Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:46:25 +0100 From: Chris Zumbrunn <chris@czv.com> To: Sander Vesik <sander.vesik@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The only worthwhile logo-related comments so far.... Message-ID: <db80838ae124559635d8e18dccd0e651@czv.com> In-Reply-To: <dcb2c27a050219074932b10e41@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050213001621.59515.qmail@web53907.mail.yahoo.com> <200502180212.08316.aksis@idea-anvil.net> <a1ed0802a871e9795b4120690d23f386@czv.com> <dcb2c27a050219074932b10e41@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Feb 19, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Sander Vesik wrote: >> Except that there is no reason why individual >> corporations/groups/organisations can't take the role of marketing >> FreeBSD to these general markets under their brands and with their >> specific added value and services. FreeBSD.org could keep the >> gatekeeper in place and concentrate on development while other >> organisations would operate out there in the "real world" and deal >> with >> the masses. > > Would it be FreeBSD then? Sure, why not... But it could also be "based on FreeBSD". I guess FreeSBIE is a mild example of what I'm talking about. > Besides, we have already been there with the CD-ROM companies, haven't > we? Yes, but targeting another market with added value that is different than burning CDs. /czv
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?db80838ae124559635d8e18dccd0e651>