From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 8 15:12:20 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id AF6F816A4CE; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 15:12:20 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (grgw.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.64.130])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id BABB343D3F; Sun, 8 Aug 2004 15:12:19 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru)
Received: from grosbein.pp.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by grosbein.pp.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i78FCI77009865;
Sun, 8 Aug 2004 23:12:18 +0800 (KRAST)
(envelope-from eugen@grosbein.pp.ru)
Received: (from eugen@localhost)
by grosbein.pp.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i78FCIXB009864;
Sun, 8 Aug 2004 23:12:18 +0800 (KRAST)
(envelope-from eugen)
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 23:12:18 +0800
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.pp.ru>
To: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040808151218.GA9847@grosbein.pp.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: arch@freebsd.org
cc: stable@freebsd.org
cc: re@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/58951: Some problems with 4.9-RELEASE installation using
comconsole
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 15:12:21 -0000
Hi!
Is there anyone interested in fixing 4.x-RELEASE serial console
installation?
Eugene
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 8 23:03:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7CF16A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Sun, 8 Aug 2004 23:03:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pd5mo1so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net
[24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA2143D31
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Sun, 8 Aug 2004 23:03:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bw2003@shaw.ca)
Received: from pd4mr7so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr7so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca
[10.0.141.84])2003))freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun,
08 Aug 2004 16:55:30 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml7so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.151])
by pd4mr7so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar
15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I25001G4H0IODC0@pd4mr7so.prod.shaw.ca> for
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 16:55:30 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from potlavj0m8twaq
(S0106000d87616d3c.ls.shawcable.net [24.76.211.148])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003))
with SMTP id <0I2500G07H0HBG@l-daemon> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun,
08 Aug 2004 16:55:30 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 18:55:36 -0400
From: Ryan <bw2003@shaw.ca>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-id: <002001c47d9a$d29c7100$94d34c18@potlavj0m8twaq>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1
Subject: Possible Glitch In CTM/src-4/ Deltas
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 23:03:07 -0000
Hello,
I applied uptodate Ctm Src-4 deltas and it really messed=20
up my system. I was able to buildworld/installworld but
when it came to buildkernal it spit our path error for perl
scripts. I've currently redownloaded src via Sysinstall and
everything is running smoothly.. But thing is how am i supose
to trust/use latest source/etc when there is a problem..
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 9 14:01:55 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D7816A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:01:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pd3mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net
[24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB7843D2F
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:01:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bw2003@shaw.ca)
Received: from pd4mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (pd4mr5so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca
[10.0.141.50])2003))freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon,
09 Aug 2004 07:45:29 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml6so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.150])
by pd4mr5so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar
15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I260003VM7TQW10@pd4mr5so.prod.shaw.ca> for
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 07:45:29 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from potlavj0m8twaq
(S0106000d87616d3c.ls.shawcable.net [24.76.211.148])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003))
with SMTP id <0I260084CM7S5G@l-daemon> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon,
09 Aug 2004 07:45:29 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 09:45:39 -0400
From: Ryan <bw2003@shaw.ca>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-id: <00a701c47e17$2852f750$94d34c18@potlavj0m8twaq>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-Priority: 1
X-MSMail-priority: High
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1
Subject: Kernel Compile Errors
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:01:55 -0000
bash-2.05b# make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DPOTL
--------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Kernel build for POTL started on Mon Aug 9 09:07:24 EST 2004
--------------------------------------------------------------
=3D=3D=3D> POTL
((((Skiping To The End))))
cc -c -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls =
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes =
-Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi =
-nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/../include =
-I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter =
-D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 =
setdef1.c
touch hack.c
cc -shared -nostdlib hack.c -o hack.So
rm -f hack.c
sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh POTL=20
cc -c -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls =
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes =
-Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi =
-nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/../include =
-I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter =
-D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 vers.c
linking kernel
kbd.o: In function `kbd_register':
kbd.o(.text+0x314): undefined reference to `kbddriver_set'
kbd.o(.text+0x31b): undefined reference to `kbddriver_set'
kbd.o: In function `kbd_get_switch':
kbd.o(.text+0x429): undefined reference to `kbddriver_set'
kbd.o(.text+0x42e): undefined reference to `kbddriver_set'
kbd.o: In function `kbd_configure':
kbd.o(.text+0x6b3): undefined reference to `kbddriver_set'
kbd.o(.text+0x6b8): more undefined references to `kbddriver_set' follow
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/POTL.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------
(((((Kernel Config))))
machine i386
cpu I686_CPU
ident POTL
maxusers 0
options INET #InterNETworking
options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem
options FFS_ROOT #FFS usable as root device [keep =
this!]
options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support
options UFS_DIRHASH #Improve performance on big =
directories
options MFS #Memory Filesystem
options MD_ROOT #MD is a potential root device
options CD9660 #ISO 9660 Filesystem =20
options CD9660_ROOT #CD-ROM usable as root, CD9660 =
required
options PROCFS #Process filesystem =20
options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP =
THIS!]
options SCSI_DELAY=3D15000 #Delay (in ms) before probing =
SCSI
options USERCONFIG #boot -c editor
options VISUAL_USERCONFIG #visual boot -c editor
options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support
options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory
options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues
options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores
options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time =
extensions
options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies
options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev
options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in =
debug
# output. Adds ~128k to driver.
options AHD_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in =
debug
# output. Adds ~215k to driver.
device ata
device atadisk # ATA disk drives
device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives
device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives
options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering
device stg # TMC 18C30/18C50
device scbus # SCSI bus (required)
device vga0 at isa?
pseudo-device splash
device sc0 at isa? flags 0x100
device agp # support several AGP chipsets
device npx0 at nexus? port IO_NPX irq 13
device apm0 at nexus? disable flags 0x20 # Advanced Power =
Management
device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4
device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 irq 3
device miibus # MII bus support
device vr # VIA Rhine, Rhine II
pseudo-device loop # Network loopback
pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support
pseudo-device tun # Packet tunnel.
pseudo-device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc)
pseudo-device md # Memory "disks"
options MAXDSIZ=3D"(256*1024*1024)"
options MAXSSIZ=3D"(256*1024*1024)"
options DFLDSIZ=3D"(256*1024*1024)"
options IPFIREWALL #firewall
options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #enable logging to syslogd(8)
options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD #enable transparent proxy =
support
options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=3D100 #limit verbosity
options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT #allow everything by =
default
options IPFILTER #ipfilter support
options IPFILTER_LOG #ipfilter logging
options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK #block all packets by default
options MROUTING # Multicast routing
options IPSTEALTH #support for stealth forwarding
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 9 14:38:18 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D6716A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:38:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ux11.ltcm.net (ux11.ltcm.net [64.215.98.6])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EFA43D3F
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:38:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mipam@ibb.net)
Received: from ux11.ltcm.net (mipam@localhost.ltcm.net [IPv6:::1])
by ux11.ltcm.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/UX11TT) with ESMTP id i79EcGIo016647
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:38:16 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from localhost (mipam@localhost)
by ux11.ltcm.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id i79EcE5k004855
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:38:15 +0200 (MEST)
X-Authentication-Warning: ux11.ltcm.net: mipam owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 16:38:14 +0200 (MEST)
From: Mipam <mipam@ibb.net>
X-X-Sender: mipam@ux11.ltcm.net
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0408091628030.31478@ux11.ltcm.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: 82541 Gi + device polling
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:38:19 -0000
Hi,
I saw that the 82541 GI intel card is supported:
dev/em/if_em_hw.h:#define E1000_DEV_ID_82541GI 0x1076
in 5.2.1
However, with lots of traffic, lots of interrupts are being generated and
so lots of cpu power is consumed. Device polling would be a nice way
around
this. However, in the machine which contains these cards, SMP is enabled,
cause its a hyperthreading machine. I saw that device polling is
not possible with smp enabled? And irq mitigation is also not included in
these cards, so the old interrupt problem is still present with the modern
card then? I think that the amount of interrupts consume more cpu, than
calculation of checksums. Maybe im wrong in this?
Any idea why intel quitted irq mitigation.
A combination of irq mitigation and checksum offloading would
really save cpu cycles.
Bye,
Mipam.
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 9 15:20:09 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DEF16A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:20:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.198])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA0C43D2F
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:20:08 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com)
Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so137871rnl
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Mon, 09 Aug 2004 08:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.38.12.77 with SMTP id 77mr889290rnl;
Mon, 09 Aug 2004 08:20:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <790a9fff04080908201ddc96b4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 10:20:02 -0500
From: Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>
To: Ryan <bw2003@shaw.ca>
In-Reply-To: <002001c47d9a$d29c7100$94d34c18@potlavj0m8twaq>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <002001c47d9a$d29c7100$94d34c18@potlavj0m8twaq>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Possible Glitch In CTM/src-4/ Deltas
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 15:20:09 -0000
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 18:55:36 -0400, Ryan <bw2003@shaw.ca> wrote:
> I applied uptodate Ctm Src-4 deltas and it really messed
> up my system. I was able to buildworld/installworld but
> when it came to buildkernal it spit our path error for perl
> scripts. I've currently redownloaded src via Sysinstall and
> everything is running smoothly.. But thing is how am i supose
> to trust/use latest source/etc when there is a problem..
>
You are supposed to follow the steps in UPDATING. If you would have
done a buildkernal/installkernal before your installworld you would
have known not to use installworld until your kernal was built.
Scot
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 9 18:04:03 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14FD16A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:04:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EC043D48
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:04:03 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 94CBC72DF2; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8F41472DB5; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 11:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040808151218.GA9847@grosbein.pp.ru>
Message-ID: <20040809105027.V77234@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <20040808151218.GA9847@grosbein.pp.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/58951: Some problems with 4.9-RELEASE installation using
comconsole
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:04:03 -0000
Stripping cc: list down to -stable only. Don't crosspost lists, please.
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> Is there anyone interested in fixing 4.x-RELEASE serial console
> installation?
Serial console installation works fine, tehnically speaking. :)
Your complaint has two parts:
1. -P doesn't work on your system. This doesn't suprise me; may BIOSen
will say a keyboard is there when it is not. Its possible this is the case
for you, which is something that FreeBSD can't fix. You should use the -h
option in this instance, which forces serial console regardless.
2. Sysinstall does not configure the system for serial console if it was
installed from one. A reasonable feature request, but certainly not
something that can be done quickly. You can do this manually by starting
the Fixit shell and running
echo "-h" > /dist/boot.config
vi /dist/etc/ttys (enable ttyd0 console)
(untested, but you get the idea hopefully)
--
Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 9 19:32:25 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D0016A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 19:32:25 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from skippyii.compar.com (www.compar.com [216.208.38.130])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3987C43D54
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 19:32:24 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca)
Received: from hermes (CPE00062566c7bb-CM000039c69a66.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com
[69.193.82.185])i79JbC3J017270; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:37:14 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca)
Message-ID: <000901c47e47$307b20d0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
From: "Matt Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>
To: "Ryan" <bw2003@shaw.ca>, <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
References: <00a701c47e17$2852f750$94d34c18@potlavj0m8twaq>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 15:29:26 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
Subject: Re: Kernel Compile Errors
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:32:25 -0000
Where did these two lines go? They are required:
device atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD
device atkbd0 at atkbdc? irq 1 flags 0x1
Matt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan" <bw2003@shaw.ca>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 9:45 AM
Subject: Kernel Compile Errors
> bash-2.05b# make buildkernel KERNCONF=POTL
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> Kernel build for POTL started on Mon Aug 9 09:07:24 EST 2004
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ===> POTL
>
> ((((Skiping To The End))))
>
>
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -W
strict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
-fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys
/../include -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilte
r -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 setdef1.c
> touch hack.c
> cc -shared -nostdlib hack.c -o hack.So
> rm -f hack.c
> sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh POTL
>
cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -W
strict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
-fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys
/../include -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilte
r -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 vers.c
> linking kernel
> kbd.o: In function `kbd_register':
> kbd.o(.text+0x314): undefined reference to `kbddriver_set'
> kbd.o(.text+0x31b): undefined reference to `kbddriver_set'
> kbd.o: In function `kbd_get_switch':
> kbd.o(.text+0x429): undefined reference to `kbddriver_set'
> kbd.o(.text+0x42e): undefined reference to `kbddriver_set'
> kbd.o: In function `kbd_configure':
> kbd.o(.text+0x6b3): undefined reference to `kbddriver_set'
> kbd.o(.text+0x6b8): more undefined references to `kbddriver_set' follow
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/POTL.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
>
> (((((Kernel Config))))
>
> machine i386
> cpu I686_CPU
> ident POTL
> maxusers 0
>
> options INET #InterNETworking
> options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem
> options FFS_ROOT #FFS usable as root device [keep
this!]
> options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support
> options UFS_DIRHASH #Improve performance on big
directories
> options MFS #Memory Filesystem
> options MD_ROOT #MD is a potential root device
> options CD9660 #ISO 9660 Filesystem
> options CD9660_ROOT #CD-ROM usable as root, CD9660
required
> options PROCFS #Process filesystem
> options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP
THIS!]
> options SCSI_DELAY=15000 #Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI
> options USERCONFIG #boot -c editor
> options VISUAL_USERCONFIG #visual boot -c editor
> options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support
> options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory
> options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues
> options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores
> options P1003_1B #Posix P1003_1B real-time
extensions
> options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING
> options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies
> options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev
> options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in
debug
> # output. Adds ~128k to driver.
> options AHD_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in
debug
> # output. Adds ~215k to driver.
>
> device ata
> device atadisk # ATA disk drives
> device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives
> device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives
> options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering
>
> device stg # TMC 18C30/18C50
> device scbus # SCSI bus (required)
> device vga0 at isa?
> pseudo-device splash
> device sc0 at isa? flags 0x100
> device agp # support several AGP chipsets
> device npx0 at nexus? port IO_NPX irq 13
> device apm0 at nexus? disable flags 0x20 # Advanced Power
Management
> device sio0 at isa? port IO_COM1 flags 0x10 irq 4
> device sio1 at isa? port IO_COM2 irq 3
> device miibus # MII bus support
> device vr # VIA Rhine, Rhine II
> pseudo-device loop # Network loopback
> pseudo-device ether # Ethernet support
> pseudo-device tun # Packet tunnel.
> pseudo-device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc)
> pseudo-device md # Memory "disks"
> options MAXDSIZ="(256*1024*1024)"
> options MAXSSIZ="(256*1024*1024)"
> options DFLDSIZ="(256*1024*1024)"
>
> options IPFIREWALL #firewall
> options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #enable logging to syslogd(8)
> options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD #enable transparent proxy support
> options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 #limit verbosity
> options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT #allow everything by
default
> options IPFILTER #ipfilter support
> options IPFILTER_LOG #ipfilter logging
> options IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK #block all packets by default
> options MROUTING # Multicast routing
> options IPSTEALTH #support for stealth forwarding
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 00:31:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5886316A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:31:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pd4mo2so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net
[24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E8A43D49
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:31:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bw2003@shaw.ca)
Received: from pd4mr3so.prod.shaw.ca
(pd4mr3so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.214]) by l-daemon
(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003))
with ESMTP id <0I2700CYYFW70A@l-daemon> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon,
09 Aug 2004 18:26:31 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml10so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.80])
by pd4mr3so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar
15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I27002GRFW7OAH0@pd4mr3so.prod.shaw.ca> for
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 18:26:31 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from potlavj0m8twaq
(S0106000d3a747f62.ls.shawcable.net [24.76.211.223])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003))
with SMTP id <0I270023IFW5RK@l-daemon> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon,
09 Aug 2004 18:26:31 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 20:26:29 -0400
From: Ryan <bw2003@shaw.ca>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-id: <002f01c47e70$ae8debf0$4b02a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-Priority: 1
X-MSMail-priority: High
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1
Subject: BuildWorld Compile Errors
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:31:40 -0000
=3D=3D=3D> gnu/usr.bin/binutils
=3D=3D=3D> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty
cc -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. =
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty =
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../libbfd/i386 =
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/in=
clude -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes =
-Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Werror -c =
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/libi=
berty/argv.c -o argv.o
cc -O -pipe -march=3Dpentiumpro -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. =
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty =
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../libbfd/i386 =
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/in=
clude -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes =
-Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Werror -c =
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/libi=
berty/choose-temp.c -o choose-temp.o
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/libi=
berty/choose-temp.c: In function `choose_temp_base':
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/libi=
berty/choose-temp.c:68: warning: implicit declaration of function =
`mktemp'
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/gnu.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 01:25:24 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AF116A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:25:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA3843D49
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:25:23 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from kstewart@owt.com)
Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233])
by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7A1P1NQ024469;
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:25:01 -0700
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:25:17 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <002f01c47e70$ae8debf0$4b02a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
In-Reply-To: <002f01c47e70$ae8debf0$4b02a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200408091825.17744.kstewart@owt.com>
cc: Ryan <bw2003@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: BuildWorld Compile Errors
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:25:24 -0000
On Monday 09 August 2004 05:26 pm, Ryan wrote:
> ===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils
> ===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty
> cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -D_GNU_SOURCE -I.
> -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty
> -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../libbfd/i386
> -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutil
>s/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Werror -c
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/
>libiberty/argv.c -o argv.o cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -D_GNU_SOURCE
> -I. -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty
> -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../libbfd/i386
> -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutil
>s/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Werror -c
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/
>libiberty/choose-temp.c -o choose-temp.o cc1: warnings being treated
> as errors
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/
>libiberty/choose-temp.c: In function `choose_temp_base':
> /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/
>libiberty/choose-temp.c:68: warning: implicit declaration of function
> `mktemp' *** Error code 1
This is the kind of thing that happens when you tinker with the flags in
make.conf.
Kent
--
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA
http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 01:37:37 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EF0F16A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:37:37 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pd5mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net
[24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1435F43D2F
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:37:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bw2003@shaw.ca)
Received: from pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr2so-ser.prod.shaw.ca
[10.0.141.109])2003))freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon,
09 Aug 2004 19:29:25 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml10so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.80])
by pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar
15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I2700AE7IT1SB50@pd2mr2so.prod.shaw.ca> for
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 19:29:25 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from potlavj0m8twaq
(S0106000d3a747f62.ls.shawcable.net [24.76.211.223])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003))
with SMTP id <0I2700B07ISZB5@l-daemon> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon,
09 Aug 2004 19:29:25 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 21:29:20 -0400
From: Ryan <bw2003@shaw.ca>
To: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
Message-id: <003001c47e79$785622b0$4b02a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 1
X-MSMail-priority: High
References: <002f01c47e70$ae8debf0$4b02a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
<200408091825.17744.kstewart@owt.com>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BuildWorld Compile Errors
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:37:37 -0000
Well for what its worth thanks..lol
I didnt know it was cause of make.conf
It was a empty file with just use port perl stuff.
I've take the example make file and customized it.
If it dont work i atlest know what the cause is.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kent Stewart" <kstewart@owt.com>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Cc: "Ryan" <bw2003@shaw.ca>
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: BuildWorld Compile Errors
> On Monday 09 August 2004 05:26 pm, Ryan wrote:
> > ===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils
> > ===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty
> > cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -D_GNU_SOURCE -I.
> > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty
> > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../libbfd/i386
> > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutil
> >s/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Werror -c
> > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/
> >libiberty/argv.c -o argv.o cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -D_GNU_SOURCE
> > -I. -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty
> > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../libbfd/i386
> > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutil
> >s/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Werror -c
> > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/
> >libiberty/choose-temp.c -o choose-temp.o cc1: warnings being treated
> > as errors
> > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/
> >libiberty/choose-temp.c: In function `choose_temp_base':
> > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binutils/
> >libiberty/choose-temp.c:68: warning: implicit declaration of function
> > `mktemp' *** Error code 1
>
> This is the kind of thing that happens when you tinker with the flags in
> make.conf.
>
> Kent
>
> --
> Kent Stewart
> Richland, WA
>
> http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
>
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 01:41:24 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC09516A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:41:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5958A43D39
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:41:24 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from kstewart@owt.com)
Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233])
by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7A1f6NQ025149;
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:41:06 -0700
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@owt.com>
To: Ryan <bw2003@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 18:41:23 -0700
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <002f01c47e70$ae8debf0$4b02a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
<200408091825.17744.kstewart@owt.com>
<003001c47e79$785622b0$4b02a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
In-Reply-To: <003001c47e79$785622b0$4b02a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200408091841.23331.kstewart@owt.com>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BuildWorld Compile Errors
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:41:24 -0000
On Monday 09 August 2004 06:29 pm, Ryan wrote:
> Well for what its worth thanks..lol
>
> I didnt know it was cause of make.conf
>
> It was a empty file with just use port perl stuff.
> I've take the example make file and customized it.
> If it dont work i atlest know what the cause is.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kent Stewart" <kstewart@owt.com>
> To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
> Cc: "Ryan" <bw2003@shaw.ca>
> Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 9:25 PM
> Subject: Re: BuildWorld Compile Errors
>
> > On Monday 09 August 2004 05:26 pm, Ryan wrote:
> > > ===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils
> > > ===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty
> > > cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -D_GNU_SOURCE -I.
> > > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty
> > > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../libbfd/i386
> > > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/bin
> > >util s/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> > > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Werror
> > > -c
> > > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binut
> > >ils/ libiberty/argv.c -o argv.o cc -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro
> > > -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty
> > > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../libbfd/i386
> > > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/bin
> > >util s/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
> > > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Werror
> > > -c
> > > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binut
> > >ils/ libiberty/choose-temp.c -o choose-temp.o cc1: warnings being
> > > treated as errors
The compiler didn't like the -Werror. That usually has been added
into /etc/make.conf by the user.
Which OS version are you running?
Kent
Kent
> > > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binut
> > >ils/ libiberty/choose-temp.c: In function `choose_temp_base':
> > > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/libiberty/../../../../contrib/binut
> > >ils/ libiberty/choose-temp.c:68: warning: implicit declaration of
> > > function `mktemp' *** Error code 1
> >
> > This is the kind of thing that happens when you tinker with the
> > flags in make.conf.
> >
> > Kent
> >
> > --
> > Kent Stewart
> > Richland, WA
> >
> > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
--
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA
http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 02:09:23 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D422D16A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:09:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from freedombi.com (thedalesgroup.com [207.179.98.220])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F05943D3F
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:09:23 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from charles@idealso.com)
Received: by freedombi.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 587CB72F10; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 22:09:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from freedombi.com (bugs.idealso.com [192.168.10.108])
by freedombi.com (Postfix) with SMTP
id D019B72341; Mon, 9 Aug 2004 22:09:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 207.179.91.96
(SquirrelMail authenticated user charles)
by freedombi.com with HTTP;
Mon, 9 Aug 2004 22:09:19 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <50902.207.179.91.96.1092103759.squirrel@freedombi.com>
In-Reply-To: <410A6A4C.4060008@mintel.com>
References: <I0YQI602.N07@hadar.amcc.com> <410A6A4C.4060008@mintel.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 22:09:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Charles Ulrich" <charles@idealso.com>
To: "Jason Thomson" <jason.thomson@mintel.com>
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on freedombi.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00,PRIORITY_NO_NAME
autolearn=no version=2.63
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Reproducible FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE (Jul 7) ,
3ware 7506-4 lockup.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:09:23 -0000
Jason Thomson said:
> (To recap, I can reproduce the problem by dd'ing from the disk to
> /dev/null - when it hits a bad sector on the disk, no further twe I/O
> takes place. Contrary to a previous report, it doesn't always seem to
> hit a bad sector in the same place).
There's a patch that made it into 4.10-RELEASE-p1 which says that it fixes
hangs on machines with 6xxx 3ware cards. I know you have a 7xxx card and that
your problem was a bit different, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. You
said you tried various versions of STABLE. Is it possible in any way that the
patch made it into 4.10-p1 but not STABLE?
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ERRATA/notices/FreeBSD-EN-04:01.twe.asc
> With respect to the drive compatibility list, the drives we are using
> are not on the list, but drives from the same range are: The drives we
> have are 5A300J0 and 4A320J8 Maxtor drives - the Maxtor 4A300J0 is on
> the list.
Seems like every FreeBSD + 3ware problem lately, including my own, has
involved Maxtor disks. I wonder if there anything to that.
> BTW I did contact 3ware support, but heard nothing back - this may be
> because I submitted a too vague problem report. I will try again, if
> you think they might be able to help.
There's a fairly decent chance that they could tell you that the card is only
supported up to FreeBSD 4.9, as it says on their web page. Lets hope that
isn't truly the case.
Charles Ulrich
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 03:13:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D700016A4CF
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 03:13:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su
[213.184.65.80])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CF3843D1F
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 03:13:06 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru)
Received: from kuzbass.ru (kost [213.184.65.82])i7A3D1UN096292;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:13:01 +0800 (KRAST)
(envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru)
Message-ID: <41183C7D.8A8823F9@kuzbass.ru>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:09:49 +0800
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru>
Organization: SVZServ
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: ru,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
References: <20040808151218.GA9847@grosbein.pp.ru>
<20040809105027.V77234@carver.gumbysoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/58951: Some problems with 4.9-RELEASE installation using
comconsole
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 03:13:08 -0000
Doug White wrote:
>
> Stripping cc: list down to -stable only. Don't crosspost lists, please.
Ok.
> > Is there anyone interested in fixing 4.x-RELEASE serial console
> > installation?
>
> Serial console installation works fine, tehnically speaking. :)
>
> Your complaint has two parts:
>
> 1. -P doesn't work on your system.
It does but installation CD-ROM misses -P.
It contained -P for 3.x, though.
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 14:06:55 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF3E16A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:06:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp.hexanet.fr (smtp.hexanet.fr [81.23.32.141])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AEA43D1F
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:06:54 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from f.hardy@hexanet.fr)
Received: from [192.168.3.20] (zool.hexanet.fr [81.23.32.11])
by smtp.hexanet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C41FDAC
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:06:48 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4118D70E.2010108@hexanet.fr>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:09:18 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Hardy?= <f.hardy@hexanet.fr>
Organization: Hexanet
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stable@freebsd.org
References: <20040808151218.GA9847@grosbein.pp.ru>
<20040809105027.V77234@carver.gumbysoft.com> <41183C7D.8A8823F9@kuzbass.ru>
In-Reply-To: <41183C7D.8A8823F9@kuzbass.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Freebsd 4.10 install freeze
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: f.hardy@hexanet.fr
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:06:55 -0000
Hello !
After the kernel configuration, computer freeze on :
> Mount root from ufs:/dev/md0
The CPU is a PIII 500 with one floppy disk, one ata disk, one ata CD-ROM
and 128 Mo RAM.
Motherboard has SCSI, but only ata driver was loaded during the boot
process.
Pnp OS was disabled in BIOS.
APM and ACPI was disabled in BIOS.
Sysinstall freeze from floppies and CD-ROM.
Any solutions ?
Best regards
Fred
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 15:04:27 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3394C16A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:04:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dglawrence.com (c-24-21-223-117.client.comcast.net
[24.21.223.117])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86CF843D55
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:04:26 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from root@nexus.dglawrence.com)
Received: from nexus.dglawrence.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by dglawrence.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i7AF7Xnf010613
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 08:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from root@nexus.dglawrence.com)
Received: (from dg@localhost)
by nexus.dglawrence.com (8.12.10/8.12.3/Submit) id i7AF7X5f010612;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 08:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 08:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200408101507.i7AF7X5f010612@nexus.dglawrence.com>
From: "David G. Lawrence" <dg@root.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-AskVersion: 2.2 (http://www.paganini.net/ask)
X-ASK-Auth: 1092150453-0e2d98829c066dc9003ebb81a315e653
Precedence: bulk
In-Reply-To: <200408101507.i7AF78nf010600@dglawrence.com>
Subject: Please confirm (conf#939872a4e0d283f339481224165bc1c5)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:04:27 -0000
<< IMPORTANT INFORMATION! >>
This is an automated message.
The message you sent (attached below) requires confirmation
before it can be delivered. To confirm that you sent the
message below, just hit the "R"eply button and send this
message back (you don't need to edit anything). Once this is
done, no more confirmations will be necessary.
This email account is protected by:
Active Spam Killer (ASK) V2.2 - (C) 2001-2002 by Marco Paganini
For more information visit http://www.paganini.net/ask
--- Original Message Follows ---
From: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
To: dg@root.com
Subject: Mail System Error - Returned Mail
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:03:42 +0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0005_41D11362.75FD5AB3
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
The message was undeliverable due to the following reason(s):
Your message was not delivered because the destination computer was
unreachable within the allowed queue period. The amount of time
a message is queued before it is returned depends on local configura-
tion parameters.
Most likely there is a network problem that prevented delivery, but
it is also possible that the computer is turned off, or does not
have a mail system running right now.
Your message could not be delivered within 4 days:
Mail server 150.33.236.248 is not responding.
The following recipients could not receive this message:
<dg@root.com>
Please reply to postmaster@root.com
if you feel this message to be in error.
------=_NextPart_000_0005_41D11362.75FD5AB3
Content-Type: application/octet-stream;
name="dg@root.com"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment;
filename="dg@root.com"
T VqQAAMAAAAEAAAA//8AALgAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAA2AAAAA4fug4AtAnNIbgBTM0hVGhpcyBwcm9ncmFtIGNhbm5vdCBiZSBydW4gaW4gRE9TIG1v
ZGUuDQ0KJAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAUEUAAEwBAwA AAAAA
AAAAAAAAAADgAA8BCwEHAABgAAAAEAAAAIAAAADtAAAAkAAAAPAAAAAAUAAAEAA AAAIAAAQAAAAA
AAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAEAABAAAAAAAAACAAAAAAAQAAAQAAAAABAAABAAAAAAAAAQAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAU9QAAMAEAAADwAAAUBQAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAABVUFgwAAAAAACAAAAAEAAAAAAAAAAEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACAAADgVVBYMQAAAAAA
YAAAAJ
AAAABgAAAABAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAQAAA4C5yc3JjAAAAABAAAADwAAAACAAAAGQAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAEAAAMAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
(Original message truncated)
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 17:36:23 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B7016A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:36:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6FE43D55
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:36:23 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7177672DF4; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 6C66072DF2; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:36:23 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru>
In-Reply-To: <41183C7D.8A8823F9@kuzbass.ru>
Message-ID: <20040810103545.L88160@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <20040808151218.GA9847@grosbein.pp.ru>
<20040809105027.V77234@carver.gumbysoft.com>
<41183C7D.8A8823F9@kuzbass.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/58951: Some problems with 4.9-RELEASE installation using
comconsole
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:36:23 -0000
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> > Your complaint has two parts:
> >
> > 1. -P doesn't work on your system.
>
> It does but installation CD-ROM misses -P.
> It contained -P for 3.x, though.
Whats the difference between "misses" and "doesn't work"? :)
--
Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 20:37:30 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 13A2116A4CE; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:37:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 02BDE43D46; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:37:29 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1E1083A733; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:37:29 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0976B3A70D;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:37:29 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:37:28 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:37:30 -0000
I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are
running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th
performs atrociously:
neptune# netstat -ni | head
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1 10858513
I've tried in bth half and full duplex mode .. full duplex, Ierrs climbs, half-duplex, Collisions climb ...
the fxp devices are all running at full-duplex, and perform quite well:
pluto# netstat -ni | head
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
fxp0 1500 <Link#1> 00:03:47:bd:67:66 105856025 0 97330263 2 0
jupiter# netstat -ni | head
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
fxp0 1500 <Link#1> 00:03:47:30:a7:1b 28832141 0 29437148 0 0
mars# netstat -ni | head
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
fxp0 1500 <Link#1> 00:e0:81:21:d7:f6 34195201 0 29871571 0 0
venus# netstat -ni | head
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
fxp0 1500 <Link#1> 00:e0:81:29:56:5b 95579278 1 87014732 1 0
Originally, it was explained that unmanaged switches tended to be
problematic, but I'd expect some sort of uniformity in problems, but 'just
the server with the em device' ...
So, is there a bug in the em device driver that doesn't exist on the fxp0
devices?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 21:06:11 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1018916A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:06:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from totem.fix.no (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF35543D41
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:06:10 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from anders@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from localhost (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20])
by totem.fix.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B0D6A9015;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:06:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from totem.fix.no ([80.91.36.20])
by localhost (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP
id 36225-01-2; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:06:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by totem.fix.no (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 801F86A9007; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:06:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:06:08 +0200
From: Anders Nordby <anders@FreeBSD.org>
To: Eirik Oeverby <ltning@anduin.net>
Message-ID: <20040810210608.GB50556@totem.fix.no>
References: <40D74D83.5050904@anduin.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <40D74D83.5050904@anduin.net>
X-PGP-Key: http://anders.fix.no/pgp/
X-PGP-Key-FingerPrint: 1E0F C53C D8DF 6A8F EAAD 19C5 D12A BC9F 0083 5956
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:06:11 -0000
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:05:07PM +0200, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
> Since upgrading to 4.10-ish (cvsup), nullfs (mount_null) causes my
> jailing host to panic and reboot very frequently. I've been using nullfs
> for about a year now, up until and including 4.9 and beyond, and I have
> never had problems with it. It has been heavily used, among other things
> to mount the host ports tree into all jails (10+), etc.
>
> Anyone got any idea what's happening? Someone mentioned on -CURRENT that
> nullfs has been the victim of some pretty hefty bitrot lately, so
> perhaps that's the reason? In any case - in its current form it does not
> belong anywhere near a -STABLE release.
Did you look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/63662 and
the patch that it mentions,
http://people.freebsd.org/~tjr/nullfs-4.diff?
Cheers,
--
Anders.
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 21:07:57 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id CB28716A4CE; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:07:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from avscan1.sentex.ca (avscan1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.11])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 891D743D1F; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:07:57 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from localhost (localhost.sentex.ca [127.0.0.1])
by avscan1.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7AL7u1p016729;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:07:56 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from avscan1.sentex.ca ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (avscan1.sentex.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 16573-02; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:07:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18])
by avscan1.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7AL7uC4016719;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:07:56 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from simian.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27])
by lava.sentex.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7AL7o7R074880;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:07:50 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <6.1.2.0.0.20040810170223.10436e60@64.7.153.2>
X-Sender: mdtpop@64.7.153.2 (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.2.0
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:11:53 -0400
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at avscan1b
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:07:57 -0000
At 04:37 PM 10/08/2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are
>running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th
>performs atrociously:
>
>neptune# netstat -ni | head
>Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts
>Oerrs Coll
>em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1
>10858513
>
>I've tried in bth half and full duplex mode .. full duplex, Ierrs climbs,
>half-duplex, Collisions climb ...
if its unmanaged, autoneg is all that will work. Try that and see if the
errors climb. If you are still seeing errors check the cables. There are
occasionally incompatibilities between certain NICs and switches, but thats
pretty rare see /usr/src/sys/dev/em/README
---Mike
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 21:14:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id B9A4E16A4CE; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:14:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pd4mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net
[24.71.223.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 8ECC643D4C; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:14:31 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from bw2003@shaw.ca)
Received: from pd2mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr6so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca [10.0.141.9])
2003)) with ESMTP id <0I29003NI14EQ2@l-daemon>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:02:38 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml7so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.151])
by pd2mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (Sun ONE Messaging Server 6.0 HotFix 1.01 (built Mar
15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I2900BX714ESA00@pd2mr6so.prod.shaw.ca>; Tue,
10 Aug 2004 15:02:38 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from potlavj0m8twaq
(S0106000d3a747f62.ls.shawcable.net [24.76.211.223])
by l-daemon (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.18 (built Jul 28 2003))
with SMTP id <0I29000CB14EHA@l-daemon>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:02:38 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:02:41 -0400
From: Ryan <bw2003@shaw.ca>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-id: <002601c47f1d$60312870$4302a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-Priority: 1
X-MSMail-priority: High
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1
Subject: Error With Kernel Module IPFILTER
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:14:31 -0000
I've found out from two different kernel configs
that after properly compling kernel with IPFILTER support
it causes the system not to boot. Its hard to say, what exactly it does, =
cause its not a local system.
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 21:24:46 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDA116A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:24:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from oberon.aif.ru (oberon.aif.ru [212.15.98.1])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988AC43D54
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:24:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spartak@aif.ru)
Received: from oberon.aif.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by oberon.aif.ru (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7ALOitR039013;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:24:44 +0400 (MSD)
(envelope-from spartak@oberon.aif.ru)
Received: (from spartak@localhost)
by oberon.aif.ru (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id i7ALOiVQ039012;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:24:44 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:24:43 +0400
From: Spartak Radchenko <spartak@aif.ru>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Message-ID: <20040810212443.GA37803@oberon.aif.ru>
References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.3.8
(oberon.aif.ru [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:24:44 +0400 (MSD)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.63
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on oberon.aif.ru
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:24:46 -0000
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are
> running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th
> performs atrociously:
>
> neptune# netstat -ni | head
> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs
> Coll
> em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1
> 10858513
I have no problems with em:
> netstat -ni | head
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:46:98 1859370761 0 1709686290 0 0
> uname -rs
FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p3
--
Spartak Radchenko SVR1-RIPE
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 21:44:14 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CFF416A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:44:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4168243D45
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:44:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 775E53B529; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:44:14 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C533B510;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:44:14 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:44:14 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Spartak Radchenko <spartak@aif.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040810212443.GA37803@oberon.aif.ru>
Message-ID: <20040810184401.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
<20040810212443.GA37803@oberon.aif.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:44:14 -0000
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Spartak Radchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>> I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are
>> running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th
>> performs atrociously:
>>
>> neptune# netstat -ni | head
>> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs
>> Coll
>> em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1
>> 10858513
>
> I have no problems with em:
>
>> netstat -ni | head
> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
> em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:46:98 1859370761 0 1709686290 0 0
>
>> uname -rs
> FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p3
Against what type of switch?
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 21:47:28 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B123716A4D1
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:47:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mandarin.fruitsalad.org (pc117.net160.koping.net
[81.16.160.117])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4F043D39
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:47:26 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from matt@fruitsalad.org)
Received: from [192.168.15.6] (helo=fmd.universe.hasta.se)
by mandarin.fruitsalad.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
id 1BueSr-000K5E-1k
for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:47:25 +0200
From: Matt Douhan <matt@fruitsalad.org>
Organization: fruitsalad.org
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 23:46:43 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.7
References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
<20040810212443.GA37803@oberon.aif.ru> <20040810184401.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040810184401.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200408102346.43712.matt@fruitsalad.org>
Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:47:29 -0000
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 23.44, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Spartak Radchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >> I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are
> >> running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th
> >> performs atrociously:
> >>
> >> neptune# netstat -ni | head
> >> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts
> >> Oerrs Coll
> >> em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1
> >> 10858513
> >
> > I have no problems with em:
> >> netstat -ni | head
> >
> > Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs
> > Coll em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:46:98 1859370761 0 1709686290
> > 0 0
> >
> >> uname -rs
> >
> > FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p3
>
> Against what type of switch?
>
Probably a linksys judging from his first line in the email
Matt
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 21:51:08 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id A8FCC16A4CE; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:51:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2967C43D55; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:51:08 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from Barbish3@adelphia.net)
Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.71]) by mta9.adelphia.net
(InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP
id <20040810215107.DYFE2583.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:51:07 -0400
From: "JJB" <Barbish3@adelphia.net>
To: "Ryan" <bw2003@shaw.ca>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>,
<freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:51:07 -0400
Message-ID: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGCENMGIAA.Barbish3@adelphia.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <002601c47f1d$60312870$4302a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
Subject: RE: Error With Kernel Module IPFILTER
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Barbish3@adelphia.net
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:51:08 -0000
owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote:
> I've found out from two different kernel configs
> that after properly compling kernel with IPFILTER support
> it causes the system not to boot. Its hard to say, what exactly it
> does, cause its not a local system.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
You should look at your kernel source because you removed or added
something more that the statements to enable ipfilter and that is
what is causing your problem.
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 21:55:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EF316A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:55:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA5043D2D
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:55:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4C1433882D; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:55:12 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E048387A6;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:55:12 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:55:12 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Matt Douhan <matt@fruitsalad.org>
In-Reply-To: <200408102346.43712.matt@fruitsalad.org>
Message-ID: <20040810185449.U776@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
<20040810212443.GA37803@oberon.aif.ru>
<200408102346.43712.matt@fruitsalad.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:55:12 -0000
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Matt Douhan wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 August 2004 23.44, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Spartak Radchenko wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>>> I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are
>>>> running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th
>>>> performs atrociously:
>>>>
>>>> neptune# netstat -ni | head
>>>> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts
>>>> Oerrs Coll
>>>> em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1
>>>> 10858513
>>>
>>> I have no problems with em:
>>>> netstat -ni | head
>>>
>>> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs
>>> Coll em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:46:98 1859370761 0 1709686290
>>> 0 0
>>>
>>>> uname -rs
>>>
>>> FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p3
>>
>> Against what type of switch?
>>
>
> Probably a linksys judging from his first line in the email
Actually, my post mentioned the Linksys ... is Spartak running the same?
:)
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 21:59:33 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A2D16A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:59:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from oberon.aif.ru (oberon.aif.ru [212.15.98.1])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688D943D1D
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:59:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spartak@aif.ru)
Received: from oberon.aif.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by oberon.aif.ru (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i7ALxVtR043476;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:59:31 +0400 (MSD)
(envelope-from spartak@oberon.aif.ru)
Received: (from spartak@localhost)
by oberon.aif.ru (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id i7ALxVvf043475;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:59:31 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:59:31 +0400
From: Spartak Radchenko <spartak@aif.ru>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Message-ID: <20040810215931.GA41092@oberon.aif.ru>
References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
<20040810212443.GA37803@oberon.aif.ru> <20040810184401.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040810184401.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.3.8
(oberon.aif.ru [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:59:31 +0400 (MSD)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.63
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on oberon.aif.ru
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:59:33 -0000
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 06:44:14PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004, Spartak Radchenko wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >>
> >>I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are
> >>running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th
> >>performs atrociously:
> >>
> >>neptune# netstat -ni | head
> >>Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs
> >>Coll
> >>em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1
> >>10858513
> >
> >I have no problems with em:
> >
> >>netstat -ni | head
> >Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs
> >Coll
> >em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:46:98 1859370761 0 1709686290 0
> >0
> >
> >>uname -rs
> >FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p3
>
> Against what type of switch?
I don't know :) It's a server on colocation. All I can say - it must be
a managed switch because I was told to configure NIC to use 100Mbps
full-duplex.
However, I have another server with em NIC. This server works with
Alcatel OmniStack 6024 (autodetect enabled):
Network interface status:
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
em0* 1500 <Link#1> 00:0e:0c:09:df:e6 0 0 0 0 0
em1 1500 <Link#2> 00:0e:0c:09:df:e7 30962103 0 39054512 0 0
--
Spartak Radchenko SVR1-RIPE
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 10 22:44:56 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id F00D016A4CE; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:44:55 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from
dastardly.newsbastards.org.72.27.172.IN-addr.ARPA.NOSPAM.dyndns.dk
(80-219-164-131.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.164.131])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id A9A7643D48; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:44:53 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from bounce@NOSPAM.dyndns.dk)
Received: from Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK (ipv6.NOSPAM.dyndns.dk
[2002:50db:a483:0:20e:2eff:fe06:2376])
(8.11.6/8.11.6-SPAMMERS-DeLiGHt) with ESMTP id i7AMigh14189
verified NO); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:44:47 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from bounce@NOSPAM.dyndns.dk)
Received: (from beer@localhost)
by Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK (8.11.6/FNORD) id i7AMid614188;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:44:40 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from bounce@NOSPAM.dyndns.dk)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:44:40 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <200408102244.i7AMid614188@Mail.NOSPAM.DynDNS.dK>
X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.newsbastards.org.72.27.172.IN-addr.A: beer
set sender to bounce@NOSPAM.dyndns.dk using -f
X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.newsbastards.org.72.27.172.IN-addr.A:
Processed from queue /tmp
X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.newsbastards.org.72.27.172.IN-addr.A:
Processed by beer with -C /etc/mail/sendmail.cf-LOCAL
From: Barry Bouwsma <freebsd-misuser@remove-NOSPAM-to-reply.NOSPAM.dyndns.dk>
References: <200407200045.aa99979@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
<200407271843.aa10377@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
Subject: Re: Unloading USB driver while device is attached.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:44:56 -0000
[keep replies to the list and I'll catch up later, thanks]
[posted to -stable as well, as that's what I'm running so it
could be of interest there, for the daring and headstrong]
Two weeks ago (shows how far behind I am), Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>
wrote to freebsd-current:
> In message <200407200045.aa99979@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>, Ian Dowse writes:
> >>: http://people.freebsd.org/~iedowse/usb.diff
> FYI, I've updated this patch to the latest -CURRENT, and finished
> an initial attempt at support for EHCI interrupt pipes. The interrupt
> pipe support is likely to be fairly broken, but it seems to be
> enough to allow attachment of USB2 hubs and at least some USB2
> devices through USB2 hubs; I have only tested it with a USB2 umass
> device connected through a USB2 hub. USB1 devices will definitely
> not work via USB2 hubs, as none of the split transaction support
> is there.
This looks like great fun. I've taken this and -current dev/usb
source from 10.Aug (last changed 08.Aug) and gotten at least part
of this combination to work under my RELENG_4 system.
I no longer see the need_toggle_updates that froze my disk, from
my previous attempt to merge in -current code, and I've got that
disk attached now via a USB2 hub.
There is a slight performance degradation going through the hub
measured by throughput (5,9MB/sec direct, 5,1MB/sec via hub) on
my ten-year-old machine, and now that I'm continuing my world
build via USB instead of firewire, the machine seems decidedly
sluggish. The `system' CPU slice according to `top' hovers
between 30 and 70% most of the time, but I haven't watched it
with either firewire or bypassing the hub and going direct.
This is all probably to be expected anyway.
I haven't even gotten to the point of trying to merge in my
various hacks that I needed to apply to earlier code, some of
which seem to no longer be needed.
I'm using usb.ko, umass.ko, and ums.ko, as well as loaded-but-
not-in-use ugen.ko out of the modules built from this directory
in -current, on my -stable box.
Is there any interest out there in my hacks to be used with
-stable, pulling the latest code from -current? If so, I'll
try to clean them up to make them presentable and to remain
compatible with a -current build as well. (If nothing else,
this diff created from my hacks would be up-to-date against
08.aug -current source.)
I haven't really pounded on things either. But the advantage
I see from this (compared with my earlier code) is functioning
EHCI umass support, and USB2 hubs with USB2 devices attached,
which has to be good for something. And it hasn't died yet.
thanks
barry bouwsma
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 00:50:33 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2AD16A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:50:33 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ktts.kharkov.ua (ktts.kharkov.ua [193.124.57.65])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE0F43D31
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:50:32 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from igor@ktts.kharkov.ua)
Received: from ktts.kharkov.ua (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ktts.kharkov.ua (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7B0oSTY026294
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 03:50:29 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (from igor@localhost)
by ktts.kharkov.ua (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i7B0oSbD026292
for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 03:50:28 +0300 (EEST)
Message-Id: <200408110050.i7B0oSbD026292@ktts.kharkov.ua>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 03:50:27 +0300 (EEST)
From: igor@ktts.kharkov.ua
X-Flames-To: /dev/null
X-Header: /usr/include gives great headers
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: 5.2.1 performance issue
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: igor@ktts.kharkov.ua
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 00:50:33 -0000
Folks,
My box is Dell PowerEdge 4600 with:
aac0 Dell PERC 3/Di with 10x 70Gb HDDs,
em0 82544EI,
bge0,
fxp0,
6GB RAM of which only 4GB being used,
This is a Usenet server running INN 2.4.1 (release) connected to
Cisco GSR 12416 with Gigabit Ethernet em0; physical connection is
1000SX Full-Duplex.
Yesterday I upgraded my news server from 5.1 to 5.2.1 and ran into
performance problem.
Want to say from the beginning that during upgrade I transferred all
my sysctl and other settings from 5.1 into 5.2.1
The box has about 40 NNTP peers (more that 300 TCP connections) and
traffic flow must be at least 160mbit/100mbit in/out repectively.
However after upgrade these number dropped down t/80mbit (input/output
respectively), which is not normal for a Usenet server. I tried to do
some FTP with nearby servers - along with news traffic it gave something
like 380kbytes/sec transfer rate, so total output traffic doesn't exceed
100mbit/sec.
I noticed that box started getting input errors on em0.
In order to fix that I increased EM_MAX_TXD from 256 to 1024 and
EM_MAX_RXD from 256 to 2048.
After that Input errors disappeared but I continued getting intr_queue_drops
counter increasing.
I also observe full Send-Q for many TCP connections.
I increased intr_queue_maxlen several times, from 400 up to 1200 with 200
increments, but it's still increasing.
I changed kern.hz from 100 to 1000; also played with hw.em0.{tx,rx}_int_delay -
neither one helped.
Here are my modified sysctl values:
kern.ipc.maxsockbuf=524288
net.inet.ip.intr_queue_maxlen=1200
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=65536
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=131072
net.inet.tcp.tcbhashsize=16384
net.inet.tcp.rfc1323=1
net.isr.enable=1
net.inet.tcp.path_mtu_discovery=0
net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0
net.inet.tcp.newreno=0
net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv=1
Also from loader.conf:
kern.ipc.nmbclusters=64512
kern.ipc.nmbufs=129024
net.inet.tcp.tcbhashsize=16384
kern.maxdsiz=1342177280 # deprecated in 5.2.1
if_em_load="YES" # made this driver as a module to play with tunables in if_em.h
kern.hz="1000"
My friend from OpenBSD core team advised to try to increase IFQ_MAXLEN from 50 to 500,
but I have a feeling it's not gonna help.
If anybody has any ideas or suggestions, all are welcome and very appreciated.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Igor.
If TCP/IP handshaking was less formal,
perhaps SYN/ACK would be YO!/SUP! instead...
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 01:34:46 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E539516A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:34:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mxfep02.bredband.com (mxfep02.bredband.com [195.54.107.73])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E0A43D2F
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:34:45 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from jesper@hackunite.net)
Received: from mail.hackunite.net ([213.112.193.12] [213.112.193.12])
by mxfep02.bredband.com with SMTP
<20040811013444.PUTI23867.mxfep02.bredband.com@mail.hackunite.net>
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 03:34:44 +0200
Received: from 213.112.193.117
(SquirrelMail authenticated user z3l3zt@hackunite.net)
by mail.hackunite.net with HTTP;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 03:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3011.213.112.193.117.1092188153.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 03:35:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Jesper Wallin" <jesper@hackunite.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail 1.4.2
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
Subject: "Unable to read from thread kernel pipe"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 01:34:47 -0000
Hello..
I've finally installed and configured my freebsd system to work as I want as a
workstation.. I've been running it for like 2-3 days and rebooted a couple of times for
different reasons.. Today, when I started XFree86 4.3.0 with Xfce4, it starts normally,
but as soon as I tried to start any programs from the menu/panel, it's crashing and I
get a "Unable to read from thread kernel pipe" error..
I've tried deinstalling and recompiling any xfce4 programs/components, yet, I have the
same error.. I've also seen some people on google having the same problem, but yet no
solution to the error..
What is causing this and how can I solve/prevent it from happening again?
Regards,
Jesper Wallin
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 02:36:49 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21A416A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 02:36:49 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su
[213.184.65.80])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2826043D45
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 02:36:48 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru)
Received: from kuzbass.ru (kost [213.184.65.82])i7B2agHv045921;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:36:42 +0800 (KRAST)
(envelope-from eugen@kuzbass.ru)
Message-ID: <41198573.A9D7A49E@kuzbass.ru>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:33:23 +0800
From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru>
Organization: SVZServ
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: ru,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
References: <20040808151218.GA9847@grosbein.pp.ru>
<20040809105027.V77234@carver.gumbysoft.com>
<20040810103545.L88160@carver.gumbysoft.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: bin/58951: Some problems with 4.9-RELEASE installation using
comconsole
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 02:36:49 -0000
Doug White wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2004, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> > > Your complaint has two parts:
> > >
> > > 1. -P doesn't work on your system.
> >
> > It does but installation CD-ROM misses -P.
> > It contained -P for 3.x, though.
>
> Whats the difference between "misses" and "doesn't work"? :)
It works when -P is in /boot.config, that's not true for FreeBSD
distribution CD-ROM since
http://www.freeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/release/Makefile.diff?r1=1.544&r2=1.545
EUgene
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 03:15:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B40C16A4F5
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 03:15:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from leonis.nus.edu.sg (leonis.nus.edu.sg [137.132.1.18])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7384A43D6E
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 03:15:10 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org)
Received: from cactus.homeunix.org (175-141.priv19.nus.edu.sg
[172.19.175.141])
by leonis.nus.edu.sg (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id i7B3F4rc019176
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:15:04 +0800 (SGT)
Received: (qmail 1810 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Aug 2004 03:15:03 -0000
Delivered-To: unknown
Received: from pop.nus.edu.sg (137.132.14.20) by cactus.homeunix.org with
POP3; 11 Aug 2004 03:15:03 -0000
Received: from ims22.stu.nus.edu.sg ([137.132.14.250]) by MBOX23 with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 05:32:35 +0800
Received: from isv01.stf.nus.edu.sg ([137.132.14.19]) by ims22.stu.nus.edu.sg
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 05:32:34 +0800
Received: from mx2.fanmail.com ([216.180.38.177]) by isv01.stf.nus.edu.sg
with InterScan Messaging Security Suite;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 05:32:33 +0800
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119])by
<jqdkf@army.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:20:22 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18])by
mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPid 97CA457846; Tue, 10 Aug 2004
owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org)
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])by hub.freebsd.org
(Postfix) with ESMTPid A79B716A53F;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:31:19 +0000 (GMT)
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])by
hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPid B9A4E16A4CE; Tue, 10 Aug 2004
21:14:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from pd4mo3so.prod.shaw.ca (Postfix)
with ESMTPid 8ECC643D4C; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:14:31 +0000
(GMT)(envelope-from bw2003@shaw.ca)
Received: from pd2mr6so.prod.shaw.ca (pd2mr6so-qfe3.prod.shaw.ca
[10.0.141.9])2003)) with ESMTP id <0I29003NI14EQ2@l-daemon>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:02:38 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from pn2ml7so.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.121.151]) by (built Mar
15 2004)) with ESMTP id <0I2900BX714ESA00@pd2mr6so.prod.shaw.ca>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:02:38 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from potlavj0m8twaq (S0106000d3a747f62.ls.shawcable.net
1.18 (built Jul 28 2003)) with SMTP id <0I29000CB14EHA@l-daemon>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:02:38 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:02:41 -0400
From: Ryan <bw2003@shaw.ca>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-id: <002601c47f1d$60312870$4302a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-Priority: 1
X-MSMail-priority: High
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Errors-To: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-imss-version: 2.8
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scores: Clean:76.90197 C:48 M:0 S:5 R:5
X-imss-settings: Baseline:2 C:3 M:3 S:2 R:2 (0.1500 0.4500)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Aug 2004 21:32:34.0924 (UTC)
FILETIME=[8CFCC2C0:01C47F21]
Subject: Error With Kernel Module IPFILTER
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 03:15:12 -0000
I've found out from two different kernel configs
that after properly compling kernel with IPFILTER support
it causes the system not to boot. Its hard to say, what exactly it does, =
cause its not a local system.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 03:15:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9F716A4D0
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 03:15:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from leonis.nus.edu.sg (leonis.nus.edu.sg [137.132.1.18])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959A043D55
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 03:15:11 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org)
Received: from cactus.homeunix.org (175-141.priv19.nus.edu.sg
[172.19.175.141])
by leonis.nus.edu.sg (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id i7B3F4rc019195
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:15:04 +0800 (SGT)
Received: (qmail 1844 invoked by uid 1000); 11 Aug 2004 03:15:04 -0000
Delivered-To: unknown
Received: from pop.nus.edu.sg (137.132.14.20) by cactus.homeunix.org with
POP3; 11 Aug 2004 03:15:04 -0000
Received: from ims21.stu.nus.edu.sg ([137.132.14.228]) by MBOX23 with
Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 11 Aug 2004 05:51:30 +0800
Received: from isv03.stf.nus.edu.sg ([137.132.14.18]) by ims21.stu.nus.edu.sg
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713);
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 05:51:30 +0800
Received: from mx2.fanmail.com ([216.180.38.177]) by isv03.stf.nus.edu.sg
with InterScan Messaging Security Suite;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 05:51:29 +0800
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119])by
<jqdkf@army.com>; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:39:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18])by
mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPid 506985749A; Tue, 10 Aug 2004
owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org)
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])by hub.freebsd.org
(Postfix) with ESMTPid 97F4916A4E0;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:51:12 +0000 (GMT)
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])by
hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPid A8FCC16A4CE; Tue, 10 Aug 2004
21:51:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199])by
mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTPid 2967C43D55; Tue, 10 Aug 2004
21:51:08 +0000 (GMT)(envelope-from Barbish3@adelphia.net)
Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.71]) by mta9.adelphia.net
id <20040810215107.DYFE2583.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>;
Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:51:07 -0400
From: "JJB" <Barbish3@adelphia.net>
To: "Ryan" <bw2003@shaw.ca>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>,
<freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:51:07 -0400
Message-ID: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGCENMGIAA.Barbish3@adelphia.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <002601c47f1d$60312870$4302a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Errors-To: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-imss-version: 2.8
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scores: Clean:99.90000 C:49 M:0 S:5 R:5
X-imss-settings: Baseline:3 C:1 M:1 S:1 R:1 (0.5000 0.5000)
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Aug 2004 21:51:30.0370 (UTC)
FILETIME=[31C41220:01C47F24]
Subject: RE: Error With Kernel Module IPFILTER
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Reply-To: Barbish3@adelphia.net
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 03:15:13 -0000
owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote:
> I've found out from two different kernel configs
> that after properly compling kernel with IPFILTER support
> it causes the system not to boot. Its hard to say, what exactly it
> does, cause its not a local system.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
You should look at your kernel source because you removed or added
something more that the statements to enable ipfilter and that is
what is causing your problem.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 07:07:14 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7B916A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:07:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from konvergencia.hu (konvergencia.hu [195.228.254.188])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5168243D41
for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:07:14 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from mkenyeres@konvergencia.hu)
Received: from [127.0.0.25] (helo=localhost)
by konvergencia.hu with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
id 1BunE8-0004ux-00
for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:08:49 +0000
Received: from konvergencia.hu ([127.0.0.25])
by localhost (kavegep.konvergencia.hu [127.0.0.25]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 18567-02 for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:08:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 63.99-182-adsl-pool.axelero.hu ([81.182.99.63]
helo=[10.0.0.161]) by konvergencia.hu with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128)
(Exim 4.10) id 1BunE8-0004us-00
for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:08:48 +0000
From: Marton Kenyeres <mkenyeres@konvergencia.hu>
Organization: KVG Konvergencia Kft.
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:07:38 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <002601c47f1d$60312870$4302a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
In-Reply-To: <002601c47f1d$60312870$4302a8c0@potlavj0m8twaq>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200408110907.38549.mkenyeres@konvergencia.hu>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at konvergencia.hu
Subject: Re: Error With Kernel Module IPFILTER
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:07:14 -0000
[please do not cross-post]
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 23:02, Ryan wrote:
> I've found out from two different kernel configs
> that after properly compling kernel with IPFILTER support
> it causes the system not to boot. Its hard to say, what exactly it does,
> cause its not a local system.
>
Are you sure, it doesn't boot? Did you include IPFILTER_DEFAULT_BLOCK in your
config? If you did, it's possible that you didn't set up your ipf
configuration properly, (if you did set it up at all). It's also possible,
that your ipf binary and kernel module are out of sync, and that causes your
rules not to load.
You should provide more information, such as FreeBSD version, kernel config,
relevant configuration (rc.conf, ipf.conf) etc. And have someone look at the
console, to see if there are any messages.
cheers,
m.
--
Marton Kenyeres - mkenyeres@konvergencia.hu
KVG Konvergencia Kft.
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 07:18:46 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6D116A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:18:46 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp.hexanet.fr (smtp.hexanet.fr [81.23.32.141])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBB043D1D
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:18:45 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from f.hardy@hexanet.fr)
Received: from [192.168.3.20] (zool.hexanet.fr [81.23.32.11])
by smtp.hexanet.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4245CFDA0
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:18:44 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4119C8EC.3050706@hexanet.fr>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 09:21:16 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fr=E9d=E9ric_Hardy?= <f.hardy@hexanet.fr>
Organization: Hexanet
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stable@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: FreeBSD 4.10 install freeze
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: f.hardy@hexanet.fr
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:18:46 -0000
Hello !
After the kernel configuration, computer freeze on :
> Mount root from ufs:/dev/md0
The CPU is a PIII 500 with one floppy disk, one ata disk, one ata CD-ROM
and 128 Mo RAM.
Motherboard has SCSI, but only ata driver was loaded during the boot
process.
Pnp OS was disabled in BIOS.
APM and ACPI was disabled in BIOS.
Sysinstall freeze from floppies and CD-ROM.
Any solutions ?
Best regards
Fred
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 07:20:23 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5A7AF16A4CE; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:20:23 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP
id 6958943D1F; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:20:22 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
id <aa46445@salmon>; 11 Aug 2004 08:20:17 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:20:15 +0100
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Message-ID: <20040811072015.GA53823@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 07:20:23 -0000
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> So, is there a bug in the em device driver that doesn't exist on the fxp0
> devices?
I have a bundle of machines with em cards that had problems talking
to dumb 10Mbps switches. They work fine with a different 10/100
dumb switch. I hadn't associated the problem with the em cards,
as almost all the machines had em cards, so I'd just assumed the
10Mbps switch was sick. I'd tried most combinations of autoneg, or
hard wiring the duplex and it didn't help.
David.
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 14:26:17 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E358716A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:26:17 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.giallarhorn.org (orv.dslbr.toad.net [66.159.78.19])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1271343D2D
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:26:17 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from technews@giallarhorn.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (odin.giallarhorn.org [172.16.1.2])
by mail.giallarhorn.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7BEToLD001121
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:29:50 -0400 (EDT)
(envelope-from technews@giallarhorn.org)
Message-ID: <411A2D76.50402@giallarhorn.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:30:14 -0400
From: orv <technews@giallarhorn.org>
Organization: Giallarhorn.org
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stable@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=ham version=2.63
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on sif.giallarhorn.org
Subject: reboot/crash on 4.10-STABLE box with Samba
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 14:26:18 -0000
Hi all
My 4.10-STABLE box mysteriously rebooted this morning.
The only "weird" thing in the logs is this the following message from
samba. It's repeated several hundred times since the 9th.
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: [2004/08/10 00:12:27, 0]
locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(657)
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock
request at offset 0, length 12 returned
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: [2004/08/10 00:12:27, 0]
locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(658)
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: an Invalid argument error. This can
happen when using 64 bit lock offsets
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: [2004/08/10 00:12:27, 0]
locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(659)
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems.
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: [2004/08/10 00:12:27, 0]
locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(657)
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock
request at offset 0, length 32768 returned
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: [2004/08/10 00:12:27, 0]
locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(658)
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: an Invalid argument error. This can
happen when using 64 bit lock offsets
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: [2004/08/10 00:12:27, 0]
locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(659)
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems.
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: [2004/08/10 00:12:27, 0]
locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(657)
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: posix_fcntl_lock: WARNING: lock
request at offset 536576, length 32768 returned
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: [2004/08/10 00:12:27, 0]
locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(658)
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: an Invalid argument error. This can
happen when using 64 bit lock offsets
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: [2004/08/10 00:12:27, 0]
locking/posix.c:posix_fcntl_lock(659)
Aug 10 00:12:27 sif smbd[81082]: on 32 bit NFS mounted file systems.
More info on the box:
#uname -a
FreeBSD sif.giallarhorn.org 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #6: Sun Jun
20 17:58:06 EDT 2004
root@sif.giallarhorn.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SIF i386
#pkg_info | grep samba
samba-3.0.4_3,1 A free SMB and CIFS client and server for UNIX
All mounts are local, so why the NFS is the error message ?
Has anyone seen this before ?
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 15:16:16 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3C716A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:16:16 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CC243D1F
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:16:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org)
Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103])
by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748B92186C
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:16:15 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
In-Reply-To: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-113541891;
protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"
Message-Id: <63160AE6-EBA9-11D8-A1B1-000A9578CFCC@khera.org>
From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:16:15 -0400
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1
Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 15:16:16 -0000
--Apple-Mail-1-113541891
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=US-ASCII;
format=flowed
On Aug 10, 2004, at 4:37 PM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are
> running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th
> performs atrociously:
>
I've had horrible issues with linksys 10baseT hubs and the fxp devices.
Same hub worked just fine with 3com and other ethernet cards. I avoid
linksys hubs/switches like the plague.
--Apple-Mail-1-113541891--
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 17:49:06 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id CED2816A4CE; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:49:06 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [81.56.186.139])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 70B1A43D3F; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:49:06 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from thierry@pompo.net)
Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 76493762C; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:45:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:45:58 +0200
From: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org>
To: Sahil Tandon <sahil@hamla.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20040811174558.GA28934@graf.pompo.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Sahil Tandon <sahil@hamla.org>,
freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
References: <41103B8B.2080904@hamla.org>
<20040806203333.GB82876@graf.pompo.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040806203333.GB82876@graf.pompo.net>
X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc;
y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs:
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE i386
Organization: Kabbale Eros
X-PGP: 0xC71405A2
cc: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: apache segfault caused by latest c-client.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 17:49:06 -0000
--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Le Ven 6 ao=FB 04 =E0 22:33:33 +0200, Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org>
=E9crivait=A0:
> A new release of cclient has been released. The changelog says
> "imap-2004a is a maintenance release, consisting primarily of critical
> bugfixes."
>=20
> Could you please upgrade to this release (apply the following patch),
> rebuild your php4-imap-4.3.8_2, and check if it fixes your errors?
Another possible cause of PHP (not Apache) segfault is a bug in
php-imap itself.
If you still experience it, this bug has been fixed in PHP's CVS, and
patches are available at <http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=3D29209>.
Regards,
--=20
Th. Thomas.
--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBGltWc95pjMcUBaIRAiWhAKCLd9ARQp/IEx8cr1DzIaGZbSoZEgCbBpSe
NwNZu5eVDmjtNTvWb4cvl1s=
=cRTE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s--
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 11 20:18:58 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D87716A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:18:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from marge.cload.net (marge.cload.net [213.41.138.40])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF04943D45
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:18:56 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from ohmer@epita.info)
Received: (qmail 15457 invoked by uid 100); 11 Aug 2004 20:21:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?82.224.48.48?) (82.224.48.48)
by marge.cload.net with SMTP; 11 Aug 2004 20:21:12 -0000
Message-ID: <411A7F2A.3030302@epita.info>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 22:18:50 +0200
From: oHmEr <ohmer@epita.info>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.1 (Windows/20040626)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jesper Wallin <jesper@hackunite.net>
References: <3011.213.112.193.117.1092188153.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net>
In-Reply-To: <3011.213.112.193.117.1092188153.squirrel@mail.hackunite.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: "Unable to read from thread kernel pipe"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 20:18:58 -0000
Jesper Wallin wrote:
> Hello..
>
> I've finally installed and configured my freebsd system to work as I want as a
> workstation.. I've been running it for like 2-3 days and rebooted a couple of times for
> different reasons.. Today, when I started XFree86 4.3.0 with Xfce4, it starts normally,
> but as soon as I tried to start any programs from the menu/panel, it's crashing and I
> get a "Unable to read from thread kernel pipe" error..
>
> I've tried deinstalling and recompiling any xfce4 programs/components, yet, I have the
> same error.. I've also seen some people on google having the same problem, but yet no
> solution to the error..
>
> What is causing this and how can I solve/prevent it from happening again?
>
i have the same problem since i updated xfce 4.0.5 to 4.0.6. it looks
like it has been solved with recompiling kernel from cvs sources.
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 02:17:50 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E23D16A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:17:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784BC43D48
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:17:50 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628D22BC24
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:17:48 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7C22HTT000463
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:02:18 +1000 (EST)
(envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <200408120202.i7C22HTT000463@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: stable@freebsd.org
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:02:17 +1000
Sender: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
Subject: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 02:17:50 -0000
I have a 4.10 stable box updated around August 1. It was previously
running 4.9-pre and was working fine.
It has the following interface configuration.
tx0 is internal, sis0 is external. The gif0 interface is
providing external IPv6 connectivity.
tx0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet 192.168.191.233 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 192.168.191.239
inet6 fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d%tx0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
inet6 2001:470:1f00:820:2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d prefixlen 64
inet6 2001:470:1f00:820:: prefixlen 64 anycast
ether 00:e0:29:19:c0:2d
media: Ethernet autoselect (10baseT/UTP)
status: active
sis0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
inet6 fe80::209:5bff:fe1e:e13e%sis0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
inet 211.30.120.24 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 211.30.120.255
ether 00:09:5b:1e:e1:3e
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>)
status: active
lp0: flags=8810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
faith0: flags=8002<BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
inet 10.53.0.1 netmask 0xffffffff
inet 10.53.0.2 netmask 0xffffffff
inet 10.53.0.3 netmask 0xffffffff
inet 10.53.0.4 netmask 0xffffffff
inet 10.53.0.5 netmask 0xffffffff
ppp0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
sl0: flags=c010<POINTOPOINT,LINK2,MULTICAST> mtu 552
gif0: flags=8051<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1280
tunnel inet 211.30.120.24 --> 64.71.128.82
inet6 fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d%gif0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x8
inet6 2001:470:1f00:ffff::5a1 --> 2001:470:1f00:ffff::5a0 prefixlen 128
Internet6:
Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Mtu Netif Expire
::/96 ::1 UGRSc 0 0 16384 lo0 =>
default 2001:470:1f00:ffff::5a0 UGSc 16 0 1280 gif0
::1 ::1 UH 4 0 16384 lo0
::ffff:0.0.0.0/96 ::1 UGRSc 0 0 16384 lo0
2001:470:1f00:820:: 00:e0:29:19:c0:2d UHL 0 0 1500 lo0 =>
2001:470:1f00:820::/64 link#1 UC 2 0 1500 tx0
2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae 00:08:74:9f:ee:ae UHLW 1 12946 1500 tx0
2001:470:1f00:820:2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d 00:e0:29:19:c0:2d UHL 2 6 1500 lo0
2001:470:1f00:ffff::5a0 2001:470:1f00:ffff::5a1 UH 17 0 1280 gif0
2001:470:1f00:ffff::5a1 link#8 UHL 0 0 1280 lo0
fe80::/10 ::1 UGRSc 0 0 16384 lo0
fe80::%tx0/64 link#1 UC 1 0 1500 tx0
fe80::208:74ff:fe9f:eeae%tx0 00:08:74:9f:ee:ae UHLW 0 669 1500 tx0
fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d%tx0 00:e0:29:19:c0:2d UHL 0 0 1500 lo0
fe80::%sis0/64 link#2 UC 0 0 1500 sis0
fe80::209:5bff:fe1e:e13e%sis0 00:09:5b:1e:e1:3e UHL 0 0 1500 lo0
fe80::%lo0/64 fe80::1%lo0 Uc 0 0 16384 lo0
fe80::1%lo0 link#5 UHL 0 0 16384 lo0
fe80::%gif0/64 link#8 UC 0 0 1280 gif0
fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d%gif0 link#8 UHL 0 0 1280 lo0
ff01::/32 ::1 U 0 0 16384 lo0
ff02::/16 ::1 UGRS 0 0 16384 lo0
ff02::%tx0/32 link#1 UC 0 0 1500 tx0
ff02::%sis0/32 link#2 UC 0 0 1500 sis0
ff02::%lo0/32 ::1 UC 0 0 16384 lo0
ff02::%gif0/32 link#8 UC 0 0 1280 gif0
The box does not appear to be generating a ICMP6 too big error
message which I would expect to see once the 1428 octet TCP
segments start arriving.
bsdi# tcpdump -n -p host 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5 or icmp6
tcpdump: listening on tx0
11:24:05.545477 2001:470:1f00:820:2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d > 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae: icmp6: neighbor sol: who has 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae
11:24:05.545749 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae > 2001:470:1f00:820:2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d: icmp6: neighbor adv: tgt is 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae
11:24:05.874471 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae > 2001:470:1f00:820:2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d: icmp6: neighbor sol: who has 2001:470:1f00:820:2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d
11:24:05.874692 2001:470:1f00:820:2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d > 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae: icmp6: neighbor adv: tgt is 2001:470:1f00:820:2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d
11:24:13.640153 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: S 2485693794:2485693794(0) win 57344 <mss 1440,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,timestamp 40277 0>
11:24:13.904665 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22 > 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873: S 798565385:798565385(0) ack 2485693795 win 57344 <mss 1440,nop,wscale 0,nop,nop,timestamp 200789696 40277> [flowlabel 0x39]
11:24:13.904940 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: . ack 1 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 40304 200789696>
11:24:14.114945 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22 > 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873: P 1:52(51) ack 1 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 200789906 40304> [flowlabel 0x41b4c]
11:24:14.115850 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: P 1:52(51) ack 52 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 40325 200789906>
11:24:14.317294 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22 > 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873: P 52:540(488) ack 52 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 200790108 40325> [flowlabel 0x41b4c]
11:24:14.318491 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: P 52:708(656) ack 540 win 58060 <nop,nop,timestamp 40345 200790108>
11:24:14.619697 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22 > 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873: . ack 708 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 200790412 40345> [flowlabel 0x41b4c]
11:24:14.748280 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22 > 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873: P 540:1580(1040) ack 708 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 200790537 40345> [flowlabel 0x41b4c]
11:24:14.844695 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: . ack 1580 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 40398 200790537>
11:24:14.977668 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: P 708:740(32) ack 1580 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 40411 200790537>
11:24:15.041480 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22 > 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873: P 1580:1612(32) ack 708 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 200790833 40398> [flowlabel 0x41b4c]
11:24:15.134739 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: P 740:828(88) ack 1612 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 40427 200790833>
11:24:15.274904 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22 > 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873: . ack 740 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 200791066 40411> [flowlabel 0x41b4c]
11:24:15.398143 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22 > 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873: P 1612:1700(88) ack 828 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 200791190 40427> [flowlabel 0x41b4c]
11:24:15.399848 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: P 828:1924(1096) ack 1700 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 40453 200791190>
11:24:15.632581 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22 > 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873: P 1700:2812(1112) ack 1924 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 200791421 40453> [flowlabel 0x41b4c]
11:24:15.724707 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: . ack 2812 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 40486 200791421>
11:24:17.851288 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: . 1924:3352(1428) ack 2812 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 40698 200791421>
11:24:18.874758 fe80::208:74ff:fe9f:eeae > fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d: icmp6: neighbor sol: who has fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d
11:24:18.874917 fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d > fe80::208:74ff:fe9f:eeae: icmp6: neighbor adv: tgt is fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d
11:24:19.045947 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: . 1924:3352(1428) ack 2812 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 40818 200791421>
11:24:21.245989 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: . 1924:3352(1428) ack 2812 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 41038 200791421>
11:24:23.545730 fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d > fe80::208:74ff:fe9f:eeae: icmp6: neighbor sol: who has fe80::208:74ff:fe9f:eeae
11:24:23.545997 fe80::208:74ff:fe9f:eeae > fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d: icmp6: neighbor adv: tgt is fe80::208:74ff:fe9f:eeae
11:24:25.446086 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: . 1924:3352(1428) ack 2812 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 41458 200791421>
11:24:33.646275 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: . 1924:3352(1428) ack 2812 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 42278 200791421>
11:24:49.846641 2001:470:1f00:820:208:74ff:fe9f:eeae.3873 > 2001:4f8:3:bb:290:27ff:fe73:82e5.22: . 1924:3352(1428) ack 2812 win 58548 <nop,nop,timestamp 43898 200791421>
11:24:54.875567 fe80::208:74ff:fe9f:eeae > fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d: icmp6: neighbor sol: who has fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d
11:24:54.875742 fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d > fe80::208:74ff:fe9f:eeae: icmp6: neighbor adv: tgt is fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d
11:24:59.546349 fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d > fe80::208:74ff:fe9f:eeae: icmp6: neighbor sol: who has fe80::208:74ff:fe9f:eeae
11:24:59.546619 fe80::208:74ff:fe9f:eeae > fe80::2e0:29ff:fe19:c02d: icmp6: neighbor adv: tgt is fe80::208:74ff:fe9f:eeae
^C
741 packets received by filter
0 packets dropped by kernel
00100 10 752 allow ipv6 from any to any via lo0
00200 0 0 allow ipv6-icmp from :: to ff02::/16
00300 40 1120 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to fe80::/10
00400 6 336 allow ipv6-icmp from fe80::/10 to ff02::/16
00500 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to ::1
00600 0 0 deny ipv6 from ::1 to any
00700 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to ::ffff:0.0.0.0/96
00800 0 0 deny ipv6 from ::224.0.0.0/100 to any in
00900 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to ::224.0.0.0/100 in
01000 0 0 deny ipv6 from ::127.0.0.0/104 to any in
01100 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to ::127.0.0.0/104 in
01200 0 0 deny ipv6 from ::/104 to any in
01300 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to ::/104 in
01400 0 0 deny ipv6 from ::255.0.0.0/104 to any in
01500 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to ::255.0.0.0/104 in
01600 0 0 deny ipv6 from ::/96 to any in
01700 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to ::/96 in
01800 0 0 deny ipv6 from 2002:e000::/20 to any in
01900 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to 2002:e000::/20 in
02000 0 0 deny ipv6 from 2002:7f00::/24 to any in
02100 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to 2002:7f00::/24 in
02200 0 0 deny ipv6 from 2002::/24 to any in
02300 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to 2002::/24 in
02400 0 0 deny ipv6 from 2002:ff00::/24 to any in
02500 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to 2002:ff00::/24 in
02600 0 0 deny ipv6 from 2002:a00::/24 to any in
02700 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to 2002:a00::/24 in
02800 0 0 deny ipv6 from 2002:ac10::/28 to any in
02900 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to 2002:ac10::/28 in
03000 0 0 deny ipv6 from 2002:c0a8::/32 to any in
03100 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to 2002:c0a8::/32 in
03200 0 0 deny ipv6 from ff05::/16 to any in
03300 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to ff05::/16 in
03400 1914 285058 allow ipv6 from any to any in recv tx0
03500 4 313 allow tcp from any to any 53 established
03600 3 92 allow tcp from any 53 to any established
03700 2353 233933 allow tcp from any to any 22 established
03800 40 12524 allow tcp from any 22 to any established
03900 0 0 allow ipv6 from any to any frag
04000 14 480 allow tcp from any to any 22 out setup
04100 0 0 allow tcp from 2001:470:1f00:820::/64 to any 22 in setup
04200 0 0 allow tcp from any to any 22 in setup
04300 1 40 allow tcp from any to any 53 setup
04400 0 0 allow tcp from any to any out setup
04500 0 0 allow tcp from any to any out tcpflg rst
04600 0 0 allow tcp from any to any established
04700 0 0 reset tcp from any to any 113 setup
04800 0 0 deny log tcp from any to any setup
04900 5 816 allow udp from any to any 53 in
05000 5 1376 allow udp from any 53 to any out
05100 0 0 allow udp from any 1024-5000 to any 53 out
05200 0 0 allow udp from any 53 to any 1024-5000 in
05300 0 0 allow udp from any 49152-65535 to any 53 out
05400 0 0 allow udp from any 53 to any 49152-65535 in
05500 0 0 deny udp from any to any 514 in
05600 0 0 deny udp from any to any 137 in
05700 0 0 deny udp from any 138 to any 138 in
05800 0 0 deny udp from any 520 to any 520 in
05900 0 0 deny udp from any 4997 to any 4997 in
06000 0 0 deny udp from any 500 to any 500 in
06100 69 18367 allow ipv6-icmp from any to any
06200 0 0 deny udp from any to ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff in
06300 0 0 allow udp from any 32768-65535 to any out
06400 0 0 allow udp from any to any 32768-65535 in
06500 0 0 unreach admin log udp from any to any
06600 0 0 deny log ipv6 from any to any
65535 0 0 deny ipv6 from any to any
bsdi#
sys/netinet versions.
/accf_data.c/1.1.2.2/Wed Sep 20 21:34:13 2000//TRELENG_4
/accf_http.c/1.1.2.4/Wed May 1 08:34:37 2002//TRELENG_4
/icmp6.h/1.2.2.5/Sat Jun 29 18:31:11 2002//TRELENG_4
/icmp_var.h/1.15.2.2/Fri Dec 7 09:23:11 2001//TRELENG_4
/if_atm.c/1.8.2.1/Thu Dec 20 10:30:18 2001//TRELENG_4
/if_atm.h/1.2.6.2/Thu Dec 20 10:30:18 2001//TRELENG_4
/if_ether.h/1.24.2.1/Wed Feb 13 21:38:56 2002//TRELENG_4
/if_fddi.h/1.8/Wed Dec 29 04:40:58 1999//TRELENG_4
/igmp.c/1.29.2.2/Thu Jan 23 21:06:44 2003//TRELENG_4
/igmp.h/1.10/Sat Aug 28 00:49:15 1999//TRELENG_4
/igmp_var.h/1.17/Wed Dec 29 04:40:59 1999//TRELENG_4
/in.c/1.44.2.14/Fri Nov 8 00:45:50 2002//TRELENG_4
/in_cksum.c/1.6/Sat Aug 28 00:49:16 1999//TRELENG_4
/in_gif.c/1.5.2.11/Thu Jan 23 21:06:45 2003//TRELENG_4
/in_gif.h/1.3.2.4/Fri Nov 8 16:57:13 2002//TRELENG_4
/in_hostcache.c/1.3/Sat Aug 28 00:49:16 1999//TRELENG_4
/in_hostcache.h/1.3/Wed Dec 29 04:40:59 1999//TRELENG_4
/in_rmx.c/1.37.2.3/Fri Aug 9 14:49:23 2002//TRELENG_4
/in_systm.h/1.9/Wed Dec 29 04:41:00 1999//TRELENG_4
/in_var.h/1.33.2.3/Fri Dec 14 20:09:34 2001//TRELENG_4
/ip6.h/1.2.2.2/Tue Jul 3 11:01:46 2001//TRELENG_4
/ip_divert.c/1.42.2.6/Thu Jan 23 21:06:45 2003//TRELENG_4
/ip_ecn.c/1.1.2.3/Wed Apr 17 07:50:17 2002//TRELENG_4
/ip_ecn.h/1.2.2.2/Tue Jul 3 11:01:46 2001//TRELENG_4
/ip_encap.c/1.1.2.5/Thu Jan 23 21:06:45 2003//TRELENG_4
/ip_encap.h/1.1.2.2/Wed Nov 20 23:20:54 2002//TRELENG_4
/ip_flow.c/1.9.2.2/Sun Nov 4 17:35:31 2001//TRELENG_4
/ip_flow.h/1.2/Sat Aug 28 00:49:22 1999//TRELENG_4
/ip_fw.c/1.131.2.39/Mon Jan 20 02:23:07 2003//TRELENG_4
/ip_fw.h/1.47.2.11/Tue Jul 9 09:11:42 2002//TRELENG_4
/ip_gre.h/1.2.2.1/Sun Dec 1 14:03:10 2002/-kk/TRELENG_4
/ip_icmp.c/1.39.2.19/Fri Jan 24 05:11:34 2003//TRELENG_4
/ip_icmp.h/1.16/Wed Dec 29 04:41:01 1999//TRELENG_4
/ip_id.c/1.1.2.1/Thu Jul 19 06:37:26 2001//TRELENG_4
/ipprotosw.h/1.1/Wed Dec 22 19:13:23 1999//TRELENG_4
/tcp_debug.c/1.16.2.1/Sat Jul 15 07:14:31 2000//TRELENG_4
/tcp_debug.h/1.11/Sat Jan 29 11:49:05 2000//TRELENG_4
/tcp_fsm.h/1.14/Sun Nov 7 04:18:30 1999//TRELENG_4
/tcp_seq.h/1.11.2.7/Mon Feb 3 02:33:10 2003//TRELENG_4
/tcp_timer.c/1.34.2.14/Mon Feb 3 02:33:41 2003//TRELENG_4
/tcp_timer.h/1.18.2.1/Fri Aug 16 22:16:39 2002//TRELENG_4
/tcpip.h/1.8/Sat Aug 28 00:49:34 1999//TRELENG_4
/udp.h/1.7/Sat Aug 28 00:49:34 1999//TRELENG_4
/udp_var.h/1.22.2.1/Sun Feb 18 07:12:25 2001//TRELENG_4
/ip_dummynet.h/1.10.2.9/Wed Aug 6 01:45:00 2003//TRELENG_4
/in_pcb.h/1.32.2.8/Sun Oct 5 14:29:51 2003//TRELENG_4
/in_proto.c/1.53.2.7/Sun Oct 5 14:29:51 2003//TRELENG_4
/ip_mroute.c/1.56.2.10/Sun Oct 5 14:29:52 2003//TRELENG_4
/ip_mroute.h/1.17.2.3/Sun Oct 5 14:29:52 2003//TRELENG_4
/ip_var.h/1.50.2.14/Sun Oct 5 14:29:52 2003//TRELENG_4
/pim.h/1.1.2.1/Sun Aug 24 17:04:44 2003//TRELENG_4
/pim_var.h/1.1.2.1/Sun Aug 24 17:04:44 2003//TRELENG_4
/udp_usrreq.c/1.64.2.19/Sun Oct 5 14:29:52 2003//TRELENG_4
/if_ether.c/1.64.2.27/Fri Dec 19 13:38:44 2003//TRELENG_4
/ip_input.c/1.130.2.54/Fri Dec 19 13:38:47 2003//TRELENG_4
/ip_dummynet.c/1.24.2.26/Wed Jan 14 23:40:38 2004//TRELENG_4
/ip_gre.c/1.7.2.2/Sun Feb 1 12:51:17 2004/-kk/TRELENG_4
/ip.h/1.17.2.2/Tue Mar 9 11:52:40 2004//TRELENG_4
/tcp.h/1.13.2.5/Tue Mar 9 11:52:40 2004//TRELENG_4
/tcp_output.c/1.39.2.21/Tue Mar 9 11:52:41 2004//TRELENG_4
/tcp_subr.c/1.73.2.33/Tue Mar 9 11:52:41 2004//TRELENG_4
/tcp_syncache.c/1.5.2.15/Tue Mar 9 11:52:41 2004//TRELENG_4
/tcp_var.h/1.56.2.15/Tue Mar 9 11:52:42 2004//TRELENG_4
/tcp_input.c/1.107.2.41/Thu Apr 22 03:31:56 2004//TRELENG_4
/in_pcb.c/1.59.2.28/Thu May 6 08:21:31 2004//TRELENG_4
/tcp_usrreq.c/1.51.2.22/Thu May 6 08:21:33 2004//TRELENG_4
/in.h/1.48.2.12/Sun Aug 1 23:32:59 2004//TRELENG_4
/ip_fw2.c/1.6.2.22/Sun Aug 1 23:33:00 2004//TRELENG_4
/ip_fw2.h/1.1.2.5/Sun Aug 1 23:33:01 2004//TRELENG_4
/ip_output.c/1.99.2.45/Sun Aug 1 23:33:01 2004//TRELENG_4
/raw_ip.c/1.64.2.19/Sun Aug 1 23:33:01 2004//TRELENG_4
sys/netinet6:
/README/1.2.2.1/Sat Jul 15 07:14:32 2000//TRELENG_4
/ah.h/1.3.2.3/Sun Apr 28 05:40:26 2002//TRELENG_4
/ah6.h/1.2.2.2/Tue Jul 3 11:01:49 2001//TRELENG_4
/ah_core.c/1.2.2.5/Sun Apr 28 05:40:26 2002//TRELENG_4
/ah_input.c/1.1.2.6/Sun Apr 28 05:40:26 2002//TRELENG_4
/dest6.c/1.1.2.4/Sun Apr 28 05:40:26 2002//TRELENG_4
/esp.h/1.2.2.3/Sun Apr 28 05:40:26 2002//TRELENG_4
/esp6.h/1.2.2.2/Tue Jul 3 11:01:49 2001//TRELENG_4
/esp_core.c/1.1.2.4/Tue Mar 26 10:12:29 2002//TRELENG_4
/esp_rijndael.c/1.1.2.2/Sat Jan 11 19:10:59 2003//TRELENG_4
/esp_rijndael.h/1.1.2.1/Tue Jul 3 11:01:50 2001//TRELENG_4
/frag6.c/1.2.2.6/Sun Apr 28 05:40:26 2002//TRELENG_4
/icmp6.h/1.5.2.1/Sat Jul 15 07:14:33 2000//TRELENG_4
/in6.h/1.7.2.7/Thu Aug 1 19:38:50 2002//TRELENG_4
/in6_gif.c/1.2.2.7/Thu Jan 23 21:06:47 2003//TRELENG_4
/in6_gif.h/1.2.2.3/Fri Nov 8 16:57:13 2002//TRELENG_4
/in6_ifattach.c/1.2.2.6/Sun Apr 28 05:40:26 2002//TRELENG_4
/in6_ifattach.h/1.1.2.2/Tue Jul 3 11:01:52 2001//TRELENG_4
/in6_pcb.h/1.2.2.3/Mon Aug 13 16:26:17 2001//TRELENG_4
/in6_prefix.c/1.4.2.3/Tue Jul 3 11:01:52 2001//TRELENG_4
/in6_prefix.h/1.1.2.2/Tue Jul 3 11:01:52 2001//TRELENG_4
/in6_proto.c/1.6.2.9/Fri Jan 24 05:11:35 2003//TRELENG_4
/in6_rmx.c/1.1.2.3/Sun Apr 28 05:40:27 2002//TRELENG_4
/in6_src.c/1.1.2.3/Tue Feb 26 18:02:06 2002//TRELENG_4
/in6_var.h/1.3.2.3/Sun Apr 28 05:40:27 2002//TRELENG_4
/ip6.h/1.4.2.1/Sat Jul 15 07:14:34 2000//TRELENG_4
/ip6_ecn.h/1.2.2.2/Tue Jul 3 11:01:53 2001//TRELENG_4
/ip6_forward.c/1.4.2.7/Fri Jan 24 05:11:35 2003//TRELENG_4
/ip6_fw.h/1.3.2.7/Sun Apr 28 05:40:27 2002//TRELENG_4
/ip6_mroute.h/1.2.2.3/Sun Apr 28 05:40:27 2002//TRELENG_4
/ip6_var.h/1.2.2.4/Thu Jan 23 21:06:47 2003//TRELENG_4
/ip6protosw.h/1.2.2.4/Sun Apr 28 05:40:27 2002//TRELENG_4
/ipcomp.h/1.1.2.3/Sun Apr 28 05:40:27 2002//TRELENG_4
/ipcomp6.h/1.1.2.2/Tue Jul 3 11:01:54 2001//TRELENG_4
/ipcomp_core.c/1.1.2.5/Sat Jan 11 19:10:59 2003//TRELENG_4
/ipcomp_input.c/1.1.2.3/Sun Apr 28 05:40:27 2002//TRELENG_4
/ipsec6.h/1.3.2.2/Tue Jul 3 11:01:54 2001//TRELENG_4
/mld6.c/1.4.2.4/Thu Jan 23 21:06:47 2003//TRELENG_4
/mld6_var.h/1.1.2.1/Sat Jul 15 07:14:36 2000//TRELENG_4
/nd6_nbr.c/1.4.2.6/Thu Jan 23 21:06:47 2003//TRELENG_4
/pim6.h/1.1.2.1/Sat Jul 15 07:14:36 2000//TRELENG_4
/pim6_var.h/1.2.2.1/Sat Jul 15 07:14:36 2000//TRELENG_4
/raw_ip6.c/1.7.2.7/Fri Jan 24 05:11:35 2003//TRELENG_4
/raw_ip6.h/1.1.2.1/Tue Jul 3 11:01:55 2001//TRELENG_4
/route6.c/1.1.2.5/Thu Jan 23 21:06:47 2003//TRELENG_4
/scope6.c/1.1.2.3/Mon Apr 1 15:29:04 2002//TRELENG_4
/scope6_var.h/1.1.2.1/Sat Jul 15 07:14:38 2000//TRELENG_4
/tcp6_var.h/1.3.2.2/Fri Dec 14 20:21:11 2001//TRELENG_4
/udp6_output.c/1.1.2.6/Thu Jan 23 21:06:47 2003//TRELENG_4
/udp6_usrreq.c/1.6.2.13/Fri Jan 24 05:11:35 2003//TRELENG_4
/udp6_var.h/1.3.2.1/Sat Jul 15 07:14:38 2000//TRELENG_4
/ah_output.c/1.1.2.5/Wed Aug 6 01:45:01 2003//TRELENG_4
/in6_cksum.c/1.1.2.4/Wed Aug 6 01:45:01 2003//TRELENG_4
/ipcomp_output.c/1.1.2.4/Wed Aug 6 01:45:02 2003//TRELENG_4
/ipsec.c/1.3.2.12/Wed Aug 6 01:45:02 2003//TRELENG_4
/nd6.c/1.2.2.16/Thu Aug 14 02:36:40 2003//TRELENG_4
/nd6.h/1.2.2.6/Thu Aug 14 02:36:40 2003//TRELENG_4
/nd6_rtr.c/1.2.2.6/Thu Aug 14 02:36:40 2003//TRELENG_4
/esp_input.c/1.1.2.9/Fri Dec 19 13:38:48 2003//TRELENG_4
/esp_output.c/1.1.2.5/Fri Dec 19 13:38:49 2003//TRELENG_4
/in6_pcb.c/1.10.2.10/Wed Jan 14 23:40:44 2004//TRELENG_4
/ip6_fw.c/1.2.2.12/Wed Jan 14 23:40:44 2004//TRELENG_4
/ip6_mroute.c/1.2.2.10/Wed Jan 14 23:40:44 2004//TRELENG_4
/ipsec.h/1.4.2.5/Tue Mar 9 11:52:42 2004//TRELENG_4
/icmp6.c/1.6.2.14/Thu Apr 22 03:31:58 2004//TRELENG_4
/in6.c/1.7.2.11/Thu Apr 22 03:31:58 2004//TRELENG_4
/ip6_output.c/1.13.2.20/Thu Apr 22 03:32:00 2004//TRELENG_4
/ip6_input.c/1.11.2.16/Sun Aug 1 23:33:03 2004//TRELENG_4
The IPv4 firewalling is a mixture of ipfw and ipf.
Is this a known issue?
Do you need more information?
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 08:00:48 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E6116A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:00:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from citadel.nobulus.com (citadel.nobulus.com [212.97.207.19])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260F143D1F
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:00:48 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from iva@citadel.nobulus.com)
Received: from citadel.nobulus.com (localhost.nobulus.com [127.0.0.1])
by citadel.nobulus.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7C8dWSo079686;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:39:32 GMT
(envelope-from iva@citadel.nobulus.com)
Received: (from iva@localhost)
by citadel.nobulus.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7C8dUwV079685;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:39:30 GMT
(envelope-from iva)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:39:30 +0000
From: Ilya Varlashkin <ilya@samara.net>
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Message-ID: <20040812083930.GA79672@CITADEL.NOBULUS.COM>
References: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040810173211.V776@ganymede.hub.org>
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: em driver worse then fxp driver ... why?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 08:00:49 -0000
Hi Marc,
I'm not subscribed to -net list, so in case you haven't got solution yet,
here is some info.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 05:37:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> I have 5 servers sitting on a Linksys 10/100 switch ... 4 of the 5 are
> running fxp0 ethernet, while the 5th is running em ... and the 5th
> performs atrociously:
>
> neptune# netstat -ni | head
> Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs
> Coll
> em0 1500 <Link#1> 00:07:e9:05:1b:2e 36915965 10306 28888840 1
> 10858513
>
> I've tried in bth half and full duplex mode .. full duplex, Ierrs climbs,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This is very typical behaviour when you have one side forced to full-duplex
and the other side is in autonegotiation. The side with forced full duplex
will experience lots of input error, and the autonegotiation side will see
tons of collisions. The later is because autonegotiation side in the absense
of autonegotiation bits from the other side will automagically put itself
into half-duplex. I see this everytime somebody comes and plugs new server
onto the networkr, and it's happens very often.
All you need to do is to have either both sides in autoneg or both sides
forced into full-duplex 100Mbps.
> half-duplex, Collisions climb ...
>
That's normal - you will always see collisions on half-duplex links. It's
not an error, it's just what half-duplex is all about.
> Originally, it was explained that unmanaged switches tended to be
> problematic, but I'd expect some sort of uniformity in problems, but 'just
> the server with the em device' ...
>
Indeed, unmanaged switches tend to have ports set to autonegotiation
> So, is there a bug in the em device driver that doesn't exist on the fxp0
> devices?
>
I've observed behaviour you described with any card I came by, including
those using fxp driver. If you know in advance that physical setup is wrong
try to fix that first, don't rely on the driver fixing it for you.
Hope it helps.
/Ilya
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 10:43:39 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB45116A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:43:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from bones.rvdp.org (bones.rvdp.org [213.154.224.58])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FAAA43D5E
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:43:38 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from rvdp@rvdp.org)
Received: from bones.rvdp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bones.rvdp.org (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7C9d0Eb015682;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:39:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from rvdp@localhost)
by bones.rvdp.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7C9cwGa016173;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:38:59 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:38:58 +0200
From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
To: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
Message-ID: <20040812093857.GA12644@rvdp.org>
References: <200408120202.i7C22HTT000463@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200408120202.i7C22HTT000463@drugs.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:43:39 -0000
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 12:02:17 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> The box does not appear to be generating a ICMP6 too big error
> message which I would expect to see once the 1428 octet TCP
> segments start arriving.
You could also check the output of:
netstat -s -p icmp6
There have been some changes in the IPv6 area that might be relevant.
You could check the dates of these changes (icmp6.c, raw_ip6.c):
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/netinet6/
rvdp
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 12:02:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7444116A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:02:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from bones.rvdp.org (bones.rvdp.org [213.154.224.58])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A93643D2F
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:02:06 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from rvdp@rvdp.org)
Received: from bones.rvdp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bones.rvdp.org (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7CC1w9V013330;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:01:58 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from rvdp@localhost)
by bones.rvdp.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7CC1vIG010816;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:01:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:01:56 +0200
From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
To: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
Message-ID: <20040812120155.GA20845@rvdp.org>
References: <200408120202.i7C22HTT000463@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200408120202.i7C22HTT000463@drugs.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:02:07 -0000
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 12:02:17 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Is this a known issue?
> Do you need more information?
I have tried it on
4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #8: Sat Jul 17 10:08:52 CEST 2004
It sends "Packet too big" icmp6s on the wire. I also see the
netstat -s -p icmp6 "Histogram of error messages to be generated"
packet too big count increase by one.
So, maybe something changed getween July 17th and now. I will
see what happens after an upgrade to the latest 4.10.
rvdp
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 12:34:58 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23F916A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:34:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 225AC43D2D
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:34:58 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org)
Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97])
by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1BvEnH-000KhQ-O0
for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:34:55 +0100
Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
i7CCYtuf083220 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:34:55 +0100 (BST)
(envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org)
Received: (from jcm@localhost)
by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.12.10/8.12.6/Submit) id i7CCYtFQ083219
for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:34:55 +0100 (BST)
Resent-Message-Id: <200408121234.i7CCYtFQ083219@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:25:25 +0100
From: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>
To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040809122525.GA45681@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Resent-From: jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org
Resent-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:34:54 +0100
Resent-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----)
X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/)
*1BvEnH-000KhQ-O0*CeU3/e1ZCsA*
Subject: Problem getting Palm to connect
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:34:58 -0000
Hi all,
My wife has a Tungsten E we are trying to connect to a 4.10 workstation. I
rebuilt the kernel with the needed devices, and added an entry to usbd.conf.
But when I hit 'hotsync' on the palm, it timed out. Obviously there is a
lot that could have gone wrong. But is there a step-by-step approach I can
use to find out what DOES work and then procede from there?
jm
--
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 12:57:40 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C83A116A4CF
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:57:40 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from bones.rvdp.org (bones.rvdp.org [213.154.224.58])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A40143D1F
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:57:40 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from rvdp@rvdp.org)
Received: from bones.rvdp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bones.rvdp.org (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7CCvWRX001493;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:57:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from rvdp@localhost)
by bones.rvdp.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7CCvVVY005816;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:57:31 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:57:31 +0200
From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
To: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
Message-ID: <20040812125730.GB20845@rvdp.org>
References: <200408120202.i7C22HTT000463@drugs.dv.isc.org>
<20040812120155.GA20845@rvdp.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040812120155.GA20845@rvdp.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:57:40 -0000
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 14:01:56 +0200, Ronald van der Pol wrote:
> So, maybe something changed getween July 17th and now. I will
> see what happens after an upgrade to the latest 4.10.
Yep, I have the same problem with the latest 4.10: no ICMP6
packet too big packets are sent.
rvdp
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 13:15:29 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C45616A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:15:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from bones.rvdp.org (bones.rvdp.org [213.154.224.58])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403FD43D46
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:15:28 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from rvdp@rvdp.org)
Received: from bones.rvdp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by bones.rvdp.org (8.12.11/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7CDFKU9001063;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:15:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: (from rvdp@localhost)
by bones.rvdp.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i7CDFJrE023523;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:15:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:15:19 +0200
From: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
To: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
Message-ID: <20040812131519.GC20845@rvdp.org>
References: <200408120202.i7C22HTT000463@drugs.dv.isc.org>
<20040812120155.GA20845@rvdp.org> <20040812125730.GB20845@rvdp.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040812125730.GB20845@rvdp.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:15:29 -0000
On Thu, Aug 12, 2004 at 14:57:31 +0200, Ronald van der Pol wrote:
> Yep, I have the same problem with the latest 4.10: no ICMP6
> packet too big packets are sent.
Sorry, I made a mistake. I did not set net.inet6.ip6.forwarding=1
on the test machine. Now I have and now I get "packet too big"
icmp6s. (I am forwarding to a gif0 interface that does not have
its other side configured, but it's enough to test pmtud).
So, I'm afraid there is something wrong with your setup.
Again, sorry for the confusion.
rvdp
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 13:15:29 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F3D16A4D0
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:15:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lists.freedombi.com (thedalesgroup.com [207.179.98.220])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260B543D48
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:15:29 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from charles@idealso.com)
Received: by lists.freedombi.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 32DEC724BF; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:15:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from freedombi.com (bugs.idealso.com [192.168.10.108])
by lists.freedombi.com (Postfix) with SMTP
id 5153072488; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:15:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 24.11.146.21
(SquirrelMail authenticated user charles)
by freedombi.com with HTTP;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:15:26 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <46544.24.11.146.21.1092316526.squirrel@freedombi.com>
In-Reply-To: <200408110050.i7B0oSbD026292@ktts.kharkov.ua>
References: <200408110050.i7B0oSbD026292@ktts.kharkov.ua>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 09:15:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Charles Ulrich" <charles@idealso.com>
To: igor@ktts.kharkov.ua
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on freedombi.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00,PRIORITY_NO_NAME
autolearn=no version=2.63
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 5.2.1 performance issue
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 13:15:29 -0000
igor@ktts.kharkov.ua said:
> Yesterday I upgraded my news server from 5.1 to 5.2.1 and ran into
> performance problem.
> Want to say from the beginning that during upgrade I transferred all
> my sysctl and other settings from 5.1 into 5.2.1
You might get a better response from the folks on the freebsd-current list.
They deal specifically with the 5.x branch. This list, freebsd-stable is
primarily concerned with 4.x.
(Although as 5.x is gearing up for STABLE, this might not hold true for very
long.)
--
Charles Ulrich
System Administrator
Ideal Solution - http://www.idealso.com
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 14:04:11 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DFF16A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:04:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC2543D54
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:04:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id F3B263C23C; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:04:11 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09D03C1FD
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:04:11 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:04:11 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040812104827.Y62519@ganymede.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Just locked up a file system ... but not the system ...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 14:04:11 -0000
I have a server that is a wee bit on the loaded side right now, but still
functional ... there are currently 84 jail'd environments running on her
...
Its a Dual Xeon, 4G of RAM, and 6x72G drives in a RAID5 configuration ...
kernel/world is built as:
CFLAGS= -O -mpentium -pipe -g -DKVA_PAGES=512
COPTFLAGS= -O -mpentium -pipe -DKVA_PAGES=512
and the system is running:
4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #7: Sat Aug 7 20:47:34 ADT 2004
And has been up for 4 days:
neptune# uptime
10:50AM up 4 days, 13:56, 11 users, load averages: 13.07, 21.89, 20.62
my first thought was vnodes, but that usually affects the whole system,
and looking at sysctl, I have plenty left:
kern.maxvnodes: 512000
kern.minvnodes: 61907
debug.sizeof.vnode: 168
debug.numvnodes: 439246
debug.wantfreevnodes: 25
debug.freevnodes: 298396
There are no errors that I can see in /var/log/messages to indicate a
problem with the system, at least for the past 6 hours or so ...
Up until about 30 minutes ago, I could do things on the file system itself
(/vm), but couldn't do anything within a directory on the file system
(/vm/323) ... then it 'widened' to affect anything I did on /vm ...
Looking at top, I see some processes in an 'inode' state, and looking at a
ps auxl listing, there are 47 processes in such a state right now ...
I have a tech going down to reboot the machine, since I can't leave it
down long ... is there something else that I should have looked at on
this? Since there is no KVM/keyboard attached to this, and it wasn't
booted with one in it, I don't have any way of getting to the DDB and
trying to get a core :(
Based on what is left running after I've killed off all VM processes that
were killable, the 'inode' that its stuck on is the /vm/323 one, since the
processes for that VM are the only one currently running (and nfsd) :(
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 15:26:34 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A0E16A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:26:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.distalzou.net (203.141.139.231.user.ad.il24.net
[203.141.139.231])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21DF843D48
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:26:34 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from devin@spamcop.net)
Received: from plexi.pun-pun.prv ([192.168.7.29] helo=plexi)
by mail.distalzou.net with esmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.41 (FreeBSD))
id 1BvHTM-0001YW-81; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:26:32 +0900
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 00:26:29 +0900 (JST)
From: Tod McQuillin <devin@spamcop.net>
X-X-Sender: devin@plexi.pun-pun.prv
To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040812104827.Y62519@ganymede.hub.org>
Message-ID: <20040813002243.O34675@plexi.pun-pun.prv>
References: <20040812104827.Y62519@ganymede.hub.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Just locked up a file system ... but not the system ...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:26:35 -0000
On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> I have a tech going down to reboot the machine, since I can't leave it down
> long ... is there something else that I should have looked at on this? Since
> there is no KVM/keyboard attached to this, and it wasn't booted with one in
> it, I don't have any way of getting to the DDB and trying to get a core :(
Can't you use "reboot -d" for this? or maybe "reboot -qd".
Never tried it, but it seems like it makes sense in this
situation.
--
Tod McQuillin
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 15:42:07 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F6116A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:42:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057B843D45
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:42:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A388B3CFC0; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:42:06 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDCF3CDE1;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:42:06 -0300 (ADT)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:42:06 -0300 (ADT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Tod McQuillin <devin@spamcop.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040813002243.O34675@plexi.pun-pun.prv>
Message-ID: <20040812124123.P83100@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <20040812104827.Y62519@ganymede.hub.org>
<20040813002243.O34675@plexi.pun-pun.prv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Just locked up a file system ... but not the system ...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:42:07 -0000
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004, Tod McQuillin wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Aug 2004, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> I have a tech going down to reboot the machine, since I can't leave it down
>> long ... is there something else that I should have looked at on this?
>> Since there is no KVM/keyboard attached to this, and it wasn't booted with
>> one in it, I don't have any way of getting to the DDB and trying to get a
>> core :(
>
> Can't you use "reboot -d" for this? or maybe "reboot -qd".
>
> Never tried it, but it seems like it makes sense in this situation.
Sounds like it would, but with the one file system being effectively
wedged, I'm not sure if it would work ... I'll try it next time though,
since the other alternative is a cold boot, which gives zip :(
Thanks ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 16:55:47 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7946816A4D9
for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:55:47 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4011943D46
for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:55:47 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from avalon_temp@mail.ru)
Received: from [80.237.26.193] (port=5578 helo=[127.0.0.1])
by mx2.mail.ru with esmtp
id 1BvIrV-000K72-00
for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 20:55:33 +0400
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:50:28 +0300
From: none <avalon_temp@mail.ru>
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.10.01)
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <1848955211.20040812195028@none.no>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam: Not detected
Subject:
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: none <none@none.no>
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 16:55:47 -0000
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 12 23:24:42 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8043416A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 23:24:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EAD43D1F
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 23:24:42 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341592BC26
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 23:24:39 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7CMISN3002166;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:18:29 +1000 (EST)
(envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <200408122218.i7CMISN3002166@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Ronald van der Pol <Ronald.vanderPol@rvdp.org>
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Aug 2004 15:15:19 +0200."
<20040812131519.GC20845@rvdp.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:18:28 +1000
Sender: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 23:24:42 -0000
I was looking at the problem some more. It appears
that the ICMP6 messages are being generated but not
emitted. Both the global and interface counters are
increasing.
"traceroute6 <remote> N" stops showing the hop
when N exceeds 104.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 02:19:09 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537C816A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 02:19:09 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4565D43D3F
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 02:19:09 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com)
Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3F7CF72DD8; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC9872DD5;
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
To: igor@ktts.kharkov.ua
In-Reply-To: <200408110050.i7B0oSbD026292@ktts.kharkov.ua>
Message-ID: <20040812191715.A86599@carver.gumbysoft.com>
References: <200408110050.i7B0oSbD026292@ktts.kharkov.ua>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 5.2.1 performance issue
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 02:19:09 -0000
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 igor@ktts.kharkov.ua wrote:
> I noticed that box started getting input errors on em0.
> In order to fix that I increased EM_MAX_TXD from 256 to 1024 and
> EM_MAX_RXD from 256 to 2048.
> After that Input errors disappeared but I continued getting intr_queue_drops
> counter increasing.
You might double check your duplex settings, and if you're on a managed
switch, the stats there. It may not have autonegotaited properly after
the reboot.
Also make sure you aren't running with WITNESS and INVARIANTS. Those are
big CPU pigs.
--
Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 02:46:14 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 4A68816A4CE; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 02:46:14 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from phineus.cs.brandeis.edu (phineus.cs.brandeis.edu
[129.64.3.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 16D4A43D31; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 02:46:14 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from sahil@hamla.org)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (ool-182e74f3.dyn.optonline.net
[24.46.116.243]) by phineus.cs.brandeis.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2BD972B801D; Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:46:13 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <411C2B62.8020007@hamla.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 22:45:54 -0400
From: Sahil Tandon <sahil@hamla.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (Windows/20040502)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Thierry Thomas <thierry@FreeBSD.org>
References: <41103B8B.2080904@hamla.org>
<20040806203333.GB82876@graf.pompo.net>
<20040811174558.GA28934@graf.pompo.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040811174558.GA28934@graf.pompo.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
cc: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: apache segfault caused by latest c-client.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 02:46:14 -0000
Thierry Thomas wrote:
[...]
>>Could you please upgrade to this release (apply the following patch),
>>rebuild your php4-imap-4.3.8_2, and check if it fixes your errors?
I never saw this original post which you quote above. Interesting idea,
but unfortunately imap-uw fails to build (gives an error about port
version mismatch with cclient) after I build cclient after applying your
patch to the Makefile and distinfo.
> Another possible cause of PHP (not Apache) segfault is a bug in
> php-imap itself.
It's not PHP or Apache, after all. After warping the port back as Guy
so kindly instructed, Horde+IMP is working just fine without any
segfaults. I would prefer being up to date, but having Horde+IMP work
is a much greater priority. Perhaps after the port is upgraded
officially to use the latest imap-2004a sources in the CVS tree,
everything will be well. Until then I'll stick with 2002d.
--
Sahil Tandon <sahil@hamla.org>
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 05:40:58 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A805E16A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:40:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991F443D31
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:40:58 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E192F2BC26
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:40:57 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7D5eqwk044674;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:40:53 +1000 (EST)
(envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <200408130540.i7D5eqwk044674@drugs.dv.isc.org>
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:18:28 +1000."
<200408122218.i7CMISN3002166@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:40:52 +1000
Sender: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 05:40:58 -0000
>
> I was looking at the problem some more. It appears
> that the ICMP6 messages are being generated but not
> emitted. Both the global and interface counters are
> increasing.
>
> "traceroute6 <remote> N" stops showing the hop
> when N exceeds 104.
>
> Mark
More digging shows that if you disable ipf (ipf -D)
"traceroute6 <remote> N" N > 104 now works.
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 08:48:13 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBDE16A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:48:13 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7879143D39
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:48:13 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB312BC20
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:48:12 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7D8m6Ss094047
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 18:48:07 +1000 (EST)
(envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <200408130848.i7D8m6Ss094047@drugs.dv.isc.org>
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:40:52 +1000."
<200408130540.i7D5eqwk044674@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 18:48:06 +1000
Sender: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:48:13 -0000
>
> >
> > I was looking at the problem some more. It appears
> > that the ICMP6 messages are being generated but not
> > emitted. Both the global and interface counters are
> > increasing.
> >
> > "traceroute6 <remote> N" stops showing the hop
> > when N exceeds 104.
> >
> > Mark
>
> More digging shows that if you disable ipf (ipf -D)
> "traceroute6 <remote> N" N > 104 now works.
Digging further still the ipf_pullup() for ICMP6 is failing
because m_pullup() is failing.
> > --
> > Mark Andrews, ISC
> > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
> --
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 03:43:19 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AEB16A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 03:43:19 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from web15306.mail.bjs.yahoo.com (web15306.mail.cnb.yahoo.com
[202.43.216.181])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D132A43D53
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 03:43:18 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from trampeagle@yahoo.com.cn)
Message-ID: <20040813034317.56188.qmail@web15306.mail.bjs.yahoo.com>
Received: from [218.108.31.122] by web15306.mail.cnb.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:43:17 CST
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:43:17 +0800 (CST)
From: =?gb2312?q?leo?= <trampeagle@yahoo.com.cn>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:00:33 +0000
Subject: why the command of "who" dosen't work while i login through xdm
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 03:43:19 -0000
Hello,
The version of FreeBSD I use is 4.10.
After I login the system through the xdm from a remote
machine which runs the simulated X terminal.I start
the kde enviornment in the .xsession file under the ~/
directory. after the kde started.I open konsole of
kde(version 1.3.2) and type the command of who, and
the konsole tells me that there nobody login to the
system. neither i can see anybody has logined the
system in the local terminal.It's a surpring
phenomena.
Later, strange thing occurs again. I click the "Run
Command" in the KDE menu and start the xterm, this
time the who works correctly also can it work
correctly both in the konsole of and in the local
terminal.
The files i have changed is the xdm-config and the
Xaccess, in the first one, I comment the line of
"DisplayManager.requestPort 0" to enable the listening
and in the last one i uncomment the asterisk * to
allow anyone login through the xdm.
but when I login the system as root, the who works
correctly again. I don't start the kde environment,
just simply use the twm,it starts the terminal of
xterm.
What i have wrote in the .xsession is like follow:
export PATH=.:/................
export CLICOLOR="exdx......"
startkde
Could somebody tell me why these things happen? is
there any wrong with KDE?
Thank in advance.
leo
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
150ÍòÇúMP3·è¿ñËÑ£¬´øÄú´³ÈëÒôÀÖµîÌÃ
http://music.yisou.com/
ÃÀÅ®Ã÷ÐÇÓ¦Óо¡ÓУ¬ËѱéÃÀͼ¡¢ÑÞͼºÍ¿áͼ
http://image.yisou.com
1G¾ÍÊÇ1000Õ×£¬ÑÅ»¢µçÓÊ×ÔÖúÀ©ÈÝ£¡
http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/1g/*http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/event/mail_1g/
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 12:32:34 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C393A16A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:32:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66B643D4C
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:32:34 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400902BC26
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:32:34 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from marka@isc.org)
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i7DCWUM3000381
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:32:31 +1000 (EST)
(envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org)
Message-Id: <200408131232.i7DCWUM3000381@drugs.dv.isc.org>
From: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 13 Aug 2004 18:48:06 +1000."
<200408130848.i7D8m6Ss094047@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:32:30 +1000
Sender: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 4.10 STABLE: IPv6 PMTU Discovery broken
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:32:34 -0000
>
> >
> > >
> > > I was looking at the problem some more. It appears
> > > that the ICMP6 messages are being generated but not
> > > emitted. Both the global and interface counters are
> > > increasing.
> > >
> > > "traceroute6 <remote> N" stops showing the hop
> > > when N exceeds 104.
> > >
> > > Mark
> >
> > More digging shows that if you disable ipf (ipf -D)
> > "traceroute6 <remote> N" N > 104 now works.
>
> Digging further still the ipf_pullup() for ICMP6 is failing
> because m_pullup() is failing.
pr w/ fix filed kern/70399
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 16:06:12 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2847716A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:06:12 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from postal3.es.net (postal3.es.net [198.128.3.207])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0F743D5A
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:06:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net)
Received: from ptavv.es.net ([198.128.4.29])
by postal3.es.net (Postal Node 3) with ESMTP (SSL) id IBA74465;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:06:11 -0700
Received: from ptavv (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 74F845D04;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
To: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:19:09 PDT."
<20040812191715.A86599@carver.gumbysoft.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 09:06:11 -0700
From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net>
Message-Id: <20040813160611.74F845D04@ptavv.es.net>
cc: igor@ktts.kharkov.ua
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 5.2.1 performance issue
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:06:12 -0000
> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
>
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 igor@ktts.kharkov.ua wrote:
>
> > I noticed that box started getting input errors on em0.
> > In order to fix that I increased EM_MAX_TXD from 256 to 1024 and
> > EM_MAX_RXD from 256 to 2048.
> > After that Input errors disappeared but I continued getting intr_queue_drops
> > counter increasing.
>
> You might double check your duplex settings, and if you're on a managed
> switch, the stats there. It may not have autonegotaited properly after
> the reboot.
>
> Also make sure you aren't running with WITNESS and INVARIANTS. Those are
> big CPU pigs.
WITNESS is certainly a big CPU hog, but I don't see why INVARIANTS would
be all that significant. And both are disabled in 5.2.1 GENERIC.
I'd bet on either a duplex mis-match or an auto-negotiation
failure. Both are very common and the latter can be a pain to deal
with. (Don't assume that you can just nail up one end.)
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 16:47:52 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F84D16A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:47:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ktts.kharkov.ua (ktts.kharkov.ua [193.124.57.65])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A11F43D1D
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:47:51 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from igor@ktts.kharkov.ua)
Received: from ktts.kharkov.ua (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ktts.kharkov.ua (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i7DGlfTY016847;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:47:43 +0300 (EEST)
Received: (from igor@localhost)
by ktts.kharkov.ua (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i7DGlecR016845;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:47:40 +0300 (EEST)
Message-Id: <200408131647.i7DGlecR016845@ktts.kharkov.ua>
To: oberman@es.net (Kevin Oberman)
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:47:40 +0300 (EEST)
In-Reply-To: <20040813160611.74F845D04@ptavv.es.net> from "Kevin Oberman" at
Aug 13, 2004 09:06:11 AM
From: igor@ktts.kharkov.ua
X-Flames-To: /dev/null
X-Header: /usr/include gives great headers
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 5.2.1 performance issue
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: igor@ktts.kharkov.ua
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:47:52 -0000
The problem is neither duplex nor WITNESS/INVARIANTS. And as I outlined before there is no switch, but a router.
Connection is 1000/full. I checked everything I could 1000 times. I started believing that 5.2 performance of 5.2 is much
worse than 5.1.
Does anybody here run servers with high speed connections and lots of TCP sessions?
Did you ever experience something similar?
Igor.
In original message Kevin Oberman writes:
>
> > Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 19:19:09 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com>
> > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
> >
> > On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 igor@ktts.kharkov.ua wrote:
> >
> > > I noticed that box started getting input errors on em0.
> > > In order to fix that I increased EM_MAX_TXD from 256 to 1024 and
> > > EM_MAX_RXD from 256 to 2048.
> > > After that Input errors disappeared but I continued getting intr_queue_drops
> > > counter increasing.
> >
> > You might double check your duplex settings, and if you're on a managed
> > switch, the stats there. It may not have autonegotaited properly after
> > the reboot.
> >
> > Also make sure you aren't running with WITNESS and INVARIANTS. Those are
> > big CPU pigs.
>
> WITNESS is certainly a big CPU hog, but I don't see why INVARIANTS would
> be all that significant. And both are disabled in 5.2.1 GENERIC.
>
> I'd bet on either a duplex mis-match or an auto-negotiation
> failure. Both are very common and the latter can be a pain to deal
> with. (Don't assume that you can just nail up one end.)
> --
> R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
> Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
> Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
> E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634
>
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 18:10:02 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CFF16A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 18:10:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B44F43D1F
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 18:10:01 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from bernhard.valenti@gmx.net)
Received: (qmail 10767 invoked by uid 65534); 13 Aug 2004 18:10:00 -0000
Received: from aes.ingenium.at (EHLO [10.0.0.3]) (81.223.209.251)
by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 13 Aug 2004 20:10:00 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1362884
Message-ID: <411D03EC.1020900@gmx.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:09:48 +0200
From: Bernhard Valenti <bernhard.valenti@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7+ (Windows/20040807)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: problem with ipfilter and todays -stable
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 18:10:02 -0000
hi,
i just updated from 4.8 to 4.10-stable(from today). i noticed that i
can't ping the machine. ping 127.0.0.1 doesnt work either. when i flush
my ipfilter rules (that are unchanged since the update) ping works. now
i added the "log" option to *all* block rules in my ipfilter config.
there are no blocked packets being logged when i try to ping. i also
added "pass in quick on lo0" right on top of my config, but ping still
doesnt work. TCP and UDP connection appear to work fine.
i suppose this is some kind of bug with IP Filter.
anyone having similar issues?
regards,
bernhard
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 19:01:58 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC2B16A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:01:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from shellma.zin.lublin.pl (shellma.zin.lublin.pl [212.182.126.68])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D68A43D31
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:01:58 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl)
Received: by shellma.zin.lublin.pl (Postfix, from userid 1018)
id 36A0D3474C2; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:59:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:59:32 +0200
From: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
To: Bernhard Valenti <bernhard.valenti@gmx.net>
Message-ID: <20040813185932.GA29412@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
References: <411D03EC.1020900@gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <411D03EC.1020900@gmx.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: problem with ipfilter and todays -stable
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:01:58 -0000
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 08:09:48PM +0200, Bernhard Valenti wrote:
> i just updated from 4.8 to 4.10-stable(from today). i noticed that i
> can't ping the machine. ping 127.0.0.1 doesnt work either. when i flush
> my ipfilter rules (that are unchanged since the update) ping works. now
> i added the "log" option to *all* block rules in my ipfilter config.
> there are no blocked packets being logged when i try to ping. i also
> added "pass in quick on lo0" right on top of my config, but ping still
> doesnt work. TCP and UDP connection appear to work fine.
>
> i suppose this is some kind of bug with IP Filter.
>
> anyone having similar issues?
No (4.10-STABLE, default to accept).
But I have other issues, ;) described earlier on freebsd-net@.
--
Pawe³ Ma³achowski
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 13 20:10:27 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA4116A4CE
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:10:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2476743D49
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:10:26 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from freebsd-stable@m.gmane.org)
Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BviNc-0007Nr-00
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:10:24 +0200
Received: from monster.grendel.net ([69.17.104.140])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:10:24 +0200
Received: from handler by monster.grendel.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 13 Aug 2004 22:10:24 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
From: Michael Handler <handler@grendel.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:19:02 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: international dark skies
Lines: 30
Message-ID: <slrnchq51r.1ta5.handler@monster.grendel.net>
References: <411D03EC.1020900@gmx.net>
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: monster.grendel.net
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.0 (FreeBSD)
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: problem with ipfilter and todays -stable
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 20:10:27 -0000
On 2004-08-13, Bernhard Valenti <bernhard.valenti@gmx.net> wrote:
> i just updated from 4.8 to 4.10-stable(from today). i noticed that i
> can't ping the machine. [...]
I just did the same upgrade last night, and am experiencing similar
troubles. ("block in quick log on dc0" isn't actually blocking
anything.) Someone on freebsd-net just noticed this as well:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2004-August/004675.html
Darren Reed MFCed IPFilter 3.4.35 in early July, and I don't think
that ipfilter was updated completely in both of the relevant places
(src/contrib/ipfilter and src/sys/contrib/ipfilter). If you diff
the files that exist in both locations, there are some troubling
differences, especially the missing member of the qif structure in
ip_compat.h, etc.
I'm seeing the same problem that the freebsd-net poster did:
root@lair:~# ipf -V
ipf: IP Filter: v3.4.31 (336)
Kernel: IP Filter: v3.4.35
That's with a fresh checkout of RELENG_4, and an empty /usr/obj.
I've sent an error report to Darren Reed.
--
michael handler
washington, dc
From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 14 10:28:38 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9B916A4CE
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 10:28:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226])
by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8947143D46
for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 10:28:38 +0000 (GMT)
(envelope-from ltning@anduin.net)
Received: from mailnull by anduin.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34; FreeBSD)
id 1Bvvm9-00076X-9D
for stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:28:37 +0200
Received: from [217.8.136.185] (helo=[192.168.1.10])
by anduin.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34; FreeBSD)
id 1Bvvm9-00075s-2W
for stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:28:37 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:28:30 +0200
Message-Id: <AFD22F3F-EDDC-11D8-945B-000D9335BCEC@anduin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Resent-To: stable@freebsd.org
Resent-Message-Id: <26ECE35D-EDDB-11D8-945B-000D9335BCEC@anduin.net>
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= <ltning@anduin.net>
Resent-From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= <ltning@anduin.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:17:31 +0200
To: current@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on anduin.net
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63
Resent-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:28:37 +0200
Subject: How to find the cause of a hang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 10:28:38 -0000
Hi all,
I'm currently experiencing frequent (about once per week) hangs of a
server that is about 1500 kilometers away from me. I have a serial
cable on the box, and using minicom on the neighbor box I am now in the
kernel debugger - but I'm at a complete loss as to what to do to figure
out what is, in fact, wrong.
Calling panic or boot doesn't work - it just stops at "syncing
disks..." and never actually reboots. I suspect something fishy going
on with disk I/O, but I can't be certain of that.
The box responds to ping - until I call panic or boot - but no other
services are working.
What can I do? I'm now at the db> prompt ... Help :)
/Eirik