From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 00:01:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB15A16A4CF for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:01:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ybbsmtp16.mail.mci.yahoo.co.jp (ybbsmtp16.mail.mci.yahoo.co.jp [210.80.241.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF4E143D4C for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:01:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from takeharu1219@ybb.ne.jp) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.14?) (takeharu1219@219.35.170.20 with plain) by ybbsmtp16.mail.mci.yahoo.co.jp with SMTP; 27 Feb 2005 00:01:38 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <42210DE2.9060903@ybb.ne.jp> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:01:38 +0900 From: Takeharu KATO User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: MCE on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:01:41 -0000 Hi Does anyone work on some hardware abnormaly checking mechanism using MCE on AMD64? If someone has this sort of patch, please tell me where I can obtain it from. Regards, -- Takeharu KATO From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 03:59:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854BC16A4CF; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:59:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 609E743D49; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:59:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B422A901; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:59:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from peter-laptop.wemm.org (dhcp54.wemm.org [10.0.0.54]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72DDE2B3; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:59:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by peter-laptop.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) id j1R3wkDb016209; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:58:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter) From: Peter Wemm To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 19:58:45 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <42210DE2.9060903@ybb.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <42210DE2.9060903@ybb.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502261958.46361.peter@wemm.org> cc: current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MCE on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 03:59:04 -0000 On Saturday 26 February 2005 04:01 pm, Takeharu KATO wrote: > Hi > > Does anyone work on some hardware abnormaly > checking mechanism using MCE on AMD64? > If someone has this sort of patch, please > tell me where I can obtain it from. > > Regards, There is little or no MCE support in either i386 or amd64 kernels. The code in i386 has never even been tested, because CR4.MCE was never actually turned on. This would be a good project. Both i386 and amd64 could benefit from some work here. Testing it is hard though.. It might take a deliberate attempt to overheat a cpu to trigger a MCE event though... -Peter From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 04:49:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E763116A4D0 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:49:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ybbsmtp05.mail.mci.yahoo.co.jp (ybbsmtp05.mail.mci.yahoo.co.jp [210.80.241.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 954B043D49 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:49:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from takeharu1219@ybb.ne.jp) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.14?) (takeharu1219@219.35.170.20 with plain) by ybbsmtp05.mail.mci.yahoo.co.jp with SMTP; 27 Feb 2005 04:49:40 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <42215163.1000802@ybb.ne.jp> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:49:39 +0900 From: Takeharu KATO User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Wemm References: <42210DE2.9060903@ybb.ne.jp> <200502261958.46361.peter@wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <200502261958.46361.peter@wemm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MCE on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 04:49:43 -0000 Hi Thank you for your response. > There is little or no MCE support in either i386 or amd64 kernels. The code > in i386 has never even been tested, because CR4.MCE was never actually turned > on. > Appearantly, my AMD64 box turn on MCE feature in the CPU. I will start to try to write MCE feature support functions. > This would be a good project. Both i386 and amd64 could benefit from some > work here. Testing it is hard though.. It might take a deliberate attempt > to overheat a cpu to trigger a MCE event though... > Regards, -- Takeharu KATO From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 08:01:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202B016A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:01:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.simplenet.com (mailer.simplenet.com [209.132.1.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE12643D49 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:01:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tt-list@simplenet.com) Received: from [192.168.1.106] (24.25.210.244) by mail1.simplenet.com (7.0.016) (authenticated as tt@simplenet.com) id 4220574D000488ED for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:01:08 -0800 Message-ID: <42217E4B.10102@simplenet.com> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:01:15 -0800 From: Tim Traver User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 - [MOOX M3] (Windows/20041208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Running i386 scripts in 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:01:13 -0000 Hi all, ok, I have read a bunch of the posts on the subject, and it seems like a fairly complicated subject. I have recently purchased a Tyan Dual Opteron machine that I am pretty happy with so far. I have FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE for amd64 installed, and it is running good. However, I didn't realize that there are several binaries that I need to run that are i386 binaries, and there is no way for me to re-compile them. I've tried the /usr/src/tools/lib32/build32.sh script, and although it appeared to work, there were many wanrings. When trying to run my binaries, it get core dumps. Is there a better way to do this ? or should I just recompile the kernel using i386 to be sure ? If I go the route of making the operating system i386, what am I really losing in the way of performance ? And is there a roadmap to get a nice clean method for running i386 binaries ? what about i386 binaries from 4.x ? I just wanted to post this question before I went ahead and basically rebult the system, just in case there was an easy way of doing this. I hate to get a cutting edge 64 bit system and have to run it in full 32 bit mode... Thanks, Tim. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 12:39:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B455116A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:39:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81DD043D1D for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:39:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arkay@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 14802 invoked by uid 0); 27 Feb 2005 12:39:22 -0000 Received: from 62.143.28.220 by www41.gmx.net with HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:39:22 +0100 (MET) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:39:22 +0100 (MET) From: "Rainer Koschnick" To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated: #1732206 Message-ID: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:39:24 -0000 Hello, I tried to install release 5.3 from CD without any success. First I had problems with the USB controllers which I then turned off in the BIOS. This would let the boot run up to this point: [...] ata0-master: setting PIO4 on VIA 8237 chip ata0-master: setting UDMA133 on VIA 8237 chip ad0: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D589216A4CE; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:21:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mehl.gfz-potsdam.de (mehl.gfz-potsdam.de [139.17.1.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF88D43D2F; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:21:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from nfw1.gfz-potsdam.de (virscan [139.17.1.10]) by mehl.gfz-potsdam.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j1RDLDMH025828; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:21:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from ([139.17.145.116]) by nfw1; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:21:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4221C943.8080500@uni-mainz.de> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:21:07 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Kernel/Userland Mem-Space Tuning (1/3 on IA32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:21:17 -0000 Hello. I read about address space division of recent operating systems like Linux and Windows XP. In both cases, the whole address space of the 32 or 64 Bit system is divided into halfes, 2GB for kernel, 2 GB for process(es) (speaking in 32Bit words). The same in 64bit systems like AMD64. Those who happily utilize an AMD64 based machine are not (yet) involved by this problem, but on recent 32 Bit architectures someone can run out of process space, like me! Some geophysical modelling software needs more than the allowed 2GB address space and therefore I would like to ask whether FreeBSD (my preferred OS) has a 'knob' to change the kernel/userland parity of the address space like it is done in Windows with a special knob at boot time (/W3GB I think, but I'm not sure about the exakt syntax but I know someone can change the half by half parity towards 1 to 3 in XP). I'm not sure whether FreeBSD divides kernel/userland address space this way, I know Linux and Windows does and on Windows we changed this (not yet on Linux and not yet on our FreeBSD machines (OS version >5.0, mostly FreeBSD 5.3-R or 5.4-PRERELEASE). Any help is appreciated. Thanks, Oliver From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 14:15:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C6716A4CE; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:15:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dglawrence.com (dsl-230-156.ipns.com [209.210.230.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573E443D2D; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:15:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Received: from opteron.dglawrence.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dglawrence.com (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1REFPUf022630; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:15:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Received: (from dg@localhost) by opteron.dglawrence.com (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j1REFNUx022629; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:15:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 06:15:23 -0800 From: "David G. Lawrence" To: "O. Hartmann" Message-ID: <20050227141523.GG3258@opteron.dglawrence.com> References: <4221C943.8080500@uni-mainz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4221C943.8080500@uni-mainz.de> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel/Userland Mem-Space Tuning (1/3 on IA32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:15:29 -0000 > Hello. > I read about address space division of recent operating systems like > Linux and Windows XP. > In both cases, the whole address space of the 32 or 64 Bit system is > divided into halfes, 2GB for > kernel, 2 GB for process(es) (speaking in 32Bit words). The same in > 64bit systems like AMD64. > Those who happily utilize an AMD64 based machine are not (yet) involved > by this problem, > but on recent 32 Bit architectures someone can run out of process space, > like me! Some > geophysical modelling software needs more than the allowed 2GB address > space and therefore > I would like to ask whether FreeBSD (my preferred OS) has a 'knob' to > change the kernel/userland parity > of the address space like it is done in Windows with a special knob at > boot time (/W3GB I think, but I'm not > sure about the exakt syntax but I know someone can change the half by > half parity towards 1 to 3 in > XP). I'm not sure whether FreeBSD divides kernel/userland address space > this way, I know Linux and > Windows does and on Windows we changed this (not yet on Linux and not > yet on our FreeBSD machines > (OS version >5.0, mostly FreeBSD 5.3-R or 5.4-PRERELEASE). > > Any help is appreciated. FreeBSD divides the 32bit virtual address space with 1GB for the kernel and 3GB for user processes. This can be changed with some kernel compile- time constants (primarily KVA_PAGES, however NKPT may also need to be increased if the kernel address space is increased). -DG David G. Lawrence President Download Technologies, Inc. - http://www.downloadtech.com - (866) 399 8500 TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com - (888) 346 7175 The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Pave the road of life with opportunities. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 15:38:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9902016A4CE; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:38:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mehl.gfz-potsdam.de (mehl.gfz-potsdam.de [139.17.1.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D5443D5F; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:38:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from nfw1.gfz-potsdam.de (virscan [139.17.1.10]) by mehl.gfz-potsdam.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j1RFcZFt008973; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:38:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from ([139.17.145.116]) by nfw1; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:38:29 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4221E975.8090202@uni-mainz.de> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:38:29 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David G. Lawrence" References: <4221C943.8080500@uni-mainz.de> <20050227141523.GG3258@opteron.dglawrence.com> In-Reply-To: <20050227141523.GG3258@opteron.dglawrence.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel/Userland Mem-Space Tuning (1/3 on IA32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:38:51 -0000 David G. Lawrence wrote: >>Hello. >>I read about address space division of recent operating systems like >>Linux and Windows XP. >>In both cases, the whole address space of the 32 or 64 Bit system is >>divided into halfes, 2GB for >>kernel, 2 GB for process(es) (speaking in 32Bit words). The same in >>64bit systems like AMD64. >>Those who happily utilize an AMD64 based machine are not (yet) involved >>by this problem, >>but on recent 32 Bit architectures someone can run out of process space, >>like me! Some >>geophysical modelling software needs more than the allowed 2GB address >>space and therefore >>I would like to ask whether FreeBSD (my preferred OS) has a 'knob' to >>change the kernel/userland parity >>of the address space like it is done in Windows with a special knob at >>boot time (/W3GB I think, but I'm not >>sure about the exakt syntax but I know someone can change the half by >>half parity towards 1 to 3 in >>XP). I'm not sure whether FreeBSD divides kernel/userland address space >>this way, I know Linux and >>Windows does and on Windows we changed this (not yet on Linux and not >>yet on our FreeBSD machines >>(OS version >5.0, mostly FreeBSD 5.3-R or 5.4-PRERELEASE). >> >>Any help is appreciated. >> >> > > FreeBSD divides the 32bit virtual address space with 1GB for the kernel >and 3GB for user processes. This can be changed with some kernel compile- >time constants (primarily KVA_PAGES, however NKPT may also need to be >increased if the kernel address space is increased). > >-DG > >David G. Lawrence >President >Download Technologies, Inc. - http://www.downloadtech.com - (866) 399 8500 >TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com - (888) 346 7175 >The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org >Pave the road of life with opportunities. > > Dear David. Thank you very much. I assumed FreeBSD do the same like Linux, but don't obviously. I found a lot of tweaking kernel parameters, KVA_PAGES VM_KMEM_SIZE_SCALE VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX VM_KMEM_SIZE Reading some comments in sys/kern/kern_malloc.c make be a bit confused, I do not know much about kernel's interna. It is nice to hear that FreeBSD do a 1/3 division, I expected a 2/2 division like Linux does. So no need for anything changing. Can someone please explain NKPT? I'm simply curious, didn't found a satisfying answer via google, but a lot of source code with this in ... Thanks Oliver From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 15:46:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E07B16A4CE; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:46:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dglawrence.com (dsl-230-156.ipns.com [209.210.230.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF51C43D1F; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:46:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Received: from opteron.dglawrence.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dglawrence.com (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1RFk0TP022991; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 07:46:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Received: (from dg@localhost) by opteron.dglawrence.com (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j1RFk0ih022990; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 07:46:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dg@dglawrence.com) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 07:46:00 -0800 From: "David G. Lawrence" To: "O. Hartmann" Message-ID: <20050227154600.GI3258@opteron.dglawrence.com> References: <4221C943.8080500@uni-mainz.de> <20050227141523.GG3258@opteron.dglawrence.com> <4221E975.8090202@uni-mainz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4221E975.8090202@uni-mainz.de> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel/Userland Mem-Space Tuning (1/3 on IA32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:46:05 -0000 > >>sure about the exakt syntax but I know someone can change the half by > >>half parity towards 1 to 3 in > >>XP). I'm not sure whether FreeBSD divides kernel/userland address space > >>this way, I know Linux and > >>Windows does and on Windows we changed this (not yet on Linux and not > >>yet on our FreeBSD machines > >>(OS version >5.0, mostly FreeBSD 5.3-R or 5.4-PRERELEASE). > >> > >>Any help is appreciated. > >> > >> > > > > FreeBSD divides the 32bit virtual address space with 1GB for the kernel > >and 3GB for user processes. This can be changed with some kernel compile- > >time constants (primarily KVA_PAGES, however NKPT may also need to be > >increased if the kernel address space is increased). ... > Dear David. > Thank you very much. > I assumed FreeBSD do the same like Linux, but don't obviously. > > I found a lot of tweaking kernel parameters, > KVA_PAGES > VM_KMEM_SIZE_SCALE > VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX > VM_KMEM_SIZE The last three are not related to the address space division and you should not change those under normal circumstance. > Reading some comments in sys/kern/kern_malloc.c make be a bit confused, > I do not know much about kernel's interna. > > It is nice to hear that FreeBSD do a 1/3 division, I expected a 2/2 > division like Linux does. So no need for anything changing. It's a 1:4 ratio. > Can someone please explain NKPT? I'm simply curious, didn't found a > satisfying answer via google, but a lot of source code with this in ... It's the number of page table pages that are assigned to the kernel address space. Each page maps 4MB, so 256 (the default) provides for 1GB of kernel virtual address space, leaving 3GB for user space. -DG David G. Lawrence President Download Technologies, Inc. - http://www.downloadtech.com - (866) 399 8500 TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com - (888) 346 7175 The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Pave the road of life with opportunities. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 16:02:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0514A16A4CE; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:02:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mehl.gfz-potsdam.de (mehl.gfz-potsdam.de [139.17.1.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DBD43D5C; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:02:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from nfw1.gfz-potsdam.de (virscan [139.17.1.10]) by mehl.gfz-potsdam.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id j1RG2S6t010631; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:02:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from ([139.17.145.116]) by nfw1; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:02:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4221EF12.6020301@uni-mainz.de> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:02:26 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de-AT; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 X-Accept-Language: de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "David G. Lawrence" References: <4221C943.8080500@uni-mainz.de> <20050227141523.GG3258@opteron.dglawrence.com> <4221E975.8090202@uni-mainz.de> <20050227154600.GI3258@opteron.dglawrence.com> In-Reply-To: <20050227154600.GI3258@opteron.dglawrence.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel/Userland Mem-Space Tuning (1/3 on IA32) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:02:35 -0000 David G. Lawrence wrote: >>>>sure about the exakt syntax but I know someone can change the half by >>>>half parity towards 1 to 3 in >>>>XP). I'm not sure whether FreeBSD divides kernel/userland address space >>>>this way, I know Linux and >>>>Windows does and on Windows we changed this (not yet on Linux and not >>>>yet on our FreeBSD machines >>>>(OS version >5.0, mostly FreeBSD 5.3-R or 5.4-PRERELEASE). >>>> >>>>Any help is appreciated. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> FreeBSD divides the 32bit virtual address space with 1GB for the kernel >>>and 3GB for user processes. This can be changed with some kernel compile- >>>time constants (primarily KVA_PAGES, however NKPT may also need to be >>>increased if the kernel address space is increased). >>> >>> >... > > >>Dear David. >>Thank you very much. >>I assumed FreeBSD do the same like Linux, but don't obviously. >> >>I found a lot of tweaking kernel parameters, >>KVA_PAGES >>VM_KMEM_SIZE_SCALE >>VM_KMEM_SIZE_MAX >>VM_KMEM_SIZE >> >> > > The last three are not related to the address space division and you >should not change those under normal circumstance. > > > >>Reading some comments in sys/kern/kern_malloc.c make be a bit confused, >>I do not know much about kernel's interna. >> >>It is nice to hear that FreeBSD do a 1/3 division, I expected a 2/2 >>division like Linux does. So no need for anything changing. >> >> > > It's a 1:4 ratio. > > Sorry, I meant 1GB kernel, 3GB userland or 2GB kernel, 2GB userland, not the divisor or mathematical ratio, sorry for this unprecise. > > > >>Can someone please explain NKPT? I'm simply curious, didn't found a >>satisfying answer via google, but a lot of source code with this in ... >> >> > > It's the number of page table pages that are assigned to the kernel >address space. Each page maps 4MB, so 256 (the default) provides for >1GB of kernel virtual address space, leaving 3GB for user space. > > Many thanks, that helped a lot! Oliver From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 18:07:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F323C16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:07:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web61104.mail.yahoo.com (web61104.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7014343D1F for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:07:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from archwndas@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 87168 invoked by uid 60001); 27 Feb 2005 18:07:11 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=SeNsAkCg/98zF7jh1IMPNGYr1lHhlToOhqfxsaXP1myohW4D9SzEPtB56q4a6A3zHTlFKiPBR8+Up+RO+RUUO68aGZCOH84bm51nXnJBHxHEaUuSPJ1GG8X3gSG+1xDRJmxJ2eWLUyqJly79MiF9DDZbCRFwSUV5HwxHFO7bCKU= ; Message-ID: <20050227180711.87166.qmail@web61104.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [195.130.113.228] by web61104.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:07:11 PST Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:07:11 -0800 (PST) From: Simeon Nifos To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: cannot boot installation CD 5.3 Release AMD_64 on a quad Opteron Tyan S4882 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:07:13 -0000 Dear list, I booted(or tried to boot) with 5.3 Release for AMD_64 and unfortunately it couldn't boot! It stacked : ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi 0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only> in Compatible mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: network interface on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 here it stoped booting and the system freezed! My motherboard is a Tyan S4882! So what is next? Best Wishes! SN. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 18:14:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB1A16A4CE; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:14:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A034F43D5D; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:14:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp2.sentex.ca (smtp2c.sentex.ca [64.7.153.30]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j1RIEvhr058723; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:14:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by smtp2.sentex.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1RIEvgS071588; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:14:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 22C7D7306E; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:14:57 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20050227181457.22C7D7306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:14:57 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.83, clamav-milter version 0.83 on clamscanner1 X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:14:58 -0000 TB --- 2005-02-27 17:44:40 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-02-27 17:44:40 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2005-02-27 17:44:40 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-02-27 17:44:40 - cd /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- 2005-02-27 17:44:40 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2005-02-27 17:50:30 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe) TB --- 2005-02-27 17:50:30 - cd /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2005-02-27 17:50:30 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries [...] cc -O2 -pipe -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/../../include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/amd64 -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/gdtoa -DINET6 -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DPORTMAP -DDES_BUILTIN -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/rpc -DYP -DHESIOD -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/db/recno/rec_search.c cc -O2 -pipe -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/../../include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/amd64 -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/gdtoa -DINET6 -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DPORTMAP -DDES_BUILTIN -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/rpc -DYP -DHESIOD -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/db/recno/rec_seq.c cc -O2 -pipe -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/../../include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/amd64 -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/gdtoa -DINET6 -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DPORTMAP -DDES_BUILTIN -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/rpc -DYP -DHESIOD -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/db/recno/rec_utils.c cc -O2 -pipe -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/../../include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/amd64 -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/gdtoa -DINET6 -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DPORTMAP -DDES_BUILTIN -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/rpc -DYP -DHESIOD -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/compat-43/creat.c cc -O2 -pipe -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/../../include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/amd64 -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/gdtoa -DINET6 -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DPORTMAP -DDES_BUILTIN -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/rpc -DYP -DHESIOD -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/compat-43/gethostid.c cc -O2 -pipe -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/../../include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/amd64 -D__DBINTERFACE_PRIVATE -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/../../contrib/gdtoa -DINET6 -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc -DPOSIX_MISTAKE -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/locale -DBROKEN_DES -DPORTMAP -DDES_BUILTIN -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/rpc -DYP -DHESIOD -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -c /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/compat-43/getwd.c /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/compat-43/getwd.c: In function `getwd': /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc/compat-43/getwd.c:52: warning: implicit declaration of function `strerror_r' *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2005-02-27 18:14:57 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2005-02-27 18:14:57 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2005-02-27 18:14:57 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 18:23:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC7216A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:23:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org (asylum.afflictions.org [64.7.134.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC8043D5E for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:23:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F9E78C64 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:24:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pandora.afflictions.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 26927-05 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:24:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from dementia.afflictions.org (dementia.afflictions.org [172.19.206.56]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65AFD78C62 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:24:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by dementia.afflictions.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 75EC928726; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:23:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:23:59 -0500 From: Damian Gerow To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050227182359.GE35988@afflictions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3D7 D901 A53A 1A99 BFD6 E6DF 9F3B 742B C288 9CC9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pandora.afflictions.org Subject: Word Processor on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:23:39 -0000 So, I've been playing with a brand spankin' new AMD64 system, and it's been pretty fun. There's a few bugs here and there (-STABLE), but nothing worth getting excited over. But I've run into a bit of a snag: I can't seem to use any word processors on the system. AbiWord crashes anytime I try to open a file (before the file chooser window opens). As much as I loved using TextMaker, they don't have a 64-bit version (and there's no 32-bit compatibility (?) ). OpenOffice flat-out doesn't compile, even after removing the dependancy on java (gcc dependancy, doesn't build on !i386). I have yet to try using -2.0-devel, but it seems like it'd work. Are there any good[1] word processors that are currently available for use on AMD64 systems? [1] By 'good' I mean stable (not a development branch), and able to read/write MS Word format. It would be nice if it could do OO.org as well, as that's what all of my current docs are in. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 18:34:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85D3F16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:34:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF3343D2F for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:34:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j1RIYalC082799; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:34:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost)j1RIYanp082798; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:34:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:34:36 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Damian Gerow Message-ID: <20050227183436.GA82670@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20050227182359.GE35988@afflictions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050227182359.GE35988@afflictions.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Word Processor on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:34:44 -0000 On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:23:59PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote: > > Are there any good[1] word processors that are currently available for use > on AMD64 systems? > amd64 has both 32-bit FreeBSD and Linux support. I use the 32-bit linux version of OO on my system. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 18:48:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81FA16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:48:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lobo.homeunix.org (reverse-82-141-58-194.dialin.kamp-dsl.de [82.141.58.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD23943D5E for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:48:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ewinter@lobo.homeunix.org) Received: from lobo.homeunix.org (localhost.homeunix.org [127.0.0.1]) by lobo.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1RIkeLF001206; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:46:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ewinter@lobo.homeunix.org) Received: (from ewinter@localhost) by lobo.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j1RIkdjD001205; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:46:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ewinter) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:46:39 +0100 From: "Ernst W. Winter" To: Damian Gerow Message-ID: <20050227184639.GA1163@lobo.homeunix.org> References: <20050227182359.GE35988@afflictions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050227182359.GE35988@afflictions.org> X-Phone: + 49-89-3075-6800 Organization: FreeBSD Evangelist X-Operating-System: FreeBSD lobo.homeunix.org 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Word Processor on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Ernst W. Winter" List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:48:16 -0000 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Damian Gerow wrote: > Are there any good[1] word processors that are currently available > for use on AMD64 systems? > Abiword no problems here as I use it also to convert to other formats and it works wel, had no crash so far, I even loaded by accident a *ps file and it it shoed it correctly. > [1] By 'good' I mean stable (not a development branch), and able to > read/write MS Word format. It would be nice if it could do OO.org > as well, as that's what all of my current docs are in. What version of amd64 are you running? I use so far "5-STABLE", that is up to date until today. If you cvsup up to today, then recompile the whole lot inclusive a new kernel I would say most of your problems will go away. The only difference is that I have a ASUS board A8V Delux with single 939 CPU, if that should make a difference, but I doubt it. Ernst From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 20:45:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1DD16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:45:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org (asylum.afflictions.org [64.7.134.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 671D243D58 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:45:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE0378CA1 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:46:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pandora.afflictions.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84841-05 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:46:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from dementia.afflictions.org (dementia.afflictions.org [172.19.206.56]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A7B78C64 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:46:20 -0500 (EST) Received: by dementia.afflictions.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7D95328689; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:46:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:46:15 -0500 From: Damian Gerow To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050227204615.GF35988@afflictions.org> References: <20050227182359.GE35988@afflictions.org> <20050227183436.GA82670@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050227183436.GA82670@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3D7 D901 A53A 1A99 BFD6 E6DF 9F3B 742B C288 9CC9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pandora.afflictions.org Subject: Re: Word Processor on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:45:55 -0000 Thus spake Steve Kargl (sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) [27/02/05 13:35]: : > Are there any good[1] word processors that are currently available for use : > on AMD64 systems? : : amd64 has both 32-bit FreeBSD and Linux support. I use : the 32-bit linux version of OO on my system. Yeah, I guess I left out one big piece of information: it has to be 64-bit. I'm running 64-bit FreeBSD, and would really rather not swap over to 32-bit. - Damian From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 20:48:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4839C16A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:48:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org (asylum.afflictions.org [64.7.134.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2CA43D54 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:48:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A031578CA1 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:49:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pandora.afflictions.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 83577-06 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:49:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from dementia.afflictions.org (dementia.afflictions.org [172.19.206.56]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7D978C64 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:48:59 -0500 (EST) Received: by dementia.afflictions.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3543828689; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:48:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:48:54 -0500 From: Damian Gerow To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050227204854.GG35988@afflictions.org> References: <20050227182359.GE35988@afflictions.org> <20050227184639.GA1163@lobo.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050227184639.GA1163@lobo.homeunix.org> X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3D7 D901 A53A 1A99 BFD6 E6DF 9F3B 742B C288 9CC9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pandora.afflictions.org Subject: Re: Word Processor on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:48:33 -0000 Thus spake Ernst W. Winter (ewinter@ewinter.org) [27/02/05 13:49]: : > Are there any good[1] word processors that are currently available : > for use on AMD64 systems? : : Abiword no problems here as I use it also to convert to other formats : and it works wel, had no crash so far, I even loaded by accident a : *ps file and it it shoed it correctly. Hmmm.... Maybe I'll dig a little deeper. I know the problem's actually in glib, but I haven't bothered digging any further. : > [1] By 'good' I mean stable (not a development branch), and able to : > read/write MS Word format. It would be nice if it could do OO.org : > as well, as that's what all of my current docs are in. : : What version of amd64 are you running? I use so far "5-STABLE", that : is up to date until today. I'm running -STABLE, from a few weeks back: : pretty fun. There's a few bugs here and there (-STABLE), but nothing I'll give an update a shot. - Damian From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 20:56:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E0816A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:56:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A99A43D49 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:56:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j1RKuTkd066699; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:56:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost)j1RKuTkV066698; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:56:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:56:29 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Damian Gerow Message-ID: <20050227205629.GA66621@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20050227182359.GE35988@afflictions.org> <20050227183436.GA82670@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050227204615.GF35988@afflictions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050227204615.GF35988@afflictions.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Word Processor on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:56:33 -0000 On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 03:46:15PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote: > Thus spake Steve Kargl (sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) [27/02/05 13:35]: > : > Are there any good[1] word processors that are currently available for use > : > on AMD64 systems? > : > : amd64 has both 32-bit FreeBSD and Linux support. I use > : the 32-bit linux version of OO on my system. > > Yeah, I guess I left out one big piece of information: it has to be 64-bit. > I'm running 64-bit FreeBSD, and would really rather not swap over to 32-bit. > You don't swap over to 32-bit. You can run 32-bit FreeBSD or linux binaries on the 64-bit FreeBSD (as known as FreeBSd-amd64). Add the following to your kernel config and rebuild. options COMPAT_IA32 #Compatible with i386 binaries options COMPAT_LINUX32 #Compatible with i386 linux binaries Add "WITH_LIB32=yes" to /etc/make.conf and rebuild world. -- steve From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 21:00:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B6616A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:00:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org (asylum.afflictions.org [64.7.134.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA7743D3F for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:00:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5849C78CA1 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:00:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pandora.afflictions.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 84841-08 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:00:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from dementia.afflictions.org (dementia.afflictions.org [172.19.206.56]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F8E78C64 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:00:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by dementia.afflictions.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CB9D828689; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:00:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:00:25 -0500 From: Damian Gerow To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050227210025.GH35988@afflictions.org> References: <20050227182359.GE35988@afflictions.org> <20050227183436.GA82670@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050227204615.GF35988@afflictions.org> <20050227205629.GA66621@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050227205629.GA66621@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3D7 D901 A53A 1A99 BFD6 E6DF 9F3B 742B C288 9CC9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pandora.afflictions.org Subject: Re: Word Processor on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:00:03 -0000 Thus spake Steve Kargl (sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) [27/02/05 15:57]: : You don't swap over to 32-bit. You can run 32-bit FreeBSD : or linux binaries on the 64-bit FreeBSD (as known as FreeBSd-amd64). : : Add the following to your kernel config and rebuild. : : options COMPAT_IA32 #Compatible with i386 binaries : options COMPAT_LINUX32 #Compatible with i386 linux binaries : : : Add "WITH_LIB32=yes" to /etc/make.conf and rebuild world. Really? Huh. I was under the impression it didn't work so well... You learn something new every day! Thanks! - Damian From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 22:13:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B387516A4CE for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:13:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 139E543D64 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:13:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zombyfork@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so776771rng for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:13:46 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=L9bUsDg8CjBwx2aC0Jgx3r7UQ5ZgZhHkwbOCinVMoQkf5n4CLJWrzMJKIJLtfQ2oa1jYoqlW+TXSU61/Dqnf0uOm1ee3kaeWYOVp6kYqTeaN5iGX7jPc/XXomO3db1cydKU8phO047yU8nfHt5yPkvOPbJvPmKcZt1WsXuItleM= Received: by 10.38.76.48 with SMTP id y48mr28112rna; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:13:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.22.22 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:13:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <346a8022050227141350fd392d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:13:46 -0500 From: Coleman Kane To: Damian Gerow In-Reply-To: <20050227210025.GH35988@afflictions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050227182359.GE35988@afflictions.org> <20050227183436.GA82670@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050227204615.GF35988@afflictions.org> <20050227205629.GA66621@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050227210025.GH35988@afflictions.org> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Word Processor on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: cokane@cokane.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:13:47 -0000 I have Abiword2 working on my system. Usually, I use teTeX for most work. I just use Abiword to read other people's word docs. On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:00:25 -0500, Damian Gerow wrote: > Thus spake Steve Kargl (sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) [27/02/05 15:57]: > : You don't swap over to 32-bit. You can run 32-bit FreeBSD > : or linux binaries on the 64-bit FreeBSD (as known as FreeBSd-amd64). > : > : Add the following to your kernel config and rebuild. > : > : options COMPAT_IA32 #Compatible with i386 binaries > : options COMPAT_LINUX32 #Compatible with i386 linux binaries > : > : > : Add "WITH_LIB32=yes" to /etc/make.conf and rebuild world. > > Really? Huh. I was under the impression it didn't work so well... You > learn something new every day! > > Thanks! > > - Damian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 27 22:17:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5532E16A4D1 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:17:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lobo.homeunix.org (reverse-82-141-58-194.dialin.kamp-dsl.de [82.141.58.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA4543D49 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:17:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ewinter@lobo.homeunix.org) Received: from lobo.homeunix.org (localhost.homeunix.org [127.0.0.1]) by lobo.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1RMG30k017718; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:16:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ewinter@lobo.homeunix.org) Received: (from ewinter@localhost) by lobo.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j1RMG3VV017717; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:16:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ewinter) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 23:16:02 +0100 From: "Ernst W. Winter" To: cokane@cokane.org Message-ID: <20050227221602.GE17537@lobo.homeunix.org> References: <20050227182359.GE35988@afflictions.org> <20050227183436.GA82670@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050227204615.GF35988@afflictions.org> <20050227205629.GA66621@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20050227210025.GH35988@afflictions.org> <346a8022050227141350fd392d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <346a8022050227141350fd392d@mail.gmail.com> X-Phone: + 49-89-3075-6800 Organization: FreeBSD Evangelist X-Operating-System: FreeBSD lobo.homeunix.org 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Word Processor on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Ernst W. Winter" List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:17:57 -0000 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Coleman Kane wrote: > I have Abiword2 working on my system. Usually, I use teTeX for most > work. I just use Abiword to read other people's word docs. > sounds the same as what I got here, as I use Abiword too just for whenever I get a *doc type and otherwise teTeX works well, right from the start too. eww From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 01:18:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5E216A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:18:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web51001.mail.yahoo.com (web51001.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.38.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A059143D41 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:18:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tfcheng@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 64440 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Feb 2005 01:18:46 -0000 Message-ID: <20050228011846.64438.qmail@web51001.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.113.106.60] by web51001.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:18:45 CST Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:18:45 +0800 (CST) From: "T.F. Cheng" To: cokane@cokane.org, Damian Gerow In-Reply-To: <346a8022050227141350fd392d@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Word Processor on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:18:47 -0000 Hi, I am a by-stander of this discussion. I used to run amd64 version but quite a lot app only run at i386, now I recall that there seems to be some issue about this and I couldn't get enable i386-compatible mode at that time, but seeing this, does this mean that all app now is able to run on amd64 without a problem? thanks TFC --- Coleman Kane ¼g¹D¡G > I have Abiword2 working on my system. Usually, I use > teTeX for most > work. I just use Abiword to read other people's word > docs. > > > On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:00:25 -0500, Damian Gerow > wrote: > > Thus spake Steve Kargl > (sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) [27/02/05 15:57]: > > : You don't swap over to 32-bit. You can run > 32-bit FreeBSD > > : or linux binaries on the 64-bit FreeBSD (as > known as FreeBSd-amd64). > > : > > : Add the following to your kernel config and > rebuild. > > : > > : options COMPAT_IA32 > #Compatible with i386 binaries > > : options COMPAT_LINUX32 #Compatible with > i386 linux binaries > > : > > : > > : Add "WITH_LIB32=yes" to /etc/make.conf and > rebuild world. > > > > Really? Huh. I was under the impression it > didn't work so well... You > > learn something new every day! > > > > Thanks! > > > > - Damian > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ===== Best Regards, Tsu-Fan Cheng _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? µn°O§K¶Oªº @yahoo.com ¤¤¤å¹q¤l¶l¥ó @ http://chinese.mail.yahoo.com Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://chinese.mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 01:22:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBCC16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:22:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE3C43D1D for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:22:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zombyfork@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so790401rng for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=XZigora1lNHq+GC9zhydKvOkprgby4r+rIIQX69Xr14wdOywmE4cAxAvmdIpkk67uLtncjPsPTT5NzkFaDAOu5lzGFik11XQUJTbpE8vjPPxSxc/cl4nSdNWMQ92dNWTwmB671plGFjT14gntrVxLpDV8o2s3/auXloPKs/u8Cg= Received: by 10.38.161.73 with SMTP id j73mr101601rne; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.22.22 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:22:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <346a80220502271722532610c6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:22:23 -0500 From: Coleman Kane To: "T.F. Cheng" In-Reply-To: <20050228011846.64438.qmail@web51001.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: <346a8022050227141350fd392d@mail.gmail.com> <20050228011846.64438.qmail@web51001.mail.yahoo.com> cc: Damian Gerow cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Word Processor on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: cokane@cokane.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:22:25 -0000 Works perfectly well for me: cokane@erwin:~> file /usr/X11R6/bin/AbiWord-2.2=20 /usr/X11R6/bin/AbiWord-2.2: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped -- coleman kane On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:18:45 +0800 (CST), T.F. Cheng wr= ote: > Hi, I am a by-stander of this discussion. I used to > run amd64 version but quite a lot app only run at > i386, now I recall that there seems to be some issue > about this and I couldn't get enable i386-compatible > mode at that time, but seeing this, does this mean > that all app now is able to run on amd64 without a > problem? >=20 > thanks >=20 > TFC >=20 > --- Coleman Kane =E5=AF=AB=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > I have Abiword2 working on my system. Usually, I use > > teTeX for most > > work. I just use Abiword to read other people's word > > docs. > > > > > > On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:00:25 -0500, Damian Gerow > > wrote: > > > Thus spake Steve Kargl > > (sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) [27/02/05 15:57]: > > > : You don't swap over to 32-bit. You can run > > 32-bit FreeBSD > > > : or linux binaries on the 64-bit FreeBSD (as > > known as FreeBSd-amd64). > > > : > > > : Add the following to your kernel config and > > rebuild. > > > : > > > : options COMPAT_IA32 > > #Compatible with i386 binaries > > > : options COMPAT_LINUX32 #Compatible with > > i386 linux binaries > > > : > > > : > > > : Add "WITH_LIB32=3Dyes" to /etc/make.conf and > > rebuild world. > > > > > > Really? Huh. I was under the impression it > > didn't work so well... You > > > learn something new every day! > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > - Damian > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >=20 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > Best Regards, >=20 > Tsu-Fan Cheng >=20 > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > =E7=99=BB=E8=A8=98=E5=85=8D=E8=B2=BB=E7=9A=84 @yahoo.com =E4=B8=AD=E6=96= =87=E9=9B=BB=E5=AD=90=E9=83=B5=E4=BB=B6 @ http://chinese.mail.yahoo.com > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://chinese.mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 02:12:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8D816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:12:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C04443D1D for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:12:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1S2CKWT014077; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:12:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1S2CKx9014076; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:12:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:12:20 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Rainer Koschnick Message-ID: <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:12:22 -0000 On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:39:22PM +0100, Rainer Koschnick wrote: > I tried to install release 5.3 from CD without any success. First I had > problems with the USB controllers which I then turned off in the BIOS. This > would let the boot run up to this point: Can you try the 5.3-STABLE snapshot at ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/Feb_2005/ And also try the first 5.4 snapshot which should come out in about 2 weeks? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 02:17:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442F116A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:17:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3B943D1F for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:17:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1S2HfOr014211; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:17:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1S2HfbV014210; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:17:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:17:41 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Tim Traver Message-ID: <20050228021741.GC13696@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <42217E4B.10102@simplenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42217E4B.10102@simplenet.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running i386 scripts in 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 02:17:48 -0000 On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 12:01:15AM -0800, Tim Traver wrote: > ok, I have read a bunch of the posts on the subject, and it seems like a > fairly complicated subject. .. > However, I didn't realize that there are several binaries that I need to > run that are i386 binaries, and there is no way for me to re-compile them. > > I've tried the /usr/src/tools/lib32/build32.sh script, and although it > appeared to work, there were many wanrings. When trying to run my > binaries, it get core dumps. > > Is there a better way to do this ? or should I just recompile the kernel > using i386 to be sure ? You should upgrade to a 5.4 prerelease snapshot (or just wait for 5.4-RELEASE). 5.4 will be released sometime in April. If you need something now, CVSup to RELENG_5 and build your system (after this weekend). > And is there a roadmap to get a nice clean method for running i386 > binaries ? what about i386 binaries from 4.x ? There will a clean way to run i386 4.x binaries be for 5.4-RELEASE. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 03:02:44 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0368616A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:02:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.182.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3D043D2D for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:02:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sdodson@sdodson.com) Received: from filter04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.71]) by relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F31C364253 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.164]) [66.133.183.71]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 23996-01-100 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from essence.sdodson.com (67-50-81-59.br1.tbr.ga.frontiernet.net [67.50.81.59]) by relay01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE50364125 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:02:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([192.168.42.182]) by essence.sdodson.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1RLvUjZ047016 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:57:31 GMT (envelope-from sdodson@sdodson.com) Message-ID: <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:02:51 -0500 From: Scott Dodson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0508-4, 02/27/2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20040701 (2.0) at filter04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:02:44 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: >On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:39:22PM +0100, Rainer Koschnick wrote: > > >>I tried to install release 5.3 from CD without any success. First I had >>problems with the USB controllers which I then turned off in the BIOS. This >>would let the boot run up to this point: >> >> > >Can you try the 5.3-STABLE snapshot at >ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/Feb_2005/ > >And also try the first 5.4 snapshot which should come out in about 2 weeks? > > > I'm getting the same type of problems but on my MSI K8N Platinum, nForce4 based board. I realize nForce was a no, no. I've tried the snapshot at that location as well as the 6-current snapshot dated 02-09. Another data point. Thanks, Scott From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 05:13:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB75116A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:13:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freckleface.aedifice.net (adsl-209-233-30-172.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [209.233.30.172]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF2343D4C for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:13:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from myers@aedifice.net) Received: from [10.0.0.20] (dmz2 [192.168.1.2])j1S54fl09087 for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:04:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4222A870.2090500@aedifice.net> Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:13:20 -0800 From: "David C. Myers" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: VNC on amd64: SIOCGIFCONF problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:13:26 -0000 VNC-3.3.7 in ports looks like it doesn't work because of 64-bit alignment issues with SIOCGIFCONF. The offending code is in Xvnc/programs/Xserver/os/access.c: if (ifioctl (fd, (int) SIOCGIFCONF, (pointer) &ifc) < 0) Error ("Getting interface configuration (4)"); which comes out in the trace file as: 28138 Xvnc CALL bind(0x1,0x7fffffffe670,0x13) 28138 Xvnc NAMI "/tmp/.X11-unix/X1" 28138 Xvnc RET bind 0 28138 Xvnc CALL listen(0x1,0x80) 28138 Xvnc RET listen 0 28138 Xvnc CALL umask(0x12) 28138 Xvnc RET umask 0 28138 Xvnc CALL ioctl(0,0xffffffffc0106924 ,0x7fffffffe030) 28138 Xvnc RET ioctl -1 errno 6 Device not configured 28138 Xvnc CALL writev(0x2,0x7fffffffd790,0x4) 28138 Xvnc GIO fd 2 wrote 59 bytes "Getting interface configuration (4): Device not configured " (Actually, the very first error you'll get is a "Could not open default font 'fixed'" message, but you can make that go away by running a font server and passing its address to Xvnc...) Is there a quick solution to this? A 32-bit compatibility shim? Judging from Google, issues with this ioctl go back years, on all kinds of platforms. getifaddrs() is the right way to do this on BSD? -David. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 05:16:34 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584E816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:16:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A84A43D31 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:16:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arkay@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2005 05:16:32 -0000 Received: from ip220.28.1411H-CUD12K-01.ish.de (EHLO [192.168.1.100]) (62.143.28.220) by mail.gmx.net (mp017) with SMTP; 28 Feb 2005 06:16:32 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1732206 Message-ID: <4222A92E.6020500@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:16:30 +0100 From: Rainer Koschnick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Macintosh/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> In-Reply-To: <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:16:34 -0000 Scott Dodson wrote: > David O'Brien wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 01:39:22PM +0100, Rainer Koschnick wrote: >> >> >>> I tried to install release 5.3 from CD without any success. First I had >>> problems with the USB controllers which I then turned off in the >>> BIOS. This >>> would let the boot run up to this point: >>> >> >> >> Can you try the 5.3-STABLE snapshot at >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/Feb_2005/ >> >> And also try the first 5.4 snapshot which should come out in about 2 >> weeks? >> >> >> > I'm getting the same type of problems but on my MSI K8N Platinum, > nForce4 based board. I realize nForce was a no, no. I've tried the > snapshot at that location as well as the 6-current snapshot dated 02-09. > > Another data point. I could give it a try, yes. This is on a VIA K8T800 chipset. I really don't know what could cause this error since the message itself isn't very helpful (no device information or anything). So I will test a current Feb snapshot either today or tomorrow. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 05:52:24 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255DD16A4CF for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:52:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD4A43D39 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:52:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so813123rnf for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:52:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=c2xXRo1/KXoRwy54PRcv84RevLOyiIlz9dXYRfln1LC6PlxCSn7qnRPza3GTyDziVmIHDNr8Bza4Is9UDA/8oRzDGA7ist9QCoPl8/wkNo3aVkswAsMag8jx7vuMFSAHcEeYSVnTDbJXy5edok7F2a+bd3Nf8U6J42veuJDahQI= Received: by 10.38.92.1 with SMTP id p1mr104637rnb; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:52:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.209.12 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:52:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <84dead72050227215243be0950@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:52:22 +0000 From: Joseph Koshy To: Rainer Koschnick In-Reply-To: <4222A92E.6020500@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> <4222A92E.6020500@gmx.net> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joseph Koshy List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:52:24 -0000 > I could give it a try, yes. This is on a VIA K8T800 chipset. I really > don't know what could cause this error since the message itself isn't > very helpful (no device information or anything). A few weeks back I tried 5.3-RELEASE/amd64 on an MSI K8V Neo board with 512MB RAM and a 40GB Samsung PATA HDD. This board had a Via K8T800 chipset. While the initial install went through without problems, the board failed the standard test of running "make -jN buildworld". The indications were of memory corruption under load. Tweaking the relevant BIOS settings didn't help. Just another data point. -- FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 06:24:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F8016A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:24:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19DA043D64 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:24:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arkay@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2005 06:24:26 -0000 Received: from ip220.28.1411H-CUD12K-01.ish.de (EHLO [192.168.1.102]) (62.143.28.220) by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 28 Feb 2005 07:24:26 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1732206 Message-ID: <4222B915.1070103@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:24:21 -0100 From: Rainer Koschnick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> <4222A92E.6020500@gmx.net> <84dead72050227215243be0950@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <84dead72050227215243be0950@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:24:29 -0000 Joseph Koshy wrote: >>I could give it a try, yes. This is on a VIA K8T800 chipset. I really >>don't know what could cause this error since the message itself isn't >>very helpful (no device information or anything). > > > A few weeks back I tried 5.3-RELEASE/amd64 on an MSI K8V Neo board with > 512MB RAM and a 40GB Samsung PATA HDD. This board had a Via K8T800 > chipset. > > While the initial install went through without problems, the board failed > the standard test of running "make -jN buildworld". The indications were > of memory corruption under load. Tweaking the relevant BIOS settings > didn't help. That doesn't sound too good then. Well, I tried this 5.3 release dated 30th of January with the same result I got before. I am wondering which chipsets the other amd64 users here are using, there aren't too many choices if nForce4 & K8T800 fail. Unless of course people here are all using MP which I can't afford :) My problem though is that I cannot even get it to install. I have to turn off the USB ports in order to pass the first couple of tests. I made a screenshot at the point where it froze with USB turned off (it doesn't even get to ask for a reboot). With/without APIC, with/without promise controller--all makes no difference. http://www.arkay.de/temp/FreeBSDBoot.gif Anyway, even if I _would_ get to install it my hopes of having a usable system are quite low. Using an i386 build wouldn't make any difference, would it? Cheers, Rainer From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 06:31:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0242116A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:31:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9F743D41 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:31:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so816926rnf for ; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:31:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=DAdLkBfNJgJPQWY3GDoRViedLs8oRpYgcXARQcs5s/HwJ7ZmTOhba0s4WZRCqcIhIdGqsMMjUhrU3QnZ/8Z5lyQ///GtP/jNgZ9VJP9zkr+gGkE4874luJemkh81gFpifbLEzDlM6TZ3pii0By8UE5DgoZdkdS+DGx17eR+jZtk= Received: by 10.38.104.1 with SMTP id b1mr291733rnc; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:31:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.209.12 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Feb 2005 22:31:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <84dead72050227223168341fa6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:31:24 +0000 From: Joseph Koshy To: Rainer Koschnick In-Reply-To: <4222B915.1070103@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> <4222A92E.6020500@gmx.net> <4222B915.1070103@gmx.net> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joseph Koshy List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:31:26 -0000 > Anyway, even if I _would_ get to install it my hopes of having a usable [snip] > Using an i386 build wouldn't make any difference, would it? One thing you could try is to reduce the RAM on board to 512MB. -- FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 06:44:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC5C16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:44:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED05943D3F for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:44:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arkay@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2005 06:44:51 -0000 Received: from ip220.28.1411H-CUD12K-01.ish.de (EHLO [192.168.1.102]) (62.143.28.220) by mail.gmx.net (mp015) with SMTP; 28 Feb 2005 07:44:51 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1732206 Message-ID: <4222BDDF.3020105@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:44:47 -0100 From: Rainer Koschnick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> <4222A92E.6020500@gmx.net> <84dead72050227215243be0950@mail.gmail.com> <4222B915.1070103@gmx.net> <84dead72050227223168341fa6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <84dead72050227223168341fa6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:44:55 -0000 Joseph Koshy wrote: >>Anyway, even if I _would_ get to install it my hopes of having a usable [snip] >>Using an i386 build wouldn't make any difference, would it? > > One thing you could try is to reduce the RAM on board to 512MB. Hmmm, I have 2 other systems on this machine which I use. And 1 of those is veeeery memory hungry, esp. since I have to do Java development. It _should_ be able to handle 1GB of memory, no? 512MB won't get me very far. Rainer From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 07:39:57 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF19316A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:39:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smradoch.ath.cx (r2g224.chello.upc.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD4943D1D for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:39:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@chello.cz) Received: by smradoch.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 04F0A1F87BEE; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:39:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:39:54 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Joseph Koshy Message-ID: <20050228073954.GA14037@isis.wad.cz> References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> <4222A92E.6020500@gmx.net> <84dead72050227215243be0950@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <84dead72050227215243be0950@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:39:58 -0000 # joseph.koshy@gmail.com / 2005-02-28 05:52:22 +0000: > A few weeks back I tried 5.3-RELEASE/amd64 on an MSI K8V Neo board with > 512MB RAM and a 40GB Samsung PATA HDD. This board had a Via K8T800 > chipset. > > While the initial install went through without problems, the board failed > the standard test of running "make -jN buildworld". The indications were > of memory corruption under load. Tweaking the relevant BIOS settings > didn't help. What memory did you have in the box? I've had the same problem with K8T Neo-FIS2R and 3x Corsair CMX512-3200C2. The board only works with a narrow selection of 400MHz modules. :( -- FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE 8:36AM up 3 days, 23:33, 11 users, load averages: 0.00, 0.02, 0.00 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 08:07:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4D616A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:07:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91B2643D31 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:07:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so826398rnf for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:07:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=YMyh5+aaIZxG8l3lVD8mW4/XADF+YLWT/kTTDLzwpXRMbpdj8yFwQyckvZ4Gmu69VBPgXvihjTrrYUXx1DV7gwnDErnsS5tJUvMTpM79vV7iI87RZ1xMwaUkv7lL8HyDVer+5zc54xhnv776rSy63eW+GHJw0i5+iaQuKcjGqfo= Received: by 10.38.92.1 with SMTP id p1mr163010rnb; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:07:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.209.12 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:07:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <84dead720502280007a21afb4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:07:00 +0000 From: Joseph Koshy To: Roman Neuhauser In-Reply-To: <20050228073954.GA14037@isis.wad.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> <4222A92E.6020500@gmx.net> <84dead72050227215243be0950@mail.gmail.com> <20050228073954.GA14037@isis.wad.cz> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joseph Koshy List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:07:03 -0000 > What memory did you have in the box? I've had the same problem with > K8T Neo-FIS2R and 3x Corsair CMX512-3200C2. The board only works > with a narrow selection of 400MHz modules. :( I had tested the board with Hynix memory, using one of the recommended part numbers on the MSI website for that motherboard. -- FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 08:22:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B02C16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:22:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B341443D5A for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:22:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1S8MdiI039064; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:22:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1S8Mc9G039063; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:22:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:22:38 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Rainer Koschnick Message-ID: <20050228082238.GA38063@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> <4222A92E.6020500@gmx.net> <84dead72050227215243be0950@mail.gmail.com> <4222B915.1070103@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4222B915.1070103@gmx.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:22:42 -0000 On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 05:24:21AM -0100, Rainer Koschnick wrote: > That doesn't sound too good then. Well, I tried this 5.3 release dated > 30th of January with the same result I got before. I am wondering which > chipsets the other amd64 users here are using, there aren't too many > choices if nForce4 & K8T800 fail. Unless of course people here are all > using MP which I can't afford :) I have a FreeBSD UP Gigabyte K8T800-based system that is rock solid. Though I do mostly have MP AMD64 systems. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 08:25:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5385716A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:25:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192F543D55 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:25:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1S8PONH039108; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:25:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1S8PNx5039107; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:25:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:25:23 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Roman Neuhauser Message-ID: <20050228082523.GB38063@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> <4222A92E.6020500@gmx.net> <84dead72050227215243be0950@mail.gmail.com> <20050228073954.GA14037@isis.wad.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050228073954.GA14037@isis.wad.cz> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:25:29 -0000 On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:39:54AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > What memory did you have in the box? I've had the same problem with > K8T Neo-FIS2R and 3x Corsair CMX512-3200C2. The board only works > with a narrow selection of 400MHz modules. :( Actually I would read the mobo *and* AMD docs very, very carefully. Using 3x DDR400 (PC3200) DIMM's is out of the JEDEC spec, IIRC. I stick to DDR333 (PC2700) memory as its easy to find CL2.5 DIMMs, but most DDR400 is CL3.0. So the end performance in the BW increase is mostly a wash; and I avoid the electrical loading issues of the faster memory bus. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 08:33:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B4816A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:33:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smradoch.ath.cx (r2g224.chello.upc.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADC743D49 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:33:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@chello.cz) Received: by smradoch.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 301211F87BEE; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:33:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:33:19 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050228083319.GA379@isis.wad.cz> References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> <4222A92E.6020500@gmx.net> <84dead72050227215243be0950@mail.gmail.com> <20050228073954.GA14037@isis.wad.cz> <20050228082523.GB38063@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050228082523.GB38063@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:33:22 -0000 # obrien@freebsd.org / 2005-02-28 00:25:23 -0800: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:39:54AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > What memory did you have in the box? I've had the same problem with > > K8T Neo-FIS2R and 3x Corsair CMX512-3200C2. The board only works > > with a narrow selection of 400MHz modules. :( > > Actually I would read the mobo *and* AMD docs very, very carefully. > Using 3x DDR400 (PC3200) DIMM's is out of the JEDEC spec, IIRC. I stick > to DDR333 (PC2700) memory as its easy to find CL2.5 DIMMs, but most > DDR400 is CL3.0. So the end performance in the BW increase is mostly a > wash; and I avoid the electrical loading issues of the faster memory bus. I'll admit I'm not an expert on hardware, can you point out what's wrong with the configuration (3 double-sided 400MHz modules)? BTW, the Corsairs are 2.5-3-3-6. Oh, and DDR400 modules are (or were two months ago, not sure about the situation ATM) cheaper than DDR33 ones. -- FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE 9:29AM up 2 mins, 2 users, load averages: 0.10, 0.06, 0.02 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 11:01:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C4B16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:01:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E991043D3F for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:01:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1SB1qGF006641 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:01:52 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1SB1qkV006635 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:01:52 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:01:52 GMT Message-Id: <200502281101.j1SB1qkV006635@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:01:53 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2004/10/27] amd64/73211 amd64 FAST_IPSEC broken on amd64 1 problem total. Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/11/26] amd64/59714 amd64 device timeout and ad0: WARNING - WRITE_D o [2004/07/28] amd64/69704 amd64 ext2/ext3 unstable in amd64 o [2004/07/28] amd64/69707 amd64 IPC32 dont work OK in amd64 FreeBSD o [2004/09/07] amd64/71471 amd64 Can not install 5.3beta3/amd64 on IBM eSe o [2004/10/28] amd64/73252 amd64 ad6: WARNING - READ_DMA interrupt was see o [2004/10/30] amd64/73322 amd64 unarchiving /etc to msdos fs locks up amd o [2004/11/01] amd64/73369 amd64 on-board firewire unreliable with Asus K8 o [2004/11/07] amd64/73650 amd64 5.3-release panics on boot o [2004/11/10] amd64/73775 amd64 Kernel panic (trap 12) when booting with o [2004/11/16] amd64/74014 amd64 5.3-RELEASE-AMD64 freezes on boot during o [2004/12/05] amd64/74747 amd64 System panic on shutdown when process wil o [2004/12/18] amd64/75209 amd64 5.3-Release panics on attempted boot from o [2004/12/23] amd64/75417 amd64 ACPI: SATA Hard-disk o [2005/01/12] amd64/76136 amd64 system halts before reboot o [2005/01/17] amd64/76336 amd64 racoon/setkey -D cases instant "Fatal Tra o [2005/02/02] amd64/77011 amd64 consisten 5.3-p5 make crash on installwor o [2005/02/04] amd64/77101 amd64 Please include ULi M1689 LAN, SATA, and A o [2005/02/17] amd64/77629 amd64 aMule hardlocks AMD64 system o [2005/02/23] amd64/77949 amd64 Pb boot FreeBSD 64 19 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2004/01/11] amd64/61209 amd64 ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range o [2004/02/21] amd64/63188 amd64 ti(4) broken on amd64 o [2004/07/28] amd64/69705 amd64 IPC problem (msq_queues) o [2004/07/28] amd64/69709 amd64 ACPI enabled then floppy don't work (5.2. o [2004/08/15] amd64/70500 amd64 bge driver for 3Com 3C996B on amd64 preve o [2004/12/02] amd64/74608 amd64 mpt hangs 5 minutes when booting o [2004/12/07] amd64/74811 amd64 df, nfs mount, negative Avail -> 32/64-bi o [2004/12/25] amd64/75488 amd64 ntfs_iconv not working on amd64 o [2005/02/13] amd64/77470 amd64 Using of cyrillic filenames conversion le 9 problems total. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 16:17:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB3116A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:17:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ox.eicat.ca (ox.eicat.ca [66.96.30.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D67243D5F for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:17:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by ox.eicat.ca (Postfix, from userid 66) id 10B43F290; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:17:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by canoe.dclg.ca (Postfix, from userid 101) id 7BD144662; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:17:21 -0500 (EST) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16931.17425.441677.617748@canoe.dclg.ca> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:17:21 -0500 To: amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid Subject: ia32 ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:17:23 -0000 Having wrestled with a few ports (including java) on amd64, what I don't understand is why we don't have the capability to compile ia32 versions of ports that won't compile in amd64 mode... Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================ From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 17:07:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB19E16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:07:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF85C43D62 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:07:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arkay@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2005 17:07:21 -0000 Received: from ip220.28.1411H-CUD12K-01.ish.de (EHLO [192.168.1.102]) (62.143.28.220) by mail.gmx.net (mp024) with SMTP; 28 Feb 2005 18:07:21 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1732206 Message-ID: <42234FC3.50301@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:07:15 -0100 From: Rainer Koschnick User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> <4222A92E.6020500@gmx.net> <84dead72050227215243be0950@mail.gmail.com> <20050228073954.GA14037@isis.wad.cz> <20050228082523.GB38063@dragon.nuxi.com> <20050228083319.GA379@isis.wad.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050228083319.GA379@isis.wad.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:07:23 -0000 Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # obrien@freebsd.org / 2005-02-28 00:25:23 -0800: > >>On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:39:54AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: >> >>> What memory did you have in the box? I've had the same problem with >>> K8T Neo-FIS2R and 3x Corsair CMX512-3200C2. The board only works >>> with a narrow selection of 400MHz modules. :( >> >>Actually I would read the mobo *and* AMD docs very, very carefully. >>Using 3x DDR400 (PC3200) DIMM's is out of the JEDEC spec, IIRC. I stick >>to DDR333 (PC2700) memory as its easy to find CL2.5 DIMMs, but most >>DDR400 is CL3.0. So the end performance in the BW increase is mostly a >>wash; and I avoid the electrical loading issues of the faster memory bus. > > > I'll admit I'm not an expert on hardware, can you point out what's > wrong with the configuration (3 double-sided 400MHz modules)? > > BTW, the Corsairs are 2.5-3-3-6. Oh, and DDR400 modules are (or > were two months ago, not sure about the situation ATM) cheaper than > DDR33 ones. > I only bought 2 memory modules when I bought this board because on the ASUS site it was clearly stated that only 2 DDR400 modules can be used together. I wished I had more than 1GB of memory though. I got 2 corsair modules with 512MB each. Mine are running at 2.5-3-3-8@200MHz, using the default SPD values because they actually got slower when I tried changing the timings. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 17:47:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456B316A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:47:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54302.mail.yahoo.com (web54302.mail.yahoo.com [68.142.225.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADF0043D53 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:47:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iliaroot@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 89095 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Feb 2005 17:47:24 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=I+5oCCarQ52ZKnWwm4rcYaOxCKUCSeumHvC4BhEgHUbV6Q+hEcYA/vvivIbYsF4p9uQcj8wF5ZLb7i+aIejgqYiT03Rc5PBaO63shaS20CGXXOf5QopRT3wVF7ih/jCnuk+DfR99Chz64l2ie8idLvBzBmk9Xewa4IMVnYDaxXo= ; Message-ID: <20050228174724.89093.qmail@web54302.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [65.173.228.59] by web54302.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:47:23 PST Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:47:23 -0800 (PST) From: Ilia Rassadzin To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Ethernet address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:47:25 -0000 Hello list, I have Averatek 6200 notebook (network card SiS 900) I've got this message from dmesg - Ethernet address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff after this dhcp client did not pick up neither gateway, nor dns servers, but it did receive its ip address and subnet mask I can ping other boxes on my network but this is all I can do. Everything else works fine for the fresh install. How to fix my network card? Any suggestions? Thanks in advance, Ilia __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 18:10:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADB116A501 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:10:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ares.wolfpond.org (ns1.wolfpond.org [62.212.96.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6C243D55 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:10:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ftigeot@wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (aoi.wolfpond.org [IPv6:2001:7a8:24db:1:20c:76ff:feb4:27e1]) by ares.wolfpond.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j1SIAmRA057978; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:10:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1SIAuBk070524; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:10:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: (from ftigeot@localhost) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j1SIAuV3070523; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:10:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ftigeot) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:10:56 +0100 From: Francois Tigeot To: David Gilbert Message-ID: <20050228181056.GC69361@aoi.wolfpond.org> References: <16931.17425.441677.617748@canoe.dclg.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16931.17425.441677.617748@canoe.dclg.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ia32 ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:10:56 -0000 On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:17:21AM -0500, David Gilbert wrote: > Having wrestled with a few ports (including java) on amd64, what I > don't understand is why we don't have the capability to compile ia32 > versions of ports that won't compile in amd64 mode... It would be even better to have an option to compile amd64 binaries with 32-bit pointers. Unclean code would be able to run an still benefit from the amd64 architectural improvements (more registers, better abi, etc...) The Digital C compiler had such an option on Alpha machines. -- Francois Tigeot From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 19:49:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F06916A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:49:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3BB43D69 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:49:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1SJmwfZ059366; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:48:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1SJmvX9059365; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:48:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:48:57 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Roman Neuhauser Message-ID: <20050228194857.GA59327@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <25805.1109507962@www41.gmx.net> <20050228021220.GB13696@dragon.nuxi.com> <422289DB.5090408@sdodson.com> <4222A92E.6020500@gmx.net> <84dead72050227215243be0950@mail.gmail.com> <20050228073954.GA14037@isis.wad.cz> <20050228082523.GB38063@dragon.nuxi.com> <20050228083319.GA379@isis.wad.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050228083319.GA379@isis.wad.cz> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3 installation on Asus K8V-D impossible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:49:04 -0000 On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:33:19AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > # obrien@freebsd.org / 2005-02-28 00:25:23 -0800: > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:39:54AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > > > What memory did you have in the box? I've had the same problem with > > > K8T Neo-FIS2R and 3x Corsair CMX512-3200C2. The board only works > > > with a narrow selection of 400MHz modules. :( > > > > Actually I would read the mobo *and* AMD docs very, very carefully. > > Using 3x DDR400 (PC3200) DIMM's is out of the JEDEC spec, IIRC. I stick > > to DDR333 (PC2700) memory as its easy to find CL2.5 DIMMs, but most > > DDR400 is CL3.0. So the end performance in the BW increase is mostly a > > wash; and I avoid the electrical loading issues of the faster memory bus. > > I'll admit I'm not an expert on hardware, can you point out what's > wrong with the configuration (3 double-sided 400MHz modules)? It is an electrical load issue. The non-buffered memory controller can only drive 2x DDR400 loads. A 939-pin dual-channel memory controller Athlon64 can drive 4x DDR400 loads. An Opteron can drive more due to being buffered/registered memory. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 19:51:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36DA16A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:51:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E66543D53 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:51:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1SJp3Hx059404; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:51:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1SJp233059403; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:51:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:51:02 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: David Gilbert Message-ID: <20050228195102.GB59327@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <16931.17425.441677.617748@canoe.dclg.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16931.17425.441677.617748@canoe.dclg.ca> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ia32 ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:51:17 -0000 On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:17:21AM -0500, David Gilbert wrote: > Having wrestled with a few ports (including java) on amd64, what I > don't understand is why we don't have the capability to compile ia32 > versions of ports that won't compile in amd64 mode... We don't yet support building any 32-bit apps on a 64-bit system. I have some changes to GCC I need to finish. We also need to start installing the 32-bit headers and .a's. And this is just for the base system. If you want to build a 32-bit package under a 64-bit OS, you also need to have two copies of gtk, gettext, libiconv, etc... installed. It turns into a mess. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 19:52:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A922416A4D5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:52:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764CF43D5E for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:52:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1SJpx27059422; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:51:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1SJpwMi059420; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:51:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:51:58 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Francois Tigeot Message-ID: <20050228195158.GC59327@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <16931.17425.441677.617748@canoe.dclg.ca> <20050228181056.GC69361@aoi.wolfpond.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050228181056.GC69361@aoi.wolfpond.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org cc: David Gilbert Subject: Re: ia32 ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:52:02 -0000 On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 07:10:56PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:17:21AM -0500, David Gilbert wrote: > > Having wrestled with a few ports (including java) on amd64, what I > > don't understand is why we don't have the capability to compile ia32 > > versions of ports that won't compile in amd64 mode... > > It would be even better to have an option to compile amd64 binaries with > 32-bit pointers. > Unclean code would be able to run an still benefit from the amd64 > architectural improvements (more registers, better abi, etc...) The extra registers (and thus ABI) is not supported in 32-bit mode for compatability reasons. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 20:53:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF9416A4D0 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:53:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ares.wolfpond.org (ns1.wolfpond.org [62.212.96.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F272E43D46 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:53:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ftigeot@wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (aoi.wolfpond.org [IPv6:2001:7a8:24db:1:20c:76ff:feb4:27e1]) by ares.wolfpond.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j1SKrnQr058876; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:53:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1SKrxYF073521; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:53:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: (from ftigeot@localhost) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j1SKrwBZ073520; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:53:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ftigeot) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:53:58 +0100 From: Francois Tigeot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050228205358.GA73467@aoi.wolfpond.org> References: <16931.17425.441677.617748@canoe.dclg.ca> <20050228181056.GC69361@aoi.wolfpond.org> <20050228195158.GC59327@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050228195158.GC59327@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: ia32 ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:53:52 -0000 On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:51:58AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 07:10:56PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:17:21AM -0500, David Gilbert wrote: > > > Having wrestled with a few ports (including java) on amd64, what I > > > don't understand is why we don't have the capability to compile ia32 > > > versions of ports that won't compile in amd64 mode... > > > > It would be even better to have an option to compile amd64 binaries with > > 32-bit pointers. > > Unclean code would be able to run an still benefit from the amd64 > > architectural improvements (more registers, better abi, etc...) > > The extra registers (and thus ABI) is not supported in 32-bit mode for > compatability reasons. I know that. What I meant was not to compile to i386 but to amd64 with 32-bit pointers. The binary would technically still be a 64-bit one. This page explains the mechanism: http://alpha.caspur.it/C++6.3A_DOC/uguhdr.htm#xtaso_sec It was possible to compile "32-bit limited" applications on the Alpha, which was a 64-bit only architecture. I don't know if it is possible on amd64. I'm not sure I'm very clear either. -- Francois Tigeot From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 28 22:12:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764C016A4CE for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:12:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.simplenet.com (mailer.simplenet.com [209.132.1.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAB943D1F for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:12:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tt-list@simplenet.com) Received: from [209.132.9.116] (209.132.9.116) by mail1.simplenet.com (7.0.016) (authenticated as tt-list@simplenet.com) id 4222FA2900016B03 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:58:22 -0800 Message-ID: <4223771B.1010008@simplenet.com> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:55:07 -0800 From: Tim Traver User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 - [MOOX M2] (Windows/20041208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <42217E4B.10102@simplenet.com> <20050228021741.GC13696@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20050228021741.GC13696@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Re: Running i386 scripts in 5.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:12:54 -0000 Thanks David, I will be looking forward to 5.4-RELEASE to try that out... In the mean time, I think I have to go ahead and build the box with i386... Tim. David O'Brien wrote: >On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 12:01:15AM -0800, Tim Traver wrote: > > >>ok, I have read a bunch of the posts on the subject, and it seems like a >>fairly complicated subject. >> >> >.. > > >>However, I didn't realize that there are several binaries that I need to >>run that are i386 binaries, and there is no way for me to re-compile them. >> >>I've tried the /usr/src/tools/lib32/build32.sh script, and although it >>appeared to work, there were many wanrings. When trying to run my >>binaries, it get core dumps. >> >>Is there a better way to do this ? or should I just recompile the kernel >>using i386 to be sure ? >> >> > >You should upgrade to a 5.4 prerelease snapshot (or just wait for >5.4-RELEASE). 5.4 will be released sometime in April. If you need >something now, CVSup to RELENG_5 and build your system (after this >weekend). > > > >>And is there a roadmap to get a nice clean method for running i386 >>binaries ? what about i386 binaries from 4.x ? >> >> > >There will a clean way to run i386 4.x binaries be for 5.4-RELEASE. > > > From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 01:40:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492DF16A4D2 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:40:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D771D43D31 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:40:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsh.lists@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (tardiss.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.82.93]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2005030101401801200s54ere>; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:40:18 +0000 Message-ID: <4223C7FC.60305@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:40:12 -0500 From: Sean User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050201) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: WITH_LIB32=yes format X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rsh.lists@comcast.net List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:40:29 -0000 What is the correct format of having WITH_LIB32=yes? In my make.conf I have WITH_LIB32=yes. However I have seen others posting with "WITH_LIB32=yes" Are the quotes needed? Thanks Sean From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 01:41:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEB216A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:41:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B19543D5C for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:41:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j211fBKG011942; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:41:11 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j211fBqp011941; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:41:11 -0800 Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:41:11 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: "David C. Myers" Message-ID: <20050301014111.GA6907@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <4222A870.2090500@aedifice.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4222A870.2090500@aedifice.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VNC on amd64: SIOCGIFCONF problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:41:39 -0000 --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 09:13:20PM -0800, David C. Myers wrote: >=20 >=20 > VNC-3.3.7 in ports looks like it doesn't work because of 64-bit=20 > alignment issues with SIOCGIFCONF. The offending code is in=20 > Xvnc/programs/Xserver/os/access.c: >=20 > if (ifioctl (fd, (int) SIOCGIFCONF, (pointer) &ifc) < 0) > Error ("Getting interface configuration (4)"); >=20 > which comes out in the trace file as: >=20 > 28138 Xvnc CALL bind(0x1,0x7fffffffe670,0x13) > 28138 Xvnc NAMI "/tmp/.X11-unix/X1" > 28138 Xvnc RET bind 0 > 28138 Xvnc CALL listen(0x1,0x80) > 28138 Xvnc RET listen 0 > 28138 Xvnc CALL umask(0x12) > 28138 Xvnc RET umask 0 > 28138 Xvnc CALL ioctl(0,0xffffffffc0106924 ,0x7fffffffe030) > 28138 Xvnc RET ioctl -1 errno 6 Device not configured > 28138 Xvnc CALL writev(0x2,0x7fffffffd790,0x4) > 28138 Xvnc GIO fd 2 wrote 59 bytes > "Getting interface configuration (4): Device not configured > " >=20 >=20 > (Actually, the very first error you'll get is a "Could not open default= =20 > font 'fixed'" message, but you can make that go away by running a font=20 > server and passing its address to Xvnc...) >=20 > Is there a quick solution to this? A 32-bit compatibility shim? =20 > Judging from Google, issues with this ioctl go back years, on all kinds= =20 > of platforms. getifaddrs() is the right way to do this on BSD? You need to copy the misaligned element(s) into properly aligned temporary storage or use getifaddrs instead. SIOCGIFCONF is a really crappy inteface. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCI8g3XY6L6fI4GtQRAg70AJ0bjutnUGvavO9rLhs4XMKgNO8xFQCeO+5w OFqDt7hAzGAR0rtn3aJILro= =xElg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 01:49:07 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E7F16A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:49:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc13.comcast.net (rwcrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.198.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C7E43D31 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:49:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsh.lists@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (tardiss.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.82.93]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2005030101490601500l4s91e>; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:49:06 +0000 Message-ID: <4223CA11.6040008@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:49:05 -0500 From: Sean User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050201) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <16931.17425.441677.617748@canoe.dclg.ca> <20050228195102.GB59327@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20050228195102.GB59327@dragon.nuxi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ia32 ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rsh.lists@comcast.net List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 01:49:07 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:17:21AM -0500, David Gilbert wrote: > >>Having wrestled with a few ports (including java) on amd64, what I >>don't understand is why we don't have the capability to compile ia32 >>versions of ports that won't compile in amd64 mode... > > > We don't yet support building any 32-bit apps on a 64-bit system. I have > some changes to GCC I need to finish. We also need to start installing > the 32-bit headers and .a's. And this is just for the base system. > > If you want to build a 32-bit package under a 64-bit OS, you also need to > have two copies of gtk, gettext, libiconv, etc... installed. It turns > into a mess. > I thought I have seen posts stating that people are using 32 version of programs on 64 bit amd? So I guess some people have done this with the two copies you mentioned? Then why if these 32 bit programs can't easily be built, if at all, do we add such things as with_lib32=yes to make.conf and options like LINPROCFS, COMPAT_LINUX32 ,COMPAT_IA32 , COMPAT_FREEBSD4 ,COMPAT_43 to the kernel config? I thought with these added in 32 bit program support was available? Thanks Sean From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 02:13:45 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F08716A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:13:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238CB43D1D for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:13:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j212DikT028349; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:13:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost)j212DisI028348; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:13:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:13:44 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Sean Message-ID: <20050301021344.GB28309@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <4223C7FC.60305@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4223C7FC.60305@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WITH_LIB32=yes format X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 02:13:45 -0000 On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:40:12PM -0500, Sean wrote: > What is the correct format of having WITH_LIB32=yes? > In my make.conf I have WITH_LIB32=yes. That's it. > However I have seen others posting with "WITH_LIB32=yes" > Are the quotes needed? The quotes are not not needed. The quotes are used to set the text off from surrounding text. See make.conf(5). -- Steve From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 02:38:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A029A16A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:38:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.208.78.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7409843D46 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:38:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j212cThP028464; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:38:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost)j212cTrQ028463; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:38:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:38:29 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Sean Message-ID: <20050301023829.GA28427@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <16931.17425.441677.617748@canoe.dclg.ca> <20050228195102.GB59327@dragon.nuxi.com> <4223CA11.6040008@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4223CA11.6040008@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ia32 ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 02:38:30 -0000 On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:49:05PM -0500, Sean wrote: > > I thought I have seen posts stating that people are using 32 version of > programs on 64 bit amd? It's a very simple concept. If you have 64-bit FreeBSD dynamic linked binaries, you need the 64-bit FreeBSD shared libraries to run them. If you have 32-bit FreeBSD dynamic linked binaries, then you need the 32-bit FreeBSD shared libraries to run them. If you have the 32-bit linux dynamic binaries, then you need to have the 32-bit linux shared libraries. I have 314 libraries and symlinks in /usr/lib32. > So I guess some people have done this with the two copies you mentioned? David was talking about *building* the 32-bit software on a 64-bit machine. This isn't supported. What you can do is take a 32-bit binary, built on a 32-bit machine, and run it on your 64-bit amd64 system. "make buildworld" is setup to build the needed 32-bit libraries and loader on a 64-bit system/ > Then why if these 32 bit programs can't easily be built, if at all, do > we add such things as with_lib32=yes to make.conf and options like > LINPROCFS, COMPAT_LINUX32 ,COMPAT_IA32 , COMPAT_FREEBSD4 ,COMPAT_43 to > the kernel config? > I thought with these added in 32 bit program support was available? Yes. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 04:59:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA1616A4CE; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 04:59:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 103A943D3F; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 04:59:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D1E5972DD4; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:59:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCECF72DCB; Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:59:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:59:41 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: Takeharu KATO In-Reply-To: <42215163.1000802@ybb.ne.jp> Message-ID: <20050228205837.Y62607@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <42210DE2.9060903@ybb.ne.jp> <200502261958.46361.peter@wemm.org> <42215163.1000802@ybb.ne.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MCE on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 04:59:42 -0000 On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Takeharu KATO wrote: > Hi > > Thank you for your response. > > There is little or no MCE support in either i386 or amd64 kernels. The code > > in i386 has never even been tested, because CR4.MCE was never actually turned > > on. > > > Appearantly, my AMD64 box turn on MCE feature in the CPU. > I will start to try to write MCE feature support functions. Make sure you test your code on a Rioworks HDAMA-based AMD64 if you get the chance. I turned on MCE on our 2.4.25 Linux i386 kernels and they trapped during the boot. Apparently there's something goofy with that board (or Opteron 244 processors?) and MCE. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 11:05:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C731116A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:05:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com (mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E59343D1F for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:05:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) Received: from fwd17.aul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D65CD-0001IF-00; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:05:45 +0100 Received: from fw.reifenberger.com (EAvC0+ZpQeLiFxttwn7xfhSo0fiTEquhYArbnm+yDA9iZVFqfV+XUF@[217.232.251.20]) by fwd17.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1D65Bw-0sCpkG0; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:05:28 +0100 Received: from localhost (mike@localhost)j21B5Rq0017582 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:05:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fw.reifenberger.com: mike owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:05:27 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Reifenberger To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050301115009.X17256@fw.reifenberger.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-ID: EAvC0+ZpQeLiFxttwn7xfhSo0fiTEquhYArbnm+yDA9iZVFqfV+XUF@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: d26d9c6c-3b34-407e-8049-11e5067da885 Subject: Memory question X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:05:46 -0000 Hi, currently I'm using a ASUS A8V-Deluxe MB with 4x512MB DDR400 Samsung mem. After some weeks of working without problems I got some interesting memory corruption (md5 printing different values on repeated runs...) when using dual-channel access. After reverting the dual-channel access, all is stable again (for now). (The system is cooled properly and not overloaded BTW) - Has anyone else seen this? - Is anyone using A8V with ECC mem? - Any recommendation about mem brand? - When using 4x1GB mem, what is the amount of usable mem? Thanks in advance! Bye/2 --- Michael Reifenberger, Business Development Manager SAP-Basis, Plaut Consulting Comp: Michael.Reifenberger@plaut.de | Priv: Michael@Reifenberger.com http://www.plaut.de | http://www.Reifenberger.com From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 12:22:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD1816A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:22:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.202.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D5843D1F for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:22:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsh.lists@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (tardiss.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.30.82.93]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2005030112223001400s7l0ee>; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:22:34 +0000 Message-ID: <42245E86.5080105@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 07:22:30 -0500 From: Sean User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050201) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <16931.17425.441677.617748@canoe.dclg.ca> <20050228195102.GB59327@dragon.nuxi.com> <4223CA11.6040008@comcast.net> <20050301023829.GA28427@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20050301023829.GA28427@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ia32 ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: rsh.lists@comcast.net List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:22:35 -0000 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:49:05PM -0500, Sean wrote: > >>I thought I have seen posts stating that people are using 32 version of >>programs on 64 bit amd? > > > It's a very simple concept. If you have 64-bit FreeBSD dynamic > linked binaries, you need the 64-bit FreeBSD shared libraries to > run them. If you have 32-bit FreeBSD dynamic linked binaries, > then you need the 32-bit FreeBSD shared libraries to run them. > If you have the 32-bit linux dynamic binaries, then you need to > have the 32-bit linux shared libraries. I have 314 libraries and > symlinks in /usr/lib32. > > >>So I guess some people have done this with the two copies you mentioned? > > > David was talking about *building* the 32-bit software on a 64-bit > machine. This isn't supported. What you can do is take a 32-bit > binary, built on a 32-bit machine, and run it on your 64-bit amd64 > system. "make buildworld" is setup to build the needed 32-bit > libraries and loader on a 64-bit system/ > > >>Then why if these 32 bit programs can't easily be built, if at all, do >>we add such things as with_lib32=yes to make.conf and options like >>LINPROCFS, COMPAT_LINUX32 ,COMPAT_IA32 , COMPAT_FREEBSD4 ,COMPAT_43 to >>the kernel config? >>I thought with these added in 32 bit program support was available? > > > Yes. > But all this means the 32 bit versions can't be built on a 64 bit version? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 13:02:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5214316A4CF for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:02:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com (mailout06.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA1343D2D for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:02:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) Received: from fwd29.aul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D6718-0002G1-02; Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:02:26 +0100 Received: from fw.reifenberger.com (T-S+c+ZCgeZ8XRz6cfe3EGdxsLcW1o5WLU23gEeqoOL1aLSvY4p8YO@[217.232.251.20]) by fwd29.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1D6711-11gCDA0; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:02:19 +0100 Received: from localhost (mike@localhost)j21D2JoT017997 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:02:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fw.reifenberger.com: mike owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:02:19 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Reifenberger To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050301135543.E17973@fw.reifenberger.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-ID: T-S+c+ZCgeZ8XRz6cfe3EGdxsLcW1o5WLU23gEeqoOL1aLSvY4p8YO@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: c606dd24-363b-4ba8-8d68-42ae804e6f6e Subject: openoffice 1.1.4 (FreeBSD 32bit) not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 13:02:28 -0000 Hi, after putting WITH_LIB32=yes into /etc/make.conf, having the right COMPAT switches in the kernel-conf, after a 'make world' and trying openoffice.org-1.1.4 I get: totum# openoffice.org-1.1.4 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libsal.so.3" not found, required by "javaldx" /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.5" not found, required by "pagein" /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libvcl645fi.so" not found, required by "soffice.bin" the libc one is easy to work-around by an softlink. But he others? Is LD_LIBRARY_PATH only working for elf64 on amd64? Anyone running native 32bit openoffice? Thanks! Bye/2 --- Michael Reifenberger, Business Development Manager SAP-Basis, Plaut Consulting Comp: Michael.Reifenberger@plaut.de | Priv: Michael@Reifenberger.com http://www.plaut.de | http://www.Reifenberger.com From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 16:10:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0837616A4CE for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:10:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ybbsmtp09.mail.mci.yahoo.co.jp (ybbsmtp09.mail.mci.yahoo.co.jp [210.80.241.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EFE9B43D62 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:10:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from takeharu1219@ybb.ne.jp) Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.14?) (takeharu1219@219.35.170.20 with plain) by ybbsmtp09.mail.mci.yahoo.co.jp with SMTP; 1 Mar 2005 16:10:09 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <422493E1.3040807@ybb.ne.jp> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 01:10:09 +0900 From: Takeharu KATO User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Takeharu KATO References: <42210DE2.9060903@ybb.ne.jp> <200502261958.46361.peter@wemm.org> <42215163.1000802@ybb.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <42215163.1000802@ybb.ne.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MCE on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:10:13 -0000 Hi >> > Appearantly, my AMD64 box turn on MCE feature in the CPU. > I will start to try to write MCE feature support functions. > sorry. I misread your mail. CR4.MCE is not turning on as said. I think that it is difficult to do this sort of tests with a real machine. I thinks the following as alternatives. 1) The start of the MCE interrupt handler is tested by using other interrupt. 2) Various error report handling routines are checked by the review. 3) The register handling parts are tested with stub routines in user modes. -- Takeharu KATO From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 16:47:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589F416A4CF for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:47:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ares.wolfpond.org (ns1.wolfpond.org [62.212.96.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D8443D4C for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:47:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ftigeot@wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (aoi.wolfpond.org [IPv6:2001:7a8:24db:1:20c:76ff:feb4:27e1]) by ares.wolfpond.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j21Gl6Ej064083 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:47:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: from aoi.wolfpond.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j21Gl9Te079475 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:47:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ftigeot@aoi.wolfpond.org) Received: (from ftigeot@localhost) by aoi.wolfpond.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j21Gl9xn079474 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:47:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ftigeot) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:47:09 +0100 From: Francois Tigeot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050301164709.GB78743@aoi.wolfpond.org> References: <16931.17425.441677.617748@canoe.dclg.ca> <20050228181056.GC69361@aoi.wolfpond.org> <20050228195158.GC59327@dragon.nuxi.com> <20050228205358.GA73467@aoi.wolfpond.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050228205358.GA73467@aoi.wolfpond.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: -taso on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 16:47:10 -0000 On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 09:53:58PM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote: > > It was possible to compile "32-bit limited" applications on the Alpha, which > was a 64-bit only architecture. I don't know if it is possible on amd64. This extract from contrib/binutils/ld/ChangeLog-0001 is hopefully better worded: 2000-07-27 Ivan Kokshaysky * emulparams/elf64alpha.sh: Implement "-taso" emulation specific option to fit 64-bit executable in the lower 31-bit address range. This is done by changing start address of .interp (the very first section of executable) and then setting EF_ALPHA_32BIT elf header flag. This stuff could be useful to have a native OpenOffice, for example. -- Francois Tigeot From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 21:33:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4636116A4CE; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:33:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cpinternet.com (mail.cpinternet.com [209.240.224.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDC643D3F; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:33:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mharnois@cpinternet.com) X-Node: 2 Received: from mharnois.mdharnois.net (customer-mpls-23.cpinternet.com [209.240.253.23])j21LXrNn022802; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:33:53 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mharnois.mdharnois.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7547BFDD; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:33:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from mharnois.mdharnois.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mharnois.mdharnois.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13838-08; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:33:31 -0600 (CST) Received: by mharnois.mdharnois.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 93D0C7BFDA; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:33:31 -0600 (CST) From: mharnois@cpinternet.com (Michael D. Harnois) To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 15:33:31 -0600 Message-ID: <863bvfgifo.fsf@customer-mpls-23.cpinternet.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.5-b19 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mdharnois.net Subject: X in a chroot X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 21:33:54 -0000 Shut my mouth and call me stupid, but I cannot for the life of me figure out how to run X programs inside a /compat/linux chroot on an amd64. No matter what I try, I get cannot open display: :0 -- Michael D. Harnois Hugo, Minnesota Earth has its boundaries, but human stupidity is limitless. -- Gustave Flaubert From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 1 22:57:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1280C16A4DC for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 22:57:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE3943D31 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 22:57:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 32634 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2005 22:57:24 -0000 Received: from server.baldwin.cx ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 1 Mar 2005 22:57:24 -0000 Received: from [10.50.40.202] (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j21MuexP075581; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:57:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:20:50 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <863bvfgifo.fsf@customer-mpls-23.cpinternet.com> In-Reply-To: <863bvfgifo.fsf@customer-mpls-23.cpinternet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503011720.50369.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.8 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on server.baldwin.cx cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: X in a chroot X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:57:25 -0000 On Tuesday 01 March 2005 04:33 pm, Michael D. Harnois wrote: > Shut my mouth and call me stupid, but I cannot for the life of me > figure out how to run X programs inside a /compat/linux chroot on an > amd64. No matter what I try, I get > > cannot open display: :0 Maybe need to copy or nullfs mount /tmp/.X11-unix and friends into /tmp in the chroot. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 03:29:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6166B16A4CE; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 03:29:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BCE43D46; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 03:29:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp2.sentex.ca (smtp2.sentex.ca [199.212.134.9]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j223Tn3C025746; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 22:29:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by smtp2.sentex.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j223Tnso055848; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 22:29:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id A15827306E; Tue, 1 Mar 2005 22:29:49 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20050302032949.A15827306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2005 22:29:49 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.82/742/Tue Mar 1 20:05:59 2005 on smarthost2.sentex.ca X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.83, clamav-milter version 0.83 on clamscanner2 X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 03:29:51 -0000 TB --- 2005-03-02 01:51:23 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-03-02 01:51:23 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2005-03-02 01:51:23 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-03-02 01:51:23 - cd /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- 2005-03-02 01:51:23 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2005-03-02 01:57:24 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe) TB --- 2005-03-02 01:57:24 - cd /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2005-03-02 01:57:24 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything TB --- 2005-03-02 03:04:58 - building generic kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O2 -pipe) TB --- 2005-03-02 03:04:58 - cd /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2005-03-02 03:04:58 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Wed Mar 2 03:04:59 UTC 2005 >>> stage 1: configuring the kernel >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3.1: making dependencies >>> stage 3.2: building everything >>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Wed Mar 2 03:19:51 UTC 2005 TB --- 2005-03-02 03:19:51 - generating LINT kernel config TB --- 2005-03-02 03:19:51 - cd /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf TB --- 2005-03-02 03:19:51 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT TB --- 2005-03-02 03:19:51 - building LINT kernel (COPTFLAGS=-O2 -pipe) TB --- 2005-03-02 03:19:51 - cd /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2005-03-02 03:19:51 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Wed Mar 2 03:19:51 UTC 2005 >>> stage 1: configuring the kernel >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3.1: making dependencies >>> stage 3.2: building everything [...] cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/altq -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-builtin -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror /tinderbox/CURRENT/a md64/amd64/src/sys/netinet/accf_http.c cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/altq -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-builtin -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror /tinderbox/CURRENT/a md64/amd64/src/sys/netinet/if_atm.c cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/altq -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-builtin -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror /tinderbox/CURRENT/a md64/amd64/src/sys/netinet/if_ether.c cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/altq -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-builtin -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror /tinderbox/CURRENT/a md64/amd64/src/sys/netinet/igmp.c cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/altq -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-builtin -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror /tinderbox/CURRENT/a md64/amd64/src/sys/netinet/in.c cc -c -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/altq -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-builtin -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel -mno-red-zone -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding -Werror /tinderbox/CURRENT/a md64/amd64/src/sys/netinet/ip_carp.c /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/netinet/ip_carp.c: In function `carp_set_addr6': /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/netinet/ip_carp.c:1617: error: structure has no member named `cif_tmp' *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/LINT. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2005-03-02 03:29:49 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2005-03-02 03:29:49 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2005-03-02 03:29:49 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 10:05:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6008416A4CE for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:05:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52303.mail.yahoo.com (web52303.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEE7F43D2F for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:05:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dystopianrebel@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 41542 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Mar 2005 10:05:02 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=YX0MrzD9TY8h6I2LUU3h5mGyHLoVIw1QN/xuO5zlnjp41BSEoOCjfDCq8xy0CAHCWZWRFg1tPxAl74F3L4EHYNJD6LLlUAkZh3nzmQc2Wiwax3WPBfTVuwfxorL9aVqZqH4EupMkzR7o5ehJl3CxDM5uqyvw4OpnNwrD2RVZ/aA= ; Message-ID: <20050302100502.41535.qmail@web52303.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.26.160.170] by web52303.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 02:05:02 PST Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 02:05:02 -0800 (PST) From: dR To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: AMD64/rel 5.3 - setting up Linux compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:05:05 -0000 I need OpenOffice so I'm trying to set up Linux compatibility for AMD64/FreeBSD 5.3 Release, I've modified, rebuilt and installed the kernel and rebooted. I followed these instructions: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/linuxemu-lbc-install.html as well as these: http://people.freebsd.org/~tjr/linux32.html and any other pertinent links in the above articles. Following the reboot, when I type "linux" (linux KLD object), I get "command not found". kldstat does not show linux.ko. Would someone please suggest what I might check? I am sure that the kernel file has the documented entries. Thanks... I hope all tonight's good insomnia was not wasted. :o) Marko __________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/ From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 10:53:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD44616A4CE for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:53:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neo.redjade.org (neo.redjade.org [219.254.21.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2668743D31 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:53:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssw@neo.redjade.org) Received: from neo.redjade.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by neo.redjade.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j22Arldg025899; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 19:53:47 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from ssw@neo.redjade.org) Received: (from ssw@localhost) by neo.redjade.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j22ArlJS025898; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 19:53:47 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from ssw) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 19:53:47 +0900 From: Sangwoo Shim To: dR Message-ID: <20050302105347.GB25618@neo.redjade.org> References: <20050302100502.41535.qmail@web52303.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050302100502.41535.qmail@web52303.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64/rel 5.3 - setting up Linux compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:53:42 -0000 On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:05:02AM -0800, dR wrote: [snip] AFAIK, kernel modules for linux compatibility do not work yet. You should include them directly in the kernel configuration file. Well, I'll describe a little what I've done to use OOo for linux on FBSD/amd64. FYI, I installed OOo 1.9.m79. 1. Rebuild and install kernel with following options. options LINPROCFS options COMPAT_43 options COMPAT_LINUX32 2. After reboot, install emulators/linux_base. 3. Install java/linux-sun-jdk14. 3. Download OOo package for linux and expand it. Extract generated rpms using rpm2cpio, like rpm2cpio *.rpm | tar xvf - OOo files will be extracted into $PWD/opt. 4. Copy entire opt directory to /compat/linux/opt. 5. Add OOo shlib directory (/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/filter) to /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf, and run /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig. And then you are all set. Execute /compat/linux/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/soffice. If you are not using English-version of OOo, you might have to map some font files for your language. Hope these help. Regards, Sangwoo Shim From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 11:32:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FA1B16A4CE; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:32:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com (mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9F643D49; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 11:32:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd27.aul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D6S5S-0005yZ-04; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 12:32:18 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (Ze2G8EZe8eOgA7oNQFDkkoZVi9tQ8ASpZupIaH393oAQwQTxCO1xor@[217.83.27.180]) by fwd27.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1D6S5C-1cOm7E0; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:32:02 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])j22BVCet059078; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:31:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from 141.113.101.32 ([141.113.101.32]) by netchild.homeip.net (Horde) with HTTP for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:31:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20050302123112.z9rninqg8o84ksks@netchild.homeip.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:31:12 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: John Baldwin References: <863bvfgifo.fsf@customer-mpls-23.cpinternet.com> <200503011720.50369.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200503011720.50369.jhb@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.2) / FreeBSD-4.11 X-ID: Ze2G8EZe8eOgA7oNQFDkkoZVi9tQ8ASpZupIaH393oAQwQTxCO1xor@t-dialin.net X-TOI-MSGID: 5097b526-4a98-4ee8-a597-2144367a9479 cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X in a chroot X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 11:32:21 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday 01 March 2005 04:33 pm, Michael D. Harnois wrote: >> Shut my mouth and call me stupid, but I cannot for the life of me >> figure out how to run X programs inside a /compat/linux chroot on an >> amd64. No matter what I try, I get >> >> cannot open display: :0 X11 tries to open the display over an unix domain socket. If the server is in a chroot, then it's in the chroot /tmp dir. You can try to set the DISPLAY variable to "localhost/tcp:0" or "localhost:0". You X server needs to listen on TCP connections for this. > Maybe need to copy or nullfs mount /tmp/.X11-unix and friends into > /tmp in the chroot. A copy doesn't help, since it contains an unix domain socket. Doing a nullfs mount in the proposed direction helps when a X11 program is run in the chroot. If the linux program is just started normaly (without calling chroot(8)), another workaround is to remove /compat/linux/tmp (f it exists), this way the program should see the FreeBSD /tmp directory instead of /comapt/linux/tmp. If the X Server is run in a chroot (and a program not in the chroot has to connect to it), the nullfs mount has to be the other way around or a symlink into the chroot should be provided which does the same in this case. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 The penalty for laughing in a courtroom is six months in jail; if it were not for this penalty, the jury would never hear the evidence. -- H. L. Mencken From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 14:37:53 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E462E16A562 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:37:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz [195.122.204.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F3C43D49 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:37:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])j22EbpnJ057702; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:37:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by pav.hide.vol.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j22EbpId057701; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:37:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: pav.hide.vol.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Adam McLaurin In-Reply-To: <1109772482.12876.216375803@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1109772044.12090.216373914@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1109772214.53302.8.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <1109772482.12876.216375803@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-02zz02VI9CGcajrYPfPM" Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:37:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1109774270.53302.16.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problems with misc/gkrellweather2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:37:54 -0000 --=-02zz02VI9CGcajrYPfPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Adam McLaurin p=ED=B9e v st 02. 03. 2005 v 09:08 -0500: > Hi Pav, >=20 > -$ make -V OSVERSION > 503100 >=20 > -$ uname -a > FreeBSD jake 5.3-STABLE FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #2: Sun Nov 21 00:42:14 EST > 2004 root@jake:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ESKI i386 Most interesting, it seems lrintf() is gcc builtin on amd64 but not on i386. D'oh! How come? Please open the port Makefile and delete the .if and .endif around EXTRA_PATCHES line and check if that helps. > On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:03:34 +0100, "Pav Lucistnik" > said: > > Adam McLaurin p=EDše v st 02. 03. 2005 v 09:00 -0500: > > > Hi Pav, > > >=20 > > > The new gkrellweather2 has problems with lrintf() > > >=20 > > > When compiling: > > > gkrellweather.c: In function `draw_panel': > > > gkrellweather.c:304: warning: implicit declaration of function `lrint= f' > > >=20 > > > When loading into gkrellm: > > > /usr/X11R6/libexec/gkrellm2/plugins/gkrellweather.so > > > Error: /usr/X11R6/libexec/gkrellm2/plugins/gkrellweather.so: Undefine= d > > > symbol "lrintf" > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Can you take a look? Probably something very simple. :) > >=20 > > What's your OSVERSION? > >=20 > > make -V OSVERSION > >=20 > > in any port dir > >=20 > > --=20 > > Pav Lucistnik > > > >=20 > > What do we know about love? Love is like a pear. Pear is sweet and hav= e > > a specific shape. Try to exactly define the shape of a pear. > > -- Marigold: 50 Years Of Poetry >=20 >=20 --=20 Pav Lucistnik May your arrow always find its mark. --=-02zz02VI9CGcajrYPfPM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCJc++ntdYP8FOsoIRAlKzAKCILhVAHQ1eXSNHnlk64O7nQaHqXwCePZs8 TRpcoCy50jzdC6IIsLFknw4= =uMzQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-02zz02VI9CGcajrYPfPM-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 15:03:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643D016A4CE; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:03:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FF443D1F; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:03:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@irotas.net) Received: from web3.messagingengine.com (web3.internal [10.202.2.212]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EECAC5A544; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:03:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by web3.messagingengine.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id D70C74D79; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:03:31 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1109775811.18108.216380381@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: aR7D1dWzUZvM7jsYv+eKgzluBsSilajf02PPQDerO9co 1109775811 From: "Adam McLaurin" To: pav@FreeBSD.org Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME::Lite 1.5 (F2.73; T1.001; A1.64; B3.05; Q3.03) References: <1109772044.12090.216373914@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1109772214.53302.8.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <1109772482.12876.216375803@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1109774270.53302.16.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <1109774270.53302.16.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 10:03:31 -0500 cc: amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Problems with misc/gkrellweather2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:03:32 -0000 Hi Pav, That did the trick, thanks! Now I can see how cold it is outside without actually walking out there. ;) -Adam On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 15:37:50 +0100, "Pav Lucistnik" said: > Most interesting, it seems lrintf() is gcc builtin on amd64 but not on > i386. D'oh! How come? > > Please open the port Makefile and delete the .if and .endif around > EXTRA_PATCHES line and check if that helps. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 17:25:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691A516A4CE for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:25:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54305.mail.yahoo.com (web54305.mail.yahoo.com [68.142.225.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E11A443D2F for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:25:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iliaroot@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 49855 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Mar 2005 17:25:22 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=4brYkhsZDduBpd7cVLJ8a9UW2f/5ETDVabFAnoZHB04t/2jaGc8L7Zx2gQ6E2LBXda6T30MPff3QCTX79g/avBLv+ZLLrkPCIzB5U3d0dXCiB0xCzz9AfhgKTidGu5spOqDEXJJCLMX/nf+TTmmEV2QbCKN+roeonUzGk0DoEvk= ; Message-ID: <20050302172522.49853.qmail@web54305.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [65.173.228.59] by web54305.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 09:25:22 PST Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 09:25:22 -0800 (PST) From: Ilia Rassadzin To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Ethernet address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:25:23 -0000 here is some information from dmesg still cannot make network card work :( pcio: at device 3,3 (no driver attatched) sis0: port 0xd8ff mom 0xdffc000-0xdfff irq 19 at device 4,0 on pcio miibus0: on sisO rlphy 0: media interface> on miibus0 rlphy 0: 10 baseT, 10 baseT-FDX, 100baseTX-100base TX-FDX, auto sis0:Ethernet address: ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff cbb0: at device 10.0 on pciO cardbusO: on cbbo pcio: network at device 14,0 (no driver attatched) __________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/ From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 20:35:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABC116A4CF for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:35:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5031E43D2D for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:35:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 43ADD72DD4; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:35:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDA072DCB for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:35:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:35:23 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050302123323.U79573@carver.gumbysoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: spin lock smp rendezvous panics X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:35:23 -0000 I've been getting this panic during buildworlds for the past few days from -CURRENT: spin lock smp rendezvous held by 0xffffff005ae39be0 for > 5 seconds panic: spin lock held too long cpuid = 0 KDB: enter: panic debug.kdb.stop_cpus=0 is needed to get into ddb. This is a HDAMA with 2 Opteron 244s with 2GB RAM and a 3ware twe controller. Anyone else having problems with this? -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 21:27:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FBF16A53A for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:27:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BF043D2D for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:27:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) Received: from [10.70.0.244] (daemon.mj.niksun.com [10.70.0.244]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j22LRHWj018483; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:27:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) From: Jung-uk Kim Organization: Niksun, Inc. To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:27:14 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20050302100502.41535.qmail@web52303.mail.yahoo.com> <20050302105347.GB25618@neo.redjade.org> In-Reply-To: <20050302105347.GB25618@neo.redjade.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503021627.14736.jkim@niksun.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/742/Tue Mar 1 20:05:59 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: AMD64/rel 5.3 - setting up Linux compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:27:23 -0000 On Wednesday 02 March 2005 05:53 am, Sangwoo Shim wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:05:02AM -0800, dR wrote: > [snip] > > AFAIK, kernel modules for linux compatibility do not work yet. > You should include them directly in the kernel configuration file. > > Well, I'll describe a little what I've done to use OOo for linux on > FBSD/amd64. FYI, I installed OOo 1.9.m79. > > 1. Rebuild and install kernel with following options. > options LINPROCFS > options COMPAT_43 > options COMPAT_LINUX32 > 2. After reboot, install emulators/linux_base. > 3. Install java/linux-sun-jdk14. > 3. Download OOo package for linux and expand it. > Extract generated rpms using rpm2cpio, like > rpm2cpio *.rpm | tar xvf - > > OOo files will be extracted into $PWD/opt. > 4. Copy entire opt directory to /compat/linux/opt. Copy usr/bin/* to /compat/linux/bin and usr/share/* to /compat/linux/share. > 5. Add OOo shlib directory > (/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/filter) to > /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf, and run /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig. > > And then you are all set. > Execute /compat/linux/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/soffice. If > you are not using English-version of OOo, you might have to map > some font files for your language. I am running korean version just fine without any mapping. ;-) One more tip: you may have to map proper JRE directory if it doesn't find /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/jre automatically. Mine didn't. http://marketing.openoffice.org/2.0/featureguide.html 'Choose Tools - Options - OpenOffice.org - Java. You do not have to select a version of Java manually as it will be done automatically if necessary, but you can if you want.' > Hope these help. It was great help for me. Thanks!!! Jung-uk Kim > Regards, > Sangwoo Shim From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 21:41:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F4F16A4D0 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:41:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D7B43D41 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:41:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 21793 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2005 21:41:47 -0000 Received: from server.baldwin.cx ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 2 Mar 2005 21:41:47 -0000 Received: from [10.50.40.202] (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j22LffD9084187; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:41:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: alpha@FreeBSD.org, amd64@FreeBSD.org, ia64@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:43:05 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503021643.05580.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.8 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on server.baldwin.cx Subject: [PATCH] More stackgap removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:41:48 -0000 I've fixed up a few more syscalls to have kern_foo versions so that ABI wrappers for them can stop using the stackgap. In this patch, I've added kern_settimeofday() for ibcs2 and freebsd32, kern_adjtime() for freebsd32, and kern_sched_rr_get_interval() for Linux/i386 on amd64 (note that this means that COMPAT_LINUX32 now requires POSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING). I've also added kern_readv() and kern_writev() for OSF/1, Linux/i386 on amd64, and freebsd32. For these functions I added a per-ABI version of copyinuio() to build a uio structure from the iovec array in userland. Testing and feedback of both native and compat binaries greatly appreciated. http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/abi.patch -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 21:57:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E768016A4CE for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:57:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E5D043D41 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 21:57:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) Received: from [10.70.0.244] (daemon.mj.niksun.com [10.70.0.244]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j22LvFHH019527; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:57:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) From: Jung-uk Kim Organization: Niksun, Inc. To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:57:11 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20050302100502.41535.qmail@web52303.mail.yahoo.com> <20050302105347.GB25618@neo.redjade.org> <200503021627.14736.jkim@niksun.com> In-Reply-To: <200503021627.14736.jkim@niksun.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503021657.11219.jkim@niksun.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/742/Tue Mar 1 20:05:59 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: AMD64/rel 5.3 - setting up Linux compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 21:57:17 -0000 On Wednesday 02 March 2005 04:27 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > Copy usr/bin/* to /compat/linux/bin and usr/share/* -------------------- to /compat/linux/usr/bin > to /compat/linux/share. ----------------------- to /compat/linux/usr/share. Sorry for the typo. Jung-uk Kim From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 2 22:33:22 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F5216A4CE for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 22:33:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAAC43D39 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 22:33:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j22MXJH4086496; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:33:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j22MXJjM086495; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:33:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:33:19 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: "Michael D. Harnois" Message-ID: <20050302223319.GA84962@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <863bvfgifo.fsf@customer-mpls-23.cpinternet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <863bvfgifo.fsf@customer-mpls-23.cpinternet.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X in a chroot X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 22:33:22 -0000 On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 03:33:31PM -0600, Michael D. Harnois wrote: > Shut my mouth and call me stupid, but I cannot for the life of me > figure out how to run X programs inside a /compat/linux chroot on an > amd64. No matter what I try, I get Why are you chroot'ing? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) P.S. only post to one freebsd-*@freebsd.org list at a time. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 01:54:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5772816A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:54:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0357E43D41 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 01:54:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from briangonzales@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 68so413584wra for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:54:26 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hgHqhqk7i7rN9K4SUXv02LUvH1+05XyQeSXNDabGwtPSCaP7KZCJWaM9o0HzmLWdNB+vgahkg2NGqgZTAwYJxxCMXRnOsffMo2hMfKJ/h7q8+uUTPZgO9veYdME01NHwi/ACqX+FZga7ThdjfbvjCjistgWsR0Fq7rWum+0kjrg= Received: by 10.54.42.64 with SMTP id p64mr23068wrp; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 17:54:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.4.12 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:54:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <45bf45040503021754738d201f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:54:26 -0800 From: brian gonzales To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: add X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: brian gonzales List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 01:54:27 -0000 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 03:44:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228B416A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 03:44:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-gw-cl-d.dmv.com (smtp-gw-cl-d.dmv.com [216.240.97.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8410443D3F for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 03:44:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) Received: from mail-gw-cl-a.dmv.com (mail-gw-cl-a.dmv.com [216.240.97.38]) by smtp-gw-cl-d.dmv.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j233xqWa022352 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 22:59:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) Received: from [64.45.134.154] (dogpound.dyndns.org [64.45.134.154]) by mail-gw-cl-a.dmv.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j2341Ew5033158 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:01:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) Message-ID: <42268841.8040703@dmv.com> Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 22:45:05 -0500 From: Sven Willenberger User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 216.240.97.42 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 216.240.97.38 Subject: fxp can't map mbuf (error 12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 03:44:40 -0000 Dual opteron Tyan s2882 with onboard intel (fxp) and broadcom (bge). System essentially freezes during network traffic through fxp. Not only that, but any process that was started that used fxp (cvsup, for example) will lock. Rebooting will result in an unclean unmount as it "gives up on 64 buffers". Anyway the exact error message is: kernel: fxp0: can't map mbuf (error 12) Portions of dmesg that may be relevant: FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE #0: Wed Mar 2 15:07:54 EST 2005 root@:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NORACCT Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 248 (2190.89-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0xf5a Stepping = 10 Features=0x78bfbff AMD Features=0xe0500800 real memory = 8589934592 (8192 MB) avail memory = 8250486784 (7868 MB) ACPI APIC Table: FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-27 on motherboard ioapic2 irqs 28-31 on motherboard acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x5008-0x500b on acpi0 fxp0: port 0xa400-0xa43f mem 0xfeaa0000-0xfeabffff,0xfeafb000-0xfeafbfff irq 18 at device 8.0 on pci4 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:81:29:b0:0d ahd0: port 0x9c00-0x9cff,0x9000-0x90ff mem 0xfc8fc000-0xfc8fdfff irq 24 at device 6.0 on pci3 aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs ahd1: port 0x9400-0x94ff,0x9800-0x98ff mem 0xfc8fe000-0xfc8fffff irq 25 at device 6.1 on pci3 aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel B, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 67-100Mhz, 512 SCBs bge0: mem 0xfc8a0000-0xfc8affff,0xfc8b0000-0xfc8bffff irq 24 at device 9.0 on pci3 miibus1: on bge0 brgphy0: on miibus1 brgphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:81:29:b0:4a bge1: mem 0xfc8d0000-0xfc8dffff,0xfc8e0000-0xfc8effff irq 25 at device 9.1 on pci3 miibus2: on bge1 brgphy1: on miibus2 brgphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto bge1: Ethernet address: 00:e0:81:29:b0:4b pci0: at device 10.1 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 11.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib3 pcib4: at device 3.0 on pci1 pci2: on pcib4 amr0: mem 0xfc580000-0xfc5fffff,0xff4f0000-0xff4fffff irq 28 at device 0.0 on pci2 amr0: Firmware 413B, BIOS H409, 128MB RAM pci0: at device 11.1 (no driver attached) acpi_button0: on acpi0 Using the broadcom gigE connector resolves the issue ... Sven From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 03:53:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0D316A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 03:53:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neo.redjade.org (neo.redjade.org [219.254.21.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DFD843D5C for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 03:53:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssw@neo.redjade.org) Received: from neo.redjade.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by neo.redjade.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j233rEGg030293; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:53:14 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from ssw@neo.redjade.org) Received: (from ssw@localhost) by neo.redjade.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j233rDpO030292; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:53:13 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from ssw) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:53:13 +0900 From: Sangwoo Shim To: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <20050303035313.GA30221@neo.redjade.org> References: <20050302100502.41535.qmail@web52303.mail.yahoo.com> <20050302105347.GB25618@neo.redjade.org> <200503021627.14736.jkim@niksun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200503021627.14736.jkim@niksun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64/rel 5.3 - setting up Linux compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 03:53:05 -0000 On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 04:27:14PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Wednesday 02 March 2005 05:53 am, Sangwoo Shim wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:05:02AM -0800, dR wrote: [snip] > > 3. Download OOo package for linux and expand it. > > Extract generated rpms using rpm2cpio, like > > rpm2cpio *.rpm | tar xvf - > > > > OOo files will be extracted into $PWD/opt. > > 4. Copy entire opt directory to /compat/linux/opt. > > Copy usr/bin/* to /compat/linux/bin and usr/share/* > to /compat/linux/share. Hmm, mine does not contain any directory name 'usr'. Might have been caused by version difference. > > > 5. Add OOo shlib directory > > (/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/filter) to > > /compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf, and run /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig. > > > > And then you are all set. > > Execute /compat/linux/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/soffice. If > > you are not using English-version of OOo, you might have to map > > some font files for your language. > > I am running korean version just fine without any mapping. ;-) ^^^^^^ :-) > > One more tip: you may have to map proper JRE directory if it doesn't > find /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/jre automatically. Mine didn't. > > http://marketing.openoffice.org/2.0/featureguide.html > > 'Choose Tools - Options - OpenOffice.org - Java. You do not have to > select a version of Java manually as it will be done automatically if > necessary, but you can if you want.' > > > Hope these help. > > It was great help for me. > > Thanks!!! > > Jung-uk Kim Thanks for all your comments! And your invaluable advices on -amd64 and -current are really helpful. :-) Regards, Sangwoo Shim From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 04:01:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611A316A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:01:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB35743D4C for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:01:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so281407rnf for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:01:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Txbc/fqRSgq1BasAXnF5oaHGkjYFmePhaYuAHyHhl+OwmEgljHjoW00XijAxQkfUTJZMP3yplJKsMjRZpKbx4vid0qASfxjSqU5O/9WDZ6AA2Hd8oCdL25O+hju7ZEkj4KFZC/IrFfbKuk4c5x46SrT66JrXaOvn1pxXES4vtdg= Received: by 10.38.78.48 with SMTP id a48mr195610rnb; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 20:00:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.209.22 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:00:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <84dead72050302200034b96d81@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 04:00:47 +0000 From: Joseph Koshy To: Ilia Rassadzin In-Reply-To: <20050302172522.49853.qmail@web54305.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050302172522.49853.qmail@web54305.mail.yahoo.com> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ethernet address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joseph Koshy List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 04:01:12 -0000 > sis0: port 0xd8ff mom > sis0:Ethernet address: ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff Does the card work correctly after a cold boot into a 32 bit OS? If so what is the ethernet address shown by it? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 10:20:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1428716A4D8 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:20:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 864F243D1F for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:20:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j23AK4jF055740 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:20:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j23AK4EJ055739; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:20:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:20:04 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <200503031020.j23AK4EJ055739@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Fredrik Widell Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDECB16A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:14:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nic2.widell.net (nic2.widell.net [194.68.48.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4645443D31 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:14:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fredrik@nic2.widell.net) Received: from nic2.widell.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nic2.widell.net (8.13.3/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j23ADwTI006092 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:13:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fredrik@nic2.widell.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by nic2.widell.net (8.13.3/8.12.10/Submit) id j23ADwJL006091; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:13:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from fredrik) Message-Id: <200503031013.j23ADwJL006091@nic2.widell.net> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:13:58 +0100 (CET) From: Fredrik Widell To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Subject: amd64/78349: making of kernel with options SMBFS and NETSMB fails on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Fredrik Widell List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 10:20:06 -0000 >Number: 78349 >Category: amd64 >Synopsis: making of kernel with options SMBFS and NETSMB fails on amd64 >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-amd64 >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Mar 03 10:20:04 GMT 2005 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Fredrik Widell >Release: FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE amd64 >Organization: KTHNOC >Environment: System: FreeBSD nic2.widell.net 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #0: Wed Mar 2 16:53:07 CET 2005 root@nic2.widell.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >Description: Cannot get mount_smbfs to work, mount_smbfs -I 10.0.0.1 //widell@host/share /mnt/share mount_smbfs: kldload(smbfs): No such file or directory Trying to get mount_smbfs to work I put these 2 lines in my kernelconfig: options SMBFS options NETSMB make fails with the following output: ... smb_usr.o(.text+0x590): In function `smb_usr_simplerequest': : undefined reference to `md_get_uint16le' smb_usr.o(.text+0x5c7): In function `smb_usr_simplerequest': : undefined reference to `md_get_mem' smb_usr.o(.text+0x654): In function `smb_cpdatain': : undefined reference to `mb_init' smb_usr.o(.text+0x66c): In function `smb_cpdatain': : undefined reference to `mb_put_mem' smb_usr.o(.text+0x7c4): In function `smb_usr_t2request': : undefined reference to `md_get_mem' smb_usr.o(.text+0x816): In function `smb_usr_t2request': : undefined reference to `md_get_mem' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/NIC2. >How-To-Repeat: Make a kernel with the above options, options SMBFS options NETSMB >Fix: >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 14:55:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD5B16A4CF for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:55:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54305.mail.yahoo.com (web54305.mail.yahoo.com [68.142.225.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1719143D3F for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:55:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iliaroot@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 24068 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Mar 2005 14:55:16 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=e8oWeQ3rROokokgFw/MH5HeQNCYno3//n27eK3vjETWwjZbCGxGvpqgu7FC317AiOOt0bZ7XiMbSkTuDMhd3Cv1VPWV9y+RJ7GtYzZC//yFyZ/eJEpBgR/GcSQJtHl9ZpyOTeM8qdgu/X065Vxm6DIp3h/8THg21MdF1SNsh7/c= ; Message-ID: <20050303145516.24066.qmail@web54305.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [67.175.162.214] by web54305.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 06:55:16 PST Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 06:55:16 -0800 (PST) From: Ilia Rassadzin To: Joseph Koshy In-Reply-To: <84dead72050302200034b96d81@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ethernet address ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 14:55:17 -0000 I have dual boot WinXP and FreeBSD with XP it works fine and shows 00-0C-76-F7-25-85 --- Joseph Koshy wrote: > > sis0: port 0xd8ff mom > > sis0:Ethernet address: ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > > Does the card work correctly after a cold boot into > a 32 bit OS? If so what > is the ethernet address shown by it? > __________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/ From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 15:18:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FB716A4CF for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:18:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7DF43D5A for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:18:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zombyfork@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so388334rng for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 07:18:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ajUz5S9hZfMHITwawAEw0abLXuJ9xxSvvg6KDIps0RK0f7zpoSV32HN9Is/zRjlIa+D3mzg6rAbS53jHZRQJwGsctPOwskSTdre3UJQOpaq/K1Q+JMJXY6O35/O28c0I5Z2Pks5/7XgXB7dAiX+kFX+BF+bMS9PayehXo1Y5sCM= Received: by 10.38.10.60 with SMTP id 60mr157769rnj; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 07:17:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.22.22 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 07:17:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <346a8022050303071740b05a82@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:17:43 -0500 From: Coleman Kane To: rsh.lists@comcast.net In-Reply-To: <42245E86.5080105@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <16931.17425.441677.617748@canoe.dclg.ca> <20050228195102.GB59327@dragon.nuxi.com> <4223CA11.6040008@comcast.net> <20050301023829.GA28427@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <42245E86.5080105@comcast.net> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ia32 ports... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: cokane@cokane.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 15:18:11 -0000 On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 07:22:30 -0500, Sean wrote: > Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 08:49:05PM -0500, Sean wrote: > > > >>I thought I have seen posts stating that people are using 32 version of > >>programs on 64 bit amd? > > > > > > It's a very simple concept. If you have 64-bit FreeBSD dynamic > > linked binaries, you need the 64-bit FreeBSD shared libraries to > > run them. If you have 32-bit FreeBSD dynamic linked binaries, > > then you need the 32-bit FreeBSD shared libraries to run them. > > If you have the 32-bit linux dynamic binaries, then you need to > > have the 32-bit linux shared libraries. I have 314 libraries and > > symlinks in /usr/lib32. > > > > > >>So I guess some people have done this with the two copies you mentioned? > > > > > > David was talking about *building* the 32-bit software on a 64-bit > > machine. This isn't supported. What you can do is take a 32-bit > > binary, built on a 32-bit machine, and run it on your 64-bit amd64 > > system. "make buildworld" is setup to build the needed 32-bit > > libraries and loader on a 64-bit system/ > > > > > >>Then why if these 32 bit programs can't easily be built, if at all, do > >>we add such things as with_lib32=yes to make.conf and options like > >>LINPROCFS, COMPAT_LINUX32 ,COMPAT_IA32 , COMPAT_FREEBSD4 ,COMPAT_43 to > >>the kernel config? > >>I thought with these added in 32 bit program support was available? > > > > > > Yes. > > > But all this means the 32 bit versions can't be built on a 64 bit version? > They can be built, it is just difficult to build them. The latest versions of gcc and ld support a 32-bit executable target now. You would need to have some way of selecting which target (32-bit or 64-bit) you were compiling to in the .mk files. In addition, you'd need all of this automated across all ports, which is probably not easy. I have managed to build 32-bit binaries using the existing tools. The problem is, I haven't built 32-bit versions of things like Xorg and libgtk, libgnome, etc.... The solution seems like it would be easy, but actually doing the work and effort to make sure it works across the board is something else entirely. It is important to know that 32-bit binaries won't work with your existing 64-bit libs, and 64-bit binaries won't work with your 32-bit libs. It just won't happen, it is architectural in nature. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 16:07:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CD6016A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:07:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail27.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B01643D39 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:07:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 2432 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2005 16:07:09 -0000 Received: from server.baldwin.cx ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 3 Mar 2005 16:07:09 -0000 Received: from [10.50.40.202] (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j23G74qB090508; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:07:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org, Fredrik Widell Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:08:33 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200503031013.j23ADwJL006091@nic2.widell.net> In-Reply-To: <200503031013.j23ADwJL006091@nic2.widell.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503031108.33371.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.8 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on server.baldwin.cx cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: amd64/78349: making of kernel with options SMBFS and NETSMB fails on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:07:10 -0000 On Thursday 03 March 2005 05:13 am, Fredrik Widell wrote: > Cannot get mount_smbfs to work, > mount_smbfs -I 10.0.0.1 //widell@host/share /mnt/share > mount_smbfs: kldload(smbfs): No such file or directory > > Trying to get mount_smbfs to work I put these 2 lines in my kernelconfig: > > options SMBFS > options NETSMB > > make fails with the following output: Check /sys/conf/NOTES again: # # SMB/CIFS requester # NETSMB enables support for SMB protocol, it requires LIBMCHAIN and LIBICONV # options. # NETSMBCRYPTO enables support for encrypted passwords. options NETSMB #SMB/CIFS requester options NETSMBCRYPTO #encrypted password support for SMB Specifically, note that NETSMB requires LIBMCHAIN and LIBICONV. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 16:08:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446A816A4CF; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:08:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EEE43D31; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:08:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (jhb@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j23G7x3Z007040; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:07:59 GMT (envelope-from jhb@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from jhb@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j23G7xDX007036; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:07:59 GMT (envelope-from jhb) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:07:59 GMT From: John Baldwin Message-Id: <200503031607.j23G7xDX007036@freefall.freebsd.org> To: fredrik@widell.net, jhb@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: amd64/78349: making of kernel with options SMBFS and NETSMB fails on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:08:00 -0000 Synopsis: making of kernel with options SMBFS and NETSMB fails on amd64 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: jhb State-Changed-When: Thu Mar 3 16:07:38 GMT 2005 State-Changed-Why: NETSMB depends on LIBMCHAIN and LIBICONV as documented in NOTES. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=78349 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 16:10:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA07B16A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:10:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE69743D53 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:10:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j23GAGEO007137 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:10:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j23GAGD8007136; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:10:16 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:10:16 GMT Message-Id: <200503031610.j23GAGD8007136@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org From: John Baldwin Subject: Re: amd64/78349: making of kernel with options SMBFS and NETSMB fails on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Baldwin List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:10:16 -0000 The following reply was made to PR amd64/78349; it has been noted by GNATS. From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org, Fredrik Widell Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: amd64/78349: making of kernel with options SMBFS and NETSMB fails on amd64 Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:08:33 -0500 On Thursday 03 March 2005 05:13 am, Fredrik Widell wrote: > Cannot get mount_smbfs to work, > mount_smbfs -I 10.0.0.1 //widell@host/share /mnt/share > mount_smbfs: kldload(smbfs): No such file or directory > > Trying to get mount_smbfs to work I put these 2 lines in my kernelconfig: > > options SMBFS > options NETSMB > > make fails with the following output: Check /sys/conf/NOTES again: # # SMB/CIFS requester # NETSMB enables support for SMB protocol, it requires LIBMCHAIN and LIBICONV # options. # NETSMBCRYPTO enables support for encrypted passwords. options NETSMB #SMB/CIFS requester options NETSMBCRYPTO #encrypted password support for SMB Specifically, note that NETSMB requires LIBMCHAIN and LIBICONV. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 16:54:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF82316A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:54:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438A543D49 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:54:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) Received: from [10.70.0.244] (daemon.mj.niksun.com [10.70.0.244]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j23Gskwv039669; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:54:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@niksun.com) From: Jung-uk Kim Organization: Niksun, Inc. To: Sangwoo Shim Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:54:45 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <20050302100502.41535.qmail@web52303.mail.yahoo.com> <200503021627.14736.jkim@niksun.com> <20050303035313.GA30221@neo.redjade.org> In-Reply-To: <20050303035313.GA30221@neo.redjade.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200503031154.45046.jkim@niksun.com> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/743/Wed Mar 2 19:02:05 2005 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64/rel 5.3 - setting up Linux compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 16:54:50 -0000 On Wednesday 02 March 2005 10:53 pm, Sangwoo Shim wrote: > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 04:27:14PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Wednesday 02 March 2005 05:53 am, Sangwoo Shim wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:05:02AM -0800, dR wrote: > > [snip] > > > > 3. Download OOo package for linux and expand it. > > > Extract generated rpms using rpm2cpio, like > > > rpm2cpio *.rpm | tar xvf - > > > > > > OOo files will be extracted into $PWD/opt. > > > 4. Copy entire opt directory to /compat/linux/opt. > > > > Copy usr/bin/* to /compat/linux/bin and usr/share/* > > to /compat/linux/share. > > Hmm, mine does not contain any directory name 'usr'. Might have > been caused by version difference. Step 3 doesn't seem to work for me. I just extracted individual RPMs. Maybe you have missed few RPMs? Jung-uk Kim From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 17:31:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516FF16A4CE for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:31:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from phoenix.gargantuan.com (phoenix.gargantuan.com [24.73.171.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B9843D53 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:31:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael@gargantuan.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.gargantuan.com [127.0.0.1]) by spamassassin-injector (Postfix) with SMTP id 71C3A4C9; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:31:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by phoenix.gargantuan.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9295B375; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:31:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:31:12 -0500 From: "Michael W. Oliver" To: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <20050303173112.GA65467@gargantuan.com> References: <20050302100502.41535.qmail@web52303.mail.yahoo.com> <200503021627.14736.jkim@niksun.com> <20050303035313.GA30221@neo.redjade.org> <200503031154.45046.jkim@niksun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200503031154.45046.jkim@niksun.com> X-WWW-URL: http://michael.gargantuan.com X-GPG-PGP-Public-Key: http://michael.gargantuan.com/gnupg/pubkey.asc X-GPG-PGP-Fingerprint: 2694 0179 AE3F BFAE 0916 0BF5 B16B FBAB C5FA A3C9 X-Home-Phone: +1-863-816-8091 X-Mobile-Phone: +1-863-738-2334 X-Mailing-Address0: 8008 Apache Lane X-Mailing-Address1: Lakeland, FL X-Mailing-Address2: 33810-2172 X-Mailing-Address3: United States of America X-Guide-Questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html X-Guide-Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Spam-DCC: Misty: phoenix.gargantuan.com 1170; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on phoenix.gargantuan.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64/rel 5.3 - setting up Linux compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 17:31:25 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2005-03-03T11:54:45-0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Wednesday 02 March 2005 10:53 pm, Sangwoo Shim wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 04:27:14PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >>> On Wednesday 02 March 2005 05:53 am, Sangwoo Shim wrote: >>>> On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:05:02AM -0800, dR wrote: >>>> rpm2cpio *.rpm | tar xvf - > Step 3 doesn't seem to work for me. I just extracted individual RPMs. = =20 > Maybe you have missed few RPMs? I followed the following procedure, which is an off-shoot of Sangwoo's procedure, and it worked great. One note -- I also had to manually set the JRE path, as it was not found automatically. 1. Rebuild and install kernel with following options. options COMPAT_43 options LINPROCFS options COMPAT_LINUX32 2. reboot 3. add the following to /etc/fstab linprocfs /usr/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 4. mount /usr/compat/linux/proc 5. cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base && make install clean 6. cd /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk14 && make install clean 7. cd /usr/local/src # or where ever you want 8. fetch "http://openoffice.mirrors.pair.com/contrib/rc/2.0bc/OOo_2.0bc_Lin= uxIntel_install.tar.gz" 9. tar -zxvf OOo_2.0bc_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz 10. cd RPMS 11. mv openofficeorg* /usr/compat/linux # (do this so that the extracted usr/bin and usr/share stuff are put in the right place later) 12. cd /usr/compat/linux 13. /bin/ls -1 openofficeorg*rpm | while read line; \ do rpm2cpio $line | tar -xvf - ; done 14. rm openofficeorg*rpm 15. echo "/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/filter" >>/usr/compat/linux/etc= /ld.so.conf 16. /usr/compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig 17. Execute /compat/linux/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/soffice NOTE: failing to add "/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/filter" /usr/compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf resulted in the following error when trying to run soffice: /usr/compat/linux/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/soffice.bin: error while loading shared libraries: libfreetype.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory --=20 Mike Oliver [see complete headers for contact information] --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCJ0ngsWv7q8X6o8kRAggIAJ9FzDssD0LPMMUi2IX4cfB7D22HHgCeMdjn KBm3/XT7Z5vsKfbbY17g/XM= =XF2F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 20:53:33 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAC4516A4CE; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:53:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3C143D54; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:53:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior-wifi.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j23KtFti006282; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:55:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <422778B2.3000406@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 13:50:58 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean-Yves Avenard References: <41EFB111.8010906@michaelmeltzer.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd stable cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: twa breakage on AMD64with9.1.5.23wareversionand2005-01-1103:00:49 UTC RELENG_5 commit X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:53:34 -0000 Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > Well, it may work for you, but not for me. > Still hangs exactly in the same spot. > > Jean-Yves > > On 21/01/2005, at 12:24 AM, Michael Meltzer wrote: > >> looks like patch3 worked, good job! I had to turn off TWA_DEBUG to >> get the boot going, the debug was starving the boot on a 9600 baud >> terminal. I can increase the speed and caputer the output on monday if >> it will help(it on the large side, bigger than the 10,000 line capture >> buffer in am using). I incude 2 iozone reports, the first one the new >> driver the second one the old driver, Is thier a way to increase the >> "read ahead" in freebsd?? -mjm >> >> > --- I have a patch that I'll be posting for review tonight that hopefully will put all of this to rest. Stay tuned, and harass me if you don't see it by tomorrow. Scott From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 21:01:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4611816A4CE; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 21:01:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.hydrix.com (ns1.hydrix.com [218.214.210.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DE043D58; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 21:01:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jean-yves.avenard@hydrix.com) Received: from [192.168.0.94] (vpn6.private.hydrix.com [192.168.0.94]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.hydrix.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j23L1ZAm019224 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:01:37 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from jean-yves.avenard@hydrix.com) In-Reply-To: <422778B2.3000406@samsco.org> References: <41EFB111.8010906@michaelmeltzer.com> <422778B2.3000406@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jean-Yves Avenard Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:01:46 +1100 To: Scott Long X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=6.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,J_CHICKENPOX_42 autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on server2.private.hydrix.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.81, clamav-milter version 0.81b on server2.private.hydrix.com X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd stable cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: twa breakage on AMD64 with9.1.5.23wareversionand2005-01-1103:00:49 UTC RELENG_5 commit X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:01:42 -0000 can't wait to test.. I'm just about to revert to FreeBSD i386 this week-end as i can't put up with the constant amd64 crashes anymore... It's not just the twa driver ; the NFS server often start to take 100% of CPU time and various network utilities crashes once a week. I didn't notice much speed increase when I moved from i386 to amd64 so it's not going to be too much of an issue to revert back (except Subversion server: for some reasons it's much faster on amd64) Jean-Yves On 04/03/2005, at 7:50 AM, Scott Long wrote: > Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: >> Well, it may work for you, but not for me. >> Still hangs exactly in the same spot. >> Jean-Yves >> On 21/01/2005, at 12:24 AM, Michael Meltzer wrote: >>> looks like patch3 worked, good job! I had to turn off TWA_DEBUG to >>> get the boot going, the debug was starving the boot on a 9600 baud >>> terminal. I can increase the speed and caputer the output on monday >>> if it will help(it on the large side, bigger than the 10,000 line >>> capture buffer in am using). I incude 2 iozone reports, the first >>> one the new driver the second one the old driver, Is thier a way to >>> increase the "read ahead" in freebsd?? -mjm >>> >>> >> --- > > I have a patch that I'll be posting for review tonight that hopefully > will put all of this to rest. Stay tuned, and harass me if you don't > see it by tomorrow. > > Scott > > --- Jean-Yves Avenard Hydrix Pty Ltd - Embedding the net www.hydrix.com | fax +61 3 9572 2686 | phone +61 3 9572 0686 ext 100 VoIP: direct: 100@voip.hydrix.com, general: info@voip.hydrix.com From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 01:17:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC63816A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 01:17:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tower.berklix.org (bsd.bsn.com [194.221.32.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0095643D31 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 01:17:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.org) Received: from js.berklix.net (p549A5090.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.80.144]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j23NmcYS055101; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 00:48:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@tower.berklix.net) Received: from fire.jhs.private (fire.jhs.private [192.168.91.41]) by js.berklix.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j23Nntmm009705; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 00:49:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@tower.berklix.net) Received: from fire.jhs.private (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.jhs.private (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j23Nnt8N035702; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 00:49:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.jhs.private) Message-Id: <200503032349.j23Nnt8N035702@fire.jhs.private> To: Jean-Yves Avenard In-Reply-To: Message from Jean-Yves Avenard Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 00:49:55 +0100 From: "Julian H. Stacey" cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: twa breakage on AMD64 with9.1.5.23wareversionand2005-01-1103:00:49 UTC RELENG_5 commit X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 01:17:01 -0000 Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: Cc: freebsd stable Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Header breaches rules: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL No posting should be made to more than 2 mailing lists, and only to 2 when ... Stripped to freebsd-amd64@ > I'm just about to revert to FreeBSD i386 this week-end as i can't put > up with the constant amd64 crashes anymore... > > It's not just the twa driver ; the NFS server often start to take 100% > of CPU time and various network utilities crashes once a week. I also see crashes after heavy NFS on amd64 (the box is my main X terminal - painful !) FreeBSD fire.jhs.private 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Sat Feb 26 21:47:28 CET 2005 jhs@fire.jhs.private:/usr1/src/sys/amd64/compile/FIRE64.small amd64 http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2005-March/000936.html Dropping back to i386 would avoid i386/amd ports compat issues. It might bring stability (don't know, not tried), or not I've also had crashes on a new 686 box runing 5.3-RELEASE (not always heavy NFS related, maybe &/or dvdrip related, but maybe it's hardware, that 686 host is newly arrived)... I'll be aiming for stable next, & if I still have probs, then kernel trace & send-pr, & finally current if I must :-) PS re. > can't wait to test.. Fortunately I built both my crashing hosts with the luxury of dual boot partitions (F1 & 2) & a large common F3 of /usr1 for common data, so I can take 1 slice up, & leave one at release for rescue :-) - Julian Stacey Net & Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Mail in Ascii (Html=Spam). Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 02:21:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF1416A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 02:21:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F7443D55 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 02:21:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Peter_Losher@isc.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::37] (tardis.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::37]) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2276677EF; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 02:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Peter_Losher@isc.org) Message-ID: <4227C659.2060206@isc.org> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:22:17 -0800 From: Peter Losher User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050210) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7AB238F3E0D03A91E0C5BA5A" Subject: make buildworld failing this afternoon... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 02:21:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7AB238F3E0D03A91E0C5BA5A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit from a 5-STABLE tree cvsupped six hours ago... It dies here: -=- cc -m32 -march=athlon-xp -msse2 -mfancy-math-387 -DCOMPAT_32BIT -I/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/include -L/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32 -B/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32 -O -pipe -Wall -DFREEBSD_ELF -DIN_RTLD -I/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/i386 -I/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf -elf -fpic -DPIC -Wformat=2 -Wno-format-extra-args -Werror -nostdlib -e .rtld_start -elf -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -o ld-elf32.so.1 rtld_start.o reloc.o rtld.o rtld_lock.o map_object.o malloc.o xmalloc.o debug.o libmap.o -lc_pic # -=- with the buildworld incomplete; it dies at 'make installworld' here -=- mtree -deU -f /usr/src/include/../etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/include cd /usr/include/cam; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/geom; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/net; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/net80211; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netatalk; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netatm; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netgraph; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netinet; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netinet6; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netipsec; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netipx; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netkey; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netnatm; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netncp; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netsmb; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/nfs; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/nfsclient; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/nfsserver; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/pccard; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/posix4; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/sys; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/vm; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/cam/scsi; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/dev/acpica; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd: can't cd to /usr/include/dev/acpica *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/include. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. -=- Ideas? (This same compile was sucessfull 18 hours ago on this same box) -Peter -- Peter_Losher@isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP 0xE8048D08 | "The bits must flow" --------------enig7AB238F3E0D03A91E0C5BA5A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCJ8ZZPtVx9OgEjQgRAmmWAKDEESmsPT1jyweuT/qPU4i6L07HvwCfWTjn 9Am24um/tWWZYMM8KoIJqkc= =Pbjd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7AB238F3E0D03A91E0C5BA5A-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 02:27:21 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A4C16A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 02:27:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1995D43D41 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 02:27:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john.poynor@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so502949rnf for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:27:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ftW1+6NSGMjSAItA+89WgvhjRmFdqsvYcJHN/JcRLCAEPoXKCijlgPlKSLwq3B5SN6UDzF3Y3uo8cpt5eIojxqFP3zvuj3d7t1e99ipQxPrLs3J2K0Mtca+WAmWRSJRzcb2OxN952m4Gg6KePTunb0olqjQTmF1G/XzbI/Q8fnk= Received: by 10.38.70.17 with SMTP id s17mr66805rna; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:27:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.65.52 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 18:27:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6a1895eb0503031827ac76c03@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:27:19 -0600 From: John Poynor To: Peter Losher In-Reply-To: <4227C659.2060206@isc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4227C659.2060206@isc.org> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make buildworld failing this afternoon... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Poynor List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 02:27:21 -0000 I had an issue doing a buildworld recently and it turned out to be that my system's clock was way off. Run ntpdate on your machine and run make buildworld again. If you paste the exact error you're getting (probably next few lines after what you pasted below), it might be helpful. On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 18:22:17 -0800, Peter Losher wrote: > from a 5-STABLE tree cvsupped six hours ago... > > It dies here: > > -=- > cc -m32 -march=athlon-xp -msse2 -mfancy-math-387 -DCOMPAT_32BIT > -I/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/include -L/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32 > -B/usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32 -O -pipe -Wall -DFREEBSD_ELF > -DIN_RTLD -I/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/i386 -I/usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf > -elf -fpic -DPIC -Wformat=2 -Wno-format-extra-args -Werror -nostdlib -e > .rtld_start -elf -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -o ld-elf32.so.1 rtld_start.o > reloc.o rtld.o rtld_lock.o map_object.o malloc.o xmalloc.o debug.o > libmap.o -lc_pic > # > -=- > > with the buildworld incomplete; it dies at 'make installworld' here > > -=- > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/include/../etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p > /usr/include > cd /usr/include/cam; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; > done > cd /usr/include/geom; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/net; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; > done > cd /usr/include/net80211; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/netatalk; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/netatm; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/netgraph; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/netinet; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/netinet6; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/netipsec; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/netipx; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/netkey; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/netnatm; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/netncp; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/netsmb; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/nfs; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; > done > cd /usr/include/nfsclient; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/nfsserver; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/pccard; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/posix4; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/sys; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; > done > cd /usr/include/vm; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; > done > cd /usr/include/cam/scsi; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/dev/acpica; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd: can't cd to /usr/include/dev/acpica > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/src/include. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > -=- > > Ideas? (This same compile was sucessfull 18 hours ago on this same box) > > -Peter > -- > Peter_Losher@isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP 0xE8048D08 | "The bits must flow" > > > From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 03:19:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E05516A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 03:19:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52308.mail.yahoo.com (web52308.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEDC443D1F for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 03:19:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dystopianrebel@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 36522 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Mar 2005 03:19:15 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=zk+IwRFKL1i4U7eqecwh1kxSLre+WgPR624gUjyb8ciBS67GI1ksqDOCG+wuSo935a3mWZEdIN4PcIileN5+tvkS4PFIiP4sLyzY0X26j1m67iYBGwJqaLDFxVVVih2DpOwt0b8Aath035+ux360AfT9pFLj+yfPbu6iJs8yxfQ= ; Message-ID: <20050304031915.36520.qmail@web52308.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.26.160.170] by web52308.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 19:19:15 PST Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 19:19:15 -0800 (PST) From: dR To: "Michael W. Oliver" , Jung-uk Kim In-Reply-To: <20050303173112.GA65467@gargantuan.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64/rel 5.3 - setting up Linux compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 03:19:16 -0000 I follow your steps, but I get no soffice.bin among the extracted files! (Your step 17.) # ls opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/ libanalysis680li.so libdate680li.so resource libbf_sc680li.so libsc680li.so scalc libcalc680li.so libscd680li.so I get a syntax error message in step 13. while: Expression Syntax. - - - 8. fetch "http://openoffice.mirrors.pair.com/contrib/rc/2.0bc/OOo_2.0bc_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz" 9. tar -zxvf OOo_2.0bc_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz 10. cd RPMS 11. mv openofficeorg* /usr/compat/linux # (do this so that the extracted usr/bin and usr/share stuff are put in the right place later) 12. cd /usr/compat/linux 13. /bin/ls -1 openofficeorg*rpm | while read line; \ do rpm2cpio $line | tar -xvf - ; done 14. rm openofficeorg*rpm 15. echo "/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/filter" >>/usr/compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf 16. /usr/compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig 17. Execute /compat/linux/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/soffice __________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/ From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 04:10:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319EE16A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:10:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from phoenix.gargantuan.com (phoenix.gargantuan.com [24.73.171.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706A843D49 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:10:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael@gargantuan.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.gargantuan.com [127.0.0.1]) by spamassassin-injector (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C50268B; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:10:41 -0500 (EST) Received: by phoenix.gargantuan.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EB77E4C9; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:10:30 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:10:30 -0500 From: "Michael W. Oliver" To: dR Message-ID: <20050304041030.GA6962@gargantuan.com> References: <20050303173112.GA65467@gargantuan.com> <20050304031915.36520.qmail@web52308.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050304031915.36520.qmail@web52308.mail.yahoo.com> X-WWW-URL: http://michael.gargantuan.com X-GPG-PGP-Public-Key: http://michael.gargantuan.com/gnupg/pubkey.asc X-GPG-PGP-Fingerprint: 2694 0179 AE3F BFAE 0916 0BF5 B16B FBAB C5FA A3C9 X-Home-Phone: +1-863-816-8091 X-Mobile-Phone: +1-863-738-2334 X-Mailing-Address0: 8008 Apache Lane X-Mailing-Address1: Lakeland, FL X-Mailing-Address2: 33810-2172 X-Mailing-Address3: United States of America X-Guide-Questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html X-Guide-Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i X-Spam-DCC: sgs_public_dcc_server: phoenix.gargantuan.com 1199; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on phoenix.gargantuan.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64/rel 5.3 - setting up Linux compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 04:10:43 -0000 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2005-03-03T19:19:15-0800, dR wrote: > I follow your steps, but I get no soffice.bin among > the extracted files! (Your step 17.)=20 >=20 > # ls opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/ > libanalysis680li.so libdate680li.so =20 > resource > libbf_sc680li.so libsc680li.so scalc > libcalc680li.so libscd680li.so >=20 >=20 > I get a syntax error message in step 13. >=20 > while: Expression Syntax. >=20 >=20 >=20 > - - - >=20 > 8. fetch=20 > "http://openoffice.mirrors.pair.com/contrib/rc/2.0bc/OOo_2.0bc_LinuxIntel= _install.tar.gz" > 9. tar -zxvf OOo_2.0bc_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz > 10. cd RPMS > 11. mv openofficeorg* /usr/compat/linux # (do this > so=20 > that the extracted > usr/bin and usr/share stuff are put in the right > place=20 > later) > 12. cd /usr/compat/linux > 13. /bin/ls -1 openofficeorg*rpm | while read line; \ > do rpm2cpio $line | tar -xvf - ; done > 14. rm openofficeorg*rpm > 15. echo "/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/filter"=20 >>> /usr/compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf > 16. /usr/compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig > 17. Execute=20 > /compat/linux/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/soffice >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 that is a one-liner to extract all of the RPMs, and since you only have scalc, it looks like you only extracted the first of the many RPMs. That is what happened to me initially when using... rpm2cpio *rpm ...... the wildcard wasn't expanded, and only the first RPM was extracted. if you are still having trouble, extract them all manually. --=20 Mike Oliver [see complete headers for contact information] --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCJ9+2sWv7q8X6o8kRAsXsAJ4rXE2cODNuOHSpM4Haw46uqk4KEgCgluih PiHqY1nkkIgOfl00RxY10HY= =lJSS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 04:21:16 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6D116A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:21:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AD643D31 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:21:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Peter_Losher@isc.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::37] (tardis.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::37]) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D65967503; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:21:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Peter_Losher@isc.org) Message-ID: <4227E24F.3050804@isc.org> Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:21:35 -0800 From: Peter Losher User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050210) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Poynor References: <4227C659.2060206@isc.org> <6a1895eb0503031827ac76c03@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6a1895eb0503031827ac76c03@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.6.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA2551DCF1F4D3A8796614878" cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make buildworld failing this afternoon... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 04:21:16 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA2551DCF1F4D3A8796614878 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit John Poynor wrote: > I had an issue doing a buildworld recently and it turned out to be > that my system's clock was way off. Tried that already: -=- 4 Mar 02:34:48 ntpdate[96847]: step time server 204.152.184.72 offset -7.811119 sec -=- > Run ntpdate on your machine and > run make buildworld again. If you paste the exact error you're > getting (probably next few lines after what you pasted below), it > might be helpful. A thought just popped in my head; perhaps this is just how buildworld ends now that we compile in 32-bit libs on amd64. (I am so used to a complete buildworld ending at sendmail, since there is no "Make Buildworld completed" banner as there is for buildkernel) :) So assuming this; I try and make installworld, and it bombs in the same place: -=- mtree -deU -f /usr/src/include/../etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/include cd /usr/include/cam; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/geom; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/net; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/net80211; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netatalk; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netatm; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netgraph; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netinet; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netinet6; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netipsec; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netipx; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netkey; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netnatm; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netncp; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/netsmb; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/nfs; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/nfsclient; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/nfsserver; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/pccard; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/posix4; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/sys; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/vm; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/cam/scsi; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd /usr/include/dev/acpica; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; done cd: can't cd to /usr/include/dev/acpica -=- Well of course it can't cd into /usr/include/dev/acpica, a file already exists there: -=- # ls -lag /usr/include/dev/acpica -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4210 Mar 3 11:08 /usr/include/dev/acpica -=- So I removed it, and 'make installworld' suceeded... but wait... -=- # ls -lag /usr/include/dev/acpica -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4210 Mar 4 04:14 /usr/include/dev/acpica -=- So a new file takes it's place, and the next 'make installworld' will stumble as before trying to cd to a file... Fix? ;) -Peter -- Peter_Losher@isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP 0xE8048D08 | "The bits must flow" --------------enigA2551DCF1F4D3A8796614878 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCJ+JPPtVx9OgEjQgRAvjhAJ4h5XJiDuwa9pVANMajDD9df+Kh5QCfe2tE 9GGAqOdgKnoYVcP6dsUYa60= =IXzA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA2551DCF1F4D3A8796614878-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 04:25:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0B616A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:25:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E556A43D41 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:25:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from john.poynor@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so517893rnf for ; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:25:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=CDNmb11cBt8TTQmvC2+6V8HmxO2D4ZykKHSnSzKoOdk5zNXH4eYLXfzwExK6TIkLhID6UUz4kkQXm6RRLJUdqV87au9hFqFFMb3mP9kUAZM7Bqf+IZV4y+P7D47PKbtyM8CjfAJnR/kCyPzZagrSLxHeyOIKCM/8/QfA22lLSck= Received: by 10.38.97.60 with SMTP id u60mr228839rnb; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:25:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.65.52 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:25:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6a1895eb0503032025becb582@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:25:39 -0600 From: John Poynor To: Peter Losher In-Reply-To: <4227E24F.3050804@isc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4227C659.2060206@isc.org> <6a1895eb0503031827ac76c03@mail.gmail.com> <4227E24F.3050804@isc.org> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make buildworld failing this afternoon... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John Poynor List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 04:25:41 -0000 My bag of tricks is empty then (sorry for the small bag...). Maybe someone else can chime in on this one. On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:21:35 -0800, Peter Losher wrote: > John Poynor wrote: > > I had an issue doing a buildworld recently and it turned out to be > > that my system's clock was way off. > > Tried that already: > > -=- > 4 Mar 02:34:48 ntpdate[96847]: step time server 204.152.184.72 offset > -7.811119 sec > -=- > > > Run ntpdate on your machine and > > run make buildworld again. If you paste the exact error you're > > getting (probably next few lines after what you pasted below), it > > might be helpful. > > A thought just popped in my head; perhaps this is just how buildworld > ends now that we compile in 32-bit libs on amd64. (I am so used to a > complete buildworld ending at sendmail, since there is no "Make > Buildworld completed" banner as there is for buildkernel) :) > > So assuming this; I try and make installworld, and it bombs in the same > place: > > -=- > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/include/../etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p > /usr/include > cd /usr/include/cam; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; > done > cd /usr/include/geom; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/net; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; > done > cd /usr/include/net80211; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/netatalk; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/netatm; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/netgraph; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/netinet; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/netinet6; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/netipsec; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/netipx; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/netkey; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/netnatm; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/netncp; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/netsmb; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/nfs; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; > done > cd /usr/include/nfsclient; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/nfsserver; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/pccard; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/posix4; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; > fi; done > cd /usr/include/sys; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; > done > cd /usr/include/vm; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f $h; fi; > done > cd /usr/include/cam/scsi; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd /usr/include/dev/acpica; for h in *.h; do if [ -L $h ]; then rm -f > $h; fi; done > cd: can't cd to /usr/include/dev/acpica > -=- > > Well of course it can't cd into /usr/include/dev/acpica, a file already > exists there: > > -=- > # ls -lag /usr/include/dev/acpica > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4210 Mar 3 11:08 /usr/include/dev/acpica > -=- > > So I removed it, and 'make installworld' suceeded... but wait... > > -=- > # ls -lag /usr/include/dev/acpica > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4210 Mar 4 04:14 /usr/include/dev/acpica > -=- > > So a new file takes it's place, and the next 'make installworld' will > stumble as before trying to cd to a file... Fix? ;) > > -Peter > -- > Peter_Losher@isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP 0xE8048D08 | "The bits must flow" > > > From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 04:48:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE0516A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:48:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org (asylum.afflictions.org [64.7.134.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AB743D2D for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:48:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58FB78C64 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:48:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pandora.afflictions.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 90580-02 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:48:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from dementia.afflictions.org (dementia.afflictions.org [172.19.206.56]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8EC278C62 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:48:43 -0500 (EST) Received: by dementia.afflictions.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1050328C27; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:48:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 23:47:59 -0500 From: Damian Gerow To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050304044759.GB36385@afflictions.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org References: <4227C659.2060206@isc.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4227C659.2060206@isc.org> X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3D7 D901 A53A 1A99 BFD6 E6DF 9F3B 742B C288 9CC9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pandora.afflictions.org Subject: Re: make buildworld failing this afternoon... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 04:48:03 -0000 Thus spake Peter Losher (Peter_Losher@isc.org) [03/03/05 21:22]: : cd: can't cd to /usr/include/dev/acpica : *** Error code 2 : : Stop in /usr/src/include. : *** Error code 1 I ran into the same problem. I did a 'make clean && rm -rf /usr/obj', and re-built again with success. But it did throw another error: there's a bunch of libraries in /usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32/ that are all schg, and can't be removed. Might be done on purpose, might not. (Yes, 'chflags noschg /usr/obj/usr/src/lib32/usr/lib32/*' did the trick.) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 06:12:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4462F16A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 06:12:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52307.mail.yahoo.com (web52307.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDED543D1F for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 06:12:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dystopianrebel@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 91357 invoked by uid 60001); 4 Mar 2005 06:12:26 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=yx4mVFdjggpUf9clgtUJ/YyDehZT7ozXcBpkZl8SI7VKF5hTgKD/F8USiTG7YrUup+dz0y8aAPJKBPF0eE1uQXzKRcQyWLHk8bLu54jOLKp4KZrxqCZ0ZBELc7I4WBEE2rmnbgfEcSi7R7DHL6f6zKGCCNInZOP2C94Q5AvKAoE= ; Message-ID: <20050304061226.91355.qmail@web52307.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [64.26.160.170] by web52307.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 03 Mar 2005 22:12:26 PST Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:12:26 -0800 (PST) From: dR To: "Michael W. Oliver" In-Reply-To: <20050304041030.GA6962@gargantuan.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64/rel 5.3 - success with OpenOffice! (linux_compat) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 06:12:27 -0000 My thanks to you, Mike and Jung-uk! I am finally able to use OpenOffice on my FreeBSD box! I'm so happy, I'm typing this in OO to let you know. :o) Here are the steps that I followed, slightly adapted from yours (see **): 1. Rebuild and install kernel with: options COMPAT_43 options LINPROCFS options COMPAT_LINUX32 2. reboot 3. add the following to /etc/fstab linprocfs /usr/compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 4. mount /usr/compat/linux/proc **5. cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-8 && make install clean (I could not install linux_base; I had to use linux_base-8.) 6. cd /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk14 && make install clean 7. cd /usr/local/src # or where ever you want 8. fetch "http://openoffice.mirrors.pair.com/contrib/rc/2.0bc/OOo_2.0bc_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz" 9. tar -zxvf OOo_2.0bc_LinuxIntel_install.tar.gz 10. cd RPMS 11. mv openofficeorg* /usr/compat/linux # (do this so that the extracted usr/bin and usr/share stuff are put in the right place later) 12. cd /usr/compat/linux **13. For each RPM file, run rpm2cpio [filename] | tar -xvf - I know it's clumsy, but it got me on the bus. :o) 14. rm openofficeorg*rpm 15. echo "/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/filter" >>/usr/compat/linux/etc/ld.so.conf **15 i) Ensure that the paths in ld.so.conf are FULLY QUALIFIED. **15 ii) Ensure that this line is in ld.so.conf: /usr/linux/usr/X11R6/lib 16. /usr/compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig 17. Run /compat/linux/opt/openoffice.org1.9.79/program/soffice & - - - Until we can build OO natively on 5.3 Release/AMD64 (I get an error about "soltools"), this solution will work for me. I'm very grateful to you. Thanks again! Marko Ottawa, Canada __________________________________ Celebrate Yahoo!'s 10th Birthday! Yahoo! Netrospective: 100 Moments of the Web http://birthday.yahoo.com/netrospective/ From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 07:57:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C2016A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 07:57:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neo.redjade.org (neo.redjade.org [219.254.21.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C0943D39 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 07:57:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssw@neo.redjade.org) Received: from neo.redjade.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by neo.redjade.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j247vXjU035437; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:57:33 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from ssw@neo.redjade.org) Received: (from ssw@localhost) by neo.redjade.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j247vWNE035436; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:57:32 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from ssw) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:57:32 +0900 From: Sangwoo Shim To: "Michael W. Oliver" Message-ID: <20050304075732.GA35388@neo.redjade.org> References: <20050303173112.GA65467@gargantuan.com> <20050304031915.36520.qmail@web52308.mail.yahoo.com> <20050304041030.GA6962@gargantuan.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050304041030.GA6962@gargantuan.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64/rel 5.3 - setting up Linux compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 07:57:35 -0000 On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:10:30PM -0500, Michael W. Oliver wrote: > On 2005-03-03T19:19:15-0800, dR wrote: [snip] > that is a one-liner to extract all of the RPMs, and since you only have > scalc, it looks like you only extracted the first of the many RPMs. > That is what happened to me initially when using... > > rpm2cpio *rpm ...... > > the wildcard wasn't expanded, and only the first RPM was extracted. > > if you are still having trouble, extract them all manually. I did write the procedure from my memory. Apparently wildcard expansion doesn't work well with rpm2cpio. :-( I also extracted them with small shell script, like: for i in *.rpm; do rpm2cpio $i | tar xvf -; done Sorry for the wrong instruction. Regards, Sangwoo Shim From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 08:04:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D1B16A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:04:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from neo.redjade.org (neo.redjade.org [219.254.21.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5C343D41 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 08:04:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ssw@neo.redjade.org) Received: from neo.redjade.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by neo.redjade.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j2484Tf4035480; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:04:29 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from ssw@neo.redjade.org) Received: (from ssw@localhost) by neo.redjade.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j2484T6x035479; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:04:29 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from ssw) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:04:29 +0900 From: Sangwoo Shim To: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <20050304080429.GB35388@neo.redjade.org> References: <20050302100502.41535.qmail@web52303.mail.yahoo.com> <200503021627.14736.jkim@niksun.com> <20050303035313.GA30221@neo.redjade.org> <200503031154.45046.jkim@niksun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=euc-kr Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200503031154.45046.jkim@niksun.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64/rel 5.3 - setting up Linux compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 08:04:30 -0000 On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 11:54:45AM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Wednesday 02 March 2005 10:53 pm, Sangwoo Shim wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 04:27:14PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > On Wednesday 02 March 2005 05:53 am, Sangwoo Shim wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:05:02AM -0800, dR wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > 3. Download OOo package for linux and expand it. > > > > Extract generated rpms using rpm2cpio, like > > > > rpm2cpio *.rpm | tar xvf - > > > > > > > > OOo files will be extracted into $PWD/opt. > > > > 4. Copy entire opt directory to /compat/linux/opt. > > > > > > Copy usr/bin/* to /compat/linux/bin and usr/share/* > > > to /compat/linux/share. > > > > Hmm, mine does not contain any directory name 'usr'. Might have > > been caused by version difference. > > Step 3 doesn't seem to work for me. I just extracted individual RPMs. > Maybe you have missed few RPMs? > > Jung-uk Kim Ah, it was error in the email. I wrote the mail from my memory. Actually I extracted all rpms correctly. I don't know what was going on here. My rpm list: openofficeorg-calc-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-core01-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-core02-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-core03-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-core04-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-core05-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-core06-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-core07-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-core08-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-draw-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-gnome-integration-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-graphicfilter-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-impress-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-javafilter-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-math-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-pyuno-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-redhat-menus-1.9.79-1.noarch.rpm openofficeorg-spellcheck-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-suse-menus-1.9.79-1.noarch.rpm openofficeorg-testtool-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-writer-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm openofficeorg-xsltfilter-1.9.79-1.i586.rpm Anyway, I made a presentation with openoffice successfully. So I'll not worry about it anymore. :-) Regards, Sangwoo Shim From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 12:00:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5457D16A616 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:00:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A6A43D46 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:00:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j24C0dJ2011416 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:00:39 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j24C0dWX011412; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:00:39 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:00:39 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <200503041200.j24C0dWX011412@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Ray Johns Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1161416A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:57:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.freebsd.org (www.freebsd.org [216.136.204.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE13343D4C for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:57:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from www.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j24BvGMv057877 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:57:16 GMT (envelope-from nobody@www.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j24BvGr9057876; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:57:16 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <200503041157.j24BvGr9057876@www.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:57:16 GMT From: Ray Johns To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-2.3 Subject: amd64/78406: AMD64 w/ SCSI, install FreeBSD 5.3 fine. issue 'rm -r /usr/ports' and system crashes X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:00:40 -0000 >Number: 78406 >Category: amd64 >Synopsis: AMD64 w/ SCSI, install FreeBSD 5.3 fine. issue 'rm -r /usr/ports' and system crashes >Confidential: no >Severity: critical >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-amd64 >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri Mar 04 12:00:39 GMT 2005 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Ray Johns >Release: 5.3 AMD64 >Organization: n/a >Environment: AMD server with Tyan MB and dual CPU's. I believe the system board is their Thunder MB. eren@opensourcestorage.com can give full system specs (reference AMD system from Ray Johns) >Description: This has happened twice. First time, I installed FreeBSD 5.3 AMD64 on the server (it's an eval server from eren@opensourcestorage.com). Everything goes fine. I log into the machine, make some changes to my shell/prompt, no problems. I ftp an updated ports.tar.gz from ftp.freebsd.org to the machine, no problem. As root, I cd /usr then issue rm -r ports/ so that I can remove the ports tree and untar the new ports and the system crashes/locks. on the console, there are error messages. I took a photo of them here: http://www.redshift.com/~ray/amd/ I contacted opensourcestorage and they sent a replacement SCSI drive (it's a maxtore 18GB). I installed the new drive, reloaded FreeBSD again and the system crashed again at the exact same spot when I issued rm -r ports >How-To-Repeat: install FreeBSD AMD64, delete ports directory >Fix: none at this time. >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 12:56:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AFE16A4CE; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:56:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from buxton.digitalspy.co.uk (buxton.digitalspy.co.uk [212.42.1.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03ADE43D2F; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:56:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alan_jay_uk@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from AJDELL9200 (213-78-6-149.uk.onetel.net.uk [213.78.6.149]) by buxton.digitalspy.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC3F54834; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:56:45 +0000 (GMT) From: "Alan Jay" To: , Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:56:44 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <1108448432.508.16.camel@mark.aboutit.co.za> Thread-Index: AcUTJmyAFHNdkPjvTdiS3PZghBjorQNja7Eg X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Message-Id: <20050304125645.BCC3F54834@buxton.digitalspy.co.uk> Subject: RE: Possible problems with Broadcom BCM5704C 10/100/1000 on TyanThunder K8S pro S2882 twin Operteron X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:56:47 -0000 A couple of weeks ago we reported a potential problem with the Broadcom BCM5704C 10/100/1000 onboard Ethernet (being used in Gigabit mode) controller on the Tyan Thunder pro S2882 with twin Operteron and 8Gb of RAM. The system was running a three databases using mySQL - the first database ran fine but the others when hit hard caused the server to crash in what appeared to be a memory / Ethernet controller error. We have now done the first phase of some tests and thought we would report back. We switched off the broadcom Ethernet controller (via software) and routed all traffic via the boards Intel 10/000 Ethernet connection. One of the problem databases has now been running for a few days and so far has been ok. We will be doing some more tests over the next few days but this seems to be pointing to some issues with the driver for the Broadcom Ethernet Chipset. Alan > Having got 5.3 onto our new twin operteron Tyan Thunder K8S Pro S2882 with 8Gb > of RAM and had a reasonabley stable operation for a few days we installed a > couple of databases one worked fine but the other kept on causing the server > to crash. After some hunting around we found discussion about problems with > the on board Broadcom BCM5704C 10/100/1000 Gigabit ethernet controller on > Linux last year and wondered if there were similar issues with FreeBSD 5.3's > broadcom driver? > The problem only seems to happen when the controller is streched with lots of > data as the other mySQL database runs fine but switching to the more load > intensive one causes issues. > > > Thanks in advance for your advice. > Alan Jay From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 14:46:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCBF16A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:46:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gunfright.epcdirect.co.uk (gunfright.epcdirect.co.uk [195.10.242.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEEDB43D3F for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:46:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-smp@epcdirect.co.uk) Received: from lfarr (mail.shorewood-epc.co.uk [195.10.240.17]) by gunfright.epcdirect.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EBD67866; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:46:46 +0000 (GMT) From: "Lawrence Farr" To: "'Ray Johns'" , Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:46:44 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: <200503041157.j24BvGr9057876@www.freebsd.org> Thread-Index: AcUgsf3XzjnjfS9ETo2Azz/6rR1hKQAFuE4Q Message-Id: <20050304144646.99EBD67866@gunfright.epcdirect.co.uk> Subject: RE: amd64/78406: AMD64 w/ SCSI, install FreeBSD 5.3 fine. issue 'rm -r/usr/ports' and system crashes X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 14:46:48 -0000 Try limiting the drive to U160 in the bios utility and see if it helps. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ray Johns > Sent: 04 March 2005 11:57 > To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org > Subject: amd64/78406: AMD64 w/ SCSI, install FreeBSD 5.3 > fine. issue 'rm -r/usr/ports' and system crashes > > > >Number: 78406 > >Category: amd64 > >Synopsis: AMD64 w/ SCSI, install FreeBSD 5.3 fine. > issue 'rm -r /usr/ports' and system crashes > >Confidential: no > >Severity: critical > >Priority: high > >Responsible: freebsd-amd64 > >State: open > >Quarter: > >Keywords: > >Date-Required: > >Class: sw-bug > >Submitter-Id: current-users > >Arrival-Date: Fri Mar 04 12:00:39 GMT 2005 > >Closed-Date: > >Last-Modified: > >Originator: Ray Johns > >Release: 5.3 AMD64 > >Organization: > n/a > >Environment: > AMD server with Tyan MB and dual CPU's. I believe the system > board is their Thunder MB. eren@opensourcestorage.com can > give full system specs (reference AMD system from Ray Johns) > >Description: > This has happened twice. First time, I installed FreeBSD 5.3 > AMD64 on the server (it's an eval server from > eren@opensourcestorage.com). Everything goes fine. I log > into the machine, make some changes to my shell/prompt, no > problems. I ftp an updated ports.tar.gz from ftp.freebsd.org > to the machine, no problem. As root, I cd /usr then issue rm > -r ports/ so that I can remove the ports tree and untar the > new ports and the system crashes/locks. on the console, > there are error messages. I took a photo of them here: > > http://www.redshift.com/~ray/amd/ > > I contacted opensourcestorage and they sent a replacement > SCSI drive (it's a maxtore 18GB). I installed the new drive, > reloaded FreeBSD again and the system crashed again at the > exact same spot when I issued rm -r ports > >How-To-Repeat: > install FreeBSD AMD64, delete ports directory > >Fix: > none at this time. > >Release-Note: > >Audit-Trail: > >Unformatted: > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 17:19:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F00616A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:19:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8CF43D41 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:19:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from astrodog@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 70so887764wra for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:19:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=SxpGxPTRfp651iZyUho9qgVjqOfNdIpDSg2XP6fJholimeCadmwoSgDjJyDPFuedEp9x5uCcMjeUuFgFjrKs6rL60l+il483scUElFKwLLX7oOmNWUKWS+DdoE8HWALJdnoclD4pc3ktbi9BIVvRF+Xht4AGAx2f1/xz/udWz4s= Received: by 10.54.72.18 with SMTP id u18mr14304wra; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 09:19:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.40.69 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:19:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2fd864e05030409193907f549@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:19:43 -0600 From: Astrodog To: Lawrence Farr In-Reply-To: <20050304144646.99EBD67866@gunfright.epcdirect.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <200503041157.j24BvGr9057876@www.freebsd.org> <20050304144646.99EBD67866@gunfright.epcdirect.co.uk> cc: Ray Johns cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/78406: AMD64 w/ SCSI, install FreeBSD 5.3 fine. issue 'rm -r/usr/ports' and system crashes X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Astrodog List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 17:19:54 -0000 On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:46:44 -0000, Lawrence Farr wrote: > Try limiting the drive to U160 in the bios utility and see if > it helps. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Ray Johns > > Sent: 04 March 2005 11:57 > > To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org > > Subject: amd64/78406: AMD64 w/ SCSI, install FreeBSD 5.3 > > fine. issue 'rm -r/usr/ports' and system crashes > > > > > > >Number: 78406 > > >Category: amd64 > > >Synopsis: AMD64 w/ SCSI, install FreeBSD 5.3 fine. > > issue 'rm -r /usr/ports' and system crashes > > >Confidential: no > > >Severity: critical > > >Priority: high > > >Responsible: freebsd-amd64 > > >State: open > > >Quarter: > > >Keywords: > > >Date-Required: > > >Class: sw-bug > > >Submitter-Id: current-users > > >Arrival-Date: Fri Mar 04 12:00:39 GMT 2005 > > >Closed-Date: > > >Last-Modified: > > >Originator: Ray Johns > > >Release: 5.3 AMD64 > > >Organization: > > n/a > > >Environment: > > AMD server with Tyan MB and dual CPU's. I believe the system > > board is their Thunder MB. eren@opensourcestorage.com can > > give full system specs (reference AMD system from Ray Johns) > > >Description: > > This has happened twice. First time, I installed FreeBSD 5.3 > > AMD64 on the server (it's an eval server from > > eren@opensourcestorage.com). Everything goes fine. I log > > into the machine, make some changes to my shell/prompt, no > > problems. I ftp an updated ports.tar.gz from ftp.freebsd.org > > to the machine, no problem. As root, I cd /usr then issue rm > > -r ports/ so that I can remove the ports tree and untar the > > new ports and the system crashes/locks. on the console, > > there are error messages. I took a photo of them here: > > > > http://www.redshift.com/~ray/amd/ > > > > I contacted opensourcestorage and they sent a replacement > > SCSI drive (it's a maxtore 18GB). I installed the new drive, > > reloaded FreeBSD again and the system crashed again at the > > exact same spot when I issued rm -r ports > > >How-To-Repeat: > > install FreeBSD AMD64, delete ports directory > > >Fix: > > none at this time. > > >Release-Note: > > >Audit-Trail: > > >Unformatted: > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Might try just cvsup'ing ports, instead of delete/extract. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 18:17:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A70416A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:17:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from people.fsn.hu (people.fsn.hu [195.228.252.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC98C43D46 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:17:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bra@fsn.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by people.fsn.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0970784408 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:16:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from people.fsn.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (people.fsn.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 95373-02-5 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:16:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.16.129.72] (japan.axelero.com [195.228.243.99]) by people.fsn.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AB08444F for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:16:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4228A60A.40200@fsn.hu> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 19:16:42 +0100 From: Attila Nagy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fsn.hu Subject: HP DL380G4 vs. Sun V20z X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 18:17:02 -0000 Hello, I've conducted a small and meaningless test using the above two machines. DL380: 2x3,6 GHz Xeon/800 FSB, 2 GB memory V20z: 2x2,4 GHz Opteron 250/800 MHz FSB, 4 GB memory Each of them are running FreeBSD/amd64 5-STABLE, however the DL380 lags a bit (built in february). The test was to compile (make buildworld) the actual RELENG_5 branch with different concurrency. On the DL380 HTT was enabled. The results are the following: Concurrency 1 2 4 8 HP DL380G4 31:24.32 19:12.99 17:36.09 17:44.53 Sun V20z 27:53.66 15:55.28 15:57.86 16:16.16 For the dmesgs and the detailed timing info, please take a look at: http://hup.hu/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=8230 The site is in hungarian, but it is obvious to get the interesting info out of it. FreeBSD rocks on this machine. :) -- Attila Nagy e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu Adopt a directory on our free software phone @work: +361 371 3536 server! http://www.fsn.hu/?f=brick cell.: +3630 306 6758 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 22:10:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB0B16A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 22:10:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from salvador.pacific.net.sg (salvador.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8049643D31 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 22:10:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 30583 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2005 22:10:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maxwell2.pacific.net.sg) (203.120.90.192) by salvador with SMTP; 4 Mar 2005 22:10:28 -0000 Received: from [192.168.0.107] ([210.24.122.133]) by maxwell2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP <20050304221028.HRRN1207.maxwell2.pacific.net.sg@[192.168.0.107]>; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 06:10:28 +0800 Message-ID: <4228DCA9.3020003@pacific.net.sg> Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 06:09:45 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050224) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Attila Nagy References: <4228A60A.40200@fsn.hu> In-Reply-To: <4228A60A.40200@fsn.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP DL380G4 vs. Sun V20z X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:10:31 -0000 Hi, Attila Nagy wrote: > Hello, > > I've conducted a small and meaningless test using the above two machines. > DL380: 2x3,6 GHz Xeon/800 FSB, 2 GB memory > V20z: 2x2,4 GHz Opteron 250/800 MHz FSB, 4 GB memory > > Each of them are running FreeBSD/amd64 5-STABLE, however the DL380 lags > a bit (built in february). > It is not a good idea to compare two machines which have a different amount of RAM installed. Erich From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 00:22:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFA116A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 00:22:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-gw-cl-d.dmv.com (smtp-gw-cl-d.dmv.com [216.240.97.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2485743D39 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 00:22:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) Received: from lanshark.dmv.com (lanshark.dmv.com [216.240.97.46]) by smtp-gw-cl-d.dmv.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j250bkWa016618 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:37:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) From: Sven Willenberger To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050304125645.BCC3F54834@buxton.digitalspy.co.uk> References: <20050304125645.BCC3F54834@buxton.digitalspy.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 19:23:25 -0500 Message-Id: <1109982205.11071.17.camel@lanshark.dmv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 216.240.97.42 Subject: RE: Possible problems with Broadcom BCM5704C 10/100/1000 on TyanThunder K8S pro S2882 twin Operteron X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 00:22:23 -0000 On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 12:56 +0000, Alan Jay wrote: > A couple of weeks ago we reported a potential problem with the Broadcom > BCM5704C 10/100/1000 onboard Ethernet (being used in Gigabit mode) controller > on the Tyan Thunder pro S2882 with twin Operteron and 8Gb of RAM. > > The system was running a three databases using mySQL - the first database ran > fine but the others when hit hard caused the server to crash in what appeared > to be a memory / Ethernet controller error. > > We have now done the first phase of some tests and thought we would report > back. > > We switched off the broadcom Ethernet controller (via software) and routed all > traffic via the boards Intel 10/000 Ethernet connection. One of the problem > databases has now been running for a few days and so far has been ok. > > We will be doing some more tests over the next few days but this seems to be > pointing to some issues with the driver for the Broadcom Ethernet Chipset. > I would be interested in hearing how that works. We too just got an S2882 with dual opteron and 8 G RAM running postgresql server. We actually had the issue with the onboard intel ethernet (fxp) locking up on us (rather than the broadcom) and locking whatever program was trying to use this (noticed during a cvsup). So far the broadcom has been running fine, but we have not been running intense traffic through it yet. Sven From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 02:07:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF05C16A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 02:07:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FD643D62 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 02:07:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so727716rnf for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 18:07:40 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=a/WC7b68d8aO6QnQwe8lQFxjlz272IcNQ56z8Z80yJpgiHN1nFWiYeHOG2egbQLqwKpEgBkM220PiBVg4iVgLGxtK3iqIMQg/RWOhU2NVtC7NLJCGA2IVob7kbtZbYWY7+pOKxgHMBtZtRg7sZWXkHtrIMrDt7mXTf1XJwwppbs= Received: by 10.38.163.21 with SMTP id l21mr289544rne; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 18:07:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.209.22 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 18:07:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <84dead72050304180774050b63@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 02:07:39 +0000 From: Joseph Koshy To: Erich Dollansky In-Reply-To: <4228DCA9.3020003@pacific.net.sg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <4228A60A.40200@fsn.hu> <4228DCA9.3020003@pacific.net.sg> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP DL380G4 vs. Sun V20z X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joseph Koshy List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 02:07:40 -0000 > It is not a good idea to compare two machines which have a different > amount of RAM installed. Thats true in general, but in this case it is likely that the entire test ran out of RAM on both boxes. % du -sk /home/src-5x 444748 /home/src-5x And /usr/obj is about the same size ... -- FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 04:30:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A810116A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 04:30:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org (asylum.afflictions.org [64.7.134.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54BE43D2F for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 04:30:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgerow@afflictions.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA0478C64 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:30:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from pandora.afflictions.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pandora.afflictions.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32332-01 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:30:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from dementia.afflictions.org (dementia.afflictions.org [172.19.206.56]) by pandora.afflictions.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF20778C62 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:30:48 -0500 (EST) Received: by dementia.afflictions.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CFC0A28C61; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:30:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:30:07 -0500 From: Damian Gerow To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050305043006.GN83265@afflictions.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3D7 D901 A53A 1A99 BFD6 E6DF 9F3B 742B C288 9CC9 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pandora.afflictions.org Subject: Is -O2 supported for world? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 04:30:03 -0000 I'm a little fuzzy on whether -O2 is supported for world or not: I seem to remember on x86 it is, but the only references I've seen to amd64 were speaking about ports. Is -O2 optimization supported in amd64? It most definitely doesn't work: /usr/src/lib/libc/i386/sys/_amd64_get_fsbase.c: In function `_amd64_get_fsbase': /usr/src/lib/libc/i386/sys/_amd64_get_fsbase.c:40: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules without -fno-strict-aliasing. Not that I have any serious desire to run with -O2, just curious. - Damian From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 06:51:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C4916A4CF for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 06:51:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545D743D55 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 06:51:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from astrodog@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 70so1027038wra for ; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:51:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=sIRMWEQObwlCCXn+RjMR/4j5eBQUL/iwsxzf3DwDG1rAxMsLFfZEPfBdvFkKWAj5Cmbp9qDIanLPUglgGrV5TFUwJlJCMN7BZmjONLucgzF9W4WIQj/vt7ENtGuxcSkYARnncnJdvaNcN6BxOHHoJRg4C8u+OYxBeSMpzwJKNJE= Received: by 10.54.24.48 with SMTP id 48mr2197wrx; Fri, 04 Mar 2005 22:51:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.40.69 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 22:51:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2fd864e05030422514452e184@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 00:51:03 -0600 From: Astrodog To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050305043006.GN83265@afflictions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050305043006.GN83265@afflictions.org> Subject: Re: Is -O2 supported for world? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Astrodog List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 06:51:04 -0000 On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:30:07 -0500, Damian Gerow wrote: > I'm a little fuzzy on whether -O2 is supported for world or not: I seem to > remember on x86 it is, but the only references I've seen to amd64 were > speaking about ports. > > Is -O2 optimization supported in amd64? It most definitely doesn't work: > > /usr/src/lib/libc/i386/sys/_amd64_get_fsbase.c: In function `_amd64_get_fsbase': > /usr/src/lib/libc/i386/sys/_amd64_get_fsbase.c:40: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules > > without -fno-strict-aliasing. Not that I have any serious desire to run > with -O2, just curious. > > - Damian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > As I understand it, AMD64 will not compile with -O2. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 07:21:48 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C015116A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 07:21:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lobo.homeunix.org (reverse-82-141-58-238.dialin.kamp-dsl.de [82.141.58.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5BF43D1D for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 07:21:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ewinter@lobo.homeunix.org) Received: from lobo.homeunix.org (localhost.homeunix.org [127.0.0.1]) by lobo.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j257K8iY070618 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:20:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ewinter@lobo.homeunix.org) Received: (from ewinter@localhost) by lobo.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j257K8nX070617 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:20:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ewinter) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 08:20:07 +0100 From: "Ernst W. Winter" To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050305072007.GA70581@lobo.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Phone: + 49-89-3075-6800 Organization: FreeBSD Evangelist X-Operating-System: FreeBSD lobo.homeunix.org 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Subject: java 15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Ernst W. Winter" List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 07:21:48 -0000 I have tried to compile java15 and it looked like it will make it. I have installed the Linux compatible stuff and all and got all the jave files and so everything was smooth untuil it broke. Here the end part of the compiling: -----------------------------Snip------------------------------------- ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/GC.java ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/Service.java ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/JavaLangAccess.java /usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/control/build/bsd-amd64/gensrc/java/lang/UNIXProcess.java ../../../src/solaris/classes/java/io/UnixFileSystem.java ../../../src/solaris/classes/java/util/prefs/FileSystemPreferences.java ../../../src/solaris/classes/java/util/prefs/FileSystemPreferencesFactory.java ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/AccessibleObject.java ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Field.java ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Method.java ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Constructor.java ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/InvocationTargetException.java ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Array.java ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Proxy.java ../../../src/share/classes/sun/io/ByteToCharConverter.java ../../../src/share/classes/sun/io/CharToByteConverter.java ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/AtomicLong.java ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/AtomicLongCSImpl.java ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/AtomicLongLockImpl.java ../../../src/share/classes/sun/reflect/ConstantPool.java ../../../src/share/classes/sun/reflect/NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java ../../../src/share/classes/sun/reflect/NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java ../../../src/share/classes/sun/reflect/Reflection.java ; \ fi execv(): Bad address Error trying to exec /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/bin/javac. Check if file exists and permissions are set correctly. gmake[3]: *** [.compile.classlist] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java/java' gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java' gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make' gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. /usr/ports/java/jdk15 lobo root 504--> -----------------------------Snip------------------------------------- wgen I do a ls -al to the directory the file is there: lobo root 506-->ls -sl /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/bin total 1586 2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1080 Jan 15 21:22 HtmlConverter 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66420 Jan 15 21:08 appletviewer 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:12 extcheck 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66188 Jan 15 20:58 idlj 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:00 jar 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:00 jarsigner 64 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 64940 Jan 15 20:52 java 2 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1789 Jan 15 21:09 java-rmi.cgi 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 20:53 javac 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 20:53 javadoc 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 20:54 javah 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:09 javap 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:12 jdb 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 20:59 keytool 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66188 Jan 15 21:00 kinit 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66188 Jan 15 21:00 klist 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66188 Jan 15 21:00 ktab 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:10 native2ascii 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66380 Jan 15 21:11 orbd 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66420 Jan 15 21:00 policytool 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:09 rmic 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:09 rmid 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:09 rmiregistry 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:10 serialver 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66188 Jan 15 21:11 servertool 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66188 Jan 15 21:11 tnameserv /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/bin lobo root 507--> -----------------------------Snip------------------------------------- has anyone experienced this probelm with java15? and what could be done to fix it? Ernst -- Ernst Winter ewinter@ewinter.org "Nec scire fas est onmnia" --Horaz Microsoft: Where do you want to go today? Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow? BSD: Are you guys coming, or what? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 07:57:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C19B16A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 07:57:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68ED243D41 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 07:57:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5B73372DD8; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:57:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567F572DD4; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:57:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 23:57:15 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: Alan Jay In-Reply-To: <20050304125645.BCC3F54834@buxton.digitalspy.co.uk> Message-ID: <20050304235133.N4084@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <20050304125645.BCC3F54834@buxton.digitalspy.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Possible problems with Broadcom BCM5704C 10/100/1000 onTyanThunder K8S pro S2882 twin Operteron X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 07:57:15 -0000 dropping -stable crosspost. This is on RELENG_5. On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Alan Jay wrote: > A couple of weeks ago we reported a potential problem with the Broadcom > BCM5704C 10/100/1000 onboard Ethernet (being used in Gigabit mode) controller > on the Tyan Thunder pro S2882 with twin Operteron and 8Gb of RAM. Alan, Thanks for the update. I have a S2881 in my clutches right now and its been working fine with -CURRENT, although it only has 2GB RAM. It booted and ran 5.3-R fine when I initially installed it. I have it running in a cvsup + -j16 buildworld loop with the terminal over ssh. Here's the relevant pciconf output: bge0@pci2:9:0: class=0x020000 card=0x164414e4 chip=0x164814e4 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'BCM5704 NetXtreme Dual Gigabit Adapter' class = network subclass = ethernet bge1@pci2:9:1: class=0x020000 card=0x164414e4 chip=0x164814e4 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'BCM5704 NetXtreme Dual Gigabit Adapter' class = network subclass = ethernet > We switched off the broadcom Ethernet controller (via software) and > routed all traffic via the boards Intel 10/000 Ethernet connection. > One of the problem databases has now been running for a few days and so > far has been ok. > > We will be doing some more tests over the next few days but this seems > to be pointing to some issues with the driver for the Broadcom Ethernet > Chipset. I believe scottl has some fixes to busdma that may be making their way into RELENG_5 soon. I should probably migrate my machine back down to RELENG_5 and check for any issues. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 15:22:35 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id D33EB16A4CF; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:22:35 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 15:22:35 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050305152235.GE26240@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050305043006.GN83265@afflictions.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050305043006.GN83265@afflictions.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Is -O2 supported for world? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 15:22:35 -0000 On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:30:07PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote: > I'm a little fuzzy on whether -O2 is supported for world or not: I seem to > remember on x86 it is, but the only references I've seen to amd64 were > speaking about ports. > > Is -O2 optimization supported in amd64? It most definitely doesn't work: > > /usr/src/lib/libc/i386/sys/_amd64_get_fsbase.c: In function `_amd64_get_fsbase': > /usr/src/lib/libc/i386/sys/_amd64_get_fsbase.c:40: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules > > without -fno-strict-aliasing. Not that I have any serious desire to run > with -O2, just curious. -O2 produces broken code on amd64 anyway, and a number of ports will fail to build or run when world is compiled with -O2, with or without -fno-strict-aliasing. Kris From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 16:48:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5441516A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 16:48:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.netcologne.de (smtp2.netcologne.de [194.8.194.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC36243D4C for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 16:48:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailinglists@nockmann.de) Received: from tun-2.tun.netz (xdsl-213-196-217-60.netcologne.de [213.196.217.60]) by smtp2.netcologne.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E8C43B1 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 17:48:08 +0100 (MET) From: Thomas Ulrich Nockmann To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 17:48:42 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503051748.42708.mailinglists@nockmann.de> Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: mailinglists@nockmann.de List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 16:48:11 -0000 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 19:17:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBFF16A4CE; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:17:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bgo1smout1.broadpark.no (bgo1smout1.broadpark.no [217.13.4.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B057343D3F; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:17:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from bgo1sminn1.broadpark.no ([217.13.4.93]) by bgo1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ICW003DZ7ZFPP90@bgo1smout1.broadpark.no>; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:11:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from dsa.des.no ([80.203.228.37]) by bgo1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ICW00E828BQYY50@bgo1sminn1.broadpark.no>; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:19:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by dsa.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id F3CF095813; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:17:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from xps.des.no (xps.des.no [10.0.0.12]) by dsa.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 6B38695812; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:16:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 707D733C1B; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:16:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:16:54 +0100 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) In-reply-to: <20050305152235.GE26240@hub.freebsd.org> To: Kris Kennaway Message-id: <86eket52e1.fsf@xps.des.no> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on dsa.des.no References: <20050305043006.GN83265@afflictions.org> <20050305152235.GE26240@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL autolearn=disabled version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Level: cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is -O2 supported for world? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 19:17:04 -0000 Kris Kennaway writes: > -O2 produces broken code on amd64 anyway, and a number of ports will > fail to build or run when world is compiled with -O2, with or without > -fno-strict-aliasing. No trouble here... DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 20:59:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2507316A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 20:59:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com (mailout06.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4003E43D55 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 20:59:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vjordana@t-online.de) Received: from fwd20.aul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D7gNP-0005Re-00; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:59:55 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (r9QOW-ZcYeZgp3vRKyHCZ28p8g1dmVDdn65XlRcU3fD5hunA4rNVkw@[217.83.130.239]) by fwd20.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1D7gNF-0C8crI0; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 21:59:45 +0100 Message-ID: <422A1DC0.6090601@shih.be> Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:59:44 +0100 From: vjordana@t-online.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041226 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ernst W. Winter" References: <20050305072007.GA70581@lobo.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: <20050305072007.GA70581@lobo.homeunix.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: r9QOW-ZcYeZgp3vRKyHCZ28p8g1dmVDdn65XlRcU3fD5hunA4rNVkw X-TOI-MSGID: b14c89de-4c8d-4db8-83f2-1dd5152ee9d6 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: java 15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 20:59:58 -0000 Ernst W. Winter wrote: > I have tried to compile java15 and it looked like it will make it. I > have installed the Linux compatible stuff and all and got all the > jave files and so everything was smooth untuil it broke. Here the end > part of the compiling: > -----------------------------Snip------------------------------------- > ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/GC.java > ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/Service.java > ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/JavaLangAccess.java > /usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/control/build/bsd-amd64/gensrc/java/lang/UNIXProcess.java > ../../../src/solaris/classes/java/io/UnixFileSystem.java > ../../../src/solaris/classes/java/util/prefs/FileSystemPreferences.java > ../../../src/solaris/classes/java/util/prefs/FileSystemPreferencesFactory.java > ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/AccessibleObject.java > ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Field.java > ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Method.java > ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Constructor.java > ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/InvocationTargetException.java > ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Array.java > ../../../src/share/classes/java/lang/reflect/Proxy.java > ../../../src/share/classes/sun/io/ByteToCharConverter.java > ../../../src/share/classes/sun/io/CharToByteConverter.java > ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/AtomicLong.java > ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/AtomicLongCSImpl.java > ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/AtomicLongLockImpl.java > ../../../src/share/classes/sun/reflect/ConstantPool.java > ../../../src/share/classes/sun/reflect/NativeConstructorAccessorImpl.java > ../../../src/share/classes/sun/reflect/NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java > ../../../src/share/classes/sun/reflect/Reflection.java ; \ > fi > execv(): Bad address > Error trying to exec /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/bin/javac. > Check if file exists and permissions are set correctly. > gmake[3]: *** [.compile.classlist] Error 1 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java/java' > gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java' > gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make' > gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. > /usr/ports/java/jdk15 > lobo root 504--> > -----------------------------Snip------------------------------------- > > wgen I do a ls -al to the directory the file is there: > > lobo root 506-->ls -sl /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/bin > total 1586 > 2 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1080 Jan 15 21:22 HtmlConverter > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66420 Jan 15 21:08 appletviewer > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:12 extcheck > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66188 Jan 15 20:58 idlj > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:00 jar > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:00 jarsigner > 64 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 64940 Jan 15 20:52 java > 2 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 1789 Jan 15 21:09 java-rmi.cgi > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 20:53 javac > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 20:53 javadoc > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 20:54 javah > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:09 javap > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:12 jdb > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 20:59 keytool > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66188 Jan 15 21:00 kinit > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66188 Jan 15 21:00 klist > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66188 Jan 15 21:00 ktab > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:10 native2ascii > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66380 Jan 15 21:11 orbd > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66420 Jan 15 21:00 policytool > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:09 rmic > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:09 rmid > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:09 rmiregistry > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 21:10 serialver > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66188 Jan 15 21:11 servertool > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66188 Jan 15 21:11 tnameserv > /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/bin > lobo root 507--> > -----------------------------Snip------------------------------------- > > has anyone experienced this probelm with java15? and what could be > done to fix it? > > Ernst > > -- > Ernst Winter ewinter@ewinter.org "Nec scire fas est onmnia" --Horaz > Microsoft: Where do you want to go today? > Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow? > BSD: Are you guys coming, or what? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > I had the same problem and solved it executing the last command which caused the error manually. Looks like the error comes because it's a very long command. Just put the command that comes between 'then' and 'fi' in a shell file and execute it manually in the directory work/j2sre/make/java/java (I'm not seating now in my amd64 FreeBSD computer but I think that was the directory). The compilation will go on without any problem if you resume it afterwards with a 'make build'. -- J.V. Jordan -- FreeBSD caladan.jelpke.de 5.3-RELEASE #1: Mon Nov 8 21:14:36 CET 2004 root@caladan.jelpke.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CALADAN530 i386 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 21:38:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A7016A4DF for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 21:38:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lobo.homeunix.org (reverse-82-141-59-75.dialin.kamp-dsl.de [82.141.59.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006B843D46 for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 21:38:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ewinter@lobo.homeunix.org) Received: from lobo.homeunix.org (localhost.homeunix.org [127.0.0.1]) by lobo.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j25Lar0N001757; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 22:36:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ewinter@lobo.homeunix.org) Received: (from ewinter@localhost) by lobo.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j25Larxi001756; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 22:36:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ewinter) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 22:36:52 +0100 From: "Ernst W. Winter" To: vjordana@t-online.de Message-ID: <20050305213652.GA1708@lobo.homeunix.org> References: <20050305072007.GA70581@lobo.homeunix.org> <422A1DC0.6090601@shih.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <422A1DC0.6090601@shih.be> X-Phone: + 49-89-3075-6800 Organization: FreeBSD Evangelist X-Operating-System: FreeBSD lobo.homeunix.org 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: java 15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Ernst W. Winter" List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:38:40 -0000 On Sat, 05 Mar 2005, vjordana@t-online.de wrote: > Ernst W. Winter wrote: [...] > >../../../src/share/classes/sun/reflect/NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java > >../../../src/share/classes/sun/reflect/Reflection.java ; \ > >fi > >execv(): Bad address > >Error trying to exec /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/bin/javac. > >Check if file exists and permissions are set correctly. > >gmake[3]: *** [.compile.classlist] Error 1 > >gmake[3]: Leaving directory > >`/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java/java' > >gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 1 > >gmake[2]: Leaving directory > >`/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java' > >gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 1 > >gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make' > >gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2 > >*** Error code 2 > > > >Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. > >/usr/ports/java/jdk15 > >lobo root 504--> [...] > > 66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 20:53 javac > > > >has anyone experienced this probelm with java15? and what could be > >done to fix it? > > > >Ernst > > [...] > I had the same problem and solved it executing the last command which > caused the error manually. Looks like the error comes because it's a > very long command. Just put the command that comes between 'then' and > 'fi' in a shell file and execute it manually in the directory Hmm, where is or would be the command? In the Makefile? > work/j2sre/make/java/java (I'm not seating now in my amd64 FreeBSD that would be the directory. > computer but I think that was the directory). The compilation will > go on without any problem if you resume it afterwards with a 'make > build'. > nice and thanks so far at least I'm getting closer with it. Here the version I run: -----------------------------Snip------------------------------------- lobo root 508-->uname -a FreeBSD lobo.homeunix.org 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #9: Fri Mar 4 13:28:16 CET 2005 ewinter@lobo.homeunix.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/lobo amd64 ~ -----------------------------Snip------------------------------------- Ernst From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 21:51:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id AA59716A4CF; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 21:51:31 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 21:51:31 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav Message-ID: <20050305215131.GD84206@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20050305043006.GN83265@afflictions.org> <20050305152235.GE26240@hub.freebsd.org> <86eket52e1.fsf@xps.des.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86eket52e1.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Kris Kennaway cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is -O2 supported for world? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:51:31 -0000 On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 08:16:54PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > Kris Kennaway writes: > > -O2 produces broken code on amd64 anyway, and a number of ports will > > fail to build or run when world is compiled with -O2, with or without > > -fno-strict-aliasing. > > No trouble here... The problems were publicized last year but no action taken since; a number of ports such as perl 5.6 do not build when world was built with -O2, but build when world is built with -O. I have had to use local modifications on my amd64 package build source trees ever since for this reason. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 5 22:19:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E062716A4CE for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 22:19:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com (mailout02.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E225043D3F for ; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 22:19:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vjordana@t-online.de) Received: from fwd25.aul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1D7hbx-0007dT-00; Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:19:01 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.4] (bHnq0iZ18eaPfxrvlGqRAW5u706cyFPnKpWuLR-HalvgNukzKheK0l@[217.83.130.239]) by fwd25.sul.t-online.de with esmtp id 1D7hbv-1IbFnE0; Sat, 5 Mar 2005 23:18:59 +0100 Message-ID: <422A3051.40703@shih.be> Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:18:57 +0100 From: vjordana@t-online.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041226 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ernst W. Winter" References: <20050305072007.GA70581@lobo.homeunix.org> <422A1DC0.6090601@shih.be> <20050305213652.GA1708@lobo.homeunix.org> In-Reply-To: <20050305213652.GA1708@lobo.homeunix.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ID: bHnq0iZ18eaPfxrvlGqRAW5u706cyFPnKpWuLR-HalvgNukzKheK0l X-TOI-MSGID: e69f8d05-a878-465b-ae01-ed0a91cc9f11 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org cc: vjordana@t-online.de Subject: Re: java 15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Mar 2005 22:19:08 -0000 Ernst W. Winter wrote: > On Sat, 05 Mar 2005, vjordana@t-online.de wrote: > > >>Ernst W. Winter wrote: > > [...] > >>>../../../src/share/classes/sun/reflect/NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java >>>../../../src/share/classes/sun/reflect/Reflection.java ; \ >>>fi >>>execv(): Bad address >>>Error trying to exec /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/bin/javac. >>>Check if file exists and permissions are set correctly. >>>gmake[3]: *** [.compile.classlist] Error 1 >>>gmake[3]: Leaving directory >>>`/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java/java' >>>gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 1 >>>gmake[2]: Leaving directory >>>`/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java' >>>gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 1 >>>gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make' >>>gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2 >>>*** Error code 2 >>> >>>Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. >>>/usr/ports/java/jdk15 >>>lobo root 504--> > > [...] > > >>>66 -rwxrwxr-x 1 root wheel 66156 Jan 15 20:53 javac >>> >>>has anyone experienced this probelm with java15? and what could be >>>done to fix it? >>> >>>Ernst >>> > > [...] > > >>I had the same problem and solved it executing the last command which >>caused the error manually. Looks like the error comes because it's a >>very long command. Just put the command that comes between 'then' and >>'fi' in a shell file and execute it manually in the directory > > > Hmm, where is or would be the command? In the Makefile? > > >>work/j2sre/make/java/java (I'm not seating now in my amd64 FreeBSD > > > that would be the directory. > > >>computer but I think that was the directory). The compilation will >>go on without any problem if you resume it afterwards with a 'make >>build'. >> > > nice and thanks so far at least I'm getting closer with it. > > Here the version I run: > -----------------------------Snip------------------------------------- > lobo root 508-->uname -a > FreeBSD lobo.homeunix.org 5.4-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-PRERELEASE #9: > Fri Mar 4 13:28:16 CET 2005 > ewinter@lobo.homeunix.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/lobo amd64 > ~ > -----------------------------Snip------------------------------------- > > Ernst > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Try 'make build |& tee build.out' (if your shell is csh or tcsh) or 'make build 2>&1 | tee build.out' (if sh or bash). After the error comes, edit build.out and you will see the command causing it (takes about two pages). -- J.V. Jordan FreeBSD caladan.jelpke.de 5.3-RELEASE #1: Mon Nov 8 21:14:36 CET 2004 root@caladan.jelpke.de:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CALADAN530 i386