From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 21 02:06:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E82C16A4CE for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:06:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D54743D48 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:06:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iAL26Nv7022655; Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:06:23 -0500 Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:09:38 -0500 (EST) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <8776.1100981342@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: <20041120210256.K27307@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <8776.1100981342@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: FreeBSD Security List Subject: Re: Importing into rc.firewal rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting] List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:06:25 -0000 On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > If the list is long it may be almost as good, if not better, to use > blackhole routes for it. I was not familiar with the term. Looking in Google came up with a link. However in that link they recommend against that method. http://tinyurl.com/5r5cl Also any link on how to implement it? What would be the advantage of that route vs ipfw?