From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 28 01:01:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7181816A4CE for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:01:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44FF43D64 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:01:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [69.27.131.0] ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Sat, 27 Nov 2004 18:57:57 -0600 Message-ID: <41A9235D.7050806@daleco.biz> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 19:01:17 -0600 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041023 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathon McKitrick References: <20041127215612.GA86416@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20041127215612.GA86416@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Nov 2004 00:57:57.0715 (UTC) FILETIME=[4CF83230:01C4D4E5] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is this a hole in my firewall? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 01:01:09 -0000 Jonathon McKitrick wrote: >Here are my rules: > >root@neptune:~# ipfw show >00100 0 0 check-state >00200 2 144 allow ip from me to any keep-state out xmit tun0 >00300 0 0 allow ip from any to any keep-state out xmit tun0 >00400 0 0 deny tcp from any to any in recv tun0 established >00500 0 0 allow ip from any to any via vr0 >00600 0 0 allow ip from any to any via lo0 >00700 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 >00800 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any >00900 0 0 allow tcp from any to me 22 keep-state in recv vr0 setup >01000 0 0 allow icmp from any to any via tun0 icmptype 0,3,8,11,12 >01100 0 0 deny log logamount 100 ip from any to any >65535 0 0 deny ip from any to any > >I added rule 300 so that my laptop on my wireless network can connect, ping, >and get DNS and DHCP. Is there a better way to specify this? > >jm > > Well, maybe; is the laptop's IP assigned statically or dynamically? If static, I suppose "allow ip from lap.top.id.addr to any keep-state out xmit tun0" would be the thing. You can also specify the network: "allow ip from any 192.168.0/24 to any keep-state out via tun0". HTH,