From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 3 10:47:41 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD9A16A4CE for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:47:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811F943D60 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 10:47:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j03AldKG018963 for ; Mon, 3 Jan 2005 11:47:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: arch@freebsd.org From: Poul-Henning Kamp Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 11:47:39 +0100 Message-ID: <18962.1104749259@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Subject: making nmdm(4) emulate actual speed. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 10:47:41 -0000 I participated in an "Editor Celebrity Death Match" recently and being the senior combatant my weapon of choice was ed(1). To properly show off ed(1)'s main weakness I wanted to run my slides in ed(1) on a 300 bps line. Rather than use two USB-serial dongles and a usb-hub, I hacked nmdm(4) up to actually respect the baud-rate set with stty. Would this be considered generally useful ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.