From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 24 02:15:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A8916A4CE for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 02:15:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D2EB43D5C for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 02:15:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0778E1DD4B6; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:15:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21230-04; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:15:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rincewind.ijs.si (rincewind.ijs.si [193.2.4.137]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D5B1DD496; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:15:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Dejan Lesjak To: Eric Anholt Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 04:15:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <1098244372.21078.25.camel@leguin> <200410230720.02511.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <1098565937.16967.1012.camel@leguin> In-Reply-To: <1098565937.16967.1012.camel@leguin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410240415.35294.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Second stab at X.Org 6.8.1 update X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 02:15:40 -0000 On Saturday 23 of October 2004 23:12, Eric Anholt wrote: > I won't make any changes to the diff for a bit, so you can do XFree86 > bits. They are merged with your patch here: http://www.ijs.si/~lesi/xorg-681-up-4c.diff While modifying imake-4 is enough to avoid html manpages being installed, that works only for upgrading with up-to-date imake-4 port. As this tends to be forgotten, I've also explicitly modified others to not install html. While this affects package contents, I don't think that it affects users enough to warrant PORTREVISION bump, but I still don't have a proper feeling for that. > I also need to figure out what to do about DRI. I want to move > us over to Mesa snapshots. The reason is that DRI driver development > happens much faster than X releases, and there's never a stable release > -- something just escapes. Mesa snapshots will let us update when > important changes are made and things are feeling stable, and let people > build them from a much smaller source tarball than the hideous > monolithic tree. The problem is that there's a libGL incompatibility, > so that the new drivers won't work on an old libGL (it's a bug, but it's > a bug that nobody's fixed in 3 months or so). Because of this, I'm > thinking of repocopying graphics/dri to graphics/xfree86-dri, making it > use xfree86 sources again, and make graphics/dri be Mesa snapshots. > graphics/dri-devel would die. Makes sense. I'll dig up xfree-dri port I have somewhere then. Dejan