, you wouldn't have the ability to log or to diverd. The later would result in packets being throuwn away at rule 30. Can you add the output of ifconfig to this all? (i.e. has your fxp0 public IP?) -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 15:15:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0369B16A4CF for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:15:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A2343D45 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:15:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i8TFFXi17188; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:15:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200409291515.i8TFFXi17188@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: aaehsan@vlsi.eng.ukm.my (annuar) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:15:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: from "annuar" at Sep 29, 2004 11:12:34 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD hardware specifications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:15:42 -0000 > > Hi All, > > I'm interested on FreeBSD (download the 4.10) and would like to install it > either on this machine or a new machine. Can anyone suggest a suitable > machine (with specs so that I can go to the PC shops)? Almost any reasonably standard i386 family machine (plus some others) will work fine. If you are buying something new, then think bigger is better when it comes to CPU, memory and disk. Although FreeBSD will run on a fairly small, slow machine, you will soon find youself thinking of all kinds of additional things to run that will eat up space. Greater than 1GHz CPU, 256MB memory and 40GB disk is nice. Separate 10-100MB or even 1GB NIC card is good. Any modern modem other than Winmodem is good. SCSI controller and disk is my preference, but tends to be a little more expensive and conservative in sizes. Most CD/DVD units now work and DAT, DLT and LTO tapes are supported - especially on SCSI. One thing to avoid is Winmodem type controllers that parasite the main CPU to run them. These are generally controllers built in to the main motherboard and don't have their own processing ability. Almost everything else that is being sold on the mainline market will work. That will include Dell, IBM, Toshiba, Sony, Compaq, and a lot of somewhat lesser known brands and even most garage-built machines. On the FreeBSD web site http://www.freebsd.org/ look under the version you with to install (you said 4.10 - good choice for now) and click on the "Hardware Notes" link and follow it through the appropriate paths to see the extensive lists of known supported hardware. So, jump in and have fun. Do a lot of reading in the FreeBSD handbook which is available online and other documentation. It takes a little extra effort to get started and then after that is done is easily recognized as superior. ////jerry > Regards, > AA EHSAN > Malaysia So, how is Malaysia doing? I haven't been there for more than 10 years. /jrm > --- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 15:33:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C07616A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:33:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.tsgincorporated.com (smtp2.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE63243D49 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:33:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from support.tsgincorporated.com (support.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.9])i8TFXKsg010765; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:33:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from micheal (micheal.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.77]) i8TFXFTD033425; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:33:15 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Message-ID: <06b201c4a639$a5e76ad0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: "Alex de Kruijff" , References: <20040928205839.L2872@genesis.ridley.unimelb.edu.au> <20040929150553.GB885@alex.lan> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:33:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: r.dridan@ridley.unimelb.edu.au cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: natd not doing anything X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:33:30 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex de Kruijff" To: Cc: ; Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:05 AM Subject: Re: natd not doing anything > I changed the list from current@ to questions@, since you question is > not only for CURRENT. > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:11:39PM +1000, Rebecca Dridan wrote: > > Hi all: > > > > I am having some issues with network set-up. I'm running CURRENT as of > > 26th September, with an ipfw firewall and natd. I have one gateway > > machine with one external NIC and 3 internal NICs. At present nothing from > > my internal machines can get out. I've reduced the firewall (temporarily) to > > a basic > > ipfw -f flush > > divert natd ip from any to any via fxp0 > > allow ip from any to any > > > > When I turn logging on, I see the packets being diverted, and then > > accepted by later rules, but not being rewritten in between, ie > > > > ipfw: 30 Divert 8668 TCP 192.168.7.2:54619 :1025 out via fxp0 > > ipfw: 70 Accept TCP 192.168.7.2:54619 :1025 out via fxp0 > > >From the looks of that log entry, he's created a double NAT with 192.168.7.2 being the IP of fxp0, his outside interface. If his next link (router?) isn't configured to do NAT for the range he's using on fxp0, he'll not have a back channel for the traffic to respond to and routing will fail. The end result, is the problem that he's encountering. > > options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK #block all packets by default > > options IPFIREWALL #firewall - need for mac filtering > > options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT #allow everything by > Your kernel is fine. Otherwise, you wouldn't have the ability to log or > to diverd. The later would result in packets being throuwn away at rule > 30. > He has both accept and block as the default configuration for the firewall. That's not fine. I honestly don't know if it may cause a conflict with them both defined nor which one would take precedence when both configured. I would recommend removing one or the other for the default action he wishes his firewall to take. -- Micheal Patterson Senior Communications Systems Engineer 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 15:51:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E745A16A4CF for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:51:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp16.wxs.nl (smtp16.wxs.nl [195.121.6.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3702343D1F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:51:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl) Received: from kruij557.speed.planet.nl (ipd50a97ba.speed.planet.nl [213.10.151.186]) by smtp16.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4T00B1K82FFM@smtp16.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:51:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alex.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kruij557.speed.planet.nl (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8TFppQF097736; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:51:51 +0200 Received: (from akruijff@localhost) by alex.lan (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8TFpnWr097078; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:51:49 +0200 Content-return: prohibited Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:51:49 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff In-reply-to: <06b201c4a639$a5e76ad0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> To: Micheal Patterson Message-id: <20040929155149.GD885@alex.lan> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i References: <20040928205839.L2872@genesis.ridley.unimelb.edu.au> <20040929150553.GB885@alex.lan> <06b201c4a639$a5e76ad0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> X-Authentication-warning: alex.lan: akruijff set sender to freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl using -f cc: r.dridan@ridley.unimelb.edu.au cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: sysadmin@ridley.unimelb.edu.au Subject: Re: natd not doing anything X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 15:51:54 -0000 On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:33:13AM -0500, Micheal Patterson wrote: > From: "Alex de Kruijff" > > I changed the list from current@ to questions@, since you question is > > not only for CURRENT. > > > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 09:11:39PM +1000, Rebecca Dridan wrote: > > > Hi all: > > > > > > I am having some issues with network set-up. I'm running CURRENT as of > > > 26th September, with an ipfw firewall and natd. I have one gateway > > > machine with one external NIC and 3 internal NICs. At present nothing > from > > > my internal machines can get out. I've reduced the firewall > (temporarily) to > > > a basic > > > ipfw -f flush > > > divert natd ip from any to any via fxp0 > > > allow ip from any to any > > > > > > When I turn logging on, I see the packets being diverted, and then > > > accepted by later rules, but not being rewritten in between, ie > > > > > > ipfw: 30 Divert 8668 TCP 192.168.7.2:54619 :1025 out via fxp0 > > > ipfw: 70 Accept TCP 192.168.7.2:54619 :1025 out via fxp0 > > > > > >From the looks of that log entry, he's created a double NAT with 192.168.7.2 > being the IP of fxp0, his outside interface. If his next link (router?) > isn't configured to do NAT for the range he's using on fxp0, he'll not have > a back channel for the traffic to respond to and routing will fail. The end > result, is the problem that he's encountering. > > > > > > options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK #block all packets by default > > > options IPFIREWALL #firewall - need for mac > filtering > > > options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT #allow everything by > > > > > Your kernel is fine. Otherwise, you wouldn't have the ability to log or > > to diverd. The later would result in packets being throuwn away at rule > > 30. > > He has both accept and block as the default configuration for the firewall. > That's not fine. I honestly don't know if it may cause a conflict with them > both defined nor which one would take precedence when both configured. I > would recommend removing one or the other for the default action he wishes > his firewall to take. This is not a problem. First ipfw and ipf are two different firewall rules. Its perfectly ok for one to deny everything by default and the other to accept everything. Also both firewalls can be used to gether. Secondly where one to set something like this for one firewall, then that firewall would most likly pick only one setting. He probly don't use ipf and thus can remove IPFILTHER lines. All this does is to make the kernel a bit smaller. -- Alex Articles based on solutions that I use: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 16:11:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2449C16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:11:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.tsgincorporated.com (ns1.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4BE43D41 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:11:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from support.tsgincorporated.com (support.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.9])i8TGB2ET011906; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:11:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from micheal (micheal.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.77]) i8TGAxmn035603; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:10:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Message-ID: <06df01c4a63e$ea2d0a60$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: "Alex de Kruijff" References: <20040928205839.L2872@genesis.ridley.unimelb.edu.au> <20040929150553.GB885@alex.lan> <06b201c4a639$a5e76ad0$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> <20040929155149.GD885@alex.lan> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:10:57 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: r.dridan@ridley.unimelb.edu.au cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: sysadmin@ridley.unimelb.edu.au Subject: Re: natd not doing anything X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:11:08 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alex de Kruijff" To: "Micheal Patterson" Cc: ; ; Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:51 AM Subject: Re: natd not doing anything > This is not a problem. First ipfw and ipf are two different firewall > rules. Its perfectly ok for one to deny everything by default and the > other to accept everything. Also both firewalls can be used to gether. > Secondly where one to set something like this for one firewall, then > that firewall would most likly pick only one setting. > > He probly don't use ipf and thus can remove IPFILTHER lines. All this > does is to make the kernel a bit smaller. > > -- > Alex > > Articles based on solutions that I use: > http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ Oops.. my bad. I missed that it was IPFilter and IPFW. As for the double nat, that can be an issue as I've recently had that exact same problem. If his router / natd unit isn't configured to provide nat for the range he is using, it will fail due to routing. -- Micheal Patterson Senior Communications Systems Engineer 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 16:20:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4853716A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:20:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m14.mx.aol.com (imo-m14.mx.aol.com [64.12.138.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD87C43D41 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:20:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from TM4525@aol.com) Received: from TM4525@aol.com by imo-m14.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.7.) id j.bb.46ae4ca1 (3924); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:19:54 -0400 (EDT) From: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:19:54 EDT To: list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5112 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD hardware specifications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:20:24 -0000 In a message dated 9/29/04 8:44:14 AM Eastern Daylight Time, list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com writes: On Wednesday 29 September 2004 04:12, annuar wrote: > I'm interested on FreeBSD (download the 4.10) and would like to > install it either on this machine or a new machine. If you are a new FreeBSD user, you might want to wait a week or two and download the 5.3 release. 5.x versions have been available for some time as new technology releases, but 5.3 will be a stable release. Lets be real. Anything with "FreeBSD 5.x" and "stable" in the same context is an oxymoron. It MAY be stable, IF it works on your motherboard, and IF you don't use a card that hasn't been tested, and IF there are no buglets in your bios and IF the stars line up in a pattern that looks like your grandmother. Try freebsd 4.10. Unless you're in some kind of hurry to go gray. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 16:53:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD5116A4CE; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:53:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgw-20.stcloudstate.edu (mailgw-20.stcloudstate.edu [199.17.25.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0671E43D58; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:53:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bepratt@stcloudstate.edu) Received: from exchange17.campus.stcloudstate.edu [199.17.25.221] by mailgw-20.stcloudstate.edu with XWall v3.31 ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:53:28 -0500 Received: from exchange.campus.stcloudstate.edu ([199.17.25.200]) by exchange17.campus.stcloudstate.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:53:38 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:53:29 -0500 Message-ID: <22ECDF671FCD564398087D64CFCF46BD056E089C@EXCHANGE.campus.stcloudstate.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 5.3-BETAx Boot Problems Thread-Index: AcSmRN1GYjKZ6ZnnRaSu3uTzKekjsw== From: "Pratt, Benjamin E." To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Sep 2004 16:53:38.0200 (UTC) FILETIME=[DDC6D980:01C4A644] Subject: 5.3-BETAx Boot Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:53:32 -0000 Hello, I am still trying to get FreeBSD Beta to work but am running into problems when my system boots. The boot problem appears to be occurring just after the IDE drives are detected but before the root file system is mounted. These are the last four lines of text that are displayed when I try to boot from either ISO or after running CVSUP: md0: Preloaded image 4423680 bytes at 0xc09b6c5c ad0: 29314MB [59560/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 ATAPI_RESET time =3D 1630us acd0: CDRW at ata1-master UDMA33 When 5.2.1 or 6.0-CURRENT are installed on the system everything boots fine and the next line is: Mounted root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a. I looked at /var/log/messages and did not see any boot problems logged when I had CVSUPed to 5.3-BETA5 or 5.3-BETA6, attempted to boot, and then re-booted with the 5.2.1 kernel so that would suggest a problem mounting the file system for writing. The boot problems are occurring after I build the world, build the kernel and install the kernel but before I install the world. I looked at the GENERIC kernel from both the 5.2.1 and 5.3-BETA6 systems and the only options that 5.2.1 had and 5.3-BETA6 doesn't are: options PFIL_HOOKS options INVARIANT_SUPPORT 5.3-BETA6 has two options and eight devices that 5.2.1 doesn't. The options are: options GEOM_GPT options ADAPTIVE_GIANT The only two devices that I could possibly see affecting my system are: device mem device io I do have 5.3-BETAx installed on two other systems so I can't imagine why it's not working on this one Dell Celeron system that want it to be on. I don't imagine that I'm the only one having this problem as I have seen other cases reported but I haven't found a solution other than going to 6.0-CURRENT which I would like to stay away from since it'll probably be a while before it's considered stable. Any help anyone can give would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Ben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 16:53:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8355016A4CF for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:53:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52510.mail.yahoo.com (web52510.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3428343D5F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:53:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ronj_clark@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040929165357.16126.qmail@web52510.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.89.83.220] by web52510.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:53:57 PDT Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:53:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Ronnie Clark To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: sendmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ronj_clark@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:53:58 -0000 Hello all, I am building a central syslog server. I am seeing sendmail related items in the maillog file, even though I have sendmail_enable="NONE" in my /etc/rc.conf file. Is there a way to turn off any resemblance of an MTA on a FreeBSD system? Or, is there a way to turn on a localhost MTA but not have it actively listen on a port? (in this case tcp 587) Thanks again in advance, Ron Clark __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 17:22:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC0F16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:22:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D1143D1F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:22:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EB469A39; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:22:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:22:15 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Ronj_clark@yahoo.com Message-Id: <20040929132215.56551a88.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040929165357.16126.qmail@web52510.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040929165357.16126.qmail@web52510.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ronj_clark@yahoo.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:22:19 -0000 Ronnie Clark wrote: > Hello all, > > I am building a central syslog server. I am seeing > sendmail related items in the maillog file, even > though I have sendmail_enable="NONE" in my > /etc/rc.conf file. Is there a way to turn off any > resemblance of an MTA on a FreeBSD system? Or, is > there a way to turn on a localhost MTA but not have it > actively listen on a port? (in this case tcp 587) sendmail_enable="NONE" should disable it totally. sendmail_enable="NO" should allow local submission only. You could also install something like ssmtp to replace sendmail. What kind of log messages are you getting? -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 17:32:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E6516A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:32:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BFF43D2D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:32:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq68-086.dial.allstream.net [216.123.128.86]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id 7868DEB2B0; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:32:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:32:26 -0400 From: epilogue To: Gary Dunn Message-Id: <20040929133226.1db3c1ae@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1096447403.2621.48.camel@vaiosr7k.ozland> References: <94BD514305B4A24C971E0FB32400B2E004380D@msgswbiadsm04.wellsfargo.com> <1096447403.2621.48.camel@vaiosr7k.ozland> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Geoffrey.Gloistein@wellsfargo.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Broken X fonts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:32:35 -0000 On 28 Sep 2004 22:43:21 -1000 Gary Dunn wrote: > On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 11:39, Geoffrey.Gloistein@wellsfargo.com wrote: > > > The first time I used "portupgrade -arR". > > Slightly off topic, but are there args redundant? How would this differ > from -a ? I'm still struggling to understand portupgrade. hello gary, the following brief article should clarify matters for you (page 2): http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html?page=2 i highly recommend clicking on and bookmarking 'All Articles' (black frame on the right side of page, under BSD Content). spend some time there, it will be very much worth you while. hth. cheers, epi > Gary Dunn > Honolulu > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 17:39:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C096916A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:39:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sinclair-rm1.norwest.com (troyius.norwest.com [198.74.20.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0D6D43D54 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:38:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Geoffrey.Gloistein@wellsfargo.com) Received: from troyius.norwest.com by sinclair-rm1.norwest.com via smtpd (for mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) with SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 17:38:57 UT Received: from mojave.wellsfargo.com (mojave.wellsfargo.com [10.30.2.154]) i8THU7fo008373; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:30:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mojave.wellsfargo.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8THbYk0008096; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:37:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from MSGSPSIADSM02.ent.wfb.bank.corp (msgspsiadsm02.wellsfargo.com [10.30.15.243])i8THbQwo007895; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:37:33 -0500 (CDT) Received: from MSGSWBIADSM04.ent.wfb.bank.corp ([10.30.15.205]) by MSGSPSIADSM02.ent.wfb.bank.corp with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:37:27 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6556.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:37:26 -0500 Message-ID: <94BD514305B4A24C971E0FB32400B2E0030BB0@msgswbiadsm04.wellsfargo.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Broken X fonts Thread-Index: AcSmSlGo9VEaKBk8QbKjMzhA306OnAAAFUbQ From: To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Sep 2004 17:37:27.0014 (UTC) FILETIME=[FCAC0860:01C4A64A] cc: Geoffrey.Gloistein@wellsfargo.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Broken X fonts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:39:02 -0000 Good call on that one. That is where I got the switch information myself. It is a great article. -geoff -----Original Message----- From: epilogue [mailto:epilogue@allstream.net]=20 Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 10:32 AM To: Gary Dunn Cc: Geoffrey.Gloistein@wellsfargo.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Broken X fonts On 28 Sep 2004 22:43:21 -1000 Gary Dunn wrote: > On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 11:39, Geoffrey.Gloistein@wellsfargo.com wrote: >=20 > > The first time I used "portupgrade -arR". >=20 > Slightly off topic, but are there args redundant? How would this=20 > differ from -a ? I'm still struggling to understand portupgrade. hello gary, the following brief article should clarify matters for you (page 2): http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html?page=3D2 i highly recommend clicking on and bookmarking 'All Articles' (black frame on the right side of page, under BSD Content). spend some time there, it will be very much worth you while. hth. cheers, epi > Gary Dunn > Honolulu >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 17:42:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF22616A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:42:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9307643D39 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:42:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 4377 invoked by uid 65534); 29 Sep 2004 17:42:43 -0000 Received: from flb.schmalzbauer.de (EHLO cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de) (62.245.232.135) by mail.gmx.net (mp022) with SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 19:42:43 +0200 X-Authenticated: #301138 From: Emanuel Strobl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:42:26 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <22ECDF671FCD564398087D64CFCF46BD056E089C@EXCHANGE.campus.stcloudstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <22ECDF671FCD564398087D64CFCF46BD056E089C@EXCHANGE.campus.stcloudstate.edu> X-OS: FreeBSD X-Birthday: 10/06/72 X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-Tel: +49 89 18947781 X-CelPhone: +49 173 9967781 X-Country: Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5510702.IfkKrttLxr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409291942.31728.Emanuel.Strobl@gmx.net> cc: "Pratt, Benjamin E." Subject: Re: 5.3-BETAx Boot Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:42:46 -0000 --nextPart5510702.IfkKrttLxr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Mittwoch, 29. September 2004 18:53 schrieb Pratt, Benjamin E.: > Hello, I am still trying to get FreeBSD Beta to work but am running into > problems when my system boots. The boot problem appears to be occurring > just > after the IDE drives are detected but before the root file system is > mounted. > These are the last four lines of text that are displayed when I try to > boot > from either ISO or after running CVSUP: > > md0: Preloaded image 4423680 bytes at 0xc09b6c5c > ad0: 29314MB [59560/16/63] at ata0-master > UDMA66 > ATAPI_RESET time =3D 1630us > acd0: CDRW at ata1-master > UDMA33 It's possibly a bug in the new fdc code. I also have one system with a flop= py=20 which stops booting since beta6. Just remove device fdc from the kernel (or= =20 try to disable the Floppy Controller in the BIOS) and see if that helps.=20 Hadn't have time yet to look at -current if this bug is known and if=20 applicable create a PR. =2DMano > > When 5.2.1 or 6.0-CURRENT are installed on the system everything boots > fine > and the next line is: > > Mounted root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a. > > I looked at /var/log/messages and did not see any boot problems logged > when I > had CVSUPed to 5.3-BETA5 or 5.3-BETA6, attempted to boot, and then > re-booted > with the 5.2.1 kernel so that would suggest a problem mounting the file > system > for writing. > > The boot problems are occurring after I build the world, build the > kernel and > install the kernel but before I install the world. > > I looked at the GENERIC kernel from both the 5.2.1 and 5.3-BETA6 systems > and > the only options that 5.2.1 had and 5.3-BETA6 doesn't are: > > options PFIL_HOOKS > options INVARIANT_SUPPORT > > 5.3-BETA6 has two options and eight devices that 5.2.1 doesn't. The > options > are: > > options GEOM_GPT > options ADAPTIVE_GIANT > > The only two devices that I could possibly see affecting my system are: > > device mem > device io > > I do have 5.3-BETAx installed on two other systems so I can't imagine > why it's > not working on this one Dell Celeron system that want it to be on. I > don't > imagine that I'm the only one having this problem as I have seen other > cases > reported but I haven't found a solution other than going to 6.0-CURRENT > which > I would like to stay away from since it'll probably be a while before > it's > considered stable. > > Any help anyone can give would be greatly appreciated. > > Thank you, > > Ben > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --nextPart5510702.IfkKrttLxr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBWvQHBylq0S4AzzwRAvuiAJ9kyBiGzGGzu+C8Uwy7gX1dmxr5xwCcDXdT ifM5vZlQ9fBo16bebIxRSag= =K3V+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5510702.IfkKrttLxr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 17:50:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880BC16A4CE; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:50:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-gw1.york.ac.uk (mail-gw1.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.246]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD52B43D2F; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:50:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (ury.york.ac.uk [144.32.108.81]) by mail-gw1.york.ac.uk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8THoV7U023227; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:50:31 +0100 (BST) Received: from ury.york.ac.uk (localhost.york.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by ury.york.ac.uk (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i8THoKMu015183; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:50:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from localhost (gavin@localhost)i8THoFZQ015180; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:50:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: ury.york.ac.uk: gavin owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:50:15 +0100 (BST) From: Gavin Atkinson X-X-Sender: gavin@ury.york.ac.uk To: "Pratt, Benjamin E." In-Reply-To: <22ECDF671FCD564398087D64CFCF46BD056E089C@EXCHANGE.campus.stcloudstate.edu> Message-ID: <20040929184822.K14959@ury.york.ac.uk> References: <22ECDF671FCD564398087D64CFCF46BD056E089C@EXCHANGE.campus.stcloudstate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-York-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-York-MailScanner-From: gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-BETAx Boot Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:50:35 -0000 On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Pratt, Benjamin E. wrote: > Hello, I am still trying to get FreeBSD Beta to work but am running into > problems when my system boots. The boot problem appears to be occurring > just after the IDE drives are detected but before the root file system > is mounted. These are the last four lines of text that are displayed > when I try to boot from either ISO or after running CVSUP: > > md0: Preloaded image 4423680 bytes at 0xc09b6c5c > ad0: 29314MB [59560/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 > ATAPI_RESET time = 1630us > acd0: CDRW at ata1-master UDMA33 Yes, this bug was present in BETA5 and BETA6. It will be fixed in BETA7. In the mean time, you can avoid it by disabling your floppy drive (by setting hint.fd.0.disabled=1 at the loader) Gavin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 18:05:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C663D16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:05:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from palrel12.hp.com (palrel12.hp.com [156.153.255.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789A443D55 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:05:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason.sheets@hp.com) Received: from cacexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net (cacexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net [16.92.1.67]) by palrel12.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAC74103D0; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:05:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from idbexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net ([16.88.97.3]) by cacexg11.americas.cpqcorp.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:05:26 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:07:22 -0600 Message-ID: <2D8BB15C7B5C214F81C32D3A83B32736013D4BC5@idbexc01.americas.cpqcorp.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Which Development Environment/Tools For FreeBSD + PostgreSQL Service? Thread-Index: AcSl+XKyiOT+rFzYT4uobz9di5wdNwAVFEIQ From: "Sheets, Jason (OZ CEEDR)" To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Sep 2004 18:05:26.0519 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5BC2870:01C4A64E] Subject: RE: Which Development Environment/Tools For FreeBSD + PostgreSQL Service? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:05:30 -0000 It sounds like you are wanting to research Unix development tools in general not just BSD as they are fairly standard and widely available for Linux/BSD. It seems like you've selected c or c++ by the exclusion of the other languages, if you are not happy with c or c++ perhaps you should re-evaulate the other languages and really determine why you excluded them and also your needs, if you need a real time solution that will eliminate a lot of them right off the bat. I'm not sure I would characterize the extensive use of pointers as a disadvantage when used correctly they work well, regardless of the language you choose you will need to keep an eye out for dangerous utilization of language features. There is a wealth of information on writing better code using a variety of methods including code review, code guidelines, etc that are outside the scope of my message. Pretty much all the GNU development tools are available on BSD, autoconf, automake, gcc, gdb, the front ends to gdb, kdevel (KDE programming environment). I encourage you to look in /usr/ports/devel and lang. Borlands C++ BuilderX IDE is nice because it works on Window, Linux and probably on BSD through the Linux compatability layer and is able to take advantage of pretty much every tool chain available including GNU. Kdevel is also nice, there is also gvim, emacs and a wealth of other editors both commercial and open source so it really depends on the features you need and the overhead you are willing to run with. I use scons (http://www.scons.org/) for the build infrastructure instead of gmake, and then use gcc for the compiler. I use subversion or CVS for version control needs. There is also distcc and ccache that allow you to do distributed/cached builds across the network/development environment. Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of tom_oak@telstra.com > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 1:52 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Which Development Environment/Tools For FreeBSD + PostgreSQL > Service? >=20 > Hello All, >=20 > We are a company looking for a good development environment/tool(s) for a > service-type application. The OS is FreeBSD and the database will be > PostgreSQL. The first emphasis is placed on reliability, with secondary > emphasis on performance. Third in importance would be the richness of the > language/features and avoidance of "plumbing" code. >=20 > - Is this the right place to be asking about development tools? Since this > involves FreeBSD, we thought it might be appropriate. >=20 > - We do not need any GUI. The programs will either run from the shell, or > as services. >=20 > - C/C++ comes to mind, but which flavour of compiler/debugger/third party > add-ons/editor? An advantage here is the fact that this language is well > established which should improve reliability to some extent (if we are > careful with pointers). A disadvantage would be the extensive use of > pointers, the cryptic and unreadable look of the code and the fact that > C/C++ is getting a bit long in the tooth. >=20 > - We are considering the Borland tools (JBuilder/Kylix) since we are > familiar with Borland tools and like their database connectivity, rich > components and elegant looking code (less plumbing). But on the other > hand, we don't need any GUI, and we had some problems in the past with > reliability. Do you have any thoughts on this? >=20 > - We would prefer not to use ODBC/JDBC, and instead interface directly to > the database. We had some bad experience in the past regarding reliability > and performance. We can either use the library provided by Postgres or > write our own wrappers to make things more readable. >=20 > - We would prefer not to use an interpreted language such as Python, Java, > and Perl etc for performance reasons. We know that Java can be compiled, > but is it a good solution without using JDBC? How about reliability? >=20 > Are there any particularly elegant solutions you have experience with? > Thank you for your help. >=20 > Tom >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 18:28:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA2116A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:28:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.bahnhof.se (mailut.bahnhof.net [213.136.33.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2140C43D45 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:28:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark.rowlands@mypost.se) Received: from mfilter2.bahnhof.se (mail.bahnhof.se [213.136.33.1]) by smtp2.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDEC88CCD for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:28:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by re-injector2.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B15AA564 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:28:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp5.bahnhof.se ([213.136.33.3]) by localhost (mfilter2.bahnhof.se [10.0.1.22]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02349-10 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:28:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pcmarpxy.mine.nu (unknown [81.170.150.191]) by smtp5.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0681293B76 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:28:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.mwrwin2k.se [127.0.0.1]) by pcmarpxy.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6523810954 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:28:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pcmarpxy.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pcmarpxy.mine.nu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55704-02 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:28:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from exchsrv1.mwrwin2k.se (kalendar.mine.nu [192.168.0.4]) by pcmarpxy.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1662107A9 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:28:16 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:28:15 +0200 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Pentax Optio 30 panic under 5.3 beta 6 Thread-Index: AcSmUhXEe8lUg7a7Tfep4T8xBqQPOA== From: "Mark Rowlands" To: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at bahnhof.se Subject: Pentax Optio 30 panic under 5.3 beta 6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:28:27 -0000 Anyone got one of these working under 5.3 ? I get an instant panic..... And if not...does anyone know of a usb SD card reader that works under 5.3?=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 18:28:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C9B16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:28:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ni-mail2.dna.utvinternet.net (ni-mail2.dna.utvinternet.net [194.46.8.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC5243D1F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:28:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from charlessmyth@nireland.com) Received: from utvinternet.com (unverified [194.46.8.35]) by ni-mail2.dna.utvinternet.net for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:28:51 +0100 From: "Charles Smyth" Sender: fn15790@utvinternet.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:28:50 +0100 X-Mailer: DMailWeb Web to Mail Gateway 2.8a, http://netwinsite.com/top_mail.htm Message-id: <415afee2.380.0@utvinternet.com> X-User-Info: 62.254.32.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 5.3 discs 1 & 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: charlessmyth@nireland.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:28:53 -0000 Dears Sirs, The iso downloads for 5.3 has discs 1 & 2 at over 600 MB apiece. Can you give me a rough idea what is on disc two. In other words, will discs 1 and 2 have an application suite similar to slackware 10.0. Charles Smyth. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 18:36:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE9C16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:36:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52504.mail.yahoo.com (web52504.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9391543D55 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:36:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ronj_clark@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040929183642.76738.qmail@web52504.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.89.83.220] by web52504.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:36:41 PDT Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:36:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Ronnie Clark To: Bill Moran , Ronj_clark@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <20040929132215.56551a88.wmoran@potentialtech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: ronj_clark@yahoo.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ronj_clark@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:36:43 -0000 Bill, Thanks for the response. Here is the last entry in the maillog file: Sep 29 03:01:48 src@rc_gcux sendmail[1204]: i8T81lo5001204: to=root, delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=31632, relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] This makes sense that the log says what it does since I have sendmail_enable="NONE". What I am asking is if there is a way to not have this file at all since there is no need to send amy mail of any kind from this server. Make sense? Thanks again for any and all help. Ron Clark --- Bill Moran wrote: > Ronnie Clark wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I am building a central syslog server. I am seeing > > sendmail related items in the maillog file, even > > though I have sendmail_enable="NONE" in my > > /etc/rc.conf file. Is there a way to turn off any > > resemblance of an MTA on a FreeBSD system? Or, is > > there a way to turn on a localhost MTA but not > have it > > actively listen on a port? (in this case tcp 587) > > sendmail_enable="NONE" should disable it totally. > > sendmail_enable="NO" should allow local submission > only. > > You could also install something like ssmtp to > replace sendmail. > > What kind of log messages are you getting? > > -- > Bill Moran > Potential Technologies > http://www.potentialtech.com > _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 18:53:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8AA16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:53:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AFDB43D3F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:53:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799DA69A39; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:53:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:53:51 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Ronj_clark@yahoo.com Message-Id: <20040929145351.28b8af1e.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040929183642.76738.qmail@web52504.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040929132215.56551a88.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20040929183642.76738.qmail@web52504.mail.yahoo.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ronj_clark@yahoo.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:53:54 -0000 Ronnie Clark wrote: > Bill, > > Thanks for the response. Here is the last entry in the > maillog file: > > Sep 29 03:01:48 src@rc_gcux sendmail[1204]: > i8T81lo5001204: to=root, delay=00:00:00, > xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=31632, > relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: > Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] > > This makes sense that the log says what it does since > I have sendmail_enable="NONE". What I am asking is if > there is a way to not have this file at all since > there is no need to send amy mail of any kind from > this server. Make sense? Not really. A lot of stuff in FreeBSD uses email for notifications and the like. A few examples are cron (which will email the output of cron jobs) and periodic. If you want to disable _all_ mail delivery, you'll need to track down all of these utilities and either a) prevent them from running or b) arrange for notifications from them to be sent via some other means. I don't know that a comprehensive list of these applications has ever been compiled, but I think disabling them and mail delivery is A Bad Idea (tm) because you're pretending your smarter than 30 years of Unix system administrators' combined experience. The Right Thing To Do (tm) is to set sendmail_enable="NONE" (or replace sendmail with ssmtp) and configure the "root" account to forward to your email account so you can properly receive these informative emails. If you're not familiar with sendmail or uncomfortable with it doing anything, check out the handbook page on replacing it with ssmtp: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail.html HTH. > --- Bill Moran wrote: > > > Ronnie Clark wrote: > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > I am building a central syslog server. I am seeing > > > sendmail related items in the maillog file, even > > > though I have sendmail_enable="NONE" in my > > > /etc/rc.conf file. Is there a way to turn off any > > > resemblance of an MTA on a FreeBSD system? Or, is > > > there a way to turn on a localhost MTA but not > > have it > > > actively listen on a port? (in this case tcp 587) > > > > sendmail_enable="NONE" should disable it totally. > > > > sendmail_enable="NO" should allow local submission > > only. > > > > You could also install something like ssmtp to > > replace sendmail. > > > > What kind of log messages are you getting? > > > > -- > > Bill Moran > > Potential Technologies > > http://www.potentialtech.com > > > > > > > _______________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! > http://vote.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 19:05:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6E716A4CE; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:05:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from turtle.freedns.us (netblock-66-159-221-76.dslextreme.com [66.159.221.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E0243D1F; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:05:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@turtle.freedns.us) Received: from turtle.freedns.us (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turtle.freedns.us (8.12.11/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i8TJ5rHS001188; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:05:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bt@turtle.freedns.us) Message-ID: <415B0791.5060504@turtle.freedns.us> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 12:05:53 -0700 From: Igor Serikov Organization: Private Person User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20030209 X-Accept-Language: ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Bugs , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 4.10 system stops responding] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:05:54 -0000 Hello, World! Opening a remote HTTP URL in raplayer (old a.out program) makes my FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE box completely frozen. The system does not respond on PINGs. The same happens when I run raplayer in a remote X session. It looks like the trouble happens in the beginning of the prebuffering, before start of the playback. What is quite interesting is that when I entered "tuss raplayer >& /dev/console" the system did not get frozen. Can this be something timing/buffering related? Is there any way to investigate the problem without using NMI? Igor. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 19:22:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CAF16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:22:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carroll-tech.net (mail.totalspeed.com [63.137.244.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83D843D2D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:22:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrew@carroll-tech.net) Received: from win [4.228.126.139] by carroll-tech.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.13) id AB11ECE00F8; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:20:49 -0600 Message-ID: <002601c4a65c$79c6f2e0$0202a8c0@win> From: "Andrew" To: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:42:36 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: COM port problems p5mvp3-at X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:22:16 -0000 Hello, I am having some trouble with the COM ports on a ESA motherboard; model # P5MVP3-AT "Viking". Issues are: 1. With modem hooked up (via 9 pin D) to COM1 (/dev/cuaa0) the command "cu -l/dev/cuaa0 -s57600" does not communicate with the modem. 2. /sbin/dmesg output reveals that sio0 and sio1 are "identified", at the correct port (according to the BIOS settings), and are on the correct irq. The type of the device is 16550A. 3. device sio has been compiled into the kernel and cuaa0 and cuaa1 are in the /dev directory. 4. I can remove the external modem and put in an old US Robotics internal ISA modem configured with the jumpers to COM1 and the command "cu -l/dev/cuaa0 -s57600" works fine. In order for me to put in the ISA modem into the system I have to disable COM1 settings in the BIOS (the port number) or there is a conflict message at BIOS boot time. When I remove the ISA modem and hook the external modem back up to the system via 9 pin D cable the external modem still does not work. 5. BIOS has been updated. 6. Default BIOS settings have been tried along with alternate settings. 7. I know the modem works because I can hook it up to my Windows machine and connect to the internet. 8. I had the modem hooked up to a previous FreeBSD machine that was acting as a gateway and the modem worked fine. So, basically with BIOS set to default settings everything "seems" to be set up correctly but for some reason the modem does not work. Is this the appropriate list for help? Andrew Carroll Carroll-Tech 720-273-6814 andrew@carroll-tech.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 19:26:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD0416A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:26:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52904.mail.yahoo.com (web52904.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED22543D64 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:26:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eduhuertas@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040929192629.31088.qmail@web52904.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.230.149.4] by web52904.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:26:29 CDT Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:26:29 -0500 (CDT) From: Eduardo Huertas To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-264360939-1096485989=:31078" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Sound problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:26:30 -0000 --0-264360939-1096485989=:31078 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Id: Content-Disposition: inline Hi Everybody I have a SONY Vaio PCG-FXA36 and have worked very well with FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0 Except with the sound card :-( Sometimes it does work and others simply not. When it doesn't dmesg shows me this: ----------- pcm0: port 0x1c50-0x1c53,0x1c54-0x1c57,0x1000- 0x10ff irq 5 at device 7.5 on pci0 via: codec busy via: codec busy via: codec busy via: codec busy via: codec busy via: codec busy pcm0: ac97 codec invalid or not present (id == ffffffff) device_probe_and_attach: pcm0 attach returned 6 ----------- And KDE sends me this message: ----------- Sound server informational message: Error while initializing the sound driver: device /dev/dsp can't be opened (No such file or directory) The sound server will continue, using the null output device. ------------ Attached is dmesg when everything is OK. Thanks for your time and your sugestions. -edu- _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias. Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com --0-264360939-1096485989=:31078 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=sound-ok Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Description: sound-ok Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=sound-ok Q29weXJpZ2h0IChjKSAxOTkyLTIwMDQgVGhlIEZyZWVCU0QgUHJvamVjdC4K Q29weXJpZ2h0IChjKSAxOTc5LCAxOTgwLCAxOTgzLCAxOTg2LCAxOTg4LCAx OTg5LCAxOTkxLCAxOTkyLCAxOTkzLCAxOTk0CglUaGUgUmVnZW50cyBvZiB0 aGUgVW5pdmVyc2l0eSBvZiBDYWxpZm9ybmlhLiBBbGwgcmlnaHRzIHJlc2Vy dmVkLgpGcmVlQlNEIDUuMi4xLVJFTEVBU0UgIzA6IEZyaSBBdWcgMjcgMTk6 NTc6MDEgQ1NUIDIwMDQKICAgIGVkdWFyZG9Aa3VrdWxrYW4uaW50ZWxuZXR0 LmNvbTovdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3JjL3N5cy9PUkFDTEUKUHJlbG9hZGVkIGVs ZiBrZXJuZWwgIi9ib290L2tlcm5lbC9rZXJuZWwiIGF0IDB4YzA4OTMwMDAu ClByZWxvYWRlZCBlbGYgbW9kdWxlICIvYm9vdC9rZXJuZWwvYWNwaS5rbyIg YXQgMHhjMDg5MzI0NC4KVGltZWNvdW50ZXIgImk4MjU0IiBmcmVxdWVuY3kg MTE5MzE4MiBIeiBxdWFsaXR5IDAKQ1BVOiBtb2JpbGUgQU1EIEF0aGxvbih0 bSkgNCAgKDEwMDAuMDQtTUh6IDY4Ni1jbGFzcyBDUFUpCiAgT3JpZ2luID0g IkF1dGhlbnRpY0FNRCIgIElkID0gMHg2NjIgIFN0ZXBwaW5nID0gMgogIEZl YXR1cmVzPTB4MzgzZjlmZjxGUFUsVk1FLERFLFBTRSxUU0MsTVNSLFBBRSxN Q0UsQ1g4LFNFUCxNVFJSLFBHRSxNQ0EsQ01PVixQQVQsUFNFMzYsTU1YLEZY U1IsU1NFPgogIEFNRCBGZWF0dXJlcz0weGMwNDgwMDAwPE1QLEFNSUUsRFNQ LDNETm93IT4KcmVhbCBtZW1vcnkgID0gMjY4NDM1NDU2ICgyNTYgTUIpCmF2 YWlsIG1lbW9yeSA9IDI1MTA0NzkzNiAoMjM5IE1CKQpQZW50aXVtIFBybyBN VFJSIHN1cHBvcnQgZW5hYmxlZApucHgwOiBbRkFTVF0KbnB4MDogPG1hdGgg cHJvY2Vzc29yPiBvbiBtb3RoZXJib2FyZApucHgwOiBJTlQgMTYgaW50ZXJm YWNlCmFjcGkwOiA8U09OWSAgIEs1ICAgICAgPiBvbiBtb3RoZXJib2FyZApw Y2liaW9zOiBCSU9TIHZlcnNpb24gMi4xMApVc2luZyAkUElSIHRhYmxlLCA2 IGVudHJpZXMgYXQgMHhjMDBmZGY2MAphY3BpMDogUG93ZXIgQnV0dG9uIChm aXhlZCkKVGltZWNvdW50ZXIgIkFDUEktc2FmZSIgZnJlcXVlbmN5IDM1Nzk1 NDUgSHogcXVhbGl0eSAxMDAwCmFjcGlfdGltZXIwOiA8MzItYml0IHRpbWVy IGF0IDMuNTc5NTQ1TUh6PiBwb3J0IDB4ODAwOC0weDgwMGIgb24gYWNwaTAK YWNwaV9jcHUwOiA8Q1BVPiBwb3J0IDB4NTMwLTB4NTM3IG9uIGFjcGkwCmFj cGlfdHowOiA8VGhlcm1hbCBab25lPiBwb3J0IDB4NTMwLTB4NTM3IG9uIGFj cGkwCmFjcGlfYnV0dG9uMDogPFNsZWVwIEJ1dHRvbj4gb24gYWNwaTAKcGNp YjA6IDxBQ1BJIEhvc3QtUENJIGJyaWRnZT4gcG9ydCAweGNmOC0weGNmZiBv biBhY3BpMApwY2kwOiA8QUNQSSBQQ0kgYnVzPiBvbiBwY2liMApwY2liMDog c2xvdCA3IElOVEQgaXMgcm91dGVkIHRvIGlycSA5CnBjaWIwOiBzbG90IDcg SU5URCBpcyByb3V0ZWQgdG8gaXJxIDkKcGNpYjA6IHNsb3QgNyBJTlRDIGlz IHJvdXRlZCB0byBpcnEgNQpwY2liMDogc2xvdCA3IElOVEMgaXMgcm91dGVk IHRvIGlycSA1CnBjaWIwOiBzbG90IDEwIElOVEEgaXMgcm91dGVkIHRvIGly cSA5CnBjaWIwOiBzbG90IDEwIElOVEIgaXMgcm91dGVkIHRvIGlycSAxMApw Y2liMDogc2xvdCAxNCBJTlRBIGlzIHJvdXRlZCB0byBpcnEgOQpwY2liMDog c2xvdCAxNiBJTlRBIGlzIHJvdXRlZCB0byBpcnEgMTAKYWdwMDogPFZJQSA4 MkM4MzYzIChBcG9sbG8gS1QxMzNBKSBob3N0IHRvIFBDSSBicmlkZ2U+IG1l bSAweGYwMDAwMDAwLTB4ZjdmZmZmZmYgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDAuMCBvbiBwY2kw CnBjaWIxOiA8QUNQSSBQQ0ktUENJIGJyaWRnZT4gYXQgZGV2aWNlIDEuMCBv biBwY2kwCnBjaTE6IDxBQ1BJIFBDSSBidXM+IG9uIHBjaWIxCnBjaWIxOiBz bG90IDAgSU5UQSBpcyByb3V0ZWQgdG8gaXJxIDUKcGNpMTogPGRpc3BsYXks IFZHQT4gYXQgZGV2aWNlIDAuMCAobm8gZHJpdmVyIGF0dGFjaGVkKQppc2Fi MDogPFBDSS1JU0EgYnJpZGdlPiBhdCBkZXZpY2UgNy4wIG9uIHBjaTAKaXNh MDogPElTQSBidXM+IG9uIGlzYWIwCmF0YXBjaTA6IDxWSUEgODJDNjg2QiBV RE1BMTAwIGNvbnRyb2xsZXI+IHBvcnQgMHgxYzQwLTB4MWM0ZiBhdCBkZXZp Y2UgNy4xIG9uIHBjaTAKYXRhcGNpMDogQ29ycmVjdGluZyBWSUEgY29uZmln IGZvciBzb3V0aGJyaWRnZSBkYXRhIGNvcnJ1cHRpb24gYnVnCmF0YTA6IGF0 IDB4MWYwIGlycSAxNCBvbiBhdGFwY2kwCmF0YTA6IFtNUFNBRkVdCmF0YTE6 IGF0IDB4MTcwIGlycSAxNSBvbiBhdGFwY2kwCmF0YTE6IFtNUFNBRkVdCnVo Y2kwOiA8VklBIDgzQzU3MiBVU0IgY29udHJvbGxlcj4gcG9ydCAweDFjMDAt MHgxYzFmIGlycSA5IGF0IGRldmljZSA3LjIgb24gcGNpMAp1c2IwOiA8VklB IDgzQzU3MiBVU0IgY29udHJvbGxlcj4gb24gdWhjaTAKdXNiMDogVVNCIHJl dmlzaW9uIDEuMAp1aHViMDogVklBIFVIQ0kgcm9vdCBodWIsIGNsYXNzIDkv MCwgcmV2IDEuMDAvMS4wMCwgYWRkciAxCnVodWIwOiAyIHBvcnRzIHdpdGgg MiByZW1vdmFibGUsIHNlbGYgcG93ZXJlZAp1aGNpMTogPFZJQSA4M0M1NzIg VVNCIGNvbnRyb2xsZXI+IHBvcnQgMHgxYzIwLTB4MWMzZiBpcnEgOSBhdCBk ZXZpY2UgNy4zIG9uIHBjaTAKdXNiMTogPFZJQSA4M0M1NzIgVVNCIGNvbnRy b2xsZXI+IG9uIHVoY2kxCnVzYjE6IFVTQiByZXZpc2lvbiAxLjAKdWh1YjE6 IFZJQSBVSENJIHJvb3QgaHViLCBjbGFzcyA5LzAsIHJldiAxLjAwLzEuMDAs IGFkZHIgMQp1aHViMTogMiBwb3J0cyB3aXRoIDIgcmVtb3ZhYmxlLCBzZWxm IHBvd2VyZWQKaXNhYjE6IDxQQ0ktSVNBIGJyaWRnZT4gYXQgZGV2aWNlIDcu NCBvbiBwY2kwCmRldmljZV9wcm9iZV9hbmRfYXR0YWNoOiBpc2FiMSBhdHRh Y2ggcmV0dXJuZWQgNgpwY20wOiA8VklBIFZUODJDNjg2QT4gcG9ydCAweDFj NTAtMHgxYzUzLDB4MWM1NC0weDFjNTcsMHgxMDAwLTB4MTBmZiBpcnEgNSBh dCBkZXZpY2UgNy41IG9uIHBjaTAKcGNtMDogPEFuYWxvZyBEZXZpY2VzIEFE MTg4MUEgQUM5NyBDb2RlYz4KcGNpMDogPHNpbXBsZSBjb21tcz4gYXQgZGV2 aWNlIDcuNiAobm8gZHJpdmVyIGF0dGFjaGVkKQpjYmIwOiA8VEkxNDIwIFBD SS1DYXJkQnVzIEJyaWRnZT4gaXJxIDkgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDEwLjAgb24gcGNp MApjYXJkYnVzMDogPENhcmRCdXMgYnVzPiBvbiBjYmIwCnBjY2FyZDA6IDwx Ni1iaXQgUENDYXJkIGJ1cz4gb24gY2JiMApjYmIwOiBbTVBTQUZFXQpjYmIx OiA8VEkxNDIwIFBDSS1DYXJkQnVzIEJyaWRnZT4gaXJxIDEwIGF0IGRldmlj ZSAxMC4xIG9uIHBjaTAKY2FyZGJ1czE6IDxDYXJkQnVzIGJ1cz4gb24gY2Ji MQpwY2NhcmQxOiA8MTYtYml0IFBDQ2FyZCBidXM+IG9uIGNiYjEKY2JiMTog W01QU0FGRV0KZndvaGNpMDogPFRleGFzIEluc3RydW1lbnRzIFRTQjEyTFYy Nj4gbWVtIDB4ZTgwMDAwMDAtMHhlODAwM2ZmZiwweGU4MDA0MDAwLTB4ZTgw MDQ3ZmYgaXJxIDkgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDE0LjAgb24gcGNpMApmd29oY2kwOiBP SENJIHZlcnNpb24gMS4wIChST009MSkKZndvaGNpMDogTm8uIG9mIElzb2No cm9ub3VzIGNoYW5uZWwgaXMgNC4KZndvaGNpMDogRVVJNjQgMDg6MDA6NDY6 MDM6MDA6ZjU6MDE6NGUKZndvaGNpMDogUGh5IDEzOTRhIGF2YWlsYWJsZSBT NDAwLCAxIHBvcnRzLgpmd29oY2kwOiBMaW5rIFM0MDAsIG1heF9yZWMgMjA0 OCBieXRlcy4KZmlyZXdpcmUwOiA8SUVFRTEzOTQoRmlyZVdpcmUpIGJ1cz4g b24gZndvaGNpMApzYnAwOiA8U0JQLTIvU0NTSSBvdmVyIEZpcmVXaXJlPiBv biBmaXJld2lyZTAKZndlMDogPEV0aGVybmV0IG92ZXIgRmlyZVdpcmU+IG9u IGZpcmV3aXJlMAppZl9md2UwOiBGYWtlIEV0aGVybmV0IGFkZHJlc3M6IDBh OjAwOjQ2OmY1OjAxOjRlCmZ3b2hjaTA6IEluaXRpYXRlIGJ1cyByZXNldApm d29oY2kwOiBCVVMgcmVzZXQKZndvaGNpMDogbm9kZV9pZD0weGMwMDBmZmMw LCBnZW49MSwgQ1lDTEVNQVNURVIgbW9kZQpmaXJld2lyZTA6IDEgbm9kZXMs IG1heGhvcCA8PSAwLCBjYWJsZSBJUk0gPSAwIChtZSkKZmlyZXdpcmUwOiBi dXMgbWFuYWdlciAwIChtZSkKcmwwOiA8UmVhbFRlayA4MTM5IDEwLzEwMEJh c2VUWD4gcG9ydCAweDE4MDAtMHgxOGZmIG1lbSAweGU4MDA0ODAwLTB4ZTgw MDQ4ZmYgaXJxIDEwIGF0IGRldmljZSAxNi4wIG9uIHBjaTAKcmwwOiBFdGhl cm5ldCBhZGRyZXNzOiAwODowMDo0NjoyZjo3NjphMgptaWlidXMwOiA8TUlJ IGJ1cz4gb24gcmwwCnJscGh5MDogPFJlYWxUZWsgaW50ZXJuYWwgbWVkaWEg aW50ZXJmYWNlPiBvbiBtaWlidXMwCnJscGh5MDogIDEwYmFzZVQsIDEwYmFz ZVQtRkRYLCAxMDBiYXNlVFgsIDEwMGJhc2VUWC1GRFgsIGF1dG8KYWNwaV9h Y2FkMDogPEFDIEFkYXB0ZXI+IG9uIGFjcGkwCmFjcGlfY21iYXQwOiA8Q29u dHJvbCBNZXRob2QgQmF0dGVyeT4gb24gYWNwaTAKYWNwaV9jbWJhdDE6IDxD b250cm9sIE1ldGhvZCBCYXR0ZXJ5PiBvbiBhY3BpMAphY3BpX2xpZDA6IDxD b250cm9sIE1ldGhvZCBMaWQgU3dpdGNoPiBvbiBhY3BpMApmZGMwOiA8RW5o YW5jZWQgZmxvcHB5IGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgKGk4MjA3NywgTkU3MjA2NSBvciBj bG9uZSk+IHBvcnQgMHgzZjcsMHgzZjAtMHgzZjUgaXJxIDYgZHJxIDIgb24g YWNwaTAKZmRjMDogRklGTyBlbmFibGVkLCA4IGJ5dGVzIHRocmVzaG9sZApm ZDA6IDwxNDQwLUtCIDMuNSIgZHJpdmU+IG9uIGZkYzAgZHJpdmUgMApzaW8w IHBvcnQgMHgzZjgtMHgzZmYgaXJxIDQgb24gYWNwaTAKc2lvMDogdHlwZSAx NjU1MEEKcHBjMCBwb3J0IDB4Nzc4LTB4NzdmLDB4Mzc4LTB4MzdmIGlycSA3 IGRycSAzIG9uIGFjcGkwCnBwYzA6IFNNQy1saWtlIGNoaXBzZXQgKEVDUC9F UFAvUFMyL05JQkJMRSkgaW4gQ09NUEFUSUJMRSBtb2RlCnBwYzA6IEZJRk8g d2l0aCAxNi8xNi84IGJ5dGVzIHRocmVzaG9sZApwcGJ1czA6IDxQYXJhbGxl bCBwb3J0IGJ1cz4gb24gcHBjMApwbGlwMDogPFBMSVAgbmV0d29yayBpbnRl cmZhY2U+IG9uIHBwYnVzMApscHQwOiA8UHJpbnRlcj4gb24gcHBidXMwCmxw dDA6IEludGVycnVwdC1kcml2ZW4gcG9ydApwcGkwOiA8UGFyYWxsZWwgSS9P PiBvbiBwcGJ1czAKYXRrYmRjMDogPEtleWJvYXJkIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgKGk4 MDQyKT4gcG9ydCAweDY0LDB4NjAgaXJxIDEgb24gYWNwaTAKYXRrYmQwOiA8 QVQgS2V5Ym9hcmQ+IGZsYWdzIDB4MSBpcnEgMSBvbiBhdGtiZGMwCmtiZDAg YXQgYXRrYmQwCnBzbTA6IDxQUy8yIE1vdXNlPiBpcnEgMTIgb24gYXRrYmRj MApwc20wOiBtb2RlbCBHbGlkZVBvaW50LCBkZXZpY2UgSUQgMAphY3BpX2Vj MDogPEVtYmVkZGVkIENvbnRyb2xsZXI6IEdQRSAweDE+IHBvcnQgMHg2Niww eDYyIG9uIGFjcGkwCm9ybTA6IDxPcHRpb24gUk9Ncz4gYXQgaW9tZW0gMHhk YzAwMC0weGRmZmZmLDB4ZDAwMDAtMHhkM2ZmZiwweGMwMDAwLTB4Y2ZmZmYg b24gaXNhMApwbXRpbWVyMCBvbiBpc2EwCnNjMDogPFN5c3RlbSBjb25zb2xl PiBhdCBmbGFncyAweDEwMCBvbiBpc2EwCnNjMDogVkdBIDwxNiB2aXJ0dWFs IGNvbnNvbGVzLCBmbGFncz0weDMwMD4Kc2lvMTogY29uZmlndXJlZCBpcnEg MyBub3QgaW4gYml0bWFwIG9mIHByb2JlZCBpcnFzIDAKc2lvMTogcG9ydCBt YXkgbm90IGJlIGVuYWJsZWQKdmdhMDogPEdlbmVyaWMgSVNBIFZHQT4gYXQg cG9ydCAweDNjMC0weDNkZiBpb21lbSAweGEwMDAwLTB4YmZmZmYgb24gaXNh MApUaW1lY291bnRlciAiVFNDIiBmcmVxdWVuY3kgMTAwMDA0MDA2NyBIeiBx dWFsaXR5IDgwMApUaW1lY291bnRlcnMgdGljayBldmVyeSAxMC4wMDAgbXNl YwphY3BpX2NwdTogdGhyb3R0bGluZyBlbmFibGVkLCAxNiBzdGVwcyAoMTAw JSB0byA2LjIlKSwgY3VycmVudGx5IDEwMC4wJQpzeXN0ZW0gcG93ZXIgcHJv ZmlsZSBjaGFuZ2VkIHRvICdlY29ub215JwpHRU9NOiBjcmVhdGUgZGlzayBh ZDAgZHA9MHhjMmZhMDY2MAphZDA6IDM4MTU0TUIgPFRPU0hJQkEgTUs0MDI1 R0FTPiBbNzc1MjAvMTYvNjNdIGF0IGF0YTAtbWFzdGVyIFVETUExMDAKYWNk MDogQ0RSVyA8VUpEQTcxMD4gYXQgYXRhMS1tYXN0ZXIgUElPNApzeXN0ZW0g cG93ZXIgcHJvZmlsZSBjaGFuZ2VkIHRvICdwZXJmb3JtYW5jZScKTW91bnRp bmcgcm9vdCBmcm9tIHVmczovZGV2L2FkMHMyYQpXQVJOSU5HOiBSL1cgbW91 bnQgZGVuaWVkLiAgRmlsZXN5c3RlbSBpcyBub3QgY2xlYW4gLSBydW4gZnNj awpjZDk2NjA6IFJvY2tSaWRnZSBFeHRlbnNpb24K --0-264360939-1096485989=:31078-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 19:29:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78E916A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:29:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452F743D39 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:29:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437E663DA; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:29:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08923-10; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:28:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E253D637F; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:28:52 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <415B0D02.7080607@makeworld.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:29:06 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eduardo Huertas References: <20040929192629.31088.qmail@web52904.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040929192629.31088.qmail@web52904.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.1.1 at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Sound problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:29:03 -0000 Eduardo Huertas wrote: > Hi Everybody > > I have a SONY Vaio PCG-FXA36 and have worked very well > with > > FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0 > > Except with the sound card :-( > > Sometimes it does work and others simply not. > > When it doesn't dmesg shows me this: > > ----------- > pcm0: port > 0x1c50-0x1c53,0x1c54-0x1c57,0x1000- > 0x10ff irq 5 at device 7.5 on pci0 > via: codec busy > via: codec busy > via: codec busy > via: codec busy > via: codec busy > via: codec busy > pcm0: ac97 codec invalid or not present (id == > ffffffff) > device_probe_and_attach: pcm0 attach returned 6 > ----------- > > And KDE sends me this message: > ----------- > Sound server informational message: > Error while initializing the sound driver: > device /dev/dsp can't be opened (No such file or > directory) > The sound server will continue, using the null output > device. > ------------ > > Attached is dmesg when everything is OK. > > Thanks for your time and your sugestions. > > > > -edu- Try adding this to your kernel, then recompile it, install it. device pcm -- Best regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 19:31:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1BB16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:31:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52906.mail.yahoo.com (web52906.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E743443D31 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:31:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eduhuertas@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040929193125.75947.qmail@web52906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.230.149.4] by web52906.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:31:25 CDT Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:31:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Eduardo Huertas To: Chris In-Reply-To: <415B0D02.7080607@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Sound problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:31:27 -0000 --- Chris escribió: > Eduardo Huertas wrote: > > Hi Everybody > > > > I have a SONY Vaio PCG-FXA36 and have worked very > well > > with > > > > FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0 > > > > Except with the sound card :-( > > > > Sometimes it does work and others simply not. > > > > When it doesn't dmesg shows me this: > > > > ----------- > > pcm0: port > > 0x1c50-0x1c53,0x1c54-0x1c57,0x1000- > > 0x10ff irq 5 at device 7.5 on pci0 > > via: codec busy > > via: codec busy > > via: codec busy > > via: codec busy > > via: codec busy > > via: codec busy > > pcm0: ac97 codec invalid or not present (id == > > ffffffff) > > device_probe_and_attach: pcm0 attach returned 6 > > ----------- > > > > And KDE sends me this message: > > ----------- > > Sound server informational message: > > Error while initializing the sound driver: > > device /dev/dsp can't be opened (No such file or > > directory) > > The sound server will continue, using the null > output > > device. > > ------------ > > > > Attached is dmesg when everything is OK. > > > > Thanks for your time and your sugestions. > > > > > > > > -edu- > > > Try adding this to your kernel, then recompile it, > install it. > > device pcm > > -- > Best regards, > Chris > Thanks Chris, but that's already done. -edu- _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Información de Estados Unidos y América Latina, en Yahoo! Noticias. Visítanos en http://noticias.espanol.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 19:33:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E5C16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:33:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pr.gov.br (ns.pr.gov.br [200.189.112.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB82F43D3F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:33:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nlunkel@ig.com.br) Received: from [10.29.30.17] ([10.29.30.17]) by pr.gov.br (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i8TJM4FS007919 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:22:15 -0300 Message-ID: <415B0B56.2030404@ig.com.br> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:21:58 -0300 From: Newton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-pr.gov.br-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-pr.gov.br-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-pr.gov.br-MailScanner-SpamScore: sssss X-MailScanner-From: nlunkel@ig.com.br Subject: DHCP Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:33:06 -0000 Dear Friends : I'm having problems, with a 5.21 version install. After XFree86 troubles, finally I could see KDE. All, except internet , it's OK. My system is an Atlhon 1000 (T-Bird), Soyo K7-VTA-B, 256 Mb RAM, 32 Mb Savage 4 (Savage Generic driver), Sound Blaster Live, Realtek 8139 and 56K Lucent modem (not used). This is my first experience with FreeBSD, I'm a newbie. Sincerely, Newton - Curitiba - Brazil From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 19:46:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5D716A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:46:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE1343D5D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:46:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuri.vanovermeeren@reston.demon.nl) Received: from reston.demon.nl ([212.238.216.87]:3451 helo=[192.168.1.100]) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CCkPh-000FeE-6a; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:46:57 +0000 Message-ID: <415B116C.8010409@reston.demon.nl> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:47:56 +0200 From: yuri van Overmeeren User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: charlessmyth@nireland.com References: <415afee2.380.0@utvinternet.com> In-Reply-To: <415afee2.380.0@utvinternet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5.3 discs 1 & 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: yuri.vanovermeeren@reston.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:46:58 -0000 Charles Smyth wrote: >Dears Sirs, > >The iso downloads for 5.3 has discs 1 & 2 at over 600 MB apiece. Can you give >me a rough idea what is on disc two. In other words, will discs 1 and 2 have >an application suite similar to slackware 10.0. > >Charles Smyth. > > Hi, For installing FreeBSD from cd you need either the miniinst.iso (a minimal install, just the base system) or the disc1.iso (same as miniinst.iso but with lots of extra packages). disc2.iso is a rescue disc, a sort of live cd for FreeBSD. The disc1.iso image contains a selection of packages. other/more (all) packages can be installed via the FreeBSD mirrors. You can use sysinstall or pkg_add to do this. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-media.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/packages-using.html -yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 20:00:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CD516A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:00:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9636243D3F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:00:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq57-111.dial.allstream.net [216.123.134.239]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id 4E2B4B47C2; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:00:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:00:49 -0400 From: epilogue To: Ronj_clark@yahoo.com Message-Id: <20040929160049.31494bf7@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040929145351.28b8af1e.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <20040929132215.56551a88.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20040929183642.76738.qmail@web52504.mail.yahoo.com> <20040929145351.28b8af1e.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Bill Moran cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:00:59 -0000 On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:53:51 -0400 Bill Moran wrote: > Ronnie Clark wrote: > > Bill, > > > > Thanks for the response. Here is the last entry in the > > maillog file: > > > > Sep 29 03:01:48 src@rc_gcux sendmail[1204]: > > i8T81lo5001204: to=root, delay=00:00:00, > > xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, pri=31632, > > relay=[127.0.0.1], dsn=4.0.0, stat=Deferred: > > Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] > > > > This makes sense that the log says what it does since > > I have sendmail_enable="NONE". What I am asking is if > > there is a way to not have this file at all since > > there is no need to send amy mail of any kind from > > this server. Make sense? > > Not really. > > A lot of stuff in FreeBSD uses email for notifications and the like. > A few examples are cron (which will email the output of cron jobs) and > periodic. If you want to disable _all_ mail delivery, you'll need to > track down all of these utilities and either a) prevent them from > running or b) arrange for notifications from them to be sent via some > other means. hello ron, while this may not catch everything, it is a good and reasonable (imho) start. 1) add the following lines to /etc/periodic.conf: daily_output="/var/log/daily.log" weekly_output="/var/log/weekly.log" monthly_output="/var/log/monthly.log" daily_status_security_output="/var/log/security.log" 2) be sure that these logs exist. if they don't, 'touch' them. 3) the following in rc.conf: sendmail_enable="NONE" syslogd_enable="YES" syslogd_flags="-ss" # read the man page, if you want details inetd_enable="NO" # <- only if you're not running any inet services 4) reboot or shutdown. upon restart, examine 'netstat -n | grep -i list' for output. if get any output, it is for services that are 'listening'. deal with those, as you see fit. 5) if you ever need to send mail from this host, use one of the clients which have their own MTA's integrated (ex. sylpheed). while such CLI clients may exist, i am only aware of the gui clients. while it doesn't everything (firewalls in particular), this is a very good article, if you're looking to start locking down this machine: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2002/08/08/FreeBSD_Basics.html hth. cheers, epi > I don't know that a comprehensive list of these applications has ever > been compiled, but I think disabling them and mail delivery is A Bad > Idea (tm) because you're pretending your smarter than 30 years of > Unix system administrators' combined experience. > > The Right Thing To Do (tm) is to set sendmail_enable="NONE" (or > replace sendmail with ssmtp) and configure the "root" account to > forward to your email account so you can properly receive these > informative emails. If you're not familiar with sendmail or > uncomfortable with it doing anything, check out the handbook page > on replacing it with ssmtp: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mail.html > > HTH. > > > --- Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > Ronnie Clark wrote: > > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > I am building a central syslog server. I am seeing > > > > sendmail related items in the maillog file, even > > > > though I have sendmail_enable="NONE" in my > > > > /etc/rc.conf file. Is there a way to turn off any > > > > resemblance of an MTA on a FreeBSD system? Or, is > > > > there a way to turn on a localhost MTA but not > > > have it > > > > actively listen on a port? (in this case tcp 587) > > > > > > sendmail_enable="NONE" should disable it totally. > > > > > > sendmail_enable="NO" should allow local submission > > > only. > > > > > > You could also install something like ssmtp to > > > replace sendmail. > > > > > > What kind of log messages are you getting? > > > > > > -- > > > Bill Moran > > > Potential Technologies > > > http://www.potentialtech.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! > > http://vote.yahoo.com > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > -- > Bill Moran > Potential Technologies > http://www.potentialtech.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 20:08:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C5016A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:08:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1D043D1F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:08:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [67.1.199.80] (0-1pool199-80.nas2.fargo1.nd.us.da.qwest.net [67.1.199.80]) (authenticated bits=0)i8TJvkm5003973; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:57:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) In-Reply-To: <415B0B56.2030404@ig.com.br> References: <415B0B56.2030404@ig.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric Crist Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:56:49 -0500 To: Newton X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:08:06 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 29, 2004, at 2:21 PM, Newton wrote: > Dear Friends : I'm having problems, with a 5.21 version install. After > XFree86 troubles, finally I could see KDE. All, except internet , it's > OK. My system is an Atlhon 1000 (T-Bird), Soyo K7-VTA-B, 256 Mb RAM, > 32 Mb Savage 4 (Savage Generic driver), Sound Blaster Live, Realtek > 8139 and 56K Lucent modem (not used). This is my first experience with > FreeBSD, I'm a newbie. Sincerely, Newton - Curitiba - Brazil > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > What's your question? - ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkFbE4EACgkQRAAY9knOW+rtPwCdH6jBilfjVzUGmDNH9dZcidL9 Lc0An23bq6c3mhaZXTFbwHcH+MbXM+TY =BFAk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 20:16:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCE316A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:16:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cqgigw.cqg.com (cqgigw.cqg.com [208.48.16.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5668843D2F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:16:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tomc@cqg.com) Received: from cqgmail.cqg.com (int.cqg.com [96.0.0.2]) i8TKFvBQ030603; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:15:57 -0600 Received: from d3stomc ([192.168.17.154]) by cqgmail.cqg.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8TKFqtK019435; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:15:52 -0600 From: "Tom Connolly" To: "'Newton'" , Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:15:52 -0600 Message-ID: <02de01c4a661$1ea89620$9a11a8c0@d3stomc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.181 In-Reply-To: <415B0B56.2030404@ig.com.br> Importance: Normal X-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0, required 3) Subject: RE: DHCP Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:16:00 -0000 Do you have an IP Address? Tom -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Newton Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 1:22 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: DHCP Problems Dear Friends : I'm having problems, with a 5.21 version install. After=20 XFree86 troubles, finally I could see KDE. All, except internet , it's=20 OK. My system is an Atlhon 1000 (T-Bird), Soyo K7-VTA-B, 256 Mb RAM, 32=20 Mb Savage 4 (Savage Generic driver), Sound Blaster Live, Realtek 8139=20 and 56K Lucent modem (not used). This is my first experience with=20 FreeBSD, I'm a newbie. Sincerely, Newton - Curitiba - Brazil _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 20:31:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B1916A4CF for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:31:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pengo.systems.pipex.net (pengo.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA32E43D68 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:31:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark.cullen@dsl.pipex.com) Received: from ape (81-178-127-34.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.127.34]) by pengo.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B5824C0013B for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:31:44 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <000b01c4a663$d40a8990$f700000a@ape> From: "Markie" To: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:35:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: installworld touch: not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:31:48 -0000 Hi, I just got this error when I went to installworld on my laptop. Google came up with an incorrect time/date and unmounted NFS, but my date and time are correct and I am not using NFS. I changed newvers.sh to /usr/bin/touch instead and it's working, is this safe to do? Will I encounter any weird problems? Never had this problem before... Thanks.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 20:48:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7942116A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:48:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41B143D46 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:48:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8TKlQkG031424; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:47:27 -0700 From: kent To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:48:32 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <000b01c4a663$d40a8990$f700000a@ape> In-Reply-To: <000b01c4a663$d40a8990$f700000a@ape> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409291348.33092.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Markie Subject: Re: installworld touch: not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:48:35 -0000 On Wednesday 29 September 2004 01:35 pm, Markie wrote: > Hi, > > I just got this error when I went to installworld on my laptop. Google came > up with an incorrect time/date and unmounted NFS, but my date and time are > correct and I am not using NFS. I changed newvers.sh to /usr/bin/touch > instead and it's working, is this safe to do? Will I encounter any weird > problems? Never had this problem before... I won't comment on what you did as a fix. Another possibility is that you are running a cmos clock with local time. You need to run "adjkerntz -i" before you do anything. See /usr/src/UPDATING Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 20:49:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8C016A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:49:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EBD43D5D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:49:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shantanoo@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so3476603rnk for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.163.7 with SMTP id l7mr1507677rne; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.150.72 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 13:42:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <23017470040929134235946fa4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:12:31 +0530 From: Shantanoo To: Newton In-Reply-To: <415B0B56.2030404@ig.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <415B0B56.2030404@ig.com.br> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Shantanoo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 20:49:33 -0000 On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:21:58 -0300, Newton wrote: > Dear Friends : I'm having problems, with a 5.21 version install. After > XFree86 troubles, finally I could see KDE. All, except internet , it's > OK. My system is an Atlhon 1000 (T-Bird), Soyo K7-VTA-B, 256 Mb RAM, 32 > Mb Savage 4 (Savage Generic driver), Sound Blaster Live, Realtek 8139 > and 56K Lucent modem (not used). This is my first experience with > FreeBSD, I'm a newbie. Sincerely, Newton - Curitiba - Brazil How are you trying to get connected to internet? through modem or PPPoE? or connection is shared on some other machine? Regards, Shantanoo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 21:08:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7308616A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:08:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346D743D53 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:08:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from taras-s-y@mail.ru) Received: from [195.128.97.122] (port=60824 helo=taras.gznet.ru) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1CClgz-000Dcw-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:08:53 +0400 From: Savchuk Taras Organization: msu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:08:48 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409300108.48854.taras-s-y@mail.ru> X-Spam: Not detected Subject: How to begin ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:08:54 -0000 I undertand nothing in FreeBSD source code, but want to sort out this problem. The hard business is begining, so I want to begin. Who can show me the right way? ps: I have some expirience in C/C++ programming, understanding i386 arch and I am familiar whith HANDBOOK, archbook, etc. ps ps: sorry for my english. -- Taras From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 21:11:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE78D16A4D0 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:11:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pengo.systems.pipex.net (pengo.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D02A43D4C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:11:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark.cullen@dsl.pipex.com) Received: from ape (81-178-127-34.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.127.34]) by pengo.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id EEAA44C000FF; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:11:41 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <001901c4a669$68cd5300$f700000a@ape> From: "Markie" To: "kent" , References: <000b01c4a663$d40a8990$f700000a@ape> <200409291348.33092.kstewart@owt.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:15:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Re: installworld touch: not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:11:44 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "kent" To: Cc: "Markie" Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 9:48 PM Subject: Re: installworld touch: not found | On Wednesday 29 September 2004 01:35 pm, Markie wrote: | > Hi, | > | > I just got this error when I went to installworld on my laptop. Google came | > up with an incorrect time/date and unmounted NFS, but my date and time are | > correct and I am not using NFS. I changed newvers.sh to /usr/bin/touch | > instead and it's working, is this safe to do? Will I encounter any weird | > problems? Never had this problem before... | | I won't comment on what you did as a fix. Oops! I guess it wasn't the greatest idea in the world then? You can call me stupid, I don't mind :) It seems to be running fine... but if I really shouldn't have done that can I just do another buildworld? | | Another possibility is that you are running a cmos clock with local time. You | need to run "adjkerntz -i" before you do anything. See /usr/src/UPDATING What am I looking at in UPDATING? I don't see anything recent related to adjkerntz... but I just ran it anyway. Should it have changed my time or date? It didn't seem to do much? | | Kent | | -- | Kent Stewart | Richland, WA | | http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 21:30:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226E016A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:30:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE8243D2F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:30:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8TLTgkG000771; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:29:42 -0700 From: kent To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:30:44 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <000b01c4a663$d40a8990$f700000a@ape> <200409291348.33092.kstewart@owt.com> <001901c4a669$68cd5300$f700000a@ape> In-Reply-To: <001901c4a669$68cd5300$f700000a@ape> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409291430.44231.kstewart@owt.com> cc: Markie Subject: Re: installworld touch: not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:30:51 -0000 On Wednesday 29 September 2004 02:15 pm, Markie wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "kent" > To: > Cc: "Markie" > Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 9:48 PM > Subject: Re: installworld touch: not found > > | On Wednesday 29 September 2004 01:35 pm, Markie wrote: > | > Hi, > | > > | > I just got this error when I went to installworld on my laptop. Google > > came > > | > up with an incorrect time/date and unmounted NFS, but my date and time > > are > > | > correct and I am not using NFS. I changed newvers.sh to /usr/bin/touch > | > instead and it's working, is this safe to do? Will I encounter any > > weird > > | > problems? Never had this problem before... > | > | I won't comment on what you did as a fix. > > Oops! I guess it wasn't the greatest idea in the world then? You can call > me stupid, I don't mind :) It seems to be running fine... but if I really > shouldn't have done that can I just do another buildworld? Touch is important to the system and you really don't want to run newver.sh instead of it. > > | Another possibility is that you are running a cmos clock with local time. > > You > > | need to run "adjkerntz -i" before you do anything. See /usr/src/UPDATING > > What am I looking at in UPDATING? I don't see anything recent related to > adjkerntz... but I just ran it anyway. Should it have changed my time or > date? It didn't seem to do much? If you are running wall clock time, it sets your timezone so that the system knows the UTC creation time of the src. The touch problem usually occurs because something you have created appears to be older than code you imported using cvsup. When you set the timezone, the imported source code is now older than the created file and make is happy. Look at UPDATING and do a search on adjkerntz. You will find it in 1 or 2 attempts. Kent > > | Kent > | > | -- > | Kent Stewart > | Richland, WA > | > | http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 21:46:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34AA116A4CF for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:46:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (pemaquid.safeport.com [204.156.12.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A426043D3F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:46:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8TLkN6C083659 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:46:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost)i8TLkNLe083656 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:46:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pemaquid.safeport.com: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:46:23 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20040929173554.C11866@pemaquid.safeport.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Xorg and ATI Rage-Mobility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:46:25 -0000 I finally got around to trying XFree86 4.3 (from the 5.2 CD). It works fine. I could find nothing on the Xorg or XFree86 (4.4) sites. but neither works with my system (and perhaps) this chip. I am going to post this on those sites. I tested Free86 with the 5.x binary. Installing that does not update the package database. Where might I find how to do that manually? I am sure the need will arise again :) On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Joe Altman wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 02:22:53PM -0400, doug@safeport.com wrote: > > > > I have tried the default xorg.conf (from Xorg -configure), one that I > > edited, All do the same thing - give a black screen, > > Me, too. > > > Xorg.0.log has no error messages. > > Me, too. > > > vendor = 'ATI Technologies' > > device = '01541014 Rage P/M Mobility AGP 2x' > > The P/M Mobility AGP 2x matches what the laptop I have uses: an IBM > A20m. > > What I see from ps ux is that both my X session and window manager > start, but (as you point out) the screen goes black. > > It's almost as if xset comes on and blanks the screen, immediately > pursuant to the invocation of X, for this particular chip. > > > Thanks for any ideas > > I've no ideas. I've pondered and used google and the search function > for the lists; no joy. I do note that there is a recommendation to use > the gatos bits (gatos.sourceforge.net) if one wishes to use the > multimedia capabilities of this chip; this occurs during the compile > of Xorg and/or in the Xorg log. It doesn't seem to me that the > multimedia capabilities of the card are relevant to the basic use of X > for a windowing system. > > -- > One million points of light shining on the new world-order model for > fascism and tyranny. Get in line. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-469-8766 Fax: 301-469-0601 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 21:52:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB47116A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:52:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m27.mx.aol.com (imo-m27.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F82843D54 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:52:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from TM4525@aol.com) Received: from TM4525@aol.com by imo-m27.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.7.) id n.fa.2e69790 (16781) for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:51:54 -0400 (EDT) From: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:51:53 EDT To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5112 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:52:01 -0000 While I was had a nice little test set up, I figured I'd test Freebsd 4.9 against 5.2.1 since I had fresh installs handy on separate drives. The simple test was as follows: Hardware: Celeron 2.4Ghz processor Dual onboard Intel (em) NICs, 32bit, 33Mhz bus Setup: Traffic Generator -> FreeBSD System -> Server I had it set up to route between the 2 interfaces (ie NOT bridged). I fired a unidirectional stream of UDP packets (so there was no return traffic from the server, which was discarding the packets) at a rate of ~100Kpps. The disturbing results: FreeBSD 4.9: 33% interrupt usage FreeBSD 5.2.1: >80% interrupt usage What has happened to the stack? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 22:01:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9E516A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:01:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from allrounder.lame.at (mail.softlink.at [195.58.166.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824C243D46 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:01:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from haimat@lame.at) Received: from itchy (home.lame.at [80.78.254.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by allrounder.lame.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF2B62FE87 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:00:54 +0200 (CEST) From: "Matthias F. Brandstetter" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:01:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <200409300108.48854.taras-s-y@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <200409300108.48854.taras-s-y@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409300001.07698.haimat@lame.at> Subject: Re: How to begin ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:01:19 -0000 ---------- quoting Savchuk Taras ---------- > I undertand nothing in FreeBSD source code, but want to sort out this > problem. The hard business is begining, so I want to begin. > Who can show me the right way? what problem do you have? -- Sorry, Mr. Burns, but I don't go in for these backdoor shenanigans. Sure I'm flattered, maybe even a little curious, but the answer is no! -- Homer Simpson Last Exit to Springfield From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 22:09:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4C416A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:09:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03C943D54 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:09:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4T0013IPJ8M8@mta8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:09:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:09:18 -0400 From: bsdfsse To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <415B328E.4060704@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) Subject: Are there step-by-step VMWare instructions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:09:52 -0000 I am beginning to try and run the vmware3 port on FreeBSD-5.3beta6. First I "upgraded" the machine to 5.3-Stable by putting "RELENG_5" in my stable-supfile. Next I went in to /usr/ports/emulators/vmware3 and ran: make make install I rebooted and ran "vmware &" in a command window, and then entered my Linux licsense serial number. One of the first things it asked me, was what network device to bind to "vmmonet" (I think), so I entered "fxp0" - which now I wonder if it should have been "/dev/fxp0". After completing the install, I rebooted so it would run its start script. Next I used the wizard to make Win2000 Professional system, and copied the Win2000 Pro ISO over to this machine. I configured the vm's cdrom to be the Win2000 ISO file, so I could install it. When the VM machine boot, it couldn't find the mouse, so I selected (I think) "/dev/mouse" and that error went away. Them it would not go past this error: Cannot attach shared memory segment: Invalid argument. Failed to initialize SVGA device. I looked up on Google and found this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2004-August/000526.html "ake sure that you have sysctl kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed set to 1" So I made the change he suggested, rebooted, and it did get past that error. When it came up, it complained about not being able to bind vmnet, then the machine locked up solid. Now I made a new virtual machine, and tried to install without networking inside the vm, and it the machine 99% locked (the mouse sometimes moves). I can't shell in using putty.exe either. It would really be nice if there was some step-by-step instructions, it would make it easier for people to switch to FreeBSD (like I'm doing). I am trying to document things as I go along, so if such doucments do not exist, mine can be used by the next guy. The above link I found is an example of the knowledge being spread around, maybe we can collect it in to one spot? I can post more detailed errors if this document does not exist, I thought I would ask first in case it did. thx! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 22:11:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4E716A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:11:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D900B43D5C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:11:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBD769A3F; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:11:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:11:01 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Savchuk Taras Message-Id: <20040929181101.67636326.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <200409300108.48854.taras-s-y@mail.ru> References: <200409300108.48854.taras-s-y@mail.ru> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to begin ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:11:03 -0000 Savchuk Taras wrote: > I undertand nothing in FreeBSD source code, but want to sort out this problem. > The hard business is begining, so I want to begin. > Who can show me the right way? > > ps: I have some expirience in C/C++ programming, understanding i386 arch and I > am familiar whith HANDBOOK, archbook, etc. If you're looking to start understanding the FreeBSD codebase, probably the best thing for you to do is buy and read _The_Design_and_Implementation_ _of_FreeBSD_. I just finished reading it's predecessor, _The_Design_and_Implementation_of_ _the_4.4bsd_Operating_System_, and it's cleared up a LOT of my misunderstandings on how the Unix kernel works ... I can only assume that the newer one will be even better. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 22:11:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4935F16A4D7 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:11:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.server.rpi.edu (smtp2.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E0943D31 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:11:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp2.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8TMAwoB021680; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:10:59 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:10:57 -0400 To: TM4525@aol.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:11:06 -0000 At 5:51 PM -0400 9/29/04, TM4525@aol.com wrote: >While I was had a nice little test set up, I figured I'd test >Freebsd 4.9 against 5.2.1 since I had fresh installs handy on >separate drives. It would be interesting to try a fresh install of the most recent 5.3-beta ISO's. A lot has changed between 5.2.1 and today, and some of that should result in significant performance improvements. Note that 5.2.1 was released back in February. A lot has changed. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 22:44:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FC716A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:44:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from geofront.co.uk (port-179.dolphin.c4l.co.uk [80.253.114.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AEED43D3F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:43:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (82-35-149-54.cable.ubr04.enfi.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.149.54]) by geofront.co.uk (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i8TMkopc064717; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:46:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from Mike@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk) Message-ID: <415B3A39.6030404@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:42:01 +0100 From: Mike Woods User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040827) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <200409300108.48854.taras-s-y@mail.ru> <20040929181101.67636326.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040929181101.67636326.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: Savchuk Taras cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to begin ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:44:00 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: >If you're looking to start understanding the FreeBSD codebase, probably >the best thing for you to do is buy and read _The_Design_and_Implementation_ >_of_FreeBSD_. > > It seems the register have a special offer on that very book atm :) http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/bookshop/detail.asp?affid=TRE&t=59&item=210066 ---------------- Mike Woods IT Technician From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 22:50:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32D116A4D0 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:50:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from usw2.natel.net (2b.bz [209.152.117.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D62A343D1F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:50:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from WD@US-Webmasters.com) Received: (qmail 57931 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2004 22:50:01 -0000 Received: from batv-01-046.dialup.netins.net (HELO xyz.US-Webmasters.com) (216.248.109.47) by us-webmasters.com with SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 22:50:01 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040929174245.058a90c0@209.152.117.178> X-Sender: wd@209.152.117.178 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:49:05 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "W. D." In-Reply-To: <200409300108.48854.taras-s-y@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: Savchuk Taras Subject: Re: How to begin ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:50:05 -0000 At 20:08 9/29/2004, Savchuk Taras, wrote: >I understand nothing in FreeBSD source code, but want to sort out this= problem.=20 >The hard business is begining, so I want to begin.=20 >Who can show me the right way? > >ps: I have some expirience in C/C++ programming, understanding i386 arch= and I=20 >am familiar with HANDBOOK, archbook, etc. > >ps: Sorry for my English. >--=20 >Taras Hi Taras, I sympathize with you. I found it a bit much when starting out too. You might find that you can learn a lot by installing and using FreeBSD. I've got every book on FreeBSD, but still found it a bit difficult to install. I've put together my notes that I use when installing. I hope they can be of some help to you: http://www.US-Webmasters.com/FreeBSD/Install/ Here's the online handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ Start Here to Find It Fast!=99 ->= http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names -> http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 23:00:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E5A16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:00:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C055B43D45 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:00:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC41D5144B; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:01:18 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: <20040929230118.GA43201@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:00:55 -0000 --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 05:51:53PM -0400, TM4525@aol.com wrote: > While I was had a nice little test set up, I figured I'd test Freebsd 4.9= =20 > against 5.2.1 since I had fresh installs handy on separate drives. > The simple test was as follows: >=20 > Hardware: >=20 > Celeron 2.4Ghz processor > Dual onboard Intel (em) NICs, 32bit, 33Mhz bus >=20 > Setup: >=20 > Traffic Generator -> FreeBSD System -> Server >=20 > I had it set up to route between the 2 interfaces (ie NOT bridged). I > fired a unidirectional stream of UDP packets (so there was no return traf= fic > from the server, which was discarding the packets) at a rate of ~100Kpps.= =20 > The disturbing results: >=20 > FreeBSD 4.9: 33% interrupt usage > FreeBSD 5.2.1: >80% interrupt usage >=20 > What has happened to the stack?=20 See the Early Adopter's Guide that was distributed with 5.2.1, or just don't worry about it and update to 5.3 which has vastly better network performance. Kris --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBWz6+Wry0BWjoQKURAmf/AJ9LvY0r7TiXCUWhl8PoQGLd2TH9HQCfZ9T+ +fTQv+EVLDmVQtqOqTTha5w= =Sa8H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 23:14:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C6616A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:14:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from viper4.dataraq.net (viper4.dataraq.net [209.218.168.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD1E43D49 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:14:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aj@siegel-tech.net) Received: (qmail 13861 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2004 23:14:43 -0000 Received: from pcp09609084pcs.brodwy01.nm.comcast.net (HELO ?192.168.245.20?) (69.241.168.76) by viper4.dataraq.net with SMTP; 29 Sep 2004 23:14:43 -0000 From: Aaron Siegel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:14:19 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20040926222815.88396.qmail@web53906.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040926222815.88396.qmail@web53906.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409291714.20928.aj@siegel-tech.net> Subject: Re: cannot see Windows after installing FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:14:35 -0000 Hello A simple solution, just to get things working, is to us one hard drive at a time. Set up both drives a the master IDE device and swap between operating systems by swapping the cable between the two drives. If you want to run FreeBSD plug in the 40GB drive and unplug the 80GB. The reverse if you want to run windows, plug in the 80GB and unplug the 40 GB. If you cannot get windows to boot as the master device you may have corrupted the MBR on you Windows drive. I do not know how to fix this on XP, dos based systems fdisk had an option that repaired the MBR. On Sunday 26 September 2004 04:28 pm, stheg olloydson wrote: > it was said: > >Hi, > >I still cannot boot Windows so I set the BIOS to boot > >from the slave hard disk that has Windows first and it > >gave me the following error: > > > >NTLDR is missing > >press ATL-CTRL-DEL to restart > > > >> I am a newbie to FreeBSD. I have a Pentium 3, 5oo > > > >IBM > > As an aside, using FreeBSD will be MUCH easier to learn and use if you > don't use a lower case letter "o" in place of the numeral "0". > > >> computer that I put two hard drives in. I added a > > > >4.3G > > > >> hard drive (master) and an 80G hard drive (slave). > >> Initially, windows XP was installed on both hard > >> drives. > > When you say this, do you mean that you installed XP on the 80GB drive, > then added a 4.3GB drive and then installed XP that? Or do you mean you > installed part of XP on the 4.3GB drive and part on the 80GB? Or do you > mean you installed XP on the 4.3GB and the 80GB was an extended > partition containing logical drives, such as D:, E:, F:, G:, etc that > XP had access to? > The answers to these questions determine what must be done in order to > get you back into XP. > > >> Last night, I decided to install FreeBSD 4.10 on > > > > the > > > >> 4.3G hard drive and keep windows on the 80G. > > > > Anyway, > > > >> after I installed FreeBSD, I couldn't gain any > > > > access > > > >> to Windows XP on the 80G hard drive. What > > > > happened? Do > > > >> I have to reinstall windows? > > You'll have to answer my preceding questions to know the answer to > these > two questions. > > Regards, > > Stheg > > > > > _______________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! > http://vote.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 23:27:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C20416A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:27:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail03.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E01543D46 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:27:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andrewr@uidaho.edu) Received: from c211-28-75-111.frank1.vic.optusnet.com.au (c211-28-75-111.frank1.vic.optusnet.com.au [211.28.75.111]) i8TNRErq029521 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:27:15 +1000 Received: from c211-28-75-111.frank1.vic.optusnet.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])ESMTP id i8TNRtqU040685 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:27:55 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from andrewr@uidaho.edu) Received: (from andrewr@localhost)id i8TNRtKS040684 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:27:55 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from andrewr@uidaho.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: c211-28-75-111.frank1.vic.optusnet.com.au: andrewr set sender to andrewr@uidaho.edu using -f Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:27:55 +1000 From: Andrew Robinson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040929232755.GW5379@uidaho.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Organizing the output of make etc. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:27:17 -0000 Hi everyone, I'm administering my own little hobby system. Great fun. I notice that when I make targets, usually through portupgrade, a great deal of text flies by. Some of it is of obvious immediate use, such as this advice from Subversion: Make sure that: * all your svn users are members of a common group * this group is the group id of the db/ and locks/ subdirectories of your repository * the above subdirectories are writable by this group and some of it is not, unless the upgrade or installation fails, eg, the output from each compilation. What I'd like to know is: how do you more experienced types cope with this information flow? I'd like to use a little script that winnows out the useful advice from the recover-from-catastrophe-maybe advice, and then emails selections to root, with appropriate subject line, etc. Does anyone have a similar script,? If not I'll have a bash at writing one. If so, I'd love to use it. Thanks for any ideas! Andrew -- Andrew Robinson Ph: 208 885 7115 Department of Forest Resources Fa: 208 885 6226 University of Idaho E : andrewr@uidaho.edu PO Box 441133 W : http://www.uidaho.edu/~andrewr Moscow ID 83843 Or: http://www.biometrics.uidaho.edu No statement above necessarily represents my employer's opinion. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 23:36:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F114A16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:36:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gremlin.internode.com.au (gremlin.internode.com.au [192.83.231.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50BC43D4C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:36:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adam@internode.com.au) Received: from gremlin.internode.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8TNae0X000717; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:06:40 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from adam@internode.com.au) Received: (from adam@localhost) by gremlin.internode.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8TNadcc000716; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:06:39 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from adam@internode.com.au) X-Authentication-Warning: gremlin.internode.com.au: adam set sender to adam@internode.com.au using -f Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:06:39 +0930 From: Adam Smith To: Raman Message-ID: <20040929233639.GA712@internode.com.au> References: <20040929005122.GE696@internode.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Face: $vsV$1FNbZN\JVpjV#&+/!oVW`Kw$j?w_,te\SS}(tKD21c+l$t%\RCS(r$G; XXk]6,(!N:&(N3EV0bY`3):UrgG7'*qsj3l.75IaHV1<`i*{[L\:F*l6fH##C:-p2]xW/R-Z:!bo; 5g3GP-{I{}7O>tN}`Xm/=-:8NG?f-r'$Qc3y[aW-7'W_S<`KYU!_; `7K=kuC$-.7J2*kk=~`c@ADp+xhsv(!a@eW-R_5wtx+tC)(]%W+ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup propagate? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:36:45 -0000 On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:27:20AM -0400, Raman said: > I should rephrase my question. A new version of apache port came out. > How long will it take the cvsup servers to notice the new version is > out so when I cvsup my ports I will recieve it? My answer is still correct. It depends on how frequently your CVSup server updates. If it is following the guidelines I provided in the link below, then it will be however long that time period is, give or take. Adam > On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 10:21:22 +0930, Adam Smith wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 07:53:01PM -0400, Raman said: > > > Hi, I was just wondering when a new release of a port comes out how > > > long does it take cvsup to get it and propagate to the other cvsup > > > servers? > > > > It depends how it's configured. > > > > Have a look at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/mirror-howto.html > > and check section 3.4 "How often should I mirror?" for the FreeBSD > > reccomendations. > > > > -- > > Adam Smith > > Internode : http://www.internode.on.net > > Phone : (08) 8228 2999 > > > > Dog for sale: Eats lots and is fond of children. > > > -- Adam Smith Internode : http://www.internode.on.net Phone : (08) 8228 2999 Dog for sale: Eats lots and is fond of children. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 23:42:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942D616A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:42:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out014.verizon.net (out014pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C75D43D48 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:42:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from r.juliano@verizon.net) Received: from ralph3 ([141.158.63.167]) by out014.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040929234231.OTXT17054.out014.verizon.net@ralph3> for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:42:31 -0500 Message-ID: <001301c4a67b$c4f9a5e0$6400a8c0@ralph3> From: "Ralph Juliano" To: References: <002d01c4a619$df216f00$6400a8c0@ralph3> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:26:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out014.verizon.net from [141.158.63.167] at Wed, 29 Sep 2004 18:42:31 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: SENDMAIL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:42:32 -0000 PLEASE post this message to the most appropriate Lists. THANKS Subject: SENDMAIL For us to provide a SENDMAIL SERVICE we need help to configure and remotely install FreeBSD, SendMail and Majordomo on our UNIX mail = server. Our server must be remotely automated to function flawlessly 24/7. If you can clone and configure our UNIX system online, please advise = us of the options and your fee (contract) to perform this task. Sincerely, Ralph Juliano Wilmington, DE USA mailto:r.juliano@verizon.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 23:49:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E08816A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:49:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14305.mail.yahoo.com (web14305.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7230343D55 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:49:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linuxrule@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040929234948.66897.qmail@web14305.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.130.195.127] by web14305.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:49:48 PDT Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 16:49:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Stanley Wright To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: ISP blocking port 80 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:49:48 -0000 If my ISP blocking port 80 and all other ports, what options do I have for running Apache. Thanks. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 00:09:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2CE16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:09:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net (scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D12143D45 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:09:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm@inbox.lv) Received: from pool0256.cvx26-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.223.1] helo=ringworm.mechee.com) by scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1CCoVW-0003ZL-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:09:14 -0700 Received: by ringworm.mechee.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1E27710; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:08:54 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:08:54 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <1096396806.4159b00629bd8@secure.quay.net> In-Reply-To: <1096396806.4159b00629bd8@secure.quay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409291708.54544.ringworm@inbox.lv> Subject: Re: Can somebody explain how the autotools are configured in FreeBSD 4.10? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:09:16 -0000 On Tuesday 28 September 2004 11:40 am, Gabriel O'Brien wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm hoping somebody can explain to me how to use the autotools (automake, > autoconf, libtool, etc.) in FreeBSD 4.10 because plainly I'm doing > something quite wrong. > > I am trying to build turck-mmcache-2.4.6 with PHP 4.3.9 and with this (and > other PHP modules) I am continually getting aclocal and libtool related > errors, even after installing *all* of the various autoconf and automake > options. I see that they are all getting installed with names like > "autoconf259" and so on so I suspect that it has something to do with the > fact that "phpize" can't figure out what's going on. I've done quite a few > web searches looking for info on how to do this sort of thing properly but > I can't seem to find anything either on the FreeBSD site or elsewhere. If > anyone can point me in the right direction that would be great. > > Here are some examples of the behavior I'm seeing: > > --- > > sol# ./pear install APC > downloading APC-2.0.4.tgz ... > Starting to download APC-2.0.4.tgz (44,606 bytes) > ............done: 44,606 bytes > 35 source files, building > running: phpize > aclocal: not found > `phpize' failed > > --- > > sol# which aclocal > aclocal: Command not found. > sol# which aclocal18 > /usr/local/bin/aclocal18 > > --- > > I've tried creating a soft link to the various utilities involved but this > just results in unresolved m4 macros so I don't think this is a proper > solution, even if I could get it working. > > Any help would be apreciated! > > -Gabe > I ran into similar problems when trying to repackage a port. Basically I set up several soft links to solve the problem, here is my aclocal for example: ls -l /usr/local/bin/aclocal* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 24 Sep 26 16:23 /usr/local/bin/aclocal -> /usr/local/bin/aclocal18 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 11496 Sep 24 11:17 /usr/local/bin/aclocal14 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12852 Sep 21 14:23 /usr/local/bin/aclocal15 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 19234 Sep 26 16:30 /usr/local/bin/aclocal18 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 20434 Sep 26 15:39 /usr/local/bin/aclocal19 and automake: ls -l /usr/local/bin/automake* lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 25 Sep 26 16:20 /usr/local/bin/automake -> /usr/local/bin/automake18 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 199592 Sep 24 11:17 /usr/local/bin/automake14 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 216027 Sep 21 14:23 /usr/local/bin/automake15 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 211032 Sep 26 16:30 /usr/local/bin/automake18 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 220728 Sep 26 15:39 /usr/local/bin/automake19 Basically some scripts will only look for aclocal or automake without an extention number. I use automake18 instead of 19 because 19 seems not to work properly. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 00:17:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD51A16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:17:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail1.cableone.net [24.116.0.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84A2543D4C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:17:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.62.13]) by smail1.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 19961481 for multiple; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:04:26 -0700 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:16:40 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: Message-ID: <20040929191640.35e37645@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <12881114.1096444348988.JavaMail.imail@owaxs02.opwv.email.bigpond.com> References: <12881114.1096444348988.JavaMail.imail@owaxs02.opwv.email.bigpond.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Which Development Environment/Tools For FreeBSD + PostgreSQL Service? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:17:14 -0000 On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:52:28 +1000 wrote: > - Is this the right place to be asking about development tools? > Since this involves FreeBSD, we thought it might be appropriate. > http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html would be a nice start > - We do not need any GUI. The programs will either run from the > shell, or as services. > > - C/C++ comes to mind, but which flavour of compiler/debugger/third > party add-ons/editor? An advantage here is the fact that this > language is well established which should improve reliability to > some extent (if we are careful with pointers). A disadvantage would > be the extensive use of pointers, the cryptic and unreadable look of > the code and the fact that C/C++ is getting a bit long in the tooth. Don't like C/C++ then create binding for what ever you want to it for another language... for editor and and the like, let your developers choose what ever they like... > - We are considering the Borland tools (JBuilder/Kylix) since we are > familiar with Borland tools and like their database connectivity, > rich components and elegant looking code (less plumbing). But on the > other hand, we don't need any GUI, and we had some problems in the > past with reliability. Do you have any thoughts on this? Kylix is aimed at linux, not freebsd. As far as jbuilder is concerned, really don't see any thing that impressive it when compared to other IDEs, from it's website. > - We would prefer not to use ODBC/JDBC, and instead interface > directly to the database. We had some bad experience in the past > regarding reliability and performance. We can either use the library > provided by Postgres or write our own wrappers to make things more > readable. Then do so... if the language exists in the ports or can easily be ported, I don't see any thing stopping you... > - We would prefer not to use an interpreted language such as Python, > Java, and Perl etc for performance reasons. We know that Java can be > compiled, but is it a good solution without using JDBC? How about > reliability? I personally would just go with C++ over java. > Are there any particularly elegant solutions you have experience > with? Thank you for your help. Can't think of any off hand, at this moment. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 00:29:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF3C16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:29:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.mi.celestial.com (dagney.celestial.com [192.136.111.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1E643D1D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:29:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill@celestial.com) Received: by mail.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id 2D55A11FA15; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 17:29:03 -0700 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040930002903.GA49516@alexis.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040929234948.66897.qmail@web14305.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040929234948.66897.qmail@web14305.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: ISP blocking port 80 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:29:04 -0000 On Wed, Sep 29, 2004, Stanley Wright wrote: >If my ISP blocking port 80 and all other ports, what >options do I have for running Apache. Either get another ISP or a contract with your current one that allows you to run servers. Many ISPs started blocking port 80 to their customer's sites on cable broadband connections in response to the ``Code Red'' and ``Nimda'' worms a couple of years ago. Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ Instead of giving money to found colleges to promote learning, why don't they pass a constitutional amendment prohibiting anybody from learning anything? If it works as good as the Prohibition one did, why, in five years we would have the smartest race of people on earth. -- The Best of Will Rogers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 00:29:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E58D16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:29:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gremlin.internode.com.au (gremlin.internode.com.au [192.83.231.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4290243D4C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:29:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adam@internode.com.au) Received: from gremlin.internode.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8U0TUbr001487; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:59:30 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from adam@internode.com.au) Received: (from adam@localhost) by gremlin.internode.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8U0TTdV001485; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:59:29 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from adam@internode.com.au) X-Authentication-Warning: gremlin.internode.com.au: adam set sender to adam@internode.com.au using -f Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:59:29 +0930 From: Adam Smith To: Raman Message-ID: <20040930002928.GH712@internode.com.au> References: <20040929005122.GE696@internode.com.au> <20040929233639.GA712@internode.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040929233639.GA712@internode.com.au> X-Face: $vsV$1FNbZN\JVpjV#&+/!oVW`Kw$j?w_,te\SS}(tKD21c+l$t%\RCS(r$G; XXk]6,(!N:&(N3EV0bY`3):UrgG7'*qsj3l.75IaHV1<`i*{[L\:F*l6fH##C:-p2]xW/R-Z:!bo; 5g3GP-{I{}7O>tN}`Xm/=-:8NG?f-r'$Qc3y[aW-7'W_S<`KYU!_; `7K=kuC$-.7J2*kk=~`c@ADp+xhsv(!a@eW-R_5wtx+tC)(]%W+ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup propagate? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:29:36 -0000 On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:06:39AM +0930, Adam Smith said: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 10:27:20AM -0400, Raman said: > > I should rephrase my question. A new version of apache port came out. > > How long will it take the cvsup servers to notice the new version is > > out so when I cvsup my ports I will recieve it? > > My answer is still correct. It depends on how frequently your CVSup server > updates. If it is following the guidelines I provided in the link below, > then it will be however long that time period is, give or take. Or perhaps you mean "How long does it take for a new version of Apache, once released on apache.org, to appear in the ports?" And the answer is, however long it takes. The port maintainers are responsible for porting over to the Ports Collection, and you would have to ask the port maintainers themselves. Their contact details are listed in the files that make up the port (the README I think?) Adam -- Adam Smith Internode : http://www.internode.on.net Phone : (08) 8228 2999 Dog for sale: Eats lots and is fond of children. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 00:36:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8B916A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:36:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7F643D2F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:36:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 3561D855F8; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:06:27 +0930 (CST) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:06:27 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: tom_oak@telstra.com Message-ID: <20040930003627.GE46815@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <12881114.1096444348988.JavaMail.imail@owaxs02.opwv.email.bigpond.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y2zxS2PfCDLh6JVG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12881114.1096444348988.JavaMail.imail@owaxs02.opwv.email.bigpond.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which Development Environment/Tools For FreeBSD + PostgreSQL Service? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:36:32 -0000 --y2zxS2PfCDLh6JVG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html] Single line paragraphs. On Wednesday, 29 September 2004 at 17:52:28 +1000, tom_oak@telstra.com wrote: > Hello All, > > We are a company looking for a good development environment/tool(s) > for a service-type application. The OS is FreeBSD and the database > will be PostgreSQL. The first emphasis is placed on reliability, with > secondary emphasis on performance. Third in importance would be the > richness of the language/features and avoidance of "plumbing" code. > > - Is this the right place to be asking about development tools? Yes. > - C/C++ comes to mind, but which flavour of compiler/debugger/third > party add-ons/editor? Until proof of the contrary (which I think would be difficult), why not stick with the tools supplied with the system? > An advantage here is the fact that this language is well established > which should improve reliability to some extent (if we are careful > with pointers). A disadvantage would be the extensive use of > pointers, the cryptic and unreadable look of the code and the fact > that C/C++ is getting a bit long in the tooth. I've noted in the past that C has actually proven more robust than C++ in this matter; I don't think the age is as important as the utility of the language. I haven't seen *any* newer compiled language which works as well. > - We are considering the Borland tools (JBuilder/Kylix) since we are > familiar with Borland tools and like their database connectivity, > rich components and elegant looking code (less plumbing). But on the > other hand, we don't need any GUI, and we had some problems in the > past with reliability. Do you have any thoughts on this? I don't know the tools. I'm pretty sure that they wouldn't interoperate as well with the FreeBSD environment. > - We would prefer not to use ODBC/JDBC, and instead interface > directly to the database. We had some bad experience in the past > regarding reliability and performance. We can either use the library > provided by Postgres or write our own wrappers to make things more > readable. A priori, my take on this is to use the tools provided (Postgres library interface, in this case) until proof of the contrary. > - We would prefer not to use an interpreted language such as Python, > Java, and Perl etc for performance reasons. We know that Java can be > compiled, but is it a good solution without using JDBC? How about > reliability? I'd stick with C. AUUG (the Australian UNIX User Group) will be doing a symposium on development techniques in Adelaide next year, probably March or April. It sounds like this would be a good thing for you to attend. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --y2zxS2PfCDLh6JVG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBW1ULIubykFB6QiMRAhKKAJ4t0Nc4wRcgnvdsGr7Cx8mSzE9KtQCgjIu9 3U/G9RKa40nEEyttAEaK23c= =POWr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y2zxS2PfCDLh6JVG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 01:09:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5762716A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:09:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A3F43D41 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:09:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael2043@comcast.net) Received: from server (c-24-10-148-239.client.comcast.net[24.10.148.239]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <20040930010928016001bmb8e>; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:09:28 +0000 From: "Michael G. Goodell" To: "FreeBSD Questions" Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:09:41 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Which FreeBSD For A Production System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: michael2043@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:09:29 -0000 Which release of FreeBSD is best for a production environment? I am aware of the different branches of development: CURRENT, STABLE, RELEASE and I *think* I understand the meaning of each from what I have read. Perhaps not since I am writing this question! But, what I would like to know is when I am setting up a production system, or desktop for that matter, which is considered *THE* most stable of the choices in versions. Is it in the 4.x branch, 5x etc... Where can I get clarification on this topic - any direction would be welcome. Thanks, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 01:21:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CC516A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:21:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAAC43D39 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:21:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7412669A39; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:21:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:21:33 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: michael2043@comcast.net Message-Id: <20040929212133.673cba5e.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which FreeBSD For A Production System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:21:35 -0000 "Michael G. Goodell" wrote: > Which release of FreeBSD is best for a production environment? I am aware of > the different branches of development: CURRENT, STABLE, RELEASE and I > *think* I understand the meaning of each from what I have read. Perhaps not > since I am writing this question! But, what I would like to know is when I > am setting up a production system, or desktop for that matter, which is > considered *THE* most stable of the choices in versions. Is it in the 4.x > branch, 5x etc... > > Where can I get clarification on this topic - any direction would be > welcome. You can't, because it's a moving target. FreeBSD is under constant development, so the answer today is different than it was some months ago, and may be different again in a few months. Right now, I'm thinking that 5.3 is the way to go. It's not quite considered stable yet, but unless you can set up a server damn fast, it'll be announced as stable before you're ready to go live. Even if it's not yet, it's already damn close. If you want the absolutely best FreeBSD, the 4 series has been a rock solid performer. The only problem is that 5 is ready to become _the_ FreeBSD, and in a year or so, you'll be wanting to upgrade to 5, which will be a bit of a chore from what I can see. So, if you don't think that server will be online for longer than a year, but you want it to be reliable, install 4, and when you replace the machine, use 5. Otherwise, you'll probably want 5 so you're up with all the latest stuff. Some might argue that 5 is not officially for production use yet, but the announcement that it is ready for production use seems as if it will be coming within the next few weeks. Just use cvsup to keep the system updated. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 01:31:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA98C16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:31:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ybbsmtp04.mail.yahoo.co.jp (ybbsmtp04.mail.yahoo.co.jp [210.81.151.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AD4A743D39 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:31:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ayakokiko@ybb.ne.jp) Received: from unknown (HELO gorgon.near.this) (219.11.234.11 with poptime) by ybbsmtp04.mail.yahoo.co.jp with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 01:31:43 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Received: from hydra.near.this (hydra.near.this [10.0.3.20]) by gorgon.near.this (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF87A7F24 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:31:35 +0900 (JST) Received: by hydra.near.this (Postfix, from userid 100) id 57581980B; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:31:35 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:31:34 +0900 From: horio shoichi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <415B3A39.6030404@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk> References: <200409300108.48854.taras-s-y@mail.ru> <20040929181101.67636326.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <415B3A39.6030404@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20040930.013135.181dd1124b5bfebc.10.0.3.20@bugsgrief.net> Subject: Re: How to begin ??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:31:45 -0000 On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:42:01 +0100 Mike Woods wrote: > Bill Moran wrote: > > >If you're looking to start understanding the FreeBSD codebase, probably > >the best thing for you to do is buy and read _The_Design_and_Implementation_ > >_of_FreeBSD_. > > > > > It seems the register have a special offer on that very book atm :) > > http://www.pearsoned.co.uk/bookshop/detail.asp?affid=TRE&t=59&item=210066 > > ---------------- > Mike Woods > IT Technician > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Looks like Amazon is the winner this time. E.g., Bookpool: List Price: $59.99 Our Price: $41.95 You Save: $18.04 (30% Off) Amazon: List Price: $59.99 Price: $40.79 & This item ships for FREE with Super Saver Shipping. You Save: $19.20 (32%) horio shoichi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 02:21:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E50C16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:21:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1186443D49 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:21:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gwschenk@socal.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (cpe-66-74-147-103.socal.rr.com [66.74.147.103])i8U2LGkM018071 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:21:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <415B6D9C.90203@socal.rr.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:21:16 -0700 From: Gary Schenk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040903 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: lpr error messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:21:18 -0000 I cannot print from either X or the command line. It was working fine until a few hours ago. Any suggestions on where to start on this would be much appreciated. Here is an example: bash-2.05b$ lpr test.txt /usr/bin/lpr: line 12: */5: No such file or directory /usr/bin/lpr: line 15: 0: command not found /usr/bin/lpr: line 18: 1: command not found /usr/bin/lpr: line 19: 15: command not found /usr/bin/lpr: line 20: 30: command not found /usr/bin/lpr: line 25: 1,31: command not found /usr/bin/lpr: line 28: 1: command not found lptest > /dev/lpt0 produces output to the printer. bash-2.05b$ grep lpd_enable /etc/rc.conf lpd_enable="YES" I'm thinking that /usr/bin/lpr must be corrupted. I'm not sure how to go about testing that theory, or what to do if that is the case. I've searched the list archives and googled to no avail. Thanks in advance! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 02:28:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECCF16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:28:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gremlin.internode.com.au (gremlin.internode.com.au [192.83.231.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7198743D45 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:28:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adam@internode.com.au) Received: from gremlin.internode.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8U2SBUx003664; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:58:11 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from adam@internode.com.au) Received: (from adam@localhost) by gremlin.internode.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8U2SB4x003663; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:58:11 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from adam@internode.com.au) X-Authentication-Warning: gremlin.internode.com.au: adam set sender to adam@internode.com.au using -f Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:58:11 +0930 From: Adam Smith To: Gary Schenk Message-ID: <20040930022810.GS1967@internode.com.au> References: <415B6D9C.90203@socal.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <415B6D9C.90203@socal.rr.com> X-Face: $vsV$1FNbZN\JVpjV#&+/!oVW`Kw$j?w_,te\SS}(tKD21c+l$t%\RCS(r$G; XXk]6,(!N:&(N3EV0bY`3):UrgG7'*qsj3l.75IaHV1<`i*{[L\:F*l6fH##C:-p2]xW/R-Z:!bo; 5g3GP-{I{}7O>tN}`Xm/=-:8NG?f-r'$Qc3y[aW-7'W_S<`KYU!_; `7K=kuC$-.7J2*kk=~`c@ADp+xhsv(!a@eW-R_5wtx+tC)(]%W+ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lpr error messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:28:15 -0000 On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 07:21:16PM -0700, Gary Schenk said: > I cannot print from either X or the command line. It was working > fine until a few hours ago. Any suggestions on where to start > on this would be much appreciated. LPR is a binary and so the output here is unexpected (as they look more like script errors). > bash-2.05b$ lpr test.txt > /usr/bin/lpr: line 12: */5: No such file or directory > /usr/bin/lpr: line 15: 0: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 18: 1: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 19: 15: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 20: 30: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 25: 1,31: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 28: 1: command not found > I'm thinking that /usr/bin/lpr must be corrupted. I'm not > sure how to go about testing that theory, or what to do > if that is the case. I've searched the list archives and > googled to no avail. If you want to reinstall the lpr binary, you can either go through a make installworld process or install the binary on it's own by going into /usr/src/usr/sbin/lpr and doing a 'make install'. That will recompile and reinstall lpr. -- Adam Smith Internode : http://www.internode.on.net Phone : (08) 8228 2999 Dog for sale: Eats lots and is fond of children. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 02:38:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F35FC16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:38:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED7D43D54 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:38:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [67.1.199.60] (0-1pool199-60.nas2.fargo1.nd.us.da.qwest.net [67.1.199.60]) (authenticated bits=0)i8U2cJLI004942; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:38:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) In-Reply-To: <415B6D9C.90203@socal.rr.com> References: <415B6D9C.90203@socal.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric Crist Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:37:21 -0500 To: Gary Schenk X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lpr error messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:38:22 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sep 29, 2004, at 9:21 PM, Gary Schenk wrote: > I cannot print from either X or the command line. It was working > fine until a few hours ago. Any suggestions on where to start > on this would be much appreciated. > > Here is an example: > > bash-2.05b$ lpr test.txt > /usr/bin/lpr: line 12: */5: No such file or directory > /usr/bin/lpr: line 15: 0: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 18: 1: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 19: 15: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 20: 30: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 25: 1,31: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 28: 1: command not found > > lptest > /dev/lpt0 produces output to the printer. > > bash-2.05b$ grep lpd_enable /etc/rc.conf > lpd_enable="YES" > > I'm thinking that /usr/bin/lpr must be corrupted. I'm not > sure how to go about testing that theory, or what to do > if that is the case. I've searched the list archives and > googled to no avail. > > Thanks in advance! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Looks to me like someone replaced your lpr binary with a script. Possibly one written for Linux, where the executables aren't where they're supposed to be. Try to read the lpr file from a text editor. Make sure your user's path is still correct, too. HTH - ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkFbcWIACgkQRAAY9knOW+rLOwCfWiML/yb0TSlCugK3TD+vG7tm 4EYAn3xkighfWWuMhoP6r97+B0J4Pa77 =Av3f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 02:43:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12BB16A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:43:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [208.187.29.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A51443D1D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:43:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 22809 invoked by uid 1001); 30 Sep 2004 02:43:23 -0000 Received: from 67.167.52.21 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com); by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:43:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1297.67.167.52.21.1096512203.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: <415B6D9C.90203@socal.rr.com> References: <415B6D9C.90203@socal.rr.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:43:23 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: "Gary Schenk" User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail X-Mailer: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lpr error messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:43:19 -0000 Gary Schenk wrote: > I cannot print from either X or the command line. It was working > fine until a few hours ago. Any suggestions on where to start > on this would be much appreciated. > > Here is an example: > > bash-2.05b$ lpr test.txt > /usr/bin/lpr: line 12: */5: No such file or directory > /usr/bin/lpr: line 15: 0: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 18: 1: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 19: 15: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 20: 30: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 25: 1,31: command not found > /usr/bin/lpr: line 28: 1: command not found > > lptest > /dev/lpt0 produces output to the printer. > > bash-2.05b$ grep lpd_enable /etc/rc.conf > lpd_enable="YES" > > I'm thinking that /usr/bin/lpr must be corrupted. I'm not > sure how to go about testing that theory, or what to do > if that is the case. I've searched the list archives and > googled to no avail. The way I read this, lpr is expecting to get a PostScript file, and you are feeding it a TEST file. I'm even willing to bet that on line 12 of your text file, there is a */5, which lpr is valiantly attempting to interpret as a PostScript command. Similarly, the other lines mentioned in the error output above indicate that all the other lines in your text file start with integers such as 0, 1, 15, etc. So all you really need to do now is find some way to convert your TEXT file to a PostScript file. Or convince lpr that it should accept text files, and somehow convert them internally to PostScript. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 02:56:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7E816A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:56:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [208.187.29.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2119543D39 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:56:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 36274 invoked by uid 1001); 30 Sep 2004 02:56:22 -0000 Received: from 67.167.52.21 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com); by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:56:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1313.67.167.52.21.1096512982.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: <415B0B56.2030404@ig.com.br> References: <415B0B56.2030404@ig.com.br> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:56:22 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: "Newton" User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail X-Mailer: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DHCP Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:56:18 -0000 Newton wrote: > Dear Friends : I'm having problems, with a 5.21 version install. After > XFree86 troubles, finally I could see KDE. All, except internet , it's > OK. My system is an Atlhon 1000 (T-Bird), Soyo K7-VTA-B, 256 Mb RAM, 32 > Mb Savage 4 (Savage Generic driver), Sound Blaster Live, Realtek 8139 > and 56K Lucent modem (not used). This is my first experience with > FreeBSD, I'm a newbie. Sincerely, Newton - Curitiba - Brazil 1. Open up a terminal/shell and type: dmesg | less Search through that for something that looks like your Realtek 8139 being correctly identified or not. 2. If it is identified, it should have some kind of name like rltk0 or rl0 or rt0 or somesuch. ls /dev should show that name existing. 3. ifconfig -a should also show that device 4. You should be able to do: sysinstall -> post-install configure -> network -> rt0 and find a place to either set the card up as DHCP or to put in the IP address you have been assigned for that device. Hope that helps! If any of the above don't work, post back with whatever error messages you see. Oh, and if there are any lights, blinking, colored, or otherwise on the network card, describe the lights, their colors, any markings next to them, and whether they are off, on, or blinking when you post. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 03:00:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7652F16A4D0 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:00:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA3943D48 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:00:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:01:40 -0500 Message-ID: <415B766B.1080505@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:58:51 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd@celestial.com References: <20040929234948.66897.qmail@web14305.mail.yahoo.com> <20040930002903.GA49516@alexis.mi.celestial.com> In-Reply-To: <20040930002903.GA49516@alexis.mi.celestial.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2004 03:01:50.0295 (UTC) FILETIME=[D4C2A670:01C4A699] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISP blocking port 80 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:00:49 -0000 Bill Campbell wrote: >On Wed, Sep 29, 2004, Stanley Wright wrote: > > >>If my ISP blocking port 80 and all other ports, what >>options do I have for running Apache. >> >> > >Either get another ISP or a contract with your current one that >allows you to run servers. > > Or get an account with a "hosting provider" ... I'd recommend Pair Networks, very supportive of the FreeBSD community, and run the best OS on the planet ;-) Of course, then it is not "I" who would be "running apache" ... although you could get a "Jailed server", perhaps.... KDK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 03:27:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D9016A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:27:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-07.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1E8D43D39 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:27:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfb@exadios.com) Received: (qmail 20711 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2004 03:27:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO goldmund.pri) (203.59.214.243) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 03:27:08 -0000 Received: from goldmund.pri ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost ident=pfb) by goldmund.pri with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CCrb1-0002eN-00 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:27:07 +0800 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:27:07 +0800 (WST) From: Peter F Bradshaw Sender: pfb@exadios.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040929234948.66897.qmail@web14305.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: References: <20040929234948.66897.qmail@web14305.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: ISP blocking port 80 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:27:12 -0000 Hi; On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Stanley Wright wrote: > If my ISP blocking port 80 and all other ports, what > options do I have for running Apache. I doubt whether your ISP is blocking all ports. If they where a number your applications would not work. You do not have to use port 80 as the listening port for Apache - it is only the default. For instance you could use 1080. Your URL would then be http://www.mywebpage.com:1080/. However, if you move away from port 80 I doubt whether stuff like Google would pick you up. I guess it all depends on what you want to use the Web server for. > > Thanks. > Cheers -- Peter F Bradshaw, pfb@exadios.com, ICQ 75431157 (exadios). http://www.exadios.com PGP public key at http://www.exadios.com/public_key.html "I love truth, and the way the government still uses it occasionally to keep us guessing. " - Sam Kekovich. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 03:27:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584CB16A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:27:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m22.mx.aol.com (imo-m22.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E478B43D1F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:27:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from TM4525@aol.com) Received: from TM4525@aol.com by imo-m22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.7.) id g.b9.4739edca (16633); Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:27:20 -0400 (EDT) From: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:27:19 EDT To: kris@obsecurity.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5112 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:27:23 -0000 In a message dated 9/29/04 7:02:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time, kris@obsecurity.org writes: >See the Early Adopter's Guide that was distributed with 5.2.1, or just >don't worry about it and update to 5.3 which has vastly better network >performance. > >Kris I'll post some numbers after trying it. But its pretty frightening to think that one release has such major changes. Sounds like (yet another) crapshoot. I'd have hoped that 5.whatever would be better than 4.anything simply as a matter of course. But 4.9 is slower than 4.7 and I can't help but worry that its just all downhill from here on. To think that its taken 18 months to get to be more than twice as slow as what was before is pretty discouraging. Nor can I have even the slightest bit of confidence that something so different than the previous release is going to be as "stable" as everyone seems to be claiming. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 03:28:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946D716A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:28:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516D243D46 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:28:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4U007CG4BC1R@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:28:24 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:28:34 -0400 From: bsdfsse To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <415B7D62.9040005@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) Subject: Ok,status" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:28:25 -0000 I solved these DMA problems on my server by replacing my ASUS motherboard's IDE controller with an Adaptec 1200A RAID controller (simply used as a different ATA controller). Now my workstation is getting a similar error. The machine is a 2 year-old Compaq Presario 6024. What's up with 5.3-Beta6? Does it not work with regular Maxtor drives? I've been converting all my machines to FreeBSD, but I keep running in to these showstoppers. Any suggestions? thx! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 03:36:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5A416A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:36:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE97A43D3F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:36:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4U00DMJ4OWAY@mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:36:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:36:42 -0400 From: bsdfsse In-reply-to: <415B7D62.9040005@optonline.net> To: bsdfsse Message-id: <415B7F4A.3010800@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) References: <415B7D62.9040005@optonline.net> cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ok, this is bad X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:36:33 -0000 My computers are trully going haywire. The subject of this thread was supposed to be: Ok, this is bad. "WRITE_DMA retrying...WRITE_DMA no interrupt but good status" Thunderbird also deletes messages after I read them, to where I do not know. All I know is, I get to read them once. :-( bsdfsse wrote: > > I solved these DMA problems on my server by replacing my ASUS > motherboard's IDE controller with an Adaptec 1200A RAID controller > (simply used as a different ATA controller). > > Now my workstation is getting a similar error. The machine is a 2 > year-old Compaq Presario 6024. > > What's up with 5.3-Beta6? Does it not work with regular Maxtor drives? > > I've been converting all my machines to FreeBSD, but I keep running in > to these showstoppers. > > Any suggestions? > > thx! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 03:53:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F7616A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:53:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D3D43D2D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:53:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from E.Schuele@comcast.net) Received: from dhclient214_102 (c-24-1-214-142.client.comcast.net[24.1.214.142]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2004093003532601500fv95ae> (Authid: e.schuele); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:53:26 +0000 From: Eric Schuele To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:53:38 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409292253.38880.E.Schuele@Comcast.Net> Subject: NDIS problem on FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE (I think).... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: E.Schuele@Computer.Org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 03:53:27 -0000 Hello, I'm not sure who to go to with this. I managed to get everything installed the way I like it on my Dell laptop... including the miniPCI WLAN adapter using the NDIS wrapper for Windows Drivers. It appears to work flawlessly when I am within range of a WAP... but when I am at the office (where there are none)... I occasionally get completely locked up. If I leave it locked up for a minute or so, it dies and reboots itself. I might think it is my wired interface except I can run on it all night at home (WAP is present). Guess I could try disabling my WAP at home and run wired. But its a bit random.... so I could be like that for hours at home. It generally happens 2-3 times in an 8 hour period. Saw it happen once when I manually ran dhclient. If I manually unload the NDIS modules after booting up... It never happens. So I suspect the NDIS wrapper. I realize the work may not be completed on these wrappers... but though maybe if I could let the appropriate folks know... maybe they could fix it before it becomes a real problem. Any help is appreciated. Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 04:02:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A59816A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 04:02:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEF843D39 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 04:02:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CFADC51448; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:02:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 21:02:44 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: <20040930040244.GA58193@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: kris@obsecurity.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 04:02:19 -0000 --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 11:27:19PM -0400, TM4525@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 9/29/04 7:02:13 PM Eastern Daylight Time,=20 > kris@obsecurity.org writes: > >See the Early Adopter's Guide that was distributed with 5.2.1, or just > >don't worry about it and update to 5.3 which has vastly better network > >performance. > > > >Kris > I'll post some numbers after trying it. But its pretty frightening to thi= nk=20 > that one release has such major changes. Sounds like (yet another)=20 > crapshoot. I'd have hoped that 5.whatever would be better than 4.anything= =20 > simply as a matter of course. But 4.9 is slower than 4.7 and I can't > help but worry that its just all downhill from here on. To think that its= =20 > taken > 18 months to get to be more than twice as slow as what was before is=20 > pretty discouraging. Nor can I have even the slightest bit of confidence = that > something so different than the previous release is going to be as "stabl= e" > as everyone seems to be claiming. Uh..you've obviously not read any documentation and just blindly charged into 5.2.1 expecting it to be something it's documented not to be. Sorry, pal, but that's your fault, not ours, and throwing around random assertions now just makes you look silly. If you'd read the release documentation you'd understand the history of the 5.x branch and the current status of it (including, specifically, why networking on 5.3 will perform much better than 5.2.1 and even 4.x on SMP systems). Perhaps at this point you should go and do that, and avoid yourself any further embarrassment. Kris --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBW4VjWry0BWjoQKURAqaHAKDS+l5hPiaFkkCyOP7v6ulmNBnbnwCgr97B a4inR8xo6eOF1NGOF4tFsxs= =70UU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KsGdsel6WgEHnImy-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 04:03:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2138116A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 04:03:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from theta2.hostspectrum.com (theta2.hostspectrum.com [209.120.224.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC5E943D1F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 04:03:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nate@nathansouer.com) Received: from cpe-65-25-219-10.mn.rr.com ([65.25.219.10] helo=[192.168.0.113]) by theta2.hostspectrum.com with asmtp (Exim 4.41) id 1CCsAC-0000I6-0A for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 23:03:28 -0500 Message-ID: <415B8438.3000906@nathansouer.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:57:44 -0500 From: Nathan Alan Souer User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - theta2.hostspectrum.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - nathansouer.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: X Windows Mouse Issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 04:03:34 -0000 Greetings, I am running 4.9 on a Pavilion N5210. 650 Celeron. 192 megs of ram. Savage S3 video card, Direct X in windows reports it as 4 megs of dedicated video memory. Whenever X windows loads instead of a mouse cursor, I get a .75 inch square of distortion. The rest of the display comes up great. This happens in all the desktop managers I've tried: the default vanilla x, KDE, and XFce. It even happens in Red Hat 9! However I do not get the problem in any version of windows. The kernal is installed as default. The mouse is configured using the moused daemon. x is using sysmouse. my monitor is set to specs from hewlett-packard: resolution, refresh, and color depth. I'm worried that this is a video memory limitation which would be unfortunate I don't want windows on this laptop! Thanks everyone in advance, Nathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 04:17:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DC416A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 04:17:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A15D43D46 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 04:17:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq52-067.dial.allstream.net [216.123.132.67]) by outbox.allstream.net (Allstream MTA) with SMTP id 9A6845741E; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:17:50 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:17:43 -0400 From: epilogue To: Andrew Robinson Message-Id: <20040930001743.5e46333b@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20040929232755.GW5379@uidaho.edu> References: <20040929232755.GW5379@uidaho.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Organizing the output of make etc. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 04:17:52 -0000 On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:27:55 +1000 Andrew Robinson wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm administering my own little hobby system. Great fun. I notice > that when I make targets, usually through portupgrade, a great deal of > text flies by. Some of it is of obvious immediate use, such as this > advice from Subversion: > > Make sure that: > * all your svn users are members of a common group > * this group is the group id of the db/ and locks/ > subdirectories of your repository > * the above subdirectories are writable by this group > > and some of it is not, unless the upgrade or installation fails, eg, > the output from each compilation. > > What I'd like to know is: how do you more experienced types cope with > this information flow? this article should add a few tricks to your bag. page 2 should be the most relevant to the question at hand:: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/07/FreeBSD_Basics.html while you're there, check out the many other useful articles. click on 'All Articles' under 'BSD Content' (on the left-side frame). another option would be to use /usr/bin/script, although that doesn't filter out any of the build messages. > I'd like to use a little script that winnows out the useful advice > from the recover-from-catastrophe-maybe advice, and then emails > selections to root, with appropriate subject line, etc. Does anyone have > a similar script,? If not I'll have a bash at writing one. If so, I'd > love to use it. > > Thanks for any ideas! > > Andrew > -- > Andrew Robinson Ph: 208 885 7115 > Department of Forest Resources Fa: 208 885 6226 > University of Idaho E : andrewr@uidaho.edu > PO Box 441133 W : http://www.uidaho.edu/~andrewr > Moscow ID 83843 Or: http://www.biometrics.uidaho.edu > No statement above necessarily represents my employer's opinion. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 05:10:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 646F316A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 05:10:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFC043D46 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 05:10:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gwschenk@socal.rr.com) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (cpe-66-74-147-103.socal.rr.com [66.74.147.103])i8U5AluY019093; Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:10:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <415B9558.4030401@socal.rr.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:10:48 -0700 From: Gary Schenk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040903 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Smith References: <415B6D9C.90203@socal.rr.com> <20040930022810.GS1967@internode.com.au> In-Reply-To: <20040930022810.GS1967@internode.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lpr error messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 05:10:50 -0000 Adam Smith wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2004 at 07:21:16PM -0700, Gary Schenk said: > >>I cannot print from either X or the command line. It was working >>fine until a few hours ago. Any suggestions on where to start >>on this would be much appreciated. > > > LPR is a binary and so the output here is unexpected (as they look more > like script errors). > > >>bash-2.05b$ lpr test.txt >>/usr/bin/lpr: line 12: */5: No such file or directory >>/usr/bin/lpr: line 15: 0: command not found >>/usr/bin/lpr: line 18: 1: command not found >>/usr/bin/lpr: line 19: 15: command not found >>/usr/bin/lpr: line 20: 30: command not found >>/usr/bin/lpr: line 25: 1,31: command not found >>/usr/bin/lpr: line 28: 1: command not found > > >>I'm thinking that /usr/bin/lpr must be corrupted. I'm not >>sure how to go about testing that theory, or what to do >>if that is the case. I've searched the list archives and >>googled to no avail. > > > If you want to reinstall the lpr binary, you can either go through a make > installworld process or install the binary on it's own by going into > /usr/src/usr/sbin/lpr and doing a 'make install'. That will recompile and > reinstall lpr. > Yes, that fixed it. I did a stupid thing while root and hosed the lpr file. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 06:03:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A003D16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 06:03:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF4943D45 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 06:03:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4U00J4MBH5FH@mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:03:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:03:15 -0400 From: bsdfsse To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <415BA1A3.3010608@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) Subject: How do you know how to install ports? (like vmware3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 06:03:06 -0000 For example, I have been trying to install the vmware3 port - and I find all kinds of tidbits all over the web about little things that need to be done to get it to work. The information sometimes covers version 2.0, sometimes 3.2, and sometimes 4.5. If someone just goes in to /usr/ports/emulators/vmware3 and does a "make install", how would they know what else to do? I'm new to FreeBSD, maybe I am missing something obvious? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 06:34:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF63216A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 06:34:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from inertia.drifthost.com (inertial.drifthost.com [66.90.101.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A662943D5C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 06:34:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@drifthost.com) Received: from drift by inertia.drifthost.com with local (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CCuVC-000ACq-9l for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:33:18 +1000 Received: from 61.88.244.4 ([61.88.244.4]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@drifthost.com); by drifthost.com with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:33:18 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <58844.61.88.244.4.1096525998.squirrel@61.88.244.4> In-Reply-To: <415BA1A3.3010608@optonline.net> References: <415BA1A3.3010608@optonline.net> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:33:18 +1000 (EST) From: steve@drifthost.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - inertia.drifthost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [1029 1029] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - drifthost.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: IPFW Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 06:34:03 -0000 Hi, I am tryin to setup my Firewall on my server, so far i have the following. =========================================================== oif=bge0 fwcmd=ipfw $fwcmd -f flush $fwcmd add check-state $fwcmd add allow ip from any to any via lo0 $fwcmd add deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 $fwcmd add deny all from any to any frag in via $oif $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to me 21,25,26,53,110,143,443,465,953,993,995,2082,2083,2086,2087,2089,2095,2096,2627,6666,40000-49452 in via $oif keep-state setup $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to me 80 setup keep-state $fwcmd add allow udp from me 53 to any keep-state $fwcmd add allow udp from any to any 53 keep-state $fwcmd add allow all from me to any out via $oif setup keep-state $fwcmd add deny all from any to any 137,138,139,67,68 in $fwcmd add deny log all from me to any 22 $fwcmd add deny log all from any to any ====================================================== When i turn the firewall on i am getting this in my /var/log/security ======================================================== Sep 30 16:30:48 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP SOMECLIENT:2858 MYIP:80 in via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:48 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP SOMECLIENT:2864 MYIP:80 in via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:48 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP SOMECLIENT:2858 MYIP:80 in via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:48 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP MYIP:80 SOMECLIENT:1431 out via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:49 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP MYIP:80 SOMECLIENT:2694 out via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:49 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP MYIP:80 SOMECLIENT:3059 out via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:49 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP MYIP:80 SOMECLIENT:33077 out via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:49 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP MYIP:80 SOMECLIENT:33130 out via bge0 ============================================================== I am unsure to why i am getting theses, its like the check-state command is half working.. I can still browse my web server fine but im still getting theses messages. Anyone got any ideas? Thanks Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 07:50:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEDC16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:50:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51602.mail.yahoo.com (web51602.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C351843D1F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:50:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay2xra@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040930075030.1921.qmail@web51602.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.90.128.28] by web51602.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:50:30 PDT Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 00:50:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Jayson Alvarez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Anyone here already configured wine on freebsd?? Help me please X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:50:31 -0000 Good day! I've already installed the binary package of wine for freebsd which i've downloaded from winehq. My problem is that, no matter how hard I read the configuration section of their documentation, I can't figure out how the software works... I've already copied the example config file I found from the directory /documentation/samples of the latest wine source code to $HOME/.wine/ but when I tried to `wine winampinstaller.exe` i got an error which says: Invalid path L"c:\\windows" for L"windows" directory: does not exist. Perhaps you have not properly edited your Wine configuration file (/root/.wine/config Please explain this, cause I don't really know what's happening here. I've been reading their docs again and again, but I can't seem to find any line such as: "edit this line in config and change it to something bla bla..." All it says are merely explanation of what the line does, not how should I modify that certain line.. Any help would be appreciated greatly. Thanks.. Hope this one works=( -jay __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 08:14:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D63D16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:14:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B6043D46 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:14:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Roisin.Murphy@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so3523451rnk for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.171.77 with SMTP id t77mr1937675rne; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.171.55 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 01:14:52 -0700 From: Roisin Murphy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: filtering aliasIP from the primaryIP with IPF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Roisin Murphy List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:14:53 -0000 hi my freebsd machine is 192.168.1.34 with one jail running on 192.168.1.35 (dc0_alias), and i have one more separate win2k box: 192.168.1.33, i want to filter that jail with ipf, so that it cannot access anything running on that win2k machine and anything bind to the primary fbsd IP, but i want to be still able to ssh into that .35 jail filtering the win2k box worked as expected: pass in quick on dc0 proto tcp from 192.168.1.33 to 192.168.1.35 port = 22 flags S keep state block out quick on dc0 proto tcp/udp from 192.168.1.35 to 192.168.1.33 keep state keep frags but that primary fbsd IP, since its the same dc0 interface, i dont know how to write that rule... anyone? thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 08:47:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18CE16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:47:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ngfl.dialnet.com (ngmail.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52CE43D31 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:47:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) Received: from ngmfilt.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.121] by ngfl.dialnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id A8DC1A9B0058; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:50:36 +0100 Received: from relay.ngfl.dialnet.com (unverified) by ngmfilt.ngfl.dialnet.com ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:47:06 +0100 Received: from firewall.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk (YahooBB219209044064.bbtec.net [172.30.0.70]) by ngrelay.dialnet.com with SMTP (MailShield v2.04 - WIN32 Jul 17 2001 17:12:42); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:46:47 +0100 Received: from mail.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk (mail.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk [10.248.192.10]) ESMTP id i8U8ljKY069559; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:47:45 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) Received: from [10.248.195.196] (dumpster.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk [10.248.195.196])ESMTP id i8U8lX4r092365; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:47:33 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) From: ict technician Organization: Cardinal Newman School To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:45:15 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409300945.15068.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=USER_AGENT_KMAIL version=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (mail.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) X-SMTP-HELO: firewall.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: ianjhart@ntlworld.com X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: YahooBB219209044064.bbtec.net [172.30.0.70] cc: ian j hart Subject: broken fs dump file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:47:58 -0000 I have a broken fs dump I need to fix. Is there a diagnostic/repair tool I can use? I know about restore -N. Dump was taken on 4.10. Restoring on 5.3BETA, although I can change that. Content is our Samba server home directories. I need to extract the data so that I can copy it to our new 2k3 server. File is big (50Gb). A full listing looks okay but the extract fails, apparently while skipping. supplementary question: How do I compile restore for debugging. I cannot find 'the magic'. Thanks -- i j hart ICT Technician Cardinal Newman Catholic School & Community College From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 09:25:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41A616A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:25:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14715.mail.yahoo.com (web14715.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95E8A43D31 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:25:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from whatluo@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040930092524.45192.qmail@web14715.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.108.88.130] by web14715.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:25:24 PDT Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:25:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Huajian Luo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: fetchyahoo Failed: Couldn't get challenge to log in X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:25:24 -0000 hi,guys I installed fetchyahoo and when I run fetchyahoo It told me ---- Logging in securely via SSL as Failed: Couldn't get challenge to log in, Try again later, any comments on this? Thanks in advance!!! Whatluo __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 09:41:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B3E16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:41:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D115F43D5C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:41:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Roisin.Murphy@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so3527694rnk for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.77.56 with SMTP id z56mr3003064rna; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.171.55 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:41:03 -0700 From: Roisin Murphy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: filtering aliasIP from the primaryIP with IPF X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Roisin Murphy List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:41:11 -0000 allright, nevermind, this solved it: pass in quick on lo0 proto tcp from 192.168.1.34 to 192.168.1.35 port = 22 flags S keep state block out quick on lo0 proto tcp/udp from 192.168.1.35 to 192.168.1.34 keep state keep frags From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 09:54:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2DC16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:54:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51609.mail.yahoo.com (web51609.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E6CE43D62 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:54:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jay2xra@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040930095458.54176.qmail@web51609.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.90.128.28] by web51609.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:54:58 PDT Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:54:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Jayson Alvarez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Is there a reverse Network Address Translation??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:54:59 -0000 Hi, I wan't to access my pc at work from home through freebsd's sshd. Is it possible?, knowing that it doesn't have a public ip address? That workstation of mine is only gaining internet access through LAN servers and routers. Will it help if I know the gateway ip where my workstation passes through and the proxy as well as dns server's ip's? I know its possible but I can't imagine the process, perhaps something like a reverse network address translation... Any idea? Thanks--> :-) _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 11:05:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C7D16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:05:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from xxl.rdsbv.ro (xxl.rdsbv.ro [82.77.46.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B054943D53 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:05:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petre@kgb.ro) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by xxl.rdsbv.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832BD60D5 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:07:30 +0300 (EEST) Received: from xxl.rdsbv.ro ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (xxl.rdsbv.ro [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09001-07 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:07:27 +0300 (EEST) Received: from xxl.rdsbv.ro (localhost.rdsbv.ro [127.0.0.1]) by xxl.rdsbv.ro (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:07:27 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:07:27 +0300 From: Petre Bandac To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040930140727.1cf2fa20@xxl.rdsbv.ro> Organization: kgb.ro X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at xxl.rdsbv.ro Subject: openssh upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:05:55 -0000 as the default instalation of openssh becomes deprecated, I don't know which of the ports should I use, openssh or openssh-portable ? what are the differences between them (besides the version number, openssh-portable being the latest version, while openssh is only 3.6) ? thanks in advance, petre -- Login: petre Name: Petre Bandac Directory: /home/petre Shell: /usr/local/bin/zsh On since Wed Sep 29 15:06 (EEST) on ttyv0, idle 3:53 (messages off) Last login Wed Sep 29 20:01 (EEST) on ttyp2 from lubyanka.kgb.ro New mail received Mon May 24 19:09 2004 (EEST) Unread since Tue Feb 17 12:31 2004 (EET) No Plan. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 11:39:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797B316A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:39:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rtc.ro (mail.rtc.ro [212.93.139.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAA7C43D31 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:39:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cristi.tauber@sbhost.ro) Received: (qmail 26508 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2004 14:25:05 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO sbhost.ro) (212.93.139.11) by mail.rtc.ro with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 14:25:05 +0300 Message-ID: <415BFE1A.9F479928@sbhost.ro> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:37:46 +0200 From: Cristi Tauber X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Petre Bandac References: <20040930140727.1cf2fa20@xxl.rdsbv.ro> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntivirusScanner: eTrust Antivirus v7 X-eTrust-Spam: 0 X-eTrust-Signatures: 23.66.70 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openssh upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:39:11 -0000 I believe that openssh is openBSD's while portable is meant to be installed on other OSes. Portable is your choice here. Cristi Petre Bandac wrote: > as the default instalation of openssh becomes deprecated, I don't know > which of the ports should I use, openssh or openssh-portable ? > > what are the differences between them (besides the version number, > openssh-portable being the latest version, while openssh is only 3.6) ? > > thanks in advance, > > petre > > -- > Login: petre Name: Petre Bandac > Directory: /home/petre Shell: /usr/local/bin/zsh > On since Wed Sep 29 15:06 (EEST) on ttyv0, idle 3:53 (messages off) > Last login Wed Sep 29 20:01 (EEST) on ttyp2 from lubyanka.kgb.ro > New mail received Mon May 24 19:09 2004 (EEST) > Unread since Tue Feb 17 12:31 2004 (EET) > No Plan. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > --------------------------------------------------- > This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for > transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This > message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected > information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the > addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you > are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please > notify the sender and return it.Thank you. > > --------------------------------------------------- This message and its contents have been scanned and certified for transmission as being free from malicious code by <>. This message may contain confidential, privileged or other legally protected information. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the addressee, or someone the addressee authorized to receive this message, you are prohibited from copying, distributing or otherwise using it. Please notify the sender and return it.Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 08:45:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B9D416A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:45:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.263.net (mx04.263.net [211.150.96.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E373743D31 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:45:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bingwang_nudt@263.net) Received: by smtp.263.net (Postfix, from userid 500) id 35CB643745; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:45:03 +0800 (CST) From: =?gb2312?B?zfWx+A==?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:45:02 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XMail-1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Message-Id: <20040930084503.35CB643745@smtp.263.net> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:35:28 +0000 Subject: about ULE and KSE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:45:09 -0000 c28gd2hhdCBpcyB0aGUgZGlmZmVyZW5jZSBiZXR3ZWVuIDI/aSB0aGluayAsIHVsZSBpcyBu b3Qgc28gZ29vZCBhcyB0aGV5IHRvbGQgbWUgLHNvIHNsb3cuDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KPT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NCjI2M7Xn19PTyrz+o63QxcC108rX1Neo0rU= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 12:36:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E1B16A4DD for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:36:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsmail.ro [193.231.236.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF81543D3F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:36:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 1158 invoked by uid 89); 30 Sep 2004 12:36:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 12:36:46 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 99280197; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:36:45 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:36:44 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Mark Jayson Alvarez Message-ID: <20040930153644.0068febf@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <20040930095458.54176.qmail@web51609.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040930095458.54176.qmail@web51609.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a reverse Network Address Translation??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:36:49 -0000 On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote: > Hi, > I wan't to access my pc at work from home through > freebsd's sshd. Is it possible?, knowing that it > doesn't have a public ip address? That workstation of > mine is only gaining internet access through LAN > servers and routers. Will it help if I know the > gateway ip where my workstation passes through and the > proxy as well as dns server's ip's? I know its > possible but I can't imagine the process, perhaps > something like a reverse network address > translation... Any idea? man natd and see redirect_* -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 12:44:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41ED16A4D1; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:44:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailgw-20.stcloudstate.edu (exchange8.stcloudstate.edu [199.17.25.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486AA43D55; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:44:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bepratt@stcloudstate.edu) Received: from exchange17.campus.stcloudstate.edu [199.17.25.221] by mailgw-20.stcloudstate.edu with XWall v3.31 ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:44:52 -0500 Received: from exchange.campus.stcloudstate.edu ([199.17.25.200]) by exchange17.campus.stcloudstate.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:44:53 -0500 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:44:55 -0500 Message-ID: <22ECDF671FCD564398087D64CFCF46BD056E08A4@EXCHANGE.campus.stcloudstate.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 5.3-BETAx Boot Problems Thread-Index: AcSmTNSx6ledxWfKQcGa7AxulCOfrgAniCWw From: "Pratt, Benjamin E." To: "Gavin Atkinson" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2004 12:44:53.0409 (UTC) FILETIME=[48523910:01C4A6EB] cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: 5.3-BETAx Boot Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:44:57 -0000 Thank you both very much. This did indeed resolve my issues and I am now=20 getting FreeBSD 5.3-BETA6 configured on my problem system. Ben -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Gavin Atkinson Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2004 12:50 PM To: Pratt, Benjamin E. Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-BETAx Boot Problems On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Pratt, Benjamin E. wrote: > Hello, I am still trying to get FreeBSD Beta to work but am running into > problems when my system boots. The boot problem appears to be occurring > just after the IDE drives are detected but before the root file system > is mounted. These are the last four lines of text that are displayed > when I try to boot from either ISO or after running CVSUP: > > md0: Preloaded image 4423680 bytes at 0xc09b6c5c > ad0: 29314MB [59560/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA66 > ATAPI_RESET time =3D 1630us > acd0: CDRW at ata1-master UDMA33 Yes, this bug was present in BETA5 and BETA6. It will be fixed in BETA7. In the mean time, you can avoid it by disabling your floppy drive (by setting hint.fd.0.disabled=3D1 at the loader) Gavin _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 13:12:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2254E16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:12:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from musashi.fi.uba.ar (musashi.fi.uba.ar [157.92.49.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B540043D41 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:12:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gkullak@fi.uba.ar) Received: from musashi.fi.uba.ar (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by musashi.fi.uba.ar (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8UDCKHZ014103 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:12:20 -0300 Received: (from apache@localhost) by musashi.fi.uba.ar (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8UDCJoZ014101; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:12:19 -0300 Received: from 161.190.1.253 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gkullak); by webmail.fi.uba.ar with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:12:19 -0300 (ART) Message-ID: <35603.161.190.1.253.1096549939.squirrel@161.190.1.253> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:12:19 -0300 (ART) From: gkullak@fi.uba.ar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-FIUBA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-FIUBA-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-FIUBA-MailScanner-SpamCheck: no es spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (puntaje=-3.807, requerido 5, AWL 0.31, BAYES_00 -4.90, NO_REAL_NAME 0.16, RATWR20_MESSID 0.62) X-MailScanner-From: gkullak@fi.uba.ar Subject: Sendmail default installed? Why it is in port collection because? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:12:35 -0000 My question is in the subject. If you search in port collection you will see: sendmail and sendmail-sasl. sendmail-sasl contains only Makefile, I supouse that it compile the sendmail port with SASL paramether and others. But why I must install sendmail port if I see that Sendmail is up and running in my FreeBSD but in "#pkg_info -l" list it not appear. How can I remove it totaly? Whats happened if i go to #/usr/ports/mail/sendmail or sendmail-sasl and install it? This problem found first when I configure Sendmail por SMTP auth and before when I try to replace Sendmail with Postfix. Regards. PS: Sorry for my english. -- Gustavo Ariel Kullak e-mail:gkullak@fi.uba.ar TE particular: (011) 4966-1246 TE laboral: (011) 6329-4261 Móvil : 15-5416-1246 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 13:13:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F45716A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:13:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sentry.24cl.com (174.113.sn.ct.dsl.thebiz.net [216.238.113.174]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF31143D5E for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:13:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zlists@mgm51.com) Received: from XPMM (unknown [63.119.50.193]) by sentry.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B83837278 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:13:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <200409300913550492.03B6382A@sentry.24cl.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Courier 3.50.00.00.1081 (http://www.rosecitysoftware.com) (P) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:13:55 -0400 From: "MikeM" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:13:57 -0000 On 9/29/2004 at 11:27 PM TM4525@aol.com wrote: |I'll post some numbers after trying it. But its pretty frightening to |think that one release has such major changes. Sounds like (yet another) |crapshoot. ... ============= If you had taken the time to read and understand the release notes you might not have led yourself down this path of misunderstanding. The developers have been very up front with the fact that the 5.x releases up to and including 5.2.1 have all been development-oriented debugging releases that have not been optimized for performance and that include a lot of debugging code. 5.3 is the first release of the 5.x series for which the developers have stated that they have removed some (most?) debugging code and have made important performance releases. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 13:31:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FAD16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:31:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from musashi.fi.uba.ar (musashi.fi.uba.ar [157.92.49.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C574943D2F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:31:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gkullak@fi.uba.ar) Received: from musashi.fi.uba.ar (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by musashi.fi.uba.ar (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8UDUeHZ019786 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:30:40 -0300 Received: (from apache@localhost) by musashi.fi.uba.ar (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8UDUeWW019784; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:30:40 -0300 Received: from 161.190.1.253 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gkullak); by webmail.fi.uba.ar with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:30:40 -0300 (ART) Message-ID: <13270.161.190.1.253.1096551040.squirrel@161.190.1.253> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:30:40 -0300 (ART) From: gkullak@fi.uba.ar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-FIUBA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-FIUBA-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-FIUBA-MailScanner-SpamCheck: no es spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (puntaje=-3.818, requerido 5, AWL 0.30, BAYES_00 -4.90, NO_REAL_NAME 0.16, RATWR20_MESSID 0.62) X-MailScanner-From: gkullak@fi.uba.ar Subject: Subject=does%20java%20needs%20linux%20base%3F&In-Reply-To= 20040901043748.34017.qmail%40web50301.mail.yahoo.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:31:30 -0000 Why do you no use pkg_add instead port collection? Remember that one are binary and the other is maded from the source, but it is more simple. Regards -- Gustavo Ariel Kullak e-mail:gkullak@fi.uba.ar -- Gustavo Ariel Kullak e-mail:gkullak@fi.uba.ar TE particular: (011) 4966-1246 TE laboral: (011) 6329-4261 Móvil : 15-5416-1246 -- Gustavo Ariel Kullak e-mail:gkullak@fi.uba.ar TE particular: (011) 4966-1246 TE laboral: (011) 6329-4261 Móvil : 15-5416-1246 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 13:39:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2D116A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:39:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from proxy.hddesign.com (dsl-194.madison.chorus.net [216.165.159.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93ADB43D53 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:39:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from damon@hddesign.com) Received: from [10.0.0.20] (bob.hddesign.com [192.168.1.254]) by proxy.hddesign.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8UDdGw0017063 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:39:16 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from damon@hddesign.com) Message-ID: <415C0C84.8000906@hddesign.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:39:16 -0500 From: Damon Butler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040727 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Error mounting Linux ext2fs drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:39:23 -0000 I recompiled my kernel, including the "options EXT2FS" option line. No problem. After rebooting, I was able to successfully mount my linux drive thusly: mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s1 /linux I transferred some files and was very happy. Now here's the frustrating bit. Time has passed and the machine has been shut down and rebooted a few times. After that initial success, I have never been able to mount that !$!@#$ drive again. I invariably get a Operation not permitted error. What gives? How can I retrieve my former happiness? --Damon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 13:44:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A3016A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:44:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from esemetz.metz.supelec.fr (esemetz.metz.supelec.fr [193.48.224.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4C043D1D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:44:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregorynou@altern.org) Received: from smtp.metz.supelec.fr (smtp.metz.supelec.fr [193.48.224.205]) by esemetz.metz.supelec.fr (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i8UDiYO14265 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:44:34 +0200 Received: from altern.org (nou.rez-metz.supelec.fr [193.48.225.2]) by smtp.metz.supelec.fr (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8UDsZV01965 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:54:35 +0200 Message-ID: <415C0DC0.1030807@altern.org> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:44:32 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E9gory_Nou?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (Windows/20040207) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: a very annoying pb with accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:44:37 -0000 Hi everybody, Here is my (weird) problem ... I opened /etc/spwd.db with ee and exited (which was actually a very bad idea, even if I did not modified anything). At this time, everything was still ok. Then, a few minutes later, I tried to su ... Impossible : I get some weird error message telling me "su: who are you ?" Then I tried to log directly from the login shell on tty0 with my account... unknown user. I add a look at /etc/passwd : everything was correct. And when I tried to recreate my account : "user already exists" Then I reboot (the second very bad idea in the same day), and user "gdm" didn't exist anymore. Exactly as if I forgot to make mergemaster after upgrading, but with only one difference : I actually didn't made a upgrade. So now the situation is : I can only access with root account. Does someone know when I did a mistake ? and does someone knows how to fix it ? Should I delete account in /etc/passwd and create them again ? I had this idea, but I didn't want to make another stupid thing today :) Thanks a lot -- Gregory Nou From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 13:52:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA87716A4D1 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:52:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from proxy.hddesign.com (dsl-194.madison.chorus.net [216.165.159.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7D343D6B for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:52:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from damon@hddesign.com) Received: from [10.0.0.20] (bob.hddesign.com [192.168.1.254]) by proxy.hddesign.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8UDq6w0017337 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:52:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from damon@hddesign.com) Message-ID: <415C0F86.7000607@hddesign.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:52:06 -0500 From: Damon Butler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040727 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <415C0C84.8000906@hddesign.com> <415C0E27.7070902@altern.org> In-Reply-To: <415C0E27.7070902@altern.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: Error mounting Linux ext2fs drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:52:11 -0000 Gr=E9gory Nou wrote: > May sound as a stupid question, but did you actually logged as root, or= =20 > su before performing this command ? marcio.mallavazzi@unibanco.com.br wrote: > Have you tried to mount the drive as root? Heh. Yes indeed, first thing I tried. I've also tried mounting the drive = as virtually every other user that exists. No dice. > What is in the /var/log/messages file? I'm not sitting in front of the machine, so I can't tell you. If you=20 still think it's relevant, I'll fetch a copy of it as soon as I can. > What kind of error? I wish I knew. The error message is no more explicit than "Operation not = permitted." Seriously. Here's the error in full: ext2fs: /dev/ad0s1: Operation not permitted My attempts at Googling some help have so far proven useless. Bother. --Damon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:01:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBAC16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:01:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from musashi.fi.uba.ar (musashi.fi.uba.ar [157.92.49.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BC543D45 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:01:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gkullak@fi.uba.ar) Received: from musashi.fi.uba.ar (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by musashi.fi.uba.ar (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8UE0YHZ029521 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:00:34 -0300 Received: (from apache@localhost) by musashi.fi.uba.ar (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8UE0YqM029518; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:00:34 -0300 Received: from 161.190.1.253 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gkullak); by webmail.fi.uba.ar with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:00:34 -0300 (ART) Message-ID: <13441.161.190.1.253.1096552834.squirrel@161.190.1.253> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:00:34 -0300 (ART) From: gkullak@fi.uba.ar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-FIUBA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-FIUBA-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-FIUBA-MailScanner-SpamCheck: no es spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (puntaje=-3.825, requerido 5, AWL 0.29, BAYES_00 -4.90, NO_REAL_NAME 0.16, RATWR20_MESSID 0.62) X-MailScanner-From: gkullak@fi.uba.ar Subject: Subject=Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:01:08 -0000 How I response to a question? -- Gustavo Ariel Kullak e-mail:gkullak@fi.uba.ar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:01:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7355716A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:01:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from musashi.fi.uba.ar (musashi.fi.uba.ar [157.92.49.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDCE43D45 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:01:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gkullak@fi.uba.ar) Received: from musashi.fi.uba.ar (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by musashi.fi.uba.ar (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8UE0YHZ029526 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:00:34 -0300 Received: (from apache@localhost) by musashi.fi.uba.ar (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8UE0YK7029524; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:00:34 -0300 Received: from 161.190.1.253 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gkullak); by webmail.fi.uba.ar with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:00:34 -0300 (ART) Message-ID: <13374.161.190.1.253.1096552834.squirrel@161.190.1.253> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:00:34 -0300 (ART) From: gkullak@fi.uba.ar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-FIUBA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-FIUBA-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-FIUBA-MailScanner-SpamCheck: no es spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (puntaje=-3.828, requerido 5, AWL 0.29, BAYES_00 -4.90, NO_REAL_NAME 0.16, RATWR20_MESSID 0.62) X-MailScanner-From: gkullak@fi.uba.ar Subject: ?Subject=Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:01:11 -0000 How I response to a question? -- Gustavo Ariel Kullak e-mail:gkullak@fi.uba.ar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:01:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597E216A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:01:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from musashi.fi.uba.ar (musashi.fi.uba.ar [157.92.49.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF3243D53 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:01:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gkullak@fi.uba.ar) Received: from musashi.fi.uba.ar (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by musashi.fi.uba.ar (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8UE1PHZ029835 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:01:25 -0300 Received: (from apache@localhost) by musashi.fi.uba.ar (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i8UE1PGh029833; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:01:25 -0300 Received: from 161.190.1.253 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gkullak); by webmail.fi.uba.ar with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:01:25 -0300 (ART) Message-ID: <14085.161.190.1.253.1096552885.squirrel@161.190.1.253> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:01:25 -0300 (ART) From: gkullak@fi.uba.ar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-FIUBA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-FIUBA-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-FIUBA-MailScanner-SpamCheck: no es spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (puntaje=-3.831, requerido 5, AWL 0.28, BAYES_00 -4.90, NO_REAL_NAME 0.16, RATWR20_MESSID 0.62) X-MailScanner-From: gkullak@fi.uba.ar Subject: Subject=Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:01:44 -0000 How I response to a question? -- Gustavo Ariel Kullak e-mail:gkullak@fi.uba.ar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:23:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF40A16A4DB for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:23:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D02543D64 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:23:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3560212rnb for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:23:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.80 with SMTP id 80mr361627rnh; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:23:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:23:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:53:17 +0530 From: Subhro To: Damon Butler In-Reply-To: <415C0F86.7000607@hddesign.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <415C0C84.8000906@hddesign.com> <415C0E27.7070902@altern.org> <415C0F86.7000607@hddesign.com> cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Error mounting Linux ext2fs drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:23:22 -0000 sysctl -a | grep securelevel ? Regards S. On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:52:06 -0500, Damon Butler wrote= : > Gr=E9gory Nou wrote: > > May sound as a stupid question, but did you actually logged as root, or > > su before performing this command ? >=20 > marcio.mallavazzi@unibanco.com.br wrote: > > Have you tried to mount the drive as root? >=20 > Heh. Yes indeed, first thing I tried. I've also tried mounting the drive > as virtually every other user that exists. No dice. >=20 > > What is in the /var/log/messages file? >=20 > I'm not sitting in front of the machine, so I can't tell you. If you > still think it's relevant, I'll fetch a copy of it as soon as I can. >=20 > > What kind of error? >=20 > I wish I knew. The error message is no more explicit than "Operation not > permitted." Seriously. Here's the error in full: >=20 > ext2fs: /dev/ad0s1: Operation not permitted >=20 > My attempts at Googling some help have so far proven useless. Bother. >=20 >=20 > --Damon >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 --=20 Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:25:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D322716A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:25:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from acidy.com (iade006wl01.blackmesh.com [216.66.28.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5179643D45 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:25:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@acidy.com) Received: (qmail 14523 invoked by uid 512); 30 Sep 2004 14:25:21 -0000 Received: from steve@acidy.com by terrence by uid 510 with qmail-scanner-1.21st (clamdscan: 0.70rc. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(212.44.26.32):. Processed in 0.850836 secs); 30 Sep 2004 14:25:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO apollo.howes-macnaghten.com) (212.44.26.32) by acidy.com with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 14:25:20 -0000 Received: from steve ([192.168.42.70]) by apollo.howes-macnaghten.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:25:20 +0100 From: "Steve Hodgson" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?'Gr=E9gory_Nou'?= , Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:25:20 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: <415C0DC0.1030807@altern.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2004 14:25:20.0159 (UTC) FILETIME=[508B4AF0:01C4A6F9] Subject: RE: a very annoying pb with accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:25:24 -0000 owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote: > Hi everybody, > > Here is my (weird) problem ... > I opened /etc/spwd.db with ee and exited (which was actually > a very bad > idea, even if I did not modified anything). At this time, everything > was still ok. > Then, a few minutes later, I tried to su ... Impossible : I get some > weird error message telling me "su: who are you ?" > Then I tried to log directly from the login shell on tty0 with my > account... unknown user. I add a look at /etc/passwd : everything was > correct. > And when I tried to recreate my account : "user already > exists" Then I reboot (the second very bad idea in the same > day), and user "gdm" > didn't exist anymore. > Exactly as if I forgot to make mergemaster after upgrading, but with > only one difference : I actually didn't made a upgrade. > So now the situation is : I can only access with root > account. Does someone know when I did a mistake ? and does > someone knows how to > fix it ? Should I delete account in /etc/passwd and create > them again ? > I had this idea, but I didn't want to make another stupid > thing today :) Thanks a lot I can only guess that you need to use pwd_mkdb. Probably the easiest way to do this is to use /sbin/vipw, just doing ":wq" to save the changes (though there will be none), which will run pwd_mkdb for you. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:28:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685E316A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:28:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FA743D53 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:28:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v30so595723rnb for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.1.72 with SMTP id 72mr463366rna; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:58:20 +0530 From: Subhro To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E9gory_Nou?= In-Reply-To: <415C0DC0.1030807@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <415C0DC0.1030807@altern.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: a very annoying pb with accounts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:28:25 -0000 On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:44:32 +0200, Gr=E9gory Nou w= rote: > Hi everybody, Hello, >=20 > Here is my (weird) problem ... > I opened /etc/spwd.db with ee and exited (which was actually a very bad > idea, even if I did not modified anything). At this time, everything was > still ok. Indeed a bad idea as you really should not open databases in text editors like ee. > Then I reboot (the second very bad idea in the same day), and user "gdm" > didn't exist anymore. vipw Search for the string gdm. If it exists then the gdm account is there. > Exactly as if I forgot to make mergemaster after upgrading, but with > only one difference : I actually didn't made a upgrade. > So now the situation is : I can only access with root account. > Does someone know when I did a mistake ? and does someone knows how to > fix it ? Should I delete account in /etc/passwd and create them again ? You can try it out but do not open the password file in a normal vi session and start deleting the lines. Instead open it up in vipw or use rmuser. You can either try to rebuild the source tree and run mermaster. this would fix the /etc/master.passwd if it is corrupted. Alternatively you can manually add the user gdm using vipw assuming that the gdm account does not exist. > I had this idea, but I didn't want to make another stupid thing today :) > Thanks a lot You are most welcome Regards S. --=20 Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:29:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09CE16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:29:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from inertia.drifthost.com (inertial.drifthost.com [66.90.101.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB9543D1D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:29:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@drifthost.com) Received: from [203.142.133.217] (helo=Steve) by inertia.drifthost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CD05Q-0000FJ-MD; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:31:05 +1000 From: "Steven Adams" To: , Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:32:16 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <58844.61.88.244.4.1096525998.squirrel@61.88.244.4> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcSmt2nzhkTsUExUSCeTUaiWaJT9/QAMcluw X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - inertia.drifthost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - drifthost.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Message-Id: <20040930142936.8EB9543D1D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: IPFW Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: drift@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:29:37 -0000 When I add $fwcmd add allow ip from any to any established The messages go away, but when I remove it they come back, I ran a tcpdump it seems most of the packet just have ACK set? Im not to sure whats going on? Steven Adams steve@drifthost.com DriftNet Web Services http://www.drifthost.com Home: +61 2 94274857 Fax: +61 2 94274857 Mobile +61 (0) 404 085644 -----Original Message----- From: steve@drifthost.com [mailto:steve@drifthost.com] Sent: Thursday, 30 September 2004 4:33 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: IPFW Problem Hi, I am tryin to setup my Firewall on my server, so far i have the following. =========================================================== oif=bge0 fwcmd=ipfw $fwcmd -f flush $fwcmd add check-state $fwcmd add allow ip from any to any via lo0 $fwcmd add deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 $fwcmd add deny all from any to any frag in via $oif $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to me 21,25,26,53,110,143,443,465,953,993,995,2082,2083,2086,2087,2089,2095,2096,2 627,6666,40000-49452 in via $oif keep-state setup $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to me 80 setup keep-state $fwcmd add allow udp from me 53 to any keep-state $fwcmd add allow udp from any to any 53 keep-state $fwcmd add allow all from me to any out via $oif setup keep-state $fwcmd add deny all from any to any 137,138,139,67,68 in $fwcmd add deny log all from me to any 22 $fwcmd add deny log all from any to any ====================================================== When i turn the firewall on i am getting this in my /var/log/security ======================================================== Sep 30 16:30:48 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP SOMECLIENT:2858 MYIP:80 in via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:48 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP SOMECLIENT:2864 MYIP:80 in via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:48 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP SOMECLIENT:2858 MYIP:80 in via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:48 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP MYIP:80 SOMECLIENT:1431 out via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:49 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP MYIP:80 SOMECLIENT:2694 out via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:49 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP MYIP:80 SOMECLIENT:3059 out via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:49 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP MYIP:80 SOMECLIENT:33077 out via bge0 Sep 30 16:30:49 inertia kernel: ipfw: 1200 Deny TCP MYIP:80 SOMECLIENT:33130 out via bge0 ============================================================== I am unsure to why i am getting theses, its like the check-state command is half working.. I can still browse my web server fine but im still getting theses messages. Anyone got any ideas? Thanks Steve _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:35:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8093616A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:35:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254DF43D5C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:35:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3560792rnb for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.80 with SMTP id 80mr365764rnh; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:05:50 +0530 From: Subhro To: drift@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040930142936.8EB9543D1D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <58844.61.88.244.4.1096525998.squirrel@61.88.244.4> <20040930142936.8EB9543D1D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> cc: steve@drifthost.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:35:53 -0000 On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:32:16 +1000, Steven Adams wrote: > When I add > > $fwcmd add allow ip from any to any established > > The messages go away, but when I remove it they come back, I ran a tcpdump > it seems most of the packet just have ACK set? If this works for you then the keep-state is definitely not working for you. Because when a SYN comes in, the state is saved in the firewall dynamic states so that subsequent ACKs corresponding to that SYN gets through without any problem. >=========================================================== > oif=bge0 > fwcmd=ipfw > > $fwcmd -f flush > > $fwcmd add check-state > > $fwcmd add allow ip from any to any via lo0 > $fwcmd add deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > > $fwcmd add deny all from any to any frag in via $oif > > $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to me > 21,25,26,53,110,143,443,465,953,993,995,2082,2083,2086,2087,2089,2095,2096,2 > 627,6666,40000-49452 > in via $oif keep-state setup > $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to me 80 setup keep-state > $fwcmd add allow udp from me 53 to any keep-state > $fwcmd add allow udp from any to any 53 keep-state > > $fwcmd add allow all from me to any out via $oif setup keep-state > > $fwcmd add deny all from any to any 137,138,139,67,68 in > > $fwcmd add deny log all from me to any 22 > $fwcmd add deny log all from any to any change this to $fwcmd add deny log all from any to any in xmit $oif BTW, any good reason not to trust your internal network from sending data through the firewall? Regards S. -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:39:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74E516A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:39:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5618F43D2F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:39:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 80so2479679rnl for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.1.72 with SMTP id 72mr467554rna; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:09:21 +0530 From: Subhro To: bsdfsse In-Reply-To: <415BA1A3.3010608@optonline.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <415BA1A3.3010608@optonline.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do you know how to install ports? (like vmware3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:39:22 -0000 On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 02:03:15 -0400, bsdfsse wrote: > > For example, I have been trying to install the vmware3 port - and I find > all kinds of tidbits all over the web about little things that need to > be done to get it to work. The information sometimes covers version > 2.0, sometimes 3.2, and sometimes 4.5. If someone just goes in to > /usr/ports/emulators/vmware3 and does a "make install", how would they > know what else to do? The best part of the FreeBSD port collection is, you dont need to know what else to do. The port tree is designed in such a way that if you try to install a particular port, then the system would fetch all the dependancies automatically unless you specifically ask it not to do so. Just go through the vmware manual to get an idea about how to configure vmware. You need not worry about the installation. Regards S. -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:41:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BCE16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:41:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from phoenix.smluc.org (phoenix.smluc.org [12.28.48.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D09D043D49 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:41:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erik@phoenix.smluc.org) Received: (qmail 26785 invoked by uid 1000); 30 Sep 2004 14:42:46 -0000 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:42:46 -0500 From: Erik Greenwald To: Damon Butler Message-ID: <20040930144246.GA26630@phoenix.smluc.org> References: <415C0C84.8000906@hddesign.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <415C0C84.8000906@hddesign.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Error mounting Linux ext2fs drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:41:43 -0000 On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 08:39:16AM -0500, Damon Butler wrote: > I recompiled my kernel, including the "options EXT2FS" option line. No > problem. After rebooting, I was able to successfully mount my linux > drive thusly: > > mount -t ext2fs /dev/ad0s1 /linux > > I transferred some files and was very happy. > > Now here's the frustrating bit. Time has passed and the machine has been > shut down and rebooted a few times. After that initial success, I have > never been able to mount that !$!@#$ drive again. I invariably get a > > Operation not permitted > > error. What gives? How can I retrieve my former happiness? > --Damon this is the default error spewed out when the linux file system is not clean. (I.E. it was not unmounted properly on the shutdown where it ceased working) install the sysutils/e2fsprogs port and e2fsck the /dev/ad0s1 (or boot linux and use that if it's possible), hopefully that will fix your issue :) -- -Erik [http://math.smsu.edu/~erik] The opinions expressed by me are not necessarily opinions. In all probability, they are random rambling, and to be ignored. Failure to ignore may result in severe boredom or confusion. Shake well before opening. Keep Refrigerated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:46:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E151716A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:46:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52505.mail.yahoo.com (web52505.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8A4F243D39 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:46:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ronj_clark@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040930144612.93232.qmail@web52505.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [63.89.83.220] by web52505.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:46:11 PDT Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 07:46:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Ronnie Clark To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Installing mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ronj_clark@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:46:13 -0000 Hello all, Is there an easy way to install mod_php5 so that it has GD and MySQL support? There used to be a graphical menu that came up for these options, but it is no longer there. Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Ron Clark __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 15:17:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3757216A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:17:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF3943D5F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:17:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1] (may be forged))i8UFHDLb078582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:17:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8UFHDYW078581; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:17:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:17:13 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: gkullak@fi.uba.ar Message-ID: <20040930151713.GA78240@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , gkullak@fi.uba.ar, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <35603.161.190.1.253.1096549939.squirrel@161.190.1.253> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <35603.161.190.1.253.1096549939.squirrel@161.190.1.253> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:17:13 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail default installed? Why it is in port collection because? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:17:31 -0000 --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:12:19AM -0300, gkullak@fi.uba.ar wrote: > My question is in the subject. > If you search in port collection you will see: sendmail and sendmail-sasl. > sendmail-sasl contains only Makefile, I supouse that it compile the > sendmail port with SASL paramether and others. Sendmail is in the ports as well as in the base system for several reasons. One is so older versions of FreeBSD can update to a recent sendmail. Another is to provide a relatively easy was on installing sendmail with a customised compilation -- there are quite a lot of optional features that could be turned on or off, dependencies on various other software packages etc. The sendmail-sasl port is what's known as a 'slave' port -- all that Makefile does is use all of the settings, files, patches etc. from the master sendmail port, except that it changes a few configuration settings so that SASL functionality is turned on. It saves pretty much duplicating the whole sendmail port with only minor changes. > But why I must install sendmail port if I see that Sendmail is up and > running in my FreeBSD but in "#pkg_info -l" list it not appear. In general, you don't need to install sendmail from ports. The sendmail as provided in the base system will work just fine for the vast majority of sites, from machines that produce only the daily/weekly/monthly reports, to those that handle the e-mail for hundreds of users. If you're using the version of sendmail from the base system, there won't be any 'pkg_info' indicating that sendmail is installed. That's simply because the base system is not installed using packages. (Compare this to, say NetBSD or Solaris, where the same packaging system is used to install the core system as well as add-on software). Packagizing the base system is one of those bikeshed items that will cause people to throw things at you if you suggest "what a good idea it would be...": pretty much everyone agrees that it would, but no one has yet managed to come up with a workable way of switching the base system to packages that doesn't throw away the advantages of the current way of doing things. > How can I remove it totaly? Whats happened if i go to > #/usr/ports/mail/sendmail or sendmail-sasl and install it? FreeBSD has a system called mailwrapper(8) imported from NetBSD. This allows you to install any of the popular MTAs (sendmail, postfix, qmail, exim, etc) through the ports, and then mailwrapper ensures that the default Unix method of sending e-mail programatically, which is to pipe the message into a program called /usr/sbin/sendmail, will in fact submit it via which ever MTA you have chosen. When you use one of the sendmail ports it will automatically modify the configuration file (mailer.conf(5)) to use the newly installed MTA. =20 > This problem found first when I configure Sendmail por SMTP auth and > before when I try to replace Sendmail with Postfix. You can implement SASL and SMTP Auth using the base system sendmail. This section of the handbook explains how: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/smtp-auth.html Although that does talk about SASLv1 -- the procedure for setting it up with SASLv2 is almost identical, except that: i) Install the security/cyrus-sasl2 port. ii) Edit the file /usr/local/lib/sasl2/Sendmail.conf to say: pwcheck_method: saslauthd iii) Edit make.conf to set the following flags: SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=3D-I/usr/local/include -DSASL=3D2 SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=3D-L/usr/local/lib SENDMAIL_LDADD=3D-lsasl2 iv) Rebuild sendmail as described in the referenced article v) Add SASL configuration to /etc/mail/`hostname`.mc: FEATURE(no_default_msa)dnl ## overridden with DAEMON_OPTIONS below [...] dnl ## Set SASL options TRUST_AUTH_MECH(`GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN')dnl define(`confAUTH_MECHANISMS', `GSSAPI DIGEST-MD5 CRAM-MD5 LOGIN')dnl define(`confDEF_AUTH_INFO', `/etc/mail/auth-info')dnl define(`confDONT_BLAME_SENDMAIL',`GroupReadableSASLDBFile')dnl [...] DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=3D587, Name=3DMSA, M=3DE')dnl vi) Rebuild and install the modified sendmail configuration by running: # make # make install in the /etc/mail directory. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXCN5iD657aJF7eIRArd+AJ0dNHdZ3Fzll7CyvhlXmtK0GtKCsQCdF3JB jV0UoOpweJPE6B9aazceI+M= =6hbm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cWoXeonUoKmBZSoM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 15:18:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF51B16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:18:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862EE43D5A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:18:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i8UFIXP22792; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:18:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200409301518.i8UFIXP22792@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: gkullak@fi.uba.ar Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:18:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <14085.161.190.1.253.1096552885.squirrel@161.190.1.253> from "gkullak@fi.uba.ar" at Sep 30, 2004 11:01:25 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Subject=Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:18:38 -0000 > > How I response to a question? If you mean how do you respond to a question that has been posted to the FreeBSD questions, just reply to the question. Do a "group" reply or "reply to all" or something that makes your reply go back to the list (questions@freebsd.org) as well as the original poster. As matters of style: Break your lines of text at about 72 characters length - either by configuring your Email client to do it or by hitting RETURN/ENTER at about 72 characters length. Also, turn on inclusion marking and then intersperse your responses at the appropriate places in the original text to make the response simulate a conversation - rather than putting all of the response at the top of the message - eg don't top post. The most common inclusion marking style nowdays seems to be using the GreaterThan > character plus a space on all lines includes as my mailer did with your message above. People on this list are very easy-going about handling English from someone who has first learned in another language, but be aware that some misunderstandings can come up and it may take some patience to sort them out. That should be it. ////jerry > > Gustavo Ariel Kullak > e-mail:gkullak@fi.uba.ar > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 15:22:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C660B16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:22:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CAF43D31 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:22:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1] (may be forged)) i8UFMgcY078666 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:22:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8UFMfQE078665; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:22:41 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:22:41 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Ronnie Clark Message-ID: <20040930152241.GB78240@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Ronnie Clark , FreeBSD Questions References: <20040930144612.93232.qmail@web52505.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040930144612.93232.qmail@web52505.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:22:42 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Installing mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:22:47 -0000 --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 07:46:11AM -0700, Ronnie Clark wrote: > Is there an easy way to install mod_php5 so that it > has GD and MySQL support? There used to be a graphical > menu that came up for these options, but it is no > longer there.=20 >=20 > Any help is appreciated.=20 Yet another person who has not read the 20040719 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING. Use the lang/php5-extensions port to get the options menu that lets you choose what extensions to install. Or just install the databases/php5-mysql and graphics/php5-gd ports. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXCTBiD657aJF7eIRAseEAJ9u93DFJPuCq2b9gnAU4NoE9sCkrwCfSsX7 2x9izWZigtA5vip+BSVF69A= =ML2Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 15:34:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3978C16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:34:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.indatacorp.com (65.104.0.66.ptr.us.xo.net [65.104.0.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78F0643D49 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:34:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rgrafton@indatacorp.com) Received: (qmail 20089 invoked by uid 0); 30 Sep 2004 15:41:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.100.179?) (rgrafton@indatacorp.com@192.168.100.179) by netfb01.indatacorp.com with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 15:41:32 -0000 Message-ID: <415C2789.5090401@indatacorp.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:34:33 -0700 From: Randy Grafton User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ronj_clark@yahoo.com References: <20040930144612.93232.qmail@web52505.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040930144612.93232.qmail@web52505.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Installing mod_php5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:34:36 -0000 Ronnie Clark wrote: >Hello all, > >Is there an easy way to install mod_php5 so that it >has GD and MySQL support? There used to be a graphical >menu that came up for these options, but it is no >longer there. > >Any help is appreciated. > >Thanks, >Ron Clark > > > > > >__________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! >http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Yes. Install mod_php5 from /usr/ports/www/mod_php5, then install php5-extensions from /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions. It is the php5-extensions port that has the menu you were looking for. Once both are installed be sure to look at your php.ini file to verify that the extensions are referenced properly. -Randy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 15:45:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4479A16A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:45:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53904.mail.yahoo.com (web53904.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A9EC643D5D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:45:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stheg_olloydson@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040930154528.66104.qmail@web53904.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.210.49.231] by web53904.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:45:28 PDT Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 08:45:28 -0700 (PDT) From: stheg olloydson To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: jay2xra@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Is there a reverse Network Address Translation??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:45:29 -0000 It was said: > I wan't to access my pc at work from home through >freebsd's sshd. Is it possible?, knowing that it >doesn't have a public ip address? That workstation of >mine is only gaining internet access through LAN >servers and routers. Will it help if I know the >gateway ip where my workstation passes through and the >proxy as well as dns server's ip's? I know its >possible but I can't imagine the process, perhaps >something like a reverse network address >translation... Any idea? Hello, Yes, this is possible. From home, you would ssh to your work's external IP address. You don't specify the setup you have at work, but at a minimum you need to have fowarding rules setup in the company's firewall to direct your ssh connection to your workstation. Obviously, if you can ssh in, so can anyone else. Be sure you use a _very_ good password. HTH, Stheg __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 16:03:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F4516A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:03:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9F143D53 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:03:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andyh@hhbb.co.uk) Received: from [10.0.0.25] (hedgie1.gotadsl.co.uk [82.133.95.107]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697B925DCE3 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:03:02 +0100 (BST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <362558FC-12FA-11D9-97C2-000D93511A6A@hhbb.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Andy Holyer Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:03:04 +0100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Funny one: "install" dumps core? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:03:09 -0000 I've managed to get the source and kernel out of sync (I blame a confusion between "make world" and "make buildworld"). Now in trying to install a port, I get "Segmentation Fault - Core dumped" when it gets to the install process. I could understand "ps" core dumping, but "install"? That's practically a shell script! Has anyone seen this before? Any idea what the solution is? --- Andy Holyer, Systems Administrator Hedgehog Broadband, 11 Marlborough Place Brighton BN1 1UB 08451 260895 x 241 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 16:09:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D08416A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:09:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from advmail.lsn.net (advmail.lsn.net [66.90.138.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9BC43D1F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:09:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norm@etherealconsulting.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (24-155-40-125.ip.grandenetworks.net [24.155.40.125]) by advmail.lsn.net (8.12.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i8UG9F0A019552 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:09:17 -0500 Message-ID: <415C2FA7.6010408@etherealconsulting.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:09:11 -0500 From: Norm Vilmer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.27.0.12; VDF 6.27.0.82 Subject: ipfw console messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:09:15 -0000 I have been running a IPFW firewall on FreeBSD 4.10 for a few weeks now. For some reason a few connection attempts are showing up on the console rather than going to the log file. I can't seem to figure out why. Any ideas? I have tried adding the 'log' key word to every deny statement in my IPFW firewall config file. For the most part all denied packets are logged to /var/log/ipfw.log. But about 3-12 per night are not. These also show up in the security run output email as kernel log messages. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 16:15:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EF716A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:15:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from exponential-e.com (snails.exponential-e.net [62.244.177.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F07343D45 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:15:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jim.mozley@exponential-e.com) Received: from [62.244.191.249] (account jim.mozley HELO [192.168.22.49]) by exponential-e.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 3802726 for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:14:59 +0100 Message-ID: <415C3102.10000@exponential-e.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:14:58 +0100 From: Jim Mozley Organization: Exponential-e User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20040930154528.66104.qmail@web53904.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040930154528.66104.qmail@web53904.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a reverse Network Address Translation??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:15:20 -0000 stheg olloydson wrote: > It was said: > > >> I wan't to access my pc at work from home through >>freebsd's sshd. Is it possible?, knowing that it >>doesn't have a public ip address? That workstation of >>mine is only gaining internet access through LAN >>servers and routers. Will it help if I know the >>gateway ip where my workstation passes through and the >>proxy as well as dns server's ip's? I know its >>possible but I can't imagine the process, perhaps >>something like a reverse network address >>translation... Any idea? > > > Hello, > > Yes, this is possible. From home, you would ssh to your work's external > IP address. You don't specify the setup you have at work, but at a > minimum you need to have fowarding rules setup in the company's > firewall to direct your ssh connection to your workstation. Obviously, > if you can ssh in, so can anyone else. Be sure you use a _very_ good > password. Would using a public/private key not be better? Any password would still be guessable. Jim Mozley From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 16:19:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD6516A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:19:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED70843D41 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:19:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp51-93.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.51.93]) i8UGJ5OU082078; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:49:06 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: ict technician , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:49:04 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200409300945.15068.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> In-Reply-To: <200409300945.15068.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410010149.04790.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> cc: ian j hart Subject: Re: broken fs dump file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:19:14 -0000 On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 06:15 pm, ict technician wrote: > I have a broken fs dump I need to fix. Is there a diagnostic/repair tool I > can use? I know about restore -N. > > > > Dump was taken on 4.10. Restoring on 5.3BETA, although I can change that. > A question rather than an answer:---- Is it valid to dump a ufs file system and try to restore it to a ufs2 system? Malcolm > Content is our Samba server home directories. I need to extract the data so > that I can copy it to our new 2k3 server. File is big (50Gb). A full > listing looks okay but the extract fails, apparently while skipping. > > supplementary question: How do I compile restore for debugging. I cannot > find 'the magic'. > > Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 16:31:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A7C16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:31:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web60505.mail.yahoo.com (web60505.mail.yahoo.com [216.109.116.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF43E43D1F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:31:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitryseliv@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040930163127.70136.qmail@web60505.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [216.239.162.95] by web60505.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:31:27 PDT Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:31:27 -0700 (PDT) From: D S To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <415BF16A.8060308@Yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: FreeBSD compilation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:31:30 -0000 Does anybody knows to compile FreeBSD with HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP? Thank you --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? vote.yahoo.com - Register online to vote today! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 17:08:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0843F16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:08:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m16.mx.aol.com (imo-m16.mx.aol.com [64.12.138.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882A843D41 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:08:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from TM4525@aol.com) Received: from TM4525@aol.com by imo-m16.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.7.) id n.1ea.2b3eae1a (4214) for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:08:16 -0400 (EDT) From: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: <1ea.2b3eae1a.2e8d9780@aol.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:08:16 EDT To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5112 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:08:22 -0000 In a message dated 9/30/04 12:03:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time, kris@obsecurity.org writes: >Perhaps at this point you should go and do that, and avoid yourself >any further embarrassment. I have read it, and I don't equate "might be some regressions in performance" to mean "more than twice as slow". I also don't see any assurances that the performance of single processor systems is not being sacrificed in favor of improving multiprocessor performance. I'll be happy to test once its released. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 17:09:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84BD16A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:09:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from advmail.lsn.net (advmail.lsn.net [66.90.138.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E3D43D49 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:09:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norm@etherealconsulting.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (24-155-40-125.ip.grandenetworks.net [24.155.40.125]) by advmail.lsn.net (8.12.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i8UH9j0A032476; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:09:46 -0500 Message-ID: <415C3DD4.3020202@etherealconsulting.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:09:40 -0500 From: Norm Vilmer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Norm Vilmer References: <415C2FA7.6010408@etherealconsulting.com> In-Reply-To: <415C2FA7.6010408@etherealconsulting.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.27.0.12; VDF 6.27.0.82 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw console messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:09:51 -0000 Norm Vilmer wrote: > I have been running a IPFW firewall on FreeBSD 4.10 for a few weeks > now. For some reason a few connection attempts are showing up on the > console rather than going to the log file. I can't seem to figure out > why. Any ideas? > > I have tried adding the 'log' key word to every deny statement in my > IPFW firewall config file. For the most part all denied packets are > logged to /var/log/ipfw.log. But about 3-12 per night are not. These > also show up in the security run output email as kernel log messages. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > More info: my kernel is compiled with these option: option TCP_DROP_SYNFIN option ICMP_BANDLIM option IPFIREWALL option IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE option IPDIVERT option RANDOM_IP_ID From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 17:09:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38B516A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:09:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53910.mail.yahoo.com (web53910.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 624E943D54 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:09:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stheg_olloydson@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040930170951.51958.qmail@web53910.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.210.49.231] by web53910.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:09:51 PDT Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 10:09:51 -0700 (PDT) From: stheg olloydson To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: jim.mozley@exponential-e.com Subject: Re: Is there a reverse Network Address Translation??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:09:53 -0000 It was said: >> Obviously, if you can ssh in, so can anyone else. Be sure you use a >>_very_ good password. > >Would using a public/private key not be better? Any password would still >be guessable. > >Jim Mozley Hello, Most certainly! I was taking into account the OP's relative newness to the unix world. While it may seem condescending, I find newer users tend to get overwhelmed when more experienced users try to supply an exhaustive answer. For example, bringing up PKI would almost certainly lead to a discussion of algorithm choice, etc. The result in these cases often is the new user drops out of the thread (and does whatever) while the old hands bikeshed what must seem like (and sometimes is) arcane minutiae. As the OP uses ssh, he will learn more about it and ask deeper questions. In the meantime, his network is relatively safe. He asked about ssh not telnet, after all. Understand, this is just my personal philosophy, which makes it as valid or invalid as anyone else's. I'm not saying it is The Right Way(tm) - even though it is ;). Regards, Stheg __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail is new and improved - Check it out! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 17:15:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C43216A524 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:15:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p15140542.pureserver.info (papendorf-se.de [217.160.222.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8553243D41 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:15:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@nagilum.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by p15140542.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6507F2F4117 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:15:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from p15140542.pureserver.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p15140542 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10650-09 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:15:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cakebox.homeunix.net (stgt-d9bb3247.pool.mediaWays.net [217.187.50.71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by p15140542.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3B72F405B for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:15:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cakebox.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3073029C8 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:14:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cakebox.homeunix.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cakebox.tis [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18989-06 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:14:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.1.4] (scorpio.tis [10.1.1.4]) by cakebox.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98753029C5 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:14:50 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <415C3F08.5020208@nagilum.org> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:14:48 +0200 From: Nagilum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cakebox.homeunix.net X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at papendorf-se.de Subject: FreeBSD 5.3-BETA6 RPC/rcorder X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:15:07 -0000 Hi i just updated from FreeBSD 5.3-BETA3 to BETA6 unfortunately I'm having some problems now, during boot I see this: Sep 30 17:04:00 cakebox mountd[357]: can't register UDP RPCMNT_VER1 service Sep 30 17:04:00 cakebox mountd[357]: can't register UDP RPCMNT_VER3 service Sep 30 17:04:00 cakebox mountd[357]: can't register TCP RPCMNT_VER1 service Sep 30 17:04:00 cakebox mountd[357]: can't register TCP RPCMNT_VER3 service Sep 30 17:04:00 cakebox mountd[357]: can't register UDP6 RPCMNT_VER1 service Sep 30 17:04:00 cakebox mountd[357]: can't register UDP6 RPCMNT_VER3 service Sep 30 17:04:00 cakebox mountd[357]: can't register TCP6 RPCMNT_VER1 service Sep 30 17:04:00 cakebox kernel: Starting statd. Sep 30 17:04:00 cakebox mountd[357]: can't register TCP6 RPCMNT_VER3 service Sep 30 17:04:00 cakebox mountd[357]: could not create any services Sep 30 17:04:00 cakebox kernel: Sep 30 17:04:00 cakebox mountd[357]: could not create any services Sep 30 17:04:01 cakebox kernel: rpc.statd: Sep 30 17:04:01 cakebox kernel: svc_tp_create: Could not register prog 100024 vers 1 on udp6 Sep 30 17:04:01 cakebox kernel: Sep 30 17:04:01 cakebox kernel: rpc.statd: Sep 30 17:04:01 cakebox kernel: svc_tp_create: Could not register prog 100024 vers 1 on udp Sep 30 17:04:01 cakebox kernel: rpc.statd: Sep 30 17:04:01 cakebox kernel: cannot create udp service Sep 30 17:04:01 cakebox kernel: Sep 30 17:04:01 cakebox kernel: Starting lockd. Sep 30 17:04:01 cakebox kernel: rpc.lockd: Sep 30 17:04:01 cakebox kernel: unable to register (NLM_PROG, NLM_SM, udp) so nfs is "out of order" and bit later I see: Sep 30 17:05:15 cakebox kernel: pid 486 (rcorder), uid 0: exited on signal 6 (core dumped) The rcorder failure is especially bad, as it's hard to tell what things it already started before dying (as it dies after producing half the list). Here is what it looks like when run rcorder manually (only the last lines): root@cakebox ~ > rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/*.sh ... /usr/local/etc/rc.d/arpwatch.sh rcorder: Circular dependency on file `/usr/local/etc/rc.d/amavisd.sh'. rcorder: Circular dependency on provision `fake_prov_00000013' in file `/usr/local/etc/rc.d/amavisd.sh'. /usr/local/etc/rc.d/amavis-milter.sh rcorder in free(): error: chunk is already free Abort trap (core dumped) I tried running rcorder against each rcfile individually to pinpoint it to a certain rcfile, but of course it's working then :-/ I've uploaded a tarball containing the source from /usr/src/sbin/rcorder , my binary (x86/pentium) and the coredump to http://www.nagilum.org/tempdir/rcorder.tar.gz . In case someone want's to take a look.. Of course world (especially including /etc) and kernel are in sync and everything was working with BETA3.. Ok, I thinks that's about it, any ideas anyone? Thanks, Alex. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 17:24:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD4116A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:24:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grummit.biaix.org (86.Red-213-97-212.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.212.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ECEAD43D1D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:24:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists-freebsd-questions@biaix.org) Received: (qmail 4528 invoked by uid 1000); 30 Sep 2004 17:22:41 -0000 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:22:41 +0200 From: Joan Picanyol To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040930172241.GA2882@grummit.biaix.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, lists-freebsd-questions@biaix.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: NFS locking issues => rpc.lockd: 100024 RPC: Port mapper failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:24:52 -0000 [please honour Mail-Followup-To:, not subscribed] Hi, For some unknow cause my 5.3-BETA6 workstation (calvin) cannot lock files over my NFS mounts to my 4.10 server (grummit). I've been all afternoon trying to sort it out with no luck. Portmapper and rpc.lockd are running on the server: joan@grummit:~(1)$ uname -sr FreeBSD 4.10-RC joan@grummit:~(0)$ sockstat | egrep 'portmap|lock' root rpc.lock 112 3 udp4 *:614 *:* root rpc.lock 112 4 tcp4 *:953 *:* daemon portmap 100 3 udp4 *:111 *:* daemon portmap 100 4 tcp4 *:111 *:* root rpc.lock 112 5 dgram syslogd[96]:3 And all programs are available from the client: joan@calvin:~(1)$ rpcinfo -s grummit program version(s) netid(s) service owner 100000 2 udp,tcp portmapper unknown 100004 2,1 tcp,udp ypserv unknown 100005 1,3 tcp,udp mountd unknown 100003 3,2 tcp,udp nfs unknown 100021 4,3,1 tcp,udp nlockmgr unknown 100024 1 tcp,udp status unknown joan@calvin:~(1)$ rpcinfo -T tcp grummit 100024 program 100024 version 1 ready and waiting joan@calvin:~(0)$ rpcinfo -T udp grummit 100024 program 100024 version 1 ready and waiting joan@calvin:~(0)$ rpcinfo -T tcp grummit 100021 program 100021 version 1 ready and waiting rpcinfo: RPC: Program/version mismatch; low version = 1, high version = 4 program 100021 version 2 is not available program 100021 version 3 ready and waiting program 100021 version 4 ready and waiting joan@calvin:~(1)$ rpcinfo -T udp grummit 100021 program 100021 version 1 ready and waiting rpcinfo: RPC: Program/version mismatch; low version = 1, high version = 4 program 100021 version 2 is not available program 100021 version 3 ready and waiting program 100021 version 4 ready and waiting The only issue I can see is the Program/version mismatch, but I have no idea if this could be the cause nor how to solve it. Any insights? tks -- pica From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 18:03:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05FBF16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:03:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD2F43D46 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:03:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-160-246-51.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.160.246.51]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8UI3Moo096642 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:03:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <415C4A67.3000801@mac.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:03:19 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: michael2043@comcast.net References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pi.codefab.com cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Which FreeBSD For A Production System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:03:29 -0000 Michael G. Goodell wrote: > Which release of FreeBSD is best for a production environment? I am aware of > the different branches of development: CURRENT, STABLE, RELEASE and I > *think* I understand the meaning of each from what I have read. Perhaps not > since I am writing this question! But, what I would like to know is when I > am setting up a production system, or desktop for that matter, which is > considered *THE* most stable of the choices in versions. Is it in the 4.x > branch, 5x etc... The most stable version of FreeBSD available today is 4.10. If your priority is to get something that will work, stay up, and not have to fiddled with, go with that. If you've got some time available, beta-testing 5.3 would be very helpful. In a matter of a few weeks, 5.3 is going to become -STABLE. It would be easier to stay up-to-date in the future if you go with 5.3. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 18:19:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C570D16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:19:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FAA743D31 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:19:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F8CA51262; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:19:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:19:53 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: <20040930181953.GA4072@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1ea.2b3eae1a.2e8d9780@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1ea.2b3eae1a.2e8d9780@aol.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:19:22 -0000 --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 01:08:16PM -0400, TM4525@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 9/30/04 12:03:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time,=20 > kris@obsecurity.org writes: >=20 > >Perhaps at this point you should go and do that, and avoid yourself > >any further embarrassment. > I have read it, and I don't equate "might be some regressions in performa= nce"=20 > to > mean "more than twice as slow". OK, we can't be responsible for your misperceptions. Kris --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXE5JWry0BWjoQKURAnFeAKC878dYC58b1rt+Tjp4BOdd0w8eEgCgvXQ9 LjYu2fddUiXAkZOSFRDUHZg= =bdGm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 18:19:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835A816A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:19:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1B543D39 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:19:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F03725150B; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:20:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:20:23 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: D S Message-ID: <20040930182023.GB4072@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <415BF16A.8060308@Yahoo.com> <20040930163127.70136.qmail@web60505.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040930163127.70136.qmail@web60505.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD compilation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:19:52 -0000 --nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 09:31:27AM -0700, D S wrote: >=20 > Does anybody knows to compile FreeBSD with HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP? What on earth is that? :) Kris --nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXE5nWry0BWjoQKURAlZmAJ9vIo+tRjJXaiJwg1PmiYdaj7u7WQCgzlv/ 9lksba3OkungGhTIILnODgA= =b+2J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nVMJ2NtxeReIH9PS-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 18:55:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1543916A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:55:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CBB43D2D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:55:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from E.Schuele@comcast.net) Received: from host59.gtisd.com ([208.206.151.59]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2004093018552101500felqse> (Authid: e.schuele); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:55:22 +0000 From: Eric Schuele To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:55:29 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <1ea.2b3eae1a.2e8d9780@aol.com> In-Reply-To: <1ea.2b3eae1a.2e8d9780@aol.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409301355.29288.E.Schuele@Comcast.Net> Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: E.Schuele@Computer.Org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:55:23 -0000 Well... you can't get much newer to BSD than me. So, most likely I have no place in this thread at all (please be gentle). And I certainly do not want to get in the middle of something that appears to be on the virge of becoming personal... But.... I was experiencing very VERY poor performance TCP/IP wise, untill I dug up a tip from google.... Someone mentioned that many ISPs do not fully support IPv6, and that 5.2.1 would try to use it first.... and then after a timeout it would try IPv4. So in my case, the solution was to remove IPv6 from my kernel and rebuild. Things zip right along now. -Eric On Thursday 30 September 2004 12:08 pm, TM4525@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 9/30/04 12:03:05 AM Eastern Daylight Time, > > kris@obsecurity.org writes: > >Perhaps at this point you should go and do that, and avoid yourself > >any further embarrassment. > > I have read it, and I don't equate "might be some regressions in > performance" to > mean "more than twice as slow". I also don't see any assurances that > the performance of single processor systems is not being sacrificed in > favor of improving multiprocessor performance. I'll be happy to test > once its released. _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 18:59:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E05416A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:59:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A0E43D1D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:59:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2F57C5150F; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:59:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 11:59:38 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: E.Schuele@Computer.Org Message-ID: <20040930185938.GA4844@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1ea.2b3eae1a.2e8d9780@aol.com> <200409301355.29288.E.Schuele@Comcast.Net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409301355.29288.E.Schuele@Comcast.Net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:59:06 -0000 --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 01:55:29PM -0500, Eric Schuele wrote: > Well... you can't get much newer to BSD than me. So, most likely I have = no=20 > place in this thread at all (please be gentle). And I certainly do not= =20 > want to get in the middle of something that appears to be on the virge of= =20 > becoming personal... >=20 > But.... >=20 > I was experiencing very VERY poor performance TCP/IP wise, untill I dug u= p=20 > a tip from google.... > Someone mentioned that many ISPs do not fully support IPv6, and that 5.2.= 1=20 > would try to use it first.... and then after a timeout it would try IPv4.= =20 No, that's referring to order of DNS lookups and your ISP's broken nameserver, not TCP/IP performance. Kris --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXFeZWry0BWjoQKURAjbHAJ9HbO9rMUxmLbs57KHPTF7G7nMHrACg9bt1 6tv+/0P2xIXloNr3hGzeP60= =iBlE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:05:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDE816A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:05:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F35943D2F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:05:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.52] (port=4709 helo=SATPC) by mx1.mail.ru with smtp id 1CD6El-000Ic6-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:05:07 +0400 Message-ID: <000601c4a720$99264270$4611a8c0@SATPC> From: "Andrew" To: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:06:32 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Spam: Not detected Subject: 64-bit arithmetic in scripts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:05:09 -0000 Hi, I'm counting traffic with ipfw and shell scripts. Is there a way to use more than 32-bit numbers in shell arithmetic? Regards, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:14:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC17A16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:14:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com (imo-d03.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509F643D49 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:14:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MissIcetall@aol.com) Received: from MissIcetall@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_gc_dev1.2.) id n.192.2f5da997 (3890) for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:14:45 -0400 (EDT) From: MissIcetall@aol.com Message-ID: <192.2f5da997.2e8db525@aol.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:14:45 EDT To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 631 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: USB problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:14:51 -0000 I am trying to install a all in one lexmark printer onto my computer, everything is correctly plugged in but the computer just cannot detect it. I know that it is not a problem with the installation disk or printer. Ithink that it may be a problem with my computer system. thanks Ieshia From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:32:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA26C16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:32:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E4343D2F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:32:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com) Received: from ms-mss-01 ([10.10.4.10])i8UJW9uY008608 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from socal.rr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I4V00HZ1CXLV7@ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.10.6.203] (Forwarded-For: [66.8.190.99]) by ms-mss-01.socal.rr.com (mshttpd); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:32:09 -1000 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:32:09 -1000 From: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <23c55d2398c6.2398c623c55d@socal.rr.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: Re: Is there a reverse Network Address Translation??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: hoe-waa@hawaii.rr.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:32:12 -0000 On Thursday, September 30, 2004 stheg olloydson spoke as if he was talking about me. > Most certainly! I was taking into account the OP's relative newness to > the unix world. While it may seem condescending, I find newer users > tend to get overwhelmed when more experienced users try to supply an > exhaustive answer. For example, bringing up PKI would almost certainly > lead to a discussion of algorithm choice, etc. The result in these > cases often is the new user drops out of the thread (and does > whatever)while the old hands bikeshed what must seem like (and > sometimes is) arcane minutiae. I have been using FreeBSD for about 10 months as a hobbyist/learning tool. I lurk on the lists to pick up pointers and solve my own little problems. Because I am retired and am only a hobyist, I do exactly as Stheg has indicated above. I will start reading a thread to learn something new or it may be something on my list of features/programs in my future agenda. When it gets too deep for my knowledge level, I will drop out and try to make a mental note that it will always be in the archives. In the time I started with FreeBSD, I have installed it on 4 desktops and 2 laptops. I am running 5.3betas on 3 boxes and 5.2.1P9 on the others. I have solved many of my troubles by lurking and have asked the list a few questions. I have always received polite, helpful responses even if they did not solve my troubles. More times than not, I will solve the problems by research rather than sending to questions. One needs a strong base to build a large pyramid of knowledge. If I were allowed to issue karma points, I would give a couple of dozen to Stheg. Just my 2 seashells Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:32:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCA8B16A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:32:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73AC743D55 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:32:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED7869A39; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:32:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:32:21 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Kris Kennaway Message-Id: <20040930153221.37247498.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20040930185938.GA4844@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <1ea.2b3eae1a.2e8d9780@aol.com> <200409301355.29288.E.Schuele@Comcast.Net> <20040930185938.GA4844@xor.obsecurity.org> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: E.Schuele@Computer.Org Subject: Re: Freebsd 5.2.1 Performance Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:32:23 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 01:55:29PM -0500, Eric Schuele wrote: > > Well... you can't get much newer to BSD than me. So, most likely I have no > > place in this thread at all (please be gentle). And I certainly do not > > want to get in the middle of something that appears to be on the virge of > > becoming personal... > > > > But.... > > > > I was experiencing very VERY poor performance TCP/IP wise, untill I dug up > > a tip from google.... > > Someone mentioned that many ISPs do not fully support IPv6, and that 5.2.1 > > would try to use it first.... and then after a timeout it would try IPv4. > > No, that's referring to order of DNS lookups and your ISP's broken > nameserver, not TCP/IP performance. There is also the workaround of recompiling a kernel without IPv6 support. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:38:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5BD16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:38:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9884B43D1D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:38:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8UJcb39029059; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:38:37 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040930163127.70136.qmail@web60505.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040930163127.70136.qmail@web60505.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:38:36 -0400 To: D S , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: FreeBSD compilation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:38:39 -0000 At 9:31 AM -0700 9/30/04, D S wrote: >Does anybody knows to compile FreeBSD with HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP? Well, the simple answer would be "Yes, it is easy to compile FreeBSD with that variable defined". However, the more useful answer would be to point out "There is nothing in the system which references that variable, so it does not matter if you define it..." I suspect you *might* be thinking of the recent change on the sparc64 platform, which happened after 5.2.1-release. *IF* you are running freebsd on sparc64 hardware, then the instructions for that change are included in a file under /usr/src (note that file was only added after 5.2.1-release). However, those instructions do not reference any variable named HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP. Where did you get that variable name from? Are you compiling some program which expects that variable to exist? That sounds like something which would be generated by an auto- configure script. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:40:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B2216A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:40:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A8543D55 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:40:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i8UJe1bK022571; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:40:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:40:01 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Andrew Message-ID: <20040930194001.GD22530@dan.emsphone.com> References: <000601c4a720$99264270$4611a8c0@SATPC> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000601c4a720$99264270$4611a8c0@SATPC> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-BETA5 X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit arithmetic in scripts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:40:06 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 30), Andrew said: > I'm counting traffic with ipfw and shell scripts. Is there a way to > use more than 32-bit numbers in shell arithmetic? POSIX only requires "signed long" support in the shell, but FreeBSD's expr command has a -e flag that will let it do 64-bit math: $ echo $(( 65536*65536 )) 0 $ echo $(expr 65536 "*" 65536) 0 $ echo $(expr -e 65536 "*" 65536) 4294967296 bash, ksh93 (but not pdksh), and zsh's shell arithmetic are all 64-bit, also. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:40:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A68F16A4D9 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:40:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at (chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at [84.114.137.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 055C043D41 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:40:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 4711@chello.at) Received: (qmail 45239 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2004 19:40:53 -0000 Received: from matrix010.matrix.net (192.168.123.10) by ns.matrix.net with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 19:40:53 -0000 From: Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:40:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <415BA1A3.3010608@optonline.net> In-Reply-To: <415BA1A3.3010608@optonline.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409302140.53339.4711@chello.at> cc: bsdfsse Subject: Re: How do you know how to install ports? (like vmware3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:40:57 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 30 September 2004 08:03, bsdfsse wrote: > For example, I have been trying to install the vmware3 port - and I find > all kinds of tidbits all over the web about little things that need to > be done to get it to work. The information sometimes covers version > 2.0, sometimes 3.2, and sometimes 4.5. If someone just goes in to > /usr/ports/emulators/vmware3 and does a "make install", how would they > know what else to do? > > I'm new to FreeBSD, maybe I am missing something obvious? You probably missed the pkg-message display. In your terminal session, simply scroll back a view lines after the install target has been completed or type 'cat /usr/ports/emulators/vmware3/pkg-message' to view it again. Cheers, ch - -- Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> | OpenPGP KeyID 0x3BCA53BE OpenPGP-Key at hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net and http://pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD4DBQFBXGFF09WjGjvKU74RAqaLAJj3ZwnEzL9UCxsGAVeeEmQUrZFvAJ4z8ZOr bDDv3kkNq9PMl48iusnd4w== =kpjd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:52:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208B416A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:52:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0E243D41 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:52:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4V00DVPDT6XF@mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:51:06 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:51:16 -0400 From: bsdfsse In-reply-to: <200409302140.53339.4711@chello.at> To: Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> Message-id: <415C63B4.2000307@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) References: <415BA1A3.3010608@optonline.net> <200409302140.53339.4711@chello.at> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do you know how to install ports? (like vmware3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:52:21 -0000 >>I'm new to FreeBSD, maybe I am missing something obvious? > > You probably missed the pkg-message display. In your terminal session, simply > scroll back a view lines after the install target has been completed or type > 'cat /usr/ports/emulators/vmware3/pkg-message' to view it again. Indeed, I was missing those messages, and was able to incorporate that information once I was aware of it. If you're not running X, is there a way to get the screen to scroll upwards? When I was running XFCE4, the terminal also did not have scroll bars. I will be doing a fresh install after I get something to eat. I will start over from scratch. Currently I have a lot more info, but now my FBSD machine simply reboots when I run VMWARE. thx! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:53:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D835516A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:53:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from idesigns.net (idesigns.net [209.239.38.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BA743D48 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:53:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from software@schmittnet.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ct-seymour2d-19.wtrbct.adelphia.net [68.71.172.19]) by idesigns.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8UJrHLp009519 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:53:19 -0400 Message-ID: <415C642E.7090902@schmittnet.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:53:18 -0400 From: "Bill Schmitt (SW)" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: firefox help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:53:21 -0000 I'm a newbie who is trying to install a recent release of firefox under version 4.9 of FreeBSD. I downloaded the installer (for linux since there doesn't appear to be a FreeBSD version, yet) from Mozilla, but when I try to execute it, I get the message "error while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0". I've tried finding a package that includes this library, but haven't been successful. Can somebody help? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:55:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744DC16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:55:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1559B43D1F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:55:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 9076 invoked by uid 65534); 30 Sep 2004 19:55:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) (129.187.19.157) by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 21:55:12 +0200 X-Authenticated: #147403 Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D2776C118; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:26:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:26:19 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Huajian Luo Message-ID: <20040930182619.GA3580@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20040930092524.45192.qmail@web14715.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040930092524.45192.qmail@web14715.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetchyahoo Failed: Couldn't get challenge to log in X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:55:15 -0000 --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Huajian Luo wrote: > hi,guys > I installed fetchyahoo and when I run fetchyahoo > It told me=20 > ---- > Logging in securely via SSL as=20 > Failed: Couldn't get challenge to log in, Try again=20 > later, >=20 > any comments on this? > Thanks in advance!!! I remember to have read that they changed their login interface, and thus fetchyahoo needs to be updated. A PR is already in the queue, but since the ports tree is currently frozen, the update will take some time to take place. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/71804 If you are very impatienty, you can try the following: Edit the ports makefile, and change PORTVERSION to 2.8.6. Now run `make makesum && make build' and see if it works. No guarantees, of course... ;-) Simon --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXE/LCkn+/eutqCoRAgn7AJ9cQJqnZWpAwxxvK7N2p5uQ6/yJ3QCg1/ql Mj0jMIF0HWKT8ol8kNSS/pg= =RxQ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:55:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAE616A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:55:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9936243D39 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:55:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 51067 invoked by uid 1002); 30 Sep 2004 19:57:44 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 1.596991 secs); 30 Sep 2004 19:57:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 19:57:42 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:57:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4098.209.167.16.15.1096574262.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <415C642E.7090902@schmittnet.com> References: <415C642E.7090902@schmittnet.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:57:42 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "Bill Schmitt (SW)" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firefox help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:55:40 -0000 > I'm a newbie who is trying to install a recent release of firefox > under > version 4.9 of FreeBSD. I downloaded the installer (for linux since > there doesn't appear to be a FreeBSD version, yet) from Mozilla, but > when I try to execute it, I get the message "error while loading > shared > libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0". I've tried finding a package that > includes this library, but haven't been successful. Can somebody help? The method I used was: # cd /usr/ports/www/firefox # make # make install I first updated my ports tree though. Everything went perfectly slick. Steve > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 20:01:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19BC16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:01:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nemschoff.com (smtp.Nemschoff.com [64.179.52.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC0D43D41 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:01:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MClark@Nemschoff.com) Received: from EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com ([10.10.11.20]) by smtp.nemschoff.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:03:49 -0500 Received: by EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:04:29 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael Clark To: "'Bill Schmitt (SW)'" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:04:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Sep 2004 20:03:49.0189 (UTC) FILETIME=[99AB5750:01C4A728] Subject: RE: firefox help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:01:57 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Schmitt (SW) [mailto:software@schmittnet.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 2:53 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: firefox help > > > I'm a newbie who is trying to install a recent release of > firefox under > version 4.9 of FreeBSD. I downloaded the installer (for linux since > there doesn't appear to be a FreeBSD version, yet) from Mozilla, but > when I try to execute it, I get the message "error while > loading shared > libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0". I've tried finding a package that > includes this library, but haven't been successful. Can somebody help? > Why not just use the port or a package? Michael Clark Nemschoff Chairs Inc mclark at nemschoff dot com CompTIA A+, Network+, Server+, MCP Voice: (920) 457 7726 x294 Fax: (920) 453 6594 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 20:08:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE0E16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:08:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A216943D46 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:08:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.52] (port=4838 helo=SATPC) by mx2.mail.ru with smtp id 1CD7Dc-000P8Z-00; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:08:00 +0400 Message-ID: <004901c4a729$61fc7810$4611a8c0@SATPC> From: "Andrew" To: "Dan Nelson" References: <000601c4a720$99264270$4611a8c0@SATPC> <20040930194001.GD22530@dan.emsphone.com> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:09:24 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Spam: Not detected cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit arithmetic in scripts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:08:02 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Sep 30), Andrew said: > > I'm counting traffic with ipfw and shell scripts. Is there a way to > > use more than 32-bit numbers in shell arithmetic? > > POSIX only requires "signed long" support in the shell, but FreeBSD's > expr command has a -e flag that will let it do 64-bit math: > > $ echo $(( 65536*65536 )) > 0 > $ echo $(expr 65536 "*" 65536) > 0 > $ echo $(expr -e 65536 "*" 65536) > 4294967296 > > bash, ksh93 (but not pdksh), and zsh's shell arithmetic are all 64-bit, > also. Thanks! I haven't thought about using expr. How come that my expr(1) manpage has nothing to say about -e option? In fact my expr(1) does not accept it. I have FreeBSD 4.10. I've just looked into a current manpage from www.freebsd.org, and it says something about 4.x compatibility. What is the best way to go if I need to write scripts now, but I'm planning to switch to 5.x later? Can I upgrade expr(1) now? If not, what should I do? Thanks again and regards, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 20:15:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA40516A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:15:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from slacknet.com (slacknet.com [204.228.135.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D6543D39 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:15:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rj45@slacknet.com) Received: from rj45 (helo=localhost) by slacknet.com with local-esmtp (Exim 4.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1CD7LG-0005vk-GZ for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:15:54 -0600 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:15:54 -0600 (MDT) From: RJ45 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rj45@slacknet.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on slacknet.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: problems with FreeBSD-5.1 any progam goes core X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:15:54 -0000 pid 19543 (cc1), uid 0: exited on signal 4 (core dumped) pid 20066 (cc1), uid 0: exited on signal 4 (core dumped) pid 21680 (cc1), uid 0: exited on signal 4 (core dumped) hello, suddently on my system happens that any running program crashes with signal 4 or signal 10 and dumps a core. This happens also when I Am compiling programs. I Was compiling sendmail and I had to do it 4 times to have success because the compilation was always failing all the time with cc1 system error. I suspect there is some bad hardware here. the machine is a Dell power edge 2650 with 2 Xeon CPUs. I tested all the memory modules and the memory modules are ok. I used the Dell diagnostic program. Could it be a CPU problem ? I don't really know what to do anymore, progams are crashing on the machine and it is a mail server. anyone has some hint to help me track the problem ? thanks Rick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 20:24:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6410E16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:24:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at (chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at [84.114.137.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE31043D55 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:24:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 4711@chello.at) Received: (qmail 45471 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2004 20:24:29 -0000 Received: from matrix010.matrix.net (192.168.123.10) by ns.matrix.net with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 20:24:29 -0000 From: Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> To: bsdfsse Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:24:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <415BA1A3.3010608@optonline.net> <200409302140.53339.4711@chello.at> <415C63B4.2000307@optonline.net> In-Reply-To: <415C63B4.2000307@optonline.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2499096.6ZnqRZNTTG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409302224.29481.4711@chello.at> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do you know how to install ports? (like vmware3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:24:32 -0000 --nextPart2499096.6ZnqRZNTTG Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="Boundary-01=_otGXB9odC1Sbx1Z" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --Boundary-01=_otGXB9odC1Sbx1Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 30 September 2004 21:51, bsdfsse wrote: > >>I'm new to FreeBSD, maybe I am missing something obvious? > > > > You probably missed the pkg-message display. In your terminal session, > > simply scroll back a view lines after the install target has been > > completed or type 'cat /usr/ports/emulators/vmware3/pkg-message' to view > > it again. > > Indeed, I was missing those messages, and was able to incorporate that > information once I was aware of it. If you're not running X, is there a > way to get the screen to scroll upwards? Scroll-lock - Page-up - Page-down > When I was running XFCE4, the terminal also did not have scroll bars. xterm -sb > > I will be doing a fresh install after I get something to eat. I will > start over from scratch. Currently I have a lot more info, but now my > FBSD machine simply reboots when I run VMWARE. > > thx! In case you still in the need of some detailed VMware setup instuctions, I= =20 attached some quick and dirty notes I made short time ago. Maybe there is=20 something useful for you. =20 =2D-=20 Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> | OpenPGP KeyID 0x3BCA53BE=20 OpenPGP-Key at hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net and http://pgp.mit.edu --Boundary-01=_otGXB9odC1Sbx1Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="vmware-setup" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="vmware-setup" Vmware3-3.2.1.2242_9,1 on FreeBSD 5.3-BETA6 1. Check Kernel options: options VFS_AIO (or load aio.ko via /boot/loader.conf) options HZ=3D1000 (should also work w/o) 2. Check /etc/sysctl: kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=3D1 3. Prepare Firewalls and DNS on host-OS/network 4. Install VMware Port rm /usr/local/etc/vmware/config (if there already exists an old non-working config file) cd /usr/ports/emulators/vmware3 make install Do you want to configure vmnet interface? --> Yes Do you want to use netgraph bridging? --> Yes To which interface ...? --> xl0 5. Read pkg-message and docs. 6. Place your license file under ~/.vmware/license.ws.3.0 7. Check vmnet1 interface, ip-address/mask in /usr/local/etc/vmware/config: [...] vmnet1.Bridged =3D "YES" vmnet1.BridgeInterface =3D "xl0" vmnet1.HostOnlyAddress =3D "192.168.0.1" vmnet1.HostOnlyNetMask =3D "255.255.255.0" (ip-address/mask should not conflict with your network settings)=20 8. Reboot 9. Start vmware > vmware 10. --> Settings --> Memory Settings Enable Memory Limits: --> on Memory size: --> use recommend value 11. --> File --> New Enter filename --> YourConfig --> OK 12. --> File --> Open --> Select Filename --> YourConfig --> OK 13. --> Settings --> Configuration Editor * Misc Display Name --> any name you like Guest OS --> select your guest os =20 * Harddisk IDE drive 0:0 (P-M) Device Type: --> Viriual Disk Mode: --> Persistent Name: --> IDE0-0 Size: --> 3999 --> Create --> Install * CD-ROM - installation media IDE drive 1:0 (S-M) Device Type: --> CD-ROM Image Mode: --> Persistent Name: --> /path/to/your/guest-install.iso --> Start connected --> Install * CD-ROM - vmware-tools IDE drive 1:1 (S-S) Device Type: --> CD-ROM Image Mode: --> Persistent Name: --> /usr/local/lib/vmware/isoimages/freebsd.iso --> Start connected --> Install * Ethernet Adapters Connection Type: --> Custom Vmnet: --> /dev/vmnet1 --> Install [Connection Type: --> HostOnly should work too] * Mouse Host Mouse Type: --> autodedect Host Mouse Device: --> autodedect (worked for me, even for an usb mouse. got a warning message about fullscreen vga mode will not work - which is true) * Sound (if you have a soundcard installed) Device: --> /dev/dsp0.1 (any free snd device)=20 --> Start connected --> Install * Memory Guest size: --> enter recommend value --> OK 14. --> Power on=20 To check or change BIOS settings Enter F2 =20 15. Install guest OS =20 16. --> Settings --> VMware Tools Install --> Install Installs display driver, copy'n paste, auto mouse grab/release, time sync (requires that guest-OS is up and running) 17. Install guest-OS sound driver=20 Sound Blaster 16, AWE 32 should work =09 =09 Notes: * Some mouse configuration settings might crash the machine on vmware start= =2Dup. * VMmware doesn't work with the x11/nvidia-driver from ports for me. * If you need to set up a fixed guest MAC address append the line ethernet0.address =3D "00:50:56:xx:xx:xx" to ~/.vmware/YourConfig - replace xx with the address of your choice. --Boundary-01=_otGXB9odC1Sbx1Z-- --nextPart2499096.6ZnqRZNTTG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBXGt909WjGjvKU74RApLiAJ9HzoAyPtbGTI/pbdcQJk6ik9XGdACfeNdF oVhl7Wgvhw2RPdaxPETHh4c= =keVx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2499096.6ZnqRZNTTG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 20:24:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4E916A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:24:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9B243D2F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:24:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from FreeBSD@amadeus.demon.nl) Received: from amadeus.demon.nl ([82.161.18.200]:56297 helo=[10.0.1.1]) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CD7Tx-000Bb6-Qg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:24:54 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: FreeBSD From: FreeBSD questions mailing list Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:24:44 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Wishx X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:24:55 -0000 Hello, I am trying to get Liveice up and running on a FBSD 5.2.1 machine. So far everything went well but I ran into a script that uses wishx. I googled it and found it's part of the Tk toolkit for TCL, so I installed that (tk-8.2.3_2 and tk-8.3.5_2) but still no wishx. I have installed wish8.3 and wish8.4 installed but the script returns errors when I use one of those. Can someone opint me in a deirection how to get wishx installed or maybe anyone knows how to get the script running? thanks Arno From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 20:34:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DF016A513 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:34:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8F4043D46 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:34:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3578942rnb for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.1.72 with SMTP id 72mr599255rna; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.179.42 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2b5f066d04093013344d048003@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:34:23 -0400 From: Brian McCann To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Backup/Restore X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Brian McCann List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:34:26 -0000 Hi all...I'm having a conceptual problem I can't get around and was hoping someone can change my focus here. I've been backing up roughly 6-8 million small files (roughly 2-4k each) using dump, but restores take forever due to the huge number of files and directories. Luckily, I haven't had to restore for an emergency yet...but if I need to, I'm kinda stuck. I've looked at distributed file systems like CODA, but the number of files I have to deal with will make it choke. Can anyone offer any suggestions? I've pondered running rsync, but am very worried about how long that will take... Thanks, --Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 20:39:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8688616A4D2 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:39:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from viper4.dataraq.net (viper4.dataraq.net [209.218.168.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDBC43D2D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:39:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aj@siegel-tech.net) Received: (qmail 18094 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2004 20:39:27 -0000 Received: from pcp09609084pcs.brodwy01.nm.comcast.net (69.241.168.76) by viper4.dataraq.net with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 20:39:27 -0000 From: Aaron Siegel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:38:57 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409301438.58061.aj@siegel-tech.net> Subject: Re: Which Version of FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:39:18 -0000 I really believe the choose would depend on your requirements and your experience. If you are new to open source Unix-like environment then you should not use either in version in a production environment unless you can afford the cost associated with learning a new system. Do not under estimate that cost. In a production environment I would recommend using a system you are familiar with administering. I hope I do not get too many people mad at me for say this. If you are seating up a file sharing server that works in a windows environment you may want to use 5.3. This version adds support for ACL, NSS (nss_ldap) , and a bunch of other stuff that I have not be able to explore yet. On Wednesday 29 September 2004 19:07, Michael G. Goodell wrote: > Which release of FreeBSD is best for a production environment? I am aware > of the different branches of development: CURRENT, STABLE, RELEASE and I > *think* I understand the meaning of each from what I have read. Perhaps not > since I am writing this question! But, what I would like to know is when I > am setting up a production system, or desktop for that matter, which is > considered *THE* most stable of the choices in versions. Is it in the 4.x > branch, 5x etc... > > Where can I get clarification on this topic - any direction would be > welcome. > > Thanks, > > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-newbies > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-newbies-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 20:48:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A8E16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:48:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968EC43D39 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:48:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i8UKm9Jl058662; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:48:09 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:48:09 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Andrew Message-ID: <20040930204808.GE22530@dan.emsphone.com> References: <000601c4a720$99264270$4611a8c0@SATPC> <20040930194001.GD22530@dan.emsphone.com> <004901c4a729$61fc7810$4611a8c0@SATPC> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <004901c4a729$61fc7810$4611a8c0@SATPC> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-BETA5 X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit arithmetic in scripts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:48:10 -0000 In the last episode (Oct 01), Andrew said: > Thanks! I haven't thought about using expr. > > How come that my expr(1) manpage has nothing to say about -e option? > In fact my expr(1) does not accept it. I have FreeBSD 4.10. I've just > looked into a current manpage from www.freebsd.org, and it says > something about 4.x compatibility. > > What is the best way to go if I need to write scripts now, but I'm > planning to switch to 5.x later? Can I upgrade expr(1) now? If not, > what should I do? In 4.x, expr does 64-bit math by default. Apparently POSIX requires that expr use whatever the systems' "signed long" size is, so the default was changed for 5.x, and -e was added to get the old behaviour. If you want your script to work on both, you'll have to do a feature test. I started out just testing expr and expr -e, but it sort of grew... The following script will check the shell's math, two ways of calling expr, and finally fall back on calling bc. As long as you just use the basic math operators, quote your "*"'s, and put spaces between everything, all the methods should be compatible, and your script will work on any bourne-compatible shell :) #! /bin/sh if [ x$(( 65536 * 65536 )) = "x4294967296" ] ; then shellarith() { echo $(( $@ )) ; } MATH="shellarith" else if [ x`expr 65536 "*" 65536` = "x4294967296" ] ; then MATH="expr" else if [ x`expr -e 65536 "*" 65536 2>/dev/null` = x"4294967296" ] ; then MATH="expr -e" else if [ x`echo 65536 "*" 65536 | bc` = "x4294967296" ] ; then bcfunc() { echo "$@" | bc ; } MATH="bcfunc" else echo "Can't do 64-bit math noway nohow" fi fi fi fi echo "Using $MATH" bigval=`$MATH 65536 "*" 65536` echo $bigval -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 20:55:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F10E16A52F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:55:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from viper4.dataraq.net (viper4.dataraq.net [209.218.168.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75EF43D2D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:55:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aj@siegel-tech.net) Received: (qmail 38286 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2004 20:55:45 -0000 Received: from pcp09609084pcs.brodwy01.nm.comcast.net (69.241.168.76) by viper4.dataraq.net with SMTP; 30 Sep 2004 20:55:45 -0000 From: Aaron Siegel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:55:19 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409301455.20289.aj@siegel-tech.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD hardware specifications X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:55:42 -0000 I would recommend setting up dual boot system with FreeBSD and Linux see which system you like best or suites your needs the best. Get your feet wet first, jump in when you feel comfortable. There are a couple ways of creating such a system, buy a new hard drive or crate a partition on you current drive for FreeBSD. I am typing this email on a PII laptop running 5.2.1 Release and KDE it is a little slow but it get the job done reliably. On Tuesday 28 September 2004 21:12, annuar wrote: > Hi All, > > I'm new to Linux/Unix. I've installed Fedora Core 1 on my AMD Sempron 1.67, > 256 MB, 40GB and 17" monitor. It is running but the CD player does work (No > sound) - can anyone help me on this? > > I'm interested on FreeBSD (download the 4.10) and would like to install it > either on this machine or a new machine. Can anyone suggest a suitable > machine (with specs so that I can go to the PC shops)? > > Regards, > AA EHSAN > Malaysia > --- > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). > Version: 6.0.768 / Virus Database: 515 - Release Date: 9/22/2004 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 20:59:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8725516A4D0 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:59:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [208.187.29.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4865343D1D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:59:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 76712 invoked by uid 1001); 30 Sep 2004 20:59:05 -0000 Received: from 67.167.52.21 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com); by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:59:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2034.67.167.52.21.1096577945.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: <2b5f066d04093013344d048003@mail.gmail.com> References: <2b5f066d04093013344d048003@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:59:05 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: "Brian McCann" User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail X-Mailer: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup/Restore X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:59:02 -0000 Brian McCann wrote: > Hi all...I'm having a conceptual problem I can't get around and > was hoping someone can change my focus here. I've been backing up > roughly 6-8 million small files (roughly 2-4k each) using dump, but > restores take forever due to the huge number of files and directories. > Luckily, I haven't had to restore for an emergency yet...but if I > need to, I'm kinda stuck. I've looked at distributed file systems > like CODA, but the number of files I have to deal with will make it > choke. Can anyone offer any suggestions? I've pondered running > rsync, but am very worried about how long that will take... Do the files change a lot, or is it more like a few files added/changed every day, and the bulk don't change? If it's the latter, you could maybe get best performance from something like Subversion (a CVS derivative). Though I suspect rsync would also do well in that case. If a ton of those files are changing all the time, try doing a test on creating a tarball and then backing up the tarball. That may be a simple managable solution. There are probably other more complex solutions of which I am ignorant :-) -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 21:01:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A82B16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:01:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tapuz.safe-mail.net (tapuz.safe-mail.net [212.68.149.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EE043D2D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:01:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trypticon@SAFe-mail.net) Received: from trypticon@SAFe-mail.net by tapuz.safe-mail.net with SAFe-mail (Exim 4.30) id 1CD83K-0001Br-65 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:01:26 -0400 Received: from pc ([162.84.187.244]) by SAFe-mail.net with https Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:01:26 -0400 From: trypticon@SAFe-mail.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMType: Regular X-SMRef: N1-J5dXKILk Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SMSignature: Ai/ZDjQmiDriOYSA3izwIWpJ5xqxSWIZnk7EsYrg8uxTsYUq1kRbQ447yzQUyf0IuywSsbzlmpQaLSn8 /rdIpIXloYZMpt+8fWo48YiPhOtZrs7Iidb77e0Jm2iLUk0CeMKIg8zQBhRalctDQtFkgQPi4V0evaHl sZ/VdXruMcc= Subject: problem installing firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:01:34 -0000 I'm having trouble installing firefox on freebsd-4.10. When i try to install it it gives me this error: /usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot find -lXcursor gmake[2]: *** [libgtkxtbin.so] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving Directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla /widget/src/gtkxtbin' gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving Directory`/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 any help would be appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 21:15:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5F916A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:15:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CE343D31 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:15:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A11AD53A2C; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:16:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:16:21 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: ???? Message-ID: <20040930211621.GA13800@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040930084503.35CB643745@smtp.263.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040930084503.35CB643745@smtp.263.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: about ULE and KSE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:15:49 -0000 --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 04:45:02PM +0800, ???? wrote: > so what is the difference between 2?i think , ule is not so good as > they told me ,so slow. One's a scheduler, one's a thread system. Apples, oranges. Kris --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXHelWry0BWjoQKURAr14AJ9gGWdpmfkuijWxUoT5MLTXfuFSDQCfcxxI pTsyQyRuM00DvG49rbTZhpg= =WM7k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 21:17:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AEF16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:17:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imo-m20.mx.aol.com (imo-m20.mx.aol.com [64.12.137.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0824243D3F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:17:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from TM4525@aol.com) Received: from TM4525@aol.com by imo-m20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.7.) id q.14.34dd766b (4410); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:17:25 -0400 (EDT) From: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: <14.34dd766b.2e8dd1e5@aol.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:17:25 EDT To: cswiger@mac.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5112 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which FreeBSD For A Production System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:17:36 -0000 In a message dated 9/30/04 2:04:35 PM Eastern Daylight Time, cswiger@mac.com writes: > Which release of FreeBSD is best for a production environment? I am aware of > the different branches of development: CURRENT, STABLE, RELEASE and I > *think* I understand the meaning of each from what I have read. Perhaps not > since I am writing this question! But, what I would like to know is when I > am setting up a production system, or desktop for that matter, which is > considered *THE* most stable of the choices in versions. Is it in the 4.x > branch, 5x etc... >The most stable version of FreeBSD available today is 4.10. If your priority >is to get something that will work, stay up, and not have to fiddled with, go >with that. >If you've got some time available, beta-testing 5.3 would be very helpful. In >a matter of a few weeks, 5.3 is going to become -STABLE. It would be easier >to stay up-to-date in the future if you go with 5.3. If its for a production system, then the only answer is 4.10. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 21:22:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6EF16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:22:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.tsgincorporated.com (ns2.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A09643D41 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:22:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from support.tsgincorporated.com (support.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.9])i8ULMSlg001121 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:22:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from micheal (micheal.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.77]) i8ULMS0q019303 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:22:28 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Message-ID: <08c001c4a733$96cc0420$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:22:27 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: FreeBSD 5.x and Lint X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:22:32 -0000 Stupid question maybe, but are there any plans on putting the comments back into Lint? I realize that these may be documented within the online handbook, however, for those of us, who at times are required to go to a remote site, and the net link has failed, needing to recompile something without comments or access to the handbook is a problem. Thanks. -- Micheal Patterson Senior Communications Systems Engineer 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 21:25:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E62816A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:25:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5620A43D53 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:25:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D7B4B51491; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:25:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:25:52 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Micheal Patterson Message-ID: <20040930212552.GA13999@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <08c001c4a733$96cc0420$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="liOOAslEiF7prFVr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <08c001c4a733$96cc0420$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.x and Lint X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:25:20 -0000 --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 04:22:27PM -0500, Micheal Patterson wrote: > Stupid question maybe, but are there any plans on putting the comments back > into Lint? I realize that these may be documented within the online > handbook, however, for those of us, who at times are required to go to a > remote site, and the net link has failed, needing to recompile something > without comments or access to the handbook is a problem. They're in NOTES instead, from which LINT is autogenerated. Kris --liOOAslEiF7prFVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXHngWry0BWjoQKURAtO9AKCK4zUDRTRibxRViJ7t3gN0mdkKfACgntSO KpnDa+fCmsUFmUbXwaycjs4= =Rx3+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --liOOAslEiF7prFVr-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 21:27:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A11B16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:27:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aps.mosline.ru (mail.mosline.ru [193.27.41.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE5D43D49 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:27:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamper@mosline.ru) Received: from [192.168.24.8] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aps.mosline.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 974793759F9 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:27:16 +0400 (MSD) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:27:19 +0400 From: =?Windows-1251?B?1+Xw7e7j7vDx6ujpIMzo9eDo6w==?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.04.7) CD5BF9353B3B7091 Organization: mosline ISP X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <19810086499.20041001012719@mosline.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: freebsd 5.2.1 & catalist 2924 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?Windows-1251?B?1+Xw7e7j7vDx6ujpIMzo9eDo6w==?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:27:19 -0000 Hello freebsd-questions, Problem free.A --- catalist (with multy-vlan) | | free.B ping -S free.A -s 1468 free.B All ok ping -S free.A -s 1469 free.B All ok Packet droped ... as i found because mtu of tagged packet is smaller ifconfig vlan10 mtu 1460 dose nothing how the problem can be solved thanks -- Michail V. Chernogorsky, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 21:29:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675B316A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:29:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.sbfnet.com (mail.sbfnet.com [12.18.252.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413A743D2D for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:29:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keving@sbfnet.com) Received: from administrator ([90.1.2.37]) by mail.sbfnet.com (SBF Mail Services) with SMTP id AAE74724; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:29:44 -0700 From: To: "'Kris Kennaway'" Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:29:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20040930212552.GA13999@xor.obsecurity.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Thread-Index: AcSnOKfkphgrcQlqRIurW2Weo/rtzwABHc1g Message-Id: <20040930212947.413A743D2D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD 5.x and Lint X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:29:48 -0000 >From the handbook: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-confi g.html In FreeBSD 5.X and later versions you can still generate a buildable LINT file by typing: # cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf && make LINT Kevin Glick ITS Manager keving@sbfnet.com Sterling Business Forms -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 2:26 PM To: Micheal Patterson Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.x and Lint On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 04:22:27PM -0500, Micheal Patterson wrote: > Stupid question maybe, but are there any plans on putting the comments back > into Lint? I realize that these may be documented within the online > handbook, however, for those of us, who at times are required to go to a > remote site, and the net link has failed, needing to recompile something > without comments or access to the handbook is a problem. They're in NOTES instead, from which LINT is autogenerated. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 21:38:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A808316A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:38:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [208.187.29.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6539243D3F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:38:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 20688 invoked by uid 1001); 30 Sep 2004 21:38:35 -0000 Received: from 67.167.52.21 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com); by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:38:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2065.67.167.52.21.1096580315.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: <20040930095458.54176.qmail@web51609.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040930095458.54176.qmail@web51609.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:38:35 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: "Mark Jayson Alvarez" User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail X-Mailer: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is there a reverse Network Address Translation??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:38:32 -0000 Mark Jayson Alvarez wrote: > Hi, > I wan't to access my pc at work from home through > freebsd's sshd. Is it possible?, knowing that it > doesn't have a public ip address? That workstation of > mine is only gaining internet access through LAN > servers and routers. Will it help if I know the > gateway ip where my workstation passes through and the > proxy as well as dns server's ip's? I know its > possible but I can't imagine the process, perhaps > something like a reverse network address > translation... Any idea? I think you would need to have the public IP LAN server/router ready, willing, and able to port-forward SSH packets to your personal workstation. Your work IT Administrator may, or may not, be willing to set this up for you. If *YOU* control the public-IP LAN gear at work, you need to set them up to "port-forward" anything on some port that the public-IP LAN gear isn't using to your desktop workstation. You'd think that SSH needs port 22, but if that's already in use, you can: 1. Configure the public-IP to accept/forward port 222 (or whatever) to your desktop workstation. 2. Configure sshd on the desktop workstation to accept traffic on 222 and use sshd to handle that traffic. 3. Use ssh -p 222 USER@PUBLIC_IP at home to log in to the desktop at work. The PUBLIC IP box gets the connection on 222, forwards it to your desktop, and you're in like Flynn. If the "PUBLIC" IP is dynamic (IE, cable modem, DSL, etc) you can also set up software to create a valid domain name for it using something like: http://dyndns.org or one of a few dozen other similar services. In that case, you'd install a small client on the PUBLIC IP box which will notify the DynDNS folks whenever your IP changes, then they update the DNS routing tables for you, and Whammo! you don't really care that your IP is dynamic because they tied a domain name to it for you. If you can't alter the PUBLIC IP LAN gear at work, then I don't think you can manage to ssh in to your desktop box. -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 21:51:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C61B16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:51:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bjwcs.com (swing.bjwcs.com [208.185.25.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A650A43D41 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:51:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brently@bjwcs.com) Received: from SAMBA [66.252.69.26] by bjwcs.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id AFD0151E0092; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:51:12 -0400 From: "Brent Wiese" To: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:51:08 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 Thread-Index: AcSnNw081TH8agUWR+CFd5r3Qdcxpw== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-Id: <200409301751469.SM01528@SAMBA> Subject: Confused about SATA Raid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 21:51:19 -0000 I installed FreeBSD 5.3 Beta 6 today on an Intel s875wp1-e server board. I enabled RAID on the ICH5 SATA ports. Using its BIOS, I built a 2 drive mirror. FreeBSD saw both the native disks (ad4 and ad6). I installed to ad4. I ran "atacontrol create RAID1 ad4 ad6". It said ar0 was created. Now I'm stuck. How do I make the system use ar0 instead of adX? Can I simply change the /etc/fstab file and reboot? Thanks! Brent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 22:00:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F3A16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:00:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.tsgincorporated.com (ns1.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DAC43D55 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:00:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from support.tsgincorporated.com (support.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.9])i8UM0MX8051144 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:00:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from micheal (micheal.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.77]) i8UM0MPU021473 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:00:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Message-ID: <09a701c4a738$e1dab330$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> From: "Micheal Patterson" Cc: References: <08c001c4a733$96cc0420$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> <20040930212552.GA13999@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:58:29 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.x and Lint X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:00:24 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kris Kennaway" To: "Micheal Patterson" Cc: Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 4:25 PM Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.x and Lint On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 04:22:27PM -0500, Micheal Patterson wrote: > Stupid question maybe, but are there any plans on putting the comments back > into Lint? I realize that these may be documented within the online > handbook, however, for those of us, who at times are required to go to a > remote site, and the net link has failed, needing to recompile something > without comments or access to the handbook is a problem. They're in NOTES instead, from which LINT is autogenerated. Kris ----------- Just out of curiosity, have you compared 5x NOTES to a 4.10 LINT and see what's missing? I don't see anything on FIREWALL or IPFW or even IPF within the 5.x NOTES, whereas within a 4.10 LINT, you have all the information for the various settings. You need to cross reference the 5.x LINT, NOTES and Handbook now to get the information you had within one single file within the 4.x branch. Not that I'm really complaining, it's just that from all of the various other version updates to FBSD, from 2.x to 3.x, from 3.x to 4.x everything you needed to know about the kernel options was contained within one single file. With the jump from 4.x to 5.x, it's no longer the same. There was a time, when you could take LINT, remove what you didn't need and actually build your kernel and maintain the comments so you knew exactly what you had within your kernel. That's no longer an option unless one desires to recombine NOTES and LINT themself. -- Micheal Patterson Senior Communications Systems Engineer 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 22:00:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED1016A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:00:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.tsgincorporated.com (smtp2.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC2243D4C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:00:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from support.tsgincorporated.com (support.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.9])i8UM0MnQ002028 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:00:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from micheal (micheal.tsgincorporated.com [67.66.242.77]) i8UM0MPW021473 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:00:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Message-ID: <09a801c4a738$e1dcfd20$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> From: "Micheal Patterson" Cc: References: <20040930212947.413A743D2D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:00:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.x and Lint X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:00:25 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "'Kris Kennaway'" Cc: Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 4:29 PM Subject: RE: FreeBSD 5.x and Lint > >From the handbook: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-confi > g.html > > In FreeBSD 5.X and later versions you can still generate a buildable LINT > file by typing: > > # cd /usr/src/sys/i386/conf && make LINT > > Kevin Glick > ITS Manager > keving@sbfnet.com > Sterling Business Forms I'm not concerned about the LINT generation, I'm concerned with the lack of comments within LINT now compared to the 2.x, 3.x and 4.x trees. -- Micheal Patterson Senior Communications Systems Engineer 405-917-0600 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 22:05:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B571616A4D1 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:05:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6B543D54 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:05:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3F4815150B; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:06:03 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Micheal Patterson Message-ID: <20040930220603.GA16933@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <08c001c4a733$96cc0420$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> <20040930212552.GA13999@xor.obsecurity.org> <09a701c4a738$e1dab330$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <09a701c4a738$e1dab330$4df24243@tsgincorporated.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.x and Lint X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:05:30 -0000 --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 04:58:29PM -0500, Micheal Patterson wrote: >=20 >=20 > ----- Original Message -----=20 > From: "Kris Kennaway" > To: "Micheal Patterson" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 4:25 PM > Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.x and Lint >=20 > On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 04:22:27PM -0500, Micheal Patterson wrote: > > Stupid question maybe, but are there any plans on putting the comments > back > > into Lint? I realize that these may be documented within the online > > handbook, however, for those of us, who at times are required to go to a > > remote site, and the net link has failed, needing to recompile something > > without comments or access to the handbook is a problem. >=20 > They're in NOTES instead, from which LINT is autogenerated. >=20 > Kris >=20 > ----------- >=20 > Just out of curiosity, have you compared 5x NOTES to a 4.10 LINT and see > what's missing? I don't see anything on FIREWALL or IPFW or even IPF with= in > the 5.x NOTES, whereas within a 4.10 LINT, you have all the information f= or > the various settings.=20 The machine-independent stuff is in sys/conf/NOTES, and machine-dependent is in sys/${ARCH}/conf/NOTES. Kris --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXINKWry0BWjoQKURAvMrAKDV/fuJ00zwjg0GA6Ab+8CkcCLjwACg44l7 TJAzgY3WjyEK5iMWgwHYWSo= =xcl5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 22:11:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450F216A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:11:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bjwcs.com (swing.bjwcs.com [208.185.25.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39F843D1F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:11:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brently@bjwcs.com) Received: from SAMBA [66.252.69.26] by bjwcs.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.05) id A4909E900E0; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:11:28 -0400 From: "Brent Wiese" To: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:11:24 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20040926184512.GA48082@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Thread-Index: AcSj+QUKuYZ66I1fQiGuxFEGzAXS7gDQGwIg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-Id: <200409301811921.SM01528@SAMBA> Subject: RE: Backup Mail Server Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:11:31 -0000 > That's the hard part. The Secondary MX'ing part is fairly easy. All > you do is get your friend to add an MX record to the DNS > 'yourfriend.com' zone listing your server as a high numbered MXer: > > $ORIGIN yourfriend.com. > > @ IN MX 0 smtp.yourfriend.com. > 10 smtp2.yourfriend.com. > 30 smtp.you.com. > > And then add: > > yourfriend.com RELAY > > to /etc/mail/access and rebuild access.db. That means your machine > will accept e-mails addressed to users @yourfriend.com and queue them > up for relaying onto to his servers as soon as they come back up > again. If his site has to go down for an extended length of time, you > can make special arrangements to store incoming mail for longer than > the usual 5 days and then flush it over to him when he comes back up. I have a question that builds off this. Is there a way to make the backup MX server understand that some mail is ultimately destined for it and try to deliver it locally? Here would be an example: Mydomain.com is MX'd to mail.mydomin.com, which handles email for all my users. On that server, I've set up an alias for support@ that is actually a forward to my ticket system box (ie: support@tickets.mydomain.com). In the event my main mail server is down, I'd like to use the tickets.mydomain.com box as the backup MX. Its already running SMTP to handle the tickets, so seems a logical choice. What would be ideal is to have mail destined for support@ to be delivered locally. So, for example, a user can create a ticket saying the mail server is down (of course that is only useful if admins have off-site email addresses the ticket system notifies for redundancy, but that's easy enough). Mostly interested in knowing how to do this under Postfix, but I'm not married to it. Thanks, Brent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 22:16:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5243716A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:16:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from f12.mail.ru (f12.mail.ru [194.67.57.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F3043D4C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:16:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamper_m@mail.ru) Received: from mail by f12.mail.ru with local id 1CD9Dh-000KyZ-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 02:16:13 +0400 Received: from [193.27.41.3] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 02:16:13 +0400 From: jumper jumper To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [193.27.41.3] Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 02:16:13 +0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Subject: freebsd 5.2.1 & catalist 2924 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jumper jumper List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:16:14 -0000 Hello freebsd-questions, Problem free.A --- catalist (with multy-vlan) | | free.B ping -S free.A -s 1468 free.B All ok ping -S free.A -s 1469 free.B All ok Packet droped ... as i found because mtu of tagged packet is smaller ifconfig vlan10 mtu 1460 dose nothing how the problem can be solved how can i reduce mss ? or enable hard fragmintation all packets greater 1460 ??? thanks -- Michail V. Chernogorsky, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 23:00:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A988516A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:00:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net (smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B8543D55 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:00:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from 209-6-197-67.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.197.67] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp03.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #7) id 1CD9uL-0001Z1-00 for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:00:18 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16732.36867.643543.549746@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:00:19 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta16) "celeriac" XEmacs Lucid Subject: relationship of uhid to other usb devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:00:22 -0000 As I understand the man pages, ukbd/ums/uscanner are independant of uhid. Is this correct? Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 23:13:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F9F16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:13:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from c3po.barnesos.net (c3po.LPL.arizona.edu [128.196.64.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C29343D46 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:13:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jbarnes@c3po.barnesos.net) Received: by c3po.barnesos.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AB168B898; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:13:45 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c3po.barnesos.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DB2B86A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:13:45 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:13:45 -0700 (MST) From: Jason Barnes To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040930160527.A58465@c3po.barnesos.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: process will not die. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:13:46 -0000 While running an mpirun job on my dual-processor SMP system (FreeBSD 4-STABLE from August 28), my program (initiated with the command line 'mpirun -np 2 ../sphagr') periodically dies, leaving a process that I can't kill -9. Here's the top: 216 root 2 0 166M 113M select 1 27:44 3.22% 3.22% XFree86 327 jbarnes 2 0 72364K 58056K poll 1 6:53 0.00% 0.00% kdeinit 549 jbarnes 28 0 400M 90744K CPU0 0 3:02 0.00% 0.00% sphagr 267 jbarnes 2 0 23388K 10932K poll 1 0:42 0.00% 0.00% kdeinit here's ps -auxw | grep sph: jbarnes 549 0.0 8.7 410076 90744 p2 R 3:39PM 3:01.97 sphagr -p4pg /usr/home/ jbarnes 550 0.0 0.0 0 0 p2 Z 3:39PM 0:00.00 (sphagr) The 550 process I kill -9ed, but its still there, and now when I try to kill it it says 'no such process'. Has anyone else had any experience with mpi processes being unkillable? Supposedly 5.3 has better SMP support -- might it solve this problem? Thanks for your ideas, - Jason Barnes From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 23:28:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5573516A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:28:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from casbah.it.northwestern.edu (casbah.it.northwestern.edu [129.105.16.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0106F43D1F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:28:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bret-walker@northwestern.edu) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by casbah.it.northwestern.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i8UNSqdP024779 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:28:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from MEDILLBWPC (dhcp051177.medill.northwestern.edu [129.105.51.177]) by casbah.it.northwestern.edu via smap (V2.0) id xma024062; Thu, 30 Sep 04 18:28:38 -0500 From: "Bret Walker" To: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:28:29 -0500 Message-ID: <00bd01c4a745$348c79e0$b1336981@medill.northwestern.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B9_01C4A71B.487D8E00" Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Pam_ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:28:53 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00B9_01C4A71B.487D8E00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I've been trying all day to get pam_ldap to authenticate an ssh session against Active Directory. I thought that I had found the perfect HOWTO (read: one that didn't require nss_ldap), but its instructions didn't seem to get it working on my system. I've read that can authenticate to AD with pam_ldap alone, and I've read that you can't, as well. Does anyone have any experience doing this w/o nss_ldap. I'm running 4.10, and I don't think it has support for nss_ldap. If anyone has any advice, I'd love to hear it. Thanks, Bret PS - The instructions I followed are here: http://www.netsys.com/pamldap/2002/04/msg00074.html ---------------------------- Bret Walker Technical Support Consultant Medill School of Journalism Northwestern University 847-467-7845 847-491-2370 fax bret-walker@northwestern.edu ------=_NextPart_000_00B9_01C4A71B.487D8E00 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII2TCCAmEw ggHKoAMCAQICAwzDcDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDQwNzI3MjMwMzM1WhcNMDUwNzI3MjMwMzM1WjBOMR8wHQYDVQQD ExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxicmV0LXdhbGtlckBub3J0 aHdlc3Rlcm4uZWR1MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQCr2KxZcyBLN/M2+Shau42D HRCTwrVNq2aB3ke9Ulo5GCzJMgZeLPK9WeY6GEbri7OUdF7tH/FS8qCrFCXHcUwJnMx0Ifa6ILMC YRvH3H8u8W3Q4QinnVPGUwx84VDg0rFpQf79F/BS4MofBMcsucO/F1t/linKZgMvq0vOgKoP6QID AQABozkwNzAnBgNVHREEIDAegRxicmV0LXdhbGtlckBub3J0aHdlc3Rlcm4uZWR1MAwGA1UdEwEB /wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAXonUId4OXjTXG19LKdWZ7cd4LcEtJlnFan5nwj2P1p+a bEd4doxkueYJ9u4+Thn633uqHR1v1CTPuTVSt5sGXKcSG8fUeaITE0lamDOKU6lqtc0S5+/0/5tb GCcmSp02WaLAatE9Iy8OY4NmGcR2oqHx05nYSwNB50UqOBNa4ZMwggMtMIIClqADAgECAgEAMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYD VQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0 aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJl ZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcN OTYwMTAxMDAwMDAwWhcNMjAxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdl c3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGlu ZzEoMCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhh d3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVlbWFp bEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDUadfUsJRkW3HpR9gMUbbq cpGwhF59LQ2PexLfhSV1KHQ6QixjJ5+Ve0vvfhmHHYbqo925zpZkGsIUbkSsfOaP6E0PcR9AOKYA o4d49vmUhl6t6sBeduvZFKNdbnp8DKVLVX8GGSl/npom1Wq7OCQIapjHsdqjmJH9edvlWsQcuQID AQABoxMwETAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBAMfskn5O+PWWpWdiKqTw TRFg0G+NYFhhrCa7UjVcCM8w+6hKloofYkIjjBcP9LpknBesRynfnZhe0mxgcVyirNx54+duAEcf tQ0o6AKd5Jr9E/Sm2Xyx+NxfIyYJkYBz0BQb3kOpgyXy5pwvFcr+pquKB3WLDN1RhGvk+NHOd6KB MIIDPzCCAqigAwIBAgIBDTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgT DFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3Vs dGluZzEoMCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMb VGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVl bWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMB4XDTAzMDcxNzAwMDAwMFoXDTEzMDcxNjIzNTk1OVowYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1Ro YXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCB iQKBgQDEpjxVc1X7TrnKmVoeaMB1BHCd3+n/ox7svc31W/Iadr1/DDph8r9RzgHU5VAKMNcCY1os iRVwjt3J8CuFWqo/cVbLrzwLB+fxH5E2JCoTzyvV84J3PQO+K/67GD4Hv0CAAmTXp6a7n2XRxSpU hQ9IBH+nttE8YQRAHmQZcmC3+wIDAQABo4GUMIGRMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQAwQwYDVR0f BDwwOjA4oDagNIYyaHR0cDovL2NybC50aGF3dGUuY29tL1RoYXd0ZVBlcnNvbmFsRnJlZW1haWxD QS5jcmwwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdEQQiMCCkHjAcMRowGAYDVQQDExFQcml2YXRlTGFiZWwy LTEzODANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOBgQBIjNFQg+oLLswNo2asZw9/r6y+whehQ5aUnX9MIbj4Nh+q LZ82L8D0HFAgk3A8/a3hYWLD2ToZfoSxmRsAxRoLgnSeJVCUYsfbJ3FXJY3dqZw5jowgT2Vfldr3 94fWxghOrvbqNOUQGls1TXfjViF4gtwhGTXeJLHTHUb/XV9lTzGCAs8wggLLAgEBMGkwYjELMAkG A1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMMw3AwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAbww GAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDQwOTMwMjMyODI5WjAj BgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUHvhfoUA39DDnq9ox1HidOyZc2ncwZwYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMVowWDAKBggq hkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcN AwICASgwBwYFKw4DAhowCgYIKoZIhvcNAgUweAYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMWswaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3Rl IFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECAwzDcDB6BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFroGkwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNV BAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMMw3AwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEB BQAEgYAfodxXSkIPsr/NYq/RduFX6LZXRP1VBhveKwOkabdajAR9bt6FjoKScyFET44GBYqCbMUd B4tOGXXIMes8SoS4sWeyL3d49aN2b5L38LKE6vO3N7jyjw+oKG8wzieULgmZ5kN+dtBffr2XnLDW AyVBDJmDy0Wd90kXAXcRRvujlwAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_00B9_01C4A71B.487D8E00-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 23:43:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE7B16A4CE for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:43:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F0443D1F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:43:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apeiron@comcast.net) Received: from prophecy.dyndns.org ([68.83.169.224]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <2004093023431601600kud4ge> (Authid: apeiron); Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:43:18 +0000 From: Christopher Nehren To: ceo@l-i-e.com In-Reply-To: <2034.67.167.52.21.1096577945.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> References: <2b5f066d04093013344d048003@mail.gmail.com> <2034.67.167.52.21.1096577945.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-iBHgoFy12zzkhLdXZLde" Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:43:12 -0400 Message-Id: <1096587792.44576.12.camel@prophecy.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.0FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: Brian McCann cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup/Restore X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:43:19 -0000 --=-iBHgoFy12zzkhLdXZLde Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2004-09-30 at 13:59 -0700, Richard Lynch wrote: > If it's the latter, you could maybe get best performance from something > like Subversion (a CVS derivative). Just a minor correction: Subversion is *not* a derivative of CVS. It does not share code with CVS, it is not based on the same code, and it is not related to CVS other than that it covers the same problem domain. If it were a derivative of CVS, then it'd have to be licensed under the GPL. Thankfully, it's not a derivative, and thus it's released under a much more palatable (Apache, which is a modified BSD) license. --=-iBHgoFy12zzkhLdXZLde Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBXJoQk/lo7zvzJioRAvd6AKCnGO75II1Qk1Rs+V+8c3PVYwdAsACgsqyr XQVB7iyO/uyugbvrJuDRcZg= =QmFh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-iBHgoFy12zzkhLdXZLde-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 23:57:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2D416A4CF for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:57:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail1.cableone.net [24.116.0.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70FF43D2F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:57:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.62.13]) by smail1.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 20102344 for multiple; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:57:44 -0700 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:57:06 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: "Bill Schmitt (SW)" Message-ID: <20040930185706.2033b3e5@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <415C642E.7090902@schmittnet.com> References: <415C642E.7090902@schmittnet.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: firefox help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:57:38 -0000 On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 15:53:18 -0400 "Bill Schmitt (SW)" wrote: > I'm a newbie who is trying to install a recent release of firefox > under version 4.9 of FreeBSD. I downloaded the installer (for linux > since there doesn't appear to be a FreeBSD version, yet) from > Mozilla, but when I try to execute it, I get the message "error > while loading shared libraries: libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0". I've tried > finding a package that includes this library, but haven't been > successful. Can somebody help? You will want to use the ports. man ports for more details. http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html is a nice way to find software from the web. One port you will probally want to look into is portinstall. It simplifies install and upgrading The problem with installing software that way is it can screw up future upgrades and/or installs and/or builds. Because of that, it is generally best to avoid it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 00:20:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025F616A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:20:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB30343D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:20:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhrider@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3586671rnb for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.8.80 with SMTP id 80mr558549rnh; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.58 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ceee7040930172042dae1d5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:20:01 -0700 From: Dan Finn To: f-questions , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: upgrading openssl/openssh only using ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dan Finn List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:20:02 -0000 I want to upgrade OpenSSH/OpenSSL and I only want to have to use the ports tree to do this. What is the best way to do this? If possible I would like to over write my existing base installations of those two packages, or delete the base install ones if that's possible (preferably not by hand). How should I do this? Thanks Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 00:38:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA8D16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:38:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6D443D1F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:38:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jammet@swbell.net) Received: from winbox (c-24-18-89-242.client.comcast.net[24.18.89.242]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <20041001003811014005aubpe>; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:38:11 +0000 Message-ID: <001401c4a74e$f4928ff0$0200a8c0@winbox> From: "jammet" To: Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:38:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: question reguarding Evolution... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:38:11 -0000 Im running 4.10 right now and even since 4.9 and lower i have had this = problem. Im running 1.4.6 right now... the latest as of last night form ports. = (9/29/2004) Basicly what is happening is it downloads 1 email every 2 minutes and 10 = seconds, just an FYI im running 3Mbit cable and if i download email from = the same server same account on any other computer its at most 2 seconds = or so per email. I have tryed rebuilding it a few times, and playing = around with differnt ports and such.=20 Another problem im having is every once in a while i will be downloading = emails and it will come to an email and just stop. It will not delete = the ones it downloaded off the server and it will not download any more. = It just halts and stops downloading then retrys in 30 minutes (what its = set too) and repeats that over and over. It stores the emails that it = downloaded so i generally come home or wake up to 200-300 of the same = emails waiting around in their respective places.=20 Anyone have any ideas on how to fix these problems? Its pretty common = for the second one to happen, and it runs very very slow.=20 Some computer specs are tho: AMD k6-2 400 with 386MB of ram running xorg (latest and greatest) and = fluxbox (ditto) Nothing terribly special in the background, its mainly = just a NAT server but does nothing else with its proccessor time. For = some reason it runs really slow in X, still have not figured out why but = thats for another email. Thanks for your time, Jammet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 00:55:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5102916A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:55:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53909.mail.yahoo.com (web53909.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8AFA43D5A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 00:55:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stheg_olloydson@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20041001005534.70185.qmail@web53909.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.210.49.231] by web53909.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:55:33 PDT Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:55:33 -0700 (PDT) From: stheg olloydson To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: jammet@swbell.net Subject: Re: question reguarding Evolution... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 00:55:35 -0000 It was said (with broken MS formatting): X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 >Im running 4.10 right now and even since 4.9 and lower i have had this >= >problem. >Im running 1.4.6 right now... the latest as of last night form ports. = >(9/29/2004) > >Basicly what is happening is it downloads 1 email every 2 minutes and >10 = >seconds, just an FYI im running 3Mbit cable and if i download email >from = >the same server same account on any other computer its at most 2 >seconds = >AMD k6-2 400 with 386MB of ram running xorg (latest and greatest) and = >fluxbox (ditto) Nothing terribly special in the background, its mainly >= >just a NAT server but does nothing else with its proccessor time. For = >some reason it runs really slow in X, still have not figured out why >but = >thats for another email. Hello, Do you have this same problem if you use a CLI program such as Mutt or Pine? I'll bet not. And if not, then the X perfomance problem should be resolved first. HTH, Stheg __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Read only the mail you want - Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 01:26:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E123216A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:26:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52506.mail.yahoo.com (web52506.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 86D1543D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:26:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ronj_clark@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20041001005319.48158.qmail@web52506.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.206.140.231] by web52506.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:53:19 PDT Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:53:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Ronnie Clark To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: makeworld issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ronj_clark@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 01:26:05 -0000 Hello all, I have been trying for some time to update a system via makeworld. The system would always error out and not complete its update. Someone from the list suggested that I cvsup my system, which I did multiple time to no avail. This morning, I tried again. Still errors out. I even went so far as to backup my old kernel, and then completely remove the /usr/src/sys directory and all subdirectories. Then I cvsuped again to get all new code. Edited the GENERIC kernel to match my old kernel and tried to makeworld again. Below is the errors I am seeing. Any help is greatly appreciated. Right now, the only thing I know to do is to rebuild, and I don't want to do that if it can be avoided. Thanks, Ron Clark -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Error Message: -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386 DESTDIR= INSTALL="sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh" make -f Makefile.inc1-DBOOTSTRAPPING -DNOHTML -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED -DNO_WERROR bootstrap-tools echo "===> games/fortune/strfile"; cd /usr/src/games/fortune/strfile; make DIRPRFX=games/fortune/strfile/ obj; make DIRPRFX=games/fortune/strfile/ depend; make DIRPRFX=games/fortune/strfile/ all; make DIRPRFX=games/fortune/strfile/ DESTDIR=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386 install ===> games/fortune/strfile /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/games/fortune/strfile created for /usr/src/games/fortune/strfile rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -D__FBSDID=__RCSID /usr/src/games/fortune/strfile/strfile.c echo strfile: /usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend cc -O -pipe -Wall -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c /usr/src/games/fortune/strfile/strfile.c cc -O -pipe -Wall -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -static -o strfile strfile.o sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 strfile /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games echo "===> usr.bin/yacc"; cd /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc; make DIRPRFX=usr.bin/yacc/ obj; make DIRPRFX=usr.bin/yacc/ depend; make DIRPRFX=usr.bin/yacc/ all; make DIRPRFX=usr.bin/yacc/ DESTDIR=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386 install ===> usr.bin/yacc /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/usr.bin/yacc created for /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -D__FBSDID=__RCSID /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/closure.c /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/error.c /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/lalr.c /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/lr0.c /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/main.c /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/mkpar.c /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/output.c /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/reader.c /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/skeleton.c /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/symtab.c /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/verbose.c /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/warshall.c echo yacc: /usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend cc -O -pipe -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/closure.c cc -O -pipe -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/error.c cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 01:29:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F74F16A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:29:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F6343D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:29:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i911TWFT038258; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:29:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:29:32 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Jason Barnes Message-ID: <20041001012932.GH22530@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20040930160527.A58465@c3po.barnesos.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040930160527.A58465@c3po.barnesos.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.3-BETA5 X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: process will not die. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 01:29:39 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 30), Jason Barnes said: > While running an mpirun job on my dual-processor SMP system > (FreeBSD 4-STABLE from August 28), my program (initiated with the > command line 'mpirun -np 2 ../sphagr') periodically dies, leaving a > process that I can't kill -9. Here's the top: > > here's ps -auxw | grep sph: > > jbarnes 549 0.0 8.7 410076 90744 p2 R 3:39PM 3:01.97 sphagr -p4pg /usr/home/ > jbarnes 550 0.0 0.0 0 0 p2 Z 3:39PM 0:00.00 (sphagr) > > The 550 process I kill -9ed, but its still there, and now when I > try to kill it it says 'no such process'. Processes in the Z state have already exited, but their parent process has not retrieved their status with one of the wait*() functions. The entry in the process table will stay until that happens. You can run "ps axlp 550" and look at the PPID column to determine the parent's pid. The parent code needs to either wait() for the child status, or if it doesn't need to know when the child exits, ignore SIGCHLD or set the SA_NOCLDWAIT flag with sigaction(). -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 01:36:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A14516A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:36:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14710.mail.yahoo.com (web14710.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.232.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2799643D41 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 01:36:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from whatluo@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20041001013612.3271.qmail@web14710.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.108.88.130] by web14710.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:36:12 PDT Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:36:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Huajian Luo To: Simon Barner In-Reply-To: <20040930182619.GA3580@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetchyahoo Failed: Couldn't get challenge to log in X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 01:36:12 -0000 --- Simon Barner wrote: > Huajian Luo wrote: > > hi,guys > > I installed fetchyahoo and when I run fetchyahoo > > It told me > > ---- > > Logging in securely via SSL as > > Failed: Couldn't get challenge to log in, Try > again > > later, > > > > any comments on this? > > Thanks in advance!!! > > I remember to have read that they changed their > login interface, and > thus fetchyahoo needs to be updated. > > A PR is already in the queue, but since the ports > tree is currently > frozen, the update will take some time to take > place. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/71804 > > If you are very impatienty, you can try the > following: > > Edit the ports makefile, and change PORTVERSION to > 2.8.6. > Now run `make makesum && make build' and see if it > works. > > No guarantees, of course... ;-) > > Simon Thanks for your information ,but I download the latest version 2.8.6 from its master site,the output is same as before, so maybe Yahoo changed his page again =( Thanks anyway, huajian _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 02:00:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6066C16A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 02:00:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay18-f22.bay18.hotmail.com [65.54.187.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481B143D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 02:00:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fglerk@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:57:01 -0700 Received: from 67.116.141.27 by by18fd.bay18.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 01:56:10 GMT X-Originating-IP: [67.116.141.27] X-Originating-Email: [fglerk@hotmail.com] X-Sender: fglerk@hotmail.com From: "Frank Glerkin" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:56:10 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2004 01:57:01.0751 (UTC) FILETIME=[F16BAC70:01C4A759] Subject: libusb, gphoto2, sony dsc-t1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 02:00:15 -0000 Hi everyone, I'm experiencing some problems getting my digital camera (Sony Cybershot DSC-T1) to interface with the USB system under FreeBSD RELENG_5. I've tried setting my camera into normal mode and tried to use it as a umass device, but no /dev/da* device is created so there's nothing for me to mount. umass0 entry is created though. Setting my camera to PTP mode, I tried using gphoto2 to get pictures, or even just simply listing the files on the camera, fails with operation timed out. The offending portion being 0.109944 gphoto2-port(2): Setting timeout to 8000 millisecond(s)... 0.110027 ptp(2): PTP: Opening session 0.110083 gphoto2-port(2): Writing 16=0x10 byte(s) to port... 0.110139 gphoto2-port(3): Hexdump of 16 = 0x10 bytes follows: 0000 10 00 00 00 01 00 02 10-00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 ................ 0.114318 gphoto2-port(2): Reading 512=0x200 bytes from port... gp_port_read: Operation timed out 8.128040 PTP2/library.c(2): PTP: gp_port_* function returned 0xffffffde -34 8.128085 context(0): PTP I/O error *** Error *** PTP I/O error 8.128114 gphoto2-port(2): Closing port... 8.128240 context(0): An error occurred in the io-library ('Unspecified error'): No error description available *** Error *** An error occurred in the io-library ('Unspecified error'): No error description available *** Error (-1: 'Unspecified error') *** I've read on google and other places where this has been resolved for some cameras, but it doesn't seem to work with mine. I'm willing to help debug the code. I've tried looking into the file bsd.c that comes with libusb and found that gphoto2 stalls around the place where the read takes place (obvious). I'm not really sure what else to check since it's writing and it's being accepted by the camera, but the read is just failing. I'm inclined to think it's a USB issue since gphoto2 sends the exact same bytes to the camera on my linux machine and it works perfectly there. I have gphoto2-2.1.4_1 libusb-0.1.7_1 Thanks all, Frank _________________________________________________________________ Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 02:19:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0603A16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 02:19:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [208.187.29.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE1A243D2D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 02:19:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 71487 invoked by uid 1001); 1 Oct 2004 02:19:45 -0000 Received: from 24.148.51.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com); by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1439.24.148.51.115.1096597185.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: <20040930160527.A58465@c3po.barnesos.net> References: <20040930160527.A58465@c3po.barnesos.net> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 19:19:45 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: "Jason Barnes" User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail X-Mailer: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: process will not die. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 02:19:41 -0000 Jason Barnes wrote: > While running an mpirun job on my dual-processor SMP system > (FreeBSD 4-STABLE from August 28), my program (initiated with the command > line 'mpirun -np 2 ../sphagr') periodically dies, leaving a process that I > can't kill -9. Here's the top: > > The 550 process I kill -9ed, but its still there, and now when I > try to kill it it says 'no such process'. Is it possible that the process really is dead, but top and/or ps are out of sync a bit?... Perhaps 'killall sphagr' would find it, assuming you don't have another sphagr running already... -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 03:13:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D3A16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:13:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07E443D3F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:13:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carmoda@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 74so264084rnk for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.208.76 with SMTP id f76mr292124rng; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.59.5 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <692ce9a4040930201374f5984e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:13:00 +1000 From: Anthony Carmody To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?Intel=AE_ICH5-R_SATA_controllers?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gmail@carmoda.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 03:13:02 -0000 has anyone managed to test or use Intel=AE ICH5-R SATA controllers? (RAID 0 and 1)?? i see they are unsupported, but do they work anyhow? Intel=AE ICH5-R SATA controllers --=20 /carmoda /carmoda at gmail dot com /carmoda at jabber dot org /wuh wuh wuh carmoda dot com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 03:40:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B426216A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:40:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A08943D41 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:40:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3590718rnb for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.80 with SMTP id d80mr714127rng; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:40:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:10:37 +0530 From: Subhro To: ronj_clark@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <20041001005319.48158.qmail@web52506.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041001005319.48158.qmail@web52506.mail.yahoo.com> cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: makeworld issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 03:40:41 -0000 Did you cvsup with src-all? If not then please do so. Also can we have a look at /etc/make.conf? On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:53:19 -0700 (PDT), Ronnie Clark wrote: > Hello all, > > I have been trying for some time to update a system > via makeworld. The > system would always error out and not complete its > update. Someone from > the list suggested that I cvsup my system, which I did > multiple time to > no avail. This morning, I tried again. Still errors > out. I even went so > far as to backup my old kernel, and then completely > remove the > /usr/src/sys directory and all subdirectories. Then I > cvsuped again to > get all new code. Edited the GENERIC kernel to match > my old kernel and > tried to makeworld again. Below is the errors I am > seeing. > > Any help is greatly appreciated. Right now, the only > thing I know to do > is to rebuild, and I don't want to do that if it can > be avoided. > > Thanks, > Ron Clark > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Error Message: > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools > -------------------------------------------------------------- > cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386 > DESTDIR= > INSTALL="sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh" make -f > Makefile.inc1-DBOOTSTRAPPING -DNOHTML -DNOINFO > -DNOMAN -DNOPIC > -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED -DNO_WERROR bootstrap-tools > echo "===> games/fortune/strfile"; cd > /usr/src/games/fortune/strfile; > make DIRPRFX=games/fortune/strfile/ obj; make > DIRPRFX=games/fortune/strfile/ depend; make > DIRPRFX=games/fortune/strfile/ all; make > DIRPRFX=games/fortune/strfile/ > DESTDIR=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386 install > ===> games/fortune/strfile > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/games/fortune/strfile > created for > /usr/src/games/fortune/strfile > rm -f .depend > mkdep -f .depend -a -D__FBSDID=__RCSID > /usr/src/games/fortune/strfile/strfile.c > echo strfile: /usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend > cc -O -pipe -Wall -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c > /usr/src/games/fortune/strfile/strfile.c > cc -O -pipe -Wall -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -static -o > strfile strfile.o > sh /usr/src/tools/install.sh -s -o root -g wheel -m > 555 strfile > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/games > echo "===> usr.bin/yacc"; cd /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc; > make > DIRPRFX=usr.bin/yacc/ obj; make DIRPRFX=usr.bin/yacc/ > depend; make > DIRPRFX=usr.bin/yacc/ all; make DIRPRFX=usr.bin/yacc/ > DESTDIR=/usr/obj/usr/src/i386 install > ===> usr.bin/yacc > /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/usr.bin/yacc created for > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc > rm -f .depend > mkdep -f .depend -a -D__FBSDID=__RCSID > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/closure.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/error.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/lalr.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/lr0.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/main.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/mkpar.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/output.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/reader.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/skeleton.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/symtab.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/verbose.c > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/warshall.c > echo yacc: /usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend > cc -O -pipe -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/closure.c > cc -O -pipe -D__FBSDID=__RCSID -c > /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc/error.c > cc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal > signal 11 > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/yacc. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 03:44:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09D416A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:44:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C8D43D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:44:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3590793rnb for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.80 with SMTP id d80mr714885rng; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:44:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:14:02 +0530 From: Subhro To: Dan Finn In-Reply-To: <89ceee7040930172042dae1d5@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <89ceee7040930172042dae1d5@mail.gmail.com> cc: f-questions cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrading openssl/openssh only using ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 03:44:03 -0000 On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:20:01 -0700, Dan Finn wrote: > I want to upgrade OpenSSH/OpenSSL and I only want to have to use the > ports tree to do this. What is the best way to do this? Just cd to the ports directory and make all install clean >f possible > I would like to over write my existing base installations of those two Not a good idea. You can just instruct the system to use the ports using rc.conf. > packages, or delete the base install ones if that's possible > (preferably not by hand). How should I do this? If youdont want ssl and ssh then put NO_OPENSSL="YES" and NO_OPENSSH="YES" in.conf and rebuild world > > Thanks You are welcome Regards S. -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 03:44:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467F516A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:44:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA6543D31 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:44:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 71FBA51509; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:45:26 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Subhro Message-ID: <20041001034526.GA32694@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041001005319.48158.qmail@web52506.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: ronj_clark@yahoo.com cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: makeworld issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 03:44:51 -0000 --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 09:10:37AM +0530, Subhro wrote: > Did you cvsup with src-all? If not then please do so. Also can we have > a look at /etc/make.conf? Also, internal compiler errors are almost always hardware-related. Kris --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXNLWWry0BWjoQKURAtO1AKC1y1X/2olWWe+6r6YzrF4xeiME8ACfYGll uKnTczYM2n66VfLOoREACm4= =PO+0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a8Wt8u1KmwUX3Y2C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 03:49:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF5116A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:49:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B274643D1D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:49:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3590918rnb for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.80 with SMTP id d80mr716263rng; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:19:53 +0530 From: Subhro To: Andy Holyer In-Reply-To: <362558FC-12FA-11D9-97C2-000D93511A6A@hhbb.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <362558FC-12FA-11D9-97C2-000D93511A6A@hhbb.co.uk> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Funny one: "install" dumps core? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 03:49:54 -0000 Its not the install script. Its basically make which is acting up. Regards S. On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:03:04 +0100, Andy Holyer wrote: > I've managed to get the source and kernel out of sync (I blame a > confusion between "make world" and "make buildworld"). Now in trying to > install a port, I get "Segmentation Fault - Core dumped" when it gets > to the install process. > > I could understand "ps" core dumping, but "install"? That's practically > a shell script! Has anyone seen this before? Any idea what the solution > is? > > --- > Andy Holyer, Systems Administrator > Hedgehog Broadband, 11 Marlborough Place Brighton BN1 1UB > 08451 260895 x 241 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 03:51:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1EA16A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:51:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408A543D55 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:51:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 80so2497736rnl for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.1.72 with SMTP id 72mr724806rna; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:21:09 +0530 From: Subhro To: RJ45 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems with FreeBSD-5.1 any progam goes core X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 03:51:10 -0000 Any good reason to run 5.1 and not 5.2.1 or 5.3? And did this box ever cvompile and run things perfectly? Any changes in hardware? Regards S. On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 14:15:54 -0600 (MDT), RJ45 wrote: > > pid 19543 (cc1), uid 0: exited on signal 4 (core dumped) > pid 20066 (cc1), uid 0: exited on signal 4 (core dumped) > pid 21680 (cc1), uid 0: exited on signal 4 (core dumped) > > hello, suddently on my system happens that any running program > crashes with signal 4 or signal 10 and dumps a core. > This happens also when I Am compiling programs. > I Was compiling sendmail and I had to do it 4 times to have success > because the compilation was always failing all the time with cc1 system > error. > I suspect there is some bad hardware here. > the machine is a Dell power edge 2650 with 2 Xeon CPUs. > I tested all the memory modules and the memory modules are ok. > I used the Dell diagnostic program. > Could it be a CPU problem ? > I don't really know what to do anymore, progams are crashing on the > machine and it is a mail server. > anyone has some hint to help me track the problem ? > thanks > > Rick > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 03:53:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167CB16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:53:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB68243D1D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 03:53:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3590986rnb for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.80 with SMTP id d80mr717140rng; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 20:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:23:30 +0530 From: Subhro To: Norm Vilmer In-Reply-To: <415C3DD4.3020202@etherealconsulting.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <415C2FA7.6010408@etherealconsulting.com> <415C3DD4.3020202@etherealconsulting.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw console messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 03:53:32 -0000 Could we have a look at the syslof configuration file? Regards S. On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:09:40 -0500, Norm Vilmer wrote: > > > Norm Vilmer wrote: > > > I have been running a IPFW firewall on FreeBSD 4.10 for a few weeks > > now. For some reason a few connection attempts are showing up on the > > console rather than going to the log file. I can't seem to figure out > > why. Any ideas? > > > > I have tried adding the 'log' key word to every deny statement in my > > IPFW firewall config file. For the most part all denied packets are > > logged to /var/log/ipfw.log. But about 3-12 per night are not. These > > also show up in the security run output email as kernel log messages. > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > More info: my kernel is compiled with these option: > > option TCP_DROP_SYNFIN > option ICMP_BANDLIM > option IPFIREWALL > option IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE > option IPDIVERT > option RANDOM_IP_ID > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 04:11:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7565A16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 04:11:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC3E43D2D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 04:11:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael2043@comcast.net) Received: from server (c-24-10-148-239.client.comcast.net[24.10.148.239]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <2004100104114701500o4olge>; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 04:11:48 +0000 From: "Michael G. Goodell" To: "FreeBSD Questions" Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:12:36 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Last Question On Which Release Is Best For Production X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: michael2043@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 04:11:48 -0000 First of all, Thank you to those who replied to my original post about which FreeBSD Release is the most stable for a production system. I would still like to ask for clarification on one last item. Almost invariably the reply to my post asking which FreeBSD release is *the* most stable for a production environment was 4.10 is *the* best choice for a production system and that I could wait for 5.3 to become marked as STABLE in the coming months. I assume this information is taken from: http://www.freebsd.org/releases/index.html that shows 5.2.1 and 4.10 as the two releases. My question is this: I currently run 5.1 (uname -a yields: 5.1-RELEASE-p17) and I read at the page http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html it states that 5.1 is Frozen and also states (not officially supported) - Does this mean that I am using a release that is not supported at all any longer and I should upgrade to 5.3 or will my 5.1 release still have security patches and such applied to it and eventually become production worthy. Am I just missing out on functionality by sticking with 5.1 and not moving up to 5.3? Moreover, *if* I choose to move to 5.3 (when it is ready for prime time) can I change my cvsupfile and then rebuild my kernel and world to the new 5.3 release? Thanks, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 05:33:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D316116A4FA for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:33:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from execonn.com (execonn.com [216.176.199.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A702D43D31 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:33:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sdudley@execonn.com) Received: from execonn.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by execonn.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i915XY2R079250 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sdudley@localhost) by execonn.com (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i915XYlY079249; Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200410010533.i915XYlY079249@execonn.com> From: sdudley@byterunner.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: IMPORTANT: My email address has changed, please resend your message. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 05:33:34 -0000 Hello, I have been forced to change my email address due to being bombarded by spam & viruses (I was receiving hundreds of bogus emails per day). Please resend your message to me at my new email address of contact@byterunner.com. Sorry for any inconvenience this may cause. If you didn't send me a message, please disregard this email. It means that a spoofing virus sent me a virus and said it was from your email address. Thank you. Sean Dudley Byte Runner Technologies From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 07:16:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD2216A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:16:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from home.elkhorn.net (home.elkhorn.net [208.4.161.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A811E43D3F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:16:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjorkman@elkhorn.net) Received: from [192.168.0.121] (atkwirelesspri.elkhorn.net [208.4.161.13]) by home.elkhorn.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id i917L0t16666 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 02:21:00 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <415D043C.4060801@elkhorn.net> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 02:16:12 -0500 From: Eric and Michelle Bjorkman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Terminal Services Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 07:16:17 -0000 Are Terminal Services supported by FreeBSD. In that I mean is there a port already included that I will not have to buy a Terminal Services server application. I'm looking for somthing like Novell that is free. Or do you know of project out there that can function like Novell? Thank You, Eric Bjorkman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 07:30:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3390416A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:30:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from webmail.tiscali.de (relay1.tiscali.de [62.26.116.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981DB43D46 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:30:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mib@tiscali.de) Received: from localhost.home.inet (83.129.34.226) by webmail.tiscali.de (6.7.019) id 40FB89A001926481 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:30:33 +0200 Received: from localhost.home.inet (localhost.home.inet [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.home.inet (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i917UVFB003342 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:30:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mib@localhost.home.inet) Received: (from mib@localhost) by localhost.home.inet (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i917UQNU003341 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:30:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mib) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:30:26 +0200 From: Michael Bohn To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041001073026.GA3212@lisa.home.inet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Which class 2 smard card reader works under FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 07:30:35 -0000 Hi, could any body tell me which class 2 smard card reader is supported by FreeBSD 5.x. best regards Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 08:13:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48A1216A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:13:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from geofront.co.uk (port-179.dolphin.c4l.co.uk [80.253.114.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213F643D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:13:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mike@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (82-35-149-54.cable.ubr04.enfi.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.149.54]) by geofront.co.uk (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i918Gppc083665 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:16:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from Mike@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk) Message-ID: <415D114F.3090207@the-rubber-chicken-network.co.uk> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:11:59 +0100 From: Mike Woods User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040827) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20041001073026.GA3212@lisa.home.inet> In-Reply-To: <20041001073026.GA3212@lisa.home.inet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: Which class 2 smard card reader works under FreeBSD 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:13:58 -0000 Michael Bohn wrote: >Hi, >could any body tell me which class 2 smard card reader is supported by FreeBSD 5.x. > > If you're looking at smart card readers you might want to see if you can get a "wedge" reader, wedge readers sit between the machine and the keyboard and pump data directly into machine as if i was typed. ---------------- Mike Woods IT Technician From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 08:36:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F0C16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:36:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ariel.yandex.ru (ariel.yandex.ru [213.180.200.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA51143D45 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:36:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from metallarch@yandex.ru) Received: from YAMAIL (ariel.yandex.ru) by mail.yandex.ru id ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:36:30 +0400 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:36:30 +0400 (MSD) From: "metallarch" Sender: metallarch@yandex.ru Message-Id: <415D170E.000037.14036@ariel.yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] Errors-To: metallarch@yandex.ru To: questions@FreeBSD.org X-source-ip: 62.212.228.67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: nat or ......? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: metallarch@yandex.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:36:36 -0000 I made the ppp connection from windows to freebsd(tun0), and from freebsd to internet (tun2)"at the same time"! I have 2 modems What can i do that i could browse internet on windows over freebsd? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 08:45:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529CC16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:45:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78C643D3F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:45:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andyh@hhbb.co.uk) Received: from [10.0.0.25] (hedgie1.gotadsl.co.uk [82.133.95.107]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6437524C925; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:45:13 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: References: <362558FC-12FA-11D9-97C2-000D93511A6A@hhbb.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <365DC77E-1386-11D9-9C1C-000D93511A6A@hhbb.co.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Andy Holyer Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:45:14 +0100 To: Subhro X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Funny one: "install" dumps core? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:45:19 -0000 On 1 Oct 2004, at 04:49, Subhro wrote: > Its not the install script. Its basically make which is acting up. > > No, it's install: when I type the install command manually I get the same seg fault, and the destination file is left size 0. Though I don't get a problem when I type install with no arguments... > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:03:04 +0100, Andy Holyer > wrote: >> I've managed to get the source and kernel out of sync (I blame a >> confusion between "make world" and "make buildworld"). Now in trying >> to >> install a port, I get "Segmentation Fault - Core dumped" when it gets >> to the install process. >> >> I could understand "ps" core dumping, but "install"? That's >> practically >> a shell script! Has anyone seen this before? Any idea what the >> solution >> is? >> >> --- >> Andy Holyer, Systems Administrator >> Hedgehog Broadband, 11 Marlborough Place Brighton BN1 1UB >> 08451 260895 x 241 >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > -- > Subhro Sankha Kar > School of Information Technology > Block AQ-13/1 Sector V > ZIP 700091 > India > > --- Andy Holyer, Systems Administrator Hedgehog Broadband, 11 Marlborough Place Brighton BN1 1UB 08451 260895 x 241 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 08:48:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEA116A4CE; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:48:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from inertia.drifthost.com (inertial.drifthost.com [66.90.101.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFCD43D45; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:48:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@drifthost.com) Received: from dsl-203-142-133-217.syd.directcorp.net.au ([203.142.133.217] helo=Steve) by inertia.drifthost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CDJ5s-000C5I-LD; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:48:49 +1000 From: "Steven Adams" To: "'Subhro'" , Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:50:11 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcSm+tilFl7qRld1Q1WRC1690vee1AAmJp/g X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - inertia.drifthost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - drifthost.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Message-Id: <20041001084847.EEFCD43D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: IPFW Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: drift@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:48:48 -0000 I don't have an internal network. This is a server with 1 gigabit network card on a gig link. Im really confussed on whats happing then, because web browsing still works but its blocking come packets.. I host 60sites+ so I cant pin it down to one site or nothing. Anyone have any other ideas? Steven Adams steve@drifthost.com DriftNet Web Services http://www.drifthost.com Home: +61 2 94274857 Fax: +61 2 94274857 Mobile +61 (0) 404 085644 -----Original Message----- From: Subhro [mailto:subhro.kar@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 1 October 2004 12:36 AM To: drift@freebsd.org Cc: steve@drifthost.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW Problem On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 22:32:16 +1000, Steven Adams wrote: > When I add > > $fwcmd add allow ip from any to any established > > The messages go away, but when I remove it they come back, I ran a tcpdump > it seems most of the packet just have ACK set? If this works for you then the keep-state is definitely not working for you. Because when a SYN comes in, the state is saved in the firewall dynamic states so that subsequent ACKs corresponding to that SYN gets through without any problem. >=========================================================== > oif=bge0 > fwcmd=ipfw > > $fwcmd -f flush > > $fwcmd add check-state > > $fwcmd add allow ip from any to any via lo0 > $fwcmd add deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > > $fwcmd add deny all from any to any frag in via $oif > > $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to me > 21,25,26,53,110,143,443,465,953,993,995,2082,2083,2086,2087,2089,2095,2096,2 > 627,6666,40000-49452 > in via $oif keep-state setup > $fwcmd add allow tcp from any to me 80 setup keep-state > $fwcmd add allow udp from me 53 to any keep-state > $fwcmd add allow udp from any to any 53 keep-state > > $fwcmd add allow all from me to any out via $oif setup keep-state > > $fwcmd add deny all from any to any 137,138,139,67,68 in > > $fwcmd add deny log all from me to any 22 > $fwcmd add deny log all from any to any change this to $fwcmd add deny log all from any to any in xmit $oif BTW, any good reason not to trust your internal network from sending data through the firewall? Regards S. -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 08:54:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDFD16A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:54:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6908743D49 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:54:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.13.52] (port=5452 helo=SATPC) by mx1.mail.ru with smtp id 1CDJBg-0000Ww-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:54:48 +0400 Message-ID: <001501c4a794$81d031c0$4611a8c0@SATPC> From: "Andrew" Cc: References: <000601c4a720$99264270$4611a8c0@SATPC> <20040930194001.GD22530@dan.emsphone.com> <004901c4a729$61fc7810$4611a8c0@SATPC> <20040930204808.GE22530@dan.emsphone.com> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:56:14 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Spam: Not detected Subject: Re: 64-bit arithmetic in scripts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:54:50 -0000 Dan Nelson has kindly explained everything: > In the last episode (Oct 01), Andrew said: > > Thanks! I haven't thought about using expr. > > > > How come that my expr(1) manpage has nothing to say about -e option? > > In fact my expr(1) does not accept it. I have FreeBSD 4.10. I've just > > looked into a current manpage from www.freebsd.org, and it says > > something about 4.x compatibility. > > > > What is the best way to go if I need to write scripts now, but I'm > > planning to switch to 5.x later? Can I upgrade expr(1) now? If not, > > what should I do? > > In 4.x, expr does 64-bit math by default. Apparently POSIX requires > that expr use whatever the systems' "signed long" size is, so the > default was changed for 5.x, and -e was added to get the old behaviour. > > If you want your script to work on both, you'll have to do a feature > test. I started out just testing expr and expr -e, but it sort of > grew... The following script will check the shell's math, two ways of > calling expr, and finally fall back on calling bc. As long as you just > use the basic math operators, quote your "*"'s, and put spaces between > everything, all the methods should be compatible, and your script will > work on any bourne-compatible shell :) > > #! /bin/sh > > if [ x$(( 65536 * 65536 )) = "x4294967296" ] ; then > shellarith() { echo $(( $@ )) ; } > MATH="shellarith" > else > if [ x`expr 65536 "*" 65536` = "x4294967296" ] ; then > MATH="expr" > else > if [ x`expr -e 65536 "*" 65536 2>/dev/null` = x"4294967296" ] ; then > MATH="expr -e" > else > if [ x`echo 65536 "*" 65536 | bc` = "x4294967296" ] ; then > bcfunc() { echo "$@" | bc ; } > MATH="bcfunc" > else > echo "Can't do 64-bit math noway nohow" > fi > fi > fi > fi > > echo "Using $MATH" > bigval=`$MATH 65536 "*" 65536` > echo $bigval Thank you very much! I think, I'll just assign MATH="expr" and change it to something else when I need it. Best regards, Andrew P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 09:21:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0D016A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:21:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7289C43D48 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:21:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 21925 invoked by uid 65534); 1 Oct 2004 09:21:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) (129.187.19.157) by mail.gmx.net (mp019) with SMTP; 01 Oct 2004 11:21:36 +0200 X-Authenticated: #147403 Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7E12FC0D4; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:21:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:21:49 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: "Michael G. Goodell" Message-ID: <20041001092148.GA26273@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Last Question On Which Release Is Best For Production X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:21:38 -0000 --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Michael G. Goodell wrote: > My question is this: I currently run 5.1 (uname -a yields: 5.1-RELEASE-p17) > and I read at the page http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html it states > that 5.1 is Frozen and also states (not officially supported) - Does this > mean that I am using a release that is not supported at all any longer and I > should upgrade to 5.3 or will my 5.1 release still have security patches and > such applied to it and eventually become production worthy. I'd say a two-fold "no". First, it's no longer a security branch, see e.g. here http://www.freebsd.org/security/#adv , and 5.1 is definitively not production worthy. Lot's of improvements (regarding stability, performance and features) went into FreeBSD 5 since then. Just have a look at the freebsd-current mailing list archive, and see how busy they are, and given the fact that 5.1 was released over one year ago, you can imagine what has changed since then. > Am I just > missing out on functionality by sticking with 5.1 and not moving up to 5.3? > Moreover, *if* I choose to move to 5.3 (when it is ready for prime time) can > I change my cvsupfile and then rebuild my kernel and world to the new 5.3 > release? Yes, but you should also rebuild all of your ports, for the following reasons: - the default threading libs changed - a new version of gcc was imported (bringing an (binary) incompatible c++ mangeling scheme) You might also upgrade to FreeBSD 5.3-BETA6 now, which already is in a very good condition, and update to 5.3-RELEASE as soon as it's released (presumably on 17 October). HTH, Simon --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXSGsCkn+/eutqCoRAhnQAJ46T6CPb5sAgtS0q/9NxycOVT4GnACdH39P qS/HN+6xpqQNuocMzxndlIs= =JaDF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 09:32:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B763E16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:32:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 9.hellooperator.net (cpc3-cdif2-3-0-cust202.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.32.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBA043D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:32:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputin@hellooperator.net) Received: from rasputin by 9.hellooperator.net with local (Exim 4.42) id 1CDJky-0003mT-B4; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:31:16 +0100 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:31:16 +0100 From: Dick Davies To: Bret Walker Message-ID: <20041001093116.GB26679@lb.tenfour> References: <00bd01c4a745$348c79e0$b1336981@medill.northwestern.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <00bd01c4a745$348c79e0$b1336981@medill.northwestern.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: Rasputin cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Pam_ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dick Davies List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:32:17 -0000 * Bret Walker [1028 00:28]: > I've been trying all day to get pam_ldap to authenticate an ssh session > against Active Directory. I thought that I had found the perfect HOWTO > (read: one that didn't require nss_ldap), but its instructions didn't seem > to get it working on my system. >=20 > I've read that can authenticate to AD with pam_ldap alone, and I've read > that you can't, as well. Does anyone have any experience doing this w/o > nss_ldap. I'm running 4.10, and I don't think it has support for > nss_ldap. >=20 > If anyone has any advice, I'd love to hear it. You're not going to need nss_ldap if you just want to validate a password. But it sounds a bit odd to have existing users in /etc/passwd and only have the password itself from AD - and if the users don't exist in /etc/passwd the system won't be able to log them in. What was the howto you used? --=20 I think it is true for all _=08n. I was just playing it safe with _=08n >= =3D 3 because I couldn't remember the proof. -- Baker, Pure Math 351a Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 09:36:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDB116A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:36:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868B943D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:36:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1] (may be forged))i919aAU4005748 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:36:10 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i919aAAC005747; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:36:10 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:36:10 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: "Michael G. Goodell" Message-ID: <20041001093610.GA91573@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , "Michael G. Goodell" , FreeBSD Questions References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:36:10 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Last Question On Which Release Is Best For Production X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:36:21 -0000 --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 10:12:36PM -0600, Michael G. Goodell wrote: > My question is this: I currently run 5.1 (uname -a yields: 5.1-RELEASE-p1= 7) > and I read at the page http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html it states > that 5.1 is Frozen and also states (not officially supported) - Does this > mean that I am using a release that is not supported at all any longer an= d I > should upgrade to 5.3 or will my 5.1 release still have security patches = and > such applied to it and eventually become production worthy. Am I just > missing out on functionality by sticking with 5.1 and not moving up to 5.= 3? > Moreover, *if* I choose to move to 5.3 (when it is ready for prime time) = can > I change my cvsupfile and then rebuild my kernel and world to the new 5.3 > release? "5.1 is no longer supported" means that there is no guarrantee that any security patches etc. will be applied to it. Although individual committers may well provide patches to 5.1 if they have the time and the inclination, this cannot be relied upon. Anyone still running 5.1 should upgrade as soon as possible. 5.1 will never be declared a production ready release. First of all, that's because it is a *RELEASE*. Releases do not have development work committed to them, not even to fix obvious bugs[1]. The only things that would ever be fixed are security problems. If you want new code, you can either upgrade to a newer release, or track one of the development branches (4-STABLE, 5-STABLE, CURRENT) Secondly, it's a developer preview -- a snap shot of the upcoming 5.x series of releases made solely for testing purposes. Full scale releases are guarranteed support for at least one year. Developer previews, on the other hand, just last until superceded by the next preview, in this case 5.2.1-RELEASE. Even that is teetering on the rim of consignment to the dustbin of history, with the impending 5.3-RELEASE. Right now, installing one of the 5.3-BETAs is in many cases a better choice than installing 5.2.1-RELEASE. 5.3 however *is* intended to be production ready, with all of the long term support that implies. You can use cvsup and buildworld to upgrade to 5.3-BETA right now, or 5.3-RELEASE when it becomes available. However, you will need to read /usr/src/UPDATING carefully, as that upgrade has a few gotchas! It just needs you to do some stuff you wouldn't normally do for a routine buildworld so that everything will work smoothly. If you're inexperienced at using buildworld to maintain your system, make serious consideration of just doing a reinstall from the 5.3 .iso images. Cheers, Matthew [1] With one exception: 4.10-RELEASE has been declared a 'security and errata' branch. All other releases are strictly 'security branches'. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXSUKiD657aJF7eIRAk63AKCzJjQ6tOdZdHdtLYBVd/9EhfY3+ACgqMYE MNpUma3ClaC8bfE8gYMHYy8= =oTZU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 09:51:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDC916A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:51:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80F143D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:51:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1] (may be forged)) i919pf74005857 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:51:42 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i919paTf005852; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:51:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:51:36 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Eric and Michelle Bjorkman Message-ID: <20041001095136.GB91573@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Eric and Michelle Bjorkman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <415D043C.4060801@elkhorn.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <415D043C.4060801@elkhorn.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:51:42 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Terminal Services Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:51:50 -0000 --SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 02:16:12AM -0500, Eric and Michelle Bjorkman wrote: > Are Terminal Services supported by FreeBSD. In that I mean is there a=20 > port already included that I will not have to buy a Terminal Services=20 > server application. I'm looking for somthing like Novell that is free. = =20 > Or do you know of project out there that can function like Novell? The short answer is "yes". The rather longer and more reasoned answer is that "Terminal Services" as a distinct product is an artefact of the way Windows works. Unix and Linux systems (including MacOS X) have had true multiuser capability from the start. Similarly X windows was always designed to be network transparent, so you can run any X application on a remote machine and have it display on your local desktop[1]. That means that you can have a whole companies' worth of people all logging into the same server to each run their own copy of an application that displays on their personal desktop. Those applications can even include window managers or whole destop environments if that's what you want. No problem, so long as the server is powerful enough. What's more, it's just the standard way the system works: no extra (and expensive) software required. Cheers, Matthew [1] Although MacOS X doesn't use X Windows as it's native windowing system, a) it comes with X as a standard feature and b) I believe that you can do similar remote display things with the Cocoa layer: in fact, it has a generic 'remote object method call' capability which gives you even more possibilities. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXSioiD657aJF7eIRApEzAJ4mhpaPV/8tzVKnCkjuHrp+B0aBhgCfbWZ1 DzsxzyfReJgg3PmSdriUslI= =DoNx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 09:54:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAC216A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:54:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ngfl.dialnet.com (ngmail.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4DCB43D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:54:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) Received: from ngmfilt2.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.78] by ngfl.dialnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id A9ED1C130020; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:57:01 +0100 Received: from relay.ngfl.dialnet.com (unverified) by ngmfilt2.ngfl.dialnet.com ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:41:37 +0100 Received: from firewall.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk (YahooBB219209044064.bbtec.net [172.30.0.70]) by ngrelay.dialnet.com with SMTP (MailShield v2.04 - WIN32 Jul 17 2001 17:12:42); Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:40:07 +0100 Received: from mail.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk (mail.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk [10.248.192.10]) ESMTP id i919f5It073364; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:41:05 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) Received: from [10.248.195.196] (dumpster.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk [10.248.195.196])ESMTP id i919cZNV002677; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:38:35 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) From: ict technician Organization: Cardinal Newman School To: Malcolm Kay Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:38:35 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200409300945.15068.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> <200410010149.04790.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <200410010149.04790.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410011038.35037.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.8 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_KMAIL version=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (mail.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) X-SMTP-HELO: firewall.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: malcolm.kay@internode.on.net X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: ianjhart@ntlworld.com X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: YahooBB219209044064.bbtec.net [172.30.0.70] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: ian j hart Subject: Re: broken fs dump file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:54:22 -0000 On Thursday 30 September 2004 17:19, Malcolm Kay wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 06:15 pm, ict technician wrote: > > I have a broken fs dump I need to fix. Is there a diagnostic/repair tool I > > can use? I know about restore -N. > > > > > > > > Dump was taken on 4.10. Restoring on 5.3BETA, although I can change that. > > > > A question rather than an answer:---- > Is it valid to dump a ufs file system and try to restore it to a ufs2 > system? > > Malcolm wrt dump: on 5.x dump has to understand ufs2. However, you might choose to use ufs; so it has to deal with that. Since dump does both, restore must do both. QED :) wrt files: I don't think ufs2 was MFCd so you can't put a 4.x system on ufs2 and expect it to work, if that's what you mean. > > > Content is our Samba server home directories. I need to extract the data so > > that I can copy it to our new 2k3 server. File is big (50Gb). A full > > listing looks okay but the extract fails, apparently while skipping. > > > > supplementary question: How do I compile restore for debugging. I cannot > > find 'the magic'. > > > > Thanks Anyway: Not sure it's official, but I did this: cd /usr/src/sbin/restore make clean make DEBUG_FLAGS=-g I tried again on a 4.10 box and it skips and resyncs 3 times and is missing three files; which is at least consistent. So this looks distinctly like bad RAM. However... md5 of the 50Gb file is consistent between the two boxes memtest pass of 18hrs Since the error is apparently in the "skip recovery" code, could this be a regression that no-one (else) has noticed. backup# gdb /usr/obj/usr/src/sbin/restore/restore GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"... (gdb) core-file restore.core Core was generated by `restore'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.5...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.5 Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #0 0x08050319 in getfile (fill=0x805070c , skip=0x805070c ) at /usr/src/sbin/restore/tape.c:728 728 if (readmapflag || spcl.c_addr[i]) { (gdb) bt #0 0x08050319 in getfile (fill=0x805070c , skip=0x805070c ) at /usr/src/sbin/restore/tape.c:728 #1 0x0805026a in skipfile () at /usr/src/sbin/restore/tape.c:700 #2 0x0804c809 in createfiles () at /usr/src/sbin/restore/restore.c:711 #3 0x0804a159 in main (argc=-1, argv=0xbfbfec68) at /usr/src/sbin/restore/main.c:278 (gdb) frame #0 0x08050319 in getfile (fill=0x805070c , skip=0x805070c ) at /usr/src/sbin/restore/tape.c:728 728 if (readmapflag || spcl.c_addr[i]) { (gdb) list 723 if (!gettingfile && setjmp(restart) != 0) 724 return; 725 gettingfile++; 726 loop: 727 for (i = 0; i < spcl.c_count; i++) { 728 if (readmapflag || spcl.c_addr[i]) { 729 readtape(&buf[curblk++][0]); 730 if (curblk == fssize / TP_BSIZE) { 731 (*fill)((char *)buf, (long)(size > TP_BSIZE ? 732 fssize : (curblk - 1) * TP_BSIZE + size)); (gdb) print i $1 = 53650716 (gdb) line no. seems consistent, value of i is not. Cheers -- i j hart ICT Technician Cardinal Newman Catholic School & Community College From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 10:04:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4915C16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:04:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5105043D1F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:04:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1] (may be forged))i91A4Dcj005982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:04:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i91A4DXe005981; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:04:13 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:04:13 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: metallarch Message-ID: <20041001100413.GC91573@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , metallarch , questions@freebsd.org References: <415D170E.000037.14036@ariel.yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <415D170E.000037.14036@ariel.yandex.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:04:13 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nat or ......? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:04:19 -0000 --KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 12:36:30PM +0400, metallarch wrote: >=20 > I made the ppp connection from windows to freebsd(tun0), and from freebsd= to internet > (tun2)"at the same time"! > I have 2 modems > What can i do that i could browse internet on windows over freebsd? That should certainly be feasible. You will need to make the FreeBSD system be a gateway machine -- add: gateway_enable=3D"YES" to /etc/rc.conf. You'll need to run an instance of ppp for each modem, each with its own separate configuration. You will need to run NAT on the FreeBSD boxes' internet interface: that's built into the ppp(8) server and can be specified on the command line. On the windows box side, all you need is the configuration that lets you dial in as required. Remember to adjust any firewall rulesets to allow traffic from your windows machine out to the world at large, and for the responses to come back again. Running a caching recursive DNS server on the FreeBSD box would be a good idea, as would running some sort of web proxying software, although you will be able to get away without either of those. Don't expect a stellar web browsing experience from your windows box -- running through two PPP links is going to result in pretty horrendous network latency. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXSudiD657aJF7eIRArqgAJ9ynDqK3KubJM0pn0C4ixczpqfqkACgkM7Y wHMJhte4HVmwuQrf0/+w/uI= =O+mK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KDt/GgjP6HVcx58l-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 10:20:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0425816A4CE; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:20:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailbox.rainbownet.com (mailbox.rainbownet.com [213.174.191.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B5743D39; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:20:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aturetta@commit.it) Received: from nbangx ([81.174.12.226]) (authenticated user aturetta@rainbownet.com) by rainbownet.com (mailbox.rainbownet.com [127.0.0.1]) (MDaemon.PRO.v6.8.5.R) with ESMTP id 53-md50000000316.tmp; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:19:59 +0200 Message-ID: <005801c4a7a0$2ff11070$c92aa8c0@lan> From: "Angelo Turetta" To: "Dan Finn" , "f-questions" , References: <89ceee7040930172042dae1d5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:19:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Authenticated-Sender: aturetta@rainbownet.com X-Spam-Processed: mailbox.rainbownet.com, Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:19:59 +0200 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 81.174.12.226 X-Return-Path: aturetta@commit.it Subject: Re: upgrading openssl/openssh only using ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:20:43 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Finn" Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 2:20 AM > I want to upgrade OpenSSH/OpenSSL and I only want to have to use the > ports tree to do this. What is the best way to do this? If possible > I would like to over write my existing base installations of those two > packages, or delete the base install ones if that's possible > (preferably not by hand). How should I do this? > > Thanks > Dan Build the ports with -DOPENxxx_OVERWRITE_BASE or, if you use portupgrade, better put the following lines in your /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf MAKE_ARGS section: 'security/openssl*' => '-DOPENSSL_OVERWRITE_BASE', 'security/openssh*' => '-DOPENSSH_OVERWRITE_BASE', Then you must remember to use -DNO_OPENSSL and -DNO_OPENSSH when running 'make installworld' (I advice against using the flags during buildworld, it gave me some problems at times) Angelo. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 10:30:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E0016A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:30:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from esemetz.metz.supelec.fr (esemetz.metz.supelec.fr [193.48.224.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3048043D4C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:30:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregory.nou@supelec.fr) Received: from smtp.metz.supelec.fr (smtp.metz.supelec.fr [193.48.224.205]) by esemetz.metz.supelec.fr (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i91AU6529933 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:30:06 +0200 Received: from [193.48.225.2] (nou.rez-metz.supelec.fr [193.48.225.2]) by smtp.metz.supelec.fr (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i91Ae5V21506 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:40:06 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gr=E9gory?= Nou To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sup=E9lec?= Message-Id: <1096626599.50795.21.camel@alfred> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:30:00 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Gnome very very very slow ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: gregory.nou@metz.supelec.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:30:08 -0000 Hi again, here is my new pb (well, actually I say new, but I think it's related) I currently use Gnome, which was not fast, but after giving password in the Gdm thing, loaded in say 20 seconds. Now, I would say it's something like 20 minutes ... I took my clock and and double clicked on "home" link on the desktop. I wait for 37 minutes ... I haven't tried another wm yet. All this began to happen after I had to repair spwd.db The rest of the system has not change at all. And other applications seems to have normal habit (less than 2 second to start) The top doesn't show anything weird, I wasn't able to find the relevant log file (at least there were no error on everything I looked at) and nobody seems to had my problem according to google. Maybe there's a devil and not a daemon in my computer :) Thx G. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 10:32:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B62B16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:32:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE3443D2D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:32:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1] (may be forged)) i91AWBDI018526 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:32:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i91AWBxY018497; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:32:11 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:32:11 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Brent Wiese Message-ID: <20041001103211.GD91573@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Brent Wiese , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040926184512.GA48082@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <200409301811921.SM01528@SAMBA> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qGV0fN9tzfkG3CxV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409301811921.SM01528@SAMBA> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:32:12 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup Mail Server Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:32:20 -0000 --qGV0fN9tzfkG3CxV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 30, 2004 at 03:11:24PM -0700, Brent Wiese wrote: =20 > Is there a way to make the backup MX server understand that some mail is > ultimately destined for it and try to deliver it locally? >=20 > Here would be an example: >=20 > Mydomain.com is MX'd to mail.mydomin.com, which handles email for all my > users. On that server, I've set up an alias for support@ that is actually= a > forward to my ticket system box (ie: support@tickets.mydomain.com). So people would usually send e-mail to 'support@mydomain.com' which then gets automatically aliased to 'support@tickets.mydomain.com'? And you want a system like aliases, but that can rewrite destinations based on matching stuff after the '@' sign, rather than just before it? Hmmm... virtusertable should do the trick. Try adding: support@mydomain.com support@tickets.mydomain.com to /etc/mail/virtusertable , and then run 'make' to rebuild the .db tables. You'll need: FEATURE(virtusertable, `hash -o /etc/mail/virtusertable') in your `hostname`.mc file, but that should already be there, as it's a standard in freebsd.mc This is analogous to the situation where you run a company spread over multiple sites each with their own local mail server, but all using the same e-mail domain: you'ld use virtusertable to redirect the incoming e-mail to the appropriate site server for each user. > In the event my main mail server is down, I'd like to use the > tickets.mydomain.com box as the backup MX. Its already running SMTP to > handle the tickets, so seems a logical choice.=20 Yes, you should be able to use the tickets machine as a backup MX for your domain as well as using the virtusertable stuff as above. Indeed, if incoming e-mail for support@mydomain.com just happens to be delivered to the tickets machine, you'll save a round trip to the main server. =20 > What would be ideal is to have mail destined for support@ to be delivered > locally. So, for example, a user can create a ticket saying the mail serv= er > is down (of course that is only useful if admins have off-site email > addresses the ticket system notifies for redundancy, but that's easy > enough). That should work for your unix boxes where they use a local sendmail instance for sending e-mail. Windowzy stuff that speaks SMTP directly to the server will need somehow to be told to connect to the backup MX rather than the main server. Hmmm... it may be possible to use VRRP to do that automatically; you'ld have to experiment. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --qGV0fN9tzfkG3CxV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXTIriD657aJF7eIRAlmrAJ4gdMgyt68mve3iEqK0Vr++OoVNvwCfdzh3 SuXMY5YpctqdjnvgpEVkaZ0= =wLQv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qGV0fN9tzfkG3CxV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 10:52:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62ADE16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:52:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 64C6B43D48 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:52:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 21003 invoked by uid 65534); 1 Oct 2004 10:52:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) (129.187.19.157) by mail.gmx.net (mp013) with SMTP; 01 Oct 2004 12:52:18 +0200 X-Authenticated: #147403 Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E816BC0D4; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:52:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:52:32 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: gregory.nou@metz.supelec.fr Message-ID: <20041001105232.GC26273@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <1096626599.50795.21.camel@alfred> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1096626599.50795.21.camel@alfred> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome very very very slow ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:52:21 -0000 --KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I guess you have to fix your hostname: http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq2.html#q20 Simon --KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXTbwCkn+/eutqCoRApZsAKC8+B3hWjJW8QYGN5bKjt2TSsj3PwCfbpet f/IIqOdvu6mMwYgG0c3sbpM= =uNQB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 11:01:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7E216A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:01:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from esemetz.metz.supelec.fr (esemetz.metz.supelec.fr [193.48.224.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2379F43D46 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:01:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregorynou@altern.org) Received: from smtp.metz.supelec.fr (smtp.metz.supelec.fr [193.48.224.205]) by esemetz.metz.supelec.fr (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i91B11502877 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:01:01 +0200 Received: from [193.48.225.2] (nou.rez-metz.supelec.fr [193.48.225.2]) by smtp.metz.supelec.fr (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i91BAsV22130; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:10:55 +0200 From: Gregory Nou To: Simon Barner In-Reply-To: <20041001105232.GC26273@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <1096626599.50795.21.camel@alfred> <20041001105232.GC26273@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Message-Id: <1096628453.50795.27.camel@alfred> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:00:54 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome very very very slow ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:01:03 -0000 Ok, thanks a lot, that worked (next I'll RTFM a bit more before asking (ashamed)) I put net.inet.tcp.blackhole to 0 and as a miracle all the windows I was waiting appeared. Since, I can't understand, why it formerly worked. I made gnome work without lo0 (so 127.0.0.1 was unknown ...) and with tcp.blackhole at 2 and udp.blackhole at 1 ... Le Ven 01/10/2004 à 12:52, Simon Barner a écrit : > Hi, > > I guess you have to fix your hostname: > > http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq2.html#q20 > > Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 11:36:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7589716A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:36:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.zeelandnet.nl (mail1.zeelandnet.nl [212.115.192.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6798143D41 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:36:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kaelthun@zeelandnet.nl) Received: from JIM (kbl-gs5891.zeelandnet.nl [62.238.87.49]) by mail.zeelandnet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75D918BE43 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:36:07 +0200 (CEST) From: kaelthun@zeelandnet.nl To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:36:11 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <415D5D4B.6986.AF030A@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.21c) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Platforms X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:36:10 -0000 Dear FreeBSD staff member, I have no idea what all these platforms mean, I am especially confused by the following statement: "operating system for x86 compatible (including Pentium and Athlon), amd64 compatible (including Opteron, Athlon 64" And when I look to the left in the menu, I don't see x86 as a category. I am currently employing an AMD Athlon XP 2200+ as a processor so I have no idea how to proceed. What platform should I use for the processor I am using? Thank you in advance, I am looking forward to using your OS =) Regards, Jimmy Koeman Kaelthun Morganthis Angelfeet Industries Lead Artist Creative Division 282.90.AC.00.82 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 11:41:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F076D16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:41:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CBE43D3F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:41:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176F669A39; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:41:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:41:46 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: kaelthun@zeelandnet.nl Message-Id: <20041001074146.456196b6.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <415D5D4B.6986.AF030A@localhost> References: <415D5D4B.6986.AF030A@localhost> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Platforms X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:41:48 -0000 kaelthun@zeelandnet.nl wrote: > Dear FreeBSD staff member, > > I have no idea what all these platforms mean, I am especially confused by > the following > statement: > > "operating system for x86 compatible (including Pentium and Athlon), > amd64 compatible > (including Opteron, Athlon 64" "x86" refers to "all platforms whose name ends in "86"", which is also commonly called the i386 architecture, and includes the Pentium. It also includes technologies competing with Intel, such as AMD's series of processors. If you look at the list of platforms, you'll see that the other platforms are very different from run-of-the-mill PC hardware: sparc, alpha, and the new 64-bit versions of i386 (which aren't compatiable with i386) > And when I look to the left in the menu, I don't see x86 as a category. > I am currently > employing an AMD Athlon XP 2200+ as a processor so I have no idea how > to proceed. What > platform should I use for the processor I am using? That is an x86/i386 architecture system. > Thank you in advance, I am looking forward to using your OS =) Good luck, and enjoy FreeBSD. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 11:49:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF4716A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:49:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C9143D49 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:49:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp51-93.lns1.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.51.93]) i91Bn44Y087301; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:19:06 +0930 (CST) From: Malcolm Kay Organization: at home To: ict technician Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:19:03 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200409300945.15068.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> <200410010149.04790.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> <200410011038.35037.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> In-Reply-To: <200410011038.35037.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410012119.04048.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: ian j hart Subject: Re: broken fs dump file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:49:14 -0000 On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:08 pm, ict technician wrote: > On Thursday 30 September 2004 17:19, Malcolm Kay wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 06:15 pm, ict technician wrote: > > > I have a broken fs dump I need to fix. Is there a diagnostic/repair > > > tool I can use? I know about restore -N. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dump was taken on 4.10. Restoring on 5.3BETA, although I can change > > > that. > > > > A question rather than an answer:---- > > Is it valid to dump a ufs file system and try to restore it to a ufs2 > > system? > > > > Malcolm > > wrt dump: > on 5.x dump has to understand ufs2. However, you might choose to use ufs; > so it has to deal with that. Since dump does both, restore must do both. > QED :) > I agree with the argument that dump must be able to dump a ufs fs that restore can restore to a ufs fs, and that dump must be able to dump a ufs2 fs that restore can restore to a ufs2 fs. But to dump a ufs fs and restore it to a ufs2 fs is not the same thing, nor is it the 'normal' application for dump/restore. Maybe this is quite a valid thing to do; I'd like to see an 'official' statement to that effect -- I find your argument in relation to this situation unconvincing. Sorry about that. But you seem to be convinced by your investigation that the problem is elsewhere so at least tentitively I will accept that it is valid thing to do even though I dismiss your argument. Malcolm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 11:50:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FF0E16A4D0 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:50:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C3D43D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:50:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikrais@bellsouth.net) Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([68.209.158.10]) by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.netESMTP <20041001115015.ICRI1718.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[192.168.1.3]> for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:50:15 -0400 Message-ID: <415D446C.6030201@bellsouth.net> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 06:50:04 -0500 From: Brent Archer User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <415D5D4B.6986.AF030A@localhost> In-Reply-To: <415D5D4B.6986.AF030A@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Platforms X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:50:18 -0000 kaelthun@zeelandnet.nl wrote: > I have no idea what all these platforms mean, I am especially confused by the following > statement: > > "operating system for x86 compatible (including Pentium and Athlon), amd64 compatible > (including Opteron, Athlon 64" > > And when I look to the left in the menu, I don't see x86 as a category. I am currently > employing an AMD Athlon XP 2200+ as a processor so I have no idea how to proceed. What > platform should I use for the processor I am using? You want i386 for your Athlon XP :) For some reason the FreeBSD.org link under platforms/i386 points only to the SMP project. I can understand your confusion. However, the introduction under the Platforms main link says: Here you will find a list of platforms that FreeBSD currently supports along with platforms currently being ported to (with the exception of x86, since most of the information on the remainder of the site already pertains to that platform). So, everything you need to get started you can more than likely find in the FAQ and Handbook for your Athlon. --bsa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 11:51:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2526C16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:51:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hermes.uci.kun.nl (hermes.uci.kun.nl [131.174.93.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B782743D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:51:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Peter.Bex@student.kun.nl) Received: from frohike.nvie.com (vhe-382807.sshn.net [195.169.208.136]) by hermes.uci.kun.nl (PMDF V6.2-X17 #30689) with ESMTP id <0I4W004OSM8TWR@hermes.uci.kun.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:50:53 +0200 (MEST) Received: by frohike.nvie.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BEC766B3D5; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:49:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:49:47 +0200 From: Peter Bex To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20041001114947.GA10264@frohike.nvie.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-PGP-Key: http://www.student.kun.nl/peter.bex/pubkey.txt Subject: Trying to find ULE's benchmark program X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:51:08 -0000 --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi list, I'm in the process of preparing for an internship during which I will be working on NetBSD's process scheduler. Right now I'm gathering information on the availability of existing scheduler benchmarking tools. I've read Jeff Robertson's ULE paper, which mentions that a benchmarking program was created for ULE called Late. I would like to try this program for my own testing and perhaps extend it a little. According to the paper, Late can be found in the FreeBSD source tree. I just checked out the tree using cvs (using no tags, so I assume that's the current version), but I can't find this benchmarking program anywhere. Could someone please give me a pointer to where I should look in the tree? (or perhaps some other scheduler benchmarking programs you know of) BTW, I am not subscribed to the list, so please CC me on your replies. Thanks in advance, Peter Bex --=20 http://www.student.kun.nl/peter.bex -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD) iD8DBQFBXURbLg33BXzVMqsRArWTAJ0d/9pAlflb7V/1acLvIoCYFrWcZgCgqMdZ ZnzMTjr0BZDpLjAtf4Qvla8= =U1SP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 11:54:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D146A16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:54:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6700143D45 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:54:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nico.meijer@zonnet.nl) Received: from piweblw.demon.nl ([82.161.24.55]:28884 helo=[192.168.2.100]) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CDLzR-000Gvb-De; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:54:21 +0000 Message-ID: <415D456A.1040106@zonnet.nl> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:54:18 +0200 From: Nico Meijer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040908 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kaelthun@zeelandnet.nl References: <415D5D4B.6986.AF030A@localhost> In-Reply-To: <415D5D4B.6986.AF030A@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Platforms X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:54:22 -0000 Hi Jimmy, > Dear FreeBSD staff member, This is a public mailing list. :-) > I am currently > employing an AMD Athlon XP 2200+ as a processor so I have no idea how to proceed. What > platform should I use for the processor I am using? Get the i386 version. Your closest ftp-mirror is probably: ftp://ftp.nl.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ Whatever you do, please read as much of the Handbook as you can before attempting an install. HTH... Nico From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 12:07:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9825A16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:07:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082BC43D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:07:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from europax@comcast.net) Received: from comcast.net (c-67-169-203-186.client.comcast.net[67.169.203.186]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2004100112071301100k3enie> (Authid: europax); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:07:13 +0000 Message-ID: <415D48F5.9080304@comcast.net> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 05:09:25 -0700 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Good Outlook Calendar Replacement in ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rob2@pythonemproject.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:07:14 -0000 Made my doc a committment to put appointments on FreeBSD, like I used to do at work on Windoze. No more missed ones LOL. Is there a good desk app in ports that will do this? Doesnt have to be fancy, just work reliably. Something that ran in background would be perfect. And no- I'm not going to put them in as cron jobs HAHA Thanks, Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 12:42:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65ABA16A4DE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:42:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1795543D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:42:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3599928rnb for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 05:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.80 with SMTP id d80mr830539rng; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 05:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.179.42 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 05:42:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2b5f066d0410010542a38e93b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:42:28 -0400 From: Brian McCann To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <2034.67.167.52.21.1096577945.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <2b5f066d04093013344d048003@mail.gmail.com> <2034.67.167.52.21.1096577945.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> Subject: Re: Backup/Restore X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Brian McCann List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:42:29 -0000 I have the case where a new file is created about every second or two, nothing gets changed, but files get deleted occasionally (it's a mail server). I thought of using tar, but it would be just as slow as dump I would think. I've thought of breaking it up into chunks, but that still doesn't solve my speed issue...i'm beginning to consider using dd since it reads the actual disk bits, and just hope that a)I don't ever need one file and b) the system I restore to has at least or more space then the original server. Any other thoughts anyone? Thanks again, --Brian On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:59:05 -0700 (PDT), Richard Lynch wrote: > > > Brian McCann wrote: > > Hi all...I'm having a conceptual problem I can't get around and > > was hoping someone can change my focus here. I've been backing up > > roughly 6-8 million small files (roughly 2-4k each) using dump, but > > restores take forever due to the huge number of files and directories. > > Luckily, I haven't had to restore for an emergency yet...but if I > > need to, I'm kinda stuck. I've looked at distributed file systems > > like CODA, but the number of files I have to deal with will make it > > choke. Can anyone offer any suggestions? I've pondered running > > rsync, but am very worried about how long that will take... > > Do the files change a lot, or is it more like a few files added/changed > every day, and the bulk don't change? > > If it's the latter, you could maybe get best performance from something > like Subversion (a CVS derivative). > > Though I suspect rsync would also do well in that case. > > If a ton of those files are changing all the time, try doing a test on > creating a tarball and then backing up the tarball. That may be a simple > managable solution. There are probably other more complex solutions of > which I am ignorant :-) > > -- > Like Music? > http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 13:18:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238E516A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:18:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dnsmail4.ior.navy.mil (nocb.ior.navy.mil [205.56.210.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B119143D60 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:18:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil) Received: from cg69ubd01.vicksburg.navy.mil ([205.95.65.21]) i91DGRbM018700; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:17:20 GMT Received: by CG69UBD01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:43:30 +0300 Message-ID: From: JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil To: kaelthun@zeelandnet.nl, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:43:29 +0300 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Subject: RE: Platforms X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:18:58 -0000 An athlon XP is i386. -----Original Message----- From: kaelthun@zeelandnet.nl [mailto:kaelthun@zeelandnet.nl] Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 1:36 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Platforms Dear FreeBSD staff member, I have no idea what all these platforms mean, I am especially confused by the following statement: "operating system for x86 compatible (including Pentium and Athlon), amd64 compatible (including Opteron, Athlon 64" And when I look to the left in the menu, I don't see x86 as a category. I am currently employing an AMD Athlon XP 2200+ as a processor so I have no idea how to proceed. What platform should I use for the processor I am using? Thank you in advance, I am looking forward to using your OS =) Regards, Jimmy Koeman Kaelthun Morganthis Angelfeet Industries Lead Artist Creative Division 282.90.AC.00.82 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 13:43:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF11B16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:43:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from enterprise.thenetnow.com (enterprise.thenetnow.com [65.39.193.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2BA43D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:43:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from GRANT (hpeel.ody.ca [216.240.12.2])i91DZ4u40746 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:35:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Message-ID: <009301c4a7bc$a21b12b0$6601a8c0@GRANT> From: "Grant Peel" To: Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:43:26 -0400 Organization: The Net Now MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: IP - Interface Setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Grant Peel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:43:33 -0000 Hello all, We have five servers. FreeBSD 4.4 on two, 4.7 on one, and 4.10 on two. We have server IP addresses on all of them. We have came accross the situation where we have blocks of ips being used on more than one server. THe question is, for example, if I have a block of 60 IPs, 1.0.0.0 - 1.0.0.60 with a netmask of 192, Do I need to specify that netmask on for the first IP on each server that uses one or more of those IPs or just the first one on any of the servers? The servers are all connected to the same network segment, and are all behind the same switch. TIA, -Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 13:50:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC6D16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:50:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from musashi.fi.uba.ar (musashi.fi.uba.ar [157.92.49.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7207543D3F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:50:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gkullak@fi.uba.ar) Received: from musashi.fi.uba.ar (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by musashi.fi.uba.ar (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i91DnYHZ022837 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:49:34 -0300 Received: (from apache@localhost) by musashi.fi.uba.ar (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i91DnYhV022835; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:49:34 -0300 Received: from 161.190.1.253 (SquirrelMail authenticated user gkullak); by webmail.fi.uba.ar with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:49:34 -0300 (ART) Message-ID: <31898.161.190.1.253.1096638574.squirrel@161.190.1.253> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:49:34 -0300 (ART) From: gkullak@fi.uba.ar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-FIUBA-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-FIUBA-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-FIUBA-MailScanner-SpamCheck: no es spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (puntaje=-3.835, requerido 5, AWL 0.28, BAYES_00 -4.90, NO_REAL_NAME 0.16, RATWR20_MESSID 0.62) X-MailScanner-From: gkullak@fi.uba.ar Subject: Terminal Services Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:50:15 -0000 On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 02:16:12AM -0500, Eric and Michelle Bjorkman wrote: > Are Terminal Services supported by FreeBSD. In that I mean is there a > port already included that I will not have to buy a Terminal Services > server application. I'm looking for somthing like Novell that is free. > Or do you know of project out there that can function like Novell? Try reading XDM protocol that is for open XSession in another machines like Terminal Services of Microsoft. You must run X in your server (with XDM, KDM o GDM) and need a client like Xmanager for Windows por example. Like say Matthew J Seaman you must run only X application in your Windows environment without need of run XDM in your server, only calling the program through SSH or TELNET. Try with Xmanager too or find for PC X Server in Google. Sorry for my english. Regards. -- Gustavo Ariel Kullak e-mail:gkullak@fi.uba.ar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 13:54:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B76C16A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:54:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from proxy.hddesign.com (dsl-194.madison.chorus.net [216.165.159.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7403243D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:54:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from damon@hddesign.com) Received: from [10.0.0.20] (bob.hddesign.com [192.168.1.254]) by proxy.hddesign.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i91Ds6w0033081; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:54:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from damon@hddesign.com) Message-ID: <415D617E.4090509@hddesign.com> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:54:06 -0500 From: Damon Butler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040727 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Greenwald , FreeBSD Questions References: <415C0C84.8000906@hddesign.com> <20040930144246.GA26630@phoenix.smluc.org> In-Reply-To: <20040930144246.GA26630@phoenix.smluc.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Re: Error mounting Linux ext2fs drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:54:14 -0000 >>Now here's the frustrating bit. Time has passed and the machine has been >>shut down and rebooted a few times. After that initial success, I have >>never been able to mount that !$!@#$ drive again. I invariably get a >> >> Operation not permitted >> >>error. What gives? How can I retrieve my former happiness? >>--Damon > > this is the default error spewed out when the linux file system is not > clean. (I.E. it was not unmounted properly on the shutdown where it > ceased working) This is the problem! Thank you! As soon as I rebuilt the journal (it's actually an ext3 filesystem) I could mount the drive again. Happiness is a mounted hard drive. --Damon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 13:57:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED9116A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:57:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from advmail.lsn.net (advmail.lsn.net [66.90.138.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B77943D53 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:57:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norm@etherealconsulting.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (24-155-40-125.ip.grandenetworks.net [24.155.40.125]) by advmail.lsn.net (8.12.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i91DvT0A019815; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:57:32 -0500 Message-ID: <415D6247.5080507@etherealconsulting.com> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:57:27 -0500 From: Norm Vilmer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040910 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subhro References: <415C2FA7.6010408@etherealconsulting.com> <415C3DD4.3020202@etherealconsulting.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.6; VAE 6.27.0.12; VDF 6.27.0.83 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw console messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:57:31 -0000 Subhro wrote: > Could we have a look at the syslof configuration file? > > Regards > S. > > > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 12:09:40 -0500, Norm Vilmer > wrote: > >> >>Norm Vilmer wrote: >> >> >>>I have been running a IPFW firewall on FreeBSD 4.10 for a few weeks >>>now. For some reason a few connection attempts are showing up on the >>>console rather than going to the log file. I can't seem to figure out >>>why. Any ideas? >>> >>>I have tried adding the 'log' key word to every deny statement in my >>>IPFW firewall config file. For the most part all denied packets are >>>logged to /var/log/ipfw.log. But about 3-12 per night are not. These >>>also show up in the security run output email as kernel log messages. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >>More info: my kernel is compiled with these option: >> >>option TCP_DROP_SYNFIN >>option ICMP_BANDLIM >>option IPFIREWALL >>option IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE >>option IPDIVERT >>option RANDOM_IP_ID >> >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > I dont think it is a login problem. I made only one change to the syslog.conf file, I added !ipfw *.* /var/log/ipfw.log Ok, I did an experiment. I added ${cmd} add 10 pass TCP from any to ${oif} where oif is my outside/public ip. Then I attempted an FTP connection to my public ip from another machine. This popped up on the console. Connection attempt to TCP :21 from :3079 flags:0x02 Now I get it , the message on the console are connection attempts that get through the firewall but no service is running on the port. need to look at my rules From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:02:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3743816A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:02:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-out-1002.amazon.com (iad-fw-global.amazon.com [207.171.172.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AB443D41 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:02:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mail@amazon.com) Received: from smtp-in-0102.sea3.amazon.com by smtp-out-1002.amazon.com with ESMTP (peer crosscheck: smtp-in-0102.sea3.amazon.com) X-Amazon-Corporate-Relay: smtp-out-1002.vdc.amazon.com X-AMAZON-TRACK: Received: from mail-admin-1.amazon.com by smtp-in-0102.sea3.amazon.com with ESMTP (crosscheck: mail-admin-1.amazon.com [10.16.42.239]) id i91E2bFs011352 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:02:44 -0700 Received: (from mail@localhost) by mail-admin-1.amazon.com (8.12.7/) id i91E2Zib018877 for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:02:35 -0700 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:02:35 -0700 Message-Id: From: ship-confirm@amazon.com To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Your Amazon.com Order X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:02:48 -0000 Greetings from Amazon.com. We're sorry. You replied to a confirmation-only address that cannot accept incoming e-mail. But that's OK--this automated response will direct you to the right place at Amazon.com to answer your question or help you make changes to your order. To track recent shipments, get updated delivery estimates, or make changes to any unshipped orders, just log in to Your Account at: http://www.amazon.com/wheres-my-stuff If you need to return an item from your order, visit our online Returns Center at: http://www.amazon.com/returns/ For answers to questions about our shipping rates, returns policy, and how to use any of our services, visit: http://www.amazon.com/help/ We hope our online resources meet all your needs. If you've explored the above links but find you still need to get in touch with us, please use the e-mail form in our online Help department. Thanks for shopping at Amazon.com. Sincerely, Amazon.com Customer Service http://www.amazon.com/ P.S. You received this message because Amazon.com received the following message from you: >From questions@freebsd.org Fri Oct 1 07:02:35 2004 Received: from mail-border-1001.vdc.amazon.com (mail-border-1001.vdc.amazon.com [10.139.9.251]) by mail-admin-1.amazon.com (8.12.7/) with ESMTP id i91E24sQ017840 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:02:04 -0700 Received: from service-4-internal.amazon.com by mail-border-1001.vdc.amazon.com with SMTP (crosscheck: service-4-internal.amazon.com [10.16.42.50]) id i91E21vM002269 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:02:02 GMT Message-Id: X-Amazon-External-Source: yes X-Amazon-External-Envelope-Sender: questions@freebsd.org From: questions@freebsd.org To: ship-confirm@amazon.com Received: from ool-182fa825.dyn.optonline.net ([24.47.168.37]) by service-4-internal.amazon.com via smtpd (for mail-border-1001.vdc.amazon.com [10.139.9.251]) with SMTP; 1 Oct 2004 14:02:01 UT Subject: %]Re: Old photos Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:02:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-PMX-Version: 4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.1.0, Antispam-Data: 2004.10.1.0 X-AMAZON-GAUGE: XXXXXX X-PMX-REPORT: The following antispam rules were triggered by this message: Rule Score Description Y_NJABL_DUL 3.000 NJABL: dial-up/dynamic IP ranges MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART 2.100 Spam tool pattern in MIME boundary PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716 Message has priority setting, but no X-Mailer NO_REAL_NAME 0.000 From: does not include a real name RELAY_IN_NJABL_ORG 0.000 Received via dnsbl.njabl.org: 37.168.47.24.dnsbl.njabl.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:03:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8069A16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:03:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 9.hellooperator.net (cpc3-cdif2-3-0-cust202.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.32.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F0743D46 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:03:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputin@hellooperator.net) Received: from rasputin by 9.hellooperator.net with local (Exim 4.42) id 1CDNzO-0006DV-19 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:02:26 +0100 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:02:26 +0100 From: Dick Davies To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20041001140225.GE29161@lb.tenfour> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: Rasputin Subject: Re: Pam_ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dick Davies List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:03:27 -0000 Right, basically this is doing what I thought - just checking passwords in AD without looking up user info, so the accounts need to exist on the bsd server (that may become a real pain in the arse, by the way). couple of quick checks; 1) the ldap.conf referred to should be /usr/local/etc/ldap.conf *NOT* /etc/openldap/ldap.conf 2) can you log onto the console as these users? If you're sshing you may need to edit /etc/pam.d/sshd, and not login. 3) what's in your logs? If you have the 'debug' flag on, something will be getting written to - check /var/log/secure and /var/log/messages * Bret Walker [1043 13:43]: > It is here: http://www.netsys.com/pamldap/2002/04/msg00074.html > > Thanks, > Bret > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Dick Davies > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 4:31 AM > To: Bret Walker > Cc: FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Re: Pam_ldap > > > * Bret Walker [1028 00:28]: > > I've been trying all day to get pam_ldap to authenticate an ssh > > session against Active Directory. I thought that I had found the > > perfect HOWTO > > (read: one that didn't require nss_ldap), but its instructions didn't > seem > > to get it working on my system. > > > > I've read that can authenticate to AD with pam_ldap alone, and I've > > read that you can't, as well. Does anyone have any experience doing > > this w/o nss_ldap. I'm running 4.10, and I don't think it has support > > for nss_ldap. > > > > If anyone has any advice, I'd love to hear it. > > You're not going to need nss_ldap if you just want to validate a password. > But it sounds a bit odd to have existing users in /etc/passwd and only > have the password itself from AD - and if the users don't exist in > /etc/passwd the system won't be able to log them in. > > What was the howto you used? -- Yeah, life is hilariously cruel. - Bender Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:09:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9E016A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:09:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAB343D58 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:09:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph.peterson@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so3645733rnk for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 07:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.73.46 with SMTP id v46mr2426033rna; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 07:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.164.67 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:09:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <38a23c3604100107091ab286a4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:09:33 -0500 From: Joseph Peterson To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: Subject: Re: Your Amazon.com Order X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joseph Peterson List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:09:47 -0000 ROFLMAO On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:02:35 -0700, ship-confirm@amazon.com wrote: > Greetings from Amazon.com. > > We're sorry. You replied to a confirmation-only address that cannot > accept incoming e-mail. But that's OK--this automated response will > direct you to the right place at Amazon.com to answer your question or > help you make changes to your order. > > To track recent shipments, get updated delivery estimates, or make > changes to any unshipped orders, just log in to Your Account at: > > http://www.amazon.com/wheres-my-stuff > > If you need to return an item from your order, visit our online > Returns Center at: > > http://www.amazon.com/returns/ > > For answers to questions about our shipping rates, returns policy, and > how to use any of our services, visit: > > http://www.amazon.com/help/ > > We hope our online resources meet all your needs. If you've explored > the above links but find you still need to get in touch with us, > please use the e-mail form in our online Help department. > > Thanks for shopping at Amazon.com. > > Sincerely, > Amazon.com Customer Service > http://www.amazon.com/ > > P.S. You received this message because Amazon.com received > the following message from you: > > >From questions@freebsd.org Fri Oct 1 07:02:35 2004 > Received: from mail-border-1001.vdc.amazon.com (mail-border-1001.vdc.amazon.com [10.139.9.251]) > by mail-admin-1.amazon.com (8.12.7/) with ESMTP id i91E24sQ017840 > for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:02:04 -0700 > Received: from service-4-internal.amazon.com by mail-border-1001.vdc.amazon.com with SMTP > (crosscheck: service-4-internal.amazon.com [10.16.42.50]) > id i91E21vM002269 > for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:02:02 GMT > Message-Id: > X-Amazon-External-Source: yes > X-Amazon-External-Envelope-Sender: questions@freebsd.org > From: questions@freebsd.org > To: ship-confirm@amazon.com > Received: from ool-182fa825.dyn.optonline.net ([24.47.168.37]) by service-4-internal.amazon.com > via smtpd (for mail-border-1001.vdc.amazon.com [10.139.9.251]) with SMTP; 1 Oct 2004 14:02:01 UT > Subject: %]Re: Old photos > Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:02:05 -0400 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; > boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0016----=_NextPart_000_0016" > X-Priority: 3 > X-MSMail-Priority: Normal > X-PMX-Version: 4.7.0.111621, Antispam-Engine: 2.0.1.0, Antispam-Data: 2004.10.1.0 > X-AMAZON-GAUGE: XXXXXX > X-PMX-REPORT: The following antispam rules were triggered by this message: > Rule Score Description > Y_NJABL_DUL 3.000 NJABL: dial-up/dynamic IP ranges > MIME_BOUND_NEXTPART 2.100 Spam tool pattern in MIME boundary > PRIORITY_NO_NAME 0.716 Message has priority setting, but no X-Mailer > NO_REAL_NAME 0.000 From: does not include a real name > RELAY_IN_NJABL_ORG 0.000 Received via dnsbl.njabl.org: 37.168.47.24.dnsbl.njabl.org > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:36:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F7B16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:36:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (conn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF21743D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from patm@visi.com) Received: from isis.visi.com (isis.visi.com [209.98.98.8]) by conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBE084E3 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:36:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: by isis.visi.com (Postfix, from userid 14328) id 3240276C6A; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:36:57 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:36:57 -0500 From: Patrick McNamee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041001143656.GA2905@isis.visi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Subject: legato networker X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:36:58 -0000 Looked at google, archives, and ports but don't see anything recent regarding using Legato Networker backup system with FreeBSD. Anybody have any recent info about that, or is it just not supported? tia pm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:38:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC87416A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:38:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ha-smtp1.tiscali.nl (smtp-b2c.tiscali.nl [195.241.80.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3C743D48 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:38:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cerion@open-works.co.uk) Received: from ragnarok.frop.org (82-169-241-200-bbxl.xdsl.tiscali.nl [82.169.241.200]) by ha-smtp1.tiscali.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310D57EA094 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:38:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Cerion Armour-Brown Organization: OpenWorks LLP To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:38:42 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410011638.42860.cerion@open-works.co.uk> Subject: alternative to 'top' in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:38:45 -0000 Hi, I have a jail with a freebsd jails provider... What do people use as an alternative to 'top', inside a jail? What else can I use to measure resource usage (cpu/ram) Cheers, Cerion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:41:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C312816A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:41:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 9.hellooperator.net (cpc3-cdif2-3-0-cust202.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.32.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E532543D5F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:41:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputin@hellooperator.net) Received: from rasputin by 9.hellooperator.net with local (Exim 4.42) id 1CDOaG-0006U1-6K; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:40:32 +0100 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:40:32 +0100 From: Dick Davies To: Bret Walker Message-ID: <20041001144031.GF29161@lb.tenfour> References: <20041001140131.GD29161@lb.tenfour> <00ea01c4a7c2$62661dd0$b1336981@medill.northwestern.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00ea01c4a7c2$62661dd0$b1336981@medill.northwestern.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: Rasputin cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Pam_ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dick Davies List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:41:33 -0000 * Bret Walker [1023 15:23]: > I have ldap.conf in /etc/ and in /usr/local/etc/ldap.conf The one in /etc isn't doing anything, so get rid of it. The /usr/local/etc/ldap.conf should be holding the ad stuff (what user to bind as , etc). > I am able to log into the console as these users using the local password, > but not using the ldap password. All of my pam info is in /etc/pam.conf, > I don't have /etc/pam.d. Then you're on 4.X right? Shouldn't stop this working. > > sshd auth sufficient pam_skey.so > sshd auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_fake_prompts > sshd auth sufficient pam_unix.so try_first_pass > sshd auth sufficient /usr/local/lib/pam_ldap.so > try_first_pass debug > sshd account required pam_unix.so > sshd password required pam_permit.so > sshd session required pam_permit.co > > > All I see in the logs are messages saying: > "error: PAM: User not known to the underlying authentication module" Right, so sshd is using pam. That's something. The error could mean several things, one of which is that the user doesn't exist. If you look through your ldap.conf, you should have enough info to pretend to be PAM. use ldapsearch and try ldapsearch -H "ldap:// -D "" -W \ =username and enter the bindpw from ldap.conf If you don't get the AD account back, then your ldap.conf is screwed. > I'm pretty sure the ldap.conf files are correct, because I've followed the > instructions from several places to the T. "The nice thing about definitive LDAP howtos is there are so many to choose from" :) -- You may need to metaphorically make a deal with the devil. By 'devil' I mean robot devil and by 'metaphorically' I mean get your coat. - Bender Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:59:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DB716A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:59:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from casbah.it.northwestern.edu (casbah.it.northwestern.edu [129.105.16.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945ED43D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:59:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bret-walker@northwestern.edu) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by casbah.it.northwestern.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i91ExZhH021647; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:59:35 -0500 (CDT) Received: from MEDILLBWPC (dhcp051177.medill.northwestern.edu [129.105.51.177]) by casbah.it.northwestern.edu via smap (V2.0) id xma021176; Fri, 1 Oct 04 09:59:30 -0500 From: "Bret Walker" To: "'Dick Davies'" Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:59:22 -0500 Message-ID: <00fd01c4a7c7$3f5a27a0$b1336981@medill.northwestern.edu> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: <20041001144031.GF29161@lb.tenfour> Importance: Normal Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=SHA1; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00F9_01C4A79D.53205B30" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: RE: Pam_ldap X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:59:37 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00F9_01C4A79D.53205B30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The query you gave me worked. I was able to see real name, home dir, ect. I'm assuming since I can get that info, that I should be able to verify a password too. In my /usr/local/etc/ldap.conf file, I had binddb not bingdn. Upon changing this, I now get a different pam error. It says: "error: PAM: Authentication failure" One step closer.. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Dick Davies Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 9:41 AM To: Bret Walker Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Pam_ldap * Bret Walker [1023 15:23]: > I have ldap.conf in /etc/ and in /usr/local/etc/ldap.conf The one in /etc isn't doing anything, so get rid of it. The /usr/local/etc/ldap.conf should be holding the ad stuff (what user to bind as , etc). > I am able to log into the console as these users using the local > password, but not using the ldap password. All of my pam info is in > /etc/pam.conf, I don't have /etc/pam.d. Then you're on 4.X right? Shouldn't stop this working. > > sshd auth sufficient pam_skey.so > sshd auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_fake_prompts > sshd auth sufficient pam_unix.so try_first_pass > sshd auth sufficient /usr/local/lib/pam_ldap.so > try_first_pass debug > sshd account required pam_unix.so > sshd password required pam_permit.so > sshd session required pam_permit.co > > > All I see in the logs are messages saying: > "error: PAM: User not known to the underlying authentication module" Right, so sshd is using pam. That's something. The error could mean several things, one of which is that the user doesn't exist. If you look through your ldap.conf, you should have enough info to pretend to be PAM. use ldapsearch and try ldapsearch -H "ldap:// -D "" -W \ =username and enter the bindpw from ldap.conf If you don't get the AD account back, then your ldap.conf is screwed. > I'm pretty sure the ldap.conf files are correct, because I've followed > the instructions from several places to the T. "The nice thing about definitive LDAP howtos is there are so many to choose from" :) -- You may need to metaphorically make a deal with the devil. By 'devil' I mean robot devil and by 'metaphorically' I mean get your coat. - Bender Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ------=_NextPart_000_00F9_01C4A79D.53205B30 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIII2TCCAmEw ggHKoAMCAQICAwzDcDANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhh d3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVt YWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDQwNzI3MjMwMzM1WhcNMDUwNzI3MjMwMzM1WjBOMR8wHQYDVQQD ExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxicmV0LXdhbGtlckBub3J0 aHdlc3Rlcm4uZWR1MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQCr2KxZcyBLN/M2+Shau42D HRCTwrVNq2aB3ke9Ulo5GCzJMgZeLPK9WeY6GEbri7OUdF7tH/FS8qCrFCXHcUwJnMx0Ifa6ILMC YRvH3H8u8W3Q4QinnVPGUwx84VDg0rFpQf79F/BS4MofBMcsucO/F1t/linKZgMvq0vOgKoP6QID AQABozkwNzAnBgNVHREEIDAegRxicmV0LXdhbGtlckBub3J0aHdlc3Rlcm4uZWR1MAwGA1UdEwEB /wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAXonUId4OXjTXG19LKdWZ7cd4LcEtJlnFan5nwj2P1p+a bEd4doxkueYJ9u4+Thn633uqHR1v1CTPuTVSt5sGXKcSG8fUeaITE0lamDOKU6lqtc0S5+/0/5tb GCcmSp02WaLAatE9Iy8OY4NmGcR2oqHx05nYSwNB50UqOBNa4ZMwggMtMIIClqADAgECAgEAMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAMIHRMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYD VQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xGjAYBgNVBAoTEVRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nMSgwJgYDVQQLEx9DZXJ0 aWZpY2F0aW9uIFNlcnZpY2VzIERpdmlzaW9uMSQwIgYDVQQDExtUaGF3dGUgUGVyc29uYWwgRnJl ZW1haWwgQ0ExKzApBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWHHBlcnNvbmFsLWZyZWVtYWlsQHRoYXd0ZS5jb20wHhcN OTYwMTAxMDAwMDAwWhcNMjAxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdl c3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGlu ZzEoMCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhh d3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVlbWFp bEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKBgQDUadfUsJRkW3HpR9gMUbbq cpGwhF59LQ2PexLfhSV1KHQ6QixjJ5+Ve0vvfhmHHYbqo925zpZkGsIUbkSsfOaP6E0PcR9AOKYA o4d49vmUhl6t6sBeduvZFKNdbnp8DKVLVX8GGSl/npom1Wq7OCQIapjHsdqjmJH9edvlWsQcuQID AQABoxMwETAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQH/MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBAMfskn5O+PWWpWdiKqTw TRFg0G+NYFhhrCa7UjVcCM8w+6hKloofYkIjjBcP9LpknBesRynfnZhe0mxgcVyirNx54+duAEcf tQ0o6AKd5Jr9E/Sm2Xyx+NxfIyYJkYBz0BQb3kOpgyXy5pwvFcr+pquKB3WLDN1RhGvk+NHOd6KB MIIDPzCCAqigAwIBAgIBDTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgT DFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTESMBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3Vs dGluZzEoMCYGA1UECxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMb VGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVl bWFpbEB0aGF3dGUuY29tMB4XDTAzMDcxNzAwMDAwMFoXDTEzMDcxNjIzNTk1OVowYjELMAkGA1UE BhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1Ro YXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCB iQKBgQDEpjxVc1X7TrnKmVoeaMB1BHCd3+n/ox7svc31W/Iadr1/DDph8r9RzgHU5VAKMNcCY1os iRVwjt3J8CuFWqo/cVbLrzwLB+fxH5E2JCoTzyvV84J3PQO+K/67GD4Hv0CAAmTXp6a7n2XRxSpU hQ9IBH+nttE8YQRAHmQZcmC3+wIDAQABo4GUMIGRMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYBAf8CAQAwQwYDVR0f BDwwOjA4oDagNIYyaHR0cDovL2NybC50aGF3dGUuY29tL1RoYXd0ZVBlcnNvbmFsRnJlZW1haWxD QS5jcmwwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdEQQiMCCkHjAcMRowGAYDVQQDExFQcml2YXRlTGFiZWwy LTEzODANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOBgQBIjNFQg+oLLswNo2asZw9/r6y+whehQ5aUnX9MIbj4Nh+q LZ82L8D0HFAgk3A8/a3hYWLD2ToZfoSxmRsAxRoLgnSeJVCUYsfbJ3FXJY3dqZw5jowgT2Vfldr3 94fWxghOrvbqNOUQGls1TXfjViF4gtwhGTXeJLHTHUb/XV9lTzGCAs8wggLLAgEBMGkwYjELMAkG A1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMT I1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMMw3AwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAbww GAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDQxMDAxMTQ1OTIxWjAj BgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUP5JXIRNxPTHdGI3vIFP/BQoogecwZwYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMVowWDAKBggq hkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcN AwICASgwBwYFKw4DAhowCgYIKoZIhvcNAgUweAYJKwYBBAGCNxAEMWswaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3Rl IFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0ECAwzDcDB6BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFroGkwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNV BAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMMw3AwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEB BQAEgYBb1DnquKFRZNJV9ZXUGUmtV5Fmf8sxF1WM2olucMqUn791vwFq8+O+kN8Fdlr7QVJPUv4W cdASnJmQFy8Yu3CVtqZtteUK85IYUZnUSkiW3bT5/7NKl2TQ9SiXr7KZ0bveeIGtjY1laoUvSWJ4 d8hS2Ac7yb4+38/gYZx5cBR1qAAAAAAAAA== ------=_NextPart_000_00F9_01C4A79D.53205B30-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 15:06:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6534216A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:06:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zeus.davez.org (dlajoie-gw.rf.ncia.net [69.24.8.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF21743D5A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:06:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from questions@zeus.davez.org) Received: from zeus.davez.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.davez.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i91F6fb2008801 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:06:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from questions@zeus.davez.org) Received: from localhost (questions@localhost)i91F6fKp008798 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:06:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from questions@zeus.davez.org) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:06:41 -0400 (EDT) From: questions To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040213210413.T71247@admin1.mdc.net> Message-ID: <20040215094620.V6994@zeus.davez.org> References: <20040213192047.I431@zeus.davez.org> <20040213210413.T71247@admin1.mdc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: /var/log/wtmp always reseting to 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:06:43 -0000 Howdy, I'm running FreeBSD 4.10 my /var/log/wtmp file gets reset to 0 Kb (as well as the wtmp.X.gz files) at the end/beginning of each month. I noticed this last month when the monthly run output notice sent to roots mail stated = __________________Snip_____________________ TO:root@davez.org Subject: davez.org monthly run output Doing login accounting: total 0.00 -- End of monthly output -- _______________End Snip___________________ At first I thought maybe a isolated case but this month the same thing happened, the end of month accounting shows no logins and when I check the log files they are all empty 0Kb prior to todays activity. Anyone else seen this or have any ideas what may be wrong? Thanks in advance for any help provided - Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 15:08:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC17A16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:08:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B86E143D58 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:08:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krylon@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 23018 invoked by uid 65534); 1 Oct 2004 15:08:10 -0000 Received: from i5387493D.versanet.de (EHLO neuromancer.krylon.net) (83.135.73.61) by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 01 Oct 2004 17:08:10 +0200 X-Authenticated: #685629 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:08:10 +0200 From: Benjamin Walkenhorst To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20041001170810.28984ac8.krylon@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <415D48F5.9080304@comcast.net> References: <415D48F5.9080304@comcast.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2.1) User-Agent: Sylpheed 0.9.7 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Good Outlook Calendar Replacement in ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:08:12 -0000 On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 05:09:25 -0700 Rob wrote: > Made my doc a committment to put appointments on FreeBSD, like I used > to do at work on Windoze. No more missed ones LOL. > > Is there a good desk app in ports that will do this? Doesnt have to be > > fancy, just work reliably. Something that ran in background would be > perfect. And no- I'm not going to put them in as cron jobs HAHA > > Thanks, Rob > KDE has Kontact. Also, Evolution comes to mind. I think I remember there was a KDE app called korganizer, which also had some functionality for managing appointments among several users. I have never worked with Kontact and Evolution and only little experience with Korganizer on a single-user desktop. Kind regards, Benjamin -- If cars had improved at [the computer industry's] rate, a Rolls Royce would now cost 10 dollars and get a billion miles per gallon. (Unfortunately, it would probably also have 200-page manual telling how to open the door.) -- Andrew Tanenbaum, "Introduction To Distributed Systems" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 15:12:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E2916A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:12:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from stewie.obfuscated.net (stewie.obfuscated.net [66.118.188.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B9F43D3F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:12:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from meconlen@obfuscated.net) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (653260hfc185.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.60.185]) by stewie.obfuscated.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C576106; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:23:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <006301c4a557$6a387840$6e7dfea9@Shanelaptop> References: <415918AA.C4433D9D@sbhost.ro> <006301c4a557$6a387840$6e7dfea9@Shanelaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael E.Conlen Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 10:22:46 -0400 To: "shane mullins" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: Cristi Tauber cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:12:55 -0000 On Sep 28, 2004, at 8:33 AM, shane mullins wrote: > Why not just run OpenBSD if you want to use pf? I use both Free > and OpenBSD. But, pf is much easier to set up on OpenBSD. Just > install OpenBSD, enable routing, enable pf in rc.conf and you are > done. > I can tell you in my case OpenBSD doesn't provide drivers for the hardware I have. -- Michael Conlen meconlen@obfuscated.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 15:18:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F8B16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:18:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53404.mail.yahoo.com (web53404.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC12E43D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:18:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bg271828@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20041001151825.81704.qmail@web53404.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.107.204.129] by web53404.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:18:25 PDT Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:18:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Your Name To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: OpenOffice freezing on 5.2-CURRENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:18:26 -0000 Hi. i just installed OpenOffice 1.1.2 from a package; i need to work with some PowerPoint presentations and it seemed the best way. It looked like the install went fine, but now i cant seem to actually do anything with it. When it runs, the initial screen comes up but if i select the "open" dialog box it just freezes. Some other options go a bit longer--i can choose "New->Presentation" and that pops up an AutoPilot window, but after selecting one or two things that freezes too. None of these give any kind of crash report. i did the install as suggested, and there wasnt anything useful in the README (i did try to unset SESSION_MANAGER as suggested--im running GNOME--but it didnt work). What do i do? And if i cant get this working is there some other PowerPoint thing I can use, or a PowerPoint to HTML converter? Thanks! Jen __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 15:21:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C3616A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:21:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from webmail.wkcorp.com (webgate.wkcorp.com [142.179.95.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A315343D53 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:20:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mkj1@wkcorp.com) Received: from BILLLAPTOP (d66-183-67-167.bchsia.telus.net [66.183.67.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by webmail.wkcorp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700EA33FCB for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:20:56 -0700 (PDT) From: "Michael Kreykenbohm" To: Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 08:23:53 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: dynamic IPSEC: Holy grail sighted X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:21:04 -0000 I have a router/ FreeBSd with a network on the other side with a Dynamic IP. At the other end is a static IP router/ FreeBsd box. I was using a manually keyed encryption, now I have the racoon to do the key negotiation. I can change the static gif0 interfaces at the VPn dynamic router using the dhclient-exit-loop. But what about the server gif0 interface. The gif0 tunnel attributes want the VPN's router address, and I would need an "exit-hook" from racoon to set this up, more then just setting the SPD keys. Any idea where to latch that from. I'v though about watchdogs (check the SPD keys), but is there a better way. Michael Kreykenbohm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 15:38:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4281E16A54E for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:38:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from asmtp-a063f33.pas.sa.earthlink.net (asmtp-a063f33.pas.sa.earthlink.net [207.217.120.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229D943D31 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:38:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 31-21.lctv-ubr2-blk1.cablelynx.com ([206.255.31.21] helo=[192.168.63.10]) by asmtp-a063f33.pas.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.34) id 1CDPU2-0001aY-6p for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 08:38:10 -0700 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:38:19 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <415D48F5.9080304@comcast.net> <20041001170810.28984ac8.krylon@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20041001170810.28984ac8.krylon@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410011038.19078.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4bd0e4c0085390568bfa38e9088e97bccd350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Subject: Re: Good Outlook Calendar Replacement in ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:38:11 -0000 On Friday 01 October 2004 10:08 am, Benjamin Walkenhorst wrote: > On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 05:09:25 -0700 > > Rob wrote: > > Made my doc a committment to put appointments on FreeBSD, like I > > used to do at work on Windoze. No more missed ones LOL. > > > > Is there a good desk app in ports that will do this? Doesnt have to > > be > > > > fancy, just work reliably. Something that ran in background would > > be perfect. And no- I'm not going to put them in as cron jobs > > HAHA > > > > Thanks, Rob > > KDE has Kontact. Also, Evolution comes to mind. > I think I remember there was a KDE app called korganizer, which also > had some functionality for managing appointments among several users. > > I have never worked with Kontact and Evolution and only little > experience with Korganizer on a single-user desktop. > > Kind regards, > Benjamin I currently use jpilot, which doesn't do email; so I'm looking at Evolution, which has tools for syncing palm pilots, as a possible replacement. I could not find syncing tools for Kontact. Have fun, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 15:57:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3318816A4D0 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:57:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ngfl.dialnet.com (ngmail.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBED743D41 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:57:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) Received: from ngmfilt2.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.78] by ngfl.dialnet.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.12) id AF1E357C0076; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:00:30 +0100 Received: from relay.ngfl.dialnet.com (unverified) by ngmfilt2.ngfl.dialnet.com ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:56:23 +0100 Received: from firewall.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk (YahooBB219209044064.bbtec.net [172.30.0.70]) by ngrelay.dialnet.com with SMTP (MailShield v2.04 - WIN32 Jul 17 2001 17:12:42); Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:54:52 +0100 Received: from mail.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk (mail.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk [10.248.192.10]) ESMTP id i91FtpEu074130; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:55:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) Received: from [10.248.195.196] (dumpster.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk [10.248.195.196])ESMTP id i91FrKH0005841; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:53:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) From: ict technician Organization: Cardinal Newman School To: Malcolm Kay Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:53:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200409300945.15068.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> <200410011038.35037.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> <200410012119.04048.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> In-Reply-To: <200410012119.04048.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410011653.20646.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.8 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT, QUOTE_TWICE_1,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_KMAIL version=2.50 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp) X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (mail.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk) X-SMTP-HELO: firewall.lan.cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: malcolm.kay@internode.on.net X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: ianjhart@ntlworld.com X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: YahooBB219209044064.bbtec.net [172.30.0.70] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: ian j hart Subject: Re: broken fs dump file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:57:49 -0000 On Friday 01 October 2004 12:49, Malcolm Kay wrote: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 07:08 pm, ict technician wrote: > > On Thursday 30 September 2004 17:19, Malcolm Kay wrote: > > > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 06:15 pm, ict technician wrote: > > > > I have a broken fs dump I need to fix. Is there a diagnostic/repair > > > > tool I can use? I know about restore -N. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dump was taken on 4.10. Restoring on 5.3BETA, although I can change > > > > that. > > > > > > A question rather than an answer:---- > > > Is it valid to dump a ufs file system and try to restore it to a ufs2 > > > system? > > > > > > Malcolm > > > > wrt dump: > > on 5.x dump has to understand ufs2. However, you might choose to use ufs; > > so it has to deal with that. Since dump does both, restore must do both. > > QED :) > > > > I agree with the argument that dump must be able to dump a ufs fs > that restore can restore to a ufs fs, and that dump must be able to dump a > ufs2 fs that restore can restore to a ufs2 fs. > > But to dump a ufs fs and restore it to a ufs2 fs is not the same thing, > nor is it the 'normal' application for dump/restore. Normal use is dump newfs restore. newfs now defaults to ufs2, so the default behavior (on 5.x) is to convert from ufs to ufs2. RTFM and note the absence of supporting evidence in any of the BUGS sections. I see no CAVEATS. man 8 dump man 8 restore man 8 newfs > Maybe this is quite a valid thing to do; I'd like to see an 'official' > statement to that effect -- I find your argument in relation to this > situation unconvincing. Sorry about that. > > But you seem to be convinced by your investigation that the problem is > elsewhere so at least tentitively I will accept that it is valid thing to do > even though I dismiss your argument. My problem is not that it doesn't restore. restore is quite happy to write out 150,000 files. What it doesn't do is to recover from 3 faults in the file, leaving 100,000 files unrestored. If these files were in some way "magic" (/dev ?) you might have a point, but they are MS word documents. > > Malcolm > > > > -- i j hart ICT Technician Cardinal Newman Catholic School & Community College From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 16:12:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99BD16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:12:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta10.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8937543D49 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:12:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta10.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4W00455YBF14@mta10.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:11:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:11:48 -0400 From: bsdfsse In-reply-to: <16732.25993.895957.532010@satchel.alerce.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <415D81C4.1090200@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) References: <415B40E0.5030708@optonline.net> <16732.17233.408255.749193@satchel.alerce.com> <16732.25993.895957.532010@satchel.alerce.com> Subject: Re: Are there step-by-step VMWare instructions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:12:20 -0000 I'm going to try to install vmware2 instead of vmware3. I put a call in to VMWare to get a 2.0 license. I tried everything, I think. I'm new to FreeBSD, so that is kind of working against me. I will now try to dig up how to install vmware2 (I assume I don't have to make quite some many changes). vmware3 kept causing the DMA Read/Write errors when I turned on the vm machine. thx From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 16:32:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044F516A4CF; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:32:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B170F43D31; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:31:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4W00IQBZ9BUS@mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:31:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:32:07 -0400 From: bsdfsse In-reply-to: <415D81C4.1090200@optonline.net> To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Message-id: <415D8687.7040905@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) References: <415B40E0.5030708@optonline.net> <16732.17233.408255.749193@satchel.alerce.com> <415D81C4.1090200@optonline.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Are there step-by-step VMWare instructions? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:32:00 -0000 bsdfsse wrote: > > I'm going to try to install vmware2 instead of vmware3. I put a call in > to VMWare to get a 2.0 license. > > I tried everything, I think. I'm new to FreeBSD, so that is kind of > working against me. > > I will now try to dig up how to install vmware2 (I assume I don't have > to make quite some many changes). > > vmware3 kept causing the DMA Read/Write errors when I turned on the vm > machine. > > thx I didn't get very far with vmware2: ================================================================ ================================================================ cpq24# cd /usr/ports/emulators/vmware2 cpq24# make install ===> Building for vmware2-2.0.4.1142 ===> vmmon-only make -f Makefile.FreeBSD SMP=YES clean && make -f Makefile.FreeBSD SMP=YES rm -f /usr/ports/emulators/vmware2/work/vmware-distrib/vmmon-only/export_syms vmmon_smp.ko vmmon_smp.kld memtrack.o phystrack.o task.o vmx86.o driver.o hostif.o linux_emu.o vmnet_linux.o @ machine symb.tmp tmp.o Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/ports/emulators/vmware2/work/vmware-distrib/vmmon-only @ -> /usr/src/sys machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include cc -O -pipe -I/usr/ports/emulators/vmware2/work/vmware-distrib/vmmon-only/include -I/usr/ports/emulators/vmware2/work/vmware-distrib/vmmon-only/common --------------------- <> --------------------- /usr/ports/emulators/vmware2/work/vmware-distrib/vmmon-only/freebsd/driver.c:489: warning: 'FreeBSD_Driver_Poll' defined but not used /usr/ports/emulators/vmware2/work/vmware-distrib/vmmon-only/freebsd/driver.c:572: warning: 'FreeBSD_Driver_Ioctl' defined but not used *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/vmware2/work/vmware-distrib/vmmon-only. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/vmware2/work/vmware-distrib/vmmon-only. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/vmware2/work/vmware-distrib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/vmware2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/vmware2. cpq24# ================================================================ ================================================================ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 16:47:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8193D16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:47:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C6B43D49 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:47:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [10.2.1.2] (vpn-client-2.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.2]) i91GjdCW018178; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 12:45:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Message-ID: <415D8A11.8000806@marcuscom.com> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:47:13 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Macintosh/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gregory Nou References: <1096626599.50795.21.camel@alfred> <20041001105232.GC26273@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <1096628453.50795.27.camel@alfred> In-Reply-To: <1096628453.50795.27.camel@alfred> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome very very very slow ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:47:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Gregory Nou wrote: | Ok, thanks a lot, that worked (next I'll RTFM a bit more before asking | (ashamed)) | I put net.inet.tcp.blackhole to 0 and as a miracle all the windows I was | waiting appeared. | Since, I can't understand, why it formerly worked. | I made gnome work without lo0 (so 127.0.0.1 was unknown ...) and with | tcp.blackhole at 2 and udp.blackhole at 1 ... As that same FAQ says, FAM support is now enabled by default. If you do not configure FAM correctly, and you have TCP blackhole enabled, you will get these huge hangs at login time. You can either configure FAM, or recompile gnomevfs2 without FAM support, then you can use TCP blackhole all you want. Joe | | | | Le Ven 01/10/2004 à 12:52, Simon Barner a écrit : | |>Hi, |> |>I guess you have to fix your hostname: |> |>http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq2.html#q20 |> |>Simon | | | _______________________________________________ | freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list | http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions | To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" | - -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBXYoRb2iPiv4Uz4cRAi1BAKCqXbbGXaQbSVZtPj2urRjC/MyUGwCfesuw niF0COL0k4qHTtboXwPYXvk= =6+/1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 16:49:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123D216A4D1 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:49:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web50806.mail.yahoo.com (web50806.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62AAF43D1D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:49:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deegaans@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20041001164930.54614.qmail@web50806.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.110.76.168] by web50806.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:49:30 PDT Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:49:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Dee Gaans To: "Andrew L. Gould" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200410011038.19078.algould@datawok.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Good Outlook Calendar Replacement in ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:49:32 -0000 I am currently using Evolution and it is great.. I would recommend it.. DeeMan --- "Andrew L. Gould" wrote: > On Friday 01 October 2004 10:08 am, Benjamin > Walkenhorst wrote: > > On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 05:09:25 -0700 > > > > Rob wrote: > > > Made my doc a committment to put appointments on > FreeBSD, like I > > > used to do at work on Windoze. No more missed > ones LOL. > > > > > > Is there a good desk app in ports that will do > this? Doesnt have to > > > be > > > > > > fancy, just work reliably. Something that ran > in background would > > > be perfect. And no- I'm not going to put them > in as cron jobs > > > HAHA > > > > > > Thanks, Rob > > > > KDE has Kontact. Also, Evolution comes to mind. > > I think I remember there was a KDE app called > korganizer, which also > > had some functionality for managing appointments > among several users. > > > > I have never worked with Kontact and Evolution and > only little > > experience with Korganizer on a single-user > desktop. > > > > Kind regards, > > Benjamin > > I currently use jpilot, which doesn't do email; so > I'm looking at > Evolution, which has tools for syncing palm pilots, > as a possible > replacement. I could not find syncing tools for > Kontact. > > Have fun, > > Andrew Gould > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 16:57:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB0016A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:57:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53601.mail.yahoo.com (web53601.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.37.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F90843D48 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:57:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shimo_mild@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20041001165726.89258.qmail@web53601.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [219.83.36.250] by web53601.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 09:57:26 PDT Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:57:26 -0700 (PDT) From: shimo mura To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: pls give me more info about.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 16:57:30 -0000 Hello Sir, I need to know the site where available for me to make download freebsd 5.2.1 free and complete. Because i'm new and i really interest with the os and i want to learn more about it. Pls give me more link for free dowload freebsd 5.2.1. Thank you for your confirmation. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 17:00:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2F916A4D0 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:00:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4165F43D31 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:00:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4X00LVR0J8TE@mta8.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:59:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 12:59:41 -0400 From: bsdfsse In-reply-to: <20041001165726.89258.qmail@web53601.mail.yahoo.com> To: shimo mura Message-id: <415D8CFD.10801@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) References: <20041001165726.89258.qmail@web53601.mail.yahoo.com> cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pls give me more info about.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:00:24 -0000 > Pls give me more link for free dowload freebsd 5.2.1. http://www.linuxiso.org/distro.php?distro=15 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 17:02:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id C01A316A4D0; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20041001170200.C01A316A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:02:00 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2004/09/19 02:40:48 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions, -newbies or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions, -newbies or -hackers? =================================================== Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In addition, the FreeBSD-newbies list caters specifically for people who are new to FreeBSD and may be having trouble getting used to the environment. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If you're new to FreeBSD, and the message is about your own relationship to FreeBSD, send the message to FreeBSD-newbies. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.5 2004/09/19 02:40:48 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 17:02:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id C5BC716A4D2; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20041001170200.C5BC716A4D2@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:02:01 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm constantly updating it. Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 17:04:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E5E16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:04:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0829443D3F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:04:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ahze@ahze.net) Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([68.209.163.3]) by imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.netESMTP <20041001170401.EVGB1719.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[192.168.1.5]>; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:04:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20041001165726.89258.qmail@web53601.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20041001165726.89258.qmail@web53601.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Johnson Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:04:00 -0400 To: shimo mura X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pls give me more info about.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:04:02 -0000 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors- ftp.html On Oct 1, 2004, at 12:57 PM, shimo mura wrote: > Hello Sir, > > I need to know the site where available for me to make download > freebsd 5.2.1 free and complete. Because i'm new and i really interest > with the os and i want to learn more about it. > > Pls give me more link for free dowload freebsd 5.2.1. > > Thank you for your confirmation. > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 17:19:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AB2416A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:19:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF5043D1D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:19:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dhrider@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3611137rnb for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.1.72 with SMTP id 72mr931117rna; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.58 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <89ceee7041001101963feb009@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 10:19:34 -0700 From: Dan Finn To: Huajian Luo In-Reply-To: <20041001013612.3271.qmail@web14710.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040930182619.GA3580@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20041001013612.3271.qmail@web14710.mail.yahoo.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetchyahoo Failed: Couldn't get challenge to log in X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dan Finn List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:19:41 -0000 It's still working fine for me. On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 18:36:12 -0700 (PDT), Huajian Luo wrote: > > > > --- Simon Barner wrote: > > > Huajian Luo wrote: > > > hi,guys > > > I installed fetchyahoo and when I run fetchyahoo > > > It told me > > > ---- > > > Logging in securely via SSL as > > > Failed: Couldn't get challenge to log in, Try > > again > > > later, > > > > > > any comments on this? > > > Thanks in advance!!! > > > > I remember to have read that they changed their > > login interface, and > > thus fetchyahoo needs to be updated. > > > > A PR is already in the queue, but since the ports > > tree is currently > > frozen, the update will take some time to take > > place. > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/71804 > > > > If you are very impatienty, you can try the > > following: > > > > Edit the ports makefile, and change PORTVERSION to > > 2.8.6. > > Now run `make makesum && make build' and see if it > > works. > > > > No guarantees, of course... ;-) > > > > Simon > > Thanks for your information ,but I download the latest > version 2.8.6 from its master site,the output is same > as before, so maybe Yahoo changed his page again =( > > Thanks anyway, > huajian > > > _______________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! > http://vote.yahoo.com > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 17:26:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A0916A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:26:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wrongcrowd.com (dsl231-043-085.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF8643D54 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:26:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@wrongcrowd.com) Received: from [192.168.1.95] (port=1048 helo=tbird.wrongcrowd.com) by wrongcrowd.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1CDR9t-000DdZ-2L for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:25:30 -0700 Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.2.20041001102302.0cd64560@wrongcrowd.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0 Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:26:14 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Matt Staroscik In-Reply-To: <20041001171949.885F316A4F3@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20041001171949.885F316A4F3@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Subject: How do you duplicate a drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:26:18 -0000 I have a RAID mirror (2x 160GB) which I would like to back up onto a spare 160GB drive. I do not have a hot-swap caddy so I was planning on powering down the system to get the backup drive in and out. But once I have the new blank drive in, what is the best way to duplicate the RAID? Ideally I would like to create a disk that could boot the system (and rebuild the RAID) in case disaster strikes. Can dd do this? I am new to Unix disk operations... Many thanks in advance for the help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 18:00:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CBBE16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:00:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pearl.ibctech.ca (dev.eagle.ca [209.167.58.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3988343D1F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:00:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iaccounts@ibctech.ca) Received: (qmail 1358 invoked by uid 1002); 1 Oct 2004 18:03:07 -0000 Received: from iaccounts@ibctech.ca by pearl.ibctech.ca by uid 89 with qmail-scanner-1.22 (clamscan: 0.73. spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 2.871105 secs); 01 Oct 2004 18:03:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.ibctech.ca) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ibctech.ca with SMTP; 1 Oct 2004 18:03:03 -0000 Received: from 209.167.16.15 (SquirrelMail authenticated user steve@ibctech.ca); by webmail.ibctech.ca with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:03:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3513.209.167.16.15.1096653783.squirrel@209.167.16.15> In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20041001102302.0cd64560@wrongcrowd.com> References: <20041001171949.885F316A4F3@hub.freebsd.org> <6.1.2.0.2.20041001102302.0cd64560@wrongcrowd.com> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:03:03 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Bertrand" To: "Matt Staroscik" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do you duplicate a drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:00:57 -0000 > > I have a RAID mirror (2x 160GB) which I would like to back up onto a > spare > 160GB drive. > > I do not have a hot-swap caddy so I was planning on powering down the > system to get the backup drive in and out. > > But once I have the new blank drive in, what is the best way to > duplicate > the RAID? Ideally I would like to create a disk that could boot the > system > (and rebuild the RAID) in case disaster strikes. > > Can dd do this? # man rsync Steve > > I am new to Unix disk operations... Many thanks in advance for the > help. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 18:04:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5566E16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:04:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hermes.hyperhosting.gr (hermes.hyperhosting.gr [65.109.239.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A010243D55 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:04:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nicx@ebox.gr) Received: from hermes.hyperhosting.gr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i91I4umd006422 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:04:57 +0300 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:04:56 +0300 Message-Id: <200410011804.i91I4umd006422@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary From: Nicx To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: AtMail Pro 3.61 - http://webbasedemail.com/ X-Origin: 212.205.209.72 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: nicx@ebox.gr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:04:59 -0000 Hello Guy's! Is there any emulator that i can run win32 apllications on freeBSD? ... Nicx ---- www.ebox.gr - Dwrea'n E-mail µe 15MB mailbox www.hyperhosting.gr Apokty%ste to diko' sa*s web site µe dw%ro to domain name! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 18:21:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BC216A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:21:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EC543D3F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:21:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70D662E1; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:21:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29494-05; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:21:47 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B066294; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:21:45 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <415DA053.5000100@makeworld.com> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:22:11 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nicx@ebox.gr References: <200410011804.i91I4umd006422@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> In-Reply-To: <200410011804.i91I4umd006422@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.1.1 at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I'm a 'tard - I don't know what a Subject line is (Was well, no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:21:51 -0000 Nicx wrote: > Hello Guy's! > > Is there any emulator that i can run win32 apllications on freeBSD? > ... Nicx > ---- www.ebox.gr - Dwrea'n E-mail µe 15MB mailbox www.hyperhosting.gr > Apokty%ste to diko' sa*s web site µe dw%ro to domain name! I would be sooo much nicer it 'tards would learn to use the subject line -- Best regards, Chris It's better to retire too soon than too late. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 19:04:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0925416A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:04:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from p15140542.pureserver.info (papendorf-se.de [217.160.222.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4D443D1F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:04:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@nagilum.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by p15140542.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C572F4117; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:04:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from p15140542.pureserver.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p15140542 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05457-02; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:04:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cakebox.homeunix.net (stgt-d9bb5d86.pool.mediaWays.net [217.187.93.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by p15140542.pureserver.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7BD2F405B; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:04:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cakebox.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FD43029BD; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:04:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cakebox.homeunix.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cakebox.tis [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 99184-05; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:03:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.1.4] (scorpio.tis [10.1.1.4]) by cakebox.homeunix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672A7302903; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:03:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <415DAA10.1010909@nagilum.org> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 21:03:44 +0200 From: Nagilum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: metallarch@yandex.ru References: <415D170E.000037.14036@ariel.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <415D170E.000037.14036@ariel.yandex.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cakebox.homeunix.net X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at papendorf-se.de cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: nat or ......? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 19:04:21 -0000 ..use a proxy like squid (/usr/ports/www/squid) . probably easier than setting up NAT and sufficient if you only need http(s)/ftp(s). Kind regards, Alex. metallarch wrote: >I made the ppp connection from windows to freebsd(tun0), and from freebsd to internet >(tun2)"at the same time"! >I have 2 modems >What can i do that i could browse internet on windows over freebsd? >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 19:14:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6232316A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:14:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.chrononomicon.com (chrononomicon.com [216.37.143.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0CE343D5A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:14:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.0.42]) by mail.chrononomicon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43482FD582; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 07:42:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: References: <2256FBDB-1020-11D9-9161-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <14C2CA75-1021-11D9-B748-000A959CEE6A@pursued-with.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <5FAE19E6-107A-11D9-98C2-000D9338770A@chrononomicon.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 07:42:56 -0400 To: Eric Crist X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT] Anyone know a good counterpart to this list for Mac OS X? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 19:14:18 -0000 On Sep 26, 2004, at 9:16 PM, Eric Crist wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Sep 26, 2004, at 8:03 PM, Kevin Stevens wrote: > >> >> On Sep 26, 2004, at 17:56, Eric Crist wrote: >> >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Sorry for the off-topic question. I was wondering if anyone is >>> aware of a good counterpart to this list for Mac OS X. Possibly >>> even containing people from this list who've moved to a Mac? I just >>> moved my primary workstation to a PowerBook G4 and I'm starting to >>> have some techie questions that I can't quite figure out. >> >> If you want to post to a Mac list, I suggest taking a look at the >> X-Unix >> list at: http://www.themacintoshguy.com/lists/X-Unix.html >> >> KeS > > I'm going to give this a shot. Hopefully they're as professional as > those on this list. I've got high standards now a days. ;) I'm looking for a decent list for Windows Server 2000 :-/ We have some terminal servers and file servers acting up with some quirks (surprise!). For your question, I am subscribed to a pretty good MacOSX admin list...my rule lists the address as macosx-admin.omnigroup.com , so maybe I had subscribed from the omnigroup website :-) -Bart From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 19:14:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8620C16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:14:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.chrononomicon.com (chrononomicon.com [216.37.143.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE9B43D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:14:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.0.42]) by mail.chrononomicon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A9CFDE17; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:44:55 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <764C01E1-10B9-11D9-8AA7-000393681B06@lafn.org> References: <493F1EDF-0FE0-11D9-A586-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <20040926143211.02d40949.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <4157A0F9.6010007@zonnet.nl> <20040927090142.1719d106.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <41585E4B.9040108@zonnet.nl> <764C01E1-10B9-11D9-8AA7-000393681B06@lafn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 15:44:53 -0400 To: Doug Hardie X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: FreeBSD Question List Subject: Re: Backup Mail Server Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 19:14:18 -0000 On Sep 27, 2004, at 3:14 PM, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On Sep 27, 2004, at 11:39, Nico Meijer wrote: > >> Regular folks don't understand how mail works. They have no clue >> whatsoever. They don't _want_ to have a clue either. They are just >> behaving like consumers, again. Do you *really* want to know what's >> on your plate at dinner? ;-) I do, maybe you too, but most people >> don't. >> >> If I had a dime for every time I have had to discuss how mail delivery >> actually works to Joe Average or his Windows NT/2000 systems >> administrator... boy. >> >>> Again, I have many _very_ strong opinions on how email should be >>> managed, this is one of them. >> >> I happen to have a very strong opinion on the grim state of humanity >> in general and regular, everyday, Joe Average computer users in >> particular. I am therefore strongly biased. ;-) > > When Joe Average computer user sends an order to Jane Trader to sell > his stock in xxx because its the highest its ever been and that email > sits in your secondary MX until after xxx falls to penny stock status, > then Joe Average computer user will have plenty of world class lawyers > on his doorstep with big dollar signs in their eyes. They will have > no problem convincing Joe Sub-Average juror (of which there will be > more than enough to go around) that you were the cause of Joe Average > computer users' loss of his entire retirement savings. After all, you > accepted the email and acknowledged it and failed to deliver it to > Jane in a timely fashion. Any technical arguments you make about the > server down etc., will not faze the judge (who couldn't care less - he > gets paid the same no matter who wins) or Joe Sub-Average juror who is > only interested in who is putting on the better entertainment (you or > the soap opera he is missing at home). Joe Average was stupid to have only one way of verifying that this transaction took place...and failed...lacking verification, there should ALWAYS be a backup way to do a transaction involving large sums of cash to verify that transactions go through when the primary means of communication (like your email server) becomes unavailable. If you don't, that's your fault. Crap happens to any ISP and at some point your primary means of internet usage WILL go down. Not the system admin's problem as long as the system admin wasn't knowingly negligent. My domain was just changed over. While my domain changed appropriately, my reverse DNS still isn't set right (the company that controls the IP block is about as responsive as a pack of slugs). My postings to the freebsd question list have not been appearing, despite the fact that the changes seem to be working since late Saturday (except the afore-mentioned reverse dns lookups). I can't really look into "fixing" this more until I know that the reversals are working properly to see if there's something else causing it. I have gotten no bounces from the mail servers, no bounces from the list, NOTHING...my three or so postings have simply disappeared. Can I sue someone? I may have had a big issue on my servers to see help on before we lose lots of money... :-) (yes, I'm really having this problem right now, and I don't know how to get it fixed at the moment, even though I'm hoping it is just a reverse-DNS lookup issue and once the slugs get off their butts I'll start getting my posts back to the list again :-( -Bart From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 19:24:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463C816A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:24:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F055743D3F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:24:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F24369A40; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:24:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:24:20 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Chris Message-Id: <20041001152420.2647dae9.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <415DA053.5000100@makeworld.com> References: <200410011804.i91I4umd006422@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> <415DA053.5000100@makeworld.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: nicx@ebox.gr cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I'm a 'tard - I don't know what a Subject line is (Was well, no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 19:24:24 -0000 Chris wrote: > Nicx wrote: > > Hello Guy's! > >=20 > > Is there any emulator that i can run win32 apllications on freeBSD? > > ... Nicx > > ---- www.ebox.gr - Dwrea'n E-mail =B5e 15MB mailbox www.hyperhosting= .gr > > Apokty%ste to diko' sa*s web site =B5e dw%ro to domain name! >=20 > I would be sooo much nicer it 'tards would learn to use the subject line Those kind of comments are not welcome on this list. When a poster violates the posting policy, it is customary to _politely_ direct him/her to a reference regarding the proper policy, i.e. http://www.lemis.com/questions.html If you want to be rude to people, please don't associate yourself with FreeBSD when you do it. As to the OP's question, look at wine (http://www.winehq.com) ... although I've never had much success with it, that's what it's supposed to do. --=20 Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 19:26:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4549216A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:26:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cqgigw.cqg.com (cqgigw.cqg.com [208.48.16.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE6543D39 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:26:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tomc@cqg.com) Received: from cqgmail.cqg.com (int.cqg.com [96.0.0.2]) i91JQMXU031308; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:26:22 -0600 Received: from d3stomc ([192.168.17.154]) by cqgmail.cqg.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i91JPxSf026335; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:26:00 -0600 From: "Tom Connolly" To: "'Bill Moran'" , "'Chris'" Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:25:59 -0600 Message-ID: <043801c4a7ec$7b9c0740$9a11a8c0@d3stomc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.181 In-Reply-To: <20041001152420.2647dae9.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Importance: Normal X-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (score=0, required 3) cc: nicx@ebox.gr cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: I'm a 'tard - I don't know what a Subject line is (Was well, no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 19:26:34 -0000 Here here! -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Bill Moran Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 1:24 PM To: Chris Cc: nicx@ebox.gr; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I'm a 'tard - I don't know what a Subject line is (Was = well, no subject) Chris wrote: > Nicx wrote: > > Hello Guy's! > >=20 > > Is there any emulator that i can run win32 apllications on = freeBSD? > > ... Nicx > > ---- www.ebox.gr - Dwrea'n E-mail =B5e 15MB mailbox = www.hyperhosting.gr > > Apokty%ste to diko' sa*s web site =B5e dw%ro to domain name! >=20 > I would be sooo much nicer it 'tards would learn to use the subject = line Those kind of comments are not welcome on this list. When a poster violates the posting policy, it is customary to _politely_ direct him/her to a reference regarding the proper policy, i.e. http://www.lemis.com/questions.html If you want to be rude to people, please don't associate yourself with FreeBSD when you do it. As to the OP's question, look at wine (http://www.winehq.com) ... = although I've never had much success with it, that's what it's supposed to do. --=20 Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 19:30:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E9D16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:30:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.chrononomicon.com (chrononomicon.com [216.37.143.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F98343D48 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:30:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.0.42]) by mail.chrononomicon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5C2FD699; Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:03:24 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20040927141959.789dc1ea@bofh.spyderweb.com.au> References: <20040927085147.7b2d8575@bofh.spyderweb.com.au> <20040927141959.789dc1ea@bofh.spyderweb.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <3C63F041-107D-11D9-98C2-000D9338770A@chrononomicon.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 08:03:25 -0400 To: Tim Aslat X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 19:30:57 -0000 On Sep 27, 2004, at 12:49 AM, Tim Aslat wrote: > In the immortal words of "Ted Mittelstaedt" ... >> Once again, I must assume that these notebooks legitimately owned by >> students and staff are NOT owned by the people that are changing the >> IP numbers. > > I actually think it's more than 1 culprit, and I couldn't be 100% > certain whether they are using their own notebooks or school machines > until I catch them in the act. Do what spammers do...set up all the school machines to act as zombies and when you detect the asshats pulling their little trick, flood them with connection requests to poof them off the network :-) >> If you have a situation where you KNOW who is doing it, and they are >> getting away with this, with the full knowledge of the Dean and others >> in the college, >> then you may as well just start looking for another job. If I was in >> your shoes >> I would. > > Nobody is actually getting away with it, it's just frustrating not > knowing who. Doesn't arpwatch look for the mac changes on the network, which could help you track down the MAC which is pulling the address when it shouldn't? I see messages from arpwatch from some of our servers when DHCP leases change. Will at least help you narrow down the suspects...If you get a MAC address, you can run a detailed NMap against them to try identifying platform information as well as get the make/model of their network card from the MAC. That MAC, unless they're spoofing it, will give you evidence to use against them. There's also Nessus you can use on the system once you narrow it down...see what if any vulnerabilities there may be. Not that *I* advocate doing something like this. I'd *never* advocate breaking into another machine just because it was causing problems on your network. Once you have their MAC, you could also watch and see what address that MAC is magically changed to when the "attack" stops...then redirect their traffic using some ARP redirection (etherpeek? dsniff?) to redirect their requests through a local BSD machine acting as a gateway (forwarding packets). Sniff the traffic for awhile until a username comes through when looking for POP mail or some other text-based requests, then you know who it is (or at least who's at that machine). It's your school's network, and usually there's policies in place saying that a user does not have guaranteed privacy to information going over school or university networks (or business networks, for that matter), especially if the hardware is school owned (and you don't really have a way of telling this with this attack, unless you have a list of MACs owned by the school and know for a fact that the user isn't spoofing the MAC). Just some ideas I'd consider. > More than likely. Unfortunately this is a legacy network held together > with band-aids and fencing wire. I'm gradually making changes to the > infrastructure, but it all costs money and in this case, it definitely > won't happen overnight, but it is happening. > > Thanks for the suggestions. Can you contact your upstream provider for a couple static IPs or a static IP that you could use to subnet and NAT your servers for the public off the regular student network? That way the idiots in your own network shouldn't be *able* to affect your web servers, mail servers, etc... Of course, they could continue screwing with your internal servers, but at least this would reduce the damage they inflict. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 19:42:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9201A16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:42:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.chrononomicon.com (chrononomicon.com [216.37.143.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F61743D3F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:42:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.0.42]) by mail.chrononomicon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A371057B4 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:42:44 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: <20041001152420.2647dae9.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <200410011804.i91I4umd006422@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> <415DA053.5000100@makeworld.com> <20041001152420.2647dae9.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: <0FC23518-13E2-11D9-A30F-000D9338770A@chrononomicon.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:42:43 -0400 To: FreeBSD Question List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Re: I'm a 'tard - I don't know what a Subject line is (Was well, no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 19:42:45 -0000 On Oct 1, 2004, at 3:24 PM, Bill Moran wrote: > Chris wrote: > >> Nicx wrote: >>> Hello Guy's! >>> >>> Is there any emulator that i can run win32 apllications on=20 >>> freeBSD? >>> ... Nicx >>> ---- www.ebox.gr - Dwrea'n E-mail =B5e 15MB mailbox=20 >>> www.hyperhosting.gr >>> Apokty%ste to diko' sa*s web site =B5e dw%ro to domain name! >> >> I would be sooo much nicer it 'tards would learn to use the subject=20= >> line > > Those kind of comments are not welcome on this list. Maybe he was having a bad day and took one too many irritations like=20 that to heart; I sometimes don't bother replying to top posters anymore=20= in my emails or to lists just because it's irritating to me to keep=20 going through jumbled headers and sorting crap out to get an actual=20 idea of what is going on in an email. Eventually I just pop it into=20 the bit bucket...if it's important, they'll email again with hopefully=20= a new email that's clean and free of crap. Same with people that use reply-to to post their new message=20 topics...so it gets threaded under a different subject that has NOTHING=20= to do with the actual topic at hand. So they screw up the threading. AAARGH then again, I break the 72-character wrapping. Other people are really=20= miffed at that in this list. I wish someone would fix the Unix mailers=20= to see this properly, because I'm using Mail.app and it's stupid after=20= being drilled so often not to hit "enter" periodically for word=20 processing. Mail.app does put in wrapping, but it's using a type of=20 word wrapping that is configurable...something from qualcomm, I want to=20= say?...where messages would be dynamically wrapped to be more readable=20= on variable display sizes. Something about messages showing up=20 properly in email editors on PCs to small displays like those on PDA's=20= and cellphones. If the mailer interprets this properly, every=20 quotation is properly indented regardless of the size of the window. =20 So I irritate people in that regard. When everyone who emails me stops top posting and screwing up the=20 threading or doing anything else to irritate my wonderful online=20 experience, I'll manually wrap lines at 72 characters. Anyway, yeah, it was wrong to be so harsh...but maybe he had *some*=20 justification in mind at the time. > If you want to be rude to people, please don't associate yourself with > FreeBSD when you do it. Yeah...take it to an advocacy forum! :-) > As to the OP's question, look at wine (http://www.winehq.com) ...=20 > although > I've never had much success with it, that's what it's supposed to do. Try using vmware, or QEMU. Or Plex86, or whatever they're calling that=20= project now. VM's tended to work much better for running Windows=20 software than WINE has worked for me, but that's just my experience. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 19:45:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3CA616A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:45:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vvi.com (mail.vvi.com [207.68.114.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C68E43D1D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:45:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lbland@vvi.com) Received: from [207.68.114.251] (account lbland [207.68.114.251] verified) by vvi.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 4420075; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:47:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: <2256FBDB-1020-11D9-9161-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> References: <2256FBDB-1020-11D9-9161-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: lbland Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:47:21 -0400 To: Eric Crist X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT] Anyone know a good counterpart to this list for Mac OS X? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 19:45:00 -0000 On Sep 26, 2004, at 8:56 PM, Eric Crist wrote: > Sorry for the off-topic question. I was wondering if anyone is aware > of a good counterpart to this list for Mac OS X. Possibly even > containing people from this list who've moved to a Mac? I just moved > my primary workstation to a PowerBook G4 and I'm starting to have some > techie questions that I can't quite figure out. hi- check out the few dozen lists available at: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo thanks!- -lance Lance Bland mailto:lbland@vvi.com VVI 888-VVI-PLOT http://www.vvi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 19:45:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2922E16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:45:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E8243D2D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:45:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF02663A1; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:45:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29961-08; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:45:40 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D56637F; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:45:39 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <415DB3FE.8070001@makeworld.com> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:46:06 -0500 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <200410011804.i91I4umd006422@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> <415DA053.5000100@makeworld.com> <20041001152420.2647dae9.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20041001152420.2647dae9.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.1.1 at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: nicx@ebox.gr cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I'm a 'tard - I don't know what a Subject line is (Was well, no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 19:45:45 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > Chris wrote: > > >>Nicx wrote: >> >>> Hello Guy's! >>> >>> Is there any emulator that i can run win32 apllications on freeBSD? >>> ... Nicx >>> ---- www.ebox.gr - Dwrea'n E-mail µe 15MB mailbox www.hyperhosting.gr >>> Apokty%ste to diko' sa*s web site µe dw%ro to domain name! >> >>I would be sooo much nicer it 'tards would learn to use the subject line > > > Those kind of comments are not welcome on this list. > > When a poster violates the posting policy, it is customary to _politely_ > direct him/her to a reference regarding the proper policy, i.e. > http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Then something has changed. So often flames start by a user simply asking a question that had he/she simply searched the list - would have found the answer covered many times over. This is really no different then users that top post. Sorry folks, I'm not the "touchy-feely" type. Choose your verbiage - I call it as I see it. -- Best regards, Chris Beware of the physician who is great at getting out of trouble. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 20:07:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A0016A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:07:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yoda.pixi.com (yoda.pixi.com [206.127.224.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DEF43D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:07:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from knowtree@aloha.com) Received: from yoda.pixi.com (yoda.pixi.com [206.127.224.41]) by yoda.pixi.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id i91JTmh14405; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:29:48 -1000 Message-Id: <200410011929.i91JTmh14405@yoda.pixi.com> To: Matt Staroscik , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: knowtree@aloha.com Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 09:29:48 HST X-Posting-IP: 141.190.32.68 X-Mailer: Endymion MailMan Standard Edition v3.2.19 Subject: Re: How do you duplicate a drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:07:23 -0000 > > I have a RAID mirror (2x 160GB) which I would like to back up onto a spare > 160GB drive. > > I do not have a hot-swap caddy so I was planning on powering down the > system to get the backup drive in and out. > > But once I have the new blank drive in, what is the best way to duplicate > the RAID? Ideally I would like to create a disk that could boot the system > (and rebuild the RAID) in case disaster strikes. > > Can dd do this? As far as I know (never having done it myself) yes, byte for byte. Before you do that I suggest you read up on vinum, the FreeBSD mirroring service. There is man vinum, and a lot more in the on-line handbook, and even more in Greg Lehey's The Complete FreeBSD. Greg wrote vinum, BTW. (Greg, no charge for the plug.) Gary Dunn Honolulu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 20:27:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB92716A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:27:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBFE43D46 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:27:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i91KRMf29553; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:27:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200410012027.i91KRMf29553@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: racerx@makeworld.com (Chris) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:27:22 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <415DB3FE.8070001@makeworld.com> from "Chris" at Oct 01, 2004 02:46:06 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: nicx@ebox.gr cc: Bill Moran cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I'm a 'tard - I don't know what a Subject line is (Was well, X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:27:40 -0000 > > Bill Moran wrote: > > Chris wrote: > > > > > >>Nicx wrote: > >> > >>> Hello Guy's! > >>> > >>> Is there any emulator that i can run win32 apllications on freeBSD? > >>> ... Nicx > >>> ---- www.ebox.gr - Dwrea'n E-mail µe 15MB mailbox www.hyperhosting.gr > >>> Apokty%ste to diko' sa*s web site µe dw%ro to domain name! > >> > >>I would be sooo much nicer it 'tards would learn to use the subject line > > > > > > Those kind of comments are not welcome on this list. > > > > When a poster violates the posting policy, it is customary to _politely_ > > direct him/her to a reference regarding the proper policy, i.e. > > http://www.lemis.com/questions.html > > Then something has changed. So often flames start by a user simply > asking a question that had he/she simply searched the list - would have > found the answer covered many times over. > > This is really no different then users that top post. > Sorry folks, I'm not the "touchy-feely" type. > Choose your verbiage - I call it as I see it. We don't appreciate people calling people names -- even if the person started by calling themself that name "'tard". There is no need to be offensive or to perpetuate offensive or inhumane language. As for specific criticisms of behavior, done in reasonable language, they are acceptable. ////jerry > > -- > Best regards, > Chris > > Beware of the physician who is great at getting > out of trouble. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 20:34:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE56416A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:34:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCD943D49 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:34:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280A569A3F; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:34:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:34:34 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: Chris Message-Id: <20041001163434.0bc40983.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <415DB3FE.8070001@makeworld.com> References: <200410011804.i91I4umd006422@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> <415DA053.5000100@makeworld.com> <20041001152420.2647dae9.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <415DB3FE.8070001@makeworld.com> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: nicx@ebox.gr cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I'm a 'tard - I don't know what a Subject line is (Was well, no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:34:36 -0000 Chris wrote: > Bill Moran wrote: > > Chris wrote: > >=20 > >=20 > >>Nicx wrote: > >> > >>> Hello Guy's! > >>> > >>> Is there any emulator that i can run win32 apllications on freeBSD? > >>> ... Nicx > >>> ---- www.ebox.gr - Dwrea'n E-mail =B5e 15MB mailbox www.hyperhostin= g.gr > >>> Apokty%ste to diko' sa*s web site =B5e dw%ro to domain name! > >> > >>I would be sooo much nicer it 'tards would learn to use the subject line > >=20 > >=20 > > Those kind of comments are not welcome on this list. > >=20 > > When a poster violates the posting policy, it is customary to _politely_ > > direct him/her to a reference regarding the proper policy, i.e. > > http://www.lemis.com/questions.html >=20 > Then something has changed. So often flames start by a user simply=20 > asking a question that had he/she simply searched the list - would have=20 > found the answer covered many times over. No. Nothing has changed. The official list policy has ALWAYS been to be polite. And people have ALWAYS violated that policy. And people like me have ALWAYS jumped in and made a point of the fact that this kind of thing is NOT acceptable. I don't care how many flame wars have upset you. This list can get VERY frustrating at times ... since it's not moderated, people say a lot of things, but that doesn't mean it's OK. It just means that nobody's going to get banned from the list because they have a bad day. On top of that, I'm pointing out ... once again, that OFFICIAL LIST POLICY is posted at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html (there is a copy of this on www.freebsd.org, but I don't feel like searching for it right now) and I quote: "... If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. " If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like." > This is really no different then users that top post. > Sorry folks, I'm not the "touchy-feely" type. > Choose your verbiage - I call it as I see it. I don't really care what "type" you are. If you continually make rude remarks to new posters, I will email postmaster@ with a corpus of your rudeness, and request that you be banned on the basis that it's against list policy. As I said, we all have bad days, I'm no exception. But admit that you're having a bad day, apologize for it and move on. If you can't do that, you should follow grog's advice and "don't answer." --=20 Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 20:34:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA6216A4DA for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:34:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from deimos.aros.net (deimos.aros.net [66.219.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D5E43D1D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:34:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@josh.aros.net) Received: from [10.0.1.37] (firebat.aros.net [66.219.192.36]) by deimos.aros.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i91KYVeU036088 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 14:34:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from lists@josh.aros.net) Message-ID: <415DBFFE.7010301@josh.aros.net> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 14:37:18 -0600 From: Josh Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040926) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris References: <200410011804.i91I4umd006422@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> <415DA053.5000100@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <415DA053.5000100@makeworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new on deimos.aros.net cc: nicx@ebox.gr cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I'm a 'tard - I don't know what a Subject line is (Was well, no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:34:40 -0000 Chris wrote: > Nicx wrote: > >> Hello Guy's! >> >> Is there any emulator that i can run win32 apllications on freeBSD? >> ... Nicx >> ---- www.ebox.gr - Dwrea'n E-mail µe 15MB mailbox www.hyperhosting.gr >> Apokty%ste to diko' sa*s web site µe dw%ro to domain name! > > > I would be sooo much nicer it 'tards would learn to use the subject line > It would be nice if everyone used proper grammar and spelling as well. ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 20:35:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA7116A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:35:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8D843D49 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:35:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.16.62]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CDU7Y-0006Aw-91; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 21:35:17 +0100 Received: from cmjg (helo=localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CDU7O-0003B7-Vy; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 21:35:15 +0100 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:35:06 +0100 (BST) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: Brian McCann In-Reply-To: <2b5f066d0410010542a38e93b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <2b5f066d04093013344d048003@mail.gmail.com> <2034.67.167.52.21.1096577945.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> <2b5f066d0410010542a38e93b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Jan Grant X-Spam-Score: 0.0 X-Spam-Level: / cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Backup/Restore X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:35:19 -0000 On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Brian McCann wrote: > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:59:05 -0700 (PDT), Richard Lynch wrote: > > > > Brian McCann wrote: > > > Hi all...I'm having a conceptual problem I can't get around and > > > was hoping someone can change my focus here. I've been backing up > > > roughly 6-8 million small files (roughly 2-4k each) using dump, but > > > restores take forever due to the huge number of files and directories. > > > Luckily, I haven't had to restore for an emergency yet...but if I > > > need to, I'm kinda stuck. I've looked at distributed file systems > > > like CODA, but the number of files I have to deal with will make it > > > choke. Can anyone offer any suggestions? I've pondered running > > > rsync, but am very worried about how long that will take... > > > > Do the files change a lot, or is it more like a few files added/changed > > every day, and the bulk don't change? > > > > If it's the latter, you could maybe get best performance from something > > like Subversion (a CVS derivative). > > > > Though I suspect rsync would also do well in that case. > > > > If a ton of those files are changing all the time, try doing a test on > > creating a tarball and then backing up the tarball. That may be a simple > > managable solution. There are probably other more complex solutions of > > which I am ignorant :-) > > I have the case where a new file is created about every second or two, > nothing gets changed, but files get deleted occasionally (it's a mail > server). I thought of using tar, but it would be just as slow as dump > I would think. I've thought of breaking it up into chunks, but that > still doesn't solve my speed issue...i'm beginning to consider using > dd since it reads the actual disk bits, and just hope that a)I don't > ever need one file and b) the system I restore to has at least or more > space then the original server. Any other thoughts anyone? You might want to experiment with something like rsync to maintain a "live" (ie, on a FS) second copy. If you do this don't be put off by the initial rsync time (which may well take ages - tar or dump/restore may be faster to get the second copy in place initially). Rsync over such a large filesystem may take quite a while but the best bet is to actually try it to see if it meets your needs. Obviously a restore of a mail repository is a pretty awful thing to have to do. Amongst other things, users can find the "ressurrection" of deleted mails to be a real pain. You might want to see if your mail repo can generate some kind of replay log - if so, this might be the best route for minimising the amount of time needed to synchronise mailstores and to get the closest fidelity out of the copy. Breaking your mailstore into separate chunks may well help. Yes, the total time for a dump/restore may be close to your current state of play, but if you can split the partitions between machines then you have the option to perform these in parallel. -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ "...perl has been dead for more than 4 years." - Abigail in the Monastery From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 20:39:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD5516A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:39:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (redqueen.elvandar.org [217.148.169.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4837443D55 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:39:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 512D329547C; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:27:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.elvandar.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (redqueen.elvandar.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62538-18; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:27:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <415DA1AA.4000804@elvandar.org> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:27:54 +0200 From: Remko Lodder User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: nicx@ebox.gr, FreeBSD Questions References: <200410011804.i91I4umd006422@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> In-Reply-To: <200410011804.i91I4umd006422@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org Subject: Re: Emulatof for win32 apps on FreeBSD (Was: ) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:39:17 -0000 Nicx wrote: > Hello Guy's! > > Is there any emulator that i can run win32 apllications on freeBSD? > ... Nicx Try wine... and like others said, try to use the subject line please! -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl Founder Tienervaders |remko@tienervaders.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 20:39:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEC216A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:39:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (redqueen.elvandar.org [217.148.169.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4821743D53 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:39:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05AD295494; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:32:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.elvandar.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (redqueen.elvandar.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63119-06; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:32:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <415DA2BB.4010408@elvandar.org> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:32:27 +0200 From: Remko Lodder User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Staroscik References: <20041001171949.885F316A4F3@hub.freebsd.org> <6.1.2.0.2.20041001102302.0cd64560@wrongcrowd.com> In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20041001102302.0cd64560@wrongcrowd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do you duplicate a drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:39:17 -0000 Matt Staroscik wrote: > > I have a RAID mirror (2x 160GB) which I would like to back up onto a > spare 160GB drive. > > I do not have a hot-swap caddy so I was planning on powering down the > system to get the backup drive in and out. > > But once I have the new blank drive in, what is the best way to > duplicate the RAID? Ideally I would like to create a disk that could > boot the system (and rebuild the RAID) in case disaster strikes. > > Can dd do this? > > I am new to Unix disk operations... Many thanks in advance for the help. > I think that dd if=/dev/ of=/dev/ would work in duplicating the entire raid disk. I don't know if there are better ways, so if someone knows them, we would like to know ;) Cheers! -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl Founder Tienervaders |remko@tienervaders.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 20:46:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D52A16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:46:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web14122.mail.yahoo.com (web14122.mail.yahoo.com [66.163.171.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E2C143D1D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:46:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from k_greenwood1@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20041001204624.18145.qmail@web14122.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.105.201.44] by web14122.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 13:46:24 PDT Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:46:24 -0700 (PDT) From: "K. Greenwood" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: NDISulator (aka. Project Evil) wmp54gs w. bcm4306 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 20:46:24 -0000 Quick question. Where do queries regarding Bill Paul's NDISulator go? I have seen some to current, hardware, mobile. Or even better, a howto (the best I have seen thus far is:) http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-January/019486.html The following is extraneous info, if someone here can clue me in. I have a PCI Linksys WMP54GS (pciconf -vl as follows): ndis00@pci0:8:0 class=0x028000 card=0x00151737 chip=0x432014e4 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller' class = network FreeBSD type (uname -a) as follows: FreeBSD workstation.domain.org 5.3-BETA6 FreeBSD 5.3BETA6 #0: Sat Sep 25 19:41:14 UTC 2004 root@wv1u.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 The only device that I can find that looks like it is listed as pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) I copied over the win32exe from the linksys site, used a windows system and got the required files (BCMWL5.inf & bcmwl5.sys). Address follows. http://www.linksys.com/download/driver.asp?dlid=132&osid=6 And attempted the following, as per Mr. Paul's message. # cp foo.sys foo.inf /sys/modules/if_ndis # cd /sys/modules/ndis # make; make load # cd /sys/modules/if_ndis # ndiscvt -i foo.inf -s foo.sys -o ndis_driver_data.h # make; make load When I attempt to 'make load' the following message is displayed. ndis0: mem 0xffef6000-0xffef7fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci 0 ndis0: NDIS API version: 5.0 ndis0: NDIS ERROR: c0001389 (unknown error) ndis0: NDIS NUMERRORS: 1 ndis0: argptr: 0xc ndis0: init handler failed device_attach: ndis0 attach returned 6 And kldstat lists the following: Id Refs Address Size Name 1 6 0xc0400000 5b6c5c kernel 2 1 0xc14f1000 53000 if_ndis.ko 3 1 0xc1544000 d000 ndis.ko I have even attempted to enter ndis_load="YES" in the loader.conf, but to no avail. Also, I have hand typed these in, so any mistakes are likely due to me typing in this message. If you have gotten to this point, thanks for your patience. If you have a suggestion, even better! But please, type slowly and use small words. I have the capacity of an ill trained carp. _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 21:42:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0B116A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:42:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from earth.blowwater.hk (cm218-255-5-59.hkcable.com.hk [218.255.5.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B4343D60 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:42:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lila@earth.blowwater.hk) Received: from earth.blowwater.hk (localhost.blowwater.hk [127.0.0.1]) by earth.blowwater.hk (8.13.1/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i91LictX024582 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 05:44:38 +0800 (HKT) (envelope-from lila@earth.blowwater.hk) Received: from localhost (lila@localhost)i91Liban024579 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 05:44:38 +0800 (HKT) (envelope-from lila@earth.blowwater.hk) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 05:44:37 +0800 (HKT) From: Lila To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041002051250.D24507@earth.blowwater.hk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: about ports reinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 21:42:39 -0000 Hi, The php4 ports that I installed did not work with mysql, it seems like it never able to configure to work with mysql. No mysql info can be found with phpinfo(). I tried to reinstall php4 many times but no luck for me. I want to ask is there a way to completely remove the installed ports and related deps so that I can do a very clean install of php4 and maybe with apache and mysql. Thanks! Regards, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:01:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B9016A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:01:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.zeelandnet.nl (mail1.zeelandnet.nl [212.115.192.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F3B43D49 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:01:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kaelthun@zeelandnet.nl) Received: from 10.255.255.161 (www1.zeelandnet.nl [212.115.192.161]) by mail.zeelandnet.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7F818BD7D; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:00:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (proxying for 62.238.87.49, 10.255.255.164) (SquirrelMail authenticated user kaelthun); by secure.zeelandnet.nl with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:01:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <37270.127.0.0.1.1096668060.squirrel@127.0.0.1> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:01:00 +0200 (CEST) From: kaelthun@zeelandnet.nl To: JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Platforms X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:01:00 -0000 Thanks guys. And I most certainly will enjoy FreeBSD as Microsoft windows is really starting to get to me >:| Regards, Jimmy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:05:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F82816A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:05:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from internet.potentialtech.com (h-66-167-251-6.phlapafg.covad.net [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038E143D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:05:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from working.potentialtech.com (pa-plum-cmts1e-68-68-113-64.pittpa.adelphia.net [68.68.113.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by internet.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F1169A39; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:05:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:05:53 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: kaelthun@zeelandnet.nl Message-Id: <20041001180553.2fffccbd.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <37270.127.0.0.1.1096668060.squirrel@127.0.0.1> References: <37270.127.0.0.1.1096668060.squirrel@127.0.0.1> Organization: Potential Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Platforms X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:05:55 -0000 kaelthun@zeelandnet.nl wrote: > Thanks guys. And I most certainly will enjoy FreeBSD as Microsoft windows > is really starting to get to me >:| Acutally, you probably won't enjoy it at first. My experience: Windows users love Windows at first, then grow to hate it. BSD users hate FreeBSD at first, but grow to love it. The reason is that Windows is easy to use and learn, but once you understand it, you start to realize all the problems and shortcomings it has. FreeBSD (or any Unix-like system) doesn't pretent to be easy to learn. It _is_ learnable, it just takes some time. But after 5 years of using FreeBSD as my desktop computer, I'm _still_ learning new ways to use it to make my work easier. And I had it working better than Windows 5 years ago. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:22:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D5216A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:22:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F68443D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:22:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 7464 invoked by uid 65534); 1 Oct 2004 22:22:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) (129.187.19.157) by mail.gmx.net (mp006) with SMTP; 02 Oct 2004 00:22:18 +0200 X-Authenticated: #147403 Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 603A9C0D4; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:22:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:22:24 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Bill Moran Message-ID: <20041001222224.GA57007@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <200410011804.i91I4umd006422@hermes.hyperhosting.gr> <415DA053.5000100@makeworld.com> <20041001152420.2647dae9.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <415DB3FE.8070001@makeworld.com> <20041001163434.0bc40983.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041001163434.0bc40983.wmoran@potentialtech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: nicx@ebox.gr cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I'm a 'tard - I don't know what a Subject line is (Was well, no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:22:20 -0000 --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bill Moran wrote: > Chris wrote: [...] > > Then something has changed. So often flames start by a user simply=20 > > asking a question that had he/she simply searched the list - would have= =20 > > found the answer covered many times over. >=20 > No. Nothing has changed. The official list policy has ALWAYS been to > be polite. And people have ALWAYS violated that policy. And people > like me have ALWAYS jumped in and made a point of the fact that this > kind of thing is NOT acceptable. [ outline of list charta ] I absolutely agree with Bill. One of the most pleasant things about FreeBSD mailing lists and the community as a whole is that you have the feeling that you are talking to adult human beings you share an interest / preference in operating system / profession / etc. with. And I heared a lot of people support my opinion, esp. from newbies trying FreeBSD for the first time. The professional and polite style here has become rare in today's internet, where every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks he needs to be kewl or insulting. Simon --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXdifCkn+/eutqCoRAoG1AKD8vSe2Gk1++TamsSvqPNZbpofSNACgiFED mZH5dYmM23uthHyKzTOCU/k= =Z0UI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:25:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EC716A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:25:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from richard.syix.com (richard.syix.com [205.171.72.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BDA43D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:25:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@syix.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.syix.com [127.0.0.1]) by richard.syix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56FB35C42 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:29:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leopard (leopard.syix.com [205.171.72.34]) by richard.syix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026415C40 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:29:57 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Marriner" To: Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:25:07 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcSoBYFJxKIaO6Q6TrKgrpKAT6JlXQ== Message-Id: <20041001222957.026415C40@richard.syix.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at richard.syix.com Subject: Quickie... Hopefully! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:25:58 -0000 Dear list, Just wondering if there is anyway (preferably simple.) to have two ip addresses on the same NIC that are different networks. A little background. We are in the process of changing ISPs, we now have two circuits going to two differnet ISPs. Because of this change we have to renumber our entire network. Being an ISP ourselves we have a handful of servers that run FreeBSD. While trying to get one of our test servers to talk to both networks from the internet we fail, I think because even though your request is on the new numbers FreeBSD still trys routing the response back through our old gateway. Another question, I know in Windows XP you can set two gateways, two ips, etc. Can you do this in FBSD? Our windows boxes are talking fine on both networks. Any help or suggestions appreciated... Richard Dean Marriner II SYIX.COM --=-- Network Administrator 530-755-1751x206 - richard at syix.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:33:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3107216A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:33:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0900243D3F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:33:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7CFB751491; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:34:20 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Richard Marriner Message-ID: <20041001223420.GA90660@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041001222957.026415C40@richard.syix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041001222957.026415C40@richard.syix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quickie... Hopefully! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:33:38 -0000 --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 03:25:07PM -0700, Richard Marriner wrote: > Dear list, >=20 > Just wondering if there is anyway (preferably simple.) to have two ip > addresses on the same NIC that are different networks. =20 >=20 > A little background. We are in the process of changing ISPs, we now have > two circuits going to two differnet ISPs. Because of this change we have= to > renumber our entire network. Being an ISP ourselves we have a handful of > servers that run FreeBSD. While trying to get one of our test servers to > talk to both networks from the internet we fail, I think because even tho= ugh > your request is on the new numbers FreeBSD still trys routing the response > back through our old gateway. Another question, I know in Windows XP you > can set two gateways, two ips, etc. Can you do this in FBSD? Our windo= ws > boxes are talking fine on both networks. Yes, there's nothing to it..use the 'ifconfig alias' command. Kris --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXdtsWry0BWjoQKURAigLAKD8FMrp6f0CNFRgqt1VVhcG5jPNbACcD3M6 7FtJ4bavO9tdZQVxzdHc8+I= =1SHV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:37:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F6416A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:37:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro (Hawat.CC.UBBCluj.Ro [193.226.40.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA0B43D2D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:37:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from taipan@hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro) Received: from hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i91MhfDI022092 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 01:43:41 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from taipan@hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro) Received: from localhost (taipan@localhost)i91MhfAv022089 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 01:43:41 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from taipan@hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 01:43:41 +0300 (EEST) From: Radu MOLNAR To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041002013159.P22074@hawat.cc.ubbcluj.ro> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Symbios scsi and too large ata X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:37:31 -0000 Hello I a computer wich has a Symbios scsi controller and a 40G ata drive. Because the computer's bios is too old it does notdetect the 40G drive. So i tried to install FreeBSD on this box and failed miserably. 5.3BETA5 would freeze on boot. Only prints 2 lines or so. Then i tried 4.10. This one booted but doesnt see my scsi drive, only the ata one, on which ofcourse there is no point on instaling the system because it wont boot. I read some documentation and saw that Symbios scsi controllers are supported in both 4.10 and 5.2.1 so i realy dont understand what the problem is. In scsi bios utility it sais that the device uses irq 9. When doing kernel configuration on CLI mode i saw there is a device sio3 that uses the irq 9 but it is not enabled. I also booted OpenBSD on this box and it detected my scsi drive as sd0. But would really prefer running FreeBSD to Open so if you have any ideas pls tell me. And if it is not possible to install the system on the scsi drive maybe some suggestions on how to boot the sistem from the ata drive which doesnt boot(some floppies or smth like that) thanks Radu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:37:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDC516A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:37:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from richard.syix.com (richard.syix.com [205.171.72.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4273043D46 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:37:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@syix.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.syix.com [127.0.0.1]) by richard.syix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F765C42; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leopard (leopard.syix.com [205.171.72.34]) by richard.syix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE055C40; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:41:42 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Marriner" To: "'Kris Kennaway'" Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:36:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcSoB1IqEswI4OODTtm9wVUYI0WZGAAAIPmw In-Reply-To: <20041001223420.GA90660@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-Id: <20041001224142.BBE055C40@richard.syix.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at richard.syix.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Quickie... Hopefully! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:37:44 -0000 Yes, I have tried that, but it doesn't send the reply out the route that it received it on. Richard > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > Kris Kennaway > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 3:34 PM > To: Richard Marriner > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Quickie... Hopefully! > > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 03:25:07PM -0700, Richard Marriner wrote: > > Dear list, > > > > Just wondering if there is anyway (preferably simple.) > to have two ip > > addresses on the same NIC that are different networks. > > > > A little background. We are in the process of changing > ISPs, we now have > > two circuits going to two differnet ISPs. Because of this > change we have to > > renumber our entire network. Being an ISP ourselves we > have a handful of > > servers that run FreeBSD. While trying to get one of our > test servers to > > talk to both networks from the internet we fail, I think > because even though > > your request is on the new numbers FreeBSD still trys > routing the response > > back through our old gateway. Another question, I know in > Windows XP you > > can set two gateways, two ips, etc. Can you do this in > FBSD? Our windows > > boxes are talking fine on both networks. > > Yes, there's nothing to it..use the 'ifconfig alias' command. > > Kris > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:39:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8FB16A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:39:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wingfoot.org (caduceus.wingfoot.org [64.32.179.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D35C43D45 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:39:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ges@wingfoot.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.wingfoot.org [127.0.0.1]) by wingfoot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59621F4496; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:39:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: from wingfoot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (caduceus.wingfoot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40492-09; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:39:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [64.32.179.50]) by wingfoot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01AC1F4498; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:39:14 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <415DDC8D.9070605@wingfoot.org> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:39:09 -0400 From: Glenn Sieb User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Thunderbird/0.8 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20041001222957.026415C40@richard.syix.com> In-Reply-To: <20041001222957.026415C40@richard.syix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at wingfoot.org cc: richard@syix.com Subject: Re: Quickie... Hopefully! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:39:16 -0000 Richard Marriner said the following on 10/1/2004 6:25 PM: >Dear list, > > Just wondering if there is anyway (preferably simple.) to have two ip >addresses on the same NIC that are different networks. > > First, I would test things out by adding an ifconfig alias (man ifconfig) and adding a new route to the new gateway IP (using the route command). Then, once you're sure things are working, add an ifconfig alias in rc.conf. You probably want the *new* IP to be the non-alias address, and the *old* IP to be the alias. Make sure that defaultrouter is set in rc.conf to be the new gateway IP. You'll need to also add the route for the aliased IP to the route table using the route command. Then, test away--make sure traffic from both IP blocks makes it through! Traceroute is your friend! :) (I'm not a total network geek, but IIRC, this is one way of doing what you're looking for. If there are better ways of doing this, I look forward to reading the replies and learning better ways! :) ) Best, Glenn -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:40:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2839116A4D3 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:40:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED71143D1F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:40:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 838F951491; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:41:32 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Richard Marriner Message-ID: <20041001224132.GA90819@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041001223420.GA90660@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041001224142.BBE055C40@richard.syix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041001224142.BBE055C40@richard.syix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: 'Kris Kennaway' Subject: Re: Quickie... Hopefully! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:40:54 -0000 --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 03:36:52PM -0700, Richard Marriner wrote: > Yes, I have tried that, but it doesn't send the reply out the route that it > received it on. OK, please provide more details then. I'd guess you're doing something wrong, e.g. using the wrong subnet for the aliased address. Kris --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXd0cWry0BWjoQKURAg0fAKCcI3jE7EA4RGViNfYupP87ixqmowCfTtge z1+Zhj8QL+w2zjpQ1RIqOrw= =BD/0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --lrZ03NoBR/3+SXJZ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:52:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C8116A4CF for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:52:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zeus.davez.org (dlajoie-gw.rf.ncia.net [69.24.8.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A397543D4C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:52:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from questions@zeus.davez.org) Received: from zeus.davez.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zeus.davez.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i91MqLUE013898 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:52:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from questions@zeus.davez.org) Received: from localhost (questions@localhost)i91MqL6x013895 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:52:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from questions@zeus.davez.org) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:52:21 -0400 (EDT) From: questions To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1311.66.243.145.38.1096668046.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> Message-ID: <20041001183944.W13734@zeus.davez.org> References: <20040213210413.T71247@admin1.mdc.net> <1311.66.243.145.38.1096668046.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: /var/log/wtmp always reseting to 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:52:23 -0000 On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Richard Lynch wrote: > man logrotate > > Probably the logs are getting rotated and old ones discarded. > > Or, possibly, you haven't realized that the old logs are in /var/log/*.# > where * matches the old log name, and # is 1 to N, for some N defined in > logrotate configuration. man logrotate does nothing = ________Snip Command Output_______ $ man logrotate No manual entry for logrotate ________End Snip_________________ Given that all wtmp.#.gz files have a 0 size would seem to indicate all the files were emptied somehow? __________Snip Command Output_____ $ cd /var/log $ ls -al wtmp* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 308 Oct 1 18:34 wtmp -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Oct 1 05:48 wtmp.0 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Oct 1 05:42 wtmp.1 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Oct 1 05:36 wtmp.2 -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Oct 1 05:30 wtmp.3 $ _______End Snip__________________ Also the end of month accounting report sent to root shows no logins at all wound indicate the wtmp file must be resetting to 0 prior to the end of the month account process taking place? Dave From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:54:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F9316A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:54:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.sbfnet.com (sbfnet.com [12.18.252.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BD243D1F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:54:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keving@sbfnet.com) Received: from administrator ([90.1.2.37]) by mail.sbfnet.com (SBF Mail Services) with SMTP id AAE74724; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 15:54:18 -0700 From: "Kevin Glick" To: "'Richard Marriner'" Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 15:53:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20041001222957.026415C40@richard.syix.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Thread-Index: AcSoBYFJxKIaO6Q6TrKgrpKAT6JlXQAAOMGw Message-Id: <20041001225433.84BD243D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Quickie... Hopefully! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 22:54:37 -0000 Richard, I've done the same thing a few times. To get the full description, check the ifconfig man page and look for "alias". There's two problems with doing this: first, BSD can't have two default routes. Windows allows you to set two default gateways, and it works because of the "Route Discovery" built into it (this is why a windows machine can use a gateway that's not on it's local subnet...but, that's another topic). Second, if you've got servers set to listen only on a specific IP (apache, etc) it still won't work, even with the alias. Example: 1.1.1.1-1.1.1.255 -->from ISP #1 \ /-> 1.1.1.2 -->hub/switch --> FreeBSD fxp0 2.2.2.1-2.2.2.255 -->from ISP #2 / \-> 2.2.2.2 In the crude diagram above, both ISPs feeds end up coming into a hub/switch that your BSD machine is plugged into. The normal ifconfig on the device is 1.1.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0. You would then: "ifconfig fxp0 inet 2.2.2.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 alias" the device. This will work, as long as routing is setup correctly. Any request for 2.2.2.2 from anywhere in the world would end up at the same machine/interface as a request for 1.1.1.2. The problem lies in getting data out with the aliased address. The default route on the machine would be 1.1.1.1 and all traffic goes there. If you have specific traffic that you want to go out with the 2.2.2.2 address, you'd have to add routes for each DESTINATION IP: "route add -net 3.3.3.3 -netmask 255.255.255.0 2.2.2.1" and so on. BSD isn't smart enough to do source based routing. So the traffic will come into 2.2.2.2 via ISP #2, but the replies/ACKs will go out via ISP #1. Any traffic generated from the machine, without a specified SOURCE IP will go out as 1.1.1.2, and get sent via the 1.1.1.1 gateway. The other problem with the diagram above is that you've got two subnets running on the same lan, which breaks most rules of networking. This can be remedied with a few vlans, but again, that's another topic. Hope this helps. I'm sure most of this info is correct, but I'm more than willing to have somebody set me straight. Kevin Glick ITS Manager keving@sbfnet.com Sterling Business Forms -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Richard Marriner Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 3:25 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Quickie... Hopefully! Dear list, Just wondering if there is anyway (preferably simple.) to have two ip addresses on the same NIC that are different networks. A little background. We are in the process of changing ISPs, we now have two circuits going to two differnet ISPs. Because of this change we have to renumber our entire network. Being an ISP ourselves we have a handful of servers that run FreeBSD. While trying to get one of our test servers to talk to both networks from the internet we fail, I think because even though your request is on the new numbers FreeBSD still trys routing the response back through our old gateway. Another question, I know in Windows XP you can set two gateways, two ips, etc. Can you do this in FBSD? Our windows boxes are talking fine on both networks. Any help or suggestions appreciated... Richard Dean Marriner II SYIX.COM --=-- Network Administrator 530-755-1751x206 - richard at syix.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 23:16:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E0116A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 23:16:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk [212.104.129.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FB343D46 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 23:16:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fun@thingy.apana.org.au) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EB62E2B78 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:11:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25666-01-65 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:11:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from [10.0.0.4] (dyn-81-5-135-167.dsl.eclipse.net.uk [81.5.135.167]) by mra03.ex.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 184D22E2A07 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:11:03 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <415DE510.30302@thingy.apana.org.au> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 00:15:28 +0100 From: David Gerard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <37270.127.0.0.1.1096668060.squirrel@127.0.0.1> <20041001180553.2fffccbd.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20041001180553.2fffccbd.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by Eclipse VIRUSshield at eclipse.net.uk Subject: Re: Platforms X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 23:16:09 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: > Windows users love Windows at first, then grow to hate it. > BSD users hate FreeBSD at first, but grow to love it. Windows is a luxury car with all the electric devices and trim. And it's all shoddy and breaks in a few months. Unix is a Land Rover with NOTHING fitted. But everything you install properly stays there and keeps working. (Linux users hate FreeBSD until they realise the pain in their forehead has mysteriously vanished.) - d. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 23:58:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA76B16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 23:58:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from richard.syix.com (richard.syix.com [205.171.72.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79D443D2F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 23:58:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@syix.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.syix.com [127.0.0.1]) by richard.syix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CBCD5C42; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:02:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leopard (leopard.syix.com [205.171.72.34]) by richard.syix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35E55C40; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:02:47 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Marriner" To: "'Kevin Glick'" Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 16:57:57 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20041001225425.1508E34F08D@lynx.syix.com> Thread-Index: AcSoBYFJxKIaO6Q6TrKgrpKAT6JlXQAAOMGwAAK/jiA= X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-Id: <20041002000247.A35E55C40@richard.syix.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at richard.syix.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Quickie... Hopefully! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 23:58:50 -0000 Kevin, This is exactly what is happening.. I have found though that if I give the interface two Ips with ifconfig and set the default route to our newest router (Cisco 7204) somehow I am able to do what I am wanting. (I guess the Cisco is lots smarter than our Tiara..) I am aware that having two numbered networks on one physical lan is not good practice, but this is only a temporary solution and VLANs are planned for the near future.. As for our daemons, most are running promiscuous to any IP, but I am aware I will need to "double check" the configs.. Thank you very much for your reply.. Richard > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Glick [mailto:keving@sbfnet.com] > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 3:54 PM > To: 'Richard Marriner' > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: Quickie... Hopefully! > > Richard, > > I've done the same thing a few times. To get the full > description, check > the ifconfig man page and look for "alias". There's two > problems with doing > this: first, BSD can't have two default routes. Windows > allows you to set > two default gateways, and it works because of the "Route > Discovery" built > into it (this is why a windows machine can use a gateway > that's not on it's > local subnet...but, that's another topic). Second, if you've > got servers > set to listen only on a specific IP (apache, etc) it still > won't work, even > with the alias. > > Example: > 1.1.1.1-1.1.1.255 -->from ISP #1 \ > /-> 1.1.1.2 > -->hub/switch --> > FreeBSD fxp0 > 2.2.2.1-2.2.2.255 -->from ISP #2 / > \-> 2.2.2.2 > > In the crude diagram above, both ISPs feeds end up coming > into a hub/switch > that your BSD machine is plugged into. The normal ifconfig > on the device is > 1.1.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0. You would then: "ifconfig > fxp0 inet 2.2.2.2 > netmask 255.255.255.0 alias" the device. This will work, as > long as routing > is setup correctly. Any request for 2.2.2.2 from anywhere in > the world > would end up at the same machine/interface as a request for > 1.1.1.2. The > problem lies in getting data out with the aliased address. > The default > route on the machine would be 1.1.1.1 and all traffic goes > there. If you > have specific traffic that you want to go out with the > 2.2.2.2 address, > you'd have to add routes for each DESTINATION IP: "route add > -net 3.3.3.3 > -netmask 255.255.255.0 2.2.2.1" and so on. BSD isn't smart > enough to do > source based routing. So the traffic will come into 2.2.2.2 > via ISP #2, but > the replies/ACKs will go out via ISP #1. Any traffic > generated from the > machine, without a specified SOURCE IP will go out as > 1.1.1.2, and get sent > via the 1.1.1.1 gateway. > > The other problem with the diagram above is that you've got > two subnets > running on the same lan, which breaks most rules of > networking. This can be > remedied with a few vlans, but again, that's another topic. > > Hope this helps. I'm sure most of this info is correct, but > I'm more than > willing to have somebody set me straight. > > Kevin Glick > ITS Manager > keving@sbfnet.com > Sterling Business Forms > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > Richard Marriner > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2004 3:25 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Quickie... Hopefully! > > Dear list, > > Just wondering if there is anyway (preferably simple.) to > have two ip > addresses on the same NIC that are different networks. > > A little background. We are in the process of changing ISPs, > we now have > two circuits going to two differnet ISPs. Because of this > change we have to > renumber our entire network. Being an ISP ourselves we have > a handful of > servers that run FreeBSD. While trying to get one of our > test servers to > talk to both networks from the internet we fail, I think > because even though > your request is on the new numbers FreeBSD still trys routing > the response > back through our old gateway. Another question, I know in > Windows XP you > can set two gateways, two ips, etc. Can you do this in FBSD? > Our windows > boxes are talking fine on both networks. > > Any help or suggestions appreciated... > > Richard Dean Marriner II > SYIX.COM --=-- Network Administrator > 530-755-1751x206 - richard at syix.com > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 00:39:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA0C16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:39:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C1243D3F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:39:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from desavant@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin01-en2 [10.13.10.146]) by smtpout.mac.com (8.12.6/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i920dA5D009526 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.111.6] (ip68-102-150-34.ks.ok.cox.net [68.102.150.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin01/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id i920d8xT008342 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <774016CA-140B-11D9-AFE9-000A958D061C@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: De Savant Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:39:06 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Java5 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: di0s@alt-hacker.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 00:39:11 -0000 I was looking around with this latest announcement of Sun's Java2 1.5, since I was considering using FreeBSD on our server (amd64) instead of Linux. I made my way to Sun's java page, and then to the newest Java2 Enterprise Edition 1.4 release. Yet no FreeBSD Java? "This release of the J2EE 1.4 SDK and the Sun Java System Application Server Platform Edition 8 is available for the following platforms: Solaris 9 (SPARC and x86) Sun Java Desktop System Windows 2000 Advanced Server Windows XP Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1, 3.0" That's odd, but Linux wasn't taken very seriously either for a long time, so maybe it's under J2SE instead? Nope. Windows, Linux (x86), Linux (amd64), Solaris (SPARC), and Solaris (x86). The same for 1.4 sdk too. WTF, Right? Now I found: http://www.freebsd.org/java/ This I'm guessing is not the J2EE that you read about in Sun's Java books, but J2SE. So now I'm approaching my question. Will there ever be plans to port J2EE to FreeBSD running as a server? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 00:47:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7C116A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:47:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 9.hellooperator.net (cpc3-cdif2-3-0-cust202.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.32.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EFB43D39 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:47:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputin@hellooperator.net) Received: from rasputin by 9.hellooperator.net with local (Exim 4.42) id 1CDY31-0004f1-EK; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 01:46:51 +0100 Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 01:46:51 +0100 From: Dick Davies To: di0s@alt-hacker.org Message-ID: <20041002004651.GH29161@lb.tenfour> References: <774016CA-140B-11D9-AFE9-000A958D061C@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <774016CA-140B-11D9-AFE9-000A958D061C@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: Rasputin cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Java5 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dick Davies List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 00:47:54 -0000 * De Savant [1038 01:38]: > I was looking around with this latest announcement of Sun's Java2 1.5, > since I was considering using FreeBSD on our server (amd64) instead of > Linux. I made my way to Sun's java page, and then to the newest Java2 > Enterprise Edition 1.4 release. Yet no FreeBSD Java? Sun have never released any VM for FreeBSD. The linux one will probably work out of the box under the Linuxulator. > "This release of the J2EE 1.4 SDK and the Sun Java System Application > Server Platform Edition 8 is available for the following platforms: > Solaris 9 (SPARC and x86) > Sun Java Desktop System > Windows 2000 Advanced Server > Windows XP > Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1, 3.0" > That's odd, but Linux wasn't taken very seriously either for a long > time, so maybe it's under J2SE instead? Nope. Windows, Linux (x86), > Linux (amd64), Solaris (SPARC), and Solaris (x86). The same for 1.4 sdk > too. WTF, Right? Now I found: > > http://www.freebsd.org/java/ > > This I'm guessing is not the J2EE that you read about in Sun's Java > books, but J2SE. So now I'm approaching my question. Will there ever be > plans to port J2EE to FreeBSD running as a server? J2EE is just a buttload of jarfiles, effectively. Install jboss from ports and you have all the j2ee stuff you could ever want^W need^W , uh, put up with. -- When you have to kill a man it costs nothing to be polite. - Winston Churchill, On formal declarations of war Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 00:58:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010F716A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:58:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp3.server.rpi.edu (smtp3.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8756943D1D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:58:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp3.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i920wnJq021263; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:58:50 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20041001183944.W13734@zeus.davez.org> References: <20040213210413.T71247@admin1.mdc.net> <1311.66.243.145.38.1096668046.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> <20041001183944.W13734@zeus.davez.org> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 20:58:48 -0400 To: questions , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: /var/log/wtmp always reseting to 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 00:58:58 -0000 At 6:52 PM -0400 10/1/04, questions wrote: >On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Richard Lynch wrote: > >> man logrotate >> > > Probably the logs are getting rotated and old ones discarded. > > man logrotate does nothing On FreeBSD, the utility is called newsyslog. The entry would be in /etc/newsyslog.conf . You should have an entry in there for /var/log/wtmp, but all that will do is rotate the file. It isn't going to truncate it. >__________Snip Command Output_____ > $ cd /var/log > $ ls -al wtmp* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 308 Oct 1 18:34 wtmp > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Oct 1 05:48 wtmp.0 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Oct 1 05:42 wtmp.1 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Oct 1 05:36 wtmp.2 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Oct 1 05:30 wtmp.3 > $ >_______End Snip__________________ Uh, it seems odd that all those files have a date of "Oct 1". newsyslog should only rotate the file once on any given day, not five times, once every six minutes. Did someone change the entry for newsyslog in /etc/crontab ? The only reference to newsyslog in /etc/crontab should look like: # Rotate log files every hour, if necessary. 0 * * * * root newsyslog -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 00:59:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BD716A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:59:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rdstm.ro (mail.rdstm.ro [193.231.233.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1164D43D2F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:59:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aanton@spintech.ro) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (casa_auto [81.196.32.25]) by mail.rdstm.ro (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i920vhhl032273 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 03:57:43 +0300 Message-ID: <415DFD6B.8050607@spintech.ro> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 03:59:23 +0300 From: Anton Alin-Adrian User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040706) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: gnome 2.8 mime associations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 00:59:26 -0000 Hello, I just installed gnome 2.8 from the marcuscom.com tinderbox, and everything is great and neat, except mimes are completely broken. I reinstalled gnome-mime from ports, latest nautilus. The gnome-vfs from the tinderbox is the latest. Apparantely gnome control center from the tinderbox does not come with the capplet for manually setting mimes. The mimes in /usr/X11R6/share.. appear to be allright, i tried copying them in the $HOME/.gnome/mime-info/ dir but without effect. So not only that all mimes are broken, but I also can't add them manually. (or i did it in the wrong way by using vi) If would really appreciate if anyone knows some possible fix for this and shares it with me. Thanks a lot for your time. Yours Sincerely, -- Alin-Adrian Anton Spintech Systems GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1E2FFF2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 01:04:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0FE116A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 01:04:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2369643D39 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 01:04:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i9213Kju021374; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:03:20 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Anton Alin-Adrian In-Reply-To: <415DFD6B.8050607@spintech.ro> References: <415DFD6B.8050607@spintech.ro> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-tv6AIC6p9OzZVf+RQk2i" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1096679083.97192.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 21:04:43 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: FreeBSD User Questions List Subject: Re: gnome 2.8 mime associations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 01:04:57 -0000 --=-tv6AIC6p9OzZVf+RQk2i Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 20:59, Anton Alin-Adrian wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I just installed gnome 2.8 from the marcuscom.com tinderbox, and=20 > everything is great and neat, except mimes are completely broken. Define, "completely broken." >=20 > I reinstalled gnome-mime from ports, latest nautilus. The gnome-vfs from= =20 > the tinderbox is the latest. >=20 > Apparantely gnome control center from the tinderbox does not come with t= he=20 > capplet for manually setting mimes. Read the GNOME online help. The MIME system has changed in 2.8. All MIME changes must go through Nautilus. >=20 > The mimes in /usr/X11R6/share.. appear to be allright, i tried copying=20 > them in the $HOME/.gnome/mime-info/ dir but without effect. >=20 > So not only that all mimes are broken, but I also can't add them manuall= y.=20 > (or i did it in the wrong way by using vi) >=20 > If would really appreciate if anyone knows some possible fix for this an= d=20 > shares it with me. You need to provide more details than simply saying something is broken. Provide screenshots, expected behavior, files in question, and steps to reproduce. Joe >=20 > Thanks a lot for your time. >=20 > Yours Sincerely, --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-tv6AIC6p9OzZVf+RQk2i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBXf6rb2iPiv4Uz4cRAkAVAJ0aii7K8KlkXmfRrOFI7UGzYixNbACdGTpt 4DHRhfZOuY8xIHM9HzWB5/w= =6bAS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-tv6AIC6p9OzZVf+RQk2i-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 02:16:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4475216A4CF for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:16:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (pemaquid.safeport.com [204.156.12.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10B843D55 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:16:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i922GjlN096573 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:16:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost)i922GjI6096570 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:16:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pemaquid.safeport.com: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:16:45 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20041001220612.K95941@pemaquid.safeport.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: A packages question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 02:16:49 -0000 Neither XFree86 4.4 nor Xorg supports the video on my laptop while XFree86 4.3 works. I want to set up the package database to say XFree 4.4 is installed to see if I can install the latest packages. Does anyone know that this will not work? Also if I could get some pointer on how to modify the package db or where this may be documented _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-469-8766 Fax: 301-469-0601 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 02:27:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C37516A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:27:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D618443D1D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:27:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so3697631rnk for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 19:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.163.7 with SMTP id l7mr4164319rne; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 19:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.15.64 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 19:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:27:23 -0500 From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: "doug@safeport.com" In-Reply-To: <20041001220612.K95941@pemaquid.safeport.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041001220612.K95941@pemaquid.safeport.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A packages question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eric Kjeldergaard List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 02:27:29 -0000 While this idea may seem good on the surface, it's really a very bad idea (and I speak from experience) to hand-modify your package database. What you /should/ do instead is force the addition of the packages. `pkg_add -f ` On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:16:45 -0400 (EDT), doug@safeport.com wrote: > Neither XFree86 4.4 nor Xorg supports the video on my laptop while XFree86 4.3 > works. > > I want to set up the package database to say XFree 4.4 is installed to see if I > can install the latest packages. Does anyone know that this will not work? Also > if I could get some pointer on how to modify the package db or where this may be > documented > > _____ > Douglas Denault > http://www.safeport.com > doug@safeport.com > Voice: 301-469-8766 > Fax: 301-469-0601 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 02:35:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F30B16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:35:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (pemaquid.safeport.com [204.156.12.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B366543D58 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:35:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i922ZdD6097033 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:35:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost)i922ZdVW097030 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:35:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pemaquid.safeport.com: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:35:38 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20041001223259.W95941@pemaquid.safeport.com> References: <20041001220612.K95941@pemaquid.safeport.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: A packages question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 02:35:40 -0000 thanks - I will try it this way On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > While this idea may seem good on the surface, it's really a very bad > idea (and I speak from experience) to hand-modify your package > database. What you /should/ do instead is force the addition of the > packages. `pkg_add -f ` > > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:16:45 -0400 (EDT), doug@safeport.com > wrote: > > Neither XFree86 4.4 nor Xorg supports the video on my laptop while XFree86 4.3 > > works. > > > > I want to set up the package database to say XFree 4.4 is installed to see if I > > can install the latest packages. Does anyone know that this will not work? Also > > if I could get some pointer on how to modify the package db or where this may be > > documented > > > -- > If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised. > _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-469-8766 Fax: 301-469-0601 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 02:54:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB94516A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:54:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5DF43D49 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:54:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from E.Schuele@comcast.net) Received: from dhclient213_100 (c-24-1-214-142.client.comcast.net[24.1.214.142]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <2004100202542401100jtefme> (Authid: e.schuele); Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:54:24 +0000 From: Eric Schuele To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:54:41 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20041001204624.18145.qmail@web14122.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20041001204624.18145.qmail@web14122.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410012154.41725.E.Schuele@Comcast.Net> Subject: Re: NDISulator (aka. Project Evil) wmp54gs w. bcm4306 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: E.Schuele@Computer.Org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 02:54:25 -0000 On Friday 01 October 2004 03:46 pm, K. Greenwood wrote: > Quick question. Where do queries regarding Bill > Paul's NDISulator go? I have seen some to current, > hardware, mobile. > > Or even better, a howto (the best I have seen thus far > is:) > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-January/01948 >6.html Google: FreeBSD NDIS You'll get some good returns. Here are the two best 'HowTo's' I've found: http://tweakbsd.homeunix.org/guides/windoof-ndis-drivers.php http://www.xl0.org/FreeBSD/ndis.txt Here is my HowTo: (i.e. that which worked for me, constructed from the sites referenced above) =========================================================== wLAN (TrueMobile 1300) =========================================================== Download and build NDIS wrapper for Windows wLAN drivers # cd /usr # cvs -d anoncvs@anoncvs.fr.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs co src/sys/ modules/ndis src/sys/modules/if_ndis src/usr.sbin/ndiscvt src/sys/ compat/ndis src/sys/dev/if_ndis # cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/ndiscvt/ && make && make install # cd /usr/src/sys/modules/ndis && make && make install # make load # cd /usr/src/sys/modules/if_ndis # cp /path/to/windows_driver.sys # cp /path/to/windows_driver.inf # rename old /usr/src/sys/dev/pccard/pccarddevs.h # ndiscvt -i windows_driver.inf -s windows_driver.sys -o pccarddevs.h # ndiscvt -i windows_driver.inf -s windows_driver.sys -o ndis_driver_data.h # make install # re-rename old /usr/src/sys/dev/pccard/pccarddevs.h (needed for future kernel builds) NOTE: It appears that if you later rebuild your kernel... you must _rebuild_ the above as well. Maybe just re-install? Add to /etc/rc.conf ifconfig_ndis0="DHCP" hostname="yourhostname" Add to /boot/loader.conf ndis_load="YES" if_ndis_load="YES" Edit /etc/dhclient.conf timeout 10; retry 10; reboot 10; select-timeout 5; initial-interval 2; interface "ndis0" { send dhcp-client-identifier "unx.unxlaptop.org"; media "ssid Your_SSID channel 1 wepmode on wepkey 0x57065YourWepKey753B5; request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, routers, domain-name-servers, domain-n; } HTH > > > > > > The following is extraneous info, if someone here can > clue me in. > > I have a PCI Linksys WMP54GS (pciconf -vl as follows): > > ndis00@pci0:8:0 class=0x028000 card=0x00151737 > chip=0x432014e4 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 > > vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' > device = 'BCM4306 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Controller' > class = network > > > FreeBSD type (uname -a) as follows: > > FreeBSD workstation.domain.org 5.3-BETA6 FreeBSD > 5.3BETA6 #0: Sat Sep 25 19:41:14 UTC 2004 > root@wv1u.samsco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > i386 > > > The only device that I can find that looks like it is > listed as > > pci0: at device 8.0 (no driver attached) > > > I copied over the win32exe from the linksys site, used > a windows system and got the required files > (BCMWL5.inf & bcmwl5.sys). Address follows. > > http://www.linksys.com/download/driver.asp?dlid=132&osid=6 > > And attempted the following, as per Mr. Paul's > message. > > # cp foo.sys foo.inf /sys/modules/if_ndis > # cd /sys/modules/ndis > # make; make load > # cd /sys/modules/if_ndis > # ndiscvt -i foo.inf -s foo.sys -o ndis_driver_data.h > # make; make load > > When I attempt to 'make load' the following message is > displayed. > > ndis0: SpeedBooster> mem 0xffef6000-0xffef7fff irq 11 at > device 8.0 on pci 0 > ndis0: NDIS API version: 5.0 > ndis0: NDIS ERROR: c0001389 (unknown error) > ndis0: NDIS NUMERRORS: 1 > ndis0: argptr: 0xc > ndis0: init handler failed > device_attach: ndis0 attach returned 6 > > And kldstat lists the following: > > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 6 0xc0400000 5b6c5c kernel > 2 1 0xc14f1000 53000 if_ndis.ko > 3 1 0xc1544000 d000 ndis.ko > > > I have even attempted to enter ndis_load="YES" in the > loader.conf, but to no avail. Also, I have hand typed > these in, so any mistakes are likely due to me typing > in this message. > > If you have gotten to this point, thanks for your > patience. If you have a suggestion, even better! But > please, type slowly and use small words. I have the > capacity of an ill trained carp. > > > > _______________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! > http://vote.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 03:09:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFB616A4CE; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 03:09:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F9543D2D; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 03:09:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4X002CDSR666@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 23:09:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 23:09:15 -0400 From: bsdfsse In-reply-to: <415D8687.7040905@optonline.net> Message-id: <415E1BDB.4020203@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) References: <415B40E0.5030708@optonline.net> <16732.17233.408255.749193@satchel.alerce.com> <415D81C4.1090200@optonline.net> <415D8687.7040905@optonline.net> cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Are there step-by-step VMWare instructions? (giving up) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 03:09:08 -0000 I give up on trying to get VMWare 3.2 to work on either FreeBSD 4.x or 5.x. Thank you to everyone who tried to help me. After 5 full days of trial and error on 3 machines, I think I can say it needs to be looked at by a non-newby. The only time I got it to run was with a 5.2-Release installation with networking disabled (following Christian's docs). Every other configuration resulted in losing access to the hard-drive as soon as I hit the VM's "Power On" button. I might try again if there is a known working solution, but for now I have to do a 6-week project on native Winblows. I learned a ton, and wouldn't use any other OS on a server. I hope to run it on my desktop soon. thx. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 03:22:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270BE16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 03:22:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A76A43D4C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 03:22:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from E.Schuele@comcast.net) Received: from dhclient213_100 (c-24-1-214-142.client.comcast.net[24.1.214.142]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <2004100203225501200mrqcge> (Authid: e.schuele); Sat, 2 Oct 2004 03:22:55 +0000 From: Eric Schuele To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:23:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200409292253.38880.E.Schuele@Comcast.Net> In-Reply-To: <200409292253.38880.E.Schuele@Comcast.Net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410012223.12906.E.Schuele@Comcast.Net> Subject: Re: NDIS problem on FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE (I think).... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: E.Schuele@Computer.Org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 03:22:57 -0000 Disregard my post/thread. Found a typo in my /etc/dhclient.conf. Fixed it.... problem went away. thx On Wednesday 29 September 2004 10:53 pm, Eric Schuele wrote: > Hello, > > I'm not sure who to go to with this. I managed to get everything > installed the way I like it on my Dell laptop... including the > miniPCI WLAN adapter using the NDIS wrapper for Windows Drivers. > > It appears to work flawlessly when I am within range of a WAP... but > when I am at the office (where there are none)... I occasionally get > completely locked up. If I leave it locked up for a minute or so, it > dies and reboots itself. I might think it is my wired interface > except I can run on it all night at home (WAP is present). Guess I > could try disabling my WAP at home and run wired. But its a bit > random.... so I could be like that for hours at home. > > It generally happens 2-3 times in an 8 hour period. Saw it happen > once when I manually ran dhclient. If I manually unload the NDIS > modules after booting up... It never happens. So I suspect the NDIS > wrapper. > > I realize the work may not be completed on these wrappers... but > though maybe if I could let the appropriate folks know... maybe they > could fix it before it becomes a real problem. > > Any help is appreciated. > Eric > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 04:07:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F62D16A4CF for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 04:07:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9333943D31 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 04:07:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Fri, 1 Oct 2004 23:11:29 -0500 Message-ID: <415E2991.4030000@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 23:07:45 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040712 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lila References: <20041002051250.D24507@earth.blowwater.hk> In-Reply-To: <20041002051250.D24507@earth.blowwater.hk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Oct 2004 04:11:30.0556 (UTC) FILETIME=[E5375BC0:01C4A835] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: about ports reinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 04:07:55 -0000 Lila wrote: > Hi, > > The php4 ports that I installed did not work with mysql, > it seems like it never able to configure to work with mysql. > No mysql info can be found with phpinfo(). > > I tried to reinstall php4 many times but no luck for me. > I want to ask is there a way to completely remove the > installed ports and related deps so that I can do a very > clean install of php4 and maybe with apache and mysql. > > Thanks! > > Regards, $cd /usr/ports/lang/php4 $make deinstall clean But ... I never saw that you posted with a problem. There have been a few changes lately that required some slightly different installation methods ... perhaps you missed something? Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 06:04:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F1216A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 06:04:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mygirlfriday.info (mo-65-41-216-204.sta.sprint-hsd.net [65.41.216.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE58D43D48 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 06:04:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gv-list-suse@mygirlfriday.info) Received: (qmail 16315 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2004 06:04:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mygirlfriday.info) (192.168.0.5) by mongo.mygirlfriday.info with SMTP; 2 Oct 2004 06:04:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 2962 invoked by uid 500); 2 Oct 2004 06:04:02 -0000 Message-ID: <20041002060402.2961.qmail@letric.mygirlfriday.info> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 01:04:02 -0500 From: Gary To: bsdfsse Mail-Followup-To: bsdfsse , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <415B40E0.5030708@optonline.net> <16732.17233.408255.749193@satchel.alerce.com> <415D81C4.1090200@optonline.net> <415D8687.7040905@optonline.net> <415E1BDB.4020203@optonline.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <415E1BDB.4020203@optonline.net> Organization: Hardly User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Are there step-by-step VMWare instructions? (giving up) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 06:04:04 -0000 On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 11:09:15PM -0400 or thereabouts, bsdfsse wrote: > > I give up on trying to get VMWare 3.2 to work on either FreeBSD 4.x or > 5.x. Thank you to everyone who tried to help me. After 5 full days of > trial and error on 3 machines, I think I can say it needs to be looked > at by a non-newby. Just saw this.. There is a new kid on the block called. Serenity Virtual Station, very similar to VMWare, but they have just released a version specifically for FreeBSD.. This is beta software, (not free), and although I have not tried it with FreeBSD yet (all my FreeBSD boxes currently are servers), I have it running on one Linux box... it works Perhaps this might be an alternative for you. http://www.serenityvirtual.com/ for general info and here for FreeBSD specific info http://tinyurl.com/5as7a -- Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 06:35:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871F216A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 06:35:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 9.hellooperator.net (cpc3-cdif2-3-0-cust202.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.32.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A31643D31 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 06:35:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputin@hellooperator.net) Received: from rasputin by 9.hellooperator.net with local (Exim 4.42) id 1CDdTX-0006Bn-Og; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 07:34:35 +0100 Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 07:34:35 +0100 From: Dick Davies To: Adam Smith Message-ID: <20041002063435.GI29161@lb.tenfour> References: <774016CA-140B-11D9-AFE9-000A958D061C@mac.com> <20041002004651.GH29161@lb.tenfour> <20041002010617.GG9966@internode.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041002010617.GG9966@internode.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: Rasputin cc: di0s@alt-hacker.org cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Java5 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dick Davies List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 06:35:46 -0000 * Adam Smith [1005 02:05]: > On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 01:46:51AM +0100, Dick Davies said: > > * De Savant [1038 01:38]: > > > I was looking around with this latest announcement of Sun's Java2 1.5, > > > since I was considering using FreeBSD on our server (amd64) instead of > > > Linux. I made my way to Sun's java page, and then to the newest Java2 > > > Enterprise Edition 1.4 release. Yet no FreeBSD Java? > > > > Sun have never released any VM for FreeBSD. The linux one will probably work > > out of the box under the Linuxulator. > > Don't they suck? :) Well of course they do - they're Java VMs. But they're no slower than a native one, and have the advantage of *existing* :) -- If there's an alien out there I can't kill, I haven't met him and killed him yet. - Zapp. Brannigan Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 07:18:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD4D16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 07:18:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9B643D55 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 07:18:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4Y0000E4B8PO@mta9.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 03:18:44 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 03:18:52 -0400 From: bsdfsse In-reply-to: <20041002060402.2961.qmail@letric.mygirlfriday.info> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <415E565C.80003@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) References: <415B40E0.5030708@optonline.net> <16732.17233.408255.749193@satchel.alerce.com> <415D81C4.1090200@optonline.net> <415D8687.7040905@optonline.net> <415E1BDB.4020203@optonline.net> <20041002060402.2961.qmail@letric.mygirlfriday.info> Subject: Re: Are there step-by-step VMWare instructions? (giving up) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 07:18:45 -0000 > Just saw this.. There is a new kid on the block called. Serenity Virtual > Station, very similar to VMWare, but they have just released a version > specifically for FreeBSD.. This is beta software, (not free), and although If they supporr FreeBSD, then I will support them. I tried to purchase their stuff for $50, but Iam waiting for a confirmation email. Tonigh I gad 11 beers while tryint to get VMWare to work on FreeBSD. ANother option is highly welcomed. thx! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 07:26:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F07616A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 07:26:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp813.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp813.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E415143D1F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 07:26:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from krinklyfig@spymac.com) Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com) (krinklyfig@pacbell.net@67.116.52.185 with plain) by smtp813.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2004 07:26:12 -0000 From: Joshua Tinnin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 00:26:31 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <415B40E0.5030708@optonline.net> <20041002060402.2961.qmail@letric.mygirlfriday.info> <415E565C.80003@optonline.net> In-Reply-To: <415E565C.80003@optonline.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410020026.31685.krinklyfig@spymac.com> Subject: Re: Are there step-by-step VMWare instructions? (giving up) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: krinklyfig@spymac.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 07:26:13 -0000 On Saturday 02 October 2004 12:18 am, bsdfsse wrote: > > Just saw this.. There is a new kid on the block called. Serenity > > Virtual Station, very similar to VMWare, but they have just > > released a version specifically for FreeBSD.. This is beta > > software, (not free), and although > > If they supporr FreeBSD, then I will support them. I tried to > purchase their stuff for $50, but Iam waiting for a confirmation > email. Tonigh I gad 11 beers while tryint to get VMWare to work on > FreeBSD. ANother option is highly welcomed. Try 12 beers. - jt (sorry for the noise ... couldn't help it ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 07:40:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87BC16A4CE; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 07:40:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4B343D31; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 07:40:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 06D5E85649; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:08:37 +0930 (CST) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:08:36 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: robg Message-ID: <20041002053836.GN460@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <5c389d3b041001211056012a3f@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OQhbRXNHSL5w/5po" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5c389d3b041001211056012a3f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: "$Id: index.html,v 1.46 2004/08/19 23:15:05 grog Exp $" ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 07:40:05 -0000 --OQhbRXNHSL5w/5po Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline [redirected to FreeBSD-questions; this is a technical issue] On Saturday, 2 October 2004 at 0:10:40 -0400, robg wrote: > Hi: > > I see this at the end of a lot of documents: > > $Id: index.html,v 1.46 2004/08/19 23:15:05 grog Exp $ > > or something similar. How is that done? Is it done from a text > editor that just appends it by itself? This comes from RCS or CVS. I'll talk about RCS below, because it's easier. > How would I go about doign it? Start with a file with just $Id$ in it. This file is obviously called index.html (in fact, to judge by the date and revision ID, it's the current version of my home page, http://www.lemis.com/grog/index.html). Then check it in with the ci command: $ ci -u index.html index.html,v <-- index.html enter description, terminated with single '.' or end of file: NOTE: This is NOT the log message! >> Home page >> ^D initial revision: 1.1 done If you now look at the file, the $Id$ will have changed to (in this case) $Id: index.html,v 1.1 2004/10/02 05:29:27 grog Exp $. When you then want to update the file, you first need to check it out (the version you have is write-protected). Do this with: $ co -l index.html Make your changes; when you're done, check in again with ci: $ ci -u index.html index.html,v <-- index.html new revision: 1.2; previous revision: 1.1 enter log message, terminated with single '.' or end of file: >> Added text >> ^D done The text after >> gets put into the revision log. You can look at it with rlog: $ rlog index.html RCS file: index.html,v Working file: index.html head: 1.2 branch: locks: strict access list: symbolic names: keyword substitution: kv total revisions: 2; selected revisions: 2 description: Home page ---------------------------- revision 1.2 date: 2004/10/02 05:33:39; author: grog; state: Exp; lines: +2 -1 Added text ---------------------------- revision 1.1 date: 2004/10/02 05:29:27; author: grog; state: Exp; Initial revision ---------------------------- ============================================================================= You can also check out older versions and compare things; somewhere there must be a tutorial. One thing you should note is that for any file index.html, the "control file" (that contains all the revisions and the logs and things) is called index.html,v. By default it gets put in the same directory as the file you're tracking, but if you have a subdirectory RCS (which I recommend), it'll get put there instead. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --OQhbRXNHSL5w/5po Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXj7cIubykFB6QiMRAoMQAJ4v4PQ5nV62OTrP6+sjvvxw5lUkkgCfVE/O 7uKJFzLEDFVnwvrRR+B2lp4= =BkBq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OQhbRXNHSL5w/5po-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 08:50:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088C316A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 08:50:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from herkus.is.lt (herkus.is.lt [193.219.14.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3EC43D1D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 08:50:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eg@zemaitija.net) Received: from lp.akmene.net ([195.182.78.45]) by herkus.is.lt (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i928olFw085971 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:50:48 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from eg@zemaitija.net) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:49:51 +0300 From: "E.Girkantas" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20041002114951.4c5a5ada.eg@zemaitija.net> In-Reply-To: <415E2991.4030000@daleco.biz> References: <20041002051250.D24507@earth.blowwater.hk> <415E2991.4030000@daleco.biz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanner-Information: Contact the antivirus@is.lt for more information X-Scanner: Clean Subject: Re: about ports reinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 08:50:53 -0000 On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 23:07:45 -0500 "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." wrote: > Lila wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The php4 ports that I installed did not work with mysql, > > it seems like it never able to configure to work with mysql. > > No mysql info can be found with phpinfo(). > > > > I tried to reinstall php4 many times but no luck for me. > > I want to ask is there a way to completely remove the > > installed ports and related deps so that I can do a very > > clean install of php4 and maybe with apache and mysql. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Regards, cd /usr/ports/database/php4-mysql make install -- E.Girkantas http://bsd.akmene.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 09:16:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D70116A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 09:16:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (s142-179-111-232.bc.hsia.telus.net [142.179.111.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B6E43D49 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 09:16:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sandy@krvarr.bc.ca) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i929GWog042146; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:16:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca) Received: (from sandy@localhost) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id i929GWvv042143; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:16:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sandy) From: Sandy Rutherford MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16734.29168.339392.225926@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:16:32 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.07 under Emacs 21.3.1 cc: Aleksey Cheusov Subject: Re: dictd, UTF-8, & FreeBSD 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 09:16:33 -0000 On Fri, 01 Oct 2004 you wrote: >> Has anybody been able to get dictd working with UTF-8 dictionaries in >> FreeBSD 4.10? When I start "dictd --locale de_DE.UTF-8" it >> seg. faults. I do have the UTF-8 locales installed and the dictionary >> should be fine as it works for dictd running on a Linux machine. >> I'm using dictd-1.9.11 installed from the ports. >> Thanks, >> Sandy > Try to use dictd-1.9.14. > A few FreeBSD related bugs have been fixed since 1.9.11 release. Tried this and now "dictd --locale de_DE.UTF-8" returns "UTF-8 disabled in this version". With some checking I found that UTF-8 is disabled because FreeBSD-4.10 doesn't have the iswalnum, iswspace, and towlower functions. These appear to exist in FreeBSD 5. Does anybody know if FreeBSD 4.10 can be patched to have these functions, or is upgrading to 5 the only option? Thanks, Sandy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 09:29:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885EB16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 09:29:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7977343D46 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 09:29:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john.oxley@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q44so362596cwc for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 02:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.116.18 with SMTP id o18mr287009cwc; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 02:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.11.118.61 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 02:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:29:00 +0200 From: John Oxley To: questions@freebsd.org, Me Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Disk quotas X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Oxley List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 09:29:00 -0000 The Scenario: I am running a multiuser FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE box for ~500 users. We have enforced disk quotas on /home and /tmp of 250MB soft and 256MB hard The Problem: One user has inadvertently snaked around this. (btw I like users who tell you when they have found a problem that works in their favour) We're running Apache 1 with mod_php, mod_ssl etc etc etc. This user has gallery setup on his webpage and the albums directory is chmod 707'd so that httpd can write to it. The problem is that httpd creates files as http:group and quota is not picking up that he is using more disk space than we want him to. The Question: Can quota be told that all files in ~luser belong to luser as well as all files owned by luser. If not, where would the appropriate place for hacking be, the kernel or usr.bin/*quota* -Ox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 11:02:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C62316A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:02:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ariel.yandex.ru (ariel.yandex.ru [213.180.200.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD2B43D46 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dextermetall@yandex.ru) Received: from YAMAIL (ariel.yandex.ru) by mail.yandex.ru id ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:01:44 +0400 Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:01:44 +0400 (MSD) From: "dextermetall" Sender: dextermetall@yandex.ru Message-Id: <415E8A98.000004.01543@ariel.yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] Errors-To: dextermetall@yandex.ru To: questions@freebsd.org X-source-ip: 62.212.228.67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: dextermetall@yandex.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:02:01 -0000 How can i add the computer in rc.firewall? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 11:04:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591B716A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:04:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from brian.firebadger.net (82-69-4-157.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.4.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B5D543D31 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:04:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@firebadger.net) Received: (qmail 30662 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2004 12:05:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.10?) (192.168.1.10) by 192.168.1.15 with SMTP; 2 Oct 2004 12:05:11 -0000 Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 12:04:28 +0100 From: Richard Collyer To: dextermetall@yandex.ru, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <415E8A98.000004.01543@ariel.yandex.ru> References: <415E8A98.000004.01543@ariel.yandex.ru> Message-Id: <20041002120326.5081.RICHARD@firebadger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.10 [en] (beta4) Subject: Re: rc.firewall (was no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:04:35 -0000 Hello, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls.html Cheers Richard On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:01:44 +0400 (MSD) "dextermetall" wrote: > > How can i add the computer in rc.firewall? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Richard Collyer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 11:55:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D53216A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:55:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D24A43D1D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:55:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ndologoy@yahoo.fr) Message-ID: <20041002115509.82455.qmail@web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [213.255.195.227] by web25105.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:55:09 CEST Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:55:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Ndolo Patrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Problem while installing GLIB-2.4.0 FOR GTK2.0 on freeBSD5.2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:55:11 -0000 Hello, I need to install glib-2.4.0 prior to installing gtk2.0 I am using source package glib-2.4.0.tar.gz I have libiconv installed with prefix /usr/local According to consulted documentation, the sequence of commands to compile and install is ./configure --with-libiconv=/usr/local make make install The ./configure exits with error message iconv or libiconv not found. I have also tried ./configure without prefix but did not achieve any results. Can anyone help? Papy --------------------------------- Créez gratuitement votre Yahoo! Mail avec 100 Mo de stockage ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail Le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger est arrivé ! Découvrez toutes les nouveautés pour dialoguer instantanément avec vos amis.Téléchargez GRATUITEMENT ici ! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 12:39:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2DF16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:39:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE52543D49 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:39:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from z49x2vmq@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 74so85041rnk for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 05:39:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.59.51 with SMTP id h51mr4206490rna; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 05:39:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.162.3 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 05:39:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2ede6f320410020539602eb974@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 08:39:12 -0400 From: Rae To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: "shutdown -p now" reboots my computer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Rae List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 12:39:19 -0000 I'm using 5.2.1-Release "shutdown -p now" command worked well couple of days ago. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 12:41:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A4A16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:41:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from northgate.starhub.net.sg (northgate.starhub.net.sg [203.117.1.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55AC43D54 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:41:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pryan@singnet.com.sg) Received: from DellDual (cm6.sigma235.maxonline.com.sg [218.212.235.6]) i92Cex9w008177 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 20:41:03 +0800 (SST) Message-Id: <200410021241.i92Cex9w008177@northgate.starhub.net.sg> From: "Peter Ryan" To: Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 20:40:49 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Thread-Index: AcSofQvvVMNxWHgTTWmQbjAxAXgP3A== Subject: JBoss ports in use - tomcat X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pryan@singnet.com.sg List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 12:41:07 -0000 I am running 4.10R and have installed JBoss3.2.5. I also installed Tomcat5 When i boot the machine and try to startup JBoss it reports ports in use. I have to run the shutdown script first, and then the startup script works fine. I notice when I boot up that three packages appear to start under 'local package initialisation'. These are Tomcat4, Tomcat5, and JBoss3starting. I did not install Tomcat4 - i think this might have come from the JBoss installation. I have found a directory called rc.d which seems to hold the scripts which run these initialisations. I think my solution to the JBoss problem is to prevent these scripts running, but I dont know how to do this. Has anyone else had this problem with JBoss ? (it does not seem have been reported) How do I get rid of these initialisation scripts in an orderly manner ? I am very new to all this. Any suggestions gratefully received. Thanks Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 12:49:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B46C16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:49:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D01F43D31 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:49:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjmccann@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3632952rnb for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 05:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.1.72 with SMTP id 72mr1176522rna; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 05:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.179.42 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 05:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2b5f066d041002054953305891@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 08:49:45 -0400 From: Brian McCann To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <2b5f066d04093013344d048003@mail.gmail.com> <2034.67.167.52.21.1096577945.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> <2b5f066d0410010542a38e93b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Backup/Restore X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Brian McCann List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 12:49:52 -0000 We actually came up with another solution, for those of you who care...we are going to rewrite part of the mail handler so that it writes to multiple file systems on multiple servers and to a log indicating if it failed on any of them. When one comes up, a client will check the log to see what it missed. Thanks again everyone! --Brian On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:35:06 +0100 (BST), Jan Grant wrote: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Brian McCann wrote: > > > On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 13:59:05 -0700 (PDT), Richard Lynch wrote: > > > > > > Brian McCann wrote: > > > > Hi all...I'm having a conceptual problem I can't get around and > > > > was hoping someone can change my focus here. I've been backing up > > > > roughly 6-8 million small files (roughly 2-4k each) using dump, but > > > > restores take forever due to the huge number of files and directories. > > > > Luckily, I haven't had to restore for an emergency yet...but if I > > > > need to, I'm kinda stuck. I've looked at distributed file systems > > > > like CODA, but the number of files I have to deal with will make it > > > > choke. Can anyone offer any suggestions? I've pondered running > > > > rsync, but am very worried about how long that will take... > > > > > > Do the files change a lot, or is it more like a few files added/changed > > > every day, and the bulk don't change? > > > > > > If it's the latter, you could maybe get best performance from something > > > like Subversion (a CVS derivative). > > > > > > Though I suspect rsync would also do well in that case. > > > > > > If a ton of those files are changing all the time, try doing a test on > > > creating a tarball and then backing up the tarball. That may be a simple > > > managable solution. There are probably other more complex solutions of > > > which I am ignorant :-) > > > > I have the case where a new file is created about every second or two, > > nothing gets changed, but files get deleted occasionally (it's a mail > > server). I thought of using tar, but it would be just as slow as dump > > I would think. I've thought of breaking it up into chunks, but that > > still doesn't solve my speed issue...i'm beginning to consider using > > dd since it reads the actual disk bits, and just hope that a)I don't > > ever need one file and b) the system I restore to has at least or more > > space then the original server. Any other thoughts anyone? > > You might want to experiment with something like rsync to maintain a > "live" (ie, on a FS) second copy. If you do this don't be put off by the > initial rsync time (which may well take ages - tar or dump/restore may > be faster to get the second copy in place initially). Rsync over such a > large filesystem may take quite a while but the best bet is to actually > try it to see if it meets your needs. > > Obviously a restore of a mail repository is a pretty awful thing to have > to do. Amongst other things, users can find the "ressurrection" of > deleted mails to be a real pain. You might want to see if your mail repo > can generate some kind of replay log - if so, this might be the best > route for minimising the amount of time needed to synchronise mailstores > and to get the closest fidelity out of the copy. > > Breaking your mailstore into separate chunks may well help. Yes, the > total time for a dump/restore may be close to your current state of > play, but if you can split the partitions between machines then you have > the option to perform these in parallel. > > -- > jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ > Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 http://ioctl.org/jan/ > "...perl has been dead for more than 4 years." - Abigail in the Monastery > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 18:57:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B46AA16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:57:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web41907.mail.yahoo.com (web41907.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A840B43D41 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 18:57:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wd145@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20041001185712.36991.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [80.75.190.5] by web41907.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:57:12 PDT Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 11:57:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Elwaleed Khafagy To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:00:50 +0000 Subject: ask for information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 18:57:12 -0000 dear sir; i can not tell you how happy we am to use free BSD but i need some information . I am from egypt and our language is arabic , so our company really need to know how to make free BSD support for arabic . we have informix database on our server and sometimes we need to use arabic . would you please tell me if there is a way to make free BSD support arabic thank you _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 13:25:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3787E16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:25:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ctb-mesg1.saix.net (ctb-mesg1.saix.net [196.25.240.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D9343D39 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:25:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from livhu.tshisikule@telkomsa.net) Received: from host2-fbsd.Dembe.net (tpr-122-41.telkomadsl.co.za [165.165.122.41]) by ctb-mesg1.saix.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB335F44 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:25:48 +0200 (SAST) From: Livhu Tshisikule Organization: Dembe Open Source Unix Solutions To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:26:22 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410021526.22049.livhu.tshisikule@telkomsa.net> Subject: Problem with LG 8525B CD Writer. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:25:52 -0000 Hi I am trying to burn some iso images using burncd Dmesg : acd0: CDRW at ata1-master PIO4 burncd -f /dev/acd0 data image.iso fixate Everything works fine but when I try to do mount_cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt I am getting the following error mount_cd9660: /dev/acd0: Input/output error I am trying to make a bootable CD Regards Livhu Tshisikule From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 13:26:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6745C16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:26:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pengo.systems.pipex.net (pengo.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3743743D2F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:26:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark.cullen@dsl.pipex.com) Received: from ape (81-178-127-34.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.127.34]) by pengo.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id EADD24C00098 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:26:42 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <001d01c4a883$f65bf3e0$f700000a@ape> From: "Markie" To: Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:30:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: Kernel Compile slow on 5.x series? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:26:44 -0000 Has anyone else noticed that the 5.x series kernel compile times take much longer than that of the 4.x series? My friends 233MHz machine running 4.x finished a kernel compile before my 500MHz machine running 5.x a while back. It seems to take forever? Is there a reason for this, or is it just me seeing this problem? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 13:33:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED4FC16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:33:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A66643D4C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:33:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1] (may be forged))i92DXNLY031058 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:33:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i92DXNLS031057; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:33:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:33:23 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: Elwaleed Khafagy Message-ID: <20041002133323.GA30405@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Elwaleed Khafagy , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20041001185712.36991.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041001185712.36991.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:33:24 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ask for information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:33:31 -0000 --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 11:57:12AM -0700, Elwaleed Khafagy wrote: > i can not tell you how happy we am to use free BSD > but i need some information . > I am from egypt and our language is arabic , so our > company really need to know how to make free BSD > support for arabic . > we have informix database on our server and sometimes > we need to use arabic . > would you please tell me if there is a way to make > free BSD support arabic As far as I can tell, there is no support for an Arabic language locale in the base system. However many ports exist with Arabic support -- eg. OpenOffice. There is an arabic category in the ports -- mostly containing a number of Arabic fonts. I wasn't aware that Informix databases were available or supported under FreeBSD -- perhaps this is a Linux version of Informix being run under emulation? Anyhow, I'd expect that IBM as the vendors of Informix software would be good people to ask about localization support. I can state for certain that the two biggest free RDBMS available -- MySQL and PostgeSQL -- both provide excellent support for many different languages. Certainly, there is no problem with such things as hosting (or viewing) Arabic language web sites under FreeBSD -- all of the web application programming languages do support Arabic in principle, although examples and localized documentation may be hard to come by. FreeBSD depends entirely on people donating their time and expertise for all of its code development, web sites and documentation. As far as I can see there is no ongoing project to translate FreeBSD documentation and other material into Arabic, or to provide an Arabic locale in the base system. However, anyone stepping forward and volunteering to produce such things would be welcomed with open arms. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXq4jiD657aJF7eIRAiwZAJ9PYhZokaJuFIHblk2BxcBl0G85ngCgmhES Jhqsx0nVct1WuNM4akfBTR4= =72yG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 13:42:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A367C16A4CF for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:42:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.prodigy.net.mx (nlpproxy09.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D90A43D48 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:42:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from edwinculp@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from prodigy.net.mx (du-148-235-52-32.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.32]) by smtp.prodigy.net.mx (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I4Y00B2UM2EA1@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 08:42:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [148.235.52.104] (Forwarded-For: [201.129.94.187]) by nlpmail02.prodigy.net.mx (mshttpd); Sat, 02 Oct 2004 08:42:33 -0500 Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 08:42:33 -0500 From: edwinculp To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <1d22c167ef.167ef1d22c@prodigy.net.mx> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: iPlanet Messenger Express 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: es Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: es Priority: non-urgent X-Priority: 5 (Lowest) Subject: skype and audio distortion (aka: donald duck imitation) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:42:19 -0000 I've installed skype and am able to call with no problem. The recieving end hears me as if I were there but when they respond it sounds like a bad imitation of Donald Duck. I've tried using the connection test service of skype, echo123 with the same results, both the skype voice and my recorded and played back voice sound like Donald Duck. I've tried it on different machines with different sound chipsets and it seems to be accross the board. Has anyone experienced this? Were you able to fix it? Is it working as expected for anyone without distortion? Any suggestions appreciated. TIA, ed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 13:42:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7599816A4D6 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:42:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rdstm.ro (mail.rdstm.ro [193.231.233.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A3343D49 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:42:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aanton@spintech.ro) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (casa_auto [81.196.32.25]) by mail.rdstm.ro (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i92Defhl017883; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:40:41 +0300 Message-ID: <415EB039.7000704@spintech.ro> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 16:42:17 +0300 From: Anton Alin-Adrian User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040706) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joe Marcus Clarke , FreeBSD Questions References: <415DFD6B.8050607@spintech.ro> <1096679083.97192.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <1096679083.97192.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: gnome 2.8 mime associations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:42:24 -0000 Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 20:59, Anton Alin-Adrian wrote: > >>Hello, >> >> I just installed gnome 2.8 from the marcuscom.com tinderbox, and >>everything is great and neat, except mimes are completely broken. > > > Define, "completely broken." > > Hi Marcus, I appologise for putting the problem in fast words. I really appreciate the fact that I can install gnome 2.8 because of your work, instead of waiting the ports freeze. Maybe I did something wrong here. Nautilus is unable to open any sort of files, because "there is no application associated with this file type". This include text files, pictures, and even directories. It can't open simple directories, it gives the same error. I run FreeBSD 4.10 as desktop. For example, when I click the homedir icon on my desktop, it sais "There is no action associated with "bu".", and bu is my username. The same window provides a button for "Associate Application", but clicking on it makes the window vanish, and nothing happens (because the applet which is called when this button is pushed, is not found. I found it in the gnome 2.6 port source, as a tool in sysutils/gnome-control-center, but nowhere else in the filesystem.) Here's a sample error: (nautilus:332): GnomeUI-WARNING **: While connecting to session manager: Authentication Rejected, reason : None of the authentication protocols specified are supported and host-based authentication failed. (nautilus:332): Eel-WARNING **: Error starting command 'gnome-file-types-properties 'x-directory/normal' 'Pseudo'': Failed to execute child process "gnome-file-types-properties" (No such file or directory) (nautilus:332): Bonobo-WARNING **: Leaked a total of 1 refs to 1 bonobo object(s) Thanks for your hard work, Marcus, and again, I appologise if I managed to offend you. If I shall make snapshots, I believe it is not proper to submit them on the list, so please let me know, and thanks for your time again. Yours, -- Alin-Adrian Anton Spintech Systems GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1E2FFF2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 13:42:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BA016A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:42:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.speakeasy.net (mail2.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E3243D45 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:42:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 24132 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2004 13:42:58 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.no-ip.com) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Oct 2004 13:42:57 -0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 61FE47D; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 09:42:57 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: trypticon@SAFe-mail.net References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 02 Oct 2004 09:42:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44ekkhp76m.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem installing firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:42:58 -0000 trypticon@SAFe-mail.net writes: > I'm having trouble installing firefox on freebsd-4.10. When i try to install it it gives me this error: > > /usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot find -lXcursor > gmake[2]: *** [libgtkxtbin.so] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving Directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla > /widget/src/gtkxtbin' > gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 > gmake[1]: Leaving Directory`/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla' > gmake: *** [default] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > any help would be appreciated. Had you done a build before this? It looks like the problem is in the build part, not the install. Are your ports up-to-date? There have been some major changes in the port since the release of FreeBSD 4.10. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 13:45:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7265A16A4CF for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:45:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D13943D1F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:45:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 23870 invoked by uid 65534); 2 Oct 2004 13:45:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) (129.187.19.157) by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 02 Oct 2004 15:45:13 +0200 X-Authenticated: #147403 Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0BFABC0F9; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:45:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:45:31 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Markie Message-ID: <20041002134531.GB57007@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <001d01c4a883$f65bf3e0$f700000a@ape> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001d01c4a883$f65bf3e0$f700000a@ape> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Compile slow on 5.x series? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:45:18 -0000 --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Markie wrote: > Has anyone else noticed that the 5.x series kernel compile times take much > longer than that of the 4.x series? My friends 233MHz machine running 4.x > finished a kernel compile before my 500MHz machine running 5.x a while > back. It seems to take forever? Is there a reason for this, or is it just > me seeing this problem? FreeBSD 5 uses GCC 3.x as system compiler, whereas 4 is based on GCC 2.y. =20 Due to enhenced code optimization, support for modern language features and other things the _compilation_ times increased considerably in the newk version of the compiler (the resulting code is often much faster). Fortunately, things are getting better with the most recent compilers from the GCC 3.x series. Simon --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXrD7Ckn+/eutqCoRAnLrAJ9XDpvYMHow4elXx5ZQp9gu6jN06ACfQomO UMV8q6r0LWtHqa2dXN6aU9U= =VstU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4bRzO86E/ozDv8r1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 13:54:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFDED16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:54:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pengo.systems.pipex.net (pengo.systems.pipex.net [62.241.160.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1237743D45 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:54:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark.cullen@dsl.pipex.com) Received: from ape (81-178-127-34.dsl.pipex.com [81.178.127.34]) by pengo.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 772464C00147; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:54:53 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <003201c4a887$e6605220$f700000a@ape> From: "Markie" To: "Simon Barner" References: <001d01c4a883$f65bf3e0$f700000a@ape> <20041002134531.GB57007@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:58:29 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Compile slow on 5.x series? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:54:56 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Barner" To: "Markie" Cc: Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 2:45 PM Subject: Re: Kernel Compile slow on 5.x series? Markie wrote: >> Has anyone else noticed that the 5.x series kernel compile times take much >> longer than that of the 4.x series? My friends 233MHz machine running 4.x >> finished a kernel compile before my 500MHz machine running 5.x a while >> back. It seems to take forever? Is there a reason for this, or is it just >> me seeing this problem? > >FreeBSD 5 uses GCC 3.x as system compiler, whereas 4 is based on GCC >2.y. > >Due to enhenced code optimization, support for modern language features >and other things the _compilation_ times increased considerably in the newk >version of the compiler (the resulting code is often much faster). > >Fortunately, things are getting better with the most recent compilers from >the GCC 3.x series. > >Simon > Oh right, that's fair enough then :-) Thanks very much! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 13:57:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E47016A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:57:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E7BE43D2F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:57:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barner@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 9026 invoked by uid 65534); 2 Oct 2004 13:57:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (EHLO zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) (129.187.19.157) by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 02 Oct 2004 15:57:18 +0200 X-Authenticated: #147403 Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F26AAC0D4; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:57:37 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:57:37 +0200 From: Simon Barner To: Elwaleed Khafagy Message-ID: <20041002135737.GC57007@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20041001185712.36991.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041001185712.36991.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ask for information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 13:57:21 -0000 --Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Elwaleed Khafagy wrote: > dear sir; > i can not tell you how happy we am to use free BSD > but i need some information . > I am from egypt and our language is arabic , so our > company really need to know how to make free BSD > support for arabic . > we have informix database on our server and sometimes > we need to use arabic . > would you please tell me if there is a way to make > free BSD support arabic This is probably not what you are looking for right now, but it might be interesting anyways: AFAIK the GNOME desktop enviroment has support the arabic language, which means that text is displayed properly form right to left, and there's some sort of advanced text input technique, and according to http://www.gnome.org/start/2.8/notes/rni18.html, most of GNOME's base is also translated. I don't know about other desktop environments, e.g. KDE, but I guess that making similar efforts are under way. Regards, Simon --Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXrPRCkn+/eutqCoRAgiLAKC7HAr0zATZh31avvyFmMLIe/QqAQCgubsV jCeIt0shB1674NZPS6x8UNE= =mNXO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qbvjkv9qwOGw/5Fx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 14:02:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F3516A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:02:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E4743D2D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:02:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason@monsterjam.org) Received: from monsterjam.org (cpe-024-211-171-119.nc.rr.com [24.211.171.119]) i92E2WZf029411 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 10:02:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 85501 invoked by uid 1001); 2 Oct 2004 14:02:32 -0000 Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 10:02:32 -0400 From: Jason To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041002140232.GC84014@monsterjam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: video memory on intel extreme graphics? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:02:36 -0000 can someone explain this to me please from dmesg agp0: detected 8060k stolen memory agp0: aperture size is 128M so is my i810 video using 8meg or 128 meg or what? [jason@dellbox]$ uname -a FreeBSD dellbox 5.3-BETA6 FreeBSD 5.3-BETA6 #0: Fri Oct 1 22:59:20 EDT 2004 jason@dellbox:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/DELLBOX i386 regards, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 14:04:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA8916A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:04:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D8543D2F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:04:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1] (may be forged)) i92E21oh031406 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:02:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i92E21cD031405; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:02:01 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:02:01 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: John Oxley Message-ID: <20041002140201.GB30405@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , John Oxley , questions@freebsd.org, Me References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sat, 02 Oct 2004 15:02:01 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Me Subject: Re: Disk quotas X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:04:20 -0000 --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 11:29:00AM +0200, John Oxley wrote: =20 > The Question: >=20 > Can quota be told that all files in ~luser belong to luser as well as > all files owned by luser. The simplest way to do that is to give each user their own individual group, and then simply use the *group* quotas rather than the individual per-user quotas. This works very well where the user is having files created on their behalf by other UIDs (eg. httpd in this case) because of the standard BSD behaviour that files default to inheriting the same group ownership as the directory they are created in. With some exceptions for files created by root, or where the sticky bit is set on the directory. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXrTZiD657aJF7eIRAvqhAKCmvo8UHjo+Rc4wgBeQY9UuJZ0RyACglFjs zStpxVHDqW4tDzzPF6s8wuY= =tozV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 14:21:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062AC16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:21:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (redqueen.elvandar.org [217.148.169.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 760F443D31 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:21:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D985D295479; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:14:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.elvandar.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (redqueen.elvandar.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84627-06; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:14:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <415EA9CC.8020003@elvandar.org> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 15:14:52 +0200 From: Remko Lodder User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elwaleed Khafagy References: <20041001185712.36991.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20041001185712.36991.qmail@web41907.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ask for information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:21:48 -0000 Elwaleed Khafagy wrote: > dear sir; > i can not tell you how happy we am to use free BSD > but i need some information . > I am from egypt and our language is arabic , so our > company really need to know how to make free BSD > support for arabic . > we have informix database on our server and sometimes > we need to use arabic . > would you please tell me if there is a way to make > free BSD support arabic > thank you > Hi Elwaleed, You can have a look at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/l10n.html for more information, this goes about localizing FreeBSD etc, so i figure that that would be the best place. Hope this helps and good luck ;) Cheers! -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl Founder Tienervaders |remko@tienervaders.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 14:41:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7164A16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:41:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at (chello084114137224.1.15.vie.surfer.at [84.114.137.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0F52743D1D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:41:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 4711@chello.at) Received: (qmail 54667 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2004 14:41:20 -0000 Received: from matrix010.matrix.net (192.168.123.10) by ns.matrix.net with SMTP; 2 Oct 2004 14:41:20 -0000 From: Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:41:00 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <415B40E0.5030708@optonline.net> <415D8687.7040905@optonline.net> <415E1BDB.4020203@optonline.net> In-Reply-To: <415E1BDB.4020203@optonline.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410021641.19902.4711@chello.at> cc: bsdfsse Subject: Re: Are there step-by-step VMWare instructions? (giving up) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:41:23 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 02 October 2004 05:09, bsdfsse wrote: [...] > The only time I got it to run was with a 5.2-Release installation with > networking disabled (following Christian's docs). Every other > configuration resulted in losing access to the hard-drive as soon as I > hit the VM's "Power On" button. Curiously I tried to install VMware on an other, faster machine. The slow machine was a P3-850MHz 440BX chipset and a SiI 0680 with 2 gvinum mirrored hdds in UDMA133 mode - worked w/o problems. I moved the data over to the faster XP2800+ KT600 chipset with VIA 8237 controller w/ 2 gvinum mirrored hdds (ad0/ad1) in UDMA133 mode and a Promise PDC20269 with 2 hdds (ad4/ad6) in UDMA133 mode. I observed similar symptoms: read and write DMA timeouts on the faster machine. After the guest OS had started I got lots of timeouts until the system is hard locked. All VMware data on ad6. / and /usr on the ad0/ad1 mirror. I will try to find out more on this and pr results when I have some more sparetime. /var/log/messages output: Oct 2 06:28:24 matrix010 kernel: ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=171871667 Oct 2 06:28:24 matrix010 kernel: ad0: WARNING - READ_DMA no interrupt but good status Oct 2 06:28:30 matrix010 kernel: ad1: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=171872247 Oct 2 06:28:30 matrix010 kernel: ad1: WARNING - READ_DMA no interrupt but good status Oct 2 06:28:35 matrix010 kernel: ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=170673789 Oct 2 06:28:35 matrix010 kernel: ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA no interrupt but good status Oct 2 06:28:40 matrix010 kernel: ad0: TIMEOUT - WRITE_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=170674433 [...] Cheers, ch - -- Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> | OpenPGP KeyID 0x3BCA53BE OpenPGP-Key at hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net and http://pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXr4P09WjGjvKU74RAkCAAJ9v8ekiuSFSPzW/PmA1x0Fb/NryVgCggUKz aq16VmtQ/efQ17ommNq6y4I= =zemb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 14:53:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0491916A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:53:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32C543D2F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:53:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4Y00GHYPDP2N@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 10:53:49 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 10:53:58 -0400 From: bsdfsse In-reply-to: <200410021641.19902.4711@chello.at> To: Christian Hiris <4711@chello.at> Message-id: <415EC106.1010200@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) References: <415B40E0.5030708@optonline.net> <415D8687.7040905@optonline.net> <415E1BDB.4020203@optonline.net> <200410021641.19902.4711@chello.at> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Are there step-by-step VMWare instructions? (giving up) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:53:51 -0000 > Oct 2 06:28:24 matrix010 kernel: ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (2 retries left) LBA=171871667 > Oct 2 06:28:24 matrix010 kernel: ad0: WARNING - READ_DMA no interrupt but good status Those are the same errors I am getting! It's somewhat of a relief to see other people getting the same error, at least now we know it isn't me doing something silly. thx! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 15:15:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1AA16A4CF for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:15:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.libertysurf.net (mx-out.tiscali.fr [213.36.80.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C4A43D41 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:15:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cave.dnb@tiscali.fr) Received: from dyn-213-36-116-166.ppp.tiscali.fr (213.36.116.166) by mail.libertysurf.net (6.5.036) id 415D20B700317B1D for questions@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:15:02 +0200 From: nigel henry To: questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:14:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410021614.43582.cave.dnb@tiscali.fr> Subject: Boot floppies for FreeBSD 4,8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 15:15:04 -0000 Having multiple linux installs on my machines, I've had to use boot floppies to boot some of em. I'm not too good at configuring GRUB or LiLo to chainload to other bootloaders at the moment, so, is it possible when installing FreeBSD to make a boot floppy. I hav'nt installed it yet, just reading the docs, and trying to find a spare harddrive to put it on. Any help would be very gratefully received. Nigel. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 15:20:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76E716A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:20:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dnsmail4.ior.navy.mil (nocb.ior.navy.mil [205.56.210.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EAE43D39 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:20:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil) Received: from cg69ubd01.vicksburg.navy.mil ([205.95.65.21]) i92FItR6018030; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:18:58 GMT Received: by CG69UBD01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:23:02 +0300 Message-ID: From: JohnsoBS@vicksburg.navy.mil To: bsdfsse@optonline.net, 4711@chello.at Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:22:55 +0300 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Are there step-by-step VMWare instructions? (giving up) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 15:20:14 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: bsdfsse [mailto:bsdfsse@optonline.net] > Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2004 4:54 PM > To: Christian Hiris > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Are there step-by-step VMWare instructions? (giving up) > > > > > Oct 2 06:28:24 matrix010 kernel: ad0: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA > retrying (2 > retries left) LBA=171871667 > > Oct 2 06:28:24 matrix010 kernel: ad0: WARNING - READ_DMA no > interrupt but good status > > > Those are the same errors I am getting! > > It's somewhat of a relief to see other people getting the > same error, at > least now we know it isn't me doing something silly. > > thx! I've been getting this for a while now to. I only have it with my 160GB and greater disk. I have researched and it seems to be a problem with 48bit addressing above 137GB. Its an older board without bios support to read it properly. I only have the problem on the higher LBA addresses to. I have had it FAR FAR less since beta4 though. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 15:39:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB6916A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:39:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from usw2.natel.net (2b.bz [209.152.117.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5D2D43D2F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:39:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from WD@US-Webmasters.com) Received: (qmail 12088 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2004 15:39:36 -0000 Received: from batv-01-025.dialup.netins.net (HELO xyz.US-Webmasters.com) (216.248.109.26) by us-webmasters.com with SMTP; 2 Oct 2004 15:39:36 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20041002103111.0600dbe0@209.152.117.178> X-Sender: wd@209.152.117.178 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 10:39:01 -0500 To: nigel henry From: "W. D." In-Reply-To: <200410021614.43582.cave.dnb@tiscali.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Boot floppies for FreeBSD 4,8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 15:39:39 -0000 At 10:14 10/2/2004, nigel henry, wrote: >Having multiple linux installs on my machines, I've had to use boot= floppies=20 >to boot some of em. I'm not too good at configuring GRUB or LiLo to= chainload=20 >to other bootloaders at the moment, so, is it possible when installing=20 >FreeBSD to make a boot floppy. I hav'nt installed it yet, just reading the= =20 >docs, and trying to find a spare harddrive to put it on. Any help would be= =20 >very gratefully received. Nigel. Hi Nigel, Here are some helpful links: http://tinyurl.com/4paps http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html http://www.Google.com/search?q=3Dboot+floppy+freebsd.org http://www.US-Webmasters.com/FreeBSD/Install/ Start Here to Find It Fast!=99 ->= http://www.US-Webmasters.com/best-start-page/ $8.77 Domain Names -> http://domains.us-webmasters.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 16:08:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A545716A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:08:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A82D43D48 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:08:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuri.vanovermeeren@reston.demon.nl) Received: from reston.demon.nl ([212.238.216.87]:1479 helo=[192.168.1.100]) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CDmRJ-000APa-8z; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 16:08:53 +0000 Message-ID: <415ED2A0.3020800@reston.demon.nl> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:09:04 +0200 From: yuri van Overmeeren User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason References: <20041002140232.GC84014@monsterjam.org> In-Reply-To: <20041002140232.GC84014@monsterjam.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: video memory on intel extreme graphics? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: yuri.vanovermeeren@reston.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 16:08:54 -0000 Jason wrote: >can someone explain this to me please > >from dmesg >agp0: detected 8060k stolen memory >agp0: aperture size is 128M > >so is my i810 video using 8meg or 128 meg or what? > > > Hi, The 128 Mb aperture is the maximum amount of system memory the AGP can use as graphics memory, it's using 8Mb currently (but it can use 128 Mb max). you can usually adjust aperture size in your bios. -yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 16:13:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DE816A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:13:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A011143D45 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:13:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i92GCjk02669; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:12:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200410021612.i92GCjk02669@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: matt@wrongcrowd.com (Matt Staroscik) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:12:44 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20041001102302.0cd64560@wrongcrowd.com> from "Matt Staroscik" at Oct 01, 2004 10:26:14 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How do you duplicate a drive? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 16:13:22 -0000 > > > I have a RAID mirror (2x 160GB) which I would like to back up onto a spare > 160GB drive. > > I do not have a hot-swap caddy so I was planning on powering down the > system to get the backup drive in and out. > > But once I have the new blank drive in, what is the best way to duplicate > the RAID? Ideally I would like to create a disk that could boot the system > (and rebuild the RAID) in case disaster strikes. > > Can dd do this? > > I am new to Unix disk operations... Many thanks in advance for the help. I am just a bit unsure of what you are asking. Do you mean to try and duplicate the raid mirror set on the single 160GB spare disk? Or do you mean that you just want to make a backup copy of the files on the raid mirror set to the spare drive? I don't think you can do the first. But the second would be easily accomplished using dump(8) (and restore(8) if you wish). Depending on whether you want to access the files in place while they are on the spare disk or you want to just have a convenient backup of the raid mirrot set in case something happened you would either: - dump the file system[s] on the raid mirror set to [a] file[s] on the spare disk. example: if you had a file systems named /usr and /home on the mirror dump 0af /spare/usr.dump /usr dump 0af /spare/home.dump /home would give you an easily accessible dump files of /usr and /home You would have to 'restore -if' any files that you want to use from the dump files. But if the mirror crashed, it would be easy to (first repair or replace it) and then do a standard restore of the whole dump files in to the rebuilt mirror file systems. or - pipe the dump[s] of file system[s] on the raid mirror to restore[s] on the spare disk. You need to premake at least directories on the spare to receive the dumps. Better to make file systems on the spare for each file system on the mirror set. In case you ever need to do a complete restore of the mirror set then you can just do a reverse of this dump | restore So, assuming you have done the slicing, partitioning and newfsing of the needed size file systems on the spare disk and mounted them as something like /spareusr and /sparehome then: cd /spareusr dump 0af - /usr | restore -rf - cd /sparehome dump 0af - /home | restore -rf - would duplicate the file systems and make the files all usable in place. To rebuild the mirror set if it crashed and after you repaired it and rebuilt the filesystems and mounted them in their original places you would have to reverse the dump-restore as is cd /usr dump 0af - /spareusr | restore rf - Or you could just remount the spares as /usr and /home and use them just like that without reviving the raid. Anyway, using dd to copy the device would not work I don't think because it would try a byte for byte copy and the spare disk is definitely not an identical device to the raid mirror set. Hope that is all clear. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 16:45:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7FB16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:45:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-24.mail.nl.demon.net (post-24.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D8D43D55 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:45:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuri.vanovermeeren@reston.demon.nl) Received: from reston.demon.nl ([212.238.216.87]:1617 helo=[192.168.1.100]) by post-24.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CDn0r-000EY3-Ol; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 16:45:37 +0000 Message-ID: <415EDB3E.4080408@reston.demon.nl> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:45:50 +0200 From: yuri van Overmeeren User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jason@monsterjam.org References: <20041002140232.GC84014@monsterjam.org> <415ED2A0.3020800@reston.demon.nl> In-Reply-To: <415ED2A0.3020800@reston.demon.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: video memory on intel extreme graphics? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: yuri.vanovermeeren@reston.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 16:45:39 -0000 yuri van Overmeeren wrote: > Jason wrote: > >> can someone explain this to me please >> >> from dmesg >> agp0: detected 8060k stolen memory >> agp0: aperture size is 128M >> >> so is my i810 video using 8meg or 128 meg or what? >> >> >> > Hi, > > The 128 Mb aperture is the maximum amount of system memory the AGP can > use as graphics memory, it's using 8Mb currently (but it can use 128 > Mb max). you can usually adjust aperture size in your bios. ehm no, that's not quite correct...it's using a maximum of 128 Mb of system memory as graphics memory as said before, AND 8 Mb of stolen memory (I think..., used as framebuffer?, to do all vga/vesa modes?) To be honest I read about the intel graphics and how they work...but can quite remember it (brain probably did not use enough stolen memory) -yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 17:45:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDEF16A4CF for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:45:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA4B43D46 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:45:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuri.vanovermeeren@reston.demon.nl) Received: from reston.demon.nl ([212.238.216.87]:1667 helo=[192.168.1.100]) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CDnxA-000LY6-Ei for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 17:45:52 +0000 Message-ID: <415EE95D.9060109@reston.demon.nl> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 19:46:05 +0200 From: yuri van Overmeeren User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (Windows/20040707) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20041002140232.GC84014@monsterjam.org> <415ED2A0.3020800@reston.demon.nl> <415EDB3E.4080408@reston.demon.nl> In-Reply-To: <415EDB3E.4080408@reston.demon.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: video memory on intel extreme graphics? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: yuri.vanovermeeren@reston.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 17:45:54 -0000 Jason wrote: > thanks for the info.. > my bios only has settings for 1Mb and 8M. Ive got it set to 8Mb now.. > so If in my xorg.conf, I have VideoRam 32768 > does this influence what the video card will use? I have that in my > config now.. can I tell how much memory my video card is using? > > Yes, if you set it to 1 Mb you probably can not go above 640x480 24bit colour in X, I think 1024x768 max but only at 8 bit colour, so 8 Mb is better. As far as I know it's best to leave the VideoRam setting in xorg.conf commented out, In most cases the driver detects the memory X can use. The setting influences how much memory X uses for video modes, setting it too high can cause problems. -yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 18:24:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1615316A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:24:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35C843D54 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:24:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from whodoctor@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 74so97076rnk for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.208.53 with SMTP id f53mr4372417rng; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 11:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.13.32 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4b75340e04100211249748642@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:24:38 -0400 From: Doctor Who To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [OT] gmail invites X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Doctor Who List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:24:39 -0000 I have a few gmail invites. If you'd like one, email me *off-list*. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 18:27:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294F816A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:27:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B338B43D31 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:27:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) i92IRNq63251; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:27:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Bart Silverstrim" , "Tim Aslat" Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:27:23 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 In-Reply-To: <3C63F041-107D-11D9-98C2-000D9338770A@chrononomicon.com> Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:27:33 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Bart > Silverstrim > Sent: Monday, September 27, 2004 5:03 AM > To: Tim Aslat > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: IP address conflicts > > > > On Sep 27, 2004, at 12:49 AM, Tim Aslat wrote: > > > In the immortal words of "Ted Mittelstaedt" ... > > >> Once again, I must assume that these notebooks legitimately owned by > >> students and staff are NOT owned by the people that are changing the > >> IP numbers. > > > > I actually think it's more than 1 culprit, and I couldn't be 100% > > certain whether they are using their own notebooks or school machines > > until I catch them in the act. > > Do what spammers do...set up all the school machines to act as zombies > and when you detect the asshats pulling their little trick, flood them > with connection requests to poof them off the network :-) > > >> If you have a situation where you KNOW who is doing it, and they are > >> getting away with this, with the full knowledge of the Dean and others > >> in the college, > >> then you may as well just start looking for another job. If I was in > >> your shoes > >> I would. > > > > Nobody is actually getting away with it, it's just frustrating not > > knowing who. > > Doesn't arpwatch look for the mac changes on the network, which could > help you track down the MAC which is pulling the address when it > shouldn't? I see messages from arpwatch from some of our servers when > DHCP leases change. Will at least help you narrow down the > suspects...If you get a MAC address, you can run a detailed NMap > against them to try identifying platform information as well as get the > make/model of their network card from the MAC. > > That MAC, unless they're spoofing it, will give you evidence to use > against them. > > There's also Nessus you can use on the system once you narrow it > down...see what if any vulnerabilities there may be. Not that *I* > advocate doing something like this. I'd *never* advocate breaking into > another machine just because it was causing problems on your network. > > Once you have their MAC, you could also watch and see what address that > MAC is magically changed to when the "attack" stops...then redirect > their traffic using some ARP redirection (etherpeek? dsniff?) to > redirect their requests through a local BSD machine acting as a gateway > (forwarding packets). Sniff the traffic for awhile until a username > comes through when looking for POP mail or some other text-based > requests, then you know who it is (or at least who's at that machine). > It's your school's network, and usually there's policies in place > saying that a user does not have guaranteed privacy to information > going over school or university networks (or business networks, for > that matter), especially if the hardware is school owned (and you don't > really have a way of telling this with this attack, unless you have a > list of MACs owned by the school and know for a fact that the user > isn't spoofing the MAC). > > Just some ideas I'd consider. > The problem is that if the attacker has a modicum of intelligence they will have done this to someone elses' system. This is a college. For example, someone in a dorm room just surfing the web gets up to take a piss. As soon as they walk out the door and go down the hall, some joker down the hall runs into their room and in a few seconds changes the IP number of their PC to that of the mailserver then runs out. Bullshit like this happens all the time. The only solution is to use managed switches with a modicum of intelligence to where you can build a MAC filter that disallows packets that originate from the end users that have the same MAC as the mailserver, (to block spoofers) and that allows you to dump the internal MAC table. That way when someone pulls their fun your going to see their MAC in your routers, and you can then look at the switches and see exactly what port is being used. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 18:33:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D7A16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:33:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB3143D1F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:33:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4Y00H87ZKABA@mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:33:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:33:55 -0400 From: bsdfsse In-reply-to: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <415EF493.6020608@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) References: Subject: VMWare 2 works on FreeBSD 4.10-Stable (except for NIC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:33:49 -0000 I have everything working except for the networking (which is proving to be very difficult). I followed Phusion's guide for VMWare 2 and FreeBSD 4.10 located here: http://www.packetwatch.net/documents/guides/freebsd/vmware2.php Previously I had tried 4.10, but I think at that time I was erroneously entering "vmnet1" in to the NIC config, instead of "/dev/vmnet1". I was also getting ATA errors on that particular machine's 200GB drives, which is prolly a completely different problem. My Win 2000 Pro virtual machine can ping itself, but not the host machine, or any of my other LAN machines. Christian emailed me some instructions that differ from Phusion's regarding the configuration of the /usr/local/etc/vmware/config file. Christian has these 2 lines while Phusion does not (and I tried it both ways): vmnet1.Bridged = "YES" vmnet1.BridgedInterface = "x10" Phusion does mention the "x10" in his instructions for the /etc/rc.firewall. My IP setting are: Linksys Router: 192.168.0.1 FreeBSD 4.10-Stable PC Static IP: 192.168.0.24 DNS Server: 167.206.1.103 Gateway: 192.168.0.1 SubnetMask: 255.255.255.0 VMWare /usr/local/etc/vmware/config: vmnet1.HostOnlyAddress = "192.168.0.10" vmnet1.HostOnlyNetMask = "255.255.255.0" (also from Christian's doc) vmnet1.Bridged = "YES" vmnet1.BridgedInterface = "x10" Win2000 Pro Virtual PC Static IP: 192.168.0.11 Gateway: 192.168.0.10 SubnetMask: 255.255.255.0 I made the changes to my kernel, /etc/rc.conf, /etc/rc.firewall, and /etc/fstab that Phusion indicated. Any ideas why my Virtual Machine cannot ping either the "HostOnly" IP or the FreeBSD's machine normal IP? It also cannot ping my Linksys router, or any of my other machines. Inside the VM I have the NIC defined as "Custom" and "/dev/vmnet1". The HostOnly and Bridged options did not work, as they seemed to be leaving off the "/dev/" in front of vmnet0 and vmnet1 (as I did too!). Aside from no networking, Win 2000 Pro seems to be running pretty well inside VMWare 2.0. thx! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 18:49:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BADD316A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:49:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out005.verizon.net (out005pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46C7443D2D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:49:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: from kirk.dlee.org ([141.156.254.96]) by out005.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20041002184911.IIKT24464.out005.verizon.net@kirk.dlee.org> for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:49:11 -0500 Received: from kirk.dlee.org (dgl@localhost.dlee.org [127.0.0.1]) by kirk.dlee.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i92InA6L009944 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:49:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: (from dgl@localhost) by kirk.dlee.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i92In9vd009943 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:49:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dgl) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:49:09 -0400 From: Doug Lee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041002184908.GB564@kirk.dlee.org> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Lee , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Bartimaeus Group User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out005.verizon.net from [141.156.254.96] at Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:49:11 -0500 Subject: Is there a way to clean up the ports database without a lot of manual intervention? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:49:12 -0000 I have reason to believe I've made some mistakes trying to run pkgdb -F to clean up a couple ports trees on different FreeBSD systems I run. I confess I've never fully understood how to answer some of the prompts during that process. Also though, my ports tree was formed before portupgrade/portinstall were available, so I have some ports that were installed via a simple "make install," some by portinstall/portupgrade, some I installed first with "make install" and then tried to upgrade with portupgrade, etc. Is there a process I can run that will make the database consistent again so I can install/upgrade ports without error? I don't care if it takes two days to run. :-) I also know I may be asking the impossible here, but I figure it doesn't hurt to try. Please email responses directly to me so they don't get lost in traffic. -- Doug Lee dgl@dlee.org http://www.dlee.org Bartimaeus Group doug@bartsite.com http://www.bartsite.com "If you refuse to be made straight when you are green, you will not be made straight when you are dry." {African} From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 18:58:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581AF16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:58:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (pemaquid.safeport.com [204.156.12.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53D543D31 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:58:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from pemaquid.safeport.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i92Iw3bE031785 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:58:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost)i92Iw3cW031782 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:58:03 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: pemaquid.safeport.com: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:58:03 -0400 (EDT) From: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20041002140750.L29827@pemaquid.safeport.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: A packages question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 18:58:05 -0000 Well actually its looking better and better. What's the worst that can happen? I have done 'pkg_delete -a' now several times because removing one of the packages for XFree86 4.3 and replacing it with the newer version removes xterm. While twm is not my window manager of choice, it is better than the console. pkg_add -f -r package-name does not force the installation of 2nd level dependencies. So installing kde 3.<{anything -gt 1}> means finding all the dependencies such as imake, expat, ..., qt, ... and installing or forcing them before going after kdelib and then kdebase which must be done in this order (maybe not if all the lower level dependencies are met). I am going to try this just just for grins even though I suspect this will fail and I will drop back for 4.10 because of one or more of the following possibilities: 1) Xorg and XFree 86 have (inadvertently?) dropped support for the video card used by my laptop. Due to its age, I suspect this is not a pressing problem. To report the problem I need to reinstall one or both to provide the information that either fails without an error. 2) Some where in the maturation of 5.x, the C++ compiler changes have probably introduced changes in the BPI (if not the API) that may make it impossible to run X-based packages without moving forward. This is the supposition I think I am testing by trying to use kde 3.4 which has been built with Xorg. 3) Buy a new PC is the wrong answer. 4) building KDE and every other X application on a 400MHz laptop is the wrong answer. All of that was background so I could say this. Perhaps it is time to introduce branches into the packages tree. The alternative (IMO) is to require that only packages that were on the CD set when you burned or purchased it can be installed. Like #3 above I believe this to be the wrong answer because its greatly limits the population that will use FreeBSD as a workstation. After re-reading this, please do not consider this a rant. I love FreeBSD and will solve my problem one way or the other, help now in the form of ideas would be nice, but worst case, evenutally I will buy a newer PC. The idea here was to to float the idea of a branch in the package tree. On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 doug@safeport.com wrote: > thanks - I will try it this way > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Eric Kjeldergaard wrote: > > > While this idea may seem good on the surface, it's really a very bad idea > > (and I speak from experience) to hand-modify your package database. What > > you /should/ do instead is force the addition of the packages. `pkg_add -f > > ` > > > > > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2004 22:16:45 -0400 (EDT), doug@safeport.com > > wrote: > > > Neither XFree86 4.4 nor Xorg supports the video on my laptop while XFree86 > > > 4.3 works. > > > > > > I want to set up the package database to say XFree 4.4 is installed to see > > > if I can install the latest packages. Does anyone know that this will not > > > work? Also if I could get some pointer on how to modify the package db or > > > where this may be documented > > > > _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-469-8766 Fax: 301-469-0601 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 19:02:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E03A16A4EB for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:02:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 385EE43D31 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:02:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i92J15kG017873; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:01:06 -0700 From: kent To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 12:02:05 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20041002184908.GB564@kirk.dlee.org> In-Reply-To: <20041002184908.GB564@kirk.dlee.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410021202.05949.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: Is there a way to clean up the ports database without a lot of manual intervention? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 19:02:17 -0000 On Saturday 02 October 2004 11:49 am, Doug Lee wrote: > I have reason to believe I've made some mistakes trying to run pkgdb > -F to clean up a couple ports trees on different FreeBSD systems I > run. I confess I've never fully understood how to answer some of the > prompts during that process. Also though, my ports tree was formed > before portupgrade/portinstall were available, so I have some ports > that were installed via a simple "make install," some by > portinstall/portupgrade, some I installed first with "make install" > and then tried to upgrade with portupgrade, etc. I like the information provided by portsearch. You can find it in /usr/ports/Tools/scripts. I created an alias called search, which is equated to 'portsearch -n $1'. It is handy when you are told to run "pkgdb -F" because you can see what the index thinks the port should be linked to and not the strange link you are provided with as a choice at times. I only see the strange choice when the port it needs is not installed. The easy way out for me is to install the missing port manually. > > Is there a process I can run that will make the database consistent > again so I can install/upgrade ports without error? I don't care if > it takes two days to run. :-) I also know I may be asking the > impossible here, but I figure it doesn't hurt to try. I think that "pkgdb -fu" is going to be the only automated recovery. Kent > > Please email responses directly to me so they don't get lost in > traffic. -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 19:16:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B793416A4D2 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:16:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nuumen.pair.com (nuumen.pair.com [209.68.1.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D44643D39 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:16:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thuppi@nuumen.pair.com) Received: (qmail 39578 invoked by uid 55300); 2 Oct 2004 19:16:34 -0000 Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:16:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom Huppi X-X-Sender: thuppi@nuumen.pair.com To: robg In-Reply-To: <20041002053836.GN460@wantadilla.lemis.com> Message-ID: References: <5c389d3b041001211056012a3f@mail.gmail.com> <20041002053836.GN460@wantadilla.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: RCS tutorial (was: Re: "$Id: index.html,v 1.46 2004...) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 19:16:35 -0000 On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > [redirected to FreeBSD-questions; this is a technical issue] > You can also check out older versions and compare things; somewhere > there must be a tutorial. I've found Dave Plonka's tutorial to be most usefull. It's all over the place. A quick search pulls it up here for instance: http://www.samag.com/documents/s=1184/sam9812a/ I'm one of those guys who is paranoid about forgetting how I did something or what I did to a machine, so I try to use RCS religiously for sys-admin details. Note from Plonka's document that it is a one-liner to see every file that has ever been tweaked over the life of the machine (assuming one used RCS for it.) There are some down-sides and hassles, but I think it's worth using RCS in many situations, and developing a basic understanding of how RCS works helps get around these issues. RCS is a relatively simple and understandable system. Thanks, - Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 19:36:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190FA16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:36:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.chrononomicon.com (chrononomicon.com [216.37.143.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D3F043D2F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:36:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsilver@chrononomicon.com) Received: from [192.168.0.42] (unknown [192.168.0.42]) by mail.chrononomicon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A81DF10767D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:36:40 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <6204B748-14AA-11D9-BD30-000D932C89A2@chrononomicon.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Bart Silverstrim Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:36:40 -0400 To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) Subject: Re: IP address conflicts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 19:36:44 -0000 On Oct 2, 2004, at 2:27 PM, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > The problem is that if the attacker has a modicum of intelligence they > will have done this to someone elses' system. Yet you say this is taking place in colleges... :-) > This is a college. For example, someone in a dorm room just surfing > the web > gets up to take a piss. As soon as they walk out the door and go down > the > hall, some joker down the hall runs into their room and in a few > seconds > changes the IP number of their PC to that of the mailserver then runs > out. > Bullshit like this happens all the time. Funny how just yesterday there was some slash story about users not being careful with security. My systems this wouldn't be effective. Screen saver is hot cornered and password protected. In the school office, control-alt-del->k. When I was in college, there was this thing where your "friends" would steal your mattress...mattress police. They would hide it somewhere on campus. Never happened to my roommate and I, because we carried our keys with us and locked the bedroom when we weren't there (or in the living room connected to the hallway); no reason to leave the door open if we weren't there, and our "community belongings" were already outside of that room for the other roommates and friends to use. We try to have a policy where I work where if your account is used to do something against the rules, like browse porn, you must have given that person your account password or you left your account logged in and walked away. There's no way to prove who the body was sitting at that console, so it is assumed to be you. You get in trouble for it. You allowed it, you were irresponsible, and you're going to get hassled for it until you learn to take responsibility for your belongings (including your identity) within reason. It is not unreasonable to expect people to not give their passwords out and to log off of a console when they're done using it. Your reactions are your policies and your rules; if they work for you, that's all and good. If students continue to play stupid and allow things like this to happen to their computers, then so be it. Or you can nail them a couple times and have them wise up for it. "Honest! I didn't put kiddie porn on that computer...my...my roommate did it! Or a computer virus did it!" "OH!!! Nevermind then..." > The only solution is to use managed switches with a modicum of > intelligence > to where you can build a MAC filter that disallows packets that > originate > from > the end users that have the same MAC as the mailserver, (to block > spoofers) > and that allows you to dump the internal MAC table. This is a good infrastructure to the network change and it would also solve the problem. I thought he was having money troubles and needed a quick solution to try solving the problem, while this solution would be done in the future once funds are released and time can be allocated to switch things over. It sounded like his network was somewhat in shambles at the moment. > That way when someone pulls their fun your going to see their MAC in > your > routers, and you can then look at the switches and see exactly what > port is > being used. Any way to have it send a 50,000 volt spike through that port? -Bart From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 20:42:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906DB16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 20:42:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (cromagnon.cullmail.com [67.33.58.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3492E43D31 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 20:42:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (localhost.cullmail.com [127.0.0.1]) i92Kc3OL056955 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:38:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by cromagnon.cullmail.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i92Kc3BA056954 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:38:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jamoore) From: Jay Moore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:38:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <000001c4a47f$0ae68d60$0b01000a@SPIDEY> In-Reply-To: <000001c4a47f$0ae68d60$0b01000a@SPIDEY> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410021538.02681.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> Subject: Re: VoIP World Leaders X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 20:42:16 -0000 On Monday 27 September 2004 05:44 am, Spidey Knepscheld wrote: > Hi Guys > > > Can anyone perhaps inform me on the world leader in VoIP Solutions.We > were granted a license to supply VoIP in South Africa and we would like > to get in contact with the big guys in this field. > > Thank you > > > Spidey This might be the lamest question ever asked on any mailing list or usenet group in the history of the Internet... where's that Guinness Records book? Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 20:49:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94FA16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 20:49:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (cromagnon.cullmail.com [67.33.58.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F7943D2D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 20:49:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: from cromagnon.cullmail.com (localhost.cullmail.com [127.0.0.1]) i92Kj8OL056983 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:45:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jamoore@cromagnon.cullmail.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by cromagnon.cullmail.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i92Kj7XZ056982 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:45:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jamoore) From: Jay Moore To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:45:07 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <415918AA.C4433D9D@sbhost.ro> <006301c4a557$6a387840$6e7dfea9@Shanelaptop> In-Reply-To: <006301c4a557$6a387840$6e7dfea9@Shanelaptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200410021545.07438.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> Subject: Re: pf for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 20:49:20 -0000 On Tuesday 28 September 2004 07:33 am, shane mullins wrote: << reformatted to correct top-posting >> > > ----- Original Message ----- > > hello folks, > > i want to install the packet filter for FreeBSD so i recompile the > > kernel with the options : > Why not just run OpenBSD if you want to use pf? I use both Free and > OpenBSD. But, pf is much easier to set up on OpenBSD. Just install > OpenBSD, enable routing, enable pf in rc.conf and you are done. > > Shane Why not...? One reason might be that he is not a masochist. Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 21:09:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7C416A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:09:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A8343D3F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:09:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [67.1.199.170] (0-1pool199-170.nas2.fargo1.nd.us.da.qwest.net [67.1.199.170]) (authenticated bits=0)i92L9QI3000371 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:09:31 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <35BF716A-14B7-11D9-9E70-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: FreeBSD Questions From: Eric Crist Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:08:29 -0500 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Starting apache at boot with SSL. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 21:09:33 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I must be missing something. I have apache starting correctly during boot, but without SSL. I have to log in and type apachectl startssl to get it to work correctly. What did I miss? - ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkFfGM4ACgkQRAAY9knOW+qbFACcDzXjuDRWejnfBgiUbp0OJOrm trsAn2GIVSAVMZP8sAFzSWsEX1dIyVRU =XBJJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 21:15:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA73A16A4CE; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:15:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7377F43D3F; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:15:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdfsse@optonline.net) Received: from [192.168.0.28] (ool-43532b7b.dyn.optonline.net [67.83.43.123]) by mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I4Z0050S71I6N@mta6.srv.hcvlny.cv.net>; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 17:15:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 17:15:27 -0400 From: bsdfsse In-reply-to: <415EF493.6020608@optonline.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <415F1A6F.1070907@optonline.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) References: <415EF493.6020608@optonline.net> cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VMWare 2 works on FreeBSD 4.10-Stable (SOLVED!) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 21:15:22 -0000 I have mostly everything working now: special thanks to George Hartzell, Christian Hiris, Phusion, and Orlando Bassotto. I will write up my experience after I digest it a little more. A few of the gotchas were that I originally did not install "bridging" when I installed vmware, and when I did, I was binding it to the wrong NIC (I was binding it to Christian's NIC, lol). For some reason I *had* to select "Custom" as the VM's ethernet type, and use the value of "/dev/vmnet1" when I did. "Bridged" and "HostOnly" did not work. Also the VM's gateway setting had to be that of my Linksys router, and not the "Host IP" of my FreeBSD machine. I ended up running VMWare 2.0 on FreeBSD 4.10-Stable. I will make another attempt at VMWare 3.2 and also using FBSD 5.x when I have more time (in about 2 months). I am ecstatic, I get to run FreeBSD now! Woo Hoo!! thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 21:15:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9172016A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:15:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A71A43D1D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:15:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd-questions@trini0.org) Received: from hivemind.trini0.org (trini0.org[65.34.205.195]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004100221155401400rjfn8e>; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:15:55 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.3] (gladiator.trini0.org [192.168.0.3]) by hivemind.trini0.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588BF1BA; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:15:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <415F1A8C.7090806@trini0.org> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 17:15:56 -0400 From: Gerard Samuel User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040909) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Crist References: <35BF716A-14B7-11D9-9E70-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> In-Reply-To: <35BF716A-14B7-11D9-9E70-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Starting apache at boot with SSL. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 21:15:55 -0000 Eric Crist wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello all, > > I must be missing something. I have apache starting correctly during > boot, but without SSL. I have to log in and type apachectl startssl to > get it to work correctly. What did I miss? > > From /usr/ports/UPDATING 20040605: AFFECTS: users of www/apache2 AUTHOR: clement@FreeBSD.org The apache2 port must now be enabled / disabled and configured in rc.conf. See the pkg-message or script for details. Im not sure about apache13 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 21:29:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C1716A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:29:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB5843D31 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:29:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from thought.org (tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i92LTNh0081152; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:29:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i92LTOnh003125; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:29:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i92LTOvW003124; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:29:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:29:23 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Jay Moore Message-ID: <20041002212923.GA3108@thought.org> References: <000001c4a47f$0ae68d60$0b01000a@SPIDEY> <200410021538.02681.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200410021538.02681.jaymo@cromagnon.cullmail.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 18 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VoIP World Leaders X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 21:29:31 -0000 On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 03:38:02PM -0500, Jay Moore wrote: > On Monday 27 September 2004 05:44 am, Spidey Knepscheld wrote: > > Hi Guys > > > > > > Can anyone perhaps inform me on the world leader in VoIP Solutions.We > > were granted a license to supply VoIP in South Africa and we would like > > to get in contact with the big guys in this field. > > > > Thank you > > > > > > Spidey > > This might be the lamest question ever asked on any mailing list or usenet > group in the history of the Internet... where's that Guinness Records book? > Naah, I cam easily come up with something lamer: like: "Why do we even need computers besides those of Microsoft's multi-billion-dollar expertise?" gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 21:53:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16AF16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:53:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from o2.hostbaby.com (o2.hostbaby.com [208.187.29.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2C7B43D3F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:53:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceo@l-i-e.com) Received: (qmail 6088 invoked by uid 1001); 2 Oct 2004 21:53:27 -0000 Received: from 66.243.145.38 (SquirrelMail authenticated user ceo@l-i-e.com); by www.l-i-e.com with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:53:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1221.66.243.145.38.1096754007.squirrel@www.l-i-e.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:53:27 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Lynch" To: "John Oxley" User-Agent: Hostbaby Webmail X-Mailer: Hostbaby Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disk quotas X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ceo@l-i-e.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 21:53:25 -0000 John Oxley wrote: > has gallery setup on his webpage and the albums directory is chmod > 707'd so that httpd can write to it. Does that user realize that everybody else on the server can use PHP to write web content to that directory?... Perhaps if a defacement example were demonstrated, he'd move those files out of his web directory, and add in some PHP scripts to read/write the image files with validation-checking, such as using http://php.net/getimagesize to make sure the image file *IS* an image file. > The problem is that httpd creates files as http:group and quota is not > picking up that he is using more disk space than we want him to. One possibility, if you are running Apache 2.0, is to set each PHP user on a directory by directory basis in httpd.conf Or so I've been told. Never done it yet. It cannot (readily) be done in Apache 1.x -- Like Music? http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 21:57:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB85416A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:57:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9128743D48 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 21:57:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subhro.kar@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id v18so3640142rnb for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.80 with SMTP id d80mr1263595rng; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 14:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.206.15 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 14:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 03:27:02 +0530 From: Subhro To: Simon Barner In-Reply-To: <20041002134531.GB57007@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <001d01c4a883$f65bf3e0$f700000a@ape> <20041002134531.GB57007@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> cc: Markie cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Compile slow on 5.x series? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Subhro List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 21:57:05 -0000 On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:45:31 +0200, Simon Barner wrote: > Markie wrote: > > Has anyone else noticed that the 5.x series kernel compile times take much > > longer than that of the 4.x series? My friends 233MHz machine running 4.x > > finished a kernel compile before my 500MHz machine running 5.x a while > > back. It seems to take forever? Is there a reason for this, or is it just > > me seeing this problem? The reason why it takes longer to compile a 5.* kernel is the difference in the architecture. The 5.* kernels handle the hardware differently than the 4.* kernels. > > FreeBSD 5 uses GCC 3.x as system compiler, whereas 4 is based on GCC > 2.y. Negative, the gcc 3.* compiler is used only in FreeBSD versions onwards 5.3. Regards S. -- Subhro Sankha Kar School of Information Technology Block AQ-13/1 Sector V ZIP 700091 India From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 22:00:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226D116A4CF for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:00:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from grog.secure-computing.net (grog.secure-computing.net [63.228.14.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD20D43D1F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:00:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) Received: from [67.1.199.170] (0-1pool199-170.nas2.fargo1.nd.us.da.qwest.net [67.1.199.170]) (authenticated bits=0)i92M0OSX000530; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:00:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ecrist@secure-computing.net) In-Reply-To: <415F1AA5.3080001@elvandar.org> References: <35BF716A-14B7-11D9-9E70-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <415F1AA5.3080001@elvandar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <554B282C-14BE-11D9-9E70-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Eric Crist Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 16:59:29 -0500 To: Remko Lodder X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.74, clamav-milter version 0.74a on grog.secure-computing.net X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Starting apache at boot with SSL. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 22:00:35 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Oct 2, 2004, at 4:16 PM, Remko Lodder wrote: > Eric Crist wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> Hello all, >> I must be missing something. I have apache starting correctly during >> boot, but without SSL. I have to log in and type apachectl startssl >> to get it to work correctly. What did I miss? > > Hi Eric, > > Since you are not very verbose on your information, i guess that you > use apache2, did you specify apache2ssl_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf ? > That should enable SSL based webservices during startup. > > Cheers! Remko, My bad. I'm using apache 1: grog# /usr/local/sbin/httpd -v Server version: Apache/1.3.31 (Unix) Server built: Jul 13 2004 17:51:03 I have apache_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf. I would assume I use apachessl_enable="YES"? Thanks. - ----- Eric F Crist Secure Computing Networks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkFfJMEACgkQRAAY9knOW+qOmgCfSJcVX8gRVm4iDot+wmCfyklg 88IAn1eqYl7L/EKfSSTKLGZhqI9jKoin =G2Je -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 22:15:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8784816A4CE; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:15:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blackwater.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5EB43D45; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:15:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: by blackwater.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id CB4E48562A; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 07:45:23 +0930 (CST) Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 07:45:23 +0930 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20041002221523.GQ460@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <5c389d3b041001211056012a3f@mail.gmail.com> <415E5305.9050804@nbritton.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MM5RgFPKyuP3gDcV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <415E5305.9050804@nbritton.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org cc: robg Subject: Re: "$Id: index.html,v 1.46 2004/08/19 23:15:05 grog Exp $" ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 22:15:27 -0000 --MM5RgFPKyuP3gDcV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday, 2 October 2004 at 2:04:37 -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote: Please don't answer these questions on -newbies. -questions is the correct mailing list. I answered there and blind copied this list, but it seems that blind copying is no longer allowed, so I suppose nobody saw it. > robg wrote: > >> Hi: >> >> I see this at the end of a lot of documents: >> >> $Id: index.html,v 1.46 2004/08/19 23:15:05 grog Exp $ >> >> or something similar. How is that done? Is it done from a text >> editor that just appends it by itself? How would I go about doign it? > > It's the check-in tag that is automaticly appended to a document when it > is checked into a version management system. > > Check out subversion (SVN) if you want to get into version > management, Check out Subversion if you want to get into a really complicated way of version control. It requires significant setup, and it's based on a number of other packages. > also FreeBSD has it's own built-in version management system called > RCS. RCS isn't FreeBSD specific. It's universal, and it also doesn't need any setup (beyond optionally creating a directory RCS). Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --MM5RgFPKyuP3gDcV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBXyh7IubykFB6QiMRArzQAKCv8wFraZP8FUXbQhRO/NjGv9pbhwCfVVMX ilgU3nF5Zqe8GZjSqIpq22Y= =SLNz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MM5RgFPKyuP3gDcV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 22:18:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9FF16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:18:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB8F43D31 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:18:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0C60513630; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 11:18:29 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2004 11:18:28 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Peter Ryan Message-ID: <20041002221828.GA1135@grimoire.chen.org.nz> References: <200410021241.i92Cex9w008177@northgate.starhub.net.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200410021241.i92Cex9w008177@northgate.starhub.net.sg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: JBoss ports in use - tomcat X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 22:18:31 -0000 On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 08:40:49PM +0800, Peter Ryan wrote: > I am running 4.10R and have installed JBoss3.2.5. > I also installed Tomcat5 > > When i boot the machine and try to startup JBoss it > reports ports in use. I have to run the shutdown script > first, and then the startup script works fine. > > I notice when I boot up that three packages appear > to start under 'local package initialisation'. These > are Tomcat4, Tomcat5, and JBoss3starting. > > I did not install Tomcat4 - i think this might have come > from the JBoss installation. JBoss-3.2.5 comes with Tomcat-5. If you have manually installed Tomcat-5 and or Tomcat-4, I suggest that you deinstall those ports. It would seem that your configuration for Tomcat4/5 are using listener ports that are conflicting with the JBoss-3.2.5's Tomcat setup. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The Internet: an empirical test of the idea that a million monkeys banging on a million keyboards can produce Shakespeare From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 22:36:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5557516A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:36:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rdstm.ro (mail.rdstm.ro [193.231.233.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D7E43D1D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:36:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aanton@spintech.ro) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (casa_auto [81.196.32.25]) by mail.rdstm.ro (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i92MYfhl015186; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 01:34:41 +0300 Message-ID: <415F2D62.8090809@spintech.ro> Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 01:36:18 +0300 From: Anton Alin-Adrian User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040706) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: marcus@marcuscom.com, FreeBSD Questions References: <415DFD6B.8050607@spintech.ro> <1096679083.97192.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <415EB039.7000704@spintech.ro> In-Reply-To: <415EB039.7000704@spintech.ro> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090405080504030205020106" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: gnome 2.8 mime associations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 22:36:29 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090405080504030205020106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Ok, here is a snapshot. Expected result is how it is showed on the gnome website, and the real-result is how it is showed on my desktop. I got this by right-clicking a .PDF file, then selecting properties. Looks to me that my "Open With" tab is missing. PS: the files might get filtered by mailman. Best Regards, -- Alin-Adrian Anton Spintech Systems GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1E2FFF2E --------------090405080504030205020106-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 22:38:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B7D16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:38:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F20743D2F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:38:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rdormer@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 74so105525rnk for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 15:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.208.76 with SMTP id f76mr1507947rng; Sat, 02 Oct 2004 15:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.76.17 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 15:38:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3174add604100215384455ca4a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:38:30 -0400 From: Robert Dormer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: vinum X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Robert Dormer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 22:38:31 -0000 Hello all, I'm setting up a mirrored volume with vinum, using the following config file: drive a device /dev/ad0 drive b device /dev/ad3 volume storage plex org concat sd length 78167m drive a plex org concat sd length 78167m drive b but when I run the config, I get this: vinum -> create raidconfig 1: drive a device /dev/ad0 ** 1 Can't initialize drive a: Operation not supported by device 2: drive b device /dev/ad3 ** 2 Can't initialize drive b: Operation not supported by device And thus far, a search on the problem has been much less than illuminating. Is this a common problem? How do I fix it? I've made sure that the disks in question have been labeled using disklabel -e as vinum volumes. What else? -Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 22:41:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E44416A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:41:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (redqueen.elvandar.org [217.148.169.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE1043D46 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 22:41:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6D7295449; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 00:08:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.elvandar.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (redqueen.elvandar.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93384-16; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 00:08:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <415F26E7.1020200@elvandar.org> Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 00:08:39 +0200 From: Remko Lodder User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Crist References: <35BF716A-14B7-11D9-9E70-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <415F1AA5.3080001@elvandar.org> <554B282C-14BE-11D9-9E70-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> In-Reply-To: <554B282C-14BE-11D9-9E70-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Starting apache at boot with SSL. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 22:41:48 -0000 Eric Crist wrote: > > Remko, > > My bad. I'm using apache 1: Ah, that's a bit of a different story, Do you use the next generation startup script? If so then it would have had the following options available to you: apache_enable="YES" (which you have) apache_flags="-DSSL" (which you do not yet have). This should work according to /usr/ports/www/apache13-modssl/files/rcng.sh Cheers! > > grog# /usr/local/sbin/httpd -v > Server version: Apache/1.3.31 (Unix) > Server built: Jul 13 2004 17:51:03 > > I have apache_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf. I would assume I use > apachessl_enable="YES"? Thanks. -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl Founder Tienervaders |remko@tienervaders.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 23:01:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E684516A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:01:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (redqueen.elvandar.org [217.148.169.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B086443D1F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:01:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF0129545B; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:16:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.elvandar.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (redqueen.elvandar.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 93308-06; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:16:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <415F1AA5.3080001@elvandar.org> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 23:16:21 +0200 From: Remko Lodder User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Crist References: <35BF716A-14B7-11D9-9E70-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> In-Reply-To: <35BF716A-14B7-11D9-9E70-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Starting apache at boot with SSL. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 23:01:07 -0000 Eric Crist wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello all, > > I must be missing something. I have apache starting correctly during > boot, but without SSL. I have to log in and type apachectl startssl to > get it to work correctly. What did I miss? Hi Eric, Since you are not very verbose on your information, i guess that you use apache2, did you specify apache2ssl_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf ? That should enable SSL based webservices during startup. Cheers! > > - ----- > Eric F Crist > Secure Computing Networks -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl Founder Tienervaders |remko@tienervaders.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 23:10:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA7F16A4D3 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:10:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.clubplus.net (pop3.clubplus.net [216.113.38.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B2543D49 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:10:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david+dated+1097190608.0a8a39@skytracker.ca) Received: (qmail 8535 invoked by uid 2280); 2 Oct 2004 23:13:23 -0000 Received: from 3s1.com (209.188.66.29) by ott.clubplus.net with DES-CBC3-SHA encrypted SMTP; 2 Oct 2004 23:13:23 -0000 Received: (from root@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) id i92NA9VS080627 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:10:09 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1097190608.0a8a39@skytracker.ca) Received: from 3s1.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i92NA8BV080603 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:10:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from david@localhost) by 3s1.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id i92NA8P5080602 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:10:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from david+dated+1097190608.0a8a39@skytracker.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: 3s1.com: david set sender to david+dated+1097190608.0a8a39@skytracker.ca using -f Received: by 3s1.com (tmda-sendmail, from uid 1000); Sat, 02 Oct 2004 19:10:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:10:07 -0400 To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041002231007.GA80368@skytrackercanada.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i From: David Banning X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.2 (Bold Forbes) X-scanner: scanned by Inflex 1.0.12.3 - (http://pldaniels.com/inflex/) Subject: apache - how to redirect page not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 23:10:26 -0000 I notice on some web sites when you try to load a page that does not exist, it directs the users browser to another page. How do I set that up in apache? -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 23:27:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E22AB16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:27:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lupin.angrypanda.net (adsl-69-212-103-57.dsl.chmpil.ameritech.net [69.212.103.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F2943D31 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:27:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from philipp1@lupin.angrypanda.net) Received: from lupin.angrypanda.net (localhost.angrypanda.net [127.0.0.1]) i92NREaV031197 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:27:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from philipp1@lupin.angrypanda.net) Received: (from philipp1@localhost) by lupin.angrypanda.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i92NREmY031196 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:27:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from philipp1) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 18:27:13 -0500 From: Anthony Philipp To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041002232713.GA31177@lupin.angrypanda.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: password files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 23:27:27 -0000 Hello, Which password files do I need to copy over so that the users will still all be there, and and the passwords will all be the same. Thanks for the help Anthony Philipp From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 23:27:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF3016A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:27:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.rdstm.ro (mail.rdstm.ro [193.231.233.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFB643D1F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aanton@spintech.ro) Received: from [10.0.0.2] (casa_auto [81.196.32.25]) by mail.rdstm.ro (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i92NPwhl017572; Sun, 3 Oct 2004 02:25:58 +0300 Message-ID: <415F3968.7040508@spintech.ro> Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 02:27:36 +0300 From: Anton Alin-Adrian User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (X11/20040706) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: marcus@marcuscom.com References: <415DFD6B.8050607@spintech.ro> <1096679083.97192.1.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <415EB039.7000704@spintech.ro> <415F2D62.8090809@spintech.ro> In-Reply-To: <415F2D62.8090809@spintech.ro> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.2.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: gnome 2.8 mime associations X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 23:27:42 -0000 Anton Alin-Adrian wrote: > Ok, here is a snapshot. Expected result is how it is showed on the gnome > website, and the real-result is how it is showed on my desktop. > > I got this by right-clicking a .PDF file, then selecting properties. > > Looks to me that my "Open With" tab is missing. Ok, I got things working. By mistake, my mistake, parts of the gnome packages were still from 2.6.x version.. including Nautilus.. this caused everything related to mime problems.. Thanks to Marcus again for his contribution to our wealth. Best Wishes, -- Alin-Adrian Anton Spintech Systems GPG keyID 0x1E2FFF2E (2963 0C11 1AF1 96F6 0030 6EE9 D323 639D 1E2F FF2E) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 1E2FFF2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 23:51:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C0216A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:51:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.hec.utah.edu (mail.hec.utah.edu [155.101.19.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78B143D1D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 23:51:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from seymour@hec.utah.edu) Received: from goudan (70-56-99-16.slkc.qwest.net [70.56.99.16]) by mail.hec.utah.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DF3B64D2 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:50:38 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <000301c4a8da$be743440$0b00a8c0@goudan> From: "Feng Wang" To: Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:51:30 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: freebsd samba bug report X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2004 23:51:30 -0000 Dear Freebsd development team: I found the samba server on freebsd corrupts my file under the following conditions: Put a large text file, in my case a fortran 77 source code, in unix format. Open it using any text editor under windowxp. I tried ultraedit and compaq visual fortran ide. The file will be corrupted. I tried several large files on two different drives. It is reproducible. My samba server does not currupt the file if it is in dos format. It also does not corrupt my other binary files. I am using freebsd 4.10 release. Seymour