From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 00:55:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C735E16A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:55:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from iscan1.intra.oki.co.jp (okigate.oki.co.jp [202.226.91.194])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA9743D39
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:55:35 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from yamamoto436@oki.com)
Received: from aoi.okilab.oki.co.jp (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by iscan1.intra.oki.co.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA11114
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:55:34 +0900
Received: (qmail 23568 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2004 17:55:33 +0900
Received: from tulip.okilab.oki.co.jp (172.24.23.187)
  by aoi.okilab.oki.co.jp with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 17:55:33 +0900
Received: from localhost (tulip [172.24.23.187])i0B8uj0H002218
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:56:46 +0900 (JST)
	(envelope-from yamamoto436@oki.com)
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:56:45 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20040111.175645.112628358.yamamoto436@oki.com>
To: stable@freebsd.org
From: Hideki Yamamoto <yamamoto436@oki.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031230.053858.74753983.yamamoto436@oki.com>
References: <20031229.184207.74681106.yamamoto436@oki.com>
	<20031229.191615.71155718.yamamoto436@oki.com>
	<20031230.053858.74753983.yamamoto436@oki.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: bge drivers does not work for 3COM 3C996-SX / 3C996B-T
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:55:41 -0000


Hi,

After all, SUN recognise the FreeBSD box with 3COM 3C996-SX 
by setting adv_1000autoneg_cap = 0 in /kernel/drv/ge.conf on Solaris,
As 3COM 3C996-SX does not support MIIbus, my patch I wrote last year
was meaningless.

Regards,
Hideki Yamamoto

From: Hideki Yamamoto <hyama@acm.org>
Subject: Re: bge drivers does not work for 3COM 3C996-SX / 3C996B-T
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 05:38:58 +0900 (JST)
Message-ID: <20031230.053858.74753983.yamamoto436@oki.com>

> 
> Hi, 
> 
> I added code to recognize 3com 1000base-SX card as miibus and 
> compiled them, but I do not have time to test yet.
> I think this may solove my original problem that link of SUN SX card
> does not go up, though 3com card goes up well.
> 
> I will start testing it from Jan.4,2004.  I uploaded the fixed code
> on my web page, http://members.aol.com/hyama99/.
> 
> I appreciate If someone gives me comments on the code before testing.
> 
> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 19:16:15 +0900 (JST)
> > 
> > Dear Peters
> > 
> > > > >
> > > > > bge0: <Broadcom BCM5701 Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x105> mem
> > > > > 0xf7ef0000-0xf7efffff irq 10 at device 1.0 on pci1 bge0: Ethernet
> > > > > address: 00:04:76:e1:06:cf
> > > > 
> > > >  No miibus or PHY on bge0?
> > > 
> > > Sorry, I cannot answer because my knowledge is not sufficient.
> > 
> > Neither PHY nor miibus exist on bge0 and bge2.  
> > Both bge0 and bge2 are SX cards.  The following is the full dmesg.
> > bge1 and bge3 have miibus and phy.
> 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > bge0: <Broadcom BCM5701 Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x105> mem 0xf7ef0000-0xf7efffff irq 10 at device 1.0 on pci1
> > bge0: Ethernet address: 00:04:76:e1:06:cf
> > bge1: <Broadcom BCM5703 Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x1002> mem 0xf7ee0000-0xf7eeffff irq 11 at device 2.0 on pci1
> > bge1: Ethernet address: 00:0b:cd:d2:b0:40
> > miibus0: <MII bus> on bge1
> > brgphy0: <BCM5703 10/100/1000baseTX PHY> on miibus0
> > brgphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto
> > bge2: <Broadcom BCM5701 Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x105> mem 0xf7ff0000-0xf7ffffff irq 15 at device 1.0 on pci4
> > bge2: Ethernet address: 00:0a:5e:1d:83:25
> > bge3: <Broadcom BCM5703 Gigabit Ethernet, ASIC rev. 0x1002> mem 0xf7fe0000-0xf7feffff irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci4
> > bge3: Ethernet address: 00:0b:cd:d2:b0:3b
> > miibus1: <MII bus> on bge3
> > brgphy1: <BCM5703 10/100/1000baseTX PHY> on miibus1
> > brgphy1:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto
> > bge0: gigabit link up
> > bge2: gigabit link up
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hideki Yamamoto

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 08:19:22 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F9916A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:19:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.komquats.com (h24-108-145-252.gv.shawcable.net
	[24.108.145.252])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DF343D53
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:19:14 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com)
Received: from cwsys.cwsent.com (cwsys [10.1.1.1])
	by mail.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309E25A82D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:19:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cwsys (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0BGJAr7075479
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:19:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca)
Message-Id: <200401111619.i0BGJAr7075479@cwsys.cwsent.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
X-os: FreeBSD
X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com
X-URL: http://www.komquats.com/
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:19:10 -0800
Sender: Cy.Schubert@komquats.com
Subject: -STABLE Won't Boot On A Multidisk System
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:19:22 -0000

I have a system which usually runs a recent copy of -CURRENT. I have one 
ATA disk and four SCSI disks in this system. My -CURRENT root device is 
/dev/ad0s1a while my -STABLE (4.9R) boot device is /dev/da1s1a. No problems 
booting -CURRENT however I haven't used my -STABLE system in a while and as 
I need to do some testing on it, I tried booting it this morning. It 
responded with a "Root mount failed:22" message.

Any ideas would be appreciated. This could be an issue with -CURRENT's 
loader as it used to boot when I first installed it but I'm posting here as 
it is a -STABLE problem.

The version of -CURRENT I'm running is:

FreeBSD cwtest 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Fri Jan  9 19:46:38 PST 
2004     root@cwsys:/export/obj/opt/src/cvs-current/src/sys/KOMQUATS  i386

The version of -STABLE I'm running is:

FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #0: Mon Nov  3 01:07:46 PST 2003
    root@cwtest:/dsk01/obj/dsk02/src/cvs-490r/src/sys/CWTEST

My -STABLE fstab is:

cwtest$ cat /stable/etc/fstab
/dev/da1s1a                     /               ufs     rw 1 1
# /dev/ad0s1a                   /current        ufs     ro 1 2
# /dev/da0s1a                   /current/usr    ufs     ro 1 2
/dev/ad0s1b                     none            swap    sw 0 0
/dev/da0s1b                     none            swap    sw 0 0
/dev/da2s1b                     none            swap    sw 0 0
/dev/da3s1b                     none            swap    sw 0 0
/dev/da0s1e                     /dsk01          ufs     ro 0 2
/dev/da2s1a                     /dsk02          ufs     ro 0 2
/dev/da3s1e                     /dsk03          ufs     ro 0 2
proc                            /proc           procfs  rw 0 0
fdesc                           /dev/fd         fdesc   rw 0 0
# md                            /md             mfs     rw,-s86016 0 0
/dev/md0                        /md             mfs     xx,-s86016 0 0
/dev/md0                        /tmp            mdfs    xx,-s40960 0 0
/dev/da1s1d                     /tmp            ufs     rw,nodev,nosuid 0 2
# cwsys:/usr                    /cwsys/usr      nfs     ro,nfsv3,mntudp 0 0
# # cwsys:/usr/opt                      /usr/opt        nfs     
ro,nfsv3,mntudp
0 0
# cwsys:/usr/X11R6              /usr/X11R6      nfs     ro,nfsv3,mntudp 0 0
# cwsys:/opt                    /opt            nfs     ro,nfsv3,mntudp 0 0
# cwsys:/opt2                   /opt2           nfs     ro,nfsv3,mntudp 0 0
# cwsys:/usr/compat             /usr/compat     nfs     ro,nfsv3,mntudp 0 0
# /var/linux                    /usr/compat/linux       union   rw,noauto 0 
0
# # /var/linux                  /compat/linux   null    rw,noauto 0 0
/dev/fd0.1440                   /fd0            ufs     xx 0 0
/dev/fd1.1200                   /fd1            ufs     xx,noauto 0 0
cwtest$ 

Boot messages captured from a serial console are:

Rebooting...
/boot/kernel/kernel text=0x27b3a4 data=0x33ed0+0x4fd8c 
syms=[0x4+0x3eac0+0x4+0x4d1fa]

Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt.
Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel] in 9 seconds... 

Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help.
OK unload
OK lsdev
cd devices:
disk devices:
    disk0:   BIOS drive A:
    disk1:   BIOS drive C:
        disk1s1a: FFS
        disk1s1b: swap
    disk2:   BIOS drive D:
        disk2s1a: FFS
        disk2s1b: swap
        disk2s1c: FFS
        disk2s1e: FFS
    disk3:   BIOS drive E:
        disk3s1a: FFS
        disk3s1d: FFS
        disk3s1e: FFS
pxe devices:
OK set currdev=disk3s1a:
OK ls /kernel
/kernel: not a directory
OK ls
/
 d  dev
 d  stand
 d  etc
 d  proc
 d  bin
 d  mnt
 d  root
 d  tmp
 d  usr
 d  var
 d  sbin
 d  home
 d  cwsys
 d  export
 d  vol
 d  opt
 d  fd0
 d  fd1
 d  dos
 d  net
 d  dsk03
 d  modules
 d  boot                                                
 d  dsk01
 d  opt2
 d  opt3
 d  dsk02
 d  dos2
 d  modules.old
 d  export2
 d  dsk04
 d  dsk05
 d  .snap
 d  current
 d  tmp_mnt
 l  sys
    kernel.old
    kernel
 l  compat
    rda0s1
    kernel.GENERIC
    boot.help
    COPYRIGHT
    STABLE4
 l  lib
 l  archives                                            
 l  cdrom
    .bash_history
    kernel.config
    boot.config-alt
    .profile
    .login
    .cshrc
OK load
no filename specified
OK load /kernel
/kernel text=0x1b4148 data=0x225f0+0x19a04 syms=[0x4+0x288f0+0x4+0x2ee9f]
OK boot -s
Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
        The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #0: Mon Nov  3 01:07:46 PST 2003
    root@cwtest:/dsk01/obj/dsk02/src/cvs-490r/src/sys/CWTEST
Timecounter "i8254"  frequency 1193182 Hz
Timecounter "TSC"  frequency 119752540 Hz
CPU: Pentium/P54C (119.75-MHz 586-class CPU)
  Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0x52c  Stepping = 12
  Features=0x1bf<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8>
real memory  = 83886080 (81920K bytes)
avail memory = 78282752 (76448K bytes)
Preloaded elf kernel "/kernel" at 0xc034a000.
Intel Pentium detected, installing workaround for F00F bug
md0: Malloc disk
npx0: <math processor> on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 interface
pcib0: <Host to PCI bridge> on motherboard
pci0: <PCI bus> on pcib0
isab0: <Intel 82371SB PCI to ISA bridge> at device 7.0 on pci0
isa0: <ISA bus> on isab0
atapci0: <Intel PIIX3 ATA controller> port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 on 
pci0
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
xl0: <3Com 3c905B-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0x6000-0x607f mem 
0xe1001000-0xe100
107f irq 5 at device 18.0 on pci0
xl0: Ethernet address: 00:50:da:80:28:96
miibus0: <MII bus> on xl0
xlphy0: <3Com internal media interface> on miibus0
xlphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
ahc0: <Adaptec 2940 SCSI adapter> port 0x6100-0x61ff mem 
0xe1000000-0xe1000fff i
rq 9 at device 19.0 on pci0
aic7870: Single Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/253 SCBs
pci0: <ATI model 5656 graphics accelerator> at 20.0 irq 15
orm0: <Option ROMs> at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xca7ff,0xdc000-0xdffff
 on
isa0
pmtimer0 on isa0
fdc0: <NEC 72065B or clone> at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0
fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold
fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0
aha0 at port 0x330-0x333 irq 11 drq 5 on isa0
aha0: AHA-1542CF FW Rev. C.0 (ID=45) SCSI Host Adapter, SCSI ID 7, 16 CCBs
atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0
atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> irq 1 on atkbdc0
vga0: <Generic ISA VGA> at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0
sc0: <System console> on isa0
sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0>
da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: <SEAGATE ST34520N 1487> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device 
da0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged Queueing Enabled
da0: 4340MB (8888924 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 4340C)
da2 at ahc0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0
da2: <QUANTUM TRB850S 043C> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device 
da2: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 8)
da2: 810MB (1660299 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 810C)
da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0
da1: <CONNER CFP1080S 4649> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device 
da1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged Queueing Enabled
da1: 1030MB (2110812 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 1030C)
da3 at aha0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da3: <SEAGATE SX910800N 8514> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device 
da3: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 8)
da3: 8669MB (17755614 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 8669C)
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da1s1a
Root mount failed: 22

mountroot> ufs:/dev/da1s1a
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da1s1a
Root mount failed: 22

Manual root filesystem specification:
  <fstype>:<device>  Mount <device> using filesystem <fstype>
                       eg. ufs:/dev/da0s1a
  ?                  List valid disk boot devices
  <empty line>       Abort manual input

mountroot> 


Cheers,
--
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>        http://www.komquats.com/
BC Government                     .                       FreeBSD UNIX
Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca         .                     cy@FreeBSD.org
http://www.gov.bc.ca/             .            http://www.FreeBSD.org/



From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 14:49:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 53CC016A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:49:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from awww.jeah.net (66-192-41-97.gen.twtelecom.net [66.192.41.97])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 98B8143D49; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:49:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from chris@JEAH.net)
Received: from chris (chris [24.209.188.26])
	by awww.jeah.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i0BMnEbT001437;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:49:14 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from chris@JEAH.net)
Message-ID: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
From: "Chris Byrnes" <chris@JEAH.net>
To: <stable@freebsd.org>, <questions@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:49:07 -0600
Organization: JEAH Communications, LLC
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Subject: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:49:18 -0000

Sorry for the crosspost, not sure where this should go.  Please cc me in
replies because I am not subscribed.

Server was up almost 134 days and spontaneously rebooted this morning saying
"All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7)."  Had never seen it before, read
up on it and figured something just happened causing a lot of memory usage
or something, chalked it up to an abnormality.

Took the opportunity to upgrade to the latest -STABLE and rebooted.

Server was up for 30 minutes and just rebooted AGAIN with the same
message(s)..

Jan 11 16:32:19 /kernel: All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7).
Jan 11 16:32:50 last message repeated 33 times
Jan 11 16:34:44 last message repeated 127 times

Do you have any idea what's causing this and how I can monitor/stop it?

Thank you..


Chris

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 14:57:53 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A264A16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:57:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 946C443D1D; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:57:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kstewart@owt.com)
Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233])
	by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0BMvoi30717;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:57:50 -0800
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
To: "Chris Byrnes" <chris@JEAH.net>, <stable@freebsd.org>,
	<questions@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:57:50 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401111457.50578.kstewart@owt.com>
Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:57:53 -0000

On Sunday 11 January 2004 02:49 pm, Chris Byrnes wrote:
> Sorry for the crosspost, not sure where this should go.  Please cc me in
> replies because I am not subscribed.
>
> Server was up almost 134 days and spontaneously rebooted this morning
> saying "All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7)."  Had never seen it
> before, read up on it and figured something just happened causing a lot of
> memory usage or something, chalked it up to an abnormality.
>
> Took the opportunity to upgrade to the latest -STABLE and rebooted.
>
> Server was up for 30 minutes and just rebooted AGAIN with the same
> message(s)..
>
> Jan 11 16:32:19 /kernel: All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7).
> Jan 11 16:32:50 last message repeated 33 times
> Jan 11 16:34:44 last message repeated 127 times
>
> Do you have any idea what's causing this and how I can monitor/stop it?
>

Could you have missed a security update and some one found your hole?

Kent

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 14:59:44 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 476CF16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:59:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from awww.jeah.net (66-192-41-100.gen.twtelecom.net [66.192.41.100])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D7AB643D5F; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:59:34 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from chris@JEAH.net)
Received: from chris (chris [24.209.188.26])
	by awww.jeah.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i0BMxWbT005592;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:59:32 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from chris@JEAH.net)
Message-ID: <06fd01c3d896$8ebdc000$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
From: "Chris Byrnes" <chris@JEAH.net>
To: "Kent Stewart" <kstewart@owt.com>, <stable@freebsd.org>,
	<questions@freebsd.org>
References: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
	<200401111457.50578.kstewart@owt.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:59:24 -0600
Organization: JEAH Communications, LLC
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:59:44 -0000

I don't think I did, but if that were the case, wouldn't it have been
patched with the upgrade to -STABLE?


Chris

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kent Stewart" <kstewart@owt.com>
To: "Chris Byrnes" <chris@JEAH.net>; <stable@freebsd.org>;
<questions@freebsd.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today


> On Sunday 11 January 2004 02:49 pm, Chris Byrnes wrote:
> > Sorry for the crosspost, not sure where this should go.  Please cc me in
> > replies because I am not subscribed.
> >
> > Server was up almost 134 days and spontaneously rebooted this morning
> > saying "All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7)."  Had never seen it
> > before, read up on it and figured something just happened causing a lot
of
> > memory usage or something, chalked it up to an abnormality.
> >
> > Took the opportunity to upgrade to the latest -STABLE and rebooted.
> >
> > Server was up for 30 minutes and just rebooted AGAIN with the same
> > message(s)..
> >
> > Jan 11 16:32:19 /kernel: All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7).
> > Jan 11 16:32:50 last message repeated 33 times
> > Jan 11 16:34:44 last message repeated 127 times
> >
> > Do you have any idea what's causing this and how I can monitor/stop it?
> >
>
> Could you have missed a security update and some one found your hole?
>
> Kent
>
> -- 
> Kent Stewart
> Richland, WA
>
> http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
>
>

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 15:03:27 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 701F616A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:03:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 22AD443D5E; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:03:26 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kstewart@owt.com)
Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233])
	by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0BN3Ki30941;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:03:20 -0800
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
To: "Chris Byrnes" <chris@JEAH.net>, <stable@freebsd.org>,
	<questions@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:03:20 -0800
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
	<200401111457.50578.kstewart@owt.com>
	<06fd01c3d896$8ebdc000$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <06fd01c3d896$8ebdc000$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401111503.20501.kstewart@owt.com>
Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:03:27 -0000

On Sunday 11 January 2004 02:59 pm, Chris Byrnes wrote:
> I don't think I did, but if that were the case, wouldn't it have been
> patched with the upgrade to -STABLE?

Yes, wirh a recent stable. It could be other things such as Apache.

Kent
>
>
> Chris
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kent Stewart" <kstewart@owt.com>
> To: "Chris Byrnes" <chris@JEAH.net>; <stable@freebsd.org>;
> <questions@freebsd.org>
> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 4:57 PM
> Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today
>
> > On Sunday 11 January 2004 02:49 pm, Chris Byrnes wrote:
> > > Sorry for the crosspost, not sure where this should go.  Please cc me
> > > in replies because I am not subscribed.
> > >
> > > Server was up almost 134 days and spontaneously rebooted this morning
> > > saying "All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7)."  Had never seen it
> > > before, read up on it and figured something just happened causing a lot
>
> of
>
> > > memory usage or something, chalked it up to an abnormality.
> > >
> > > Took the opportunity to upgrade to the latest -STABLE and rebooted.
> > >
> > > Server was up for 30 minutes and just rebooted AGAIN with the same
> > > message(s)..
> > >
> > > Jan 11 16:32:19 /kernel: All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7).
> > > Jan 11 16:32:50 last message repeated 33 times
> > > Jan 11 16:34:44 last message repeated 127 times
> > >
> > > Do you have any idea what's causing this and how I can monitor/stop it?
> >
> > Could you have missed a security update and some one found your hole?
> >
> > Kent
> >
> > --
> > Kent Stewart
> > Richland, WA
> >
> > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 15:15:16 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B114716A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:15:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server4.yawl.com.br (server4.yawl.com.br [200.193.239.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A4DA43D5C
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:15:12 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from einstein@yawl.com.br)
Received: (qmail 35042 invoked by uid 1009); 11 Jan 2004 23:15:10 -0000
Received: from unknown (200.193.239.25)
  by server4.yawl.com.br with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 21:15:10 -0000
Message-ID: <4001D903.2030209@yawl.com.br>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:15:15 -0200
From: Einstein Oliveira <einstein@yawl.com.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Chris Byrnes <chris@JEAH.net>
References: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
In-Reply-To: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: stable@freebsd.org
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:15:16 -0000

Chris Byrnes wrote:
> Sorry for the crosspost, not sure where this should go.  Please cc me in
> replies because I am not subscribed.
> 
> Server was up almost 134 days and spontaneously rebooted this morning saying
> "All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7)."  Had never seen it before, read
> up on it and figured something just happened causing a lot of memory usage
> or something, chalked it up to an abnormality.
> 
> Took the opportunity to upgrade to the latest -STABLE and rebooted.
> 
> Server was up for 30 minutes and just rebooted AGAIN with the same
> message(s)..
> 
> Jan 11 16:32:19 /kernel: All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7).
> Jan 11 16:32:50 last message repeated 33 times
> Jan 11 16:34:44 last message repeated 127 times
> 
> Do you have any idea what's causing this and how I can monitor/stop it?
> 

Use netstat -m to chek the current configuration/load.

It's something like this:

----
191/8272/65536 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
         186 mbufs allocated to data
         5 mbufs allocated to packet headers
170/8128/16384 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
18324 Kbytes allocated to network (37% of mb_map in use)
0 requests for memory denied
0 requests for memory delayed
0 calls to protocol drain routines
----

You can modify the number of mbufs with sysctl variable 
kern.ipc.nmbclusters.

Usually setting this on /boot/loader.conf

ex.:

kern.ipc.nmbclusters=16384

Check also tuning(7) ;)

> Thank you..
> 
> 
> Chris
> 

-- 
Einstein Oliveira                 einstein@yawl.com.br
______________________________________________________
Yawl Internet Ltda.            http://www.yawl.com.br/

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 15:16:53 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0692E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:16:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shellma.zin.lublin.pl (shellma.zin.lublin.pl [212.182.126.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEB943D46
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:16:47 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl)
Received: by shellma.zin.lublin.pl (Postfix, from userid 1018)
	id 9B2565F103; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:27:53 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:27:53 +0100
From: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
To: Chris Byrnes <chris@JEAH.net>
Message-ID: <20040111232753.GA25039@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
References: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:16:53 -0000

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 04:49:07PM -0600, Chris Byrnes wrote:

> Server was up almost 134 days and spontaneously rebooted this morning saying
> "All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7)."  Had never seen it before, read
> up on it and figured something just happened causing a lot of memory usage
> or something, chalked it up to an abnormality.
> 
> Took the opportunity to upgrade to the latest -STABLE and rebooted.
> 
> Server was up for 30 minutes and just rebooted AGAIN with the same
> message(s)..
> 
> Jan 11 16:32:19 /kernel: All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7).
> Jan 11 16:32:50 last message repeated 33 times
> Jan 11 16:34:44 last message repeated 127 times
> 
> Do you have any idea what's causing this and how I can monitor/stop it?

Latest STABLE? Interesting. I had similar problem in the past, but this
was fixed. Please obtain a crashdump and show backtrace.

(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html#KERNELDEBUG-OBTAIN)


-- 
Paweł Małachowski

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 15:20:22 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C4E16A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:20:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shellma.zin.lublin.pl (shellma.zin.lublin.pl [212.182.126.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9629343D62
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:20:21 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl)
Received: by shellma.zin.lublin.pl (Postfix, from userid 1018)
	id 989805F103; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:31:27 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:31:27 +0100
From: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
To: Einstein Oliveira <einstein@yawl.com.br>
Message-ID: <20040111233127.GB25039@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
References: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
	<4001D903.2030209@yawl.com.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4001D903.2030209@yawl.com.br>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:20:22 -0000

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:15:15PM -0200, Einstein Oliveira wrote:

> You can modify the number of mbufs with sysctl variable 
> kern.ipc.nmbclusters.

This will hide a problem, without fixing it.


-- 
Paweł Małachowski

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 15:30:26 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0CF16A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:30:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from server4.yawl.com.br (server4.yawl.com.br [200.193.239.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9692A43D41
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:30:24 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from einstein@yawl.com.br)
Received: (qmail 36100 invoked by uid 1009); 11 Jan 2004 23:30:23 -0000
Received: from unknown (200.193.239.25)
  by server4.yawl.com.br with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 21:30:23 -0000
Message-ID: <4001DC93.3010906@yawl.com.br>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:30:27 -0200
From: Einstein Oliveira <einstein@yawl.com.br>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
References: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com>
	<4001D903.2030209@yawl.com.br> <20040111233127.GB25039@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
In-Reply-To: <20040111233127.GB25039@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:30:26 -0000

Pawel Malachowski wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:15:15PM -0200, Einstein Oliveira wrote:
> 
> 
>>You can modify the number of mbufs with sysctl variable 
>>kern.ipc.nmbclusters.
> 
> 
> This will hide a problem, without fixing it.
> 
> 

You're right, but it also can keep the things running while you figure 
out what's happenning (load/DoS/etc).


-- 
Einstein Oliveira                 einstein@yawl.com.br
______________________________________________________
Yawl Internet Ltda.            http://www.yawl.com.br/

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 15:41:39 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A1FC16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:41:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shellma.zin.lublin.pl (shellma.zin.lublin.pl [212.182.126.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0939243D5D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:40:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl)
Received: by shellma.zin.lublin.pl (Postfix, from userid 1018)
	id 0DE805F103; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:51:48 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:51:48 +0100
From: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
To: Thorsten Steentjes <tst@guug.de>
Message-ID: <20040111235148.GC25039@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
References: <20031223233420.GA5508@icon.icon.bg>
	<20031225184936.GA1310@duke.tm.priv>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20031225184936.GA1310@duke.tm.priv>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: Victor Ivanov <v0rbiz@icon.bg>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: possible (kernel) bug with zebra
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:41:39 -0000

On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 07:49:36PM +0100, Thorsten Steentjes wrote:

> I have no solution for your problem, but I can confirm that it is not
> hardware related, cause I see the same behavior here.

Obtain a crashdump. Also compare with:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/42030


-- 
Paweł Małachowski

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 16:22:21 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7EA16A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:22:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EDD43D54
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:22:18 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bfoz@terrandev.com)
Received: from terrandev.com (c-24-6-52-207.client.comcast.net[24.6.52.207])
          by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP
          id <2004011200221801500b7hvue>
          (Authid: bfoz);
          Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:22:18 +0000
Message-ID: <4001E8B9.6070407@terrandev.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:22:17 -0800
From: Brandon Fosdick <bfoz@terrandev.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031122
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
References: <200312250137.32351.skquinn@xevious.kicks-ass.net>
	<20031225094321.GA59679@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
In-Reply-To: <20031225094321.GA59679@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: "Shawn K. Quinn" <skquinn@xevious.kicks-ass.net>
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Very weird problem with dc driver
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:22:21 -0000

David Malone wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 01:37:32AM -0600, Shawn K. Quinn wrote:
> 
>>Oh, I also found this little gem after the first power-off/power-on 
>>reboot:
>>
>>Dec 25 00:32:58 xevious /kernel: dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX 
>>threshold
> 
> 
> In general, you don't need to worry about these, they are just the driver
> adjusting itself to the speed of your card/motherboard. You may see a few
> of them when the machine is first busy after boot, and then they should
> probably stop.

I have a machine running 4.9 and using the dc driver (Netgear FA310TX) 
that gets lots of these messages. For the most part they happen when the 
network cable is unplugged, but I also get a number of them randomly. 
They're not entirely harmless either since the umass driver seems to be 
affected. If one of the messages pops up while transferring to/from a 
usb drive the transfer stalls in poll (according to top) and any 
subsequent attempt to access (ls,cd, etc) either disk involved in the 
transfer also gets locked in the poll state.

I can't provide much more info since the machine is on the other side of 
the country and not on the net anymore, but this isn't the first time 
I've had this problem. And I think I saw something about it on a mailing 
list a long time ago....

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=freebsd+netgear+310tx+underrun&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=200001070505.VAA01104_mordred.cs.ucla.edu%40ns.sol.net&rnum=1
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=3BEBCA14.8FFC9781_wgops.com%40ns.sol.net&rnum=2&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dfreebsd%2Bdc%2Bunderrun%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D3BEBCA14.8FFC9781_wgops.com%2540ns.sol.net%26rnum%3D2
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=freebsd+dc+underrun&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=3BB811A5.F301F9FD%40pacbell.net&rnum=3
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=20020225203050.U21168-100000_patrocles.silby.com%40ns.sol.net&rnum=9&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dfreebsd%2Bdc%2Bunderrun%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D20020225203050.U21168-100000_patrocles.silby.com%2540ns.sol.net%26rnum%3D9
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&threadm=20020226101713.S25801-100000_patrocles.silby.com%40ns.sol.net&rnum=8&prev=/groups%3Fq%3Dfreebsd%2Bdc%2Bunderrun%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3DUTF-8%26selm%3D20020226101713.S25801-100000_patrocles.silby.com%2540ns.sol.net%26rnum%3D8

Google found a few other threads but I don't feel like listing them.

-- 
Brandon Fosdick
http://www.terranspace.org


From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 16:34:44 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9636016A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:34:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from matrix.tk-pttuntex.com (matrix.tk-pttuntex.com
	[203.77.209.162])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5D4AE43D5D; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:34:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from zen@tk-pttuntex.com)
Received: from database.ANGINA (unknown [192.168.0.2])
	by matrix.tk-pttuntex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 104B6105E7; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:31:36 +0700 (WIT)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:40:22 +0700
From: zen <zen@tk-pttuntex.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62i) Business
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <8310647171.20040112074022@tk-pttuntex.com>
To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040110121341.E36595@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <46254658343.20040110091532@tk-pttuntex.com>
 <20040110121341.E36595@carver.gumbysoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: stable@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re[2]: help
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: zen <zen@tk-pttuntex.com>
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:34:44 -0000

Hello Doug,

Sunday, January 11, 2004, 3:14:19 AM, you wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, zen wrote:

>> Hello freebsd-stable,
>>
>>   i know this is may be the wrong place to ask these question,
>>   i just cvsup my 5.1 box today,
>>   and during the make installworld it's stop with these following
>>   error messages:
>>
>> PASS: Test notdef detected no regression.
>> Running test modifiers
>> PASS: Test modifiers detected no regression.
>> Running test funny_targets
>> PASS: Test funny_targets detected no regression.
>> Checking to see if your booted kernel is fresh enough..
>> /usr/obj/usr/src/bin/sh/sh -c  'echo "Testing installed kernel for new sigaction(2) syscall"'
>> /usr/obj/usr/src/bin/sh/sh: not found
>> *** Error code 127
>>
>> Stop in /usr/src.

> It appears you haven't followed the instructions correctly in how to build
> world.  In particular, it never built. :-)

> Please see the section in the Handbook on updating and try again.


thx for the info, i'll will start it all over again.


-- 
Cheers,
 zen                            

+------------------+-----------------------+
Misael Happy Agus                          |        
<zen at tk-pttuntex dot com>               |
+------------------+-----------------------+
"Be liberal in what you accept,
and conservative in what you send."-- Postel

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 16:34:44 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9636016A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:34:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from matrix.tk-pttuntex.com (matrix.tk-pttuntex.com
	[203.77.209.162])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5D4AE43D5D; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:34:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from zen@tk-pttuntex.com)
Received: from database.ANGINA (unknown [192.168.0.2])
	by matrix.tk-pttuntex.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 104B6105E7; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:31:36 +0700 (WIT)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:40:22 +0700
From: zen <zen@tk-pttuntex.com>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62i) Business
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <8310647171.20040112074022@tk-pttuntex.com>
To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040110121341.E36595@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <46254658343.20040110091532@tk-pttuntex.com>
 <20040110121341.E36595@carver.gumbysoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: stable@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re[2]: help
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: zen <zen@tk-pttuntex.com>
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:34:44 -0000

Hello Doug,

Sunday, January 11, 2004, 3:14:19 AM, you wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, zen wrote:

>> Hello freebsd-stable,
>>
>>   i know this is may be the wrong place to ask these question,
>>   i just cvsup my 5.1 box today,
>>   and during the make installworld it's stop with these following
>>   error messages:
>>
>> PASS: Test notdef detected no regression.
>> Running test modifiers
>> PASS: Test modifiers detected no regression.
>> Running test funny_targets
>> PASS: Test funny_targets detected no regression.
>> Checking to see if your booted kernel is fresh enough..
>> /usr/obj/usr/src/bin/sh/sh -c  'echo "Testing installed kernel for new sigaction(2) syscall"'
>> /usr/obj/usr/src/bin/sh/sh: not found
>> *** Error code 127
>>
>> Stop in /usr/src.

> It appears you haven't followed the instructions correctly in how to build
> world.  In particular, it never built. :-)

> Please see the section in the Handbook on updating and try again.


thx for the info, i'll will start it all over again.


-- 
Cheers,
 zen                            

+------------------+-----------------------+
Misael Happy Agus                          |        
<zen at tk-pttuntex dot com>               |
+------------------+-----------------------+
"Be liberal in what you accept,
and conservative in what you send."-- Postel

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 19:03:59 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E6A16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:03:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ip166.usw253.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com
	[209.20.253.166])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A6F43D3F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:03:57 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from randy@psg.com)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ran.psg.com)
	by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD)
	id 1AfsMv-000ND9-G4
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:03:57 -0800
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Message-Id: <E1AfsMv-000ND9-G4@ran.psg.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:03:57 -0800
Subject: arplookup failures
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 03:03:59 -0000

in /etc/rc.conf, i have

ifconfig_em0="inet 147.28.0.60 netmask 255.255.255.0 <media stuff>"
ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet 192.83.230.1 netmask 255.255.255.255"
ifconfig_em0_alias1="inet 198.133.206.1 netmask 255.255.255.255"

and i constantly log

Jan 11 00:30:44 bbgp /kernel: arplookup 192.83.230.253 failed: host is not on local network
Jan 11 00:39:16 bbgp /kernel: arplookup 198.133.206.253 failed: host is not on local network
Jan 11 00:45:52 bbgp /kernel: arplookup 192.83.230.253 failed: host is not on local network
Jan 11 01:01:22 bbgp /kernel: arplookup 192.83.230.253 failed: host is not on local network
Jan 11 01:03:47 bbgp /kernel: arplookup 198.133.206.253 failed: host is not on local network
Jan 11 01:21:04 bbgp /kernel: arplookup 192.83.230.253 failed: host is not on local network
Jan 11 01:25:40 bbgp /kernel: arplookup 198.133.206.253 failed: host is not on local network
Jan 11 01:42:15 bbgp /kernel: arplookup 192.83.230.253 failed: host is not on local network

yet i can

# more /etc/rc.conf
bbgp.psg.com:/root# ping 192.83.230.253
PING 192.83.230.253 (192.83.230.253): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 192.83.230.253: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=0.994 ms
64 bytes from 192.83.230.253: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.792 ms
64 bytes from 192.83.230.253: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.686 ms
64 bytes from 192.83.230.253: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=1.080 ms

# ping 198.133.206.253
PING 198.133.206.253 (198.133.206.253): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 198.133.206.253: icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=1.035 ms
64 bytes from 198.133.206.253: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=0.904 ms
64 bytes from 198.133.206.253: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=0.672 ms
64 bytes from 198.133.206.253: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=0.692 ms
64 bytes from 198.133.206.253: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=23.821 ms

what's the clue this time?

randy

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 19:09:57 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFECC16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:09:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46A8E43D1D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:09:56 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id D48AF66C4F; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:09:55 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:09:55 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Message-ID: <20040112030955.GA10194@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <E1AfsMv-000ND9-G4@ran.psg.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1AfsMv-000ND9-G4@ran.psg.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: arplookup failures
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 03:09:57 -0000


--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 07:03:57PM -0800, Randy Bush wrote:
> in /etc/rc.conf, i have
>=20
> ifconfig_em0=3D"inet 147.28.0.60 netmask 255.255.255.0 <media stuff>"
> ifconfig_em0_alias0=3D"inet 192.83.230.1 netmask 255.255.255.255"
> ifconfig_em0_alias1=3D"inet 198.133.206.1 netmask 255.255.255.255"
>=20
> and i constantly log
>=20
> Jan 11 00:30:44 bbgp /kernel: arplookup 192.83.230.253 failed: host is no=
t on local network
> Jan 11 00:39:16 bbgp /kernel: arplookup 198.133.206.253 failed: host is n=
ot on local network

Those aren't part of the subnets you have specified above.  Did you mean to=
 use '255.255.255.0'?

Kris

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAAhADWry0BWjoQKURAtVsAJ0ehVdGJ6eijqYeljs/HSBqxUJXEACfTM6U
ondXtQpuqIY+37X0A38yieQ=
=5o/q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 19:36:28 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA8E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:36:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ip166.usw253.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com
	[209.20.253.166])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8046843D4C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:36:27 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from randy@psg.com)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ran.psg.com)
	by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD)
	id 1AfssL-000O1U-Na; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:36:25 -0800
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
References: <E1AfsMv-000ND9-G4@ran.psg.com>
	<20040112030955.GA10194@xor.obsecurity.org>
Message-Id: <E1AfssL-000O1U-Na@ran.psg.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:36:25 -0800
cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: arplookup failures
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 03:36:28 -0000

>> ifconfig_em0="inet 147.28.0.60 netmask 255.255.255.0 <media stuff>"
>> ifconfig_em0_alias0="inet 192.83.230.1 netmask 255.255.255.255"
>> ifconfig_em0_alias1="inet 198.133.206.1 netmask 255.255.255.255"
>> 
>> and i constantly log
>> 
>> Jan 11 00:30:44 bbgp /kernel: arplookup 192.83.230.253 failed: host is not on local network
>> Jan 11 00:39:16 bbgp /kernel: arplookup 198.133.206.253 failed: host is not on local network
> 
> Those aren't part of the subnets you have specified above.  Did you mean
> to use '255.255.255.0'?

<deep blush>

i am so used to hacking alii on the same subnet as the primary, and
hence using 255, that i turned my brain off.  thanks for catching.

i feel sooooo stoooopid!

randy

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 20:21:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0A28916A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:21:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 31E8943D1F; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:21:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kblists@comcast.net)
Received: from [192.168.50.54]
	(h00045a2a945a.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.31.245.154])
	by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP
	id <20040112042137012006hdbie>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:21:37 +0000
From: Kevin Berrien <kblists@comcast.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Organization: 
Message-Id: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-1b) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: kblists@comcast.net
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:21:40 -0000
X-Original-Date: 17 Apr 2018 09:10:14 -0400
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:21:40 -0000

I can confirm an issue posted Dec 3rd, freebsd-stable maillist, titled
"4.9 install buglet".

I experience this bug running the install (various configurations) 100%
of the time.  After install, after system reboot, the boot loader comes
up with F1: FreeBSD, and reboots continually forever.  To test, I made 3
installs without issue using 4.8.  So first, I'd like to confirm the bug
report, and ask the following.

In his "buglet" post, Ian noted the following work around.

> Work around.  Force write in label screen (or rewrite MBR
> and label post reboot)

Looking at fdisk, and the label utility I see nothing option along these
lines.  Could someone explain to me what/how to do this?

Has anyone else seen this apparently prevalent issue?  Is a fix likely,
or do these kind of things just slip by?  I did not expect this from a
'stable' release.

Unfortunately, I'm making my second attempt at evaluating FreeBSD (last
time I used an active box - and got frustrated with bad ports, MySQL/BSD
issues, and needed to get the box online, so I installed something that
worked).  I'm interested in BSD's lean-ness, and other aspects, as
opposed to other "nix'es".  Needless to say, testing again using 4.9
this time hasn't been very impressive.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jan 11 21:01:23 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3A9CE16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:01:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freeman.4gh.net
	(washdc3-ar5-4-64-188-085.washdc3.elnk.dsl.genuity.net [4.64.188.85])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A66C543D46; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:01:21 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from stuartb@4gh.net)
Received: from localhost (stuartb@localhost)
	by freeman.4gh.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0C51J5U048994;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:01:20 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from stuartb@4gh.net)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:01:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Stuart Barkley <stuartb@4gh.net>
To: Kevin Berrien <kblists@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc>
Message-ID: <20040111234757.X48488@freeman.4gh.net>
References: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:01:23 -0000

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 09:10 -0400, Kevin Berrien wrote:

Check your system clock.  Its way off.

> I can confirm an issue posted Dec 3rd, freebsd-stable maillist,
> titled "4.9 install buglet".
>
> I experience this bug running the install (various configurations)
> 100% of the time.  After install, after system reboot, the boot
> loader comes up with F1: FreeBSD, and reboots continually forever.
> To test, I made 3 installs without issue using 4.8.  So first, I'd
> like to confirm the bug report, and ask the following.

I have also seen this problem on two of my systems when installing
4.9-RELEASE.

> In his "buglet" post, Ian noted the following work around.
>
> > Work around.  Force write in label screen (or rewrite MBR and
> > label post reboot)

Yes, I found this workaround also and it works for me.

> Looking at fdisk, and the label utility I see nothing option along
> these lines.  Could someone explain to me what/how to do this?

(From memory, YMMV) Reboot for the installation CD into sysinstall.
Select "Configure"  then "Fdisk".  In fdisk select "W" this will cause
the MBR to be rewritten correctly (I always select the FreeBSD boot
manager, I don't know if that is necessary).

> Has anyone else seen this apparently prevalent issue?  Is a fix
> likely, or do these kind of things just slip by?  I did not expect
> this from a 'stable' release.

I'm not running stable so don't know if the problem is fixed there, or
even if a fix in known.

I'm using an ASUS P4B533-E motherboard with the original BIOS (Rev
1008 08/06/02).  There is an updated BIOS available and I hope to be
able to give it a try soon (it also fixes another minor problem I've
seen: booting from floppy which doesn't work currently).

Stuart
-- 
I've never been lost; I was once bewildered for three days, but never lost!
                                        --  Daniel Boone

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 02:58:52 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C8916A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:58:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B4A843D2D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:58:50 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa41556@salmon>; 12 Jan 2004 10:58:49 +0000 (GMT)
To: Brandon Fosdick <bfoz@terrandev.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:22:17 PST."
             <4001E8B9.6070407@terrandev.com> 
X-Request-Do: 
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:58:48 +0000
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
Message-ID: <200401121058.aa41556@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
cc: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
cc: "Shawn K. Quinn" <skquinn@xevious.kicks-ass.net>
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Very weird problem with dc driver 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:58:53 -0000

> >>Dec 25 00:32:58 xevious /kernel: dc0: TX underrun -- increasing TX 
> >>threshold

> > In general, you don't need to worry about these, they are just the driver
> > adjusting itself to the speed of your card/motherboard. You may see a few
> > of them when the machine is first busy after boot, and then they should
> > probably stop.

> I have a machine running 4.9 and using the dc driver (Netgear FA310TX) 
> that gets lots of these messages. For the most part they happen when the 
> network cable is unplugged, but I also get a number of them randomly. 
> They're not entirely harmless either since the umass driver seems to be 
> affected. If one of the messages pops up while transferring to/from a 
> usb drive the transfer stalls in poll (according to top) and any 
> subsequent attempt to access (ls,cd, etc) either disk involved in the 
> transfer also gets locked in the poll state.

While it's possible that the TX underrun is somehow causing your
USB subsystem to stall, it seems more likely that either the USB
subsystem is stalling your NIC or that something else is stalling
both of them.

> Google found a few other threads but I don't feel like listing them.

Most of the threads that you posted say roughly what I's said,
"don't worry about them". One did mention that there may be hardware
problems with the Netgear card that you mention. However, the section
of the driver man page quoted suggests that the driver contains
work-arounds for these problems.

	David.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 13:05:36 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7140B16A4DC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:05:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpc2-cove3-6-0-cust88.brhm.cable.ntl.com
	(cpc2-cove3-6-0-cust88.brhm.cable.ntl.com [81.107.10.88])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4709B43D6D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:04:51 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com)
Received: from gamma.private.lan (gamma.private.lan [192.168.0.12])
	ESMTP id i0CL4gOl091373;	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:04:47 GMT
	(envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com)
From: ian j hart <ianjhart@ntlworld.com>
To: kblists@comcast.net, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:04:42 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc>
In-Reply-To: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401122104.42709.ianjhart@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:05:36 -0000

On Tuesday 17 April 2018 2:10 pm, Kevin Berrien wrote:

Please don't cross post, it's confusing.

> I can confirm an issue posted Dec 3rd, freebsd-stable maillist, titled
> "4.9 install buglet".
>
> I experience this bug running the install (various configurations) 100%
> of the time.  After install, after system reboot, the boot loader comes
> up with F1: FreeBSD, and reboots continually forever.  To test, I made 3
> installs without issue using 4.8.  So first, I'd like to confirm the bug
> report, and ask the following.
>
> In his "buglet" post, Ian noted the following work around.
>
> > Work around.  Force write in label screen (or rewrite MBR
> > and label post reboot)
>
> Looking at fdisk, and the label utility I see nothing option along these
> lines.  Could someone explain to me what/how to do this?
>
> Has anyone else seen this apparently prevalent issue?

Clearly this is not prevalent. If the majority of installs showed this problem 
there would be more than one previous post, or at least a reply. Or to put it 
another way. If it's prevalent, why ask if anyone else has seen it? Perhaps 
you meant something else.

There must be something specific to the hardware and/or the installation 
method that causes this to happen to us (only). This is why I called it a 
buglet rather than a bug.

> Is a fix likely, or do these kind of things just slip by?  

If a sysinstall developer reproduces it then it will probably get fixed. Other 
than that the normal open source methodology suggests that those who have the 
problem, fix the problem. ie Me or thee. I'm going to decline as the work 
around is truely trivial and this will be a b*st*rd to find.

> I did not expect this from a 'stable' release.

A release only gets the testing "we" give it. Due to time constraints I didn't 
test this hardware with this release. Mea culpa.

I suspect most pre-release testing follows defaults quite closely. This is why 
I listed the partition/boot information, as it's not typical.

Can you tell us what motherboard you have and what you did in the fdisk and 
boot manager screens? Common choices might give a clue.

>
> Unfortunately, I'm making my second attempt at evaluating FreeBSD (last
> time I used an active box - and got frustrated with bad ports, MySQL/BSD
> issues, and needed to get the box online, so I installed something that
> worked).

Never evaluate anything when you "need it to work". You're setting your self 
up to fail. Not only that but you do FreeBSD a disservice.

> I'm interested in BSD's lean-ness, and other aspects, as
> opposed to other "nix'es".  Needless to say, testing again using 4.9
> this time hasn't been very impressive.

Well  you've managed to find a trivial work around for a very obscure bug. I'd 
say that was quite impressive.
 
Never give up, never surrender.

-- 
ian j hart

http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20031016

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 13:16:37 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A351C16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:16:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpc2-cove3-6-0-cust88.brhm.cable.ntl.com
	(cpc2-cove3-6-0-cust88.brhm.cable.ntl.com [81.107.10.88])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2925F43D54
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:16:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com)
Received: from gamma.private.lan (gamma.private.lan [192.168.0.12])
	ESMTP id i0CL7XOl091383;	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:07:34 GMT
	(envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com)
From: ian j hart <ianjhart@ntlworld.com>
To: Stuart Barkley <stuartb@4gh.net>,
	Kevin Berrien <kblists@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:07:33 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc>
	<20040111234757.X48488@freeman.4gh.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040111234757.X48488@freeman.4gh.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401122107.33585.ianjhart@ntlworld.com>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:16:37 -0000

On Monday 12 January 2004 5:01 am, Stuart Barkley wrote:
[snip]
> I'm using an ASUS P4B533-E motherboard with the original BIOS (Rev
> 1008 08/06/02).  There is an updated BIOS available and I hope to be
> able to give it a try soon (it also fixes another minor problem I've
> seen: booting from floppy which doesn't work currently).
>
> Stuart

fdisk/boot choices?

That's three of us now. Maybe this should go in the errata?

-- 
ian j hart

http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20031016

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 13:18:28 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5639A16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:18:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pretender.boolean.net (router.boolean.net [198.144.206.49])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0C143D1F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:17:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from Kurt@OpenLDAP.org)
Received: from gypsy.OpenLDAP.org (kurt@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pretender.boolean.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0CLHo4f000305
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:17:50 GMT
	(envelope-from Kurt@OpenLDAP.org)
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20040112082548.0423eff0@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: kurt@127.0.0.1
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:17:32 -0800
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: RELENG_4 crash: UDMA100 drive on with old UDMA33 controller
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:18:28 -0000

I am having problems with RELENG_4 (cvsup last night) crashing.  I
recently purchased a WDC WD1600JB (160GB) disk drive to attach to my
trusty, old home server:
 ASUS P5A-B Motherboard with integrated Acer UDMA33 controller
 Fujitsu MPC3032AT/6018 (3GB) disk drive (channel 0 master)
 FX322M/w03 CDROM drive (channel 0 slave)

I presently have the WD1600JB was added as the channel 1 master
(no slave).  It is connected to the controller using the 80
conductor/40-pin cable provided with the drive.  (I've also
tried to setups with the WD1600JB replacing the CDROM drive
as slave on channel 0, using both 80/40 and 40/40 cable with
like results.)  I have configured the BIOS (as directed in
the WDC documents) for C/H/S for 1023/16/63 (528M).

RELENG_4 sees that a UDMA100 drive is connected to ata1 and
tries fallback to UDMA33 and then to PIO4.  This is the last
page of messages (which shows the panic).  I'll try to type
in more if this isn't enough (sorry, but I don't a laplink
cable handy):

ad2: trying fallback to PIO mode
ata1: resetting devices .. done

Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address	= 0x78007a
fault code		= supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer	= 0x8:0xc018760e
stack pointer		= 0x10:0xc03b9314
frame pointer		= 0x10:0xc02931c
code segment		= base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
			= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags	= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process	= Idle
interrupt mask		= bio
trap number		= 12
panic: page fault

This seems to be related problems others have noted with regards
to Acer UDMA33 controller and RELENG_4.  It does seem specific
to 4.x as tests against 4.8 failed same as above yet tests against
FreeBSD 5.2 and NetBSD 1.6 were okay.

Kurt

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 14:42:44 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503B016A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:42:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572BF43D2D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:42:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4C8AC72DC9; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:42:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 496F372DC7; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:42:42 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:42:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
In-Reply-To: <200401111619.i0BGJAr7075479@cwsys.cwsent.com>
Message-ID: <20040112144117.U54897@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <200401111619.i0BGJAr7075479@cwsys.cwsent.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: -STABLE Won't Boot On A Multidisk System
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:42:44 -0000

On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Cy Schubert wrote:

> I have a system which usually runs a recent copy of -CURRENT. I have one
> ATA disk and four SCSI disks in this system. My -CURRENT root device is
> /dev/ad0s1a while my -STABLE (4.9R) boot device is /dev/da1s1a. No problems
> booting -CURRENT however I haven't used my -STABLE system in a while and as
> I need to do some testing on it, I tried booting it this morning. It
> responded with a "Root mount failed:22" message.

Error 22 is EINVAL.  Which disk did you get loader off of?

My first shot at this would be that somehow a -stable kernel is trying to
mount a ufs2 filesystem, but everything *seems* to be in order.

Are you using boot0?

I have a machine with 2 ide disks and boot0 that seems to keep everything
straight. Combined IDE/SCSI systems can be a bit tempermental.

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 14:48:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C36F416A4CE; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:48:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D2DE243D4C; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:48:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C919172DC9; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:48:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BBB2F72DC7; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:48:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:48:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: Kevin Berrien <kblists@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc>
Message-ID: <20040112144706.A54897@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:48:31 -0000

On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Kevin Berrien wrote:

> I can confirm an issue posted Dec 3rd, freebsd-stable maillist, titled
> "4.9 install buglet".
>
> I experience this bug running the install (various configurations) 100%
> of the time.  After install, after system reboot, the boot loader comes
> up with F1: FreeBSD, and reboots continually forever.  To test, I made 3
> installs without issue using 4.8.  So first, I'd like to confirm the bug
> report, and ask the following.

Please qualify "reboots continutally forever."  It reboots after printing
the F1: FreeBSD message, or after you press a key, or what?

This sounds like a BIOS issue. boot0 uses only BIOS calls to do its work.
Lots of problems like this are also caused by bad drive geometry.

What is the partition layout on the disk(s) in the system? Hardware
description?

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 14:50:38 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDB616A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:50:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 295B043D67
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:50:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 1CF1F72DC9; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:50:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1A4AA72DC7; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:50:30 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:50:30 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20040112082548.0423eff0@127.0.0.1>
Message-ID: <20040112144855.S54897@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <6.0.0.22.0.20040112082548.0423eff0@127.0.0.1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RELENG_4 crash: UDMA100 drive on with old UDMA33 controller
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:50:38 -0000

On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:

> I am having problems with RELENG_4 (cvsup last night) crashing.  I
> recently purchased a WDC WD1600JB (160GB) disk drive to attach to my
> trusty, old home server:

Try running this in loader(8) before booting the kernel:

set hw.ata.ata_dma=0

This disables DMA support. If your system runs OK with this set then you
might want to check your cabling, or try isolating your disks to their own
channels.

>  ASUS P5A-B Motherboard with integrated Acer UDMA33 controller
>  Fujitsu MPC3032AT/6018 (3GB) disk drive (channel 0 master)
>  FX322M/w03 CDROM drive (channel 0 slave)

> I presently have the WD1600JB was added as the channel 1 master
> (no slave).  It is connected to the controller using the 80
> conductor/40-pin cable provided with the drive.  (I've also
> tried to setups with the WD1600JB replacing the CDROM drive
> as slave on channel 0, using both 80/40 and 40/40 cable with
> like results.)  I have configured the BIOS (as directed in
> the WDC documents) for C/H/S for 1023/16/63 (528M).

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 15:28:35 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77CCD16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cpc2-cove3-6-0-cust88.brhm.cable.ntl.com
	(cpc2-cove3-6-0-cust88.brhm.cable.ntl.com [81.107.10.88])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7791543D46
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:28:33 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com)
Received: from gamma.private.lan (gamma.private.lan [192.168.0.12])
	ESMTP id i0CNSSkw091989;	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:28:32 GMT
	(envelope-from ianjhart@ntlworld.com)
From: ian j hart <ianjhart@ntlworld.com>
To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:28:28 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc>
	<20040112144706.A54897@carver.gumbysoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040112144706.A54897@carver.gumbysoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401122328.28414.ianjhart@ntlworld.com>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:28:35 -0000

On Monday 12 January 2004 10:48 pm, Doug White wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Kevin Berrien wrote:
> > I can confirm an issue posted Dec 3rd, freebsd-stable maillist, titled
> > "4.9 install buglet".
> >
> > I experience this bug running the install (various configurations) 100%
> > of the time.  After install, after system reboot, the boot loader comes
> > up with F1: FreeBSD, and reboots continually forever.  To test, I made 3
> > installs without issue using 4.8.  So first, I'd like to confirm the bug
> > report, and ask the following.
>
> Please qualify "reboots continutally forever."  It reboots after printing
> the F1: FreeBSD message, or after you press a key, or what?
>
> This sounds like a BIOS issue. boot0 uses only BIOS calls to do its work.
> Lots of problems like this are also caused by bad drive geometry.
>
> What is the partition layout on the disk(s) in the system? Hardware
> description?

Here's my original post for comparison:

http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200312031933.25176.ianjhart

-- 
ian j hart

http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=20031016

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 15:57:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 497EB16A514; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:57:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3BC2E43D53; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:57:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kblists@comcast.net)
Received: from 204.127.205.144 ([204.127.205.144])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP
          id <2004011223570901100lbtp5e>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:57:09 +0000
Received: from [66.31.245.154] by 204.127.205.144;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:57:08 +0000
From: kblists@comcast.net
To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:57:08 +0000
Message-Id: <011220042357.24178.847@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 27 2003)
X-Authenticated-Sender: a2JsaXN0c0Bjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA==
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:57:13 -0000

I've fixed the problem, but for the benefit of others...

> Please qualify "reboots continutally forever."  It reboots after printing
> the F1: FreeBSD message, or after you press a key, or what?

Yes, hitting a key.  I would suppose if I let it time out it'd do the same.

> This sounds like a BIOS issue. boot0 uses only BIOS calls to do its work.
> Lots of problems like this are also caused by bad drive geometry.

4.8 installs correctly 100%, 4.9 fails 100%.
 
> What is the partition layout on the disk(s) in the system? Hardware
> description?

One of my old test boxes, on which I've install most everything in the past.  Single partition, Micron/Intel mb, PII 300, SIS graphics, 4 gig ide, 256 ram.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 15:59:50 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883FC16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:59:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F01443D76
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:59:49 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kblists@comcast.net)
Received: from 204.127.205.147 ([204.127.205.147])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP
          id <2004011223594901100mj714e>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:59:49 +0000
Received: from [66.31.245.154] by 204.127.205.147;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:59:49 +0000
From: kblists@comcast.net
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:59:49 +0000
Message-Id: <011220042359.23426.2438@comcast.net>
X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 27 2003)
X-Authenticated-Sender: a2JsaXN0c0Bjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA==
Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:59:50 -0000

Thanks to Stuart Barkley detailed suggestion:

>(From memory, YMMV) Reboot for the installation CD into sysinstall.
>Select "Configure"  then "Fdisk".  In fdisk select "W" this will cause
>the MBR to be rewritten correctly (I always select the FreeBSD boot
>manager, I don't know if that is necessary).

I was able to get my 4.9 to boot.

Ian,

> That's three of us now. Maybe this should go in the errata?

Obsolutely.  As I said in my original posting.  I'm re-evaluating BSD for the 
2nd time,  and I was inches away ending my evaluation with the concensus that 
BSD is not worth my time in 2004.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 22:34:54 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C849716A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:34:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from neuron.tuke.sk (neuron-ai.fei.tuke.sk [147.232.24.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E101143D55
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:34:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from babjak@neuron.tuke.sk)
Received: from babjak by neuron.tuke.sk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AgI8K-0007R1-00
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:34:36 +0100
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:34:36 +0100
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040113063436.GA28270@neuron.tuke.sk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
From: Jozef Babjak <babjak@neuron.tuke.sk>
Subject: undefined reference to pthread_cond_init during many ports
	compilation
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: babjak@neuron.tuke.sk
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:34:54 -0000

Hi all, 

I installed FreeBSD-4.9 Release, CVSup-ed system sources according to 
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile and ports according to 
/usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile yesterday. Updating by make buildworld, make 
buildkernel, make installkernel and shutdown now and make installworld was fine and without 
any errors. Now I'm trying to install applications from CVSup-ed ports collection and lot 
of installations ends with the same error (this one from /usr/ports/graphics/gimp1):

/usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_cond_signal'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXThrStub.so.6: undefined reference to `_Xthr_zero_stu                          
b_'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to `pthread_cond_broadcas                          
t'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXThrStub.so.6: undefined reference to `_Xthr_self_stu                          
b_'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_cond_init'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_mutex_unlock'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_self'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_mutex_destroy'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_mutex_lock'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_cond_wait'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_cond_destroy'
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_mutex_init'
gmake: *** [bin/gs] Error 1
*** Error code 2

Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gnu.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/print/cups-pstoraster.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/print/gimp-print.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/gimp1.


I obtain the same end of installation trials of XFree86-4-Server, KDE3... 

My system:

[babjak]{~}<7:32:39>uname -a
FreeBSD cronin.chtf.stuba.sk 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #0: Mon Jan 12 16:03:27 CET 2004     
root@cronin.chtf.stuba.sk:/usr/src/sys/compile/KERONIN  i386
[babjak]{~}<7:32:41>

Oh, it's terrible to spend all day by unsuccessful installations. :-(

Jozef Babjak. 

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 22:47:11 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A67C16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:47:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from neuron.tuke.sk (neuron-ai.fei.tuke.sk [147.232.24.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484A743D64
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:47:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from babjak@neuron.tuke.sk)
Received: from babjak by neuron.tuke.sk with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AgIKP-0007bG-00
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:47:05 +0100
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:47:05 +0100
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040113064705.GA28765@neuron.tuke.sk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
From: Jozef Babjak <babjak@neuron.tuke.sk>
Subject: ad3 turns to ad1 after kernel update
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: babjak@neuron.tuke.sk
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:47:11 -0000

Hi all!

I updated kernel on my system:

[babjak]{~}<7:32:39>uname -a
FreeBSD cronin.chtf.stuba.sk 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #0: Mon Jan 12 16:03:27 CET 2004     
root@cronin.chtf.stuba.sk:/usr/src/sys/compile/KERONIN  i386
[babjak]{~}<7:32:41>

I have one CD-ROM and two hard disk which is connected:

  PRIMARY MASTER: HD Western Digital Caviar 40GB (this holds system)  
   PRIMARY SLAVE: none
SECONDARY MASTER: CD-RW PLEXTOR CD-R PX-W5224A
 SECONDARY SLAVE: HD Western Digital Caviar 6.4GB (backup files)

The smaller disk was /dev/ad3 before, but after the kernel update it turns to /dev/ad1. 
Why? (When I boot a GENERIC kernel now, the disk is /dev/ad3 back.)

Jozef Babjak. 

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 22:57:37 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954F116A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:57:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504C543D68
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:57:33 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au)
Received: from chowder.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0D6vSQ9091344;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:27:28 +1030 (CST)
	(envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au)
From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
To: babjak@neuron-ai.fei.tuke.sk, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:27:27 +1030
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <20040113064705.GA28765@neuron.tuke.sk>
In-Reply-To: <20040113064705.GA28765@neuron.tuke.sk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401131727.27592.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
X-Spam-Score: -4.4 ()
	CARRIAGE_RETURNS,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
Subject: Re: ad3 turns to ad1 after kernel update
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:57:37 -0000

On Tuesday 13 January 2004 17:17, Jozef Babjak wrote:
> I have one CD-ROM and two hard disk which is connected:
>
>   PRIMARY MASTER: HD Western Digital Caviar 40GB (this holds system)
>    PRIMARY SLAVE: none
> SECONDARY MASTER: CD-RW PLEXTOR CD-R PX-W5224A
>  SECONDARY SLAVE: HD Western Digital Caviar 6.4GB (backup files)
>
> The smaller disk was /dev/ad3 before, but after the kernel update it turns
> to /dev/ad1. Why? (When I boot a GENERIC kernel now, the disk is /dev/ad3
> back.)

Did you comment or uncomment the ATA_STATIC_ID option?

This will cause ATA controller numbers to move around..

The output of dmesg before and after (if possible) would be useful too.

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140  AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 12 23:01:00 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E90816A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:01:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.dss.com.ua (dss.zaporozhye.net [217.151.239.34])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C52343D3F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:00:55 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from art@dss.com.ua)
Received: from art.oaodss.net ([172.16.4.50] helo=dss.com.ua)
	by mail.dss.com.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD)
	id 1AgIXE-000Kj7-L6; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:00:20 +0200
Message-ID: <4003979E.80406@dss.com.ua>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:00:46 +0200
From: Arthur Filobok <art@dss.com.ua>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: babjak@neuron.tuke.sk
References: <20040113064705.GA28765@neuron.tuke.sk>
In-Reply-To: <20040113064705.GA28765@neuron.tuke.sk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ad3 turns to ad1 after kernel update
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:01:00 -0000

Jozef Babjak wrote:

>Hi all!
>
>I updated kernel on my system:
>
>[babjak]{~}<7:32:39>uname -a
>FreeBSD cronin.chtf.stuba.sk 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #0: Mon Jan 12 16:03:27 CET 2004     
>root@cronin.chtf.stuba.sk:/usr/src/sys/compile/KERONIN  i386
>[babjak]{~}<7:32:41>
>
>I have one CD-ROM and two hard disk which is connected:
>
>  PRIMARY MASTER: HD Western Digital Caviar 40GB (this holds system)  
>   PRIMARY SLAVE: none
>SECONDARY MASTER: CD-RW PLEXTOR CD-R PX-W5224A
> SECONDARY SLAVE: HD Western Digital Caviar 6.4GB (backup files)
>
>The smaller disk was /dev/ad3 before, but after the kernel update it turns to /dev/ad1. 
>Why? (When I boot a GENERIC kernel now, the disk is /dev/ad3 back.)
>
>Jozef Babjak. 
>  
>
Hello.
Insert
options        ATA_STATIC_ID
 in your kernel config, recompile and reinstall kernel, then reboot.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
With best regards
Arthur Filobok
JSC "Dneprospecstal"

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 02:13:10 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A6416A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:13:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from redix.it (host49-169.pool8172.interbusiness.it [81.72.169.49])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A79D443D2D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:13:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from roberto@redix.it)
Received: (qmail 26109 invoked by uid 72); 13 Jan 2004 10:13:02 -0000
Received: from 192.168.0.77
        (SquirrelMail authenticated user roberto)
        by mail.redix.it with HTTP;
        Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:13:02 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <1103.192.168.0.77.1073988782.squirrel@mail.redix.it>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:13:02 +0100 (CET)
From: roberto@redix.it
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
Subject: #2 - Swapped disks and now stuck in the mountroot> prompt
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:13:10 -0000



Date: 12 jan 2004

I've installed FreeBSD 4.9 on a ide0:0 (primary IDE, master hd) then
ported the hard disk on a second PC and installed as ide1:0 (secondary
IDE, master hd) without update the "/etc/fstab" file.

When booting the kernel start probing devices, I see the disk as "ad2"
then the kernel halts when trying to mount the root file system with the
following message:

       mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
       root mount failed: 6

At the prompt I've tried with "ufs:/dev/ad2s1a", now the right device, but
it does not work.

The solution is to instruct the kernel with the right device: but ad2s1a
seems to be wrong...

After several attempts I discover that the kernel must be started with the
option "-a": with this flag the device "ufs:/dev/ad2s1a" is accepted by
"mountroot> " and the boot proceed. Than I can change the fstab
accordingly to make the change permanent.

My question are:
 1) I've made any mistake ?
 2) Without the boot "-a" flag, why the kernel ask me a device and even it
is the correct one vfs_conf.c:vfs_mountroot_ask() give me the error code
6?


Thanks
Roberto


From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 07:19:49 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A9916A4CF
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:19:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D731B43D60
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:19:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by woozle.rinet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DFJFNq097596
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:19:15 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:19:15 +0300 (MSK)
From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To: stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040113181214.C95352@woozle.rinet.ru>
X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: /kernel: ipfw: pullup failed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:19:49 -0000

Dear colleagues,

for last couple of hours I've encountered random TCP packets drops (most
visible as ssh sessions lockups) and random kernel messages about "pullup
failed"

marck@gw-f:~> netstat -m
1051/1584/32768 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
        1050 mbufs allocated to data
        1 mbufs allocated to packet headers
1047/1582/16384 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
3560 Kbytes allocated to network (8% of mb_map in use)
0 requests for memory denied
0 requests for memory delayed
0 calls to protocol drain routines

Quick googling shows me
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-net@freebsd.org/msg10291.html which has not
been answered by luigi


Any thoughts?

Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 07:40:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E074716A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:40:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.macomnet.ru (relay.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B675D43D2D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:40:29 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru)
Received: from news1.macomnet.ru (2p2z53lx@news1.macomnet.ru [195.128.64.14])
	by relay.macomnet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DFeSsf1782191;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:40:28 +0300 (MSK)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:40:28 +0300 (MSK)
From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru>
To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040113181214.C95352@woozle.rinet.ru>
Message-ID: <20040113183325.J55133@news1.macomnet.ru>
References: <20040113181214.C95352@woozle.rinet.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: /kernel: ipfw: pullup failed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:40:32 -0000

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, 18:19+0300, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:

> Dear colleagues,
>
> for last couple of hours I've encountered random TCP packets drops (most
> visible as ssh sessions lockups) and random kernel messages about "pullup
> failed"

tcpdump of these sessions would be helpful.

> marck@gw-f:~> netstat -m
> 1051/1584/32768 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
>         1050 mbufs allocated to data
>         1 mbufs allocated to packet headers
> 1047/1582/16384 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
> 3560 Kbytes allocated to network (8% of mb_map in use)
> 0 requests for memory denied
> 0 requests for memory delayed
> 0 calls to protocol drain routines
>
> Quick googling shows me
> http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-net@freebsd.org/msg10291.html which has not
> been answered by luigi

The patch is incorrect.

-- 
Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 07:49:36 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BE3116A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:49:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mutare.noc.clara.net (mutare.noc.clara.net [195.8.70.95])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C243F43D49
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:49:33 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ollie@mutare.noc.clara.net)
Received: from ollie by mutare.noc.clara.net with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AgQnM-0005WS-Qt
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:49:32 +0000
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:49:32 +0000
From: Ollie Cook <ollie@uk.clara.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040113154932.GE354@mutare.noc.clara.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE i386
X-NCC-RegID: uk.claranet
Sender: Ollie Cook <ollie@mutare.noc.clara.net>
X-Envelope-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Clara-Scan: content scanned according to recipient preferences
Subject: nfs send errors 32 and 35 on RELENG_4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:49:36 -0000

Hi,

For a while I have been seeing errors of this nature on a cluster of i386
FreeBSD RELENG_4 hosts which mount a volume from a NetApp F825 filer using
NFSv3 over a mixture of UDP and TCP, depending on whether the host is on the
same local LAN as the filer or not:

Jan 13 14:02:02 mese /kernel: nfs server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail: not responding
Jan 13 14:02:03 mese /kernel: nfs server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail: is alive again

The messages are logged with alarming regularity, but don't seem to actually
have any bearing on the performance or availablility of the volume. My full
findings are in my initial post to freebsd-net, which has been archived here:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=178585+184466+/usr/local/www/db/text/2004/freebsd-net/20040111.freebsd-net

However more recently, and especially today, I am seeing errors which *are*
affecting the availability of the mount point on one of the hosts in question:

Jan 13 14:09:37 mese /kernel: nfs send error 35 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail
Jan 13 14:09:42 mese /kernel: nfs send error 35 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail
Jan 13 14:09:47 mese /kernel: nfs send error 35 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail
Jan 13 14:09:52 mese /kernel: nfs send error 35 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail
Jan 13 14:09:53 mese /kernel: nfs send error 32 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail

We are running version 1.60.2.6 of nfs_socket.c, which is generating this
message. Looking at the CVS Web Repository, that seems to be the latest version
for RELENG_4.

A quick google suggests that error 32 is 'OK' in the sense that the TCP
connection should be reestablished and things can pick up where they left
off[1], but I can't find what causes error 35. 35 seems to be the more abundant
error, in any case.

The symptoms on the hosts when these errors occur are:

 - processes accessing files on the remote volume get stuck in disk wait,
   specifically their state is 'nfsrcv'.
 - even when all processes accessing volume are killed, and lsof shows no
   open files on the volume, "umount /vol" claims the device is busy.
 - a "umount -f" hangs and the umount process can't be killed.
 - however, after a "umount -f", /vol is not listed in "mount" or "df"
 - similarly, trying to then mount the volume, "mount" hangs and can't be
   killed, and the volume does not appear in "mount" or "df" (in fact, df
   hangs too. Presumably as it's trying to work out available space etc.)
 - a tcpdump between client and server doesn't show any NFS traffic at all
   being emitted by the client, although IP connectivity to the server is
   maintained, and other hosts are able to still talk NFS to it happily.

I tried to reboot the host in question to restore service, but it stayed
multi-user. The host was in a remote data centre so in the end it had to be
power cycled. The host wasn't on console so I wasn't able to determine why it
stayed multi-user.

I'm at a loss as to how to further debug this. It occurs to me that determining
what error 35 is would be helpful. :) I've looked in a book that I have
available[2], but it lists neither error 32 nor 35. Is there an up-to-date list
of NFSv3 errors anywhere? 

At this stage, any and all advice on where to look and what data I can usefully
retrieve that would help analyse this problem would be gratefully received.

Cheers,

Ollie

1: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2003-July/001988.html
2: NFS Illustrated, Brent Callaghan, First Printing, ISBN 0-201-32570-5

-- 
Oliver Cook    Systems Administrator, Claranet UK
ollie@uk.clara.net               +44 20 7903 3065

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 07:55:30 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1245916A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:55:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp3.sentex.ca (smtp3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89A043D2D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:55:12 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18])
	by smtp3.sentex.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DFt8U7010723;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:55:08 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27])
	by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0DFt8Xw015969;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:55:08 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040113105047.0897df68@209.112.4.2>
X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:54:16 -0500
To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>, stable@freebsd.org
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040113181214.C95352@woozle.rinet.ru>
References: <20040113181214.C95352@woozle.rinet.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Subject: Re: /kernel: ipfw: pullup failed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:55:30 -0000


What is the output of
  sysctl net.inet.ip | grep queue

Do you have any errors on your ethernet ?  what does netstat -ni show ?

         ---Mike


At 10:19 AM 13/01/2004, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
>Dear colleagues,
>
>for last couple of hours I've encountered random TCP packets drops (most
>visible as ssh sessions lockups) and random kernel messages about "pullup
>failed"
>
>marck@gw-f:~> netstat -m
>1051/1584/32768 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
>         1050 mbufs allocated to data
>         1 mbufs allocated to packet headers
>1047/1582/16384 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
>3560 Kbytes allocated to network (8% of mb_map in use)
>0 requests for memory denied
>0 requests for memory delayed
>0 calls to protocol drain routines
>
>Quick googling shows me
>http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-net@freebsd.org/msg10291.html which 
>has not
>been answered by luigi
>
>
>Any thoughts?
>
>Sincerely,
>D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 09:39:26 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012BA16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:39:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4822D43D69
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:39:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 39DD972DC7; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:39:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 376CB72DB5; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:39:20 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:39:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: kblists@comcast.net
In-Reply-To: <011220042359.23426.2438@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <20040113093832.P63000@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <011220042359.23426.2438@comcast.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:39:26 -0000

On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 kblists@comcast.net wrote:

> Thanks to Stuart Barkley detailed suggestion:
>
> >(From memory, YMMV) Reboot for the installation CD into sysinstall.
> >Select "Configure"  then "Fdisk".  In fdisk select "W" this will cause
> >the MBR to be rewritten correctly (I always select the FreeBSD boot
> >manager, I don't know if that is necessary).
>
> I was able to get my 4.9 to boot.

I wonder if this is resetting some bogus boot0 option. THere is a
boot0cfg.exe on the CD I think... wonder if that could be used to rectify
things.  I'd have to reproduce it, which I can't :)

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 10:59:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2762016A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:59:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from steeltoe.niceboots.com (steeltoe.niceboots.com
	[66.117.154.154])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7AB43D49
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:59:36 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tenebrae_BSD@niceboots.com)
Received: from steeltoe.niceboots.com (tenebrae@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i0DJ24QK036674;	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:02:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tenebrae_BSD@niceboots.com)
Received: from localhost (tenebrae@localhost)i0DJ22QY036670;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:02:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Authentication-Warning: steeltoe.niceboots.com: tenebrae owned process doing
	-bs
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:02:01 -0800 (PST)
From: Tenebrae <tenebrae_BSD@niceboots.com>
X-X-Sender: tenebrae@steeltoe.niceboots.com
To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20040112082548.0423eff0@127.0.0.1>
Message-ID: <20040113105534.R36474@steeltoe.niceboots.com>
References: <6.0.0.22.0.20040112082548.0423eff0@127.0.0.1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: RELENG_4 crash: UDMA100 drive on with old UDMA33 controller
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:59:40 -0000

On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:

> I am having problems with RELENG_4 (cvsup last night) crashing.  I
> recently purchased a WDC WD1600JB (160GB) disk drive to attach to my
> trusty, old home server:
>  ASUS P5A-B Motherboard with integrated Acer UDMA33 controller
>  Fujitsu MPC3032AT/6018 (3GB) disk drive (channel 0 master)
>  FX322M/w03 CDROM drive (channel 0 slave)
>
> I presently have the WD1600JB was added as the channel 1 master
> (no slave).  It is connected to the controller using the 80
> conductor/40-pin cable provided with the drive.  (I've also
> tried to setups with the WD1600JB replacing the CDROM drive
> as slave on channel 0, using both 80/40 and 40/40 cable with
> like results.)  I have configured the BIOS (as directed in
> the WDC documents) for C/H/S for 1023/16/63 (528M).
>
> RELENG_4 sees that a UDMA100 drive is connected to ata1 and
> tries fallback to UDMA33 and then to PIO4.  This is the last
> page of messages (which shows the panic).  I'll try to type
> in more if this isn't enough (sorry, but I don't a laplink
> cable handy):
>
> ad2: trying fallback to PIO mode
> ata1: resetting devices .. done
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> fault virtual address	= 0x78007a
> fault code		= supervisor read, page not present
> instruction pointer	= 0x8:0xc018760e
> stack pointer		= 0x10:0xc03b9314
> frame pointer		= 0x10:0xc02931c
> code segment		= base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
> 			= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
> processor eflags	= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
> current process	= Idle
> interrupt mask		= bio
> trap number		= 12
> panic: page fault
>
> This seems to be related problems others have noted with regards
> to Acer UDMA33 controller and RELENG_4.  It does seem specific
> to 4.x as tests against 4.8 failed same as above yet tests against
> FreeBSD 5.2 and NetBSD 1.6 were okay.

I haven't really noticed a problem with crashing or panics, but I do
have the resetting devices errors show up in my logs quite a bit.
I had thought it was just related to the [expletive deleted] IBM drives,
but it would seem that you are using the same motherboard I am.
I keep meaning to just purchase a UDMA-100 controller card to stick in
there...but now my server's on the other side of the continent from me.
Ah well.
Me too, almost.
								-Tenebrae.
---
The sending of any unsolicited email advertising messages to this domain
may result in the imposition of civil liability against you in accordance
with Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code Section 17538.45.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 10:31:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A61416A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:31:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hotmail.com (bay1-f150.bay1.hotmail.com [65.54.245.150])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368AD43D41
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:31:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from digo_x_ng@hotmail.com)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:31:16 -0800
Received: from 211.148.194.45 by by1fd.bay1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:31:16 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [211.148.194.45]
X-Originating-Email: [digo_x_ng@hotmail.com]
X-Sender: digo_x_ng@hotmail.com
From: =?gb2312?B?zuIgz/7R9A==?= <digo_x_ng@hotmail.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:31:16 +0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312; format=flowed
Message-ID: <BAY1-F150IlNNFRarAJ00016929@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2004 18:31:16.0868 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[6E69A440:01C3DA03]
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:08:53 -0800
Subject: Build kernel VOP_UNLOCK error
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:31:18 -0000

/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function 
`union_lookup':
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: `td' 
undeclared (first use in this function)
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: (Each 
undeclared identifier is reported only once
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: for 
each function it appears in.)
vnode_if.h:876: warning: inlining failed in call to `VOP_UNLOCK'
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: 
warning: called from here
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function 
`union_inactive':
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1705: 
warning: unused variable `vpp'
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function 
`union_unlock':
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1803: 
warning: unused variable `un'
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/union.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/sys/compile/digo

the problem is cvsup after
please reply digo@21cn.com

_________________________________________________________________
ÓëÁŞ»úµÄĹóÓŃ˝řĐĐ˝»Á÷Ł¬ÇëĘąÓĂ MSN Messenger:  http://messenger.msn.com/cn  

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 11:13:44 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2AB16A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:13:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BDB43D6B
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:13:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by woozle.rinet.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DJDfNq060668
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:13:41 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from marck@rinet.ru)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:13:41 +0300 (MSK)
From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>
To: stable@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20040113181214.C95352@woozle.rinet.ru>
Message-ID: <20040113221234.C24207@woozle.rinet.ru>
References: <20040113181214.C95352@woozle.rinet.ru>
X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: /kernel: ipfw: pullup failed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:13:44 -0000

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:

DM> for last couple of hours I've encountered random TCP packets drops (most
DM> visible as ssh sessions lockups) and random kernel messages about "pullup
DM> failed"

False (or, more precisely, coincident) alarm: real problem lies somewhere under
hardware and software driving rl 8139 (planned to be replaced by fxp ;-)


Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 11:40:11 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E9416A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:40:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AE243D46
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:40:00 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E831F72DBF; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:39:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E601772DB5; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:39:59 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:39:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: Jozef Babjak <babjak@neuron.tuke.sk>
In-Reply-To: <20040113063436.GA28270@neuron.tuke.sk>
Message-ID: <20040113113739.W63732@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <20040113063436.GA28270@neuron.tuke.sk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: 
 Re: undefined reference to pthread_cond_init during many ports
 compilation
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:40:11 -0000

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Jozef Babjak wrote:

> I installed FreeBSD-4.9 Release, CVSup-ed system sources according to
> /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile and ports according to
> /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile yesterday. Updating by make
> buildworld, make buildkernel, make installkernel and shutdown now and
> make installworld was fine and without any errors. Now I'm trying to
> install applications from CVSup-ed ports collection and lot of
> installations ends with the same error (this one from
> /usr/ports/graphics/gimp1):
>
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_cond_signal'
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXThrStub.so.6: undefined reference to `_Xthr_zero_stu
> b_'
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so: undefined reference to `pthread_cond_broadcas
> t'
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXThrStub.so.6: undefined reference to `_Xthr_self_stu
> b_'
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_cond_init'
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_mutex_unlock'
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_self'
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_mutex_destroy'
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_mutex_lock'
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_cond_wait'
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_cond_destroy'
> /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so: undefined reference to `pthread_mutex_init'

There appear to be multipe issues here.  XThrStub is getting pulled in,
yet -lc_r wasn't selected so the pthread stuff is missing. Since you're
building this from a port, it looks like the port is broken.  Try updating
the port and rebuilding.

I'd have to see the command line (prior to the errors) to make sure the
libraries were selected properly.

> [babjak]{~}<7:32:39>uname -a
> FreeBSD cronin.chtf.stuba.sk 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #0: Mon Jan 12 16:03:27 CET 2004
> root@cronin.chtf.stuba.sk:/usr/src/sys/compile/KERONIN  i386

This all works on -current, but that has special handling WRT threads.

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 11:50:42 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDCC16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:50:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1750843D1F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:50:41 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 0A86072DC7; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:50:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0874F72DBF; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:50:41 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:50:41 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: Ollie Cook <ollie@uk.clara.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040113154932.GE354@mutare.noc.clara.net>
Message-ID: <20040113114525.L63732@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <20040113154932.GE354@mutare.noc.clara.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: nfs send errors 32 and 35 on RELENG_4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:50:43 -0000

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Ollie Cook wrote:

> For a while I have been seeing errors of this nature on a cluster of i386
> FreeBSD RELENG_4 hosts which mount a volume from a NetApp F825 filer using
> NFSv3 over a mixture of UDP and TCP, depending on whether the host is on the
> same local LAN as the filer or not:
>
> Jan 13 14:02:02 mese /kernel: nfs server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail: not responding
> Jan 13 14:02:03 mese /kernel: nfs server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail: is alive again

There's some tuning options for this, which I don't immediately recall.
Under heavy load these are somewhat normal.

> Jan 13 14:09:37 mese /kernel: nfs send error 35 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail
> Jan 13 14:09:42 mese /kernel: nfs send error 35 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail
> Jan 13 14:09:47 mese /kernel: nfs send error 35 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail
> Jan 13 14:09:52 mese /kernel: nfs send error 35 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail
> Jan 13 14:09:53 mese /kernel: nfs send error 32 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail

These errors tend to imply resource shortages. Monitor netstat -m output
and make sure you aren't running out of mbuf or mbuf clusters. Also check
for network errors and dropped packets (netstat -s, switch statistics).

Are you running rpc.lockd?

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 12:48:28 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E561E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:48:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80C743D1D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:47:40 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from fj@panix.com)
Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5])
	by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1961498381
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:47:38 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from fj@localhost)
	by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i0DKlcn15817
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:47:38 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:47:38 -0500
From: Joe Altman <fj@panix.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040113204738.GA14543@panix.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Joe Altman <fj@panix.com>,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: make buildkernel KERNCONF errors...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:48:29 -0000

joe on anna ~ $: uname -a
FreeBSD anna.chthonixia.net 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #1: Thu Jan
1 12:56:25 EST 2004 root@anna.chthonixia.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ANNA i386

/usr/src I AM ROOT ttyp5 # make buildkernel KERNCONF=ANNA

At about Tue Jan 13 15:46:02 EST 2004 proceeds normally until:

cc -O -pipe -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ANNA/opt_global.h -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I-  -I. -I@ -I@/../include  -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes  -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual  -fformat-extensions -ansi -c
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_lookup':
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: `td' undeclared (first use in this function)
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: for each function it appears in.)
vnode_if.h:876: warning: inlining failed in call to `VOP_UNLOCK'
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: warning: called from here
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_inactive':
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1705: warning: unused variable `vpp'
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_unlock':
/usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1803: warning: unused variable `un'
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/union.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ANNA.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1

-- 
The George W. Bush Five Point Economic Recovery Plan:
	      Hunt, Kill, Eat, Hump, Shit.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 12:56:05 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F2BCD16A4CE; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:56:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org
	(adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.123.122])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E274443D1F; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:56:01 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from david@catwhisker.org)
Received: from bunrab.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i0DKu1Gc011392;	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:56:01 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from david@bunrab.catwhisker.org)
Received: (from david@localhost)
	by bunrab.catwhisker.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0DKu1YO011391;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:56:01 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from david)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:56:01 -0800 (PST)
From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
Message-Id: <200401132056.i0DKu1YO011391@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
To: fj@panix.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <20040113204738.GA14543@panix.com>
cc: das@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: make buildkernel KERNCONF errors...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:56:05 -0000

Arrggh...  I got so used to -STABLE being, well, "stable" that I sent the
patch to fix this off to -current instead of -stable.  Sorry....  :-(

Anyway, this worked for me on 2 machines, but I don't actually use
unionfs on either one:

Index: sys/miscfs/union/union_vnops.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/freebsd/src/sys/miscfs/union/Attic/union_vnops.c,v
retrieving revision 1.72.2.2
diff -u -r1.72.2.2 union_vnops.c
--- sys/miscfs/union/union_vnops.c	13 Jan 2004 06:51:55 -0000	1.72.2.2
+++ sys/miscfs/union/union_vnops.c	13 Jan 2004 14:02:09 -0000
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@
 		 */
 		if (*ap->a_vpp != dvp) {
 			if (!lockparent || (cnp->cn_flags & ISLASTCN) == 0)
-				VOP_UNLOCK(dvp, 0, td);
+				VOP_UNLOCK(dvp, 0, p);
 		}
 
 		if (cnp->cn_namelen == 1 &&


And copying a note from my misdirected post:

["td" is a "struct *thread", from KSE.  What's defined earlier in the
source is "struct *proc p".]

Peace,
david
-- 
David H. Wolfskill				david@catwhisker.org
If you want true virus-protection for your PC, install a non-Microsoft OS
on it.  Plausible candidates include FreeBSD, Linux, NetBSD, OpenBSD, and
Solaris (in alphabetical order).

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 13:33:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48B216A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:33:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from VARK.homeunix.com (adsl-68-124-78-95.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net
	[68.124.78.95])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8946E43D6A
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:33:35 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from VARK.homeunix.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by VARK.homeunix.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DLXOKu014684;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:33:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: (from das@localhost)
	by VARK.homeunix.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0DLXOTk014683;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:33:24 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:33:24 -0800
From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>
Message-ID: <20040113213324.GA14556@VARK.homeunix.com>
Mail-Followup-To: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org>,
	fj@panix.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <20040113204738.GA14543@panix.com>
	<200401132056.i0DKu1YO011391@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200401132056.i0DKu1YO011391@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
cc: fj@panix.com
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: make buildkernel KERNCONF errors...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:33:40 -0000

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004, David Wolfskill wrote:
> Anyway, this worked for me on 2 machines, but I don't actually use
> unionfs on either one:
> 
> Index: sys/miscfs/union/union_vnops.c

Thanks, and sorry about the botch.  I just committed a fix.

I had decided to test this patch under my free copy of VirtualPC
(new toy!), but since NFS didn't immediately work over the virtual
network, I copied the merged sources, fixed the bug when I
encountered it, and forgot to copy them back.  Whups.  But the
biggest whups of all was using VirtualPC at all---the buildworld
took close to 20 hours on a P3-450.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 13:47:37 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 92E8C16A4CE; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:47:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org
	[192.58.184.34])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D3D0343D41; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:47:35 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i0DLlZLO049187;	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:47:35 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i0DLlZ06049186;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:47:35 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:47:35 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200401132147.i0DLlZ06049186@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org>
X-Authentication-Warning: triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org: des set sender to
	Tinderbox <des+tinderbox@freebsd.org> using -f
Sender: Tinderbox <des+tinderbox@freebsd.org>
From: Tinderbox <des+tinderbox@freebsd.org>
To: stable@freebsd.org, alpha@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk
Subject: [releng_4 tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:47:37 -0000

TB --- 2004-01-13 21:06:15 - tinderbox 2.2 running on triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org
TB --- 2004-01-13 21:06:15 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2004-01-13 21:06:15 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src
TB --- 2004-01-13 21:11:02 - building world
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src
TB --- /usr/bin/make -B buildworld
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
>>> stage 2: rebuilding the object tree
>>> stage 2: build tools
>>> stage 3: cross tools
>>> stage 4: populating /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/obj/alpha/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/i386/usr/include
>>> stage 4: building libraries
>>> stage 4: make dependencies
>>> stage 4: building everything..
TB --- 2004-01-13 21:43:20 - building generic kernel
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src
TB --- /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC
>>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Tue Jan 13 21:43:20 GMT 2004
[...]
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: for each function it appears in.)
vnode_if.h:876: warning: inlining failed in call to `VOP_UNLOCK'
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: warning: called from here
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_inactive':
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1705: warning: unused variable `vpp'
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_unlock':
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1803: warning: unused variable `un'
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules/union.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/modules.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/obj/alpha/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src/sys/GENERIC.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/alpha/alpha/src.
TB --- 2004-01-13 21:47:35 - TB --- /usr/bin/make returned exit code  1 
TB --- 2004-01-13 21:47:35 - TB --- ERROR: failed to build generic kernel
TB --- 2004-01-13 21:47:35 - tinderbox aborted

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 14:08:24 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DFC616A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:08:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.gn.apc.org (greennet1.poptel.org.uk [213.55.2.205])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E6543D48
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:07:57 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from martin@rakupottery.org.uk)
Received: from localhost (unknown [192.168.0.2])
	by mail.gn.apc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663BD14B711
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:07:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from saturn.rakupottery.org.uk (unknown [212.248.151.108])
	by mail.gn.apc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A582C14B6F8
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:07:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: by saturn.rakupottery.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4D49C55A7; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:06:30 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:06:30 +0000
From: Martin Smith <martin@rakupottery.org.uk>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040113220630.GA831@rakupottery.org.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: Martin Smith <martin@rakupottery.org.uk>,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <20040113200055.CDB8D16A5D8@hub.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040113200055.CDB8D16A5D8@hub.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:08:24 -0000

> On Tuesday 17 April 2018 2:10 pm, Kevin Berrien wrote:
> 
> Please don't cross post, it's confusing.
> 
> > I can confirm an issue posted Dec 3rd, freebsd-stable maillist, titled
> > "4.9 install buglet".
> >
> > I experience this bug running the install (various configurations) 100%
> > of the time.  After install, after system reboot, the boot loader comes
> > up with F1: FreeBSD, and reboots continually forever.  To test, I made 3
> > installs without issue using 4.8.  So first, I'd like to confirm the bug
> > report, and ask the following.
> >
> > In his "buglet" post, Ian noted the following work around.
> >
> > > Work around.  Force write in label screen (or rewrite MBR
> > > and label post reboot)
> >
> > Looking at fdisk, and the label utility I see nothing option along these
> > lines.  Could someone explain to me what/how to do this?
> >
> > Has anyone else seen this apparently prevalent issue?
> 
> Clearly this is not prevalent. If the majority of installs showed this problem 
> there would be more than one previous post, or at least a reply. Or to put it 
> another way. If it's prevalent, why ask if anyone else has seen it? Perhaps 
> you meant something else.
> 
> There must be something specific to the hardware and/or the installation 
> method that causes this to happen to us (only). This is why I called it a 
> buglet rather than a bug.

What a coincidence I might say as yesterday I installed 4.9-R on QDI P61440BX/BIS(Intel BX chipset) mobo and got exactly the same thing, except I had chosen the second install a standard bootsector? which is what I normally choose, machine passed through bios just fine after installation, then immediate reboot after "updated ESCD successfully...", round and round in circles, I thought I had a hardware problem, the machine was gift and is destined to be a small samba server for one of the NGO's that I support. This is incidentally the 4th machine I have put 4.9 on in as many weeks, and is the first install I have ever had any problem with since 2.2.6. I followed the advice to reinsert the boot cd and go back to fdisk and press w, it worked perfectly when rebooted the next time.
-- 
Martin Smith

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 14:08:53 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF3116A4E6
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:08:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F75943D72
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:08:27 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from fj@panix.com)
Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5])
	by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE1F983E3
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:08:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from fj@localhost)
	by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i0DM8Qt27147
	for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:08:26 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:08:26 -0500
From: Joe Altman <fj@panix.com>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-ID: <20040113220825.GA25495@panix.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Joe Altman <fj@panix.com>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <20040113204738.GA14543@panix.com>
	<200401132056.i0DKu1YO011391@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
	<20040113213324.GA14556@VARK.homeunix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040113213324.GA14556@VARK.homeunix.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: Re: make buildkernel KERNCONF errors...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:08:53 -0000

In this context, "...committed a fix.." means something like:

"I applied a patch to the root of a CVS source tree, and it will dist
over the next 24-48 hours to all of the relevant CVSUP machines. Try
to upgrade sources at intervals over this time period; if it fails
after this interim, send another heads-up."

I ask because in the three years I've used FreeBSD, I've never seen
this type of failure, so I'm not at all informed WRT the parameters
and such about the fix.

Feel free to redirect to -questions; I only ask here because I'm not
sure if either of the two respondents read -questions.

Thanks for your help, David and David...

fj

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:33:24PM -0800, David Schultz wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2004, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > Anyway, this worked for me on 2 machines, but I don't actually use
> > unionfs on either one:
> > 
> > Index: sys/miscfs/union/union_vnops.c
> 
> Thanks, and sorry about the botch.  I just committed a fix.
> 
> I had decided to test this patch under my free copy of VirtualPC
> (new toy!), but since NFS didn't immediately work over the virtual
> network, I copied the merged sources, fixed the bug when I
> encountered it, and forgot to copy them back.  Whups.  But the
> biggest whups of all was using VirtualPC at all---the buildworld
> took close to 20 hours on a P3-450.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 14:15:22 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A940616A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:15:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freeman.4gh.net
	(washdc3-ar5-4-64-188-157.washdc3.elnk.dsl.genuity.net [4.64.188.157])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49C143D5E
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:14:05 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from stuartb@4gh.net)
Received: from localhost (stuartb@localhost)
	by freeman.4gh.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0DME4vM080164;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:14:04 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from stuartb@4gh.net)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:14:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Stuart Barkley <stuartb@4gh.net>
To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040113093832.P63000@carver.gumbysoft.com>
Message-ID: <20040113155820.H386@freeman.4gh.net>
References: <011220042359.23426.2438@comcast.net>
	<20040113093832.P63000@carver.gumbysoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:15:22 -0000

On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 at 09:39 -0800, Doug White wrote:

> > >(From memory, YMMV) Reboot for the installation CD into
> > >sysinstall. Select "Configure"  then "Fdisk".  In fdisk select
> > >"W" this will cause the MBR to be rewritten correctly (I always
> > >select the FreeBSD boot manager, I don't know if that is
> > >necessary).
>
> I wonder if this is resetting some bogus boot0 option. THere is a
> boot0cfg.exe on the CD I think... wonder if that could be used to
> rectify things.  I'd have to reproduce it, which I can't :)

I had some time today to look at this further and have a few clues to
the problem.  I've repeated these tests a few times to try to isolate
the specifics of the problem.

I'm using a 40GB scratch disk for these tests.

Before the tests there was a working FreeBSD installation on the disk.

I'm using Disk 1 from the FreeBSD Mall FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE.

Boot from CD-ROM
Select Express Install
In fdisk select "A" to wipe all previous partitions and restart.
Select FreeBSD boot manager
In disklabel select "A" to get a default disk layout.
Select "minimal" installation set.
Skip all post installation configuration
Exit install

Upon restart I get the bootmgr prompt (F1 - FreeBSD)

Booting further causes the machine to restart the BIOS bootstrap
function into the "circular reboot"

Further testing shows the the boot0 blocks are identical between
working and failing modes.

I found the I could fix the problem before exiting the install process
by using F4 to go to the emergency shell reinstalling the bootstrap
blocks using:

% disklabel -B ad0

Before and after the fix I dumped the first 50000 sectors of ad0 and
have compared them.  It appears that there is one block of boot2
(0x1810-0x19ff) which was written as zeros instead of the correct
code.  A diff of the boot2 blocks is included below.  A full dump of
the differences between the first 50000 blocks of the bad and good ad0
is available at:

    http://www/4gh/net/volatile/ad0.full.diff

Note: There may be some disk geometry issues in play here.

When using a drive with a previously installed FreeBSD installation
there are no warnings about geometry problems.

However, once I wipe out the disk using sysinstall to delete the only
partition and selecting the standard boot manager.  A reinstallation
give a message similar to "Warning: geometry 77545/16/63 for ad0 is
incorrect.  Using a more likely geometry."

Stuart
-- 
http://www.4gh.net/tudor/resume.html

*** boot2.4.9R.hd.v	Tue Jan 13 16:12:30 2004
--- ad0.bad.boot2.hd.v	Tue Jan 13 16:13:03 2004
***************
*** 1,20 ****
! 00000000  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  00000010  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00000020  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00000030  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00000040  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  00000050  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  00000060  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  00000070  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00000080  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00000090  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000000a0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000000b0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  000000c0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000000d0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000000e0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000000f0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00000100  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  00000110  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  00000120  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  00000130  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
--- 1,20 ----
! 00000000  57 45 56 82 05 00 00 00  61 64 30 73 31 00 00 00  |WEV.....ad0s1...|
  00000010  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00000020  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 02 00 00 3f 00 00 00  |............?...|
! 00000030  ff 00 00 00 00 13 00 00  c1 3e 00 00 82 91 a8 04  |˙.......Á>....¨.|
! 00000040  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  10 0e 01 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  00000050  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  00000060  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  00000070  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00000080  00 00 00 00 57 45 56 82  88 3f 08 00 00 20 00 00  |....WEV..?... ..|
! 00000090  00 20 00 00 00 00 04 00  3f 00 00 00 00 08 00 00  |. ......?.......|
! 000000a0  07 08 5e 00 a0 83 1f 00  3f 00 04 00 00 00 00 00  |..^. ...?.......|
! 000000b0  01 00 00 00 82 91 a8 04  3f 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |......¨.?.......|
  000000c0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000000d0  00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00  df 83 23 00 00 08 00 00  |........ß.#.....|
! 000000e0  07 08 5e 00 00 00 08 00  df 83 2b 00 00 08 00 00  |..^.....ß.+.....|
! 000000f0  07 08 5e 00 e2 0d 75 04  df 83 33 00 00 08 00 00  |..^.â.u.ß.3.....|
! 00000100  07 08 59 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |..Y.............|
  00000110  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  00000120  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  00000130  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
***************
*** 383,419 ****
  000017e0  54 2a 00 00 ff 75 10 a1  54 2a 00 00 01 45 0c 8b  |T*..˙u.ˇT*...E..|
  000017f0  45 0c 50 ff 75 08 e8 81  01 00 00 8d 65 f4 5b 5e  |E.P˙u.č.....eô[^|
  00001800  5f c9 c2 0c 00 55 89 e5  83 ec 10 57 56 53 8b 7d  |_ÉÂ..U.ĺ.ě.WVS.}|
! 00001810  08 8d 75 0c e9 a6 00 00  00 83 f8 25 0f 85 97 00  |..u.é¦....ř%....|
! 00001820  00 00 0f be 07 47 83 f8  73 74 25 7f 0a 83 f8 63  |...ľ.G.řst%...řc|
! 00001830  74 11 e9 82 00 00 00 83  f8 75 74 30 83 f8 78 74  |t.é.....řut0.řxt|
! 00001840  2b eb 76 83 c6 04 ff 76  fc e8 87 00 00 00 eb 6f  |+ëv.Ć.˙vüč....ëo|
! 00001850  83 c6 04 8b 5e fc 80 3b  00 74 64 0f be 03 50 e8  |.Ć..^ü.;.td.ľ.Pč|
! 00001860  71 00 00 00 43 80 3b 00  75 f1 eb 53 c7 45 f0 10  |q...C.;.uńëSÇEđ.|
! 00001870  00 00 00 83 f8 75 75 07  c7 45 f0 0a 00 00 00 83  |....řuu.ÇEđ.....|
! 00001880  c6 04 8b 46 fc 8d 5d f4  31 d2 f7 75 f0 89 c1 8a  |Ć..Fü.]ô1Ň÷uđ.Á.|
! 00001890  82 f4 23 00 00 88 03 43  89 c8 85 c0 75 ea 4b 8d  |.ô#....C.Č.ŔuęK.|
! 000018a0  45 f4 39 c3 72 19 0f be  03 50 e8 26 00 00 00 4b  |Eô9Ăr..ľ.Pč&...K|
! 000018b0  8d 45 f4 39 c3 73 ef eb  06 50 e8 16 00 00 00 0f  |.Eô9Ăsďë.Pč.....|
! 000018c0  be 07 47 85 c0 0f 85 4e  ff ff ff 31 c0 8d 65 e4  |ľ.G.Ŕ..N˙˙˙1Ŕ.eä|
! 000018d0  5b 5e 5f c9 c3 55 89 e5  53 8b 5d 08 83 fb 0a 75  |[^_ÉĂU.ĺS.]..ű.u|
! 000018e0  07 6a 0d e8 a1 01 00 00  53 e8 9b 01 00 00 8b 5d  |.j.čˇ...Sč.....]|
! 000018f0  fc c9 c2 04 00 55 89 e5  56 53 8b 75 08 8b 55 10  |üÉÂ..U.ĺVS.u..U.|
! 00001900  89 f3 8b 4d 0c 85 d2 74  09 8a 01 88 03 41 43 4a  |.ó.M..Ňt.....ACJ|
! 00001910  75 f7 89 f0 5b 5e c9 c2  0c 00 55 89 e5 83 3d 3c  |u÷.đ[^ÉÂ..U.ĺ.=<|
! 00001920  2a 00 00 00 75 1f 8b 15  18 31 00 00 89 d0 03 05  |*...u....1...Đ..|
! 00001930  24 31 00 00 05 ff ff 00  00 25 00 00 ff ff 29 d0  |$1...˙˙..%..˙˙)Đ|
! 00001940  a3 3c 2a 00 00 a1 3c 2a  00 00 8b 55 08 01 c2 89  |Ł<*..ˇ<*...U..Â.|
! 00001950  15 3c 2a 00 00 c9 c2 04  00 55 89 e5 8b 45 08 a3  |.<*..ÉÂ..U.ĺ.E.Ł|
! 00001960  e4 30 00 00 c7 05 f8 30  00 00 00 88 00 00 e8 f5  |ä0..Ç.ř0......čő|
! 00001970  ef ff ff a1 f8 30 00 00  c9 c2 04 00 55 89 e5 57  |ď˙˙ˇř0..ÉÂ..U.ĺW|
! 00001980  56 53 8b 5d 08 8b 7d 0c  8b 75 10 a1 08 24 00 00  |VS.]..}..u.ˇ.$..|
! 00001990  c1 c0 08 a3 08 24 00 00  50 68 a4 23 00 00 e8 62  |ÁŔ.Ł.$..Ph¤#..čb|
! 000019a0  fe ff ff c7 05 e0 30 00  00 00 00 07 00 c7 05 e4  |ţ˙˙Ç.ŕ0......Ç.ä|
! 000019b0  30 00 00 25 07 00 00 89  d8 03 05 18 31 00 00 c1  |0..%....Ř...1..Á|
! 000019c0  e0 0c c1 e8 10 a3 e8 30  00 00 89 3d f8 30 00 00  |ŕ.Áč.Łč0...=ř0..|
! 000019d0  66 03 1d 18 31 00 00 89  d8 83 e0 0f a3 04 31 00  |f...1...Ř.ŕ.Ł.1.|
! 000019e0  00 89 f8 c1 e8 10 a3 fc  30 00 00 c1 e6 08 0b 35  |..řÁč.Łü0..Áć..5|
! 000019f0  40 2a 00 00 89 35 00 31  00 00 e8 69 ef ff ff c7  |@*...5.1..čiď˙˙Ç|
  00001a00  05 e0 30 00 00 00 00 04  00 83 c4 08 f6 05 08 31  |.ŕ0.......Ä.ö..1|
  00001a10  00 00 01 75 04 31 c0 eb  18 57 0f b6 05 f9 30 00  |...u.1Ŕë.W.¶.ů0.|
  00001a20  00 50 68 a8 23 00 00 e8  d9 fd ff ff b8 ff ff ff  |.Ph¨#..čŮý˙˙¸˙˙˙|
--- 383,419 ----
  000017e0  54 2a 00 00 ff 75 10 a1  54 2a 00 00 01 45 0c 8b  |T*..˙u.ˇT*...E..|
  000017f0  45 0c 50 ff 75 08 e8 81  01 00 00 8d 65 f4 5b 5e  |E.P˙u.č.....eô[^|
  00001800  5f c9 c2 0c 00 55 89 e5  83 ec 10 57 56 53 8b 7d  |_ÉÂ..U.ĺ.ě.WVS.}|
! 00001810  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001820  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001830  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001840  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001850  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001860  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001870  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001880  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001890  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000018a0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000018b0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000018c0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000018d0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000018e0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000018f0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001900  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001910  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001920  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001930  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001940  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001950  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001960  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001970  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001980  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 00001990  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000019a0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000019b0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000019c0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000019d0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000019e0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
! 000019f0  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  |................|
  00001a00  05 e0 30 00 00 00 00 04  00 83 c4 08 f6 05 08 31  |.ŕ0.......Ä.ö..1|
  00001a10  00 00 01 75 04 31 c0 eb  18 57 0f b6 05 f9 30 00  |...u.1Ŕë.W.¶.ů0.|
  00001a20  00 50 68 a8 23 00 00 e8  d9 fd ff ff b8 ff ff ff  |.Ph¨#..čŮý˙˙¸˙˙˙|

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 14:21:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B782E16A4CE; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:21:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org
	[192.58.184.34])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 615C743D48; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:21:49 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i0DMLmLO016964;	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:21:48 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i0DMLmZn016963;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:21:48 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:21:48 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200401132221.i0DMLmZn016963@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org>
X-Authentication-Warning: triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org: des set sender to
	Tinderbox <des+tinderbox@freebsd.org> using -f
Sender: Tinderbox <des+tinderbox@freebsd.org>
From: Tinderbox <des+tinderbox@freebsd.org>
To: stable@freebsd.org, i386@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk
Subject: [releng_4 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:21:51 -0000

TB --- 2004-01-13 21:47:35 - tinderbox 2.2 running on triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org
TB --- 2004-01-13 21:47:35 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2004-01-13 21:47:35 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src
TB --- 2004-01-13 21:50:33 - building world
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src
TB --- /usr/bin/make -B buildworld
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
>>> stage 2: rebuilding the object tree
>>> stage 2: build tools
>>> stage 3: cross tools
>>> stage 4: populating /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/i386/usr/include
>>> stage 4: building libraries
>>> stage 4: make dependencies
>>> stage 4: building everything..
TB --- 2004-01-13 22:18:03 - building generic kernel
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src
TB --- /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC
>>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Tue Jan 13 22:18:03 GMT 2004
[...]
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: for each function it appears in.)
vnode_if.h:876: warning: inlining failed in call to `VOP_UNLOCK'
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: warning: called from here
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_inactive':
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1705: warning: unused variable `vpp'
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_unlock':
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1803: warning: unused variable `un'
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/modules/union.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/modules.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/obj/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src/sys/GENERIC.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/i386/src.
TB --- 2004-01-13 22:21:48 - TB --- /usr/bin/make returned exit code  1 
TB --- 2004-01-13 22:21:48 - TB --- ERROR: failed to build generic kernel
TB --- 2004-01-13 22:21:48 - tinderbox aborted

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 14:35:02 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770E316A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:35:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from delphes.homeunix.com
	(ANeuilly-109-1-24-159.w81-248.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.248.82.159])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF88643D7F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:34:41 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nicolas@delphes.homeunix.com)
Received: by delphes.homeunix.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 0758143A2; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:40:23 +0000 (GMT)
From: Nicolas =?iso-8859-1?q?God=E9?= <nicolas@delphes.homeunix.com>
Organization: Viva el presidente Ezechiel
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:40:23 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401132340.23718.nicolas@delphes.homeunix.com>
Subject: 4.9 crashes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:35:02 -0000

Hello,

I have some problems running my Freebox (P3-450 Mhz + 256 Mb SDRAM) with KDE 3 
or GNOME.
Under medium charge (openoffice, mldonkey, kmail), XFree often freezes, and I 
cannot move the mouse cursor anymore,

Here is the message it could get from an ssh remote session:

Gdk-ERROR X connection to : 0.0 broken
ksmserver : Fatal IO error: client killed

What could be the root cause of this problem. Could it be something wrong in 
my kernel configuration file?
Is a Xfree bug (the problem happens whatever the window manager I use: KDE or 
GNOME

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 14:56:08 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BE88116A4CE; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:56:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.org
	[192.58.184.34])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 29A7A43D53; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:56:07 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: from triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i0DMu6LO083867;	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:56:06 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i0DMu6JT083866;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:56:06 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from des+tinderbox@freebsd.org)
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:56:06 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200401132256.i0DMu6JT083866@triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org>
X-Authentication-Warning: triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org: des set sender to
	Tinderbox <des+tinderbox@freebsd.org> using -f
Sender: Tinderbox <des+tinderbox@freebsd.org>
From: Tinderbox <des+tinderbox@freebsd.org>
To: stable@freebsd.org, i386@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk
Subject: [releng_4 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:56:08 -0000

TB --- 2004-01-13 22:21:49 - tinderbox 2.2 running on triangle.rtp.FreeBSD.Org
TB --- 2004-01-13 22:21:49 - starting RELENG_4 tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2004-01-13 22:21:49 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -rRELENG_4 src
TB --- 2004-01-13 22:26:35 - building world
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src
TB --- /usr/bin/make -B buildworld
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
>>> stage 2: rebuilding the object tree
>>> stage 2: build tools
>>> stage 3: cross tools
>>> stage 4: populating /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/obj/pc98/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src/i386/usr/include
>>> stage 4: building libraries
>>> stage 4: make dependencies
>>> stage 4: building everything..
TB --- 2004-01-13 22:52:48 - building generic kernel
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src
TB --- /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC
>>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Tue Jan 13 22:52:48 GMT 2004
[...]
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: for each function it appears in.)
vnode_if.h:876: warning: inlining failed in call to `VOP_UNLOCK'
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: warning: called from here
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_inactive':
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1705: warning: unused variable `vpp'
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_unlock':
/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1803: warning: unused variable `un'
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src/sys/modules/union.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src/sys/modules.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/obj/pc98/vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src/sys/GENERIC.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /vol/vol0/users/des/tinderbox/RELENG_4/i386/pc98/src.
TB --- 2004-01-13 22:56:06 - TB --- /usr/bin/make returned exit code  1 
TB --- 2004-01-13 22:56:06 - TB --- ERROR: failed to build generic kernel
TB --- 2004-01-13 22:56:06 - tinderbox aborted

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 15:38:36 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD0C16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:38:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.heronetwork.com (mail.heronetwork.com [216.254.62.176])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCBA43D60
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:38:33 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rmerrick@heronetwork.com)
Received: by mx1.heronetwork.com (Postfix, from userid 1003)
	id 3AAB9A6943; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:38:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from heronetwork.com (ON-01-FW.heronetwork.com [216.254.62.177])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mx1.heronetwork.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 71F1AA694E; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:38:31 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <40048177.3080603@heronetwork.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:38:31 -0800
From: Ryan Merrick <rmerrick@heronetwork.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Nicolas_God=E9?= <nicolas@delphes.homeunix.com>
References: <200401132340.23718.nicolas@delphes.homeunix.com>
In-Reply-To: <200401132340.23718.nicolas@delphes.homeunix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on 
	nott.heronetwork.com
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.9 crashes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:38:36 -0000

Nicolas Godé wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I have some problems running my Freebox (P3-450 Mhz + 256 Mb SDRAM) with KDE 3 
> or GNOME.
> Under medium charge (openoffice, mldonkey, kmail), XFree often freezes, and I 
> cannot move the mouse cursor anymore,
> 
> Here is the message it could get from an ssh remote session:
> 
> Gdk-ERROR X connection to : 0.0 broken
> ksmserver : Fatal IO error: client killed
> 
> What could be the root cause of this problem. Could it be something wrong in 
> my kernel configuration file?
> Is a Xfree bug (the problem happens whatever the window manager I use: KDE or 
> GNOME
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 
Hi,

Your problem looks to in XFree or an application being run. The fact that 
you could get a sshd session into Freebsd and look at log messages indicate 
that freebsd 4.9 is fine.


-- 
Sincerely,

Ryan Merrick
rmerrick@heronetwork.com


From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 01:08:11 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28BE16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:08:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBDB43D5E
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:08:10 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id 14D57530C; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:08:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id 2B022530A; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:08:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id B313233C9A; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:08:00 +0100 (CET)
To: Joe Altman <fj@panix.com>
References: <20040113204738.GA14543@panix.com>
	<200401132056.i0DKu1YO011391@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
	<20040113213324.GA14556@VARK.homeunix.com>
	<20040113220825.GA25495@panix.com>
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:08:00 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20040113220825.GA25495@panix.com> (Joe Altman's message of
 "Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:08:26 -0500")
Message-ID: <xzpsmii6gpb.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	flood.des.no
X-Spam-Level: ss
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: make buildkernel KERNCONF errors...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:08:11 -0000

Joe Altman <fj@panix.com> writes:
> "I applied a patch to the root of a CVS source tree, and it will dist
> over the next 24-48 hours to all of the relevant CVSUP machines.

shouldn't take more than two hours.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 01:56:28 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038F516A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:56:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from techno.sub.ru (webmail.sub.ru [213.247.139.22])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22D9C43D5C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:56:24 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru)
Received: (qmail 14393 invoked by uid 0); 14 Jan 2004 09:53:52 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tarkhil.over.ru) (213.148.23.65)
  by webmail.sub.ru with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 09:53:52 -0000
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:56:04 +0300
From: Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <20040114125604.107490d2.tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040109111133.GA58630@marvin.home.local>
References: <20040107104515.GA42786@izb.knu.ac.kr>
	<20040107124038.GA37600@i18n.org>
	<20040109111133.GA58630@marvin.home.local>
Organization: sub.ru
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: 4.x -> 5.x
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:56:28 -0000

On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:11:33 +1100
Tony Frank <tfrank@optushome.com.au> wrote:

TF> > 5) mkdir /usr/tmpfs && make installworld DESTDIR=/usr/tmpfs
TF> > 6) chflags noschg /bin/* /sbin/* /usr/bin/* /usr/sbin/* /usr/lib/*
TF> > \
TF> > 	/usr/libexec/*
TF> > 7) tar -C /usr/tmpfs -cpf . | tar -C / -xpvf -
TF> > 8) reboot
TF> 
TF> Is there any particular reason to do these steps 5-7 instead of just
TF> a 'make installworld' ?

Oh, YES IT IS!

Yesterday, I've tried to upgrade 5.1 to 5.2. For some unknown yet to me reason (I'm investigating), make installworld failed somehwere in between, and I had to reinstall 5.1 from CD... Most of userlad programs crashed early, including csh, ls and even sh...

-- 
Alex.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 01:56:52 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B5816A4D4
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:56:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smta11.mail.ozemail.net (smta11.mail.ozemail.net
	[203.103.165.150])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601B143D2F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:56:50 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from robbyrnes@ozemail.com.au)
Received: from cartman.ozemail.com.au ([203.61.125.43])
	by smta11.mail.ozemail.net with ESMTP
	<20040114095601.RQHC332.smta11.mail.ozemail.net@cartman.ozemail.com.au>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:56:01 +0000
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20040114205232.02382008@127.0.0.1>
X-Sender: pop.ozemail.com.au/110/robbyrnes@127.0.0.1 (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:56:38 +1100
To: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru>, stable@freebsd.org
From: Rob B <robbyrnes@ozemail.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <20040113181214.C95352@woozle.rinet.ru>
References: <20040113181214.C95352@woozle.rinet.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Subject: Re: /kernel: ipfw: pullup failed
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:56:52 -0000

At 02:19 AM 14/01/2004, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
>Dear colleagues,
>
>for last couple of hours I've encountered random TCP packets drops (most
>visible as ssh sessions lockups) and random kernel messages about "pullup
>failed"
>
>marck@gw-f:~> netstat -m
>1051/1584/32768 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
>         1050 mbufs allocated to data
>         1 mbufs allocated to packet headers
>1047/1582/16384 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
>3560 Kbytes allocated to network (8% of mb_map in use)
>0 requests for memory denied
>0 requests for memory delayed
>0 calls to protocol drain routines
>
>Quick googling shows me
>http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-net@freebsd.org/msg10291.html which 
>has not
>been answered by luigi

I've seen this happening as well, since you don't appeaer to be low on 
mbufs ...

(from the ipfw man page:)

"There are circumstances where fragmented datagrams are uncondition-
ally dropped.  TCP packets are dropped if they do not contain at
least 20 bytes of TCP header, UDP packets are dropped if they do not
contain a full 8 byte UDP header, and ICMP packets are dropped if
they do not contain 4 bytes of ICMP header, enough to specify the
ICMP type, code, and checksum.  These packets are simply logged as
``pullup failed'' since there may not be enough good data in the
packet to produce a meaningful log entry."

Cheers,
Rob


-- 
He lived in such a low room he could only eat pancakes.

This is random quote 549 of 1254.

Distance from the centre of the brewing universe
[15200.8 km (8207.8 mi), 262.8 deg](Apparent) Rennerian

Public Key fingerprint = 6219 33BD A37B 368D 29F5  19FB 945D C4D7 1F66 D9C5

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 02:27:57 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EA216A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:27:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from y0d4.mr0vka.eu.org (y0d4.mr0vka.eu.org [195.116.69.198])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F7443D2D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:27:53 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from lbromirski@mr0vka.eu.org)
Received: from mr0vka.eu.org (unknown [195.117.157.3])
	by y0d4.mr0vka.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655BAED2D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:28:09 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <400519AC.2090202@mr0vka.eu.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:27:56 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?=A3ukasz_Bromirski?= <lbromirski@mr0vka.eu.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird M4+ (20040109)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <20040107104515.GA42786@izb.knu.ac.kr>
	<20040107124038.GA37600@i18n.org>	<20040109111133.GA58630@marvin.home.local>
	<20040114125604.107490d2.tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040114125604.107490d2.tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: 4.x -> 5.x
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:27:57 -0000

Alex Povolotsky wrote:

> TF> Is there any particular reason to do these steps 5-7 instead of just
> TF> a 'make installworld' ?
> Oh, YES IT IS!
> Yesterday, I've tried to upgrade 5.1 to 5.2. For some unknown yet to me reason
 > (I'm investigating), make installworld failed somehwere in between, 
and I had
 > to reinstall 5.1 from CD... Most of userlad programs crashed early, 
including
 > csh, ls and even sh...

You simply didn't read /usr/src/UPDATING note, added on
2003-11-12. It starts with:

  "The statfs structure has been updated with 64-bit fields".

There's a *DANGER* section below and if You fail to do it as it's
written there, You'll very likely fail with crashing applications and
non-functional system.

I did 5.1->5.2 remote (ssh only) upgrade yesterday without any fancy
`tar -C /usr/tmpfs -cpf . | tar -C / -xpvf' constructions.

-- 
Łukasz Bromirski                             lbromirski:mr0vka,eu,org

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 02:47:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C74516A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:47:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smarthost.enta.net (smarthost.enta.net [195.74.97.231])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C56043D46
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:47:09 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jacs@gnome.co.uk)
Received: from smartsmtp.enta.net (smtp.enta.net [195.74.97.230])
	by smarthost.enta.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E8FEB4
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:49:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp.enta.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smartsmtp.enta.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i0EAwtQm009883
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:58:56 GMT
	(envelope-from jacs@gnome.co.uk)
Received: from hawk.gnome.co.uk (81-31-113-153.adsl.entanet.co.uk
	[81.31.113.153])	by smtp.enta.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E7A69EC96
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:58:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [192.168.123.12] (hawk.gnome.co.uk [192.168.123.12])
	by hawk.gnome.co.uk (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0EAl2C6015232
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:47:02 GMT
	(envelope-from jacs@gnome.co.uk)
From: Chris Stenton <jacs@gnome.co.uk>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <400519AC.2090202@mr0vka.eu.org>
References: <20040107104515.GA42786@izb.knu.ac.kr>
	 <20040107124038.GA37600@i18n.org>
	 <20040109111133.GA58630@marvin.home.local>
	 <20040114125604.107490d2.tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru>
	 <400519AC.2090202@mr0vka.eu.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Message-Id: <1074077222.14644.8.camel@hawk.gnome.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:47:02 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact your postmaster for more information
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Subject: Re: 4.x -> 5.x
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:47:13 -0000

On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 10:27, Łukasz Bromirski wrote:
> Alex Povolotsky wrote:

> I did 5.1->5.2 remote (ssh only) upgrade yesterday without any fancy
> `tar -C /usr/tmpfs -cpf . | tar -C / -xpvf' constructions.

I've done the same (as per the UPDATE instructions) and it worked out of
the box apart from evolution, which needed to be recompiled.


Chris


From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 03:51:38 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C371216A4CE; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 03:51:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alogis.com (firewall.solit-ag.de [212.184.102.1])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 55BF743D64; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 03:51:36 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from Holger.Kipp@alogis.com)
Received: from intserv.int1.b.intern (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by alogis.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id i0EBpPY94333;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:51:26 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from hk@alogis.com)
Message-Id: <200401141151.i0EBpPY94333@alogis.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:51:20 +0000
From: Holger Kipp <Holger.Kipp@alogis.com>
To: kris@obsecurity.org, des@des.no
X-Mailer: phpGroupWare (http://www.phpgroupware.org)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-description: Mail message body
cc: stable@freebsd.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: perl malloc slow?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Holger.Kipp@alogis.com
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:51:38 -0000



Kris Kennaway (kris@obsecurity.org) wrote: 
>
>> This is basically a bug in Perl (poor choice of algorithm for growing
>> strings).  Perl's malloc() implementation knows about and compensates
>> for this bug.  FreeBSD's malloc() implementation does not.

>I heard someone say it was fixed in perl 5.<mumble> (8?)

As I now know, at least the perl(5.8.2) port is build with perl malloc as
default.

Sorry for starting this thread - but I learned a lot about malloc this way ;-)
and with perl v5.8.2 performance is very good again!

Thanx for all who replied!


Regards,
Holger

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 04:53:56 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B615B16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:53:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from osku.suutari.iki.fi (osku.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23AF43D3F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:53:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
Received: from coffee.syncrontech.com (coffee.syncrontech.com [62.71.8.37])
	by osku.suutari.iki.fi (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0ECrodf024538
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:53:51 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
From: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Organization: At Home
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:53:50 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Subject: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:53:56 -0000

Hi,

I have been wondering if my disk setup should perform better than
it is now doing. 

I have a dual PIII 500 Mhz with intel server mother board.
(a couple of years old). On that, I have DPT (or currently Adaptec)
raid controller "DPT PM2654U2", which supports 40 Mhz SCSI bus,
giving a theoretical data transfer speed of 80 MB/s. There are
two physical disks, which have been mirrored (ie. raid-1).
The disks are maxtor atlas 10K4, I think that maxtor tells
that they should give sustained transfer rate up to 72MB/s.
I have confirmed that SCSI bus is at 80MB/s speed
with dptutil.

The system is running FreeBSD 4.8.

However, when reading raw device with dd like this:

dd if=/dev/rda1s1a of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 4.193832 secs (25002814 bytes/sec)

So, I get only about 25MB/s. Shouldn't I be getting something
like 70 MB/s, or even more since there are two disks that
can server read requests ?

Maybe there is something I could tune ? The BIOS doesn't
have much, there is only setting to enable bus mastering (enabled)
and another for pci latency timer values (was 40, I think)


	Ari S.


-- 
Ari Suutari
Lemi, Finland

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 05:02:06 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8F716A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:02:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nimitz.osl.fast.no (mailoslo.fast.no [217.144.235.131])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A0343D49
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:02:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from Raymond.Wiker@fast.no)
Received: from raw.grenland.fast.no.fast.no (raw.grenland.fast.no
	[192.168.48.104])
	by nimitz.osl.fast.no (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0ED23UB073020;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:02:03 +0100 (MET)
From: Raymond Wiker <Raymond.Wiker@fast.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16389.15817.322098.577889@raw.grenland.fast.no>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:02:01 +0100
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
References: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 12) "Portable Code" XEmacs Lucid
Subject: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:02:06 -0000

Ari Suutari writes:
 > dd if=/dev/rda1s1a of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
 > 100+0 records in
 > 100+0 records out
 > 104857600 bytes transferred in 4.193832 secs (25002814 bytes/sec)
 > 
 > So, I get only about 25MB/s. Shouldn't I be getting something
 > like 70 MB/s, or even more since there are two disks that
 > can server read requests ?

        Have you tried other block sizes? I think you may be able to
get better results by going to a lower block size (e.g, 64k instead of
1m). Some experimentation will show which block size(s) work best.
 

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 05:11:46 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652C716A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:11:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from osku.suutari.iki.fi (osku.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52C343D66
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:11:40 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
Received: from coffee.syncrontech.com (coffee.syncrontech.com [62.71.8.37])
	by osku.suutari.iki.fi (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0EDBVdf024584;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:11:31 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
From: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Organization: At Home
To: Raymond Wiker <Raymond.Wiker@fast.no>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:11:30 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
	<16389.15817.322098.577889@raw.grenland.fast.no>
In-Reply-To: <16389.15817.322098.577889@raw.grenland.fast.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401141511.30958.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:11:46 -0000

On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:02, Raymond Wiker wrote:
> Ari Suutari writes:
>  > dd if=/dev/rda1s1a of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
>  > 100+0 records in
>  > 100+0 records out
>  > 104857600 bytes transferred in 4.193832 secs (25002814 bytes/sec)
>  >
>  > So, I get only about 25MB/s. Shouldn't I be getting something
>  > like 70 MB/s, or even more since there are two disks that
>  > can server read requests ?
>
>         Have you tried other block sizes? I think you may be able to
> get better results by going to a lower block size (e.g, 64k instead of
> 1m). Some experimentation will show which block size(s) work best.


	I tried with 32k, 64k, 256k and 512k. Speed is about the same
	with every block size. Block sizes less than 32k seem to give
	even worse performance.

		Ari S.	

-- 
Ari Suutari
Lemi, Finland

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 05:13:03 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1957916A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:13:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dev.null.cz (dev.null.cz [81.0.254.183])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E8F43D5E
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:12:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from buki@dev.null.cz)
Received: from dev.null.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dev.null.cz (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0EDCeOe028715
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:12:40 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from buki@dev.null.cz)
Received: (from buki@localhost)
	by dev.null.cz (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i0EDCesj028710
	for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:12:40 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from buki)
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:12:40 +0100
From: Buki <dev@null.cz>
To: stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040114131240.GA28095@dev.null.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 'clamd / ClamAV version 0.65', clamav-milter
	version '0.60p'
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=6.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	dev.null.cz
Subject: 4.9 /usr/src/UPDATING error?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:13:03 -0000


--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

hi,

I have FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p1 #0: Tue Dec  9 16:46:46 CET 2003 and as I have
dual P4 @2.4GHz I was wondering about HyperThreading(tm). In UPDATING I rea=
d:

20031022:
        Support for HyperThread logical CPUs has now been enabled by
        default.  As a result, the HTT kernel option no longer exists.
        Instead, the logical CPUs are always started so that they can
        handle interrupts.  However, the extra logical CPUs are prevented
        from executing user processes by default.  To enable the logical
        CPUs, change the value of the machdep.hlt_logical_cpus from 1 to
        0.  This value can also be set from the loader as a tunable of
        the same name.

but it seems like there is no such sysctl oid:

#sysctl machdep. | grep cpu
machdep.cpu_idle_hlt: 1
machdep.smp_cpus: 4
machdep.hlt_cpus: 0

so I have no oid set in /etc/sysctl.conf or loader.conf

nevertheless, the system seems to work out of the box:

CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2393.19-MHz 686-class CPU)
  Origin =3D "GenuineIntel"  Id =3D 0xf25  Stepping =3D 5
  Features=3D0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PG=
E,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,
SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE>
  Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs

=2E..

FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard: 4 CPUs
 cpu0 (BSP): apic id:  0, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000
 cpu1 (AP):  apic id:  6, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000
 cpu2 (AP):  apic id:  1, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000
 cpu3 (AP):  apic id:  7, version: 0x00050014, at 0xfee00000
 io0 (APIC): apic id:  4, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec00000
 io1 (APIC): apic id:  5, version: 0x000f0011, at 0xfec01000

=2E..

SMP: AP CPU #3 Launched!
SMP: AP CPU #2 Launched!
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!

and 'top' confirms that processes are running on CPU 0 through 3

shouldn't be UPDATING corrected?

Buki
--=20
PGP public key: http://dev.null.cz/buki.asc

                /"\
                \ /     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
                 X      Against HTML & Outlook Mail
                / \     http://www.thebackrow.net


--DocE+STaALJfprDB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFABUBIPzhIkpLLm08RAl6IAJ9Acw70tXn9qx2FNUUAexIWyNuL4ACfTOQB
HTPaqQAjcCHlQ5mKki1icMk=
=BRZx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--DocE+STaALJfprDB--

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 05:17:22 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E9016A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:17:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.rotfl.com.au (eth1779.sa.adsl.internode.on.net
	[150.101.235.242])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1AA43D46
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:17:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from Phil@Kernick.org)
Received: from undisclosed
	by mail.rotfl.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 690EB7482E; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:47:19 +1030 (CST)
Received: from mail.rotfl.com.au ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.rotfl.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with LMTP id 84410-06; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:47:16 +1030 (CST)
Received: from undisclosed
	by mail.rotfl.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CB8517482C; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:47:16 +1030 (CST)
Message-ID: <4005415C.6090102@Kernick.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:47:16 +1030
From: Phil Kernick <Phil@Kernick.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031208
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>
References: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
	<16389.15817.322098.577889@raw.grenland.fast.no>
	<200401141511.30958.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <200401141511.30958.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at rotfl.com.au
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
cc: Raymond Wiker <Raymond.Wiker@fast.no>
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:17:23 -0000

A note from the dump(8) man page...

      Currently, physio(9) slices all requests into chunks of 64 KB.  There-
      fore, it is impossible to use a larger output block size, so dump will
      prevent this from happening.

Same thing likely happens with dd, so bigger than 64k doesn't ever help.


Phil.

Ari Suutari wrote:

> On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:02, Raymond Wiker wrote:
> 
>>Ari Suutari writes:
>> > dd if=/dev/rda1s1a of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
>> > 100+0 records in
>> > 100+0 records out
>> > 104857600 bytes transferred in 4.193832 secs (25002814 bytes/sec)
>> >
>> > So, I get only about 25MB/s. Shouldn't I be getting something
>> > like 70 MB/s, or even more since there are two disks that
>> > can server read requests ?
>>
>>        Have you tried other block sizes? I think you may be able to
>>get better results by going to a lower block size (e.g, 64k instead of
>>1m). Some experimentation will show which block size(s) work best.
> 
> 
> 
> 	I tried with 32k, 64k, 256k and 512k. Speed is about the same
> 	with every block size. Block sizes less than 32k seem to give
> 	even worse performance.
> 
> 		Ari S.	
> 


-- 
    _-_|\   Phil Kernick                      E-Mail: Phil@Kernick.org
   /     \  ROTFL Enterprises                 Mobile:  041 61 ROTFL
   \_.-*_/
        v   Humourist, satirist, and probably a few more 'ists to boot!

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 05:20:57 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B492216A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:20:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0.dmpriest.net.uk (mx0.dmpriest.net.uk [62.13.128.30])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E930743D53
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:20:53 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk)
Received: from rainbow (adsl-blk-62-13-130-225.dmpriest.net.uk [62.13.130.232]
	(may be forged))
	by mx0.dmpriest.net.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6/Kp) with ESMTP id i0EDHnO14833;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:17:49 GMT
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:20:43 +0000
From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk>
To: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <741002750.1074086443@rainbow>
In-Reply-To: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
References: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:20:57 -0000



--On 14 January 2004 14:53 +0200 Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi> wrote:

> I have a dual PIII 500 Mhz with intel server mother board.
> (a couple of years old). On that, I have DPT (or currently Adaptec)
> raid controller "DPT PM2654U2", which supports 40 Mhz SCSI bus,
> giving a theoretical data transfer speed of 80 MB/s. There are
> two physical disks, which have been mirrored (ie. raid-1).
> The disks are maxtor atlas 10K4, I think that maxtor tells
> that they should give sustained transfer rate up to 72MB/s.

72Mbytes per second? - That seems a little high? If that's the 'up to rate' 
- you can guarantee it won't do that across the whole surface - it could be 
half that speed in places.

> dd if=/dev/rda1s1a of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes transferred in 4.193832 secs (25002814 bytes/sec)
>
> So, I get only about 25MB/s. Shouldn't I be getting something
> like 70 MB/s, or even more since there are two disks that
> can server read requests ?

Hmmm, what happens if you run two of those at once?

> Maybe there is something I could tune ? The BIOS doesn't
> have much, there is only setting to enable bus mastering (enabled)
> and another for pci latency timer values (was 40, I think)

In theory (and assuming nothing else fiddles, or overrides it etc.) - the 
higher you set the latency, the faster but more 'jerky' the PCI bus gets. 
i.e. devices spend longer talking on it, which means the initial setup for 
transfers etc. as an overhead goes down - at the expensive of devices 
'hogging' the bus for longer... I think :)

But, I can't remember seeing adjusting it making any real-world difference 
- what happens if you max it out (e.g. 128, or 256)?

It'll be interesting to see what speed you get for 2 of the benchmarks 
running at the same time... Have you also tried different block sizes, e.g. 
64k, 128k etc?

-Karl

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 05:20:58 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67A016A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:20:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xyzzy.wireless.snsonline.net (xyzzy.snsonline.net
	[210.18.214.106])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FF943D31
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:20:53 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from msergeant@snsonline.net)
Received: from xyzzy.wireless.snsonline.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i0EDL4NT002331;	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:21:04 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from msergeant@snsonline.net)
Received: (from msergeant@localhost)i0EDL0il002330;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:21:00 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from msergeant@snsonline.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: xyzzy.wireless.snsonline.net: msergeant set sender
	to msergeant@snsonline.net using -f
From: Mark Sergeant <msergeant@snsonline.net>
To: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
References: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-M0KZ1fMW41g2riYrDxXD"
Organization: SNSOnline Technical Services
Message-Id: <1074086459.2080.0.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:21:00 +1000
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:20:58 -0000


--=-M0KZ1fMW41g2riYrDxXD
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I've got to say this seems pretty bad since my laptop gets ...

104857600 bytes transferred in 4.491311 secs (23346770 bytes/sec)


On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 22:53, Ari Suutari wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> I have been wondering if my disk setup should perform better than
> it is now doing.=20
>=20
> I have a dual PIII 500 Mhz with intel server mother board.
> (a couple of years old). On that, I have DPT (or currently Adaptec)
> raid controller "DPT PM2654U2", which supports 40 Mhz SCSI bus,
> giving a theoretical data transfer speed of 80 MB/s. There are
> two physical disks, which have been mirrored (ie. raid-1).
> The disks are maxtor atlas 10K4, I think that maxtor tells
> that they should give sustained transfer rate up to 72MB/s.
> I have confirmed that SCSI bus is at 80MB/s speed
> with dptutil.
>=20
> The system is running FreeBSD 4.8.
>=20
> However, when reading raw device with dd like this:
>=20
> dd if=3D/dev/rda1s1a of=3D/dev/null bs=3D1m count=3D100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes transferred in 4.193832 secs (25002814 bytes/sec)
>=20
> So, I get only about 25MB/s. Shouldn't I be getting something
> like 70 MB/s, or even more since there are two disks that
> can server read requests ?
>=20
> Maybe there is something I could tune ? The BIOS doesn't
> have much, there is only setting to enable bus mastering (enabled)
> and another for pci latency timer values (was 40, I think)
>=20
>=20
> 	Ari S.
--=20
Mark Sergeant <msergeant@snsonline.net>
SNSOnline Technical Services

--=-M0KZ1fMW41g2riYrDxXD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBABUI7bS4ZEpHb8t0RApAzAJ0aiaUmZHW3jzBoYvM0zfZSQgWusACdG+qV
hudbg/dC+7P1QonvoJGcomE=
=pHSU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-M0KZ1fMW41g2riYrDxXD--

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 05:26:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CAE16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:26:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk
	[194.200.93.187])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF1843D2F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:26:00 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from petefrench@keithprowse.com)
Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim
	4.22)	id 1Agl1x-000IYF-FG; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:25:57 +0000
To: ari@suutari.iki.fi, msergeant@snsonline.net
In-Reply-To: <1074086459.2080.0.camel@localhost>
Message-Id: <E1Agl1x-000IYF-FG@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
From: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:25:57 +0000
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:26:01 -0000

> I've got to say this seems pretty bad since my laptop gets ...
> 104857600 bytes transferred in 4.491311 secs (23346770 bytes/sec)

You have a laptop with SCSI RAID on it ??????!!!!

-pcf.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 05:27:37 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989D616A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:27:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from osku.suutari.iki.fi (osku.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 366A043D78
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:27:14 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
Received: from coffee.syncrontech.com (coffee.syncrontech.com [62.71.8.37])
	by osku.suutari.iki.fi (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0EDRCdf024629;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:27:12 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
From: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Organization: At Home
To: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:27:11 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
	<741002750.1074086443@rainbow>
In-Reply-To: <741002750.1074086443@rainbow>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401141527.11930.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:27:37 -0000

Hi,

On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:20, Karl Pielorz wrote:
> > So, I get only about 25MB/s. Shouldn't I be getting something
> > like 70 MB/s, or even more since there are two disks that
> > can server read requests ?
>
> Hmmm, what happens if you run two of those at once?

	Running 5 dd's at once gives in iostat:

      tty             da0              da1             acd0             cpu
 tin tout  KB/t tps  MB/s   KB/t tps  MB/s   KB/t tps  MB/s  us ni sy in id
   1  146  0.00   0  0.00  64.00 473 29.58   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  1 98
   0   38  0.00   0  0.00  64.00 625 39.06   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  2  1 97
   0   38  0.00   0  0.00  64.00 492 30.76   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  2  1 97
   0   38  0.00   0  0.00  64.00 506 31.62   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  0 98
   0   38  0.00   0  0.00  64.00 495 30.94   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  1 98

	The peak seems to be 39 Mb/s.
>
> But, I can't remember seeing adjusting it making any real-world difference
> - what happens if you max it out (e.g. 128, or 256)?

	I'll have to try this. However, I also doubt that it is not going
	to change anything.
	
		Ari S.

-- 
Ari Suutari
Lemi, Finland

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 05:32:24 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AAD16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:32:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xyzzy.wireless.snsonline.net (xyzzy.snsonline.net
	[210.18.214.106])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4366643D48
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:32:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from msergeant@snsonline.net)
Received: from xyzzy.wireless.snsonline.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	i0EDWTNT002383;	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:32:29 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from msergeant@snsonline.net)
Received: (from msergeant@localhost)i0EDWOVm002382;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:32:24 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from msergeant@snsonline.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: xyzzy.wireless.snsonline.net: msergeant set sender
	to msergeant@snsonline.net using -f
From: Mark Sergeant <msergeant@snsonline.net>
To: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1Agl1x-000IYF-FG@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
References: <E1Agl1x-000IYF-FG@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mdDpGuRx2pzamn9xQPq6"
Organization: SNSOnline Technical Services
Message-Id: <1074087144.2080.2.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:32:24 +1000
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:32:24 -0000


--=-mdDpGuRx2pzamn9xQPq6
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 23:25, Pete French wrote:
> > I've got to say this seems pretty bad since my laptop gets ...
> > 104857600 bytes transferred in 4.491311 secs (23346770 bytes/sec)
>=20
> You have a laptop with SCSI RAID on it ??????!!!!

heh nah standard ide, hence the scsi raid performance being bad when my
laptop compares pretty well.


--=-mdDpGuRx2pzamn9xQPq6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBABUTobS4ZEpHb8t0RAg9mAJ96AFW1OJRrdwETG9bSZFzvTU0jygCfY72I
DQ1ik+2JwUYK+ESoM6WjppY=
=ggCt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-mdDpGuRx2pzamn9xQPq6--

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 05:42:42 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF3416A4D2
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:42:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0.dmpriest.net.uk (mx0.dmpriest.net.uk [62.13.128.30])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E950043D31
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:42:39 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk)
Received: from rainbow (adsl-blk-62-13-130-225.dmpriest.net.uk [62.13.130.232]
	(may be forged))
	by mx0.dmpriest.net.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6/Kp) with ESMTP id i0EDdlb15899;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:39:47 GMT
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:42:40 +0000
From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk>
To: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <742320171.1074087760@rainbow>
In-Reply-To: <200401141527.11930.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
References: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
 <741002750.1074086443@rainbow> <200401141527.11930.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:42:43 -0000



--On 14 January 2004 15:27 +0200 Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:20, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>> > So, I get only about 25MB/s. Shouldn't I be getting something
>> > like 70 MB/s, or even more since there are two disks that
>> > can server read requests ?
>>
>> Hmmm, what happens if you run two of those at once?
>
> 	Running 5 dd's at once gives in iostat:
>
> [snip]
>
> 	The peak seems to be 39 Mb/s.

Was that the peak 'each' - or combined? - i.e. what was the combined 
throughput for 2 dd's running?

>> PCI latency..
>>
>> But, I can't remember seeing adjusting it making any real-world
>> difference - what happens if you max it out (e.g. 128, or 256)?
>
> 	I'll have to try this. However, I also doubt that it is not going
> 	to change anything.

Wouldn't be the first time :)

Give two dd's a run at the same, with 64k blocksizes and see what you get 
for each one...

We have a machine at the office with the same controller in it, and some 
IBM 36Gb 10K drives, but unfortunately it's not in any fit state to dd 
anything at the moment, else I'd give it a while :)

-Karl

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 05:48:21 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B76916A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:48:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from osku.suutari.iki.fi (osku.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8AD43D49
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:48:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
Received: from coffee.syncrontech.com (coffee.syncrontech.com [62.71.8.37])
	by osku.suutari.iki.fi (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0EDmFdf024739;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:48:16 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
From: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Organization: At Home
To: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:48:15 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
	<200401141527.11930.ari@suutari.iki.fi> <742320171.1074087760@rainbow>
In-Reply-To: <742320171.1074087760@rainbow>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401141548.15660.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:48:21 -0000

Hi,

On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:42, you wrote:
> > 	The peak seems to be 39 Mb/s.
>
> Was that the peak 'each' - or combined? - i.e. what was the combined
> throughput for 2 dd's running?

	This was combined ie. from iostat. I didn't look what each dd
	reported, I think it was around 10 MB/s (for five dd's).
	I would run it again, but I just started a test with PostgreSQL on
	that server and it is going to take a while...

	I'll run dd again when it is possible.

	Ari S.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 06:11:19 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A23C16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:11:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ngfl.dialnet.com (ngmail.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.76])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 115F643D2D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:11:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk)
Received: from ngmfilt.ngfl.dialnet.com [212.44.44.121] by ngfl.dialnet.com
	with ESMTP
	(SMTPD32-6.06) id AD18311C003C; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:07:20 +0000
Received: from relay.ngfl.dialnet.com (unverified) by ngmfilt.ngfl.dialnet.com
	<T67211d8d19d42c2c79133@ngmfilt.ngfl.dialnet.com>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:06:56 +0000
Received: from firewall.cardinalnewman.lan (swtp74-53-91.adsl.seed.net.tw
	[172.30.0.70]) by ngrelay.dialnet.com with SMTP (MailShield v2.04 - WIN32 Jul
	17 2001 17:12:42); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:09:08 -0000
Received: from mail.cardinalnewman.lan (mail.cardinalnewman.lan [192.168.0.3])
	i0EEAnPW005017;	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:10:49 GMT
	(envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk)
Received: from dumpster.cardinalnewman.lan (dumpster.cardinalnewman.lan
	[192.168.0.9])i0EEAmcF092506;	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:10:49 GMT
	(envelope-from ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk)
From: ict technician <ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk>
Organization: Cardinal Newman School
To: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>,
	Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:10:47 +0000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
	<741002750.1074086443@rainbow> <200401141527.11930.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <200401141527.11930.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401141410.47630.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-32.2 required=5.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
	      REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_KMAIL
	version=2.50
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.50 (1.173-2003-02-20-exp)
X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (mail.cardinalnewman.lan)
X-SMTP-HELO: firewall.cardinalnewman.lan
X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk
X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: ari@suutari.iki.fi
X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: kpielorz@tdx.co.uk
X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: swtp74-53-91.adsl.seed.net.tw [172.30.0.70]
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:11:19 -0000

On Wednesday 14 January 2004 1:27 pm, Ari Suutari wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:20, Karl Pielorz wrote:
> > > So, I get only about 25MB/s. Shouldn't I be getting something
> > > like 70 MB/s, or even more since there are two disks that
> > > can server read requests ?
> >
> > Hmmm, what happens if you run two of those at once?
>
> 	Running 5 dd's at once gives in iostat:
>
>       tty             da0              da1             acd0             cpu
>  tin tout  KB/t tps  MB/s   KB/t tps  MB/s   KB/t tps  MB/s  us ni sy in id
>    1  146  0.00   0  0.00  64.00 473 29.58   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  1 98
>    0   38  0.00   0  0.00  64.00 625 39.06   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  2  1 97
>    0   38  0.00   0  0.00  64.00 492 30.76   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  2  1 97
>    0   38  0.00   0  0.00  64.00 506 31.62   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  0 98
>    0   38  0.00   0  0.00  64.00 495 30.94   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  1 98
>
> 	The peak seems to be 39 Mb/s.
>
> > But, I can't remember seeing adjusting it making any real-world
> > difference - what happens if you max it out (e.g. 128, or 256)?
>
> 	I'll have to try this. However, I also doubt that it is not going
> 	to change anything.
>
> 		Ari S.

Where's the other CPU?
What's da0 - send dmesg output

-- 
i j hart

ICT Technician
Cardinal Newman Catholic School & Community College

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 06:58:59 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC97216A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:58:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.classy.jp (mail.classY.jp [202.33.21.54])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B6843D48
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:58:58 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from fbsdml@typhoon.co.jp)
Received: from typhoon.co.jp (218.231.221.42.eo.eaccess.ne.jp
	[218.231.221.42])	(authenticated bits=0)i0EEwoMF056292
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:58:56 GMT
Message-ID: <40055924.5020905@typhoon.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:58:44 +0900
From: "N. Fung" <fbsdml@typhoon.co.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US;
	rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stable@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.4; VAE 6.23.0.2; VDF 6.23.0.30
Subject: Dell PE600SC with ServerWorks CSB6
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:58:59 -0000

Hello!

Has anyone gotten 4.9R to recognize the "ServerWorks CSB6" ATA 
controller on a Dell 600SC?  How about installing 5.2R on a 600SC?  5.2R 
recognizes the said controller, but it corrupts data.

--
eof

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 07:11:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD6E416A4CF
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:11:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tangelo.mediumgreen.com (tangelo.mediumgreen.com
	[207.188.202.243])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4B3843D5D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:11:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from lists@mediumgreen.com)
Received: (qmail 82764 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 15:11:08 -0000
Received: from localhost.mediumgreen.com (HELO tangelo) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost.mediumgreen.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 15:11:08 -0000
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
From: lists@mediumgreen.com
In-Reply-To: Message from Raymond Wiker <Raymond.Wiker@fast.no> 
	<16389.15817.322098.577889@raw.grenland.fast.no> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:11:08 -0500
Message-Id: <20040114151111.B4B3843D5D@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:11:14 -0000

I think I heard Raymond Wiker say:
>Ari Suutari writes:
> > dd if=/dev/rda1s1a of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
> > 100+0 records in
> > 100+0 records out
> > 104857600 bytes transferred in 4.193832 secs (25002814 bytes/sec)
> > 
> > So, I get only about 25MB/s. Shouldn't I be getting something
> > like 70 MB/s, or even more since there are two disks that
> > can server read requests ?


FWIW, on my mylex controller w/ raid 5 I'm getting:

# dd if=/dev/da0s1g of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 3.707196 secs (28284882 bytes/sec)


and my dell perc3/dc (raid 5) is getting:

# dd if=/dev/amrd0s2e of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 2.133522 secs (49147653 bytes/sec)


-matthew



From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 08:08:47 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DE816A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:08:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mutare.noc.clara.net (mutare.noc.clara.net [195.8.70.95])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1663843DA4
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:07:50 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ollie@mutare.noc.clara.net)
Received: from ollie by mutare.noc.clara.net with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AgnYa-0001ZD-PA; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:07:48 +0000
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:07:48 +0000
From: Ollie Cook <ollie@uk.clara.net>
To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
Message-ID: <20040114160748.GJ27744@mutare.noc.clara.net>
References: <20040113154932.GE354@mutare.noc.clara.net>
	<20040113114525.L63732@carver.gumbysoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040113114525.L63732@carver.gumbysoft.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE i386
X-NCC-RegID: uk.claranet
Sender: Ollie Cook <ollie@mutare.noc.clara.net>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: nfs send errors 32 and 35 on RELENG_4
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:08:47 -0000

On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:50:41AM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> > Jan 13 14:02:02 mese /kernel: nfs server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail: not responding
> > Jan 13 14:02:03 mese /kernel: nfs server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail: is alive again
> 
> There's some tuning options for this, which I don't immediately recall.
> Under heavy load these are somewhat normal.

Hi Doug,

I have set the kernel to auto-scale nmbclusters based on the memory in the host
in question. I think it's not worth hard-coding these values since the peak
value seems not to get near the maximum:

  root@mese:[conf] (10) # netstat -m
  397/1200/34816 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
          294 mbufs allocated to data
          103 mbufs allocated to packet headers
  215/676/8704 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
  1652 Kbytes allocated to network (6% of mb_map in use)
  0 requests for memory denied
  0 requests for memory delayed
  0 calls to protocol drain routines

If peak does get close to max, I will increase the number of nmbclusters, but
it doesn't look necessary at present.

All sysctls are at default values.

Are there other things I can be looking at tuning? These hosts do approximately
500 NFS operations each per second (appx 5Mbit/s).

> > Jan 13 14:09:37 mese /kernel: nfs send error 35 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail
> > Jan 13 14:09:53 mese /kernel: nfs send error 32 for server 192.168.1.1:/vol/vol1/claramail
> 
> These errors tend to imply resource shortages. Monitor netstat -m output
> and make sure you aren't running out of mbuf or mbuf clusters. Also check
> for network errors and dropped packets (netstat -s, switch statistics).

Prior to power cycling the box I was able to look at netstat -m, and netstat
-i, neither of which showed anything to worry about. Next time it happens I'll
be sure to take a copy of the output, in case there's something I'm missing.

Is there any way of finding out what error 35 actually means?

> Are you running rpc.lockd?

The server is an Network Appliance F-Series filer which runs a locking manager:

root@metis:[conf] (13) # rpcinfo -p 192.168.1.1 | grep lock
    100021    4   tcp    607  nlockmgr
    100021    3   tcp    607  nlockmgr
    100021    1   tcp    607  nlockmgr
    100021    4   udp    606  nlockmgr
    100021    3   udp    606  nlockmgr
    100021    1   udp    606  nlockmgr

Thank you for your help so far.

Cheers,

Ollie

-- 
Oliver Cook    Systems Administrator, Claranet UK
ollie@uk.clara.net               +44 20 7903 3065

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 08:33:53 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C0616A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:33:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp3.sentex.ca (smtp3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A104543D64
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:33:51 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18])
	by smtp3.sentex.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0EGXmU7029890
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:33:48 -0500 (EST)	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27])
	by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0EGXlXw020207
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:33:48 -0500 (EST)	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040114111325.08c0be58@209.112.4.2>
X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:32:59 -0500
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040114151111.B4B3843D5D@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
References: <20040114151111.B4B3843D5D@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:33:53 -0000


OK, I was curious to see my various 3wares. Both backup servers are Celeron 2G
Raid5 with a 7810 3ware in RAID5.  backup2 RAID1 on a 6800 card (all the 
same Seagate drives)

offsite# dd if=/dev/twed1s1e of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 2.190987 secs (47858611 bytes/sec)

And RAID1 on the 6800.
backup2# dd if=/dev/twed0s1e of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 2.604936 secs (40253425 bytes/sec)

and writing
backup2% dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/big bs=1m count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 2.919785 secs (35912781 bytes/sec)
backup2%

offsite% dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/big bs=1m count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 2.452074 secs (42762824 bytes/sec)
offsite%

backup2% grep CPU /var/run/dmesg.boot
CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.00GHz (2017.98-MHz 686-class CPU)
offsite% grep CPU /var/run/dmesg.boot
CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.20GHz (2200.38-MHz 686-class CPU)
         ---Mike

At 10:11 AM 14/01/2004, lists@mediumgreen.com wrote:
>FWIW, on my mylex controller w/ raid 5 I'm getting:
>
># dd if=/dev/da0s1g of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
>100+0 records in
>100+0 records out
>104857600 bytes transferred in 3.707196 secs (28284882 bytes/sec)
>
>
>and my dell perc3/dc (raid 5) is getting:
>
># dd if=/dev/amrd0s2e of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
>100+0 records in
>100+0 records out
>104857600 bytes transferred in 2.133522 secs (49147653 bytes/sec)
>
>
>-matthew
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 08:48:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC7716A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk
	[194.200.93.187])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E0143D48
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:48:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from petefrench@keithprowse.com)
Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim
	4.22)	id 1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:48:37 +0000
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
From: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:48:37 +0000
Subject: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:48:51 -0000

As I understand it, the ports tree is the same for both STABLE and
CURRENT isnt it ? So can I safely do a cvsup with the line

ports-all tag=RELEASE_5_2_0

to update my ports collection to the set which comes with 5.2
release, despite the fact I am running 4.9 ? I want to do this
as I know the sets of ports which are marked for a RELEASE are
tested to all work together, which saves some of the problems I sometimes
get cvsupping at an arbitrary time.

The only reason I ask is that I ran the above command and it looked like
it altered almost every port in the tree!

-pcf.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 09:10:37 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009A616A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:10:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (conn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB7743D62
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:10:25 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from veldy@veldy.net)
Received: from veldy.net (fuggle.veldy.net [209.98.200.33])
	by conn.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B220D8919; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:10:24 -0600 (CST)
Received: from localhost (localhost.veldy.net [127.0.0.1])
	by veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4A3E91CC86; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:10:24 -0600 (CST)
Received: from veldy.net ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (fuggle.veldy.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 27860-03; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:10:19 -0600 (CST)
Received: from 4K3500B (localhost.veldy.net [127.0.0.1])
	by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 5810A1CC83; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:10:19 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <00c901c3dac1$4a087f40$d037630a@nic.target.com>
From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>,
	"Pete French" <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:10:16 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at veldy.net
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:10:37 -0000

Pete French wrote:
> As I understand it, the ports tree is the same for both STABLE and
> CURRENT isnt it ? So can I safely do a cvsup with the line
> 
> ports-all tag=RELEASE_5_2_0
> 
> to update my ports collection to the set which comes with 5.2
> release, despite the fact I am running 4.9 ? I want to do this
> as I know the sets of ports which are marked for a RELEASE are
> tested to all work together, which saves some of the problems I
> sometimes get cvsupping at an arbitrary time.
> 
> The only reason I ask is that I ran the above command and it looked
> like it altered almost every port in the tree!
> 
> -pcf.

No.  Use

tag = .

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 09:27:55 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 980A016A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:27:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jk.homeunix.net (dhcp-19-33.dsl.CSUChico.EDU [132.241.19.33])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D41643D6D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:27:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jk@jk.homeunix.net)
Received: from jk.homeunix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])i0EHReSH025162
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:27:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from warlock@localhost)i0EHReHU025161;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:27:40 -0800
From: John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:27:55 -0000

On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 04:48:37PM +0000, Pete French wrote:
> As I understand it, the ports tree is the same for both STABLE and
> CURRENT isnt it ? So can I safely do a cvsup with the line
> 
> ports-all tag=RELEASE_5_2_0
> 
> to update my ports collection to the set which comes with 5.2
> release, despite the fact I am running 4.9 ? ...

  There are *lots* of differences between 4.x, 5.x and current given some
distance in time separating them, but you're right that the ports are more
or less the same.  They key word there is "more or less" -- there are tiny
differences (by volume) and that is what you're seeing.

  For example, if I look at the CVS history of the sendmail port, I might
see something like this:

   cvs log Makefile | grep -e RELEASE_5_[12] -e RELEASE_4_[89] -e ^head
	head: 1.83
		RELEASE_5_2_0: 1.83
		RELEASE_4_9_0: 1.77
		RELEASE_5_1_0: 1.71
		RELEASE_4_8_0: 1.65

  Anytime you see that version number bump up (4.9 at 1.77, 5.2 at 1.83)
then you're going to see alterations.  5.2 vs.  head wouldn't have caused
them in this one case, since they're the same.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 09:31:21 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C796A16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:31:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miramanee.icarz.com (miramanee.icarz.com [207.99.22.55])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7A643D82
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:31:12 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from kenm@icarz.com)
Received: from deanna.icarz.com (deanna.icarz.com [207.99.22.19])
	by miramanee.icarz.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0EHVBLc037174;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:31:11 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from kenm@icarz.com)
Received: from kenxp (netb-178.icarz.com [209.123.219.178])
	by deanna.icarz.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with SMTP id i0EHVBLL083007;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:31:11 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from kenm@icarz.com)
Message-ID: <039301c3dac4$2b76d880$b2db7bd1@icarz.com>
From: "Ken Menzel" <kenm@icarz.com>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, "Mike Tancsa" <mike@sentex.net>
References: <20040114151111.B4B3843D5D@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
	<6.0.1.1.0.20040114111325.08c0be58@209.112.4.2>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:30:57 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Spam-Score: -100.001 () BAYES_44,USER_IN_WHITELIST
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:31:21 -0000

riker# dd if=riker-bin.068 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes transferred in 4.869752 secs (215324315 bytes/sec)
riker#
asr0: <Adaptec Caching SCSI RAID> mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 17 at
device
 on pci3
asr0: major=154
asr0: ADAPTEC 3200S FW Rev. 370F, 2 channel, 256 CCBs, Protocol I2O

Six 72gig 10KRPM drives in RAID 1+0 config 215Meg per second wow

Ken!

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 09:32:29 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B34416A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:32:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web14607.mail.yahoo.com (web14607.mail.yahoo.com
	[216.136.224.87])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 555D243D1F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:32:28 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from plageotakes@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20040114173228.5113.qmail@web14607.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [68.164.226.146] by web14607.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:32:28 PST
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:32:28 -0800 (PST)
From: peter lageotakes <plageotakes@yahoo.com>
To: "N. Fung" <fbsdml@typhoon.co.jp>, stable@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <40055924.5020905@typhoon.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: Dell PE600SC with ServerWorks CSB6
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:32:29 -0000


--- "N. Fung" <fbsdml@typhoon.co.jp> wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Has anyone gotten 4.9R to recognize the "ServerWorks
> CSB6" ATA 
> controller on a Dell 600SC?  How about installing
> 5.2R on a 600SC?  5.2R 
> recognizes the said controller, but it corrupts
> data.
> 
> --
> eof
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"


There is a PR out for the 600sc:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=54549

There is a temp. work around for this issue.  However
going into /stand/sysinstall has a tendency to panic
the system on my system.

=====
ESCape with VI. Cheese A La mode.

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 09:35:38 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D60BE16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:35:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9752C43D58
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:35:27 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from fj@panix.com)
Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5])
	by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5483A983D9
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:35:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from fj@localhost)
	by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p2-a/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id i0EHZQu02337
	for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:35:26 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:35:26 -0500
From: Joe Altman <fj@panix.com>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-ID: <20040114173526.GA1891@panix.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Joe Altman <fj@panix.com>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <20040113204738.GA14543@panix.com>
	<200401132056.i0DKu1YO011391@bunrab.catwhisker.org>
	<20040113213324.GA14556@VARK.homeunix.com> <20040113220825.GA25495@panix.com>
	<xzpsmii6gpb.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <xzpsmii6gpb.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: Re: make buildkernel KERNCONF errors...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:35:38 -0000

On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:08:00AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smřrgrav wrote:
> Joe Altman <fj@panix.com> writes:
> > "I applied a patch to the root of a CVS source tree, and it will dist
> > over the next 24-48 hours to all of the relevant CVSUP machines.
> 
> shouldn't take more than two hours.

Very true. All is now well. My thanks to everyone.

-- 
The George W. Bush Five Point Economic Recovery Plan:
	      Hunt, Kill, Eat, Hump, Shit.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 12:18:35 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC3D16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:18:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miramanee.icarz.com (miramanee.icarz.com [207.99.22.55])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D446A43D8B
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:17:23 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from kenm@icarz.com)
Received: from deanna.icarz.com (deanna.icarz.com [207.99.22.19])
	by miramanee.icarz.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0EKHILc050928;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:17:18 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from kenm@icarz.com)
Received: from kenxp (netb-178.icarz.com [209.123.219.178])
	by deanna.icarz.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with SMTP id i0EKHILL084983;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:17:18 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from kenm@icarz.com)
Message-ID: <03ee01c3dadb$6025d150$b2db7bd1@icarz.com>
From: "Ken Menzel" <kenm@icarz.com>
To: "Brandon Gale" <brandon@globaldiagnostics.com>
References: <OJEMJMCPIMDLKHDCJPBNGEPNJGAA.brandon@globaldiagnostics.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:17:04 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
X-Spam-Score: -100.734 () BAYES_10,USER_IN_WHITELIST
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD (cached numbers!)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:18:35 -0000

Ooops,
riker# dd if=riker-bin.067 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes transferred in 29.302370 secs (35784682 bytes/sec)
riker# dd if=riker-bin.067 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000
1000+0 records in
1000+0 records out
1048576000 bytes transferred in 5.192789 secs (201929259 bytes/sec)
riker#

The cache works great.  Thanks for the heads up Brandon,

Ken

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brandon Gale" <brandon@globaldiagnostics.com>
To: "Ken Menzel" <kenm@icarz.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 2:55 PM
Subject: RE: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD


> Ken, that smells like it's coming out of memory cache and not from
the disk.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ken Menzel
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 12:31 PM
> > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mike Tancsa
> > Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
> >
> >
> > riker# dd if=riker-bin.068 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000
> > 1000+0 records in
> > 1000+0 records out
> > 1048576000 bytes transferred in 4.869752 secs (215324315
bytes/sec)
> > riker#
> > asr0: <Adaptec Caching SCSI RAID> mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 17
at
> > device
> >  on pci3
> > asr0: major=154
> > asr0: ADAPTEC 3200S FW Rev. 370F, 2 channel, 256 CCBs, Protocol
I2O
> >
> > Six 72gig 10KRPM drives in RAID 1+0 config 215Meg per second wow
> >
> > Ken!
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> >
> >
>
>

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 12:22:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1234B16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:22:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from osku.suutari.iki.fi (osku.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1715343D8F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:21:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
Received: from raisa (raisa.lemi.suutari.iki.fi [192.168.53.2])
	by osku.suutari.iki.fi (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with SMTP id i0EKJmdf025722;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:19:48 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
Message-ID: <005d01c3dadd$341c8de0$0235a8c0@raisa>
From: "Ari Suutari" <ari@suutari.iki.fi>
To: "Ken Menzel" <kenm@icarz.com>, <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>,
	"Mike Tancsa" <mike@sentex.net>
References:
	<20040114151111.B4B3843D5D@mx1.FreeBSD.org><6.0.1.1.0.20040114111325.08c0be58@209.112.4.2>
	<039301c3dac4$2b76d880$b2db7bd1@icarz.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:30:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:22:01 -0000

Hi,

> riker# dd if=riker-bin.068 of=/dev/null bs=1m count=1000
> 1000+0 records in
> 1000+0 records out
> 1048576000 bytes transferred in 4.869752 secs (215324315 bytes/sec)

    I'm afraid that reading from file might give too good results since
    you might be getting data from filesystem cache.

        Ari  S.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 12:26:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14D116A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:26:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from osku.suutari.iki.fi (osku.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B4BA43D67
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:24:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
Received: from raisa (raisa.lemi.suutari.iki.fi [192.168.53.2])
	by osku.suutari.iki.fi (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with SMTP id i0EKNPdf025745;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:23:25 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
Message-ID: <006301c3dadd$b56b46c0$0235a8c0@raisa>
From: "Ari Suutari" <ari@suutari.iki.fi>
To: "ict technician" <ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk>,
	"Karl Pielorz" <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk>, <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
References: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
	<741002750.1074086443@rainbow> <200401141527.11930.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
	<200401141410.47630.ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:33:45 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:26:02 -0000

Hi,

From: "ict technician" <ict@cardinalnewman.coventry.sch.uk>
>
> Where's the other CPU?
> What's da0 - send dmesg output

    The other CPU is sure active, at least when I look at things with top.
    da0 is another pair of disks, but older ones. I don't expect them
    to perform that well.

    Here is dmesg:

Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
        The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p13 #2: Mon Oct  6 12:15:38 EEST 2003
Timecounter "i8254"  frequency 1193182 Hz
CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (498.75-MHz 686-class CPU)
  Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0x673  Stepping = 3

Features=0x387fbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,
CMOV,PAT,PSE36,PN,MMX,FXSR,SSE>
real memory  = 268369920 (262080K bytes)
avail memory = 257400832 (251368K bytes)
Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC #0
IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> irq 0
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor motherboard
 cpu0 (BSP): apic id:  1, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000
 cpu1 (AP):  apic id:  0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000
 io0 (APIC): apic id:  2, version: 0x00170011, at 0xfec00000
Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0353000.
Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled
Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00fdf40
npx0: <math processor> on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 interface
pcib0: <Intel 82443BX host to PCI bridge (AGP disabled)> on motherboard
IOAPIC #0 intpin 17 -> irq 2
IOAPIC #0 intpin 21 -> irq 5
IOAPIC #0 intpin 22 -> irq 9
IOAPIC #0 intpin 20 -> irq 10
IOAPIC #0 intpin 19 -> irq 11
pci0: <PCI bus> on pcib0
pcib1: <PCI to PCI bridge (vendor=1044 device=a500)> at device 12.0 on pci0
pci1: <PCI bus> on pcib1
asr0: <Adaptec Caching SCSI RAID> mem 0xf8000000-0xfbffffff irq 2 at device
12.1 on pci0
asr0: major=154
asr0: DPT PM2654U2 FW Rev. 3010, 1 channel, 256 CCBs, Protocol I2O
sym0: <875> port 0x1400-0x14ff mem
0xf4200000-0xf4200fff,0xf4204000-0xf42040ff irq 5 at device 13.0 on pci0
sym0: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking
sym1: <875> port 0x1800-0x18ff mem
0xf4201000-0xf4201fff,0xf4204400-0xf42044ff irq 9 at device 13.1 on pci0
sym1: No NVRAM, ID 7, Fast-20, SE, parity checking
fxp0: <Intel Pro 10/100B/100+ Ethernet> port 0x1060-0x107f mem
0xf4000000-0xf40fffff,0xf4205000-0xf4205fff irq 10 at device 15.0 on pci0
fxp0: Ethernet address 00:90:27:6a:95:e3
inphy0: <i82555 10/100 media interface> on miibus0
inphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
fxp1: <Intel Pro 10/100B/100+ Ethernet> port 0x1080-0x10bf mem
0xf4100000-0xf41fffff,0xf4202000-0xf4202fff irq 11 at device 16.0 on pci0
fxp1: Ethernet address 00:90:27:43:be:59
inphy1: <i82555 10/100 media interface> on miibus1
inphy1:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
isab0: <Intel 82371AB PCI to ISA bridge> at device 18.0 on pci0
isa0: <ISA bus> on isab0
atapci0: <Intel PIIX4 ATA33 controller> port 0x1050-0x105f at device 18.1 on
pci0
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
uhci0: <Intel 82371AB/EB (PIIX4) USB controller> port 0x10c0-0x10df irq 9 at
device 18.2 on pci0
usb0: <Intel 82371AB/EB (PIIX4) USB controller> on uhci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
Timecounter "PIIX"  frequency 3579545 Hz
chip1: <Intel 82371AB Power management controller> port 0x1040-0x104f at
device 18.3 on pci0
pci0: <Cirrus Logic GD5480 SVGA controller> at 20.0
orm0: <Option ROMs> at iomem
0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xc87ff,0xc8800-0xc8fff,0xc9000-0xc9fff,0xca000-0xce
fff on isa0
fdc0: <NEC 72065B or clone> at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0
fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold
fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0
atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0
atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0
kbd0 at atkbd0
vga0: <Generic ISA VGA> at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0
sc0: <System console> at flags 0x100 on isa0
sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300>
sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
sio0: type 16550A
sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0
sio1: type 16550A
ppc0: <Parallel port> at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0
ppc0: Generic chipset (ECP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode
ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold
ppi0: <Parallel I/O> on ppbus0
lpt0: <Printer> on ppbus0
lpt0: Interrupt-driven port
APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt delivery
APIC_IO: routing 8254 via IOAPIC #0 intpin 2
ata0-slave: ATAPI identify retries exceeded
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
acd0: DVD-ROM <TOSHIBA DVD-ROM SD-M1302> at ata0-master PIO4
Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
sa0 at sym1 bus 0 target 5 lun 0
sa0: <HP C1537A L907> Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device
sa0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 16)
pass2 at asr0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0
pass2: <ESG-SHV SCA HSBP M7 0.12> Fixed Processor SCSI-2 device
da0 at asr0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: <DPT RAID-1 3010> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device
da0: 8748MB (17915904 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1115C)
da1 at asr0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0
da1: <DPT RAID-1 3010> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device
da1: 70149MB (143665152 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 8942C)
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a


    Ari S.


From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 13:08:34 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168A116A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:08:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailserver.coqui.net (piro.coqui.net [196.28.61.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9545943D75
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:07:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nieves@caribeweather.com)
Received: (qmail 21079 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 21:12:41 +0000
Received: from unknown (HELO filter2.prtc.net) ([196.28.61.27])
          (envelope-sender <nieves@caribeweather.com>)
          by mailserver.coqui.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; 14 Jan 2004 21:12:41 +0000
Received: from nodnsquery(66.50.247.82) by filter2.prtc.net via csmap 
	 id 8c54018c_46d5_11d8_8a4a_00304811e4dc_19511;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:06:40 -0400 (AST)
Received: from caribe.caribeweather.net (caribe.caribeweather.net
	[192.168.2.7])i0EL7TTd007674
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:07:29 -0400 (AST)
	(envelope-from nieves@tropical.caribeweather.net)
Received: from caribe.caribeweather.net (localhost.caribeweather.net
	[127.0.0.1])i0EL7PUA079651
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:07:29 -0400 (AST)
	(envelope-from nieves@caribe.caribeweather.net)
Message-Id: <200401142107.i0EL7PUA079651@caribe.caribeweather.net>
To: stable@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: Message from peter lageotakes <plageotakes@yahoo.com> 
	<20040114173228.5113.qmail@web14607.mail.yahoo.com> 
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:07:25 -0400
From: Jose F Nieves <nieves@caribeweather.com>
Subject: Re: Dell PE600SC with ServerWorks CSB6 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:08:34 -0000

I installed (and run) 4.9R on a DELL 600SC without any problems.


 
> --- "N. Fung" <fbsdml@typhoon.co.jp> wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > Has anyone gotten 4.9R to recognize the "ServerWorks
> > CSB6" ATA 
> > controller on a Dell 600SC?  How about installing
> > 5.2R on a 600SC?  5.2R 
> > recognizes the said controller, but it corrupts
> > data.
> > 
> > --
> > eof
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> >
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 
> 
> There is a PR out for the 600sc:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=54549
> 
> There is a temp. work around for this issue.  However
> going into /stand/sysinstall has a tendency to panic
> the system on my system.
> 
> =====
> ESCape with VI. Cheese A La mode.
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 13:14:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C034416A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:14:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailserver.coqui.net (piro.coqui.net [196.28.61.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A87A43D5F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:14:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nieves@caribeweather.com)
Received: (qmail 21079 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 21:12:41 +0000
Received: from unknown (HELO filter2.prtc.net) ([196.28.61.27])
          (envelope-sender <nieves@caribeweather.com>)
          by mailserver.coqui.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; 14 Jan 2004 21:12:41 +0000
Received: from nodnsquery(66.50.247.82) by filter2.prtc.net via csmap 
	 id 8c54018c_46d5_11d8_8a4a_00304811e4dc_19511;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:06:40 -0400 (AST)
Received: from caribe.caribeweather.net (caribe.caribeweather.net
	[192.168.2.7])i0EL7TTd007674
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:07:29 -0400 (AST)
	(envelope-from nieves@tropical.caribeweather.net)
Received: from caribe.caribeweather.net (localhost.caribeweather.net
	[127.0.0.1])i0EL7PUA079651
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:07:29 -0400 (AST)
	(envelope-from nieves@caribe.caribeweather.net)
Message-Id: <200401142107.i0EL7PUA079651@caribe.caribeweather.net>
To: stable@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: Message from peter lageotakes <plageotakes@yahoo.com> 
	<20040114173228.5113.qmail@web14607.mail.yahoo.com> 
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:07:25 -0400
From: Jose F Nieves <nieves@caribeweather.com>
Subject: Re: Dell PE600SC with ServerWorks CSB6 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:14:18 -0000

I installed (and run) 4.9R on a DELL 600SC without any problems.


 
> --- "N. Fung" <fbsdml@typhoon.co.jp> wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > Has anyone gotten 4.9R to recognize the "ServerWorks
> > CSB6" ATA 
> > controller on a Dell 600SC?  How about installing
> > 5.2R on a 600SC?  5.2R 
> > recognizes the said controller, but it corrupts
> > data.
> > 
> > --
> > eof
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> >
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 
> 
> There is a PR out for the 600sc:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=54549
> 
> There is a temp. work around for this issue.  However
> going into /stand/sysinstall has a tendency to panic
> the system on my system.
> 
> =====
> ESCape with VI. Cheese A La mode.
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
> http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 14:52:28 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E0916A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:52:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
	(fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.73])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F7B43D58
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:52:24 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mikej@rogers.com)
Received: from win2000 ([63.139.3.63])
	by fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.comESMTP
	<20040114225133.VOOG337742.fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@win2000>
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:51:33 -0500
From: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@rogers.com>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:52:50 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
In-Reply-To: <20040114151111.B4B3843D5D@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Thread-Index: AcPasILLh4/wRLpeReyKhd0YaJu+tgAQFqcw
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at
	fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [63.139.3.63] using ID
	<mikej@rogers.com> at Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:51:33 -0500
Message-Id: <20040114225133.VOOG337742.fep03-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@win2000>
Subject: RE: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:52:28 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org 
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of 
> lists@mediumgreen.com
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:11 AM
> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD 
> 
> I think I heard Raymond Wiker say:
> >Ari Suutari writes:
> > > dd if=/dev/rda1s1a of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
> > > 100+0 records in
> > > 100+0 records out
> > > 104857600 bytes transferred in 4.193832 secs (25002814 bytes/sec)
> > > 
> > > So, I get only about 25MB/s. Shouldn't I be getting 
> something like 
> > > 70 MB/s, or even more since there are two disks that can 
> server read 
> > > requests ?
> 
> 
> FWIW, on my mylex controller w/ raid 5 I'm getting:
> 
> # dd if=/dev/da0s1g of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes transferred in 3.707196 secs (28284882 bytes/sec)
> 
> 
> and my dell perc3/dc (raid 5) is getting:
> 
> # dd if=/dev/amrd0s2e of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
> 100+0 records in
> 100+0 records out
> 104857600 bytes transferred in 2.133522 secs (49147653 bytes/sec)

This sounds pretty poor for SCSI raid. Here are my results on a single
Maxtor ATA drive.

CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (1410.21-MHz 686-class CPU)
ad0: 76345MB <MAXTOR 6L080L4> [155114/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100

# dd if=/dev/rad0s1a of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 2.484640 secs (42202333 bytes/sec)

5 dd's running simultaneously show the following in iostast.

      tty             ad0              ad2              ad4             cpu
   0   77  0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  0  0 100
   1  119 128.00 129 16.09   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  2 98
   0   77 128.00 424 52.97   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  5  2 93
   0   77 128.00 424 52.97   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  0  2 98
   0   77 128.00 423 52.85   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  2 97
   0   77 128.00 424 52.97   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  2 97
   0   77 128.00 423 52.85   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  0  2 98
   0   77 128.00 424 52.97   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  3 96
   0   77 128.00 424 52.97   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  0  2 98
   0   77 128.00 423 52.85   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   1  0  1  2 96
   0   77 128.00 424 52.97   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  2  1 98
   0  924 128.00  21  2.60   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   1  0  1  0 98
   0   77  0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  0  0 100

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 16:59:15 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D0A16A4CF
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:59:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kiku.netforest.co.jp (kiku.netforest.co.jp [218.45.16.40])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4024243D5E
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:58:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ueda@netforest.ad.jp)
Received: (qmail 72284 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2004 09:58:40 +0900
Received: from unknown (HELO sumire.netforest.co.jp) ([218.45.16.38])
          (envelope-sender <ueda@netforest.ad.jp>)
          by kiku.netforest.co.jp (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; 15 Jan 2004 09:58:40 +0900
Received: (qmail 37595 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2004 09:58:40 +0900
Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.0.6.191)
  by sumire.netforest.co.jp with SMTP; 15 Jan 2004 09:58:40 +0900
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:58:39 +0900
From: UEDA Hiroyuki <ueda@netforest.ad.jp>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <40055924.5020905@typhoon.co.jp>
References: <40055924.5020905@typhoon.co.jp>
Message-Id: <20040115094617.DC85.UEDA@netforest.ad.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.07.02
Subject: Re: Dell PE600SC with ServerWorks CSB6
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:59:15 -0000

> Hello!
> 
> Has anyone gotten 4.9R to recognize the "ServerWorks CSB6" ATA 
> controller on a Dell 600SC?  How about installing 5.2R on a 600SC?  5.2R 
> recognizes the said controller, but it corrupts data.

  We are using Dell 600SC with ServerWorks CSB6 for FreeBSD
5.1-RELEASE-p11. The machine's dmesg is here:

-----
Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
	The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p11 #1: Wed Jan  7 19:00:21 JST 2004
    ishikawa@eir.netforest.co.jp:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/EIR
Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0454000.
Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc04541f4.
Timecounter "i8254"  frequency 1193182 Hz
Timecounter "TSC"  frequency 2399340052 Hz
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz (2399.34-MHz 686-class CPU)
  Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0xf29  Stepping = 9
  Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE>
real memory  = 1073676288 (1023 MB)
avail memory = 1038413824 (990 MB)
pnpbios: Bad PnP BIOS data checksum
Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled
npx0: <math processor> on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 interface
acpi0: <DELL   PE600SC > on motherboard
acpi0: power button is handled as a fixed feature programming model.
Timecounter "ACPI-safe"  frequency 3579545 Hz
pcibios: BIOS version 2.10
Using $PIR table, 7 entries at 0xc00fc2c0
acpi_timer0: <32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0
acpi_cpu0: <CPU> on acpi0
acpi_cpu1: <CPU> on acpi0
pcib0: <ACPI Host-PCI bridge> on acpi0
pci0: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib0
em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection, Version - 1.5.31> port 0xecc0-0xecff mem 0xfe100000-0xfe11ffff irq 10 at device 2.0 on pci0
em0:  Speed:100 Mbps  Duplex:Full
ahc0: <Adaptec 3960D Ultra160 SCSI adapter> port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfe123000-0xfe123fff irq 5 at device 6.0 on pci0
aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs
ahc1: <Adaptec 3960D Ultra160 SCSI adapter> port 0xe400-0xe4ff mem 0xfe122000-0xfe122fff irq 10 at device 6.1 on pci0
aic7899: Ultra160 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, 32/253 SCBs
pci0: <display, VGA> at device 8.0 (no driver attached)
atapci0: <ServerWorks CSB6 UDMA100 controller> port 0x8b0-0x8bf,0x374-0x377,0x170-0x177,0x3f4-0x3f7,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 15.1 on pci0
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
pci0: <serial bus, USB> at device 15.2 (no driver attached)
isab0: <PCI-ISA bridge> at device 15.3 on pci0
isa0: <ISA bus> on isab0
fdc0: <Enhanced floppy controller (i82077, NE72065 or clone)> port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0
fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold
fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0
atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0
atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0
kbd0 at atkbd0
psm0: <PS/2 Mouse> irq 12 on atkbdc0
psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3
sio0 port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0
sio0: type 16550A
ppc0 port 0x778-0x77f,0x378-0x37f irq 7 drq 1 on acpi0
ppc0: Generic chipset (ECP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode
ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold
ppbus0: <Parallel port bus> on ppc0
plip0: <PLIP network interface> on ppbus0
lpt0: <Printer> on ppbus0
lpt0: Interrupt-driven port
ppi0: <Parallel I/O> on ppbus0
orm0: <Option ROMs> at iomem 0xec000-0xeffff,0xe3000-0xea7ff,0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0
pmtimer0 on isa0
sc0: <System console> at flags 0x100 on isa0
sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300>
sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
sio1: port may not be enabled
vga0: <Generic ISA VGA> at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0
Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec
IP Filter: v3.4.31 initialized.  Default = block all, Logging = enabled
ad0: 38146MB <ST340014A> [77504/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
ad2: 38146MB <ST340014A> [77504/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA100
ar0: 38146MB <ATA RAID1 array> [4862/255/63] status: READY subdisks:
 disk0 READY on ad0 at ata0-master
 disk1 READY on ad2 at ata1-master
Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
Opened disk ad0 -> 1
Opened disk ad0 -> 1
Opened disk ad0 -> 1
Opened disk ad0 -> 1
Opened disk ad2 -> 1
Opened disk ad2 -> 1
sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0
sa0: <ARCHIVE Python 06408-XXX 9100> Removable Sequential Access SCSI-3 device 
sa0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 32, 16bit)
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ar0s1a
IP Filter: already initialized
IP Filter: already initialized
-----

  The machine has 2 IDE disk which are connected to different channel
for ataraid of FreeBSD. 

  We could not install both 4.9R and 5.1R-p11 when first try, but we
found that we could install without CD-ROM drive :-).

-----
UEDA Hiroyuki <ueda@netforest.ad.jp>
Net Forest Inc., JAPAN


From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 17:43:54 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F12C16A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:43:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.classy.jp (mail.classY.jp [202.33.21.54])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BD343D5F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:43:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from fbsdml@typhoon.co.jp)
Received: from typhoon.co.jp (218.231.206.166.eo.eaccess.ne.jp
	[218.231.206.166])	(authenticated bits=0)i0F1hfMF057207
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:43:45 GMT
Message-ID: <4005F04B.3060103@typhoon.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:43:39 +0900
From: "N. Fung" <fbsdml@typhoon.co.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US;
	rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stable@freebsd.org
References: <plageotakes@yahoo.com>
	<200401142107.i0EL7PUA079651@caribe.caribeweather.net>
In-Reply-To: <200401142107.i0EL7PUA079651@caribe.caribeweather.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.4; VAE 6.23.0.2; VDF 6.23.0.31
Subject: Re: Dell PE600SC with ServerWorks CSB6
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:43:54 -0000

Jose F Nieves wrote:
> I installed (and run) 4.9R on a DELL 600SC without any problems.
> 

Sure, but 4.9R couldn't recognize the ServerWorks ATA controller and 
without /boot/loader.conf.local saying:

    hw.ata.ata_dma=0

it would corrupt data when copying stuff from one HD to another.

--
eof

> 
>  
> 
>>--- "N. Fung" <fbsdml@typhoon.co.jp> wrote:
>>
>>>Hello!
>>>
>>>Has anyone gotten 4.9R to recognize the "ServerWorks
>>>CSB6" ATA 
>>>controller on a Dell 600SC?  How about installing
>>>5.2R on a 600SC?  5.2R 
>>>recognizes the said controller, but it corrupts
>>>data.
>>>
>>>--
>>>eof
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>>>
>>
>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>>
>>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>
>>"freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>>
>>
>>There is a PR out for the 600sc:
>>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=54549
>>
>>There is a temp. work around for this issue.  However
>>going into /stand/sysinstall has a tendency to panic
>>the system on my system.
>>
>>=====
>>ESCape with VI. Cheese A La mode.
>>
>>__________________________________
>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
>>http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus
>>_______________________________________________
>>freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 17:54:15 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B09716A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:54:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.classy.jp (mail.classY.jp [202.33.21.54])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AEC43D55
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:54:13 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from fbsdml@typhoon.co.jp)
Received: from typhoon.co.jp (218.231.206.166.eo.eaccess.ne.jp
	[218.231.206.166])	(authenticated bits=0)i0F1sAMF057221
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:54:11 GMT
Message-ID: <4005F2C2.8050700@typhoon.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:54:10 +0900
From: "N. Fung" <fbsdml@typhoon.co.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US;
	rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <40055924.5020905@typhoon.co.jp>
	<20040115094617.DC85.UEDA@netforest.ad.jp>
In-Reply-To: <20040115094617.DC85.UEDA@netforest.ad.jp>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.4; VAE 6.23.0.2; VDF 6.23.0.31
Subject: Re: Dell PE600SC with ServerWorks CSB6
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:54:15 -0000

UEDA Hiroyuki wrote:

...skipped ...
>   We are using Dell 600SC with ServerWorks CSB6 for FreeBSD
> 5.1-RELEASE-p11. The machine's dmesg is here:

...skipped...

> atapci0: <ServerWorks CSB6 UDMA100 controller> port 0x8b0-0x8bf,0x374-0x377,0x170-0x177,0x3f4-0x3f7,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 15.1 on pci0
> ad0: 38146MB <ST340014A> [77504/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
> ad2: 38146MB <ST340014A> [77504/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA100
...skipped...

> -----
> 
>   The machine has 2 IDE disk which are connected to different channel
> for ataraid of FreeBSD. 
> 
>   We could not install both 4.9R and 5.1R-p11 when first try, but we
> found that we could install without CD-ROM drive :-).

Thanks for the info!  I got pretty much the same dmesg when I put 5.2R 
on the machine.  And yes, I had to get rid of the CD-ROM drive before it 
would install :)

Anyway, I don't have raid and the 2 IDE drives are on ata0-master and 
ata0-slave. Data get corrupted when I tried compiling a kernel.  I'll 
try moving the 2nd IDE to ata1-master and see what happens.

--
eof


From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 18:52:14 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F17C16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:52:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.farley.org (farley.org [67.64.95.201])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC48C43D46
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:52:09 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org)
Received: from thor.farley.org (1d01foj6pkibc9e8@thor.farley.org
	[IPv6:2002:4340:5fcd:1::5])
	by mail.farley.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0F2q6kq051229
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:52:07 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org)
Received: from thor.farley.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by thor.farley.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0F2q6ZK000828
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:52:06 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org)
Received: from localhost (sean@localhost)i0F2q6W4000825
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:52:06 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: thor.farley.org: sean owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:52:06 -0600 (CST)
From: Sean Farley <sean-freebsd@farley.org>
X-X-Sender: sean@thor.farley.org
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040114202434.O631@thor.farley.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Subject: Panic (Fatal trap 12)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 02:52:14 -0000

I have been getting reboots of my box occassionaly under 4-STABLE for
awhile, and I would like some help trying to track it down.

Hardware:
1. Soltek 75DRV5.
2. 512MB Crucial unbuffered ECC memory
3. Ti4200 nVidia card

Software:
FreeBSD thor.farley.org 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #0: Wed Dec 31
21:03:53 CST 2003     root@thor.farley.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THOR
i386

Things I have tried:
1. Looked for leaking capacitors.  None found.
2. Ran memtest for about two days.  No errors found.
3. Swapped out video card with another card.  No help here.
4. With and without nVidia's driver.  Bummer.
5. Reseated all components.  No luck here.

Two different panics I have saved are attached at the end.  They can
happen under load or without.

As with the first panic, the second panic had this in /var/log/messages:
Jan 14 19:06:06 thor /kernel: with interrupts disabled
Jan 14 19:06:06 thor /kernel: kernel trap 9 with interrupts disabled
Jan 14 19:06:06 thor last message repeated 24 times
=2E..
<a bunch of garbage after a lot of these messages>
=2E..
Jan 14 19:49:10 thor /kernel: kernel trap 9 with interrupts disabled
Jan 14 19:49:10 thor last message repeated 24 times
Jan 14 19:49:10 thor /kernel: with interrupts disabled
<panic>

Panic 1 occurred when I tried to start Linux version of ArmyOps (game).
Panic 2 occurred while I was away from my computer.  xscreensaver was
running, but the monitor had probably powered down as I was away from
the computer for about an hour.

Does anyone see what the problem may be?


Panic 1
-------
GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you ar=
e
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain condition=
s.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd"...
IdlePTD at physical address 0x0060d000
initial pcb at physical address 0x00335820
panicstr: page fault
panic messages:
---
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address=09=3D 0x2e
fault code=09=09=3D supervisor write, page not present
instruction pointer=09=3D 0x8:0xc029e537
stack pointer=09        =3D 0x10:0xd84f984c
frame pointer=09        =3D 0x10:0xd84f9870
code segment=09=09=3D base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
=09=09=09=3D DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags=09=3D interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL =3D 0
current process=09=09=3D 49707 (armyops-bin)
interrupt mask=09=09=3D none
trap number=09=09=3D 12
panic: page fault

syncing disks... 34 4
done
Uptime: 1d9h45m26s
vmmon: Module vmmon: unloaded
vmmon: Module vmmon: unloaded

dumping to dev #ad/0x30011, offset 1026272
dump ata1: resetting devices .. done
511 510 509 508 507 506 505 504 503 502 501 500 499 498 497 496 495 494 493=
 492 491 490 489 488 487 486 485 484 483 482 481 480 479 478 477 476 475 47=
4 473 472 471 470 469 468 467 466 465 464 463 462 461 460 459 458 457 456 4=
55 454 453 452 451 450 449 448 447 446 445 444 443 442 441 440 439 438 437 =
436 435 434 433 432 431 430 429 428 427 426 425 424 423 422 421 420 419 418=
 417 416 415 414 413 412 411 410 409 408 407 406 405 404 403 402 401 400 39=
9 398 397 396 395 394 393 392 391 390 389 388 387 386 385 384 383 382 381 3=
80 379 378 377 376 375 374 373 372 371 370 369 368 367 366 365 364 363 362 =
361 360 359 358 357 356 355 354 353 352 351 350 349 348 347 346 345 344 343=
 342 341 340 339 338 337 336 335 334 333 332 331 330 329 328 327 326 325 32=
4 323 322 321 320 319 318 317 316 315 314 313 312 311 310 309 308 307 306 3=
05 304 303 302 301 300 299 298 297 296 295 294 293 292 291 290 289 288 287 =
286 285 284 283 282 281 280 279 278 277 276 275 274 273 272 271 270 269 268=
 267 266 265 264 263 262 261 260 259 258 257 256 255 254 253 252 251 250 24=
9 248 247 246 245 244 243 242 241 240 239 238 237 236 235 234 233 232 231 2=
30 229 228 227 226 225 224 223 222 221 220 219 218 217 216 215 214 213 212 =
211 210 209 208 207 206 205 204 203 202 201 200 199 198 197 196 195 194 193=
 192 191 190 189 188 187 186 185 184 183 182 181 180 179 178 177 176 175 17=
4 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 165 164 163 162 161 160 159 158 157 156 1=
55 154 153 152 151 150 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 142 141 140 139 138 137 =
136 135 134 133 132 131 130 129 128 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118=
 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 99=
 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74=
 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49=
 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24=
 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
---
#0  dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487
487=09=09if (dumping++) {
(kgdb) where
#0  dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487
#1  0xc016c783 in boot (howto=3D256) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:3=
16
#2  0xc016cba8 in poweroff_wait (junk=3D0xc02ff66c, howto=3D-1070599825)
    at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595
#3  0xc02abf92 in trap_fatal (frame=3D0xd84f980c, eva=3D46) at /usr/src/sys=
/i386/i386/trap.c:974
#4  0xc02abc65 in trap_pfault (frame=3D0xd84f980c, usermode=3D0, eva=3D46)
    at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867
#5  0xc02ab84f in trap (frame=3D{tf_fs =3D 16, tf_es =3D 16, tf_ds =3D 16, =
tf_edi =3D -1, tf_esi =3D 0,
      tf_ebp =3D -665872272, tf_isp =3D -665872328, tf_ebx =3D 46, tf_edx =
=3D 46,
      tf_ecx =3D 15213852, tf_eax =3D -2, tf_trapno =3D 12, tf_err =3D 2, t=
f_eip =3D -1070996169,
      tf_cs =3D 8, tf_eflags =3D 66178, tf_esp =3D -1067915152, tf_ss =3D 4=
6})
    at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466
#6  0xc029e537 in atomic_clear_short (p=3D0xc058e9ef, v=3D-1038268800) at m=
achine/atomic.h:112
#7  0xc058e9ef in ?? ()
#8  0xc046d370 in ?? ()
#9  0xc045f298 in ?? ()
#10 0xc045f08c in ?? ()
#11 0xc04708c6 in ?? ()
#12 0xc04701ef in ?? ()
#13 0xc058e183 in ?? ()
#14 0xc058d33a in ?? ()
#15 0xc01a8c42 in spec_ioctl (ap=3D0xd84f9db8) at /usr/src/sys/miscfs/specf=
s/spec_vnops.c:306
#16 0xc01a896d in spec_vnoperate (ap=3D0xd84f9db8)
    at /usr/src/sys/miscfs/specfs/spec_vnops.c:119
#17 0xc02625a1 in ufs_vnoperatespec (ap=3D0xd84f9db8) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/u=
fs/ufs_vnops.c:2394
#18 0xc01a2ce3 in vn_ioctl (fp=3D0xc261fd80, com=3D3223864871, data=3D0xd84=
f9e7c ";",
    p=3D0xd83c4f20) at vnode_if.h:429
#19 0xc017c96a in ioctl (p=3D0xd83c4f20, uap=3D0xd84f9f80) at /usr/src/sys/=
sys/file.h:178
#20 0xc058d416 in ?? ()
#21 0xc03d0ee4 in ?? ()
#22 0xc02ac241 in syscall2 (frame=3D{tf_fs =3D 47, tf_es =3D 47, tf_ds =3D =
47, tf_edi =3D 212027656,
      tf_esi =3D 0, tf_ebp =3D -1043333061, tf_isp =3D -665870380, tf_ebx =
=3D 88,
      tf_edx =3D -1077951696, tf_ecx =3D -1071102425, tf_eax =3D 54, tf_tra=
pno =3D 12, tf_err =3D 2,
      tf_eip =3D 680178340, tf_cs =3D 31, tf_eflags =3D 514, tf_esp =3D -10=
77951756, tf_ss =3D 47})
    at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1175
#23 0xc029ff95 in Xint0x80_syscall ()
Cannot access memory at address 0xc1d0003b.
(kgdb) quit



Panic 2
-------
GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you ar=
e
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain condition=
s.
Type "show copying" to see the conditions.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB.  Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd"...
IdlePTD at physical address 0x0060d000
initial pcb at physical address 0x00335820
panicstr: page fault
panic messages:
---
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address=09=3D 0x0
fault code=09=09=3D supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer=09=3D 0x8:0xc02aa096
stack pointer=09        =3D 0x10:0xd687aed4
frame pointer=09        =3D 0x10:0xd687aee8
code segment=09=09=3D base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
=09=09=09=3D DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags=09=3D interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL =3D 0
current process=09=09=3D 3 (pagedaemon)
interrupt mask=09=09=3D net bio cam
trap number=09=09=3D 12
panic: page fault

syncing disks... 4 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
giving up on 2 buffers
Uptime: 1d10h34m23s
vmmon: Module vmmon: unloaded
vmmon: Module vmmon: unloaded

dumping to dev #ad/0x30011, offset 1026272
dump ata1: resetting devices .. done
511 510 509 508 507 506 505 504 503 502 501 500 499 498 497 496 495 494 493=
 492 491 490 489 488 487 486 485 484 483 482 481 480 479 478 477 476 475 47=
4 473 472 471 470 469 468 467 466 465 464 463 462 461 460 459 458 457 456 4=
55 454 453 452 451 450 449 448 447 446 445 444 443 442 441 440 439 438 437 =
436 435 434 433 432 431 430 429 428 427 426 425 424 423 422 421 420 419 418=
 417 416 415 414 413 412 411 410 409 408 407 406 405 404 403 402 401 400 39=
9 398 397 396 395 394 393 392 391 390 389 388 387 386 385 384 383 382 381 3=
80 379 378 377 376 375 374 373 372 371 370 369 368 367 366 365 364 363 362 =
361 360 359 358 357 356 355 354 353 352 351 350 349 348 347 346 345 344 343=
 342 341 340 339 338 337 336 335 334 333 332 331 330 329 328 327 326 325 32=
4 323 322 321 320 319 318 317 316 315 314 313 312 311 310 309 308 307 306 3=
05 304 303 302 301 300 299 298 297 296 295 294 293 292 291 290 289 288 287 =
286 285 284 283 282 281 280 279 278 277 276 275 274 273 272 271 270 269 268=
 267 266 265 264 263 262 261 260 259 258 257 256 255 254 253 252 251 250 24=
9 248 247 246 245 244 243 242 241 240 239 238 237 236 235 234 233 232 231 2=
30 229 228 227 226 225 224 223 222 221 220 219 218 217 216 215 214 213 212 =
211 210 209 208 207 206 205 204 203 202 201 200 199 198 197 196 195 194 193=
 192 191 190 189 188 187 186 185 184 183 182 181 180 179 178 177 176 175 17=
4 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 165 164 163 162 161 160 159 158 157 156 1=
55 154 153 152 151 150 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 142 141 140 139 138 137 =
136 135 134 133 132 131 130 129 128 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118=
 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 99=
 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74=
 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49=
 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24=
 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
---
#0  dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487
487=09=09if (dumping++) {
(kgdb) where
#0  dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487
#1  0xc016c783 in boot (howto=3D256) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:3=
16
#2  0xc016cba8 in poweroff_wait (junk=3D0xc02ff66c, howto=3D-1070599825)
    at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595
#3  0xc02abf92 in trap_fatal (frame=3D0xd687ae94, eva=3D0) at /usr/src/sys/=
i386/i386/trap.c:974
#4  0xc02abc65 in trap_pfault (frame=3D0xd687ae94, usermode=3D0, eva=3D0)
    at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:867
#5  0xc02ab84f in trap (frame=3D{tf_fs =3D 16, tf_es =3D 16, tf_ds =3D 16, =
tf_edi =3D 0, tf_esi =3D 64,
      tf_ebp =3D -695750936, tf_isp =3D -695750976, tf_ebx =3D -1054249612,=
 tf_edx =3D 64,
      tf_ecx =3D -666697600, tf_eax =3D 0, tf_trapno =3D 12, tf_err =3D 0, =
tf_eip =3D -1070948202,
      tf_cs =3D 8, tf_eflags =3D 66118, tf_esp =3D -727404116, tf_ss =3D 13=
4516736})
    at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:466
#6  0xc02aa096 in pmap_testbit (m=3D0xc0d72188, bit=3D64) at /usr/src/sys/i=
386/i386/pmap.c:2836
#7  0xc02aa265 in pmap_is_modified (m=3D0xc0d72188) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i3=
86/pmap.c:2994
#8  0xc026e6eb in vm_page_test_dirty (m=3D0xc0d72188) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm=
_page.c:1773
#9  0xc026f5b0 in vm_pageout_scan (pass=3D0) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_pageout.=
c:771
#10 0xc027014b in vm_pageout () at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_pageout.c:1405
(kgdb) quit



Thank you,

Sean
-----------------------
sean-freebsd@farley.org

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 20:20:48 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCBA16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:20:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B467243D54
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:20:47 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from d.antunes@comcast.net)
Received: from progress2 (h00609708e98f.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.31.154.48])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP
          id <2004011504204601600gno77e>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 04:20:46 +0000
From: "Dennis Antunes" <d.antunes@comcast.net>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:20:40 -0500
Message-ID: <000001c3db1e$efc6f080$9500a8c0@Progress2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <4005F2C2.8050700@typhoon.co.jp>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Subject: MAC cloning?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 04:20:48 -0000

I was wondering if there is any way to misrepresent the hardware address
of a given card for the purpose of not having to call my ISP every time
I connect a different BSD box to my cable modem.
Any help is appreciated.
Dennis

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 20:31:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B0A916A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:31:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9AC43D83
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:31:12 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu)
Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (IDENT:brdavis@localhost.localdomain
	[127.0.0.1])
	by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i0F4V8aT002284;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:31:08 -0800
Received: (from brdavis@localhost)
	by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.3/Submit) id i0F4V85E002283;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:31:08 -0800
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:31:08 -0800
From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
To: Dennis Antunes <d.antunes@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <20040115043108.GA1488@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
References: <4005F2C2.8050700@typhoon.co.jp>
	<000001c3db1e$efc6f080$9500a8c0@Progress2>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <000001c3db1e$efc6f080$9500a8c0@Progress2>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) on odin.ac.hmc.edu
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: MAC cloning?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 04:31:18 -0000


--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

[Please don't reply to random messages to start a new thread.  It
confuses threaded mail readers.]

On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:20:40PM -0500, Dennis Antunes wrote:
> I was wondering if there is any way to misrepresent the hardware address
> of a given card for the purpose of not having to call my ISP every time
> I connect a different BSD box to my cable modem.

ifconfig <interface> ether <mac address>

should work with many, though not all ethernet cards.

-- Brooks

--=20
Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE.
PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529  9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4

--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFABheDXY6L6fI4GtQRAgEAAJ4mlkSXG4IqH/7iKmRoEcIIm5NLmACfcssK
okwf3FA/2JDNmMV3ee/sX+I=
=DcKD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Q68bSM7Ycu6FN28Q--

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 21:32:45 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4734116A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:32:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.6])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B4FA43D69
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:32:43 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org)
Received: (qmail 8966 invoked by uid 1002); 15 Jan 2004 05:32:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) (64.58.1.252)
  by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 15 Jan 2004 05:32:43 -0000
Message-ID: <40062590.50201@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:30:56 -0700
From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031103
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stable@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Call for bi-monthly status reports
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:32:45 -0000

All,

It's time for bi-monthly status reports.  This one is a little late due
to the excitement of releasing 5.2, so please submit reports for Oct-Dec
2003.  As always, the template is at
http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-sample.xml, and submissions
go to monthly@freebsd.org.  While this report is primarily for projects
that are in-progress, we would also encourage submissions for projects
that are still in their idea and planning phases.  It is open to src,
ports, and documentation projects that are related to FreeBSD

Submissions are due to monthly@freebsd.org by Jan 24.  Thanks!

Scott Long

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 22:36:25 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DC816A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:36:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.22])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3796E43D4C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:36:22 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from pavelbsd@mail.ru)
Received: from [213.242.59.10] (port=4879 helo=host157.int.ptt)
	by mx2.mail.ru with esmtp 
	id 1Ah176-0004uF-00
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:36:20 +0300
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:39:37 +0500
From: "Pavel S. Shirshov" <pavelbsd@mail.ru>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <89836534562.20040115113937@mail.ru>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam: Not detected
Subject: ping: sendto: No buffer space available
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Pavel S. Shirshov" <pavelbsd@mail.ru>
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 06:36:25 -0000

Hello.

OS:
# uname -a
FreeBSD devel.ucsnet.ru 4.8-RELEASE-p13 FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p13 #9: Wed Nov 26 12:38:10 YEKT 2003     root@devel.ucsnet.ru:/usr/src/sys/compile/PAVELSH_DEVEL  i386

Problem - error message "No buffer space available".
But,
# netstat -m
145/18656/32768 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
        144 mbufs allocated to data
        1 mbufs allocated to packet headers
142/628/8192 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
5920 Kbytes allocated to network (24% of mb_map in use)
25 requests for memory denied
1 requests for memory delayed
0 calls to protocol drain routines

Peak was 18656, max 32768. Why i'm got message "No buffer space
available"?

P.S.:
# sysctl -a net.inet
net.inet.ip.portrange.lowfirst: 1023
net.inet.ip.portrange.lowlast: 600
net.inet.ip.portrange.first: 1024
net.inet.ip.portrange.last: 5000
net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst: 49152
net.inet.ip.portrange.hilast: 65535
net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1
net.inet.ip.redirect: 1
net.inet.ip.ttl: 64
net.inet.ip.rtexpire: 315
net.inet.ip.rtminexpire: 10
net.inet.ip.rtmaxcache: 128
net.inet.ip.sourceroute: 0
net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen: 100
net.inet.ip.intr_queue_drops: 0
net.inet.ip.accept_sourceroute: 0
net.inet.ip.fastforwarding: 0
net.inet.ip.keepfaith: 0
net.inet.ip.subnets_are_local: 0
net.inet.ip.dummynet.hash_size: 64
net.inet.ip.dummynet.curr_time: 60478441
net.inet.ip.dummynet.ready_heap: 0
net.inet.ip.dummynet.extract_heap: 0
net.inet.ip.dummynet.searches: 0
net.inet.ip.dummynet.search_steps: 0
net.inet.ip.dummynet.expire: 1
net.inet.ip.dummynet.max_chain_len: 16
net.inet.ip.dummynet.red_lookup_depth: 256
net.inet.ip.dummynet.red_avg_pkt_size: 512
net.inet.ip.dummynet.red_max_pkt_size: 1500
net.inet.ip.fw.enable: 1
net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass: 1
net.inet.ip.fw.debug: 1
net.inet.ip.fw.verbose: 1
net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit: 0
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets: 256
net.inet.ip.fw.curr_dyn_buckets: 256
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_count: 0
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max: 1000
net.inet.ip.fw.static_count: 33
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_ack_lifetime: 300
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_syn_lifetime: 20
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_fin_lifetime: 1
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_rst_lifetime: 1
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_udp_lifetime: 10
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_short_lifetime: 5
net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_grace_time: 10
net.inet.ip.maxfragpackets: 256
net.inet.ip.maxfragsperpacket: 16
net.inet.ip.sendsourcequench: 0
net.inet.ip.check_interface: 0
net.inet.ip.stealth: 0
net.inet.icmp.maskrepl: 0
net.inet.icmp.icmplim: 200
net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect: 0
net.inet.icmp.log_redirect: 0
net.inet.icmp.icmplim_output: 1
net.inet.icmp.bmcastecho: 0
net.inet.tcp.rfc1323: 1
net.inet.tcp.rfc1644: 0
net.inet.tcp.mssdflt: 512
net.inet.tcp.keepidle: 7200000
net.inet.tcp.keepintvl: 75000
net.inet.tcp.sendspace: 32768
net.inet.tcp.recvspace: 57344
net.inet.tcp.keepinit: 75000
net.inet.tcp.delacktime: 100
net.inet.tcp.log_in_vain: 0
net.inet.tcp.blackhole: 0
net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack: 1
net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin: 0
net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery: 1
net.inet.tcp.slowstart_flightsize: 1
net.inet.tcp.local_slowstart_flightsize: 4
net.inet.tcp.newreno: 1
net.inet.tcp.tcbhashsize: 512
net.inet.tcp.do_tcpdrain: 1
net.inet.tcp.pcbcount: 66
net.inet.tcp.icmp_may_rst: 1
net.inet.tcp.isn_reseed_interval: 0
net.inet.tcp.inflight_enable: 0
net.inet.tcp.inflight_debug: 0
net.inet.tcp.inflight_min: 6144
net.inet.tcp.inflight_max: 1073725440
net.inet.tcp.inflight_stab: 20
net.inet.tcp.syncookies: 1
net.inet.tcp.syncache.bucketlimit: 30
net.inet.tcp.syncache.cachelimit: 15359
net.inet.tcp.syncache.count: 0
net.inet.tcp.syncache.hashsize: 512
net.inet.tcp.syncache.rexmtlimit: 3
net.inet.tcp.msl: 30000
net.inet.tcp.rexmit_min: 1000
net.inet.tcp.rexmit_slop: 200
net.inet.tcp.always_keepalive: 1
net.inet.udp.checksum: 1
net.inet.udp.maxdgram: 9216
net.inet.udp.recvspace: 41600
net.inet.udp.log_in_vain: 0
net.inet.udp.blackhole: 0
net.inet.accf.unloadable: 0
net.inet.raw.maxdgram: 16384
net.inet.raw.recvspace: 16384

P.P.S. Sorry for bad English.

-- 
Ń óâŕćĺíčĺě,
 Pavel                          mailto:pavelbsd@mail.ru

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 23:06:11 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104DC16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:06:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from osku.suutari.iki.fi (osku.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253CF43D5A
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:06:09 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
Received: from coffee.syncrontech.com (coffee.syncrontech.com [62.71.8.37])
	by osku.suutari.iki.fi (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0F767df027345;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:06:07 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi)
From: Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Organization: At Home
To: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz@tdx.co.uk>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:06:07 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <200401141453.50150.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
	<200401141527.11930.ari@suutari.iki.fi> <742320171.1074087760@rainbow>
In-Reply-To: <742320171.1074087760@rainbow>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200401150906.07062.ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:06:11 -0000

Hi,

On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:42, Karl Pielorz wrote:
> --On 14 January 2004 15:27 +0200 Ari Suutari <ari@suutari.iki.fi> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:20, Karl Pielorz wrote:
> >> > So, I get only about 25MB/s. Shouldn't I be getting something
> >> > like 70 MB/s, or even more since there are two disks that
> >> > can server read requests ?
> >>
> >> Hmmm, what happens if you run two of those at once?
> >
> > 	Running 5 dd's at once gives in iostat:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > 	The peak seems to be 39 Mb/s.
>
> Was that the peak 'each' - or combined? - i.e. what was the combined
> throughput for 2 dd's running?

When running 2 dd's, each reports abou 17 MB/s. iostat reports
27-33 MB/s during run.

	Ari S.

	

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 14 23:12:35 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B6216A4FF
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:12:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.22])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B552943D54
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 14 Jan 2004 23:12:34 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from pavelbsd@mail.ru)
Received: from [213.242.59.10] (port=1487 helo=host157.int.ptt)
	by mx2.mail.ru with esmtp 
	id 1Ah1g9-000BxP-00
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:12:33 +0300
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 12:15:51 +0500
From: "Pavel S. Shirshov" <pavelbsd@mail.ru>
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <10838708046.20040115121551@mail.ru>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: Not detected
Subject: Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Pavel S. Shirshov" <pavelbsd@mail.ru>
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:12:35 -0000

Hello

>> OS:
>> # uname -a
>> FreeBSD devel.ucsnet.ru 4.8-RELEASE-p13 FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p13
>> #9: Wed Nov 26 12:38:10 YEKT 2003    
>> root@devel.ucsnet.ru:/usr/src/sys/compile/PAVELSH_DEVEL  i386
>> 
>> Problem - error message "No buffer space available".
>> But,

l> What NIC are you using?

'3C905-TX Fast Etherlink XL PCI 10/100'

l> You might not have a valid link at all, which is why it fills up
l> the buf space.

What's solution in this case?
Maybe the tunnel caused problem?
Tunnel - mpd-3.14. with slow hosts

-- 
With best wishes,
 Pavel                          mailto:pavelbsd@mail.ru

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 00:42:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52EF16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:42:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965C043D49
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:42:48 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id F3012530F; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:42:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id 00251530D; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:42:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id D93C333C9A; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:42:38 +0100 (CET)
To: John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net>
References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
	<20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:42:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> (John
 Kennedy's message of "Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:27:40 -0800")
Message-ID: <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	flood.des.no
X-Spam-Level: ss
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61
cc: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:42:51 -0000

John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net> writes:
>   There are *lots* of differences between 4.x, 5.x and current given some
> distance in time separating them, but you're right that the ports are more
> or less the same.

there is no "more or less".  there is only one ports tree, and a
freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 01:16:33 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DFA16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:16:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ruminary.org (chiku.ruminary.org [216.218.185.24])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36DFF43D2F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:16:32 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from clark@ruminary.org)
Received: by ruminary.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 0FF8C22E04; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:16:32 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:16:32 -0800
From: clark shishido <clark@ruminary.org>
To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>
Message-ID: <20040115091632.GA74072@ruminary.org>
References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
	<20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
cc: John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net>
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:16:33 -0000

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:42:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smřrgrav wrote:
> John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net> writes:
>>   There are *lots* of differences between 4.x, 5.x and current given some
> 
> there is no "more or less".  there is only one ports tree, and a
> freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
> freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.

the actual CVS tree yes, but from a user perspective where some
packages may build on 4-STABLE and not on 5-CURRENT there are
differences, that's why separate INDEX and INDEX-5 ports listings
exist where some ports will build under 4-STABLE but not 5-CURRENT.

One behavioral difference which I like is "make package" where
*.tgz packages are 4-STABLE and *.tbz packages are 5-CURRENT.

And to reiterate the answer to the original question the 
ports-supfile should be set to "*default release=cvs tag=."
if you need the latest changes. The ports tree progresses
constantly independent of 4.x or 5.x except during code 
freezes before a release so use the date tag in your cvusp 
file if you want a static snapshot of the ports tree.

--clark 

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 05:18:47 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA3E16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:18:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.seekingfire.com (coyote.seekingfire.com [24.72.10.212])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A1443D53
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:18:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com)
Received: by mail.seekingfire.com (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id B2E14196; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:18:44 -0600 (CST)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:18:44 -0600
From: Tillman Hodgson <tillman@seekingfire.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040115131844.GL415@seekingfire.com>
References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
	<20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20040115091632.GA74072@ruminary.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040115091632.GA74072@ruminary.org>
X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring
X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated
X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm)
X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this
X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas
X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant
X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this
X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to <http://www.habeas.com/report/>.
X-GPG-Key-ID: 828AFC7B
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5584 14BA C9EB 1524 0E68  F543 0F0A 7FBC 828A FC7B
X-GPG-Key: http://www.seekingfire.com/gpg_key.asc
X-Urban-Legend: There is lots of hidden information in headers
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:18:47 -0000

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 01:16:32AM -0800, clark shishido wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:42:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net> writes:
> >>   There are *lots* of differences between 4.x, 5.x and current given some
> > 
> > there is no "more or less".  there is only one ports tree, and a
> > freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
> > freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.
> 
> the actual CVS tree yes, but from a user perspective where some
> packages may build on 4-STABLE and not on 5-CURRENT there are
> differences, that's why separate INDEX and INDEX-5 ports listings
> exist where some ports will build under 4-STABLE but not 5-CURRENT.
> 
> One behavioral difference which I like is "make package" where
> *.tgz packages are 4-STABLE and *.tbz packages are 5-CURRENT.

It's because of that that I NFS export two copies of the ports tree, one
for 4.X and one for 5.X. Otherwise the INDEXes were clobbering each
other and /usr/ports/packages was ... interesting. I also have both i386
and sparc64 machines, which is yet another twist on packages.

I'd love to reclaim the disk the disk space by running only a single
ports tree. I'd also love to have the build server (which is -STABLE)
perform the all the INDEX making. Is there a clean way to do this?

-T


-- 
It has long been known that one horse can run faster than another - but which
one? Differences are crucial.
	- Robert Heinlein

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 05:25:42 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8745416A4CF
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:25:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk
	[194.200.93.187])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A732243D62
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:25:41 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from petefrench@keithprowse.com)
Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim
	4.24; FreeBSD)	id 1Agop2-0005zX-Vy; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:28:52 +0000
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, petefrench@keithprowse.com,
	veldy@veldy.net
In-Reply-To: <00c901c3dac1$4a087f40$d037630a@nic.target.com>
Message-Id: <E1Agop2-0005zX-Vy@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
From: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:28:52 +0000
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:25:42 -0000

> No.  Use
>
> tag = .

Err, wont that just grab the ports tree as it currently is, rather than the
tree as it was at the point when 5.2 RELEASE was created ?

-pcf.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 05:51:08 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6C816A4CF
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:51:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jk.homeunix.net (dhcp-19-33.dsl.CSUChico.EDU [132.241.19.33])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0F743D5F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:50:54 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jk@jk.homeunix.net)
Received: from jk.homeunix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])i0FDooW4028049
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:50:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from warlock@localhost)i0FDonIu028048;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:50:49 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 05:50:49 -0800
From: John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net>
To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
Message-ID: <20040115135049.GA27992@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
	<20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 13:51:08 -0000

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:42:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> there is no "more or less".  there is only one ports tree, and a
> freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
> freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.

  Read the users email.  They're using specific tags, not "." so there are
(or may be) some differences as time elapses.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 06:13:04 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CB716A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 06:13:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.pressenter.com (hermes.pressenter.com [69.58.128.19])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CBE43D1F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 06:13:01 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nospam@hiltonbsd.com)
Received: from [69.58.129.184] (helo=daggar.sbgnet.local)
	by hermes.pressenter.com with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1Ah8F0-000076-00; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:12:59 -0600
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:12:55 -0600
From: Stephen Hilton <nospam@hiltonbsd.com>
To: Tillman Hodgson <tillman@seekingfire.com>
Message-Id: <20040115081255.428a385f.nospam@hiltonbsd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040115131844.GL415@seekingfire.com>
References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
	<20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
	<xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20040115091632.GA74072@ruminary.org>
	<20040115131844.GL415@seekingfire.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:13:04 -0000

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:18:44 -0600
Tillman Hodgson <tillman@seekingfire.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 01:16:32AM -0800, clark shishido wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:42:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > > John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net> writes:
> > >>   There are *lots* of differences between 4.x, 5.x and current given some
> > > 
> > > there is no "more or less".  there is only one ports tree, and a
> > > freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
> > > freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.
> > 
> > the actual CVS tree yes, but from a user perspective where some
> > packages may build on 4-STABLE and not on 5-CURRENT there are
> > differences, that's why separate INDEX and INDEX-5 ports listings
> > exist where some ports will build under 4-STABLE but not 5-CURRENT.
> > 
> > One behavioral difference which I like is "make package" where
> > *.tgz packages are 4-STABLE and *.tbz packages are 5-CURRENT.
> 
> It's because of that that I NFS export two copies of the ports tree, one
> for 4.X and one for 5.X. Otherwise the INDEXes were clobbering each
> other and /usr/ports/packages was ... interesting. I also have both i386
> and sparc64 machines, which is yet another twist on packages.
> 
> I'd love to reclaim the disk the disk space by running only a single
> ports tree. I'd also love to have the build server (which is -STABLE)
> perform the all the INDEX making. Is there a clean way to do this?
> 

I am also interested in a solution for this. I use portupgrade and can 
"make index" from 4.9 and get the INDEX file, then "make index" from a 
5.2 box and get INDEX-5, but the "portsdb -u" step seems to make a 
common INDEX.db from 5.2 INDEX-5 or from the 4.9 INDEX file.

In the man page for portsdb there is an environment option for 
"PORTS_DBDIR". If I set my environment options in the pkgtools.conf file 
for the 4.9 and 5.2 boxes to place the INDEX.db in /var/db/pkg and 
rm the INDEX.db from the /usr/ports directory then each machine should 
have its "version appropriate" INDEX.db file in its /var/db/pkg dir.

Snipped from my /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf files:

FreeBSD 5.2
------------------------------------------
   ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= '/usr/ports'
   ENV['PORTS_INDEX'] ||= ENV['PORTSDIR'] + '/INDEX-5'
   ENV['PKG_DBDIR'] ||= '/var/db/pkg'
   ENV['PKG_TMPDIR'] ||= '/var/tmp'
   ENV['PORTS_DBDIR'] ||= ENV['PKG_DBDIR']
   ENV['PACKAGES'] ||= ENV['PORTSDIR'] + '/packages'
   ENV['PKG_PATH'] ||= ENV['PACKAGES'] + '/All'
------------------------------------------

FreeBSD 4.9
------------------------------------------
   ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= '/usr/ports'
   ENV['PORTS_INDEX'] ||= ENV['PORTSDIR'] + '/INDEX'
   ENV['PKG_DBDIR'] ||= '/var/db/pkg'
   ENV['PKG_TMPDIR'] ||= '/var/tmp'
   ENV['PORTS_DBDIR'] ||= ENV['PKG_DBDIR']
   ENV['PACKAGES'] ||= ENV['PORTSDIR'] + '/packages'
   ENV['PKG_PATH'] ||= ENV['PACKAGES'] + '/All'
------------------------------------------

This seems to work for me, but would like some feedback as to whether 
this is the correct way to accomplish this.


Regards,


Stephen Hilton
nospam@hiltonbsd.com

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 07:13:49 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 772ED16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:13:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.pressenter.com (hermes.pressenter.com [69.58.128.19])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE8C43D46
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:13:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nospam@hiltonbsd.com)
Received: from [69.58.129.184] (helo=daggar.sbgnet.local)
	by hermes.pressenter.com with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
	id 1Ah9Bl-00051B-00; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:13:42 -0600
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:13:37 -0600
From: Stephen Hilton <nospam@hiltonbsd.com>
To: tillman@seekingfire.com
Message-Id: <20040115091337.32191ced.nospam@hiltonbsd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040115081255.428a385f.nospam@hiltonbsd.com>
References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
	<20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
	<xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20040115091632.GA74072@ruminary.org>
	<20040115131844.GL415@seekingfire.com>
	<20040115081255.428a385f.nospam@hiltonbsd.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: knu@iDaemons.org
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:13:49 -0000

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:12:55 -0600
Stephen Hilton <nospam@hiltonbsd.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:18:44 -0600
> Tillman Hodgson <tillman@seekingfire.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 01:16:32AM -0800, clark shishido wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:42:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > > > John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net> writes:
> > > >>   There are *lots* of differences between 4.x, 5.x and current given some
> > > > 
> > > > there is no "more or less".  there is only one ports tree, and a
> > > > freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
> > > > freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.
> > > 
> > > the actual CVS tree yes, but from a user perspective where some
> > > packages may build on 4-STABLE and not on 5-CURRENT there are
> > > differences, that's why separate INDEX and INDEX-5 ports listings
> > > exist where some ports will build under 4-STABLE but not 5-CURRENT.
> > > 
> > > One behavioral difference which I like is "make package" where
> > > *.tgz packages are 4-STABLE and *.tbz packages are 5-CURRENT.
> > 
> > It's because of that that I NFS export two copies of the ports tree, one
> > for 4.X and one for 5.X. Otherwise the INDEXes were clobbering each
> > other and /usr/ports/packages was ... interesting. I also have both i386
> > and sparc64 machines, which is yet another twist on packages.
> > 
> > I'd love to reclaim the disk the disk space by running only a single
> > ports tree. I'd also love to have the build server (which is -STABLE)
> > perform the all the INDEX making. Is there a clean way to do this?
> > 
> 
> I am also interested in a solution for this. I use portupgrade and can 
> "make index" from 4.9 and get the INDEX file, then "make index" from a 
> 5.2 box and get INDEX-5, but the "portsdb -u" step seems to make a 
> common INDEX.db from 5.2 INDEX-5 or from the 4.9 INDEX file.
> 
> In the man page for portsdb there is an environment option for 
> "PORTS_DBDIR". If I set my environment options in the pkgtools.conf file 
> for the 4.9 and 5.2 boxes to place the INDEX.db in /var/db/pkg and 
> rm the INDEX.db from the /usr/ports directory then each machine should 
> have its "version appropriate" INDEX.db file in its /var/db/pkg dir.
> 
> Snipped from my /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf files:
> 
> FreeBSD 5.2
> ------------------------------------------
>    ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= '/usr/ports'
>    ENV['PORTS_INDEX'] ||= ENV['PORTSDIR'] + '/INDEX-5'
>    ENV['PKG_DBDIR'] ||= '/var/db/pkg'
>    ENV['PKG_TMPDIR'] ||= '/var/tmp'
>    ENV['PORTS_DBDIR'] ||= ENV['PKG_DBDIR']
>    ENV['PACKAGES'] ||= ENV['PORTSDIR'] + '/packages'
>    ENV['PKG_PATH'] ||= ENV['PACKAGES'] + '/All'
> ------------------------------------------
> 
> FreeBSD 4.9
> ------------------------------------------
>    ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= '/usr/ports'
>    ENV['PORTS_INDEX'] ||= ENV['PORTSDIR'] + '/INDEX'
>    ENV['PKG_DBDIR'] ||= '/var/db/pkg'
>    ENV['PKG_TMPDIR'] ||= '/var/tmp'
>    ENV['PORTS_DBDIR'] ||= ENV['PKG_DBDIR']
>    ENV['PACKAGES'] ||= ENV['PORTSDIR'] + '/packages'
>    ENV['PKG_PATH'] ||= ENV['PACKAGES'] + '/All'
> ------------------------------------------
> 
> This seems to work for me, but would like some feedback as to whether 
> this is the correct way to accomplish this.
> 

After reading my post I see that the issue of package building for 
5.2 and 4.9 was not addressed.

FreeBSD 5.2
------------------------------------------
   ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= '/usr/ports'
   ENV['PORTS_INDEX'] ||= ENV['PORTSDIR'] + '/INDEX-5'
   ENV['PKG_DBDIR'] ||= '/var/db/pkg'
   ENV['PKG_TMPDIR'] ||= '/var/tmp'
   ENV['PORTS_DBDIR'] ||= ENV['PKG_DBDIR']
   ENV['PACKAGES'] ||= ENV['PORTSDIR'] + '/packages5.2'
   ENV['PKG_PATH'] ||= ENV['PACKAGES'] + '/All'
------------------------------------------

FreeBSD 4.9
------------------------------------------
   ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= '/usr/ports'
   ENV['PORTS_INDEX'] ||= ENV['PORTSDIR'] + '/INDEX'
   ENV['PKG_DBDIR'] ||= '/var/db/pkg'
   ENV['PKG_TMPDIR'] ||= '/var/tmp'
   ENV['PORTS_DBDIR'] ||= ENV['PKG_DBDIR']
   ENV['PACKAGES'] ||= ENV['PORTSDIR'] + '/packages4.9'
   ENV['PKG_PATH'] ||= ENV['PACKAGES'] + '/All'
------------------------------------------

Then mkdir /usr/ports/packages5.2 and mkdir /usr/ports/packages4.9

This also seems to work fine for me, but would like some feedback as to 
whether this is the correct way to accomplish this. My /usr/ports dir 
is an NFS mount (rw) so either machine can add distfiles and the ports 
work directorys are set to /var/portswrk by this environment variable 
set in my /etc/make.conf:

------------------------------------------
# Ports can place their working directories somewhere other than under
# /usr/ports.
WRKDIRPREFIX=   /var/portswrk
------------------------------------------

Things to keep in mind, /var in my examples has _lots_ of free space,
running "portsclean -DD" is probably not a good idea if the 4.9 box 
and the 5.2 box have different installed ports, due to distfile 
deletions.


Regards,


Stephen Hilton
nospam@hiltonbsd.com

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 07:24:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC9716A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:24:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9BD43D62
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:24:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 301B766C78; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:24:48 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:24:48 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Tillman Hodgson <tillman@seekingfire.com>
Message-ID: <20040115152447.GB12857@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
	<20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20040115091632.GA74072@ruminary.org> <20040115131844.GL415@seekingfire.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040115131844.GL415@seekingfire.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:24:51 -0000


--lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:18:44AM -0600, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 01:16:32AM -0800, clark shishido wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:42:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > > John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net> writes:
> > >>   There are *lots* of differences between 4.x, 5.x and current given=
 some
> > >=20
> > > there is no "more or less".  there is only one ports tree, and a
> > > freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
> > > freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.
> >=20
> > the actual CVS tree yes, but from a user perspective where some
> > packages may build on 4-STABLE and not on 5-CURRENT there are
> > differences, that's why separate INDEX and INDEX-5 ports listings
> > exist where some ports will build under 4-STABLE but not 5-CURRENT.
> >=20
> > One behavioral difference which I like is "make package" where
> > *.tgz packages are 4-STABLE and *.tbz packages are 5-CURRENT.
>=20
> It's because of that that I NFS export two copies of the ports tree, one
> for 4.X and one for 5.X. Otherwise the INDEXes were clobbering each
> other and /usr/ports/packages was ... interesting. I also have both i386
> and sparc64 machines, which is yet another twist on packages.

If built appropriately, the INDEXes do not clobber each other (5.x
uses INDEX-5).  If you want to build a 5.x INDEX on a 4.x machine,
you'll need to set OSVERSION first so that dependencies come out
correctly (and this will automatically use INDEX-5).

You can also override the INDEX file name, package directory, and
about 1000 other settings by using the appropriate environment
variables: see bsd.port.mk for the available variables.

Kris

--lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFABrC/Wry0BWjoQKURAmhlAJ0Yh9ucYGotNRZmttiZYTeJxXDEFACgyle0
orw1PaBc3oNkKOZO0bzxKzc=
=T00u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--lEGEL1/lMxI0MVQ2--

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 07:49:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DFB16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:49:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AF543D31
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:49:50 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666)
	id D1929530A; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:49:49 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37])
	by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP
	id 1993D5309; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:49:40 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602)
	id C553133C6A; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:49:40 +0100 (CET)
To: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
References: <E1Agop2-0005zX-Vy@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:49:40 +0100
In-Reply-To: <E1Agop2-0005zX-Vy@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk> (Pete French's
 message of "Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:28:52 +0000")
Message-ID: <xzpptdlfbzf.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	flood.des.no
X-Spam-Level: ss
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK,
	RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.61
cc: veldy@veldy.net
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:49:52 -0000

Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com> writes:
> > tag =3D .
> Err, wont that just grab the ports tree as it currently is, rather than t=
he
> tree as it was at the point when 5.2 RELEASE was created ?

Yes.  So?

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 07:53:00 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5AA16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:53:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk
	[194.200.93.187])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4567943D95
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:52:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from petefrench@keithprowse.com)
Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim
	4.30; FreeBSD)	id 1Ah9nJ-0004kR-Ne; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:52:29 +0000
To: des@des.no, petefrench@keithprowse.com
In-Reply-To: <xzpptdlfbzf.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Message-Id: <E1Ah9nJ-0004kR-Ne@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
From: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:52:29 +0000
cc: veldy@veldy.net
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:53:00 -0000

> Yes.  So?

...because thats not what I wanted to do :-)

-pcf. [point is moot now anyway as I did things a different way]

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 07:53:54 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE83216A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:53:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from voodoo.oberon.net (voodoo.oberon.net [212.118.165.100])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D184F43D79
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:53:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from krion@voodoo.oberon.net)
Received: from krion by voodoo.oberon.net with local (Exim 4.30)
	id 1Ah9o6-000IGv-MA; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:53:18 +0100
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:53:18 +0100
From: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org>
To: John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net>
Message-ID: <20040115155318.GR2221@voodoo.oberon.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org>,
	John Kennedy <jk@jk.homeunix.net>, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <E1AgoC5-000Jwa-O6@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
	<20040114172740.GA24901@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> <xzpisjdmwld.fsf@dwp.des.no>
	<20040115135049.GA27992@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040115135049.GA27992@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net>
X-NCC-Regid: de.oberon
Sender: Kirill Ponomarew <krion@voodoo.oberon.net>
cc: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ANy difference between 5.X ports tree and 4.X ports tree ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:53:55 -0000


--QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:50:49AM -0800, John Kennedy wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:42:38AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> > there is no "more or less".  there is only one ports tree, and a
> > freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
> > freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.
>=20
>   Read the users email.  They're using specific tags, not "." so there are
> (or may be) some differences as time elapses.

Users should not use tags for ports collection. It's
documentated also.

-Kirill

--QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFABrduQC1G6a60JuURApeKAKDPOSNMKy/nP0gOkTBbnkbHb6vp6gCgujuZ
lQUGibx0GcpMYCFvnJIeDA8=
=M7/o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--QFliEIXSSz7hGqqc--

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 07:57:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4F20E16A4CE; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:57:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atlmail.gnax.net (atlmail.dv2.net [209.51.128.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0F1AE43D2F; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 07:56:54 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jhinkle@gnax.net)
Received: from jhinkle ([63.247.75.50])
	by atlmail.gnax.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id i0FFqDtm013434;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:52:13 -0500
Message-ID: <005701c3db80$bbf72920$324bf73f@jhinkle>
From: "jeff hinkle" <jhinkle@gnax.net>
To: "FreeBSD-hardware list" <freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org>,
	<freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:00:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1
Subject: rocket raid with opteron board on 5.1 problems
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 15:57:07 -0000

any one know any thing special that needs to be done to get a rocket =
raid 1640 to see 3 80 gig SATA drives as one under 5.1 when installing =
on dual opteron system?

the system sees it fine and the board management interface looks good - =
however when installing 5.1 to the system - it shows the 3 drives as =
seperate and asks where you want to install the boot partician to.  any =
htuoghts please?

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 08:33:53 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F5616A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:33:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.farley.org (farley.org [67.64.95.201])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F9043D49
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:33:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org)
Received: from thor.farley.org (ka6olhc19uup9f2i@thor.farley.org
	[IPv6:2002:4340:5fcd:1::5])
	by mail.farley.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0FGXokq054224;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:33:50 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org)
Received: from thor.farley.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by thor.farley.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0FGXnZK003105;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:33:49 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org)
Received: from localhost (sean@localhost)i0FGXnTf003102;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:33:49 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from sean-freebsd@farley.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: thor.farley.org: sean owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:33:49 -0600 (CST)
From: Sean Farley <sean-freebsd@farley.org>
X-X-Sender: sean@thor.farley.org
To: Jason Andresen <jandrese@mitre.org>
In-Reply-To: <4006ADFF.1050205@mitre.org>
Message-ID: <20040115103022.R3087@thor.farley.org>
References: <20040114202434.O631@thor.farley.org> <4006ADFF.1050205@mitre.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Panic (Fatal trap 12)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:33:53 -0000

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Jason Andresen wrote:

> Sean Farley wrote:
>
> > I have been getting reboots of my box occassionaly under 4-STABLE
> > for awhile, and I would like some help trying to track it down.
> >
> > Hardware:
> > 1. Soltek 75DRV5.

<snip>

> > Things I have tried:
> > 1. Looked for leaking capacitors.  None found.
>
> I'd definatly double check those caps.  Do they look puffy?  They
> should be flat on top, pay close attention to the larger caps as they
> seem to go first.  I had almost this exact motherboard (the
> SL-75DRV2), and the caps all went out on me a few months ago.  The
> symptom was randomly rebooting for no particular reason.

I will open the case up again to check for puffiness.  Is even the
slightest bulge considered puffy?  Are they always perfectly flat?
Also, did you get Soltek to replace the board?

I also have a Soltek 75DRV2 in another computer that has been stable.  I
guess it is only a matter of time.

Sean
-----------------------
sean-freebsd@farley.org

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 09:28:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F4816A4CF
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:28:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from web41414.mail.yahoo.com (web41414.mail.yahoo.com
	[66.218.93.80])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22C1A43D5E
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:28:30 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from makhamus@yahoo.com)
Message-ID: <20040115172829.47484.qmail@web41414.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [203.113.33.8] by web41414.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:28:29 PST
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 09:28:29 -0800 (PST)
From: "ÁТŇÁ" "¤ąŕ´Ôą´Ôą" <makhamus@yahoo.com>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: cvsup mirror site in thailand
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:28:31 -0000

hi sirs,

apologize me for posting since i do not know exactly
where to post.

my friend, jane, has set up cvsup mirrir site in
thailand.  the informations
that ha passes to me are as follow


Hostname: freebsd.lru.ac.th
IP Address: 202.29.6.10
IPv6 Address: 2001:3c8:c103:a001:203:ceff:fe0f:6810
Bandwidth 2Mbps for Thai users.
cvsup concurrent 25 max.
cvsup and web only

i should inform -doc but i do not know where to inform
really.
would you please do any thing to check and/or test for
that site ?
i have finished cvsup for 4.9-stable from his site
already.  very fast.




with best regards,
psr

http://www.thai-aec.org
http://www.thai.net/makham  <<<< this is freebsd web
site run by microsoft server

=====
ÁТŇÁ ¤Ôąŕ´Ôą´ą
http://www.thai.net/makham

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 10:07:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCFB16A53A
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:07:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B41743D45
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:07:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AhBtX-0000Fo-00
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:07:03 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AhBtV-0000FV-00	for <gmane-os-freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:07:01 +0100
Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AhBtV-0006wP-00	for <gmane-os-freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:07:01 +0100
From: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:06:50 +0100
Organization: Avian Carrier & Friends
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <87u12xw0g5.fsf@beeblebrox.enst.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: T-gnus/6.16.2 (based on Gnus v5.10.2) (revision 02) SEMI/1.14.5
	(Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd)
	MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8+VobTMa2TDJ+qzjvrhrV5Kt1Xc=
X-Leafnode-NNTP-Posting-Host: 3ffe:304:103:a2:200:39ff:fe25:3aa2
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: Turning off Aironet PCI card
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:07:07 -0000

I have an Aironet PCI card seen as:

an0@pci0:17:0: class=0x028000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x035014b9 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00
    vendor   = 'Aironet Wireless Communications'
    device   = 'Cisco Systems 350 Series PCI Wireless LAN Adapter'
    class    = network

Is there a way to turn if off completely, as in "do not use radio at all"?
Is this enough to bring the interface down?

  Sam
-- 
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 10:22:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537C216A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:22:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shellma.zin.lublin.pl (shellma.zin.lublin.pl [212.182.126.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7AB43D5F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:22:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl)
Received: by shellma.zin.lublin.pl (Postfix, from userid 1018)
	id D45385F103; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:33:43 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 19:33:43 +0100
From: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
To: "Pavel S. Shirshov" <pavelbsd@mail.ru>
Message-ID: <20040115183343.GA89808@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
References: <89836534562.20040115113937@mail.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <89836534562.20040115113937@mail.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ping: sendto: No buffer space available
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:22:18 -0000

On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 11:39:37AM +0500, Pavel S. Shirshov wrote:

> Problem - error message "No buffer space available".
> But,
> # netstat -m
> 145/18656/32768 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
>         144 mbufs allocated to data
>         1 mbufs allocated to packet headers
> 142/628/8192 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
> 5920 Kbytes allocated to network (24% of mb_map in use)
> 25 requests for memory denied
> 1 requests for memory delayed
> 0 calls to protocol drain routines
> 
> Peak was 18656, max 32768. Why i'm got message "No buffer space
> available"?

Are You using dummynet?


-- 
Paweł Małachowski

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 14:01:26 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF8816A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:01:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com
	(fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com [66.185.86.71])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D2543D72
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:00:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mikej@rogers.com)
Received: from win2000 ([63.139.3.63])
	by fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.comESMTP
	<20040115215754.SZEW23685.fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@win2000>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:57:54 -0500
From: "Mike Jakubik" <mikej@rogers.com>
To: "'Paul Mather'" <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:00:33 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
In-Reply-To: <20040115143923.GC6678@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Thread-Index: AcPbdW1sDqlNrzsOSfqr/e5qhqhMBAAPPmTA
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH LOGIN at
	fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com from [63.139.3.63] using ID
	<mikej@rogers.com> at Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:57:54 -0500
Message-Id: <20040115215754.SZEW23685.fep01-mail.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com@win2000>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 22:01:26 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org 
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Paul Mather
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 9:39 AM
> To: Mike Jakubik
> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Adaptect raid performance with FreeBSD
> 
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 05:52:50PM -0500, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> 
> => This sounds pretty poor for SCSI raid. Here are my results 
> on a single => Maxtor ATA drive.
> =>
> => CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) Processor (1410.21-MHz 686-class CPU) 
> => ad0: 76345MB <MAXTOR 6L080L4> [155114/16/63] at 
> ata0-master UDMA100 => => # dd if=/dev/rad0s1a of=/dev/null 
> bs=1m count=100 => 100+0 records in => 100+0 records out => 
> 104857600 bytes transferred in 2.484640 secs (42202333 
> bytes/sec) => => 5 dd's running simultaneously show the 
> following in iostast.
> 
> What about 5 dd's running simultaneously but with slightly 
> staggered start times so that four of them aren't hitting the 
> drive's cache and hence only really testing its interface speed? :-)

Here are result with a .3 second delay between each dd start:

104857600 bytes transferred in 9.572284 secs (10954293 bytes/sec)
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 9.261223 secs (11322220 bytes/sec)
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 9.262631 secs (11320499 bytes/sec)
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 9.263857 secs (11319000 bytes/sec)
100+0 records in
100+0 records out
104857600 bytes transferred in 9.265230 secs (11317323 bytes/sec)

Im not sure if this was done properly, here Is the command I used:

# dd if=/dev/rad0s1a of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100 & sleep .3 && dd
if=/dev/rad0s1a of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100 & sleep .3 && dd
if=/dev/rad0s1a of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100 & sleep .3 && dd
if=/dev/rad0s1a of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100& sleep .3 && dd if=/dev/rad0s1a
of=/dev/null bs=1m count=100

iostst -w 1:

      tty             ad0              ad2              ad4             cpu
 tin tout  KB/t tps  MB/s   KB/t tps  MB/s   KB/t tps  MB/s  us ni sy in id
   0    2  0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  0  0 100
   1  119 128.00  37  4.62   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  0 99
   0   77 128.00 398 49.75   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  2  2 97
   0   77 128.00 422 52.72   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  2  1 98
   0   77 128.00 421 52.60   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  2  2 96
   0   77 128.00 422 52.72   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  2  1 97
   0   77 128.00 421 52.60   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  1 98
   0   77 128.00 421 52.60   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  2  2 97
   0   77 128.00 422 52.72   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  2  1 98
   0   77 128.00 421 52.60   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  2 98
   0   77 128.00 422 52.72   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  1  1 98
   0  689 128.00 155 19.43   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   1  0  1  1 98
   0   77 16.00   8  0.12   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  0  0 100
   0   77  0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0.00   0  0.00   0  0  0  0 100

> Long seeks are the major time consumer in disk I/O (and 
> multiple spindle parallelism is one of this things in RAID 
> that helps minimise this penalty).  The above dd test is not 
> a good test of performance in that regard.  What it will give 
> you is a best-case performance, not an expected real-world 
> performance (which is more valuable to know, right?).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Paul.
> 
> PS: Maybe you'll get faster transfers if you do the dd from 
> single-user mode, with no background system processes 
> interfering with the disk. :-)
> 

Yes, I agree.

Thanks.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 16:42:19 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D986916A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:42:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEA343D5A
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:42:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AhI3z-0003Z9-00
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:42:15 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AhI3x-0003Yv-00	for <gmane-os-freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:42:13 +0100
Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AhI3x-0001zm-00	for <gmane-os-freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:42:13 +0100
From: Max Clark <max@clarksys.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:41:31 -0800
Lines: 128
Message-ID: <bu7c15$7fo$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: 4.9-Stable: Disk error booting from hard drive
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 00:42:20 -0000

Hi all,

I am completely stumped by this one. I have a new MSI 1u P1-1000 server: 
2.4GHz P4, 1GB Ram, with a 40GB IDE (38166MB <ST340014A> [77545/16/63]) 
hard drive on the primary master channel.

Here's the problem, I can install 4.9-Stable, but when I finish and 
reboot the machine the bios reports disk error, the machine reboots and 
is trapped in this loop (I've tried setting the box up with a Boot 
Manger and Standard, but it doesn't work for either).

To make things interesting 5.2-Release works fine, I can install, 
reboot, everything is cool. I don't understand what is going on here, I 
even tried re-downloading the 4.9 iso to check my cd with no luck.

This machine will be a high use server so I really want to run Stable, 
what do I need to do?

Thanks in advance,
Max

This is the dmesg from 5.2:

Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
         The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE #0: Sun Jan 11 04:21:45 GMT 2004
     root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0a33000.
Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc0a331f4.
Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz (2391.15-MHz 686-class CPU)
   Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0xf29  Stepping = 9
 
Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE>
real memory  = 1073676288 (1023 MB)
avail memory = 1033510912 (985 MB)
ACPI APIC Table: <IntelR AWRDACPI>
ioapic0 <Version 2.0> irqs 0-23 on motherboard
Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled
npx0: [FAST]
npx0: <math processor> on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 interface
acpi0: <IntelR AWRDACPI> on motherboard
pcibios: BIOS version 2.10
Using $PIR table, 10 entries at 0xc00fdec0
acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0
acpi_cpu0: <CPU> on acpi0
acpi_cpu1: <CPU> on acpi0
device_probe_and_attach: acpi_cpu1 attach returned 6
acpi_tz0: <Thermal Zone> on acpi0
acpi_button0: <Power Button> on acpi0
acpi_button1: <Sleep Button> on acpi0
pcib0: <ACPI Host-PCI bridge> port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
pci0: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib0
agp0: <Intel 82845 host to AGP bridge> mem 0xd0000000-0xdfffffff at 
device 0.0 on pci0
pcib1: <PCI-PCI bridge> at device 1.0 on pci0
pci1: <PCI bus> on pcib1
uhci0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-A> port 0xd800-0xd81f 
irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0
usb0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-A> on uhci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci1: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-B> port 0xd000-0xd01f 
irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0
usb1: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-B> on uhci1
usb1: USB revision 1.0
uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhci2: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-C> port 0xd400-0xd41f 
irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0
usb2: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-C> on uhci2
usb2: USB revision 1.0
uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
pci0: <serial bus, USB> at device 29.7 (no driver attached)
pcib2: <ACPI PCI-PCI bridge> at device 30.0 on pci0
pci2: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib2
em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection, Version - 1.7.19> port 
0xc000-0xc03f mem 0xe2000000-0xe201ffff irq 21 at device 5.0 on pci2
em0:  Speed:N/A  Duplex:N/A
fxp0: <Intel 82551 Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xc400-0xc43f mem 
0xe2020000-0xe203ffff,0xe2041000-0xe2041fff irq 23 at device 6.0 on pci2
fxp0: Ethernet address 00:0c:76:4e:78:73
miibus0: <MII bus> on fxp0
inphy0: <i82555 10/100 media interface> on miibus0
inphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
pci2: <display, VGA> at device 7.0 (no driver attached)
isab0: <PCI-ISA bridge> at device 31.0 on pci0
isa0: <ISA bus> on isab0
atapci0: <Intel ICH4 UDMA100 controller> port 
0xf000-0xf00f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0x7 at device 31.1 on pci0
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
ata0: [MPSAFE]
ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
ata1: [MPSAFE]
pci0: <serial bus, SMBus> at device 31.3 (no driver attached)
fdc0: <Enhanced floppy controller (i82077, NE72065 or clone)> port 
0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0
sio0 port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0
sio0: type 16550A
sio1 port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0
sio1: type 16550A
atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0
atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0
kbd0 at atkbd0
psm0: <PS/2 Mouse> irq 12 on atkbdc0
psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3
acpi_cpu1: <CPU> on acpi0
device_probe_and_attach: acpi_cpu1 attach returned 6
orm0: <Option ROM> at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0
pmtimer0 on isa0
ppc0: parallel port not found.
sc0: <System console> at flags 0x100 on isa0
sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300>
vga0: <Generic ISA VGA> at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0
Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2391145900 Hz quality 800
Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec
GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xc6b80d60
ad0: 38166MB <ST340014A> [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
acd0: CDROM <SR244W> at ata1-master PIO4
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex
em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 17:22:38 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3B416A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:22:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684E843D60
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:22:35 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AhIh0-0003rO-00
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 02:22:34 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AhIgz-0003rG-00	for <gmane-os-freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 02:22:33 +0100
Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AhIgz-00035g-00	for <gmane-os-freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 02:22:33 +0100
From: Max Clark <max@clarksys.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 17:21:49 -0800
Lines: 143
Message-ID: <bu7eco$bjb$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <bu7c15$7fo$1@sea.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <bu7c15$7fo$1@sea.gmane.org>
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.9-Stable: Disk error booting from hard drive
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:22:38 -0000

To make this even weirder, I just installed 4.8 and it works. So now 4.8 
works, 5.2 works and 4.9 doesn't. What is up with 4.9?

Thanks,
Max

Max Clark wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> I am completely stumped by this one. I have a new MSI 1u P1-1000 server: 
> 2.4GHz P4, 1GB Ram, with a 40GB IDE (38166MB <ST340014A> [77545/16/63]) 
> hard drive on the primary master channel.
> 
> Here's the problem, I can install 4.9-Stable, but when I finish and 
> reboot the machine the bios reports disk error, the machine reboots and 
> is trapped in this loop (I've tried setting the box up with a Boot 
> Manger and Standard, but it doesn't work for either).
> 
> To make things interesting 5.2-Release works fine, I can install, 
> reboot, everything is cool. I don't understand what is going on here, I 
> even tried re-downloading the 4.9 iso to check my cd with no luck.
> 
> This machine will be a high use server so I really want to run Stable, 
> what do I need to do?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> Max
> 
> This is the dmesg from 5.2:
> 
> Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project.
> Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
>         The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
> FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE #0: Sun Jan 11 04:21:45 GMT 2004
>     root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
> Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0a33000.
> Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc0a331f4.
> Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
> CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz (2391.15-MHz 686-class CPU)
>   Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0xf29  Stepping = 9
> 
> Features=0xbfebfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> 
> 
> real memory  = 1073676288 (1023 MB)
> avail memory = 1033510912 (985 MB)
> ACPI APIC Table: <IntelR AWRDACPI>
> ioapic0 <Version 2.0> irqs 0-23 on motherboard
> Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled
> npx0: [FAST]
> npx0: <math processor> on motherboard
> npx0: INT 16 interface
> acpi0: <IntelR AWRDACPI> on motherboard
> pcibios: BIOS version 2.10
> Using $PIR table, 10 entries at 0xc00fdec0
> acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
> Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000
> acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x408-0x40b on acpi0
> acpi_cpu0: <CPU> on acpi0
> acpi_cpu1: <CPU> on acpi0
> device_probe_and_attach: acpi_cpu1 attach returned 6
> acpi_tz0: <Thermal Zone> on acpi0
> acpi_button0: <Power Button> on acpi0
> acpi_button1: <Sleep Button> on acpi0
> pcib0: <ACPI Host-PCI bridge> port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0
> pci0: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib0
> agp0: <Intel 82845 host to AGP bridge> mem 0xd0000000-0xdfffffff at 
> device 0.0 on pci0
> pcib1: <PCI-PCI bridge> at device 1.0 on pci0
> pci1: <PCI bus> on pcib1
> uhci0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-A> port 0xd800-0xd81f 
> irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0
> usb0: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-A> on uhci0
> usb0: USB revision 1.0
> uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
> uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
> uhci1: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-B> port 0xd000-0xd01f 
> irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0
> usb1: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-B> on uhci1
> usb1: USB revision 1.0
> uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
> uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
> uhci2: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-C> port 0xd400-0xd41f 
> irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0
> usb2: <Intel 82801DB (ICH4) USB controller USB-C> on uhci2
> usb2: USB revision 1.0
> uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
> uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
> pci0: <serial bus, USB> at device 29.7 (no driver attached)
> pcib2: <ACPI PCI-PCI bridge> at device 30.0 on pci0
> pci2: <ACPI PCI bus> on pcib2
> em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection, Version - 1.7.19> port 
> 0xc000-0xc03f mem 0xe2000000-0xe201ffff irq 21 at device 5.0 on pci2
> em0:  Speed:N/A  Duplex:N/A
> fxp0: <Intel 82551 Pro/100 Ethernet> port 0xc400-0xc43f mem 
> 0xe2020000-0xe203ffff,0xe2041000-0xe2041fff irq 23 at device 6.0 on pci2
> fxp0: Ethernet address 00:0c:76:4e:78:73
> miibus0: <MII bus> on fxp0
> inphy0: <i82555 10/100 media interface> on miibus0
> inphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto
> pci2: <display, VGA> at device 7.0 (no driver attached)
> isab0: <PCI-ISA bridge> at device 31.0 on pci0
> isa0: <ISA bus> on isab0
> atapci0: <Intel ICH4 UDMA100 controller> port 
> 0xf000-0xf00f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0x7 at device 31.1 on pci0
> ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
> ata0: [MPSAFE]
> ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
> ata1: [MPSAFE]
> pci0: <serial bus, SMBus> at device 31.3 (no driver attached)
> fdc0: <Enhanced floppy controller (i82077, NE72065 or clone)> port 
> 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0
> sio0 port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0
> sio0: type 16550A
> sio1 port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0
> sio1: type 16550A
> atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0
> atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0
> kbd0 at atkbd0
> psm0: <PS/2 Mouse> irq 12 on atkbdc0
> psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3
> acpi_cpu1: <CPU> on acpi0
> device_probe_and_attach: acpi_cpu1 attach returned 6
> orm0: <Option ROM> at iomem 0xc0000-0xc7fff on isa0
> pmtimer0 on isa0
> ppc0: parallel port not found.
> sc0: <System console> at flags 0x100 on isa0
> sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300>
> vga0: <Generic ISA VGA> at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0
> Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2391145900 Hz quality 800
> Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec
> GEOM: create disk ad0 dp=0xc6b80d60
> ad0: 38166MB <ST340014A> [77545/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
> acd0: CDROM <SR244W> at ata1-master PIO4
> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
> em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex
> em0: Link is up 100 Mbps Full Duplex
> 
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> 

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jan 15 18:56:37 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E2C16A4CF
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freeman.4gh.net
	(washdc3-ar5-4-35-124-121.washdc3.elnk.dsl.genuity.net [4.35.124.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BAE043D39
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 18:56:26 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from stuartb@4gh.net)
Received: from localhost (stuartb@localhost)
	by freeman.4gh.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0G2uKQo020314;
	Thu, 15 Jan 2004 21:56:20 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from stuartb@4gh.net)
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 21:56:19 -0500 (EST)
From: Stuart Barkley <stuartb@4gh.net>
To: Max Clark <max@clarksys.com>
In-Reply-To: <bu7eco$bjb$1@sea.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <20040115215208.O386@freeman.4gh.net>
References: <bu7c15$7fo$1@sea.gmane.org> <bu7eco$bjb$1@sea.gmane.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.9-Stable: Disk error booting from hard drive
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 02:56:37 -0000

On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 at 17:21 -0800, Max Clark wrote:

> To make this even weirder, I just installed 4.8 and it works. So now 4.8
> works, 5.2 works and 4.9 doesn't. What is up with 4.9?

See the recent -stable thread "Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install
circular reboot"

I wrote there:

"(From memory, YMMV) Reboot for the installation CD into sysinstall.
Select "Configure"  then "Fdisk".  In fdisk select "W" this will cause
the MBR to be rewritten correctly (I always select the FreeBSD boot
manager, I don't know if that is necessary)."

I have further looked into this and see that it is actually the boot2
bootstrap which is incorrectly written to disk on my machine.  Most of
one disk block is zeroed instead of containing the boot code.

Stuart
-- 
http://www.4gh.net/tudor/resume.html

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 01:19:24 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619F316A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:19:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rsmba.biz (evrtwa1-ar19-4-41-158-208.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net
	[4.41.158.208])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C93F43D5D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:19:23 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rschi@rsmba.biz)
Received: (qmail 3093 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2004 09:18:59 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO foghorn.rsmba.biz) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 16 Jan 2004 09:18:59 -0000
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 01:18:59 -0800
From: Richard Schilling <rschi@rsmba.biz>
To: stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040116091859.GA3041@foghorn.rsmba.biz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Balsa 1.4.4
Lines: 18
Subject: recovering lost /bin
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:19:24 -0000

I have a backup computer, and mistakenly moved /bin.  How can I recover it from, say the BSD cd set?

I'm trying to use the live filesystem CD to mount the disk drive, but I'm not having any luck:

$ mount /dev/wd0s1 /mnt 
mount: /dev/wd0s1 on /mnt: incorrect super block

$ mount /dev/wd0s1e /mnt
mount: /dev/wd0s1e on /mnt: incorrect super block


The drive is already partitioned for /dev/wd0s1a, /dev/wd0s1e, /dev/wd0s1f, etc . . . 

wd0s1a wd0s1e, etc . . .exists in the /dev subdirectory as well.

Thanks

Richard

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 02:09:41 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB85E16A549
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 02:09:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from techno.sub.ru (webmail.sub.ru [213.247.139.22])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BCA943D53
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 02:09:40 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru)
Received: (qmail 33622 invoked by uid 0); 16 Jan 2004 10:06:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO tarkhil.over.ru) (213.148.23.65)
  by webmail.sub.ru with SMTP; 16 Jan 2004 10:06:55 -0000
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:09:14 +0300
From: Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <20040116130914.57d9635d.tarkhil@webmail.sub.ru>
Organization: sub.ru
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.6claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: getrusage, thread-aware?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 10:09:42 -0000

Hello!

Does th threads-aware getrusage exists? It may be pthreads or kse-specific, but it is possible at all?

Or where is this question more appropriate?

-- 
Alex.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 03:55:11 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D7016A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 03:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDD943D7D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 03:54:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua)
Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231])
	by smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0GBKlEQ038494
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:20:47 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:20:47 +0200 (EET)
From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>
To: stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040116131248.G36380@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:55:11 -0000


Hello!

> Date:      Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:53:18 +0100
> From:      Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org>
> > > freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
> > > freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.
> >=20
> >   Read the users email.  They're using specific tags, not "." so there are
> > (or may be) some differences as time elapses.
>
> Users should not use tags for ports collection. It's
> documentated also.

 Umm... What exactly is negative impact of using, for example,
tag=RELEASE_5_2_0 for getting ports collection which came with 5.2-RELEASE
via CVSup? Yes, I understand that I won't get fixes and improvements which
came after ports tree freeze and creation of RELEASE_5_2_0 tag. I don't
need them. What else should I be aware of? I've made it several times, then
compared CVSupped ports tree against fresh one which came with 5.2-RELEASE -
they are the same.

Sincerely, Dmitry
-- 
Atlantis ISP, System Administrator
e-mail:  dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua
nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 04:06:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA1416A4CF
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:06:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC9A43DA5
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 04:05:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro)
Received: (qmail 7145 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2004 12:03:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19)
  by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 16 Jan 2004 12:03:04 -0000
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:04:26 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro>
To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>
Message-Id: <20040116140426.1706ca41@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
In-Reply-To: <20040116131248.G36380@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
References: <20040116131248.G36380@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: ports sup tag (was: Re: )
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 12:06:31 -0000

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:20:47 +0200 (EET)
Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua> wrote:

> 
> Hello!
> 
> > Date:      Thu, 15 Jan 2004 16:53:18 +0100
> > From:      Kirill Ponomarew <krion@FreeBSD.org>
> > > > freshly updated ports tree on a 4.9 box is exactly the same as a
> > > > freshly updated ports tree on a 5.2 box.
> > >=20
> > >   Read the users email.  They're using specific tags, not "." so there are
> > > (or may be) some differences as time elapses.
> >
> > Users should not use tags for ports collection. It's
> > documentated also.
> 
>  Umm... What exactly is negative impact of using, for example,
> tag=RELEASE_5_2_0 for getting ports collection which came with 5.2-RELEASE
> via CVSup?

None. But if you want the snap-shot of 5.2R's ports why cvsup ? The
cvsup will get you nothing.

> Yes, I understand that I won't get fixes and improvements which
> came after ports tree freeze and creation of RELEASE_5_2_0 tag. I don't
> need them. What else should I be aware of? I've made it several times, then
> compared CVSupped ports tree against fresh one which came with 5.2-RELEASE -
> they are the same.

If you cvsup with 5_2_0 they will not be different until the end of world.


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 05:06:09 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C96F16A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 05:06:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D4743D1D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 05:06:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua)
Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231])
	by smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0GD36EQ061076;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:03:06 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:03:06 +0200 (EET)
From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>
To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro>
In-Reply-To: <20040116140426.1706ca41@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
Message-ID: <20040116145335.G39895@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
References: <20040116131248.G36380@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
 <20040116140426.1706ca41@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports sup tag (was: Re: )
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:06:09 -0000


Hello!

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > > Users should not use tags for ports collection. It's
> > > documentated also.
> >
> >  Umm... What exactly is negative impact of using, for example,
> > tag=RELEASE_5_2_0 for getting ports collection which came with 5.2-RELEASE
> > via CVSup?
>
> None. But if you want the snap-shot of 5.2R's ports why cvsup ? The
> cvsup will get you nothing.

 Then please tell me how can I get ports tree at the moment of tagging?
Pre-release code freeze for 5.2 has been done in December, while 5.2-RELEASE
has been available since only 12th of January. Where can I get this ports
collection in the interim? As you know, distfiles for some ports have a bad
habit of disappearing from the Net, so this delay is essential for me.

 BTW, if small but critical errors (such as different typos which happen time
to time) found in ports tree between the tagging and release announcement,
I'm sure that they will be corrected in RELEASE_x_y_z also, won't them?


Sincerely, Dmitry
-- 
Atlantis ISP, System Administrator
e-mail:  dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua
nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 05:31:57 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6EE16A4D0
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 05:31:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk
	[194.200.93.187])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3491A43D45
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 05:31:56 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from petefrench@keithprowse.com)
Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim
	4.30; FreeBSD)	id 1AhU4l-000AwO-Ok; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:31:51 +0000
To: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua, itetcu@apropo.ro
In-Reply-To: <20040116145335.G39895@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
Message-Id: <E1AhU4l-000AwO-Ok@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
From: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:31:51 +0000
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports sup tag (was: Re: )
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:31:57 -0000

> None. But if you want the snap-shot of 5.2R's ports why cvsup ? The
> cvsup will get you nothing.

That rather depends on what you are cvsupping from. I had 4.9 ports tree,
I wanted 5.2 ports tree. I thought cvs might be a reasonable way to
get it!

wish I'd never mentioned it now...

-pcf.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 06:03:58 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2CA16A4CF
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:03:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (h201n1fls24o1048.bredband.comhem.se
	[212.181.162.201])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C546443D3F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:03:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se)
Received: (qmail 9779 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Jan 2004 13:57:10 -0000
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:57:10 +0100
From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>
To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>
Message-ID: <20040116135710.GA9678@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>,
	Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro>, stable@freebsd.org
References: <20040116131248.G36380@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
	<20040116140426.1706ca41@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
	<20040116145335.G39895@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040116145335.G39895@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
cc: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro>
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports sup tag (was: Re: )
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:03:58 -0000

On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 03:03:06PM +0200, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote:
> 
> Hello!
> 
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > > > Users should not use tags for ports collection. It's
> > > > documentated also.
> > >
> > >  Umm... What exactly is negative impact of using, for example,
> > > tag=RELEASE_5_2_0 for getting ports collection which came with 5.2-RELEASE
> > > via CVSup?
> >
> > None. But if you want the snap-shot of 5.2R's ports why cvsup ? The
> > cvsup will get you nothing.
> 
>  Then please tell me how can I get ports tree at the moment of tagging?
> Pre-release code freeze for 5.2 has been done in December, while 5.2-RELEASE
> has been available since only 12th of January. Where can I get this ports
> collection in the interim? As you know, distfiles for some ports have a bad
> habit of disappearing from the Net, so this delay is essential for me.

If you really want the ports tree that is included with 5.2-RELEASE,
then, yes, you can cvsup using tag=RELEASE_5_2_0, just as you surmise.
As long as you are aware that once the release has been officially
announced (as it has been) this is a static target and that if you
cvsup a second time you will get exactly the same as the first time,
then there is no problem with this approach.

(I don't quite understand *why* you want do that (and from the sounds
of it, most people who have answered in this thread don't understand it
either) but I will assume that you do have some good reason for wanting
the exact ports tree that is included with 5.2-RELEASE.)


> 
>  BTW, if small but critical errors (such as different typos which happen time
> to time) found in ports tree between the tagging and release announcement,
> I'm sure that they will be corrected in RELEASE_x_y_z also, won't them?

Between the time of the original tagging and the release announcement
it does happen from time to time that the tag is slid forward on a few
ports if changes has been made after the tagging that need to be
included with the release.  Once the release announcement has been made
no further changes to RELEASE_x_y_z will be made.



-- 
<Insert your favourite quote here.>
Erik Trulsson
ertr1013@student.uu.se

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 06:05:28 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD5E16A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:05:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from elsoxfs03089.elsevier.co.uk (elsoxfs03089.elsevier.co.uk
	[193.131.223.7])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A36443D48
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:05:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from steve@sohara.org)
Received: from elsoxfs12414.elsevier.co.uk (unverified) by 
    elsoxfs03089.elsevier.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.10) with 
    ESMTP id <T672b632f70c183df078ec@elsoxfs03089.elsevier.co.uk>; Fri, 16 
    Jan 2004 13:59:12 +0000
Received: from olorin.elsevier.nl (olorin.elsevier.nl [145.36.13.14]) by 
    elsoxfs12414.elsevier.co.uk (2.6 Build 1 (Berkeley 8.8.6)/8.8.4) with 
    ESMTP id NAA01028; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:52:35 GMT
Received: from sol8test1 ([145.36.48.241]) by olorin.elsevier.nl 
    (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA07493; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:57:50 +0100 
    (MET)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:50:51 +0000
From: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@sohara.org>
To: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
Message-Id: <20040116145051.3f5f905d.steve@sohara.org>
In-Reply-To: <E1AhU4l-000AwO-Ok@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
References: <20040116145335.G39895@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> 
    <E1AhU4l-000AwO-Ok@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
Organization: Elsevier Science
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-sun-solaris2.8)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua
cc: itetcu@apropo.ro
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports sup tag (was: Re: )
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:05:28 -0000

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:31:51 +0000
Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com> wrote:

> That rather depends on what you are cvsupping from. I had 4.9 ports
> tree, I wanted 5.2 ports tree. I thought cvs might be a reasonable way
> to get it!

	You could also just download the ports collection from 
/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/5.2-RELEASE/ports/ports.tgz on your favorite
mirror site.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 06:45:47 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A6116A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:45:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8596943D5F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:45:40 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro)
Received: (qmail 18348 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2004 14:45:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19)
  by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 16 Jan 2004 14:45:38 -0000
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:46:57 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro>
To: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
Message-Id: <20040116164657.0da43f32@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
In-Reply-To: <E1AhU4l-000AwO-Ok@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
References: <20040116145335.G39895@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
	<E1AhU4l-000AwO-Ok@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports sup tag (was: Re: )
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:45:47 -0000

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:31:51 +0000
Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com> wrote:

> > None. But if you want the snap-shot of 5.2R's ports why cvsup ? The
> > cvsup will get you nothing.
> 
> That rather depends on what you are cvsupping from. I had 4.9 ports tree,
> I wanted 5.2 ports tree. I thought cvs might be a reasonable way to
> get it!

There is no such a thing as "4.9 ports tree"  or "5.2 ports tree". Some
ports might build / don't on 4.9 / 5.2, or that they dependences,
optimisation, etc. might differ if they are build on, lets say 5.2
rather that 4.9. If you cp -R /usr/ports from a 4.9 machine to a 5.2
machine they will just work, as they are *the same*. The only
difference: on 4.x it is used /usr/ports/INDEX rather that
/usr/ports/INDEX-5 on 5.x

The only tag for cvsup-ping ports should be HEAD (.) unless you have a
very special requirement to use only ports tagged for a specific
release, from which the packages for that release where build, in which
case you will use the release name, eg. 4_9_0.

> wish I'd never mentioned it now...
> 
> -pcf.


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 06:52:20 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E0216A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:52:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5952943D1D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:52:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua)
Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231])
	by smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0GEpwEQ087064;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:51:58 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:51:57 +0200 (EET)
From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>
To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro>
In-Reply-To: <20040116164657.0da43f32@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
Message-ID: <20040116164933.E85031@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
References: <20040116145335.G39895@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
 <E1AhU4l-000AwO-Ok@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
 <20040116164657.0da43f32@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports sup tag (was: Re: )
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:52:20 -0000


Hello!

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:31:51 +0000
> Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com> wrote:
>
> > > None. But if you want the snap-shot of 5.2R's ports why cvsup ? The
> > > cvsup will get you nothing.
> >
> > That rather depends on what you are cvsupping from. I had 4.9 ports tree,
> > I wanted 5.2 ports tree. I thought cvs might be a reasonable way to
> > get it!
>
> There is no such a thing as "4.9 ports tree"  or "5.2 ports tree". Some

 I say "5.2 ports tree" when I want to get ports tree which come with
5.2-RELEASE distribution. Such a thing definitely exists. Period.

> The only tag for cvsup-ping ports should be HEAD (.) unless you have a

 Should != must.

Sincerely, Dmitry
-- 
Atlantis ISP, System Administrator
e-mail:  dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua
nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 06:59:36 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A41616A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:59:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fed1mtao02.cox.net (fed1mtao02.cox.net [68.6.19.243])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259C743D3F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:59:35 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from xcas@cox.net)
Received: from cox.net ([68.2.134.143]) by fed1mtao02.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP
          id <20040116145931.JKQI27510.fed1mtao02.cox.net@cox.net>;
          Fri, 16 Jan 2004 09:59:31 -0500
Message-ID: <4007FC83.1000008@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:00:19 -0700
From: "Greg J." <xcas@cox.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
	rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>
References: <20040116145335.G39895@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
	<E1AhU4l-000AwO-Ok@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
	<20040116164657.0da43f32@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
	<20040116164933.E85031@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20040116164933.E85031@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports sup tag
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:59:36 -0000

Taking a wild guess here.. but have you ever tried this?

ftp://ftp#.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/5.2-RELEASE/ports/

Replace # with 1, 2, 3, etc.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 06:59:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB28316A526
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4EA843D45
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:59:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro)
Received: (qmail 27387 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2004 14:59:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19)
  by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 16 Jan 2004 14:59:47 -0000
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:01:10 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro>
To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>
Message-Id: <20040116170110.2a87e021@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
In-Reply-To: <20040116164933.E85031@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
References: <20040116145335.G39895@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
	<E1AhU4l-000AwO-Ok@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
	<20040116164657.0da43f32@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
	<20040116164933.E85031@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports sup tag (was: Re: )
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:59:51 -0000

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:51:57 +0200 (EET)
Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua> wrote:

> 
> Hello!
> 
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> > On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 13:31:51 +0000
> > Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > None. But if you want the snap-shot of 5.2R's ports why cvsup ? The
> > > > cvsup will get you nothing.
> > >
> > > That rather depends on what you are cvsupping from. I had 4.9 ports tree,
> > > I wanted 5.2 ports tree. I thought cvs might be a reasonable way to
> > > get it!
> >
> > There is no such a thing as "4.9 ports tree"  or "5.2 ports tree". Some
> 
>  I say "5.2 ports tree" when I want to get ports tree which come with
> 5.2-RELEASE distribution. Such a thing definitely exists. Period.

OK, now I understand what you mean and you are right indeed.

> > The only tag for cvsup-ping ports should be HEAD (.) unless you have a
> 
>  Should != must.

True.


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 06:59:51 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0EC316A527
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:59:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk
	[194.200.93.187])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742D843D46
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 06:59:50 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from petefrench@keithprowse.com)
Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim
	4.30; FreeBSD)	id 1AhVRt-000BRD-6o; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:59:49 +0000
To: itetcu@apropo.ro, petefrench@keithprowse.com
In-Reply-To: <20040116164657.0da43f32@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
Message-Id: <E1AhVRt-000BRD-6o@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
From: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:59:49 +0000
cc: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports sup tag (was: Re: )
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:59:52 -0000

> There is no such a thing as "4.9 ports tree"  or "5.2 ports tree". Some

Sigh.. to make it *very* clear

"4.9 ports tree" = "the ports tree that was on the 4.9 RELEASE CD"
"5.2 ports tree" = "the ports tree that was on the 5.2 RELEASE CD"

> release, from which the packages for that release where build, in which
> case you will use the release name, eg. 4_9_0.

Which is what I *do* want.

I am cvsupping anumber of machines. I am doing this on different days, but I
want to end up with the same ports. If I just use '.' then I cant guarantee
this, as ports change all the time. If I use one of the tags then I know
I am getting the same set of ports. I also know that as that set of ports
was frozen for a release then they are guaranteed to work and build together.
I hav (occasionally) used the '.' tag and got a set of ports that didnt quite
build togther.

I dont see why people have a conceptual problem with this. To me its the
obvious way to ensure that you are always going to get the same set of ports
on a machine, no matter how far into the future from the -RELEASE you
happen to update it.

-pcf.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 07:08:17 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C1516A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:08:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from raven.ravenbrook.com (raven.ravenbrook.com [193.82.131.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D99943D41
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:08:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nb@ravenbrook.com)
Received: from thrush.ravenbrook.com (thrush.ravenbrook.com [193.112.141.145])
	i0GF84Wm061600;	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:08:04 GMT
	(envelope-from nb@ravenbrook.com)
Received: from thrush.ravenbrook.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by thrush.ravenbrook.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0GF83lb041476;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:08:03 GMT
	(envelope-from nb@thrush.ravenbrook.com)
From: Nick Barnes <Nick.Barnes@pobox.com>
To: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
In-Reply-To: <E1AhVRt-000BRD-6o@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk> 
   from Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com> 
   of "Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:59:49 +0000"
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:08:03 +0000
Message-ID: <41475.1074265683@thrush.ravenbrook.com>
Sender: nb@ravenbrook.com
cc: itetcu@apropo.ro
cc: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports sup tag (was: Re: ) 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:08:17 -0000

At 2004-01-16 14:59:49+0000, Pete French writes:

> I have (occasionally) used the '.' tag and got a set of ports that
> didnt quite build togther.

Yep, happened to me yesterday.  docproj-jadetex broke somewhere in
jadetex.

Nick B

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 07:14:56 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FB716A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:14:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3F843D55
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:14:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua)
Received: from smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (smtp.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.231])
	by smtp.atlantis.dp.ua (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0GFEVEQ091804;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:14:31 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:14:31 +0200 (EET)
From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov <dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua>
To: "Greg J." <xcas@cox.net>
Message-ID: <20040116170229.Q89306@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports sup tag
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:14:56 -0000


Hello!

> Date:      Fri, 16 Jan 2004 08:00:19 -0700
> From:      "Greg J." <xcas@cox.net>
>
> Taking a wild guess here.. but have you ever tried this?
>
> ftp://ftp#.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/5.2-RELEASE/ports/

 Task that I'm trying to solve is getting ports which _will come_ with
x.y-RELEASE _before_ this release (so

	ftp://ftp#.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/x.y-RELEASE

doesn't exist yet, but ports tree has already been frozen, tagged, and
unfrozen again) in order to fetch distfiles for required ports while they're
available. I want to keep distfiles for some categories of ports in synch with
ports collection in order to have nice funny set of CDs for Internet-less
installations: CD#1 (or even miniinst.iso) + distfiles for main ports
categories.

P.S. I'm sorry for creating noise in this forum, I won't continue this thread.

Sincerely, Dmitry
-- 
Atlantis ISP, System Administrator
e-mail:  dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua
nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 07:20:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B187716A4CF
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:20:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504B143D76
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:20:08 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro)
Received: (qmail 8422 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2004 15:20:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19)
  by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 16 Jan 2004 15:20:07 -0000
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:21:30 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro>
To: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
Message-Id: <20040116172130.38886116@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
In-Reply-To: <E1AhVRt-000BRD-6o@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
References: <20040116164657.0da43f32@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
	<E1AhVRt-000BRD-6o@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports sup tag (was: Re: )
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:20:12 -0000

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:59:49 +0000
Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com> wrote:

> > There is no such a thing as "4.9 ports tree"  or "5.2 ports tree". Some
> 
> Sigh.. to make it *very* clear
> 
> "4.9 ports tree" = "the ports tree that was on the 4.9 RELEASE CD"
> "5.2 ports tree" = "the ports tree that was on the 5.2 RELEASE CD"
> 
> > release, from which the packages for that release where build, in which
> > case you will use the release name, eg. 4_9_0.
> 
> Which is what I *do* want.
> 
> I am cvsupping anumber of machines. I am doing this on different days, but I
> want to end up with the same ports. If I just use '.' then I cant guarantee
> this, as ports change all the time. If I use one of the tags then I know
> I am getting the same set of ports. I also know that as that set of ports
> was frozen for a release then they are guaranteed to work and build together.
> I hav (occasionally) used the '.' tag and got a set of ports that didnt quite
> build togther.

You could also use date= in the cvsup file to get a more recent version
of the tree that you you know it will build the ports you use.
 
> I dont see why people have a conceptual problem with this. 

> To me its the
> obvious way to ensure that you are always going to get the same set of ports
> on a machine, no matter how far into the future from the -RELEASE you
> happen to update it.

If it works don't fix it ? :)

Reasons:
- bugs discovered and corrected
- ports "unbroken" from the -RELEASE time
- updates


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 07:20:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84B716A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:20:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A83143D5F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:20:08 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro)
Received: (qmail 8422 invoked from network); 16 Jan 2004 15:20:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19)
  by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 16 Jan 2004 15:20:07 -0000
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:21:30 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@apropo.ro>
To: Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com>
Message-Id: <20040116172130.38886116@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
In-Reply-To: <E1AhVRt-000BRD-6o@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
References: <20040116164657.0da43f32@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro>
	<E1AhVRt-000BRD-6o@dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports sup tag (was: Re: )
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:20:13 -0000

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:59:49 +0000
Pete French <petefrench@keithprowse.com> wrote:

> > There is no such a thing as "4.9 ports tree"  or "5.2 ports tree". Some
> 
> Sigh.. to make it *very* clear
> 
> "4.9 ports tree" = "the ports tree that was on the 4.9 RELEASE CD"
> "5.2 ports tree" = "the ports tree that was on the 5.2 RELEASE CD"
> 
> > release, from which the packages for that release where build, in which
> > case you will use the release name, eg. 4_9_0.
> 
> Which is what I *do* want.
> 
> I am cvsupping anumber of machines. I am doing this on different days, but I
> want to end up with the same ports. If I just use '.' then I cant guarantee
> this, as ports change all the time. If I use one of the tags then I know
> I am getting the same set of ports. I also know that as that set of ports
> was frozen for a release then they are guaranteed to work and build together.
> I hav (occasionally) used the '.' tag and got a set of ports that didnt quite
> build togther.

You could also use date= in the cvsup file to get a more recent version
of the tree that you you know it will build the ports you use.
 
> I dont see why people have a conceptual problem with this. 

> To me its the
> obvious way to ensure that you are always going to get the same set of ports
> on a machine, no matter how far into the future from the -RELEASE you
> happen to update it.

If it works don't fix it ? :)

Reasons:
- bugs discovered and corrected
- ports "unbroken" from the -RELEASE time
- updates


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 07:48:29 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A326316A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:48:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from enema.egg.net (enema.egg.net [198.206.140.9])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBEA43D3F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:48:28 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tomg@egg.net)
Received: by enema.egg.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 0185D17D; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:48:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by enema.egg.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB337170
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:48:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 07:48:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom Glover <tomg@egg.net>
To: stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0401160732440.63061@enema.egg.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Promise controller and 5.2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:48:29 -0000


I am running 5.2-RELEASE with a Promise S150 TX4 Serial ATA RAID
controller and a couple of WDC SATA drives at RAID 1. I am noticing some
behavior that does not seem right to me.

Systems boots fine on the two mirrored drives. If I disconnect the drive
on channel 2 then the system continues to run. However if I disconnect the
drive on channel 1 it dies. It appears that there is a primary drive on
channel 1 and a secondary on channel 2 and the system is running on the
primary. Perhaps I am confused on my ideas of RAID 1 but I was under the
impression that either drive could fail and the system keep going. Am I
wrong? If I am not does anyone have any ideas?

If I reboot after the drive on channel 1 fails I can recover and boot off
the drive on channel 2. However, the Promise S150 BIOS throws up an error
message about the drive failure that requires manual intervention before
boot can proceed. There does not appear to be any way around that. This,
IMIHO, is brain dead and makes the controller useless for any remote
operation. If this is SOP for Promise then can someone suggest a SATA RAID
controller that behaves in a more sane manner?

--
Tom Glover

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 14:47:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F97816A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:47:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F0043D55
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:47:09 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Ahck8-0006kV-00
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:47:08 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Ahck7-0006kN-00	for <gmane-os-freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:47:07 +0100
Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Ahck7-00076E-00	for <gmane-os-freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:47:07 +0100
From: Max Clark <max@clarksys.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:46:16 -0800
Lines: 5
Message-ID: <bu9pla$qh8$1@sea.gmane.org>
References: <bu7c15$7fo$1@sea.gmane.org> <bu7eco$bjb$1@sea.gmane.org>
	<20040115215208.O386@freeman.4gh.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
	rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
In-Reply-To: <20040115215208.O386@freeman.4gh.net>
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: 4.9-Stable: Disk error booting from hard drive
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 22:47:13 -0000

Stuart Barkley wrote:
> See the recent -stable thread "Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install
> circular reboot"

Thanks, that solved the problem.

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 15:57:23 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DCC16A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:57:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79A243D1F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:57:22 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id DDF7E72DC9; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:57:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DBC3672DC7; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:57:22 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:57:22 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: Richard Schilling <rschi@rsmba.biz>
In-Reply-To: <20040116091859.GA3041@foghorn.rsmba.biz>
Message-ID: <20040116155702.J93165@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <20040116091859.GA3041@foghorn.rsmba.biz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: recovering lost /bin
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:57:23 -0000

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Richard Schilling wrote:

> I have a backup computer, and mistakenly moved /bin.  How can I recover it from, say the BSD cd set?
>
> I'm trying to use the live filesystem CD to mount the disk drive, but I'm not having any luck:
>
> $ mount /dev/wd0s1 /mnt
> mount: /dev/wd0s1 on /mnt: incorrect super block

mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0c /mnt


-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 16:02:55 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D0216A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:02:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBE7743D31
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:02:54 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id CE91672DBF; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:02:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CC79372DB5; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:02:54 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:02:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: Tom Glover <tomg@egg.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0401160732440.63061@enema.egg.net>
Message-ID: <20040116155912.H93165@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0401160732440.63061@enema.egg.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Promise controller and 5.2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:02:56 -0000

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Tom Glover wrote:

>
> I am running 5.2-RELEASE with a Promise S150 TX4 Serial ATA RAID
> controller and a couple of WDC SATA drives at RAID 1. I am noticing some
> behavior that does not seem right to me.
>
> Systems boots fine on the two mirrored drives. If I disconnect the drive
> on channel 2 then the system continues to run. However if I disconnect the
> drive on channel 1 it dies.

Can you explain "dies"?

> If I reboot after the drive on channel 1 fails I can recover and boot off
> the drive on channel 2. However, the Promise S150 BIOS throws up an error
> message about the drive failure that requires manual intervention before
> boot can proceed.

This is normal for Promise and most ATA RAID, since thats likely to be the
only warning you'll get about a missing disk. Also, some operating systems
are not good about bumping the generation numbers AT ALL, and you can end
up with unsynchronized mirrors if you continue.  With the mirror, you
won't lose your data, but its not designed to be fault-tolerant in a
runtime sense.  I don't know why you get differing failure modes between
disks, though -- perhaps you aren't using the right disk device?  You
should be using ar0.

> There does not appear to be any way around that. This, IMIHO, is brain
> dead and makes the controller useless for any remote operation. If this
> is SOP for Promise then can someone suggest a SATA RAID controller that
> behaves in a more sane manner?

You've discovered that ATA RAID is software RAID with hardware assist.

If you want more transparent ATA RAID, you want 3ware.

-- 
Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 16:38:47 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5942616A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:38:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from enema.egg.net (enema.egg.net [198.206.140.9])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B1443D4C
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:38:46 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tomg@egg.net)
Received: by enema.egg.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 86D6E5F0; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:38:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by enema.egg.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7F01C58F; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:38:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 16:38:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom Glover <tomg@egg.net>
To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <20040116155912.H93165@carver.gumbysoft.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0401161637300.63061@enema.egg.net>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0401160732440.63061@enema.egg.net>
 <20040116155912.H93165@carver.gumbysoft.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Promise controller and 5.2
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 00:38:47 -0000

On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Doug White wrote:

> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Tom Glover wrote:
>
> >
> > I am running 5.2-RELEASE with a Promise S150 TX4 Serial ATA RAID
> > controller and a couple of WDC SATA drives at RAID 1. I am noticing some
> > behavior that does not seem right to me.
> >
> > Systems boots fine on the two mirrored drives. If I disconnect the drive
> > on channel 2 then the system continues to run. However if I disconnect the
> > drive on channel 1 it dies.
>
> Can you explain "dies"?

No response on console.

>
> > If I reboot after the drive on channel 1 fails I can recover and boot off
> > the drive on channel 2. However, the Promise S150 BIOS throws up an error
> > message about the drive failure that requires manual intervention before
> > boot can proceed.
>
> This is normal for Promise and most ATA RAID, since thats likely to be the
> only warning you'll get about a missing disk. Also, some operating systems
> are not good about bumping the generation numbers AT ALL, and you can end
> up with unsynchronized mirrors if you continue.  With the mirror, you
> won't lose your data, but its not designed to be fault-tolerant in a
> runtime sense.  I don't know why you get differing failure modes between
> disks, though -- perhaps you aren't using the right disk device?  You
> should be using ar0.
>
> > There does not appear to be any way around that. This, IMIHO, is brain
> > dead and makes the controller useless for any remote operation. If this
> > is SOP for Promise then can someone suggest a SATA RAID controller that
> > behaves in a more sane manner?
>
> You've discovered that ATA RAID is software RAID with hardware assist.
>
> If you want more transparent ATA RAID, you want 3ware.
>
> --
> Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
> dwhite@gumbysoft.com          |  www.FreeBSD.org
>

--
Tom Glover

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 17:19:48 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E93416A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:19:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp3.sentex.ca (smtp3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 237D243D48
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 17:19:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18])
	by smtp3.sentex.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0H1JKU7024739
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 20:19:21 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27])
	by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0H1JKXw029549
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 20:19:20 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040116201535.08335f20@209.112.4.2>
X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 20:18:16 -0500
To: stable@freebsd.org
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Subject: strange VPN1401 HiFn issue
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 01:19:48 -0000


Not sure if this is a card, FreeBSD (RELENG_4), HiFn driver, or MB 
issue.  Here is the setup.
Using openssl on freebsd, I am doing something like

/usr/bin/openssl enc -des3 -in sourcefile -k passphrase | ssh -c 3des 
user@offsite.sentex.ca "cat - >  /backup/user/targetfile.enc"

In the past, this worked great and I could blast the file across the 
network without too much CPU load using an older MB and the VPN1201 (HiFn 
7951).

We got some of the new VPN1401 cards this week based on the HiFN 7955 and 
we also upgraded the server to a faster CPU and more RAM.

Now, if I start this process on the console, the process will block.

If I then start an ssh session that uses a supported cipher (eg 3des) and 
then generate some traffic across that ssh session, the openssl session 
then continues.  Or, if I run /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/cryptotest, 
again, the openssl session blasts some data across, but then blocks once 
more.  Or, if I stop generating traffic on the other ssh session, the 
openssl session blocks.

Top reports the openssl process is in crydev.

# ps -auxw -o flags -p 1249
USER   PID %CPU %MEM   VSZ  RSS  TT  STAT STARTED      TIME 
COMMAND                F
root  1249  0.0  0.1  2520 1452  p0  D+    7:20PM   0:07.61 
/usr/bin/openssl    4006

I dont see this behavior on ssh, as I can run scp between the two sites and 
the hifn card is for sure kicking in as hifnstats are incrementing and data 
flows at wirespeed.

The hifn card does share an interrupt with the onboard video card.  I dont 
think its a hardware issue as it would affect the scp sessions as well.  Is 
there something in the way that openssl talks to the hifn card thats 
different than sshd that would cause it to block like this ?  On Monday I 
can try the previous 7951 card to see if I can duplicate the behaviour.

pci0: <Intel model 2562 VGA-compatible display device> at 2.0 irq 5
hifn0 mem 0xe8510000-0xe8517fff,0xe8518000-0xe8519fff,0xe851a000-0xe851afff 
irq 5 at device 0.0 on pci1
twe0: <3ware Storage Controller> port 0xa000-0xa00f irq 15 at device 1.0 on 
pci1
dc0: <Intel 21143 10/100BaseTX> port 0x9000-0x907f mem 
0xe8440000-0xe84403ff irq 14 at device 4.0 on pci2
dc1: <Intel 21143 10/100BaseTX> port 0x9400-0x947f mem 
0xe8441000-0xe84413ff irq 12 at device 5.0 on pci2
dc2: <Intel 21143 10/100BaseTX> port 0x9800-0x987f mem 
0xe8442000-0xe84423ff irq 10 at device 6.0 on pci2
dc3: <Intel 21143 10/100BaseTX> port 0x9c00-0x9c7f mem 
0xe8443000-0xe84433ff irq 11 at device 7.0 on pci2
fwohci0: <VIA VT6306> port 0xa400-0xa47f mem 0xe851b000-0xe851b7ff irq 11 
at device 4.0 on pci1
pci0: <unknown card> (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x24c3) at 31.3 irq 15
atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> irq 1 on atkbdc0
sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0


Anyone else out there try these new cards yet ?

# hifnstats
input 2604791208 bytes 451359 packets
output 2604787112 bytes 451358 packets
invalid 0 nomem 0 abort 0
noirq 0 unaligned 0
totbatch 0 maxbatch 0
nomem: map 0 load 0 mbuf 0 mcl 0 cr 0 sd 0


	---Mike
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Tancsa,                          	          tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications,     			  mike@sentex.net
Providing Internet since 1994                    www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada			  www.sentex.net/mike

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan 16 21:35:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6825516A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:35:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp3.eunet.yu (smtp3.EUnet.yu [194.247.192.243])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BE243D3F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:35:10 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from kolicz@eunet.yu)
Received: from smtp3.EUnet.yu (root@localhost)
	by smtp3.eunet.yu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i0H5Z8AY028598
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 06:35:08 +0100
Received: from kolic.net (P-2.14.EUnet.yu [213.240.2.14])
	by smtp3.eunet.yu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0H5Z7Dn028533
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 06:35:08 +0100
Received: by kolic.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id AD6334308; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 06:33:56 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 06:33:56 +0100
From: Zoran Kolic <kolicz@eunet.yu>
To: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20040117053356.GA557@kolic.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: CD as floppy
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 05:35:12 -0000

   Dear List!
   Some 6 months ago here
was a thread describing
the use of cd-rw in the
same manner as floppy. Then
I wasn't aware of possibility
to update small files on
daily basis. Now, I cannot
guess keywords to find it.
Content should be like: "take
cd-rw... disklabel/bsdlabel...
newfs /dev/cd0... mount...
copy this to there..."
   I wonder, does it work
with every cd-writer? (Ide,
Sony CRX225E QYB2, atapicam
scsi emulation.) Should I
install something more to
make it work? And, what is
a mechanism under the hood?
   Best regards

                 ZK


From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 17 06:30:26 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFD716A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 06:30:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2C843D53
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 06:30:23 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org)
Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AhrSv-0004qY-00
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:30:21 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AhrGj-0004jI-00	for <gmane-os-freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:17:45 +0100
Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AhrGj-0002Ek-00	for <gmane-os-freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:17:45 +0100
From: Manfred Lotz <manfred.lotz@web.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:17:32 +0100
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <pan.2004.01.17.14.17.32.75156@web.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing
	moment of clarity.)
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: Shared object "libc.so.5" not found
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:30:27 -0000

I've set up a new 4.9 STABLE system. Now when I want to install wget
I get 
Shared object "libc.so.5" not found
after a while.

I did a: cd /usr/ports/ftp/wget;make install

Any idea what's happening?

Manfred



From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 17 06:55:06 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337BC16A4CE
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 06:55:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp3.sentex.ca (smtp3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F32A43D2F
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 06:55:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18])
	by smtp3.sentex.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0HEt1U7032626
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 09:55:01 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27])
	by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0HEt1Xw058645
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 09:55:01 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.0.20040117095248.09168498@209.112.4.2>
X-Sender: mdtpop@209.112.4.2 (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 09:54:02 -0500
To: stable@freebsd.org
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.0.20040116201535.08335f20@209.112.4.2>
References: <6.0.1.1.0.20040116201535.08335f20@209.112.4.2>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Subject: Re: strange VPN1401 HiFn issue
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:55:06 -0000


It would appear it might be an issue with the card or drivers as an OpenBSD 
user was seeing the same behaviour.

         ---Mike

At 08:18 PM 16/01/2004, Mike Tancsa wrote:

>Not sure if this is a card, FreeBSD (RELENG_4), HiFn driver, or MB 
>issue.  Here is the setup.
>Using openssl on freebsd, I am doing something like
>
>/usr/bin/openssl enc -des3 -in sourcefile -k passphrase | ssh -c 3des 
>user@offsite.sentex.ca "cat - >  /backup/user/targetfile.enc"
>
>In the past, this worked great and I could blast the file across the 
>network without too much CPU load using an older MB and the VPN1201 (HiFn 
>7951).
>
>We got some of the new VPN1401 cards this week based on the HiFN 7955 and 
>we also upgraded the server to a faster CPU and more RAM.
>
>Now, if I start this process on the console, the process will block.
>
>If I then start an ssh session that uses a supported cipher (eg 3des) and 
>then generate some traffic across that ssh session, the openssl session 
>then continues.  Or, if I run /usr/src/tools/tools/crypto/cryptotest, 
>again, the openssl session blasts some data across, but then blocks once 
>more.  Or, if I stop generating traffic on the other ssh session, the 
>openssl session blocks.
>
>Top reports the openssl process is in crydev.
>
># ps -auxw -o flags -p 1249
>USER   PID %CPU %MEM   VSZ  RSS  TT  STAT STARTED      TIME 
>COMMAND                F
>root  1249  0.0  0.1  2520 1452  p0  D+    7:20PM   0:07.61 
>/usr/bin/openssl    4006
>
>I dont see this behavior on ssh, as I can run scp between the two sites 
>and the hifn card is for sure kicking in as hifnstats are incrementing and 
>data flows at wirespeed.
>
>The hifn card does share an interrupt with the onboard video card.  I dont 
>think its a hardware issue as it would affect the scp sessions as 
>well.  Is there something in the way that openssl talks to the hifn card 
>thats different than sshd that would cause it to block like this ?  On 
>Monday I can try the previous 7951 card to see if I can duplicate the 
>behaviour.
>
>pci0: <Intel model 2562 VGA-compatible display device> at 2.0 irq 5
>hifn0 mem 
>0xe8510000-0xe8517fff,0xe8518000-0xe8519fff,0xe851a000-0xe851afff irq 5 at 
>device 0.0 on pci1
>twe0: <3ware Storage Controller> port 0xa000-0xa00f irq 15 at device 1.0 
>on pci1
>dc0: <Intel 21143 10/100BaseTX> port 0x9000-0x907f mem 
>0xe8440000-0xe84403ff irq 14 at device 4.0 on pci2
>dc1: <Intel 21143 10/100BaseTX> port 0x9400-0x947f mem 
>0xe8441000-0xe84413ff irq 12 at device 5.0 on pci2
>dc2: <Intel 21143 10/100BaseTX> port 0x9800-0x987f mem 
>0xe8442000-0xe84423ff irq 10 at device 6.0 on pci2
>dc3: <Intel 21143 10/100BaseTX> port 0x9c00-0x9c7f mem 
>0xe8443000-0xe84433ff irq 11 at device 7.0 on pci2
>fwohci0: <VIA VT6306> port 0xa400-0xa47f mem 0xe851b000-0xe851b7ff irq 11 
>at device 4.0 on pci1
>pci0: <unknown card> (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x24c3) at 31.3 irq 15
>atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> irq 1 on atkbdc0
>sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
>sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0
>
>
>Anyone else out there try these new cards yet ?
>
># hifnstats
>input 2604791208 bytes 451359 packets
>output 2604787112 bytes 451358 packets
>invalid 0 nomem 0 abort 0
>noirq 0 unaligned 0
>totbatch 0 maxbatch 0
>nomem: map 0 load 0 mbuf 0 mcl 0 cr 0 sd 0
>
>
>         ---Mike
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>Mike Tancsa,                                      tel +1 519 651 3400
>Sentex Communications,                            mike@sentex.net
>Providing Internet since 1994                    www.sentex.net
>Cambridge, Ontario Canada                         www.sentex.net/mike
>
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 17 07:58:30 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B2F16A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 07:58:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk
	(happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FE343D46
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 07:58:28 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk)
Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1])
	i0HFwOfn046110
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:58:24 GMT
	(envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk)
Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0HFwN71046103;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:58:23 GMT	(envelope-from matthew)
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:58:23 +0000
From: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
To: Manfred Lotz <manfred.lotz@web.de>
Message-ID: <20040117155823.GB71989@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
Mail-Followup-To: Manfred Lotz <manfred.lotz@web.de>,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <pan.2004.01.17.14.17.32.75156@web.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <pan.2004.01.17.14.17.32.75156@web.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
	version=2.61
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on 
	happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Shared object "libc.so.5" not found
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:58:30 -0000


--1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 03:17:32PM +0100, Manfred Lotz wrote:
> I've set up a new 4.9 STABLE system. Now when I want to install wget
> I get=20
> Shared object "libc.so.5" not found
> after a while.
>=20
> I did a: cd /usr/ports/ftp/wget;make install
>=20
> Any idea what's happening?

Yes.  Somehow you've managed to install a FreeBSD 5.x version of one
of the build tools used by the ftp/wget port, and that won't run under
FreeBSD 4.x.  devel/gmake is a likely candidate -- can you run?:

    % gmake --version

If that doesn't work, then you should:

    # pkg_delete -f gmake-\*
    # cd /usr/ports/devel/gmake
    # make install

However, the problem doesn't have to be within gmake -- it could be
any of these ports:

    ...ports/ftp/wget:% make pretty-print-build-depends-list
    This port requires package(s) "expat-1.95.6_1 gettext-0.12.1 gmake-3.80=
_1 libiconv-1.9.1_3" to build.

and you might have to delete and re-install those in a similar way.

Alternatively, if you're a portupgrade user you can force a
rebuild/reinstall of *everything* that the wget port depends on in one
fell swoop by:

    # portupgrade -Rf ftp/wget

which should sort things out.

	Cheers,

	Matthew

--=20
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                       26 The Paddocks
                                                      Savill Way
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey         Marlow
Tel: +44 1628 476614                                  Bucks., SL7 1TH UK

--1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFACVufdtESqEQa7a0RAuGgAJ42EuSy3uXSI4D/cZtm15YG3qoAegCeMtMd
FuPSNWzvOpX0WFFOcpmierk=
=nlq2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--1LKvkjL3sHcu1TtY--

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 17 13:30:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B5516A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:30:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444A243D2D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 13:30:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Ahy1b-00008V-00
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:30:35 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Ahy1Y-00008N-00	for <gmane-os-freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:30:32 +0100
Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Ahy1Y-000627-00	for <gmane-os-freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:30:32 +0100
From: Manfred Lotz <manfred.lotz@web.de>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:13:12 +0100
Lines: 55
Message-ID: <pan.2004.01.17.21.13.11.950474@web.de>
References: <pan.2004.01.17.14.17.32.75156@web.de>
	<20040117155823.GB71989@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing
	moment of clarity.)
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Shared object "libc.so.5" not found
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 21:30:40 -0000

On Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:58:23 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 03:17:32PM +0100, Manfred Lotz wrote:
>> I've set up a new 4.9 STABLE system. Now when I want to install wget I
>> get
>> Shared object "libc.so.5" not found
>> after a while.
>> 
>> I did a: cd /usr/ports/ftp/wget;make install
>> 
>> Any idea what's happening?
> 
> Yes.  Somehow you've managed to install a FreeBSD 5.x version of one of
> the build tools used by the ftp/wget port, and that won't run under
> FreeBSD 4.x.  devel/gmake is a likely candidate -- can you run?:
> 
>     % gmake --version
> 
> If that doesn't work, then you should:
> 
>     # pkg_delete -f gmake-\*
>     # cd /usr/ports/devel/gmake
>     # make install
> 
> However, the problem doesn't have to be within gmake -- it could be any
> of these ports:
> 
>     ...ports/ftp/wget:% make pretty-print-build-depends-list This port
>     requires package(s) "expat-1.95.6_1 gettext-0.12.1 gmake-3.80_1
>     libiconv-1.9.1_3" to build.
> 
> and you might have to delete and re-install those in a similar way.
> 
> Alternatively, if you're a portupgrade user you can force a
> rebuild/reinstall of *everything* that the wget port depends on in one
> fell swoop by:
> 
>     # portupgrade -Rf ftp/wget
> 
> which should sort things out.
> 
> 
I tried it all although it didn't help. But your comments were very
valuable because they did point me to the right direction.

There was a makeinfo binary from FreeBSD 5.1 in my path which caused the
problems. This was because I have a TeXLive installation which I took over
from my FreeBSD 5.2 CURRENT system as well as I took over the ~/.zshrc
which had a PATH statement including the "old" FreeBSD 5.2 bin directory
of TeXLive.


Thanks a lot,
Manfred


From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 17 14:26:29 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EF916A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:26:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gw.opentable.com (gw.opentable.com [63.89.164.120])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5389043D31
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:26:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from efreis@opentable.com)
Received: (qmail 59545 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 22:26:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.opentable.com) (10.0.0.6)
  by ns1.opentable.com.ot with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 22:26:28 -0000
Received: by mail.opentable.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
	id <CQY9TR9N>; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:24:54 -0800
Message-ID: <34BD9C97B714D511B01C00D0B73EC07303EEE65B@mail.opentable.com>
From: Elliott Freis <efreis@opentable.com>
To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:24:51 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: Odd lag/hanging issue with production ftp server - Please help AS
	AP!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:26:29 -0000

I am forwarding this to this list per recommendation.


Note on recent test:  Trying to do a transfer on the public LAN off the ftp
server, I am only able to get a bursty 20k/s! down from the ftp server.
This was with nfs completely unmounted, ftping from a local drive so its not
an NFS problem.  It should get a full 2-3mb a sec at least.  It used to.  Up
is still full speed.  The machine has a Intel pro NIC, direct to a Cisco
ArrowPoint.  Both are set to 100 FD.  ifconfig_fxp2="inet 66.151.XXX.XXX
netmask 255.255.255.224 media 100baseTX"

Any help GREATLY appreciated, I have exhausted all avenues I can think of,
including hardware swaps.  Here is some diag:

last pid: 49903;  load averages:  0.12,  0.20,  0.25
up 0+15:19:19  14:19:00
73 processes:  1 running, 72 sleeping
CPU states:  1.4% user,  0.0% nice, 17.1% system,  2.3% interrupt, 79.2%
idle
Mem: 24M Active, 1233M Inact, 178M Wired, 68M Cache, 163M Buf, 3600K Free
Swap: 1024M Total, 12K Used, 1024M Free

353/17120/262144 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
        271 mbufs allocated to data
        82 mbufs allocated to packet headers
213/16806/65536 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
37892 Kbytes allocated to network (19% of mb_map in use)
0 requests for memory denied
0 requests for memory delayed
0 calls to protocol drain routines

Name  Mtu   Network       Address            Ipkts Ierrs    Opkts Oerrs
Coll
fxp2  1500  <Link#3>    00:02:a5:13:fc:b5 30214691     0 22672636     0
589096
fxp2  1500  66.151.XXX.XXX	ftp             30150589     - 22683851
-     -
fxp2  1500  fe80:3::202 fe80:3::202:a5ff:        0     -        0     -
-

>  -----Original Message-----
> From: 	Elliott Freis  
> Sent:	Friday, January 09, 2004 3:28 PM
> To:	'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG'
> Subject:	Odd lag/hanging issue with production ftp server - Please
> help ASAP!
> 
>   I have been struggling with this one for over a month now.  Here is a
> quick layout of my setup:
> 
> Primary FTP server:
> Compaq DL380 1.5gb ram
> FreeBSD 4.5  
> 3x36gb RAID 5 drives as local boot/storage
> ProFTPd
> 
> Array server for FTP:
> AMD Athlon 2200 512mb ram
> FreeBSD 4.8
> 7x36gb Fiber channel drives, RAID 5 via Vinum.
> 
> Both machines are connected via a cross-over cable, that has been tested
> good and swapped just in case.  The primary storage for FTP is done on the
> Fiber drives via nfs from FTP to Array server.  NFS options are -U -3.
> 
> My problem is this.  As more users connect and store files, the primary
> FTP machine becomes increasingly unresponsive.  Currently, I max at about
> 350 concurrent FTP connections.  The most basic test I have been doing is
> just holding down enter on an SSH session.  As you hold enter down, you
> see it visually just hang for a second or more (up to about 5 seconds
> depending on the load).  It is even worse if I spam "df -k" for example.
> For part of the time, it responds fine, though its randomly a second to
> multiple seconds.  In other words, it is randomly responsive and not
> responsive every 5 seconds or so.  During the "hanging" time, ftp sessions
> are also hung.  So you see very bursty data transfers.  Now thankfully, no
> ftp sessions drop, so we do get the data we need.  But this is a terrible
> thing to be happening to a production server.
> 
>  One other thing of note, this happened to me about 4-5 months ago, but a
> reboot fixed it for some reason.  So I concluded it was just a hiccup.
> But it has returned after a different reboot, and won't go away.  
> 
>   Any help in troubleshooting this is very appreciated!  Happy new year,
> 
>  -Elliott
> 
> Example of "enter" latency (this is from a LAN connection):
> At shell prompt ">"
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> >
> >
> 
> >
> >
> >
> 
> >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> >
> >
> >

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 17 14:48:57 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C39116A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:48:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from h2.liquidneon.com (h2.liquidneon.com [216.38.206.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53D3543D45
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 14:48:55 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bdavis@house.so14k.com)
Received: (qmail 65341 invoked from network); 17 Jan 2004 22:48:54 -0000
Received: from c-24-8-51-173.client.comcast.net (HELO
	mccaffrey.house.so14k.com) (24.8.51.173)
	by h2.liquidneon.com with SMTP; 17 Jan 2004 22:48:54 -0000
Received: by mccaffrey.house.so14k.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id AEBE9250; Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:48:25 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:48:25 -0700
From: Brad Davis <bdavis@kenisis.com>
To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20040117224825.GA48895@mccaffrey.house.so14k.com>
Mail-Followup-To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
References: <34BD9C97B714D511B01C00D0B73EC07303EEE65B@mail.opentable.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <34BD9C97B714D511B01C00D0B73EC07303EEE65B@mail.opentable.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Subject: Re: Odd lag/hanging issue with production ftp server - Please help
	AS AP!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 22:48:57 -0000

Elliott,

You might try downloading a file from the internet to locate where the
problem is. Or a different FTP server. Etc. Keep trying to narrow down
where the problem is.


Regards,
Brad

On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 02:24:51PM -0800, Elliott Freis wrote:
> I am forwarding this to this list per recommendation.
> 
> 
> Note on recent test:  Trying to do a transfer on the public LAN off the ftp
> server, I am only able to get a bursty 20k/s! down from the ftp server.
> This was with nfs completely unmounted, ftping from a local drive so its not
> an NFS problem.  It should get a full 2-3mb a sec at least.  It used to.  Up
> is still full speed.  The machine has a Intel pro NIC, direct to a Cisco
> ArrowPoint.  Both are set to 100 FD.  ifconfig_fxp2="inet 66.151.XXX.XXX
> netmask 255.255.255.224 media 100baseTX"
> 
> Any help GREATLY appreciated, I have exhausted all avenues I can think of,
> including hardware swaps.  Here is some diag:
> 
> last pid: 49903;  load averages:  0.12,  0.20,  0.25
> up 0+15:19:19  14:19:00
> 73 processes:  1 running, 72 sleeping
> CPU states:  1.4% user,  0.0% nice, 17.1% system,  2.3% interrupt, 79.2%
> idle
> Mem: 24M Active, 1233M Inact, 178M Wired, 68M Cache, 163M Buf, 3600K Free
> Swap: 1024M Total, 12K Used, 1024M Free
> 
> 353/17120/262144 mbufs in use (current/peak/max):
>         271 mbufs allocated to data
>         82 mbufs allocated to packet headers
> 213/16806/65536 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max)
> 37892 Kbytes allocated to network (19% of mb_map in use)
> 0 requests for memory denied
> 0 requests for memory delayed
> 0 calls to protocol drain routines
> 
> Name  Mtu   Network       Address            Ipkts Ierrs    Opkts Oerrs
> Coll
> fxp2  1500  <Link#3>    00:02:a5:13:fc:b5 30214691     0 22672636     0
> 589096
> fxp2  1500  66.151.XXX.XXX	ftp             30150589     - 22683851
> -     -
> fxp2  1500  fe80:3::202 fe80:3::202:a5ff:        0     -        0     -
> -
> 
> >  -----Original Message-----
> > From: 	Elliott Freis  
> > Sent:	Friday, January 09, 2004 3:28 PM
> > To:	'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG'
> > Subject:	Odd lag/hanging issue with production ftp server - Please
> > help ASAP!
> > 
> >   I have been struggling with this one for over a month now.  Here is a
> > quick layout of my setup:
> > 
> > Primary FTP server:
> > Compaq DL380 1.5gb ram
> > FreeBSD 4.5  
> > 3x36gb RAID 5 drives as local boot/storage
> > ProFTPd
> > 
> > Array server for FTP:
> > AMD Athlon 2200 512mb ram
> > FreeBSD 4.8
> > 7x36gb Fiber channel drives, RAID 5 via Vinum.
> > 
> > Both machines are connected via a cross-over cable, that has been tested
> > good and swapped just in case.  The primary storage for FTP is done on the
> > Fiber drives via nfs from FTP to Array server.  NFS options are -U -3.
> > 
> > My problem is this.  As more users connect and store files, the primary
> > FTP machine becomes increasingly unresponsive.  Currently, I max at about
> > 350 concurrent FTP connections.  The most basic test I have been doing is
> > just holding down enter on an SSH session.  As you hold enter down, you
> > see it visually just hang for a second or more (up to about 5 seconds
> > depending on the load).  It is even worse if I spam "df -k" for example.
> > For part of the time, it responds fine, though its randomly a second to
> > multiple seconds.  In other words, it is randomly responsive and not
> > responsive every 5 seconds or so.  During the "hanging" time, ftp sessions
> > are also hung.  So you see very bursty data transfers.  Now thankfully, no
> > ftp sessions drop, so we do get the data we need.  But this is a terrible
> > thing to be happening to a production server.
> > 
> >  One other thing of note, this happened to me about 4-5 months ago, but a
> > reboot fixed it for some reason.  So I concluded it was just a hiccup.
> > But it has returned after a different reboot, and won't go away.  
> > 
> >   Any help in troubleshooting this is very appreciated!  Happy new year,
> > 
> >  -Elliott
> > 
> > Example of "enter" latency (this is from a LAN connection):
> > At shell prompt ">"
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 17 15:45:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EC4116A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:45:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mandarin.fruitsalad.org (pc117.net160.koping.net
	[81.16.160.117])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA7143D3F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat, 17 Jan 2004 15:45:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from matt@fruitsalad.org)
Received: from [192.168.15.54] (helo=192.168.15.54)
	by mandarin.fruitsalad.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD)
	id 1Ai07v-0000F3-2K; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 00:45:15 +0100
From: Matt Douhan <matt@fruitsalad.org>
Organization: fruitsalad.org
To: Elliott Freis <efreis@opentable.com>,
	"'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 00:44:24 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4
References: <34BD9C97B714D511B01C00D0B73EC07303EEE65B@mail.opentable.com>
In-Reply-To: <34BD9C97B714D511B01C00D0B73EC07303EEE65B@mail.opentable.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1;
  boundary="Boundary-02=_sjcCAqHdHB4oFwM";
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200401180044.44466.matt@fruitsalad.org>
Subject: Re: Odd lag/hanging issue with production ftp server - Please help
	AS AP!
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 23:45:18 -0000


--Boundary-02=_sjcCAqHdHB4oFwM
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

>
> Note on recent test:  Trying to do a transfer on the public LAN off the f=
tp
> server, I am only able to get a bursty 20k/s! down from the ftp server.
> This was with nfs completely unmounted, ftping from a local drive so its
> not an NFS problem.  It should get a full 2-3mb a sec at least.  It used
> to.  Up is still full speed.  The machine has a Intel pro NIC, direct to a
> Cisco ArrowPoint.  Both are set to 100 FD.  ifconfig_fxp2=3D"inet
> 66.151.XXX.XXX netmask 255.255.255.224 media 100baseTX"

If you use mediaopt on your client you will need to also hardcode the setti=
ngs=20
on the arrowpoint or you may end up in trouble there with the negotiation,=
=20
and also if you only set the speed and not the duplex hardcoded you will ha=
ve=20
troubles as well.

your options are, hardcode neither speed nor duplex, or hardcode both speed=
=20
and duplex, you seem to have a mix of both and that is never a good idea.

=2D-=20
Matt Douhan
www.fruitsalad.org
matt@fruitsalad.org
ping elvis
elvis is alive

--Boundary-02=_sjcCAqHdHB4oFwM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBACcjsJ58/+TqKmQsRAhEIAKCnLxyrIUzqNT5jpF8PF6yL2ELejACfQ1Ss
GcE7DDgqBHMBBeCFRPPiUIg=
=LXbB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Boundary-02=_sjcCAqHdHB4oFwM--