Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 12:47:13 +0900 From: Eric Kjeldergaard <kjelderg@gmail.com> To: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Cc: acpi@freebsd.org, Marcin Jessa <lists@yazzy.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acpi battery rework patch Message-ID: <d9175cad0507232047160cc758@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <42E29CAA.1020007@root.org> References: <42E1481F.5040306@root.org> <d9175cad050723030041dd7387@mail.gmail.com> <20050723133819.36efb537.lists@yazzy.org> <42E29CAA.1020007@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/24/05, Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> wrote: > Marcin Jessa wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:00:01 +0900 > > Eric Kjeldergaard <kjelderg@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>Please test to be sure your battery status works as usual, along with= =20 > >>>any apps. Since most apps (xbatt, gnome, etc.) use the apm compat=20 > >>>layer, they should work as before with no recompilation needed. > >=20 > >=20 > >>-CURRENT as of 23/07/2005, does not compile. > >=20 > >=20 > > Prolly because it's for 6.0, not 7.0 >=20 > Sorry, the problem was I left a file out of the diff. I just committed= =20 > the patch so please just cvsup and test from 7-CURRENT. >=20 > Thanks, > --=20 > Nate >=20 Excellent. compiled and appears working. It does however have different values than the old system for some of the sysctl variables. I get hw.acpi.battery.life: 98 hw.acpi.battery.time: 0 hw.acpi.battery.state: 0 hw.acpi.battery.units: 1 hw.acpi.battery.info_expire: 5 when plugged in. But used to get time as -1 when plugged in and I think state may have been 1 when plugged in before (less sure about that than the time). Thanks for the enormous amount of work your efforts are very much appreciated, Eric --=20 If I write a signature, my emails will appear more personalised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d9175cad0507232047160cc758>