Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:14:46 -0800 (PST)
From:      Arne "Wörner" <arne_woerner@yahoo.com>
To:        freebsd-realtime@freebsd.org
Subject:   system calls
Message-ID:  <20041111181446.64684.qmail@web41215.mail.yahoo.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hiho!

I just read in the BUGS section of the man page of rtprio(1), that system calls
are never preemted.

Does that mean, that a "read(fd,buffer,10000000)" blocks all other processes,
until 10^7 bytes are read even if fd points to a file on a very slow and huge
floppy disc?

Does that mean, that no process can run, after the kernel ordered a hard disc
to move its heads until the data is transfer from disc to memory (sometimes it
feels like :) )?

Unfortunately I am quite sure, that I would not find out the truth by
experimentation or by looking at source code. Sorry...

If at least one answer is "yes", then I think, that it would be much better for
the performance, if processes could run, while the kernel manages lengthy
io-ops (I still remember, that there was a picture about 4 process states:
running, waiting, dead, blocked; and while the blocked processes are blocking,
the waiting processes are competiting for the CPU/-s).

Thanks.

Bye
Arne



		
__________________________________ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page. 
www.yahoo.com 
 



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041111181446.64684.qmail>