From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 20 01:05:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2972D16A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:05:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6E843D1D; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:05:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (davidxu@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2K15uUr067258; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:05:57 GMT (envelope-from davidxu@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <423CCC7C.60408@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 09:06:04 +0800 From: David Xu User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041004 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Fawcett References: <200503200019.39083.andy@athame.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200503200019.39083.andy@athame.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does anyone have any experience of the Abit KV-80 board? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:05:58 -0000 Andy Fawcett wrote: >Hi, > >I've looked through the archives, and googled a fair bit, without success. > >Does anyone here have any experience (good or bad) of running FreeBSD/amd64 on >an Abit KV-80 board? > >http://www2.abit.com.tw/page/en/motherboard/motherboard_detail.php?pMODEL_NAME=KV-80&fMTYPE=Socket%20754 > >A. > > > I haven't used kv8, but used av8, av8 has lots of bugs in ACPI script, also FreeBSD can boot and all devices seem be probed right, but kernel will keep printing annoying messages, vty0 is unusable if you press backspace and cause console to bell. ACPI is really failure technology. David Xu